Skip to main content
Frontiers in Oncology logoLink to Frontiers in Oncology
. 2026 Jun 30;16:1679309. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2026.1679309

Long term survival of patients with alpha-fetoprotein-positive hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the gallbladder: a case report and literature review

Fangzhou Wang 1, Xiang Gao 1, Wei Gao 2, Jie Cai 3, Yamin Zheng 1,*
PMCID: PMC13364591  PMID: 42453884

Abstract

Hepatoid adenocarcinoma (HAC) of the gallbladder is an exceedingly rare and highly aggressive variant of gallbladder carcinoma that is frequently associated with alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) production and typically has a poor prognosis. We report a 66-year-old male with a two-week history of right upper abdominal pain. Imaging revealed a hypermetabolic mass at the gallbladder fundus, accompanied by a significantly elevated serum AFP concentration of 1210.00 ng/mL. Histopathological and immunohistochemical analyses confirmed a diagnosis of AFP-positive HAC. Notably, next-generation sequencing (NGS) revealed a TP53 mutation and EGFR copy number amplification, providing insights into the molecular landscape of this rare tumour. The patient underwent radical resection, including cholecystectomy and wedge hepatectomy. To target the hepatoid biological features of the tumour, adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with epirubicin was administered one month after surgery. Following this combined approach, the patient’s serum AFP concentration normalized. As of January 2025, the patient has achieved a 68-month recurrence-free survival. This case highlights that aggressive surgical intervention combined with adjunctive TACE may significantly improve long-term outcomes in patients with AFP-positive gallbladder HAC.

Keywords: AFP, case report, gallbladder, gallbladder carcinoma, hepatoid adenocarcinoma

Introduction

Gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) is a prevalent malignancy of the biliary tract with a poor prognosis and low overall survival rates. Approximately 90% of GBCs are histologically classified as adenocarcinomas. AFP-producing gallbladder carcinoma is a rare subtype of which is identified as HAC. Elevated AFP is a hallmark of both HAC and clear cell carcinoma, both of which are extremely rare. The former usually consists of large polygonal cells resembling hepatocellular carcinomas, whereas the latter presents with well-differentiated papillary or tubular structures lacking hepatoid features. Occasionally, a combination of both variants is observed.

Historical milestones include Ikeda’s 1992 report of a moderately differentiated AFP-positive gallbladder adenocarcinoma (1), followed by Watanabe’s 1993 description of the first case, exhibiting both elevated AFP and hepatoid differentiation (2). Vardaman subsequently provided the first detailed characterization of gallbladder HAC in 1995 (3). Given the rarity, complex histology, and typically poor outcomes of AFP-producing GBC, we present a case of AFP-positive gallbladder HAC with exceptional long-term survival, along with a comprehensive review of the literature.

Case presentation

In November 2020, a 66-year-old male with a 30-year history of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection presented with right upper abdominal pain for two weeks’ duration. Physical examination on admission was unremarkable, with no palpable abdominal masses, tenderness, or jaundice. Laboratory evaluations revealed a significantly elevated serum AFP concentration of 1210.00 ng/ml, whereas carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), CA72-4, and CA19–9 levels were within normal limits. Preoperative imaging, including ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT), revealed a 4.3 × 3.1 cm hypermetabolic, polypoid mass at the gallbladder fundus (SUVmax: 5.24). On MRI, the lesion was round, showing a slightly low signal on T1-weighted images and a slightly high signal on T2-weighted images (Figure 1). No lymphadenopathy or distant metastasis was detected. The patient underwent radical resection of the gallbladder carcinoma on November 13, 2020 (Figure 2).

Figure 1.

Panel A shows an axial MRI scan of the abdomen without obvious abnormalities. Panel B is an axial MRI scan with an arrow indicating a mass in the left kidney. Panel C displays a diffusion-weighted MRI in the same plane, with an arrow highlighting the same left kidney lesion. Panel D is a coronal MRI scan, with an arrow marking the lesion in the left kidney.

Representative MR findings of the hepatoid adenocarcinoma. (A) Axial MR image showing a round abnormal signal at the gallbladder fundus. (B, D) Axial and coronal contrast-enhanced MRI in the arterial phase showing early enhancement of the mass (white arrows), mimicking the hemodynamic pattern of hepatocellular carcinoma. (C) Diffusion-weighted image showing restricted diffusion, reflecting the aggressive nature of the lesion.

Figure 2.

Panel A shows a surgical field with exposed liver and bile ducts isolated by colored loops, possibly during hepatic or biliary surgery with surgical instruments and gauze present. Panel B presents a cross-section of a liver specimen displaying the interior of the bile ducts, which appear dilated and contain greenish-yellow material suggestive of bile or infection.

Intraoperative surgical field and macroscopic specimen examination. (A) Intraoperative view during radical resection of gallbladder carcinoma, including cholecystectomy combined with wedge hepatectomy. Key anatomical structures are identified and protected using coloured vessel loops: hepatic artery (red), portal vein (blue), and common bile duct (yellow). (B) Macroscopic appearance of the resected gallbladder. Longitudinal section revealing a firm, grayish-white and yellowish polypoid mass (arrow) within the gallbladder lumen.

Histopathological analysis revealed a moderately differentiated gallbladder adenocarcinoma with papillary regions and focal intravascular tumour thrombi. Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining showed strong positivity for AFP, GPC-3, CK18, and CK19, as well as partial positivity for SALL-4, confirming the diagnosis of HAC. The Ki-67 index was 70%, while the Hep Par-1 and ARG-1 indices were negative (Figures 3, 4). NGS-based genomic profiling identified a TP53 p.P71Tfs52 mutation (9.96% abundance) and an increase in the number of EGFR copies (12.0% abundance). Other alterations included ABCB11 (p.E283, 3.07%), ARID1B (p.Q128_Q131del, 3.70%), CREBBP (p.L2087Q, 16.67%), DROSHA (p.P95L, 17.69%), and KCNJ5 (p.Q192*, 5.19%). The tumour mutational burden was low (4.47 Muts/Mb), and the microsatellite status was stable.

Figure 3.

Panel A shows a low-magnification histology slide of glandular tissue with irregular, densely packed structures. Panel B presents a higher magnification of similar glandular formations. Panel C displays clusters of small, round cells within glandular arrangements. Panel D offers a close-up of densely populated epithelial cells forming circular gland-like structures.

Histopathological characteristics of gallbladder hepatoid adenocarcinoma. (A) Low-magnification (×40) hematoxylin and eosin staining showing the overall nested and trabecular architecture of the tumour mass. (B) Representative section (×100) demonstrating regions of intraepithelial neoplasia within the gallbladder mucosa. (C, D) High-magnification views highlighting characteristic hepatoid differentiation: large polygonal tumour cells (arrows) exhibiting centralized nuclei, prominent nucleoli, and abundant eosinophilic, glycogen-rich cytoplasm.

Figure 4.

Twelve-panel histological figure with immunohistochemical staining of tissue sections arranged from panels A to L. Panels A and B show strong brown staining throughout the tissue, while most other panels display lighter or minimal staining, except panels I and J, which have moderate patchy brown staining. Each panel displays tissue patterns and staining intensity variations for comparison.

Immunohistochemical staining profile of the gallbladder tumor. Representative microscopic images are presented in pairs, with low-magnification (× 25) images in the left columns and high-magnification (× 40) images in the right columns. (A, B) Strong cytoplasmic positivity for AFP within the hepatoid components. (C, D) Partial nuclear positivity for SALL-4. (E, F) Immunostaining for CK7. (G, H) Negative expression of ARG-1. (I, J) Significant cytoplasmic and membranous positivity for GPC-3. (K, L) Negative staining for Hep Par-1.

Postoperatively, the patient’s serum AFP concertation decreased steadily to 822.60 ng/mL (Day 4), 435.00 ng/mL (Day 11), and 17.00 ng/mL (Day 39). One month after surgery, the patient received adjuvant TACE (30 mg epirubicin), targeting the tumour’s hepatoid biological features. During the 68-month follow-up period, the patient remained free of recurrence or metastasis. As of January 2025, his serum AFP concentration remained stable at 1.74 ng/mL.

Discussion

Gallbladder HAC is a rare and aggressive histological subtype that mimics HCC morphologically and immunophenotypically. This case is particularly significant because of the patient’s 68-month survival, which far exceeds the typical prognosis reported in the literature (4).

AFP-producing GBCs are heterogeneous. While HAC is the most distinct subtype, defined by a trabecular architecture and abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm, AFP production can also occur in conventional adenocarcinomas or mucinous carcinomas (5, 6). As summarized in Table 1 (4–14), our literature review includes patients with either elevated serum AFP levels or hepatoid morphology, regardless of their IHC AFP status. These findings suggests that AFP expression may reflect aberrant differentiation pathways or oncofetal protein reactivation, rather than a strict lineage. In this case, the combination of high serum concentration (1210.00 ng/mL) and positive results on IHC staining for AFP, GPC-3, and SALL-4 provided a definitive diagnosis.

Table 1.

Clinicopathological characteristics of AFP-producing gallbladder carcinoma.

Year Sex/Age symptoms Imaging findings Tumor markers Microscopic appearance Immuno-histochemistry Outcome Survival
(months)
Ref.
2000 Male/77 Fatigue, fever, loss of appetite and weight Gallbladder mass and metastases in liver segments IVa and V AFP: 3.5 ng/ml; CEA: 0.8 ng/ml; Tumor cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm, enlarged nuclei and prominent nucleoli arranged in nests CK7, CK8 and CK18 positive. CK19, AFP, CEA and CA19–9 negative Alive 15 (7)
2004 Male/72 Abdominal pain Thickened gallbladder wall and liver metastases CA 19-9: 42.0 U/ml Tumor cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm, enlarged nuclei and prominent nucleoli arranged in trabeculae CK8, CK19 and HepPar-1 positive. CK17, AFP and CEA negative Dead 5 (5)
2005 Female/74 Incidental finding Gallbladder mass and gallstones Not reported Tumor cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm, enlarged nuclei and nucleoli arranged in trabeculae CK8, CK19, AFP, HepPar-1 positive. CK7 negative Not reported / (8)
2005 Female/74 Incidental finding Gallbladder mass Not reported Tumor cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm, enlarged nuclei and nucleoli arranged in trabeculae CK8, CK19, HepPar-1 and CD10 positive. CK7 and AFP negative Not reported / (8)
2005 Female/71 Abdominal pain Gallbladder mass and acute cholecystitis Not reported Polygonal tumor cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm, enlarged nuclei and prominent nucleoli arranged in trabeculae AFP, Victoria blue, Stein and PAS positive. Dead 1 (14)
2007 Female/76 Abdominal pain, fatigue, loss of appetite Thickened gallbladder wall Not reported Polygonal tumor cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm, enlarged nuclei and prominent nucleoli arranged in trabeculae HepPar-1, AFP and pCEA positive. CK7 negative Alive 8 (9)
2007 Female/55 Abdominal pain Gallbladder mass and liver metastases AFP: 511000 ng/ml; Hepatocyte-like adenostructures CK7, CK19, AFP, CD10 and CD56 positive. CK20 negative Not reported / (10)
2011 Male/61 Incidental finding Liver metastases after gallbladder surgery AFP: 967.5 ng/ml; Highly pleomorphic cells arranged in a rosettoid, nested, or trabecular pattern AFP positive, HepPar-1, CK7 and CK20 negative Dead 5 (11)
2015 Femalt/43 Abdominal pain Gallbladder bed with high signal intensity in the periphery of gall bladder AFP: 23500 ng/ml; Adjacent infiltrating neoplasm composed of polygonal cells arranged in papillae, sheets and trabecular pattern HepPar-1, AFP and CEA positive. CK7 and CK20 negative Dead 1 (12)
2018 Female/46 Abdominal pain Thickened gallbladder wall and liver metastases AFP: 4068 ng/ml; Well-differentiated adenocarcinoma with papillary configuration AFP, CK7, Hepatocyte positive, CK20 negative Not reported / (4)
2020 Male/61 Incidental finding A mass in gallbladder bed with enlarged hilar lymph nodes. CEA: 104.7 ng/ml, CA12-5 421.3U/ml, AFP: normal range. Poorly differentiated cells with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm. CK7 and HepPar-1 positive Alive 5 (13)
2022 Female/69 distention of the hypogastrium Soft tissue mass shadow in the neck of the gallbladder CEA, AFP, CA19–9 normal range cuboidal or polygonal with abundant eosinophilic granular hepatocyte-like neoplastic cells CK7, CK8, HarPar-1, GPC3 and Muc1 positive, AFP negative. Alive Not reported (6)

The genomic landscape of gallbladder HAC remains largely unexplored. The identification of a TP53 mutation and EGFR copy number amplification underscores the profound molecular complexity and aggressive nature of this subtype. As TP53 alterations are recognized as central drivers in the molecular carcinogenesis of various cancers, their presence in this case likely facilitated genomic instability and tumor progression (15). Concurrently, EGFR amplification indicates a potential therapeutic vulnerability (16); such findings suggest a theoretical pathway for targeted interventions in refractory cases where conventional gemcitabine-based regimens may fail. Beyond these primary drivers, the detection of specific mutations in ABCB11, ARID1B, and CREBBP provides further insight into the unique biology of tumours. The ABCB11 gene is critical for bile acid transport, and its mutation may be mechanistically linked to the aberrant differentiation of pluripotent endodermal stem cells into hepatoid-like lineages (17, 18). Furthermore, ARID1B and CREBBP function as essential epigenetic regulators; their involvement points to dysregulated chromatin remodelling, a hallmark of aggressive malignancies (19, 20). Although the tumour mutation burden was relatively low and PD-L1 expression was negative, these integrated genomic findings establish a preliminary molecular map for gallbladder HAC. Such data are vital for transitioning from empirical clinical practices towards future precision-medicine strategies tailored to the specific molecular signatures of this rare histological subtype.

The clinical presentation of gallbladder HAC is typically insidious and often indistinguishable from that of conventional GBC or benign biliary diseases (13). Patients frequently present with nonspecific symptoms such as right upper quadrant pain, jaundice, or nausea. However, the ectopic production of AFP may lead to paraneoplastic manifestations or elevated serum AFP levels, necessitating a differential diagnosis that includes metastatic HCC or germ cell tumours (5). The imaging features of HAC often overlap with those of primary GBC, which typically appear as heterogeneous, hypoechoic, or infiltrative masses. Notably, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and CT frequently reveal a characteristic “arterial hyperenhancement and rapid venous washout” pattern (7). This enhancement signature is analogous to that seen in HCC and reflects the tumour’s hypervascular, hepatoid nature (5, 21–23).

Definitive diagnosis of HAC relies on histopathology, characterized by the interweaving of conventional adenocarcinoma components and hepatoid differentiation zones. The latter feature polygonal cells arranged in a trabecular pattern with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm and prominent nucleoli (9). IHC staining is indispensable, with reported positive rates for AFP and CEA of approximately 70% – 83.3% and 86%, respectively (22, 23). Distinguishing primary gallbladder HAC from metastatic HCC is essential for guiding clinical management (11). While both exhibit similar morphology (21), HAC typically lacks the classic risk factors for HCC, such as cirrhosis (24). Pathologically, the presence of tubular or papillary adenocarcinoma structures is a hallmark of HAC, features that are typically absent in pure HCC. Consequently, the integration of clinical data, serum markers, and a comprehensive IHC profile remains the gold standard for achieving an accurate diagnosis and implementing personalized therapeutic strategies.

Owing to its rarity, the diagnosis of HAC is often delayed, and treatment remains largely empirical. A significant clinical challenge in managing HAC is the current lack of standardized adjuvant protocols. While systemic chemotherapy remains the standard for GBC, we opted for adjunctive TACE in this case. The rationale was based on the tumour’s hepatoid characteristics, including it’s IHC profile and an MRI enhancement pattern analogous to that of HCC. By targeting the hepatic arterial blood supply on which the hepatoid components likely rely, TACE may have effectively eliminated microscopic residual disease or intravascular tumour thrombi, thereby preventing early recurrence. As demonstrated in Table 1, the survival of previously reported patients is generally poor, with outcomes ranging from only 1 to 15 months, and many cases result in early death. In contrast, we attributed the patient’s exceptional 68-month survival to several factors. First, the achievement of R0 resection remains the cornerstone of treatment and the strongest predictor of favourable outcomes (5, 12, 13). Second, the tumour exhibited a low mutation burden and microsatellite stability, which may reflect a more genomically stable phenotype than that of other highly aggressive GBCs. Finally, the strategic integration of TACE likely provided a synergistic effect by addressing the specific hepatocellular-like biology of the tumour cells, which may have been less responsive to traditional biliary-type chemotherapy (6, 25).

Conclusions

This case demonstrates that a multimodal approach, involving radical surgery followed by TACE tailored to hepatoid features, can achieve long-term survival in patients with AFP-producing gallbladder HAC. Future molecular studies are essential to refine these empirical strategies into precision medicine.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.

Footnotes

Edited by: Zhaofeng Liang, Jiangsu University, China

Reviewed by: Anastasios Karayiannakis, Democritus University of Thrace, Greece

Cong Ning, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (CAMS), China

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by Ethics Committee of Xuanwu Hospital (approval ID: LYS[2021]070). The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author contributions

FW: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft. XG: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. WG: Data curation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. JC: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. YZ: Funding acquisition, Project administration, Writing – review & editing.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2026.1679309/full#supplementary-material

DataSheet1.docx (1.8MB, docx)

References

  • 1. Ikeda M, Okada S, Morozumi A, Fujino MA, Matsumoto Y. Alpha-fetoprotein producing carcinoma of the gallbladder associated with anomalous arrangement of the pancreaticobiliary ductal system--early detection through an attack of acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterol Jpn. (1992) 27:669–73. doi:  10.1007/bf02774984 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Watanabe M, Hori Y, Nojima T, Kato H, Taketa K, Isogawa S, et al. Alpha-fetoprotein-producing carcinoma of the gallbladder. Dig Dis Sci. (1993) 38:561–4. doi:  10.1007/BF01316515 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Vardaman C, Albores-Saavedra J. Clear cell carcinomas of the gallbladder and extrahepatic bile ducts. Am J Surg Pathol. (1995) 19:91–9. doi:  10.1097/00000478-199501000-00011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Akturk G, Sagol O, Unek T, Ozbilgin M, Egeli T, Karademir S, et al. Alpha-fetoprotein-secreting gallbladder carcinoma: a case report. J Gastrointest Cancer. (2018) 49:528–31. doi:  10.1007/s12029-017-9950-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Sakamoto K, Monobe Y, Kouno M, Moriya T, Sasano H. Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the gallbladder: case report and review of the literature. Pathol Int. (2004) 54:52–6. doi:  10.1111/j.1440-1827.2004.01578.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Mita J, Tada K, Kuboyama Y, Iwaki K, Nakamura S, Fukuzawa K. Poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma with signet ring cells of the gallbladder producing a high level of alpha-fetoprotein: a case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. (2022) 101:107780. doi:  10.1016/j.ijscr.2022.107780 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Nakashima H, Nagafuchi K, Satoh H, Takeda K, Yamasaki T, Yonemasu H, et al. Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the gallbladder. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. (2000) 7:226–30. doi:  10.1007/s005340050181 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Sakamoto K, Kimura N, Tokumura H, Ogasawara T, Moriya T, Sasano H. Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the gallbladder. Histopathology. (2005) 47:649–51. doi:  10.1111/j.1365-2559.2005.02187.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Gakiopoulou H, Givalos N, Liapis G, Agrogiannis G, Patsouris E, Delladetsima I. Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the gallbladder. Dig Dis Sci. (2007) 52:3358–62. doi:  10.1007/s10620-007-9807-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. van den Bos IC, Hussain SM, Dwarkasing RS, Stoop H, Zondervan PE, Krestin GP, et al. Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the gallbladder: a mimicker of hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Radiol. (2007) 80:e317-20. doi:  10.1259/bjr/97773297 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Lee JH, Lee KG, Paik SS, Park HK, Lee KS. Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the gallbladder with production of alpha-fetoprotein. J Korean Surg Soc. (2011) 80:440–4. doi:  10.4174/jkss.2011.80.6.440 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Devi NR, Sathyalakshmi R, Devi J, Lilly SM. Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the gall bladder-a rare variant. J Clin Diagn Res. (2015) 9:ED09-10. doi:  10.7860/JCDR/2015/10799.6324 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Qian X, Zhou D, Gao B, Wang W. An alpha-fetoprotein-negative hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the gallbladder with squamous differentiation. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. (2020) 9:116–8. doi:  10.21037/hbsn.2019.12.03 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Koswara T, Marwoto W, Siregar NC, Gumay S, Azis H, Abdullah M, et al. Hepatoid carcinoma of the gallbladder. Acta Med Indones. (2007) 39:179–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Montal R, Sia D, Montironi C, Leow WQ, Esteban-Fabro R, Pinyol R, et al. Molecular classification and therapeutic targets in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatol. (2020) 73:315–27. doi:  10.1016/j.jhep.2020.03.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Kim Y, Jee S, Kim H, Paik SS, Choi D, Yoo SH, et al. EGFR, HER2, and MET gene amplification and protein expression profiles in biliary tract cancer and their prognostic significance. Oncologist. (2024) 29:e1051-e60. doi:  10.1093/oncolo/oyae076 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Strautnieks SS, Byrne JA, Pawlikowska L, Cebecauerova D, Rayner A, Dutton L, et al. Severe bile salt export pump deficiency: 82 different ABCB11 mutations in 109 families. Gastroenterology. (2008) 134:1203–14. doi:  10.1053/j.gastro.2008.01.038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. van Wessel DBE, Thompson RJ, Gonzales E, Jankowska I, Sokal E, Grammatikopoulos T, et al. Genotype correlates with the natural history of severe bile salt export pump deficiency. J Hepatol. (2020) 73:84–93. doi:  10.1016/j.jhep.2020.02.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Ishii S, Kakizuka T, Park SJ, Tagawa A, Sanbo C, Tanabe H, et al. Genome-wide ATAC-see screening identifies TFDP1 as a modulator of global chromatin accessibility. Nat Genet. (2024) 56:473–82. doi:  10.1038/s41588-024-01658-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Odnokoz O, Banerjee A, Cui X, Zeng L, Uddin A, Li C, et al. Disruption of ARID1B recruitment to the nuclear pore complex as a new anticancer therapeutic strategy. Adv Sci (Weinh). (2025) 12:e15585. doi:  10.1002/advs.202415585 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Ji X, Dong H, Dong A. FDG PET/CT of hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the gallbladder. Clin Nucl Med. (2020) 45:927–8. doi:  10.1097/RLU.0000000000003259 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Su JS, Chen YT, Wang RC, Wu CY, Lee SW, Lee TY. Clinicopathological characteristics in the differential diagnosis of hepatoid adenocarcinoma: a literature review. World J Gastroenterol. (2013) 19:321–7. doi:  10.3748/wjg.v19.i3.321 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Metzgeroth G, Strobel P, Baumbusch T, Reiter A, Hastka J. Hepatoid adenocarcinoma - review of the literature illustrated by a rare case originating in the peritoneal cavity. Onkologie. (2010) 33:263–9. doi:  10.1159/000305717 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. El-Serag HB, Rudolph KL. Hepatocellular carcinoma: epidemiology and molecular carcinogenesis. Gastroenterology. (2007) 132:2557–76. doi:  10.1053/j.gastro.2007.04.061 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Weng H, Zeng P, Chen Y, Xu Q, Ying J. An active trend of immunotherapy combination regimen as second-line therapy towards advanced biliary tract cancer. Clin Med Insights Oncol. (2024) 18:11795549241272469. doi:  10.1177/11795549241272469 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

DataSheet1.docx (1.8MB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.


Articles from Frontiers in Oncology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES