Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2026 Jun 2;22(39):e74030. doi: 10.1002/smll.74030

Mechanistic Insight into H2S‐Induced Fluorescence Quenching in a Robust Metal–Organic Framework

Valeria B López‐Cervantes 1, Juan L Obeso 2, J Gabriel Flores 3,4, Ricardo A Peralta 5, José Antonio de los Reyes 3, Jiangnan Li 2, Sihai Yang 2, Elodie Strupiechonski 6, Andrés De Luna Bugallo 7, Aída Gutiérrez‐Alejandre 8,✉, Yoarhy A Amador‐Sánchez 1,✉, Diego Solis‐Ibarra 1,✉, Ilich A Ibarra 1,✉
PMCID: PMC13360734  PMID: 42227276

ABSTRACT

The development of chemically robust sorbents capable of integrating capture and optical sensing of toxic gas remains a major challenge. Herein, the ultramicroporous Zn(II)‐based metal‐organic framework, MFM‐520, has been investigated for the adsorption and luminescent detection of H2S. Breakthrough measurements at 298 K and 1 bar show a reversible H2S uptake of 3.91 mmol g−1, while powder X‐ray diffraction confirms full retention of crystallinity after adsorption. Solid‐state photoluminescence experiments reveal a pronounced, selective fluorescence turn‐off response to H2S in the gas phase, with a limit of detection of 6.13 ppm. Time‐resolved spectroscopy shows a decrease in the excited‐state lifetime upon H2S adsorption, indicating enhanced non‐radiative decay pathways. In situ DRIFTS measurements indicate that H2S interacts with MFM‐520 through supramolecular interactions. The combined adsorption, structural, and spectroscopic analyses establish that fluorescence quenching arises from reversible, confinement‐amplified modulation of ligand‐centered excited‐state dynamics. These results highlight how coordinatively saturated Zn(II) nodes within ultramicroporous environments can couple chemical stability with selective luminescent gas sensing.

Keywords: adsorption, fluorescent sensing, H2S, MOF, structure


An ultramicroporous Zn‐based metal‐organic framework, MFM‐520, enables reversible hydrogen sulfide adsorption and selective fluorescence sensing. Confinement of H2S within the pores perturbs ligand‐centered excited states through weak host‐guest interactions, enhancing non‐radiative decay pathways. This guest‐induced modulation of excited‐state dynamics produces a pronounced fluorescence turn‐off response toward H2S.

graphic file with name SMLL-22-e74030-g005.jpg

1. Introduction

Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) is a highly toxic gas classified as a primary air pollutant, commonly present in natural gas and biogas streams and it is also emitted from various industrial processes, including oil refineries and wastewater treatment plants [1]. H2S is a colorless, hazardous, and flammable gas that is particularly corrosive, which can lead to severe material degradation and, upon atmospheric oxidation, contributes to the formation of secondary pollutants associated with acid rain [2]. Even at relatively low concentrations (e.g., ppm levels), H2S is extremely harmful to human health, causing severe nervous system failure and respiratory paralysis [3]. Therefore, the efficient capture and reliable monitoring of H2S are of critical importance for environmental protection and human health [4, 5]. In this regard, sorbent materials that combine high adsorption affinity with adsorption‐driven sensing mechanisms are urgently needed.

Current technologies for capturing H2S include ionic liquids, alkanol amines (reactive and non‐reactive absorption), cryogenic sequential distillation [6], and physisorption in zeolites, activated carbons, and metal oxides [7]. However, such approaches face challenges, including pipeline corrosion, very low H2S capture, large amounts of wastewater, high re‐use costs, low recovery, and, for porous solid materials, significant loss of porosity due to required high re‐activation temperatures [8, 9]. In parallel, the most widely used H2S detection technologies are based on electrochemical sensors employing metal oxides [10], which are often susceptible to poisoning by interfering species present in real environments, leading to poor selectivity and loss of sensitivity over time. Metal‐organic frameworks (MOFs) have attracted significant attention for their potential to integrate efficient H2S capture and detection within a single material platform [11]. Due to their high porosity, chemical stability, functionalization, low‐cost reactivation, and well‐defined distribution of metal centers, MOF materials exhibit outstanding H2S uptakes [12]. For example, MIL‐53(Al, Cr, Fe), MIL‐47(V), MIL‐100(Cr), and MIL‐101(Cr) have been applied to H2S removal [13]. Beyond adsorption, MOFs are promising materials for advanced H2S detection. For instance, H2S sensing has been demonstrated by incorporating MOF materials into multifunctional electronic textiles [14]. Also, luminescent MOFs offer an attractive sensing strategy, as interactions between guest molecules and the framework can induce measurable changes in fluorescence intensity or spectral profile [15]. In this context, recent studies have demonstrated H2S detection using chemically stable MOFs through diverse strategies, including reactive “turn‐on” sensing based on chemical transformation (e.g., azide‐to‐amine conversion) [16], luminescent Zr‐based frameworks for aqueous detection of H2S or S2− [17], and MOF‐based mixed‐matrix membranes (MMMs) that improve processability and sensing performance [18]. In addition, post‐synthetically modified MOFs have enabled sensing in biological environments [19], while lanthanide‐based systems offer multi‐responsive detection through modulation of emission pathways [20]. However, most reported systems rely on chemical reactivity, operate in solution, or lack a detailed mechanistic understanding of the fluorescence response under gas‐phase conditions. Accordingly, establishing a direct correlation between H2S adsorption and fluorescence response remains challenging because highly chemically stable MOF materials are required. For example, due to the d10 electronic configuration, Zn(II) ion exhibits a highly flexible coordination environment, which readily adapts to intermediate and distorted coordination geometries [21], such as pentacoordinated or distorted octahedral, that favors the formation of cooperative and structurally persistent bonding units in MOFs, due to greater saturation of the coordination sphere and a reduction in labile sites susceptible to substitution [22, 23]. In that context, MFM‐520 material is constructed from pentacoordinated Zn(II) centers that adopt a square pyramidal geometry, described as a [ZnO4N] node, in which each Zn(II) ion is coordinated to a pyridine nitrogen atom and four carboxylate oxygens from different ligands (Figure 1). This connectivity generates a highly stable tridentate synthon, in which the set of O and N donors cooperates to effectively saturate the metal coordination sphere, suppressing the lability typical of many Zn(II) nodes in porous frameworks. As reported in detailed structural studies of MFM‐520, the material exhibits meta‐rigid behavior, in which the [ZnO4N] node can undergo reversible geometric distortions without metal‐ligand bond breakage attributable to angular relaxation of the Zn–O/N environment [24]. This ability to accommodate local stresses while keeping the overall network intact is critical to its high stability. In this work, the ultramicroporous and chemically stable Zn(II)‐based MOF MFM‐520, [Zn2(L)] (H4L = 4,4´‐bipyridine‐2,2´,6,6´‐tetracarboxylic acid) has been selected to investigate H2S adsorption and detection. Owing to its structurally saturated [ZnO4N] nodes and bowtie‐shaped ultramicropores (dimensions of 6.6 × 4.0 Å2) [25, 26], MFM‐520 provides a confined environment in which weak host‐guest interactions can be amplified without compromising framework integrity. We hypothesized that, rather than inducing direct metal coordination or structural degradation, H2S would interact with the aromatic linker via supramolecular contacts, thereby modulating ligand‐centered excited‐state dynamics. By combining breakthrough experiments, in situ DRIFTS analysis, and steady‐state and time‐resolved photoluminescence spectroscopy, we have established a direct correlation between H2S adsorption and fluorescence response, and to elucidate the mechanism by which spatial confinement translates weak intermolecular interactions into measurable changes in emission behavior.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Structural representation of MFM‐520: (a) square‐pyramidal pentacoordinated Zn(II) center; (b) local view of the [ZnO4N] node; and (c) extended framework viewed along the b axis. Color code: Zn, yellow polyhedra; C, green; O, cyan; N, magenta.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. MFM‐520 Characterization

MFM‐520 was synthesized following a previously reported method [25]. Phase purity of MFM‐520 was corroborated using powder X‐ray diffraction (PXRD) and Fourier‐transform infrared (FTIR). The PXRD pattern of MFM‐520 shows well‐defined characteristic peaks, indicating high crystallinity [25].

2.2. H2S Adsorption Performance

The dynamic H2S adsorption performance of MFM‐520 was evaluated using breakthrough experiments. The measurements were carried out using an H2S concentration of 5 vol% in 95 vol% N2. Prior to adsorption, an acetone‐exchanged MFM‐520 was activated at 453 K for 2 h under a flow of dry N2. The breakthrough curves of H2S adsorption (Figure 2a) reveal a high dynamic uptake capacity of 3.91 mmol g−1. This highlights the strong affinity of MFM‐520 toward H2S under flow conditions. Interestingly, this uptake surpasses that of leading MOF materials, such as Mg‐CUK‐1 (1.41 mmol g−1) [27], MIL‐101(Cr) (0.4 mmol g−1) [28], and Zn‐MOF‐74 (1.6 mmol g−1) [28].

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

(a) H2S adsorption isotherm of MFM‐520 compared with a blank measurement. (b) PXRD patterns of simulated, as‐synthesised, and H2S‐exposed MFM‐520. (c) In situ DRIFTS spectra of activated MFM‐520 under different H2S pressures at 298 K, showing the appearance of the S─H stretching band (~2595 cm−1) together with perturbations in the aromatic C─H region, consistent with weak host‐guest interactions within the ultramicroporous framework.

The full retention of structural integrity of MFM‐520 after the H2S breakthrough experiment was confirmed by PXRD (Figure 2b), demonstrating the excellent chemical robustness of MFM‐520. The resistance of MFM‐520 to H2S can be understood by applying Pearson's hard and soft acids and bases (HSAB) principle to the coordination environment of Zn(II) [29]. Zn(II) is a borderline acid, and in MFM‐520 it is stabilised by a combination of hard bases (carboxylate oxygen atoms) and slightly soft bases (pyridine nitrogen atoms), resulting in an electronically balanced node that is strongly anchored to the ligand [30]. In this context, H2S, which is a soft and neutral base under non‐dissociating conditions, lacks the thermodynamic strength necessary to compete with the cooperative O, O, N set that defines the tridentate synthon [30]. Furthermore, the effective saturation of the Zn(II) coordination sphere prevents the possibility of unsaturated sites for direct Zn‐S interaction, making adsorption dominated by intermolecular interactions within the pore [31]. Thus, the combination of a frontier‐metal acid and a mixed hard/frontier‐donor environment consistently explains why MFM‐520 can tolerate H2S without structural degradation. The activated MFM‐520 exhibits a BET surface area of 308.2 m2 g−1, in excellent agreement with the literature value reported for the same framework ([Zn2(L)]) (312.7 m2 g−1). After H2S adsorption/desorption, the BET surface area remains essentially unchanged (310.7 m2 g−1), confirming preservation of the intrinsic ultramicroporosity and structural integrity of the framework.

The interactions between H2S and the MFM‐520 framework are dominated by intermolecular interactions, which are favored by the strict spatial confinement within the ultramicroporous pores. MFM‐520 exhibits pores with dimensions of 6.6 × 4.0 Å2, comparable to the kinetic diameter of H2S (∼3.6 Å) [32], allowing efficient accommodation of the molecule within the channel without inducing significant structural stresses in the framework. Under these confinement conditions, the gas is sufficiently close to the aromatic fragments of the ligand to establish directional supramolecular interactions, such as C─H···S and induced dipole–dipole. The latter is consistent with in situ DRIFTS experiments. In situ DRIFT experiments were performed at 298 K and atmospheric pressure to investigate the interaction between H2S and the MFM‐520 framework. The IR spectra for MFM‐520 samples are displayed: before (activated sample) and after H2S adsorption (under an atmosphere of H2S at different pressures) are displayed in Figure 2c. The bands observed at 3100–3095 cm−1 are related to aromatic C─H stretching vibrations of the organic linker [24]. Upon exposure to H2S, a characteristic new band at 2595 cm−1 is observed, corresponding to the S─H stretching vibration of gaseous H2S. The gradual decrease of this band with decreasing H2S pressure indicates a reduction in free gas‐phase H2S within the cell. Interestingly, slight changes are also observed in the aromatic C─H stretching region. This indicates that the H2S molecule perturbs the electronic environment of the linker. Thus, these observations suggest that H2S interacts with aromatic moieties within MFM‐520, likely via hydrogen bonding between the free electron pair on the S atom and the H atom of the CH group (C─H···S) and via induced dipole–dipole interactions [33]. Such interactions are consistent with reversible adsorption behavior.

As shown in the Raman spectra (Figure 3), the main ligand‐associated modes, particularly the aromatic ring breathing mode (∼1000 cm−1) and the C═C stretching region (1200–1600 cm−1) remain clearly observable after H2S exposure, indicating that the framework integrity is largely maintained.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Raman spectra of MFM‐520 before and after H2S exposure, evidencing the absence of Zn─S bond formation and preservation of the framework structure.

H2S may exhibit affinity toward Zn2+ centers, and the possibility of Zn─S interactions must be considered. However, the Raman data provide important insight into the nature of this interaction. The most significant spectral changes occur in the low wavenumber region (<150 cm−1), which corresponds to collective lattice vibrations and framework modes in the terahertz (THz) regime, rather than localized bond‐stretching vibrations. These low‐frequency modes involve cooperative motions of the metal nodes and organic linkers and are highly sensitive to weak perturbations such as guest adsorption, pore filling, or changes in intermolecular interactions. The observed attenuation and broadening of these bands upon H2S exposure therefore indicate a modification of the global dynamical response of the framework, rather than the formation of specific, well‐defined Zn─S bonds. It is worth noting that no new Raman bands attributable to Zn─S stretching modes are observed upon H2S exposure. Such modes, if associated with strong chemisorption or bond formation, would be expected to appear as well‐defined features in the low‐to‐mid frequency region. Instead, the spectral response is characterized by an increased damping of collective modes, which can be attributed to weak interactions and dynamic disorder within the pores.

2.3. Photophysical Properties of MFM‐520

The UV–vis diffuse reflectance spectra of the H4L ligand and activated MFM‐520 were transformed using the Kubelka–Munk function, F(R), to obtain spectra proportional to the absorption coefficient (Figure 4a). The resulting profiles display an intense absorption onset in the near‐UV region with a sharp decrease around 360 nm, characteristic of allowed π→π* intraligand transitions within the aromatic framework. The absorption profile of the activated MOF displays a slight bathochromic shift and band broadening compared to the free ligand, indicating electronic modulation upon coordination to Zn(II). Importantly, no new absorption bands appear in the visible region, confirming that the optical response remains predominantly ligand‐centered and that Zn(II), owing to its d10 electronic configuration, does not introduce low‐lying metal‐centered transitions. These results indicate that the lowest excited states responsible for the emissive behavior originate from ligand‐based π→π* transitions.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

(a) UV–vis diffuse reflectance spectra of H4L and activated MFM‐520. (b) Excitation and PL spectra of activated MFM‐520. (c) Solid‐state PL spectra of H4L and activated MFM‐520 showing quantum yield enhancement upon coordination. (d) Time‐resolved photoluminescence decay profiles monitored at the corresponding emission maxima.

The excitation and emission spectra of MFM‐520 in the solid state and after activation (Figure 4b) show behavior dominated by the organic ligand, where the excitation band has a well‐defined maximum around 340 nm, which can be attributed to π→π* intraligand electronic transitions. Meanwhile, the emission of the activated material is characterized by a broad band centered approximately at 450 nm. Based on these results, 340 nm was selected as the excitation wavelength for subsequent experiments.

The emission of the H4L acid ligand in the solid state, at λex = 340 nm, shows a broad spectrum in the visible region with two maxima around 447 and 534 nm (Figure 4c), together with low quantum yield (QY ≈ 2%, Figure S14). In most aromatic organic systems, radiative deactivation occurs exclusively from the lower energy excited singlet state (S1), in accordance with Kasha's law [34]. However, the presence of two emission maxima in this case indicates a dual‐emission scenario, attributable to two distinct emitting singlet states (e.g., locally excited (LE) versus charge transfer (CT)) that do not fully interconvert before emission [35]. Thus, we can attribute the highest energy band at ∼447 nm to a localized π→π* intraligand transition, while the band with a maximum around 534 nm and greater spectral width may be due to a stabilized intraligand CT state. The presence of non‐bonding electron pairs in nitrogen atoms introduces excited states of the n→π* type that are close in energy to typical aromatic π→π* states, which favors vibronic coupling that opens channels for non‐radiative deactivation [36]. Additionally, the electro‐attractive behavior of –COOH groups can favor excited states of internal CT that also tend to deactivate fluorescence [37, 38]. All the above result in the poor quantum yield observed for the H4L ligand.

When the ligand coordinates with Zn(II), the photoluminescence of the ligand undergoes a significant reorganization in which the disappearance of the lower energy band at 534 nm is observed, suggesting that destabilization of the CT state occurs (Figure 4c). As a result, radiative deactivation occurs predominantly via intraligand π→π* transitions, giving rise to an intense, well‐defined emission band centered around 450 nm. On the other hand, the Zn(II) ion does not exhibit low‐energy d–d transitions that can serve as efficient channels for non‐radiative deactivation because of its d10 electronic configuration [39, 40]. Thus, the excited energy remains mainly localized in the ligand, favoring emission processes centered on the organic chromophore. In this way, Zn(II) essentially acts as a structural node that rigidifies and modulates the electronic environment of the ligand, resulting in an increase in QY to about 8% for the activated MFM‐520 (Figure S15) [41, 42]. Time‐resolved photoluminescence (TRPL) measurements further support the excited‐state reorganization induced by coordination. The free H4L ligand exhibits average lifetimes of 2.13 ns when monitored at 447 nm and 2.67 ns at 535 nm (λex = 375 nm), confirming that both emissive bands arise from short‐lived singlet excited states (Figure 4d). The slightly longer lifetime associated with the 535 nm band is consistent with emission from a stabilized intraligand charge‐transfer (CT) state, which typically presents a more relaxed excited‐state geometry and enhanced non‐radiative decay channels. In contrast, activated MFM‐520 shows a significantly prolonged average lifetime of 5.57 ns when monitored at 450 nm, indicating a substantial suppression of non‐radiative deactivation pathways upon coordination to Zn(II). This lifetime extension is consistent with framework rigidification and destabilization of the CT state, as previously inferred from steady‐state emission data. Since Zn(II) possesses a d10 electronic configuration and does not introduce low‐energy metal‐centered states, the excited‐state energy remains predominantly localized on the ligand, while vibrational relaxation is reduced due to structural confinement within the framework. The increase in lifetime correlates directly with the enhancement of quantum yield observed for the activated MOF. Overall, the TRPL results demonstrate that coordination to Zn(II) enhances excited‐state stability and suppresses CT‐mediated non‐radiative decay, whereas guest interaction partially reactivates these relaxation pathways, directly linking structural modulation with photophysical response.

2.4. H2S Detection Measurements

The solid‐state photoluminescence response of activated MFM‐520 toward different gaseous analytes (Figure 5) reveals a gas‐dependent modulation of emission intensity centered at 447 nm (λex = 340 nm). While most tested gases induce only minor variations in fluorescence intensity, exposure to H2S produces a distinctly stronger quenching effect. Interestingly, no significant shift in the emission maximum or alteration of the spectral profile is observed for any of the analytes, indicating that the emissive state retains its predominantly intraligand π→π* character and that no new emissive species is generated upon guest incorporation. The preservation of band shape suggests that the ground‐state electronic structure of the framework remains largely unaffected, in agreement with the UV–DRS results, and that the sensing response arises from modulation of excited‐state dynamics. The pronounced quenching observed for H2S therefore points to stronger guest–framework interactions relative to the other gases, likely involving specific interactions within the pore environment that enhance non‐radiative relaxation pathways. These findings demonstrate that MFM‐520 exhibits selective fluorescence quenching toward H2S over the other tested gaseous species, highlighting its potential as a luminescent sensor based on excited‐state perturbation mechanisms. While partial quenching is also observed for other gases, the significantly stronger response toward H2S indicates preferential host‐guest interactions; nevertheless, further studies under mixed‐gas conditions are required to fully assess selectivity under practical environments.

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Solid‐state PL spectra of activated MFM‐520 toward different gaseous analytes (λex = 340 nm).

H2S breakthrough experiments on MFM‐520 demonstrated complete reversibility of H2S adsorption without loss of framework crystallinity (vide supra). Based on this observation, we investigated the relationship between spontaneous H2S desorption and photoluminescence recovery as a function of time, without reactivating the sample. A H2S‐saturated MFM‐520 sample was monitored in situ by recording emission spectra every 30 min for 3 h (Figure 6).

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6

Time‐dependent recovery of the solid‐state photoluminescence of H2S‐saturated MFM‐520. PL spectra were recorded every 30 min over 3 h without re‐activation (λex = 340 nm), showing gradual restoration of fluorescence intensity as H2S spontaneously desorbs from the framework pores. The emission maximum remains centered at ∼438–450 nm throughout the process, indicating preservation of the ligand‐centered emissive state.

A gradual increase in photoluminescence intensity was observed, indicating progressive desorption of H2S from the pores and concomitant recovery of the emissive state. The emission maximum remained essentially unchanged throughout this process, confirming that the recovery mechanism is governed by the removal of the quenching guest rather than by structural modification of the framework. The monitoring was extended until the emission intensity approached that of the as‐synthesized sample, which occurred after approximately one week (Figure S8), suggesting complete desorption of H2S from the pore environment. The complete recovery of the photoluminescence signal and the preservation of crystallinity suggest that the adsorption‐desorption process is fully reversible; however, further multi‐cycle studies are required to quantitatively evaluate the long‐term stability and reusability of the material.

Once the selectivity of MFM‐520 toward H2S over CO2, H2O, and SO2 was established, together with the reproducibility of the response under saturated conditions, we evaluated the photoluminescence response under lower H2S pressures. An activated sample was exposed to 0.1 bar of H2S, and the emission spectrum was recorded (Figure S9). The broad emission band remained centered at λmax = 438 nm, consistent with ligand‐centered emission, while a decrease in intensity of approximately 70% was observed under these conditions. The reproducibility of the response was confirmed through five independent cycles of activation and re‐exposure to 0.1 bar of H2S, yielding a consistent average decrease of ∼41% in emission intensity. Although the experiments were performed under controlled pressure conditions and therefore cannot be directly extrapolated to trace‐level gas sensing, the consistent quenching behavior upon repeated exposure demonstrates the robustness of the photophysical response and highlights the potential of this chemically stable MOF for H2S detection.

To further evaluate the sensing capability of MFM‐520, the limit of detection (LOD) was determined using H2S dissolved in THF. The LOD was calculated as LOD = 3σ/m, where σ is the standard deviation of the emission intensity of activated MFM‐520 in THF and m is the slope of the linear fit obtained from concentration‐dependent quenching experiments. The LOD was determined in THF to enable controlled concentration‐dependent measurements; however, the fluorescence response observed under gas‐phase conditions confirms that the sensing mechanism is preserved upon H2S adsorption within the framework. A series of H2S solutions ranging from 0.5 to 100 mm was analysed (Figure S10), showing a clear linear correlation between emission intensity and H2S concentration (Figure S11). From this calibration curve, a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.18 mM was determined, corresponding to approximately 6.13 ppm. This result demonstrates that MFM‐520 enables reliable and quantifiable fluorescence quenching in the presence of H2S. Notably, this detection limit falls within the concentration range relevant for industrial safety and environmental monitoring; however, further improvements in sensitivity would be required to extend detection toward lower, trace‐level concentrations.

Some Zn‐based luminescent MOFs have been reported for H2S detection, including a methyl viologen‐templated Zn‐MOF capable of sensing H2S in natural gas with a detection limit of 28 nmol mL− 1 (∼0.95 ppm) [43]. In contrast, the present study combines adsorption analysis, structural characterization, and time‐resolved spectroscopy to establish a direct correlation between H2S uptake and excited‐state dynamics, providing additional mechanistic insight into how weak host–guest interactions within ultramicroporous environments modulate ligand‐centered emission. A comparative summary of representative MOF‐based H2S sensors, including sensing conditions and performance metrics is provided in Table S3.

2.5. Quenching Mechanism in MFM‐520

Upon exposure to H2S, the quantum yield (QY) of MFM‐520 decreases markedly to 0.55%, evidencing highly efficient fluorescence quenching (Figure S16). The UV–DRS spectra (Figure 7A) show no significant change in the absorption profile after H2S saturation, indicating that the ground‐state electronic structure of the framework remains essentially unaltered. This observation rules out ground‐state complex formation or framework degradation as the origin of the sensing response and confirms that the quenching process is primarily governed by excited‐state perturbation. Since the emission of MFM‐520 is ligand‐centered in nature, the quenching behavior can be rationalized in terms of supramolecular interactions between adsorbed H2S molecules and the aromatic fragments of the organic linker. Within the confined ultramicroporous environment, weak host–guest interactions, including C─H···S contacts and induced dipole–dipole interactions, become spatially amplified. These interactions subtly perturb the electronic distribution of the chromophore, facilitating additional non‐radiative decay pathways. As a consequence, a significant fraction of the excited states undergo enhanced non‐radiative deactivation, resulting in substantial attenuation of emission intensity.

FIGURE 7.

FIGURE 7

(A) UV–DRS spectra of activated MFM‐520 and H2S‐saturated MFM‐520, showing negligible changes in the ground‐state absorption profile after gas exposure. (B) Time‐resolved photoluminescence decay profiles (λem = 450 nm) of activated and H2S‐saturated MFM‐520, evidencing a decrease in the average excited‐state lifetime from 5.57 ns to 3.83 ns upon H2S adsorption.

Time‐resolved photoluminescence measurements further clarify the quenching mechanism (Figure 7B). Upon H2S saturation, the average excited‐state lifetime decreases from 5.57 to 3.83 ns (monitored at 450 nm), directly confirming an increase in the non‐radiative decay rate (knr). The concurrent decrease in both quantum yield and lifetime demonstrates that the quenching process contains a pronounced dynamic component rather than being purely static in origin.

Interestingly, the absence of spectral shifts in steady‐state emission, together with the retention of crystallinity and unchanged absorption features, indicates that the emissive state preserves its ligand‐centered character, and that no new emissive species is generated. In contrast to systems where preferential adsorption sites have been resolved crystallographically by in situ synchrotron PXRD [44], particularly in frameworks containing open metal sites, the interaction of H2S with MFM‐520 was demonstrated as relatively weak supramolecular interactions within the pore environment (Figure S13), as we previously demonstrated by in situ synchrotron X‐ray diffraction when SO2 is adsorbed within MFM‐520, finding the same preferential adsorption sites for H2S [24]. The absence of new metal‐sulfur vibrational modes, together with the reversible adsorption behavior and preserved framework structure, supports a physisorption‐dominated mechanism rather than chemisorption at the metal center.

Collectively, in situ DRIFTS experiments and steady‐state, time‐resolved, and diffuse reflectance results demonstrated that fluorescence quenching in MFM‐520 arises from reversible, guest‐induced modulation of excited‐state dynamics under spatial confinement. The ultramicroporous framework functions as a supramolecular amplifier, translating weak and reversible host–guest interactions into a measurable enhancement of non‐radiative relaxation pathways without altering the fundamental electronic structure of the material.

3. Conclusions

Finally, the Zn(II)‐based MOF, MFM‐520, has been demonstrated to combine efficient H2S adsorption with selective luminescent sensing within a single chemically robust platform. The material exhibits a high dynamic H2S uptake capacity (3.91 mmol g−1) under dynamic conditions while fully preserving its crystallinity, highlighting the structural stability of the pentacoordinated [ZnO4N] nodes toward this corrosive gas. In situ DRIFTS experiments indicate that H2S interacts with the framework through relatively weak supramolecular interactions rather than direct Zn‐S coordination, consistent with the saturated coordination environment and HSAB considerations. The strict spatial confinement within the 6.6 × 4.0 Å2 ultramicropores promotes guest–framework proximity, enabling efficient perturbation of the ligand‐centered excited state. Photophysical investigations reveal that coordination of the H4L ligand to Zn(II) enhances fluorescence efficiency by suppressing charge‐transfer‐mediated non‐radiative decay pathways, leading to increased quantum yield and prolonged excited‐state lifetime. Upon H2S adsorption, a pronounced and selective fluorescence quenching is observed without spectral distortion, confirming preservation of the ligand‐centered emissive state. Time‐resolved measurements demonstrate lifetime shortening upon guest incorporation, evidencing that the sensing response arises from guest‐induced modulation of excited‐state dynamics through enhancement of non‐radiative decay rates. The fluorescence response is fully reversible, recovering spontaneously upon H2S desorption without framework degradation, thereby establishing a direct correlation between adsorption and photophysical behavior. Additionally, a remarkable limit of detection of 0.18 mM (≈ 6.13 ppm) was achieved in solvent dispersion studies, further supporting the sensing capability of this material. Overall, this study demonstrates that a structurally saturated Zn(II) node combined with ultramicropore confinement enables the integration of chemical robustness for H2S adsorption and a excited‐state‐responsive luminescence within a single MOF platform. These findings provide valuable design principles for developing stable luminescent MOFs that couple gas capture and optical sensing by controlled modulation of excited‐state dynamics.

4. Experimental Section

4.1. Materials

All reagents and solvents were purchased from commercial suppliers and used without further purification. All water was deionized.

4.2. Synthesis

MFM‐520 was synthesized according to a previously reported solvothermal procedure [25]. In a typical preparation, Zn(II) salt and 4,4′‐bipyridine‐2,6,2′,6′‐tetracarboxylic acid (H4L) were dissolved in a mixed DMF/H2O solvent system and heated under autogenous pressure in a sealed vessel at elevated temperature for several hours. After slow cooling to room temperature, colorless crystalline solids were isolated by filtration, washed with fresh solvent, and dried under ambient conditions. Prior to gas adsorption and photoluminescence measurements, the as‐synthesized material was solvent‐exchanged with methanol and subsequently activated under dynamic vacuum at elevated temperature to afford the desolvated framework.

4.3. Analytical Instruments

A detailed description of the analytical instruments employed in this work is provided in the Supporting Information.

Funding

I.A.I. thanks PAPIIT UNAM (IN201123), México, for financial support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Supporting information

Supporting File: smll74030‐sup‐0001‐SuppMat.docx.

SMLL-22-e74030-s001.docx (3.1MB, docx)

Acknowledgements

I.A.I. thanks PAPIIT UNAM (IN201123), México, for financial support. We thank U. Winnberg (Euro Health) for scientific discussions and G. Ibarra‐Winnberg for scientific encouragement. Yoarhy A. Amador‐Sánchez gratefully acknowledges the Secretaría de Ciencia, Humanidades, Tecnología e Innovación (SECIHTI) for financial support through a postdoctoral fellowship.

Contributor Information

Aída Gutiérrez‐Alejandre, Email: aidag@unam.mx.

Yoarhy A. Amador‐Sánchez, Email: yoarhy@materiales.unam.mx, Email: yoarhy@gmail.com.

Diego Solis‐Ibarra, Email: diego.solis@unam.mx.

Ilich A. Ibarra, Email: argel@unam.mx.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • 1. Kimura H., “Hydrogen Sulfide: Its Production, Release and Functions,” Amino Acids 41 (2011): 113–121, 10.1007/s00726-010-0510-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Zhang L., De Schryver P., De Gusseme B., De Muynck W., Boon N., and Verstraete W., “Chemical and Biological Technologies for Hydrogen Sulfide Emission Control in Sewer Systems: a Review,” Water Research 42 (2008): 1–12, 10.1016/j.watres.2007.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Legator M. S., Singleton C. R., Morris D. L., and Philips D. L., “Health Effects from Chronic Low‐Level Exposure to Hydrogen Sulfide,” Archives of Environmental Health: An International Journal 56 (2001): 123–131, 10.1080/00039890109604063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Calderon J. L., Sorensen C., Lemery J., Workman C. F., Linstadt H., and Bazilian M. D., “Managing Upstream Oil and Gas Emissions: a Public Health Oriented Approach,” Journal of Environmental Management 310 (2022): 114766, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Cline E. L., Obeso J. L., Al‐Kadamany G., et al., “Multifunctional Electronic Textiles for the Simultaneous Detection and Uptake of Hydrogen Sulfide,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 64 (2025): 202509883, 10.1002/anie.202509883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Shah M. S., Tsapatsis M., and Siepmann J. I., “Hydrogen Sulfide Capture: from Absorption in Polar Liquids to Oxide, Zeolite, and Metal–Organic Framework Adsorbents and Membranes,” Chemical Reviews 117 (2017): 9755–9803, 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Georgiadis A., Charisiou N., and Goula M., “Removal of Hydrogen Sulfide from Various Industrial Gases: a Review of the Most Promising Adsorbing Materials,” Catalysts 10 (2020): 521, 10.3390/catal10050521. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Kailasa S. K., Koduru J. R., Vikrant K., et al., “Recent Progress on Solution and Materials Chemistry for the Removal of Hydrogen Sulfide from Various Gas Plants,” Journal of Molecular Liquids 297 (2020): 111886, 10.1016/j.molliq.2019.111886. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Ozekmekci M., Salkic G., and Fellah M. F., “Use of Zeolites for the Removal of H 2 S: a Mini‐Review,” Fuel Processing Technology 139 (2015): 49–60, 10.1016/j.fuproc.2015.08.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Sun Z., Yuan H., Liu Z., Han B., and Zhang X., “A Highly Efficient Chemical Sensor Material for H 2 S: Α‐Fe 2 O 3 Nanotubes Fabricated Using Carbon Nanotube Templates,” Advanced Materials 17 (2005): 2993–2997, 10.1002/adma.200501562. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Martínez M. L., Marín‐Rosas P., López‐Cervantes V. B., et al., “Fluorescence Spectroscopy: Detection and Sensing of SO 2 and H 2 S Using MOFs and Other Emerging Porous Materials,” Dalton Transactions 54 (2025): 13806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. “Joe” Zhou H.‐C. and Kitagawa S., “Metal–Organic Frameworks (MOFs),” Chemical Society Review 43 (2014): 5415–5418, 10.1039/C4CS90059F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Hamon L., Serre C., Devic T., et al., “Comparative Study of Hydrogen Sulfide Adsorption in the MIL‐53(Al, Cr, Fe), MIL‐47(V), MIL‐100(Cr), and MIL‐101(Cr) Metal−Organic Frameworks at Room Temperature,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 131 (2009): 8775–8777, 10.1021/ja901587t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Smith M. K. and Mirica K. A., “Self‐Organized Frameworks on Textiles (SOFT): Conductive Fabrics for Simultaneous Sensing, Capture, and Filtration of Gases,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 139 (2017): 16759–16767, 10.1021/jacs.7b08840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Shingole M., Banerjee S., Modak B., Kolay S., Mohanty J., and Sudarsan V., “Cu‐MOF‐74 as Fluorescent Probe: Selective Optical Sensor for H2S Gas,” ChemPhotoChem 9 (2025): 202400300. [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Gogoi C., Kumar A., M S. K., and Biswas S., “Specific Fluorescence Sensing of Hydrogen Sulphide by an Azide Functionalized Zr(IV) MOF with DUT‐52 Topology,” Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 311 (2021): 110725, 10.1016/j.micromeso.2020.110725. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Guo L., Wang M., and Cao D., “A Novel Zr‐MOF as Fluorescence Turn‐on Probe for Real‐Time Detecting H 2 S Gas and Fingerprint Identification,” Small 14 (2018): 1703822, 10.1002/smll.201703822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Zhang X., Zhang Q., Yue D., et al., “Flexible Metal–Organic Framework‐Based Mixed‐Matrix Membranes: a New Platform for H 2 S Sensors,” Small 14 (2018): 1801563, 10.1002/smll.201801563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Weng Z., Xie Z., Wu X., et al., “Water‐Stable MIL‐MOFs Developed through a Novel Sacrifice‐Protection Strategy Inspired by Butterfly Wings′ Scales for Long‐Term Turn‐on Fluorescence Sensing of H 2 S,” Small Methods 9 (2025): 2500277, 10.1002/smtd.202500277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Shu Y., Hao J.‐N., Niu D., and Li Y., “A Smart Luminescent Metal–Organic Framework‐Based Logic System for Simultaneous Analysis of Copper Ions and Hydrogen Sulfide,” Journal of Materials Chemistry C 8 (2020): 8635–8642, 10.1039/D0TC00698J. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Vasile Scaeteanu G., Maxim C., Badea M., and Olar R., “Zinc(II) Carboxylate Coordination Polymers with Versatile Applications,” Molecules 28 (2023): 1132, 10.3390/molecules28031132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Erxleben A., “Structures and Properties of Zn(II) Coordination Polymers,” Coordination Chemistry Reviews 246 (2003): 203–228, 10.1016/S0010-8545(03)00117-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Zhou B.‐X., Lin X., Xie H.‐Q., et al., “Synthesis, Crystal Structure, and Properties of a Zn(II) Coordination Polymer from a New Semirigid Tripodal Nitrogen‐Containing Heterotopic Ligand,” Journal of Chemical Crystallography 54 (2024): 313–320, 10.1007/s10870-024-01023-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Li J., Zhou Z., Han X., et al., “Guest‐Controlled Incommensurate Modulation in a Meta‐Rigid Metal–Organic Framework Material,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 142 (2020): 19189–19197, 10.1021/jacs.0c08794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Li J., Han X., Zhang X., et al., “Capture of Nitrogen Dioxide and Conversion to Nitric Acid in a Porous Metal–Organic Framework,” Nature Chemistry 11 (2019): 1085–1090, 10.1038/s41557-019-0356-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Wang Z., Sheveleva A. M., Li J., et al., “Analysis of a Cu‐Doped Metal–Organic Framework, MFM‐520(Zn 1‐x Cu x ), for no 2 Adsorption,” Advanced Science 11 (2024): 2305542, 10.1002/advs.202305542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Sánchez‐González E., Mileo P. G. M., Sagastuy‐Breña M., et al., “Highly Reversible Sorption of H 2 S and CO 2 by an Environmentally Friendly Mg‐Based MOF,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A 6 (2018): 16900–16909, 10.1039/C8TA05400B. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Liu J., Wei Y., Li P., Zhao Y., and Zou R., “Selective H 2 S/CO 2 Separation by Metal–Organic Frameworks Based on Chemical‐Physical Adsorption,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 121 (2017): 13249–13255, 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b04465. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Pearson R. G., “Hard and Soft Acids and Bases,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 85 (1963): 3533–3539, 10.1021/ja00905a001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Sakai S., “Theoretical Study of the Chemical Reactions of B2H6 with Lewis Bases (NH3, PH3, H2O, and H2S),” The Journal of Physical Chemistry 99 (1995): 9080–9086, 10.1021/j100022a020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Lin J.‐B., Nguyen T. T. T., Vaidhyanathan R., et al., “A Scalable Metal‐Organic Framework as a Durable Physisorbent for Carbon Dioxide Capture,” Science 374 (2021): 1464–1469, 10.1126/science.abi7281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Matteucci S., Yampolskii Y., Freeman B. D., and Pinnau I., Materials Science of Membranes for Gas and Vapor Separation, ed. Yampolskii Y., Pinnau I., B., and Freeman, (Wiley, 2006), 1–47. [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Li Z., Xiao Y., Xue W., Yang Q., and Zhong C., “Ionic Liquid/Metal–Organic Framework Composites for H 2 S Removal from Natural Gas: a Computational Exploration,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 119 (2015): 3674–3683, 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b00019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.ed. Lakowicz J. R., Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy (Springer US, 2006), 10.1007/978-0-387-46312-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Kukhta N. A. and Bryce M. R., “Dual Emission in Purely Organic Materials for Optoelectronic Applications,” Materials Horizons 8 (2021): 33–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Mikheev Y. A. and Ershov Y. A., “Assignment of the π → π* and n → π* Transitions to the Spectral Bands of Azobenzene and Dimethylaminoazobenzene,” Russian Journal of Physical Chemistry 92 (2018): 1499–1507. [Google Scholar]
  • 37. O'Donnell R. M., Sampaio R. N., Li G., Johansson P. G., Ward C. L., and Meyer G. J., “Photoacidic and Photobasic Behavior of Transition Metal Compounds with Carboxylic Acid Group (s),” Journal of the American Chemical Society 138 (2016): 3891–3903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Zhou W.‐Q., Ye J.‐W., Zhang W.‐J., Huang M.‐J., Chen L., and Chen X.‐M., “Fluorescent Probes with Variable Intramolecular Charge Transfer: Constructing Closed‐Circle Plots for Distinguishing D 2 O from H 2 O,” Analytical Chemistry 95 (2023): 8239–8249, 10.1021/acs.analchem.3c00157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Pal T. K., “Metal–Organic Framework (MOF)‐Based Fluorescence “Turn‐On” Sensors,” Materials Chemistry Frontiers 7 (2023): 405–441, 10.1039/D2QM01070D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Du T., Huang L., Wang J., Sun J., Zhang W., and Wang J., “Luminescent Metal‐Organic Frameworks (LMOFs): an Emerging Sensing Platform for Food Quality and Safety Control,” Trends in Food Science & Technology 111: 716–730, 10.1016/j.tifs.2021.03.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Zhou X., Guo X., Liu L., et al., “Two D 10 Luminescent Metal–Organic Frameworks as Dual Functional Luminescent Sensors for (Fe 3+, Cu 2+) and 2, 4, 6‐trinitrophenol (TNP) with High Selectivity and Sensitivity,” RSC Advances 10 (2020): 4817–4824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Fu R., Xiang S., Hu S., et al., “Assembled Bright Green Fluorescent Zinc Coordination Polymer,” Chemical Communications (2005): 5292–5294, 10.1039/b509695b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Song R., Hou L., Wang Y., et al., “Fluorescence Zn‐Based Metal–Organic Frameworks for the Detection of Hydrogen Sulfide in Natural Gas,” Analytical Methods 9 (2017): 3914–3919, 10.1039/C7AY01193H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Carter J. H., Han X., Moreau F. Y., et al., “Exceptional Adsorption and Binding of Sulfur Dioxide in a Robust Zirconium‐Based Metal–Organic Framework,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 140 (2018): 15564–15567, 10.1021/jacs.8b08433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting File: smll74030‐sup‐0001‐SuppMat.docx.

SMLL-22-e74030-s001.docx (3.1MB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Small (Weinheim an Der Bergstrasse, Germany) are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES