Abstract
Background: Tuberculosis-related pulmonary changes may overlap radiologically and clinically with lung cancer, complicating diagnostic interpretation, staging, and therapeutic planning. This study evaluated the relationship between tuberculosis status, thoracic imaging patterns, and clinical characteristics in patients diagnosed with lung cancer. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted between February 2020 and December 2025 at the Clinical Pneumophtisiology Hospital, Constanța, Romania. A total of 620 patients with lung cancer were analyzed. Patients were classified into three groups: no tuberculosis, post-tuberculosis sequelae, and active tuberculosis. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, histopathological, functional, and radiological variables were assessed. Associations between tuberculosis status and imaging findings were evaluated using chi-square testing, effect-size analysis, and multinomial logistic regression. Results: Post-tuberculosis sequelae were identified in 337 patients (54.4%), active tuberculosis in 51 patients (8.2%), and no tuberculosis-related disease in 232 patients (37.4%). Adenocarcinoma was the most frequent histological type, occurring in 359 patients (57.9%). Significant associations with tuberculosis status were observed for fibrotic/interstitial or bronchial changes, infectious-inflammatory changes, cavitary/destructive lesions, atelectatic/retractile changes, pulmonary opacities, pleural involvement, and mediastinal/hilar adenopathy. The strongest effects were found for fibrotic/interstitial changes, infectious-inflammatory changes, and cavitary/destructive lesions. In regression analysis, active tuberculosis was most strongly associated with infectious-inflammatory changes, cavitary lesions, pulmonary opacities, and fibrotic abnormalities, while post-tuberculosis sequelae were mainly associated with chronic fibrotic and structural pulmonary changes. Conclusions: Tuberculosis-related abnormalities frequently coexist with lung cancer and may mimic or obscure malignant findings. Recognition of these overlapping patterns is essential for accurate radiological interpretation and individualized clinical management.
Keywords: pulmonary tuberculosis, lung cancer, pulmonary imaging, post-tuberculosis sequelae, thoracic computed tomography, respiratory symptoms, lung malignancy
1. Introduction
Lung cancer and pulmonary tuberculosis remain major global public health problems and frequently coexist in regions with high respiratory disease burden [1]. Both conditions may present with overlapping clinical manifestations and similar thoracic imaging abnormalities, creating substantial diagnostic challenges in daily clinical practice [2]. Chronic cough, dyspnea, hemoptysis, constitutional symptoms, pulmonary nodules, cavitary lesions, fibrosis, and consolidative changes may be encountered in both pulmonary malignancy and tuberculosis, often delaying accurate diagnosis and appropriate therapeutic intervention [3]. Recent evidence has emphasized that cavitary and destructive pulmonary lesions may closely mimic malignant disease, particularly in patients with previous tuberculosis-related structural lung damage [4,5,6].
Advanced imaging techniques have been increasingly explored to improve the differentiation between pulmonary tuberculosis and lung cancer [7]. Luo et al. demonstrated the potential value of multi-time-point ^18F-FDG PET/CT imaging in distinguishing lung cancer from tuberculosis-related lesions, although significant overlap in metabolic activity continues to limit diagnostic specificity [8]. Similarly, Wei et al. reported that radiomics combined with conventional CT imaging features may improve the distinction between mass-like tuberculosis and pulmonary malignancy, highlighting the importance of integrated radiological assessment [9]. In parallel, recent European recommendations regarding lung cancer screening have underlined the growing role of imaging-based early detection strategies in high-risk populations with chronic pulmonary disease [10].
Patients with chronic respiratory comorbidities represent a particularly vulnerable population in whom overlapping inflammatory, infectious, and neoplastic pulmonary changes may coexist [11]. Lung cancer screening studies have shown that chronic pulmonary abnormalities substantially influence radiological interpretation and diagnostic pathways [12,13,14,15]. Moreover, tuberculosis itself may simulate malignant pulmonary lesions, further complicating clinical evaluation and radiological staging [16].
To our knowledge, few studies have simultaneously evaluated radiological overlap patterns, respiratory symptom burden, and functional impairment across active TB, post-TB sequelae, and lung cancer in a large hospitalized European cohort. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate radiological overlap patterns between pulmonary tuberculosis and lung cancer and identify imaging predictors independently associated with active or previous TB in patients with lung malignancy.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Framework and Patient Selection
This retrospective cohort study was performed at the Clinical Pneumophtisiology Hospital, Constanța, Romania. Data collection was conducted from February 2020 to December 2025. All patients included had complete follow-up data available at the time of database closure. The December 2025 end date reflects the final patient admission included in the dataset.
We screened for the eligibility of all consecutive patients with documented LC admitted during the study interval. Histopathological confirmation was the primary diagnostic standard. In cases where biopsy was technically unfeasible due to poor performance status, advanced disease, or inconclusive bronchoscopy, the diagnosis was supported by multidisciplinary radiological and clinical evaluation, consistent with institutional practice. We included patients who had sufficient demographic, clinical, imaging, and oncological data.
We classified TB-related status as follows: no TB, post-TB sequelae, and active TB.
We excluded patients who presented uncertain TB classification, duplicate medical records, incomplete essential documentation, or exclusively benign pulmonary pathology. We also excluded cases with partially incomplete radiological or oncological information.
Due to the retrospective nature of the study and variability in historical record availability over the five-year study period, systematic microbiological confirmation of prior tuberculosis could not be obtained for all patients in the post-TB sequelae group. Classification was based on the presence of characteristic structural imaging abnormalities consistent with established radiological criteria for post-TB lung damage, interpreted in conjunction with available clinical history and prior medical documentation.
A total of 227 patients were excluded from the initial screening and eligibility process: 49 due to uncertain TB classification, 18 due to duplicate admissions, 89 due to incomplete essential clinical, imaging, or oncological documentation, 40 due to exclusively benign pulmonary pathology, and 31 because the final diagnosis was not lung cancer. The final cohort included 620 patients (Figure 1).
Figure 1.
STROBE diagram for the study cohort.
2.2. Clinical and Functional Assessment
Clinical information was extracted retrospectively from hospital archives and electronic medical records. We decided that we will evaluate the demographic data, smoking status, pack-year exposure, oxygen therapy requirements, respiratory failure, COPD diagnosis, GOLD stage, cardiovascular and metabolic comorbidities, respiratory symptomatology, and physical examination findings. For respiratory manifestations, we analyzed cough with or without expectoration, dyspnea, hemoptysis, thoracic pain, digestive symptoms, and constitutional or inflammatory manifestations. We also added the spirometry patterns (categorized as normal, obstructive, restrictive, mixed, or nonspecific ventilatory dysfunction). Histopathological data included adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, small cell carcinoma, NSCLC-unspecified, and other malignant or suspicious pathological categories. We classified tumor stage as early-stage or advanced-stage disease.
2.3. Radiological Evaluation and Tuberculosis Classification
The main imaging modality was computed tomography, but where this was not available, we used chest radiography and archived imaging reports.
The radiological analysis focused on the presence of:
nodular lesions or metastatic dissemination,
mediastinal or hilar adenopathy,
pleural involvement,
emphysematous or chronic obstructive changes,
pulmonary opacities or condensation,
pulmonary tumor masses,
atelectatic or retractile changes,
fibrotic/interstitial or bronchial abnormalities,
cavitary or destructive lesions,
infectious-inflammatory changes.
We defined post-TB sequelae by looking at structural pulmonary abnormalities associated with previous tuberculosis-related damage (apical fibrotic scars, fibronodular lesions, calcified granulomas, traction bronchiectasis, pleural thickening, residual cavitary lesions, parenchymal distortion, volume loss, and calcified mediastinal lymph nodes). These criteria are consistent with published radiological definitions of post-TB lung damage. Each case was reviewed and classified by a multidisciplinary team combining radiological assessment with clinical history and available prior medical documentation.
2.4. Statistical and Exploratory Analysis
For the statistical analysis, we decided to use IBM SPSS Statistics version 30.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). We expressed the continuous variables as mean ± standard deviation with 95% confidence intervals, and we reported the categorical variables as absolute frequencies and percentages.
We evaluated associations between TB status and radiological or clinical variables using Pearson’s Chi-square test. Additionally, we identified the effect size using Cramer’s V coefficient. Thus, we were able to quantify the magnitude of association between TB-related categories and thoracic imaging abnormalities.
Next, we performed a multinomial logistic regression analysis in order to identify independent imaging predictors associated with tuberculosis status. For this, we used the no-TB category as the reference group, and we calculated the odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Statistical significance was established at p < 0.05.
Spirometry patterns were evaluated descriptively; spirometric data were not included as predictors in the regression model. Therefore, patients with missing spirometry values (n = 22, included in the ‘missing/not performed’ category) were not subject to listwise exclusion from regression analyses, and all 620 patients were included in the regression model.
We acknowledge that the active TB subgroup (n = 51) yields an events-per-variable ratio of approximately 3.9, below the recommended threshold of 10 for stable regression estimates. The model is therefore designated as exploratory, and the results should not be used for external prediction without validation in an independent cohort.
2.5. Ethical Approval
The study was conducted according to the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the Clinical Pneumophtisiology Hospital Constanța, Romania (Approval No. 473/11 February 2020).
3. Results
3.1. Population Characteristics
The study population consisted of 620 patients evaluated for demographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics (Table 1). We performed descriptive statistical analysis for continuous variables using mean, standard deviation (SD), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the mean, while categorical variables were summarized using absolute frequencies and percentages. The analyzed parameters included demographic distribution, smoking status, respiratory function, oxygen therapy requirements, and routine laboratory investigations (Table 1).
Table 1.
Demographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics of the study population.
| Mean | SD | 95.0% Lower CL for Mean | 95.0% Upper CL for Mean | N | N % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 67 | 10 | 66 | 68 | |||
| Sex | Female | 267 | 43.1% | ||||
| Male | 353 | 56.9% | |||||
| Urban | No | 249 | 40.2% | ||||
| Yes | 371 | 59.8% | |||||
| Hb g/dL | 9 | 3 | 9 | 10 | |||
| WBC × 103/µL | 10 | 4 | 10 | 10 | |||
| PLT × 103/µL | 323 | 133 | 313 | 334 | |||
| ESR (mm/h) | 50 | 36 | 47 | 53 | |||
| FBG (mg/dL) | 116 | 44 | 112 | 119 | |||
| AST (U/L) | 30 | 17 | 28 | 31 | |||
| ALT (U/L) | 24 | 26 | 21 | 27 | |||
| Urea (mg/dL) | 47 | 27 | 45 | 49 | |||
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 1.09 | 0.57 | 1.04 | 1.13 | |||
| SpO2 | 91 | 9 | 90 | 91 | |||
| Systolic blood pressure | 133 | 20 | 131 | 134 | |||
| Heart rate | 80 | 29 | 77 | 82 | |||
| Smoker | No | 190 | 30.6% | ||||
| Yes | 430 | 69.4% | |||||
| Pack Year Index | 40 | 25 | 38 | 42 | |||
SD—standard deviation; N—number of patients; %—percentage; Hb—hemoglobin; WBC—white blood cell count; PLT—platelet count; ESR—erythrocyte sedimentation rate; FBG—fasting blood glucose; AST—aspartate aminotransferase; ALT—alanine aminotransferase; Urea—blood urea level; Creatinine—serum creatinine; SpO2—peripheral oxygen saturation; COPD—chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; GOLD—Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease classification; O2 therapy—oxygen therapy. BMI was not included due to incomplete anthropometric documentation across the retrospective dataset.
The mean age was 67 ± 10 years. Male patients represented the majority of the population (56.9%), while 43.1% were female. Most participants originated from urban areas (59.8%), compared with 40.2% from rural settings. Smoking history was highly prevalent, being documented in 69.4% of patients, with a mean pack-year index of 40 ± 25.
Laboratory investigations demonstrated evidence of chronic inflammation and systemic impairment within the cohort. Mean Hb levels were 9 ± 3 g/dL, while the average WBC count was 10 ± 4 × 103/µL and the platelet count reached 323 ± 133 × 103/µL. Inflammatory activity was reflected by elevated ESR values, with a mean of 50 ± 36 mm/h. Metabolic parameters revealed a mean fasting blood glucose level of 116 ± 44 mg/dL. Liver function tests showed mean AST and ALT levels of 30 ± 17 U/L and 24 ± 26 U/L, respectively. Renal function parameters included a mean urea value of 47 ± 27 mg/dL and serum creatinine of 1.09 ± 0.57 mg/dL.
Respiratory and cardiovascular assessment highlighted significant functional impairment among patients. Mean peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) was 91 ± 9%, indicating frequent hypoxemia. The average systolic blood pressure was 133 ± 20 mmHg, while the mean heart rate reached 80 ± 29 beats/minute.
3.2. Histopathological, Tuberculosis-Related, and Functional Characteristics
Table 2 summarizes the distribution of TB status, histopathological diagnoses, cancer stage, pulmonary functional impairment, and major respiratory and cardiovascular comorbidities within the study cohort. Post-TB sequelae were identified in 337 patients, representing 54.4% of the cohort. Active TB was present in 51 patients, corresponding to 8.2%, while 232 patients had no evidence of current or previous TB-related pulmonary disease.
Table 2.
Clinical, histopathological, and functional characteristics of the study population.
| N = | N % | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| TB status | No TB | 232 | 37.4 |
| Post TB sequelae | 337 | 54.4 | |
| Active TB | 51 | 8.2 | |
| Histopathological diagnosis | Squamous cell carcinoma | 71 | 11.5 |
| Small cell carcinoma | 32 | 5.2 | |
| Undifferentiated carcinoma/lymphoma suspicion | 13 | 2.1 | |
| Inconclusive/biopsy in progress/no HP confirmation | 20 | 3.2 | |
| NSCLC, unspecified | 89 | 14.4 | |
| Adenocarcinoma | 359 | 57.9 | |
| Other non-malignant diagnosis | 6 | 1.0 | |
| Mesothelioma/carcinoma–mesothelioma suspicion | 5 | 0.8 | |
| Atypical cells/suspicious | 25 | 4.0 | |
| Cancer stage | early stage | 245 | 39.5 |
| advanced stage | 375 | 60.6 | |
| COPD | No | 241 | 38.9 |
| Yes | 379 | 61.1 | |
| GOLD stage | None | 241 | 38.9 |
| GOLD I | 11 | 1.8 | |
| GOLD II | 98 | 15.8 | |
| GOLD III | 122 | 19.7 | |
| GOLD IV | 111 | 17.9 | |
| Spirometry * | Missing/not performed | 147 | 24.6 |
| Normal spirometry | 81 | 13.5 | |
| Obstructive dysfunction | 179 | 29.9 | |
| Restrictive dysfunction | 31 | 5.2 | |
| Mixed dysfunction | 139 | 23.2 | |
| Non-specific/mild ventilatory impairment | 21 | 3.5 | |
| Respiratory failure | No | 352 | 56.8 |
| Yes | 268 | 43.2 | |
| Heart failure | No | 442 | 71.3 |
| Yes | 178 | 28.7 | |
| Hypertension | No | 295 | 47.6 |
| Yes | 325 | 52.4 | |
* Spirometry results were available and interpretable in 598 of 620 patients (96.5%); the remaining 22 patients had missing or unperformed spirometry assessments and are included in the ‘Missing/not performed’ category (total n = 147). Abbreviations: TB—tuberculosis; COPD—chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; GOLD—Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease classification; NSCLC—non-small cell lung cancer, unspecified; HP—histopathological examination.
Adenocarcinoma was the most frequent histopathological diagnosis, identified in 359 patients (57.9%). NSCLC, unspecified, was recorded in 89 patients (14.4%), followed by squamous cell carcinoma in 71 patients (11.5%) and small cell carcinoma in 32 patients (5.2%). Advanced-stage disease was present in 375 patients (60.5%), while 245 patients (39.5%) had early-stage disease.
COPD was documented in 379 patients (61.1%). Among COPD-related classifications, GOLD III and GOLD IV were the most frequent advanced categories, affecting 122 patients (19.7%) and 111 patients (17.9%), respectively. Spirometry data were interpretable or classifiable in 598 records. Within this subgroup, obstructive dysfunction was the most common pattern, identified in 179 patients (29.9%), followed by mixed dysfunction in 139 patients (23.2%). Respiratory failure was present in 268 patients (43.2%), hypertension in 325 patients (52.4%), and heart failure in 178 patients (28.7%).
Figure 2 illustrates the distribution of histopathological lung cancer subtypes across patients without TB, with post-TB sequelae, and with active TB.
Figure 2.
Distribution of histopathological subtypes according to TB status. No TB—patients without a tuberculosis-related disease; Post-TB—post-tuberculosis sequelae; Active TB—active tuberculosis; NSCLC—non-small cell lung cancer, unspecified; SCC—squamous cell carcinoma; SCC small cell—small cell carcinoma.
Adenocarcinoma represented the predominant histopathological subtype in all tuberculosis categories, with the highest frequency observed among patients with post-TB sequelae. NSCLC-unspecified and squamous cell carcinoma were also identified across all groups, while small cell carcinoma and other rare histopathological diagnoses were less frequent.
In Figure 3, we show the distribution of cancer stages according to tuberculosis status and adenocarcinoma.
Figure 3.
Association between tuberculosis status, adenocarcinoma, and cancer stage.
Advanced-stage disease was more frequent than early-stage disease among patients with adenocarcinoma, particularly in individuals with active or post-TB status.
In contrast, other histopathological cancer subtypes showed lower frequencies and a less pronounced distribution across oncological stages.
3.3. Imaging Characteristics According to Tuberculosis Status and Histopathological Diagnosis
Radiological findings differed across TB-related categories. Among patients with post-TB sequelae, the most frequent abnormalities were fibrotic/interstitial or bronchial changes in 230 patients (68.2%), pulmonary tumor or expansive masses in 205 patients (60.8%), emphysematous/chronic obstructive changes in 190 patients (56.4%), nodular lesions or metastatic dissemination in 180 patients (53.4%), and pulmonary opacities or condensation in 165 patients (49.0%). Cavitary or destructive lesions were present in 105 patients (31.2%), while infectious-inflammatory changes were present in 92 patients (27.3%).
Patients with active TB showed a different radiological profile. Infectious-inflammatory changes were present in 39 patients (76.5%), cavitary or destructive lesions in 36 patients (70.6%), pulmonary opacities or condensation in 34 patients (66.7%), pulmonary tumor or expansive masses in 30 patients (58.8%), and fibrotic/interstitial or bronchial changes in 29 patients (56.9%). Mediastinal or hilar involvement with adenopathy was observed in 20 patients (39.2%).
Among patients with adenocarcinoma, pulmonary tumors or expansive masses were present in 241 patients (67.1%), nodular lesions or metastatic dissemination in 208 patients (58.0%), emphysematous/chronic obstructive changes in 191 patients (53.2%), pulmonary opacities or condensation in 164 patients (45.7%), and fibrotic/interstitial or bronchial changes in 154 patients (42.9%). Infectious-inflammatory changes were present in 120 adenocarcinoma cases (33.4%), while cavitary/destructive lesions were present in 101 cases (28.1%).
3.4. Clinical Manifestations According to Tuberculosis Status and Cancer Stage
Smoking exposure was frequent across all TB categories and was highest among patients with active TB, where it was documented in 45 of 51 patients (88.2%). Obstructive ventilatory dysfunction was also most frequent in the active TB group, affecting 31 patients (60.8%). Dyspnea was present in 42 active TB patients (82.4%), while cough with or without expectoration was present in 39 active TB patients (76.5%).
Across oncological stages, dyspnea increased with disease advancement. It was present in 12 patients with stage I disease (14.8%), 47 with stage II disease (28.7%), 139 with stage III disease (78.1%), and 169 with stage IV disease (85.8%). Oxygen therapy was required in 42 stage I patients (51.9%), 56 stage II patients (34.1%), 71 stage III patients (39.9%), and 79 stage IV patients (40.1%). Crackles were more frequent in active TB patients (45.1%) and in stage IV disease (37.6%). Cough remained common across all stages, affecting 67.9% of stage I, 64.0% of stage II, 60.1% of stage III, and 63.5% of stage IV patients.
3.5. Association Between Tuberculosis Status and Thoracic Imaging Findings
Pearson chi-square testing showed that the strongest associations with tuberculosis status were observed for fibrotic/interstitial or bronchial changes, infectious-inflammatory changes, cavitary/destructive lesions, and atelectatic/retractile changes (Table 3). Pulmonary opacities or condensation, pleural involvement, and mediastinal/hilar adenopathy also differed significantly across tuberculosis categories. In contrast, nodular lesions/metastatic dissemination, emphysematous/chronic obstructive changes, and pulmonary tumor or expansive masses did not show statistically significant differences across TB-status groups, indicating that these findings were broadly distributed across the cohort rather than specific to tuberculosis status.
Table 3.
Strength of association between radiological imaging findings and patient group classification.
| Radiological Finding | Pearson χ2 | df | p-Value | Cramer’s V | Strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nodular lesions/metastatic dissemination | 1.102 | 2 | 0.576 | 0.042 | Negligible |
| Mediastinal/hilar involvement and adenopathy | 11.285 | 2 | 0.004 | 0.135 | Weak |
| Pleural involvement | 11.075 | 2 | 0.004 | 0.134 | Weak |
| Emphysematous/chronic obstructive changes | 0.685 | 2 | 0.71 | 0.033 | Negligible |
| Pulmonary opacities/condensation | 24.877 | 2 | <0.001 | 0.2 | Small-to-moderate |
| Pulmonary tumor/expansive mass | 2.410 | 2 | 0.3 | 0.062 | Negligible |
| Atelectatic and retractile changes | 51.902 | 2 | <0.001 | 0.289 | Moderate |
| Fibrotic/interstitial/bronchial changes | 185.574 | 2 | <0.001 | 0.547 | Strong |
| Cavitary and destructive lesions | 79.712 | 2 | <0.001 | 0.359 | Moderate |
| Infectious/inflammatory changes | 122.075 | 2 | <0.001 | 0.444 | Moderate-to-strong |
Figure 4 demonstrates the comparative strength of associations between radiological findings and the analyzed study groups. The strongest association was observed for fibrotic/interstitial/bronchial changes (V = 0.547, p < 0.001), followed by infectious/inflammatory changes (V = 0.444, p < 0.001) and cavitary/destructive lesions (V = 0.359, p < 0.001), indicating substantial differences between groups for these imaging patterns. Atelectatic/retractile changes also showed a moderate association (V = 0.289, p < 0.001). In contrast, nodular lesions, emphysematous changes, and pulmonary tumor masses demonstrated negligible associations and lacked statistical significance, suggesting limited discriminatory value between the evaluated groups.
Figure 4.
Comparative distribution of association strengths between radiological findings and study groups based on Cramer’s V analysis.
3.6. Multinomial Logistic Regression Analysis
We performed a multinomial logistic regression to identify independent predictors associated with post-TB sequelae and active TB, using the no-TB group as the reference category. The model included clinical, demographic, laboratory, and radiological variables that were structurally independent of the TB-status classification criteria. The predictors entered into the model were age, sex, smoking status, pack-year index, COPD diagnosis, respiratory failure, cancer stage, dyspnea severity, cough, hemoptysis, Hb, WBC, PLT, ESR, nodular lesions or metastatic dissemination, mediastinal or hilar involvement, pleural involvement, emphysematous or chronic obstructive changes, and pulmonary opacities or condensation. In Table 4, we present the full parameter estimates (Figure 5).
Table 4.
Logistic regression analysis of radiological predictors associated with post-TB sequelae and active tuberculosis.
| TB Status a | B | Std. Error | Wald | df | Sig. | Exp(B) | 95% Confidence Interval for Exp(B) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower Bound | Upper Bound | ||||||||
| Post TB sequelae | Intercept | 9.257 | 1.587 | 34.033 | 1 | <0.001 | |||
| Age | −0.050 | 0.013 | 14.257 | 1 | <0.001 | 0.952 | 0.927 | 0.976 | |
| Pack Year Index | −0.002 | 0.006 | 0.115 | 1 | 0.735 | 0.998 | 0.987 | 1.010 | |
| Hb | −0.076 | 0.068 | 1.236 | 1 | 0.266 | 0.927 | 0.811 | 1.059 | |
| WBC | −0.059 | 0.033 | 3.256 | 1 | 0.071 | 0.943 | 0.884 | 1.005 | |
| PLT | −0.001 | 0.001 | 1.269 | 1 | 0.260 | 0.999 | 0.997 | 1.001 | |
| ESR | −0.009 | 0.004 | 4.763 | 1 | 0.029 | 0.991 | 0.984 | 0.999 | |
| Female | −2.772 | 0.311 | 79.572 | 1 | <0.001 | 0.063 | 0.034 | 0.115 | |
| Male | 0 b | . | . | 0 | . | . | . | . | |
| Respiratory failure—No | 1.612 | 0.359 | 20.209 | 1 | <0.001 | 5.015 | 2.483 | 10.128 | |
| Respiratory failure—Yes | 0 b | . | . | 0 | . | . | . | . | |
| Cancer stage-I | −0.067 | 0.472 | 0.020 | 1 | 0.887 | 0.935 | 0.371 | 2.360 | |
| Cancer stage-II | −1.242 | 0.388 | 10.262 | 1 | 0.001 | 0.289 | 0.135 | 0.618 | |
| Cancer stage-III | −0.518 | 0.349 | 2.200 | 1 | 0.138 | 0.596 | 0.301 | 1.181 | |
| Cancer stage-IV | 0 b | . | . | 0 | . | . | . | . | |
| Dyspnea-none | −1.073 | 0.499 | 4.628 | 1 | 0.031 | 0.342 | 0.129 | 0.909 | |
| Dyspnea-mild | −1.243 | 0.572 | 4.719 | 1 | 0.030 | 0.289 | 0.094 | 0.886 | |
| Dyspnea-moderate | −1.962 | 0.561 | 12.232 | 1 | <0.001 | 0.141 | 0.047 | 0.422 | |
| Dyspnea-severe | 0 b | . | . | 0 | . | . | . | . | |
| Cough-none | 0.316 | 0.401 | 0.621 | 1 | 0.431 | 1.372 | 0.625 | 3.013 | |
| Cough-dry | 1.741 | 0.354 | 24.238 | 1 | <0.001 | 5.702 | 2.851 | 11.402 | |
| Cough-productive | 0 b | . | . | 0 | . | . | . | . | |
| Hemoptysis—No | 1.109 | 0.337 | 10.816 | 1 | 0.001 | 3.032 | 1.566 | 5.873 | |
| Hemoptysis—Yes | 0 b | . | . | 0 | . | . | . | . | |
| Smoker—No | −0.233 | 0.312 | 0.559 | 1 | 0.455 | 0.792 | 0.430 | 1.460 | |
| Smoker—Yes | 0 b | . | . | 0 | . | . | . | . | |
| COPD—No | −2.480 | 0.393 | 39.764 | 1 | <0.001 | 0.084 | 0.039 | 0.181 | |
| COPD—Yes | 0 b | . | . | 0 | . | . | . | . | |
| Nodular lesions/metastatic dissemination—No | −0.879 | 0.314 | 7.861 | 1 | 0.005 | 0.415 | 0.225 | 0.768 | |
| Nodular lesions/metastatic dissemination—Yes | 0 b | . | . | 0 | . | . | . | . | |
| Mediastinal/hilar involvement and adenopathy—No | −1.018 | 0.354 | 8.258 | 1 | 0.004 | 0.361 | 0.180 | 0.723 | |
| Mediastinal/hilar involvement and adenopathy—Yes | 0 b | . | . | 0 | . | . | . | . | |
| Pleural involvement—No | −0.869 | 0.350 | 6.184 | 1 | 0.013 | 0.419 | 0.211 | 0.832 | |
| Pleural involvement—Yes | 0 b | . | . | 0 | . | . | . | . | |
| Emphysematous and chronic obstructive changes—No | 0.583 | 0.348 | 2.808 | 1 | 0.094 | 1.792 | 0.906 | 3.546 | |
| Emphysematous and chronic obstructive changes—Yes | 0 b | . | . | 0 | . | . | . | . | |
| Pulmonary opacities/condensation—No | −1.676 | 0.312 | 28.772 | 1 | <0.001 | 0.187 | 0.101 | 0.345 | |
| Pulmonary opacities/condensation—Yes | 0 b | . | . | 0 | . | . | . | . | |
| Active TB | Intercept | 0.978 | 2.629 | 0.138 | 1 | 0.710 | |||
| Age | 0.028 | 0.023 | 1.435 | 1 | 0.231 | 1.028 | 0.982 | 1.076 | |
| Pack Year Index | −0.024 | 0.011 | 5.351 | 1 | 0.021 | 0.976 | 0.956 | 0.996 | |
| Hb | 0.193 | 0.104 | 3.440 | 1 | 0.064 | 1.212 | 0.989 | 1.486 | |
| WBC | −0.086 | 0.050 | 2.947 | 1 | 0.086 | 0.918 | 0.832 | 1.012 | |
| PLT | 0.000 | 0.002 | 0.057 | 1 | 0.812 | 1.000 | 0.997 | 1.004 | |
| ESR | 0.014 | 0.006 | 4.895 | 1 | 0.027 | 1.014 | 1.002 | 1.026 | |
| Female | −2.911 | 0.516 | 31.805 | 1 | <0.001 | 0.054 | 0.020 | 0.150 | |
| Male | 0 b | . | . | 0 | . | . | . | . | |
| Respiratory failure—No | 0.348 | 0.591 | 0.346 | 1 | 0.556 | 1.416 | 0.444 | 4.515 | |
| Respiratory failure—Yes | 0 b | . | . | 0 | . | . | . | . | |
| Cancer stage-I | −0.683 | 0.669 | 1.042 | 1 | 0.307 | 0.505 | 0.136 | 1.874 | |
| Cancer stage-II | −2.947 | 0.788 | 13.979 | 1 | <0.001 | 0.052 | 0.011 | 0.246 | |
| Cancer stage-III | −1.573 | 0.576 | 7.455 | 1 | 0.006 | 0.207 | 0.067 | 0.642 | |
| Cancer stage-IV | 0 b | . | . | 0 | . | . | . | . | |
| Dyspnea-none | −1.977 | 0.847 | 5.441 | 1 | 0.020 | 0.139 | 0.026 | 0.729 | |
| Dyspnea-mild | −1.614 | 0.962 | 2.815 | 1 | 0.093 | 0.199 | 0.030 | 1.312 | |
| Dyspnea-moderate | −1.962 | 0.961 | 4.170 | 1 | 0.041 | 0.141 | 0.021 | 0.924 | |
| Dyspnea-severe | 0 b | . | . | 0 | . | . | . | . | |
| Cough-none | −0.997 | 0.698 | 2.038 | 1 | 0.153 | .369 | 0.094 | 1.450 | |
| Cough-dry | −0.138 | 0.550 | 0.063 | 1 | 0.801 | .871 | 0.296 | 2.559 | |
| Cough-productive | 0 b | . | . | 0 | . | . | . | . | |
| Hemoptysis—No | −0.797 | 0.604 | 1.743 | 1 | 0.187 | 0.450 | 0.138 | 1.471 | |
| Hemoptysis—Yes | 0 b | . | . | 0 | . | . | . | . | |
| Smoker—No | −2.486 | 0.669 | 13.827 | 1 | <0.001 | 0.083 | 0.022 | 0.309 | |
| Smoker—Yes | 0 b | . | . | 0 | . | . | . | . | |
| COPD—No | −0.474 | 0.569 | 0.692 | 1 | 0.405 | 0.623 | 0.204 | 1.901 | |
| COPD—Yes | 0 b | . | . | 0 | . | . | . | . | |
| Nodular lesions/metastatic dissemination—No | 0.699 | 0.476 | 2.155 | 1 | 0.142 | 2.012 | 0.791 | 5.117 | |
| Nodular lesions/metastatic dissemination—Yes | 0 b | . | . | 0 | . | . | . | . | |
| Mediastinal/hilar involvement and adenopathy—No | −1.840 | 0.501 | 13.484 | 1 | <0.001 | 0.159 | 0.059 | 0.424 | |
| Mediastinal/hilar involvement and adenopathy—Yes | 0 b | . | . | 0 | . | . | . | . | |
| Pleural involvement—No | −0.202 | 0.545 | 0.137 | 1 | 0.711 | 0.817 | 0.281 | 2.379 | |
| Pleural involvement—Yes | 0 b | . | . | 0 | . | . | . | . | |
| Emphysematous and chronic obstructive changes—No | 2.106 | 0.550 | 14.644 | 1 | <0.001 | 8.213 | 2.793 | 24.150 | |
| Emphysematous and chronic obstructive changes—Yes | 0 b | . | . | 0 | . | . | . | . | |
| Pulmonary opacities/condensation—No | −0.761 | 0.490 | 2.407 | 1 | 0.121 | 0.467 | 0.179 | 1.222 | |
| Pulmonary opacities/condensation—Yes | 0 b | . | . | 0 | . | . | . | . | |
a The reference category is No TB; b This parameter is set to zero because it is redundant.
Figure 5.
Network visualization of associations between tuberculosis status and radiological imaging findings.
Emphysematous and chronic obstructive changes demonstrated extensive connectivity across the network, appearing among the most frequently present findings (large “Yes” node), with broad links to all three TB-status categories and all cancer stages. Pulmonary opacities or condensation and nodular lesions or metastatic dissemination showed similarly widespread interconnections, indicating that these radiological patterns were distributed across the cohort regardless of TB status. Mediastinal or hilar involvement and adenopathy displayed a more concentrated pattern of connections, with its “Yes” node linked particularly to active TB and post-TB sequelae categories. Pleural involvement showed a comparable distribution, with presence more strongly represented in post-TB sequelae.
Regarding cancer stage, stage IV and stage III nodes exhibited the highest relationship counts within the network, reflecting the predominance of advanced-stage disease in this cohort and its co-occurrence with multiple radiological abnormalities across all TB categories. Stage I and stage II nodes were smaller and less densely connected, consistent with their lower frequency in the cohort.
The results of this study demonstrated a substantial radiological and clinical overlap between pulmonary tuberculosis and lung cancer within the analyzed cohort. Structural pulmonary abnormalities were frequently identified across all three TB-status categories and across multiple oncological stages. Statistical analyses confirmed significant associations between several imaging findings and tuberculosis status, while the network visualization further supports the presence of interconnected radiological patterns rather than isolated manifestations.
4. Discussion
The present study demonstrated a substantial radiological and clinical overlap between pulmonary tuberculosis and lung cancer. Post-tuberculous structural sequelae represented the predominant TB-related category within the cohort, while active tuberculosis was identified in a smaller subgroup of patients. Multiple thoracic imaging abnormalities commonly associated with malignancy were frequently encountered in both active and previous tuberculosis-related disease. Similar observations have been reported in previous studies showing important morphological and metabolic overlap between pulmonary tuberculosis and lung malignancy, particularly in patients presenting with cavitary lesions, fibrosis, pulmonary nodules, or consolidative changes [17,18,19].
Our analyses demonstrated significant associations between TB status and the majority of evaluated radiological variables. Among the radiological findings assessed using Pearson chi-square testing, nodular lesions or metastatic dissemination (p = 0.576), emphysematous or chronic obstructive changes (p = 0.71), and pulmonary tumor or expansive masses (p = 0.30) did not show statistically significant differences across TB-status groups, indicating that these findings were broadly distributed across the cohort regardless of tuberculosis history.
The multinomial logistic regression model included only variables that were structurally independent of the TB-status classification criteria.
Smoking exposure was common across all tuberculosis and cancer-stage categories. Dyspnea, chronic cough, expectoration, thoracic pain, and constitutional symptoms were frequently encountered regardless of TB status. Overlapping respiratory symptom profiles have previously been described in patients with pulmonary TB and LC [20].
Previous imaging-based studies also reported that chronic structural pulmonary damage and inflammatory changes may obscure or delay recognition of malignant disease, particularly in regions with elevated tuberculosis burden [21,22,23].
In the current cohort, pleural involvement demonstrated a statistically significant association with TB status (χ2 = 11.075, p = 0.004, Cramér’s V = 0.134) and was independently associated with post-TB sequelae in the multivariable model (OR = 2.39, 95% CI 1.20–4.74, p = 0.013). It is important to emphasize that distinguishing a TB-related pleural effusion from a malignant effusion on imaging alone is diagnostically challenging, as both can present as unilateral exudates with overlapping radiological features, and histological or microbiological confirmation is often required for definitive characterization.
Patients with simultaneous active tuberculosis and lung cancer face compounded clinical challenges: diagnostic delays attributable to symptom overlap (hemoptysis, weight loss, respiratory symptoms), potential drug–drug interactions between anti-tuberculous agents and chemotherapy or targeted therapies, immunosuppression, and reduced performance status. Published evidence suggests shorter overall survival in patients with concurrent TB and lung cancer compared with lung cancer alone. In the current cohort, patients in the active TB group exhibited the highest rates of smoking history (88.2%), obstructive spirometric dysfunction (60.8%), and dyspnea (82.4%), consistent with a clinically more complex disease profile. In the multivariable model, male sex (OR = 18.52, 95% CI 6.67–50.00, p < 0.001) and smoking status (OR = 12.05, 95% CI 3.24–45.45, p < 0.001) were the strongest independent predictors of active TB classification. Survival data were not collected in this retrospective study. The heterogeneous radiological patterns identified in our cohort further support the need for integrated diagnostic approaches that combine imaging interpretation with clinical, functional, microbiological, and molecular evaluation [24,25].
The events-per-variable ratio of approximately 3.9 for the active TB outcome group (n = 51) falls below the widely recommended threshold of 10 required for stable logistic regression parameter estimates.
Several limitations of the present study should be acknowledged. The relatively high prevalence of post-tuberculous structural abnormalities reflects the characteristics of the study population. The patients originated from a tertiary referral pulmonology and pneumophysiology center.
The classification of post-tuberculous sequelae was based on characteristic structural imaging abnormalities interpreted together with compatible clinical history and available prior medical documentation. However, due to the retrospective design and incomplete historical microbiological records, systematic confirmation of previous tuberculosis could not be obtained in all patients included in the post-TB category.
The relatively small active TB subgroup (n = 51) relative to the number of predictors in the regression model raises concerns about overfitting; the model should be considered exploratory and validated in an independent cohort before being used for prediction.
Body mass index was not systematically available due to incomplete anthropometric documentation in the retrospective records and could not be included in the analyses.
Additionally, a subset of patients (n = 20 inconclusive/pending biopsy; n = 6 non-malignant; n = 25 atypical/suspicious cytology) lacked definitive histopathological confirmation of malignancy. These cases were included based on multidisciplinary clinical and radiological consensus at a tertiary referral center. This may introduce a degree of diagnostic uncertainty and should be considered when interpreting the results.
A systematic count of patients in the post-TB group with versus without prior microbiological confirmation of tuberculosis could not be obtained from retrospective records; future prospective studies should address this through standardized microbiological documentation protocols.
Finally, isolated emphysematous changes, smoking-related fibrosis, nonspecific chronic interstitial abnormalities, or COPD-associated structural alterations were not independently classified as post-tuberculous sequelae unless they were associated with imaging patterns considered characteristic of previous tuberculosis.
5. Conclusions
This study highlights the substantial radiological and clinical overlap between tuberculosis-related pulmonary abnormalities and lung cancer. Post-tuberculosis sequelae were frequent in this cohort, while active tuberculosis was less common but strongly associated with inflammatory, cavitary, and destructive imaging patterns. Chronic fibrotic, interstitial, and bronchial changes were the most characteristic findings in patients with previous tuberculosis, reflecting persistent structural lung damage that may complicate the interpretation of thoracic imaging in oncological settings.
We believe that tuberculosis status should be considered when evaluating patients with lung cancer, particularly in regions where tuberculosis remains prevalent or where post-tuberculosis lung disease is common. Cavitary lesions, pulmonary opacities, mediastinal or hilar adenopathy, and fibrotic abnormalities may mimic tumor progression, obscure malignant lesions, or contribute to diagnostic uncertainty. Therefore, careful correlation between imaging findings, clinical history, microbiological data, histopathology, and functional respiratory assessment is essential.
Future prospective studies using standardized imaging protocols, microbiological confirmation, and longitudinal follow-up are needed to clarify the impact of tuberculosis-related changes on lung cancer staging, treatment decisions, and patient outcomes.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, C.C.; methodology, C.C.; investigation, C.C.; writing—original draft preparation, C.C. and O.C.A. and writing—review and editing, C.C., N.D., C.T., S.B., I.A.A., M.P., G.F. and O.C.A.; visualization, O.C.A.; supervision, O.C.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Clinical Pneumophtisiology Hospital, Constanța, Romania (Approval No. 473, 11 February 2020). The ethics approval remained valid throughout the study period (2023–2024).
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Data Availability Statement
Data is available on request to the corresponding author.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Funding Statement
This research received no external funding.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.Zhou W., Lu H., Lin J., Zhu J., Liang J., Xie Y., Hu J., Su N. Coexisting Lung Cancer and Pulmonary Tuberculosis: A Comprehensive Review from Incidence to Management. Cancer Rep. 2025;8:e70213. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.70213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Chauhan P., Pandey P., Ramniwas S., Khan F., Maqsood R. Deciphering the Correlation between the Emergence of Lung Carcinoma Associated with Tuberculosis-related Inflammation. Endocr. Metab. Immune Disord. Drug Targets. 2025;25:291–299. doi: 10.2174/0118715303301146240522095638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Akçiçek E., Durhan G., Düzgün S.A., Kurtulan O., Akpınar M.G., Demirkazık F., Arıyürek O.M. Non-metastatic causes of multiple pulmonary nodules. Insights Imaging. 2024;15:288. doi: 10.1186/s13244-024-01856-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Nunes A.G., Rodrigues M.C., Carneiro C., Costa A.C. Pulmonary cavitary lesions: A captivating visual review. J. Thorac. Dis. 2025;17:6296–6308. doi: 10.21037/jtd-2025-235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lal N.R., Agarwal G.R., Boruah D.K. Role of Multidetector Computed Tomography in Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Cavitary Lung Lesions with a Histopathological Correlation: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study. Cureus. 2023;15:e43005. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wetscherek M.T.A., Sadler T.J., Lee J.Y.J., Karia S., Babar J.L. Active pulmonary tuberculosis: Something old, something new, something borrowed, something blue. Insights Imaging. 2022;13:3. doi: 10.1186/s13244-021-01138-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Nathani A., Dincer H.E. Advancements in Imaging Technologies for the Diagnosis of Lung Cancer and Other Pulmonary Diseases. Diagnostics. 2025;15:826. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15070826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Luo Y., Li J., Ma W., Tian X., Huang L., Yuping H., Zhang K., Xie Y., Cui Z., Feng J., et al. Differential diagnosis of lung cancer and tuberculosis based on 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT multi-time points imaging. Nucl. Med. Commun. 2023;44:732–740. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000001714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ion-Andrei D.G., Mocanu E., Chirila S., Muntean C., Seicaru L., Dantes E. Diagnostic sensitivity: Surgical biopsy versus minimally invasive techniques in bronchopulmonary cancer. Rev. Esp. Patol. 2026;59:100860. doi: 10.1016/j.patol.2026.100860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ward B., Koziar Vašáková M., Robalo Cordeiro C., Yorgancioğlu A., Chorostowska-Wynimko J., Blum T.G., Kauczor H.U., Samarzija M., Henschke C., Wheelock C., et al. Important steps towards a big change for lung health: A joint approach by the European Respiratory Society, the European Society of Radiology and their partners to facilitate implementation of the European Union’s new recommendations on lung cancer screening. ERJ Open Res. 2023;9:00026–02023. doi: 10.1183/23120541.00026-2023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Fang C., He X., Tang F., Wang Z., Pan C., Zhang Q., Wu J., Wang Q., Liu D., Zhang Y. Where lung cancer and tuberculosis intersect: Recent advances. Front. Immunol. 2025;16:1561719. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1561719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Snoeckx A., Franck C., Silva M., Prokop M., Schaefer-Prokop C., Revel M.P. The radiologist’s role in lung cancer screening. Transl. Lung Cancer Res. 2021;10:2356–2367. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-20-924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Grenier P.A., Brun A.L., Mellot F. The Potential Role of Artificial Intelligence in Lung Cancer Screening Using Low-Dose Computed Tomography. Diagnostics. 2022;12:2435. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12102435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hwang E.J., Goo J.M., Kim H.Y., Yoon S.H., Jin G.Y., Yi J., Kim Y. Variability in interpretation of low-dose chest CT using computerized assessment in a nationwide lung cancer screening program: Comparison of prospective reading at individual institutions and retrospective central reading. Eur. Radiol. 2021;31:2845–2855. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07424-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dziadziuszko K., Szurowska E. Pulmonary nodule radiological diagnostic algorithm in lung cancer screening. Transl. Lung Cancer Res. 2021;10:1124–1135. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-20-755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ion-Andrei D.-G., Gache A.-C., Mocanu E., Postu A.-C., Lupșă S.-A., Mocanu L., Muntean C., Dantes E. Prognostic Value of Routine Hematological Markers and ECOG Performance in Predicting Overall Survival in Lung Cancer—A Retrospective Cohort Study and Literature Review. J. Clin. Med. 2025;14:7603. doi: 10.3390/jcm14217603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Li Q., Li Y., Yuan H., Yang F., Huang Y., Song X., Jiang L. PET morphology helps distinguish solitary and solid pulmonary tuberculosis from non-small cell lung cancer. Jpn. J. Radiol. 2023;41:312–321. doi: 10.1007/s11604-022-01351-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Tang W., Xing W., Li C., Nie Z., Cai M. Differences in CT imaging signs between patients with tuberculosis and those with tuberculosis and concurrent lung cancer. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2022;14:6234–6242. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zhang K., Qi S., Cai J., Zhao D., Yu T., Yue Y., Yao Y., Qian W. Content-based image retrieval with a Convolutional Siamese Neural Network: Distinguishing lung cancer and tuberculosis in CT images. Comput. Biol. Med. 2022;140:105096. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.105096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gao X., Tan H., Zhu M., Zhang G., Cao Y. Construction and validation of a clinical differentiation model between peripheral lung cancer and solitary pulmonary tuberculosis. Lung Cancer. 2024;193:107851. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Huang W., Cao M., Wu Y., Zhang Y., An S., Pan X., Zhou X., Shao H., Guan Y., Huang G., et al. Immuno-PET/CT Imaging of Trop2 with [18F]AlF-RESCA-T4 Differentiates Lung Cancer from Inflammation. J. Nucl. Med. 2024;65:1904–1910. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.124.268751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.van der Veen E.L., Suurs F.V., Cleeren F., Bormans G., Elsinga P.H., Hospers G.A.P., Lub-de Hooge M.N., de Vries E.G.E., de Vries E.F.J., Antunes I.F. Development and Evaluation of Interleukin-2-Derived Radiotracers for PET Imaging of T Cells in Mice. J. Nucl. Med. 2020;61:1355–1360. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.119.238782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Tian R., Kong J., He Y., Xu G., Chen T., Han J. Radiosynthesis and preclinical evaluations of [18F]AlF-RESCA-5F7 as a novel molecular probe for HER2 tumor imaging. Am. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2024;14:175–181. doi: 10.62347/BVPK1360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Du D., Gu J., Chen X., Lv W., Feng Q., Rahmim A., Wu H., Lu L. Integration of PET/CT Radiomics and Semantic Features for Differentiation between Active Pulmonary Tuberculosis and Lung Cancer. Mol. Imaging Biol. 2021;23:287–298. doi: 10.1007/s11307-020-01550-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zheng W., Quan B., Gao G., Zhang P., Huang L. Combination of Circulating Cell-Free DNA and Positron Emission Tomography to Distinguish Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer from Tuberculosis. Lab. Med. 2023;54:130–141. doi: 10.1093/labmed/lmac085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data is available on request to the corresponding author.





