Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 2026 May 22;201(3):kiag292. doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiag292

Genome-wide discovery and characterization of terpene synthases contributing to strawberry aroma metabolism

Mary A Madera 1,2, Farida Yasmin 3, Kristen L Becker 4, Jenevieve D Weissman 5, Randi A Famula 6, Marta Bjornson 7, Glenn S Cole 8, Mitchell J Feldmann 9, Steven J Knapp 10, Philipp Zerbe 11,2,✉,3
PMCID: PMC13368613  PMID: 42175570

Abstract

Strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) is a globally cultivated fruit crop appreciated by consumers for its unique flavor and aroma. Major groups of volatile organic compounds that define strawberry aroma include terpenes, fatty acid esters, furanones, and benzenoids, with complex terpene blends contributing characteristic fruity, citrus, and floral notes. Here, we report the genome-wide identification and functional analysis of the terpene synthase (TPS) family that governs terpene chemical diversity in strawberry. Mining of the allo-octoploid genome of the commercial “Royal Royce” cultivar identified 75 TPS gene candidates. Biochemical characterization of 33 mono-, sesqui- and di-TPS enzymes via recombinant protein assays and/or microbial co-expression studies demonstrated TPS activities involved in the biosynthesis of nearly two-thirds of known strawberry terpenes as well as products not previously described in octoploid strawberry. Complementary metabolomic and transcriptomic studies across a diversity panel of strawberry accessions illustrated substantial variation in the composition and abundance of more than 30 common and accession-specific terpene aroma metabolites. Analysis of 2 commercial accessions, “Royal Royce” and “Mara de Bois,” with contrasting aroma profiles further revealed accession-specific alterations of terpene metabolism during fruit ripening. These findings expand our understanding of the biosynthetic genes and pathways underlying strawberry terpene metabolism and provide resources to develop breeding strategies toward improving desirable strawberry aroma traits.


The identification of the strawberry terpene synthase family provides insights into the diversity of terpene-mediated fruit aroma.

Introduction

Cultivated strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duchesne ex Rozier, Fa) originated in Europe in the early 18th century as an allo-octoploid species derived from the hybridization of North American Fragaria virginiana (Fvr) and South American Fragaria chiloensis (Fc) (Darrow 1966; Hardigan et al. 2021b). These octoploid progenitors evolved ∼1 million years ago through several polyploidization events involving 4 diploid species, Fragaria vesca (Fv), Fragaria iinumae, and 2 currently unidentified diploid progenitors (Njuguna et al. 2013; Tennessen et al. 2014; Edger et al. 2019; Hardigan et al. 2021b; Session and Rokhsar 2023). Over the past 300 yr, strawberry domestication has led to major breakthroughs in enhancing key horticultural traits, including fruit yield, berry size, firmness, and shelf life, and has largely expanded the range of available flavor and other quality traits (Fan et al. 2021b; Porter et al. 2023; Feldmann et al. 2024). These improvements have made strawberry a popular fruit crop among consumers worldwide (Darrow 1966; Ulrich and Olbricht 2016; Yan et al. 2018). Indeed, global strawberry production reached over 14M tons in 2023, with Asia, the Americas, and Europe being the primary producers (FAO 2023).

Closely associated with flavor that is largely driven by sugar and organic acid levels of the fruit (ie, the fleshy receptacle), aroma is a complex multifactorial trait that varies substantially across strawberry cultivars and is directly influenced by genotype, environment, and cultivation practices (Schwieterman et al. 2014; Ulrich and Olbricht 2016; Fan et al. 2021b; Porter et al. 2023). Strawberry aroma is characterized by complex bouquets of over 300 identified volatile organic compounds (VOCs) that include fruity esters, caramellic furans, peachy lactones, green aldehydes, and terpenes (Pyysalo et al. 1979; Bood and Zabetakis 2002; Schwieterman et al. 2014; Fan et al. 2021b). As major components of floral or fruity aroma notes, terpene VOCs have been an attractive target for aroma breeding (Schwieterman et al. 2014; Ulrich and Olbricht 2016; Fan et al. 2021b). Over 25 volatile monoterpenes (C10) and sesquiterpenes (C15) are known to contribute to strawberry aroma profiles (Zabetakis and Holden 1997; Negri et al. 2015; Urrutia et al. 2017; Duan et al. 2018; Yan et al. 2018). Especially, the fruity, floral, and jasmine-like notes of linalool, terpineol, and nerolidol have been positively associated with sensory quality and flavor intensity (Schwieterman et al. 2014; Ulrich and Olbricht 2016; Fan et al. 2021a). Indeed, strawberry cultivars are typically dominated by linalool, nerolidol, and α-terpineol. By contrast, wild octoploid and diploid strawberry accessions often feature higher abundance of terpenes with more pungent floral, woody, or minty aromas, including α- and β-pinene, limonene, citronellol, myrtenol, myrtenyl acetate, and β-phellandrene (Aharoni et al. 2004; Bianchi et al. 2014; Negri et al. 2015; Ulrich and Olbricht 2016; Urrutia et al. 2017; Duan et al. 2018).

Research over the past 2 decades has provided insights into the biosynthesis of aroma-related VOCs and advanced the breeding of strawberry aroma profiles (Aharoni et al. 2004; Beekwilder et al. 2004; Raab et al. 2006; Chambers et al. 2012; Cumplido-Laso et al. 2012; Zorrilla-Fontanesi et al. 2012; Cruz-Rus et al. 2017; Pillet et al. 2017; Barbey et al. 2021; Fan et al. 2021a, 2022; Oh et al. 2021; Porter et al. 2023). Key enzymes in the generation of terpene chemical diversity are terpene synthases (TPSs) that convert a handful of conserved prenyl diphosphate precursors (ie, geranyl diphosphate [C10, GPP], farnesyl diphosphate [C15, FPP], and geranylgeranyl diphosphate [C20, GGPP]) through complex, electrophilic cyclization and carbon-carbon rearrangement reactions (Chen et al. 2011; Karunanithi and Zerbe 2019). These diverse TPS functions have evolved through repeated events of gene and genome duplication and subsequent sub- and neo-functionalization (Zi et al. 2014; Karunanithi and Zerbe 2019). Therefore, it can be hypothesized that the polyploidization events that led to modern octoploid strawberry have been accompanied by an expansion of the TPS gene family (Njuguna et al. 2013; Tennessen et al. 2014; Edger et al. 2019; Session and Rokhsar 2023). Presently known TPS functions in strawberry include 3 functional nerolidol synthases, namely F. vesca NEROLIDOL SYNTHASE 1 (FvNES1), and F. × ananassa FaNES1 and FaNES2, which feature a dual activity, producing both the sesquiterpene nerolidol and the monoterpene linalool (Aharoni et al. 2004; Fan et al. 2022). However, gene expression of only FaNES1 was shown to be high enough to quantitatively contribute to strawberry aroma. Although displaying lower transcript abundance, a near-identical FaNES1t gene has been correlated with a broader product range, including α-terpineol, myrcene, and (E)-β-farnesene (Fan et al. 2022). In addition, F. vesca PINENE SYNTHASE (FvPINS) was identified as a monoterpene synthase, producing α-pinene, β-phellandrene, and myrcene found to be abundant in wild, ripe F. vesca berries (Aharoni et al. 2004), and a TPS predicted to form germacrene D, FaTPS1, was identified in pathogen-stressed strawberry fruits (Zhang et al. 2022).

To expand our understanding of terpene metabolism in octoploid strawberry, we here describe the identification of the strawberry TPS gene family. Biochemical characterization of 33 TPSs revealed common and accession-specific enzyme products. Combined transcriptomics and metabolomics analyses across a diverse panel of wild and domesticated accessions highlight that differences in TPS functional specificity and gene family composition contribute to variations in terpene aroma profiles in strawberry.

Results

Discovery of the TPS gene family in allo-octoploid strawberry

To identify the terpene-metabolic network in octoploid strawberry we mined a haplotype-phased genome assembly of the F. × ananassa “Royal Royce” cultivar (FaRR1; https://phytozome-next.jgi.doe.gov/info/FxananassaRoyalRoyce_v1_0) (Hardigan et al. 2021a) for candidate genes of the TPS gene family as well as genes of the upstream mevalonate (MVA) and methylerythritol phosphate (MEP) pathways that provide the conserved GPP, FPP, and GGPP precursors (Bergman et al. 2024). First, BLAST searches against curated protein databases (Zerbe et al. 2013; Tiedge et al. 2020) identified a total of 62 candidates with best matches to MEP and MVA pathway genes (Fig. S1, Table S1). Apart from isopentenyl monophosphate kinase (ipk) and 4-hydroxy-3-methylbut-2-enyl diphosphate synthase (hds) genes—which lacked homoeologous gene copies on chromosome 3C—all identified MEP and MVA pathway gene candidates were represented by 4 syntenic copies in the reference genome (Figs. S2 to S4, Table S2). Notably, 8 gene copies were identified for predicted acetoacetyl-CoA thiolases (aact), 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductases (hmgr), as well as FPP synthases and GPP or GGPP synthases, which appear in 2 groups of 4 syntenic genes each (Figs. S2 to S4).

Next, BLAST searches of the FaRR1 genome against a dedicated TPS protein database (Zerbe et al. 2013) predicted 104 TPS gene candidates, 75 of which represented full-length transcripts (Fig. 1, Tables S3 and S4). Based on the presence of characteristic DDxxD, DDxD, and RRx8W sequence motifs, these 75 TPS candidates were classified as mono- or sesqui-TPSs, Class II diTPSs (copalyl diphosphate synthase, CPS), or Class I diTPSs (kaurene synthase-like, KSL) (Fig. 1). This included the previously characterized NESs, FaNES1, FaNES1t, and FaNES2 (Aharoni et al. 2004; Fan et al. 2022), FvPINS (Aharoni et al. 2004), and FaTPS1 (Zhang et al. 2022). To improve consistency in TPS nomenclature, we here adopted the nomenclature suggested for maize and other species (Köllner et al. 2023) and designated the identified TPS genes as FaTPS1-64, FaCPS1-7, and FaKSL1-4. Accordingly, we propose a renaming of the previously characterized TPSs as FaTPS17/NES1, FaTPS18/NES1t, FaTPS11/NES2, FvTPS50/PINS, and FaTPS26/TPS1. Notably, FaTPS17/NES1 and FaTPS18/NES1t were identified at the same gene locus (Fxa3Cg100266.1), consistent with previous findings (Fan et al. 2022). Six additional TPS genes were present in the FaRR1 genome as sequences substantially longer than known TPS genes and likely represent misassembled or misannotated genes (Fig. S5).

Figure 1.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Genomic localization of identified TPS genes in the strawberry genome. a) Relative location of functionally characterized and computationally annotated full-length TPS genes in the F. × ananassa cultivar “Royal Royce” (FaRR1) genome (Hardigan et al. 2021a, 2021b). CPS, copalyl diphosphate synthase; KSL, kaurene synthase-like. b) Synteny plots of FaRR1 chromosomes 2 (top left), 6 (top right), and 3 (bottom) with TPS genes identified in the diploid F. vesca genome accession “Hawaii-4” (gray) (Edger et al. 2018). Gray lines show syntenic relationships between TPS genes. Syntenic pseudogenes are shown in gray. Chromosome 2C is highlighted to depict whole chromosome inversion. Gene-dense region of chromosome 3 shown in detail; lines depict synteny matches across all 5 chromosomes.

The identified TPS genes were broadly distributed across the FaRR1 genome, with most genes located on chromosomes 3 and 6 (Fig. 1). Although several chromosomes featured closely co-localized TPS genes, no predicted terpene-metabolic gene clusters were identified. Gene synteny analysis of the identified TPSs using the diploid F. vesca genome for accession “Hawaii-4” (Edger et al. 2018) and the octoploid FaRR1 genome illustrated that 20 TPSs were present with 4 homoeologous copies across each FaRR1 subgenome and in the F. vesca genome, forming 5 syntenic groups with F. vesca genes FvH4_3g23440 on chromosome 2, FvH4_3g14116 on chromosome 3, FvH4_5g06470 on chromosome 5, and FvH4_7g03260 and FvH4_7g33640 on chromosome 7 (Fig. S6). The remaining TPS genes lacked homoeologous copies on at least one of the FaRR1 subgenomes and were present mostly in syntenic groups of 2 or 3 copies. This included FvTPS50/PINS, FaTPS17/NES1, FaTPS18/NES1t (Aharoni et al. 2004; Fan et al. 2022), and NES-like candidates found in the transcriptomes of F. chiloensis and F. virginiana (see below) and pinene synthase-like candidates from both F. virginiana and F. vesca (Figs. S6 to S8). FaTPS3-5, 11-15, 25, 33, 41-45, 53, and 63 did not feature syntenic equivalents in the diploid F. vesca genome, suggesting that they either evolved after polyploidization or originated from one of the other 3 diploid progenitor genomes (Fig. S6; Table S3).

To identify TPSs relevant for aroma metabolism beyond the “Royal Royce” accession, we performed transcriptome analysis of field-grown fruits of “Royal Royce” and 16 additional cultivars, ecotypes, or accessions selected to encompass a range of wild species and diverse breeding materials available in the UC Davis strawberry germplasm collection (Table S5). Transcripts were assembled de novo as well as aligned to the FaRR1 genome and identified 27 full-length transcripts matching TPS genes identified in the FaRR1 genome, including FaTPS10, FaTPS55, FaKSL1-4, FaCPS5, FaTPS17/NES1, and FaTPS18/NES1t. In addition, we identified TPS candidates that featured lower (93% to 95%) sequence identity and may represent distinctive TPSs present in individual cultivars such as FaTPS7 from the “Primella” cultivar and FaTPS36 from “Direktor Paul Wallbaum.” Notably, we identified FaTPS35 and FaTPS42 in the “Royal Royce” transcriptome, which shared only ∼93% sequence identity with TPSs present in the FaRR1 genome and, therefore, could not be unambiguously matched to any gene identified in the FaRR1 genome. Furthermore, 14 additional TPSs were identified in the transcriptomes of F. chiloensis, F. virginiana, and F. vesca that were apparently distinct from those found in F. × ananassa. These TPSs were named according to the highest protein sequence similarity to TPSs identified in the FaRR1 genome: F. chiloensis ecotype “Ambato” (Amb) FcKSL5 and FcTPS18; F. chiloensis ecotype “Isle De Lemuy 02A White” (ILE) FcTPS40, FcTPS52, and FcTPS58; F. virginiana accession “NC_96-35-2” (NC) FvrCPS5, FvrTPS17, and FvrTPS55; F. virginiana accession “Harris Springs” (HS) FvrTPS5 and FvrTPS40; and F. vesca accession “UC06” FvTPS6, FvTPS35, FvTPS37, and FvTPS50 (Tables S3 and S4). Collectively, analysis of the FaRR1 genome and the obtained transcriptome data revealed 75 putative mono- and sesqui-TPSs and 13 Class II and Class I diTPSs (Table S4).

Phylogenetic analysis of the identified TPS candidates was performed to substantiate functional annotations. Consistent with the presence of a βα-domain structure, a plastidial transit peptide, and a characteristic RRX8W motif (Chen et al. 2011; Karunanithi and Zerbe 2019), 16 TPSs were placed together with known mono-TPSs of the TPS-b subfamily (Fig. 2). Sharing a βα-domain structure but lacking a transit peptide and RRX8W motif, 50 TPSs clustered with sesqui-TPSs of the TPS-a subfamily. Ten TPSs showed a close phylogenetic relationship with FaNES1, FaNES2 and related enzymes of the TPS-g subfamily, suggesting similar catalytic functions.

Figure 2.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Maximum-likelihood phylogeny of strawberry TPSs and selected TPSs of the TPS-c, TPS-e/f, TPS-b, TPS-g, and TPS-a subfamilies from related plant species. Tree rooted with the ent-CPP/ent-kaurene synthase from Physcomitrium patens (PpCPSKS). Enzyme candidates biochemically characterized in this study are highlighted in bold. Branch support values are average amino acid substitutions per site (500 bootstrap repetitions). Accession numbers and protein sequences are given in Table S4.

In addition to mono- and sesqui-TPSs with predicted functions in strawberry aroma metabolism, 13 TPS candidates were identified as putative diTPSs. Of these FaCPS1-7 and FvrCPS5 (accession “NC_96-35-2”) were placed within the TPS-c subfamily and featured a DxDD motif characteristic for Class II diTPSs (Zerbe and Bohlmann 2015, Fig. 2, Table S3). Except for FaCPS5 on chromosome 3D, all CPSs are localized on chromosome 2 and share >96% protein sequence similarity (Fig. S7, Table S6). Presence of a characteristic H-N dyad in the N-terminal catalytic domain of FaCPS1-4 and FaCPS6-7 suggested catalytic functions as diTPSs forming ent-CPP (Potter et al. 2014, 2016; Zi et al. 2014, Fig. S9). FaCPS6 featured an N-terminal truncation, lacking part of the γ-domain likely rendering the protein inactive. FaCPS5 and FvrCPS5 shared only 70% sequence identity with the other CPSs and did not feature the H-N dyad or a H501 residue conserved in syn-CPP synthases (Potter et al. 2014, 2016; Zi et al. 2014), thus suggesting a distinct function (Figs. S7 and S9). Five KSLs were identified that featured the conserved, catalytic DDxxD and NSE/DTE motifs and formed a separate group within the TPS-e/f subfamily of Class I diTPSs (Figs. 2 and S9). FaKSL1-3 co-localized on chromosome 3A-C, whereas FaKSL4 was localized adjacent to FaCPS5 on chromosome 3D (Figs. 1 and S7). In addition, we identified FcKSL5 in F. chiloensis ecotype “Ambato,” which most closely matches FaKSL4 in the FaRR1 genome. However, FaKSL4 represents a probable misassembly rendering the gene over 3 times the expected length of a typical Class I diTPS (Fig. S5), thus preventing further comparative analysis of these diTPSs. Notably, FcKSL5 adopts a βα-domain architecture known only in KSL enzymes involved in specialized diterpenoid metabolism (Zerbe and Bohlmann 2015; Karunanithi and Zerbe 2019, Fig. S9).

Strawberry mono- and sesqui-TPSs produce known and previously unrecognized aroma metabolites

Based on their predicted functions in terpene aroma metabolism, we selected 33 TPSs for biochemical characterization. Enzyme functional studies were conducted via in vitro enzyme assays using recombinant, purified proteins and commercial GPP and E,E-FPP substrates and, where further enzyme characterization was needed, in vivo co-expression assays using an Escherichia coli platform engineered for terpene production (Cyr et al. 2007; Morrone et al. 2010; Murphy et al. 2019). Enzyme products were analyzed via GC-MS and identified based on comparison to authentic standards or, where standards could not be obtained, annotation based on best matches to mass spectral databases and Kovats retention indices (Figs. S10 to S12; Tables S7 to S9).

GC-MS analysis of TPS enzyme products revealed catalytic activities for all tested TPSs except for FvrTPS5 (accession “Harris Springs”) and FvrTPS17 (accession “NC_96-35-2”). In vitro and in vivo enzyme assays with GPP as a substrate confirmed the formation of linalool 1 by FaTPS17/NES1 and FaTPS18/NES1t as previously reported (Aharoni et al. 2004; Fan et al. 2021a). Furthermore, we identified FaTPS42 (“Royal Royce”), FcTPS18 (ecotype “Ambato”), FvrTPS40 (“Harris Springs”), and FcTPS40 (ecotype “Isle de Lemuy”) as additional linalool synthases present in strawberry (Fig. 3). In vitro assays of FvTPS37 and FvTPS6 (accession “UC06”), FaTPS10 (cultivar “EarliMiss”), and FcTPS52 (“Isle de Lemuy”) did not show detectable enzyme activity. However, E. coli co-expression studies of these TPSs with an Abies grandis GPP synthase identified FvTPS37 as a multi-product enzyme, forming α-terpineol 2, borneol 3, and trans-thujanol 4 as major products with small amounts of linalool 1 as based on comparison to mass spectral databases and Kovats indices (Figs. 3 and S10). In addition, FaTPS10 and FvTPS6 produced β-(E)-ocimene 5 and FcTPS52 formed β-(Z)-ocimene 6 based on closest database matches (Figs. 3 and S10). FvTPS50 (“UC06”) was identified in vitro and in vivo as a multi-product mono-TPS, forming α-pinene 7 as a major product as well as small quantities of β-pinene 8, limonene 9, terpinolene 10, terpinen-4-ol 11, α-terpineol 2, and trans-thujanol 4 (Figs. 3 and S10).

Figure 3.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Functional characterization of monoterpene synthases. a to f) GC-MS total ion chromatograms of products resulting from either in vitro enzyme assays of individual recombinant TPSs with GPP as a substrate (gray) or co-expression assays of individual TPSs and an A. grandis GPP synthase in E. coli (white). g) Mass spectra of enzyme products identified by comparison to authentic standards. FaTPS17, TPS18, and TPS42 taken from F.×ananassa (Fa) cultivar “Royal Royce”; FvrTPS17 F. virginiana (Fvr) accession “NC_96-35-2”; FcTPS18 F. chiloensis (Fc) ecotype “Ambato”; FvrTPS40 accession “Harris Springs”; FcTPS40 and FcTPS52 ecotype “Isle de Lemuy”; FvTPS6, FvTPS37 and FvTPS50 F. vesca (Fv) diploid accession “UC06”; FaTPS10 cultivar “EarliMiss.” Identified compounds: 1, Linalool; 2, α-terpineol; 3, endo-borneol; 7, α-pinene; 8, (-)-β-pinene; 9, limonene; 10, terpinolene; 11, terpinen-4-ol.

Additional assays with E,E-FPP as the substrate showed that the identified linalool synthases, FaTPS17/NES1, FvrTPS17, FcTPS18, FaTPS18/NES1t, FvrTPS40, FcTPS40, and FaTPS42, also produced trans-nerolidol 12 (Fig. 4). This confirms the previously reported activities of FaTPS17/NES1 and FaTPS18/NES1t (Aharoni et al. 2004; Fan et al. 2022) and demonstrates that the strawberry genome contains additional dual function linalool/nerolidol synthases. In vitro enzyme assays identified FaTPS10, FaTPS7 (cultivar “Primella”) and FvTPS6 as α-farnesene 13 synthases (Fig. 4). Additional in vivo E. coli co-expression assays of FaTPS10 and FvTPS6 with a maize FPP synthase further detected small quantities of bulnesol 14, β-acoradienol 15, and 8,13-cedranediol 16 annotated based on database references and Kovats indices. These products may represent additional TPS products or oxygenated derivatives thereof formed by endogenous E. coli enzymes, considering that these compounds were observed in in vivo co-expression studies but not in vitro enzyme assays (Figs. 4 and S11). Furthermore, FcTPS52 produced (Z,E)-α-farnesene 20 and bisabolene 17 as major products, as well as small amounts of khusimol 18 and several other sesquiterpenes such as α-chenopodiol 19, 8,13-cedranediol 16, and α-farnesene 13 (Figs. 4 and S11). Protein yields generated for recombinant FvTPS35 (“UC06”), FaTPS35 (“Royal Royce”), and FaTPS36 (“Direktor Paul Wallbaum”) were consistently low. However, in vitro assays with E,E-FPP as a substrate resulted in the formation of β-elemene 21 and humulene 22 in addition to trace amounts of additional sesquiterpenes, likely including β-bisabolene 23, β-acoradiene 24, and caryophyllene 25 as based on best database and Kovats index matches (Figs. 4 and S12).

Figure 4.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Functional characterization of sesquiterpene synthases. a to f) GC-MS total ion chromatograms of products resulting from either in vitro enzyme assays of individual recombinant TPSs with farnesyl diphosphate (E,E-FPP) as a substrate (gray) or co-expression assays of individual TPSs and a FPP synthase in E. coli (white). g) Mass spectra of enzyme products identified by comparison to authentic standards. h) Synteny plots of FaRR1 chromosomes 5 and 7 with F. vesca. The following compounds are likely degradation products of FPP produced in E. coli cultures: (i) cis-trans-farnesene; (ii) farnesol; (iii) 2,3-dihydro farnesyl acetate; (iv) trans-farnesyl acetate. FaTPS17, TPS18, TPS35, and TPS42 from F. × ananassa (Fa) “Royal Royce”; FvrTPS17 and FvrTPS55 F. virginiana (Fvr) “NC_96-35-2”; FcTPS18 and FcTPS58 F. chiloensis (Fc) “Ambato”; FvrTPS40 “Harris Springs”; FcTPS40 and FcTPS52 “Isle de Lemuy”; FvTPS6, FvTPS35, and FvTPS50 F. vesca (Fv) “UC06”; FaTPS7 “Primella”; FaTPS10 “EarliMiss”; FaTPS55 “Madame Moutot.” Identified compounds: 12, trans-nerolidol; 13, α-farnesene; 14, bulnesol; 15, β-acoradienol; 16, 8,13-cedranediol; 21, β-elemene; 22, humulene; 23, β-bisabolene; 24, β-acoradiene; 25, caryophyllene; 26, α-guaiene; 34, cyperene; 35, longifolol; 36, eudesm-7(11)-en-4-ol acetate; 37, hinesol acetate.

Additional co-expression assays confirmed the production of β-elemene 21 and humulene 22 by FaTPS35 and FaTPS36, respectively, alongside a range of minor sesquiterpene products such as α-guaiene 26, whereas co-expression of FaTPS36 showed β-bisabolene 23 as the primary product. In vitro assays of FvrTPS55 (“NC_96-35-2”), FaTPS55 (cultivar “Madame Moutot”), and FcTPS58 (“Ambato”) identified germacrene D 27 and α-muurolene 28 as major products as based on an authentic standard and mass spectral database matches, respectively (Figs. 4 and S12). Complementary co-expression assays confirmed these enzyme activities and showed additional lower abundant byproducts, including viridiflorene 29, germacrene A 30, macrocarpene 31, eremoligenol 32, globulol 33, and several other byproducts (compounds 34-41) as based on Kovats indices and mass spectral databases (Fig. S12). Additional products that were present in trace amounts following TPS co-expression assays and control samples possibly represent isomerization or metabolism products of FPP, such as cis-trans-farnesene i, dauca-4(11),7-diene ii, 2,3-dihydro farnesyl acetate iii, and trans-farnesyl acetate iv (Fig. S11).

Pairwise activity of strawberry diterpene synthases produces specialized diterpenoids

Although not expected to contribute to strawberry aroma, we biochemically characterized selected diTPS candidates to assess the biosynthetic network underlying diterpenoid metabolism in strawberry. Of the identified Class II diTPSs, FaCPS1-4 and FaCPS7 featured a characteristic H-N dyad (Fig. S9), suggesting ent-CPP synthase functions. Biochemical characterization of these diTPSs via E. coli co-expression of FaCPS1-4 with an A. grandis GGPP synthase verified the production of ent-CPP 42, albeit at very low product abundance. However, additional co-expression with a known ent-kaurene synthase from switchgrass (Panicum virgatum), PvKSL13 (Pelot et al. 2018) resulted in the production of ent-kaurene 43 (a direct derivative of diTPS-catalyzed ent-CPP), thus verifying the ent-CPP synthase activity of FaCPS1-4 (Fig. S13). By contrast, FaCPS7 showed no detectable enzyme activity. Biochemical analysis of additional Class II diTPS candidate, FvrCPS5, resulted in the formation of cis-cis-clerodienyl diphosphate (CLPP) 44 as identified by comparison to the previously reported products of the switchgrass PvCPS1 forming cis-trans-CLPP 45, and a PvCPS1:F251V variant that forms cis-cis-CLPP 44 (Pelot et al. 2018, 2019) (Figs. 5 and S14). Next, co-expression assays of FaKSL1-4 or FcKSL5 with an ent-CPP synthase from Zea mays (ZmTPS38/CPS2/AN2) and the A. grandis GGPP synthase were performed. No product formation was detected when co-expressing FaKSL3 or FaKSL4 (Figs. 5 and S13). By contrast, co-expression of ZmTPS38/CPS2/AN2 with FaKSL1 or FaKSL2 yielded ent-kaurene 43 as verified by an authentic standard. In addition, pairwise activity of ZmTPS38/CPS2/AN2 with FcKSL5 resulted in 2 pimaradiene-type diterpenoid products 46/47 based on mass spectral comparison to known pimaradiene scaffolds (Figs. 5 and S14). Further co-expression of FcKSL5 or FaKSL1 with PvCPS1 or PvCPS1:F251V yielded clerodienol 48 and kolavenool 49 derivatives. However, low abundance of the above KSL products prevented further purification and structural verification by nuclear magnetic resonance analysis.

Figure 5.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Functional characterization of diterpene synthases (diTPSs). a) GC-MS total ion chromatograms of products resulting from co-expression assays of FaCPS5 or FvrCPS5 when compared with authentic standards produced by the ent-CPP synthase Z. mays AN2 (ZmTPS38/CPS2/AN2; Harris et al. 2005), the cis-trans-CLPP synthase P. virgatum CPS1 (PvCPS1; Pelot et al. 2018) and the PvCPS1 variant PvCPS1:F251V producing cis-cis-CLPP and cis-trans-CLPP. b) GC-MS traces of products resulting from co-expression assays of FaKSL1-4 and FcKSL5 with ZmTPS38/CPS2/AN2. c) Mass spectra of enzyme products identified by comparison to enzyme-produced standards. FaCPS5, and FaKSL1-4 taken from F. × ananassa (Fa) “Royal Royce”; FvrCPS5 F. virginiana (Fvr) “NC_96-35-2”; FcKSL5 F. chiloensis (Fc) “Ambato.” Identified compounds: 42, ent-CPP; 43, ent-kaurene; 44, cis-cis-clerodienyl diphosphate (CLPP); 45, cis-trans-CLPP; 46/47, 2 pimaradiene-type diterpenoid products; 48, clerodienol; 49, kolavenool.

Terpene metabolite profiles underwent substantial changes throughout strawberry domestication

To assess the diversity of terpene aroma compounds in strawberry we selected a panel of 96 strawberry accessions, cultivars, and wild ecotypes that have been curated and developed by the UC Davis Strawberry Breeding Program and represent a diverse range of aroma profiles across the germplasm (Table S10). Ripe fruits were harvested from field-grown plants during the 2021 and 2022 seasons and analyzed via SPME-GC-MS. A total of 171 VOCs were detected, which included 31 terpene metabolites, as well as a broad variety of short- and medium chain acetic, butyl, and hexyl acid esters such as methyl and hexyl butyrate, alcohols and aldehydes such as 2-hexanol and 2-hexenal, mesifurane, and γ-decalactone (Fig. S15, Data S1, Table S7). Notably, a random forest analysis of the 171 identified metabolites demonstrated that linalool 1, nerolidol 12, and α-terpineol 2 ranked among the 10 most relevant metabolites defining the metabolic differences across the analyzed strawberry accessions, alongside other key strawberry aroma compounds such as γ-decalactone and mesifurane (Fig. 6). Principal components analysis (PCA) based upon the volatile random forest data showed that most samples cluster around 0 with F. vesca “UC06” samples spreading out across PCA1, and cultivar “EarliMiss” stretching across PCA2, which explain 4.3% and 3.4% of the variance, respectively (Fig. 6).

Figure 6.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

VOC analysis of ripe berries harvested from 96 different, field-grown accessions. a) Scree plot of mean decrease accuracy values from random forest analysis depicting the top distinguishing VOCs among the 96 accessions used for quantitative metabolite profiling via SPME-GC-MS analysis. Terpene VOCs are highlighted. b) PCA plot of VOC profiles from samples harvested in 2021 and 2022. c) PCA plot of VOC profiles from samples harvested in 2021 and 2022, excluding samples from the cultivar “EarliMiss” and diploid accession “UC06.” Information on the 96 field-grown accessions used for this study are given in Table S7.

When excluding “EarliMiss” and “UC06” from the analysis, samples of 1 additional cultivar, “Morioka 17,” were identified as distinctive (Fig. 6). “UC06” featured the highest abundance of terpenes among all tested samples with regard to terpene composition, consistent with its metabolic distinctiveness (Data S1). For instance, “UC06” was the only accession consistently containing 1-R-myrtenal 50 and both α- 7 and β-pinene 8 and was 1 of 5 accessions for which different combinations of β-myrcene 51, β-phellandrene 52, β-selinene 53, humulene 22, trans-pinocarvyl acetate 54, and (−)-myrtenol 55 were detected. “UC06” further contained ≥165 times higher amounts of myrtenyl acetate 61 when compared with all other tested accessions (Data S1). In addition, cultivars “EarliMiss” and “Morioka 17” differed from other accessions in the presence of E-β-farnesene 56 and D-limonene 9 and the lack of several fatty acid esters commonly detected in strawberry.

Linalool 1 represented the most abundant terpene in most tested accessions, especially in domesticated F. × ananassa cultivars. However, across the 2021 and 2022 sample collections, the average abundance of linalool 1 and nerolidol 12 showed high variation both within samples of individual accessions and across accessions (Fig. 7, Data S1). In particular, modern cultivars “17C224P011,” “MDUS 5130,” and “Headliner” showed the highest abundance of linalool 1 and nerolidol 12. By contrast, several wild or older domesticated accessions, including F. chiloensis “Isle de Lemuy,” F. × ananassa “Direktor Paul Wallbaum,” F. virginiana accessions “Harris Springs” and “NC_96-35-2,” and F. vesca “UC06” featured overall low terpene diversity and abundance, including no or low abundance of linalool 1 and nerolidol 12. Additional abundant terpenes in the tested accessions were annotated based on best database matches and Kovats indices along with mass spectra, including α-terpineol 2, cis- 57 and trans-linalool oxide 58, nerolidol 12, and α- 13 and (E)-β-farnesene 56. By contrast, several terpene metabolites were only detected in individual accessions, including allo-ocimene 59 (“EarliMiss,” “Mara des Bois” and F. virginiana “Harris Springs”), geraniol 60 (“Headliner” and “17C244P011”), and α-muurolene 28 (F. chiloensis “Ambato” and “Mara des Bois”). Two wild accessions showed a particularly high diversity of terpene metabolites. The diploid F. vesca “UC06” displayed a diverse monoterpene profile, featuring α-pinene 7, myrtenyl acetate 61, limonene 9, terpinen-4-ol 11, β-pinene 8, β-myrcene 51, β-phellandrene 52, trans-pinocarvyl acetate 54, 1-R-myrtenal 50, (-)-myrtenol 55, (E)-β-farnesene 56, 4,11-selinadiene 62, humulene 22, and isopulegol 63 as based on authentic standards or best matches to reference mass spectra (Figs. 7 and S15). By contrast, the wild accession F. virginiana “UC11” was low in monoterpenes but contained a range of sesquiterpenes not abundant in other accessions, including caryophyllene 25, eremophilene 64, α- 26 and δ-guaiene 65, α- 66 and β-selinene 53, 4,11-selinadiene 62, and humulene 22. Additionally, small differences in the VOC profiles were detected when fruits from the same plants were processed fresh or after flash freezing (Figs. 7 and S16). For example, allo-ocimene 59 was detected in higher amounts in flash frozen F. virginiana “Harris Springs” samples and 2 other accessions harvested for transcriptomic and VOC analysis, yet it was not detected in the corresponding fruits harvested and processed fresh. Although freshly processed samples contained more terpenes, several terpenes, γ-dihydro-terpineol, carvomenthol, and γ-bisabolene, were detected only in flash frozen tissues.

Figure 7.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Abundance of terpene metabolites and relevant TPS genes in field-grown strawberry fruits. a) Dot plot representing average normalized peak area of terpenes identified via SPME-GC-MS analysis of metabolites extracted from ripe fruit of field-grown strawberry plants. b) Hierarchical cluster analysis performed on gene expression data of select TPS genes analyzed in this study. TPSs were identified based on mapping functionally characterized TPSs against the FaRR1 genome (Hardigan et al. 2021a). Scaled gene expression data are based on 3 biological replicates. F. × ananassa (Fa) cultivars “Royal Royce” (RR), “17C224P011” (17), “Mara des Bois” (MDB) for which no field-grown transcriptome data was available, “Beaver Belle” (BB), “MDUS 5130” (MDUS), “Tangi” (Tan), “Primella” (Prim), “Linn”, “Headliner” (Head), “EarliMiss” (EM), “Direktor Paul Wallbaum” (DPW), and “Madame Moutot” (MM). F. chiloensis (Fc) “Ambato” (Amb) and “Isle de Lemuy 02A White” (ILE). F. virginiana (Fvr) “Harris Springs” (HS), “NC_96-35-2” (NC), “UC11”. Diploid F. vesca (Fv) “UC04” and “UC06'”

To complement metabolite profiles, we used the generated transcriptome data of field-grown, ripe fruits of 2 diploid F. vesca, 2 F. chiloensis, 2 F. virginiana accessions, and 12 F. × ananassa accessions (ranging from 1910 and 2017) (Table S5). Overall, the gene expression levels of identified TPSs did not show substantial correlation with the terpene metabolite profiles (Fig. 7). However, select TPSs displayed transcript abundance in alignment with accession-specific terpene profiles. For example, high expression of the pinene synthase FaTPS50/PINS, terpinolene synthase FaTPS37, ocimene synthase FaTPS6, and NES FaTPS42 in diploid accession “UC06” was aligned with the predominant presence of monoterpenes.

Genotypes containing higher amounts of α-/β-farnesene 13, 45 also showed higher abundance of the farnesene synthases FaTPS6 and FaTPS10, including cultivars “MDUS 5130,” “Primella,” and “EarliMiss,” and F. chiloensis “Ambato” and “Isle de Lemuy.” However, FaTPS6 or FaTPS10 were also abundant in cultivars producing no or low levels of farnesene such as “Royal Royce” and “Madame Moutot.” Similarly, with the exception of F. vesca “UC06” that showed relatively high abundance of FaTPS18/NESt, genotypes abundant in linalool 1 and nerolidol 12 did not show high gene expression of NESs FaTPS17/NES1, FaTPS18/NESt, FaTPS40, and FaTPS42.

Alteration of terpene metabolism during fruit ripening

To assess changes in terpene abundance during fruit ripening, 2 modern F. × ananassa cultivars, “Royal Royce” and “Mara des Bois,” which feature contrasting fruit properties and are frequently used for breeding efforts centered around aroma, fruit quality, and yield, were grown in the greenhouse and fruit samples were harvested at green, white, underripe, ripe and overripe stages as described previously (Jiménez et al. 2024). Headspace VOC analysis via SPME-GC-MS identified 23 volatile terpenes, the majority of which matched compounds identified in field-grown, ripe fruits (Fig. 8). Consistent with field-grown fruit, linalool 1 was the most abundant terpene, followed by nerolidol 12, cis/trans-linalool oxide 57/58, and β-pinene 8. During fruit ripening of “Royal Royce” berries, accumulation of linalool 1 and nerolidol 12 were the dominant changes with a 677-fold increase in linalool and a 2,367-fold accumulation of nerolidol 12 during the development from green to ripe fruits (Data S2). This accumulation was followed by a decrease of both metabolites as evidenced by lower linalool 1 and nerolidol 12 abundances in overripe fruits. “Mara des Bois” fruits displayed a similar pattern, with a 709-fold- increase in linalool 1 and a 2,798-fold increase in nerolidol 12 during fruit ripening. While “Mara des Bois” fruit contained a less diverse terpene blend when compared with “Royal Royce,” both cultivars showed low terpene abundance in green and white fruit. “Royal Royce” fruit showed an increase in linalool 1 as well as linalool oxide 57/58 and β-pinene 8 at the underripe stage. In ripe fruit, monoterpene abundance except for linalool 1 was lower, while an increase in nerolidol 12 was observed. This trend continued in overripe fruit that showed a higher abundance in several sesquiterpenes. Although lower in terpene abundance, a similar pattern was observed in “Mara des Bois” berries with an increase in linalool 1 and nerolidol 12 in ripe and overripe fruit.

Figure 8.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Alterations in terpene metabolism during fruit ripening. a) Images of representative F. × ananassa “Royal Royce” (RR) and “Mara De Bois” (MDB) berries at the green, white, underripe, ripe, and overripe developmental stages. b) Dot plot showing average normalized peak area of terpenes identified via SPME-GC-MS analysis of metabolites extracted from berry tissue. Note that no MDB tissue was available for metabolite profiling of green fruit due to limited berry production in this cultivar. c) Hierarchical cluster analysis performed on gene expression data of select TPS genes analyzed in this study using the same berry tissues. TPSs were identified based on mapping functionally characterized TPSs against the FaRR1 genome (Hardigan et al. 2021a). Scaled gene expression data are based on 3 biological replicates.

Transcriptome analysis of the same fruit tissues revealed that known rate-limiting genes of the MEP pathway, eg, deoxyxylulose 5-phosphate synthase (dxs) and deoxyxylulose 5-phosphate reductoisomerase (dxr), showed highest transcript abundance in green fruit in either cultivar with a continued decrease in gene expression during ripening (Fig. S17).

In addition, 4-hydroxy-3-methylbut-2-enyl diphosphate reductase 1 (hdr1) and hdr3 showed slightly higher expression in “Mara des Bois” fruits through ripening whereas hdr2 and hdr4 expression gradually increased in “Royal Royce” fruits during ripening with the highest normalized counts detected in overripe fruits. By contrast, hmg-coa reductase (hmgr), as a key rate-limiting gene of the MVA pathway, increased in transcript abundance during ripening with highest expression levels in overripe fruit. Gene expression patterns of TPSs did not show a clear correlation with terpene abundance (Fig. 8). However, a moderate increase in the transcript abundance of the NESs, FaTPS17/NES1 and FaTPS18/NES1t, was observed during fruit ripening in both cultivars that is aligned with an accumulation of linalool 1 and nerolidol 12. In addition, expression of FaTPS50 was high in white “Royal Royce” fruit possibly associated with the increase in β-pinene 8 in underripe fruit. Notably, gene expression of FaCPS1-4 and FaKSL1-4 was highest in green fruit of “Royal Royce” and/or “Mara des Bois.” In contrast, transcript abundance of FaCPS5 with a proposed function in specialized diterpenoid metabolism was highest in overripe “Mara des Bois,” but not “Royal Royce,” fruit.

Discussion

Species-specific blends of volatile terpene metabolites serve as chemical cues in various plant-environment interactions, including roles in long-distance chemical defenses, plant-microbiome interactions, and pollinator interactions (Tholl 2015). Beyond their physiological importance, terpene VOCs are core constituents of aroma traits in many fruit crops including strawberry (Nieuwenhuizen et al. 2013; Ilc et al. 2016; Ulrich and Olbricht 2016; Fan et al. 2021b). Leveraging advanced omics and synthetic biology approaches now enables a detailed investigation of the diversity of crop aroma and the underlying gene and pathway networks. The characterization of the strawberry TPS gene family provides a genomic atlas for the biosynthesis of aroma-relevant terpenes. The presence of 75 full-length TPS gene candidates in the octoploid F. × ananassa “Royal Royce” genome (FaRR1) places the strawberry TPS family at the higher end of the TPS families identified in other species of the rosid clade, including eucalyptus (Eucalyptus grandis) with 113 TPSs (Külheim et al. 2015), grape (Vitis vinifera) with 39 TPSs (Martin et al. 2010), apple (Malus domestica) with 55 TPSs (Nieuwenhuizen et al. 2013), and almond (Prunus dulcis) with ∼30 predicted TPSs (Nawade et al. 2019). Notably, the diploid genome of the F. vesca progenitor contains a smaller TPS family of 43 predicted members (Zhang et al. 2022), 25 of which have orthologs in the octoploid FaRR1 genome. Additionally, the presence of TPSs (ie, FaTPS3-5, 11-15, 25, 33, 41-45, 53, and 63) in the FaRR1 genome that lack syntenic equivalents in F. vesca support the expansion of the TPS gene family in octoploid strawberry through a combination of polyploidization and tandem gene duplication events (Fig. 1). For instance, closely co-localized TPS genes are present on the distal ends of chromosome 3 homoeologs, including the β-farnesene synthases TPS6, TPS7, and TPS10; the NESs FaTPS17/NES1 and FaTPS18/NES1t, as well as FaTPS11/NES2 and FaTPS12-14 co-located on chromosome 3B, suggesting that they arose through repeated gene duplication events.

In addition to the previously reported NESs, FaTPS17/NES1, FaTPS18/NES1t, and FaTPS11/NES2, biochemical characterization showed that TPS40 and FaTPS42 also form nerolidol 12 and linalool 1 (Figs. 3 and 4). However, TPS40 and FaTPS42 are phylogenetically distant from known NES enzymes within the TPS-b family (Fig. 2), highlighting that the strawberry genome contains a larger group of NESs (Fig. 9), thus providing genetic redundancy for the biosynthesis of these major terpenes in strawberry and likely contributing to the high abundance of these aroma compounds in most strawberry cultivars and accessions (Fig. 7). Previous studies showed a shared QTL on chromosome 3 for several aroma terpenes such as linalool 1, α-farnesene 13, and nerolidol 12, which contained FaTPS17/NES1, thus supporting a major role in strawberry aroma metabolism (Barbey et al. 2021). However, a higher gene expression of especially FaTPS40 and FaTPS42 in early cultivars and wild relatives when compared with modern cultivars detected in this study, supports that additional TPSs contribute to nerolidol 12 and linalool 1 accumulation (Fig. 7). Interestingly, subcellular localization prediction supports a plastidial localization of TPS17 and TPS18, whereas TPS40 and TPS42 are predictably cytosolic, further suggesting that these TPS contribute differently to linalool 1 and nerolidol 12 biosynthesis at the cellular level.

Figure 9.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Current model of the strawberry terpene-metabolic network. Shown are major terpene products formed by the 27 TPS enzymes functionally analyzed in this study. TPS enzymes are colored corresponding to TPS clades assigned in Fig. 2. GGPP, geranylgeranyl diphosphate; GPP, geranyl diphosphate; FPP, farnesyl diphosphate; CPP, copalyl diphosphate; CPS, copalyl diphosphate synthase; KSL, kaurene synthase-like; RR, “Royal Royce”; 17, “17C224P011”; MDB, “Mara des Bois”; MDUS, “MDUS 5130”; Tan, “Tangi”; Prim, “Primella”; Head, “Headliner”; EM, “EarliMiss”; Amb, “Ambato”; ILE, “Isle de Lemuy 02A White”; HS, Harris Springs’; MM, “Madame Moutot” (MM).

Beyond the identification of additional NES enzymes, biochemical analysis of 20 mono- and sesqui-TPSs selected for their predicted functions and expression in strawberry fruits revealed the detection and biosynthesis of 47 terpene metabolites (Fig. 9), including known strawberry terpenes and metabolites that, to the best of our knowledge, have not previously been reported in strawberry such as α- 26 and δ-guaiene 65, α-muurolene 28, β-selinene 53, and eremophilene 64, while volatile profile analysis of field grown fruits newly detected isopulegol 63, 7-epi-α-selinane 67, trans-pinocarvyl acetate 54, and 4,11-selinadiene 62 (Figs. 4, 7, 9, and S15). The identified TPS products reveal the biosynthetic origin of over half of the terpene metabolites detected in the strawberry accessions analyzed in this study (Fig. 7), notably including linalool 1, α-terpineol 2, limonene 9, α-/β-pinene 7/8, terpinen-4-ol 11, allo-ocimene 59, nerolidol 12, α-farnesene 13, caryophyllene 25, humulene 22, α-/δ-guaiene 26/65, β-selinene 53, eremophilene 64, and α-muurolene 28. Notably, some TPS enzymes, such FaTPS35, FvTPS35, and FaTPS6 showed differences in their product profile when tested in vitro and in vivo. Presumably, additional products observed in in vivo co-expression assays result from a combination of possible factors, including differences in protein expression, substrate availability, and conversion by endogenous E. coli enzymes. The functional identification of FvTPS6, FaTPS7, and FaTPS10 as genes encoding β-farnesene synthases that form a syntenic grouping with FaTPS21 in the FaRR1 genome provides biochemical evidence for previously reported functional predictions on the basis of eQTL analyses (Barbey et al. 2021). Although only limited correlation of individual TPS gene expression with terpene abundance was detected (Fig. 8), presence of FvTPS6, FaTPS7, and FaTPS10, alongside FaTPS21 and FaNES1/TPS17, on the shared QTL on chromosome 3 for linalool 1, nerolidol 12, and α-farnesene 13 among other terpenes (Barbey et al. 2021), indicates a functional role of these TPSs in producing these aroma metabolites. In addition to FaTPS6, 7 and 10, FcTPS52, identified in F. chiloensis “Isle de Lemuy,” also produced α-farnesene 13 but represented a multi-product TPS also forming other sesquiterpenes such as β-acoradienol 15, α-farnesene 13, (E)-γ-bisabolene 17, thus possibly contributing to the diversity of strawberry aroma profiles (Figs. 4 and S11).

Production of α-pinene 7 and several low abundant byproducts by FvTPS50/PINS confirms earlier studies that demonstrated the function of FvTPS50/PINS, and a downstream-acting cytochrome P450 monooxygenase and alcohol acyltransferase, in the biosynthesis of myrtenol and myrtenyl acetate (Aharoni et al. 2004). Transcript and metabolite profiling of the diploid accession “UC06” showed significant correlation between high FaTPS50 transcript abundance and accumulation of α-/β-pinene 7/8, myrtenol 55, and myrtenyl acetate 61, suggesting that this pathway is particularly productive in this accession. In addition to FvTPS50/PINS, formation of linalool 1, α-terpineol 2, and several other monoterpenes by FvTPS37 represents another enzymatic source of consumer-preferred aroma metabolites in strawberry. Differential gene expression of FvTPS37 across the breeding material may contribute to differences in terpene aroma metabolism across different accessions (Figs. 6 and 7). In addition, production of as many as 23 different sesquiterpene products by FaTPS35, FaTPS36, TPS55, and FcTPS58 reveals the genetic basis for the biosynthesis of more complex terpene blends in some of the tested accessions such as F. virginiana “UC11” and “NC_96-35-2” and diploid “UC06” (Fig. S12). Collectively, the identified TPS functions demonstrate that catalytic redundancy and functional diversity within the strawberry TPS family provide the biochemical basis for the complex aroma profiles in different cultivars and accessions, especially in wild and diploid strawberries that often feature a higher diversity of terpenes (Aharoni et al. 2004; Bianchi et al. 2014; Negri et al. 2015; Ulrich and Olbricht 2016; Urrutia et al. 2017; Duan et al. 2018).

In addition to a large family of mono- and sesqui-TPS enzymes, genome mining identified 10 diTPS candidate genes in the FaRR1 genome (Fig. 9). Biochemical analysis of FaCPS1-4 showed enzyme catalytic redundancy also in strawberry diterpenoid metabolism with all enzymes producing ent-CPP 42, as well as ent-kaurene 43 in the pairwise activity with the Class I diTPSs FxaKSL1-2, thus suggesting functions in GA phytohormone metabolism as well as possibly specialized diterpenoid pathways similar to related enzymes identified in other plant species (Peters 2010; Karunanithi and Zerbe 2019). By contrast, FvrCPS5 “NC_96-35-2” and FaCPS5 “Royal Royce” were predicted as specialized diTPSs and indeed produced cis-cis-clerodienyl diphosphate (CC-CLPP) 44, a member of the group of clerodane diterpenoids that are abundant in species of mint and a few monocot crops where they have probable functions in stress response mechanisms (Peters 2010; Pelot et al. 2017; Johnson et al. 2019a, 2019b; Muchlinski et al. 2021; Tiedge et al. 2022). Co-localization of FaCPS5 with a predicted Class I diTPS, FaKSL4, on chromosome 3D suggested a possible pairwise activity of the encoded enzymes in clerodane biosynthesis. However, co-expression studies in E. coli did not reveal any coupled reaction products, thus requiring more expansive future studies to elucidate the diterpenoid-metabolic network in strawberry.

In addition to the terpene diversity across different strawberries, expectedly, alterations in terpene metabolism were also observed during fruit ripening. Consistent with their dominance in most tested accessions, linalool and nerolidol accumulated throughout fruit ripening (Fig. 8). High gene expression of the NESs FaTPS17/NES1 and FaTPS18/NES1t in underripe and ripe fruits indicates a likely involvement of these genes in driving metabolite production during fruit ripening. Likewise, increase in linalool oxides 57/58, limonene 9, myrtenol 55 and β-pinene 8 in green or white “Royal Royce” fruits correlated with increasing transcript abundance of FaTPS50, supporting a possible biosynthetic relationship. Furthermore, high transcript abundance of the predicted ent-CPP synthases, FaCPS1-4, in green fruit suggests possible functions in GA phytohormone biosynthesis at the onset of fruit development and ripening (Csukasi et al. 2011; Liao et al. 2018). However, given the specialized function of FaCPS5 and the role of ent-CPP as a specialized diterpenoid precursor in other plant species (Peters 2010; Pelot et al. 2017; Johnson et al. 2019a, 2019b; Muchlinski et al. 2021; Tiedge et al. 2022), possible roles in stress response mechanisms in developing fruits cannot be excluded.

Much diversity in both comparative abundance and complexity of terpene profiles exists across the diversity panel analyzed in this study as exemplified by linalool amounts varying by a factor of more than 500 between the highest and lowest linalool 1 producers. Congruent with past research, terpene-derived fruit aromas in F. × ananassa accessions are dominated by linalool 1, nerolidol 12, and α-terpineol 2, whereas wild diploid accessions are characterized by olefinic monoterpenes such as α-/β-pinene 7/8 (Aharoni et al. 2004; Chambers et al. 2012, Fig. 7). This reflects recent breeding efforts having selected for high linalool 1 cultivars based upon known positive correlations with consumer preferences (Schwieterman et al. 2014; Ulrich and Olbricht 2016; Fan et al. 2021a). Similarly, significant differences in nerolidol 12 abundance were detected between most non-F. × ananassa accessions and more modern breeding lines such as “EarliGlow” and “17C224P001” (Data S1). The functional characterization of previously reported and unidentified TPSs provides a better understanding of the functional range of the strawberry TPS family and its contribution to terpene variation across different cultivars and accessions, thus providing a resource to link biochemically verified gene functions with rapidly expanding genomic and genetic insights into the metabolic network driving terpene aroma profiles. A broader knowledge of the metabolic diversity across the existing germplasm may further aid the identification of strawberry lines for breeding of advanced, consumer-preferred strawberry aromas.

Materials and methods

Plant material

A panel of 96 strawberry (F. × ananassa) accessions comprising a selection of both ecotypes and modern cultivars derived from the UC Davis Strawberry Breeding Program collection were grown under established commercial conditions at Wolfskill Experimental Orchards in Winters, California in 2021 and UC Davis Vegetable Crop Fields in Davis, CA in 2022 (Table S10, Petrasch et al. 2022). Ripe fruits from each accession were harvested between 8 and 10 AM throughout the growing season every 2 to 3 wk between April and June and stored at 4 °C with 70% relative humidity until processing. Twice in early May during the middle of the 2021 season, additional ripe fruits from 17 accessions which span the range of strawberry domestication and were expected to harbor a diversity of volatile profiles were harvested for transcriptome analysis (Table S5). Upon harvest, berries were immediately sliced, frozen in liquid N2, transported on dry ice, and stored at −80 °C until use for metabolite and transcriptome analysis. In addition to field harvests, 2 cultivars, “Royal Royce” and “Mara de Bois,” were grown at UC Davis greenhouses. Two plants of each cultivar were planted into pots in Fall 2020 and kept throughout the winter so that berries were harvested as needed throughout the first week of March 2021 through the first week of June 2021. Fruits were harvested fully green, white, turning or underripe, fully ripe, and overripe and processed as described above for further transcriptomic and aroma analysis (Jiménez et al. 2024).

Metabolite analysis

For metabolite profiling of field-grown plants, 3 to 9 fully ripe berries (depending on different fruit production across the tested accessions) were harvested and pooled from 4 individual plants of each accession. Berries were then divided into 3 technical replicates and halved for subsequent metabolite or transcriptome analysis. For metabolite analysis, the samples were weighed and supplemented with an equal amount (w/v) of 20% NaCl and 50 pp γ-undecalactone (final concentration, in methanol; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) as an internal standard (Jetti et al. 2007). Samples were homogenized in a blender (SharkNinja, Needham, MA, USA) and 5 mL of the solution transferred to pre-weighed 20 mL glass crimp-cap SPME vials (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Samples were capped, labeled, and stored at −20 °C.

Samples were analyzed using solid-phase microextraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (SPME-GC-MS) on an Agilent Intuvo 9000 GC coupled with a 5977b MS with a 350 XTR Electron Ionization (EI) source (Agilent Technologies). Samples were incubated at 30 °C for 5 min during SPME fiber adsorption with a 50/30 µm DVB/Carboxen-WR/PDMS SPME fiber (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA), followed by injection and 6 min desorption into the inlet at 240 °C using helium as a carrier gas at a flow rate of 1.2 mL/min. Compound separation was achieved on a DB-WAX UltraInert column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 µm column; Agilent Technologies). Oven settings were held at 40 °C for 2 min, 4 °C/min to 70 °C, 6 °C/min to 180 °C, 15 °C/min to 220 °C, and held at 220 °C for 2 min. Mass ranges were recorded from 40 to 400 m/z with an EI energy of 70 eV and detector temperature set to 230 °C. Compounds were identified based on available authentic standards (Table S8) or matches to reference mass spectral databases of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST, version 17.1). Where product identification on the basis of authentic standards was not possible, Kovats indices were calculated. Compound abundance was calculated based on relative peak areas and integration using MassHunter Unknowns Analysis software with default deconvolution settings (Agilent Technologies). Metabolite abundance values were normalized against the internal standard and sample dry weight after drying samples for 48 h at 100 °C, and subtraction of saline buffer content and vial weight. The same total ion chromatograms were secondarily analyzed against 8 terpene standard curves and normalized against the same dried berry weights used above to report compound concentrations in nanograms per gram dry berry weight. Relative quantification of 8 quantified metabolites were performed using MassHunter Quantification and Unknown Analysis software (Agilent Technologies) and are shown in Table S8 with equations supplied for linear regression calibration curves for all 8 standards following previous protocols (Jetti et al. 2007). Cleaned, normalized GC-MS data were analyzed using the randomForest package (Liaw and Wiener 2002) in the R Statistical Software v.4.4.0 (R Core Team 2021) with default parameters of ntree 5000. The square root of total variables entered were tested at each split. Thus, for the analysis of all 171 detected VOCs 13 randomly chosen aroma metabolites were tested at each split. Mean decreased accuracy, or the level of accuracy lost at each tree node when a particular metabolite is omitted, were extracted from each random forest analysis to estimate metabolite impact within sample aroma profiles. Principal component analyses and multidimensional scaling plots were generated within the randomForest package and R Statistical Software.

RNA isolation and transcriptome analysis

The second half of harvested flash frozen berries (see above) were ground into a fine powder in liquid N2 using mortars and pestles. Approximately 2 g of ground tissue was mixed with 6 mL warm extraction buffer (2% v/v CTAB, 2% PVP, 100 mm Tris, 40% NaCl, 25 mm EDTA, 0.2 g spermidine, 2% mercaptothion) and incubated at 65 °C for 5 min (Blanco-Ulate et al. 2013). Equal volumes of 24:1 chloroform:isoamyl alcohol was added, mixed, and centrifuged at 4,000 rpm for 30 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was collected, supplemented with 24:1 chloroform:isoamyl alcohol and centrifuged again. The supernatant was then supplemented with 10% 1 M Potassium Acetate, centrifuged at 4,000 rpm for 20 min at 4 °C, and the resulting supernatant added to a ¼ volume of 10 M Lithium Chloride. The sample was mixed gently and precipitated overnight at −20 °C before centrifugation at 4,000 rpm for 45 min at 4 °C. The resulting pellet was resuspended in 60 µL RNAse-free water and cleaned using the Zymo Research Quick-RNA Mini-Prep Kit and DNase1 treatment (Zymo Research Corporation, Irvine, CA, USA) as per manufacturer's instructions.

Library preparation and transcriptome sequencing was performed by the NovoGene Corporation Inc. using NovaSeq 6000 paired-end short read sequencing using the NEBNext and AMPure XP suite of reagents and protocols (NEB, USA). Transcripts were cleaned using the HTStream suite to remove adapters, polyA tails, and reads under 50 bp. FastQC and MultiQC were used to assess RNA read quality before proceeding (Andrews 2010). The remaining high-quality reads (20 to 29.6 M 150 bp reads with an average of ∼24 M reads x2 per sample) were aligned to the FaRR1 genome and read counts were obtained using the STAR package with default parameters (Dobin et al. 2013; Petersen et al. 2015). Additionally, to identify transcripts that did not align to the FaRR1 genome, a Trinity de novo assembly (Grabherr et al. 2011; Haas et al. 2013) was performed with default parameters and mapped to the assembled de novo transcriptomes using bowtie2 for all reads of each genotype (Langmead and Salzberg 2012). Cleaned reads were normalized using the TMM function with default parameters in the edgeR software package (Robinson et al. 2010) and averaged across replicates for each genotype, after which any contigs or genes with fewer than 10 counts for at least one sample were discarded. Cleaned de novo transcripts were also compared with the FaRR1 genome to distinguish any transcripts that had <95% sequence identity with any of the 75 full-length FaRR1 genomic TPS candidates (Tables S3 and S4). Gene counts were normalized and analyzed in R using the edgeR (Robinson et al. 2010) and heatmap (Perry 2024) packages.

Gene identification, synthesis, and construct design

To identify TPS gene candidates and core genes of the MEP and MVA pathways, reciprocal BLAST searches were performed on the FaRR1 genome (Hardigan et al. 2021a) and the transcriptome data generated in this study against a curated database of protein sequences that represent the functional space of TPSs and MEP/MVA enzymes across higher plants (Zerbe et al. 2013). The obtained transcripts were manually curated for presence of characteristic catalytic domains, sequence completeness, and phylogenetic relationships as described previously (Zerbe et al. 2013). The resulting 104 possible TPS were narrowed further based on sequence length: mono- and sesqui-TPS candidates with a length of 450 to 750 amino acids and diTPS with a length of 550 to 850 amino acids were selected for further analysis, resulting in 27 full-length TPS genes (Table S4). Transcripts featuring expression counts lower than 10 or lacking de novo transcripts were also not considered for further study.

Full-length or N-terminally truncated (removal of the predicted plastidial transit peptides; Table S4) genes were obtained via DNA synthesis and codon optimized for expression in E. coli (Twist Biosciences, South San Francisco, CA, USA). For protein purification and in vitro enzyme assays, TPS genes were inserted into the pET28a(+) expression vector (EMD Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA) in frame with the N-terminal poly-His tag. For in vivo co-expression analysis in E. coli, synthesized TPS genes were inserted into the pACYC vector (EMD Millipore) containing previously confirmed functional copies of either A. grandis (Grand Fir) GPP synthase, Z. mays E,E-FPP synthase (ZmFPPS4), or the A. grandis GGPP synthase in the second multiple cloning site.

In vitro enzyme assays

Synthesized TPS constructs in the pET28a(+) vector were expressed in E. coli BL21DE3-C41 cells (Sigma-Aldrich) and Ni2+-NTA affinity purified as follows: 100 mL cultures were induced with 1 mm isopropyl-β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG; Sigma-Aldrich) and grown for 24 h at 16 °C. Cultures were pelleted at 4 °C and resuspended in 40 mL of wash buffer (20 mm Tris Base, 50 mm KCl, pH 7) then resuspended in 4 mL of phosphate-buffered saline lysis buffer (50 mm H2NaPO4, 200 mm NaCl, 10% glycerol, 15 mm Imidazole, pH 7) with freshly added 0.5 mm phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (Sigma-Aldrich), and 1 mm dithiothreitol (DTT; Sigma-Aldrich) and sonicated in an ice bath at 20% amplitude for a total of 2 min. Crude lysates were pelleted and stored at −80 °C. Protein was purified at 4 °C using equilibrated 750 µL Ni-NTA agarose. Lysates were added to Ni-NTA beads with 4 mL of lysis buffer and batch bound for 1 h. Lysates were allowed to settle for 30 min before they were washed with 2 mL of wash buffer 1 (50 mm H2NaPO4, 300 mm NaCl, 5% glycerol, 25 mm Imidazole, pH 7) and followed with 4 mL of wash buffer 2 (50 mm H2NaPO4, 300 mm NaCl, 5% glycerol, 35 mm imidazole, pH 7). Protein was eluted using Elution Buffer (50 mm H2NaPO4, 300 mm NaCl, 350 mm Imidazole, pH 7). Presence of all purified proteins were confirmed via Western Blot using the BioRad TransBlot and Alkaline-Phosphatase system from BioRad Technologies (Hercules, CA, USA) and Alkaline Phosphatase Anti-6x His tag antibody (AD1.1.10; Abcam Limited, Cambridge, UK).

Single-vial mono- and sesqui-TPS enzyme assays were performed as previously described (Martin et al. 2004). In brief, 100 μg of recombinant proteins were combined with 15 μm GPP or E,E-FPP (Sigma-Aldrich) as substrates in a total volume of 1 mL of assay buffer (25 mm HEPES, pH 7.2, 100 mm KCl, 10 mm MnCl2, 10% glycerol, 5 mm DTT) and overlaid with 600 µL of hexane (Thermo Fisher Scientific) to trap terpene products during the assays. Each sample was supplanted with 0.03 ppm isobutylbenzene (Sigma-Aldrich) as internal standard. After 2 h incubation at room temperature, enzyme products were extracted by vortexing and analyzed via GC-MS as described below.

In vivo enzyme co-expression analysis

For co-expression assays of selected TPSs, E. coli BL21DE3-C41 cells were co-transformed with individual TPS constructs in the pACYC vector, as well as plasmids carrying either A. grandis GPP synthase, Z. mays FPP synthase (ZmFPP4), or the A. grandis GGPP synthase (pGG plasmid) and key enzymes of the MEP pathway (pIRS plasmid) as described previously (Cyr et al. 2007; Morrone et al. 2010). For combinatorial expression of diTPSs, Class I diTPSs were cloned into the pET28a(+) plasmid and Class II diTPSs were inserted into the pACYC vector to maintain replication complementarity. For all combinations, co-expression assays were performed as described previously (Pelot et al. 2017). In brief, cultures were grown at 37 °C and 180 rpm in 50 mL of Terrific Broth medium to an OD600 of ∼0.6 before cooling the cultures to 16 °C and induction with 1 mm IPTG for 72 h with the addition of 1.25 mL 1 M Sodium pyruvate and 50 μL MgCl2. Products were extracted with 50 mL of hexane containing 17.5 ng/μL 1-eicosene (Sigma-Aldrich) as internal standard, air dried, and resuspended in 1 mL of n-hexane for GC-MS analysis.

GC-MS analysis of TPS products

Analysis of extracted enzyme products was conducted via liquid-injection GC-MS on an Agilent 7890B GC coupled with a 5977A Extractor EI MS (Agilent Technologies). Samples were injected into the inlet at 250 °C using Helium as a carrier gas at a flow rate of 1.2 mL/min. Compound separation was achieved on a HP-5MS column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 µm column; Agilent Technologies). Oven settings for analysis of the mono- and sesqui-terpenes were held at 50 °C for 2 min, 8 °C/min to 200 °C, 25 °C/min to 250 °C, and held at 250 °C for 1 min. Oven settings for analysis of diterpene products were held at 50 °C for 3 min, 15 °C/min to 300 °C and held at 300 °C for 4 min. Mass ranges were recorded after a solvent delay of 6 min for mono- and sesqui-terpenes or 13 min for diterpenes with a mass range of 40 to 400 m/z, an EI energy of 70 eV, and the detector temperature set to 230 °C. Total ion chromatogram peaks were integrated using MassHunter Unknowns Analysis software (Agilent Technologies) and compounds were identified based on comparison to available authentic standards (Table S8; Sigma-Aldrich) or best matches to reference mass spectral databases of the NIST, version 17.1. Where product identification on the basis of authentic standards was not possible, Kovats indices were calculated (Table S9). For Kovats index analysis, data were collected by GC-MS as described above using a C8-C20 alkane standard mixture (Sigma-Aldrich). Kovats indices (KI) were calculated using the following formula: KI = 100×n + x (n = carbon number of alkene eluting immediately before the focal compound; x = relative position as based on retention time (RT) as per the below formula) (Vandenpool and Kratz 1963; Kovats 1965).

X=100×(RTsample–RTalkenebeforesampleRT)/(RTalkeneaftersampleRT–RTalkenebeforesampleRT)

Heat map and hierarchical cluster analysis

Gene candidates of the MEP and MVA pathways were plotted across the FaRR1 genome using Chromplot in R (Oróstica and Verdugo 2016, Table S1). Heatmaps, and hierarchical cluster analysis on selected transcriptome data was analyzed using the heatmap package in R (Perry 2024).

Phylogenetic analysis

For phylogenetic studies, protein sequences of the identified TPSs and known TPSs from other Rosaceae and plant species were aligned using the MUSCLE package with neighbor joining parameters (Edgar 2004) and cleaned with BMGE default parameters (Criscuolo and Gribaldo 2010). A maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree was generated with the NGphylogeny.fr user interface PHYML with Smart Model Selection, Subtree Pruning and Regrafting, minimum theoretical information criterion (AIC) and 500 bootstraps (Guindon et al. 2010; Lefort et al. 2017; Lemoine et al. 2018, 2019). The tree was visualized using Newick displays (Junier and Zdobnov 2010) and formatted using Geneious (www.geneious.com).

Supplementary Material

kiag292_Supplementary_Data

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the outstanding support of the field superintendents and staff at the UC Davis Wolfskill Experiment Orchard (Winters, CA, USA) and UC Davis Department of Plant Sciences (Davis, CA, USA) and the production managers and farm managers and field staff at Mar Vista Farms (Santa Maria, CA, USA). We further thank Dr. Reuben Peters (Iowa State University) for providing the pIRS and pACYC plasmids. We also thank Anna Cowie and Gabby Wyatt for assistance analyzing the diterpene data and Mishi Vachev for help with synteny analysis.

Contributor Information

Mary A Madera, Department of Plant Biology, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616, United States; Department of Plant Sciences, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616, United States.

Farida Yasmin, Department of Plant Biology, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616, United States.

Kristen L Becker, Department of Plant Sciences, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616, United States.

Jenevieve D Weissman, Department of Plant Biology, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616, United States.

Randi A Famula, Department of Plant Sciences, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616, United States.

Marta Bjornson, Department of Plant Sciences, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616, United States.

Glenn S Cole, Department of Plant Sciences, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616, United States.

Mitchell J Feldmann, Department of Plant Sciences, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616, United States.

Steven J Knapp, Department of Plant Sciences, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616, United States.

Philipp Zerbe, Department of Plant Biology, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616, United States.

Author contributions

P.Z. and S.J.K. conceived the original research and oversaw data analysis. M.A.M., K.L.B., and J.D.W. performed the tissue harvest and metabolite analyses. G.S.C. and R.A.F. maintained field and greenhouse plant material. M.A.M., R.A.F., M.B., and M.J.F. performed transcriptome studies. M.A.M. and F.Y. performed enzyme biochemical assays. F.Y. performed the analysis of Kovats indices. M.A.M., F.Y., and P.Z. wrote the manuscript with input from all authors. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material is available at Plant Physiology online.

Funding

This research was supported by a California Strawberry Commission grant (#A19-3961-001) to P.Z. and S.J.K. through the National Science Foundation TRTech-PGR program (grant# 2312181) and grants to S.J.K. from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA; http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000199) National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) Specialty Crops Research Initiative (SCRI) (#2017-51181B6833), S.J.K., M.J.F., and M.B. from the USDA NIFA SCRI (#2022-51181-38328-0), and S.J.K., G.S.C., M.J.F., and M.B. from the California Strawberry Commission (http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100006760), as well as a UC Davis Jastro-Shields Graduate Research Award to M.A.M.

Data availability

The RNA-sequencing data were submitted to the National Center for Biotechnology Information Sequence Read Archive (NCBI SRA; ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra), BioProject: PRJNA1172127. Nucleotide sequences for functionally characterized transcripts reported in this study were submitted to the NCBI GenBank (SUB14747557) with the following accession numbers: PQ433313 (FcKSL5); PQ433314 (FcTPS18); PQ433315 (FcTPS40); PQ433316 (FcTPS52); PQ433317 (FcTPS58); PQ433318 (FvTPS6); PQ433319 (FvTPS35); PQ433320 (FvTPS37); PQ433321 (FvTPS50); PQ433322 (FvrCPS5); PQ433323 (FvrTPS5); PQ433324 (FvrTPS17); PQ433325 (FvrTPS40); PQ433326 (FvrTPS55); PQ433327 (FaCPS5); PQ433328 (FaKSL1); PQ433329 (FaKSL2); PQ433330 (FaKSL3); PQ433331 (FaKSL4); PQ433332 (FaTPS7); PQ433333 (FaTPS10); PQ433334 (FaTPS17); PQ433335 (FaTPS18); PQ433336 (FaTPS35); PQ433337 (FaTPS36); PQ433338 (FaTPS42); PQ433339 (FaTPS55).

References

  1. Aharoni  A  et al.  2004. Gain and loss of fruit flavor compounds produced by wild and cultivated strawberry species. Plant Cell. 16:3110–3131. 10.1105/tpc.104.023895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Andrews  S. 2010. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. Babraham Institute. [updated 2024 Jun 15]. https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/.
  3. Barbey  CR  et al.  2021. Genetic analysis of methyl anthranilate, mesifurane, linalool, and other flavor compounds in cultivated strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa). Front Plant Sci. 12:615749. 10.3389/fpls.2021.615749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Beekwilder  J  et al.  2004. Functional characterization of enzymes forming volatile esters from strawberry and banana. Plant Physiol. 135:1865–1878. 10.1104/pp.104.042580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bergman  ME, Kortbeek  RWJ, Gutensohn  M, Dudareva  N. 2024. Plant terpenoid biosynthetic network and its multiple layers of regulation. Prog Lipid Res. 95:101287. 10.1016/j.plipres.2024.101287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bianchi  G, Lovazzano  A, Lanubile  A, Marocco  A. 2014. Aroma quality of fruits of wild and cultivated strawberry (Fragaria spp.) in relation to the flavour-related gene expression. J Hortic Res. 22:77–84. 10.2478/johr-2014-0009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Blanco-Ulate  B, Vincenti  E, Powell  ALT, Cantu  D. 2013. Tomato transcriptome and mutant analyses suggest a role for plant stress hormones in the interaction between fruit and Botrytis cinerea. Front Plant Sci. 4:142. 10.3389/fpls.2013.00142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bood  KG, Zabetakis  I. 2002. The biosynthesis of strawberry flavor (II): biosynthetic and molecular biology studies. J Food Sci. 67:2–8. 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2002.tb11349.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chambers  A, Whitaker  VM, Gibbs  B, Plotto  A, Folta  KM. 2012. Detection of the linalool-producing NES1 variant across diverse strawberry (Fragaria spp.) accessions. Plant Breed. 131:437–443. 10.1111/j.1439-0523.2012.01959.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen  F, Tholl  D, Bohlmann  J, Pichersky  E. 2011. The family of terpene synthases in plants: a mid-size family of genes for specialized metabolism that is highly diversified throughout the kingdom. Plant J. 66:212–229. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04520.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Criscuolo  A, Gribaldo  S. 2010. BMGE (Block Mapping and Gathering with Entropy): a new software for selection of phylogenetic informative regions from multiple sequence alignments. BMC Evol Biol. 10:210. 10.1186/1471-2148-10-210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cruz-Rus  E  et al.  2017. Validation of a PCR test to predict the presence of flavor volatiles mesifurane and γ-decalactone in fruits of cultivated strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa). Mol Breed. 37:131. 10.1007/s11032-017-0732-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Csukasi  F  et al.  2011. Gibberellin biosynthesis and signalling during development of the strawberry receptacle. New Phytol. 191:376–390. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03700.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cumplido-Laso  G  et al.  2012. The fruit ripening-related gene FaAAT2 encodes an acyl transferase involved in strawberry aroma biogenesis. J Exp Bot. 63:4275–4290. 10.1093/jxb/ers120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Cyr  A, Wilderman  PR, Determan  M, Peters  RJ. 2007. A modular approach for facile biosynthesis of labdane-related diterpenes. J Am Chem Soc. 129:6684–6685. 10.1021/ja071158n. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Darrow  GM. 1966. The strawberry: history, breeding, and physiology. Holt, Rinehart & Winston. xvi + 447 pp [Google Scholar]
  17. Dobin  A  et al.  2013. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 29:15–21. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Duan  W  et al.  2018. Comparative analysis of fruit volatiles and related gene expression between the wild strawberry Fragaria pentaphylla and cultivated Fragaria × ananassa. Eur Food Res Technol. 244:57–72. 10.1007/s00217-017-2935-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Edgar  RC. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:1792–1797. 10.1093/nar/gkh340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Edger  PP  et al.  2018. Single-molecule sequencing and optical mapping yields an improved genome of woodland strawberry (Fragaria vesca) with chromosome-scale contiguity. Gigascience. 7:1–7. 10.1093/gigascience/gix124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Edger  PP  et al.  2019. Origin and evolution of the octoploid strawberry genome. Nat Genet. 51:541–547. 10.1038/s41588-019-0356-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Fan  Z  et al.  2021a. Strawberry sweetness and consumer preference are enhanced by specific volatile compounds. Hortic Res. 8:66. 10.1038/s41438-021-00502-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Fan  Z  et al.  2022. A multi-omics framework reveals strawberry flavor genes and their regulatory elements. New Phytol. 236:1089–1107. 10.1111/nph.18416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Fan  Z, Plotto  A, Bai  J, Whitaker  VM. 2021b. Volatiles influencing sensory attributes and Bayesian modeling of the soluble solids-sweetness relationship in strawberry. Front Plant Sci. 12:640704. 10.3389/fpls.2021.640704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. FAO . 2023. FAOSTAT: land use statistics. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. [updated 2026 Mar 27]. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL.
  26. Feldmann  MJ, Pincot  DDA, Cole  GS, Knapp  SJ. 2024. Genetic gains underpinning a little-known strawberry Green Revolution. Nat Commun. 15:2468. 10.1038/s41467-024-46421-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Grabherr  MG  et al.  2011. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat Biotechnol. 29:644–652. 10.1038/nbt.1883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Guindon  S  et al.  2010. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst Biol. 59:307–321. 10.1093/sysbio/syq010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Haas  BJ  et al.  2013. De novo transcript sequence reconstruction from RNA-seq using the Trinity platform for reference generation and analysis. Nat Protoc. 8:1494–1512. 10.1038/nprot.2013.084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hardigan  MA  et al.  2021a. Blueprint for phasing and assembling the genomes of heterozygous polyploids: application to the octoploid genome of strawberry [preprint]. bioRxiv. 10.1101/2021.11.03.467115. [DOI]
  31. Hardigan  MA  et al.  2021b. Unraveling the complex hybrid ancestry and domestication history of cultivated strawberry. Mol Biol Evol. 38:2285–2305. 10.1093/molbev/msab024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Harris  LJ  et al.  2005. The maize An2 gene is induced by Fusarium attack and encodes an ent-copalyl diphosphate synthase. Plant Mol Biol. 59:881–894. 10.1007/s11103-005-1674-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Ilc  T, Werck-Reichhart  D, Navrot  N. 2016. Meta-analysis of the core aroma components of grape and wine aroma. Front Plant Sci. 7:1472. 10.3389/fpls.2016.01472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Jetti  RR, Yang  E, Kurnianta  A, Finn  C, Qian  MC. 2007. Quantification of selected aroma-active compounds in strawberries by headspace solid-phase microextraction gas chromatography and correlation with sensory descriptive analysis. J Food Sci. 72:S487–S496. 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2007.00445.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Jiménez  NP  et al.  2024. Loss-of-function mutations in the fruit softening gene POLYGALACTURONASE1 doubled fruit firmness in strawberry. Hortic Res. 12:uhae315. 10.1093/hr/uhae315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Johnson  SR  et al.  2019a. A database-driven approach identifies additional diterpene synthase activities in the mint family (Lamiaceae). J Biol Chem. 294:1349–1362. 10.1074/jbc.RA118.006025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Johnson  SR  et al.  2019b. Promiscuous terpene synthases from Prunella vulgaris highlight the importance of substrate and compartment switching in terpene synthase evolution. New Phytol. 223:323–335. 10.1111/nph.15778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Junier  T, Zdobnov  EM. 2010. The Newick utilities: high-throughput phylogenetic tree processing in the UNIX shell. Bioinformatics. 26:1669–1670. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Karunanithi  PS, Zerbe  P. 2019. Terpene synthases as metabolic gatekeepers in the evolution of plant terpenoid chemical diversity. Front Plant Sci. 10:1166. 10.3389/fpls.2019.01166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Köllner  TG, Gershenzon  J, Peters  RJ, Zerbe  P, Schmelz  EA. 2023. The terpene synthase gene family in maize—a clarification of existing community nomenclature. BMC Genomics. 24:744. 10.1186/s12864-023-09856-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Kovats  ES. 1965. Gas chromatographic characterization of organic substances in the retention index system. Adv Chromatogr.  1:229–247. [Google Scholar]
  42. Kulheim  C  et al.  2015. The Eucalyptus terpene synthase gene family. BMC Genomics. 16:450. 10.1186/s12864-015-1598-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Langmead  B, Salzberg  SL. 2012. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 9:357–359. 10.1038/nmeth.1923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Lefort  V, Longueville  J-E, Gascuel  O. 2017. SMS: smart model selection in PhyML. Mol Biol Evol. 34:2422–2424. 10.1093/molbev/msx149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Lemoine  F  et al.  2018. Renewing Felsenstein's phylogenetic bootstrap in the era of big data. Nature. 556:452–456. 10.1038/s41586-018-0043-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Lemoine  F  et al.  2019. NGPhylogeny.fr: new generation phylogenetic services for non-specialists. Nucleic Acids Res. 47:W260–W265. 10.1093/nar/gkz303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Liao  X  et al.  2018. Interlinked regulatory loops of ABA catabolism and biosynthesis coordinate fruit growth and ripening in woodland strawberry. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 115:E11542–E11550. 10.1073/pnas.1812575115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Liaw  A, Wiener  M. 2002. Classification and regression by randomForest. R News. 2:18–22. [Google Scholar]
  49. Martin  DM  et al.  2010. Functional annotation, genome organization and phylogeny of the grapevine (Vitis vinifera) terpene synthase gene family based on genome assembly, FLcDNA cloning, and enzyme assays. BMC Plant Biol. 10:226. 10.1186/1471-2229-10-226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Martin  DM, Faldt  J, Bohlmann  J. 2004. Functional characterization of nine Norway Spruce TPS genes and evolution of gymnosperm terpene synthases of the TPS-d subfamily. Plant Physiol. 135:1908–1927. 10.1104/pp.104.042028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Morrone  D  et al.  2010. Increasing diterpene yield with a modular metabolic engineering system in E. coli: comparison of MEV and MEP isoprenoid precursor pathway engineering. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 85:1893–1906. 10.1007/s00253-009-2219-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Muchlinski  A  et al.  2021. Cytochrome P450-catalyzed biosynthesis of furanoditerpenoids in the bioenergy crop switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.). Plant J. 108:1053–1068. 10.1111/tpj.15492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Murphy  KM  et al.  2019. A customizable approach for the enzymatic production and purification of diterpenoid natural products. J Vis Exp. 152:e59992. 10.3791/59992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Nawade  B  et al.  2019. Profiling of volatile terpenes from almond (Prunus dulcis) young fruits and characterization of seven terpene synthase genes. Plant Sci. 287:110187. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2019.110187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Negri  AS  et al.  2015. Comparative analysis of fruit aroma patterns in the domesticated wild strawberries “Profumata di Tortonaâ” (F. moschata) and “Regina delle Valli” (F. vesca). Front Plant Sci. 6:56. 10.3389/fpls.2015.00056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Nieuwenhuizen  NJ  et al.  2013. Functional genomics reveals that a compact terpene synthase gene family can account for terpene volatile production in apple. Plant Physiol. 161:787–804. 10.1104/pp.112.208249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Njuguna  W, Liston  A, Cronn  R, Ashman  T-L, Bassil  N. 2013. Insights into phylogeny, sex function and age of Fragaria based on whole chloroplast genome sequencing. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 66:17–29. 10.1016/j.ympev.2012.08.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Oh  Y  et al.  2021. Genomic characterization of the fruity aroma gene, FaFAD1, reveals a gene dosage effect on γ-decalactone production in strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa). Front Plant Sci. 12:639345. 10.3389/fpls.2021.639345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Oróstica  KY, Verdugo  RA. 2016. chromPlot: visualization of genomic data in chromosomal context. Bioinformatics. 32:2366–2368. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Pelot  KA  et al.  2017. Biosynthesis of the psychotropic plant diterpene salvinorin A: discovery and characterization of the Salvia divinorum clerodienyl diphosphate synthase. Plant J. 89:885–897. 10.1111/tpj.13427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Pelot  KA  et al.  2018. Functional diversity of diterpene synthases in the biofuel crop switchgrass. Plant Physiol. 178:54–71. 10.1104/pp.18.00590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Pelot  KA, Hagelthorn  DM, Hong  YJ, Tantillo  DJ, Zerbe  P. 2019. Diterpene synthase-catalyzed biosynthesis of distinct clerodane stereoisomers. Chembiochem. 20:111–117. 10.1002/cbic.201800580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Perry  M. 2024. heatmaps: flexible heatmaps for functional genomics and sequence features. R package version 1.30.0. 10.18129/B9.BIOC.HEATMAPS. [DOI]
  64. Peters  RJ. 2010. Two rings in them all: the labdane-related diterpenoids. Nat Prod Rep. 27:1521–1530. 10.1039/c0np00019a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Petersen  KR, Streett  DA, Gerritsen  AT, Hunter  SS, Settles  ML. 2015. Super deduper, fast PCR duplicate detection in fastq files. In: Proceedings of the 6th ACM conference on bioinformatics, computational biology and health informatics. Association for Computing Machinery. p. 491–492. [Google Scholar]
  66. Petrasch  S  et al.  2022. Genomic prediction of strawberry resistance to postharvest fruit decay caused by the fungal pathogen Botrytis cinerea. G3 (Bethesda). 12:jkab378. 10.1093/g3journal/jkab378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Pillet  J  et al.  2017. Identification of a methyltransferase catalyzing the final step of methyl anthranilate synthesis in cultivated strawberry. BMC Plant Biol. 17:147. 10.1186/s12870-017-1088-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Porter  M, Fan  Z, Lee  S, Whitaker  VM. 2023. Strawberry breeding for improved flavor. Crop Sci. 63:1949–1963. 10.1002/csc2.21012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  69. Potter  K, Criswell  J, Zi  J, Stubbs  A, Peters  RJ. 2014. Novel product chemistry from mechanistic analysis of ent-copalyl diphosphate synthases from plant hormone biosynthesis. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 53:7198–7202. 10.1002/anie.201402911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Potter  KC, Jia  M, Hong  YJ, Tantillo  D, Peters  RJ. 2016. Product rearrangement from altering a single residue in the rice syn-copalyl diphosphate synthase. Org Lett. 18:1060–1063. 10.1021/acs.orglett.6b00181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Pyysalo  T, Honkanen  E, Hirvi  T. 1979. Volatiles of wild strawberries, Fragaria vesca L., compared to those of cultivated berries, Fragaria × ananassa cv. Senga Sengana. J Agric Food Chem. 27:19–22. 10.1021/jf60221a042. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  72. R Core Team . 2021. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. [updated 2026 Mar 27]. https://www.R-project.org/.
  73. Raab  T  et al.  2006. FaQR, required for the biosynthesis of the strawberry flavor compound 4-hydroxy-2,5-dimethyl-3(2H)-furanone, encodes an enone oxidoreductase. Plant Cell. 18:1023–1037. 10.1105/tpc.105.039784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Robinson  MD, McCarthy  DJ, Smyth  GK. 2010. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 26:139–140. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Schwieterman  ML  et al.  2014. Strawberry flavor: diverse chemical compositions, a seasonal influence, and effects on sensory perception. PLoS One. 9:e88446. 10.1371/journal.pone.0088446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Session  AM, Rokhsar  DS. 2023. Transposon signatures of allopolyploid genome evolution. Nat Commun. 14:3180. 10.1038/s41467-023-38560-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Tennessen  JA, Govindarajulu  R, Ashman  T-L, Liston  A. 2014. Evolutionary origins and dynamics of octoploid strawberry subgenomes revealed by dense targeted capture linkage maps. Genome Biol Evol. 6:3295–3313. 10.1093/gbe/evu261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Tholl  D. 2015. Biosynthesis and biological functions of terpenoids in plants. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. 148:63–106. 10.1007/10_2014_295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Tiedge  K  et al.  2022. Comparative transcriptomics and metabolomics reveal specialized metabolite drought stress responses in switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.). New Phytol. 236:1393–1408. 10.1111/nph.18443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Tiedge  K, Muchlinski  A, Zerbe  P. 2020. Genomics-enabled analysis of specialized metabolism in bioenergy crops: current progress and challenges. Synth Biol. 5:ysaa005. 10.1093/synbio/ysaa005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Ulrich  D, Olbricht  K. 2016. A search for the ideal flavor of strawberry—comparison of consumer acceptance and metabolite patterns in Fragaria × ananassa Duch. J Appl Bot Food Qual. 89:223–234. 10.5073/JABFQ.2016.089.029 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  82. Urrutia  M, Rambla  JL, Alexiou  KG, Granell  A, Monfort  A. 2017. Genetic analysis of the wild strawberry (Fragaria vesca) volatile composition. Plant Physiol Biochem. 121:99–117. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2017.10.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Vandenpool  H, Kratz  PD. 1963. A generalization of the retention index system including linear temperature programmed gas-liquid partition chromatography. J Chromatogr. 11:463–471. 10.1016/S0021-9673(01)80947-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Yan  J-W  et al.  2018. The aroma volatile repertoire in strawberry fruit: a review. J Sci Food Agric. 98:4395–4402. 10.1002/jsfa.9039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Zabetakis  I, Holden  M. 1997. Strawberry flavour: analysis and biosynthesis. J Sci Food Agric. 74:421–434. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(199708)74:4<421::AID-JSFA817>;3.0.CO;2-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  86. Zerbe  P  et al.  2013. Gene discovery of modular diterpene metabolism in nonmodel systems. Plant Physiol. 162:1073–1091. 10.1104/pp.113.218347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Zerbe  P, Bohlmann  J. 2015. Plant diterpene synthases: exploring modularity and metabolic diversity for bioengineering. Trends Biotechnol. 33:419–428. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Zhang  A  et al.  2022. Diversity and functional evolution of terpene synthases in Rosaceae. Plants. 11:736. 10.3390/plants11060736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Zi  J, Mafu  S, Peters  RJ. 2014. To gibberellins and beyond! surveying the evolution of (di)terpenoid metabolism. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 65:259–286. 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-035705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Zorrilla-Fontanesi  Y  et al.  2012. Genetic analysis of strawberry fruit aroma and identification of O-methyltransferase FaOMT as the locus controlling natural variation in mesifurane content. Plant Physiol. 159:851–870. 10.1104/pp.111.188318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

kiag292_Supplementary_Data

Data Availability Statement

The RNA-sequencing data were submitted to the National Center for Biotechnology Information Sequence Read Archive (NCBI SRA; ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra), BioProject: PRJNA1172127. Nucleotide sequences for functionally characterized transcripts reported in this study were submitted to the NCBI GenBank (SUB14747557) with the following accession numbers: PQ433313 (FcKSL5); PQ433314 (FcTPS18); PQ433315 (FcTPS40); PQ433316 (FcTPS52); PQ433317 (FcTPS58); PQ433318 (FvTPS6); PQ433319 (FvTPS35); PQ433320 (FvTPS37); PQ433321 (FvTPS50); PQ433322 (FvrCPS5); PQ433323 (FvrTPS5); PQ433324 (FvrTPS17); PQ433325 (FvrTPS40); PQ433326 (FvrTPS55); PQ433327 (FaCPS5); PQ433328 (FaKSL1); PQ433329 (FaKSL2); PQ433330 (FaKSL3); PQ433331 (FaKSL4); PQ433332 (FaTPS7); PQ433333 (FaTPS10); PQ433334 (FaTPS17); PQ433335 (FaTPS18); PQ433336 (FaTPS35); PQ433337 (FaTPS36); PQ433338 (FaTPS42); PQ433339 (FaTPS55).


Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES