Skip to main content
NCBI home page
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal logoLink to CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal
. 1992 Nov 15;147(10):1437–1439.

The Canadian National Breast Screening Study: a clinician's perspective.

A A Starreveld
PMCID: PMC1336540  PMID: 1423084

Full text

PDF
1437

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baines C. J., McFarlane D. V., Miller A. B. The role of the reference radiologist. Estimates of inter-observer agreement and potential delay in cancer detection in the national breast screening study. Invest Radiol. 1990 Sep;25(9):971–976. doi: 10.1097/00004424-199009000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baines C. J., McFarlane D. V., Wall C. Audit procedures in the National Breast Screening Study: mammography interpretation. Can Assoc Radiol J. 1986 Dec;37(4):256–260. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baines C. J., Miller A. B., Bassett A. A. Physical examination. Its role as a single screening modality in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. Cancer. 1989 May 1;63(9):1816–1822. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19900501)63:9<1816::aid-cncr2820630926>3.0.co;2-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baines C. J., Miller A. B., Kopans D. B., Moskowitz M., Sanders D. E., Sickles E. A., To T., Wall C. Canadian National Breast Screening Study: assessment of technical quality by external review. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990 Oct;155(4):743–749. doi: 10.2214/ajr.155.4.2119103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Baines C. J., Miller A. B., Wall C., McFarlane D. V., Simor I. S., Jong R., Shapiro B. J., Audet L., Petitclerc M., Ouimet-Oliva D. Sensitivity and specificity of first screen mammography in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: a preliminary report from five centers. Radiology. 1986 Aug;160(2):295–298. doi: 10.1148/radiology.160.2.3523590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Baker L. H. Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project: five-year summary report. CA Cancer J Clin. 1982 Jul-Aug;32(4):194–225. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.32.4.194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Breast screening in women under 50. Lancet. 1991 Jul 13;338(8759):113–114. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Charlson M. E., Feinstein A. R. The auxometric dimension. A new method for using rate of growth in prognostic staging of breast cancer. JAMA. 1974 Apr 8;228(2):180–185. doi: 10.1001/jama.228.2.180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Frierson H. F., Jr Ploidy analysis and S-phase fraction determination by flow cytometry of invasive adenocarcinomas of the breast. Am J Surg Pathol. 1991 Apr;15(4):358–367. doi: 10.1097/00000478-199104000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. GERSHON-COHEN J., BERGER S. M., KLICKSTEIN H. S. ROENTGENOGRAPHY OF BREAST CANCER MODERATING CONCEPT OF "BIOLOGIC PREDETERMINISM". Cancer. 1963 Aug;16:961–964. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(196308)16:8<961::aid-cncr2820160802>3.0.co;2-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gail M. H., Brinton L. A., Byar D. P., Corle D. K., Green S. B., Schairer C., Mulvihill J. J. Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1989 Dec 20;81(24):1879–1886. doi: 10.1093/jnci/81.24.1879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kopans D. B. Breast screening in women under 50. Lancet. 1991 Aug 17;338(8764):447–447. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)91071-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kuroishi T., Tominaga S., Morimoto T., Tashiro H., Itoh S., Watanabe H., Fukuda M., Ota J., Horino T., Ishida T. Tumor growth rate and prognosis of breast cancer mainly detected by mass screening. Jpn J Cancer Res. 1990 May;81(5):454–462. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.1990.tb02591.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kusama S., Spratt J. S., Jr, Donegan W. L., Watson F. R., Cunningham C. The cross rates of growth of human mammary carcinoma. Cancer. 1972 Aug;30(2):594–599. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197208)30:2<594::aid-cncr2820300241>3.0.co;2-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Miller A. B., Baines C. J., Turnbull C. The role of the nurse-examiner in the National Breast Screening Study. Can J Public Health. 1991 May-Jun;82(3):162–167. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Miller A. B., Howe G. R., Wall C. The National Study of Breast Cancer Screening Protocol for a Canadian Randomized Controlled trial of screening for breast cancer in women. Clin Invest Med. 1981;4(3-4):227–258. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Moskowitz M. Guidelines for screening for breast cancer. Is a revision in order? Radiol Clin North Am. 1992 Jan;30(1):221–233. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Pearlman A. W. Breast cancer--influence of growth rate on prognosis and treatment evaluation: a study based on mastectomy scar recurrences. Cancer. 1976 Oct;38(4):1826–1833. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197610)38:4<1826::aid-cncr2820380460>3.0.co;2-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Tabàr L., Fagerberg G., Duffy S. W., Day N. E., Gad A., Gröntoft O. Update of the Swedish two-county program of mammographic screening for breast cancer. Radiol Clin North Am. 1992 Jan;30(1):187–210. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Tabár L., Fagerberg G., Day N. E., Duffy S. W., Kitchin R. M. Breast cancer treatment and natural history: new insights from results of screening. Lancet. 1992 Feb 15;339(8790):412–414. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)90090-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Tubiana M., Koscielny S. Natural history of human breast cancer: recent data and clinical implications. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1991 Aug;18(3):125–140. doi: 10.1007/BF01990028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association

RESOURCES