Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2026 Jun 2;22(39):e73985. doi: 10.1002/smll.73985

Molten Salt Assisted Carbon Nitride Overcomes Inherent Photocatalytic Limitations: Unique Characteristics for High‐Efficiency Light‐Driven Energy Production

Zirong Liu 1, Min Cheng 1,✉, Danlian Huang 1,✉, Suhua Chen 2,✉, Guangfu Wang 1, Hongda Liu 1, Qingkai Shi 1, Si Deng 1, Ao Chen 1, Xinyu Zou 1, Chenyu Liang 1
PMCID: PMC13360550  PMID: 42227313

ABSTRACT

Under the dual challenges of global energy transition and environmental governance, the development of novel photocatalytic materials to realize the efficient conversion of solar to clean energy has become an urgent need. Despite extensive research having demonstrated the impressive photocatalysis performance of molten salt‐based carbon nitride (MSCN), the precise structure regulation mechanism of MSCN and its conformational relationship with photocatalytic performance are still crucial issues that need to be addressed. Based on this, this review first systematically analyzes the structure characteristics of MSCN, with a focus on the precise regulation mechanisms of molten salt‐assisted synthesis (MSAS). Thereafter, the intrinsic mechanism of its performance enhancement caused by the structure characteristics is discussed in depth from various aspects. Then, innovative achievements of advanced MSCN in the fields of photocatalytic energy production are summarized, which reveals the intrinsic correlation between the structure characteristics, photogenerated charge carrier behaviors, and surface reaction kinetics. Finally, the major challenges and prospects of MSCN toward real‐world implementations are outlined. Undoubtedly, this study provides insights into the potential challenges associated with rationally designing high‐performance photocatalysts to reinforce photocatalysis, which will guide the generation of ideal catalysts.

Keywords: Carbon nitride, Molten salt‐assisted synthesis strategy, Photocatalysis, Photocatalytic energy productions, Photocatalytic mechanism, Structure characteristics


This review highlights the rational structural design of molten salt‐based carbon nitride (MSCN) for advanced photocatalytic energy conversion. By tailoring its structural characteristics, MSCN exhibits enhanced photoexcitation ability, improved charge carrier behavior, and optimized target reactions, thereby significantly boosting photocatalytic energy production. Critical assessments of current challenges and future prospects are provided to guide the future development of MSCN.

graphic file with name SMLL-22-e73985-g001.jpg

1. Introduction

Against the backdrop of the intensifying global energy and environmental crises, the development of renewable and clean energy has become an urgent necessity to replace fossil fuels [1, 2, 3]. Solar energy, as the most abundant natural energy source, has been widely utilized, while its diffuse and intermittent characteristics limit its direct utilization efficiency [4, 5]. Therefore, researchers have focused on the central role of photocatalytic systems in energy conversion and environmental governance, providing innovative solutions for building a sustainable energy system [6, 7, 8]. Currently, constructing a catalyst with high stability, selectivity and activity is the core issue in enhancing various photocatalytic reactions and plays a decisive role in photocatalytic systems [9, 10, 11, 12].

Graphitic carbon nitride (CN), which is composed of triazine and tri‐s‐triazine/heptazine rings, has attracted extensive attention due to its great visible‐light‐responsive, low cost and environmentally friendly nature [13, 14, 15]. Compared to conventional semiconductor photocatalysts, CN with appealing electronic structure and narrow bandgap can satisfy the visible‐light application requirement of photocatalysts [16]. Solid‐ and wet‐phase chemical methods are the main methods used to synthesize CN. The kinetically unstable intermediates in solid‐phase strategy and the narrow reaction window in wet‐phase method, however, strongly limit the degree of polymerization and lead to poor photocatalytic performance [17]. Therefore, it is urgently needed to develop a new strategy for synthesizing CN to overcome these problems. Based on this, the molten‐salt assisted synthesis (MSAS) method, which simultaneously combines both the solid and wet phase characteristics and endows the products with numerous advantages, has gradually attracted the attention of researchers [18].

The MSAS method synthesizes catalysts in an ionic liquid environment formed by one or more molten salts, offering advantages such as a wide reaction window, environmental friendliness, and easy product separation [19, 20, 21]. Compared to other CN‐based photocatalysts, the molten salt ‐ based CN (MSCN) exhibits better physicochemical properties, thereby simplifying complex modification steps. First, this method optimizes the kinetics and thermodynamics of the synthesis process, promoting reactant diffusion and facilitating the elimination of structural defects to produce structurally uniform products [16]. Second, salt ions with distinct electronic potential can affect the electronic structure of CN, thereby altering its physicochemical properties and catalytic activity [22]. Third, the robust polar forces within the ionic liquid phase environment significantly suppress atomic aggregation and disrupt the stability of intrinsic bonds, providing the prerequisites for the formation of new bonds within MSCN [23]. Accordingly, MSCN with superior macroscopic and microscopic structures exhibits exceptional photocatalytic performance.

The past few years have witnessed the wide application of MSAS strategies in the field of preparing MSCN to achieve efficient photocatalytic energy conversion (Figure 1). Although previous reviews have reported the application of MSAS in catalyst construction, they have mainly focused on the function of molten salts, the insight into the MSCN itself with unique characteristics has not yet received core attention [18, 24]. Meanwhile, the impact of synthesis parameters on the structure and properties of catalyst, as well as the intrinsic relationship among synthesis parameters, structure parameters, and photocatalytic mechanisms, remains to be clarified. To fill these gaps, a comprehensive overview of this subject is urgently needed. This review aims to systematically elucidate the “synthesis‐structure‐performance” relationship of materials from a multidimensional perspective. The article first explores the complex effects of actively controlling synthesis parameters on the evolution of structure features from a unique perspective. It then highlights the advanced performance enhancement of this material caused by its structure characteristics. Subsequently, the latest progress of MSCN in various photocatalysis systems is summarized, providing guidance for solving the hindrance faced within photocatalysis energy production from a reaction mechanism perspective and paving the way for the practical application of MSCN. Future prospects mainly involve developing role‐shaping technologies, monitoring the dynamic synthesis process, exploring deeper reaction mechanisms, and overcoming the practical application limitations.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Milestone timeline of MSCN‐based photocatalytic energy production. Reproduced with permission [25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36]. Copyright 2008, 2021, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2025, Wiley‐VCH. Copyright 2011, 2014, 2017, 2019, 2024, American Chemical Society. Copyright 2018, Elsevier.

2. Rational Design of MSCN With Desired Characteristics

The MSAS technique has demonstrated significant advantages in the preparation of CN material, and the deepening of the mechanistic studies has revealed the unique properties that this method confers to MSCN [37, 38, 39]. Four types of structure modulations, from macro‐ to micro, can be achieved through the MSAS strategy, including crystal and morphology optimization, functional group/chemical bond construction, microstructure modulation and energy band engineering implementation (Figure 2). These properties together constitute the core design elements to enhance the photocatalytic activity and profoundly affect the stability and reaction kinetics of the materials. Based on the breakthrough advantages of MSCN over CN synthesized by traditional methods, this section systematically analyzes its structure‐property correlation mechanism. In particular, the influence of external and internal synthesis parameters on the micro‐ and nanostructures of the materials is explored to provide theoretical support for the oriented design of efficient catalysts for different photocatalytic systems.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Structure characteristics within MSCN imparted by MSCN.

2.1. Crystal and Morphological Structure Control

Generally speaking, the crystalline state and morphology of the catalyst can greatly affect its catalytic activity. Optimizing the catalytic performance of catalysts can be started with the dual adjustment of external and internal structures [40, 41, 42]. For MSCN, the use of the MSAS method is expected to achieve favorable changes in the crystalline state and morphology of CN, such as desired crystallinity, optimal interlayer spacing and ideal framework.

2.1.1. Ideal Crystallinity Modulation

Crystallinity is a crucial parameter for assessing the perfection of the crystal structure of photocatalytic materials [43, 44]. Calcination parameters, especially heating rate and holding time, are the key factors to regulate the crystallinity of MSCN. Wang et al. investigated the effects of different heating rates (1°C/min, 2°C/min, 10°C/min) on changes of crystallinity in poly(triazine imide) (PTI) samples within the KCl‐LiCl molten salt system [45]. The crystallinity of PTI was found to be regulated by the heating rate and reached best at 2°C/min, as a faster heating rate (10°C/min) caused insufficient diffusion and dissolution of precursors in the molten salt, whereas a slower heating rate (1°C/min) led to the production of impurities. It was pointed out that variation in the holding time (2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 h) could affect the amount of unpolymerized amino groups, which was inversely correlated with the level of crystallinity, thereby causing corresponding changes in crystallinity [46]. The amount of the unpolymerized amino groups was first reduced and then increased along with the heating time prolonged from 2 to 12 h, allowing the best crystallinity to be achieved at 6 h.

Modulating the composition of the molten salt system is a central internal factor in optimizing material crystallinity, which guides the orderly crystal growth through domain‐limiting effects and templating [47]. By varying the type and proportion of molten salt, the formation of highly crystalline materials is expected. For example, K+ doped poly(heptazine) imide (KPHI) synthesized with potassium thiocyanate (KSCN) exhibited higher crystallinity than Ca2+ doped PHI (CaPHI) synthesized with calcium chloride (CaCl2) [48]. This might be due to the difference in charge and radius between the metal ions (monovalent for K+ vs divalent for Ca2+; 152 pm for K+ vs 114 pm for Ca2+). K+ engaged in a gentle interaction with the monolayer frames, while Ca2+ simultaneously interacted with multiple frames. The difference in the mode of action led to the formation of different layered structures, thereby altering the confined space in which the material formed, which in turn affected the crystallinity of the materials. The obtained PHI/NaxLiy with different levels of crystallinity through changing the NaCl/LiCl ratio (x/y = 1/10, 0/10, 1/9, 1/3, 7/3, and 9/1) further confirmed the role of the molten salt system in the formation of high‐crystallinity products [49]. It was found that the function of verified molten salt proportion lay in the different crystal growth modes. The single LiCl salt lacked nucleation sites and clear interfaces, while an excessive Na salt content (x/y > 1/9) disrupted the planar structure and changed the stacking sequence, which was not effective in inducing rapid growth of crystalline materials, thus making the PHI/Na1Li9 exhibit the best crystallinity.

The essence of crystallinity regulation lies in the synergistic mechanism between exogenous calcination parameters and endogenous molten salt system. It has been shown that increasing the calcination temperature can significantly enhance the ion diffusion kinetics of the molten salt and optimize the crystallinity by promoting lattice reconstruction, but the threshold of this temperature effect is not yet clear [50]. Currently, the focus of research is shifting to analyzing the coupling mechanism of internal and external parameters, such as exploring the dynamic matching relationship between the molten salt components and thermodynamic conditions in a specific temperature interval. This will provide theoretical support for the construction of a precise model for the regulation of crystallinity.

2.1.2. Golden Zone of Interlayer Spacing Exploration

The crux of the interlayer spacing control strategy lies in balancing the interlayer forces with the reaction space requirements, in which MSAS technology realizes the precise control of the interlayer structure through copolymerization and doping effects [51]. The copolymerization effect of the MSAS refers to “cooking” suitable raw material in the liquid environment provided by the molten salt, thus enhancing chemical reaction and promoting the catalyst formation [52]. Following this property, Wang et al. successfully compressed the interlayer spacing of tri‐s‐triazine‐based CN from 3.26 to 3.2 Å compared to pristine CN without MSAS [53]. This reduction in layer spacing originated from the enhancement of copolymerization by the molten salt system, which accelerated the deamination process of melamine, and the optimized synthesis parameters could further enhance the modulation effect. The group of Antonietti introduced oxalamide additives in combination with molten salt post‐processing to induce stronger van der Waals interactions and covalent cross‐linking between the heptazine layers, resulting in an ultra‐dense stacked structure with a spacing as low as 2.92 Å [52]. This study revealed the physicochemical mechanism by which component design and reaction kinetics synergize to regulate the interlayer architecture in the molten salt system.

Doping, as another effective method, has the core principle of changing the layer spacing by embedding external atoms into the material layers or letting them replace the C/N atoms in the original CN units. In the process of MSAS, once the molten salt ions entered the interlayer, the adjustment of layer spacing could be realized through the enhancement of interlayer interaction and size effect. Zhu et al. successfully achieved the regulation of the interlayer spacing of indium (In) doped‐CN (ICN‐x) by embedding varying amounts of In atoms between the layers through altering the dosage of molten salt [51]. The regulation of the interlayer spacing (from 3.2546 to 3.2185 Å) was attributed to the gradual increasing ratio of In atoms (from 0 wt.% to 0.326 wt.%), which led to the enhancement of interlayer electrostatic attraction (Figure 3a).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

The regulation role of MSAS in crystal and morphological structure control. (a) Decreased d(002) along with the increased In atoms. Reproduced with permission [51]. Copyright 2022, Wiley‐VCH. (b) Synthesis process of PTI‐M catalyst within different molten salt systems (LiCl/KCl/NaCl). (c) Gas evolution rate of PTI/Li+Cl− with diverse molten salt ratios. Reproduced with permission [58]. Copyright 2023, Wiley‐VCH.

It should be noted that the regulation of the interlayer spacing is also closely associated with the size effect of molten salt atoms, and the varying size effect among different atoms may result in diverse interlayer spacing. V. Lotsch et al. achieved active control of the interlayer spacing of M‐PHI (M = Li, Na, K) through regulating the type of salt system [34]. The increase in interlayer distance from K‐PHI (3.15 ± 0.01 Å) to Na‐PHI (3.17 ± 0.01 Å) to Li‐PHI (3.18 ± 0.02 Å) was attributed to the changes in interlayer stacking mode and pore channels caused by differences in interatomic geometric radius and hydration ability. Specifically, the higher hydration ability of Li+ (two hydrated shells) than that of K+ and Na+ (one hydrated shell) weakened interlayer interactions, shortened interlayer slipping distances, and enlarged pore channels, which resulted in larger interlayer spacing in Li‐PHI than Na‐PHI and K‐PHI. Whereas, the difference in interlayer spacing between Na‐PHI and K‐PHI was mainly due to the slightly larger atomic radius of Na (3.6 Å) than K (3.3 Å).

2.1.3. Favorable Framework Construction

Constructing an ideal framework, which aims to break the reaction inertia of original CN, can not only be used to tailor MSCN but is also a powerful means of ensuring that the photocatalytic reaction achieves superior performance [54, 55]. The framework adjustment of CN endowed by MSAS can be divided into two parts: the apparent structure and the internal unit structure.

The regulation of the apparent morphology and structure to find the well‐matched golden zone between reactive area and excellent photocatalytic performance can be achieved by promoting the adjustment of synthesis factors [56]. With the addition of NH4Cl to the raw material, the group of Zhao successfully decomposed a large amount of C3N4 into smaller fragments (CN‐NH4) and created a CN materials with multiple order‐disorder interfaces (CN‐NH4‐NaK) [57]. This order‐disorder interface connection facilitated the formation of more spacious and orderly separated redox centers, exhibiting excellent photocatalytic capacity. Considering the effects of various salts on the formation of the ideal framework, Wang et al. further revealed the synergistic effects among molten salts on the formation of ideal framework through synthesizing PTI/Li+Cl− within the binary/ternary molten salt systems (LiCl‐KCl‐NaCl) (Figure 3b) [58]. Different from the binary system, in which the PTI/Li+Cl− tended to grow along the c‐axis to form hexagonal prism frameworks. The ternary system with a lower LiCl content was more conducive to reducing the initial carbon and nitrogen polymerization of PTI/Li+Cl− nuclei, thus facilitating the extension of PTI/Li+Cl− along the 2D plane to form a hexagonal sheet framework. This two‐dimensional π‐conjugated system provided an additional way for charge transfer and improved the reaction efficiency. Therefore, the best golden balance in the dynamic crystal‐growth polymerization process of PTI/Li+Cl− was obtained when the mass ratio of LiCl in the salt system reached 0.1 (Figure 3c).

In light of the slight powerlessness of the modified apparent structure to fight against the obstacles within the body of MSCN, a special revolution of the internal framework needs to be carried out to obtain MSCN with satisfactory photocatalytic performance. For instance, a successful internal structural transformation from a fully ionic structure (AA′ structure) to a AA′ stacking with open channels structure and non‐ionic structure (AB structure) was achieved through employing hydrochloric acid (HCl) to deplete the molten salt ions that were maintained in the PTI structure [59]. Thanks to the HCl treatment, the molten salt ions that occupied the pores and were not conducive to the transport of reaction molecules were significantly exchanged with H+, thus promoting the formation of open channels. These open channels greatly facilitated the rapid transport of water molecules and protons in PTI, which contributed to the subsequent reactions.

2.2. Beneficial Functional Groups/Bonds Formation

The core of introducing beneficial functional groups/bonds is to set up the link associated with the molecular‐level structure and the excellent reaction performance [60, 61]. Through conversion of the original structure or brought by reaction substances, beneficial groups/bonds can be successfully introduced into MSCN.

In the realm of introduced foreign functional groups, the cyanide group (‐C≡N) and the hydroxyl group (‐OH) have emerged as the two most common groups [29, 62]. To investigate the effect of different molten salt systems on the introduction of favorable functional groups, Zhang et al. successfully realized the conversion of amine group (‐NH2) to ‐C≡N by reacting KOH with the ‐NH2 on the triazine ring in the feedstock [63]. The ‐C≡N significantly enhanced the adsorption of the reactants, thus facilitating the photocatalytic reactions. Indeed, some molten salts can act as reaction terminators, which leads to the formation of beneficial groups. A suitable case was terminating polymerization PCN (TP‐PCN), which was successfully prepared by using NaI molten salt as the terminator of the polymerization reaction [64]. The introduced iodine did not destroy the internal structure of PCN but terminated the polymerization by destroying the strong π–π interaction in bulk PCN, and then formed a fragment structure, thus exposing abundant edge active sites (AEASs) (‐C≡N and ‐OH), which indirectly enhanced the activity of TP‐PCN.

By the way, the selection of specific raw materials to introduce other favorable groups is also an excellent choice to achieve good catalytic performance. Zhang et al. successfully synthesized Na, K co‐doped PHI (NaK‐PHI‐A) within NaCl/KCl system through using electron‐deficient monomers 5‐amino‐tetrazole and adenine as raw materials [65]. The imide group formed a local donor‐acceptor (D‐A) structure with the nucleoside base, accelerated charge transfer while increasing the surface area, thus giving the entire reaction chain better photochemical properties.

For the foreign chemical bonds, the salt components play a crucial role in their formation. Yang et al. used KCl and KOH molten salt systems to promote the formation of plane‐rich CNs through the “stitching” effect of KCl and the “cutting” effect of KOH [66]. In that process, OH− reacted with C‐NHX to form an imine bond, which terminated polymerization of heptazine and weakened the van der Waals forces between the chains. This mechanism exposed numerous CNs planes, made the CNs have sufficient active sites and reduced the resistance of electron transfer between layers, which was conducive to the catalytic reaction.

Considering the crucial role of various salts in the formation of beneficial groups/bonds, it is conceivable that the synergistic effect between salts may also exert force for the formation of beneficial groups/bonds. Inspired by this, Wang et al. compared binary/ternary salt systems (KCl‐LiCl‐KSCN) to explore the link between the specific effects of salt synergies and the formation of favorable chemical bonds [67]. The introduction of KSCN promoted the formation of K‐N‐C structures compared with that in the binary salt systems (KCl‐LiCl). It was worth noting that the formation of K‐N‐C structure not only reduced the exciton binding energy but also provided sufficient protons for H2 precipitation by forming interfacial K•H2O clusters.

2.3. Microstructure Control

2.3.1. Sites Regulation

Lewis acid‐base sites/pairs are generally formed in MSCN with the help of molten salt atoms, either by self‐doping or by interacting with the unit structure [68, 69, 70]. Long et al. synthesized K‐doped triazine or tri‐triazine CN (KTTCN) and used it for photocatalytic H2O2 production [71]. The doped K+ finely regulated the reaction process: K+ (Lewis acid site) and N2 (Lewis base site) (Figure 4a) synergistically promoted isopropanol (IPA) adsorption and deprotonation, so that KTTCN could efficiently generate H2O2 even at a low concentration of IPA (only 0.5 vol%). Indeed, frustrated Lewis pairs (FLPs) composed of Lewis acid and base sites are more attractive than Lewis acid or base sites alone, since the push‐pull effect of FLPs, in which electrons are transferred between FLPs and reaction molecules, can significantly improve molecular activation and reaction kinetics [72]. Inspired by this, Xiong et al. took advantage of the molecules evaporated from NH4Cl to prepare PHI nanosheets with hydrogen bond‐modified FLPs (HM‐FLPs) (Figure 4b,c) [73]. Experimental and theoretical results confirmed the existence of unquenching Lewis acid‐base sites and the hydrogen bond between N and H atoms within PHI. The hydrogen bond acted as a steric hindrance to create suitable spatial spacing between Lewis acid and base sites, which was further conducive to the push‐pull effect of FLPs. As a result, the HM‐FLPs with enhanced push‐pull effect played an advanced role in reducing the adsorption energy of reaction molecules, contributing to the capture, bending and polarization of reaction molecules.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

The Microstructure control role of MSAS in MSCN. (a) Charge density and structural model of KTTCN. Reproduced with permission [71]. Copyright 2020, Elsevier. (b) Structure model and electron density iso‐surface of PHI‐FLP. (c) Illustration of HM‐FLPs in PHI. Reproduced with permission [73]. Copyright 2024, Wiley‐VCH. (d) The formation of carbon‐rich phase within PTI‐LiBr under different calcination temperatures and times. Reproduced with permission [83]. Copyright 2024, Wiley‐VCH. (e) The structure model of PTI/Li+Cl− without defects (left) and with defects (right). Reproduced with permission [77]. Copyright 2021, Wiley‐VCH.

Active substances, which help improve the catalytic activity of catalysts, can also be easily embedded into the CN unit with the assistance of MSAS [74, 75]. Xiang et al. successfully prepared a copper single atoms (Cu SAs)/crystal CN photocatalyst (Cu‐CCN) by adding copper dichloride (CuCl2) to the synthetic raw material [76]. The results showed that with the help of KCl‐LiCl molten salt system, the Cu SAs were stably and uniformly anchored in the structure of CCN. The introduced Cu SAs acted as adsorption sites, which endowed the Cu‐CCN with strengthened capacity to absorb reaction molecules, thus giving the Cu‐CCN highly selective and efficient photocatalytic.

2.3.2. Defect Control

Construction defects, as a strategy to adjust the structure of CN without the introduction of foreign atoms, have been recognized as an effective tool to overcome the barriers that impede the performance of catalysts [77, 78]. For example, the CN synthesized within an alkali metal molten‐salt system formed more nitrogen vacancies (Nv) compared to bulk CN, and the formation of Nv inhibited the charge recombination and significantly improved the catalytic performance [79]. Notably, the controllability of defect engineering by adjusting the synthesis parameters has been successfully confirmed [80]. Mi et al. revealed that the defects concentration in the lithium ion embedded crystalline CN (LCCN) could be controlled by the molten salt ratio (LiBr/LiCl = 10/0, 7/3, 5/5, 3/7, 2/8, 1/9, and 0/10) [22]. It was pointed out that the defect level increased with the decreasing LiBr/LiCl ratio, which might be due to the higher point temperature of LiCl than that of LiBr weakened the mass transfer process during thermal polymerization, thus contributing to defect level control.

The defect repair strategy can significantly inhibit the non‐radiative polymerization caused by low energy defect level. Since most photocatalysts inevitably introduce structural defects during the synthesis process, this strategy can be universally applied to improve catalytic activity [81]. For example, Li et al. successfully synthesized U2‐PHI with low defect content by using NH3 produced from urea decomposition [82]. The NH3 generated locally in the closed system provided a high partial pressure, which made the conversion of melamine to melon maintained a balance in a certain period of time. Consequently, the degree of polymerization of melon was increased, and the in‐surface Nv caused by high temperature oxidation was effectively filled, thus significantly improving the reaction transfer kinetics.

It is worth noting that the carbon‐rich phase within MSCN, which is often overlooked or considered to contribute to the reaction, actually produces low‐energy defect states that disrupt charge transfer pathways and absorb photoluminescence. Therefore, an effective strategy for promoting the repair of defects is located in considering how to curb the excessive formation of the carbon‐rich phase. Bojdys et al. explored the changes of the carbon‐rich phase of PTI‐LiBr by finely regulating the polymerization temperature and reaction time during molten‐salts treatment [83]. It was found that the color of the materials synthesized under harsh reaction (600°C, 12 h) conditions was brown, indicating the introduction of carbon pollutants. The content of carbon pollutants would further increase when the calcination temperature was prolonged to 72 h, as reflected by the black color of PTI. In contrast, under relatively mild conditions (550°C, 48 h), almost colorless products were obtained, and the C: N ratio was closest to the theoretical value of PTI, indicating that the product had the least defects (Figure 4d).

As for internal parameters, successful defect repair is mainly achieved through the function of the molten salt system. Mi et al. employed LiCl‐NaCl/KCl molten salt systems for defect repair to activate the near‐infrared activity of red PCN (RCN) [84]. The defect repair process was achieved through passivation of the valence electron pair of Na+ or K+ and substantial elimination of structural defects such as carbon vacancies (Cv) and Nv, which led to improved activity of RCN. Interestingly, the proximity between the melting point and polymerization temperature, as another factor, can enable the structure repair strategy through adjusting the polymerization process. A case in point was PTI/Li+Cl− crystals synthesized within different molten salt systems (LiCl/MCl, M = Na, K, Rb, Cs) at a certain polymerization temperature (550°C) [77]. The closest match between melting point and polymerization temperature was achieved in LiCl/NaCl, which provided mild reaction conditions and inhibited depolymerization of the triazine unit, thus producing PTI/Li+Cl− crystals with fewer structural defects (Figure 4e).

It is worth noting that the structure characteristics discussed above are not isolated but often coexist and operate synergistically or present specific trade‐offs that define the final material performance. For instance, the ideal framework construction may coexist with the interlayer space regulation, as both rely on the molten salt environment and salt ions. Interestingly, the salt ions contained in the interlayer spacing act as chemical anchors to fine‐tune atomic stacking through size effect or ionic interaction forces, while serving as template and structure direct agent to guide structure variation in the framework construction. Moreover, the high crystallinity acts as a highway to ensure rapid electron delivery, which provides a stable matrix for the growth of specific defects or functional groups. However, the degree of defect concentration needs to be further considered, as excessive defects will disrupt the long‐range order. The key to maximizing material potential lies not in isolated manipulation but in the comprehensive integration of these interdependent structural characteristics.

2.4. Electronic and Band Structure Control

Studies have shown that the use of alkali metal salt systems (e.g., KCl) can induce the electronic rearrangement within the carbon and nitrogen skeleton and effectively enhance the conjugated structure properties of the materials [85, 86, 87]. This process not only reduces the surface electrostatic potential of the material but also narrows the bandgap by reconfiguring the energy band structure, thus giving the catalyst good photocatalytic performance [88]. However, the study failed to reveal the core mechanism of the alkaline molten salt system in the electronic regulation. Unlike conventional non‐metal doping (e.g., B, P, and S), which primarily modulate electronic structures through band bending, electronic structure modulated by alkaline ions incorporated via MSAS leverages a dynamic ionic environment [89, 90]. The uniform liquid‐phase nucleation allows for rapid ion mobility, thereby accelerating reaction kinetics and lowering growth barriers. More importantly, the incorporated salt ions can actively modulate crystal plane features, thereby enabling precise electronic structure regulation. The strong polarity forces generated by the ionized cations and anions within MSCN also provide an additional driving force for electron release and transfer, which further facilitates the generation of built‐in electric field (BIEF). Numerous recent studies have confirmed the effectiveness of this mechanism, which collectively demonstrates the capability of the MSAS in modulating electronic architectures. For example, the core‐shell S‐scheme heterojunctions formed in the NaCl system triggered interfacial charge rearrangement, thereby resulting in the formation of a BIEF that optimized the charge transfer pathways by utilizing the synergistic effects of the alkali metal ions and the unique heterojunction microstructure [91]. Based on this, the research team further constructed a composite molten salt system (KCl‐MCl2, M = Mg2 +, Ca2 +, Sr2 +, Ba2 +) to carry out the mechanism exploration [92]. They found that doping of alkali metal ions prompted the conversion of extra valence electrons into free electrons, and this significant increase in electron density not only activated the n → π* electron‐leaping process. What was more important, the controllable regulation of the bandgap width was realized by filling the material conduction band (CB) through electron injection of K+, which favored the intrinsic reaction activity of M, K‐doped CN (MKCN). This finding not only revealed the key role of alkali metal ions in energy band engineering but also corrected the theoretical limitation of the traditional knowledge about the weak influence of alkaline‐earth metal ions on the energy band structure.

The electronic rearrangement optimizes the electronic structure, creating a potential difference that is a prerequisite for forming an internal electric field [93]. Wang et al. pointed out that the semi‐coherent interface with an electrostatic potential difference in PHI/PTI allowed the generation of a BIEF [94]. This generated BIEF facilitated the electron transport, which significantly enhanced the catalytic activity of PHI/PTI. Notably, the intensity of BIEF can be effectively controlled through the variation in the doping gradient of molten salt. Zhang et al. clarified the consistency between K+ ion gradient and BIEF by controlling the diffusion of K+ from the surface to the body within K+ implanted CCN (KCCN) [95]. The variation of the K+ concentration gradient both guided the generation and the intensity of the BIEF. On the one hand, the presence of a K+ concentration gradient caused a potential difference, which induced the generation of the BIEF. On the other hand, the increased diffusion time (from 2 to 4 h) caused a relatively uniform concentration of K+ on the surface and bulk, thus reducing K+ gradient and weakening the strength of the BIEF. Asymmetric elemental doping is another effective method for regulating the intensity of the BIEF. Zhu et al. confirmed that the constructed target catalysts with an asymmetric framework exhibited a higher crystal dipole moment compared with bulk catalysts. This enhanced dipole moment significantly boosted the intensity of BIEF, thus significantly promoting directional carrier migration [96].

The bottlenecks in regulating the electronic and band structure lies in achieving effective electron reconstruction. Upon incorporating the salt ions, the primary mechanism by which these ions regulate the electronic and band structure derives from their ability to vary the electron distribution and activation. The variation of raw materials also induces uneven electron distribution, just as the addition of methyl violet (MV) constructs an external electric field (EEF) for fostering the transmission of electrons [22]. Undoubtedly, the MSAS with controllable synthesis parameters presents an alternative approach to constructing an effective MSCN with the desired electronic and band structure.

Overall, the formation of unique structure characteristics of MSCN is essentially highly related to the synthesis parameters (external and internal). The external parameters focus on improving the copolymerization process, thereby enabling the formation of MSCN with high crystallinity and low impurity content. As for the internal parameters, the variation of raw materials can exert a driving force on the introduction of active centers, which in turn affects the directional synthesis process. Molten salt system, as another vital internal parameter, can tailor the polymerization through tuning the reaction process or affecting the properties of bulk CN. Figure 5 summarizes the exact effects of the synthetic parameters within the MSAS process on the formation of the four unique structure characteristics of MSCN, aiming to provide clear and general guidance for the rational design and synthesis of MSCN. The enhancement of the unique properties of CN by the above‐mentioned unique structures may further clarify the structure‐property correlation mechanism, which will be discussed in depth later.

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

The key function mechanism and relationship regarding the structure characteristic formation and synthesis parameters variation within MSCN.

3. Unique Advantages of MSCN in Photocatalytic

The performance optimization of photocatalytic materials needs to be based on an in‐depth understanding of the constitutive relationship of the catalyst, which is of great significance for guiding the directed design of efficient catalytic systems. The performance of an ideal photocatalyst is affected by the synergistic effect of multiple key parameters, including material stability, light absorption ability, charge carrier separation efficiency and surface reaction kinetics [97, 98]. Based on the previous systematic analysis of the synthesis factors and structural properties of MSCN, the unique performance advantages conferred on this material by the MSAS modification strategy have been deeply revealed. This chapter focuses on the “collision sparks” between the structural properties of MSCN and the current well‐established photocatalytic mechanisms. The research in this chapter will establish a systematic model of the constitutive relationship between the intrinsic properties of MSCN and practical application requirements, which will provide a theoretical framework for the design and regulation of subsequent photocatalytic system.

3.1. Photocatalytic Stability Enhancement

Enhancing the stability of CN photocatalytic materials is the core challenge for large‐scale applications, and MSAS technology provides an innovative solution to this challenge through a multi‐dimensional regulatory mechanism. For example, the cyamelurate groups formed during the MSAS process modulated the hydrophilicity of CN, thus endowing K and Na co‐doped PHI (K, Na‐PHI) with strengthened stability [99]. The cyamelurate groups were formed by replacing the ‐NHx group with cyamelurate moieties, and these negatively charged groups preferentially interacted with the water molecules of the Na+ compact hydration shell to form a hydration layer on the surface of the material. The existence hydration layer excluded the hydrogen bond between heptazine units, which prevented the occurrence of solidification and precipitation. Interestingly, the dissolved K, Na‐PHI could be separated from the reaction medium without affecting on its size (100 ± 30 Å) and any noticeable loss in activity and selectivity (>80%).

Beyond the introduction of beneficial groups, the bonds formed within the structure can also support the realization of high stability of MSCN in a new light. BCN nanostructures (BCNO) with B‐O bonds synthesized within LiCl/KCl achieved stable dispersion over wide pH adaptation [26]. This was mainly due to the negative state on the surface of the BCNO caused by B‐O bonds, which contributed to preventing the aggregation of BCNO particles, thus endowing the BCNO with strong stability over a wide pH range (pH ≥ 4). This kind of interfacial self‐regulation without additional modification enabled BCNO to maintain a high dispersion state in an aqueous environment for a long period, providing a new paradigm for designing the structural stability of photocatalytic materials under complex working conditions.

Considering the challenge that the presence of numerous cations in the reaction solution would impair the stability of the catalyst, Zhang et al. constructed a lattice oxygen modified CN (CCNO) with a unique three‐dimensional configuration using MSAS [100]. The introduced lattice oxygen and Nv during the MSAS process destroyed the in‐plane symmetry of CCNO and acted as strong FLPs, thus markedly enhancing the adsorption barriers of CCNO for the abundant ions Na+, K+, Mg2+, and Ca2+ in seawater compared with bulk CN. The enhanced adsorption barriers of bulk cations reduced the competitive adsorption between these ions and H3O+ in seawater, thus greatly enhancing resistance to ionic interference. This construction of the distinctive molecule configuration of CCNO demonstrated strong resistance to bulk cation contained within reaction medium, highlighting the exceptional applicability and stability of the unique characteristics in utilizing the sunlight.

It should be noted that the molten salt ions contained in MSCN will gradually be lost along with the reaction process, which is not conducive to the subsequent catalytic. Fortunately, Hou et al. verified the repair of the photochemical instability of PHI‐Na through the common ion effects [101]. The common ion effects was induced through the addition of NaCl, which significantly reduced the loss of Na+ in PHI‐Na and stabilized the band and electronic structure of PHI. The stabilized band and electronic structure inhibited the decrease in the delocalized electron density in heptazine units along with the loss of Na+, thus endowing the PHI‐Na with NaCl a strengthened stability compared to the PHI‐Na system without NaCl.

3.2. Photoexcitation Ability Reinforcement

Broadening the photo‐responsive range of photocatalytic materials is the basis for achieving efficient photoexcitation, which is realized by increasing the absorption range and efficiency of optical radiation [65, 102]. At present, one of the main research hotspots for improving the light absorption range is the development of MSCN with an excellent electronic structure. Taking the K+‐containing crystalline PCN (CPCN) synthesized by the KCl molten salt system as an example, the embedding of K+ induced an inhomogeneous distribution of the electrons in CPCN, although it was not directly involved in the formation of the electronic states [47]. This inhomogeneous distribution caused CPCN to exhibit a broad and sharp light absorption threshold at 460 nm, which was significantly shifted compared with that of PCN.

The absorption properties of semiconductor materials are determined by their bandgap in some extent, allowing for easily manipulating the light absorption properties by adjusting the bandgap of CN. Chu et al. produced Na and B co‐doped CN (NaB‐CN) and found the modified material exhibited significantly enhanced light absorption intensity in the full wavelength range of 200‐800 nm, accompanied by a pronounced redshift of the absorption edge [92]. This could be attributed to the introduction of Na and B, which significantly reduced bandgap and made electrons become more excited in the valence band (VB), thus improving the absorption range of visible light.

As for the efficiency of optical radiation, which refers to enhancing the total amount of radiant light used in the light reaction, MSCN with desired framework provides an opportunity to significantly improve it. A suitable case was the P and K co‐doped CN (PKCN) with a three‐dimensional flower‐like structure [103]. The three‐dimensional flower shape structure expanded the specific surface area of PKCN and exposed more active sites, thus showing the excellent light absorption performance. By the way, the modified morphological structure not only exerts force to form more active sites, but it also reduces the mass transfer resistance and creates a tight contact interface, all of which are conducive to enhancing light harvest efficiency [104].

Beneficial foreign functional groups/bonds with multiple functions can also provide a feasible way to enhance light absorption efficiency. Huang et al. revealed the crucial mechanism of ‐C≡N and P─N bonds in enhancing the light absorption [105]. The grafted ‐C≡N blocked the in‐plane growth of heptazine ring structural units, cleaved CN into small nanosheets and exposed more active sites, thereby creating more chances to absorb the light. Meanwhile, the P─N bond, combined with ‐C≡N, increased the light absorption level through the rearrangement of photogenerated electrons and holes.

Defect levels, which act as electron trap sites, can effectively improve the light trapping ability. The crucial role of Nv in g‐C3Nx‐M confirmed the improved light absorption efficiency mechanism of defect levels [106]. It was found that the absorption edge of g‐C3Nx‐M was redshifted by the introduction of Nv, and the redshift increased gradually aligned with the increase of defects. The defect level generated in the bandgap had a very low reduction driving force and could capture part of photogenerated electrons, which further improved the light absorption capability of g‐C3Nx‐M. However, the relationship between the number of defect levels and the enhancement of light trapping capacity needs to be viewed with caution, as the presence of excessive defect levels may lead to a reduction in the crystallinity of MSCN, thereby indirectly reducing its light‐trapping capability [84, 106].

3.3. Charge Carrier Separation and Transportation Improvement

The effective utilization of charge depends on the efficient separation and transport of charge carrier [33, 107, 108]. To address the problem of severe carrier complexity in CN materials due to intrinsic structural defects, the charge separation efficiency can be significantly improved by modulating the material morphology and structure [3]. For example, in K‐doped PCN (KPCN), the denser and more ordered interlayer structure induced by embedded K+ significantly reduced structure defects and improved the crystallinity [109]. This kind of structural optimization endowed KPCN with the capacity to highly promote the separation of electron‐hole pairs (e−–h+). Meanwhile, reconfiguring the intrinsic framework of the material also provides a new way to break through the charge complex limitation [110]. Tian et al. crushed the CN symmetric framework with the assistance of an N‐rich triazole group and constructed a molten‐salt based asymmetric CN (MACN), revealing the crucial role of reconstructing the original framework in inhibiting charge carrier recombination [111]. The formed asymmetric framework enhanced the molecular dipole moment (from 1.5 D to 10.8 D) and reduced the surface potential, which provided a strong driving force to improve the separation and the directional transfer of charge carrier, resulting in MACN with high separation efficiency (Figure 6a,b). The S‐scheme heterojunction structure constructed by the group of Jin further supports the key role of an ideal framework in optimizing charge carrier behavior [112]. The results showed that the formation of the S‐scheme heterojunction inhibited the charge carrier recombination and facilitated the directed migration of charge carrier, achieving the high transfer efficiency of charge carrier.

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6

The charge carrier regulation role of structure characteristics in MSCN. (a) Different surface potential between BCN, ACN, and MACN. (b) ESP and dipole moment comparison of BCN, ACN, and MACN. Reproduced with permission [111]. Copyright 2025, the Royal Society of Chemistry. (c) Surface potential and charge density of SCN and SCNV. Reproduced with permission [113]. Copyright 2025, Elsevier. (d) Structural merits differences between bulk PHI and highly ordered crystalline PHI. Reproduced with permission [35]. Copyright 2024, American Chemical Society.

In fact, beneficial groups and defects are believed to inhibit the recombination of charge carrier through trapping or activating the generated electrons, which indirectly promotes the charge carrier separation. By introducing Nv and ‐C≡N into sulfur self‐doped CN (SCNV), the charge separation could be effectively realized [113]. On the one hand, Nv promoted n → π* electron transition. On the other hand, ‐C≡N trapped photo‐excitons and promoted the directional transfer of photogenerated electrons, all of which were conducive to charge carrier separation. The overlap between the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) was also significantly reduced in SCNV compared with SCN, which further confirmed the high charge carrier separation efficiency of Nv and ‐C≡N (Figure 6c).

After achieving efficient charge‐carrier separation, enhancing directional migration becomes a key challenge. The construction of an ordered structure within PHI could improve crystallinity and optimize charge storage kinetics, thus showing excellent charge carrier transmission performance [35]. The analysis of PHI showed that the increased crystallinity reduced the electrons energy barrier, increased the active sites for electrons and generated a transfer channel at the heterogeneous interface between carbon and PHI, which facilitated the transport of charge carrier (Figure 6d).

It is noteworthy that the generated BIEF can act as a diode, which significantly reduces transmission barriers, thus promoting the directional transmission of charge carrier [22, 114]. Xiang et al. revealed the crucial role of BIEF on the charge carrier transmission within a highly crystalline CN (HCCN) with an internal ternary homogeneous junction [115]. The analysis of HCCN showed that highly enhanced charge transfer was attributed to the generated BIEF: (i) the BIEF promoted the directed migration of electrons and reduced the charge transmission barriers; And (ii) the electron accumulation within the molecular orbital/unoccupied orbital energy levels was facilitated by BIEF, which significantly facilitated the charge transmission kinetics in HCCN.

The MSCN materials constructed through the multiscale structure modulation strategy show significant advantages in photocatalytic performance and at reaction mechanism level. The material stability, as the basis for practical applications, can be synergistically enhanced by introducing functional exogenous groups, constructing moderate defects, and optimizing structural integrity. In terms of light trapping capability, electronic structure modulation can effectively broaden the spectral response range, while morphology optimization can enhance energy utilization by enhancing the light scattering effect. For the charge carrier separation and transport challenges, the directional driving effect of the BIEF and the defect modulation mechanism of the strong interactions jointly construct an efficient transport channel. By systematically comparing the effects of different modification processes on the stability, photoexcitation efficiency, and carrier mobility of the materials, the research data fully confirm the comprehensive performance advantages of the MSCN system over traditional materials in the photocatalytic field (Figure 7).

FIGURE 7.

FIGURE 7

The enhanced photocatalytic properties and unique advantages of MSCN. (a) The closed loop of “structure characteristics‐functions‐properties”; (b) Unique catalysis properties advantages of MSCN compared to bulk CN.

4. The Photocatalytic Applications of MSCN

MSCN materials prepared by multiscale structure modulation strategy have shown promising applications in photocatalysis. The unique structural advantages of MSCN not only enhance the light trapping ability and carrier separation efficiency, but also generate a deep synergistic effect with the intrinsic optical properties of carbon nitride, which shows good adaptability. For the third stage of the photocatalytic reaction, it is necessary to analyze the structure‐activity relationship of MSCN with the kinetic characteristics of the specific reaction. In this paper, the representative results of MSCN in various photocatalytic systems are systematically sorted out to further focus on the activation of the redox reaction pathway by its surface interface regulatory mechanism. By revealing the dynamic correlation between the distribution of functional sites, the evolution of electronic states, and the adsorption of reactive intermediates, the paper focuses on analyzing the intrinsic mechanism of its performance enhancement, which provides theoretical support and practical guidance for the subsequent development of high‐performance photocatalytic systems. Next, it will be shown how the comprehensive performance advantages imparted by MSAS, as elaborated in Chapter 3, collectively address the specific challenges of different photocatalytic energy reactions (such as H2O2 selectivity, HER kinetics, CO2RR adsorption/activation).

4.1. H2O2 Evolution Reactions

As an environmentally friendly oxidizer, H2O2 is touted as one of the most promising emerging clean energy sources. In the photocatalytic production of H2O2, two primary reaction pathways are involved: oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) (Equations ((1), (2), (3), (4))) and water oxidation reaction (WOR) (Equations ((5), (6), (7), (8), (9))) [116]. The main challenges of H2O2 production currently faced are twofold [117]. (i) the insufficient reaction molecules utilization due to the low redox potential makes the competitive reaction exist in both ORR and WOR; And (ii) the dependence of sacrificial agent (SA) to reduce high reaction barriers and strengthen reaction kinetics. Reassuringly, the MSCN with unique characteristics provides a new pathway to overcome these obstacles and meet the different requirements of H2O2 redox reactions. To more intuitively illustrate the advantages of MSCN in H2O2 production applications, some recently reported representative catalysts for H2O2 production are summarized (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

Summary of some recently H2O2 evolution reaction catalysts.

Methods Catalysts H2O2 yield Molten‐salt systems Key structural parameters Experiment parameters Photocatalytic efficiency a Reactive species Refs.
MSAS Ox‐KPHI 16.9 mM h−1 KCl/LiCl

‐C≡N, Nv and

n→π∗ electronic transition

600°C, 4 h AQY = 41% OOH∗ [118]
CN‐I/I3 62.52 mM g−1 h−1 KI

High crystallinity

Electronic structure

80°C, 4 h AQY = 34.61% •O2 − [119]
g‐C3N5‐K, K 151.14 µM h−1 KCl/KOH ‐C≡N and ‐OH groups 550°C, 4 h — •O2 − [120]
UiO/IKCN 72.6 mM g−1 h−1 KI/KCl

Interlayer spacing

Electronic structure

550°C,4 h AQY = 10.28% •O2 − [121]
Thermally treated CoOx‐NvCN 244.8 µM L−1 h−1 — Nv and CoOx clusters 550°C, 3 h AQY = 5.73% OOH∗ [123]
C3N4‐nv 75.66 µM g−1 h−1 — Nv 520‐650°C, 2‐10 h AQE = 3.85% 1,4 ‐ endoperoxide [124]
Deposition HCP 116.25 µM g−1 h−1 —

Hollow structure,

PDA overlayer

550°C, 4 h AQY = 3.60% •O2 −, •OH [125]
Solvothermal Ph‐MCN 195.4 µM h−1 — Fragmented D‐A polymers 450°C, 4 h — •O2 −, •OH [126]
a

Apparent Quantum Yield (AQY) or apparent quantum efficiency (AQE).

ORR:

O2+e−→·O2−−0.33Vvs.NHE (1)
·O2−+e−+2H+→H2O21.44Vvs.NHE (2)
·O2−+H+→∗OOH,∗OOH+e−+H+→H2O2 (3)
O2+2e−+2H+→1,4−endoperoxidespecies→H2O20.68Vvs.NHE (4)

WOR:

2H2O+4h+→O2+4H+1.23Vvs.NHE (5)
2H2O+2h+→H2O2+2H+1.76Vvs.NHE (6)
H2O+h+→·OH+H+2.73Vvs.NHEacidiccondition (7)
OH−+h+→·OHalkalinecondition (8)
·OH+·OH→H2O21.14Vvs.NHE (9)

As for the insufficient reaction molecules utilization, MSCN can overcome it through regulating reactive centers to effectively trap reaction molecules with the help of modified morphological structures, beneficial groups and defect levels. Pelicano et al. successfully confirmed the key mechanism by which structural distortion, ‐C≡N and Nv improve the O2 molecules utilization within the oxide amide‐doped KPHI (Ox‐KPHI) framework [118]. Specifically, the structural distortion increased the distance between N atoms from 7.4 to 7.6 Å, which led to an uneven distribution of electron density, thus causing the O2 adsorption and convention sites located on Nv and ‐C≡N. This reactive site conversion lowered the O2 adsorption energy while generating more reactive sites in Ox‐KPHI, which significantly promoted the efficient trapping of O2 (Figure 8a). Since the efficient reaction molecules utilization depends not only on the adsorption of reaction molecules but also on the inhibition of competitive reaction, the modified crystal and electronic structures that can achieve the selection of effective reaction pathways are definitely feasible means. Cite highly semi‐crystalline CN embedded with an I−/I3 − redox medium (CN‐I/I3) as an example, the enhanced crystallinity and the inserted I−/I3 − synergistically achieved high O2 utilization from two aspects: adsorption and selective reaction pathway [119]. The O2 adsorption was enhanced through the van der Waals force between the material fixed dipole and the O2 dipole. Meanwhile, the lower O2 adsorption energy and the increased O‐O bond length of CN‐I/I3 compared to CN implied the enhanced activation affinity of O2, which enabled CN‐I/I3 to energetically favor the *OOH formation reaction pathway and the subsequent hydrogenation process (Figure 8b).

FIGURE 8.

FIGURE 8

(a) Relative formation energy comparison between KPHI and Ox‐KPHI within H2O2 production. Reproduced with permission [118]. Copyright 2024, Wiley‐VCH. (b) Energy comparison of H2O2 production between CN, CN‐I and CN‐I/I3. Reproduced with permission [119]. Copyright 2024, Nature Publishing Group. (c) Comparison of O2 adsorption energy of g‐C3N5, g‐C3N5‐K, and g‐C3N5‐K, K. (d) Dispersed as‐prepared catalysts in water for 14 days. Reproduced with permission [120]. Copyright 2024, Wiley‐VCH. (e) Verified Fermi level of IKCN and NH2‐UiO‐66 before and after contact [121]. Copyright 2024, Wiley‐VCH.

SA dependence will cause additional costs and difficulties in subsequent product collection. The key to addressing this issue lies in lowering the reaction energy barrier and improving reaction kinetics to meet the requirements of redox potentials. The introduction of the abundant edge active sites (AEASs) (‐C≡N and ‐OH) was believed to contribute to achieving the de‐dependence of SA through kinetic optimization [120]. On the one hand, AEASs significantly provided more surface‐active sites for the adsorption and activation of O2, which significantly enhanced the O2 adsorption energy (Figure 8c). On the other hand, AEASs made the g‐C3N5‐K, K have good hydrophilicity and dispersion, forming a quasi‐homogeneous photocatalytic system, thus ensuring that the reaction could be stably carried out in a pure water system (Figure 8d).

Actively regulating the electronic structure to enhance the redox capacity is another feasible strategy to improve slow kinetic processes and achieve SA independence. Ma et al. clarified the role of MSAS in achieving the SA‐independence through electronic structure modulation from both thermodynamic and kinetic aspects within I−/K+ co‐doped CN with NH2‐UiO‐66 (UiO‐IKCN) [121]. In thermodynamic aspect, the matched band structure between NH2‐UiO‐66 and IKCN caused the formation of the BIEF, which in turn endowed the band structure with strong reduction and oxidation potentials, thus enhancing the redox capacity of UiO‐IKCN. This strengthened redox capacity endowed UiO‐IKCN with a lower barrier from *O2 to *OOH compared to CN, suggesting a kinetic advantage in the 2e− ORR pathway (Figure 8e). It should be noted that the finding of this research supports the crucial role of thermodynamic and kinetic optimization in enhancing the efficiency of MSCN under SA‐free or low‐SA conditions, which provides new insight into the design and comprehensive view of a SA‐independent photocatalytic H2O2 production system. However, the specific contribution values of thermodynamics and kinetics to the SA‐free performance remain ambiguous. Future studies could employ ultrafast spectroscopy and other means to directly visualize charge carrier behavior under SA‐free conditions, thereby quantitatively deconvoluting the contributions of each factor [122].

4.2. H2 Evolution Reactions (HER)

As one of the key reactions in photocatalytic energy production technology, HER is considered a promising solution to the current energy crisis. Currently, photocatalytic H2 production via overall water splitting (OWS) involves two half‐reactions: proton reduction in CB (Equation (10)) and oxygen precipitation in VB (Equation (11)) [127, 128]. The efficiency of OWS is limited by the inherent problems of high activation energies, limited active sites, and severe competitive reactions, which must be overcome. Previous studies have already confirmed that photo‐thermal synergy is a pivotal strategy for enhancing the reaction kinetics, offering an effective pathway to boost HER performance [129]. Moreover, since most semiconductors do not have the ability to overcome these challenges and the application of cocatalysts will cause secondary problems that need to be addressed, further modified catalysts are needed to achieve effective reaction efficiency [130, 131]. In this context, MSCN demonstrates unique advantages, effectively addressing the inherent limitations of the OWS reaction and avoiding the additional issues associated with cocatalysts, thereby providing an ideal platform for achieving efficient HER [132]. Recent reports on representative HER catalyst studies further highlight the superiority of MSCN in HER applications (Table 2).

HER:2H++2e−→H2 (10)
OER:2H2O→O2+4H++4e− (11)

TABLE 2.

Summary of some recently H2 evolution reaction catalysts.

Methods Catalysts H2 yield Molten‐salt systems Key structural parameters Experiment parameters Photocatalytic efficiency a Refs.
MSAS PTI/HCN 478 µM h−1 KCl/LiCl Desired framework 550°C,4 h — [36]
H‐PHI 18.2 mM g−1 h−1 KCl/LiCl Open channel structure 550°C,4 h AQY = 73% [133]
CNx|Ni2P

microfibers: 104 ± 10 µmolH2 gsub−1

PET:22.0 ± 1.3 µmolH2 gsub−1

KSCN Band structure 400°C, 1 h and 500°C, 0.5 h PET: 24.5 ± 3.3% PLA: 6.7 ± 0.8% [30]
Pt/C3N4 5.8 mL h−1 cm−2 KCl/LiCl — 525°C, 2 h AQE=40% [135]
Thermally treated SS‐CNP 136.2 µM h−1 mg−1 — Break symmetry structure 550°C, 4 h AQY = 76.4% [136]
g‐C3N4‐Cx 22.45 µM h−1 — electronic polarization area 550°C, 4 h AQE = 4.7% [137]
CNND/CNUN 580 µM h−1 — Regulation of band structure and electronic structure 550°C, 4 h — [138]
Solvothermal C‐Mo3S9@CN 559 µM h−1 — Mo3S9 clusters 125°C, 1 h AQY = 88.6% [139]
a

Apparent Quantum Yield (AQY).

Highly modified structural parameters of MSCN allow for significant potential for overcoming the limitations of HER. V. Lotsch et al. pointed out that the nanosheets could break the sluggish HER kinetics limitation of bulk PTI [27]. The analysis of the excellent HER performance showed that the nanostructure made the PTI more feasible to contain water due to the matched surface energy between nanosheets and water molecules, which endowed the PTI nanosheets with strong resistance to environmental parameters and strengthened capacity to trap more reaction molecules. More importantly, more active sites and larger reactive areas brought by the nanosheets all favored photocatalysis. These nanostructure characteristics made the PTI nanosheets show stronger stability and better HER performance than bulk PTI under both acidic/basic and long time (130 h) conditions.

Desired framework of MSCN is believed to contribute to inhibiting the side and back reactions, which is another indirect pathway to enhance HER performance. Taking the PTI/heptazine‐based CN (PTI/HCN) as an example, the construction of the PTI and HCN framework contributed to inhibiting the reverse reaction in HER [36]. Theoretical calculations confirmed the generation of BIEF due to the different potential of PTI and HCN, which in turn enabled the spatial separation of redox‐active sites at the interface between PTI and HCN. The spatially separated redox active sites inhibited the occurrence of reverse reactions, thus allowing the PTI/HCN to achieve better HER compared to HCN (12 times) and PTI (2.4 times) (Figure 9,b).

FIGURE 9.

FIGURE 9

(a) Charge carrier separation mechanism of PTI and PTI/HCN. (b) OWS activity of PTI/HCN with different phase ratios. Reproduced with permission [36]. Copyright 2025, Wiley‐VCH. (c) Comparison of H2 generation rate between different final concentrations of HCl on the content of Pt. Reproduced with permission [133]. Copyright 2024, American Chemical Society. (d) Polymer photoreforming mechanism and practical application of CNx|Ni2P. Reproduced with permission [30]. Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society. (e) Practical panel reactors for methanol‐to‐H2 conversion. Reproduced with permission [135]. Copyright 2024, Wiley‐VCH.

Widely using cocatalysts will lead to secondary problems about the amount selection and the subsequent problems of stability and selectivity that significantly suppress efficient HER. To overcome these challenges brought by cocatalyst, the construction of MSCN is oriented to break the HER limitations while gradually realizing the de‐dependence of cocatalysts. The guided framework transition from K‐PHI to H‐PHI had exhibited great potential in breaking the excessive use limitation of cocatalysts [133]. This framework transition transformed the ionic structure into a covalent structure, which facilitated the formation of the “locked charges”, thus forming more photocatalytic deposition centers for platinum (Pt). The increased deposition centers promoted the homogenization of Pt on the catalyst surface, which significantly reduced the requirement of Pt. With these results, the H‐PHI exhibited a higher HER activity even with a sparse platinum (Pt) cocatalyst (only 0.05%, two orders of magnitude lower than previous systems) compared to K‐PHI (Figure 9c).

In addition to OWS, MSCN also provides other pathways that contribute to excellent HER [134]. A suitable case was the successful conversion from plastics to H2 through employing the cyanamide‐functionalized CN/nickel phosphide (CNx|Ni2P) (Figure 9d) [30]. The analysis of the plastic‐to‐H2 process showed that the cyanamide groups tuned the VB and CB to +2.2 eV and ‐0.5 eV, respectively, which made the CNx|Ni2P conducive to the plastic‐to‐H2 reaction. This verified band structure made CNx|Ni2P exhibit efficient plastics‐to‐H2 conversion while producing more high value organic chemicals (acetate and formate). In practical application, the optimal H2 yield reached 53.5 µmolH2 gsub −1 over the course of 5 days within a 60 cm2 irradiation area reactor and no loss in system efficiency was observed as the volume of pollutants increased from 2 to 120 mL. The pure organic products‐to‐H2 conversion also supported the great potential of MSCN in achieving excellent HER, just as the Pt/C3N4 exhibited excellent HER performance in both experiments and reactors. Although pure methanol had been confirmed with the advantages of inhibiting competitive reactions and promoting desorption of CH2O, the “structure‐mechanism” relationship of Pt/C3N4 in promoting methanol‐to‐H2 conversion was not yet clear, which needed to be further explored (Figure 9e) [135].

4.3. CO2 Reduction Reactions (CO2RR)

Photocatalytic CO2RR is an environmentally friendly emission reduction technology that employs clean solar energy to convert CO2 into high value‐added C1 (e.g., CO, CH4) or C2+ products (e.g., C2H4, C2H5OH) [10, 140]. The process commences with the adsorption of CO2 molecules, followed by activation and desorption steps involving electrons and holes to generate high value‐added products. Moreover, the coupling of reduction half‐reactions with the selective oxidation of organic compounds represents a promising direction for improving the atomic economy and added value of this process. Although various strategies have been taken to solve the challenges of adsorption, activation, and desorption in CO2RR caused by the intrinsic limitations of active sites and the sluggish kinetics of CN coupling reactions, two major challenges remain [11]. The first is the extreme difficulty in activating highly stable CO2 molecules, which stems from their inherent thermodynamic stability (due to their high symmetry and linear structure). The second is the similar thermodynamic energy barriers of CO2 reduction products, which limit reaction efficiency and selectivity. MSCN with broadened photoexcitation, heightened charge carrier separation/transportation and strengthened redox capacity definitely provides a new insight to solve the abovementioned challenges. Meanwhile, the enhanced activity/selectivity of CO2RR in turn provides insight into the unique structure‐CO2RR activity relationship in MSCN. Recent advancements in MSCN applications for CO2RR further highlight its competitive advantages in the field of CO2RR (Table 3).

TABLE 3.

Summary of some recently CO2 evolution reaction catalysts.

Methods Catalysts Products yield Molten‐salt systems Key structural parameters Experiment parameters Active species Selectivity a Refs.
MSAS TCN/Ni(OH)2

CO: 23.32 µM g−1 h−1

CH4: 12.47 µM g−1 h−1

LiCl/KCl Desired framework 550°C,2 h *COOH — [141]
PTI CO: 44 µM h−1 KCl/LiCl surface pyridine N sites 400°C, 6 h and 550°C,24 h *COOH 93% [142]
CeCo‐PTI CH4: 181.7 µM g−1 KCl/LiCl Co SAs and CeO2 nanoparticles; BIEF 550°C,4 h CH3O* 88.3% [146]
CoPc/PHI CO: 116 µM g−1 h−1 KCl/LiCl Co SAs 550°C,4 h *COOH 97% [145]
Thermally treated NS‐P‐g‐C3N4‐Ni HCOOH: 72.3 µM h−1 — Ni metal cluster 400°C, 2 h *CO2•−, *COOH 60% [147]
VN‐CN‐HNSs CO: 35.2 µM h−1 — VNs, delocalized π electron clouds 500°C, 2 h *COOH *CO2 100% [148]
Solvothermal CCN Hydrocarbon fuels:12.07 µM h−1 — ‐C≡N and carboxyl groups highly ordered crystallinity 550°C, 2 h — 91.5% [149]
a

The selectivity of the products.

Efficient CO2 activation typically requires high energy input to break its stable structure. The tailored MSCN with modified morphological structures and specific structural functional components provides an opportunity to solve this high energy barrier limitation. The tubular triazine‐based CN with Ni(OH)2 nanosheets (TCN/Ni(OH)2) was employed to clarify the crucial role of modified morphological structure and introduced external substance in enhancing CO2RR [141]. On the one hand, the tubular structure gave TCN more adsorption sites and reduced the formation energy barriers of ∗OOH, which effectively strengthened the activation ability of CO2 (Figure 10a). On the other hand, the modified tubular structure also ensured sufficient protons transferred to the Ni(OH)2 nanosheets, thus matching the reaction kinetics through the enhanced proton‐coupled electron transfer reaction process induced by “3CO2 + 2H2O = CH4 + 2CO + 3O2”. This tandem effect of modified morphological structure and foreign substance provided a new perspective in designing a MSCN with excellent CO2RR ability.

FIGURE 10.

FIGURE 10

(a) Energy profile comparison for CO2RR between HCN, TCN, and TCN/Ni(OH)2. Reproduced with permission [141]. Copyright 2024, Wiley‐VCH. (b) Photocatalytic CO2RR activity of PTI, PTI/melon and melon. Reproduced with permission [142]. Copyright 2025, American Chemical Society. (c) Free energy and reduction way for CO2RR of PHI and CoPc/PHI. Reproduced with permission [145]. Copyright 2025, Wiley‐VCH. (d) Illustration of the well‐designed photocatalytic platform by Co‐doped CeO2 with PTI. (e) 3D charge density of Co core and 2D valence charge density of Co‐doped CeO2. (f) Comparison of CH4 and CO selectivity of various prepared catalysts. Reproduced with permission [146]. Copyright 2024, Wiley‐VCH.

With the capacity to effectively reduce the activation barrier of CO2RR, site regulation engineering has also been proven to be an effective means to promote the activation and conversion of CO2. Based on this concept, abundant active pyridine N sites were embedded into the hexagonal prism PTI crystals to endow PTI with superior CO2 reduction capacity [142]. The introduced surface pyridine N sites not only acted as reactive sites to trap more CO2 molecules but also reduced the formation energy barrier of *COOH species, which played a key role in the capture, activation and conversion of CO2, thus giving the PTI manifest superiority in photoreduction CO2 (Figure 10b).

The key to slowing the poor selectivity and activity limitations of CO2RR lies in regulating the reaction pathways toward target products. In this context, various SAs have been anchored and integrated within MSCN to enhance CO2RR due to their strong ability to enhance the adsorption capacity and mediate the reaction pathways [90, 143, 144]. For example, cobalt phthalocyanine (CoPc) assembled PHI (CoPc/PHI) that contained Co SAs exhibited excellent CO2RR performance [145]. Experimental and theoretical results showed that Co SAs not only acted as reactive sites to enhance the adsorption of CO2 molecules, but also reduced both the formation energy barriers of *COOH and the desorption energy barriers of CO, thus facilitating CO2‐to‐CO conversion and the rapid desorption of CO (Figure 10c). The synergistic effect between SAs and nanoparticles that can reduce the energy barrier of CO2RR reactive intermediates is another feasible pathway to break the selectivity and activity limitations of CO2RR. Crystalline CN ligands that contained the synergistic effect between Co SAs and CeO2 nanoparticles revealed the contribution of the synergistic effect in CO2RR (Figure 10d) [146]. The electric potential difference between Co SAs‐doped CeO2 and PTI caused the generation of BIEF, which created a strong interconnect for subsequent directed dynamic charge transfer, thus facilitating reaction kinetics toward multiple electron‐involving reduction pathways (Figure 10e). Meanwhile, the synergistic effects between CeO2 and Co SAs caused the directional charge control, which made the CeCo‐PTI more inclined to protonate CO* into hydrogenation species rather than dissociate it from surface, thus enhancing the capacity for the ideal protonation pathway (Figure 10f).

5. Summary and Outlook

Designing efficient and stable photocatalysts is a key approach to significantly improving solar energy conversion efficiency and addressing environmental crisis and energy depletion issues. As an emerging CN material, MSCN has garnered significant attention for its ability to overcome the inherent limitations of traditional materials. This review first explores the effect of extra‐ and internal synthesis parameters on the formation of the unique structure characteristics, involving crystal and morphological structures, beneficial functional groups/bonds, microstructures and electronic and band structures. Subsequently, building on the clarification of structural regulation, the paper analyzes how these unique characteristics enhance material stability, photoexcitation capability, and the separation and transport efficiency of photogenerated carrier. Then, the energy applications of MSCN clearly demonstrate its great potential in breaking through the energy barriers existing in the H2O2 evolution, HER and CO2RR, and achieving efficient production of energy substances. Although MSCN with ideal photocatalytic performance can be successfully synthesized by regulating the MSAS process, numerous challenges remain to be overcome (Figure 11).

  • (I)

    Detecting the details of the dynamic reaction process. Although there has been considerable discussion on the influence of adjusting MSAS process parameters on the final MSCN structure parameters, the dynamic process, especially the growth process of reaction products in the molten salt system, and the specific mechanisms guiding the selection of reaction parameters still need to be explored in depth. More importantly, the current understanding of the influencing parameters is incomplete, and research on how environmental factors significantly affect MSCN remains insufficient. Current studies have only addressed the impact of environmental humidity on material properties, and the mechanism by which it affects interlayer spacing has not been thoroughly elucidated. Considering these challenges, the advanced exploration techniques, such as in situ transmission electron microscopy (in situ TEM), in situ X‐ray absorption fine spectroscopy (in situ XAFS), Artificial intelligence (AI), and density functional theory (DFT), need to be further developed to detect the dynamic formation process of key intermediates. Additionally, more attention can be paid to how the design principles of related porous materials inform MSCN engineering. For instance, covalent organic frameworks (COFs), with their well‐established structure‐property relationships, can serve as highly tailorable platforms to guide the precise design of MSCN [150]. Such comparative analysis is crucial for tailoring the porosity and electronic structure to enhance photocatalytic performance. Developing these advanced techniques and leveraging insights from analogous materials help to establish the specific equation of reaction process‐reaction parameters‐reaction activity, which will guide the design of more efficient MSCN.

  • (II)

    Exploring the deeper light on reaction mechanism. The catalytic mechanism of MSCN in specific production reactions needs to be further studied. A key challenge lies in better understanding the synergy between thermodynamic feasibility and kinetic dominance of MSCN under SA‐free or cocatalyst‐free conditions. While previous research has confirmed the crucial role of kinetic optimization in enhancing the energy production efficiency of MSCN under SA‐free or cocatalyst‐free conditions, the thermodynamic feasibility also provides the essential framework that enables these kinetic advantages. Future work should further quantify the individual and combined contributions of thermodynamics and kinetics, enabling a more precise elucidation of the underlying reaction mechanism. Another challenge lies in exploring the multiple‐dimensional mechanism. Nowadays, only the role of a single response mechanism has been revealed in most MSCN research. Since the dual‐channel mechanism has been proven to have better potential for energy production than a single response mechanism, it is of great potential to explore the various dimension mechanisms in energy production. Previous studies have also confirmed that coupling the half reduction and the selective oxidation of organic compounds exhibits significant potential in enhancing the atom economy and value of the process, as they can facilitate energy production while generating some value‐added substances [143]. For instance, Li et al. constructed a COF (TFPD)/CdS catalyst, which broke the slow e−–h+ separation and uncontrolled 5‐hydroxymethylfurfural conversion limitations, achieving highly selective oxidation of 5‐hydroxymethylfurfural or C–C coupling in conjunction with H2 evolution [128]. Future research should prioritize exploring the reaction path and couple reactions to rationally design MSCN with multi‐pathway capacity, thus improving energy efficiency and economic value, achieving a win‐win situation, and broadening application prospects of MSCN. More importantly, there still remains a system theory vacancy in determining the optimal ratio between various structures and the synergistic effect between various structure characteristics. With the deepening of the research, the synergistic roles between various structure characteristics have been gradually noted. Li et al. confirmed that the synergistic interaction between morphology regulation and S‐scheme heterojunction significantly enhanced the loading capacity and improved charge carrier transportation, thereby enhancing photocatalytic efficiency [151]. However, the relationship between the optimal proportion of CN structures endowed by MSAS is still unclear, which should be deeply revealed to find the golden zone between the optimal proportion of structure and various catalytic capacity systems.

FIGURE 11.

FIGURE 11

The major challenges and prospects of MSCN toward real‐word implementations.

  • (III)

    Practical application barriers. There remain great challenges in achieving the application of MSCN from lab to field. The first is economic effectiveness. Although MSCN has demonstrated the potential to enhance the reaction kinetics and reduce reliance on SA and cocatalysts, the challenges of the SA/cocatalyst dependence still remain. Moreover, due to the high cost of the molten salts and the significant obstacles remain in the recovery procedure, the cost of MSAS is still higher than that of other methods. Further efforts should focus on developing low‐cost and recoverable molten salts to achieve higher cost effectiveness. Safety is the second point that needs to be considered. While the MSAS process can achieve efficient synthesis under high‐temperature conditions, the inherent properties of molten salt media, such as high corrosiveness and vapor pressure, pose significant safety challenges to equipment integrity. Additionally, the possible release of toxic gases during the reaction requires stringent safety measures. To tackle these challenges, developing molten salts with lower melting points and reduced toxicity has emerged as a key strategy to enhance process safety. Thirdly, the recovery efficiency of the molten salt system needs to be enhanced. Previous studies have confirmed the feasibility of reusing recovered molten salts [152, 153]. For example, compared with crystalline polymer CN (CPCN) synthesized using fresh KCl, CPCN synthesized using recovered KCl exhibited the same crystal structure, with no observable loss of activity [47]. However, the recovery of molten salt in MSCN systems is usually achieved by water washing, which makes it difficult to achieve high‐efficiency molten salt recovery. Based on this, numerous advanced recovery technologies for the large‐scale synthesis of MSCN can be developed. For instance, the molten salt hydropyrolysis used in the biomass field can be employed in MSCN systems, as it can achieve a salt recovery efficiency of 95–100 wt.% with minimal impact on the thermal and catalytic properties of the salts [153]. Multi‐dimensional consideration is also an important direction for achieving the large‐scale application. Since the ideal MSCN currently carried out within the laboratory scale still requires demanding experimental conditions and the potential problems within more complex situations will be amplified by the large‐scale production of MSCN, the impact of MSCN on the environment should be further considered. Furthermore, the practical application of MSCN needs to address the complexity of real‐world wastewater, which often involves coexisting pollutants [154]. Future research should focus on the performance and synergistic removal mechanisms of MSCN when treating multi‐pollutant systems, such as systems containing both antibiotics and heavy metal ions. Understanding these interactions is crucial for advancing the technology from controlled laboratory settings to field applications. In this context, utilizing advanced tools such as machine learning to intelligently screen molten salts and predict MSCN performance represents a cutting‐edge direction [155]. These approaches can significantly accelerate the practical application of this technology by overcoming the limitations of traditional trial‐and‐error methods.

  • (IV)

    Life Cycle Assessments (LCA). Although the application of MSCN to photocatalytic productivity reactions has many unique advantages, more factors need to be considered for expanding its practical engineering applications. From an environmental perspective, LCA can minimize the environmental impact of MSCN catalyzed processes by defining the target and scope of material use, identifying and calculating input energy, material use, waste disposal, and estimating the environmental and human health impacts of new generation [156]. In this context, it is necessary to use LCA to define the target range of MSCN in the subsequent research. The LCA of MSCN mainly commences with the goal and scope, including the definition of MSCN system boundaries, life‐cycle inventory analysis (LCI), and life‐cycle impact assessment (LCIA), which collect all energy inputs and outputs and translate them into environmental categories. In the interpretation phase, the results are summarized and discussed to analyze the reliability and put forward improvement suggestions. LCA is an important decision‐making tool that needs to be carefully considered to achieve practical applications of MSCN photocatalytic capacity on an industrial scale.

Funding

This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52470188), the Science and Technology Innovation Program of Hunan Province, China (2023RC3107), the Program for the Natural Science Foundation of Changsha, China (kg2402075).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52470188), the Science and Technology Innovation Program of Hunan Province, China (2023RC3107), the Program for the Natural Science Foundation of Changsha, China (kg2402075).

Contributor Information

Min Cheng, Email: chengmin@hnu.edu.cn.

Danlian Huang, Email: huangdanlian@hnu.edu.cn.

Suhua Chen, Email: s-hchen@nchu.edu.cn.

Data Availability Statement

No primary research results, software or code have been included and no new data were generated or analyzed as part of this review.

References

  • 1. Ran J., Zhang H., Fu S., et al., “NiPS3 Ultrathin Nanosheets as Versatile Platform Advancing Highly Active Photocatalytic H2 Production,” Nature Communications 13, no. 1 (2022): 4600, 10.1038/s41467-022-32256-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Yue J., Yang H., Zhou L., Liu C., Wang S., and Kang X., “At Least Five: Benefit Origins of Potassium and Sodium Co‐Doping on Carbon Nitride for Integrating Pharmaceuticals Degradation and Hydrogen Peroxide Production,” Applied Catalysis B: Environment and Energy 361 (2025): 124599, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2024.124599. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Liu X., Chen S., Luo S., et al., “Bright Sparks of Single‐Atom and Nano‐Islands in Catalysis: Breaking Activity‐Stability Trade‐Off,” Nano‐Micro Letters 18, no. 1 (2026): 149, 10.1007/s40820-025-01978-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Kudo A. and Miseki Y., “Heterogeneous Photocatalyst Materials for Water Splitting,” Chemical Society Review 38, no. 1 (2009): 253–278, 10.1039/b800489g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Green M. A. and Bremner S. P., “Energy Conversion Approaches and Materials for High‐Efficiency Photovoltaics,” Nature Materials 16, no. 1 (2016): 23–34, 10.1038/nmat4676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Tachibana Y., Vayssieres L., and Durrant J. R., “Artificial Photosynthesis for Solar Water‐Splitting,” Nature Photonics 6, no. 8 (2012): 511–518, 10.1038/nphoton.2012.175. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Yan L., Zhao J., Liu H., Wen X., Wang X., and Wang Z., “Unlocking the Potential of Molten Salts in Fabricating High‐Performance Single‐Atom Electrocatalysts: A Roadmap,” Chemical Engineering Journal 535 (2026): 175458, 10.1016/j.cej.2026.175458. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Lei Z., Qi S., Ahmed M. I., et al., “Strategies to Modulate the Performance of MXenes in Energy Applications,” Coordination Chemistry Reviews 552 (2026): 217544, 10.1016/j.ccr.2025.217544. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Schneider J., Matsuoka M., Takeuchi M., et al., “Understanding TiO2 Photocatalysis: Mechanisms and Materials,” Chemical Reviews 114, no. 19 (2014): 9919–9986, 10.1021/cr5001892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Shi Q., Cheng M., Liu Y., et al., “In‐Situ Generated MOFs with Supportive LDH Substrates and Their Derivatives for Photo‐electrocatalytic Energy Production and Electrochemical Devices: Insights into Synthesis, Function, Performance and Mechanism,” Coordination Chemistry Reviews 499 (2024): 215500, 10.1016/j.ccr.2023.215500. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Ding G., Li C., Chen L., and Liao G., “Porphyrin‐based Metal–Organic Frameworks for Photo(electro)Catalytic CO2 Reduction,” Energy & Environmental Science 17, no. 15 (2024): 5311–5335, 10.1039/d4ee01748j. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Li B., Wang Z., Sun L., et al., “Breaking through the Oxygen Hindrance Effect in Fenton‐Like Reactions to Promote the Generation of High‐Valent Iron‐oxo Species within Fe‐NxB/GCN Single‐Atom Catalysts,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 372 (2025): 125280, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2025.125280. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Zhang J., Sun J., Maeda K., et al., “Sulfur‐Mediated Synthesis of Carbon Nitride: Band‐Gap Engineering and Improved Functions for Photocatalysis,” Energy & Environmental Science 4, no. 3 (2011): 675–678, 10.1039/c0ee00418a. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Fujishima A. and Honda K., “Electrochemical Photolysis of Water at a Semiconductor Electrode,” Nature 238, no. 5358 (1972): 37–38, 10.1038/238037a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Kruger D. D., García H., and Primo A., “Molten Salt Derived MXenes: Synthesis and Applications,” Advanced Science 11, no. 35 (2024): 2307106, 10.1002/advs.202307106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Li W., Huang J., Han B., et al., “Molten‐Salt‐Assisted Chemical Vapor Deposition Process for Substitutional Doping of Monolayer MoS 2 and Effectively Altering the Electronic Structure and Phononic Properties,” Advanced Science 7, no. 16 (2020): 2001080, 10.1002/advs.202001080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Ong W.‐J., Tan L.‐L., Ng Y. H., Yong S.‐T., and Chai S.‐P., “Graphitic Carbon Nitride (g‐C3N4)‐Based Photocatalysts for Artificial Photosynthesis and Environmental Remediation: Are We a Step Closer to Achieving Sustainability?,” Chemical Reviews 116, no. 12 (2016): 7159–7329, 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. He F., Hu Y., Zhong H., Wang Z., Peng S., and Li Y., “Effect of Molten‐Salt Modulation on the Composition and Structure of G‐C3N4‐based Photocatalysts,” Chemical Communications 59, no. 70 (2023): 10476–10487, 10.1039/d3cc03052k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Zhang G., Lin L., Li G., et al., “Ionothermal Synthesis of Triazine–Heptazine‐Based Copolymers with Apparent Quantum Yields of 60 % at 420 Nm for Solar Hydrogen Production from “Sea Water”,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 57, no. 30 (2018): 9372–9376, 10.1002/anie.201804702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Liu L.‐L., Chen F., Wu J.‐H., Chen J.‐J., and Yu H.‐Q., “Synergy of Crystallinity Modulation and Intercalation Engineering in Carbon Nitride for Boosted H2O2 Photosynthesis,” in Proceedings National Academy of Science USA 120, no. 6 (2023): e2215305120, 10.1073/pnas.2215305120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Zhao J., Suo Y., Zhang J., Liu X., Li C., and Liu Y., “Recently Progress in Molten Salt‐assisted Synthesis Catalysts for Photo−/Electrocatalytic Carbon Dioxide Reduction,” Coordination Chemistry Reviews 546 (2026): 217085, 10.1016/j.ccr.2025.217085. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Bai C. W., Liu L. L., Chen J. J., et al., “Circumventing Bottlenecks in H2O2 Photosynthesis over Carbon Nitride with Iodine Redox Chemistry and Electric Field Effects,” Nature Communications 15, no. 1 (2024): 4718, 10.1038/s41467-024-49046-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Yan C., Zhu Y., Fang Z., et al., “Heterogeneous Molten Salt Design Strategy toward Coupling Cobalt–Cobalt Oxide and Carbon for Efficient Energy Conversion and Storage,” Advanced Energy Materials 8, no. 23 (2018): 1800762, 10.1002/aenm.201800762. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Chen D. and Mu S., “Molten Salt‐Assisted Synthesis of Catalysts for Energy Conversion,” Advanced Materials 36, no. 45 (2024): 2408285, 10.1002/adma.202408285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Bojdys M. J., Müller J. O., Antonietti M., and Thomas A., “Ionothermal Synthesis of Crystalline, Condensed, Graphitic Carbon Nitride,” Chemistry—A European Journal 14, no. 27 (2008): 8177–8182, 10.1002/chem.200800190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Lei W., Portehault D., Dimova R., and Antonietti M., “Boron Carbon Nitride Nanostructures from Salt Melts: Tunable Water‐Soluble Phosphors,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 133, no. 18 (2011): 7121–7127, 10.1021/ja200838c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Schwinghammer K., Mesch M. B., Duppel V., Ziegler C., Senker J., and Lotsch B. V., “Crystalline Carbon Nitride Nanosheets for Improved Visible‐Light Hydrogen Evolution,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 136, no. 5 (2014): 1730–1733, 10.1021/ja411321s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Moon G.‐H., Fujitsuka M., Kim S., Majima T., Wang X., and Choi W., “Eco‐Friendly Photochemical Production of H2O2 through O2 Reduction over Carbon Nitride Frameworks Incorporated with Multiple Heteroelements,” ACS Catalysis 7, no. 4 (2017): 2886–2895, 10.1021/acscatal.6b03334. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Zhang D., Han X., Dong T., Guo X., Song C., and Zhao Z., “Promoting Effect of Cyano Groups Attached on G‐C3N4 Nanosheets towards Molecular Oxygen Activation for Visible Light‐driven Aerobic Coupling of Amines to Imines,” Journal of Catalysis 366 (2018): 237–244, 10.1016/j.jcat.2018.08.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Uekert T., Kasap H., and Reisner E., “Photoreforming of Nonrecyclable Plastic Waste over a Carbon Nitride/Nickel Phosphide Catalyst,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 141, no. 38 (2019): 15201–15210, 10.1021/jacs.9b06872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Krivtsov I., Mitoraj D., Ilkaeva M., et al., “Water‐Soluble Polymeric Carbon Nitride Colloidal Nanoparticles for Highly Selective Quasi‐Homogeneous Photocatalysis,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 59 (2020): 487–495, 10.26434/chemrxiv.9879947.v1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Kröger J., Jiménez‐Solano A., Savasci G., et al., “Interfacial Engineering for Improved Photocatalysis in a Charge Storing 2D Carbon Nitride: Melamine Functionalized Poly(heptazine imide),” Advanced Energy Materials 11, no. 6 (2020): 2003016, 10.1002/aenm.202003016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Wang M., Zhang Z., Chi Z., et al., “Alkali Metal Cations as Charge‐Transfer Bridge for Polarization Promoted Solar‐to‐H2 Conversion,” Advanced Functional Materials 33, no. 9 (2022): 2211565, 10.1002/adfm.202211565. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Kröger J., Podjaski F., Savasci G., et al., “Interfacial Engineering for Improved Photocatalysis in a Charge Storing 2D Carbon Nitride: Melamine Functionalized Poly(heptazine imide),” Advanced Materials 34, no. 7 (2022): 2107061, 10.1002/adma.202107061. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Wang Y., Li H., Zhai B., et al., “Highly Crystalline Poly(heptazine imide)‐Based Carbonaceous Anodes for Ultralong Lifespan and Low‐Temperature Sodium‐Ion Batteries,” ACS Nano 18, no. 4 (2024): 3456–3467, 10.1021/acsnano.3c10779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Wang Q., Zheng D., Pan Z., et al., “Spatially Separated Redox Cocatalysts on Poly Triazine Imides Boosting Photocatalytic Overall Water Splitting,” Advanced Functional Materials 35 (2025): 2501889, 10.1002/adfm.202501889. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Jing L., Li Z., Chen Z., Li R., and Hu J., “Engineering Polyheptazine and Polytriazine Imides for Photocatalysis,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 63, no. 49 (2024): 202406398, 10.1002/anie.202406398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Lin W., Chen H., Lin G., et al., “Engineering Polyheptazine and Polytriazine Imides for Photocatalysis,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 61, no. 36 (2022): 202207807, 10.1002/anie.202207807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Pelicano C. M. and Antonietti M., “Metal Poly(heptazine imides) as Multifunctional Photocatalysts for Solar Fuel Production,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 63, no. 24 (2024): 202406290, 10.1002/anie.202406290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Li M., Guo C., Yuan X., et al., “Ultralow‐peroxymonosulfate‐initiated Dissolved Oxygen Activation for Micropollutant Decomposition by an Asymmetric Single‐site Metal (Fe‐N2O1S1) Catalyst,” Applied Catalysis B: Environment and Energy 370 (2025): 125175, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2025.125175. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Xue W., Shi X., Guo J., et al., “Affecting Factors and Mechanism of Removing Antibiotics and Antibiotic Resistance Genes by Nano Zero‐Valent Iron (nZVI) and Modified nZVI: A Critical Review,” Water Research 253 (2024): 121309, 10.1016/j.watres.2024.121309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Zhao J., Li C., Yu Q., et al., “Interface Engineering of Mn3O4/Co3O4 S‐scheme Heterojunctions to Enhance the Photothermal Catalytic Degradation of Toluene,” Journal of Hazardous Materials 452 (2023): 131249, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.131249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Liu J., Tian N., Ren S., et al., “Which Type of Carbon Nitride More Suits Photocatalysis: Amorphous or Crystalline?,” Advanced Functional Materials 35, no. 3 (2024): 2413406, 10.1002/adfm.202413406. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Zhai B., Li H., Gao G., et al., “A Crystalline Carbon Nitride Based near‐Infrared Active Photocatalyst,” Advanced Functional Materials 32, no. 47 (2022): 2207375, 10.1002/adfm.202207375. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Liang X., Xue S., Yang C., et al., “The Directional Crystallization Process of Poly (triazine imide) Single Crystals in Molten Salts,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 62, no. 14 (2023): 202216434, 10.1002/anie.202216434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Zhang G., Xu Y., Zhu J., et al., “Enhanced Photocatalytic H2 Production Independent of Exciton Dissociation in Crystalline Carbon Nitride,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 338 (2023): 123049, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2023.123049. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Xu Y., He X., Zhong H., Singh D. J., Zhang L., and Wang R., “Solid Salt Confinement Effect: An Effective Strategy to Fabricate High Crystalline Polymer Carbon Nitride for Enhanced Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 246 (2019): 349–355, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.01.069. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Burrow J. N., Ciufo R. A., Smith L. A., et al., “Calcium Poly(Heptazine Imide): A Covalent Heptazine Framework for Selective CO2 Adsorption,” ACS Nano 16, no. 4 (2022): 5393–5403, 10.1021/acsnano.1c08912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Jin Y., Zheng D., Fang Z., et al., “Salt‐Melt Synthesis of Poly(heptazine imide) in Binary Alkali Metal Bromides for Enhanced Visible‐light Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production,” Interdiscip Mater 3, no. 3 (2024): 389–399, 10.1002/idm2.12159. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Zheng L., Wang Z., Zhang H., et al., “Boosting Excitons Dissociation in Defective‐Rich Graphitic Carbon Nitride for Efficient Hydrogen Peroxide Photosynthesis and on‐site Environmental Governance,” Applied Catalysis B: Environment and Energy 347 (2024): 123811, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2024.123811. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Ding C., Lu X., Tao B., et al., “Interlayer Spacing Regulation by Single‐Atom Indiumδ+ –N4 on Carbon Nitride for Boosting CO2/CO Photo‐Conversion,” Advanced Functional Materials 33, no. 35 (2023): 2302824, 10.1002/adfm.202302824. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Zhang G., Li G., Lan Z. A., et al., “Optimizing Optical Absorption, Exciton Dissociation, and Charge Transfer of a Polymeric Carbon Nitride with Ultrahigh Solar Hydrogen Production Activity,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 56, no. 43 (2017): 13445–13449, 10.1002/anie.201706870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Lin L., Ou H., Zhang Y., and Wang X., “Tri‐ s ‐triazine‐Based Crystalline Graphitic Carbon Nitrides for Highly Efficient Hydrogen Evolution Photocatalysis,” ACS Catalysis 6, no. 6 (2016): 3921–3931, 10.1021/acscatal.6b00922. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Deng Y., Liu W., Xu R., et al., “Reduction of Superoxide Radical Intermediate by Polydopamine for Efficient Hydrogen Peroxide Photosynthesis,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 63, no. 14 (2024): 202319216, 10.1002/anie.202319216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Zhang Y., Cao Q., Meng A., et al., “Molecular Heptazine–Triazine Junction over Carbon Nitride Frameworks for Artificial Photosynthesis of Hydrogen Peroxide,” Advanced Materials 35, no. 48 (2023): 2306831, 10.1002/adma.202306831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Guo Y., Liu Q., Li Z., Zhang Z., and Fang X., “Enhanced Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution Performance of Mesoporous Graphitic Carbon Nitride co‐doped with Potassium and Iodine,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 221 (2018): 362–370, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.08.075. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. He F., Lu Y., Wu Y., et al., “Rejoint of Carbon Nitride Fragments into Multi‐Interfacial Order‐Disorder Homojunction for Robust Photo‐Driven Generation of H2O2 ,” Advanced Materials 36, no. 9 (2023): 2307490, 10.1002/adma.202307490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Wang Q., Zhang G., Xing W., et al., “Bottom‐up Synthesis of Single‐Crystalline Poly (Triazine Imide) Nanosheets for Photocatalytic Overall Water Splitting,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 62, no. 37 (2023): 202307930, 10.1002/anie.202307930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Chi H. Y., Chen C., Zhao K., et al., “Bottom‐up Synthesis of Single‐Crystalline Poly (Triazine Imide) Nanosheets for Photocatalytic Overall Water Splitting,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 61, no. 40 (2022): 202207457, 10.1002/anie.202207457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Zhang J., Chen Y., and Wang X., “Two‐dimensional Covalent Carbon Nitride Nanosheets: Synthesis, Functionalization, and Applications,” Energy & Environmental Science 8, no. 11 (2015): 3092–3108, 10.1039/C5EE01895A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Xiao Y., Tian G., Li W., et al., “Molecule Self‐Assembly Synthesis of Porous Few‐Layer Carbon Nitride for Highly Efficient Photoredox Catalysis,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 141, no. 6 (2019): 2508–2515, 10.1021/jacs.8b12428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Hu E., Chen Q., Gao Q., et al., “Cyano‐Functionalized Graphitic Carbon Nitride with Adsorption and Photoreduction Isosite Achieving Efficient Uranium Extraction from Seawater,” Advanced Functional Materials 34, no. 19 (2024): 2312215, 10.1002/adfm.202312215. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Wang W., Zhang H., Zhang S., et al., “Potassium‐Ion‐Assisted Regeneration of Active Cyano Groups in Carbon Nitride Nanoribbons: Visible‐Light‐Driven Photocatalytic Nitrogen Reduction,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 58, no. 46 (2019): 16644–16650, 10.1002/anie.201908640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Che H., Gao X., Chen J., Hou J., Ao Y., and Wang P., “Iodide‐Induced Fragmentation of Polymerized Hydrophilic Carbon Nitride for High‐Performance Quasi‐Homogeneous Photocatalytic H2O2 Production,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 60, no. 48 (2021): 25546–25550, 10.1002/anie.202111769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Wang Y., Du P., Pan H., et al., “Increasing Solar Absorption of Atomically Thin 2D Carbon Nitride Sheets for Enhanced Visible‐Light Photocatalysis,” Advanced Materials 31, no. 40 (2019): 1807540, 10.1002/adma.201807540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Yue J., Yang H., Liu C., Wang S., and Kang X., “In‐plane Electron Transfer Dominated Carbon Nitride for High‐Efficiency Quasi‐Homogeneous Photochemical Synthesis of Hydrogen Peroxide,” Chemical Engineering Journal 497 (2024): 154683, 10.1016/j.cej.2024.154683. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Wang J., Huang Z. Q., and Nie L., “Molten Salt Modulation of Potassium–Nitrogen–Carbon for the Breaking Kinetics Bottleneck of Photocatalytic Overall Water Splitting and Environmental Impact Reduction,” ACS Nano 18, no. 39 (2024): 26902–26910, 10.1021/acsnano.4c08309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Li M., Qiu L., Popovs I., et al., “Construction of Boron‐ and Nitrogen‐Enriched Nanoporous π‐Conjugated Networks towards Enhanced Hydrogen Activation,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 62, no. 28 (2023): 202302684, 10.1002/anie.202302684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Chen H., Huang Z., Wang J., et al., “Single‐Atom Catalysts at the Crossroads: Navigating the Path from Laboratory Synthesis to Real‐World Devices,” ACS Catalysis 16, no. 4 (2026): 2976–2997, 10.1021/acscatal.5c08694. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Yan Z., Li X., Guan X., et al., “Boosting Photothermal Catalytic Non‐Oxidative Methane Coupling by High‐Density Frustrated Lewis Pairs in Ag/InOxHy,” Journal of Catalysis 447 (2025): 116117, 10.1016/j.jcat.2025.116117. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Zhang J., Yu C., Lang J., et al., “Modulation of Lewis Acidic‐Basic Sites for Efficient Photocatalytic H2O2 Production over Potassium Intercalated Tri‐s‐triazine Materials,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 277 (2020): 119225, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119225. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Ma L., Gao Y., Wei B., et al., “Visible‐Light Photocatalytic H2O2 Production Boosted by Frustrated Lewis Pairs in Defected Polymeric Carbon Nitride Nanosheets,” ACS Catalysis 14, no. 4 (2024): 2775–2786, 10.1021/acscatal.3c05360. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Wang C., Lu Y., Wang Z., et al., “Visible‐Light Photocatalytic H2O2 Production Boosted by Frustrated Lewis Pairs in Defected Polymeric Carbon Nitride Nanosheets,” ACS Catalysis 350 (2024): 123902, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2024.123902. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Li B., Feng C., Wang T., et al., “Unveiling the Overlooked Role of Structural Heterogeneity within Fe‐N‐C Single Atom Catalysts for Fenton‐Like Reactions: Efficient Decontamination of Pharmaceuticals from Wastewater and Source‐separated Urine,” Separation and Purification Technology 354 (2025): 128955, 10.1016/j.seppur.2024.128955. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Roy S., Li Z., Chen Z., et al., “Cooperative Copper Single‐Atom Catalyst in 2D Carbon Nitride for Enhanced CO2 Electrolysis to Methane,” Advanced Materials 36, no. 13 (2024): 2300713, 10.1002/adma.202300713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Li Y., Li B., Zhang D., Cheng L., and Xiang Q., “Crystalline Carbon Nitride Supported Copper Single Atoms for Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction with Nearly 100% CO Selectivity,” ACS Nano 14, no. 8 (2020): 10552–10561, 10.1021/acsnano.0c04544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Liu M., Wei C., Zhuzhang H., et al., “Fully Condensed Poly (Triazine Imide) Crystals: Extended π‐Conjugation and Structural Defects for Overall Water Splitting,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 61, no. 2 (2021): 202113389, 10.1002/anie.202113389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Zhu Y., Chen S., Zou J., et al., “Single‐Atom Catalysts Partner with Defects to Open a New Chapter in Catalysis: Synthesis, Performances, and Mechanisms,” Chinese Chemical Letters 37, no. 7 (2026): 112192, 10.1016/j.cclet.2025.112192. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Wu S., Yu H., Chen S., and Quan X., “Enhanced Photocatalytic H2O2 Production over Carbon Nitride by Doping and Defect Engineering,” ACS Catalysis 10, no. 24 (2020): 14380–14389, 10.1021/acscatal.0c03359. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Guemou S., Zhai B., Cheng C., et al., “Engineering Electronic Properties of G‐C3N4 via Cyano‐Defects and (S, Na, B) Co‐Doping for Enhanced Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction,” Advanced Sustainable Systems 10, no. 1 (2026): e01661, 10.1002/adsu.202501661. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Zhong X., Zhu Y., Wang Y., et al., “Intramolecular Quaternary Carbon Nitride Homojunction for Enhanced Visible Light Hydrogen Production,” Small 20, no. 35 (2024): 2402219, 10.1002/smll.202402219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Wu J., Li K., Zhou B., et al., “Bottom‐Up Strategy to Enhance Long‐Range Order of Poly(Heptazine Imide) Nanorods for Efficient Photocatalytic CO2 Methanation,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 64, no. 10 (2024): 202421263, 10.1002/anie.202421263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Burmeister D., Tran H. A., Müller J., et al., “Optimized Synthesis of Solution‐Processable Crystalline Poly(Triazine Imide) with Minimized Defects for OLED Application,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 61, no. 3 (2021): 202111749, 10.1002/anie.202111749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Zheng D., Su Y., Wen D., et al., “One‐Pot Preparation of Potassium, Iodine‐Codoped Hydrophilic Polymeric Carbon Nitride with Highly Efficient Quasi‐homogeneous Photocatalytic H2O2 Production,” Journal of Catalysis 428 (2023): 115180, 10.1016/j.jcat.2023.115180. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Liu W., Wang P., Chen J., et al., “Unraveling the Mechanism on Ultrahigh Efficiency Photocatalytic H2O2 Generation for Dual‐Heteroatom Incorporated Polymeric Carbon Nitride,” Advanced Functional Materials 32, no. 38 (2022): 2205119, 10.1002/adfm.202205119. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Chen L., Chen C., Yang Z., Li S., Chu C., and Chen B., “Simultaneously Tuning Band Structure and Oxygen Reduction Pathway toward High‐Efficient Photocatalytic Hydrogen Peroxide Production Using Cyano‐Rich Graphitic Carbon Nitride,” Advanced Functional Materials 31, no. 46 (2021): 2105731, 10.1002/adfm.202105731. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Zhao Y., Zhang P., Yang Z., et al., “Mechanistic Analysis of Multiple Processes Controlling Solar‐Driven H2O2 Synthesis Using Engineered Polymeric Carbon Nitride,” Nature Communications 12, no. 1 (2021): 3701, 10.1038/s41467-021-24048-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Zhang G., Zhu J., Xu Y., et al., “In‐Plane Charge Transport Dominates the Overall Charge Separation and Photocatalytic Activity in Crystalline Carbon Nitride,” ACS Catalysis 12, no. 8 (2022): 4648–4658, 10.1021/acscatal.2c00233. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Liu X., Ren Z., Zhang Y., et al., “Deciphering the Mechanistic Origins of Geometric‐Site‐Dependent Bimetallic Superexchange Interactions in Spinel Oxides to Boost VOCs Catalytic Oxidation,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 381 (2026): 125908, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2025.125908. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Jing M., Zhao H., Jian L., Pan C., Dong Y., and Zhu Y., “Coral‐Like B‐Doped G‐C3N4 with Enhanced Molecular Dipole to Boost Photocatalysis‐Self‐Fenton Removal of Persistent Organic Pollutants,” Journal of Hazardous Materials 449 (2023): 131017, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.131017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Li J., Li Y., Wei S., et al., “Asymmetric Framework Engineering of Carbon Nitride Nanotubes for Polarization Promoted H2O2 Photosynthesis,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 366 (2025): 125073, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2025.125073. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Zhang G., Xu Y., Rauf M., et al., “Breaking the Limitation of Elevated Coulomb Interaction in Crystalline Carbon Nitride for Visible and Near‐Infrared Light Photoactivity,” Advanced Science 9, no. 21 (2022): 2201677, 10.1002/advs.202201677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Guan X., Lei Z., Xue R., et al., “Polarization: A Universal Driving Force for Energy, Environment, and Electronics,” Advanced Materials 37, no. 1 (2025): 2413525, 10.1002/adma.202413525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Zhang J., Liang X., Zhang C., et al., “Improved Charge Separation in Poly(heptazine‐triazine) Imides with Semi‐Coherent Interfaces for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 61, no. 47 (2022): 202210849, 10.1002/anie.202210849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Zhang G., Xu Y., Yan D., et al., “Construction of K+ Ion Gradient in Crystalline Carbon Nitride to Accelerate Exciton Dissociation and Charge Separation for Visible Light H2 Production,” ACS Catalysis 11, no. 12 (2021): 6995–7005, 10.1021/acscatal.1c00739. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Liao Y., Tang Y., Yu M., et al., “Enhanced Built‐in Electric Field by Asymmetric Mo‐Doped BiVO4 for Photoelectrocatalytic Detoxification of Ofloxacin in Hyposaline Wastewater,” Science China Materials 69, no. 1 (2025): 127–138, 10.1007/s40843-025-3709-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Ma D., Zhang Z., Zou Y., Chen J., and Shi J.‐W., “The Progress of G‐C3N4 in Photocatalytic H2 Evolution: from Fabrication to Modification,” Coordination Chemistry Reviews 500 (2024): 215489, 10.1016/j.ccr.2023.215489. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Qin C., Wu X., Zhou W., et al., “Urea/Thiourea Imine Linkages Provide Accessible Holes in Flexible Covalent Organic Frameworks and Dominates Self‐Adaptivity and Exciton Dissociation,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 64, no. 7 (2024): 202418830, 10.1002/anie.202418830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Krivtsov I., Mitoraj D., Ilkaeva M., et al., “Water‐Soluble Polymeric Carbon Nitride Colloidal Nanoparticles for Highly Selective Quasi‐Homogeneous Photocatalysis,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition (2019): 487–495, 10.26434/chemrxiv.9879947.v1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Zhang Y., Cao N., Liu X., et al., “Crystalline Oxygen‐Modified Carbon Nitride Photocatalyst with Enhanced Internal Electric Field and Strong Resistance to Ionic Interference for Robust Seawater Splitting,” ACS Catalysis 14, no. 18 (2024): 13768–13780, 10.1021/acscatal.4c03031. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Deng Q., Li H., Hu W., and Hou W., “Stability and Crystallinity of Sodium Poly(Heptazine Imide) in Photocatalysis,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 62, no. 47 (2023): 202314213, 10.1002/anie.202314213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Bhunia M. K., Yamauchi K., and Takanabe K., “Harvesting Solar Light with Crystalline Carbon Nitrides for Efficient Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 53, no. 41 (2014): 11001–11005, 10.1002/anie.201405161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Liang H., Zhao J., Wang A., et al., “Synthesis of Novel Nanoflowers‐Like P, K Co‐Doped Graphitic Carbon Nitride for Efficient H2O2 Photoproduction,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 677 (2025): 729–739, 10.1016/j.jcis.2024.08.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Zeng Z., Yu H., Quan X., Chen S., and Zhang S., “Structuring Phase Junction Between Tri‐s‐triazine and Triazine Crystalline C3N4 for Efficient Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 227 (2018): 153–160, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.01.023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Yuan J., Tian N., Zhu Z., et al., “P, K Doped Crystalline G‐C3N4 Grafted with Cyano Groups for Efficient Visible‐light‐driven H2O2 Evolution,” Chemical Engineering Journal 467 (2023): 143379, 10.1016/j.cej.2023.143379. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Yu H., Shi R., Zhao Y., et al., “Alkali‐Assisted Synthesis of Nitrogen Deficient Graphitic Carbon Nitride with Tunable Band Structures for Efficient Visible‐Light‐Driven Hydrogen Evolution,” Advanced Materials 29, no. 16 (2017): 1605148, 10.1002/adma.201605148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Noda Y., Merschjann C., Tarábek J., Amsalem P., Koch N., and Bojdys M. J., “Directional Charge Transport in Layered Two‐Dimensional Triazine‐Based Graphitic Carbon Nitride,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 58, no. 28 (2019): 9394–9398, 10.1002/anie.201902314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Zeng Z., Quan X., Yu H., et al., “Carbon Nitride with Electron Storage Property: Enhanced Exciton Dissociation for High‐efficient Photocatalysis,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 236 (2018): 99–106, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.05.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Qiu C., Xu Y., Fan X., et al., “Highly Crystalline K‐Intercalated Polymeric Carbon Nitride for Visible‐Light Photocatalytic Alkenes and Alkynes Deuterations,” Advanced Science 6, no. 1 (2018): 1801403, 10.1002/advs.201801403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110. Li M., Feng Z., Yuan X., et al., “Innovative Asymmetric CoSA‐N‐Ti3C2Tx Catalysis: Unleashing Superoxide Radicals for Rapid Self‐coupling Removal of Phenolic Pollutant,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 64, no. 15 (2025): 202502307, 10.1002/anie.202502307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Yu W., Xing R., Tian N., et al., “Asymmetric Cyano‐rich Crystalline Carbon Nitride with a Powerful Dipole Field for Efficient Hydrogen Peroxide Photosynthesis†,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A 13, no. 5 (2025): 3791–3801, 10.1039/d4ta06956k. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 112. Wang S., Ke Y., Jin F., Li Y., and Jin Z., “Reasonable Designed Graphdiyne/AgCoO2 S‐scheme Heterojunction for Efficient Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production,” Materials Today Chemistry 43 (2025): 102450, 10.1016/j.mtchem.2024.102450. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 113. Quan Y., Li J., Li X., et al., “Molten Salt‐Assisted Synthesis of Carbon Nitride with Defective Sites as Visible‐Light Photocatalyst for Highly Efficient Hydrogen Evolution,” Applied Catalysis B: Environment and Energy 362 (2025): 124711, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2024.124711. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 114. Lau V. W.‐H., Moudrakovski I., Botari T., et al., “Rational Design of Carbon Nitride Photocatalysts by Identification of Cyanamide Defects as Catalytically Relevant Sites,” Nature Communications 7, no. 1 (2016): 12165, 10.1038/ncomms12165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. Yu Z., Yue X., Fan J., and Xiang Q., “Crystalline Intramolecular Ternary Carbon Nitride Homojunction for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution,” ACS Catalysis 12, no. 11 (2022): 6345–6358, 10.1021/acscatal.2c01563. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 116. Deng S., Xiong W. P., Zhang G. X., et al., “Metal‐Free Modification Overcomes the Photocatalytic Limitations of Graphitic Carbon Nitride: Efficient Production and In Situ Application of Hydrogen Peroxide,” Advanced Energy Materials 14, no. 39 (2024): 2401768, 10.1002/aenm.202401768. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 117. Zou X., Shi Q., Cheng M., et al., “Metal–Organic Framework‐Based Materials for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Peroxide Production: Insights into Mechanism, Modification Strategies, and Environmental Applications,” Advanced Energy Materials 15 (2025): 2501424, 10.1002/aenm.202501424. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 118. Tong H., Odutola J., Song J., et al., “Boosting the Quantum Efficiency of Ionic Carbon Nitrides in Photocatalytic H2O2 Evolution via Controllable n → π* Electronic Transition Activation,” Advanced Materials 36, no. 49 (2024): 2412753, 10.1002/adma.202412753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119. Chen F., Bai C.‐W., Duan P.‐J., et al., “Merging Semi‐Crystallization and Multispecies Iodine Intercalation at Photo‐Redox Interfaces for Dual High‐Value Synthesis,” Nature Communications 15, no. 1 (2024): 7783, 10.1038/s41467-024-52158-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120. Shen Y., Xu R., Shan P., et al., “Abundant Edge Active Sites‐Modified High‐Crystalline G‐C3N5 for Hydrogen Peroxide Production from Pure‐Water via a Quasi‐Homogeneous Photocatalytic Process,” Small 20, no. 35 (2024): 2401566, 10.1002/smll.202401566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121. Lu X., Chen Z., Hu Z., et al., “Boosted Charge Transfer for Highly Efficient Photosynthesis of H2O2 over Z‐Scheme I−/K+ Co‐Doped G‐C3N4 /Metal–Organic‐Frameworks in Pure Water under Visible Light,” Advanced Energy Materials 14, no. 38 (2024): 2401873, 10.1002/aenm.202401873. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 122. Zhou H., Chen Y., and Zhu H., “Deciphering Asymmetric Charge Transfer at Transition Metal Dichalcogenide–Graphene Interface by Helicity‐Resolved Ultrafast Spectroscopy,” Science Advances 7, no. 34: abg2999, 10.1126/sciadv.abg2999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123. Hou J., Wang K., Zhang X., et al., “Synergistic Defect Sites and CoOx Nanoclusters in Polymeric Carbon Nitride for Enhanced Photocatalytic H2O2 Production,” ACS Catalysis 14, no. 14 (2024): 10893–10903, 10.1021/acscatal.4c00334. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 124. Lu Y., Guo Y., Zhang S., et al., “Promoting Proton Donation through Hydrogen Bond Breaking on Carbon Nitride for Enhanced H2O2 Photosynthesis,” ACS Nano 18, no. 31 (2024): 20435–20448, 10.1021/acsnano.4c04797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125. Li L., Ye F., Lv Q., et al., “Polydopamine‐Coated Hollow Carbon Nitride as a Full‐Spectral Response Photocatalyst for Efficient H2O2 Production via Redox Dual Pathways,” Applied Catalysis B: Environment and Energy 363 (2025): 124802, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2024.124802. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 126. Sun P., Zhong K., Huang X., et al., “Synergistic Utilization of Photogenerated Electrons and Holes in Carbon Nitride Nanosheet Assembly for Enhanced Photocatalytic H2O2 Production,” Applied Catalysis B: Environment and Energy 366 (2025): 124998, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2024.124998. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 127. Choi J., Jung W., Gonzalez‐Carrero S., Durrant J. R., Cha H., and Park T., “Understanding Charge Carrier Dynamics in Organic Photocatalysts for Hydrogen Evolution,” Energy & Environmental Science 17, no. 21 (2024): 7999–8018, 10.1039/d4ee01808g. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 128. Qi B., Shen R., Ren Z., et al., “Bifunctional S‐Scheme sp2‐Carbon COF/CdS Heterojunction for Efficient Photocatalytic H2 Evolution and C–C Coupling of 5‐hydroxymethylfurfural,” Journal of Materials Science & Technology 232 (2025): 65–73, 10.1016/j.jmst.2025.03.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 129. Jiang H., Wang Z., Chen S., et al., “Atomic Controlled Shell Thickness on Pt@Pt3Ti Core‐shell Nanoparticles for Efficient and Durable Oxygen Reduction,” Journal of Materials Science & Technology 205 (2025): 212–220, 10.1016/j.jmst.2024.03.061. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 130. Wang Q. and Domen K., “Particulate Photocatalysts for Light‐Driven Water Splitting: Mechanisms, Challenges, and Design Strategies,” Chemical Reviews 120, no. 2 (2019): 919–985, 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131. Guan X., Zhang X., Li Z., et al., “Sulfoxide‐Functional Nanoarchitectonics of Mesoporous Sulfur‐Doped C3N5 for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution,” Chemistry of Materials 36, no. 9 (2024): 4511–4520, 10.1021/acs.chemmater.4c00138. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 132. Ou H., Lin L., Zheng Y., Yang P., Fang Y., and Wang X., “Tri‐s‐Triazine‐Based Crystalline Carbon Nitride Nanosheets for an Improved Hydrogen Evolution,” Advanced Materials 29, no. 22 (2017): 1700008, 10.1002/adma.201700008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133. Shvalagin V., Tarakina N., Badamdorj B., et al., “Simultaneous Photocatalytic Production of H2 and Acetal from Ethanol with Quantum Efficiency over 73% by Protonated Poly(heptazine imide) under Visible Light,” ACS Catalysis 14, no. 19 (2024): 14836–14854, 10.1021/acscatal.4c04180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134. Anh Nguyen T. K., Trần‐Phú T., Daiyan R., Minh Chau Ta X., Amal R., and Tricoli A., “From Plastic Waste to Green Hydrogen and Valuable Chemicals Using Sunlight and Water,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 63, no. 32 (2024): 202401746, 10.1002/anie.202401746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135. Xiao M., Baktash A., Lyu M., Zhao G., Jin Y., and Wang L., “Unveiling the Role of Water in Heterogeneous Photocatalysis of Methanol Conversion for Efficient Hydrogen Production,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 63, no. 21 (2024): 202402004, 10.1002/anie.202402004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136. Yang R., Shi H., Zhao J., Zhang H., Zhong M., and Yang P., “Novel Asymmetric Aggregation Strategy to Boost Charge Separation in Carbon Nitride Polymers for High‐Performance Hydrogen Photosynthesis,” ACS Catalysis 14, no. 12 (2024): 9607–9617, 10.1021/acscatal.4c02387. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 137. Xie Z.‐K., Jia Y.‐J., Huang Y.‐Y., et al., “Near‐Infrared Light‐Driven Photocatalytic Reforming Lignocellulose into H2 and Chemicals over Heterogeneous Carbon Nitride,” ACS Catalysis 13, no. 20 (2023): 13768–13776, 10.1021/acscatal.3c03914. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 138. Zhu X., Zhou E., Tai X., et al., “g‐C3N4 S‐Scheme Homojunction through Van der Waals Interface Regulation by Intrinsic Polymerization Tailoring for Enhanced Photocatalytic H2 Evolution and CO2 Reduction,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 64, no. 13 (2025): 202425439, 10.1002/anie.202425439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139. Ma Z., Kuang X., Peng S., and Li Y., “Manipulating Precursor to Anchor Mo3S9 Cluster onto Carbon Nitride for Photocatalytic H2 Production,” Advanced Functional Materials 35 (2025): 2425117, 10.1002/adfm.202425117. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 140. Zheng Y., Cui Y., Ruan Q., et al., “Heavily Doped Carbon Nitride Nanocrystal Promotes Visible‐Near‐Infrared Photosynthesis of Hydrogen Peroxide with near‐Unit Photon Utilization,” ACS Nano 18, no. 22 (2024): 14583–14594, 10.1021/acsnano.4c02387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141. Wang J., Sheng R., Xiao J., et al., “Matched Redox Kinetics on Triazine‐Based Carbon Nitride/Ni(OH)2 for Stoichiometric Overall Photocatalytic CO2 Conversion,” Small 20, no. 29 (2024): 2309707, 10.1002/smll.202309707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142. Liu F., Deng J., Su B., et al., “Poly(triazine imide) Crystals for Efficient CO2 Photoreduction: Surface Pyridine Nitrogen Dominates the Performance,” ACS Catalysis 15, no. 2 (2025): 1018–1026, 10.1021/acscatal.4c06685. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 143. Yang Y., Wang H., Tan X., et al., “Boosting Electrochemical Nitrogen Reduction via Axial Coordination Engineering on Single‐Iron‐Atom Catalysts,” Advanced Functional Materials 34, no. 39 (2024): 2403535, 10.1002/adfm.202403535. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 144. Wang Z., Yi Z., Wong L. W., et al., “Oxygen Doping Cooperated with Co‐N‐Fe Dual‐Catalytic Sites: Synergistic Mechanism for Catalytic Water Purification within Nanoconfined Membrane,” Advanced Materials 36, no. 30 (2024): 2404278, 10.1002/adma.202404278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145. Wang G., Zhang H., Tang T., et al., “Ultrathin Cobalt Phthalocyanine/Poly(heptazine imide) Heterojunctions with Co‐N4 Sites for Improved Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction and Electron Kinetics,” Advanced Energy Materials 15 (2025): 2405622, 10.1002/aenm.202405622. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 146. Cheng L., Yue X., Fan J., and Xiang Q., “Site‐Specific Electron‐Driving Observations of CO2‐to‐CH4 Photoreduction on Co‐Doped CeO2/Crystalline Carbon Nitride S‐Scheme Heterojunctions,” Advanced Materials 34, no. 27 (2022): 2200929, 10.1002/adma.202200929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147. Yang L., Sivasankaran R. P., Song M. K., Pawar A. U., Lee D. K., and Kang Y. S., “Highly Selective Solar CO2 Conversion into Formic Acid in Nickel‐Perylene‐C3N4 Semiconductor Photocatalyst,” Advanced Energy Materials 15, no. 3 (2024): 2402798, 10.1002/aenm.202402798. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 148. Li L., Liu H., Cheng C., et al., “Photochemical Tuning of Tricoordinated Nitrogen Deficiency in Carbon Nitride to Create Delocalized π Electron Clouds for Efficient CO2 Photoreduction,” ACS Catalysis 14, no. 13 (2024): 10204–10213, 10.1021/acscatal.4c01636. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 149. Xia P., Antonietti M., Zhu B., Heil T., Yu J., and Cao S., “Designing Defective Crystalline Carbon Nitride to Enable Selective CO2 Photoreduction in the Gas Phase,” Advanced Functional Materials 29, no. 15 (2019): 1900093, 10.1002/adfm.201900093. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 150. Liu J., Qi K., Xiang X., Jamal Sisi A., Khataee A., and Xu L., “Covalent Organic Framework‐Based Photocatalysts from Synthesis to Applications,” Energy Environ Mater 8, no. 6 (2025): 70071, 10.1002/eem2.70071. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 151. Zhao X., Zhang X., Lei M., Ma X., Li Y., and Jin Z., “Synergistic Effect of Morphology Regulation of LaNiO3 S‐scheme Heterojunction for Enhanced Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production,” Journal of Materials Science & Technology 245 (2026): 238–248, 10.1016/j.jmst.2025.05.024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 152. Susman M. D., Pham H. N., Zhao X., et al., “Synthesis of NiO Crystals Exposing Stable High‐Index Facets,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 59, no. 35 (2020): 15119–15123, 10.1002/anie.202003390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153. Ramamurthy R., Ghysels S., Estrada Léon A., Nowakowski D., and Ronsse F., “Biomass Hydropyrolysis in Molten Chloride Salts: Thermocatalytic Stability of Recycled Salts,” Energy Fules 39, no. 15 (2025): 7326–7338, 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c00090. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 154. Liu L., Liu H., Fan Z., et al., “Simultaneous Solar‐Driven Interfacial Evaporation and Photo‐Fenton Oxidation by Semiconducting Metal–Organic Framework from Waste Polyimide,” Energy Environ Mater 8, no. 2 (2024): e12812, 10.1002/eem2.12812. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 155. Cho H. and Ackom E., “Artificial Intelligence (AI)‐driven Approach to Climate Action and Sustainable Development,” Nature Communications 16, no. 1 (2025): 1228, 10.1038/s41467-024-53956-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156. Terlouw T., Bauer C., Rosa L., and Mazzotti M., “Life Cycle Assessment of Carbon Dioxide Removal Technologies: A Critical Review,” Energy & Environmental Science 14, no. 4 (2021): 1701–1721, 10.1039/d0ee03757e. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

No primary research results, software or code have been included and no new data were generated or analyzed as part of this review.


Articles from Small (Weinheim an Der Bergstrasse, Germany) are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES