Abstract
T-cell–based immunotherapies have revolutionized cancer treatment, yet their reliance on patient-derived T-cells limits scalability and accessibility. Engineering functional T-cells de novo from human hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) represents a promising alternative toward a renewable and customizable source of therapeutic lymphocytes. Successful HSC-derived T-cell generation requires recapitulation of key signaling and adhesion cues of the thymic microenvironment, particularly Notch1–DLL-4 and α4β1-integrin–VCAM-1 interactions within ex vivo engineered thymic niche (ETN) systems. Notch1-DLL-4 and α4β1-integrin-VCAM-1 interactions are known to respond to mechanical forces that regulate their bond dissociation behaviors and downstream signal transduction, yet manipulating the mechanosensitive features of these key receptor-ligand interactions in thymopoiesis has been largely ignored in current ETN designs. Here, we demonstrate that human T-cell development from cord blood-derived CD34+ HSCs is regulated via molecular cooperativity in notch1 and integrin-mediated mechanotransduction. Mechanically confining interpenetrating network (IPN) hydrogel-based 3D cell culture, comprised of collagen type I and alginate polysaccharides functionalized with DLL-4 and VCAM-1 is used as a model viscoelastic 3D ETN to manipulate human progenitor (pro)T-cell differentiation. This ETN enables orthogonal control of the mechanical properties of the thymic niche, including storage modulus, and viscoelastic properties (e.g., stress relaxation kinetics). We identify that soft, viscous matrices that enhance activation of the notch1-pathway, and subsequently notch1 intracellular domain (NICD) nuclear import, sustain the T-cell development gene regulatory network during proT-cell differentiation. Conversely, stiff, elastic matrices inhibit HSC commitment to the T-lineage, and rather promotes Myeloid-cell differentiation. Our observations indicate mechanical reciprocity in signaling pathways indispensable to thymopoiesis and highlight extracellular matrix mechanics as a variable in controlling hematopoietic stem cell fate decisions.
Keywords: α4β1-integrin, extracellular matrix, hematopoietic stem cell, mechanotransduction, notch1, progenitor T-cell, thymus, viscoelasticity
1 |. Introduction
T-cell engineering ex vivo from human hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) could provide an ′off-the-shelf′ source of therapeutic cells as an alternative to patient-derived T-cell products [1, 2]. HSC-derived T-cell engineering focuses on recapitulating indispensable features of thymopoiesis (e.g., notch1-signaling [3] and α4β1-integrin-mediated adhesion [4]) through either supportive stromal cell feeder-layers that ectopically express the notch1 ligand DLL-4 or 2D surface immobilized DLL-4 and VCAM-1 [2, 5, 6]. Synergy between the notch1-pathway and integrin-mediated adhesion via DLL-4 and VCAM-1 has been reported to enhance human progenitor (pro)T-cell differentiation, but how integrin-substrate adhesions support notch1-signaling in the context of thymopoiesis remains elusive [7]. Additionally, developing thymocytes interact with thymic epithelial cells within a mechanically confining nanoporous extracellular matrix (ECM) [8–10] that exhibits viscoelastic properties such as stress relaxation behavior [11, 12], but knowledge of the combinatorial effects of ECM mechanics (e.g., modulus, stress relaxation behavior, and the mechanical coupling of thymocytes to the ECM via integrin-ECM adhesions) on thymopoiesis is incomplete [13–16].
Notch1-DLL-4 bonds and integrin-substrate adhesions are mechanosensitive, responding to piconewton (pN)-level forces that tune ligand sensitivity and receptor-ligand mechanochemical equilibria [17–21]. Specifically, tensile load applied to the notch1-ligand bond permits proteolytic cleavage and release of the notch1 intracellular domain (NICD) transcription factor into the cytosol to translocate to the nucleus and act on downstream target genes (e.g., TCF7, Hes1, Deltex, Notch1) [18, 22]. Integrin-ligand bonds respond to the mechanical properties of their substrate to mediate cellular signals such as cell fate decisions [23–25], cytoskeletal organization [26, 27], and the nuclear import of mechanosensitive transcription factors [28–30]. Interestingly, substrate mechanics in concert with substrate-tethered notch1 ligands have been reported to impact cellular behavior and the differential expression of downstream notch1 target genes [13, 31, 32]. Despite these observations, the biomolecular mechanisms underlying the regulation of the notch1 pathway by substrate mechanics and its cooperation with actomyosin contractility (which enables integrins to pull against their ligands) remain poorly understood.
Here, we hypothesized that substrate mechanics may regulate human T-cell development from cord blood-derived CD34+ HSCs. Mechanically confining interpenetrating network (IPN) hydrogel-based 3D cell culture, comprised of collagen type I and alginate polysaccharides functionalized with DLL-4 and VCAM-1 is used as a model viscoelastic 3D engineered thymic niche (ETN) to manipulate human progenitor (pro)T-cell differentiation. This ETN permits decoupling of the mechanical features of the thymic niche, including storage modulus, and viscoelastic properties (e.g., stress relaxation kinetics). Through combinatorial small molecule inhibition of the notch1 pathway and actomyosin contraction, we identify that soft, viscous matrices enhance human proT-cell differentiation. Interestingly, stiff, elastic matrices inhibit HSC commitment to the T-lineage and rather promote Myeloid-cell differentiation. These observations indicate mechanical cooperation between notch1-signaling and integrin-substrate adhesions within the context of thymopoiesis, and highlight extracellular matrix mechanics as a variable in controlling hematopoietic stem cell fate decisions within their cellular niche. These findings may have utility for future in vitro models of thymopoiesis and therapeutic T-cell biomanufacturing strategies from stem cells.
2 |. Results
2.1 |. Thymus-Mimetic ECMs Decouple Modulus from Stress Relaxation Behavior and Ligand Density
To delineate the impacts of substrate mechanics on human proT-cell differentiation, we developed a 3D semisynthetic thymus-mimetic ECM (3D ETN) (Figure 1a), to allow the storage modulus to be varied independently of both stress relaxation kinetics and thymopoietic ligand density. 3D ETNs were synthesized from interpenetrating polymer networks (IPNs) of tetrazine (Tz)-modified alginates and collagen I fibers to investigate whether encapsulated cord blood-derived CD34+ human hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) responded to changes in storage modulus and stress relaxation behavior [33–35]. Alginate polysaccharides are bioinert to cells [36, 37] and dictate the storage modulus through the chelation of divalent calcium ions, while collagen I is a key matrix constituent of the thymus [8, 9, 13]. Alginate and collagen I concentrations were fixed (Table S1) to delineate solely the impacts of changes in storage modulus and stress relaxation behavior on human proT-cell differentiation solely. These gels do not exhibit alterations in soluble protein transport/matrix mesh size as physical properties are changed [24, 30]. The degree of ionic crosslinking in the alginate matrix controls the storage modulus of the 3D ETN (Figure 1c), independent of the stress relaxation behavior, which can be changed by reinforcing the alginate matrix with additional covalent crosslinks through the introduction of tetra-functional PEG crosslinkers terminated with Norbornene ‘click’ moieties (Nb) (Figure 1a,e). The collagen density is constant in these gels, and previous work has demonstrated similar collagen fibril assembly and distribution within the gels as the physical properties are varied [33]. Shear stress relaxation tests confirmed that the relaxation half-time of covalently crosslinked 3D ETNs was higher than that of purely ionically crosslinked 3D ETNs (Figure 1b,d). In line with the changes in relaxation half-time, the loss angle of covalently crosslinked 3D ETNs was lower than that of purely ionically crosslinked 3D ETNs (Figure 1e,f). Creep measurements confirmed these changes in both viscoelastic and viscoplastic properties, where purely ionically crosslinked 3D ETNs retained greater irreversible plastic strain than covalently crosslinked 3D ETNs (Figure 1g,h). The more ‘liquid-like’ 3D ETNs that exhibit faster stress relaxation kinetics are termed ‘viscous’, and the more ‘solid-like’ 3D ETNS that exhibit slower stress relaxation kinetics are termed ‘elastic’ (Figure 1a).
FIGURE 1 |.

Interpenetrating network collagen I-tetrazine-alginate hydrogels functionalized with DLL-4 and VCAM-1 enable orthogonal control over the viscoelastic properties of a 3D engineered thymic niche. (a) Schematic of physicochemical composition of viscous and elastic 3D ETNs. (b) Stress relaxation kinetics of viscous and elastic 3D ETNs at 15% fixed shear strain. (c) Storage modulus values for viscous and elastic 3D ETNs (n = 3); ns: no significance, Unpaired t test with Welch’s correction. (d) Loss modulus values for viscous and elastic 3D ETNs (n = 3); ns: no significance, Unpaired t test with Welch’s correction. (e) Characteristic time for 3D ETN matrices to relax 50% of the initial stress in response to fixed deformation (n = 3); *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, Unpaired t test with Welch’s correction and 95% confidence interval. (e, f) Loss angle measurements for 3D ETN matrices (n = 3); *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001, Unpaired t test with Welch’s correction and 95% confidence interval. (g) Irreversible plastic strain measurements for 3D ETN matrices (n = 3). (h) Creep behavior for viscous and elastic 3D ETNs and loss angle oscillatory time sweep kinetics for viscous vs. elastic 3D ETN matrices. Data is visualized as mean values ± SD.
Trans-cyclooctene (TCO)-modified thymopoietic ligands DLL-4 and VCAM-1 were directly ligated to the Tz-alginate backbone via an inverse-electron-demand Diels-Alder cycloaddition ‘click’ protein-polymer conjugate reaction to enable rapid and highly efficient ligand conjugation (Figure 1a) [38, 39]. The ligand concentrations of DLL-4 and VCAM-1 were kept constant in these studies with a stochiometric ratio of 5:1 DLL–4:VCAM-1, which has been previously demonstrated to promote human proT-cell differentiation (Table S1) [6, 7, 13]. Importantly, these fixed concentrations enable direct inference of how mechanical cues conveyed from the substrate impact notch1-DLL-4, integrin-VCAM-1/collagen I interactions, and downstream mechanotransduction in encapsulated CD34+ HSCs within the 3D ETN.
2.2 |. Thymic-ECM Mechanics Differentially Impacts HSC Lineage Commitment
The impact of 3D ETN substrate mechanics on HSC lineage fate decisions was next investigated. CD34+ HSCs were isolated from umbilical cord blood units procured from the Dana Farber Cancer Institute Pasquarello tissue bank and expanded in a serum-free chemically defined HSC expansion media (Figure 2a; Table S5) [40]. The differentiation potential of isolated CD34+ HSCs was confirmed by performing a colony-forming unit assay (Figure S1). CD34+ HSCs were capable of forming CFU-Es, BFU-Es, CFU-GMs, CFU-GEMMs, and CFU-Ms.
FIGURE 2 |.

Softer, viscous 3D engineered thymic niche matrices enhance progenitor T-cell differentiation whereas stiffer, elastic matrices promote Myeloid-cell differentiation. (a) proT-cell differentiation protocol in 3D ETN matrices of tunable physical properties. CD34+ cells were expanded (d-7-d0), encapsulated in matrices of varying viscoelasticity and stiffness (d0), and cultured in a chemically defined differentiation media (stage I media, d0–d7, stage II media, d7–d14). (b) Scheme of lineage fate decisions of CD34+ HSCs into either CD7+ proT-cells or CD33+ Myeloid cells. (c) Representative flow cytometry plots of CD7+CD5+ proT-cells as a function of 3D ETN matrix mechanics (d7 and d14). (d) Cell counts and frequencies of CD34−CD7+ and CD7+CD5+ proT-cells as a function of matrix mechanics (d7 and d14) (n = 3); Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc test and 95% confidence interval. (e) geometric mean fluorescent intensity (gMFI) of CD7 and CD33 on CD45+ cells and CD7-to-CD33 cell ratio as a function of matrix mechanics (d14) (n = 3); Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc test and 95% confidence interval. Data is visualized as mean values ± SD. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001, ns (no significance).
Expanded CD34+ HSCs were encapsulated in 3D ETNs of varying viscoelastic properties (soft-viscous, soft-elastic, stiff-viscous, and stiff-elastic) and cultured in serum-free, staged, human proT-cell differentiation media (stage I (d0–d7) and stage II (d7–d14)) (Figure 2a; Table S5). Encapsulated cells were subsequently phenotyped for human proT-cell markers and Myeloid-lineage markers by flow cytometry on day 7 and day 14 of culture to assess lineage fate decisions (Figure 2b). CD7 and CD5 were used to define pro-T cells since they are expressed during early intrathymic T-lineage commitment prior to TCRβ rearrangement. Softer and more viscous 3D ETN matrices were observed to enhance the emergence of CD7+CD5+ proT-cells compared to stiffer, more elastic matrices (Figure 2c). Stiffer and more elastic matrices abrogated the differentiation of CD34+ HSCs toward the T-lineage, whereas softer and more viscous matrices enhanced proT-cell differentiation abundance, increasing both the gross cell count and frequency of CD7+CD5+ proT-cells (Figure 2d). Cells cultured in soft-viscous 3D ETNs additionally had significantly higher expression of CD7 compared to stiffer and more elastic matrices, as indicated by the geometric mean fluorescent intensity (gMFI) (Figure 2e). Interestingly, despite having exogenous thymopoietic cues presented from both the matrix and the soluble media, CD34+ HSCs cultured in stiffer and more elastic matrices differentiated toward the myeloid lineage (Figure 2e). Analysis of CD33 gMFI and the ratio of CD7+ lymphoid cells to CD33+ myeloid cells further illustrated that CD34+ HSCs were significantly biased toward generating multipotent myeloid-committed progenitor cells when cultured in stiffer, elastic 3D ETNs (Figure 2e). These data indicate that stiff matrices are only poorly permissive in driving CD34−CD7+ and CD7+CD5+ proT-cell emergence, regardless of the stress relaxation behavior. In contrast, softer matrices are more permissive, and here the stress relaxation highly regulates the emergence of these cell populations.
Encapsulated CD34+ HSCs cultured in ligand-free hydrogels exhibited minimal CD7+CD5+ proT-cell differentiation across differing mechanical contexts (Figure S6), confirming that changes in gel mechanics alone were insufficient to drive T-lineage specification. In contrast, DLL-4/VCAM-1–functionalized soft-viscous and soft-elastic matrices markedly promoted proT-cell emergence by day 7, while stiff–elastic matrices supported lower frequencies of CD7+CD5+ cells. These results demonstrate that ligand presentation is necessary for proT induction and that matrix mechanics modulate, but do not substitute for, Notch and integrin signaling.
To visualize how matrix mechanics influence HSC behavior within 3D ETNs, we performed confocal imaging of encapsulated cells across soft–viscous, soft-elastic, stiff-viscous, and stiff–elastic conditions. Representative micrographs (Figure 3) confirm distinct morphological features emerging in the matrices as a function of matrix mechanics. To further assess lineage commitment and cytoskeletal organization in situ, we stained for an early proT-cell marker and actomyosin component. CD7 immunostaining (Figure 3) revealed a higher abundance of CD7+ progenitors in soft–viscous matrices, consistent with our flow cytometry analysis.
FIGURE 3 |.

In situ immunofluorescence staining of proT-cell markers and actomyosin organization within 3D ETNs. a) Brightfield imaging and actin (phalloidin), CD7 (green), and nuclei (blue) localization in (a) soft-viscous and soft-elastic 3D ETNs, and (b) in stiff-viscous and stiff-elastic 3D ETNs. Scale bar = 20 μm.
2.3 |. Notch1-Signaling and Actomyosin Contractility Enhance T-Lineage Commitment in Soft-Viscous Thymus-Mimetic ECMs
We next investigated whether the 3D ETNs are permissive of activating the notch1-signaling pathway at the gene expression level. Soluble notch1 ligands are incapable of activating the notch1 mechanotransduction module, as the receptor requires tensile loads in order to proteolytically release the NICD [6, 41, 42]. Expanded CD34+ HSCs were again encapsulated within ‘soft-viscous’ 3D ETNs and cultured in a serum-free, staged, human proT-cell differentiation media (Figure 4a; Table S5) to investigate if 3D ETNs are capable of initiating notch1-signaling and activating downstream notch1 target genes comprising the human T-cell development gene regulatory network (GRN) (Figure 4b) [43, 44]. The primary goal of this assay was to confirm that 3D ETNs are capable of activating notch1 signaling relative to baseline, with gene expression evaluated under soft-viscous conditions; future studies comparing stiffer, elastic cultures will further resolve how matrix mechanics modulate notch1 pathway activation and lineage fate decisions. Examination of key genes comprising the T-cell development GRN within cells after 72 h of culture within “soft-viscous” 3D ETNs compared to pre-encapsulated CD34+ HSCs revealed upregulation of downstream targets of NICD (TCF7, Hes1, Deltex, Notch1) (Figure 4c,d) [45]. In contrast, the myeloid-lineage transcription factor Pu.1 was downregulated, along with the HSC self-renewal gene E2a (Figure 4c,d) [46, 47]. Therefore, 3D ETNs permit activation of the notch1 pathway to initiate thymopoiesis through regulation of the T-cell development GRN.
FIGURE 4 |.

Notch1-signaling and actomyosin contractility synergize to promote progenitor T-cell differentiation. (a) Total RNA was isolated from expanded CD34+ HSCs on day 0 prior to 3D ETN encapsulation and from encapsulated cells in soft-viscous ETN matrices cultured in stage I proT-cell differentiation media on day 3. (b) NICD shuttles to the nucleus to sustain the T-cell development gene regulatory network comprising several feedback network motifs. (c) Gene expression of representative notch1 target genes (TCF7, Hes1, Deltex, Notch1), a Myeloid-lineage commitment gene (Pu.1), and an HSC self-renewal gene (E2a) (n = 3); *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ns (no significance), Unpaired t test with Welch’s correction and 95% confidence interval. (d) Log2(Fold change) in gene expression in cells that were encapsulated in soft-viscous matrices for 3 days relative to expanded CD34+ HSCs on day 0 (n = 3). (e) Representative flow cytometry plots of CD7+CD5+ proT-cells as a function of combinatorial small molecule inhibitor treatment (d7). (f) % cell viability as a function of combinatorial small molecule inhibitor treatments (d7) (n = 3); One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post-hoc test and 95% confidence interval. (g) Cell counts and frequencies of CD7+CD5+ proT-cells as a function of combinatorial small molecule inhibitor treatment (d7) (n = 3); One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post-hoc test (compared to No inhibitor treatment, 95% confidence interval. Data is visualized as mean values ± SD; ****p < 0.0001, ns (no significance).
As notch1-signaling and integrin-substrate adhesions have been demonstrated to synergize to enhance proT-cell differentiation, we sought to investigate the underlying biomolecular mechanisms underlying notch1/integrin mechanical cooperativity. Previous studies have suggested that actomyosin contractility may support notch1-signaling [48, 49]. The actin network senses the ECM across the cell membrane through integrin-ECM coupling, and actomyosin is postulated to enable receptor-mediated endocytosis and myosin-dependent tension to support the tensile load-dependent proteolytic activation of the notch1 pathway [18, 22, 48]. Additionally, the presence of actomyosin at the nuclear periphery and its co-localization with the linker of nucleoskeleton and cytoskeleton (LINC) complex protein Nesprin2 and apical actin caps suggests that actomyosin contraction may support the nucleocytoplasmic transport of NICD and other macromolecular cargoes important in sustaining the T-cell development GRN by increasing nuclear influx through deformation of the nuclear pore complex (NPC) [29, 48, 50, 51].
We therefore performed a combinatorial small molecule inhibition study targeting actomyosin contractility and critical molecular features of notch1-signaling on CD34+ HSCs encapsulated in ‘soft-viscous’ 3D ETN matrices (Table S3). Selective inhibitors targeting ADAM10-mediated notch1 cleavage (GI254023X (GI)) [52] and γ-secretase-mediated NICD release (DAPT) [43] were used in concert with an inhibitor targeting myosin II contractility (Blebbistatin (Blebb)) to delineate potential synergies between notch1 and integrin-mediated mechanotransduction. An inhibitor-dose response study on suspension culture CD34+ HSCs determined maximal working concentrations for each inhibitor (Figure S3; Table S3). Consistent with previous reports, GI and DAPT selectively inhibited proteolytic cleavage of the notch1 receptor while binding to DLL-4, significantly obstructing the emergence of CD7+CD5+ proT-cells (Figure 4e). Flow cytometry analysis revealed minimal cytotoxicity (≥ 95% cell viability) of small molecule inhibitor combinations on cells encapsulated in soft-viscous 3D ETNs (Figure 4f). Blebb decreased CD7+CD5+ proT-cell emergence, whereas combinations of Blebb and GI or DAPT significantly obstructed CD7+CD5+ proT-cell emergence (Figure 4e). Analysis of the gross cell count and frequency of CD7+CD5+ proT-cells after 7 days of culture in soft-viscous 3D ETNs further supported this observation, demonstrating significant knockdown of CD7+CD5+ proT-cell emergence when cells were treated with GI, DAPT, Blebb, GI + Blebb, and DAPT + Blebb (Figure 4g). Since GI and DAPT addition produced near-maximal inhibition, the addition of Blebb did not further reduce proT-cell frequencies to a statistically significant degree, making potential combinatorial effects difficult to resolve.
3 |. Discussion
Altogether, these experimental findings suggest that CD34+ HSC fate decisions within the thymic niche can be controlled through the mechanical manipulation of cell-matrix interface in a 3D ETN that physically presents DLL-4, and integrin binding motifs (VCAM-1 and collagen I) from the substrate. Soft-viscous matrices enhanced the emergence of CD7+CD5+ proT-cells from their hematopoietic precursors, whereas stiffer and more elastic matrices promoted HSC lineage commitment toward the myeloid lineage (Figure 2b–e). Matrix stiffness and stress relaxation both had effects on lineage biasing, but combined changes in stiffness and stress relaxation (e.g., soft-viscous vs. stiff-elastic) had the most striking effect. The impact of stiff, elastic substrates in the promotion of Myeloid cell generation and their downstream progeny has been previously established, though the underlying mechanisms driving HSC lineage fate decisions toward the myeloid fate as a function of ECM mechanics still remains elusive [34, 53, 54]. It is important to appreciate that the storage modulus of the ETNs in this study is markedly lower than that measured for native porcine thymus tissue (Figure S4), likely due to differences in cellularity, ECM composition, and the medullary/cortical compartmentalization of in vivo thymic tissue [8, 9, 55].
These studies also suggest that synergies between notch1-signaling and actomyosin contractility (via integrin-VCAM-1/collagen I adhesions) enhance proT-cell differentiation. Notch1-DLL-4 interactions and integrin-substrate adhesions are mechanosensitive and exhibit ‘catch bond’ behavior in which optimal forces applied to the bond sustain the bond lifetime to enhance the probability of notch1 cleavage by ADAM10 and γ-secretase to release NICD into the cytosol, and the formation of integrin focal adhesion complexes in response to substrate mechanics [20–22, 56]. Soft-viscous matrices may permit greater notch1-DLL-4 and integrin-substrate bond formation and enhance downstream signaling (Figure 4) [18, 48]. Stiffer and more elastic matrices could promote rapid dissociation of notch1-DLL-4 bonds and focal adhesion complexes. In the absence of notch1-signaling, encapsulated CD34+ HSCs preferentially differentiate into myeloid-competent cells [57, 58]. Moreover, in concert with notch1-signaling, actomyosin contraction may enhance thymocyte maturation (Figures 4e–g, Figure 5) [59–62], as small molecule inhibition of notch1 cleavage and actomyosin contraction within cells encapsulated in soft-viscous 3D ETNs inhibited generation of CD7+CD5+ proT-cells (Figure 4g). These results align with the mechanosensitive framework previously established for Notch and integrin signaling, in which moderate tensile loading stabilizes receptor–ligand interactions and tunes ligand sensitivity to promote T-cell lineage commitment.
FIGURE 5 |.

Potential mechanical determinants of Notch1-signaling and actomyosin contractility synergy in promoting progenitor T-cell differentiation. At the cell-substrate interface, softer, viscous matrices promote greater ‘catch’ bond engagement of notch1 to DLL-4 and integrins to VCAM-1 and collagen I, increasing the probability of proteolytic notch1 cleavage to release NICD into the cytosol. Actomyosin contraction via integrin-substrate adhesions directly energizes the notch1-DLL-4 catch bond through perturbations in membrane dynamics and cortical actomyosin tension, and enables tensile loading upon notch1 through receptor-mediated endocytosis. This deforms the nonregulatory region of the notch1 receptor to enable proteolytic cleavage by ADAM10 and γ-secretase. In concert with notch1-signaling, actomyosin contraction enables cytokinesis and asymmetric division of HSC progenitors into proliferating thymocytes that plastically deform the soft, viscous matrix in a feed forward loop to enhance thymocyte maturation. Actomyosin-nucleoskeletal coupling at the nucleus may potentially increase the flux of NICD across the NPC to sustain the T-cell development GRN in a feed forward loop that promotes thymocyte maturation. NICD: notch1 intracellular domain, LINC: linker of nucleoskeleton and cytoskeleton, NPC: nuclear pore complex.
Collectively, these observations emphasize potential mechanical determinants of signaling pathways indispensable to thymopoiesis and highlight ECM mechanics as a variable in controlling hematopoietic stem cell fate decisions within their cellular niche. These findings may therefore have additional utility for future in vitro models and investigations of thymopoiesis, and for T-cell biomanufacturing strategies from stem cells.
4 |. Materials and Methods
4.1 |. Materials Synthesis, Preparation, and Storage
Low-molecular-weight (LMW, Mw) ultrapure very-low-viscosity-G block enriched (VLVG) sodium alginate (Pronova UP VLVG alginate, NovaMatrix, BP-1802–03) was used as a base polymer for these studies, with an approximate Mw of 32 kDa, a glucuronic acid to mannuronic acid (G/M) ratio of ≥ 1.5, and ≤ 100 endotoxin units per gram of alginate, as according to manufacturer specifications. Tetrazine-(Tz)modified UP VLVG alginate was synthesized by covalent coupling of (4-(6-methyl-1,2,4,5-tetrazin-3-yl)phenyl)methanamine hydrochloric acid (Tz-HCl, KareBay Biochem, Inc., KB220830) through aqueous carbodiimide chemistry, as previously described to yield 25% degree of substitution (DS25) [33, 34]. First, UP VLVG alginate was dissolved in 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid (MES, Thermo Scientific, P15J509)) buffer at 1% w/v (pH 6.5, 0.1 m MES, 0.3 m UP NaCl) for 60 min stirring at 400RPM. Second, N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS, Sigma– Aldrich)) and 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC, Sigma–Aldrich), were immediately dissolved at 1/20 the reaction volume in MES buffer and added dropwise in 2.5X molar excess based on the number of carboxylic acid groups on each alginate monomer to the reaction vessel. After 15 min (to enable sufficient activation of carboxylic acid groups by EDC/NHS), Tz-HCl (dissolved and sonicated for 60 min at 1/20 the reaction volume in MES buffer), was added dropwise to the reaction vessel at 1 mmol per gram of alginate, stirred at 400RPM overnight at room temperature for 18 h, and protected from light with aluminum foil.
The reaction product was then collected in Falcon tubes at a volume of ≤ 35 mL and ultracentrifuged at 10,000RPM for 60 min to pellet unreacted Tz-HCl and crashed reaction side products. After ultracentrifugation, the product was decanted, filtered (0.22 μm filter), and purified via dialysis utilizing a 3.5 kDa MW cutoff membrane (VWR International, 20020178) using a decreasing salt gradient from 0.15 to 0.10 m then 0.05 to 0 m UP NaCl (VWR Life Sciences, 24B2656648) in 4L of milliQ water, with a salt-solution exchange every 2 h with one overnight step for 4 days. Dialyzed DS25 Tz-VLVG alginate was then treated with activated carbon (Thermo Scientific, P31I026) at a 1:1 alginate: carbon mass ratio for 30 min stirring at 400RPM and then sterile filtered (0.22 μm filter), and lyophilized for long-term storage at −20°C, protected from light.
4.2 |. Primary Human CD34± Hematopoietic Stem Cell Isolation from Cord Blood and Cell Culture Expansion
Primary CD34+ human hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) were isolated from cord blood units procured from the Dana Farber Cancer Institute Pasquarello Tissue bank. HSCs were isolated via density gradient centrifugation with Lymphoprep and SepMate-50 tubes (StemCell Technologies), followed by positive isolation (EasySep Human Cord Blood CD34 Positive Selection Kit III, StemCell Technologies), and frozen in freezing media (BAMBANKER) at −80°C overnight long-term storage in liquid nitrogen at a density of 2e5–2e6 cells/mL. Before hydrogel encapsulation for 3D culture on day 0, cord blood-derived HSCs were expanded for 7 days on 6 well suspension culture plates (GenClone, 25–100) at standard tissue culture conditions with a seeding density of 1e4 cells/well in an expansion media comprised of IMDM, GlutaMAX (Gibco) supplemented with 20% BIT 9500 (StemCell Technologies), 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Thermo), carrier free recombinant human (rh) SCF (100 ng/mL, R&D), rh Flt3L (100 ng/mL, R&D), and rh TPO (50 ng/mL, R&D), 1 μg/mL human low-density lipoproteins (hLDL, Calbiochem, 437644), 24 μm beta-mercaptoethanol, 60 μm L-ascorbic acid (Sigma–Aldrich, A4544–25G), and 5 mm CaCl2. Expansion media was exchanged every other day.
4.3 |. Trans-Cyclooctene Modification of DLL-4 and VCAM-1 Ligands
TCO-PEG5-DLL-4 and TCO-PEG5-VCAM-1 were prepared via maleimide-thiol bioconjugation chemistry, tethering TCO to the Fc-tag of either rh Fc-DLL-4 (Sino Biological, 10171-H02H), or rh Fc-VCAM-1 (Sino Biological, 10113-H02H). Briefly, rh Fc-DLL-4 or Fc-VCAM-1 was diluted in PBS to 0.5 mg/mL (6.173 and 4.921 μm, respectively), and reduced with 209 μm of Tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine hydrochloride (TCEP HCl, Sigma–Aldrich, 51805–45–9) for 20 min while rocking on a nutating mixer at room temperature, followed by the addition of 418 μm of Trans-cyclooctene-polyethylene-glycol5-maleimide (TCO-PEG5-mal, ConjuProbe, CP-6009) at a molar ratio of 1:34 of Fc-tag DLL-4 or VCAM-1:TCEP HCl and 1:2 molar ratio of TCEP HCl:TCO-PEG5-mal. The bioconjugation reaction was then incubated overnight at 4°C on a nutating mixer before purification in IMDM, GlutaMAX (containing 1% penicillin-streptomycin) via a protein concentrator column (Pierce, MWCO 30 kDa, 88502) as per the manufacturer’s protocol. Purified stock concentrations of TCO-PEG5-DLL-4 or TCO-PEG5-VCAM-1 were then measured via nanodrop to quantify protein concentration and A280, before short-term storage at 4°C or long-term storage at −80°C.
4.4 |. DLL-4 and VCAM-1 Conjugation and CD34± HSC Encapsulation in Thymus-Mimetic Extracellular Matrices of Tunable Viscoelastic Properties
TCO-PEG5-DLL-4 and TCO-PEG5-VCAM-1 were reacted with DS25 Tz-VLVG alginate in a solution of phenol red HyClone Hank’s 1X Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS, Cytiva, containing 20 mm HEPES) in sterile 1.5 mL Eppendorf tubes at a mass ratio of 20:4 μg:1 mg TCO-PEG5-DLL-4:TCO-PEG5-VCAM-1:Tz-VLVG alginate overnight at 4°C on a nutating mixer before IPN hydrogel-based ETN fabrication and CD34+ HSC encapsulation for 3D cell culture as previously described with some modifications [33, 34]. Briefly, rat tail telo-collagen type I (8 mg/mL in 25 mm acetic acid, Corning) was neutralized on ice at a stock neutralized concentration of 6 mg/mL to 6.5< pH < 7.0 and added to the protein-polymer conjugate solution chilled on ice. Calcium carbonate slurry (CaCO3) was then obtained by high-speed vortexing precipitated CaCO3 nanoparticles (nano-PCC, Multifex-MM, Specialty Minerals) at a stock concentration of 100 mg/mL in sterile water (Water-For-Injection, WFI, Cytiva) and added to the pre-gel solution for a final concentration of: 2 mg/mL collagen I, 1.25% w/v DLL-4/VCAM-1 modified Tz-VLVG alginate, and 10 or 100 mm CaCO3 (soft and stiff, respectively). CD34+ HSCs were retrieved from culture and suspended to 52.5e6 cells/mL in HBSS (containing 20 mm HEPES) on ice, and added to the pre-gel solution and gently vortexed for a final suspension concentration of 3.5e6 cells/mL.
Immediately before gelation, an appropriate amount (4x molar excess with respect to the CaCO3 concentration) of freshly dissolved glucono-delta-lactone (GDL, EMD Millipore, 0.4 mg/μL in HBSS (20 mm HEPES)) was added to the pre-gel solution and gently vortexed to induce gelation. To form elastic gels, 400 μm of multivalent 4-arm-PEG5k-Norbornene (4a-PEG5k-Nb, Creative PEGWorks, stock concentration of 25 mg/mL in HBSS (20 mm HEPES)) was then immediately added to the pre-gel solution and gently vortexed to reinforce the matrix with covalent crosslinks. The resulting solutions were then immediately cast into a 48-multiwell MatTek dish (MatTek Corporation, P48G-1.5–6-F) by micropipette in 50 μL volumes. Gelation was then allowed at 37°C in the tissue culture incubator for 60 min, followed by equilibration in 500 μL of HBSS (20 mm HEPES, 5 mm CaCl2) at 37°C for an additional 60 min, replacement of the buffer with 400 μL of human progenitor T-cell differentiation media. Biological replicates were defined as independently fabricated hydrogels seeded with CD34+ HSCs, with each gel prepared from a distinct umbilical cord blood donor.
4.5 |. 3D Cell Culture of CD34± HSCs in Staged Human Progenitor T-Cell Differentiation Media
After 3D ETN encapsulation, 3D cell culture was carried out in a serum free and fully defined differentiation media comprised of IMDM, GlutaMAX (Gibco) supplemented with 20% BIT 9500 (StemCell Technologies), 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Thermo), carrier free rh SCF (24 ng/mL, R&D), rh Flt3L (9 ng/mL, R&D), rh IL-3 (5 ng/mL, R&D), rh IL-7 (10 ng/mL, R&D), rh TNF-α (5 ng/mL, R&D), rh CXCL12 (10 ng/mL, R&D), 1 μg/mL human low-density lipoproteins (hLDL, Calbiochem, 437644), 24 μm beta-mercaptoethanol, 60 μm L-ascorbic acid (Sigma–Aldrich, A4544–25G), and 5 mm CaCl2 on day 0– day 7 (stage I media). Differentiation media was exchanged every other day.
For 3D cell culture on day 7– day 14 (stage II), 3D cell culture was carried out in IMDM, GlutaMAX (Gibco) supplemented with 20% BIT 9500 (StemCell Technologies), 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Thermo), carrier free rh SCF (120 ng/mL, R&D), rh Flt3L (8 ng/mL, R&D), rh IL-3 (1 ng/mL, R&D), rh IL-7 (45 ng/mL, R&D), rh TNF-α (0.4 ng/mL, R&D), rh CXCL12 (15 ng/mL, R&D), 1 μg/mL human low-density lipoproteins (hLDL, Calbiochem, 437644), 24 μm beta-mercaptoethanol, 60 μm L-ascorbic acid (Sigma–Aldrich, A4544–25G), and 5 mm CaCl2. Differentiation media was exchanged every other day.
4.6 |. Rheological Characterization of Thymus-Mimetic Extracellular Matrices
Rheological characterization of the IPN hydrogel-based ETNs was performed on a stress-controlled rheometer (AR-G2, TA instruments) using a 20 mm diameter 1° tilt angle cone geometry as previously described [33, 34, 59]. IPN-hydrogel solution (90 μL) was immediately loaded onto the Peltier plate after pulse vortexing. A solution of HBSS containing 20 mm HEPES and 5 mm CaCl2 was used to wet the periphery of the cone geometry, along with a humidity chamber to prevent dehydration. Oscillatory rheology was used to measure the storage modulus (G′), loss modulus (G″), and loss angle (δ) after equilibrium was achieved.
Rheological tests included an oscillatory time sweep for 3 h at 25°C (1 Hz, 1% strain), followed by an oscillatory frequency sweep (1% strain, 0.1–10 Hz). A shear stress relaxation test was then performed with a 15% shear strain and strain rise time of 1 s, and then maintaining a fixed 15% shear strain over time for 10 h. Creep/plasticity measurements were performed by first performing a 1 h oscillatory time sweep at 37°C (1 Hz, 1% strain), and then by applying an instantaneous 100 Pa fixed shear stress for 1 h, followed by an instantaneous 0 Pa fixed shear stress for 2 h at 20°C.
4.7 |. Cell Retrieval from Thymus-Mimetic Extracellular Matrices
Hydrogels were first washed in 500 μL of PBS, and subsequently digested with 200 μL of 100 U/mL collagenase IV (Worthington Biochemical Corp., NC9919937) and 25 U/mL alginate lyase (Sigma–Aldrich, A1603) in IMDM, GlutaMAX (containing 1% penicillin-streptomycin), at 37°C for 15 min, followed by trituration with a P1000 pipette and an additional 10 min of incubation at 37°C. Thereafter, additional trituration with a P1000 pipette was performed to fully dissolve the gels. The collagenase and lyase were then quenched with 200 μL of IMDM, GlutaMAX (containing 20% BIT 9500, 1% penicillin-streptomycin, 1 μg/mL hLDL, 24 μm beta-mercaptoethanol, 60 μm L-ascorbic acid, and 5 mm CaCl2), after which cells were collected and then passed through 40 μm mini-strainers (pluriSelect USA, 43–10040–40) into sterile 1.5 mL Eppendorf tubes. Collected cells were pelleted (at 1600RPM for 3 min), washed in PBS twice, and then resuspended for downstream analysis (e.g., flow cytometry or total RNA isolation for RT-qPCR).
4.8 |. Flow Cytometry Analysis
Cells isolated from thymus-mimetic matrices were transferred to 96-well v-bottom plates and kept at 4°C for immunostaining. Cells were stained with LIVE/DEAD fixable blue cell stain (Invitrogen, L34961) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Cells were then subsequently blocked with human FcX Fc receptor blocking solution (BioLegend, 422301) for 15 min and stained with surface protein-binding antibodies for 30 min. eBioscience Flow cytometry staining buffer (Invitrogen, 00–4222–26) was used during staining. Flow cytometry was then performed with a BD FACSymphony A3 flow cytometer. Gating was performed based on fluorescence-minus-one controls. The complete set of antibodies used for flow cytometry is listed in Table S2.
4.9 |. Small Molecule Inhibition Studies
Small molecule inhibitors targeting features of the notch1 pathway and actomyosin contraction were purchased from Selleckchem. Inhibitor working concentrations were determined using the CellTiter-Blue cell viability assay (Promega, G8080) with CD34+ HSCs cultured on 96-well U-bottom suspension plates in expansion media containing 0.5% DMSO for 7 days, with a media exchange on day 4. Determined working concentrations and catalog numbers for the small molecule inhibitors are provided in Table S3.
4.10 |. RNA Isolation and RT-qPCR Gene Expression Analysis
CD34+ HSCs were cultured in thymus-mimetic matrices for 72 h in stage I media. Cells were then retrieved from matrices for subsequent total RNA isolation. Total RNA was isolated via PureLink RNA Micro Scale Kit (Invitrogen, 12183016A) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Purity and concentration of isolated total RNA was assessed via nanodrop, prior to long-term storage at −80°C. cDNA was then synthesized from total RNA using SuperScript III Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen, 18080093), according to the manufacturer’s protocol, and stored at −80°C. cDNA was amplified with respective primers utilizing FastStart Essential SYBR Green Master Mix (Roche, 06402712001). Thermocycling and quantification was performed on a CFX-96 RT-PCR thermocycler (Bio-Rad) as according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Roche) with two technical replicates for each biological replicate. Relative expression of individual genes was calculated by the delta cycle and delta-delta cycle threshold (2−ΔCt and 2−ΔΔCt) methods with the expression of GAPDH as an internal reference housekeeping gene. PCR primer sequences are available in Table S4.
4.11 |. Immunofluorescence Staining of Hydrogel-Encapsulated Cells
Hydrogel constructs containing encapsulated CD34+ HSCs were fixed and processed for immunofluorescence staining as follows. Samples were first permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS supplemented with 5 mm CaCl2 for 30 min at room temperature. Following permeabilization, constructs were washed twice with PBS + 5 mm CaCl2, with 3–-4 min incubations between washes, and subsequently blocked for 30 min at room temperature in blocking buffer (2% BSA, 0.1% Tween-20, 5 mm CaCl2 in PBS). Primary CD7 antibody staining (ab109296) was performed by incubating constructs in primary antibody solution (1% BSA, 0.05% Tween-20, 5 mm CaCl2 in PBS) at a 1:100 dilution. Samples were incubated overnight at 4°C in the dark. The following day, constructs were washed three times with PBS + CaCl2, with 5-min intervals between washes.
A secondary antibody and counterstain solution was prepared by combining blocking buffer containing CaCl2 (400 μL), NucBlue nuclear dye (8 drops), Alexa Fluor 546 goat anti-mouse IgG, and phalloidin conjugate, and adjusting the total volume to 800 μL with PBS + CaCl2. Each well received 100 μL of this solution and was incubated for 2 h at room temperature in the dark. After secondary staining, constructs were washed twice with PBS + CaCl2 and stored at 4°C in PBS + CaCl2, and protected from light until imaging.
4.12 |. Statistical Analyses
Statistical analyses were performed in Prism Graphpad v.10.2.3. Statistical tests used one-way ANOVA and post-hoc tests for multiple comparisons, two-way ANOVA and post-hoc tests for multiple comparisons, or an unpaired t-test with Welch’s correction for comparison between two groups. p-values < 0.05 were considered significant unless otherwise noted. Error bars represent the standard deviation of the mean unless otherwise noted.
5 |. Conclusions
Mechanically confining IPN hydrogel-based 3D cell culture comprised of collagen type I and alginate polysaccharides functionalized with DLL-4 and VCAM-1 was used as a model 3D ETN to manipulate human progenitor (pro)T-cell differentiation through orthogonal changes in modulus and stress relaxation behavior. Soft-viscous 3D ETN matrices permitted activation of the T-cell development GRN, and enhanced the emergence of T-competent progenitor cells from encapsulated CD34+ HSCs through synergies between notch1-signaling and actomyosin contractility via integrin-substrate adhesions. Stiffer, elastic matrices inhibit HSC commitment to the T-lineage and proT-cell proliferation, and rather promoted the generation of Myeloid cells. These observations emphasize potential mechanical determinants of signaling pathways indispensable to thymopoiesis, and highlight ECM mechanics as a variable in controlling hematopoietic stem cell fate decisions within their cellular niche. These findings may have utility for future in vitro models of thymopoiesis and therapeutic T-cell biomanufacturing strategies from stem cells.
Supplementary Material
Additional supporting information can be found online in the Supporting Information section.
Supporting File: adhm70705-sup-0001-SuppMat.docx.
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Bryan Nerger (Harvard University), Dr. Yuesong Hu (Wyss Institute), Dr. Grace Bingham (Harvard University), Dr. Yoav Binenbaum (Wyss Institute), Mason Dacus (Harvard University), Dr. Asel Primbetova (University of British Columbia), Dr. Peter W. Zandstra (University of British Columbia), Dr. Cedric Tremblay (University of Manitoba), and Dr. Yale S. Michaels (University of Manitoba) for insightful scientific discussions. We thank Michael Carr (Wyss Institute) and Alexander Pauer (Wyss Institute) for technical staff assistance. We thank Dr. Matthew Kerr (Lightning Biotherapeutics) and Siddharth Iyer (Wyss Institute) for assistance with the RT-qPCR experiments. We thank the Dana Farber Cancer Institute Pasquarello tissue bank for procuring and providing umbilical cord blood units used for experimentation. We are especially grateful to the patients who donated their umbilical cord-blood samples used in these studies. We acknowledge funding from the NIH NCI (Wyss Institute i3 center, Wellcome Leap Foundation (HOPE), and NSF (GRFP, Harvard MRSEC (DMR-2011754)). W.-H.J. was supported by the NIH NCI (K00CA253759). N.L-G. was supported by the CRIS Cancer Foundation.
Footnotes
Conflicts of Interest
D.J.M. declares the following conflict of interests: Novartis, sponsored research, licensed IP; Immulus, equity; IVIVA, SAB; Attivare, SAB, equity; Lyell, licensed IP, equity. D.T.S. declares the following conflict of interests: Clear Creek Bio, VCanBio, Garuda Therapeutics, Editas Medicine, Sonata Therapeutics, Carisma Therapeutics, Agios Pharmaceuticals. All other authors declare no conflict of interest.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
- 1.Sadelain M, Rivière I, and Riddell S, “Therapeutic T Cell Engineering,” Nature 545 (2017): 423–431, 10.1038/nature22395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Michaels YS, Durland LJ, and Zandstra PW, “Engineering T Cell Development for the Next Generation of Stem Cell-Derived Immunotherapies,” GEN Biotechnology 2 (2023): 106–119, 10.1089/genbio.2023.0008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hozumi K, Mailhos C, Negishi N, et al. , “Delta-Like 4 Is Indispensable in Thymic Environment Specific for T Cell Development,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine 205 (2008): 2507–2513, 10.1084/jem.20080134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Salomon DR, Crisa L, Mojcik CF, Ishii JK, Klier G, and Shevach EM, “Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1 Is Expressed by Cortical Thymic Epithelial Cells and Mediates Thymocyte Adhesion. Implications for the Function of α4β1 (VLA4) Integrin in T-Cell Development,” Blood 89 (1997): 2461–2471, 10.1182/blood.V89.7.2461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mohtashami M, Shah DK, Kianizad K, Awong G, and Zúñiga-Pflücker JC, “Induction of T-cell Development by Delta-Like 4-expressing Fibroblasts,” International Immunology 25 (2013): 601–611, 10.1093/intimm/dxt027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Shukla S, Langley MA, Singh J, et al. , “Progenitor T-cell Differentiation From Hematopoietic Stem Cells Using Delta-Like-4 and VCAM-1,” Nature Methods 14 (2017): 531–538, 10.1038/nmeth.4258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Michaels YS, Edgar JM, Major MC, et al. , “DLL4 and VCAM1 Enhance the Emergence of T cell–Competent Hematopoietic Progenitors From Human Pluripotent Stem Cells,” Science Advances 8 (2022): abn5522, 10.1126/sciadv.abn5522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Berrih S, Savino W, and Cohen S, “Extracellular Matrix of the human thymus: Immunofluorescence Studies on Frozen Sections and Cultured Epithelial Cells,” Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry 33 (1985): 655–664, 10.1177/33.7.3891843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lins MP, “Thymic Extracellular Matrix in the Thymopoiesis: Just a Supporting?,” BioTechniques 11 (2022): 27, 10.3390/biotech11030027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hun M, Barsanti M, Wong K, Ramshaw J, Werkmeister J, and Chidgey AP, “Native Thymic Extracellular Matrix Improves In Vivo Thymic Organoid T Cell Output, and Drives In Vitro Thymic Epithelial Cell Differentiation,” Biomaterials 118 (2017): 1–15, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.11.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wu DT, Jeffreys N, Diba M, and Mooney DJ, “Viscoelastic Biomaterials for Tissue Regeneration,” Tissue Engineering Part C: Methods 28 (2022): 289–300, 10.1089/ten.tec.2022.0040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Saraswathibhatla A, Indana D, and Chaudhuri O, “Cell–Extracellular Matrix Mechanotransduction in 3D,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 24, 495–516 (2023), 10.1038/s41580-023-00583-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Primbetova A, Hsu HH, Baker A, et al. , “T-Cell Differentiation From Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells Using 3D Thymic-Like Hydrogels,” GEN Biotechnology 3 (2024): 136–151, 10.1089/genbio.2024.0010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Discher DE, Mooney DJ, and Zandstra PW, “Growth Factors, Matrices, and Forces Combine and Control Stem Cells,” Science 324 (2009): 1673–1677, 10.1126/science.1171643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Khalil AS, Xie AW, and Murphy WL, “Context Clues: The Importance of Stem Cell–Material Interactions,” ACS Chemical Biology 9 (2014): 45–56, 10.1021/cb400801m. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Rushdi M, et al. , “Mechanotransduction in T Cell Development,” Differentiation and Function Cells 9 (2020): 364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sprinzak D and Blacklow SC, “Biophysics of Notch Signaling,” Annual Review of Biophysics 50 (2021): 157–189, 10.1146/annurev-biophys-101920-082204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Suarez Rodriguez S, Sanlidag S, and Sahlgren C, “Mechanical Regulation of the Notch Signaling Pathway,” Current Opinion in Cell Biology 85 (2023): 102244, 10.1016/j.ceb.2023.102244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Narui Y and Salaita K, “Membrane Tethered Delta Activates Notch and Reveals a Role for Spatio-mechanical Regulation of the Signaling Pathway,” Biophysical Journal 105 (2013): 2655–2665, 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.11.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wang X and Ha T, “Defining Single Molecular Forces Required to Activate Integrin and Notch Signaling,” Science 340 (2013): 991–994, 10.1126/science.1231041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Luca VC, Kim BC, Ge C, et al. , “Notch-Jagged Complex Structure Implicates a Catch Bond in Tuning Ligand Sensitivity,” Science 355 (2017): 1320–1324, 10.1126/science.aaf9739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gordon WR, Zimmerman B, He L, et al. , “Mechanical Allostery: Evidence for a Force Requirement in the Proteolytic Activation of Notch,” Developmental Cell 33 (2015): 729–736, 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.05.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chaudhuri O, Gu L, Klumpers D, et al. , “Hydrogels With Tunable Stress Relaxation Regulate Stem Cell Fate and Activity,” Nature Materials 15 (2016): 326–334, 10.1038/nmat4489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Vining KH and Vining DJ, “Mechanical Forces Direct Stem Cell Behaviour in Development and Regeneration,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 18 (2017): 728–742, 10.1038/nrm.2017.108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Huebsch N, Arany PR, Mao AS, et al. , “Harnessing Traction-Mediated Manipulation of the Cell/Matrix Interface to Control StemCell Fate,” Nature Materials 9 (2010): 518–526, 10.1038/nmat2732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Chaudhuri O, Cooper-White J, Janmey PA, Mooney DJ, and Shenoy VB, “Effects of Extracellular Matrix Viscoelasticity on Cellular Behaviour,” Nature 584 (2020): 535–546, 10.1038/s41586-020-2612-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wang N, Butler JP, and Ingber DE, “Mechanotransduction Across the Cell Surface and through the Cytoskeleton,” Science 260 (1993): 1124–1127, 10.1126/science.7684161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Elosegui-Artola A, Andreu I, Beedle AEM, et al. , “Force Triggers YAP Nuclear Entry by Regulating Transport Across Nuclear Pores,” Cell 171 (2017): 1397–1410.e14, 10.1016/j.cell.2017.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Andreu I, Granero-Moya I, Chahare NR, et al. , “Mechanical Force Application to the Nucleus Regulates Nucleocytoplasmic Transport,” Nature Cell Biology 24 (2022): 896–905, 10.1038/s41556-022-00927-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Jeffreys N, Brockman JM, Zhai Y, Ingber DE, and Mooney DJ, “Mechanical Forces Amplify TCR Mechanotransduction in T Cell Activation and Function,” Applied Physics Reviews 11 (2024): 011304, 10.1063/5.0166848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Rizwan M, Ling C, Guo C, et al. , “Viscoelastic Notch Signaling Hydrogel Induces Liver Bile Duct Organoid Growth and Morphogenesis,” Advanced Healthcare Materials 11 (2022): 2200880, 10.1002/adhm.202200880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kretschmer M, Mamistvalov R, Sprinzak D, Vollmar AM, and Zahler S, “Matrix Stiffness Regulates Notch Signaling Activity in Endothelial Cells,” Journal of Cell Science 136 (2023): jcs260442, 10.1242/jcs.260442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Vining KH, Stafford A, and Mooney DJ, “Sequential Modes of Crosslinking Tune Viscoelasticity of Cell-Instructive Hydrogels,” Biomaterials 188 (2019): 187–197, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.10.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Vining KH, Marneth AE, Adu-Berchie K, et al. , “Mechanical Checkpoint Regulates Monocyte Differentiation in Fibrotic Niches,” Nature Materials 21 (2022): 939–950, 10.1038/s41563-022-01293-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Desai RM, Koshy ST, Hilderbrand SA, Mooney DJ, and Joshi NS, “Versatile Click Alginate Hydrogels Crosslinked via Tetrazine–norbornene Chemistry,” Biomaterials 50 (2015): 30–37, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.01.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lee KY and Mooney DJ, “Alginate: Properties and Biomedical Applications,” Progress in Polymer Science 37 (2012): 106–126, 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.06.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Rowley JA, Madlambayan G, and Mooney DJ, “Alginate Hydrogels as Synthetic Extracellular Matrix Materials,” Biomaterials 20 (1999): 45–53, 10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00107-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Nguyen SS and Prescher JA, “Developing Bioorthogonal Probes to Span a Spectrum of Reactivities,” Nature Reviews Chemistry 4 (2020): 476–489, 10.1038/s41570-020-0205-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Mayer S and Lang K, “Tetrazines in Inverse-Electron-Demand Diels–Alder Cycloadditions and Their Use in Biology,” Synthesis 49 (2016): 830–848. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Csaszar E, Kirouac DC, Yu M, et al. , “Rapid Expansion of Human Hematopoietic Stem Cells by Automated Control of Inhibitory Feedback Signaling,” Cell Stem Cell 10 (2012): 218–229, 10.1016/j.stem.2012.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Varnum-Finney B, Wu L, Yu M, et al. , “Immobilization of Notch Ligand, Delta-1, Is Required for Induction of Notch Signaling,” Journal of Cell Science 113 (2000): 4313–4318, 10.1242/jcs.113.23.4313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Trotman-Grant AC, Mohtashami M, De Sousa Casal J, et al. , “DL4-μbeads Induce T Cell Lineage Differentiation From Stem Cells in a Stromal Cell-Free System,” Nature Communications 12 (2021): 5023, 10.1038/s41467-021-25245-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Edgar JM, Michaels YS, and Zandstra PW, “Multi-objective Optimization Reveals Time- and Dose-dependent Inflammatory Cytokine-Mediated Regulation of human Stem Cell Derived T-cell Development,” npj Regenerative Medicine 7 (2022): 11, 10.1038/s41536-022-00210-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kueh HY and Rothenberg EV, “Regulatory Gene Network Circuits Underlying T Cell Development From Multipotent Progenitors,” WIREs Systems Biology and Medicine 4 (2012): 79–102, 10.1002/wsbm.162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Gonzalez-Pujana A, de Lázaro I, Vining KH, et al. , “3D encapsulation and Inflammatory Licensing of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Alter the Expression of Common Reference Genes Used in Real-time RT-qPCR,” Biomaterials Science 8 (2020): 6741–6753, 10.1039/D0BM01562H. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Etzrodt M, Ahmed N, Hoppe PS, et al. , “Inflammatory Signals Directly Instruct PU.1 in HSCs via TNF,” Blood 133 (2019): 816–819, 10.1182/blood-2018-02-832998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Semerad CL, Mercer EM, Inlay MA, Weissman IL, and Murre C, “E2A proteins Maintain the Hematopoietic Stem Cell Pool and Promote the Maturation of Myelolymphoid and Myeloerythroid Progenitors,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106 (2009): 1930–1935, 10.1073/pnas.0808866106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Hunter GL, He L, Perrimon N, Charras G, Giniger E, and Baum B, “A Role for Actomyosin Contractility in Notch Signaling,” BMC Biology 17 (2019): 12, 10.1186/s12915-019-0625-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Verma D, Singh A, Singh J, Mutsuddi M, and Mukherjee A, “Regulation of Notch Signaling by Non-Muscle Myosin II Zipper in Drosophila,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 81 (2024): 195, 10.1007/s00018-024-05142-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Matsuda A and Mofrad MRK, “On the Nuclear Pore Complex and Its Emerging Role in Cellular Mechanotransduction,” APL Bioengineering 6 (2022): 011504, 10.1063/5.0080480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Matsuda A and Mofrad MRK, “Role of Pore Dilation in Molecular Transport Through the Nuclear Pore Complex: Insights From Polymer Scaling Theory,” PLOS Computational Biology 19 (2023), 10.48550/arXiv.2307.07959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Bozkulak EC and Weinmaster G, “Selective Use of ADAM10 and ADAM17 in Activation of Notch1 Signaling,” Molecular and Cellular Biology 29 (2009): 5679–5695, 10.1128/MCB.00406-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Zhang X, Cao D, Xu L, et al. , “Harnessing Matrix Stiffness to Engineer a Bone Marrow Niche for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Rejuvenation,” Cell Stem Cell 30 (2023): 378–395.e8, 10.1016/j.stem.2023.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Tavakol DN, Tratwal J, Bonini F, et al. , “Injectable, Scalable 3D Tissue-engineered Model of Marrow Hematopoiesis,” Biomaterials 232 (2020): 119665, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Farley AM, et al. , “Dynamics of thymus Organogenesis and Colonization in Early human Development,” Dev Camb Engl 140 (2013): 2015–2026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Kong F, García AJ, Mould AP, Humphries MJ, and Zhu C, “Demonstration of Catch Bonds Between an Integrin and Its Ligand,” Journal of Cell Biology 185 (2009): 1275–1284, 10.1083/jcb.200810002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Shin J-W and Mooney DJ, “Extracellular Matrix Stiffness Causes Systematic Variations in Proliferation and Chemosensitivity in Myeloid Leukemias,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113 (2016): 12126–12131, 10.1073/pnas.1611338113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Schlenner SM, Madan V, Busch K, et al. , “Fate Mapping Reveals Separate Origins of T Cells and Myeloid Lineages in the Thymus,” Immunity 32 (2010): 426–436, 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Nam S, Lee J, Brownfield DG, and Chaudhuri O, “Viscoplasticity Enables Mechanical Remodeling of Matrix by Cells,” Biophysical Journal 111 (2016): 2296–2308, 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.10.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Arsenio J, Metz PJ, and Chang JT, “Asymmetric Cell Division in T Lymphocyte Fate Diversification,” Trends in Immunology 36 (2015): 670–683, 10.1016/j.it.2015.09.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Pham K, Shimoni R, Charnley M, et al. , “Asymmetric Cell Division During T Cell Development Controls Downstream Fate,” Journal of Cell Biology 210 (2015): 933–950, 10.1083/jcb.201502053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Shin J-W, Buxboim A, Spinler KR, et al. , “Contractile Forces Sustain and Polarize Hematopoiesis From Stem and Progenitor Cells,” Cell Stem Cell 14 (2014): 81–93, 10.1016/j.stem.2013.10.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
