Abstract
Cells enable specialized metabolism by compartmentalizing metabolic pathways into distinct organelles, which requires the membrane transport of metabolites. In melanocytes, the amino acid tyrosine is imported into developing melanosomes for the synthesis of the UV-protective pigment melanin1,2. In spite of extensive biochemical characterization, the identity of the melanosomal tyrosine transporter remains unknown. Here, we identify SLC16A6 as an orphan melanosome-localized metabolite transporter. Genetic screens reveal that SLC16A6 expression is driven by the SOX10-MITF axis, the well-characterized master regulatory program governing melanogenesis and melanosomal homeostasis3,4. By redirecting SLC16A6 to the plasma membrane with an S240A mutation5, we demonstrate that SLC16A6 transports tyrosine, a process competitively inhibited by other bulky amino acids. We further determine that SLC16A6 is sufficient for in vitro melanosomal tyrosine uptake. Genetic depletion of SLC16A6 triggered loss of melanosome biogenesis and function as well as depletion of most melanosomal components. Collectively, these findings establish SLC16A6 as a melanosomal tyrosine transporter that is essential for melanosome biogenesis.
Melanocytes synthesize the pigment melanin in specialized lysosome-related organelles called melanosomes6. These melanosomes are then ejected and taken up by keratinocytes, to be used for protection against UV irradiation. Within melanosomes, tyrosine is oxidized to L-DOPA by tyrosinase and subsequently converted through a series of enzymatic and non-enzymatic reactions to form eumelanins (derived exclusively from tyrosine) or pheomelanins (tyrosine- and cysteine-derived) (Fig. 1a)7. For complete melanin biogenesis, both tyrosine and cysteine must be imported into immature melanosomes. MFSD12 was recently identified as the melanosomal cysteine/cystine transport system8; however, the tyrosine transporter has remained elusive (Fig. 1a)2. The identity of the melanosomal tyrosine transport system has long been debated, but definitive biochemical evidence has ruled out previous candidates. For example, OCA2/P-protein was implicated in tyrosine transport because defects in this protein leads to oculocutaneous albinism9,10. However, recent functional studies have shown OCA2 transports chloride, which modulates pigmentation via melanosomal pH regulation11,12. With other candidates ruled out, the identity of the melanosomal tyrosine transporter has remained an open question. We reasoned that a tyrosine transporter for the melanosome would match the following criteria: (1) localization to early melanosomes; (2) classification within a solute carrier (SLC) subfamily with documented capacity for aromatic amino acid transport; and (3) strong co-expression with the melanosomal transcriptome, as evidenced by enrichment in pigmentation gene ontology terms among the most correlated genes.
Figure 1. SLC16A6 is an orphaned early melanosomal transporter.
(a) Illustration of melanogenesis. Tyrosine and cysteine are imported into developing melanosomes and converted to eumelanins and pheomelanins. (b) Volcano plot of proteins enriched in 3x-HA MelanoIP compared to control 3x-Myc MelanoIP from MeWo melanoma cells. (c) SLC16A6 transcriptome-wide correlation. Co-expression analysis of SLC16A6 transcripts versus all other transcripts using the DepMap short-read expression dataset (26Q1). (d) Panther GO-slim biological process analysis of top 500 most positively correlating transcripts from (c). (e) SLC16A6 proteome-wide correlation. Co-variation analysis of SLC16A6 versus all other proteins using the Harmonized MS CCLE Gygi dataset (f) SLC16A6 expression (short-read) 26Q1 across various lineages. Data extracted from the Cancer Dependency Map. (g) Representative confocal microscopy images of endogenous SLC16A6 colocalization (50 cells per colocalization; scale bar 10 μm, n=3 biological replicates). (h) Representative line scan analysis of endogenous SLC16A6 colocalization with EEA1 and LAMP2; line is indicated in (g), left image. (i) Same as (h) but colocalization with TYRP1 and LAMP2; line is indicated in (g), right image. (j) Pearson correlation coefficient analysis of line scan averages from (g). 10 cells analyzed per condition with 5 random line scan analyses performed per cell. Average Pearson correlation coefficients per cell plotted. (****P < 0.0001).
SLC16A6 localizes to melanosomes
To generate a candidate set of plausible tyrosine transporters localized to the melanosome, we used MelanoIP, a rapid melanosomal purification method8, followed by proteomics (Fig. 1b). This yielded a selective list of putative transporters, which we further prioritized based on localization13,14 and membership in SLC families with known aromatic amino acid substrates15 (Supplementary Table 1). Among these, SLC16A6 and SLC49A3 emerged as potential candidates. However, we deprioritized SLC49A3 owing to its poor association with melanosomal genes (Fig. S1a,b). In contrast, SLC16A6 expression positively correlated with the melanosomal gene network and pigmentation (Fig. 1c,d). These data were further corroborated by SLC16A6 protein co-variation, which showed the strongest positive correlation with the melanosomal chloride transporter OCA2/P-protein (Fig. 1e).
SLC16A6 is a poorly defined 12-pass transmembrane solute carrier with high expression in cutaneous and uveal melanoma cell lines, mature melanocytes, and the retina, which is also pigmented (Fig. 1f, Fig. S1c,d, Supplementary Table 1)16,17. SLC16A6 belongs to the SLC16A subfamily, whose members are proton-linked monocarboxylate transporters18. Of note, two members, SLC16A10 and SLC16A2, can transport aromatic amino acids and their derivatives (Supplementary Table 1)19,20. Given these findings, we sought to examine whether SLC16A6 indeed localizes to the early melanosomal membrane system.
We performed confocal microscopy in various melanoma cell lines of both endogenous and ectopically expressed SLC16A6. First, we observed that endogenous SLC16A6 co-localizes with early endosome antigen 1 (EEA1) (Fig. 1g–j). EEA1 is a marker of early endosomes from which later-stage melanosomes arise6. Previous studies have shown that the key melanosomal protein, PMEL, colocalizes with EEA1 in early-stage melanosomes21,22. Ectopic SLC16A6, which can be visualized with much more sensitivity due to use of the FLAG epitope/antibody, also localizes to late-stage melanosomes that contain enzymes and structural proteins such as TYRP1 and LAMP26,23,24, suggesting that it can populate throughout the melanosomal pathway (Fig. S1e–h). Together, these results suggest that SLC16A6 is a melanosome-localized transporter.
SOX10 and MITF drive SLC16A6 expression
Reasoning that its transcriptional regulators would likely be instructive as to its physiological function, we next sought to identify the transcriptional regulators of SLC16A6 using Targeted Readout to Understand Transcription via Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization (TRoUT-FISH)25. Briefly, MeWo cells were transduced with a pooled library of CRISPR sgRNAs targeting human transcription factor and epigenetic genes, and we then performed RNA-FISH assessing endogenous SLC16A6 mRNA abundance. We FACS-sorted cell populations with the highest and lowest SLC16A6 abundance and sequenced their associated sgRNAs (Fig. 2a). We found that sgRNAs targeting SOX10 and MITF were the two most enriched in cells with depleted SLC16A6, suggesting them as the primary transcriptional activators of SLC16A6 (Fig. 2a,b). During mammalian development, SOX10 specifies and maintains the melanocyte lineage by binding to the MITF promoter driving its expression3. MITF activates its own expression as well as a transcriptional network responsible for melanosome biogenesis and maturation3,4.
Figure 2. Master melanogenesis transcription factors, SOX10 and MITF, drive SLC16A6 expression.
(a) Schematic of TRoUT-FISH screen. Human MeWo melanoma cells were transduced with a pooled CRISPR library of the human epigenetic-focused sgRNA library, grown, puro-selected, and then fixed. RNA FISH targeting SLC16A6 transcripts was performed followed by flow cytometry to isolate population of cells with lowest and highest fluorescence and then sequenced to determine sgRNA abundances. (b) TRoUT-FISH results of (a). RRA scores derived from MAGeCK comparing the high and low populations of SLC16A6 abundance. (c) Genome browser tracks visualizing MITF chromatin-immunoprecipitation-sequencing (ChIP-seq) in MeWo KRAB cells25. (d) qPCR of SLC16A6 after transient transfection of MITF isoforms in HEK-293T cells (*P < 0.05; ****P < 0.0001).
ChIP-seq demonstrated that MITF directly binds to the SLC16A6 promoter with an occupancy similar to that of known MITF target genes, such as tyrosinase (TYR), SLC45A2, and DCT/TYRP2 (Fig 2c, Fig. S2a)26. In follow-up experiments, we overexpressed the three MITF isoforms in HEK-293T cells and each caused an upregulation of SLC16A6 mRNA (Fig. 2d). Further supporting this regulatory link, a CRISPR-generated MITF mutant and RNAi-mediated MITF knockdown significantly downregulated SLC16A6, while MITF induction increased SLC16A6 transcript levels (Fig. S2b–d)27. These results establish SLC16A6 as a melanogenesis network gene driven by SOX10 and MITF.
SLC16A6 mediates tyrosine transport
Although SLC16A6 belongs to the monocarboxylate transporter (SLC16A) family, its physiological substrates and functions have remained poorly defined. While prior reports suggested SLC16A6 acts as a plasma-membrane ketone body or low-affinity taurine transporter28,29, these roles are hard to rationalize with its intracellular localization and co-expression with melanosomal machinery. We therefore sought to assess the endogenous substrates of SLC16A6.
To facilitate an untargeted metabolomics-based screen for substrates, we sought to redirect the transporter to the cell surface using an SLC16A6 S240A mutant (Fig. 3a)5. The S240 residue of SLC16A6 is located within a large, 90-amino acid loop between transmembrane regions 6 and 730, and was identified as critical for regulating protein turnover. Introducing this mutation (S240A) both extends the half-life of the transporter and, importantly, causes it to accumulate at the plasma membrane5. While both wildtype (WT) SLC16A6 and SLC16A6S240A expression might change intracellular steady-state metabolite abundances, we predicted that SLC16A6S240A would have the largest metabolomic change from the extracellular milieu compared to the intracellular space, given its plasma membrane localization. Therefore, we used expression of this mutant as a cell-based model of metabolite uptake, in a similar manner to how MFSD12-PM was used to study melanosomal cysteine uptake (Fig. 3b)8. Only in SLC16A6S240A-expressing HEK-293T cells, amino acids such as L-tyrosine and the branched-chain amino acids showed significantly decreased Δabundance (extracellular-intracellular), consistent with accelerated transport from the extracellular to intracellular metabolite pool (Fig. 3b, Fig. S3a). Consistent with this, L-tyrosine levels were significantly increased intracellularly and decreased extracellularly in SLC16A6S240A-expressing cells across the GC-MS metabolomic profiling (Fig. S3c,d,f,g). In a complementary LC-MS analysis, L-tyrosine and structurally related metabolites such as phenylpyruvate and benzoic acid also showed intracellular accumulation with SLC16A6S240A expression (Fig. S3i,j). Consistent with the metabolomics screen, metabolic profiling by RESOLUTE in HEK-293T cells expressing WT SLC16A6 revealed significant shifts in intracellular hydroxybenzoic acid, a tyrosine derivative, and phenylalanine (Fig. S4a)31. In parallel, in silico substrate predictions by AlphaFill favored lactate and the phenylalanine derivative, hydrocinnamic acid (Fig. S4b)32. Our unbiased screen, along with the RESOLUTE and AlphaFill datasets, led to the hypothesis that SLC16A6 may transport L-tyrosine, the amino acid necessary for melanin production.
Figure 3. SLC16A6 is a tyrosine transporter.
(a) SLC16A6S240A reroutes SLC16A6 to the plasma membrane. Representative confocal images of dox-induced wildtype (WT) or SLC16A6S240A in HEK-293T cells (images representative of n=3 biological replicates; scale bar 10 μm). (b) Top, schematic of untargeted metabolomics screen. Stable HEK-293T cells with either WT or SLC16A6S240A mutant were treated with either DMSO or 500 ng mL−1 doxycycline and incubated for 24 h. Media was replaced and incubated for an additional four hours prior to intracellular and extracellular metabolite extractions. Bottom, heat map showing metabolites with altered extracellular-to-intracellular abundance differences between groups. Delta abundance was calculated as log2-transformed extracellular abundance minus log2-transformed intracellular abundance for each metabolite, followed by z-score normalization. (c) Top, schematic of [14C]-tyrosine cellular uptake assay. Bottom, HEK-293T cells expressing either MFSD12-PM or SLC16A6S240A were incubated in a buffer containing a LAT1 inhibitor. Cold-tyrosine (5 μM for transport assay; 500 μM for competition) and 1 μCi mL−1 14C-labeled tyrosine were added to initiate transport. Assay was performed for 10 min prior to washes and scintillation. Two-way ANOVA was used for statistical analysis (***P < 0.001; n=3 biological replicates). (d) As in (c) but cold-isoleucine, -tryptophan, -alanine, -cysteine at 500 μM were added to the SLC16A6S240A-expressing cells. Two-way ANOVA was used for statistical analysis (*P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001; n=3 biological replicates). (e) L-tyrosine uptake in isolated melanosomes. MelanoIP-isolated melanosomes were extracted from cells treated with DMSO or doxycycline to induce WT SLC16A6 expression. Melanosomes were incubated for indicated times in a buffer containing ATP and Mg2+ to promote uptake, before washing and scintillation. Two-way ANOVA was used for statistical analysis. Data normalized to DMSO-treatment at 10 min (*P < 0.05, ****P < 0.0001; n=3 biological replicates).
To examine whether SLC16A6 was sufficient for tyrosine transport, we asked whether doxycycline-inducible expression of SLC16A6 S240A increased the cellular uptake of tyrosine. To strengthen the signal-to-noise ratio of these uptake assays, we included an inhibitor of LAT1, the major neutral amino acid transporter of the plasma membrane33,34. HEK-293T cells expressing SLC16A6S240A exhibited a clear increase in radiolabeled tyrosine uptake as compared to the control MFSD12-PM, the melanosomal cysteine transporter re-localized to the plasma membrane (Fig. 3c). Importantly, the increase in transport was blocked by the addition of excess unlabeled or “cold” tyrosine, suggesting that tyrosine transport is saturable, a cardinal feature of specific substrate transport (Fig. 3c). This increase in tyrosine uptake was also observed in comparison to non-induced SLC16A6S240A HEK-293Ts as well as HEK-293Ts with induction of WT SLC16A6, which predominantly localizes to internal compartments rather than the plasma membrane (Fig. 3a, Fig. S5a,b). Moreover, SLC16A6S240A enhances tyrosine uptake even in the absence of the LAT1 inhibitor (Fig. S5c), further supporting its sufficiency to transport tyrosine.
The melanosomal tyrosine transporter was previously described as a transport system capable of transporting other aromatic and large neutral amino acids2. To test whether SLC16A6 shares this substrate profile, we performed amino acid competition assays in cellular uptake assays. Again, cold tyrosine blocked [14C]L-tyrosine uptake (Fig. 3d). We found that unlabeled isoleucine and tryptophan also competed with radiolabeled tyrosine uptake, with mean percent inhibition of 91% and 83%, respectively, whereas unlabeled alanine (38%) and cysteine (11%) were less effective at blocking labeled tyrosine uptake (Fig. 3d, Fig. S5d). The pattern of amino acid competition was very similar to the reported range of inhibition for the previously described, but unidentified, melanosomal tyrosine transport system2. We further examined previously reported substrates of SLC16A6 and observed that excessive unlabeled taurine and β-hydroxybutyrate failed to compete with labeled tyrosine uptake and therefore are unlikely to be high-affinity substrates (Fig. S5e).
To directly test whether SLC16A6 was sufficient for tyrosine uptake into melanosomes, we induced WT SLC16A6 expression in the mouse melanoma B16F10 cell line stably expressing the MelanoIP system8. Upon isolation of melanosomes by MelanoIP, we performed a radiolabeled L-tyrosine uptake assay and observed increased uptake of [14C]L-tyrosine when compared to control melanosomes (Fig. 3e). Importantly, when excess cold tyrosine was added to the reaction, or the reaction was performed at 4°C, we did not observe this increase in tyrosine uptake (Fig. S5f). Together, these results are consistent with SLC16A6 being a melanosomal tyrosine transporter.
SLC16A6 is required for melanosome formation
Given that melanin biosynthesis relies on tyrosine transport into early-stage melanosomes, we next assessed the phenotype of melanoma cells upon loss of SLC16A6. Upon SLC16A6 knock out (Fig. S6a), human melanoma MeWo cells changed morphology (Fig. 4a) and showed significantly reduced proliferation compared with parental MeWo cells, but without any evidence of cell death (Fig. 4b, Fig. S6b). SLC16A6 knockout MeWo and B16F10 cells were also devoid of apparent pigmentation (Fig. 4c), suggesting that SLC16A6 might be necessary for melanogenesis. Proteomic profiling of SLC16A6 knockout cells showed systemic downregulation of most melanosomal components (Fig. 4d). Accordingly, early melanogenesis components like PMEL and MLANA/MART-1, and late melanogenesis components like TYR, TYRP1, and DCT/TYRP2 were all undetectable at the protein level in MeWo and B16F10 knockout cells (Fig. 4e, Fig. S6c).
Figure 4. SLC16A6 is necessary for melanosomes.
(a) Brightfield images of WT or SLC16A6 knockout cells. (b) Proliferation assay of parental versus SLC16A6 knockout clone MeWo cells. One hundred thousand cells were plated at day 0, and counted at days 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 by hemocytometer (****P < 0.0001; n=3, biological replicates). (c) Representative photographs of melanotic parental versus amelanotic SLC16A6 knockout clones in human MeWo and mouse B16F10 melanoma cells. (d) TMT quantitative proteomic heatmap of MeWo parental, control clone, and two SLC16A6 knockout clones. Proteins highlighted are isolated from whole cell proteomics dataset using the gene ontology GO:0042470, melanosome. Asterisk denotes SLC16A6. (e) Representative immunoblots of indicated melanogenesis components in parental, control clone, and two SLC16A6 knockout MeWo clones. (f) Left, representative immunoblots of melanogenesis components in MeWo cells three and four days post-infection with indicated shRNA lentiviruses (Scr, scrambled shRNA control; A6_1, shRNA targeting SLC16A6 #1; A6_2, shRNA targeting SLC16A6 #2; n=3 biological replicates). Right, quantification of relative protein expression of shRNA treatment in at least n=3 biological replicates. Each protein is normalized to control alpha-tubulin (*P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001).
We next tested whether acute loss of SLC16A6 resulted in a similar loss of pigmentation and melanogenesis. We observed decreases in melanosomal components at 3 days post-infection with lentiviral shRNAs targeting SLC16A6 (Fig. 4f, Fig. S6d–f). Melanosomal biogenesis requires proper PMEL processing by BACE2 to form amyloid-like fibrils to act as both structural units for developing melanosomes and for melanin deposition35. Interestingly, PMEL cleavage defects were the most immediate phenotype observed following acute SLC16A6 knockdown, followed by the sequential loss of MLANA and TYRP1 levels (Fig. 4f, Fig. S6d). These results are consistent with SLC16A6 functioning in early melanogenesis, where the lack of tyrosine transport triggers a cascade leading to melanogenesis defects.
Conclusion
Our findings establish the orphan transporter SLC16A6 as a long-sought melanosomal tyrosine transporter, answering a biochemical question first proposed in 19962. We determined that SLC16A6 acts as an early melanogenesis solute carrier whose expression is driven by the melanocyte lineage-defining transcription factors SOX10 and MITF. Importantly, we show SLC16A6 is sufficient to transport L-tyrosine in both whole-cell uptake assays using the plasma membrane-rerouted SLC16A6S240A mutant and melanosome-specific transport assays using WT SLC16A6 expression. Furthermore, our SLC16A6S240A assays robustly mimic the competitive inhibition profile for the reported melanosomal tyrosine transporter: L-tyrosine uptake is competed by L-tyrosine, L-isoleucine and L-tryptophan, while being less sensitive to L-alanine and L-cysteine. Ultimately, this alignment between data presented 30 years apart provides strong support for SLC16A6 being the protein that was previously studied as the melanosomal tyrosine transporter.
Unexpectedly, our data reveal a dependency between tyrosine compartmentalization and organelle biogenesis, in which the loss of SLC16A6 triggers an almost complete loss of core melanosomal components. Foremost among these affected components is PMEL. PMEL is essential for melanosomal structure and function, as cleaved PMEL forms amyloid fibril-like scaffolds that serve both structural roles and sites for melanin deposition35,36. Upon SLC16A6 knockdown, PMEL cleavage becomes impaired, resulting in accumulation of uncleaved PMEL and subsequent loss of total PMEL protein. Yet, unlike PMEL deletions37, SLC16A6 knockdowns and knockouts deplete all other melanosomal components as well. While intriguing and consistent with its role in melanin synthesis, this phenotype makes it impossible for us to define the effects of loss of SLC16A6 function in mature melanocytes, as they are lost concomitant with the loss of SLC16A6 expression.
Our data suggest that the loss of tyrosine transport culminates in melanosomal failure, directly linking organelle homeostasis to the synthesis of its central metabolite. While mutations or deletions in lysosomal transporters such as CTNS or NPC1 cause cystine crystallization and cholesterol accumulation, respectively, these organelles remain intact, albeit dysfunctional38–40. Similarly, the loss of mitochondrial mitoferrins, SLC25A28 and SLC25A37, profoundly impairs oxidative respiration prior to cell death but does not abolish mitochondrial biogenesis41,42. In contrast, lysosome related organelles appear uniquely sensitive to their internal environment. This phenomenon is observed with Weibel-Palade bodies, where specific mutations (e.g., A1716P and C2190Y) in von Willebrand factor (vWF) disrupt the biogenesis of these organelles43. Similarly, in type 2 alveolar cells, deletion of the dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC) transporter Abca3 halts the formation of lamellar bodies44,45. Whether other intracellular metabolite transporters regulate organelle identity in a manner similar to SLC16A6 and ABCA3 remains an open question. Ultimately, identifying SLC16A6 as a key regulator of melanogenesis provides a new molecular framework for understanding human pigmentation disorders and offers a compelling new target for melanocyte-driven pathologies.
Methods
Cell Culture
HEK-293T and SK-MEL-30 cells were from ATCC. MeWo cells were a gift from Dr. Martin McMahon. B16F10 cells were a gift from Dr. Minna Roh-Johnson. HEK-293Ts and B16F10 cells were cultured in DMEM with L-Glutamine, 4.5g L−1 glucose, and sodium pyruvate (Gibco) supplemented with 10% FBS (Sigma). MeWo and Sk-Mel-30 cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 (Gibco) supplemented with 10% FBS. Dox-inducible HEK-293T and B16F10 cells were cultured in DMEM (Gibco) supplemented with 10% tetracycline-free FBS (Takara). All cells were propagated at 37°C with 5% CO2. Cells were routinely tested for mycoplasma contamination.
Virus production and generation of stable cell lines
Lentiviruses were produced by co-transfection of HEK-293T cells in a 10 cm plate with a target lentiviral vector (5 μg), pMDG.2 (1.67 μg), pMDLg/pRRE (1.67 μg), and pRSV-REV (1.67 μg) plasmids. Virus containing supernatants were collected 48 and 72 h post-transfection, spun at 1000 g for 5 min, and then filtered through a 0.45 μm filter. For infection, approximately 106 cells were incubated with 1–5 mL viral supernatant, 10 μg mL−1 polybrene and culture medium. Viral media was removed after 24 h and replaced with fresh culture medium for 24 h, prior to the addition of a selection agent. Selection was maintained for a minimum of 3 d or until all non-infected control cells had undergone apoptosis.
Knockout cell line generation
The following plasmid was acquired from Addgene:
pSpCas9(BB)-2A-GFP (PX458) was a gift from Feng Zhang (Addgene plasmid #48138 ; http://n2t.net/addgene:48138 ; RRID:Addgene_48138)46
The following sgRNA sequences were subcloned into the above construct:
SLC16A6_sgRNA1_exon1_sense: CACCGAGGCACTTCAGTATACACAT
SLC16A6_sgRNA1_exon1_antisense: AAACATGTGTATACTGAAGTGCCTC
SLC16A6_sgRNA2_exon1_sense: CACCGAAATGTCTTGATGATGCCGT
SLC16A6_sgRNA2_exon1_antisense: AAACACGGCATCATCAAGACATTTC
mSlc16a6_sgRNA1_exon1_FWD: CACCGGCGACCCGCGATGACAGCG
mSlc16a6_sgRNA1_exon1_REV: AAACCGCTGTCATCGCGGGTCGCC
mSlc16a6_sgRNA2_exon1_FWD: CACCGCACCAGCCGATGTCCGAAG
mSlc16a6_sgRNA2_exon1_REV: AAACCTTCGGACATCGGCTGGTGC
PX458 constructs were transiently transfected into MeWo or B16F10 cells using Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Cells were GFP flow sorted single cell into 96-well plates and outgrown clones were screened for SLC16A6 knockout.
cDNA constructs
The following plasmids were acquired from Addgene:
pEGFP-N1-MITF-M was a gift from Shawn Ferguson (Addgene plasmid #38131 ; http://n2t.net/addgene:38131 ; RRID: Addgene_38131)47
pEGFP-N1-MITF-A was a gift from Shawn Ferguson (Addgene plasmid #38132 ; http://n2t.net/addgene:38132 ; RRID: Addgene_38132)47
pEGFP-N1-MITF-D was a gift from Shawn Ferguson (Addgene plasmid #38133 ; http://n2t.net/addgene:38133 ; RRID: Addgene_38133)47
Wildtype (WT) SLC16A6–3X FLAG was synthesized by Twist Biosciences using the mRNA sequence for Homo sapiens solute carrier family 16 member 6 (SLC16A6), transcript variant 1 (NCBI Accession: NM_001174166). The S240A mutant was subsequently generated from the WT construct via site-directed mutagenesis.
shRNA-mediated knockdown
shRNA in a pLKO.1 backbone targeting SLC16A6 was purchased from Sigma. The following sequences were used:
shSLC16A6_1: CTACGGCATCATCAAGACATT
shSLC16A6_2: GTAACCATCCTATCACAATAT
Knockdowns were confirmed by quantitative PCR (qPCR). RNA was isolated from individual 6 cm plates that were 80% confluent using Trizol and an RNA Extraction Kit (Zymo). cDNA was generated using a High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems) and diluted to 10 ng μL−1 before using 2 μL for RT-qPCR reaction. SLC16A6, PolR2a, and RPLP0 transcript levels were assayed with SYBR green qPCR mix (Roche), using the following primer sets:
qPCR_SLC16A6_F: GGCATCATCTCTGGTCTGGG
qPCR_SLC16A6_R: TGGTGCGAAAGCAAACACAG
qPCR_PolR2a_F: AACACGGGCAGAGATCCAAG
qPCR_PolR2a_R: TTCATGACTTCACCCCGCTC
qPCR_RPLP0_F: CTGTTGGCCAATAAGGTGCC
qPCR_RPLP0_R: GGAGGTCTTCTCGGGTCCTA
Immunoblots
MeWo and SK-Mel-30 cells were washed and scraped in PBS. Cells were spun at 1000 g for 3 min and supernatant discarded. Pellets were lysed in 1% Triton X-100 in 50mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 150mM NaCl, supplemented with mammalian protease inhibitor cocktail (mPIC) at 1:100 (Sigma-Aldrich). For tyrosinase immunoblots, cells were lysed in 0.1% n-Dodecyl-β-D-maltoside (Anatrace) instead of 1% Triton X-100. All cells were lysed on ice for 30 min before centrifuging at 16100 g for 10 min. Protein quantifications were analyzed by Pierce BCA Protein Assays (ThermoFisher Scientific). 20–50 μg of protein was loaded per well on SDS-PAGE, transferred to 0.45 μm nitrocellulose by wet transfer, blocked in 5% non-fat milk. All primary antibodies were incubated overnight at 4 °C, at a common ratio of 1:2000 except for alpha-tubulin (1:10000). Secondary antibodies Alexafluor-conjugated goat anti-rabbit (IRDye800, Rockland) and/or goat anti-mouse (Alexafluor-680, Life Technologies) antibodies were incubated for 1 hour at room temperature. Immunoblots were imaged using a LI-COR Odyssey CLx imager.
Immunofluorescence
MeWo and HEK-293T cells were plated on 18×18 #1 coverslips and 18×18 #1, poly-l-lysine-coated coverslips, respectively. Cells were washed twice in PBS before fixing with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min. Coverslips were washed three times before permeabilization with 100% ice-cold methanol at −20 °C for 5 min. Cells were washed and blocked with 3% Fatty-Acid Free Bovine Serum Albumin for at least one hour at 4 °C. The following primary antibodies were incubated overnight at the indicated ratios: mouse anti-FLAG M2 (1:1000; Sigma), rabbit anti-FLAG (1:500; Cell Signaling Technologies), mouse anti-EEA1 (1:500; Cell Signaling Technologies), goat anti-LAMP2 (1:500; Biotechne), rabbit anti-SLC16A6 (1:250; Sigma), rabbit anti-N-Cadherin (1:500; Cell Signaling Technologies), and mouse anti-TRP1 (1:1000; Abcam). Donkey anti-rabbit IgG (H+L) highly cross-adsorbed Alexafluor 488 (1:500), Donkey anti-mouse IgG (H+L) highly cross-adsorbed Alexafluor 568 (1:500), and Donkey anti-goat IgG (H+L) cross-adsorbed (1:500) secondary antibodies were incubated for 1 hour at room temperature and washed three times with PBS. Coverslips were staged with ProLong Diamond Antifade with DAPI (Fisher Scientific). Images were captured on a Zeiss LSM 880 confocal laser scanning microscope. Line scan analyses were performed in Fiji. Whole cell pearson correlation coefficients were analyzed in Fiji by the Coloc 2 plugin. Line scan pearson correlation coefficients were calculated using GraphPad Prism 10.
Cancer Dependency Map analyses
Correlation analysis of SLC16A6 mRNA and protein expression were performed on Custom Analyses on the DepMap portal. For mRNA correlation, the Expression (Short-read) Public 26Q1 was used to identify transcripts with high correlations to SLC49A3 and SLC16A6 transcript abundance. The Harmonized MS CCLE Gygi dataset was used to identify proteins with high correlations to SLC16A6 protein abundance. Lineage expression analysis of SLC16A6 was performed by downloading the expression (short-read) public 26Q1 dataset.
TRoUT-FISH screen
The following CRISPR library was acquired from Addgene:
Human Epigenetic Knockout Library was a gift from Kivanc Birsoy (Addgene #162256 ; http://n2t.net/addgene:162256 ; RRID:Addgene_162256)48
Lentiviruses were produced in HEK-293T cells by transfecting plasmids and packaging plasmids (psPAX2 and VSVG) with polyethylenimine transfection reagent. Media was collected every 24 h for 96 h total. Media was pooled, filtered with 0.45 μm PES filters, aliquoted, and frozen at −80 °C.
The titer of lentivirus supernatant was determined by infecting target cells at various amounts of virus with polybrene followed by spinfection (30 °C for 60 min at 1200 g). The next day cells were reseeded and treated with puromycin. Viability was assessed 3 d post infection. Cells were infected at a Multiplicity of Infection (MOI) of ~0.4 via spinfection, and treated with puromycin 24 h post infection and puromycin selection persisted for 7 d. Cells were given fresh media for 6 h followed by fixation with cold 4% PFA.
Cells were permeabilized with PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100 and Hoechst 33342 for 10 min rocking at 4 °C. Cells were incubated with 43 °C wHyb buffer 49,50 for 30 min, then incubated overnight at 43 °C in hybridization buffer containing SABER-FISH PER purified DNA oligonucleotides. Subsequently, cells were washed two times with 43 °C wHyb buffer, one time with 2X SSC buffer, and incubated at 30 °C for 1 h in branch hybridization buffer containing SABER-FISH PER purified branch DNA oligonucleotides. After branching, cells were washed with 2X SSC and 37 °C PBS before incubation for 10 min in PBS containing fluorescently labeled secondary DNA oligonucleotides. After staining, cells were washed two times with 37 °C PBS and resuspended in 0.1% BSA (Millipore, Catalog: 126609–5GM) in PBS for flow cytometry.
Events were gated based on FSC and SSC to remove debris, then gated on DNA dye (violet laser) to ensure only singlets were sorted. A reference gene (EEF2) was used as a control to ensure cell quality and adequate staining. Cells were sorted based on fractions of the target gene distribution, sorting the lowest 10% and highest 10% of the total population. An unsorted population was also acquired. After sorting cells were incubated in genomic DNA isolation buffer (0.5% SDS, 10 mM TRIS pH 7.5, 10 mg mL−1 Proteinase K) and incubated at 56 °C for ≥ 36 h with gentle agitation. Genomic isolation was performed with the Qiagen DNA Mini Kit (Catalog: 51304). Libraries were generated by PCR amplification and sequenced by 150 bp paired-end sequencing at the University of Utah High-Throughput Genomics Core Facility. Sequencing reads were quantified using BBtools Seal and analysis was performed by MAGeCK51,52.
ChIP-Seq and ChIP-Atlas analysis
MITF ChIP sequencing data from MeWo KRAB cells25 was extracted and analyzed on Integrated Genome Viewer (2.18.2). MITF binding at gene loci was assessed using ChIP-Atlas53–55. We queried “Peak Browser”, restricting the search to the track class “TFs and others”, cell type class “Epidermis”, track type “MITF”, and cell type “501A” using the hg38 genome assembly. Peaks were called with a MACS2 Q-value threshold of 10−50 (ChIP-Atlas significance score of 50). MITF ChIP-Seq data from GSE172383 (SRX10640872 and SRX10640873) was queried within 5–10 kb of a transcriptional start site of SLC16A6, TYR, SLC45A2, and DCT. Genome tracks images were generated on Integrated Genome Viewer (2.18.2).
LC-MS Metabolomics
Cell pellets were extracted in 200 μL of 70% ACN, 5% MeOH, and 25% H2O + 0.1% NH4OH, 0.1 ug mL−1 D9-carnitine, 2.5 ul of labeled amino acid mix (Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, MSK-A2–1.2), and 1 ug mL−1 D4-succinate. Samples were sonicated on ice for 5 min, vortexed, and centrifuged at 20,000 g for 10 min at 4 °C. Supernatants were collected and stored at −80 °C prior to analysis/injection. Pooled quality control samples were prepared by combining equal volumes of each sample and process blanks were made using only extraction solvent and standards. Quantification of metabolites was performed by LC-MS using a SCIEX 7600 Zeno-ToF coupled to an Agilent 1290 Infinity II HPLC system. Chromatographic separation was achieved on a Waters BEH zhilic 2.1 × 100 mm column with Phenomenex Krudkatcher Ultra with a binary mobile phase of 10mM ammonium carbonate in water (A) and acetonitrile/water (95:5, v/v) (B) with using an optimized X-min gradient (min/%B: 1/99, 2/85, 5/75, 8/60, 10/40, 11/1, 12/1). Metabolites (n=390) were identified and confirmed by both high-resolution multiple reaction monitoring and retention time of analytical standards. Chromatogram integration and quantification were performed using SCIEX MultiQuant software.
GC-MS Metabolomics
Cell pellets and media samples were extracted in cold 90% MeOH containing 0.67 ug mL−1 D4 succinic acid and 20 ug mL−1 D27 myristic acid, incubated at −20 °C for 1 h, and centrifuged at 20,000 g for 10 min at 4 °C. Supernatants were collected and dried en vacuo. Pooled quality control samples and process blanks were prepared as above. Dried samples were suspended in O-methoxylamine hydrochloride (MOX) (MP Bio #155405) in dry pyridine (EMD Millipore #PX2012–7) and incubated for one hour at 37 °C before subsequent derivatization with N-methyl-N-trimethylsilyltrifluoracetamide (MSTFA with 1% TMCS, Thermo #TS48913) for 30 minutes at 37 °C. After incubation, samples (1 μL) were injected in the split mode (5:1 split ratio for most metabolites) at an inlet temperature of 250 °C. Samples were analyzed on an Agilent 5977b GC-MS MSD-HES system fit with an Agilent 7693A automatic liquid sampler. Chromatographic separation was performed with a DB-5MS capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm) with a 10 m Duraguard precolumn (Agilent Technologies) using helium carrier gas (1 mL/min) and a temperature program of 60 °C (1 min hold), ramping at 10 °C min−1 (10 min hold) to 325 °C (10 min hold). Metabolites (n=83) were identified and quantified by retention index and characteristic fragment ion matching against an in-house pure standard library, the Fiehn library, and the NIST library. Data was collected using MassHunter software (Agilent).
Whole-Cell Proteomics
Sample Preparation for Mass Spectrometry
Samples for protein analysis were prepared essentially as previously described56,57. Proteomes were extracted using a buffer containing 200 mM EPPS pH 8.5, 8M urea, 0.1% SDS and protease inhibitors. Following lysis, 25 μg of each proteome was reduced with 5 mM TCEP. Cysteine residues were alkylated using 10 mM iodoacetimide for 20 min at RT in the dark. Excess iodoacetimide was quenched with 10 mM DTT. A buffer exchange was carried out using a modified SP3 protocol58. Briefly, ~250 μg of Cytiva SpeedBead Magnetic Carboxylate Modified Particles (65152105050250 and 4515210505250), mixed at a 1:1 ratio, were added to each sample. 100% ethanol was added to each sample to achieve a final ethanol concentration of at least 50%. Samples were incubated with gentle shaking for 15 min. Samples were washed three times with 80% ethanol. Protein was eluted from SP3 beads using 200 mM EPPS pH 8.5 containing Lys-C (Wako, 129–02541). Samples were digested overnight at room temperature with vigorous shaking. The next morning trypsin (ThermoFisher Scientific) was added to each sample and further incubated for 6 h at 37 °C. Following digestion, an equal volume of each sample was pooled to generate a pooled sample to be used as a bridge between two TMTPro 16-plex experiments. Acetonitrile was added to each sample to achieve a final concentration of ~33%. Each sample was labelled, in the presence of SP3 beads, with ~62.5 μg of TMTPro reagents (ThermoFisher Scientific). Following confirmation of satisfactory labelling (>97%), excess TMT was quenched by addition of hydroxylamine to a final concentration of 0.3%. The full volume from each sample was pooled and acetonitrile was removed by vacuum centrifugation for 1 hour. The pooled sample was acidified and peptides were desalted using a Sep-Pak 50mg tC18 cartridge (Waters). Peptides were eluted in 70% acetonitrile, 1% formic acid and dried by vacuum centrifugation.
Basic pH reversed-phase separation (BPRP)
TMT labeled peptides were solubilized in 5% ACN/10 mM ammonium bicarbonate, pH 8.0 and ~300 μg of TMT labeled peptides were separated by an Agilent 300 Extend C18 column (3.5 μm particles, 4.6 mm ID and 250 mm in length). An Agilent 1260 binary pump coupled with a photodiode array (PDA) detector (Thermo Scientific) was used to separate the peptides. A 45 min linear gradient from 10% to 40% acetonitrile in 10 mM ammonium bicarbonate pH 8.0 (flow rate of 0.6 mL min−1) separated the peptide mixtures into a total of 96 fractions (36 seconds). A total of 96 Fractions were consolidated into 24 samples in a checkerboard fashion and vacuum dried to completion. Each sample was desalted via Stage Tips and re-dissolved in 5% FA/ 5% ACN for LC-MS3 analysis.
Liquid chromatography separation and tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS3)
Proteome data were collected on an Orbitrap Fusion Lumos mass spectrometer (ThermoFisher Scientific) coupled to a Proxeon EASY-nLC 1000 LC pump (ThermoFisher Scientific). Fractionated peptides were separated using a 120 min gradient at 550 nL min−1 on a 35 cm column (i.d. 100 μm, Accucore, 2.6 μm, 150 Å) packed in-house. MS1 data were collected in the Orbitrap (60,000 resolution; maximum injection time 50 ms; AGC 4 × 105). Charge states between 2 and 6 were required for MS2 analysis, and a 120 s dynamic exclusion window was used. Top 10 MS2 scans were performed in the ion trap with CID fragmentation (isolation window 0.5 Da; Rapid; NCE 35%; maximum injection time 50 ms; AGC 2 × 104). An on-line real-time search algorithm (Orbiter) was used to trigger MS3 scans for quantification59. MS3 scans were collected in the Orbitrap using a resolution of 50,000, NCE of 55%, maximum injection time of 200 ms, and AGC of 3.0 × 105. The close out was set at two peptides per protein per fraction59.
Data analysis
Raw files were converted to mzXML, and monoisotopic peaks were re-assigned using Monocle60. Searches were performed using the Comet search algorithm against a mouse database downloaded from Uniprot in May 2021. We used a 50 ppm precursor ion tolerance, 1.0005 fragment ion tolerance, and 0.4 fragment bin offset for MS2 scans collected in the ion trap. TMTpro on lysine residues and peptide N-termini (+304.2071 Da) and carbamidomethylation of cysteine residues (+57.0215 Da) were set as static modifications, while oxidation of methionine residues (+15.9949 Da) was set as a variable modification.
Each run was filtered separately to 1% False Discovery Rate (FDR) on the peptide-spectrum match (PSM) level. Then proteins were filtered to the target 1% FDR level across the entire combined data set. For reporter ion quantification, a 0.003 Da window around the theoretical m/z of each reporter ion was scanned, and the most intense m/z was used. Reporter ion intensities were adjusted to correct for isotopic impurities of the different TMTpro reagents according to manufacturer specifications. Peptides were filtered to include only those with a summed signal-to-noise (SN) ≥ 160 across all TMT channels. The signal-to-noise (S/N) measurements of peptides assigned to each protein were summed (for a given protein). These values were normalized so that the sum of the signal for all proteins in each channel was equivalent thereby accounting for equal protein loading.
MelanoIP Proteomics
Ten million MeWo cells transduced with HA-MelanoIP or myc-MelanoIP were plated in 15 cm dishes and expanded for 2 d in the presence of 10 μM forskolin. Cells were harvested by scraping in ice cold PBS, pelleted by centrifugation at 1000 g for 3 min at 4 °C, and resuspended in 200 μL PBS supplemented with protease inhibitors (Roche). Cells were then homogenized with a handheld rotary pestle (Kimble-Chase) for 45 seconds before adjusting the total volume to 1 mL with PBS and protease inhibitors and spinning at 1000 g for 5 min at 4 °C to clarify. Supernatants were transferred into new 1.5 mL tubes containing 100 μL of PBS-washed anti-HA magnetic beads (Themo Fisher) and incubated rocking for 10 minutes at 4 °C. Beads were washed 3 times with cold PBS with the final wash transferred to a new 1.5 mL tubes. Beads were then eluted with 5% SDS, 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 50 mM NaCl for 10 minutes at 4 °C.
Proteomic sample preparation
Melano-IP samples (3 independent control Myc and experimental HA enrichments) were reduced with 1 mM dithiothreitol at 56 °C for 10 min and alkylated with 2.25 mM iodoacetamide at room temperature for 20 min. Reduced and alkylated proteins were precipitated onto S-Trap micro columns (ProtiFi) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Purified proteins were digested with 2 μg of a 1:5 w/w Trypsin:LysC mixture (Worthington and Sigma, respectively) at 37 °C for 4 h. Peptides were eluted from the columns following the manufacturer's instructions. Fourteen percent of each peptide sample was loaded onto Evotip Pure (EvoSep) following the manufacturer's instructions.
LC-MS analysis
Peptides were loaded onto a 15 cm × 150 μm × 1.9 μm column (Evosep) and separated across a 44-min gradient (30SPD) using the Evosep One chromatography system. Peptides were introduced into a timsTOF HT mass spectrometer (Bruker) via a Captive Spray 2 ion source using a 20 μm PepSep emitter. The mass spectrometer was operated in Data Independent Acquisition (DIA) mode using a custom dia-PASEF method (50 ms ramp time, 1 MS1 ramp, 20 MS/MS ramps, 60 MS/MS windows, (350 −1250) m/z mass range, (0.75 – 1.3) 1/k0 mobility range).
Database search and protein quantification
Raw DIA files for all 6 samples were used to build a custom spectral library in FragPipe (version 24.0). Pseudo-MS/MS spectra were extracted using diaTracer (2.2.1)61 and searched using the MSFragger algorithm (4.4.1)62 against a human database downloaded from UniProt on 5/22/2026. The search parameters included: 20 ppm precursor and fragment ion tolerances and up to 2 missed cleavages using a strict trypsin cleavage definition. Carbamidomethylation of cysteine (+57.0215 Da) was set as static modification. N-terminal protein acetylation (+42.0106 Da), oxidation of methionine (+15.9949 Da), pyro-glutamination of glutamine or loss of ammonia of cysteine at the peptide N-terminus (−17.0265 Da) and pyro-glutamination of glutamic acid at the peptide N-terminus (−18.0106) were set as variable modifications. Default parameters for MSBooster (1.4.14)63, Percolator (3.7.1)64, ProteinProphet65, and Philosopher (5.1.3-RC9)66 were used for protein inference and to improve peptide identification. Peptide-spectrum match (PSM) and proteins were filtered to enforce a 1% false discovery rate (FDR).
Precursors were quantified using DIA-NN (2.2.0)67 using the spectral library generated above, with match between runs (MBR) enabled. Precursors were filtered to enforce a 1% FDR. Relative protein abundances were estimated from precursor quantities using the R package iq (2.0.1), excluding non-proteotypic peptides. Protein abundances were normalized using the rlr method as implemented in the R package ProteoDA (2.0.0)68. P-values were calculated using the R limma package (3.64.3) and adjusted for multiple hypotheses using the Benjamini-Hochberg method.
Whole-cell 14C-tyrosine uptake assays
Three million HEK-293T dox-inducible cells were plated in 10-cm dishes. A day later, cells were treated with DMSO or 500 ng mL−1 doxycycline. 48 h after, media was replaced with fresh media and incubated for 2 h. Cells were harvested by pipetting off the plate with KPBS. Cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 1000 g for 2 min, washed again with KPBS, and spun again. Cells were resuspended in KPBS supplemented with 125 mM sucrose and 10 μM JPH-203, a LAT1-specific inhibitor. Assays were started by the addition of cold tyrosine (5 μM for transport conditions and 500 μM for competition) and 1 μCi mL−1 [14C]tyrosine. For amino acid and reported substrate competition assays, 500 μM of cold taurine, β-hydroxybutyrate, isoleucine, tryptophan, alanine, and cysteine were added with 5 μM cold-tyrosine for transport initiation. After 10 min of incubation at 37 °C, cells were spun at 1000 g for 30 s at 4 °C and washed twice in ice-cold KPBS. Cell pellets were resuspended in minimal water before mixing into scintillation fluid and measuring scintillation counts (LS 6000IC, Beckman).
MelanoIP-isolated melanosome uptake assays
Three million doxycycline-inducible B16F10 cells were plated in 15-cm dishes; two dishes used per immunoprecipitation. 24 h later, cells were treated with 10 μM forskolin and either DMSO or 500 ng mL−1 doxycycline. 48 h later, cell media was replaced and cells were incubated for an additional 2 h. Cells were washed twice in KPBS, and harvested, pelleted at 1000 g for 3 min. Cells were resuspended in 500 μL KPBS supplemented with mPIC. Cell suspension was added to a 2 mL dounce homogenizer and dounced for 40 strokes on ice. 500 μL KPBS supplemented with mPIC was added to the homogenate prior to being spun at 3000 g for 2 min. Supernatant protein was quantified and equal protein amounts were incubated with Pierce Magenetic HA beads (ThermoFisher) in KPBS supplemented with mPIC added to equalize volume to 1 mL. Immunoprecipitations were performed for 4 min at 4 °C with rotation before washed three times with KPBS with mPIC. Immunoprecipitated melanosomes were resuspended in ice-cold 950 μL KPBS, 125 mM Sucrose, 2 mM ATP, and 2 mM MgCl2. 5 μM cold-tyrosine and 3 μCi mL−1 [14C]tyrosine was added to start the uptake assay. Melanosomes were incubated at 37 °C for indicated times, washed three times with ice-cold KPBS before resuspension in scintillation fluid and measuring scintillation counts (LS 6000IC, Beckman). For indicated experiments, 500 μM cold-tyrosine were added, or the experiment was incubated at 4 °C and normalized to samples where 1% Triton X-100 was added.
Cell Death Assays
5000 cells were cultured in 96-well plates (Falcon) in medium containing the cell death stain YOYO-1 Iodide (Invitrogen) diluted 1:2000 (v/v). Starting 24 h after cell seeding, phase confluency and cell death (YOYO-1 signal) were tracked in a time course at 10X magnitude using IncuCyte S3 System (Sartorius). Images were analyzed with the IncuCyte S3 Software (v2025B). Cell death quantifications were calculated as the percentage of green (YOYO-1+) area by phase area. Experiments were repeated as independent biological replicates.
Statistical Analysis
Quantitative data were prepared in GraphPad Prism 10. Statistical comparisons were via two-tailed unpaired t-tests, one-way and two-way ANOVAs, all performed in Prism. All quantitative measurements are from at least n=3 biological replicates. Immunoblots and immunofluorescence are representative of experiments performed at least three independent times. Analysis of metabolomics data was performed using MetaboAnalystR69.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements:
We thank members of the Rutter lab for their helpful feedback and insights. We thank members of the University of Utah Flow Cytometry Core Facility for their assistance. Metabolomics analysis was performed at the Metabolomics Core Facility at the University of Utah. Mass spectrometry equipment was obtained through NCRR Shared Instrumentation Grant 1S10OD016232-01, 1S10OD018210-01A1 and 1S10OD021505-01. This work was supported by National Institute of General Medical Sciences F32GM140525 to CNC and R35GM131854 to JR, National Cancer Institute K00CA212445 to AJB, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases K99AR084551 and Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation DRG-2452-22 to CHA, and the Susan Cooper Jones Endowed Fellowship in Cancer Research to CNC. We acknowledge indirect support from Huntsman Cancer Institute's Cancer Center Support Grant. JR is an investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.
Footnotes
Competing interests:
The authors have no competing interests.
Data availability
The data supporting the findings of this study will be made available upon publication.
References
- 1.Gahl W. A. Lysosomal membrane transport in cellular nutrition. Annu Rev Nutr 9, 39–61 (1989). 10.1146/annurev.nu.09.070189.000351 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Potterf S. B. et al. Characterization of a melanosomal transport system in murine melanocytes mediating entry of the melanogenic substrate tyrosine. J Biol Chem 271, 4002–4008 (1996). 10.1074/jbc.271.8.4002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hou L., Arnheiter H. & Pavan W. J. Interspecies difference in the regulation of melanocyte development by SOX10 and MITF. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103, 9081–9085 (2006). 10.1073/pnas.0603114103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Levy C., Khaled M. & Fisher D. E. MITF: master regulator of melanocyte development and melanoma oncogene. Trends Mol Med 12, 406–414 (2006). 10.1016/j.molmed.2006.07.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Frommelt F. et al. The solute carrier superfamily interactome. Mol Syst Biol 21, 632–675 (2025). 10.1038/s44320-025-00109-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Raposo G. & Marks M. S. Melanosomes--dark organelles enlighten endosomal membrane transport. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 8, 786–797 (2007). 10.1038/nrm2258 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wakamatsu K. & Ito S. Advanced chemical methods in melanin determination. Pigment Cell Res 15, 174–183 (2002). 10.1034/j.1600-0749.2002.02017.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Adelmann C. H. et al. MFSD12 mediates the import of cysteine into melanosomes and lysosomes. Nature 588, 699–704 (2020). 10.1038/s41586-020-2937-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gronskov K., Ek J. & Brondum-Nielsen K. Oculocutaneous albinism. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2, 43 (2007). 10.1186/1750-1172-2-43 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kidd K. K. et al. The distinctive geographic patterns of common pigmentation variants at the OCA2 gene. Sci Rep 10, 15433 (2020). 10.1038/s41598-020-72262-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bellono N. W., Escobar I. E., Lefkovith A. J., Marks M. S. & Oancea E. An intracellular anion channel critical for pigmentation. Elife 3, e04543 (2014). 10.7554/eLife.04543 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gahl W. A., Potterf B., Durham-Pierre D., Brilliant M. H. & Hearing V. J. Melanosomal tyrosine transport in normal and pink-eyed dilution murine melanocytes. Pigment Cell Res 8, 229–233 (1995). 10.1111/j.1600-0749.1995.tb00668.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Thul P. J. et al. A subcellular map of the human proteome. Science 356 (2017). 10.1126/science.aal3321 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Uhlen M. et al. Proteomics. Tissue-based map of the human proteome. Science 347, 1260419 (2015). 10.1126/science.1260419 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hediger M. A., Clemencon B., Burrier R. E. & Bruford E. A. The ABCs of membrane transporters in health and disease (SLC series): introduction. Mol Aspects Med 34, 95–107 (2013). 10.1016/j.mam.2012.12.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Andrews M. C. et al. Multi-modal molecular programs regulate melanoma cell state. Nat Commun 13, 4000 (2022). 10.1038/s41467-022-31510-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Dai W. et al. Genetic variants in PDSS1 and SLC16A6 of the ketone body metabolic pathway predict cutaneous melanoma-specific survival. Mol Carcinog 59, 640–650 (2020). 10.1002/mc.23191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Adijanto J. & Philp N. J. The SLC16A family of monocarboxylate transporters (MCTs)--physiology and function in cellular metabolism, pH homeostasis, and fluid transport. Curr Top Membr 70, 275–311 (2012). 10.1016/B978-0-12-394316-3.00009-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kim D. K. et al. The human T-type amino acid transporter-1: characterization, gene organization, and chromosomal location. Genomics 79, 95–103 (2002). 10.1006/geno.2001.6678 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Friesema E. C. et al. Identification of monocarboxylate transporter 8 as a specific thyroid hormone transporter. J Biol Chem 278, 40128–40135 (2003). 10.1074/jbc.M300909200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bissig C. et al. The PIKfyve complex regulates the early melanosome homeostasis required for physiological amyloid formation. J Cell Sci 132 (2019). 10.1242/jcs.229500 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Raposo G., Tenza D., Murphy D. M., Berson J. F. & Marks M. S. Distinct protein sorting and localization to premelanosomes, melanosomes, and lysosomes in pigmented melanocytic cells. J Cell Biol 152, 809–824 (2001). 10.1083/jcb.152.4.809 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Dennis M. K. et al. BLOC-1 and BLOC-3 regulate VAMP7 cycling to and from melanosomes via distinct tubular transport carriers. J Cell Biol 214, 293–308 (2016). 10.1083/jcb.201605090 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Setty S. R. et al. BLOC-1 is required for cargo-specific sorting from vacuolar early endosomes toward lysosome-related organelles. Mol Biol Cell 18, 768–780 (2007). 10.1091/mbc.e06-12-1066 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bott A. J. et al. Lineage specifying transcription factors determine cell function by direct control of metabolism. bioRxiv, 2026.2007.2002.735862 (2026). 10.64898/2026.07.02.735862 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Cheli Y., Ohanna M., Ballotti R. & Bertolotto C. Fifteen-year quest for microphthalmia-associated transcription factor target genes. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res 23, 27–40 (2010). 10.1111/j.1755-148X.2009.00653.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Dilshat R. et al. MITF reprograms the extracellular matrix and focal adhesion in melanoma. Elife 10 (2021). 10.7554/eLife.63093 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hugo S. E. et al. A monocarboxylate transporter required for hepatocyte secretion of ketone bodies during fasting. Genes Dev 26, 282–293 (2012). 10.1101/gad.180968.111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Higuchi K., Sugiyama K., Tomabechi R., Kishimoto H. & Inoue K. Mammalian monocarboxylate transporter 7 (MCT7/Slc16a6) is a novel facilitative taurine transporter. J Biol Chem 298, 101800 (2022). 10.1016/j.jbc.2022.101800 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Karanth S. & Schlegel A. The Monocarboxylate Transporter SLC16A6 Regulates Adult Length in Zebrafish and Is Associated With Height in Humans. Front Physiol 9, 1936 (2018). 10.3389/fphys.2018.01936 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Consortium R. Metabolomics (Knowledgebase). (2025). [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hekkelman M. L., de Vries I., Joosten R. P. & Perrakis A. AlphaFill: enriching AlphaFold models with ligands and cofactors. Nat Methods 20, 205–213 (2023). 10.1038/s41592-022-01685-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kanai Y. et al. Expression cloning and characterization of a transporter for large neutral amino acids activated by the heavy chain of 4F2 antigen (CD98). J Biol Chem 273, 23629–23632 (1998). 10.1074/jbc.273.37.23629 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Prasad P. D. et al. Human LAT1, a subunit of system L amino acid transporter: molecular cloning and transport function. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 255, 283–288 (1999). 10.1006/bbrc.1999.0206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Rochin L. et al. BACE2 processes PMEL to form the melanosome amyloid matrix in pigment cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110, 10658–10663 (2013). 10.1073/pnas.1220748110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ma B. et al. Atomic structure and in situ visualization of native PMEL lamellae in melanosomes. Nat Commun 16, 10300 (2025). 10.1038/s41467-025-65221-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Boultwood J. et al. The role of the iron transporter ABCB7 in refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts. PLoS One 3, e1970 (2008). 10.1371/journal.pone.0001970 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Krohn P. et al. Multisystem involvement, defective lysosomes and impaired autophagy in a novel rat model of nephropathic cystinosis. Hum Mol Genet 31, 2262–2278 (2022). 10.1093/hmg/ddac033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Festa B. P. et al. Impaired autophagy bridges lysosomal storage disease and epithelial dysfunction in the kidney. Nat Commun 9, 161 (2018). 10.1038/s41467-017-02536-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Colombo A. et al. Loss of NPC1 enhances phagocytic uptake and impairs lipid trafficking in microglia. Nat Commun 12, 1158 (2021). 10.1038/s41467-021-21428-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Krieg S. et al. Mitoferrin2 is a synthetic lethal target for chromosome 8p deleted cancers. Genome Med 16, 83 (2024). 10.1186/s13073-024-01357-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Seguin A. et al. The mitochondrial metal transporters mitoferrin1 and mitoferrin2 are required for liver regeneration and cell proliferation in mice. J Biol Chem 295, 11002–11020 (2020). 10.1074/jbc.RA120.013229 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Castaman G. et al. Reduced von Willebrand factor secretion is associated with loss of Weibel-Palade body formation. J Thromb Haemost 10, 951–958 (2012). 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2012.04702.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Cheong N. et al. ABCA3 is critical for lamellar body biogenesis in vivo. J Biol Chem 282, 23811–23817 (2007). 10.1074/jbc.M703927200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Fitzgerald M. L. et al. ABCA3 inactivation in mice causes respiratory failure, loss of pulmonary surfactant, and depletion of lung phosphatidylglycerol. J Lipid Res 48, 621–632 (2007). 10.1194/jlr.M600449-JLR200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Ran F. A. et al. Genome engineering using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Nat Protoc 8, 2281–2308 (2013). 10.1038/nprot.2013.143 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Roczniak-Ferguson A. et al. The transcription factor TFEB links mTORC1 signaling to transcriptional control of lysosome homeostasis. Sci Signal 5, ra42 (2012). 10.1126/scisignal.2002790 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Williams R. T. et al. ZBTB1 Regulates Asparagine Synthesis and Leukemia Cell Response to L-Asparaginase. Cell Metab 31, 852–861 e856 (2020). 10.1016/j.cmet.2020.03.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Kishi J. Y. et al. SABER amplifies FISH: enhanced multiplexed imaging of RNA and DNA in cells and tissues. Nat Methods 16, 533–544 (2019). 10.1038/s41592-019-0404-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Amamoto R. et al. Probe-Seq enables transcriptional profiling of specific cell types from heterogeneous tissue by RNA-based isolation. Elife 8 (2019). 10.7554/eLife.51452 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Li W. et al. Quality control, modeling, and visualization of CRISPR screens with MAGeCK-VISPR. Genome Biol 16, 281 (2015). 10.1186/s13059-015-0843-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Li W. et al. MAGeCK enables robust identification of essential genes from genome-scale CRISPR/Cas9 knockout screens. Genome Biol 15, 554 (2014). 10.1186/s13059-014-0554-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Oki S. et al. ChIP-Atlas: a data-mining suite powered by full integration of public ChIP-seq data. EMBO Rep 19 (2018). 10.15252/embr.201846255 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Zou Z., Ohta T., Miura F. & Oki S. ChIP-Atlas 2021 update: a data-mining suite for exploring epigenomic landscapes by fully integrating ChIP-seq, ATAC-seq and Bisulfite-seq data. Nucleic Acids Res 50, W175–W182 (2022). 10.1093/nar/gkac199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Zou Z., Ohta T. & Oki S. ChIP-Atlas 3.0: a data-mining suite to explore chromosome architecture together with large-scale regulome data. Nucleic Acids Res 52, W45–W53 (2024). 10.1093/nar/gkae358 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Li J. et al. TMTpro-18plex: The Expanded and Complete Set of TMTpro Reagents for Sample Multiplexing. J Proteome Res 20, 2964–2972 (2021). 10.1021/acs.jproteome.1c00168 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Navarrete-Perea J., Yu Q., Gygi S. P. & Paulo J. A. Streamlined Tandem Mass Tag (SL-TMT) Protocol: An Efficient Strategy for Quantitative (Phospho)proteome Profiling Using Tandem Mass Tag-Synchronous Precursor Selection-MS3. J Proteome Res 17, 2226–2236 (2018). 10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00217 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Hughes C. S. et al. Single-pot, solid-phase-enhanced sample preparation for proteomics experiments. Nat Protoc 14, 68–85 (2019). 10.1038/s41596-018-0082-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Schweppe D. K. et al. Full-Featured, Real-Time Database Searching Platform Enables Fast and Accurate Multiplexed Quantitative Proteomics. J Proteome Res 19, 2026–2034 (2020). 10.1021/acs.jproteome.9b00860 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Rad R. et al. Improved Monoisotopic Mass Estimation for Deeper Proteome Coverage. J Proteome Res 20, 591–598 (2021). 10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00563 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Li K., Teo G. C., Yang K. L., Yu F. & Nesvizhskii A. I. diaTracer enables spectrum-centric analysis of diaPASEF proteomics data. Nat Commun 16, 95 (2025). 10.1038/s41467-024-55448-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Teo G. C., Polasky D. A., Yu F. & Nesvizhskii A. I. Fast Deisotoping Algorithm and Its Implementation in the MSFragger Search Engine. J Proteome Res 20, 498–505 (2021). 10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00544 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Yang K. L. et al. MSBooster: improving peptide identification rates using deep learning-based features. Nat Commun 14, 4539 (2023). 10.1038/s41467-023-40129-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Kall L., Canterbury J. D., Weston J., Noble W. S. & MacCoss M. J. Semi-supervised learning for peptide identification from shotgun proteomics datasets. Nat Methods 4, 923–925 (2007). 10.1038/nmeth1113 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Nesvizhskii A. I., Keller A., Kolker E. & Aebersold R. A statistical model for identifying proteins by tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 75, 4646–4658 (2003). 10.1021/ac0341261 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.da Veiga Leprevost F. et al. Philosopher: a versatile toolkit for shotgun proteomics data analysis. Nat Methods 17, 869–870 (2020). 10.1038/s41592-020-0912-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Demichev V., Messner C. B., Vernardis S. I., Lilley K. S. & Ralser M. DIA-NN: neural networks and interference correction enable deep proteome coverage in high throughput. Nat Methods 17, 41–44 (2020). 10.1038/s41592-019-0638-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Thurman T. W., CL.; Alkam D.; Bird JT.; Gies A.; Dhusia K.; Robeson II MS.; Byrum SD. proteoDA: a package for quantitative proteomics. Journal of Open Source Software 8, 5184 (2023). 10.21105/joss.05184 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Chong J. & Xia J. MetaboAnalystR: an R package for flexible and reproducible analysis of metabolomics data. Bioinformatics 34, 4313–4314 (2018). 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty528 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Mica Y., Lee G., Chambers S. M., Tomishima M. J. & Studer L. Modeling neural crest induction, melanocyte specification, and disease-related pigmentation defects in hESCs and patient-specific iPSCs. Cell Rep 3, 1140–1152 (2013). 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.03.025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data supporting the findings of this study will be made available upon publication.




