Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2026 Jul 12;61(7):e71733. doi: 10.1002/ppul.71733

Correlation of Transcutaneous pCO2 and Capillary pCO2 in Newborn Patients Depending on Gestational Age: A Secondary Data Analysis

Lena Olivier 1,✉, Camelia Lauterbach Oprea 2, André Stollenwerk 2, Valerie Pfannschmidt 2, Thorsten Orlikowsky 1, Mark Schoberer 1
PMCID: PMC13358317  PMID: 42438310

ABSTRACT

Introduction

Transcutaneous monitoring of CO2 partial pressure (tcpCO2) provides continuous information about the CO2 partial pressure in the blood (pCO2). However, the deviation of tcpCO2 from pCO2 is variable. Our aim was to assess whether this deviation depends on gestational age in the first postnatal week.

Methods

Single‐center secondary data cohort study at a Tertiary Care NICU. 116 neonates undergoing tcpCO2 monitoring were included. A linear mixed‐effects model was used to analyze the difference between tcpCO2 and capillary pCO2 (ΔpCO2) in the first postnatal week.

Results

926 simultaneous measurements were included. The evaluation of the linear mixed‐effects model revealed a significant effect of gestational age on ΔpCO2. Median [interquartile 1; interquartile 3] ΔpCO2 was significantly higher for extremely preterm infants (< 28 weeks) with 7.6 [2.4; 13.9] mmHg compared to 3.1 [−1.0; 6.4] mmHg for very preterm (28−31 + 6 weeks), 0.6 [−4.6; 4.7] mmHg for late preterm (32−36 + 6 weeks) and −0.5 [−4.8; 4.7] mmHg for term infants (≥ 37 weeks). There were no significant differences in ΔpCO2 between patients born at 23 to 25 compared to 26 and 27 completed weeks of gestation. In multivariable analysis, gestational age, early‐onset bacterial infection and capillary pCO2 were independently associated with ΔpCO2, whereas birth weight was not.

Conclusions

The gestational age has a significant directed effect on the accuracy of transcutaneous CO2 monitoring in preterm neonates and can—together with other known influence factors—be used to improve the non‐invasive pCO2 estimation.

Keywords: carbon dioxide, neonatal intensive care unit, neonate, premature infants, transcutaneous blood gas monitoring, transcutaneous capnometry


Abbreviations

EOBI

early‐onset bacterial infection

EPI

extremely preterm infants (< 28 weeks)

LMM

linear mixed‐effects model

LPI

late preterm infants (32 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks)

NICU

neonatal intensive care unit

paCO2

arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide

pcCO2

capillary partial pressure of carbon dioxide

pCO2

partial pressure of CO2

tcpCO2

transcutaneous partial pressure of carbon dioxide

TI

term infant (≥ 37 weeks)

VPI

very preterm infant (28 + 0 to 31 + 6 weeks)

ΔpCO2

difference between tcpCO2 and pcCO2

1. Introduction

1.1. Background

About 10% of neonates are admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) [1, 2]. A large proportion of these infants suffer from respiratory distress or failure and require respiratory support [3, 4]. Among others, prematurity, surfactant deficiency, and sepsis can cause pulmonary failure [5]. Treatment options comprise non‐invasive or invasive ventilatory support to ensure sufficient gas exchange [6].

During assisted ventilation, it is essential to avoid hypo‐ and hypercarbia, as the arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (paCO2) influences the cerebral perfusion [7]. While hypocarbia can lead to hypoxia of the brain tissue and entail periventricular leucomalacia [8], severe hypercarbia and fluctuations of paCO2 [9, 10] may increase the cerebral blood flow and hereby contribute to the pathogenesis of intraventricular hemorrhage [11]. Both conditions can dysregulate the acid‐base balance and bring about serious long‐term neurodevelopmental impairment [12, 13]. The close monitoring of blood gases is fundamental to prevent and recognize extremes of paCO2 and to adapt treatment if necessary. This monitoring is typically conducted by blood gas analyses. Blood sampling can only provide discontinuous measurements and causes pain, for example, if blood samples are taken from capillaries. Furthermore, it may lead to a substantial loss of blood, which was found to be associated with the need for blood transfusions [14], and which can in turn contribute to the development of bronchopulmonary dysplasia [15].

Therefore, non‐invasive paCO2 monitoring techniques are frequently used to gain continuous information about the elimination of CO2 and to reduce the number of blood gas analyses. In this context, NICUs often use transcutaneous measurements of CO2 partial pressure (tcpCO2) [16]. For tcpCO2 monitoring, a sensor is applied to the skin. It heats up to a constant temperature to ensure a sufficient capillary blood flow and to enhance the diffusion of CO2 from the capillary blood through the skin to the sensor [17]. The probe then quantifies the CO2 partial pressure at the skin surface. The use of tcpCO2 monitoring can reduce the number of conducted blood gas analyses [18] and is therefore compatible with minimal handling strategies [19].

However, literature about the accuracy of tcpCO2 measurements is inconsistent [20]. Among others, body weight, age, tcpCO2 values, and ranges of the blood partial pressure of CO2 (pCO2) are known to confound the estimation of pCO2 from tcpCO2 in neonates [21, 22]. Most researchers report a good correlation of tcpCO2 and pCO2 for neonatal, pediatric and adult intensive care patients [21, 22, 23, 24, 25]. In contrast, other research groups only found a moderate [18, 26] or poor agreement of tcpCO2 and pCO2 trends, for example, in a cohort of very premature infants [27].

1.2. Objective

We hypothesized that the gestational age at birth influences the accuracy of tcpCO2 monitoring in the first postnatal week.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design

The analysis was conducted as a secondary data cohort study. Data were collected in the AIx‐Neo‐Guard project, a collaborative project of the NICU of University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Germany, and the Chair of Embedded Software of RWTH Aachen, Germany. The project's objective is to apply secondary data analyses (including artificial intelligence‐based approaches) to address health‐related aspects of neonatal and pediatric intensive care treatment. The legal framework for data collection was provided by the German Health Data Utilization Act. The Health Data Utilization Act granted an exemption from parental informed consent, as only data collected for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes were used, with no additional data being gathered. Data have been collected since August 2024. The database incorporates time‐series data from 357 pediatric patients of all age groups (as of November 30, 2025). The overall study and exemption from informed consent were approved by the local ethics committee (Ethik‐Kommission an der Medizinischen Fakultät der Rheinisch‐Westfälischen Technischen Hochschule Aachen (RWTH Aachen), approval number EK 24‐213). The study is in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki [28] and the “Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology” statement by von Elm et al. [29].

2.2. Setting

Data were collected at the Tertiary Care NICU of University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Germany.

2.3. Participants

All newborn patients of all gestational ages treated at the NICU of University Hospital RWTH Aachen between August 2024 and November 2025 were considered eligible. Patients were included if they were monitored by both blood gas analyses and a transcutaneous CO2 sensor for respiratory considerations in their first postnatal week. Patients were excluded if parents objected to study participation, if they underwent therapeutic hypothermia, or if there were alterations of the skin which might impact transcutaneous monitoring (including generalized congenital dermatosis, infections of the skin, and anasarca). We furthermore excluded infants with periods of hemodynamic shock, defined as persistent arterial hypotension (mean arterial pressure < gestational age) with the need for vasopressor therapy.

2.4. Variables

Patient characteristics used for analysis were gestational age, postnatal age, birth weight, birth weight percentile and early‐onset bacterial infections (EOBI, defined as clinical impairment and elevation of infection parameters in the blood). Measurement variables included tcpCO2 and capillary pCO2 (pcCO2). Further patient characteristics are presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

Group characteristics (shown as mean ± standard deviation).

EPI VPI LPI TI Total
Number of patients (n) 22 26 39 29 116
Number of measurements (n) 346 282 181 117 926
Gestational age (weeks) 25.5 ± 1.4 29.5 ± 1.3 34.2 ± 1.6 38.6 ± 1.4 32.6 ± 4.9
Birth weight (g) 781 ± 183 1437 ± 347 2229 ± 668 3334 ± 388 2053 ± 1018
Birth weight percentile 33 ± 17 50 ± 24 34 ± 27 48 ± 26 41 ± 25
Male sex (%) 54.5 53.8 51.2 48.3 51.7
5 min APGAR 8 ± 1 8 ± 1 8 ± 1 8 ± 2 8 ± 1
Umbilical cord pH 7.28 ± 0.11 7.30 ± 0.06 7.28 ± 0.08 7.21 ± 0.11 7.27 ± 0.1
Born by C‐section (%) 100 96 79 59 83
Early‐onset bacterial infection (%) 27 12 13 34 21
Mechanical ventilation (%) 45 15 8 14 18

2.5. Data Sources and Measurement

Patient characteristics were abstracted from the local patient data management system. pcCO2 was taken from capillary blood gas analyses, which were measured with an ABL90 FLEX Plus analyzer (Radiometer GmbH, Krefeld, Germany). tcpCO2 measurement was conducted with a Sentec Digital Monitor with V‐Sign sensor (SENTEC AG, Therwil, Switzerland). The sensor was applied to the patients' chest, thigh, or back and heated up to a temperature of 40.2°C. Re‐calibration was conducted during nursing, when routinely required by the monitor algorithm or if the correlation was assessed to be poor by the medical staff. We took the corresponding tcpCO2 value, which was recorded closest to the time of blood gas analysis within the window of tolerance (±5 min). The difference between tcpCO2 and pcCO2 measurement (ΔpCO2) was calculated by subtracting pcCO2 from tcpCO2.

2.6. Bias

To evade selection bias, we included all eligible newborn patients. Poor agreement of tcpCO2 and pcCO2 did not lead to an early termination of tcpCO2 monitoring. All neonates were treated according to local standards. tcpCO2 and pcCO2 measurements were conducted by the same type of measuring devices, respectively in all patients to minimize detection bias.

2.7. Study Size

We included all eligible patients with tcpCO2 and pcCO2 monitoring in their first postnatal week.

2.8. Quantitative Variables

Gestational age was categorized as extremely preterm (< 28 weeks, EPI), very preterm (28 + 0 to 31 + 6 weeks, VPI), moderate to late preterm (32 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks, LPI), and term (≥37 weeks, TI), according to the definition of the World Health Organization [30].

2.9. Statistical Methods

We used linear mixed‐effects models (LMM) to analyze the effect of gestational age, EOBI, birth weight, and pcCO2 on ΔpCO2. The LMM was chosen as each patient contributed a variable number of repeated measurements (1−39 measurements per patient). The respective univariate model included the categorized gestational age, EOBI, birth weight, or pcCO2 as a fixed effect and a random intercept for each participant. The model was fitted using restricted maximum likelihood. Fixed effects were evaluated by Type III F‐tests with Satterthwaite‐adjusted degrees of freedom. Variance components were estimated for both the subject‐level random intercept and the residual error term. The intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated to quantify the proportion of total variance which contributes to between‐subject differences. Effect size estimates were reported using marginal and conditional R2 values for mixed models. Post hoc pairwise comparisons were conducted using Bonferroni analysis.

In addition to the univariate analyses, a multivariable LMM was constructed to assess whether the categorized gestational age was independently associated with ΔpCO2 after adjustment for potential confounding variables. The multivariable model included gestational age, EOBI, birth weight, and pcCO2 simultaneously as fixed effects and a random intercept for each participant to account for repeated measurements within individuals.

As the group of EPI is very heterogeneous, another LMM was used for stratification and comparison of the most immature infants of 23–25 weeks gestational age to the group of 26–27 weeks.

pcCO2 measurements without simultaneous measurement of tcpCO2 were excluded from the analysis. Percentage similarity (PS) values were calculated for each group according to Scott et al. [31], as shown below:

PS=100×(((tcpCO2+pcCO2)/2)/pcCO2)

Furthermore, a Pearson correlation analysis was conducted. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. All analyses were performed using SPSS, version 29.0.0.0 (IBM, Armonk, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Patient Characteristics

During the study period, 253 neonates were treated at the NICU. Fifty‐five of these were not included in the AIx‐Neo‐Guard project due to technical aspects. 116 of 198 neonates met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis (Figure 1). Group characteristics are shown in Table 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Study population flow chart.

3.2. Main Results

A total of 926 simultaneous tcpCO2 and pcCO2 measurements were analyzed. Median [interquartile 1; interquartile 3] of ΔpCO2 was 7.6 [2.4; 13.9] mmHg for EPI, 3.1 [−1.0; 6.4] mmHg for VPI, 0.6 [−4.6; 4.7] mmHg for LPI, and −0.5 [−4.8; 4.7] mmHg for TI.

The LMM revealed a significant effect of the patient group according to gestational age on ΔpCO2 (F(3, 109.779) = 13.910, p < 0.001). Compared to the reference group (TI), both EPI and VPI showed a significantly larger positive estimate (EPI: 8.42, 95% CI [5.24, 11.61], p < 0.001, VPI: 3.82, 95% CI [0.69, 6.95], p = 0.017). In contrast, the estimate of LPI did not differ from TI (0.55, 95% CI [−2.58, 3.68], p = 0.729). Post hoc pairwise comparisons demonstrated that ΔpCO2 in EPI differed significantly from ΔpCO2 in the other three groups, while there were no statistically significant differences in ΔpCO2 among the other groups.

The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC = 0.163) indicated that approximately 16% of the total variance in ΔpCO2 was attributable to between‐subject differences, supporting the use of a mixed model. The marginal and conditional R2 values were 0.112 and 0.257, respectively, indicating that the fixed effects explained 11% of the variance, and the full model including random effects explained 26% of the variance.

pcCO2 levels did not differ significantly between the four groups (F(3, 922) = 0.299, p = 0.926). Median overall pcCO2 was 46.4 [40.7, 53.4] mmHg. For EPI, median pcCO2 was 46.4 [40.2; 53,8] mmHg, 45.9 [40.8; 52.9] mmHg for VPI, 47.1 [41.2; 52.6] mmHg for LPI, and 46.7 [40.9; 54.1] for TI. Linear mixed‐effects modeling demonstrated a significant association between pcCO2 and ΔpCO2 (F(1, 809) = 159.75, p < 0.001), indicating that the agreement between tcpCO2 and pcCO2 varied across the pCO2 range.

ΔpCO2 was also significantly associated with EOBI (F(1, 924) = 26.889, p < 0.001). EOBI patients exhibited significantly higher ΔpCO2 (6.5 [1.3; 11.8] mmHg) compared to non‐EOBi patients (2.9 [−1.8; 7.8] mmHg).

There was also a significant association between birth weight and ΔpCO2 (F(1, 923) = 73.01, p < 0.001), with lower birth weight being associated with higher ΔpCO2.

Since gestational age group, EOBI, birth weight, and pcCO2 were all significantly associated with ΔpCO2 in the univariate analyses, their independent contributions were assessed in a multivariable LMM. Gestational age (F(3, 918) = 14.47, p < 0.001), pcCO2 (F(1, 918) = 8.84, p = 0.003), and EOBI (F(1, 918) = 24.43, p < 0.001) remained independently associated with ΔpCO2, whereas birth weight was no longer significantly associated with ΔpCO2 (p = 0.16).

For the subgroup of EPI, there was no significant difference between the group of 23−25 weeks (n = 8) and 26−27 weeks (n = 14, F(1, 19.732) = 3.103, p = 0.094).

Bland‐Altman plots with the limits of agreement for tcpCO2 and pcCO2 measurements are provided in Figure 2 and PS histograms in Figure 3 for each group.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(a–d) Bland‐Altman plots with limits of agreement for each group.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(a–d) Relative frequency distribution (%) of percentage similarity (PS) values between tcpCO2 and pcCO2 measurements. PS is calculated as the average estimate of tcpCO2 and pcCO2 relative to pcCO2. The vertical line indicates the 100% similarity reference value, corresponding to perfect agreement between tcpCO2 and pcCO2. Values to the right of the line (> 100%) indicate higher tcpCO2 than pcCO2 values, whereas values to the left (< 100%) indicate lower tcpCO2 values. PS values were grouped into 30 equal 5% intervals and plotted against relative frequency on the y‐axis.

3.3. Other Analyses

The results of the Pearson correlation analysis are shown in Table 2. The overall correlation of tcpCO2 and pcCO2 was moderate (r = 0.671). ΔpCO2 correlated moderately with tcpCO2 values (r = 0.658). There was a weak correlation between ΔpCO2 and postnatal age and birth weight (r = 0.33 and r = −0.271), but no correlation with birth weight percentile.

Table 2.

Pearson correlation analysis.

pcCO2 (mmHg) tcpCO2 (mmHg) ∆pCO2 (mmHg) Birth weight (g) Weight percentile Postnatal age (days)
pcCO2 (mmHg) Pearson correlation 1 0.671** −0.089** 0.074* 0.080* −0.027
Sig. (2‐tailed) < 0.001 0.007 0.024 0.015 0.405
N 926 926 926 926 926 926
tcpCO2 (mmHg) Pearson correlation 0.671** 1 0.658** −0.150** 0.059 0.215
Sig. (2‐tailed) < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.071 < 0.001
N 926 926 926 926 926 926
∆pCO2 (mmHg) Pearson correlation −0.089** 0.658** 1 −0.271** −0.001 0.330
Sig. (2‐tailed) 0.007 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.974 < 0.001
N 926 926 926 926 926 926
birth weight (grams) Pearson correlation 0.074* −0.150** −0.271** 1 0.399** −0.318
Sig. (2‐tailed) 0.024 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001
N 926 926 926 926 926 926
weight percentile Pearson correlation 0.080* 0.059 −0.001 0.399** 1 −0.093
Sig. (2‐tailed) 0.015 0.071 0.974 < 0.001 0.004
N 926 926 926 926 926 926
postnatal age (days) Pearson correlation −0.027 0.215 0.330 −0.318 −0.093 1
Sig. (2‐tailed) 0.405 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.004
N 926 926 926 926 926 926
**

The correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2‐tailed).

*

The correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2‐tailed).

4. Discussion

4.1. Interpretation

tcpCO2 is a routine non‐invasive parameter for the continuous monitoring of gas exchange in neonates. At present, tcpCO2 measurement cannot fully replace blood gas analyses but constitutes a useful and continuous trend parameter which substantially decreases the need for blood sampling. The correlation between tcpCO2 and pcCO2 found in this work is in good accordance with previous findings reported by Janaillac et al. [27], Aly et al. [32], and Borenstein‐Levin et al. [22], who reported correlation coefficients of tcpCO2 and pCO2 of approximately r = 0.6.

An improvement of pCO2 estimation from tcpCO2 has the potential to increase the time a patient spends within the pCO2 target range. This can consequently further reduce the number of required blood gas analyses and the rate of complications associated with pCO2 extremes. For the estimation of pCO2, different confounders have to be regarded.

Sandberg et al. previously defined the difference between tcpCO2 and paCO2 as the bias of tcpCO2 [21]. This research group found a higher bias in infants weighing less than 1 kg (4.5 ± 13.5 mmHg) and older than 7 days (5.3 ± 13.5 mmHg). However, the influence of the weight and postnatal age was only reported to be small. The data for the patient group of less than 1 kg are similar to those observed in our study in EPI. Although birth weight was associated with ΔpCO2 in our univariate analyses, this association was no longer significant after adjustment for gestational age, suggesting that gestational maturity rather than body weight per se accounted for the observed effect.

Another research group investigated the accuracy of tcpCO2 depending on venous pCO2 values [33]. They found a good agreement of tcpCO2 and venous pCO2 during episodes of hypocarbia and normocapnia (mean differences 1.5 ± 1.4 mmHg and 0 ± 2.3 mmHg). During hypercarbia, tcpCO2 was shown to be significantly lower than venous pCO2 (6.1 ± 8.9 mmHg). An important finding was the significant influence of pcCO2 levels on ΔpCO2. This observation is consistent with previous reports showing that transcutaneous CO2 monitoring accuracy decreases at higher pCO2 levels, whereas precision remains relatively stable [34]. The observed proportional bias likely reflects the physiological and technical limitations of transcutaneous measurements at elevated CO2 tensions, including altered skin perfusion and diffusion characteristics. Clinically, this suggests that tcpCO2 remains useful for continuous trend monitoring across a broad pCO2 range, but caution is warranted when interpreting absolute tcpCO2 values in patients with marked hypercapnia.

Our analysis showed that the gestational age might be another essential characteristic to be considered during tcpCO2 monitoring. We hypothesize that the differences between the groups originate from the thickness of the stratum corneum in the epidermis. Its number of cell layers is known to be dependent on gestational age [35]. The epidermis is considered mature at the gestational age of 34 weeks [36]. The facilitated CO2 diffusion through the immature skin may explain the overestimation of pcCO2 by tcpCO2, particularly in more immature infants, and the significant differences in ΔpCO2 between EPI and the other groups. This systematic deviation might be overcome by the use of a correction factor. However, larger databases would be needed to make a valid suggestion for such a correction. Besides differences in epidermal structure, gestational age–related variations in hemodynamics and skin perfusion may also have contributed to the observed differences in measured pCO2 values. Since transcutaneous monitoring depends on adequate local capillary blood flow, altered peripheral perfusion could influence measurement characteristics. Previous studies have shown inverse correlations between gestational age and peripheral as well as cutaneous blood flow [37], indicating physiologic differences in skin perfusion between immature and more mature infants. However, because blood pressure and perfusion‐related parameters were unavailable in the present study, their potential influence could not be further evaluated.

For EPI and VPI, the skin maturation typically takes place faster than the chronological maturation of other organ systems [38]. In this work, we focused on the first postnatal week only to eliminate this potential influence. It would be interesting to evaluate the accuracy of tcpCO2 during the entire postnatal skin maturation process in EPI and VPI in the future.

4.2. Limitations

The temperature to which the tcpCO2 sensor is heated up is known to affect the deviation from pCO2 as it influences the perfusion of the skin. Our unit uses a temperature of only 40.2°C to minimize the risk of skin burns. We recognize that the choice of temperature may influence ΔpCO2. Previous studies demonstrated that the bias (ΔpCO2) decreases at higher operating temperatures and suggested the application of a bias correction in the case of operating temperatures below 42°C [39, 40].

Furthermore, tcpCO2 sensors are susceptible to sensor drift and shift [41, 42]. The sensor probes have to be replaced, recalibrated, and re‐membraned regularly [43]. Our database does not store information about this change in the location of the sensor or the perfusion of the skin, which can also have an impact on the quality of measurement. It was therefore not possible to consider these additional variables in the analysis. Because blood sampling was clinically driven rather than protocolized, the dataset may overrepresent periods of physiological instability or suspected monitoring inaccuracy. This could have biased agreement estimates and may limit generalizability to routine continuous monitoring conditions.

Blood gas analyses were conducted immediately after blood sampling. Within the window of tolerance of ±5 min, we extracted the corresponding tcpCO2 value. We recognize that even this small time span could introduce a bias and have an impact on the accuracy of tcpCO2.

Intensive care treatment was conducted according to local standards. The inclusion of the neonates into the study did not alter these standards and did not involve any other interventions. The local practices can potentially entail a center bias. We plan to validate our findings on external data to eliminate this influence.

As capillary blood sampling requires smaller amounts of blood [44] and avoids catheter‐associated complications, we predominantly use capillary blood gas analyses in our unit. We do not expect the source of blood sampling to have a substantial impact on our findings. Values for pcCO2 are marginally higher than arterial ones [45]. The directed effects which we have observed in this study would most likely have been more pronounced if arterial blood gas analyses had been used.

The heterogeneous requirements and pathophysiological conditions of premature and mature infants inevitably influence their critical care treatment [46]. The underlying pathology can, for example, have an impact on the number of blood gas analyses, which is deemed necessary by the medical staff. A substantial proportion of LPI and TI was admitted to the NICU due to transient tachypnea of the newborn, which led to only short observational periods and few blood gas analyses. Some of these infants had to be excluded from this analysis because tcpCO2 measurement was not conducted. In contrast, EPI and VPI typically require much longer stays on the NICU and almost always receive tcpCO2 monitoring. To minimize the resulting effect of unequal numbers of measurements per patient, we used an LMM.

4.3. Generalizability

This work uses observational data taken from a single‐center study and includes a total of 926 measurements from 116 neonatal patients. The dataset included a few EPIs (n = 22). Multi‐center analyses of larger cohorts and comparisons of different sites are required for improvement of generalizability. No a priori sample size estimation was performed because the study used an existing dataset, and the sample size was therefore fixed.

4.4. Conclusion

This is the first study to evaluate the effect of gestational age on the difference between tcpCO2 and pcCO2. We found a significant difference of ΔpCO2 depending on gestational age, EOBI, and pcCO2. This knowledge may be used to further improve the estimation of pCO2 from tcpCO2 in neonates in the future. At present, tcpCO2 monitoring is a useful additive diagnostic tool to regard pCO2 trends, while occasional blood gas analyses are still required.

Author Contributions

Lena Olivier: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, visualization, writing – original draft preparation. Camelia Lauterbach Oprea: resources, software, validation, writing – review and editing. André Stollenwerk: resources, software, validation, writing – review and editing, funding acquisition, project administration. Valerie Pfannschmidt: validation, writing – review and editing. Thorsten Orlikowsky: resources, supervision, validation, writing – review and editing. Mark Schoberer: conceptualization, methodology, supervision, validation, writing – review and editing, funding acquisition, project administration.

Ethics Statement

The study was approved by the local ethics committee (Ethik‐Kommission an der Medizinischen Fakultät der Rheinisch‐Westfälischen Technischen Hochschule Aachen [RWTH Aachen], approval number EK 24‐213). The study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki [28].

Consent

The authors have nothing to report.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Ellen Gerle for her constant support in all technical issues regarding the hard‐ and software used within this project. The AIx‐Neo‐Guard project was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Research, Technology and Space (BMFTR, funding number 031L0303). Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Data Availability Statement

The data are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.

References

  • 1. Braun D., Braun E. and Chiu V., “Trends in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Utilization in a Large Integrated Health Care System,” JAMA Netw Open 3 (2020): e205239, 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.5239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Harrison W. and Goodman D., “Epidemiologic Trends in Neonatal Intensive Care, 2007–2012,” JAMA Pediatr 169 (2015): 855–862, 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.1305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Edwards M. O., Kotecha S. J., and Kotecha S., “Respiratory Distress of the Term Newborn Infant,” Paediatric Respiratory Reviews 14 (2013): 29–36; quiz 36‐27, 10.1016/j.prrv.2012.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Holme N. and Chetcuti P., “The Pathophysiology of Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Neonates,” Paediatrics and Child Health 22 (2012): 507–512, 10.1016/j.paed.2012.09.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Khabbache K., Hennequin Y., Vermeylen D., and Van Overmeire B., “Current Respiratory Support Practices in Premature Infants: An Observational Study,” Pan African Medical Journal 39 (2021): 66, 10.11604/pamj.2021.39.66.14482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Wheeler C. R. and Smallwood C. D., “2019 Year in Review: Neonatal Respiratory Support,” Respiratory Care 65 (2020): 693–704, 10.4187/respcare.07720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Battisti‐Charbonney A., Fisher J., and Duffin J., “The Cerebrovascular Response to Carbon Dioxide in Humans,” Journal of Physiology 589 (2011): 3039–3048, 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.206052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Shankaran S., Langer J., Kazzi S., et al., “Cumulative Index of Exposure to Hypocarbia and Hyperoxia as Risk Factors for Periventricular Leukomalacia in Low Birth Weight Infants,” Pediatrics 118 (2006): 1654–1659, 10.1542/peds.2005-2463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Thome U. H. and Ambalavanan N., “Permissive Hypercapnia to Decrease Lung Injury in Ventilated Preterm Neonates,” Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 14 (2009): 21–27, 10.1016/j.siny.2008.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Fabres J., Carlo W. A., Phillips V., Howard G., and Ambalavanan N., “Both Extremes of Arterial Carbon Dioxide Pressure and the Magnitude of Fluctuations in Arterial Carbon Dioxide Pressure are Associated With Severe Intraventricular Hemorrhage in Preterm Infants,” Pediatrics 119 (2007): 299–305, 10.1542/peds.2006-2434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Waitz M., Nusser S., Schmid M., et al., “Risk Factors Associated With Intraventricular Hemorrhage in Preterm Infants With </= 28 Weeks Gestational Age,” Klinische Pädiatrie 228 (2016): 245–250, 10.1055/s-0042-111689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Bolisetty S., Dhawan A., Abdel‐Latif M., et al., “Intraventricular Hemorrhage and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Extreme Preterm Infants,” Pediatrics 133 (2014): 55–62, 10.1542/peds.2013-0372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Lindinger M. I. and Heigenhauser G. J., “Effects of Gas Exchange on Acid‐Base Balance,” Compr Physiol 2 (2012): 2203–2254, 10.1002/cphy.c100055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Balasubramanian H., Bhanushali M., Tripathi V., et al., “Effect of Minimization of Early Blood Sampling Losses Among Extremely Premature Neonates: A Randomized Clinical Trial,” Journal of Pediatrics 269 (2024): 114002, 10.1016/j.jpeds.2024.114002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Hellstrom W., Forssell L., Morsing E., Savman K., and Ley D., “Neonatal Clinical Blood Sampling Led to Major Blood Loss and Was Associated With Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia,” Acta Paediatrica 109 (2020): 679–687, 10.1111/apa.15003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Rudiger M., Topfer K., Hammer H., Schmalisch G., and Wauer R. R., “A Survey of Transcutaneous Blood Gas Monitoring Among European Neonatal Intensive Care Units,” BMC Pediatrics 5 (2005): 30, 10.1186/1471-2431-5-30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Mindt W., Eberhard P., and Schäfer R., “Monitoring of PCO2 by Skin Surface Sensors,” Biotelemetry and Patient Monitoring 9 (1982): 28–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Mukhopadhyay S., Maurer R., and Puopolo K. M., “Neonatal Transcutaneous Carbon Dioxide Monitoring‐‐Effect on Clinical Management and Outcomes,” Respiratory Care 61 (2016): 90–97, 10.4187/respcare.04212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Murdoch D. R. and Darlow B. A., “Handling During Neonatal Intensive Care,” Archives of Disease in Childhood 59 (1984): 957–961, 10.1136/adc.59.10.957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Conway A., Tipton E., Liu W., et al., “Accuracy and Precision of Transcutaneous Carbon Dioxide Monitoring: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Thorax 74 (2019): 157–163, 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2017-211466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Sandberg K. L., Brynjarsson H., and Hjalmarson O., “Transcutaneous Blood Gas Monitoring During Neonatal Intensive Care,” Acta Paediatrica 100 (2011): 676–679, 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2011.02164.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Borenstein‐Levin L., Avishay N., Soffer O., et al., “Transcutaneous CO(2) Monitoring in Extremely Low Birth Weight Premature Infants,” Journal of Clinical Medicine 12 (2023): 5757, 10.3390/jcm12175757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Baumann P., Gotta V., Adzikah S., and Bernet V., “Accuracy of a Novel Transcutaneous PCO2 and PO2 Sensor With Optical PO2 Measurement in Neonatal Intensive Care: A Single‐Centre Prospective Clinical Trial,” Neonatology 119 (2022): 230–237, 10.1159/000521809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Binder N., Atherton H., Thorkelsson T., and Hoath S. B., “Measurement of Transcutaneous Carbon Dioxide in Low Birthweight Infants During the First Two Weeks of Life,” American Journal of Perinatology 11 (1994): 237–241, 10.1055/s-2008-1040754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Bendjelid K., Schütz N., Stotz M., et al., “Transcutaneous PCO2 Monitoring in Critically Ill Adults: Clinical Evaluation of a New Sensor,” Critical Care Medicine 33 (2005): 2203–2206, 10.1097/01.ccm.0000181734.26070.26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Aliwalas L. L., Noble L., Nesbitt K., et al., “Agreement of Carbon Dioxide Levels Measured by Arterial, Transcutaneous and End Tidal Methods in Preterm Infants < or = 28 Weeks Gestation,” Journal of Perinatology 25 (2005): 26–29, 10.1038/sj.jp.7211202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Janaillac M., Labarinas S., Pfister R. E., and Karam O., “Accuracy of Transcutaneous Carbon Dioxide Measurement in Premature Infants,” Critical Care Research and Practice 2016 (2016): 8041967, 10.1155/2016/8041967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. World Medical Association , “Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects,” Journal of the American Medical Association 310 (2013): 2191–2194, 10.1001/jama.2013.281053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. von Elm E., Altman D., Egger M., et al., “The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 61 (2008): 344–349, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Lawn J.. Born too soon: The Global Action Report on Preterm Birth. 2012.
  • 31. Scott L. E., Galpin J. S., and Glencross D. K., “Multiple Method Comparison: Statistical Model Using Percentage Similarity,” Cytometry. Part B, Clinical Cytometry 54 (2003): 46–53, 10.1002/cyto.b.10016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Aly S., El‐Dib M., Mohamed M., and Aly H., “Transcutaneous Carbon Dioxide Monitoring With Reduced‐Temperature Probes in Very Low Birth Weight Infants,” American Journal of Perinatology 34 (2017): 480–485, 10.1055/s-0036-1593352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Uslu S.,Bulbul A., Dursun M., et al., “Agreement of Mixed Venous Carbon Dioxide Tension (PvCO2) and Transcutaneous Carbon Dioxide (PtCO2) Measurements in Ventilated Infants,” Iranian Journal of Pediatrics 25 (2015): e184, 10.5812/ijp.184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Martin R. J., Beoglos A., Miller M., et al., “Increasing Arterial Carbon Dioxide Tension: Influence on Transcutaneous Carbon Dioxide Tension Measurements,” Pediatrics 81 (1988): 684–687. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Cartlidge P., “The Epidermal Barrier,” Seminars in Neonatology 5 (2000): 273–280, 10.1053/siny.2000.0013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Kalia Y. N., Nonato L. B., Lund C. H., and Guy R. H., “Development of Skin Barrier Function in Premature Infants,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology 111 (1998): 320–326, 10.1046/j.1523-1747.1998.00289.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Wu P. Y., Wong W., Guerra G., et al., “Peripheral Blood Flow in the Neonate; 1. Changes in Total, Skin, and Muscle Blood Flow With Gestational and Postnatal Age,” Pediatric Research 14 (1980): 1374–1378, 10.1203/00006450-198012000-00023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Chiou Y. B. and Blume‐Peytavi U., “Stratum Corneum Maturation,” A Review of Neonatal Skin Function. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 17 (2004): 57–66, 10.1159/000076015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Rennie J. M., “Transcutaneous Carbon Dioxide Monitoring,” Archives of Disease in Childhood 65 (1990): 345–346, 10.1136/adc.65.4_spec_no.345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Hirata K., Nishihara M., Oshima Y., Hirano S., and Kitajima H., “Application of Transcutaneous Carbon Dioxide Tension Monitoring With Low Electrode Temperatures in Premature Infants in the Early Postnatal Period,” American Journal of Perinatology 31 (2014): 435–440, 10.1055/s-0033-1352485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Ng S. K.‐w, Chan E. Y.‐t, and Leung S.‐y, “Comparison of Calibration Drift in Transcutaneous Carbon Dioxide Monitoring Devices for Overnight Level 4 Sleep Study in Hong Kong Children,” Pediatric Respirology and Critical Care Medicine 8 (2024): 25–32, 10.4103/prcm.prcm_21_23. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. van Weteringen W., Goos T., van Essen T., et al., “Novel Transcutaneous Sensor Combining Optical tcPO(2) and Electrochemical tcPCO(2) Monitoring With Reflectance Pulse Oximetry,” Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing 58 (2020): 239–247, 10.1007/s11517-019-02067-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Eberhard P., “The Design, Use, and Results of Transcutaneous Carbon Dioxide Analysis: Current and Future Directions,” Anesthesia and Analgesia 105 (2007): S48–S52, 10.1213/01.ane.0000278642.16117.f8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Krleza J. L., Dorotic A., Grzunov A., et al., “Capillary Blood Sampling: National Recommendations on Behalf of the Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine,” Biochem Med (Zagreb) 25 (2015): 335–358, 10.11613/BM.2015.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Harrison A. M., Lynch J. M., Dean J. M., and Witte M. K., “Comparison of Simultaneously Obtained Arterial and Capillary Blood Gases in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Patients,” Critical Care Medicine 25 (1997): 1904–1908, 10.1097/00003246-199711000-00032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Chakkarapani A. A., Roehr C., Hooper S., et al., “Transitional Circulation and Hemodynamic Monitoring in Newborn Infants,” Pediatric Research 96 (2024): 595–603, 10.1038/s41390-022-02427-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.


Articles from Pediatric Pulmonology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES