Skip to main content
NCBI home page
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal logoLink to CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal
. 1992 Aug 1;147(3):315–321.

Le déni dans la maladie coronarienne.

Denial in coronary heart disease

F Sirois 1
PMCID: PMC1336201  PMID: 1643597

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the extent and the significance of the psychologic mechanism of denial in coronary heart disease. This problem is known to be frequent, but its significance remains controversial. DATA SOURCES: From the bibliographies of recent publications, the author traced 21 empirical studies on denial in coronary heart disease published during the last 25 years. STUDY SELECTION: For a chronologic and historical approach all the studies were retained. The oldest had a qualitative and descriptive approach; the most recent used a scale of measurement. DATA EXTRACTION: This review examines the clinical data found in the publications and does not critically analyse the measurement tools. RESULTS: The results show that the ambiguity of the question arises from three aspects that have to be clarified: (1) there is a difference between the short-term effect and the long-term effect of denial in coronary heart disease; (2) part of the contradictory results could be linked to the scale of measure; and (3) the concept of denial is a notion that is used in an equivocal way that is not clarified even by the precision of the scale of measurement. CONCLUSIONS: Persistence of denial would have negative effects in the long term. The scale of Hackett and Cassem is useful in measuring denial in the acute stage but not in the rehabilitation stage. The very notion of denial is used ambiguously in several of the studies examined.

Full text

PDF
315

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Billing E., Lindell B., Sederholm M., Theorell T. Denial, anxiety, and depression following myocardial infarction. Psychosomatics. 1980 Aug;21(8):639-41, 644-5. doi: 10.1016/S0033-3182(80)73630-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Croog S. H., Shapiro D. S., Levine S. Denial among male heart patients. An empirical study. Psychosom Med. 1971 Sep-Oct;33(5):385–397. doi: 10.1097/00006842-197109000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dimsdale J. E., Hackett T. P. Effect of denial on cardiac health and psychological assessment. Am J Psychiatry. 1982 Nov;139(11):1477–1480. doi: 10.1176/ajp.139.11.1477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Douglas C. J., Druss R. G. Denial of illness: a reappraisal. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1987 Jan;9(1):53–57. doi: 10.1016/0163-8343(87)90102-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Druss R. G., Douglas C. J. Adaptive responses to illness and disability. Healthy denial. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1988 May;10(3):163–168. doi: 10.1016/0163-8343(88)90015-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fields K. B. Myocardial infarction and denial. J Fam Pract. 1989 Feb;28(2):157–161. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Froese A., Hackett T. P., Cassem N. H., Silverberg E. L. Trajectories of anxiety and depression in denying and nondenying acute myocardial infarction patients during hospitalization. J Psychosom Res. 1974 Dec;18(6):413–420. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(74)90032-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gentry W. D., Foster S., Haney T. Denial as a determinant of anxiety and perceived health status in the coronary care unit. Psychosom Med. 1972 Jan-Feb;34(1):39–44. doi: 10.1097/00006842-197201000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hackett T. P., Cassem N. H. Factors contributing to delay in responding to the signs and symptoms of acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1969 Nov;24(5):651–658. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(69)90452-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hackett T. P., Cassem N. H., Wishnie H. A. The coronary-care unit. An appraisal of its psychologic hazards. N Engl J Med. 1968 Dec 19;279(25):1365–1370. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196812192792504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Havik O. E., Maeland J. G. Verbal denial and outcome in myocardial infarction patients. J Psychosom Res. 1988;32(2):145–157. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(88)90049-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Levenson J. L., Kay R., Monteferrante J., Herman M. V. Denial predicts favorable outcome in unstable angina pectoris. Psychosom Med. 1984 Jan-Feb;46(1):25–32. doi: 10.1097/00006842-198401000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Levenson J. L., Mishra A., Hamer R. M., Hastillo A. Denial and medical outcome in unstable angina. Psychosom Med. 1989 Jan-Feb;51(1):27–35. doi: 10.1097/00006842-198901000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Levine J., Warrenburg S., Kerns R., Schwartz G., Delaney R., Fontana A., Gradman A., Smith S., Allen S., Cascione R. The role of denial in recovery from coronary heart disease. Psychosom Med. 1987 Mar-Apr;49(2):109–117. doi: 10.1097/00006842-198703000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. McKendry M., Logan R. L. The recognition and management of denial in patients after myocardial infarction. Aust N Z J Med. 1982 Dec;12(6):607–611. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.1982.tb02647.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Miller W. B., Rosenfeld R. A psychophysiological study of denial following acute myocardial infarction. J Psychosom Res. 1975 Feb;19(1):43–54. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(75)90050-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Paris F., Pradeau D., Hamon M. Microdosage spectrophotométrique de l'acide éthylènediaminotétracétique dans les préparations pharmaceutiques. Ann Pharm Fr. 1985;43(2):133–138. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Peel A. A., Semple T., Wang I., Lancaster W. M., Dall J. L. A CORONARY PROGNOSTIC INDEX FOR GRADING THE SEVERITY OF INFARCTION. Br Heart J. 1962 Nov;24(6):745–760. doi: 10.1136/hrt.24.6.745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Prince R., Frasure-Smith N., Rolicz-Woloszyk E. Life stress, denial and outcome in ischemic heart disease patients. J Psychosom Res. 1982;26(1):23–31. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(82)90059-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Roth L. H., Appelbaum P. S., Sallee R., Reynolds C. F., Huber G. The dilemma of denial in the assessment of competency to refuse treatment. Am J Psychiatry. 1982 Jul;139(7):910–913. doi: 10.1176/ajp.139.7.910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Shaw R. E., Cohen F., Doyle B., Palesky J. The impact of denial and repressive style on information gain and rehabilitation outcomes in myocardial infarction patients. Psychosom Med. 1985 May-Jun;47(3):262–273. doi: 10.1097/00006842-198505000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Soloff P. H., Bartel A. G. Effects of denial on mood and performance in cardiovascular rehabilitation. J Chronic Dis. 1979;32(4):307–313. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(79)90086-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Stern M. J., Pascale L., Ackerman A. Life adjustment postmyocardial infarction: determining predictive variables. Arch Intern Med. 1977 Dec;137(12):1680–1685. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Stern M. J., Pascale L., McLoone J. B. Psychosocial adaptation following an acute myocardial infarction. J Chronic Dis. 1976 Aug;29(8):513–526. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(76)90015-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Thomas S. A., Sappington E., Gross H. S., Noctor M., Friedmann E., Lynch J. J. Denial in coronary care patients--an objective reassessment. Heart Lung. 1983 Jan;12(1):74–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association

RESOURCES