Abstract
Forensic science depends on identifying biological fluid stains to maintain DNA for profiling and associating suspects with crime scenes. These stains can include urine and other secretions; however, presumptive and confirmatory tests often target specific fluids and might damage DNA because of destructive chemical processes. Traditional reagents like 4‐dimethylaminocinnamaldehyde (DMAC) allow for quick screening but have low specificity and sensitivity in complex crime scene matrices. Hence, there is a necessity for a universal, highly sensitive, and non‐destructive technique for the accurate analysis and differentiation of bodily fluids. In this study, we present an eco‐friendly technique for synthesizing silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) and gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) utilizing extracts from the stems of Sclerocarya birrea and Moringa oleifera as reducing and stabilizing agents in aqueous medium. These nanoparticles were employed as alternative materials for urine analysis at the crime scene. Various characterization techniques, including Fourier‐transform infrared spectroscopy, X‐ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and spectrophotometry, were used to analyse the nanoparticles. XRD results indicated a face‐centred cubic crystalline structure, while microscopy observations showed that the nanoparticles were mainly spherical, with some in hexagonal and polyhedral shapes. Fluorescence spectroscopy revealed that AgNPs and AuNPs significantly improved the excitation and emission signals of DMAC in urine analysis when compared to plant extracts alone. Furthermore, electrophoresis gel and nanophotometer analysis showed enhanced DNA recovery and less degradation after nanoparticle‐assisted urine testing. These results indicate that these nanoparticles function as non‐toxic signal enhancers and protective agents, thereby enhancing sensitivity, specificity, and DNA preservation in forensic analysis.
Keywords: crime scene, DMAC, fluorescence, phytochemicals, tile surface, urine
This study highlights how gold and silver nanoparticles (AuNPs and AgNPs) were prepared from M oringa oleifera and Sclerocarya birrea plant extracts and used for the analysis of urine components in the detection of urine at crime scenes. Both types of nanoparticles were characterized using techniques such as tranmission electron microscopy and UV–Visible spectroscopy whilst maintaining DNA integrity.

1. Introduction
The identification of biological fluids in forensic investigations is a crucial step in crime scene analysis, as it facilitates the recovery and preservation of DNA evidence for purposes of human identification and event reconstruction [1]. The biological fluids typically found at crime scenes include blood, semen, saliva, vaginal secretions, sweat, and urine, all of which provide DNA for the identification of people as well as contextual information that assists in reconstructing the timeline and details of the criminal act [2]. Among these, urine is frequently neglected, even though it holds significant forensic importance in cases like sexual assault, harassment, and contamination incidents connected to assaults, where small traces of urine can yield essential DNA and toxicological evidence [3]. Nevertheless, accurately analyzing and detecting urine is difficult due to its diluted biochemical composition and the shortcomings of existing presumptive tests. Current forensic methods depend on biochemical and colorimetric reagents that specifically target various components in urine. For instance, 4‐dimethylaminocinnamaldehyde (DMAC) is commonly utilized because it quickly reacts with urea in alkaline environments, resulting in a fluorescent product [4, 5]. Furthermore, traditional tests like the Jaffe reaction focus on detecting creatinine compound in urine. Despite this, research indicates that methods for detecting creatinine are hindered by matrix interference and limited selectivity, whereas DMAC‐based assays may cross‐react with other biological fluids that contain amines and compounds similar to urea, leading to false positives and DNA degradation due to their destructive properties [6, 7].
Previous and recent studies have shown that nanoparticle‐based sensing systems can detect urine biomarkers like creatinine, especially employing gold and silver nanoparticles, with detection relying on plasmonic aggregation and color changes [8]. However, several of these systems necessitate intricate functionalization, sample pretreatment, and costly reagents, which restrict their applicability in forensic body fluid investigations. Urine was chosen as the focus of this study because of its notable forensic significance and its relatively limited use compared to other biological fluids. Urea, a major component in urine, is a chemically stable and abundant analyte, providing benefits over other metabolites like creatinine and uric acid found in urine [9, 10, 11]. The constant presence and high levels of urea in urine make it an ideal molecular focus for analytical detection, especially in reactions with 4‐dimethylaminocinnamaldehyde (DMAC), which has been extensively used in forensic and biochemical tests involving urea analysis. Ismael et al. (2022) developed a highly sensitive fluorometric technique utilizing silver nanoparticles to identify and measure urea in actual urine samples through interactions between nanoparticles and urea [12]. Alula et al. (2018) developed a colorimetric sensor using citrate‐capped silver nanoparticles to achieve quick, specific, and highly sensitive detection of creatinine in urine through analyte‐induced aggregation of the nanoparticles. This system allowed for quantification in just a few minutes with exceptional sensitivity (nanomolar detection limit) by measuring optical variations in nanoparticle plasmon resonance [8]. Elmasry et al. (2023) developed a dual‐signal sensing system that integrates fluorescent carbon dots with plasmonic silver nanoparticles generated in situ for the sensitive detection of urea through pH changes triggered by urease [13].
This research introduces a green nanotechnology‐based technique to improve the detection and analysis of urine samples and develops a novel biosensor utilizing plant extracts as an environmentally friendly and cost‐effective alternative for urine analysis to address ongoing issues associated with conventional techniques of urine analysis that compromise DNA integrity and require costly, laborious procedures for analyzing urine samples. Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) and gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) were synthesized using extracts from the stems of Sclerocarya birrea and Moringa oleifera, and these were employed as enhancers to enhance the performance of DMAC by enhancing its sensitivity, specificity and minimizing its DNA‐damaging toxicity. In this research, silver and gold nanoparticles derived from Sclerocarya birrea and Moringa oleifera stem extracts were used to enhance the sensitivity and specificity of DMAC for better analysis of urine. Moringa oleifera and Sclerocarya birrea water extracts were further tested for urine analysis as a potential cost‐effective and nondestructive alternative technique for urine detection at a crime scene. The synthesis of silver and gold nanoparticles was accomplished by the utilization of a green chemistry method, wherein water was used as the solvent for extracting compounds from Moringa and Marula stem extracts. These plants are rich in phytochemicals such as polyphenols, alkaloids, and flavonoids and are known for their ability to act as reducing and capping agents, facilitating the reduction of Au (III) to Au (0) and Ag(I) to Ag (0). The decision to opt for the green chemistry method was based on its eco‐friendliness and cost‐effectiveness, as opposed to chemical and physical procedures that include hazardous substances and demand substantial energy consumption [14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20].
Comparative studies were conducted to assess whether the plant‐based biosensor could serve as an affordable and alternative material for DMAC in urine analysis. In contrast to conventional nanoparticle‐based detection techniques, which rely on complex preparation steps and less effective biomarkers, this approach offers a simpler, label‐free, eco‐friendly, and cost‐effective technique that is safer for long‐term use. The synthesized AuNPs and AgNPs were analyzed for their morphological and optical properties using various techniques, including transmission electron microscopy (TEM), Fourier‐transform infrared spectroscopy, X‐ray diffraction (XRD), Zetasizer, spectrophotometer, and ultraviolet–visible spectroscopy. The results from XRD validated the formation of crystalline structures, while TEM analysis showed that the nanoparticles mainly exhibited spherical, triangular, and rod‐like geometries. These results highlight the potential of plant extract biosensor, plant‐based AgNPs, and AuNPs as effective signal enhancers, providing a nondestructive and environmentally friendly method for enhanced urine analysis in forensic applications. The Sclerocarya birrea tree and Moringa oleifera plant used for the synthesis of AgNPs and AuNPs are depicted below in Figure 1 [21].
FIGURE 1.

(A) Sclerocarya birrea tree and (B) Moringa Oleifera plant.
2. Methods and Materials
2.1. Materials
Silver nitrate (AgNO3, 99%), tryptamine, DMAC, and chloroauric acid trihydrate (HAuCl4·3H2O, 98%) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich, SA. Urine samples were collected from voluntary donors in Johannesburg. Marula stems were harvested from Limpopo Province in South Africa. Stems of Moringa were obtained from a nursery in Johannesburg, Gauteng Province, South Africa. Deionized water was used throughout the studies, and all chemicals and reagents utilized were of analytical grade. No further purification was performed on the chemicals before their use.
2.2. Preparation of Sclerocarya birrea Extract, Moringa oleifera Stem Extract, and Silver Nanoparticles Derived from both Plants
The stem samples were first cleaned with tap water and then rinsed with distilled water to eliminate surface contaminants and impurities. The cleaned stems were subsequently chopped into smaller parts and left to air‐dry for 3–4 weeks. Once fully dried, they were ground into a fine powder with an electric grinder and sifted through a 20‐mesh screen to achieve a consistent particle size. Active polar compounds were extracted into the aqueous phase by the maceration technique. A precise mass balance was used to weigh 20 g of freshly dried and pulverized Marula and Moringa stem powder separately. Approximately 20 g of plant powders were added to separate 500 mL of distilled water and stirred on a hotplate (LABOTEC MR Hei‐Tec) at 25°C for 2 h to thoroughly extract active polar compounds from Sclerocarya birrea and Moringa oleifera. After cooling to room temperature, they were filtered through Whatman Grade 3 filter paper (HW 90 mm). The resultant extracts were refrigerated at 4°C until further use. Approximately 20 mL of the stem extracts were combined with 0.5 M silver nitrate solution in different beakers and heated on a hot plate at a temperature of 60°C–70°C for 20 min. The effective synthesis of nanoparticles was confirmed by a color change from red to black. To reduce the agglomeration of nanoparticles, the mixtures were cooled in an incubator shaker for 2 h at a temperature of 25°C and a speed of 120 rpm. Subsequently, the solutions were centrifuged twice at 500 × 10 rpm for 10 min. The supernatants were discarded, and the pellets were rinsed three times with ethanol and distilled water, 50:50 separately. Subsequently, the purified pellets were dried in an oven at 70°C for 2 h [22, 23, 24].
2.3. Preparation of Gold Nanoparticles Derived from Sclerocarya Birrea Stem Extract and Moringa oleifera Stem Extract
Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) were synthesized by the procedures reported by Boruah et al. and Alhumaydhi et al. [25, 26], with further modifications. Approximately 0.330 M gold chloride solution was prepared by dissolving 0.11 g of gold salt in distilled water in a 1 L volumetric flask. Subsequently, equal amounts (50 mL each) of stem extracts and a freshly prepared 0.330 M aqueous solution of HAuCl4·3H2O were mixed in separate beakers, resulting in a total volume of 100 mL each of stem extracts and gold chloride solution. The resultant mixture was continuously stirred on a magnetic stirrer for 6 h at 25°C to achieve a homogenous solution. The alteration in color signifies the bioreduction of Au3+ ions to Au0. Following the heating, the resultant solutions were cooled and stirred in an incubator shaker for 2 h to reduce agglomeration of gold nanoparticles. Gold nanoparticles were subsequently acquired by centrifugation, conducted twice at 500 × 10 rpm for 10 min. The supernatants were removed separately, and the resultant pellets were washed three times with distilled water and ethanol 50:50. The purified pellets were further dried in an oven at 70°C for 60 min [27].
2.4. Urine Analysis Method and Preparation of 4‐Dimethylaminocinnamaldehyde (DMAC)
Approximately 5 μL of human urine samples were deposited onto both filter paper and tile surfaces, then left to air dry. The resultant stains were analyzed using a few drops of DMAC reagent (at concentrations of 0.1% and 0.05%), along with Marula extract, Moringa extract, and a nanoparticles‐based DMAC reagent in a laboratory setting under UV light at wavelengths of 250 and 350 nm to evaluate the differences. The reactions were observed at various time intervals. The DMAC solution was prepared according to the procedure outlined by Sandy et al. (2012) [10]. The reagent was dissolved in ethanol at concentrations of 0.05 and 0.1 g for every 100 mL to create 0.05% and 0.1% (w/v) solutions, respectively. Following this, 3 mL of concentrated hydrochloric acid (37% HCl) was combined with 27 mL of each solution to reach a total volume of 30 mL.
2.5. Characterization
Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) and silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) synthesized from the stem extracts of Sclerocarya birrea and Moringa oleifera were thoroughly characterized using various analytical techniques. To identify the functional groups in the plant extracts that serve as reducing and capping agents, FTIR spectroscopy (PerkinElmer Spectrum 100) was utilized, with KBr pellet preparation allowing for precise mid‐infrared measurements (4000–400 cm−1). The structural and crystallographic characteristics were studied using XRD (PANalytical EMPYREAN) with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54060 Å) over a broad scan range at a controlled temperature. Optical absorption profiles of nanoparticles were measured using UV–Vis spectroscopy (PerkinElmer Lambda 25/Shimadzu UV2450) within the range of 200–900 nm. Particle size distribution and surface charge were analyzed using a Zetasizer Nano ZS through dynamic light scattering (DLS) and measurements of electrophoretic mobility. Morphological and elemental composition of AgNPs and AuNPs were conducted with TEM (JEOL‐2100) coupled with EDS mapping. High‐resolution scanning electron microscopy (HRSEM) (Zeiss Sigma FE‐SEM) for high‐resolution imaging and surface analysis was used to analyze the surface morphology of AgNPs and AuNPs. The fluorescence characteristics of AgNPs and AuNPs were assessed using a Shimadzu RF‐6000 spectrofluorometer with excitation at 400 nm and emission at 900 nm, which confirmed the optical properties of the nanoparticles.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. FTIR Analysis
Figure 2 displays the FTIR spectra of Sclerocarya birrea and Moringa oleifera stem extracts, as well as the AgNPs and AuNPs derived from these extracts. The spectra demonstrate that comparable or identical functional groups in both stem extracts facilitated the binding and reduction of Ag+ and Au3+ ions to AgNPs and AuNPs, respectively. Absorbance peaks were detected within the ranges of 3000–3500, 2800–3000, 1626, 1400–1550, 1380–1403, and 1000–1100 cm−1, correlating with the functional groups involved in the reduction of metal salts to nanoparticles. The identified peaks are ascribed to the stretching vibrations of hydroxyl groups in alcohols or phenolic compounds, CH2 and CH3 groups, aromatic compound C=C bonds, carboxylic acid C=O groups, amide I (CONHk) and amide II (CONH) groups, geminal methyl, ether linkages, and C—O or C—O—C functional groups [23]. In the spectra of the comparable silver nanoparticles (AgNPs), these peaks seemed to be absent or had markedly diminished intensity. This suggests that functional groups in these areas are essential for the reduction and stability of AgNPs and AuNPs by subsequent oxidation. In the spectra of gold nanoparticles, these peaks were absent, and some were present and more pronounced than on the AgNPs spectra of both Sclerocarya birrea and Moringa oleifera. Furthermore, ether linkages, along with C—O and C—O—C functional groups, are linked to flavones, terpenoids, and polysaccharides present in plant biomass. The surface of AgNPs and AuNPs synthesized from plant extracts of medicinal plants has also been found to contain these functional groups [22, 25].
FIGURE 2.

FTIR spectra of gold nanoparticles (I) and silver nanoparticles (II) derived from the stem extracts of Sclerocarya birrea (Marula) and Moringa oleifera.
3.2. XRD Analysis
The analysis of XRD was used to ascertain the purity and crystalline structure of AgNPs and AuNPs. The spectra validated the purity of the synthesized gold and silver nanoparticles, as illustrated in Figure 3 (AuNPs and AgNPs, respectively). Diffraction peaks observed at 2θ values of 38.07°, 44.29°, 64.45°, 77.43°, and 81.66° correspond to the crystal planes (111), (200), (220), (311), and (222) of metallic gold, as depicted in Figure 3A,B. The observed peaks confirm the formation of a face‐centered cubic (FCC) structure in the AuNPs, a process enabled by the reduction of Au+ and Ag+ ions by Moringa and Marula extracts. The observed peaks exhibit a strong correlation with the reference powder data from JCPDS file number 04–0783. Furthermore, the Moringa and Marula extracts within AuNPs demonstrated an amorphous structure, as indicated by a low‐intensity peak at 2θ = 24.13° (002) in Figure 3A,B. The indeterminate characteristics can be ascribed to the variety of chemical compounds found within the extracts of Moringa oleifera stems [25, 28]. The XRD pattern of the synthesized AgNPs, Marula‐AgNPs, and Moringa‐AgNPs in Figure 3C,D exhibited Bragg reflection peaks at 2θ values of 32.16°, 38.12°, 44.3°, 46.21°, 64.42°, 77.45°, and 84°. The observed peaks align with the (210), (111), (200), (231), (220), (311), and (222) planes of pure silver, which are indexed to a FCC crystalline structure of metallic silver, as corroborated by JCPDS file No. 04–0783. The indeterminate characteristics of the Moringa oleifera stem and Marula stem extracts within the AgNPs were clearly illustrated by a broad, low‐intensity peak at 2θ = 23.98° (002) in Figure 3C,D. The XRD spectra demonstrated the successful synthesis of gold and silver nanoparticles (AuNPs and AgNPs) derived from the stem extracts of Marula and Moringa oleifera, both demonstrating crystalline structures. Several low‐intensity unassigned peaks, illustrated in Figure 3A–D, are ascribed to the crystallization of bio‐organic molecules on the surfaces of the AuNPs and AgNPs from the stem extract [29, 30]. The crystalline dimensions of the AgNPs and AuNPs were determined through an analysis of the broadening of the significant peaks at 2θ = 38.07° (111) for Moringa‐AgNPs and 2θ = 37.73° (111) for Moringa‐AuNPs, and 2θ = 38.07° (111) for Marula‐AgNPs and 2θ = 37.73° (111) for Marula‐AuNPs, utilizing the Debye–Scherrer equation
FIGURE 3.

XRD spectra of AgNPs (C and D) and AuNPs (A and B) derived from Marula and Moringa oleifera stem extracts.
| (1) |
d represents the average crystalline size, k denotes the Scherrer constant (0.9), λ signifies the X‐ray wavelength (0.154 nm), and β indicates the full width at half maximum of the peaks measured in radians. The determined average crystalline sizes for AgNPs and AuNPs from Marula and Moringa were found to be 11.12 and 18.28 nm, respectively. Both plants have similar values of crystalline sizes, as they have similar plane fractions [31, 32].
3.3. UV Spectroscopy Analysis (UV–Vis) Analysis
UV–VIs spectroscopy is a vital technique for assessing the formation and stability of metal nanoparticles in aqueous solutions. The known correlation between the absorbance properties of UV–visible light, size, and configuration of the absorbing material facilitates the assessment of nanoparticle morphology in suspension [33, 34]. The Ag and Au nanoparticles synthesized from Moringa oleifera water stem extract and Marula extract were analyzed using UV–VIs absorption spectroscopy. Figure 4 shows the results of UV–Vis from Moringa oleifera and Marula stem extracts. The UV–Vis absorption spectra of AgNPs (Figure 4Ib,IIb) derived from both plants display two broad peaks between 428 and 443 nm and a low‐intensity peak at 278 and 280 nm, thereby confirming the synthesis of AgNPs, with plant extracts serving as both stabilizing and reducing agents. During the synthesis, the plant extract's phytochemicals, such as polyphenols, flavonoids, and alkaloids, act as reducing agents, converting Au3+ ions to Au0 and Ag+ to Ag0. The synthesis of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) was confirmed by a notable color change from yellow to ruby red, a defining attribute of ultrasmall colloidal AuNPs, while silver nanoparticles were confirmed by a notable color change to black. The predominant formation of spherical silver nanoparticles or an increasing proportion of anisotropic particles over time was indicated by the observation of a maximal absorbance peak at 428 and 443 nm. The synthesis of AuNPs from Marula and Moringa (Figure 4Ic,IIc) was validated by two absorption peaks at 542 and 548 nm, indicative of the absorption characteristics of metallic gold nanoparticles [35, 36]. The peaks identified within the 200–330 nm range (Figure 4Ia,IIa) correspond to phytochemicals extracted from Moringa oleifera and Marula. The anticipated outcome is due to the lack of nanoparticles in the aqueous extracts, which negates any absorbance associated with nanoparticles. Silver and gold nanoparticles are recognized for their distinctive reddish‐brown color in aqueous solution, attributed to the activation of surface plasmon vibrations. The emergence of this coloration in the reaction vessels verifies the synthesis of silver and gold nanoparticles. Silver nitrate and gold chloride function as salt precursors for the synthesis of silver and gold nanoparticles, utilizing distinct qualities such as strong conductivity, catalytic activity, and chemical stability [37, 38, 39, 40].
FIGURE 4.

UV–visible spectra of silver nanoparticles derived from Marula extract (Ib and IIb) and (Ic and IIc) gold nanoparticles derived from Moringa oleifera stem extract (MOST).
3.4. Particle Size Distribution and Zeta Potential Analysis
3.4.1. Particle Size Distribution Analysis
The measurements of particle size acquired through DLS denote the hydrodynamic diameter (nm) of nanoparticles within a liquid dispersion. The synthesized silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) derived from Sclerocarya birrea and Moringa oleifera stem extracts (Figure 5) demonstrated hydrodynamic sizes of between 10 and 80 nm, whereas the gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) were measured at 15 and 95 nm, respectively. The DLS results obtained were comparable to the previously reported sizes of 77 and 105 nm for different green synthesized nanoparticles, as reported by Nune et al. and Lediga et al. 0.329 [41, 42]. In this study, the synthesized silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) demonstrated polydispersity index (PDI) values of 0.329 for Moringa AgNPs and 0.363 for Sclerocarya birrea (Marula) AgNPs. Similarly, the gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) exhibited PDI values of 0.341 for Marula and 0.325 for Moringa, respectively. The values presented suggest a significant level of polydispersity, accompanied by a negligible likelihood of aggregation. A PDI value surpassing 0.5 indicates the occurrence of nanoparticle aggregation within the solution, resulting in instability. Consequently, these findings confirm the effective stabilization of the AgNPs synthesized from the selected medicinal plant species [43].
FIGURE 5.

Particle size distribution of as‐synthesized AgNPs (A) and AuNPs (B) derived from Marula and Moringa oleifera stems water extracts.
3.4.2. Zeta Potential Analysis
The surface zeta potential is a crucial parameter to measure the stability of nanoparticle dispersions in aqueous environments and acts as an indicator of their long‐term stability [44]. Nanoparticles characterized by a high zeta potential demonstrate significant electrostatic repulsion, thereby minimizing the potential for aggregation. The silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) derived from Sclerocarya birrea (Marula) and Moringa extracts exhibited negative charges, displaying zeta potentials of −11.3 and −12.2 mV, respectively, as shown in Figure 6. Comparably, the gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) derived from Marula and Moringa exhibited zeta potentials of −12.5 and −10.6 mV, respectively. The values demonstrate efficient electrostatic repulsion, thereby reducing the likelihood of nanoparticle aggregation [45].
FIGURE 6.

Zeta potential of as‐synthesized AgNPs (A) and AuNPs (B) derived from Marula and Moringa oleifera stems' water extracts.
3.5. TEM Analysis
Figure 7 illustrates the TEM micrographs of the synthesized gold (AuNPs) and silver (AgNPs) nanoparticles synthesized from Sclerocarya birrea and Moringa oleifera, displayed at various magnifications. The micrographs of plant‐derived AgNPs and AuNPs presented in Figure 7IA–D are for Marula and Moringa oleifera AgNPs, and Figure 7IIE–H are for Marula and Moringa oleifera AuNPs, respectively. The micrographs illustrate a variety of morphologies, encompassing spherical, rod‐shaped, cubic, cylindrical, irregular, and other anisotropic forms, with an average particle size spanning from 10 to 50 nm. Similarly, the TEM micrographs of plant‐derived AuNPs from Marula and Moringa, as illustrated in Figure 7IIE–H, demonstrate their crystalline nature, depicting a range of shapes including spherical, nanorods, cubic, triangular, decahedral, icosahedral, and hexagonal plate structures, with dimensions ranging from 5 to 30 nm. These results correlate with the average nanoparticle size discovered by Zeta Sizer measurements, about 100 nm. TEM provides the size of individual nanoparticles, while Zeta Sizer determines the average hydrodynamic diameter, including aggregated particles. Thus, compared to those observed under TEM, nanoparticles measured with the Zeta Sizer appear larger, but they fall in the 100 nm range. The morphological characteristics observed are indicative of nanoparticles synthesized from plant extracts [46, 47]. The nanoparticles demonstrate a well‐dispersed nature, showing minimal signs of agglomeration, which is further corroborated by the zeta potential analysis.
FIGURE 7.

TEM micrographs for AgNPs (I) and AuNPs (II) derived from Sclerocarya birrea and Moringa oleifera stem extracts.
3.6. Spectrophotometer Analysis
The emission fluorescence properties for silver (AgNPs) and gold (AuNPs) nanoparticles derived from Moringa oleifera and Marula stem extracts were analyzed, with the results illustrated in Figure 8. The emission and excitation characteristics of gold and silver nanoparticles synthesized from plant extracts are influenced by their size and morphology [48]. The Zetasizer analysis indicates that the nanoparticles have hydrodynamic diameters between 10 and 90 nm. As the size of the nanoparticles increases, the SPR peak shifts to longer wavelengths (redshift) as a result of enhanced plasmonic coupling and radiative damping. The emission and excitation intensity are predominantly influenced by surface plasmon resonance (SPR), which is significantly contingent upon the size and shape of nanoparticles, as evidenced by UV–VIs spectroscopy [49, 50]. However, the emission spectra for AgNPs and AuNPs exhibit notable differences due to the difference in optical properties of silver and gold. The silver nanoparticles derived from Moringa and Marula demonstrated a higher excitation peak under UV light, which is referred to as the SPR peak, in comparison to their gold nanoparticle peaks. SPR occurs when conduction electrons on the nanoparticle surface oscillate in resonance with incident light, leading to amplified electromagnetic fields at the nanoparticle interface. This effect enhances both dispersion and light absorption [51]. The emission spectra linked to SPR result from electron mobility in nanoparticles and the recombination of electrons between the sp band and d band holes. The emission peaks for silver nanoparticles from Marula and Moringa oleifera are less intense and broader compared to the gold nanoparticles spectra, which is because silver nanoparticles exhibit a greater tendency to quench fluorescence, attributed to their elevated plasmonic energy. Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) exhibited a more pronounced SPR compared to gold nanoparticles when exposed to UV–VIs light, attributed to their elevated free electron density. This explains the higher absorbance peak intensity of AgNPs in the UV–Vis region 400–450 nm, as indicated in Figure 4Ib,IIb [52].
FIGURE 8.

Fluorescence spectra of AuNPs (A and B) and AgNPs (C and D), derived from Marula and Moringa oleifera stem extracts.
Fluorescence quenching of AgNPs is due to their metallic surface interacting with fluorescent molecules such as phytochemicals from Marula and Moringa via a mechanism known as nonradiative energy transfer (FRET) [52, 53]. This results in decrease in fluorescence emission intensity, as shown in Figure 8. Gold nanoparticles demonstrated reduced SPR absorbance in the UV–Vis range of 520–550 nm, as shown in Figure 4Ic,IIc (Ic and IIc); however, they facilitate enhanced radiative energy transfer to fluorescent molecules and result in higher emission fluorescence, as shown in Figure 8. Extracts from plants such as Marula and Moringa are rich in phenolic compounds, flavonoids, and proteins, serving as natural reducing and stabilizing agents. The interaction of these biomolecules with gold nanoparticles may lead to a stronger binding, resulting in the formation of a protective layer that enhances fluorescence emission. Silver nanoparticles exhibit a greater affinity for these biomolecules, leading to the quenching of fluorescence signals [48, 54].
3.7. HRSEM Analysis
Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) and silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) synthesized from Sclerocarya birrea and Moringa oleifera stem extracts were subjected to HRSEM to analyze their surface morphology. The results are shown in Figure 9. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis demonstrated a homogeneous distribution of silver (AgNPs), Figure 9IA–D, and gold (AuNPs) nanoparticles, Figure 9IIE–H, synthesized from Marula and Moringa extracts, respectively, indicating efficient stabilization by plant‐derived capping agents [55]. The Ag and Au nanoparticles primarily exhibited a spherical morphology with little agglomeration, and their sizes varied within the 1–90 nm range. The presence of bigger silver and gold nanoparticles from the micrographs of AgNPs and AuNPs derived from Marula and Moringa may result from the agglomeration of smaller particles, as indicated by SEM observations. Moreover, phytochemicals derived from plant extracts, serving as both reducing and capping agents such as alkaloids, polyphenols, and flavonoids, contribute to particle size by adhering to nanoparticle surfaces, thus affecting their overall size [56].
FIGURE 9.

HRSEM micrographs of AgNPs (I) and AuNPs (II) derived from Sclerocarya birrea and Moringa Oleifera stem extracts.
3.8. Analysis and Detection of Urine Utilizing Marula Stem Water Extract, Moringa oleifera Stem Extract Tryptamine, 4‐Dimethylaminocinnamaldehyde (DMAC), Silver, and Gold Nanoparticles. The Analysis was Conducted under UV Light and Ordinary Light
This study assessed the efficacy of various reagents in improving the identification of urine stains on tile surfaces and paper towels, which are frequently encountered in forensic investigations. Initial analysis indicated that untreated urine stains showed only faint fluorescence under UV light, particularly at 365 nm, as presented in Figure 10D, which is not sufficient for reliable analysis. The incorporation of tryptamine and tryptamine‐coated silver and gold nanoparticles led to a notable increase in fluorescence intensity (Figure 10E–H), highlighting the effectiveness of phytochemical‐assisted nanomaterials in detecting urine. Subsequent analysis (Figure 11) indicated that extracts from Sclerocarya birrea and Moringa oleifera, along with tryptamine, exhibit inherent fluorescence, with a stronger emission at 365 nm, validating their potential as efficient, nondestructive detection agents under UV light.
FIGURE 10.

Analysis and detection of human urine samples by plant extracts and tryptamine compound under UV light at 254 and 365 nm.
FIGURE 11.

Urine stain analysis on tile surface using tryptamine + nanoparticles, Marula, and Moringa extract under UV light at 254 and 365 nm.
The study also assessed the conventional reagent DMAC along with its modified variants, including DMAC‐based plant extracts, as illustrated in Figure 12. Although DMAC alone resulted in magenta color indicating the presence of urine, its fluorescence when exposed to UV light was minimal. Furthermore, since DMAC has the potential to degrade DNA, this negatively impacts its forensic use for the analysis of urine [10, 57, 58, 59]. To overcome this challenge, plant extracts were added to enhance the fluorescence of DMAC while maintaining the integrity of DNA in urine. The incorporation of Sclerocarya birrea extract led to notable visual and fluorescent enhancement: yellow fluorescence at 254 nm, blue fluorescence at 365 nm, and a light green color under ordinary lighting, as illustrated in Figure 12E–G. However, the DMAC‐Moringa oleifera sample appeared clear under regular light, resembling untreated urine. These results suggest that plant extracts can improve DMAC effectiveness without affecting DNA integrity. Additional fluorescence improvement was achieved by adding tryptamine and metal nanoparticles, as illustrated in Figure 13, which displayed strong fluorescence at 365 nm and fainter signals at 254 nm, confirming enhanced detection sensitivity under longer wavelength UV light.
FIGURE 12.

Urine analysis on the tile surfaces using DMAC and DMAC‐based AgNPs and AuNPs was viewed under UV light at 254 and 365 nm.
FIGURE 13.

Analysis of urine under 254 and 365 nm using DMAC enhanced with tryptamine, silver, and gold nanoparticles.
Human urine analysis utilizing paper towel substrates, as illustrated in Figure 14, revealed that DMAC alone produced a faint magenta color, while the incorporation of silver and gold nanoparticles and Moringa extract enhanced this to an intense magenta. Additionally, DMAC enhanced with tryptamine and Sclerocarya birrea extract resulted in a pink‐purple coloration. A new green product, resulting from mixing the DMAC reagent with Sclerocarya birrea extract, was further developed for detecting and analyzing urine on various surfaces, including tiles and paper towels, as illustrated in Figure 15. The color change is associated with the interactions between DMAC and phytochemicals, including polyphenols, flavonoids, and tannins found in Sclerocarya birrea (Marula) extract [60], along with potential complexation with trace metal ions like iron and copper found in the plant extract, which results in the formation of green chromophores through oxidation and coordination processes [61, 62, 63]. DMAC interacts with components of urine (such as urea and ammonia) to result in a magenta chromophore, which is subsequently enhanced by AgNPs and AuNPs through localized SPR, resulting in increased fluorescence at 365 nm and improved signal sensitivity as shown in Scheme 1 [37, 64]. Plant extracts provide strong intrinsic fluorescence due to phytochemicals (like flavonoids, polyphenols, and alkaloids), which increase additional fluorescent complexes with urine constituents and frequently dominate emissions at both 254 and 365 nm. In summary, urine detection is accomplished through the combined effects of DMAC chromophore formation, optical enhancement via nanoparticles, and fluorescent complexes between phytochemicals [65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70] and urine, leading to enhanced visual under UV for forensic urine analysis. In summary, the research illustrates that incorporating plant extracts, tryptamine, AgNPs, and AuNPs significantly improves the sensitivity of urine analysis, especially at 365 nm, while reducing the DNA degradation associated with DMAC. This method offers a cost‐effective, nondestructive, and sustainable solution for forensic urine detection without affecting subsequent DNA analysis.
FIGURE 14.

Analysis of urine on the paper towel under ordinary light using DMAC enhanced with Marula extract, Moringa extract, tryptamine, silver, and gold nanoparticles.
FIGURE 15.

Sclerocarya birrea extract, DMAC, and a single product of DMAC and Sclerocarya birrea.
SCHEME 1.

4‐Dimethylaminocinnamaldehyde (DMAC) + Urea → Schiff Base (which result in magenta color + water as aby product).
3.9. The Study of DNA Integrity and Purity
A DNA analysis study was carried out, with results displayed in Table 1 and Figure 16, to evaluate the integrity of DNA in urine samples before and after analysis with DMAC, plant extracts, AgNPs, and AuNPs for forensic DNA profiling. The urine samples that were not analyzed with DMAC, plant extracts, silver, and gold nanoparticles showed a DNA yield of 19,850 ng/µl (Test 8), while the application of DMAC notably decreased the DNA concentration to 3,600 ng/µl; A260/A280 = 1.204 (Test 9), indicating that the DNA was degraded by DMAC. In contrast, optimized DMAC with nanoparticles and plant extracts, as indicated in Tests 11, 13, and 14, maintained approximately 40% intact DNA, as verified by electrophoresis gels illustrated in Figure 16a,b, which display faint, but solid bands compared to the severe degradation observed in samples treated with DMAC alone. In comparison, saliva, as indicated in Table 1, exhibited significantly higher DNA concentrations in Test 1–7, with untreated saliva presenting 80,050 ng/µl in Test 1, demonstrating good purity (A260/A280 = 1.6–2.0) and clear high‐molecular‐weight bands resulting from a high presence of nucleated cells. These results correlate with electrophoresis gel results for urine DNA analysis reported by Zhi Shan et al. [71]. In contrast, urine DNA quantity was reduced and further affected by the presence of salts, urea, creatinine, and acids that naturally occur in urine [72], which contribute to degradation [73, 74, 75]. In summary, these findings indicate that while DMAC and higher concentrations of silver and gold nanoparticles can degrade DNA, the careful application of plant extracts and nanoparticles at lower concentrations can maintain the integrity of urine DNA, thus facilitating accurate forensic DNA profiling for identifying criminal suspects [72, 76, 77, 78] highlighted.
TABLE 1.
Analysis of DNA concentration and purity in saliva and urine samples after analysis with plant extracts, 4‐dimethylaminocinnamaldehyde (DMAC), silver nanoparticles, and gold nanoparticles.
| Samples | DNA concentration, ng/µl | Avg. absorbance at A260 nm (AU) | Avg. absorbance at A280 nm (AU) | A260/A280 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Saliva | 80, 050 | 1.630 | 0.919 | 1.799 |
| 2. Saliva + moringa extract | 42, 302 | 0.871 | 0.464 | 1.929 |
| 3. Saliva + moringa‐AgNPs | 36, 150 | 0.735 | 0.413 | 1.803 |
| 4. Saliva + moringa‐AuNPs | 28, 200 | 0.567 | 0.323 | 1.762 |
| 5. Saliva + marula‐AgNPs | 22, 750 | 0.724 | 0.411 | 1.832 |
| 6. Saliva + marula‐AuNPs | 28, 550 | 0.602 | 0.364 | 1.715 |
| 7. Saliva + tryptamine | 23, 750 | 0.585 | 0.421 | 1.763 |
| 8. Urine | 19, 850 | 0.396 | 0.218 | 1.813 |
| 9. Urine + DMAC | 3, 600 | 0.080 | 0.046 | 1.204 |
| 10. Urine + DMAC + marula‐AgNPs | 10, 450 | 0.213 | 0.119 | 1.817 |
| 11. Urine + DMAC + marula‐AuNPs | 11, 150 | 0.226 | 0.124 | 1.843 |
| 12. Urine + marula extract | 7, 8500 | 0.213 | 0.373 | 1.743 |
| 13. Urine + DMAC + moringa‐AgNPs | 9, 200 | 0.468 | 0.312 | 1.642 |
| 14. Urine + tryptamine | 10, 750 | 0.313 | 0.416 | 1.747 |
FIGURE 16.

Analysis of DNA integrity using agarose gel electrophoresis following urine analysis with the reagents materials in (A) bright field and (B) dark‐field.
4. Conclusion
This study demonstrates that the synthesis of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) and gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) derived from Marula (Sclerocarya birrea) and Moringa oleifera using an easy, cost‐effective, and eco‐friendly technique improves urine analysis efficacy. The synthesized AgNPs and AuNPs demonstrated significant stability, with FTIR analysis indicating that phytochemicals from Marula and Moringa were vital in the reduction and stabilization of AgNPs and AuNPs. XRD analysis verified that the resultant nanoparticles had a crystalline structure, as demonstrated by the presence of the FCC phase. The study of particle size distribution and zeta potential indicated that the synthesized AgNPs and AuNPs exhibited diameters between 5 and 90 nm and possessed a negative charge, which is ascribed to their derivation from plant extracts. Moreover, these nanoparticles, along with Marula and Moringa stem extracts, were effectively utilized for urine analysis at crime scenes. A higher fluorescence signal was detected as a result of the interaction between urea and phytochemical substances, such as polyphenols, alkaloids, and flavonoids. 4‐Dimethylaminocinnamaldehyde (DMAC) alone could detect urine, but its fluorescence intensity appeared weak. The use of AgNPs and AuNPs derived from Marula and Moringa markedly improved the signal intensity. The results indicate that Marula and Moringa extracts, in conjunction with AgNPs and AuNPs, are effective, nontoxic alternatives for urine detection in forensic applications. The analysis of DNA integrity revealed that urine inherently has lower DNA concentrations compared to saliva, and extracting DNA from urine poses difficulties owing to its acidic environment and the presence of substances such as urea and creatinine that lead to degradation of DNA. The research demonstrated that 4‐dimethylaminocinnamaldehyde (DMAC) caused DNA degradation, whereas silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) and gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) showed protective properties against the damage induced by DMAC. While a higher concentration of nanoparticles and plant extracts was observed to damage DNA, carefully optimized concentrations successfully maintained DNA integrity.
Author Contributions
Leah: conceptualization, methodology, visualization, and writing original draft preparation. Eswaran Prabakaran: methodology, editing, and interpretation of experimental data. Pillay and Komane: supervision, reviewing, editing, visualization, project administration, resources, and conceptualization.
Funding
This study was supported by the National Research Foundation (SRUG2204082701).
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the National Research Foundation (NRF) for funding this research and the University of Johannesburg for providing the facilities.
Contributor Information
Kriveshini Pillay, Email: kriveshinip@uj.ac.za.
Phogothi Patrick Komane, Email: patrickk@uj.ac.za.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.
References
- 1. Novelli B. C., “A Review of Substances Reported to cause False Positives and Negatives in Forensic Blood Identification Tests,” (Master's thesis, Boston University, 2020), https://www.proquest.com/dissertations‐theses/review‐substances‐reported‐cause‐false‐positives/docview/2503956943/se‐2?accountid=48944. [Google Scholar]
- 2. Hager E., Farber C., and Kurouski D., “Forensic Identification of Urine on Cotton and Polyester Fabric with a Hand‐Held Raman Spectrometer,” Forensic Chemistry 9 (2018): 44–49, 10.1016/j.forc.2018.05.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Lin H., Zhang Y., Wang Q., Li B., Huang P., and Wang Z., “Estimation of the Age of Human Bloodstains under the Simulated Indoor and Outdoor Crime Scene Conditions by ATR‐FTIR Spectroscopy,” Scientific Reports 7, no. 1 (2017): 13254, 10.1038/s41598-017-13725-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Yamamoto S., Takeuchi A., Yoshida Y., Nishinoiri O., Ichiba M., and Miyauchi H., “Assessment of Dermal Exposure to N, N‐Dimethylacetamide in Spray Workers by Combining Personal Exposure Monitoring, Biological Monitoring, and Glove Permeation Monitoring: A Pilot Study,” Journal of Occupational Health 63, no. 1 (2021): e12265, 10.1002/1348-9585.12265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Bigos M., Investigating the Use of SALIgAE to Identify Expirated Blood on Various Material, 2021, https://digitalcommons.newhaven.edu/honorstheses?utm_source=digitalcommons.newhaven.edu%2Fhonorstheses%2F6&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages.
- 6. Illiano A., Arpino V., Pinto G., et al., “Multiple Reaction Monitoring Tandem Mass Spectrometry Approach for the Identification of Biological Fluids at Crime Scene Investigations,” Analytical Chemistry 90, no. 9 (2018): 5627–5636, 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b04742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Doty K. C. and Lednev I. K., “Differentiation of Human Blood from Animal Blood Using Raman Spectroscopy: A Survey of Forensically Relevant Species,” Forensic Science International 282 (2018): 204–210, 10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.11.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Alula M. T., Karamchand L., Hendricks N. R., and Blackburn J. M., “Citrate‐Capped Silver Nanoparticles as a Probe for Sensitive and Selective Colorimetric and Spectrophotometric Sensing of Creatinine in Human Urine,” Analytica Chimica Acta 1007 (2018): 40–49, 10.1016/j.aca.2017.12.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Zapata F., de la Ossa M.Á.F., and García‐Ruiz C., “Emerging Spectrometric Techniques for the Forensic Analysis of Body Fluids,” TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 64 (2015): 53–63, 10.1016/j.trac.2014.08.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Ong S. Y., Wain A., Groombridge L., and Grimes E., “Forensic Identification of Urine Using the DMAC Test: A Method Validation Study,” Science & Justice 52, no. 2 (2012): 90–95, 10.1016/j.scijus.2011.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Vyas B., Halamkova L., and Lednev I. K., “A Universal Test for the Forensic Identification of All Main Body Fluids including Urine,” Forensic Chemistry 20 (2020): 100247, 10.1016/j.forc.2020.100247. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Ismail M., Xiangke W., Cazzato G., et al., “Role of Silver Nanoparticles in Fluorimetric Determination of Urea in Urine Samples,” Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy 271 (2022): 120889, 10.1016/j.saa.2022.120889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Elmasry M. R., Shaban S. M., Elbalaawy A. Y., et al., “Fluorometric and Colorimetric Hybrid Carbon‐Dot Nanosensors for Dual Monitoring of Urea,” ACS Applied Nano Materials 6, no. 9 (2023): 7992–8003, 10.1021/acsanm.3c01247. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Semong O. and Batlokwa B. S., “Morula Leaf Extract Mediated Synthesi s of Silver Nanoparticles and Their Application in the Analysis of SCN− Based on Inhibition of the Nanozyme Activity on 3, 3’, 5, 5’‐tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) by the Silver Nanoparticles,” Journal Of Food Chemistry And Nanotechnology 5, no. 4 (2022): 192–200, 10.17756/jfcn.2022-140. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Nyoni S., Muzenda E., and Mukaratirwa‐Muchanyereyi N., “Characterization and Evaluation of Antibacterial Activity of Silver Nanoparticles Prepared from Sclerocarya Birrea Stem B Ark and Leaf Extracts,” Nano Biomedicine and Engineering 11, no. 1 (2019): 28–34, 10.5101/nbe.v11i1.p28-34. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Alula M. T., Madingwane M. L., Yan H., Lemmens P., Zhe L., and Etzkorn M., “Biosynthesis of Bifunctional Silver Nanoparticles for Catalytic Reduction of Organic Pollutants and Optical Monitoring of Mercury (II) Ions Using Their Oxidase‐Mimic Activity,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research 29, no. 54 (2022): 81938–81953, 10.1007/s11356-022-21619-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Khunoana S., Parani S., Oluwafemi O. S., Ndinteh D. T., and Pillay K., “Synthesis of Gold Nanoparticles Using Crinum Macowanii Bulb Extracts and the Application of These Materials in Blood Detections at Crime Scenes,” Luminescence 35, no. 2 (2020): 187–195, 10.1002/bio.3710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Mojela N. L., Pillay K., and Komane P. P., “Comparative Study of Silver and Gold Nanoparticles Derived from Sclerocarya Birrea Stem Extract in Forensic Blood Detection,” Forensic Science International 384 (2026): 112913, 10.1016/j.forsciint.2026.112913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Mojela N. L., Pillay K., Kumar P., Choonara Y. E., Parboosing R., and Komane P. P., “Treatment of Influenza Virus A by Exosomes and Gold Nanoparticles Derived from Moringa Stem Extract,” Scientific African 32 (2026): e03370, 10.1016/j.sciaf.2026.e03370. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Mojela N. L., “Synthesis and Application of Ag‐Nanoparticles from Local Plant Extracts for Detection of ‘BLOOD’ at Crime Scenes,” (Doctoral dissertation, University of Johannesburg, 2022), https://hdl.handle.net/10210/503977. [Google Scholar]
- 21. Sinthumule N. I. and Mzamani L. C. M., “Communities and Conservation: Marula Trees (Sclerocarya Birrea subsp. Caffra) Under Communal Management at Matiyane Village, Limpopo Province South Africa,” Tropical Conservation Science 12 (2019): 1940082919828969, 10.1177/1940082919828969. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Mohammed G. M., Hawar S. N., and Ali S., “Green Biosynthesis of Silver Nanoparticles from Moringa Oleifera Leaves and Its Antimicrobial and Cytotoxicity Activities,” International Journal of Biomaterials 2022 (2022): 1–10, 10.1155/2022/4136641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Moodley J. S., Krishna S. B. N., Pillay K., Sershen, and Govender P., “Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles from Moringa Oleifera Leaf Extracts and Its Antimicrobial Potential,” Advances in Natural Sciences: Nanoscience and Nanotechnology 9 (2018): 015011, 10.1088/2043-6254/aaabb2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Logeswari P., Silambarasan S., and Abraham J., “Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Plants Extract and Analysis of Their Antimicrobial Property,” Journal of Saudi Chemical Society 19, no. 3 (2015): 311–317, 10.1016/j.jscs.2012.04.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Boruah J. S., Devi C., Hazarika U., et al., “Green Synthesis of Gold Nanoparticles Using an Antiepileptic Plant Extract: In Vitro Biological and Photo‐Catalytic Activities,” RSC Advances 11, no. 45 (2021): 28029–28041, 10.1039/d1ra02669k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Alhumaydhi F. A. and Murthy H. C. A., “Green Synthesis of Gold Nanoparticles Using Extract of Pistacia Chinensis and Their In Vitro and In Vivo Biological Activities,” Journal of Nanomaterials 2022, no. 1 (2022): 5544475, 10.1155/2022/5544475. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Botteon C. E. A., Silva L. B., Ccana‐Ccapatinta G. V., et al., “Biosynthesis and Characterization of Gold Nanoparticles Using Brazilian Red Propolis and Evaluation of Its Antimicrobial and Anticancer Activities,” Scientific Reports 11, no. 1 (2021): 1974, 10.1038/s41598-021-81281-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Mehta B. K., Chhajlani M., and Shrivastava B. D., “Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles and Their Characterization by XRD,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 836 (2017): 012050, 10.1088/1742-6596/836/1/012050. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Abel S., Tesfaye J. L., Shanmugam R., et al., “Green Synthesis and Characterizations of Zinc Oxide (ZnO) Nanoparticles Using Aqueous Leaf Extracts of Coffee (Coffea arabica) and Its Application in Environmental Toxicity Reduction,” Journal of Nanomaterials 2021, no. 1 (2021): 4525770, 10.1155/2021/3413350. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Ahmad T., Wani I. A., Manzoor N., Ahmed J., and Asiri A. M., “Biosynthesis, Structural Characterization and Antimicrobial Activity of Gold and Silver Nanoparticles,” Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 107 (2013): 227–234, 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Abdelmegeed A. I., “Biofabrication and Structural Characterization of Cd‐Nanoparticles Using Moringa Oleifera Extract,” Journal of Electronic Materials 49 (2020): 3417–3426, 10.1007/s11664-020-08004-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Bindhu M. R. and Umadevi M., “Silver and Gold Nanoparticles for Sensor and Antibacterial Applications,” Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy 128 (2014): 37–45, 10.1016/j.saa.2014.02.119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Sharmila G., Sakthi Pradeep R., Sandiya K., et al., “Biogenic Synthesis of CuO Nanoparticles Using Bauhinia Tomentosa Leaves Extract: Characterization and Its Antibacterial Application,” Journal of Molecular Structure 1165 (2018): 288–292, 10.1016/j.molstruc.2018.04.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Chen J. L., Yang P. C., Wu T., and Lin Y. W., “Determination of Mercury (II) Ions Based on Silver‐Nanoparticles‐Assisted Growth of Gold Nanostructures: UV‐Vis and Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering Approaches,” Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy 199 (2018): 301–307, 10.1016/j.saa.2018.03.077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Riazunnisa K., “Antimicrobial Activity of Biosynthesized Silver Nanoparticles of Bauhinia Racemosa Leaf Extracts,” Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology 16, no. 2 (2023): 745–749, 10.52711/0974-360X.2023.00127. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Tetgure S. R., Borse A. U., Sankapal B. R., Garole V. J., and Garole D. J., “Green Biochemistry Approach for Synthesis of Silver and Gold Nanoparticles Using Ficus Racemosa Latex and Their pH‐Dependent Binding Study with Different Amino Acids Using UV/Vis Absorption Spectroscopy,” Amino Acids 47, no. 4 (2015): 757–765, 10.1007/s00726-014-1906-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Sebastian D. and Fleming A. T., “Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles from Bauhinia Acuminata Aqueous Leaf Extract and Molecular Docking Analysis of Various Cancer Receptors,” International Journal of Scientific Research 6 (2017): 50–55, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/345325187_Synthesis_of_Silver_Nanoparticles_from_Bauhinia_acuminata_Aqueous_Leaf_Extract_and_Molecular_Docking_Analysis_of_Various_Cancer_Receptors. [Google Scholar]
- 38. Mukundan D., Mohankumar R., and Vasanthakumari R., “Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Leaves Extract of Bauhinia Tomentosa Linn and Its Invitro Anticancer Potential,” Materials Today: Proceedings 2, no. 9 (2015): 4309–4316, 10.1016/j.matpr.2015.10.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Ramar K., Gnanamoorthy G., Mukundan D., Vasanthakumari R., Narayanan V., and Jafar Ahamed A., “Environmental and Antimicrobial Properties of Silver Nanoparticles Synthesized Using Azadirachta Indica Juss Leaves Extract,” SN Applied Sciences 1 (2019): 128, 10.1007/s42452-018-0143-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Ankamwar B., Kamble V., Sur U. K., and Santra C., “Spectrophotometric Evaluation of Surface Morphology Dependent Catalytic Activity of Biosynthesized Silver and Gold Nanoparticles Using UV–vis Spectra: A Comparative Kinetic Study,” Applied Surface Science 366 (2016): 275–283, 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.01.093. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Lediga M. E., Malatjie T. S., Olivier D. K., Ndinteh D. T., and van Vuuren S. F., “Biosynthesis and Characterisation of Antimicrobial Silver Nanoparticles from a Selection of Fever‐Reducing Medicinal Plants of South Africa,” South African Journal of Botany 119 (2018): 172–180, 10.1016/j.sajb.2018.08.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Nune S. K., Chanda N., Shukla R., et al., “Green Nanotechnology from Tea: Phytochemicals in Tea as Building Blocks for Production of Biocompatible Gold Nanoparticles,” Journal of Materials Chemistry 19, no. 19 (2009): 2912–2920, 10.1039/B822015H. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Noruzi M., “Biosynthesis of Gold Nanoparticles Using Plant Extracts,” Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering 38, no. 1 (2015): 1–14, 10.1007/s00449-014-1251-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Bagyalakshmi J. and Sowmiyadevi B., “Characterization and Evaluation of Green Synthesized Silver Nanoparticles Using Moringa Oleifera Leaf Extract and Its Antihypertensive Activity,” Annals of Clinical and Medical Case Reports 13, no. 16 (2024): 01–9, https://acmcasereport.org/wp‐content/uploads/2024/05/ACMCR‐v13‐2195.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- 45. Aouf D., Khane Y., Fenniche F., et al., “Biogenic Silver Nanoparticles of Moringa Oleifera Leaf Extract: Characterization and Photocatalytic Application,” Nanotechnology Reviews 13, no. 1 (2024): 20240002, 10.1515/ntrev-2024-0002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Godfrey I. J., Dent A. J., Parkin I. P., Maenosono S., and Sankar G., “Structure of Gold–Silver Nanoparticles,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C 121, no. 3 (2017): 1957–1963, 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b11186. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Zeiri Y., Elia P., Zach R., Hazan S., Kolusheva S., and Porat Z., “Green Synthesis of Gold Nanoparticles Using Plant Extracts as Reducing Agents,” International Journal of Nanomedicine 9 (2014): 4007–4021, 10.2147/IJN.S57343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Jain S. and Mehata M. S., “Medicinal Plant Leaf Extract and Pure Flavonoid Mediated Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles and Their Enhanced Antibacterial Property,” Scientific Reports 7, no. 1 (2017): 15867, 10.1038/s41598-017-15724-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Khan S. A., Shahid S., and Lee C.‐S., “Green Synthesis of Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Using Leaf Extract of Clerodendrum Inerme; Characterization, Antimicrobial, and Antioxidant Activities,” Biomolecules 10, no. 6 (2020): 835, 10.3390/biom10060835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Gopinath K., Kumaraguru S., Bhakyaraj K., et al., “Green Synthesis of Silver, Gold and Silver/Gold Bimetallic Nanoparticles Using the Gloriosa Superba Leaf Extract and Their Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Activities,” Microbial Pathogenesis 101 (2016): 1–11, 10.1016/j.micpath.2016.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. El‐Semary M. S., Belal F., El‐Emam A. A., El‐Din E. M. R. S., and El‐Masry A. A., “Ginseng Root Extract‐Mediated Synthesis of Monodisperse Silver Nanoparticles as a Fluorescent Probe for the Spectrofluorometric Determination of Nilvadipine; Evaluation of Remarkable Anti‐Bacterial, Anti‐Fungal and in‐Vitro Cytotoxic Activities,” Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy 311 (2024): 124017, 10.1016/j.saa.2024.124017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Panzarasa G., “Shining Light on Nanochemistry Using Silver Nanoparticle‐Enhanced Luminol Chemiluminescence,” Journal of Chemical Education 91, no. 5 (2014): 696–700, 10.1021/ed400736k. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Karabchevsky A., Mosayyebi A., and Kavokin A. V., “Tuning the Chemiluminescence of a Luminol Flow Using Plasmonic Nanoparticles,” Light: Science & Applications 5, no. 11 (2016): e16164, 10.1038/lsa.2016.164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Chirumamilla P., Dharavath S. B., and Taduri S., “Eco‐Friendly Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles from Leaf Extract of Solanum Khasianum: Optical Properties and Biological Applications,” Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 195, no. 1 (2023): 353–368, 10.1007/s12010-022-04156-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Das A., Kumar H., Hariharan S., Thampi S. P., Chandiran A. K., and Basavaraj M. G., “Conducting Gold Nanoparticle Films via Sessile Drop Evaporation,” Langmuir 40, no. 5 (2024): 2510–2518, 10.1021/acs.langmuir.3c02542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Ahmad I., Khan H. U., Jan R., and Khan S. A., “Anisotropic Gold Nanoparticles Crystalizes in Multifaceted Superstructures,” Materials Research Express 6, no. 10 (2019): 105006, 10.1088/2053-1591/ab3540. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Farrugia K. J., Bandey H., Bleay S., and NicDaeid N., “Chemical Enhancement of Footwear Impressions in Urine on Fabric,” Forensic Science International 214, no. 1 (2012): 67–81, 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.07.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Yano R., Shimoda O., Okitsu T., Sakurada M., and Ueno Y., “Development of a Modified p‐Dimethylaminocinnamaldehyde Solution for Touch DNA Analysis and Its Application to STR Analysis,” Forensic Science International Genetics 38 (2019): 86–92, 10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Chuena L. W. and Eea K. B., “Forensic Light Sources for Detection of Biological Evidences in Crime Scene Investigation: A Review,” Malaysian Journal of Forensic Sciences 1 (2010): 17–28, https://forensics.org.my/mjofs/pdf/fssmVol.1No.1/Article04.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- 60. Mojela N. L., Pillay K., and Komane P. P., “Synthesis and Application of Silver Nanoparticles from Lemon Peel Extract and Other Local Plant Extracts for Detection of “blood” at Crime Scene,” Forensic Science International 365 (2024): 112257, 10.1016/j.forsciint.2024.112257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Nilanjuna G., Samrat P., and Piyali B., “Silver Nanoparticles of Moringa Oleifera–green Synthesis, Characterisation and Its Antimicrobial Efficacy,” Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics 11 (2014): 20–25, doi: http://jddtonline.info/. [Google Scholar]
- 62. Julkunen‐Tiitto R., Nenadis N., Neugart S., et al., “Assessing the Response of Plant Flavonoids to UV Radiation: An Overview of Appropriate Techniques,” Phytochemistry Reviews 14, no. 2 (2015): 273–297, 10.1007/s11101-014-9362-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Li L., Chong L., Huang T., Ma Y., Li Y., and Ding H., “Natural Products and Extracts from Plants as Natural UV Filters for Sunscreens: A Review,” Animal Models and Experimental Medicine 6, no. 3 (2023): 183–195, 10.1002/ame2.12295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Anju T. R., Parvathy S., Valiya Veettil M., et al., “Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles from Aloe Vera Leaf Extract and Its Antimicrobial Activity,” Materials Today: Proceedings 43 (2021): 3956–3960, 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.665. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Niziol‐Lukaszewska Z., Furman‐Toczek D., Bujak T., Wasilewski T., and Hordyjewicz‐Baran Z., “Moringa Oleifera L. Extracts as Bioactive Ingredients That Increase Safety of Body Wash Cosmetics,” Dermatology Research and Practice 2020 (2020): 8197902, 10.1155/2020/8197902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Wei X., Li H., Li Z., et al., “Metal‐Enhanced Fluorescent Probes Based on Silver Nanoparticles and Its Application in IgE Detection,” Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 402, no. 3 (2012): 1057–1063, 10.1007/s00216-011-5591-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Pawar S., Bhattacharya A., and Nag A., “Metal‐Enhanced Fluorescence Study in Aqueous Medium by Coupling Gold Nanoparticles and Fluorophores Using a Bilayer Vesicle Platform,” ACS Omega 4, no. 3 (2019): 5983–5990, 10.1021/acsomega.9b00036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Pilipczuk T., Dawidowska N., Kusznierewicz B., Namieśnik J., and Bartoszek A., “Simultaneous Determination of Indolic Compounds in Plant Extracts by Solid‐Phase Extraction and High‐Performance Liquid Chromatography with UV and Fluorescence Detection,” Food Analytical Methods 8, no. 9 (2015): 2169–2177, 10.1007/s12161-015-0106-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 69. El Hamd M. A., El‐Maghrabey M., Almawash S., El‐Shaheny R., and Magdy G., “Self‐Ratiometric Fluorescence Approach Based on Plant Extract‐Assisted Synthesized Silver Nanoparticles for the Determination of Vanillin,” Microchimica Acta 191, no. 1 (2024): 16, 10.1007/s00604-023-06093-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Fardiyah Q., Suprapto, Kurniawan F., Ersam T., Slamet A., Suyanta, “Preliminary Phytochemical Screening and Fluorescence Characterization of Several Medicinal Plants Extract from East Java Indonesia,” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 833 (2020): 012008, 10.1088/1757-899X/833/1/012008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Shan Z., Zhou Z., Chen H., et al., “PCR‐Ready Human DNA Extraction from Urine Samples Using Magnetic Nanoparticles,” Journal of Chromatography B 881 (2012): 63–68, 10.1016/j.jchromb.2011.11.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Nauwelaerts S. J. D., Van Geel D., Delvoye M., et al., “Selection of a Noninvasive Source of Human DNA Envisaging Genotyping Assays in Epidemiological Studies: Urine or Saliva?,” Journal of Biomolecular Techniques : JBT 31, no. 1 (2020): 27, 10.7171/jbt.20-3101-004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Yao W., Mei C., Nan X., and Hui L., “Evaluation and Comparison of In Vitro Degradation Kinetics of DNA in Serum, Urine and Saliva: A Qualitative Study,” Gene 590, no. 1 (2016): 142–148, 10.1016/j.gene.2016.06.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Bryzgunova O. and Laktionov P., “Extracellular Nucleic Acids in Urine: Sources, Structure, Diagnostic Potential,” Acta Naturae 7, no. 3 (2015): 48–54, https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/extracellular‐nucleic‐acids‐in‐urine‐sources‐structure‐diagnostic‐potential/viewer. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Bali L. El, Diman A., Bernard A., Roosens N. H., and De Keersmaecker S. C., “Comparative Study of Seven Commercial Kits for Human DNA Extraction from Urine Samples Suitable for DNA Biomarker‐Based Public Health Studies,” Journal of Biomolecular Techniques: JBT 25, no. 4 (2014): 96, 10.7171/jbt.14-2504-002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. D’angiolella G., Tozzo P., Gino S., and Caenazzo L., “Trick or Treating in Forensics—the Challenge of the Saliva Microbiome: A Narrative Review,” Microorganisms 8, no. 10 (2020): 1501, 10.3390/microorganisms8101501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Upadhyay M., Shrivastava P., Verma K., and Joshi B., “Recent Advancements in Identification and Detection of Saliva as Forensic Evidence: A Review,” Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences 13, no. 1 (2023): 17, 10.1186/s41935-023-00336-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Cianga C. M., Antohe I., Zlei M., Constantinescu D., and Cianga P., “Saliva Leukocytes rather than Saliva Epithelial Cells Represent the Main Source of DNA,” Revista Romana De Medicina De Laborator 24, no. 1 (2016): 31–44, 10.1515/rrlm-2016-0011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.
