Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 2026 Mar 18;201(3):kiag154. doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiag154

OsVPS34-generated PI3P recruits GPA5/Rab5a to regulate post-Golgi glutelin trafficking in rice endosperm

Shanbin Xu 1,#, Mingqing Ma 2,#, Huanhuan Zhao 3, Aoni Zhou 4, Zi Li 5, Bo Li 6, Yuzhe He 7, Guiping Zhang 8, Hongping Cai 9, Chuanwei Gu 10, Ting Yu 11, Xue Yang 12, Lei Zhou 13, Yu Zhang 14, Erchao Duan 15, Xuan Teng 16, Xi Liu 17, Shijia Liu 18, Yunlu Tian 19, Ling Jiang 20, Yulong Ren 21, Yihua Wang 22,✉, Hui Dong 23,4,✉,5,✉, Jianmin Wan 24,25,✉,5,✉
PMCID: PMC13360276  PMID: 41851989

Abstract

Seed storage proteins (SSPs) are stored in protein storage vacuoles (PSVs) within plant endosperm cells. In rice, glutelins undergo post-Golgi trafficking via dense vesicles (DVs) to protein body II (PBII). Phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate (PI3P) regulates endosomal, autophagic, and vacuolar trafficking, yet its role in glutelin transport remains unclear. Here, we characterized the glutelin precursor accumulation14 (gpa14) mutant, which exhibits over-accumulation of 57-kDa glutelin precursors and floury, shrunken endosperm. Map-based cloning identified a single adenine insertion in Vacuolar Protein Sorting 34 (OsVPS34), resulting in a putative truncated protein lacking the PI3Ka and PI3_PI4_kinase domains. OsVPS34 encodes phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), which interacts with other subunits of the PI3K complex to regulate the production of PI3P. PI3P was enriched in the trans-Golgi network (TGN) and prevacuolar compartment (PVC), co-localized with Rab5a and GPA5, and was detected in DVs and PBIIs. In gpa14, PI3P levels were reduced, leading to mis-localization and decreased membrane association of Rab5a and GPA5, key regulators of glutelin trafficking. Our findings demonstrate that OsVPS34 is essential for synthesis of PI3P, which plays a crucial role in recruiting GPA5 and Rab5a to DVs for glutelin post-Golgi trafficking in rice endosperm.


PI3K-dependent PI3P production recruits trafficking regulators Rab5a and GPA5 to dense vesicles and ensures efficient post-Golgi transport of glutelins in rice endosperm.

Introduction

Rice (Oryza sativa L.), a globally important staple crop, relies on seed storage proteins (SSPs) as a crucial nutrient component, second only to starch, comprising approximately 8% to 10% of the dry mass in mature caryopsis (Muthayya et al. 2014; Long et al. 2023). Based on their solubility, SSPs are categorized into glutelin (60% to 80% of total SSPs), prolamin (20% to 30%), globulin (2% to 8%), and albumin (approximately 5%) (Pan and Reeck 1988; Shorrosh et al. 1992; Yang et al. 2019; He et al. 2021). Glutelins are synthesized as 57-kDa precursors, which are subsequently cleaved into 22- to 23-kDa basic subunits and 37- to 39-kDa acidic subunits before being stored in protein body II (PBII) (Ren et al. 2022). In rice endosperm, glutelins undergo a complex trafficking process: they are initially synthesized in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), processed in the Golgi apparatus, and then sorted from the trans-Golgi network (TGN) via dense vesicles (DVs, uniform vesicles approximately 100 to 200 nm in diameter) or storage prevacuolar compartments (sPVCs) to PBⅡ (Wang et al. 2010; Shen et al. 2011; Liu et al. 2013; Pan et al. 2021; Zhang et al. 2025). Within PBII, vacuolar processing enzymes cleave the 57-kDa precursors into their mature subunits, ensuring proper deposition and storage (Wang et al. 2009).

57H mutants characterized by the overaccumulation of the 57-kDa glutelin precursor have been demonstrated to be ideal genetic materials for identifying regulators involved in glutelin trafficking (Takemoto et al. 2002; Ueda et al. 2010; Ren et al. 2022). Endosperm storage protein 2 (ESP2)/PDI, a protein disulfide isomerase, facilitates glutelin folding by forming intramolecular disulfide bonds between glutelin subunits and enables ER export (Takemoto et al. 2002). GPA4/GOT1B (for the Golgi transport 1B), GPA12/(SEC13 homolog A) Sec13a, and GPA13/(Secretion-associated Ras super family 1c) Sar1c have been reported to regulate glutelin export from the ER (Wang et al. 2016, 2024; Bao et al. 2023). Several protein regulators are specifically involved in DV-mediated post-Golgi trafficking, including GPA1/GLUP4/Rab5a, GPA2/GLUP6/VPS9a, GPA3, GPA5, and GPA7. GPA3 recruits GPA2/GLUP6/VPS9a, which functions as a guanine exchange factor (GEF) for GPA1/GLUP2/Rab5a. These proteins form functional complexes to regulate post Golgi trafficking (Ren et al. 2014). GPA5 encodes a protein with an N-terminal PX domain and a C-terminal coiled-coil (CC) domain and functions as the effector of Rab5a to regulate the fusion of DV to PSV (Wang et al. 2010; Liu et al. 2013; Ren et al. 2014). Additionally, the GPA7/MONENSIN SENSITIVITY1-CALCIUM CAFFEINE ZINC SENSITIVITY1 (MON1-CCZ1) complex acts as Rab7-GEF and is involved in post-Golgi trafficking via the sPVC-mediated pathway (Pan et al. 2021). Although these studies have outlined our basic understanding of DV-mediated glutelin sorting in rice, further identification of additional regulator is necessary to deepen our knowledge of glutelin trafficking.

The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases (PI3Ks), initially identified in yeast as Vps34p (Schu et al. 1993), are lipid kinases that catalyze the production of phosphoinositide. PI3K in animals are classified into 3 types, PI3KⅠ, PI3KⅡ, and PI3KⅢ, each synthesizing a distinct phosphoinositide: phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate (PI(3,4,5)P3), phosphatidylinositol 3,4-bisphosphate (PI(3,4)P2), and phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate (PI3P), respectively. Among these, only PI3KⅢ is evolutionarily conserved across animals, plants, yeast, and algae, which exclusively produces PI3P (Liu et al. 2020). In plants, the PI3K complex comprises 4 subunits, 1 kinase vacuolar protein sorting 34 (VPS34) and 3 accessory proteins kinase vacuolar protein sorting 15 (VPS15), kinase vacuolar protein sorting 30 (VPS30) (also known as Beclin 1 or ATG6), along with either kinase vacuolar protein sorting 38 (VPS38) or autophagy-related protein 14 (ATG14). Typically, PI3K complex I (PI3KCI), consisting of VPS34, VPS15, VPS30/ATG6, and ATG14, is primarily involved in autophagy. In contrast, PI3K complex II (PI3KCII), comprising VPS34, VPS15, VPS30/ATG6, and VPS38, functions in the endosomal and vacuolar protein sorting pathways (Itakura et al. 2008; Lee et al. 2018). Notably, PI3KCII is also required for macro-autophagy (one type of autophagic process) induction under nutrient-stressed conditions (Tasnin et al. 2022). In both PI3K complexes, the core subunits, VPS34-VPS15-VPS30/ATG6, are essential for the catalytic activity of PI3K. Both PI3P and PI3K have been reported to regulate normal plant growth, symbiosis, and responses to abiotic and biotic stresses (Lee et al. 2008b; Noack and Jaillais 2017). These regulatory functions have been demonstrated through the disruption of the PI3K complex function through antisense constructs targeting core subunits, tissue-specific expressing PI3P-binding proteins (such as FYVE domain-containing proteins such like Fab1, YOTB, Vac1, and EEA1), or chemical inhibition with wortmannin/LY294002 (Joo et al. 2005; Lee et al. 2008a). However, the lethality of homozygous mutations in VPS34, VPS30/ATG6, and VPS15 presents a major obstacle to fully understanding the functions of PI3K in agronomical trait formation in crops (Fujiki et al. 2007; Qin et al. 2007; Harrison-Lowe and Olsen 2008; Wang et al. 2012).

PI3P is a crucial endomembrane signaling molecule that regulates endosomal, autophagic, and vacuolar/lysosomal trafficking by recruiting effector proteins (Nascimbeni et al. 2017; Wallroth and Haucke 2018). Most of these effectors contain either Fab1, YGL023, Vps27, EEA1, (FYVE) or Phox homology (PX) domains (Noack and Jaillais 2017; Di Sansebastiano et al. 2018; Marshall and Vierstra 2018). PI3P is synthesized by PI3K, which phosphorylates the third position of the phosphatidylinositol (PI) head group. In macro-autophagy, PI3P is enriched in the phagophore membrane, where it facilitates autophagosome expansion and formation by recruiting proteins such as SH3 domain-containing protein 2 (SH3P2), which associates with ATG8-PE (Zhuang et al. 2013). Beyond its role in autophagy, PI3P is also essential for endosomal sorting and vacuolar transport. In animals and yeast, PI3P recruits FYVE domain protein such as Hrs/Vps27p, a key component of the endosomal sorting complexes required for transport (ESCRT) machinery. Hrs/Vps27p interacts with tumor susceptibility gene 101 (Tsg101) to mediate ESCRT-I recruitment to early endosomes (Bache et al. 2003). In plants, FREE1/FYVE1, a PI3P effector, is an integral component of the ESCRT machinery, playing a crucial role in multivesicular body (MVB) biosynthesis and MVB-mediated membrane protein sorting through interactions with ESCRT-I subunit Vps23 (Gao et al. 2014; Kolb et al. 2015; Belda-Palazon et al. 2016). During autophagosome maturation, PI3P-associated ATG8-coated autophagosomes are transported to the vacuole via PI3P effectors such as FYVE domain protein required for endosomal sorting 1 (FREE1)/FYVE1. Additionally, FYVE4, another PI3P effector, interacts with ESCRT-III subunit SNF7 to regulate intraluminal vesicle (ILV) formation within MVBs (Liu et al. 2021). PI3P also participates in the vesicle trafficking and vacuolar sorting pathways by recruiting PI3P-binding proteins, such as ADL6 (PH), NaPCCP (C2), and EpsnR2 (ENTH) (Lee et al. 2002, 2007, 2009). Moreover, in rice, PI3P plays a key role in glutelin trafficking by specifically binding to GPA5 (Ren et al. 2020). However, the precise subcellular localization of PI3P enrichment and how PI3P functions in the post-Golgi trafficking of glutelin remain poorly understood.

In this study, we isolated a mutant from a tissue culture–derived mutagenesis library, named glutelin precursor accumulation 14 (gpa14). Homozygous gpa14 mutant is seedling lethal and exhibits floury, shrunken endosperm, an over-accumulated 57-kDa glutelin precursor, incompletely filled PBII, and abnormal paramural body (PMB) structures in grains. GPA14 encodes phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and was named Vacuolar protein sorting 34 (OsVPS34). We demonstrate that OsVPS34 as a key subunit of the PI3K complex is essential for PI3P production. Using immunogold electron microscopy, PI3P was detected in DV and PBⅡ. Additionally, we found that the PI3P plays a critical role in maintaining the localization of GPA1/Rab5a and GPA5 to the PVC. Overall, our findings characterize the function of OsVPS34 in PI3P production, delineate the assembly of the PI3K complex, and elucidate how PI3P regulates glutelin post-Golgi trafficking from DVs to PBIIs as a signal phosphoinositide in rice.

Results

The gpa14 mutant exhibits over-accumulated 57-kDa glutelin precursor

The gpa14 mutant was isolated from a tissue culture–derived mutagenesis library japonica cv. Ningjing 4. Due to seedling lethality, homozygous gpa14 seeds were obtained from the segregation of heterozygous individuals. These homozygous seeds exhibited a floury, shrunken endosperm (Fig. 1a–d). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of mature seeds revealed that the starch granules in gpa14 were spherical and loosely arranged, in contrast to the tightly packed, polyhedral starch granules observed in the wild type (WT) (Fig. 1e–h). SDS-PAGE analysis of mature seeds from WT and gpa14 showed a marked over-accumulation of 57-kDa glutelin precursors in the mutant, along with reductions in glutelin acidic subunits, glutelin basic subunits, 26-kDa α-globulin, and prolamins (Fig. 1i). The accumulation of glutelin precursors in the gpa14 was further confirmed by immunoblotting with specific antibodies against GluA, GluB, GluC, and GluD (Fig. 1j). In addition, both SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analyses demonstrated decreased levels of globulin and prolamin in gpa14 compared with WT (Fig. 1i, k). As previously reported, an increased abundance of molecular chaperones such as BINDING PROTEIN1 (BiP1) and PDI1-1 typically often suggests the defective ER exit of SSPs (Takemoto et al. 2002; Yasuda et al. 2009; Wang et al. 2016, 2024; Bao et al. 2023). However, we observed no detectable differences in the abundance of BiP1 and PDI1-1 between WT and gpa14, suggesting that overaccumulation of the 57-kDa glutelin precursors in gpa14 is not due to impaired ER exit (Fig. 1l). Therefore, the gpa14 mutation likely affects the trafficking of proglutelins.

Figure 1.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Phenotypic characterization of the gpa14 mutant. a–b) Mature grains of wild type (WT) (a) and gpa14 (b). Scale bars represent 2 mm. c–d) Transverse sections of mature grains from WT (c) and gpa14 (d). Scale bars represent 2 mm. e–h) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of transverse sections of mature grains in WT (e, g) and gpa14 (f, h). Scale bars: 1 mm for panels e and f; 20 µm for panels g and h. i) SDS-PAGE analysis of total proteins from mature seeds of WT and gpa14, visualized by CBB staining. Abbreviations: pGT, unprocessed glutelin precursors; αGT, mature acidic subunits of glutelins; αGlb, 26 kDa α-globulin; βGT, mature basic subunits of glutelins; Pro, prolamins. j) Immunoblot analysis of storage proteins with anti-glutelin subfamily-specific antibodies (GluA/B/C/D). White, black, and red arrows indicate the 57-kDa glutelin precursors, glutelin acidic subunits and glutelin basic subunits, respectively. k–l) Immunoblot analysis of storage proteins with anti-α-globulin and anti-Pro10 antibodies (k) and anti-molecular chaperone (BiP1 and PDI1-1) antibodies (l). Actin served as a loading control in panels (j–l).

The gpa14 mutant exhibits disrupted sorting of storage proteins

To investigate the cytological basis of abnormal glutelin precursor accumulation in the gpa14 mutant, we prepared semi-thin sections of developing endosperm at 12 d after flowering (DAF) for both WT and gpa14. First, we performed Coomassie Brilliant Blue (CBB) staining to visualize proteins in the semi-thin sections. SSPs were predominantly deposited in the sub-aleurone cells of both WT and gpa14 endosperm (Fig. 2a). In WT, SSPs were detected in round-shaped PBI and irregularly shaped PBII structures. However, in the gpa14 mutant, SSPs were missorted to the extracellular space, forming aberrant PMB structures (Fig. 2a). We then measured the PB sizes and found that those in WT were significantly larger than those in the gpa14 mutant (Fig. 2b).

Figure 2.

Figure 2 shows abnormal protein body formation in the gpa14 rice endosperm mutant compared with wild type (WT). Histological and immunofluorescence analyses reveal enlarged and irregular protein bodies, altered glutelin and globulin distribution, and reduced PBII diameter in the mutant endosperm. Panels also show the spatial localization of glutelin-, globulin-, and prolamin-containing protein bodies within starch granules and endosperm cells.

Aberrant sorting of glutelin into PMBs in the gpa14 mutant. a) Light microscopy observation of CBB-stained sections from WT and gpa14 at 12 DAF seeds. The right side of this panel is magnified areas, which displays the black dashed boxes within the images on the left and middle of this panel. Red lines demarcate 3 endosperm cell types: Al, aleurone layer; EN, starch endosperm; Sl, sub-aleurone layer. Asterisks denote PMB structures. Scale bars = 20 µm. b) Quantification of PB diameter at 12 DAF in WT and gpa14 mutant. Within the violin plots, the horizontal black lines indicate the medians, the shape shows the data distribution density, and the red dots represent individual measurements. Asterisks indicate statistically significant difference between WT and gpa14, determined by Student t tests. Data represent mean ± SD (n > 50; **P < 0.01). c–f) Immunofluorescence microscopy of glutelins (green) and α-globulin (magenta) in sub-aleurone layer cells of 12 DAF endosperm in WT and the gpa14 mutant. Blue arrows indicate glutelins, red arrows indicate α-globulin, and white asterisk marks PMB structures. Abbreviations: CW, cell wall; SG, starch granule. Scale bars = 5 µm. g–j) Immunofluorescence microscopy of glutelin (green) and prolamins (magenta) in sub-aleurone layer cells of 12 DAF endosperm in WT and the gpa14 mutant. Blue arrows indicate PBIIs, magenta arrows denote PBIs, and white asterisks mark the PMB structures. Scale bars = 5 µm. k–l) Quantification of PBI (k) and PBII (l) diameters. Asterisks indicate statistically significant difference between WT and gpa14, determined by Student t tests. Data represent mean ± SD (n > 50; ns, not significant, P > 0.05; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01).

To further investigate the subcellular distribution of SSPs in WT and the gpa14 mutant, we performed double immunofluorescence labeling on developing endosperm at 12 DAF using antibodies specific to glutelins, α-globulin, and prolamins. Additionally, the cell wall was stained by calcofluor white. In WT, glutelins (green fluorescence) and α-globulin (magenta fluorescence) accumulated in the PBⅡs (Fig. 2c–d, g–h; Fig. S1a–b), with α-globulin specifically localized to the periphery of PBIIs (Fig. 2c–d). Prolamins (magenta fluorescence) were exclusively sequestered in PBIs (Fig. 2g–j; Fig. S1). However, in the gpa14 mutant, some glutelins and α-globulin abnormally accumulated around the cell wall, forming PMB structures (Fig. 2e–f, i–j; Fig. S1c–d). Moreover, glutelins and α-globulin were mislocalized together (Fig. 2e–f), whereas prolamins were not apparently affected (Fig. 2i–j; Fig. S1c–d). Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference in PBI size between the WT and gpa14 (Fig. 2k), In contrast, PBⅡ sizes were significantly smaller in the gpa14 mutant compared with WT (Fig. 2l). These observations are consistent with the CBB staining results, indicating that the reduction in PB size is primarily due to smaller PBIIs rather than PBIs.

The gpa14 mutant results in abnormal sorting after DV budding

To better understand the ultrastructural effects of the gpa14 mutation, we performed transmission electron microscopy (TEM) to compare subcellular structures in developing endosperm at 12 DAF. In WT, we observed well-filled, irregularly shaped PBIIs (3 to 4 µm in diameter) and spherical PBⅠs (1 to 2 µm in diameter) surrounded by rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER) (Fig. 3a). Similarly, in gpa14 endosperm, spherical PBⅠs surrounded by RER were present. However, we observed thickened cell walls and incompletely filled PBⅡs compartments (Fig. 3b). The morphology of the ER showed no noticeable differences between WT and gpa14 (Fig. 3c, d). DVs are known to be key carriers for sorting of storage proteins which are approximately 100 to 200 nm in diameter (Wang et al. 2010; Liu et al. 2013; Zhang et al. 2025). DVs were budding from the TGN were detected in both WT and gpa14 mainly according to the vesicle's diameter and subcellular location (Fig. 3e, f). However, compared with WT, some DVs in gpa14 were missecreted around the plasma membrane (PM), and electron-dense swollen structures were observed in the extracellular spaces (ECS) adjacent to the cell walls (Fig. 3g–j). These electron-dense structures, known as PMBs, resemble those previously identified in 57H mutants gpa1, gpa3, gpa5, and glup6 (Wang et al. 2010; Liu et al. 2013; Wen et al. 2015; Ren et al. 2020). Combining these observations with results from double immunofluorescence labeling (Fig. 2c–j), we suggested that PMB structures in the gpa14 mutant result from the missorting of glutelins, globulin and cell wall components into the ECS (Fig. 3i, j). Furthermore, given that BiP1 and PDI1-1 protein levels in gpa14 mutant were comparable to those in WT (Fig. 1l), we propose that the accumulation of 57-kDa glutelin precursors in the gpa14 mutant arises from the defects in DV-mediated post-Golgi trafficking.

Figure 3.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

TEM analysis of sub-aleurone layer cells in the developing endosperm of WT and gpa14 mutant. a–b) TEM images showing PBⅠs and PBⅡs in sub-aleurone layer cells of 12 DAF endosperm in WT (a) and gpa14 mutant (b). Abbreviations: CW, cell wall; PBⅠ, protein body Ⅰ; PBⅡ, protein body Ⅱ; SG, starch granule. c–d) ER morphology in WT (c) and gpa14 mutant (d). ER, endoplasmic reticulum. e–f) Golgi morphology in WT (e) and gpa14 mutant (f). G, Golgi apparatus. g–h) Presence of PMB structures in gpa14. The red dotted line marks the PMB. i–j) Cell wall structures in WT and gpa14 mutant. The red bidirectional arrow indicates the thickness of the cell wall. Abbreviations: CW, cell wall; DV, dense vesicle. Scale bars: 2 µm for panels a, b and g; 500 nm for panels c–f and h–j.

Map-based cloning of the gene responsible for the gpa14 phenotype

To investigate the genetic basis control underlying the gpa14 phenotypes, we conducted segregation ratio analysis and map-based cloning. An F2 population was generated by crossing the heterozygous gpa14 (+/−) mutant and the indica variety N22. Through SDS-PAGE analysis, we identified 12 individuals from the F2 population that exhibited 57H phenotype with floury, shrunken endosperm. DNA was extracted from these seeds for primary gene-mapping, and the GPA14 locus initially was localized to a 2.1- to 5.5-Mb region on chromosome 5 between the markers N5-7 and IN5-3 (Fig. 4a). Due to the limited number of recessive individuals in the F2 population, we performed de novo sequencing analysis to identify variations between WT and gpa14. A single thymine insertion was identified in the fourth exon of Os05g0180600 in the initial mapping interval, which resulted in a premature stop codon of this gene (Table S1; Fig. 4b–c). Os05g0180600 encodes phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, known as VPS34 based on its yeast ortholog. OsVPS34 consists of 814 amino acids with the PI3K_C2, PI3Ka, and PI3_PI4_Kinase domains. The gpa14 mutation led to the deletion of the C terminal 655 amino acids (Fig. 4d).

Figure 4.

Figure 4 shows the map-based cloning and functional characterization of GPA14/OsVPS34 in rice. The figure includes genetic mapping of the GPA14 locus on chromosome 5, identification of a frameshift insertion mutation in Os05g0180600, predicted truncation of the OsVPS34 protein, and complementation analysis using transgenic lines. Phenotypic, histological, protein, and ultrastructural analyses demonstrate that expression of OsVPS34 restores normal grain appearance, storage protein accumulation, and endosperm structure in the gpa14 mutant.

Map-based cloning of GPA14. a) The GPA14 locus was initially mapped to 2.1 to 5.5 Mb region on chromosome 5 between the markers N5-7 and IN5-3. b) Whole-genome variation analysis through resequencing identified a single nucleotide insertion in an exon within the primary mapping interval. c) Schematic representation of the Os05g0180600 gene structure and its mutation in the gpa14 mutant. White boxes denote untranslated regions (UTRs), black boxes indicate exons, and lines represent introns. The ATG and stop codons mark translation start and stop sites, respectively. d) Protein structure comparison of OsVPS34 between WT and gpa14. In gpa14 mutant, partial PI3K_C2, the entire PI3Ka and PI3_PI4_kinase domain are deleted. e) Phenotypes of mature grains from WT, gpa14 mutant, and here 35S::OsVPS34-GFP transgenic lines (OE-1, OE-2, OE-3). The top row shows intact brown rice grains, and the bottom row shows transverse cross-sections of the corresponding grains. Scale bars = 2 mm. f) Seed storage protein profile of mature seeds from WT, gpa14 mutant, and 3 transgenic lines visualized by CBB staining of an SDS-PAGE gel. pGT, unprocessed glutelin precursors; αGT, mature acidic subunits of glutelin; αGlb, α-globulin; βGT, mature basic subunits of glutelin; Pro, prolamins. g–h) CBB staining of semithin sections of developing endosperm in WT and transgenic complementary line OE-1. Note that the image of WT shown in (g) is taken from the area enclosed by the green dashed box in Fig. 2a. Scale bars = 10 µm. i–j) TEM images of developing endosperm in WT and the transgenic line OE-1. Scale bars = 2 µm.

To confirm that the mutation in Os05g0180600 is responsible for the phenotypes in gpa14, we generated transgenic lines expressing 35S::OsVPS34-GFP using seeds from gpa14 heterozygous plants. In the T2 plants, we isolated individuals carrying both the gpa14 (−/−) genotype and the 35S::OsVPS34-GFP cassette (Fig. S2). The transgenic plants exhibited a restored transparent endosperm phenotype (Fig. 4e). SDS-PAGE analysis demonstrated that glutelin precursor levels were reduced to WT levels in the positive transgenic plants (Fig. 4f). Additionally, cytological observations revealed that the disappearance of PMB structures and the restoration of normal PBⅡ filling, resembling those of WT (Fig. 4g–j). Therefore, we suggested that Os05g0180600, designated OsVPS34, is responsible for the glutelin precursor accumulation phenotype in the gpa14 mutant.

Expression pattern and subcellular localization of OsVPS34

To further investigate the molecular function of OsVPS34, we first conducted a phylogenetic analysis. The phylogenetic analysis revealed that OsVPS34 is conserved among dicots, mosses, and monocots, with the closest homologs identified in wheat and maize (Fig. 5a). Protein sequence alignment demonstrated that PI3K_C2, PI3Ka, and PI3_PI4_Kinase domains are highly conserved across different species (Fig. S3). Then, we carried out RT-qPCR to examine the expression pattern of OsVPS34 during the heading stage and filling stage. The results indicated that OsVPS34 is constitutively expressed during the heading stage, with the lowest expression observed in stem (Fig. 5b). Although OsVPS34 exhibited lower expression levels in the endosperm but relatively higher in the developing endosperm from 3 to 18 DAF, a critical period for endosperm development, especially for starch and protein synthesis (Fig. 5c). These findings suggest that OsVPS34 may play an important role in endosperm development.

Figure 5.

Figure 5 shows the evolutionary relationship, expression patterns, and subcellular localization of OsVPS34 in rice. Phylogenetic analysis indicates that OsVPS34 is highly conserved among monocot and dicot species. Gene expression analyses reveal that OsVPS34 is expressed in multiple rice tissues and during different stages of endosperm development. Fluorescence microscopy images show that OsVPS34-GFP localizes to specific intracellular membrane compartments and partially co-localizes with organelle markers in rice protoplasts and tobacco epidermal cells.

Phylogenetic, expression, and subcellular localization analyses of OsVPS34. a) Phylogenetic tree of OsVPS34 and its homologs. The tree was constructed using MEGA 7.0 with 1,000 bootstrap replicates. Proteins are named according to NCBI accession numbers, with species names indicated in parentheses. The red dot highlights OsVPS34. Numbers at the nodes indicate bootstrap values. The scale bar represents 0.10 substitutions per site. b–c) Expression profiles of OsVPS34 in root, stem, leaf, sheath, panicle (b) and developing endosperm (sampled every 3 d from 3 to 30 DAF) (c). Data are presented as mean ± SD from 3 biological replicates (n = 3), with Ubiquitin (Ubi) serving as internal control. d) Subcellular localization of OsVPS34-GFP in rice protoplasts observed by laser confocal microscopy. Chlorophyll autofluorescence (Chl) and nuclear marker D53-mCherry are magenta. Scale bars = 10 µm. e) Laser confocal microscopy images showing the subcellular localization of OsVPS34-GFP in leaf epidermal cells of Nicotiana benthamiana. Empty GFP was used as the control, Chlorophyll autofluorescence (Chl) and nuclear marker D53-mCherry are magenta. Scale bars = 25 µm.

In yeast, Vps34p localizes to the pre-autophagosomal structure (PAS), vacuolar membrane, and endosomes (Obara et al. 2006). In mammals, VPS34 is predominantly detected in early endosomes, lysosomes, autophagosome, the ER, and the Golgi apparatus (Backer 2008). In Arabidopsis, VPS34 is mainly localized in early endosomes (Itakura et al. 2008; Wang et al. 2023). To determine the subcellular localization of OsVPS34 in rice, we generated an OsVPS34-GFP fusion protein driven by the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S (CaMV 35S) promoter, containing the full-length coding region. In rice protoplasts, OsVPS34-GFP was detected in both the cytoplasm and nucleus, as evidenced by its co-localization with D53-mCherry, a nuclear localization marker (Fig. 5d). Similarly, when expressed in the leaf epidermal cells of Nicotiana benthamiana, OsVPS34 was also localized to both the cytoplasm and nucleus (Fig. 5e). As reported, VPS34 protein shows puncta signal in cytoplasm; OsVPS34 did not exhibit puncta localization pattern but rather a diffuse fluorescent signal. This may be caused by overexpression of OsVPS34 in protoplast and the leaf epidermal cells of Nicotiana benthamiana driven by 35S promoter.

OsVPS34 is a component of the PI3K complex

In plants, PI3K complexes are classified into 2 types based on their functions and subunit composition: PI3K complex Ⅰ and PI3K complex Ⅱ (Liu et al. 2020). Although the PI3K complex has been extensively studied, how it assembles in crops such as rice, wheat, and maize remains unclear (Kihara et al. 2001; Balla 2013; Ohashi et al. 2019; Wang et al. 2022). To identify the components of the PI3K complex in rice, we performed an immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry (IP-MS) analysis using 15-d-old seedlings overexpressed expressing OsVPS34-GFP, empty GFP as a control. After GFP-bead enrichment, an approximately 120-kDa band corresponding to OsVPS34-GFP was detected in the 35S::OsVPS34-GFP transgenic line, whereas only a 27-kDa GFP band was observed in the 35S::GFP control line (Fig. 6a, Fig. S4). Multiple potential interacting proteins of OsVPS34 were identified via IP-MS analysis, including OsVPS15, OsATG6b, OsVPS38, and OsATG14, which are the orthologs of PI3K components (Fig. 6b and Tables S2 and 3).

Figure 6.

Figure 6 shows the interaction and subcellular localization of OsVPS34 and OsATG6b in rice cells. Immunoblot and co-immunoprecipitation analyses confirm the expression of OsVPS34-GFP and its interaction with OsATG6b. Luciferase complementation imaging further demonstrates the association between OsVPS34 and OsATG6b in plant leaves. Fluorescence microscopy images show that the OsVPS34–OsATG6b complex localizes to intracellular membrane compartments associated with the Golgi apparatus, trans-Golgi network, and prevacuolar compartment.

Verification of PI3K complex interactions in rice. a) Immunoblot analysis of precipitated proteins using GFP beads and detected with anti-GFP antibodies. b) Identification of OsVPS34-interacting proteins through mass spectrometry analysis. Protein scores were calculated using Mascot. No PI3K complex members were precipitated with free GFP. c) Firefly LCI assay showing the interaction between OsVPS34 and OsATG6b in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves. The colored scale bar represents luminescence intensity in counts per second. cLUC, C-terminal fragment of LUC; nLUC, N-terminal fragment of LUC. d) Co-IP assay confirming the interaction between OsVPS34 and OsATG6b in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves. 3×Flag-OsATG6b was transiently co-expressed with OsVPS34-GFP (lane 2) or free GFP (lane 1). 3×Flag-OsATG6b was co-immunoprecipitated by OsVPS34-GFP but not by free GFP using anti-GFP magnetic beads. IN, input; IB, immunoblot; IP, immunoprecipitation. e) Confocal microscopy images showing partial localization of the PI3K complex to the TGN and PVC. OsVPS34-YN and ATG6b-YC were co-expressed with Man1-mCherry, ST-mCherry, and mCherry-AtVSR2 in Nicotiana benthamiana leaf cells. Scale bars = 25 µm.

To further validate their interactions, we conducted yeast 2-hybrid (Y2H) assays. In the rice genome, we identified 1 ortholog for each OsVPS15, OsVPS38, and OsATG14, as well as 3 orthologs of OsATG6, which we designated as OsATG6a, OsATG6b, and OsATG6c. Due to the longer coding sequence of OsVPS15 coding sequence, we failed to amplify it. The interaction between OsVPS34 and OsATG6b was the strongest (Fig. S5). All firefly luciferase complementation imaging (LCI), bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC), and co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) assays in Nicotiana benthamiana confirmed the interaction between OsVPS34 and OsATG6b (Fig. 6c–e). Notably, coexpression of OsVPS34 and OsATG6b resulted in dot-like fluorescence signals (Fig. 6e; Fig. S6). Given that loss of OsVPS34 function disrupted storage protein trafficking at the post-Golgi stage in gpa14 and that VPS34 has been reported to localize to early endosomes, lysosomes, and autophagosome (Obara et al. 2006; Backer 2008; Itakura et al. 2008; Wang et al. 2023), we further investigated the subcellular localization of the OsVPS34-OsATG6b complex. Using BiFC assays, we coexpressed OsVPS34 and OsATG6b with AtMan1-mCherry, AtST-mCherry, and AtVSR2-mCherry, which are markers for the Golgi, TGN, and PVC, respectively, in Nicotiana benthamiana leaf epidermal cells. The results showed that the OsVPS34-OsATG6b complex co-localizes with the TGN and PVC (Fig. 6e). These findings indicate that OsVPS34 is a key component of PI3K complex, and the OsVPS34-OsATG6b complex localizes to the TGN and PVC.

Biological functions of the PI3K complex and subcellular localization of PI3P

The PI3K complex phosphorylates PI to produce PI3P, as previously reported (Backer 2008; Simonsen and Tooze 2009). To investigate the biological function of the OsVPS34-mediated PI3K complex in rice, we performed immunofluorescence labeling using commercial PI3P-specific antibody on semi-thin sections of the WT and gpa14 mutant endosperm at 12 DAF. The anti-PI3P antibody has been reported previously shown to exhibit a punctate localization pattern in immunofluorescence labeling (Devanathan et al. 2020; Ray et al. 2022; Wrobel et al. 2022; Kang et al. 2024; Elisabeth et al. 2025). Consistently, we observed PI3P puncta signals in both sub-aleurone layer (Sl) cells and endosperm (EN) in WT (Fig. 7a–b). However, the number of punctate structures were markedly reduced in the gpa14 mutant (Fig. 7a, b). Statistical analysis confirmed the reduction of PI3P puncta signals in the gpa14 mutant seeds (Fig. 7c, d). Meanwhile, we also measured the PI3P content in developing endosperm of WT and gpa14 mutant, which showed that the PI3P content in the gpa14 was significantly decreased (Fig. 7e). These results suggest that OsVPS34 plays a crucial role in the PI3K complex-mediated production of PI3P in rice.

Figure 7.

Figure 7 shows the localization and accumulation of PI3P in rice endosperm cells and its association with storage protein trafficking. Immunofluorescence analyses reveal that PI3P signals are significantly reduced in the gpa14 mutant compared with wild type in both subaleurone and endosperm cells. Co-localization experiments indicate that FYVE-GFP-labelled PI3P partially overlaps with endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi markers and strongly co-localizes with trans-Golgi network and prevacuolar compartment markers. Immunoelectron microscopy further shows that PI3P is associated with PBII structures and glutel in-containing compartments in rice endosperm cells.

PI3P content and localization in rice endosperm. a) Immunofluorescence microscopy of PI3P in sub-aleurone cells of WT and gpa14 mutant. Scale bars = 25 µm; enlarge bars = 10 µm. b) Immunofluorescence microscopy of PI3P in endosperm cells of WT and gpa14 mutant. Scale bars = 10 µm; enlarge bars = 5 µm. Abbreviations: EN, endosperm cells; Sl, sub-aleurone cells. Anti-PI3P, PI3P-specific antibody. The white arrows indicate the point location of PI3P in endosperm cells. c, d) Quantification of PI3P fluorescent puncta in sub-aleurone cells (c) and endosperm cells (d) of WT and gpa14 mutant. In the violin plots, the outlines represent the probability density of the data distribution, and the red dots represent individual biological data points. The solid and dashed horizontal lines within the plots indicate the medians and quartiles (Q1 and Q3), respectively. Asterisks indicate statistical significance determined by Student's t-tests (n ≥ 15; *P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01). e) PI3P content in developing endosperm of WT and gpa14 mutant. Error bars represent the standard deviation (SD). Red dots indicate individual biological replicates. Asterisks indicate statistical significance determined by Student t tests (n = 3; **P < 0.01). f) Subcellular localization of PI3P using FYVE-GFP in rice protoplasts. FYVE-GFP (green) was transiently co-expressed with organelle markers (magenta): HDEL-mCherry (ER marker), Man1-mCherry (Golgi marker), SYP61-mCherry (TGN marker), and mCherry-Rha1 (PVC marker). Co-localization was analyzed using confocal microscopy. The scatterplots on the right represent the intensity distribution of all pixels in the 2 fluorescence channels. A greater degree of co-localization is indicated by a more diagonal scatterplot pattern. Scale bars = 10 µm in merged images and 5 µm in enlarged images. g–h) Immunogold labeling of ultra-thin sections of WT endosperm at 12 DAF using PI3P- and glutelin-specific antibodies. Glutelin antibodies are labeled with 12-nm gold particles (indicated by white arrowheads), while PI3P antibodies are labeled with 6-nm gold particles (black arrowheads). PI3P was detected in PBIIs (g) and DVs (f). Magnified views of regions 1 and 2 are shown. Scale bars are marked in each figure.

PI3P is an essential membrane signaling molecule involved in endocytosis, endosomal sorting, and macro-autophagy (Noack and Jaillais 2017; Di Sansebastiano et al. 2018; Marshall and Vierstra 2018). In plants, PI3P has been shown to accumulate in late endosomes/PVC using a 2×FYVE reporter (Vermeer et al. 2006; Simon et al. 2014). To further investigate the subcellular localization of PI3P in rice, we constructed a FYVE-GFP fusion protein to track its distribution (Fig. S7a) (Simon et al. 2014). In rice protoplasts, FYVE-GFP displayed a dot-like pattern in the cytoplasm, while dot-like signal of FYVE-GFP dispersed and the PI3P content markedly decreased while treated with LY294002 (a PI3K inhibitor) (Fig. S7e). And the abundance of FYVE-GFP was decreased by LY294002 treatment (Fig. S7c–d). Based on these results, we coexpressed FYVE-GFP with various organelle marker proteins, including HDEL-mCherry (ER marker), Man1-mCherry (Golgi marker), mCherry-SYP61 (TGN marker), and mCherry-Rha1 (PVC marker). Co-localization analysis revealed that PI3P predominantly localizes to the TGN and PVC as OsVPS34-OsATG6b complex, with a Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) of 0.793 and 0.827, respectively (Figs. 5e, 7f and Fig. S7f). To gain further insights into PI3P localization in developing rice endosperm and its role in glutelin sorting, we conducted immunogold labeling on ultra-thin sections of WT endosperm at12 DAF using PI3P- and glutelin-specific antibodies. PI3P was labeled with 6-nm gold particles, while glutelin was labeled with 12-nm gold particles. The results showed that PI3P co-localized with glutelin in DVs and PBIIs (Fig. 7f–g). These findings suggest that PI3P functions as a key membrane signaling molecule, coordinating SSPs transport from DVs to PSVs/PBIIs in rice endosperm.

Downregulation of intracellular PI3P levels results in abnormal subcellular localization of Rab5a and GPA5

GPA5, a key regulator of glutelin transport from DVs to PBIIs, acts as an effector of Rab5a and specifically binds to PI3P via its PX domain (Wang et al. 2010; Ren et al. 2020). To investigate how PI3P levels affect the subcellular location of GPA5 and Rab5a, we first coexpressed Rab5a-GFP and GPA5-GFP with FYVE-mCherry, respectively. Both Rab5a and GPA5 co-localized with FYVE-mCherry, which is consistent with a previous report (Fig. S8) that PI3P is an important anchor signal for PVC and TGN subcellular location of Rab5a-GFP and GPA5-GFP (Ren et al. 2020). To further verify the effect of the decrease in PI3P level on the localization of GPA5 and Rab5a, we conducted a component separation experiment with gpa14 homozygous seeds, which isolated and genotyped from the heterozygous gpa14 (+/−) individual. Anti-Tip3-1 and anti-OsUGP were used as marker proteins for the P100 (membrane fraction) and S100 (cytoplasmic fraction), respectively. Using immunoblotting with a GPA5 antibody, we found that total and membrane-associated GPA5 protein levels were reduced in the gpa14 mutant (Fig. 8a). Because the customized antibody of Rab5a did not work, we carried out the component separation experiment for Rab5a with 15-d-old Rab5a-GFP transgenic seedlings treated with 50 µM LY294002. Using immunoblotting with GFP and GPA5 antibody, we can see the proportions of both Rab5a and GPA5 in the membrane fraction substantially decreased, whereas their presence in the cytoplasmic fraction increased (Fig. S9a–c).

Figure 8.

Figure 8 shows that OsVPS34 regulates the localization and trafficking of GPA5 and Rab5a through PI3P production in rice cells. Immunoblot and fractionation analyses demonstrate altered membrane association of GPA5 in the gpa14 mutant. Inducible RNAi suppression of OsVPS34 reduces PI3P levels and disrupts the normal localization of Rab5a and GPA5 to prevacuolar compartments marked by Rha1. Fluorescence microscopy and quantitative co-localization analyses indicate that OsVPS3 4-dependent PI3P production is required for proper endomembrane trafficking in rice endosperm cells.

Localization analysis of Rab5a and GPA5 upon disruption of PI3K complex function. a) Immunoblot analysis of GPA5 in the membrane (P100) and cytoplasmic (S100) fractions. Total protein was extracted from 12 DAF developing endosperm of WT and gpa14 and subjected to ultracentrifugation (100,000 × g for 1 h) to separate P100 (membrane fraction) and S100 (cytoplasmic fraction). Anti-Tip3-1 was used as a P100 marker, and anti-OsUGP as a S100 marker. Asterisks indicate OsUGP bands. b) The diagram of DEX RNAi-OsVPS34 vector. The green arrow indicates the position of the PCR identification primers. c) Observation after DEX treatment of the RNAi-OsVPS34 seedlings. DMSO was used as control. Scale bar = 5 cm. d, e) Detection of OsVPS34 expression levels in the leaves (d) and roots (e) of WT and RNAi-OsVPS34 seedlings before and after DEX treatment. Data represent mean ± SD (n = 3; ns P > 0.05; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01), evaluated by Student t test. f) Determination of PI3P content in the leaves of seedlings after DEX treatment. Data represent mean ± SD (n = 3; *P  < 0.05, Student t test). g, h) Co-localization of Rab5a-GFP (green) and GPA5-GFP (green) with the PVC marker mCherry-Rha1 (magenta) in rice protoplasts extracted from RNAi-GPA14 seedlings. DMSO treatment was used as a control. Scale bars = 10 µm, enlarge bars = 5 µm. i) Higher PCC values indicate stronger co-localization, while lower values indicate reduced co-localization. In the box plots, the center line represents the median, the box limits represent the upper and lower quartiles, the whiskers represent 1.5× the interquartile range, and the points represent outliers and individual measurements. Statistical significance was determined by Student t test (n = 5; **P < 0.01).

To overcome the lethality, we constructed DEX-RNAi-OsVPS34 transgenic plants, which could downregulate the expression of OsVPS34 by dexamethasone (DEX)-inducible RNAi (Fig. 8b). The positive transgenic plants were identified through PCR (Fig. S10). After treating DEX-RNAi-OsVPS34 transgenic plants with DEX (50 µM DEX, 5 to 7 d), we found the seedling was shorter and expression of OsVPS34 and content of PI3P significantly decreased compared with treatment with DMSO (Fig. 8c–f). Based on these data, we co-repressed Rab5a and GPA5 with PVC markers Rha1 in the protoplast of DEX-RNAi-GPA14 transgenic seedlings treated with DEX and DMSO separately. We found that the co-overlapping signals between Rab5a-GFP and GPA5-GFP with mCherry-Rha1 significantly decreased in protoplast treated with DEX compared with it treated with DMSO (Fig. 8g–i). These findings suggest that PI3P acts as a critical phospholipid signal, facilitating the recruitment of GPA5 and Rab5a onto PVCs/DVs (Fig. 9). This process is crucial for the proper trafficking of glutelin during the post-Golgi process.

Figure 9.

Figure 9 presents a working model for the role of OsVPS34 in post-Golgi trafficking of glutelin in developing rice endosperm. In wild-type cells, the PI3K complex containing OsVPS34 generates PI3P on dense vesicle and PBII membranes, which recruits GPA5 and Rab5a to promote vesicle tethering and fusion with protein storage vacuoles through CORVET and SNARE complexes. In the gpa14 mutant, defective PI3K activity reduces PI3P production, disrupts GPA5 and Rab5a localization, and impairs vesicle transport to PBIIs, resulting in abnormal protein body formation and poorly filled storage structures.

A working model illustrating the role of OsVPS34 in post-Golgi trafficking of glutelin in developing rice endosperm. In the WT, OsVPS34 functions as a subunit of the PI3K complex, catalyzing the phosphorylation of PI on DV/PBⅡ to generate PI3P (left panel). PI3P subsequently recruits GPA5, which interacts with Rab5a. Subsequently, GPA5 interacts with the class C core vacuole/endosome tethering (CORVET) complex and the VAMP727-coatining soluble N-ethylmaleimide sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE) complex to mediate DV-PBⅡ fusion (Ren et al. 2020). However, in the gpa14 mutant, defective kinase activity in the PI3K complex prevents the production of PI3P on DV/PBⅡ, leading to improper localization of GPA5 and Rab5a. As a result, DVs cannot be correctly transported to PBIIs after budding from the TGN, resulting in inadequately filled PBIIs or PMB structures. The structure of PI3K complex was referred to previous studies (Ohashi 2021). These images are the same as those shown in Fig. 3b, h. Scale bars = 500 nm.

Discussion

OsVPS34 plays a crucial role in post-Golgi trafficking of glutelin

In rice seeds, SSPs are synthesized on the ER and transported via the Golgi-dependent endomembrane trafficking system for deposition in protein bodies, kind of PSV (Ren et al. 2022). GPA5, localized to the TGN and PVC, could bind phosphatidylinositide-3-phosphate (PI3P) and is involve in Golgi-dependent endomembrane trafficking of SSP (Wang et al. 2010; Ren et al. 2020). Through map-based cloning, we demonstrated that the post-Golgi sorting defects observed in gpa14 mutants result from impaired PI3P production due to loss of OsVPS34 function (Figs. 4, 6 and 7). Immunogold labeling revealed co-localization of PI3P and glutelin in DVs and PBII (Fig. 7g–h). Furthermore, cell fractionation and subcellular localization analyses of GPA5 and Rab5a confirmed that PI3P serves as the key phospholipid signal mediating post-Golgi sorting, directly influencing their organellar targeting and membrane association (Fig. 8a; Fig. S9). In gpa14 homozygous endosperm, total GPA5 protein levels were reduced compared with wild type, primarily due to decreased membrane-associated pools (Fig. 8a). We propose that PI3P-dependent endomembrane localization maintains GPA5 protein abundance, though the molecular mechanism regulating its stability remains unknown. There are 2 types of vacuoles, the lytic vacuole (LV) and PSV, with different physiological functions. Both vacuoles show common trafficking mechanisms, but certain aspects are specific to trafficking to either the LV or PSV (Zhang et al. 2021). The function of PI3P, localized in vacuole membrane and late endosome/PVC and produced by PI3K, has been extensively studied in endosomal sorting, lysosomal/vacuolar transport, and autophagy. However, lethality of PI3K core components has limited investigations into PI3P roles in seed storage protein trafficking (Simon et al. 2014; Liu et al. 2018). Here, we successfully isolated homozygous gpa14 developing seeds and mature grain from heterozygous plants (Figs. 2 and 3), enabling functional exploration of PI3P and PI3K during seed development. Our results highlight rice seeds as a unique and advantageous system for dissecting PI3K-mediated vesicle trafficking in developing seeds.

Functional divergence of PI3K complex components in rice

The PI3K complex consists of the catalytic subunit VPS34 and 3 regulatory subunits that together form a canonical class III PI3K responsible for PI3P production (Safaroghli-Azar et al. 2023). VPS34 is evolutionarily conserved across eukaryotes and functions as the core kinase component (Safaroghli-Azar et al. 2023). Through IP-MS analysis of OsVPS34-GFP seedlings, we identified OsVPS15, OsATG6b, OsVPS38, and OsATG14 as interacting proteins (Fig. 6b; Tables S2 and S3). Among them, OsATG6b interaction was further validated by Y2H, LCI, BiFC, and Co-IP assays (Fig. S5; Fig. 6c–e). These results indicate that rice contains both OsATG14–OsVPS34 complex I and OsVPS38–OsVPS34 complex II. To dissect the functions of individual PI3K components, we generated CRISPR/Cas9 mutants of OsVPS15, OsVPS38, and OsATG14. However, only homozygous Cr-osatg14 mutants were recovered, while neither homozygous nor heterozygous knockout lines were obtained for OsVPS15 or OsVPS38 (Figs. S11–S13). This is consistent with Arabidopsis, where null mutants of the 3 core PI3K components are sterile, while atg14a atg14b double mutants show relatively normal phenotypes (Liu et al. 2020). Arabidopsis vps38 mutants are viable but display developmental defects in leaves, roots, and seeds (Liu et al. 2018). These phenotypic differences suggest potential functional divergence between PI3K complexes. In addition, the Cr-osatg14 mutant thus provides valuable genetic material for investigating the function of the OsATG14–OsVPS34 complex I in autophagy. In addition, DEX-RNAi-OsVPS34 transgenic plants exhibited reduced OsVPS34 expression, shorter seedling growth, and decreased PI3P levels (Fig. 8b–f), offering an effective system for further dissecting PI3K roles during the vegetative stage.

Subcellular localization and potential nuclear functions of OsVPS34

In yeast, mammals, and Arabidopsis, VPS34 predominantly localizes to early endosomes and is also detected in autophagosomes and Golgi-associated membranes (Obara et al. 2006; Backer 2008; Wang et al. 2023). In our study, OsVPS34-GFP was observed in both the cytoplasm and nucleus of rice seedling protoplasts and N. benthamiana leaf epidermal cells (Fig. 5d–e). Unlike previous reports, OsVPS34 did not form punctate structures when overexpressed alone, but instead exhibited diffuse fluorescence. However, coexpression of OsVPS34 and OsATG6b in BiFC assays produced punctate fluorescent signals that co-localized with TGN and PVC markers, consistent with PI3K complex functions in endosomal sorting, vacuolar transport, and post-Golgi SSP trafficking. We speculate that diffuse localization of OsVPS34 may result from overexpression under the 35S promoter, which could obscure its native patterns. In mammals, catalytically active PI3K also localizes to distinct nuclear subdomains, including regions associated with Pol I, Pol II, and Pol III transcription (Bunney et al. 2000). The nuclear PI3K pathway has been implicated in human diseases such as cardiovascular disorders and cancer (Davis et al. 2015). Vps34 can act as a transcriptional activator of p62 by competing with Nrf2 for Keap1 binding (Jiang et al. 2017), and Vps15 has been identified as a coactivator of the Bmal1-Clock transcription factor complex that regulates circadian metabolism (Alkhoury et al. 2023). These findings suggest that although the functions of VPS34 complexes in endosomal sorting and autophagy are well established, their nuclear roles remain largely unexplored. Although our observations indicate that OsVPS34 may be present in the nucleus, additional evidence, such as endogenous promoter-driven localization, nuclear fractionation, and functional assays, are required to verify its nuclear targeting and to clarify the potential nuclear functions of PI3K complexes in plants.

Materials and methods

Plant materials and growth conditions

The gpa14 mutant was isolated from a mutagenesis library of the Japonica cv. Ningjing 4, generated through tissue culture. During the summer, plants were cultivated at the Tiao Qiao Breeding Base of Nanjing Agricultural University (32.0584°N, 118.7965°E) in Nanjing City, Jiangsu Province. In winter, they were grown at the Ling Shui Breeding Base of Nanjing Agricultural University (18.2525°N, 109.5121°E) in Sanya City, Hainan province. All samples for phenotypic analysis were collected in Nanjing.

SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis

The methods for total seed protein extraction, SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis were performed as described in previous studies (Wang et al. 2010). The dilution ratio of polyclonal antibodies, including anti-glutelins, 10 kDa prolamin, α-globulin, BiP1, and PDI1-1, were consistent with those reported in prior studies (Wang et al. 2010; Ren et al. 2020). Anti-Actin (ABclonal, AC009) was used as a loading control. Anti-IgG (H + L chain) (Rabbit) pAb-HRP (MBL, 458) and Anti-IgG (H + L chain) (Mouse) pAb-HRP (MBL, 330) were used as secondary antibodies. SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analyses were repeated at least 3 times, and representative results were selected for presentation. All antibodies used in this study were diluted at a ratio of 1:5,000.

Microscopy observation

The cross-sections of the mature seeds were observed using a HITACHI Regulus 8100 scanning electron microscope (Hitachi, Tokyo) after being coated with gold powder. For TEM, a 1-mm cross-section of developing seeds at 12 DAF was fixed in 1.25% glutaraldehyde and 1.25% paraformaldehyde in 0.2 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.2) for 24 h at 4 °C in dark. Ultra-thin sections were processed as described (Ren et al. 2020) using an ultramicrotome (Power Tome-XL; RMC, http://www.rmcproducts.com/). Images were captured using a Hitachi HT7800 transmission electron microscope (Hitachi, Tokyo). For semi-thin section preparation, 1-mm-thick sections from the middle part of developing seeds at 12 DAF were fixed, dehydrated through an ethanol gradient, and infiltrated with LR White resin (London Resin, Berkshire, UK) before embedding (Zhu et al. 2021). Semi-thin (1 μm) sections were stained with CBB following previously described methods (Ren et al. 2020) and observed under an optical microscope (Nikon ECLIPSE80i, Tokyo).

For immunofluorescence labeling experiments, the semi-thin (1 μm) sections were first incubated in TBST (pH 7.4, 0.5% Tween20) for 10 min, followed by blocking with 3% BSA in TBST. The sections were then incubated with the primary antibody diluted in blocking buffer (1% BSA in TBST), followed by 3 washes with TBST. Next, the samples were incubated with a combination of Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated (Invitrogen, A-21202) and Alexa Fluor 555-conjugated (Invitrogen, A-31572) secondary antibody and washed 3 times with TBST. Observations and imaging were performed using a LEICA TCS SP8 laser scanning confocal microscope. The primary antibody was diluted at a ratio of 1:100 (anti-Glutelin, anti-Prolamin, anti-Globulin and anti-PI3P), and the secondary antibody at 1:50. Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated secondary antibody (green fluorescence) was used to target glutelin, while Alexa Fluor 555-conjugated secondary antibody (magenta fluorescence) was used to target α-globulin and prolamins.

For immunogold labeling, ultra-thin sections were incubated in 3% BSA in PBS (pH 7.4) for 30 min. The sections were then incubated with the primary antibody (1:100) in 1% BSA in PBS, followed by 3 washes with 1% BSA in PBS. Next, the sections were incubated with 6-nm (Abcam, AB105276) or 12-nm (Abcam, AB105298) gold-conjugated secondary antibodies at 1:50 dilution and washed 3 times with 1% BSA in PBS. Finally, the sections were washed 5 times with ddH2O. Images were captured using a Hitachi HT7800 transmission electron microscope (Hitachi, Tokyo). Anti-PI3P (Z-P003) was purchased from ECHELON BIOSCIENCES.

Map-based cloning of the GPA14

We crossed the gpa14 (+/−) heterozygous plant (female parent) with the indica variety N22 (male parent) to generate hybrid combinations. The resulting F1 hybrids were grown at the breeding base in Lingshui, Hainan (18.2525°N, 109.5121°E), and F2 seeds were collected from individual F1 plants. The seeds exhibiting a floury and shrunken phenotype were isolated from F2 seeds and used for analysis of 57H over-accumulation. In detail, half of each seed, excluding the embryo, was ground into powder for total seed protein extraction, followed by SDS-PAGE analysis to observe the 57H precursor. The remaining half, which contained the embryo and exhibited an over-accumulation of 57-kDa glutelin precursor, was used for DNA extraction and genetic mapping. Additionally, we performed de novo sequence for both the WT and gpa14 mutant to analyze variation and identify potential candidate genes within the initially mapped region. The molecular markers used for mapping are listed in Table S4.

Genetic complementation analysis

The CDS sequence of OsVPS34, excluding the stop codon, was amplified from the seedling cDNA of Ningjing 4. This sequence was then inserted into the binary vector pCAMBIA1305, which had been linearized using SacI and BamHI, via homologous recombination (ABclonal, RM20523). The 35S::OsVPS34-GFP construction was introduced into the callus produced by gpa14 (+/−) mutant seeds through Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation (Hiei et al. 1994). Positive transformants harboring 35S::OsVPS34-GFP insertion were identified by PCR, and the genotype of OsVPS34 were identified by sequencing (Table S4). The transformants with 35S::OsVPS34-GFP insertion in gpa14 (−/−) were identified by phenotyping.

Phylogenetic analysis

Homologous proteins of OsVPS34 across different species were identified using a BLASTP search on the NCBI website (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) and subsequently downloaded. Amino acid sequences were aligned using ClustalW, and a phylogenetic tree was constructed with MEGA7. The sequence alignment results were exported using ClustalX.

Subcellular localization

The CDS sequence of OsVPS34 excluding stop codon, was amplified from seedling cDNA of Ningjing 4 and inserted into pENTRY vector firstly via homologous recombination (ABclonal, RM20523). Subsequently, the CDS sequence of OsVPS34 was recombined into the pAN580-gw1 vector (modified by our lab based on pAN580), driven the CaMV 35S promoter through an LR reaction (Invitrogen, 2269734). The full-length CDS of D53 was cloned into the pAN583-mCherry vector driven by CaMV 35S promoter to generate a D53-mCherry fusion protein as a nuclear marker (Zhou et al. 2013). FYVE sequence was obtained from previous studies (Kim et al. 2001) and synthesized by GenScript. The FYVE sequence was amplified and inserted into pENTRY by homologous recombination and then recombined into the pAN580-gw1 vector via LR reaction to make 35S::FYVE-GFP construction. The CDS of AtARA7, AtRha1 were cloned from Arabidopsis cDNA and inserted into pAN581 vector via homologous recombination (ABclonal, RM20523). The plasmids used for rice protoplast transformation were extracted using the Promega Wizard Plus Midipreps DNA Purification System. All constructs were transiently expressed in rice protoplasts via PEG-mediated transformation (Yoo et al. 2007). GFP and mCherry fluorescence were detected and imaged using a Leica TCS SP8 laser scanning confocal microscope.

The 35S::OsVPS34-GFP construct in pCAMBIA1305 background (as described previously) was used to observe the subcellular localization of OsVPS34 in N. benthamiana leaves. The full-length CDS of D53 were merged with mCherry dirved by CaMV 35S promoter by recombined with p1305-mCherry (taking mCherry place of GFP in pCAMBIA1305). The constructions, including 35S::OsVPS34-GFP, 35S::D53-mCherry and empty pCAMBIA1305 were introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA105. The N. benthamiana leaves were infected via Agrobacterium-mediated transient transformation. The procedure was carried out as previously described (Bao et al. 2023).

RNA extraction and real-time PCR analysis

Total RNA was extracted from endosperm or other tissue samples using the RNA Prep Pure Plant kit (TIANGEN Biotech, Beijing). Reverse transcription was performed on 1 to 2 µg of total RNA using the HiScript II 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis kit (Takara, 2690A). Real-time PCR was conducted on a Bio-Rad T100 real-time PCR system (Bio-Rad, California, USA) using SYBR Premix Ex Taq mix (Takara, RR420A). The rice Ubiquitin (Ubi) gene was used as the internal control. Primers used for RT-qPCR are listed in Table S4.

Y2H assays

OsATG6s, OsVPS38, and OsATG14 were identified in the rice database through alignment with their Arabidopsis homologs. OsATG6 has 3 copies, designated OsATG6a, OsATG6b, and OsATG6c, while OsVPS38 and OsATG14 exist as single-copy genes in rice. The full-length CDS of OsATG6a, OsATG6b, OsATG6c, OsVPS38, and OsATG14 were amplified from WT Ningjing 4 and cloned into the pENTRY vector. These were then recombined with pGADT7-GW1 and pGBKT7-GW1 via gateway LR reaction (Invitrogen, 2269734) for subsequent sequencing and plasmid extraction. Reagents for the yeast 2-hybrid experiment were purchased from Clontech. Plasmids corresponding to the genes to be tested for interaction were co-transformed into the Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain AH109 in various combinations, with appropriate controls. The preparation of competent yeast cells and transformation procedures were carried out according to the Yeast Two-Hybrid System handbook (Clontech).

Firefly LCI assays, BiFC assays, and Co-IP

For firefly luciferase complementation imaging (LCI), the full-length CDSs of OsVPS34 and OsATG6b were initially cloned into the pENTRY vector. These sequences were subsequently inserted upstream of nLUC and cLUC in the pEARLY-nLUC and pEARLY-cLUC vectors (modified by our lab based on pEARLY103) via LR reaction (Invitrogen, 2269734). The resulting constructs were transformed into the Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA105 and transiently expressed in N. benthamiana leaves (Yan et al. 2024). Luciferase activity was measured 2 to 3 d post-infiltration using the Tanon 5200CE Chemi-Image System as previously described (Chen et al. 2008), and D-Luciferin potassium salt (D8390, 115114-35-9).

For bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) assays, OsVPS34 and OsATG6b were cloned into the pENTRY vector and recombined with pEARLY-nYNE and pEARLY-YCE (modified by our lab based on pEARLY103), respectively, through LR reaction. The constructed vectors were introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA105 and infiltrated into leaves of N. benthamiana leaves. The CDS of Man1, ST, and AtVSR2, which were inserted into p1305-mCherry to merge mCherry, were used for organelle markers (Wang et al. 2010). Observations and imaging were performed on 48 to 72 h post-infiltration using Leica TCS SP8 laser confocal microscope. The CDS of OsATG6b was amplified from pENTRY-OsATG6b and inserted into 1305-3×Flag (modified by our lab based on pCAMBIA1305) vector to make 35S::OsATG6b-3Flag construction via homologous recombination. 35S::OsATG6b-3Flag and 35S::OsVPS34-GFP were co-infiltrated into leaves of N. benthamiana leaves. On 2 to 3 d post infiltration, the expression of OsATG6b-3Flag and OsVPS34-GFP were detected by western blotting with anti-FLAG (PM020-7, MBL Life Science) and anti-GFP (11814460001, Roche). The dilution ratio is 1:5,000. Then, we performed Co-IP with anti-GFP beads (D153, MBL Life Science) and immunoblotting with anti-GFP (11814460001, Roche). Anti-IgG (H + L chain) (Mouse) pAb-HRP (MBL, 330) were used as secondary antibodies. All antibodies used in this study were diluted at a ratio of 1:5,000.

Immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry

Immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry (IP-MS) analyses were performed as previously described (Ren et al. 2020). Briefly, 10 g fresh seedlings of 15-d-old 35S::OsVPS34-GFP T2 homozygous were ground in liquid nitrogen and resuspended in 15 mL NB1 buffer (PH = 8.0 50 mM Tris; 0.5 M sucrose; 1 mM 6H2O·MgCl2; 10 mM EDTA; 5 mM DTT) with freshly added protease inhibitor cocktail (20123ES50, YEASEN). The mixture was incubated at 4 °C for 30 min to extract total protein, followed by centrifugation at 4,000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C to remove debris. The supernatant was collected for subsequent experiments. To reduce nonspecific binding, 50 µL of prewashed protein G beads with cold NB1 buffer were added to the supernatant and incubated at 4 °C for 1 h at 40 rpm. The mixture was centrifuged 6,000 rpm at 4 °C for 5 min, and the supernatant was retained for immunoprecipitation. Next, 50 µL of prewashed anti-GFP beads (D153, MBL Life Science) with cold NB1 buffer were added to the supernatant and incubated at 4 °C for 2 h. Beads were then collected using a magnetic rack and washed 3 times with cold NB1 buffer with freshly added protease inhibitor cocktail. For elution, 60 µL of NB1 buffer and 15 µL of 5× protein loading buffer (P0015L, Beyotime) were added to the beads, followed by boiling at 95 °C for 5 min. A 5-µL aliquot was subjected to SDS-PAGE, followed by CBB staining and western blotting with anti-GFP (11814460001, Roche) to detect OsVPS34-GFP after immunoprecipitation. The remaining sample was separated by SDS-PAGE (10% gel, 120 V, 20 min), and the corresponding gel slice was cut and sent to Beijing Protein Innovation for mass spectrometry analysis. The 35S::GFP T2 homozygous were used as control. All antibodies used in this study were diluted at a ratio of 1:5,000.

Protoplasts with DEX treatment

The CDS of SYP61 and Rha1, which were inserted into pAN581 to merge mCherry, were used for organelle markers (Wang et al. 2010). The CDS of Rab5a and GPA5 were amplified and inserted into pAN580 to merge GFP. The plasmids used for rice protoplast transformation were extracted using the Promega Wizard Plus Midipreps DNA Purification System. All constructs were transiently expressed in rice protoplasts via PEG-mediated transformation. After PEG-mediated transient transformation for 6 to 8 h, rice protoplasts were treated with 50 µM DEX for an additional 8 h before observation (Vermeer et al. 2006). GFP and mCherry fluorescence were detected and imaged using a Leica TCS SP8 laser scanning confocal microscope.

Measurement of PI3P content in endosperm

The DEX/LY94002 treatment was applied to 3-d-old seedlings for 5 to 7 d, and the leaves were collected for the determination of PI3P content. DMSO treatment was used as the control. About 0.1 g sample of developing endosperm/seedling leaf was ground with liquid nitrogen, and then 250 uL of buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, protease inhibitor cocktail (20123ES50, YEASEN)) was added. The mixture was extracted on a 4 °C shaker for 30 min, and then centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 20 min at 4 °C. The supernatant (containing soluble lipids) was collected, and the precipitate (cell walls and impurities) was discarded. The PI3P content was detected by PI3P detection kit (LM8K957o, SHANG HAI LMAI Bio).

Subcellular fractionation

The Rab5a-GFP transgenic plants were obtained by Yu Zhang from Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing (Zhang et al. unpublished data, 2025). At 3 d after germinating, Rab5a-GFP seedlings were treated with 50 µM LY294002 for 10 d, with DMSO as the control. Roots from the seedlings were collected and ground in liquid nitrogen. NB1 buffer (PH = 8.0 50 mM Tris; 0.5 M sucrose; 1 mM 6H2O·MgCl2; 10 mM EDTA; 5 mM DTT) with freshly added protease inhibitor cocktail (20123ES50, YEASEN) was added into the mortar as the ratio 2 uL/mg. Then the homogenate was transferred to cold 2.0-mL centrifuge tubes for incubation at 4 °C for 1 h. After incubation, the samples were centrifuged at 2,000 × g for 5 min, and the cell debris was removed by filtration through coarse cloth. The supernatant was transferred to a new cold 2.0-mL centrifuge tube, with 100 µL taken as the total protein. The remaining supernatant underwent ultracentrifugation at 100,000 × g for 120 min at 4 °C to separate the soluble fraction (S100) from the membrane fraction pellet (P100). We added 1/4 volume of 5× loading buffer with soluble fraction, and equal volume 1× loading buffer as total soluble fraction into fraction pellet to resuspend the pellet. Total protein, soluble fraction, and fraction pellet were boiled at 100 °C for 5 min. All samples were analyzed via SDS-PAGE and western blotting. The operation method for the endosperm samples is the same as described above. The following antibodies were used: Anti-OsUGP (Beijing Protein innovation, AbP80276-A-SE, dilution 1:1,000) used as the marker for S100; Anti-Tip3-1 (dilution 1:2,000) used as the marker for P100; Anti-GFP (Roche, 11814460001, dilution 1:5,000); Anti-GPA5 (dilution 1:5,000) was previously described (Ren et al. 2020).

Statistical analysis

For statistical analysis, significance between 2 samples were determined using Student t test (*P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01). PI3P punctate structures were quantified using image J software within a 500-µm2 area. The diameters of PBIs and PBⅡs were measured with Leica TCS SP8 software. The scatter plot in the co-localization analysis represents the intensity distribution of all pixels in the 2 channels as a scatter plot, where the higher the degree of co-localization, the more the scatter plot tends to diagonal distribution, and the specific method is as described previously (Zinchuk et al. 2007). PCC analysis statistics were performed as described in previous reports (Zhou et al. 2023).

Accession numbers

Sequence data for this article can be found in the NCBI database under the following accession numbers: OsVPS34 (Os05g0180600), GPA5, (Os06g0643000), Rab5a/GPA1 (Os12g0631100), OsATG6a (Os01g0681400), OsATG6b (Os03g0644000), OsATG6c (Os03g0258500), OsVPS15 (Os02g0796700), OsVPS38 (Os06g0715000), OsATG14 (Os07g0626300), D53 (Os11g0104300), Ubiquitin (Os03g0234200), OsUGP (Os09g0553200), ARA7 (At4g19640), SYP61 (At1g28490), and Rha1 (At5g45130).

Supplementary Material

kiag154_Supplementary_Data

Contributor Information

Shanbin Xu, State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics & Germplasm Enhancement and Utilization, Zhongshan Biological Breeding Laboratory, Jiangsu Nanjing Rice Germplasm Resources National Field Observation and Research Station, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.

Mingqing Ma, State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics & Germplasm Enhancement and Utilization, Zhongshan Biological Breeding Laboratory, Jiangsu Nanjing Rice Germplasm Resources National Field Observation and Research Station, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.

Huanhuan Zhao, State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics & Germplasm Enhancement and Utilization, Zhongshan Biological Breeding Laboratory, Jiangsu Nanjing Rice Germplasm Resources National Field Observation and Research Station, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.

Aoni Zhou, State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics & Germplasm Enhancement and Utilization, Zhongshan Biological Breeding Laboratory, Jiangsu Nanjing Rice Germplasm Resources National Field Observation and Research Station, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.

Zi Li, State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics & Germplasm Enhancement and Utilization, Zhongshan Biological Breeding Laboratory, Jiangsu Nanjing Rice Germplasm Resources National Field Observation and Research Station, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.

Bo Li, State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics & Germplasm Enhancement and Utilization, Zhongshan Biological Breeding Laboratory, Jiangsu Nanjing Rice Germplasm Resources National Field Observation and Research Station, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.

Yuzhe He, State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics & Germplasm Enhancement and Utilization, Zhongshan Biological Breeding Laboratory, Jiangsu Nanjing Rice Germplasm Resources National Field Observation and Research Station, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.

Guiping Zhang, State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics & Germplasm Enhancement and Utilization, Zhongshan Biological Breeding Laboratory, Jiangsu Nanjing Rice Germplasm Resources National Field Observation and Research Station, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.

Hongping Cai, State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics & Germplasm Enhancement and Utilization, Zhongshan Biological Breeding Laboratory, Jiangsu Nanjing Rice Germplasm Resources National Field Observation and Research Station, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.

Chuanwei Gu, State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics & Germplasm Enhancement and Utilization, Zhongshan Biological Breeding Laboratory, Jiangsu Nanjing Rice Germplasm Resources National Field Observation and Research Station, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.

Ting Yu, State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics & Germplasm Enhancement and Utilization, Zhongshan Biological Breeding Laboratory, Jiangsu Nanjing Rice Germplasm Resources National Field Observation and Research Station, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.

Xue Yang, State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics & Germplasm Enhancement and Utilization, Zhongshan Biological Breeding Laboratory, Jiangsu Nanjing Rice Germplasm Resources National Field Observation and Research Station, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.

Lei Zhou, State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics & Germplasm Enhancement and Utilization, Zhongshan Biological Breeding Laboratory, Jiangsu Nanjing Rice Germplasm Resources National Field Observation and Research Station, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.

Yu Zhang, State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics & Germplasm Enhancement and Utilization, Zhongshan Biological Breeding Laboratory, Jiangsu Nanjing Rice Germplasm Resources National Field Observation and Research Station, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.

Erchao Duan, State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics & Germplasm Enhancement and Utilization, Zhongshan Biological Breeding Laboratory, Jiangsu Nanjing Rice Germplasm Resources National Field Observation and Research Station, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.

Xuan Teng, State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics & Germplasm Enhancement and Utilization, Zhongshan Biological Breeding Laboratory, Jiangsu Nanjing Rice Germplasm Resources National Field Observation and Research Station, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.

Xi Liu, State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics & Germplasm Enhancement and Utilization, Zhongshan Biological Breeding Laboratory, Jiangsu Nanjing Rice Germplasm Resources National Field Observation and Research Station, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.

Shijia Liu, State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics & Germplasm Enhancement and Utilization, Zhongshan Biological Breeding Laboratory, Jiangsu Nanjing Rice Germplasm Resources National Field Observation and Research Station, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.

Yunlu Tian, State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics & Germplasm Enhancement and Utilization, Zhongshan Biological Breeding Laboratory, Jiangsu Nanjing Rice Germplasm Resources National Field Observation and Research Station, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.

Ling Jiang, State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics & Germplasm Enhancement and Utilization, Zhongshan Biological Breeding Laboratory, Jiangsu Nanjing Rice Germplasm Resources National Field Observation and Research Station, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.

Yulong Ren, State Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Breeding, National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement, Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China.

Yihua Wang, State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics & Germplasm Enhancement and Utilization, Zhongshan Biological Breeding Laboratory, Jiangsu Nanjing Rice Germplasm Resources National Field Observation and Research Station, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.

Hui Dong, State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics & Germplasm Enhancement and Utilization, Zhongshan Biological Breeding Laboratory, Jiangsu Nanjing Rice Germplasm Resources National Field Observation and Research Station, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.

Jianmin Wan, State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics & Germplasm Enhancement and Utilization, Zhongshan Biological Breeding Laboratory, Jiangsu Nanjing Rice Germplasm Resources National Field Observation and Research Station, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China; State Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Breeding, National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement, Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China.

Author contributions

Hui Dong and Jianmin Wan designed and conceived the research. Yihua Wang provided the gpa14 mutant material, and Yu Zhang provided the Rab5a-GFP transgenic plants. Shanbin Xu, Mingqing Ma, Huanhuan Zhao, Zi Li, Aoni Zhou, Bo Li, Guiping Zhang, and Chuanwei Gu performed the experiments. Shanbin Xu, Yuzhe He, Hongping Cai, Yu Zhang, Ting Yu, Xue Yang, Lei Zhou, Xi Liu, Shijia Liu, and Yunlu Tian completed the field work. Shanbin Xu and Hui Dong wrote the paper. Hui Dong, Yulong Ren, Erchao Duan, Xuan Teng, and Ling Jiang revised the paper.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material is available at Plant Physiology online.

Funding

This research was supported by the Key Laboratory of Biology, Genetics and Breeding of Japonica Rice in Mid-lower Yangtze River, Ministry of Agriculture of China, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production, Jiangsu Plant Gene Engineering Research Center, and Southern Japonica Rice Research and Development Co. LTD, and the grants from the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2024YFF1000600 and 2023YFF1000400), (BE2022383 and BE2023362), National Natural Science Foundation of China (32001520).

Data availability

The data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Data. Additional data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Alkhoury  C  et al.  2023. Class 3 PI3K coactivates the circadian clock to promote rhythmic de novo purine synthesis. Nat Cell Biol. 25:975–988. 10.1038/s41556-023-01171-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bache  KG, Brech  A, Mehlum  A, Stenmark  H. 2003. Hrs regulates multivesicular body formation via ESCRT recruitment to endosomes. J Cell Biol. 162:435–442. 10.1083/jcb.200302131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Backer  JM. 2008. The regulation and function of Class III PI3Ks: novel roles for Vps34. Biochem J. 410:1–17. 10.1042/bj20071427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Balla  T. 2013. Phosphoinositides: tiny lipids with giant impact on cell regulation. Physiol Rev. 93:1019–1137. 10.1152/physrev.00028.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bao  XH  et al.  2023. A deleterious Sar1c variant in rice inhibits export of seed storage proteins from the endoplasmic reticulum. Plant Mol Biol. 111:291–307. 10.1007/s11103-022-01327-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Belda-Palazon  B  et al.  2016. FYVE1/FREE1 interacts with the PYL4 ABA receptor and mediates its delivery to the vacuolar degradation pathway. Plant Cell. 28:2291–2311. 10.1105/tpc.16.00178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bunney  TD  et al.  2000. Association of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase with nuclear transcription sites in higher plants. Plant Cell. 12:1679–1688. 10.1105/tpc.12.9.1679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen  HM, Zou  Y, Shang  YL, Lin  HQ, Zhou  JM. 2008. Firefly luciferase complementation imaging assay for protein-protein interactions in plants. Plant Physiol. 146:368–376. 10.1104/pp.107.111740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Davis  WJ  et al.  2015. Nuclear PI3K signaling in cell growth and tumorigenesis. Front Cell Dev Biol. 3:24. 10.3389/fcell.2015.00024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Devanathan  N, Jones  S, Kaur  G, Kimble-Hill  AC. 2020. Using phosphatidylinositol phosphorylation as markers for hyperglycemic related breast cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 21:2320. 10.3390/ijms21072320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Di Sansebastiano  GP, Barozzi  F, Piro  G, Denecke  J, de Marcos Lousa  C. 2018. Trafficking routes to the plant vacuole: connecting alternative and classical pathways. J Exp Bot. 69:79–90. 10.1093/jxb/erx376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Elisabeth  H  et al.  2025 Aug 18. A lipid transfer-dependent feedback loop activates ATG9A compartments in autophagy initiation. bioRxiv 670665. 10.1101/2025.08.16.670665, preprint; not peer reviewed. [DOI]
  13. Fujiki  Y, Yoshimoto  K, Ohsumi  Y. 2007. An Arabidopsis homolog of yeast ATG6/VPS30 is essential for pollen germination. Plant Physiol. 143:1132–1139. 10.1104/pp.106.093864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gao  CJ  et al.  2014. A unique plant ESCRT component, FREE1, regulates multivesicular body protein sorting and plant growth. Curr Biol. 24:2556–2563. 10.1016/j.cub.2014.09.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Harrison-Lowe  NJ, Olsen  LJ. 2008. Autophagy protein 6 (ATG6) is required for pollen germination in Arabidopsis thaliana. Autophagy. 4:339–348. 10.4161/auto.5629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. He  W, Wang  L, Lin  QL, Yu  F. 2021. Rice seed storage proteins: biosynthetic pathways and the effects of environmental factors. J Integr Plant Biol. 63:1999–2019. 10.1111/jipb.13176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hiei  Y, Ohta  S, Komari  T, Kumashiro  T. 1994. Efficient transformation of rice (Oryza sativa L.) mediated by Agrobacterium and sequence analysis of the boundaries of the T-DNA. Plant J. 6:271–282. 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1994.6020271.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Itakura  E, Kishi  C, Inoue  K, Mizushima  N. 2008. Beclin 1 forms two distinct phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase complexes with mammalian Atg14 and UVRAG. Mol Biol Cell. 19:5360–5372. 10.1091/mbc.e08-01-0080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Jiang  X  et al.  2017. VPS34 stimulation of p62 phosphorylation for cancer progression. Oncogene. 36:6850–6862. 10.1038/onc.2017.295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Joo  JH  et al.  2005. Auxin-induced reactive oxygen species production requires the activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase. FEBS Lett. 579:1243–1248. 10.1016/j.febslet.2005.01.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kang  YR, Lin  WW, Nagy  PD. 2024. Subversion of selective autophagy for the biogenesis of tombusvirus replication organelles inhibits autophagy. PLoS Pathog. 20:e1012085. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1012085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kihara  A, Noda  T, Ishihara  N, Ohsumi  Y. 2001. Two distinct Vps34 phosphatidylinositol 3–kinase complexes function in autophagy and carboxypeptidase Y sorting in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol. 152:519–530. 10.1083/jcb.152.3.519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kim  DH  et al.  2001. Trafficking of phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate from the trans-Golgi network to the lumen of the central vacuole in plant cells. Plant Cell. 13:287–301. 10.1105/tpc.13.2.287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kolb  C  et al.  2015. FYVE1 is essential for vacuole biogenesis and intracellular trafficking in arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 167:1361–1373. 10.1104/pp.114.253377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lee  CB, Kim  S, Mcclure  B. 2009. A pollen protein, NaPCCP, that binds pistil arabinogalactan proteins also binds phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate and associates with the pollen tube endomembrane system. Plant Physiol. 149:791–802. 10.1104/pp.108.127936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lee  GJ  et al.  2007. Epsinr2 interacts with clathrin, adaptor protein-3, AtVTI12, and phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate. Implications for EpsinR2 function in protein trafficking in plant cells. Plant Physiol. 143:1561–1575. 10.1104/pp.106.095349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lee  HN  et al.  2018. Vacuolar trafficking protein VPS38 is dispensable for autophagy. Plant Physiol. 176:1559–1572. 10.1104/pp.17.01297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lee  SH  et al.  2002. The intermolecular interaction between the ph domain and the c-terminal domain of arabidopsis dynamin-like 6 determines lipid binding specificity. J Biol Chem. 277:31842–31849. 10.1074/jbc.M204770200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lee  Y  et al.  2008a. Roles of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase in root hair growth. Plant Physiol. 147:624–635. 10.1104/pp.108.117341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lee  Y  et al.  2008b. The Arabidopsis phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase is important for pollen development. Plant Physiol. 147:1886–1897. 10.1104/pp.108.121590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Liu  CL  et al.  2021. A plant-unique ESCRT component, FYVE4, regulates multivesicular endosome biogenesis and plant growth. New Phytol. 231:193–209. 10.1111/nph.17358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Liu  F  et al.  2013. OsVPS9A functions cooperatively with OsRAB5A to regulate post-Golgi dense vesicle-mediated storage protein trafficking to the protein storage vacuole in rice endosperm cells. Mol Plant. 6:1918–1932. 10.1093/mp/sst081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Liu  F  et al.  2018. The vacuolar protein sorting-38 subunit of the Arabidopsis phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase complex plays critical roles in autophagy, endosome sorting, and gravitropism. Front Plant Sci. 9:781. 10.3389/fpls.2018.00781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Liu  F  et al.  2020. AUTOPHAGY-RELATED14 and its associated phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase complex promote autophagy in arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 32:3939–3960. 10.1105/tpc.20.00285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Liu  F, Hu  WM, Vierstra  RD. 2018. The vacuolar protein sorting-38 Subunit of the Arabidopsis phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase complex plays critical roles in autophagy, endosome sorting, and gravitropism. Front Plant Sci. 9:781. 10.3389/fpls.2018.00781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Long  XK  et al.  2023. Rice storage proteins: focus on composition, distribution, genetic improvement and effects on rice quality. Rice Science. 30:207–221. 10.1016/j.rsci.2023.03.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Marshall  RS, Vierstra  RD. 2018. Autophagy: the master of bulk and selective recycling. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 69:173–208. 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042817-040606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Muthayya  S, Sugimoto  JD, Montgomery  S, Maberly  GF. 2014. An overview of global rice production, supply, trade, and consumption. Ann N Y Acad. 1324:7–14. 10.1111/nyas.12540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Nascimbeni  AC, Codogno  P, Morel  E. 2017. Phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate in the regulation of autophagy membrane dynamics. FEBES Journal. 284:1267–1278. 10.1111/febs.13987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Noack  LC, Jaillais  Y. 2017. Precision targeting by phosphoinositides: how PIs direct endomembrane trafficking in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 40:22–33. 10.1016/j.pbi.2017.06.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Obara  K, Sekito  T, Ohsumi  Y. 2006. Assortment of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase complexes–Atg14p directs association of complex I to the pre-autophagosomal structure in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell. 17:1527–1539. 10.1091/mbc.e05-09-0841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Ohashi  Y. 2021. Activation mechanisms of the VPS34 complexes. Cells. 10:3124. 10.3390/cells10113124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Ohashi  Y, Tremel  S, Williams  RL. 2019. VPS34 complexes from a structural perspective. J Lipid Res. 60:229–241. 10.1194/jlr.R089490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Pan  SJ, Reeck  GR. 1988. Isolation and characterization of rice alpha-globulin. Cereal Chem J. 65:316–319. [Google Scholar]
  45. Pan  T  et al.  2021. Post-Golgi trafficking of rice storage proteins requires the small GTPase Rab7 activation complex MON1–CCZ1. Plant Physiol. 187:2174–2191. 10.1093/plphys/kiab175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Qin  GJ  et al.  2007. Arabidopsis AtBECLIN 1/AtAtg6/AtVps30 is essential for pollen germination and plant development. Cell Res. 17:249–263. 10.1038/cr.2007.7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Ray  A, Mathur  M, Choubey  D, Karmodiya  K, Surolia  N. 2022. Autophagy underlies the proteostasis mechanisms of artemisinin resistance in P. falciparum Malaria. mBio. 13:e0063022. 10.1128/mbio.00630-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Ren  YL  et al.  2014. GLUTELIN PRECURSOR ACCUMULATION3 encodes a regulator of post-Golgi vesicular traffic essential for vacuolar protein sorting in rice endosperm. Plant Cell. 26:410–425. 10.1105/tpc.113.121376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Ren  YL  et al.  2020. GPA5 encodes a Rab5a effector required for post-Golgi trafficking of rice storage proteins. Plant Cell. 32:758–777. 10.1105/tpc.19.00863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Ren  YL  et al.  2022. Endomembrane-mediated storage protein trafficking in plants: Golgi-dependent or Golgi-independent?  FEBS Lett. 596:2215–2230. 10.1002/1873-3468.14374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Safaroghli-Azar  A  et al.  2023. Phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) classes: From cell signaling to endocytic recyclin g and autophagy. Eur J Pharmacol. 953:175827. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2023.175827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Schu  PV  et al.  1993. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase encoded by yeast VPS34 gene essential for protein sorting. Science. 260:88–91. 10.1126/science.8385367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Shen  Y  et al.  2011. The rice RMR1 associates with a distinct prevacuolar compartment for the protein storage vacuole pathway. Mol Plant. 4:854–868. 10.1093/mp/ssr025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Shorrosh  BS  et al.  1992. A novel cereal storage protein: molecular genetics of the 19 kDa globulin of rice. Plant Mol Biol. 18:151–154. 10.1007/BF00018470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Simon  MLA  et al.  2014. A multi-colour/multi-affinity marker set to visualize phosphoinositide dynamics in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 77:322–337. 10.1111/tpj.12358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Simonsen  A, Tooze  SA. 2009. Coordination of membrane events during autophagy by multiple class III PI3-kinase complexes. J Cell Biol. 186:773–782. 10.1083/jcb.200907014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Takemoto  Y  et al.  2002. The rice mutant esp2 greatly accumulates the glutelin precursor and deletes the protein disulfide isomerase. Plant Physiol. 128:1212–1222. 10.1104/pp.010624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Tasnin  MN  et al.  2022. The PI3 kinase Complex II–PI3P–Vps27 axis on vacuolar membranes is critical for microautophagy induction and nutrient stress adaptation. J Mol Biol. 434:167360. 10.1016/j.jmb.2021.167360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Ueda  Y  et al.  2010. Gene-gene interactions between mutants that accumulate abnormally high amounts of proglutelin in rice seed. Breed Sci. 60:568–574. 10.1270/jsbbs.60.568. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  60. Vermeer  JE  et al.  2006. Visualization of PtdIns3P dynamics in living plant cells. Plant J. 47:687–700. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02830.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Wallroth  A, Haucke  V. 2018. Phosphoinositide conversion in endocytosis and the endolysosomal system. J Biol Chem. 293:1526–1535. 10.1074/jbc.R117.000629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Wang  TT, Li  XJ, Liu  NJ, Yang  Y, Gong  QQ. 2023. TurboID-based proximity labelling reveals a connection between VPS34 and cellular homeostasis. J Plant Physiol. 289:154100. 10.1016/j.jplph.2023.154100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Wang  WY  et al.  2012. Arabidopsis AtVPS15 plays essential roles in pollen germination possibly by interacting with AtVPS34. J Genet Genomics. 39:81–92. 10.1016/j.jgg.2012.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Wang  Y  et al.  2016. GOLGI TRANSPORT 1B regulates protein export from the endoplasmic reticulum in rice endosperm cells. Plant Cell. 28:2850–2865. 10.1105/tpc.16.00717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Wang  Y  et al.  2022. Plant UVRAG interacts with ATG14 to regulate autophagosome maturation and geminivirus infection. New Phytol. 236:1358–1374. 10.1111/nph.18437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Wang  YF  et al.  2024. Functional diversification of Sec13 isoforms for storage protein trafficking in rice endosperm cells. Plant Physiol. 196:2405–2421. 10.1093/plphys/kiae513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Wang  YH  et al.  2009. The vacuolar processing enzyme OsVPE1 is required for efficient glutelin processing in rice. Plant J. 58:606–617. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03801.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Wang  YH  et al.  2010. Osrab5a regulates endomembrane organization and storage protein trafficking in rice endosperm cells. Plant J. 64:812–824. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04370.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Wen  LY  et al.  2015. Guanine nucleotide exchange factor 2 for Rab5 proteins coordinated with GLUP6/GEF regulates the intracellular transport of the proglutelin from the Golgi apparatus to the protein storage vacuole in rice endosperm. J Exp Bot. 66:6137–6147. 10.1093/jxb/erv325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Wrobel  L  et al.  2022. Compounds activating VCP D1 ATPase enhance both autophagic and proteasomal neurotoxic protein clearance. Nat Communications. 13:4146. 10.1038/s41467-022-31905-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Yan  HG  et al.  2024. Rice LIKE EARLY STARVATION1 cooperates with FLOURY ENDOSPERM6 to modulate starch biosynthesis and endosperm development. Plant Cell. 36:1892–1912. 10.1093/plcell/koae006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Yang  YH  et al.  2019. Natural variation of OsGluA2 is involved in grain protein content regulation in rice. Nat Commun. 10:1949. 10.1038/s41467-019-09919-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Yasuda  H, Hirose  S, Kawakatsu  T, Wakasa  Y, Takaiwa  F. 2009. Overexpression of BiP has inhibitory effects on the accumulation of seed storage proteins in endosperm cells of rice. Plant Cell Physiol. 50:1532–1543. 10.1093/pcp/pcp098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Yoo  SD, Cho  YH, Sheen  J. 2007. Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts: a versatile cell system for transient gene expression analysis. Nat Protoc. 2:1565–1572. 10.1038/nprot.2007.199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Zhang  BL  et al.  2025. The MON1-CCZ1 complex plays dual roles in autophagic degradation and vacuolar protein transport in rice. J Integr Plant Biol. 67:35–54. 10.1111/jipb.13792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Zhang  XX, Li  H, Lu  H, Hwang  I. 2021. The trafficking machinery of lytic and protein storage vacuoles: how much is shared and how much is distinct?  J Exp Bot. 72:3504–3512. 10.1093/jxb/erab067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Zhou  CL  et al.  2023. A CYP78As-small grain4-coat protein complex II pathway promotes grain size in rice. Plant Cell. 35:4325–4346. 10.1093/plcell/koad239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Zhou  F  et al.  2013. D14–SCFD3-dependent degradation of D53 regulates strigolactone signalling. Nature. 504:406–410. 10.1038/nature12878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Zhu  JP  et al.  2021. Subunit E isoform 1 of vacuolar H+-ATPase OsVHA enables post-Golgi trafficking of rice seed storage proteins. Plant Physiol. 187:2192–2208. 10.1093/plphys/kiab099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Zhuang  XH  et al.  2013. A BAR-domain protein SH3P2, which binds to phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate and ATG8, regulates autophagosome formation in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 25:4596–4615. 10.1105/tpc.113.118307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Zinchuk  V, Zinchuk  Q, Okada  T. 2007. Quantitative colocalization analysis of multicolor confocal immunofluorescence microscopy images: pushing pixels to explore biological phenomena. Acta Histochem Cytochem. 40:101–111. 10.1267/ahc.07002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

kiag154_Supplementary_Data

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Data. Additional data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES