Abstract
Background
Porcine circovirus type 3 (PCV3) is an emerging pathogen with high genetic variability, posing a continuous challenge to swine health and disease control. Ongoing viral evolution highlights the need for molecular surveillance to monitor circulating PCV3 strains.
Results
From 2023 to 2024, 257 blood and tissue samples from pigs with reproductive and respiratory disorders were collected in Henan Province, China. PCV3 was detected in 21.79% (56/257) of samples by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR). Genetic characterization of 15 new PCV3 strains showed 98.95–99.95% nucleotide (nt) identity among themselves and 98.70-99.85% identity with global reference strains. Phylogenetic analysis of the ORF2 genes identified PCV3a-1, PCV3a-2, PCV3a-IM, PCV3b, and PCV3c subtypes, with PCV3b predominating. Notably, a genetically divergent strain, HN240609, clustered within the PCV3c subgroup. Additionally, multiple unique amino acid (aa) mutations were observed in the predicted T-cell and B-cell epitope regions of the capsid (Cap) protein (R10K, A35V, T102A, T102S, F104Y, T170A, and V180I).
Conclusions
Genetically diverse PCV3 strains are co-circulating in Henan Province, and mutations in antigenic regions of the Cap protein may facilitate immune evasion. Continuous molecular surveillance is therefore essential for effective PCV3 prevention and control.
Keywords: Porcine circovirus type 3, Phylogenetic analysis, PCV3c, Genetic variation
Background
Porcine circovirus (PCV), as a member of the family Circoviridae and genus Circovirus, is an envelope-less, single-stranded DNA virus, and it is one of the smallest known animal viruses because of its extremely small size [1]. Five PCV types have been identified (PCV1-PCV5) [2–5]. Among them, PCV1, first identified in 1974, is considered to be non-pathogenic to pigs and can proliferate in PK-15 cells [6]. PCV4 was reported in 2019 in a Chinese pig farm associated with severe clinical disease [4, 7]. Recently, a novel single circular DNA virus, tentatively named PCV5, was identified in pigs suffering from respiratory, diarrheal, and reproductive failure diseases in China [5]. PCV2 is the main pathogen of porcine circovirus associated disease (PCVAD), postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome (PMWS) and porcine dermatitis and nephropathy syndrome (PDNS), which have resulted in substantial economic losses to the global swine industry [8–12]. PCV3 was initially discovered in 2015 and was first detected in China in 2017 [13, 14]. Accumulating evidence suggests that PCV3 had been circulating in swine populations for decades prior to its initial report, and since its discovery, it has been detected in multiple countries and regions, indicating a global distribution trend [13, 15–20]. Experimental infection studies and clinical investigations have demonstrated that PCV3 can induce clinical manifestations similar to those of PCV2 [21, 22]. Moreover, PCV3 is capable of infecting pigs of all ages and has been associated with PDNS, reproductive disorders, and multisystemic dysfunction [18, 22–24].
The PCV3 genome is small, with a total length of about 2000 bp and contains at least three open reading frames (ORFs), ORF1 to ORF3 [25]. ORF1 encodes the replication-associated (Rep) protein, which is the most conserved region in the genome, while ORF2 encodes the unique capsid (Cap) protein, which induces a protective immune response in the host, and the function of ORF3 is not yet known [26]. Currently, the global PCV3 isolates can so far be categorized into three subtypes (PCV3a, PCV3b, and PCV3c) based on the ORF2 sequences, where PCV3a can be further classified into PCV3a-1, PCV3a-2, and PCV3a-IM genotypes [27–30]. In addition, three B-cell epitopes (amino acid (aa) 57–61, aa 140–146, and aa 161–166) were identified on the Cap protein by antigenic localization analysis using monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) [31]. Recently, a potential linear epitope predicted in the nuclear localization signal (NLS) region of the Cap protein was reported [32]. Additionally, multiple predicted linear B-cell and ten T-cell antigenic epitopes on the Cap protein were also reported [33]. However, the full biological activity of these epitopes, as well as the functional and structural changes observed between isoforms, remain unknown.
Henan Province is one of China’s largest swine-farming regions. Most of Henan’s swine farming is concentrated in six cities: Nanyang, Zhumadian, Pingdingshan, Xinyang, Zhoukou, and Shangqiu. This study aims to investigate the prevalence of PCV3 in Henan Province during the period from 2023 to 2024. We collected samples from the six cities mentioned above and obtained full-length PCV3 genome sequences, which were subjected to homology and phylogenetic analysis against reference strains in GenBank. Comparative analysis was focused on the Cap protein sequences to provide valuable insights into the genetic variation of PCV3.
Methods
Sample collection, DNA extraction, and qPCR analysis
The sample size was determined based on recent epidemiological studies of PCV3 or PCV2, in which 200–400 samples are typically used. Considering the scale and distribution of pig production in Henan Province, six major swine-producing regions (Nanyang, Zhumadian, Pingdingshan, Xinyang, Zhoukou, and Shangqiu) were selected as sampling sites between 2023 and 2024. Using a systematic random sampling approach to maximize geographic representativeness, a total of 257 samples (including both blood and tissue specimens) were collected only from pigs exhibiting clinical signs of reproductive and respiratory disorders. All samples were obtained from commercial three-way crossbred pigs (Duroc boars × Landrace × Large White sows), the predominant production type in Henan Province. All samples were stored at -80 °C until further processing. Viral genomic DNA was extracted from 200 µL serum or tissue homogenate using a Simply P Virus DNA/RNA Extraction kit (Hangzhou BORI Technology, Hangzhou, China) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) kit of PCV3 (Hunan Guanmu Biotechnology Inc., Changsha, China) was used to test all the samples.
In each reaction well, 20 µL of PCR-Mix was added, followed by 5 µL of DNA extracted of the samples to be tested, negative control and positive control, respectively. The qPCR amplification procedure was as follows: activation of Taq enzyme at 95 °C for 2 min, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 15 s, annealing, extension and fluorescence acquisition at 60 °C for 30 s, and finally an instrument cooling step at 25 °C for 10 s. For any sample, a positive result was determined when the Ct ≤ 35. The 95% confidence interval (CI) of the sample positive rate was calculated using the normal approximation method of the GraphPad Prism software.
Whole genome amplification and sequencing of PCV3
Select samples with Ct ≤ 30 as templates for PCR amplification. PCV3-specific primer pairs were designed based on existing PCV3 full-genome sequences in GenBank (Table 1). The complete PCV3 genome was amplified using the overlapping fragment method. After purification, the PCR products were cloned into the pMD18-T vector (TaKaRa, Dalian, China), and the ligation products were transformed into E. coli TOP10 competent cells (Shanghai Sangon Biotechnology Co., Ltd.). Positive colonies were screened by colony PCR and sent to Sang Bioengineering (Shanghai) for Sanger sequencing. Sequencing data were assembled and analyzed using the SeqMan program within the DNASTAR software package (version 7.10, Madison, Wisconsin, USA), producing the complete viral genome sequence.
Table 1.
The whole-genome amplification primers of PCV3
| Primer names | Primer sequences (5’-3’) | Fragment length (bp) | Annealing temperature (℃) |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCV3-1-F | ACCCGGCACCTCGGAACC | 820 | 57 |
| PCV3-1-R | ACCCTCCCCATTATAACCATC | ||
| PCV3-2-F | ATGTTTTTATTGGTCCTCCAGG | 820 | 57 |
| PCV3-2-R | ACAACCTCCGCTCACCCAG | ||
| PCV3-3-F | AGCAGTGCTCCCCATTGAACG | 575 | 57 |
| PCV3-3-R | AATACTAGCCCGGCACCAAAATG |
Identification and phylogenetic analysis
To investigate the genomic nucleotide (nt) sequence characteristics of the newly acquired PCV3 strain and clarify its phylogenetic affiliation, its assembled sequence was compared with representative strain sequences of different genotypes from the GenBank database. Using the MegAlign module of the DNASTAR software package (version 7.10), the sequence similarity between the new strain and reference strains was further assessed. The HKY + G model of the Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software (Version 11.0) was used to construct the phylogenetic tree based on the ORF2 sequences [34]. A bootstrap value was calculated using 1,000 replicates.
Analysis of amino acid variability on the Cap protein
To identify the aa mutations and evaluate sequence variability, the Cap protein sequences from the newly obtained PCV3 strains and reference strains were comparatively analyzed. Multiple sequence alignment was performed using the MegAlign program within the DNASTAR software package (Version 7.10).
Results
Positive rate and regional distribution
qPCR testing was conducted on 257 suspected samples collected from different cities in Henan Province. Results showed an average positive rate of 21.79% (56/257), with a 95% CI ranging from 16.74% to 26.84%. Positive rates varied across regions, with the highest rate observed in Nanyang (33.87%, 21/62), followed by Pingdingshan (22.80%, 13/57), Xinyang (20.59%, 7/34), Zhumadian (19.35%, 6/31), Zhoukou (15.22%, 7/46) and Shangqiu (7.41%, 2/27) (Fig. 1). The 95% CIs for the positive rates of these areas were detailed in Table 2. Notably, the positive rates in Nanyang and Pingdingshan exceeded the overall positive rate.
Fig. 1.
Regional distribution of samples and PCV3 positive rates in Henan Province
Table 2.
The 95% CIs for the positive rates of the selected areas in Henan Province
| Areas | Total samples (n) | Positive samples (k) | Positive rate (%) | 95% CI (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nanyang | 62 | 21 | 33.87 | 22.09–45.65 |
| Pingdingshan | 57 | 13 | 22.81 | 11.92–33.70 |
| Xinyang | 34 | 7 | 20.59 | 7.00-34.18 |
| Zhumadian | 31 | 6 | 19.35 | 5.45–33.26 |
| Zhoukou | 46 | 7 | 15.22 | 4.84–25.60 |
| Shangqiu | 27 | 2 | 7.41 | 0.00-17.29 |
| Total | 257 | 56 | 21.79 | 16.74–26.84 |
Sequence identity analysis
Through the combined use of PCR amplification, sequencing, and assembly, we obtained the complete genome sequences of 15 PCV3-positive samples, all with a length of 2000 nt. Whole-genome sequence comparison revealed 98.95–99.95% sequence identity among the 15 novel PCV3 strains, while their identity with the 40 PCV3 reference genome sequences from GenBank ranged from 98.30% to 99.85% (Fig. 2). Specifically, the sequence identity between the new strains and the representative strains PCV3a-1 BR/RS/6 (MF079253), PCV3a-IM CHN/GD2016 (KY421347), PCV3a-2 US/MO2015 (KX778720), PCV3b US/SD201 (KX966193) and PCV3c US-2164 (KX458235) ranged from 98.85 to 99.6%, 98.80-99.45%, 98.7-99.35%, 99.10-99.55% and 98.95–99.60%, respectively (Table 3). Notably, the new strain HN240609 exhibited greater genetic variability, with sequence identities of only 98.75–99.15% compared to the five reference strains.
Fig. 2.
Heatmap illustrating the percentage identity between 15 new PCV3 isolates and 40 reference strains based on whole-genome sequences
Table 3.
Sequence identity between the 15 new PCV3 isolates and 5 representative strains (%)
| New PCV3 strains | Accession nos. | PCV3a-1 BR/RS/6 (MF079253) |
PCV3a-IM CHN/GD2016 (KY421347) |
PCV3a-2 US/MO2015 (KX778720) |
PCV3b US/SD201 (KX966193) |
PCV3c US-2164 (KX458235) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HN230807 | PX852042 | 99.20 | 99.10 | 99.10 | 99.50 | 99.25 |
| HN230916 | PX852043 | 99.10 | 99.00 | 99.10 | 99.50 | 99.15 |
| HN231022 | PX852044 | 99.10 | 99.00 | 99.00 | 99.50 | 99.15 |
| HN231102 | PX852045 | 99.20 | 99.30 | 99.20 | 99.20 | 99.35 |
| HN231202 | PX852046 | 99.15 | 99.35 | 99.15 | 99.25 | 99.60 |
| HN240126 | PX852047 | 98.90 | 98.80 | 98.70 | 99.10 | 98.95 |
| HN240327 | PX852048 | 99.05 | 98.95 | 98.95 | 99.45 | 99.10 |
| HN240415 | PX852049 | 99.60 | 99.00 | 99.00 | 99.10 | 99.05 |
| HN240424 | PX852050 | 99.15 | 99.05 | 99.10 | 99.55 | 99.20 |
| HN240609 | PX852051 | 98.85 | 98.85 | 98.75 | 99.15 | 98.90 |
| HN240712 | PX852052 | 99.10 | 98.90 | 98.90 | 99.40 | 99.05 |
| HN240910 | PX852053 | 99.10 | 99.00 | 98.90 | 99.30 | 99.15 |
| HN240927 | PX852054 | 99.40 | 99.20 | 99.20 | 99.30 | 99.25 |
| HN241015 | PX852055 | 99.40 | 99.20 | 99.10 | 99.10 | 99.25 |
| HN241211 | PX852056 | 99.35 | 99.45 | 99.35 | 99.35 | 99.50 |
Phylogenetic analysis
To investigate the genetic diversity of PCV3 in Henan Province during 2023–2024, a total of 55 ORF2 sequences, including 15 newly identified PCV3 strains from this study and 40 representative reference strains retrieved from GenBank, were included in the phylogenetic analysis. As shown in Fig. 3, the newly identified PCV3 strains were classified into four genotypes: PCV3a-1, PCV3a-IM, PCV3a-2, PCV3b, and PCV3c. Among the new strains, HN231202, HN240415 and HN241015 clustered with the PCV3a-1 reference strains, confirming their classification as a PCV3a-1 genotype. The new strain HN240927 clustered with the PCV3a-2 reference strains, confirming their classification as a PCV3a-2 genotype. Similarly, HN231102 and HN241211 clustered with the PCV3a-IM reference strains and HN240609 clustered with the PCV3c reference strains, indicating they belong to the PCV3a-IM genotype and PCV3c genotype, respectively. The remaining 8 new strains formed a larger cluster with the PCV3b reference strains. Within this cluster, the new strains HN240910 and HN240712 form a relatively distinct clade. HN240424 clusters with PCV3b KU-1603 (KY9963339) in a small clade, while the new strains HN231022, HN240126, and HN240327 form a separate small clade. Notably, the new strain HN240609, which emerged in 2024, is the only strain clustered with the PCV3c genotype, indicating significant genetic differentiation. Similarly, although HN230916 clusters with PCV3b reference strains, it is phylogenetically distant from them, suggesting the possible presence of genetic variation.
Fig. 3.
Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree constructed from ORF2 gene sequences of 15 new PCV3 isolates and 40 reference sequences. New PCV3 strains identified in this study are indicated with red
Amino acid sequence analysis of the Cap protein
To further investigate the molecular characteristics of the newly identified PCV3 strains, the Cap protein sequences of these strains with those of reference strains were compared (Fig. 4). The results revealed consistent aa mutations within the same PCV3 subtypes, which aids the identification of the new strains. Overall, the V24A and K27R mutations were present only in the PCV3a-1, PCV3a-IM, and PCV3a-2 genotypes, suggesting that they may serve as molecular markers for the PCV3a subtype strains. In addition, compared to other PCV3 strains, the PCV3a-1 genotype consistently carried the unique mutations of S77T and I150L, thus distinguishing them from other strains. Meanwhile, the new PCV3 strains exhibited some point mutations in the Cap protein, but no aa deletions or insertions. Compared with other strains, both the new strains HN231022 and HN240327 harbored the unique V180I mutation. The new strain HN230916 carried a T102A mutation, whereas HN240126 strain possessed a T102S mutation at the same position. The newly identified HN240609 strain also exhibited three unique mutations of R10K, A35V and T170A. In addition, the new strains HN240609 and HN240927 shared the F104Y mutation with the reference strain PCV3c 2021-GD (MZ667333).
Fig. 4.
Amino acid sequence analysis of the Cap protein comparing new PCV3 isolates with reference strains. The red sphere represents the newly identified strain
Discussion
Since its first discovery in 2015, PCV3 has spread widely across numerous countries [10, 13, 15–20]. In China, PCV3 is epidemic in multiple regions, posing a significant threat to the swine industry [13, 14]. The development trend of intensive farming production has provided a favorable environment for the spread of the virus, leading to the continuous spread of PCV3 in pig herds. Moreover, under such an environment, the genome sequence of the virus may change, leading to the emergence of new genetic variants, which poses a serious threat to the health of pig herds. Although studies have demonstrated that the Cap protein of PCV3 can be utilized to construct subunit vaccines, no commercially available PCV3 vaccines have yet been developed [35–37]. Due to the low codon usage preference, PCV3 has higher effective reproductive number value and evolutionary rate than other single-stranded DNA viruses [38]. Therefore, it is necessary to pay attention to the current status of PCV3 circulation and genetic variability. Henan, a major pig farming province in Central China, has its swine industry concentrated in Nanyang, Zhumadian, Pingdingshan, Xinyang, Zhoukou and Shangqiu. To assess the prevalence of PCV3 in Henan Province, we collected samples from 2023 to 2024 in these areas and performed qPCR on 257 suspected cases of infection. The results showed that the positive rate in the sample collection areas of Henan Province ranged from 7.41% to 33.87%. The overall PCV3 positive rate was 21.79% (56/257), with a 95% CI of 16.74–26.84%, indicating that PCV3 is widely circulating in Henan Province. A recent study reported that the PCV3 positive rate was only 9.25% in Henan Province from 2022 to 2024, which is lower than the results of the present study [39]. This difference might be related to the source of the samples.
In recent years, extensive research has been conducted on PCV3 variants, with different classification methods dividing PCV3 strains into multiple genotypes [27, 30]. With deepening understanding of PCV3 genetic variation, a typing method based on the A24V and R27K mutations of the Cap protein has been widely adopted, classifying PCV3 into three subtypes: PCV3a, PCV3b, and PCV3c [27, 30]. Based on the variations of the Cap protein, PCV3a is further subdivided into three sub-genotypes: PCV3a-1, PCV3a-2, and PCV3a-IM [27, 38, 40, 41]. This study incorporated ORF2 sequences from 15 newly identified PCV3 strains and 40 representative reference strains selected from the GenBank database into the analysis. A total of 55 ORF2 sequences were used for phylogenetic analysis, classifying the 55 PCV3 strains into three genotypes: PCV3a, PCV3b, and PCV3c. The PCV3a genotype was further divided into PCV3a-1, PCV3a-IM, and PCV3a-2 sub-genotypes. Among the 15 newly identified PCV3 strains, 8 strains belonged to the PCV3b, 3 strains classified as the PCV3a-IM, 2 strains assigned to the PCV3a-1, and 1 was classified as PCV3a-2.The remaining strain was identified as PCV3c. These findings indicate that PCV3 in Henan Province exhibits a complex epidemiological pattern, as characterized by the dominance of the PCV3b genotype alongside the co-circulation of multiple genotypes. This discovery aligns with prior research indicating that between 2020 and 2022, the PCV3b genotype was replacing PCV3a as the predominant circulating genotype in Central China [42]. This is also consistent with the results of a 2022–2024 epidemiological study on PCV3 in Henan, where the PCV3b subtype was identified as the predominant genotype in the region [39]. However, in the northeastern border regions of China, PCV3a is the predominant circulating genotype [43]. In addition, mixed infections with PCV3a and PCV3b have been observed in the upper northern regions of Thailand [44]. Interestingly, in Portugal, PCV3c is the dominant genotype in domestic pigs, whereas PCV3a predominates in wild boar populations [45]. In Vietnam, PCV3b is the major circulating genotype [46]. Taken together, these observations indicate that PCV3 exhibits distinct epidemiological patterns across different regions worldwide, which may be driven by variations in pig production systems, animal movement patterns, and immunization practices. Whether a globally dominant PCV3 genotype will eventually emerge remains to be determined through continuous and comprehensive surveillance.
The Cap protein encoded by the ORF2 gene is the primary mutation region of PCV3 [47, 48]. Studies indicate that aa140-146 on the Cap protein possess characteristics of a decoy epitope. Mutations in this region may enhance PCV3’s immune evasion capacity, increase viral infectivity, and even enable it to escape antibody neutralization [31–33, 49–51]. The new PCV3 strains identified in this study shows conservation in this region but harbors multiple unique mutations at other sites. The impact of these mutations on viral properties warrants further investigation. Moreover, previous studies have reported using two specific aa mutations on the Cap protein (V24A and K27R) as molecular markers for classifying PCV3 subtypes [27]. However, this study found that only PCV3a genotype strains carry these two mutations. Furthermore, the PCV3a-1 subtype strains possess two characteristic mutations (S77T and I149L), which can serve as identification markers for this genotype.
Previous studies confirmed that PCV3 infection can lead to increased numbers of weak piglets, stillborn, and mummified fetuses on farms [24]. In the present study, the new PCV3c strain HN240609 originated from a large-scale pig farm where sows exhibited severe reproductive disorders, including abortion, stillbirth, and fetal mummification. Laboratory testing has ruled out infection by other major reproductive pathogens, such as porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV), pseudorabies virus (PRV), porcine parvovirus (PPV), and Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV), etc. PCV3 was the only pathogen detected in samples from this affected farm. However, whether this virus is a potential cause of the reproductive disorders requires verification using appropriate infection models [22]. From the perspectives of viral evolution and disease control, the continuous emergence of aa mutations in PCV3 strains has the potential to drive the formation of novel genotypes. Such genetic variations may increase the uncertainty of viral epidemiology and transmission dynamics, thereby complicating the comprehensive prevention and control of swine-associated diseases. In light of the ongoing evolutionary trends of PCV3 and the need to control reproductive disorders in pig herds, the development of new or improved vaccines targeting the continuously evolving PCV3 strains is of practical necessity and research urgency.
Conclusion
In summary, PCV3 was widely present among pigs with respiratory symptoms in Henan Province during 2023–2024, with PCV3b identified as the predominant genotype. The newly emerging PCV3c strain HN240609 contains multiple aa mutations in the envelope protein. Whether PCV3c will emerge as the dominant circulating genotype in Henan Province requires further epidemiological surveillance. Overall, these results emphasize the need for continuous PCV3 genomic monitoring to better understand viral evolution, evaluate potential effects on vaccine efficacy, and improve disease control strategies in the swine industry.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Abbreviations
- PCV
Porcine circovirus
- PCVAD
Porcine circovirus associated disease
- PMWS
Postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome
- PDNS
Porcine dermatitis and nephropathy syndrome
- ORFs
Open reading frames
- Rep protein
Replication-associated protein
- Cap protein
Capsid protein
- aa
Amino acid
- Mabs
Monoclonal antibodies
- NLS
Nuclear localization signal
- qPCR
Quantitative real-time PCR
- nt
Nucleotide
Authors’ contributions
CL participated in sample collection, and the design of the study. JS drafted the main parts of the manuscript. JS, HZ, and JC participated in sample collection and PCR detection. MJ, JW, YZ, YuZ, LX, and TJ participated in sequencing and data analysis. NL, TZ, HS, DL, YK, LY, and ZT participated in the design of the study, drafted the main parts of the manuscript and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscrip.
Funding
The Scientific and Technological Project of Henan Province (Grant No. 252102111005), and the Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province, China (Grant No. 242300421335) supported this study.
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article. Sequences obtained in the present study are deposited in GenBank under accession numbers: PX852042- PX852056.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Informed consent of the pig owner is provided in the study. The study was carried out in compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines. All methods were carried out in accordance with Chinese Law for the Care and Use of Animals. The research protocol was approved by the Animal Welfare and Ethics Committee of Nanyang Normal University (approval no. No 20019, year: 2020).
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Palinski R, Pineyro P, Shang P, Yuan F, Guo R, Fang Y, Byers E, Hause BM. A Novel Porcine Circovirus Distantly Related to Known Circoviruses Is Associated with Porcine Dermatitis and Nephropathy Syndrome and Reproductive Failure. J Virol 2017;91(1):e01879–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 2.Franzo G, Cortey M, Olvera A, Novosel D, Castro AM, Biagini P, Segales J, Drigo M. Revisiting the taxonomical classification of Porcine Circovirus type 2 (PCV2): still a real challenge. Virol J. 2015;12:131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sirisereewan C, Thanawongnuwech R, Kedkovid R. Current Understanding of the Pathogenesis of Porcine Circovirus 3. Pathogens. 2022;11(1):64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 4.Zhang HH, Hu WQ, Li JY, Liu TN, Zhou JY, Opriessnig T, Xiao CT. Novel circovirus species identified in farmed pigs designated as Porcine circovirus 4, Hunan province, China. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2020;67(3):1057–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Liu X, Wang L, Zhang X, Liu Y, Li Y, Li Z, Geng Z, Zhang L, Liu Y, Liang P, et al. Identification and biochemical characterization of a novel porcine circovirus associated with porcine respiratory and diarrheal diseases. Microbiol Spectr. 2025;13(11):e0229925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Tischer I, Gelderblom H, Vettermann W, Koch MA. A very small porcine virus with circular single-stranded DNA. Nature. 1982;295(5844):64–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Nguyen VG, Do HQ, Huynh TM, Park YH, Park BK, Chung HC. Molecular-based detection, genetic characterization and phylogenetic analysis of porcine circovirus 4 from Korean domestic swine farms. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2022;69(2):538–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Afolabi KO, Iweriebor BC, Okoh AI, Obi LC. Global Status of Porcine circovirus Type 2 and Its Associated Diseases in Sub-Saharan Africa. Adv Virol. 2017;2017:6807964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 9.Kang SJ, Kang H, You SH, Lee HJ, Lee N, Hyun BH, Cha SH. Genetic diversity and different cross-neutralization capability of porcine circovirus type 2 isolates recently circulating in South Korea. BMC Vet Res. 2020;16(1):334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Raev S, Yuzhakov A, Aliper T. Whole-Genome Analysis of Porcine Circovirus Type 2 in Russia. Pathogens. 2021;10(12). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 11.Wang H, Gu J, Xing G, Qiu X, An S, Wang Y, Zhang C, Liu C, Gong W, Tu C, et al. Genetic diversity of porcine circovirus type 2 in China between 1999–2017. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2019;66(1):599–605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Leng C, Song J, Wang J, Zhai H, Ayra-Pardo C, Cao J, Li J, Zhao Y, Shi H, Li D, et al. Epidemiological and genetic variation analysis of emerging porcine circovirus type 2 in Henan Province, 2023. Front Vet Sci. 2025;12:1598383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Opriessnig T, Karuppannan AK, Castro A, Xiao CT. Porcine circoviruses: current status, knowledge gaps and challenges. Virus Res. 2020;286:198044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Phan TG, Giannitti F, Rossow S, Marthaler D, Knutson TP, Li L, Deng X, Resende T, Vannucci F, Delwart E. Detection of a novel circovirus PCV3 in pigs with cardiac and multi-systemic inflammation. Virol J. 2016;13(1):184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bera BC, Choudhary M, Anand T, Virmani N, Sundaram K, Choudhary B, Tripathi BN. Detection and genetic characterization of porcine circovirus 3 (PCV3) in pigs in India. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2020;67(3):1062–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hayashi S, Ohshima Y, Furuya Y, Nagao A, Oroku K, Tsutsumi N, Sasakawa C, Sato T. First detection of porcine circovirus type 3 in Japan. J Vet Med Sci. 2018;80(9):1468–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Prinz C, Stillfried M, Neubert LK, Denner J. Detection of PCV3 in German wild boars. Virol J. 2019;16(1):25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Rodrigues ILF, Cruz ACM, Souza AE, Knackfuss FB, Costa CHC, Silveira RL, Castro TX. Retrospective study of porcine circovirus 3 (PCV3) in swine tissue from Brazil (1967–2018). Braz J Microbiol. 2020;51(3):1391–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sukmak M, Thanantong N, Poolperm P, Boonsoongnern A, Ratanavanichrojn N, Jirawattanapong P, Woonwong Y, Soda N, Kaminsonsakul T, Phuttapatimok S, et al. The retrospective identification and molecular epidemiology of porcine circovirus type 3 (PCV3) in swine in Thailand from 2006 to 2017. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2019;66(1):611–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ye X, Berg M, Fossum C, Wallgren P, Blomstrom AL. Detection and genetic characterisation of porcine circovirus 3 from pigs in Sweden. Virus Genes. 2018;54(3):466–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Cui C, Wang M, Zhang Q, Wang S, Zhang H, Tian Z, An T, Cai X, Wang G. Investigating the Genetic Evolution of PCV2 and PCV3 across Six Swine Herds in China from 2020 to 2021. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2023;2023:5545806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 22.Weidong Y, Yanhong. C WL, Wentao CL, Qigai L. H: Isolation, identification, and phylogenetic analysis of porcine circovirus type 3c (HK strain). . Acta Microbiologica Sinica.2025 65 (10):4406–19.
- 23.Ku X, Chen F, Li P, Wang Y, Yu X, Fan S, Qian P, Wu M, He Q. Identification and genetic characterization of porcine circovirus type 3 in China. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2017;64(3):703–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mora-Diaz J, Pineyro P, Shen H, Schwartz K, Vannucci F, Li G, Arruda B, Gimenez-Lirola L. Isolation of PCV3 from Perinatal and Reproductive Cases of PCV3-Associated Disease and In Vivo Characterization of PCV3 Replication in CD/CD Growing Pigs. Viruses. 2020;12(2):219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 25.Cao X, Huang M, Wang Y, Chen Y, Yang H, Quan F. Immunogenicity Analysis of PCV3 Recombinant Capsid Protein Virus-like Particles and Their Application in Antibodies Detection. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(12):10377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 26.Gao YY, Wang Q, Li HW, Zhang S, Zhao J, Bao D, Zhao H, Wang K, Hu GX, Gao FS. Genomic composition and pathomechanisms of porcine circoviruses: A review. Virulence. 2024;15(1):2439524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Fu X, Fang B, Ma J, Liu Y, Bu D, Zhou P, Wang H, Jia K, Zhang G. Insights into the epidemic characteristics and evolutionary history of the novel porcine circovirus type 3 in southern China. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2018;65(2):e296–303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Vargas-Bermudez DS, Mogollon JD, Jaime J. The Prevalence and Genetic Diversity of PCV3 and PCV2 in Colombia and PCV4 Survey during 2015–2016 and 2018–2019. Pathogens. 2022;11(6):633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 29.Lv W, Cao L, Yang L, Wang N, Li Z, Huang S, Wen F, Guo J. The Prevalence and Genetic Diversity of Porcine Circoviruses (PCVs) during 2017–2023 in Guangdong Province, China. Animals (Basel). 2023;13(23):3640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 30.Ge M, Ren J, Xie YL, Zhao D, Fan FC, Song XQ, Li MX, Xiao CT. Prevalence and Genetic Analysis of Porcine Circovirus 3 in China From 2019 to 2020. Front Vet Sci. 2021;8:773912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Jiang M, Guo J, Zhang G, Jin Q, Liu Y, Jia R, Wang A. Fine mapping of linear B cell epitopes on capsid protein of porcine circovirus 3. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020;104(14):6223–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zhang S, Wang D, Jiang Y, Li Z, Zou Y, Li M, Yu H, Huang K, Yang Y, Wang N. Development and application of a baculovirus-expressed capsid protein-based indirect ELISA for detection of porcine circovirus 3 IgG antibodies. BMC Vet Res. 2019;15(1):79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Yawen. Z ZL, Yi. H YJ, Yang YQML. Z, Dongliang. W, Naidong. W: Bioinformatics Analysis of Cap Protein Sequences of Porcine Circovirus Type 3. J Economic Anima. 2020;24(1):9–16. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35(6):1547–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Li S, Guo R, Fang Y, Zhang C, Jiang L, Jia W, Ning Z. Subunit vaccine of PCV3 capsid protein produced by sf9 cells with double knockout of Caspase-1 and Dronc induces strong immune response in mice. Vet Microbiol. 2025;304:110452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Pranoto S, Wu HC, Chu CY. Porcine Circovirus Type 3: Diagnostics, Genotyping, and Challenges in Vaccine Development. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2023;2023(000):9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 37.Wu X, Wang Q, Lu W, Wang Y, Han Z, Liang L, Gao S, Ma H, Luo X. The PCV3 Cap Virus-like Particle Vaccine with the Chimeric PCV2-Neutralizing Epitope Gene Is Effective in Mice. Vet Sci. 2024;11(6):264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 38.Li G, He W, Zhu H, Bi Y, Wang R, Xing G, Zhang C, Zhou J, Yuen KY, Gao GF, et al. Origin, Genetic Diversity, and Evolutionary Dynamics of Novel Porcine Circovirus 3. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2018;5(9):1800275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Chen LL, Li H, Wang XA, Zheng LL, Ma SJ, Chen HY. Prevalence and genetic analysis of porcine circovirus type 3 (PCV3) in Henan Province of China during 2022–2024. Arch Virol. 2025;170(11):228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Li G, Wang H, Wang S, Xing G, Zhang C, Zhang W, Liu J, Zhang J, Su S, Zhou J. Insights into the genetic and host adaptability of emerging porcine circovirus 3. Virulence. 2018;9(1):1301–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Qi S, Su M, Guo D, Li C, Wei S, Feng L, Sun D. Molecular detection and phylogenetic analysis of porcine circovirus type 3 in 21 Provinces of China during 2015–2017. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2019;66(2):1004–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.ChunQi. BTL, L GPL, Jun. X, Pan. Z, RunZe. Z TL, Jie G, Rui et al. W : Molecular Epidemic Characteristics and Genetic Variation Analysis of Porcine Circovirus 3 in Some Pig Farms in Central China from 2020 to 2022. Scientia Agricultura Sinica. 2024;57(3):613–626.
- 43.Sun F, Li M, Li S, Yang Z. Investigating the Presence and Genetic Variability of Porcine Circovirus Types 2 and 3 in Live Markets in Border Cities of Northeast China. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2025;2025(000):11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 44.Anukool W, Yamsakul P. Prevalence and genetic characterization of porcine circovirus type 2, 3 and 4 in the upper Northern region of Thailand. Vet Res Commun. 2025;49(4):218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Almeida B, Duarte MD, Duarte A, Fagulha T, Ramos F, Luis T, Caetano I, Barros SC, Dos Santos FA, Henriques AM. Comprehensive Survey of PCV2 and PCV3 in Domestic Pigs and Wild Boars Across Portugal: Prevalence, Geographical Distribution and Genetic Diversity. Pathogens. 2025;14(7):675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 46.Pham LNH, Dinh PX, Ngo TNT, Le HTT, Do DT. Genetic Characterization and Evidence of Capsid Epitope Variation in Porcine Circovirus Type 3 Strains from Vietnamese Swine with Reproductive Disorders. Curr Microbiol. 2025;83(1):8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Shen H, Liu X, Zhang P, Wang S, Liu Y, Zhang L, Song C. Porcine circovirus 3 Cap inhibits type I interferon signaling through interaction with STAT2. Virus Res. 2020;275:197804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Song Y, Jin M, Zhang S, Xu X, Xiao S, Cao S, Chen H. Generation and immunogenicity of a recombinant pseudorabies virus expressing cap protein of porcine circovirus type 2. Vet Microbiol. 2007;119(2–4):97–104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Ha Z, Li J, Xie C, Yu C, Hao P, Zhang Y, Xu W, Nan F, Xie Y, Li Y, et al. Prevalence, pathogenesis, and evolution of porcine circovirus type 3 in China from 2016 to 2019. Vet Microbiol. 2020;247:108756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Li L, Kapoor A, Slikas B, Bamidele OS, Wang C, Shaukat S, Masroor MA, Wilson ML, Ndjango JB, Peeters M, et al. Multiple diverse circoviruses infect farm animals and are commonly found in human and chimpanzee feces. J Virol. 2010;84(4):1674–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Wanping. YWXHGW, Qizhuang W. Genetic Variation Analysis of Porcine Circovirus Type 3 in China from 2017 to 2023. Acta Vet et Zootechnica Sinica. 2025;56(6):2857–67. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article. Sequences obtained in the present study are deposited in GenBank under accession numbers: PX852042- PX852056.




