Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2026 May 22;65(29):e7848056. doi: 10.1002/anie.7848056

Orientation‐Entropy‐Mediated Derivative Cu Sites for Selective CO2 Electroreduction to Ethylene

Zhenwei Tong 1, Shucong Zhang 2, Jing Ma 1, Xinshuo Shi 2, Dawei Shang 1, Shengwei Zhang 1, Bingzheng Wu 2, Jiali Zhou 1, Tong Yu 2, Lei Shi 2, Piaoping Yang 3,, Rihua Xiong 1,, Shenlong Zhao 2,4,
PMCID: PMC13360756  PMID: 42171434

ABSTRACT

Electrocatalytic conversion of CO2 to ethylene (C2H4) provides a sustainable route for decarbonized chemical manufacturing. Cu‐based catalysts are uniquely capable of driving the C−C coupling essential for C2H4 formation, yet their practical implementation is limited by uncontrollable dynamic reconstruction that deteriorates both selectivity and stability. Here, we develop an orientation‐entropy‐mediated regulation strategy to programmatically direct the structural evolution of Cu2O toward highly active sites for C2H4 electrosynthesis. Remarkably, the medium‐entropy Cu2O catalyst achieves a high C2H4 Faradaic efficiency of ∼75% at an industrial‐level current density of 400 mA cm−2 and operates stably for over 80 h. Operando spectroscopy combined with experimental analysis reveals that entropy‐regulated Cu sites establish an optimized kinetic balance between C−C coupling and competing *CO hydrogenation, thereby promoting the energetically preferred formation of the key *CO−*COH intermediate. Preliminary techno‐economic analysis projects an additional profit of $566 per ton of C2H4, and life‐cycle assessment demonstrates an overall ∼42% reduction in environmental impact compared to conventional production routes.

Keywords: CO2 electroreduction, ethylene production, in situ transformation, machine learning, orientation entropy


The data‐driven Cu2O catalyst enables programmable structural reconstruction by an orientation‐entropy‐mediated regulation strategy, controlling the configurational degrees of freedom governing Cu evolution, producing derivative Cu sites whose reaction pathways can be tuned precisely.

graphic file with name ANIE-65-e7848056-g005.jpg

1. Introduction

Ethylene (C2H4), the simplest olefin and a cornerstone platform chemical, underpins the manufacture of polymers, fibers, and numerous value‐added chemicals [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. At present, nearly all industrial C2H4 is produced through high‐temperature steam cracking of fossil hydrocarbons (> 750°C), an energy‐intensive route that emits over 360 million metric tons of CO2 annually [6, 7, 8]. By contrast, the electrochemical CO2 reduction reaction (CO2RR), driven by renewable electricity, offers a sustainable pathway to green C2H4 by CO2 conversion rather than emission [9, 10, 11, 12, 13]. Nevertheless, selectively directing CO2RR toward C2H4 remains challenging because the reaction pathway involves complex proton‐coupled electron‐transfer steps, while numerous competing reactions divert intermediates to C1 products or hydrogen [14, 15]. Cu‐based catalysts represent the most promising candidates for C2H4 electrosynthesis owing to their moderate CO adsorption energy [16, 17, 18, 19], yet their inherently low controllability of dynamic structural reconstruction toward metallic Cu species under reductive potentials severely limits both C2H4 selectivity and long‐term stability.

Orientation‐entropy engineering, achieved by modulating surface configurational heterogeneity [20, 21], has recently emerged as a promising strategy to regulate electrocatalytic pathways by influencing intermediate adsorption and surface structural evolution. Here, orientation entropy is used to describe the statistical distribution of exposed crystallographic facets, reflecting the degree of surface configurational heterogeneity. By precisely tuning the orientation and entropy of active sites, this approach provides fine control over the dynamic reconstruction behavior of Cu‐based pre‐catalysts, thus facilitating the formation of catalytically competent Cu derivative species [22, 23]. Beyond activity enhancement, orientation‐entropy modulation reshapes the local coordination environment and electronic distribution of surface atoms, which steers critical intermediates toward favorable C−C coupling while suppressing side reactions [24, 25]. Additionally, this strategy enhances structural stability by constraining entropically driven atomic migrations, reducing the uncontrolled reconstruction and thus promoting long‐term operational stability [26, 27, 28]. Despite these advantages, the implementation of orientation‐entropy regulation engineering in electrochemical CO2RR remains virtually unexplored.

Herein, we introduce a conceptually new descriptor of crystallographic orientation entropy that establishes a quantitative relationship between the intrinsic entropic characteristics of Cu‐based pre‐catalysts and the C2H4 selectivity of the derived Cu phase. Guided by machine‐learning screening of a self‐built database integrating representative Cu‐based catalysts, we identify an optimal pre‐catalyst prototype and develop a controllable synthesis strategy to construct data‐driven Cu2O models with well‐defined low‐, medium‐, and high‐entropy states. Experimental studies demonstrate that the medium‐entropy Cu2O generates a near‐octa‐coordinated Cu0.4+ species under −1.5 VRHE, achieving a maximum FEC2H4 of ∼75% at 400 mA cm−2 and stable operation for over 80 h. Operando spectroscopic analyses reveal that these entropy‐derived Cu sites establish an optimized kinetic balance between C−C coupling and hydrogenation pathways, which governs the efficiency and selectivity of C2H4 formation. Furthermore, preliminary techno‐economic analysis (TEA) indicates an additional revenue of $566 per ton relative to conventional production routes, while life‐cycle assessment (LCA) demonstrates an overall ∼42% reduction in environmental impact. This study not only establishes a generalizable machine‐learning framework for identifying ideal pre‐catalyst models for selective C2H4 electrocatalysts but also provides fundamental insights into the entropy‐governed reconstruction mechanism of Cu‐based CO2RR catalysts.

2. Results and Discussion

The rational design of high‐performance catalysts remains a major challenge due to the time cost and experience dependence of conventional experimental screening. Machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) offer a data‐driven paradigm to efficiently explore vast compositional and structural spaces, predict activity and selectivity, and guide catalyst optimization [12, 29, 30, 31]. By enabling accelerated iterative design cycles and reducing trial‐and‐error, these approaches pave the way for discovering catalysts with enhanced performance and sustainability [32, 33, 34]. To accelerate the discovery of highly selective Cu‐based catalysts for CO2RR to C2H4, we implemented a machine learning‐assisted screening workflow, as illustrated in Figure 1a. First, research articles related to Cu‐based catalysts for CO2RR over the past decade were collected from Web of Science. The textual content involving catalyst structures, reaction conditions, and performance was then extracted and processed using the large language model (GPT‐3.5 Turbo from OpenAI) with customized prompts, ultimately generating a database of 495 valid entries (see details in Methods). Spearman correlation analysis was subsequently used to examine the relationships between catalyst structural descriptors and performance metrics. This data‐driven screening approach guided the selection of some representative Cu‐based catalysts, such as Cu, Cu single atom (SA), Cu2O, CuO, and CuOx, for subsequent screening and experimental validation. Spearman correlation coefficient, denoted as ρ (rho), is a non‐parametric statistical measure used to assess the strength and direction of a monotonic relationship between two variables [35]. The +N indicates a positive monotonic relationship, meaning that the FEC2H4 in CO2RR is more favorable. Conversely, −N indicates a negative monotonic relationship. As shown in Figure 1b, among the surveyed copper‐based catalyst categories, Cu2O exhibited the highest a Spearman correlation coefficient with FEC2H4, highlighting its clear advantage for C2H4 production. We further explored a series of modification strategies, including doping, oxidation, carburization, and alloying, to optimize catalyst performance (Figure 1c). Although these strategies provided varying degrees of improvement for most materials, pristine Cu2O consistently maintained the best performance with Spearman correlation coefficient of 0.107, indicating that its pure state is inherently optimal for CO2RR to C2H4 production. Therefore, in the subsequent work, we deliberately synthesized Cu2O as a model catalyst and investigated the effect of crystal‐plane orientation entropy on its catalytic activity.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

(a) Schematic overview of CO2RR model catalyst database establishment. (b) Spearman correlation analysis between FEC2H4 and different Cu‐based catalysts (e.g., Cu, Cu SA, Cu2O, CuO, and CuOx). (c) Spearman correlation coefficient between FEC2H4 and Cu‐based catalysts combined with different modification strategies (oxide: coupling with other oxides to form a composite). The positive Spearman coefficient (rho) indicates that FEC2H4 increases with the variable, whereas a negative coefficient reflects a negative relationship.

The Cu2O samples were synthesized through a simple reduction process (Figure 2a). Specifically, copper acetate and PVP were dissolved in water and heated under stirring. NaOH and ascorbic acid solutions were then sequentially added, followed by reaction under controlled temperature, where Cu2O with different crystal orientation entropies was obtained at different reaction temperatures (T1‐T3). Figure 2b presents the x‐ray diffraction (XRD) pattern for the Cu2O‐LOE, Cu2O‐MOE, and Cu2O‐HOE samples. The diffraction peaks located at 29.5°, 36.4°, 42.2°, and 61.3° can be indexed to (110), (111), (200), and (220) planes of Cu2O phase (JCPDS No. 26‐4853), respectively, confirming the successful synthesis of Cu2O phase. As the orientation entropy increases, the diffraction features gradually broaden and decrease in intensity, indicating reduced long‐range crystallographic coherence while preserving the local Cu−O coordination environment. This suggests a structural transition from a highly oriented polycrystalline framework toward a more orientation‐disordered nanocrystalline network [36]. The morphological features were investigated by field‐emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). As shown in Figures S1–S6, the Cu2O‐LOE shows a well‐defined tetrakaidecahedron structure with uniform size, whereas both Cu2O‐MOE and Cu2O‐HOE consist of irregularly shaped nanoparticles. Such particle morphology may be attributed to enhanced orientation entropy arising from their intrinsically polycrystalline nature. A high‐resolution TEM (HRTEM) image taken from the target Cu2O‐MOE nanoparticles reveals well‐resolved lattice fringes with interplanar distances of 2.98, 2.43, 2.12, and 1.49 Å, corresponding to the (110), (111), (200), and (220) planes of Cu2O (Figure 2c,d). The corresponding fast Fourier transformation (FFT) pattern confirms the coexistence of multiple crystal orientations, consistent with a polycrystalline structure. Moreover, the selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern exhibits concentric diffraction rings indexed to these planes, where each diffraction spot represents an exposed crystal facet and its size correlates with the facet area. Among the three samples, Cu2O‐HOE displays the densest distribution of crystal spots within each ring, indicating the highest degree of disorder in its crystal plane orientation (Figure S7). For the Cu2O‐LOE with the lowest orientation entropy, it presents only a few sharp diffraction spots corresponding to two dominant crystal planes (Figure S8). In contrast, the target Cu2O‐MOE exhibits an intermediate spot density, reflecting a moderate level of orientation disorder and the medium‐entropy nature (Figure 2e). The energy dispersion spectrum (EDS) and element mappings in Figure 2f reveal the homogeneous dispersion of Co and O across the nanoparticles, with the component ratio of Co:O = 2:1, consistent with the stoichiometry of Cu2O.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

(a) Schematic showing the controllable synthetic process of Cu2O with different crystallographic orientation entropies. (b) XRD patterns of Cu2O‐LOE, Cu2O‐MOE, and Cu2O‐HOE. (c) TEM image of Cu2O‐MOE. (d) HRTEM image and (e) SAED pattern of Cu2O‐MOE. (f) EDS and element mappings of Cu2O‐MOE. (g) Cu K‐edge XANES spectrum and (h) FT‐EXAFS spectrum of Cu2O‐LOE, Cu2O‐MOE, Cu2O‐HOE, and standard samples.

X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was employed to probe the surface chemical states of the Cu2O‐LOE, Cu2O‐MOE, and Cu2O‐HOE samples. The survey spectra in Figure S9 clearly confirm the coexistence of Cu and O elements in these three samples. In the high‐resolution Cu 2p spectra (Figure S10), the peaks at 933.1 and 953.0 eV can be assigned to the Cu 2p3/2 and Cu 2p1/2 of the Cu+, whereas the peaks centered at 935.6 and 955.5 eV correspond to Cu2+ species. Furthermore, the Cu Auger LMM spectra indicate that Cu predominantly existed in the Cu+ state across all samples (Figure S11). For the O1s spectra (Figure S12), two distinct peaks are observed at 530.2 and 531.9 eV, which are assigned to lattice oxygen (OL) and defective oxygen (OV) species, respectively [37]. To further elucidate the local electronic and coordination structure, x‐ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) analyses were conducted. The Cu K‐edge x‐ray absorption near‐edge spectroscopy (XANES) provides direct evidence for subtle variations in the Cu valence states across the Cu2O‐LOE, Cu2O‐MOE, and Cu2O‐HOE samples (Figure 2g). The average valence of Cu at each sample was determined by linear combination fitting of the absorption edge, yielding +1.13 for Cu2O‐LOE, +1.02 for Cu2O‐MOE, and +0.95 for Cu2O‐HOE. The slightly reduced valence may be attributed to the slight oxygen vacancies caused by entropy increase. Fourier transformed extended x‐ray absorption fine structure spectra (FT‐EXAFS) spectra of these three samples exhibit the prominent Cu−O and Cu−Cu coordination at 1.47 and 2.71 Å, respectively (Figure 2h). Wavelet transform (WT) analysis (Figure S13) further corroborates the coexistence of these two coordination shells. Notably, the Cu−O peak shows a slight downward shift with increasing entropy, indicating subtle variations in the local coordination environment. Quantitative EXAFS fitting (Figure S14 and Table S1) reveals that the average coordination number of Cu atoms in Cu2O‐MOE was about 1.8, which is between those of Cu2O‐LOE (1.9) and Cu2O‐HOE (1.7), consistent with the presence of oxygen vacancies. Collectively, these spectroscopic results demonstrate that entropy‐mediated control of crystal orientation allows precise tuning of the Cu2O valence state and coordination environment, which in turn governs catalyst reconstruction under reductive potential and promotes the formation of highly active Cu sites, and is expected to show considerable catalytic CO2RR performance.

To assess the advantages of Cu2O nanoparticles with different orientation entropies toward CO2RR activity, electrochemical measurements were carried out in a standard flow‐cell electrochemical setup using 1 M KOH as the electrolyte. The gas and liquid products were analyzed by gas chromatography (GC) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, respectively. Linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) was first performed under CO2 and Ar atmospheres (Figure S15). The Cu2O‐MOE catalyst exhibits a markedly lower onset potential and higher current density under CO2 compared to Ar, confirming its preferential activity for CO2RR over the competing HER [38]. Subsequently, the Cu2O‐MOE catalysts and the control Cu2O‐LOE and Cu2O‐HOE were evaluated at various potentials to investigate the FE and current density for each individual product, particularly toward C2H4 formation. Meanwhile, several key parameters in the Cu2O synthesis, including the amount of PVP, the concentration of NaOH, and the concentration of ascorbic acid, have been investigated to achieve the best performance (Figures S16–S18). As indicated in Figure 3a, Figure S19, and Tables S2–S4, all three catalysts exhibit the volcano‐shaped trend of the FE for C2H4 (FEC2H4) with an applied potential from 1.2 to 1.7 VRHE. As the operating potential keeps decreasing, Cu2O‐MOE reaches a maximum of ∼75% at −1.5 VRHE and then decreases to ∼60% at −2.3 VRHE with the other by‐products gradually rising. Remarkably, FEH2 remains below 15% throughout the entire potential window, indicating that the competitive HER has been significantly suppressed [39]. On the contrary, the Cu2O‐LOE and Cu2O‐HOE catalysts exhibit lower C2H4 selectivity and more severe HER, reaching maximum FEC2H4 values of ∼41% at −1.6 VRHE for the former and ∼43% at −1.3 VRHE for the latter, demonstrating relatively poor C−C coupling ability with limited active sites.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

(a) FEs of all products on Cu2O‐MOE under different potentials. (b) C2H4 partial current densities under different potentials of Cu2O‐LOE, Cu2O‐MOE, and Cu2O‐HOE. (c) Tafel slope of Cu2O‐LOE, Cu2O‐MOE, and Cu2O‐HOE. (d) Comparison of CO2RR performance for Cu2O‐MOE and previously reported electrocatalysts. (e) Electrochemical stability of Cu2O‐MOE. Error bars: Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) from three independent experiments (n = 3).

In addition to the product selectivity, the efficiency of C2H4 production was further evaluated by calculating the partial current densities for C2H4 product formation (jC2H4) of these catalysts at various applied potentials (Figure 3b). Across the entire potential range, Cu2O‐MOE consistently delivers the highest jC2H4 among these three catalysts. Notably, it achieves a remarkable jC2H4 of 304 mA cm−2 at −1.5 VRHE, demonstrating strong potential for industrially relevant CO2RR operation. For comparison, the Cu2O‐LOE and Cu2O‐HOE catalysts exhibit significantly lower jC2H4, further corroborating the superior CO2RR activity for C2H4 production on Cu2O with medium surface entropy. In addition, the charge transfer rate and electrochemical active area of catalysts were assessed by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and double‐layer capacitance (C dl) values (Figure S20 and Figure S21a–d). As expected, Cu2O‐MOE consistently exhibits the lowest charge‐transfer resistance (R ct = 7.6 Ω) and highest C dl values (C dl = 3.97 mF cm−2) among all Cu2O catalysts, reflecting its enhanced charge transport and abundant active sites [40]. In addition, the intrinsic activity of Cu2O‐MOE catalysts was assessed by normalizing the electrode performance to both BET surface area and electrochemical surface area (ECSA) as well. As expected, Cu2O‐MOE consistently exhibits the highest specific activity among all Cu2O catalysts, regardless of whether jC2H4 is normalized to BET surface area or ECSA (Figure S21e,f). To gain insight into the reaction kinetics, the Tafel analysis was conducted in Figure 3c. Tafel values of C2H4 product display 93, 119, and 208 mV dec−1 for Cu2O‐MOE, Cu2O‐LOE, and Cu2O‐HOE, respectively. The smallest Tafel slope of Cu2O‐MOE confirms that the medium entropy effect endows faster electron transfer between the carbon intermediate and the catalytic sites, thus promoting the electrocatalytic CO2RR. Moreover, Cu2O‐MOE exhibits superior catalytic performance compared with most representative Cu‐based catalysts, including simple/complex oxide‐based catalysts and other Cu‐based catalysts, underscoring its great potential as a highly efficient Cu‐based CO2RR electrocatalyst for C2H4 production (Figure 3d and Table S5). Beyond high activity, long‐term durability is another critical parameter for evaluating the practical applicability of electrocatalysts. In this regard, the Cu2O‐MOE‐based flow cell delivers a total current density of approximately 300 mA cm−2 at −1.3 VRHE and maintains stable electrolysis with ∼50% FEC2H4 after a 20 h period (Figure 3e). In order to effectively alleviate the adverse effects of salt precipitation on long‐term stability, intermittent operation at open‐circuit potential (OCP) for 10 min was adopted after every 5 h of electrolysis, ultimately extending stable electrolysis beyond 80 h. Salt precipitation has long been recognized as a critical bottleneck limiting the development of alkaline CO2 electroreduction systems. The cause of salt precipitation is the recrystallization of alkali‐metal ions caused by local alkalinity, forming K2CO3 and KHCO3. Therefore, we studied the relationship between pH and salt precipitation (Figure S22). The results indicate that relatively low KOH concentration can partially suppress salt precipitation in alkaline CO2 electroreduction systems by reducing the formation rate of carbonate and bicarbonate species. However, this suppression occurs at the expense of C2H4 selectivity, which is likely associated with the diminished ability to sustain a locally high‐pH microenvironment, thereby disfavoring C−C coupling pathways while enhancing competition from the hydrogen evolution reaction.

In situ electrochemical surface‐enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) was carried out to study the intermediate species. As shown in Figure 4a and Figure S23, the characteristic peaks at approximately 2050 cm−1 of these three catalysts were assigned to the C≡O stretching vibration of *CO intermediates. As the potential decreased from −1.2 to −1.4 VRHE, the *CO signal on Cu2O‐MOE intensifies rapidly and then stabilizes at a markedly higher level than those of Cu2O‐LOE and Cu2O‐HOE, reflecting a higher *CO coverage on Cu2O‐MOE surface that can promote the C−C coupling for C2H4 production [37]. Additional evidence from the in situ attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR‐FTIR) highlights the benefits of Cu2O‐MOE in terms of intermediate stabilizing and C−C coupling, including more pronounced *CO, *COH, and *COCOH peaks (Figure 4b, Figure S24, and Table S6). Specifically, the characteristic peak at approximately 1832 cm−1 corresponded to the bridge‐site adsorption configuration of *CO, which enables higher local CO surface coverage and shorter intermolecular distances, thereby facilitating the formation of key C−C coupling intermediates (e.g., *OCCO) and their subsequent hydrogenation toward ethylene formation [41, 42]. Notably, no signals corresponding to *COatop were detected, which may be attributed to the rapid conversion into more stable bridge‐bound CO or subsequent reaction intermediates [43]. The *CO coverage on Cu2O‐MOE was higher than that on Cu2O‐LOE and Cu2O‐HOE, indicating more effective activation of adsorbed CO2. Meanwhile, a peak at 1112 cm−1 was assigned to the *COH species [37]. The higher *COH signals observed on the Cu2O‐MOE indicated that the hydrogenation reaction of *CO was more favorable compared with Cu2O‐LOE and Cu2O‐HOE. Moreover, the characteristic peak located at 1558 cm−1 was attributed to the *COCOH species, which served as the pre‐intermediate in the C−C coupling pathway toward C2+ products [44]. To further elucidate the difference in C−C coupling behavior among the Cu2O‐MOE and control catalysts, we compared the relative adsorption intensity of the *COCOH intermediate. As shown in Figure 4c, the *COCOH‐related band on Cu2O‐MOE exhibits a markedly higher intensity and a steeper potential‐dependent growth across the entire potential window relative to Cu2O‐LOE and Cu2O‐HOE, which is consistent with the trend of enhanced C2H4 selectivity shown in Figure 3a [45]. Notably, the *COCOH‐related band intensity of Cu2O‐MOE begins to exhibit a clear advantage beyond −1.4 V and becomes increasingly pronounced with further increases in the applied potential. This trend suggests a higher propensity for C−C coupling on the Cu2O‐MOE surface, indicating a strong potential for enhanced C2H4 product formation. The selective conversion of CO2 to C2H4 requires not only efficient C−C coupling but also a well‐matched hydrogenation process. The relatively stronger *COOH peaks on Cu2O‐MOE further support the more favorable hydrogenation reaction [46, 47].

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

(a) The intensity of adsorbed *CO according to in situ SERS spectra. (b) In situ SEIRAS spectra of Cu2O‐MOE. (c) The intensity of adsorbed *COCOH on Cu2O‐LOE, Cu2O‐MOE, and Cu2O‐HOE under different potentials. (d) In situ XANES spectra of Cu2O‐MOE at the Cu K‐edge under different potentials. The inset is the magnified region of the spectra between 8978 and 8980 eV. (e) Valence states of Cu2O‐LOE, Cu2O‐MOE, and Cu2O‐HOE at different potentials. (f) Wavelet transforms EXAFS plots of Cu 2p for Cu2O‐MOE. (g) In situ Cu EXAFS spectra for Cu2O‐MOE under different potentials. (h) Coordination numbers of Cu2O‐LOE, Cu2O‐MOE, and Cu2O‐HOE at different potentials.

According to well‐established knowledge, the Cu2O undergoes in situ reconstruction to metallic Cu upon exposure to sufficiently cathodic potentials during electrochemical CO2RR. Then, the generated metallic Cu serves as the authentic active species for CO2RR, where the unique electronic and coordination structures generated through reconstruction predominantly determine the intrinsic activity of catalysts. This mechanistic insight offers a rational strategy for designing highly selective catalysts by precisely manipulating the reconstruction process. To probe the evolution of the atomic and electronic structures in the reconstruction process of the catalyst, in situ XAS experiments were employed, providing a powerful tool to probe the dynamic process of Cu species during the successive CO2RR process. The XANES spectra at the Cu K‐edge with potential decreasing from −1.2 to −1.7RHE are depicted (Figure 4d and Figure S25). The absorption edge energy of Cu2O‐HOE exhibits a significantly more negative shift than those of Cu2O‐MOE and Cu2O‐LOE at the same potential, which shows a trend of Cu2O‐HOE < Cu2O‐MOE < Cu2O‐LOE, illustrating that high orientation entropy promotes deep reconstruction of Cu2O to metallic Cu. Regarding this viewpoint, we tracked the changes in the composition and morphology of three electrocatalysts during the reaction process, further supporting the above conclusion (Figure S26). Furthermore, the average valence of Cu at each condition was estimated by regressing the shifts in absorption edge energy of Cu K‐edge through linear combination fitting of standard Cu foil (Cu0) and CuO (Cu2+) XANES spectra (Figure 4e and Figure S27). We focused on the potential window of −1.4 to −1.6 VRHE, where all three catalysts exhibited their highest FE toward C2H4 production. The average oxidation states of Cu within this range were calculated to be 0.532, 0.407, and 0.293 for Cu2O‐LOE, Cu2O‐MOE, and Cu2O‐HOE, respectively. These results reveal that the Cu0.4+ derivative could optimally balance C−C and hydrogenation kinetics, thus exhibiting the highest intrinsic activity for C2H4 production. Fourier transforms (FT) and wavelet‐transforms (WT) of k 3‐weighted EXAFS spectra also revealed a gradual transformation, in which the Cu−O signal disappears and the Cu−Cu shell intensity increases with the applied potential (Figure 4f and Figure S28). This corresponds to the formation of metallic Cu phase and the changes in coordination environment. Therefore, the changes in local interatomic distance and coordination number (CN) were deducted by EXAFS curve‐fitting analysis. As shown in Figure 4g and Figures S29–S32, a remarkable CN difference in the Cu−Cu shell is observed among the three catalysts under the same potential. Interestingly, under the potential window (from −1.4 to −1.6 VRHE) corresponding to their respective maximum FEC2H4, all three catalysts exhibit Cu−Cu coordination numbers close to 8 (Figure 4h and Table S7). Overall, the medium‐entropy‐mediated Cu2O undergoes reconstruction at −1.5 V to form metallic Cu catalysts enriched in Cu0.4+ species with approximately 8‐fold coordination numbers, which exhibit the highest selectivity and stability toward C2H4 formation.

A preliminary TEA was conducted to assess the economic viability of CO2RR system by using Cu2O‐MOE model for C2H4 production in an alkaline electrolyte [48, 49, 50]. In this context, the costs include electricity, electrolyzer, catalyst and membrane (C&M), separation, chemical, balance of plant and installation (B&I), and other operations, while the revenue comes from C2H4 and O2 production [8, 51]. As can be seen, the profitability of the process depends on the electricity cost (53.2%), which was commonly dominated by FEC2H4 and operating current density (Figure 5a). In this context, we analyzed the variation in the relative contributions of different cost components at various applied voltages and calculated the corresponding total costs. The results indicate that, as the voltage increases, the proportion of electricity costs rises while the share of chemical costs gradually decreases (Figure 5b). Notably, the total cost reaches a minimum of 773 $ tonC2H4 −1 at −1.5 VRHE, suggesting an optimal operating voltage from an economic perspective (Figure S33). We further investigated the impact of FE and current density on the profitability of C2H4 electrosynthesis. We found that the profitability is highly sensitive to FE and current density of C2H4, since a decrease in FE or current density results in a significant increase in operational costs, thereby substantially augmenting the total cost. Benefiting from the high FEC2H4 and jC2H4, the catalytic system using Cu2O‐MOE as the catalyst keeps profitability within the potential range of −1.4 to −1.7 VRHE and even remains the most profitable (566 $ tonC2H4 −1 at −1.5 VRHE) among recently reported systems (Figure 5c and Table S8).

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

(a) Total cost of the C2H4 electrosynthesis process under the base case scenario at conditions of the FE of 75%, current density of 400 mAcm−2 and potential of −1.5VRHE. (b) Sensitivity analysis of kinds of costs to different potentials. (c) The impact of different FEs and current densities on the profit of C2H4 electrosynthesis, assuming the potential remains constant at −1.5 VRHE. (d) LCA of the traditional and electrochemical synthesis of C2H4.

Furthermore, the sustainability of this system was evaluated by performing a life‐cycle assessment (LCA) [52, 53, 54, 55]. The theoretical model was according to 1 t C2H4 production in 100 cm2 flow reactor, with the calculated various environmental implications being listed. In LCA model, we compared the environmental impacts of electrochemical C2H4 production with those of the conventional industrial process in terms of atmospheric emissions, radiation, global warming potential, fossil resource depletion, and toxicity (Figure 5d). Across all these categories, the electrochemical route demonstrates remarkable environmental advantages. Specifically, for every ton of ethylene produced electrochemically, only 0.02 tons of harmful gaseous and particulate emissions (NOx, SO2, PM2.5) are generated [56]. The associated ionizing radiation is equivalent to 0.21 MBq of Co‐60, while the global warming potential (GWP) corresponds to 1.48 tons of CO2 emissions. The overall human and ecological toxicity (marine, freshwater, and terrestrial) is equivalent to 30.71 tons of 1,4‐dichlorobenzene (1,4‐DCB) released, and the fossil fuel consumption is approximately 0.423 tons of oil. Compared with the conventional process, these values represent an overall reduction of approximately 42% in total environmental impact, with reduction exceeding 85% in the fossil resource scarcity impact categories.

3. Conclusion

We employed a machine‐learning‐guided screening to achieve an ideal Cu2O model for elucidating how crystallographic orientation entropy governs reconstruction dynamics. Guided by these insights, a series of Cu2O catalysts with high, medium, and low orientation entropy were rationally synthesized. Notably, the medium‐entropy Cu2O catalyst achieved a remarkable FEC2H4 of ∼75% at −1.5 VRHE and a current density of 400 mA cm−2 during alkaline CO2RR, demonstrating performance comparable to current state‐of‐the‐art systems. The near‐octa‐coordinated Cu0.4+ species derived from entropy‐mediated reconstruction facilitated CO2 activation and H2O dissociation, which synergistically increased *CO surface coverage and hydrocarbonization, thereby promoting the *CO−*COH coupling pathway. Furthermore, preliminary TEA and LCA show the profitability of 566 $ and an overall reduction of ∼42% in total environmental impact of this electrocatalytic strategy for C2H4 per ton production. This study advances the fundamental understanding of in situ reconstruction for the CO2RR to C2H4 and offers a promising entropy‐governed strategy for steering selective reaction pathways.

Author Contributions

Jing Ma: investigation, resources. Zhenwei Tong: conceptualization, methodology, writing – original draft. Shucong Zhang: conceptualization, methodology, writing – original draft. Xinshuo Shi: investigation, resources. Lei Shi: investigation, resources. Bingzheng Wu: investigation, methodology, resources. Dawei Shang: investigation, resources. Shengwei Zhang: investigation, resources. Shenlong Zhao: conceptualization, writing – review and editing, supervision. Tong Yu: investigation, resources. Piaoping Yang: methodology, software, writing – original draft, resources. Rihua Xiong: methodology, resources, writing – review and editing, supervision. Jiali Zhou: investigation, resources.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Supporting information

The authors have cited additional references within the Supporting Information.Supporting File: anie72837‐sup‐0001‐SuppMat.docx.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Numbers. 22373027, 22409199, and 22502038), the Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation (Grant Number. Z250017), and the Science and Technology R&D Program of China Energy (GJNY‐21‐84, S930023101).

Contributor Information

Piaoping Yang, Email: yangpp@udel.edu.

Rihua Xiong, Email: rihua.xiong@chnenergy.com.cn.

Shenlong Zhao, Email: zhaosl@nanoctr.cn.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • 1. Rahman M. Z., “The Dawn of Solar Ethylene,” Nature Reviews Chemistry 8 (2024): 568–568, 10.1038/s41570-024-00632-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. McFarland E., “Unconventional Chemistry for Unconventional Natural Gas,” Science 338 (2012): 340–342, 10.1126/science.1226840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Song R., Zhao G., Restrepo‐Flórez J. M., et al., “Ethylene Production Via Photocatalytic Dehydrogenation of Ethane Using LaMn1− x Cu x O3 ,” Nature Energy 9 (2024): 750–760, 10.1038/s41560-024-01541-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Akpasi S. O., Isa Y. M., Monama T. P., Kiambi S. L., and Ngema P. T., Clean Energy 8 (2024): 148–174, 10.1093/ce/zkae082. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Saikat D., “Sustainable Synthesis of Drop‐In Chemicals From Biomass via Chemical Catalysis: Scopes, Challenges, and the Way Forward,” Energy Fuels 37 (2023): 2648–2666, 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.2c03891. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Lu C., He Q., Huang S., et al., “Large Dipole Moment Enhanced CO2 Adsorption on Copper Surface: Achieving 68.9% Catalytic Ethylene Faradaic Efficiency at 1.0 A cm−2 ,” Advanced Materials 37 (2025): 2415092, 10.1002/adma.202415092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Wang Y., Li N., and Zhao Z., “Mechanisms of Digital Economy Development Driving CO2 Emission Evolution: Empirical Evidence From China,” Clean Energy 9 (2025): 35–45, 10.1093/ce/zkaf001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Xue W., Jiang H., Liu J., et al., “Bipolar Ethylene Electrosynthesis From CO2 and Biowaste Acid With Total Faradaic Efficiency Over 118%,” Nature Communications 16 (2025): 9054, 10.1038/s41467-025-64649-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Li F., Thevenon A., Rosas‐Hernández A., et al., “Molecular Tuning of CO2‐to‐Ethylene Conversion,” Nature 577 (2020): 509–513, 10.1038/s41586-019-1782-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Dinh C.‐T., Burdyn T., Kibria M. G., et al., “CO2 Electroreduction to Ethylene Via Hydroxide‐Mediated Copper Catalysis at an Abrupt Interface,” Science 360 (2018): 783–787, 10.1126/science.aas9100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Zhang T., Bui J. C., Li Z., Bell A. T., Weber A. Z., and Wu J., “Highly Selective and Productive Reduction of Carbon Dioxide to Multicarbon Products Via In Situ CO Management Using Segmented Tandem Electrodes,” Nature Catalysis 5 (2022): 202–211, 10.1038/s41929-022-00751-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Zhong M., Tran K., Min Y., et al., “Accelerated Discovery of CO2 Electrocatalysts Using Active Machine Learning,” Nature 581 (2020): 178–183, 10.1038/s41586-020-2242-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Ma W., Xie S., Liu T., et al., “Electrocatalytic Reduction of CO2 to Ethylene And Ethanol Through Hydrogen‐Assisted C–C Coupling Over Fluorine‐Modified Copper,” Nature Catalysis 3 (2020): 478–487, 10.1038/s41929-020-0450-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Wei P., Gao D., Liu T., et al., “Coverage‐Driven Selectivity Switch From Ethylene to Acetate in High‐Rate CO2/CO Electrolysis,” Nature Nanotechnology 18 (2023): 299–306, 10.1038/s41565-022-01286-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Chen Y., Li X.‐Y., Chen Z., et al., “Efficient Multicarbon Formation in Acidic CO2 Reduction Via Tandem Electrocatalysis,” Nature Nanotechnology 19 (2024): 311–318, 10.1038/s41565-023-01543-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Wang Y., Wang Z., Dinh C.‐T., et al., “Catalyst Synthesis Under CO2 Electroreduction Favours Faceting and Promotes Renewable Fuels Electrosynthesis,” Nature Catalysis 3 (2020): 98–106, 10.1038/s41929-019-0397-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Arán‐Ais R. M., Scholten F., Kunze S., Rizo R., and Cuenya B. R., “The Role of In Situ Generated Morphological Motifs and Cu(i) Species in C2+ Product Selectivity During CO2 Pulsed Electroreduction,” Nature Energy 5 (2020): 317–325, 10.1038/s41560-020-0594-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Simon G. H., Kley C. S., and Cuenya B. R., “Potential‐Dependent Morphology of Copper Catalysts During CO2 Electroreduction Revealed by In Situ Atomic Force Microscopy,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 60 (2021): 2561–2568, 10.1002/anie.202010449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Zhong D., Zhao Z.‐J., Zhao Q., et al., “Coupling of Cu(100) and (110) Facets Promotes Carbon Dioxide Conversion to Hydrocarbons and Alcohols,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 60 (2021): 4879–4885, 10.1002/anie.202015159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Zhang Y., Ye Z., Niu F., et al., “From Negligible to Giant Electrocaloric Effect of Poly(Vinylidene Fluoride),” Nature Communications 16 (2025): 11180, 10.1038/s41467-025-66151-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Qiu M., Chen J., Li J., et al., “Sustainable Clay Electrolytes for Aqueous Batteries: All‐Temperature Single‐Ion Conductor With Nanoconfined Hydration Shell Reorganization Effect,” Advanced Materials 37 (2025): e10668, 10.1002/adma.202510668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Zhao T., Shi L., Zhang G., et al., “Compressive Strain in High‐Entropy Alloy for High‐Performance Acidic Oxygen Evolution,” Matter 8 (2025): 102091, 10.1016/j.matt.2025.102091. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Cai W., Cao X., Wang Y., Chen S., Ma J., and Zhang J., “Spatial Structure of Electron Interactions in High‐Entropy Oxide Nanoparticles for Active Electrocatalysis of Carbon Dioxide Reduction,” Advanced Materials 36 (2024): 2409949, 10.1002/adma.202409949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Yang M., Liu S., Shen X., et al., “Robust Cathode for Efficient CO2 Electrolysis Driven by Entropy Engineering in Solid Oxide Electrolysis Cells,” American Chemical Society Energy Letters 9 (2024): 3818–3827, 10.1021/acsenergylett.4c01447. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Cao G., Yang S., Ren J.‐C., and Liu W., “Electronic Descriptors for Designing High‐Entropy Alloy Electrocatalysts by Leveraging Local Chemical Environments,” Nature Communications 16 (2025): 1251, 10.1038/s41467-025-56421-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Lei Z., Huang Y., Zhu Y., et al., “Automatic Discovery and Optimal Generation of Amorphous High‐Entropy Electrocatalysts,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 147 (2025): 21743–21753, 10.1021/jacs.5c04117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Shi L., Su Y., Cheng R., et al., “Industrial‐Scale Aldehydes Electrification Via Localized Hydrogen‐Affinity Engineering,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 65 (2026): e15456, 10.1002/anie.202515456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Nam H. N., Nandan R., Fu L., et al., “Modeling‐Making‐Modulating High‐Entropy Alloy With Activated Water‐Dissociation Centers for Superior Electrocatalysis,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 147 (2025): 33545–33558, 10.1021/jacs.5c08012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Han Z., Gao R., Wang T., et al., “Machine‐Learning‐Assisted Design of a Binary Descriptor to Decipher Electronic and Structural Effects on Sulfur Reduction Kinetics,” Nature Catalysis 6 (2023): 1073–1086, 10.1038/s41929-023-01041-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Yang R., Zhao J., Wu Y., Gao Y., and Zhang B., “A Spin Descriptor Map Predicts NiFe2O4 for Efficient Electrosynthesis of Cyclohexanone Oxime,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 64 (2025): e202517358, 10.1002/anie.202517358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Xu L., Lu L., Xu N., et al., “Progressive Learning‐Guided Discovery of Single‐Atom Metal Oxide Catalysts for Acidic Oxygen Evolution Reaction,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 64 (2025): e202510965, 10.1002/anie.202510965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Lin X., Du X., Wu S., et al., “Machine Learning‐Assisted Dual‐Atom Sites Design With Interpretable Descriptors Unifying Electrocatalytic Reactions,” Nature Communications 15 (2024): 8169, 10.1038/s41467-024-52519-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Ding R., Liu J., Hua K., et al., Science Advances 11 (2025): eadr9038, http://doi/10.1126/sciadv.adr9038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Han Z., Chen A., Li Z., et al., “Machine Learning‐Based Design of Electrocatalytic Materials Towards High‐Energy Lithium Sulfur Batteries Development,” Nature Communications 15 (2024): 8433, 10.1038/s41467-024-52550-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Xu H., Wang J., Liu J., and Cheng D., “Structural Descriptor Bridging the Microstructural Feature and Catalytic Reactivity for Rational Design of Metal Catalysts,” Accounts of Chemical Research 58 (2025): 2535–2549, 10.1021/acs.accounts.5c00219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Ding W., Ji D., Wang K., et al., “Rapid Surface Reconstruction of Amorphous‐Crystalline NiO for Industrial‐Scale Electrocatalytic PET Upcycling,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 64 (2025): e202418640, 10.1002/anie.202418640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Lang X., Zhu Z., Guo W., et al., “Built‐In Electric Field Triggered Interfacial Water Activation for Industrial‐Level Electrosynthesis of Ethylene From CO2 ,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 64 (2025): e17221, 10.1002/anie.202517221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Liang Y., Li F., Miao R. K., et al., “Efficient Ethylene Electrosynthesis Through C–O Cleavage Promoted by Water Dissociation,” Nature Synthesis 3 (2024): 1104–1112, 10.1038/s44160-024-00568-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Feng J., Zhang L., Liu S., et al., “Modulating Adsorbed Hydrogen Drives Electrochemical CO2‐to‐C2 Products,” Nature Communications 14 (2023): 4615, 10.1038/s41467-023-40412-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Zhang L., Feng J., Wu L., et al., “Oxophilicity‐Controlled CO2 Electroreduction to C2+ Alcohols Over Lewis Acid Metal‐Doped Cuδ+ Catalysts,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 145 (2023): 21945–21954, 10.1021/jacs.3c06697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Yan Z., Gao P., Li Z., Cao D., and Cheng D., “Strain Regulation Enhances the *CO Coverage on Cu2O Surface for CO2 Electroreduction to Ethylene Under Industrial‐Level Current Density,” Advanced Energy Materials 16 (2026): e04495, 10.1002/aenm.202504495. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Yang Q., Wang X., Zhang J., et al., “Ethylene Electrosynthesis at Low Voltages Enabled by Dopant‐Induced Modulation of the Rate‐Determining Step,” Nature Synthesis 4 (2025): 1396–1407, 10.1038/s44160-025-00850-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Liu Q., Zang J., Ye W., et al., “Universal Formation, Dynamics, and Reactivities of *CO bridge Accompanying Spontaneous Reconstruction of Cu During Electrochemical CO2 or CO Reduction,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 147 (2025): 31497–31508, 10.1021/jacs.5c03886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Yin Y., Ling Z., Liu S., et al., “Enhancing CO2 Electroreduction to Ethylene in Acidic Solution by Optimizing Cation Configuration on the Cu Surface,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 147 (2025): 25584–25591, 10.1021/jacs.5c06402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Song X., Zhang L., Ma X., et al., “Steering Ethylene Electrosynthesis by Controlling Interfacial Water Orientation,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 65 (2026): e20546, 10.1002/anie.202520546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Gui W., Cheng H., Wang H., et al., “Engineering the Local Electronic Microenvironment via Interfacial Chelation for Efficient CO2 Photoreduction Toward CH4 ,” Advanced Materials 38 (2026): e23341, 10.1002/adma.202523341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Delmo E. P., Wang Y., Song Y., et al., “In Situ Infrared Spectroscopic Evidence of Enhanced Electrochemical CO2 Reduction and C–C Coupling on Oxide‐Derived Copper,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 146 (2024): 1935–1945, 10.1021/jacs.3c08927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Yang Y., Yuwono J. A., Cheong S., et al., “High‐Entropy Alloy Nanowires for Direct Electrosynthesis of Chlorine From Seawater,” Nature Synthesis (2026) ISSN 2731–582, 10.1038/s44160-026-00999-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Leow W. R., Lum Y., Ozden A., et al., “Chloride‐Mediated Selective Electrosynthesis of Ethylene and Propylene Oxides at High Current Density,” Science 368 (2020): 1228–1233, 10.1126/science.aaz8459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Zhou H., Ren Y., Li Z., et al., “Electrocatalytic Upcycling of Polyethylene Terephthalate to Commodity Chemicals and H2 Fuel,” Nature Communications 12 (2021): 4679, 10.1038/s41467-021-25048-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Huang L., Gao G., Zhao J., Roberts W. L., and Lu X., “Electrocatalytic Upcycling of High‐Pressure Captured CO2 to Ethylene,” Nature Catalysis 8 (2025): 968–976, 10.1038/s41929-025-01411-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Guo Y., Shi L., Shi X., et al., “Scalable Metal–Organic Framework‐Based Electrodes for Efficient Alkaline Water Electrolysis,” Nature Chemical Engineering 2 (2025): 474–483, 10.1038/s44286-025-00262-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Li H., Wu J., Jiang Z., et al., “Hydroformylation of Pyrolysis Oils to Aldehydes and Alcohols From Polyolefin Waste,” Science 381 (2023): 660–666, 10.1126/science.adh1853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Nabil S. K., Raghuman M. A. M., Kannimuthu K., et al., “Acid–Base Chemistry and the Economic Implication of Electrocatalytic Carboxylate Production in Alkaline Electrolytes,” Nature Catalysis 7 (2024): 330–337, 10.1038/s41929-024-01107-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Li W., Yu C., Song X., et al., “A Chelate to Break Diffusion Limits on Helmholtz Plane for CO2 Electroreduction to Ethanol,” Nature Communications 16 (2025): 8390, 10.1038/s41467-025-63009-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Cong Y., Wang H., Gu L., Wu Z., Kuang M., and Yang J., “Surface Oxophilicity Driven * N Pathway Tuning for Selective Nitrate Electroreduction to Nitrogen,” Advanced Materials 38 (2026): e21873, 10.1002/adma.202521873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

The authors have cited additional references within the Supporting Information.Supporting File: anie72837‐sup‐0001‐SuppMat.docx.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Angewandte Chemie (International Ed. in English) are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES