Skip to main content
Frontiers in Neuroscience logoLink to Frontiers in Neuroscience
. 2026 Jul 1;20:1886999. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2026.1886999

Micro- and nanoplastics as environmental modifiers of neuroimmune dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease

Sichen Qian 1, Fei Gao 2,3,4,*, Peng Wang 5,6,*
PMCID: PMC13370565  PMID: 42459360

Abstract

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by the loss of dopaminergic neurons and the aggregation of α-synuclein, with increasing evidence implicating environmental factors and neuroimmune dysfunction in its pathogenesis. Micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs), ubiquitous environmental pollutants generated from plastic degradation, have recently emerged as potential biological stressors capable of entering the human body and accumulating in sensitive tissues, including the brain. Due to their small size, environmental persistence, and capacity to carry toxic additives and environmental contaminants, these particles can induce oxidative stress, impair mitochondrial and lysosomal function, and activate both innate and adaptive immune responses. This review summarizes current evidence linking microplastic exposure to neuroinflammatory processes relevant to PD, with a particular focus on microglial activation, astrocyte reactivity, peripheral immune involvement, and dysfunction of the gut–brain axis. Although a direct causal relationship between MNPs and PD has yet to be established, and direct human epidemiological evidence linking MNP exposure to PD is currently absent, the immunotoxic and neuroinflammatory effects of these particles suggest that they may contribute to disease susceptibility and progression. Elucidating the interactions between MNPs and neuroimmune pathways may help refine current frameworks linking environmental exposure, neuroimmune dysfunction, and PD susceptibility.

Keywords: gut–brain axis, microplastics, nanoplastics, neuroimmunity, neuroinflammation, Parkinson’s disease

1. Introduction

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by the degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra (Karlsen et al., 1999). It is the second most common neurodegenerative disease, affecting approximately 0.5–1% of individuals aged 65–69 and up to 1–3% of those over 80, with prevalence projected to increase substantially in the coming decades (Kouli et al., 2018). PD is widely recognized as a multifactorial disease, with contributions from genetic predisposition, environmental toxins, and chronic inflammatory processes (Karlsen et al., 1999). Despite extensive research, the precise mechanisms driving disease onset and progression remain incompletely understood.

Micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs) have attracted increasing attention as pervasive and persistent pollutants with potential biological effects. These tiny plastic particles, generated through the degradation of larger plastics, have been detected in drinking water, various food products, and marine organisms (Principi et al., 2025). Owing to their widespread presence and resistance to degradation, MNPs can accumulate in living organisms, raising questions about their long-term biological effects. While the ecological consequences of MNPs are increasingly documented, their potential role in human neurodegenerative diseases remains poorly understood (Liu et al., 2024).

Neuroimmune dysregulation has emerged as a central driver of PD pathogenesis (Tansey et al., 2022). Interactions among microglia, astrocytes, peripheral immune cells, and the gut–brain axis contribute to a self-amplifying cycle of inflammation and neurodegeneration (Muller and Di Benedetto, 2025). α-Synuclein, a pathological hallmark of PD, also acts as an immunogenic mediator that links peripheral and central immune responses (Bellini et al., 2025). The gut–brain axis, in particular, may serve as an early site of disease initiation, where environmental exposures and microbial dysbiosis trigger α-synuclein aggregation in the enteric nervous system, with subsequent propagation to the brain via neural and immune pathways (Lei et al., 2021; Chao et al., 2020). Given these converging lines of evidence, MNPs represent a hypothetically plausible environmental factor capable of modulating neuroimmune processes relevant to PD. However, their role within this framework remains insufficiently defined (Lin et al., 2026). Therefore, it is important to clarify the evidentiary basis for this hypothesis. Direct experimental evidence linking MNP exposure to PD-relevant neuroimmune mechanisms remains limited and derives primarily from in vitro or animal models using pristine nanoparticles at concentrations that may not reflect environmental exposure conditions.

In this review, we examine the intersection between MNP exposure and neuroimmunity in PD. Specifically, we focus on the mechanisms by which MNPs may trigger or exacerbate neuroinflammatory pathways—such as glial activation, peripheral immune dysregulation, and gut–brain axis dysfunction—thereby contributing to the neurodegenerative processes characteristic of the disease. It is important to note that no human epidemiological studies have directly examined associations between MNP exposure and PD risk, and direct evidence for MNP accumulation in human brain tissue remains limited. This review synthesizes current evidence to clarify how plastic pollution may contribute to PD and identifies key knowledge gaps to guide future mechanistic and translational research.

Literature Search Strategy: A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases up to March 2026. Search terms included combinations of “Parkinson’s disease,” “microplastics,” “nanoplastics,” “neuroinflammation,” “neuroimmunity,” “gut–brain axis,” “microglia,” “astrocytes,” and “α-synuclein.” Search term combinations included: (“Parkinson’s disease” OR “PD”) AND (“microplastics” OR “nanoplastics” OR “plastic particles”); (“microplastics” OR “nanoplastics”) AND (“neuroinflammation” OR “neuroimmunity” OR “microglia” OR “astrocytes”); (“microplastics” OR “nanoplastics”) AND (“gut-brain axis” OR “gut dysbiosis”); and (“microplastics” OR “nanoplastics”) AND (“α-synuclein” OR “alpha-synuclein”). Priority was given to original experimental studies, mechanistic investigations, and recent reviews relevant to neuroimmune and neurotoxic effects of micro- and nanoplastics. Additional references were identified through manual screening of cited literature.

2. Neuroimmune mechanisms in PD

Neuroimmune dysregulation in PD operates across central, peripheral, and enteric compartments. While α-synuclein aggregation and progressive dopaminergic neuron loss constitute the core pathological features of PD, neuroimmune dysregulation has emerged as an important modifying factor that can amplify these processes. The following sections outline the interrelated immune mechanisms that interact with primary neurodegenerative pathways.

2.1. α-Synuclein as an immunogenic driver

Aggregated α-synuclein acts as a key immunogenic trigger, engaging microglial Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and activating the NLRP3 inflammasome pathway, culminating in neuroinflammation and dopaminergic neuron loss (Li Y. et al., 2021). NLRP3 activation is further amplified by mitochondrial dysfunction, highlighting this pathway as a potential target for disease-modifying interventions (Liang J. Y. et al., 2025). In addition, chronic neuroinflammation promotes an autoimmune component: stressed dopaminergic neurons upregulate MHC Class I molecules, presenting antigens such as α-synuclein or mitochondrial peptides to cytotoxic CD8+ T cells (Hobson and Sulzer, 2022). Together, these events establish a feed-forward loop of neuronal stress, immune activation, and progressive neurodegeneration.

2.2. Microglia and astrocytes

Microglia, the resident macrophages of the central nervous system, play a key role in regulating neuroinflammation and maintaining homeostasis. Under physiological conditions, microglia are homeostatic. Pathological stimuli, such as misfolded α-synuclein aggregates, polarize microglia into a M1 pro-inflammatory and neurotoxic phenotype, also referred to as Disease-Associated Microglia (DAM) (Deczkowska et al., 2018). Recent studies have moved beyond traditional M1/M2 classifications to reveal the heterogeneity of microglial states in PD (Gao et al., 2023). M1-like microglia release cytotoxic cytokines and reactive oxygen species, promote Th1 and Th17 differentiation, and contribute to oxidative stress, mitophagy/autophagy dysfunction, and sustained α-synuclein accumulation (Su and Zhou, 2021; Isik et al., 2023; Badanjak et al., 2021; Guo et al., 2022). Chronic M1 activation of microglia thus establishes a self-perpetuating cycle of neuroinflammation and dopaminergic neuron death, and contributes to the progression of neurodegenerative diseases, particularly PD (Gao et al., 2023).

Multiple studies have now revealed that astrocytes can take up α-synuclein and have a role in the removal and degradation of α-synuclein, but in PD, this clearance system becomes overwhelmed, leading to accumulation (Booth et al., 2017). Activated microglia convert astrocytes into a neurotoxic A1 phenotype (neuroinflammatory reactive astrocytes), which triggers neuroinflammation and neuronal loss. The GLP-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonist NLY01 blocks this microglia-mediated conversion, highlighting the therapeutic potential of targeting glial crosstalk (Kam et al., 2020; Yun et al., 2018). Cytokines, extracellular vesicles, and gap junctions further mediate complex interactions among microglia, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes, underscoring glial communication as a key axis in PD neurodegeneration (Wang et al., 2025).

2.3. Peripheral adaptive immunity

Adaptive immunity contributes significantly to PD pathogenesis. Both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells infiltrate the brain, where they amplify neuroinflammation and neuronal injury. Among CD4+ subsets, Th1 and Th17 cells promote inflammation, whereas regulatory T cells (Tregs) restrain excessive responses; an imbalance favoring Th1/Th17 over Tregs is consistently observed in patients and animal models (Su and Zhou, 2021; DeMaio et al., 2022; Li W. et al., 2021; Sun et al., 2024). α-synuclein drives this shift by upregulating RORγt, enhancing Th17 differentiation, and impairing Treg stability and function (Li et al., 2023). External factors, such as periodontitis and gut colonization by Veillonella parvula or Streptococcus mutans, exacerbate Th1 infiltration into the central nervous system (CNS) and peripheral tissue (Bai et al., 2023).

CD8+ T cells in PD exhibit elevated cytotoxic and differentiation profiles, including expansion of terminally differentiated effector memory (TEMRA) and tissue-resident memory (Trm) subsets, with enhanced expression of granzymes and interferon-γ, infiltrating the substantia nigra even before substantial α-synuclein aggregation (Capelle et al., 2023; de Fabregues et al., 2023).

Innate immune cells such as natural killer (NK) cells and monocytes are also dysregulated: NK cells can degrade α-synuclein but may release pro-inflammatory cytokines, whereas circulating monocytes adopt a primed pro-inflammatory state, amplifying peripheral immune involvement (Daneshjou et al., 2025; Earls and Lee, 2020; Zhang et al., 2022; Grozdanov et al., 2014). These findings highlight multiple layers of systemic immune dysregulation as contributors to PD progression and therapeutic targets.

2.4. Gut–brain axis in PD

The enteric nervous system (ENS) is implicated early in PD pathogenesis, with alterations detectable before central nervous system involvement (Montanari et al., 2023; McQuade et al., 2021). Gut dysbiosis and environmental toxins may initiate α-synuclein aggregation in the ENS, which propagates to the brain via the vagus nerve in a prion-like manner (Santos et al., 2019; Zhu et al., 2022).

α-synuclein functions as a mechanistic bridge linking gut-derived immune activation to central neurodegeneration, providing a conceptual framework that connects peripheral environmental exposure with CNS pathology (Chen and Mor, 2023; Schaeffer et al., 2020). Gut-derived α-synuclein acts as a peripheral immune modulator, promoting Th17 differentiation and impairing Treg function through RORγt transcription, thereby reinforcing systemic and central neuroinflammation (Li et al., 2023; Park et al., 2023).

Preliminary evidence from animal studies suggests that MNP-induced gut dysbiosis could potentially exacerbate these processes by promoting intestinal barrier disruption and immune activation. However, direct evidence linking MNP exposure to α-synuclein pathology in the enteric nervous system or to PD progression is currently absent. A single study has reported increased intestinal permeability following polystyrene microplastic exposure in mice, and separate studies have demonstrated that gut dysbiosis can promote α-synuclein aggregation in PD models. The integration of these observations suggests that MNPs might influence α-synuclein pathology via gut dysbiosis, but this remains hypothetical and requires direct experimental testing (Lin et al., 2026; Perez-Pardo et al., 2017).

3. MNPs: properties, exposure, and biological fate

MNPs comprise a heterogeneous continuum of synthetic polymer particles that are now pervasive across environmental and biological systems. Their physicochemical properties (including size, polymer composition, surface charge, and morphology) govern environmental persistence, transport behavior, and biological interactions. Increasing evidence indicates that the biological effects of MNPs are strongly size-dependent, with MPs primarily contributing to environmental exposure, whereas NPs represent a more biologically active fraction capable of interacting with cellular and subcellular processes (Yang Z. et al., 2023).

3.1. Size-dependent properties: MPs versus NPs

MPs are generally defined as plastic particles smaller than 5 mm and originate from the fragmentation of larger plastic materials or from primary sources such as cosmetics and industrial products. Due to their abundance and environmental persistence, MPs constitute the dominant form of plastic exposure in humans and ecosystems. They act as long-lived reservoirs for co-contaminants, including heavy metals, persistent organic pollutants, antibiotic resistance genes, and microbial pathogens, thereby facilitating environmental transport and bioaccumulation (Hu et al., 2022).

NPs, typically ranging from approximately 1 nm to 1 μm, often arise from the progressive degradation of MPs (Lai et al., 2022). Compared with MPs, NPs exhibit markedly distinct physicochemical and biological characteristics. Their small size confers increased mobility and diffusivity, while their high surface area-to-volume ratio enhances adsorption of biomolecules and environmental contaminants (Chen et al., 2023). In biological fluids, NPs readily acquire a dynamic protein corona, which alters their biological identity, cellular uptake, biodistribution, and toxicity (Grumelot et al., 2024). These properties enable NPs to cross biological barriers and interact directly with intracellular structures. Experimental evidence indicates that NPs can penetrate cellular membranes, accumulate in organelles such as mitochondria and lysosomes, and induce oxidative stress, inflammation, and organelle dysfunction.

3.2. Human exposure routes and systemic distribution

Human exposure to MNPs occurs predominantly through ingestion and inhalation, with dermal exposure considered less significant (Jahedi and Jaafarzadeh Haghighi Fard, 2025). MPs are widely present in food, drinking water, and airborne particulate matter, representing a continuous source of exposure. Following ingestion, a fraction of these particles undergoes further fragmentation, contributing to the generation of NPs within biological systems (Mortensen et al., 2021).

Particle size determines systemic distribution. While larger MPs are generally confined to the gastrointestinal tract or cleared through excretion, smaller particles—particularly those in the submicron and nanoscale range—can translocate across epithelial barriers. NPs have been shown to cross the intestinal epithelium, enter the circulation, and distribute to secondary organs (Zhou et al., 2025). Studies using pristine polystyrene nanoparticles at concentrations ranging from 0.1–10 mg/kg (oral) or 10–50 μg/mL (in vitro) have reported that nanoscale particles can reach the brain within hours after oral exposure in rodent models, with blood–brain barrier (BBB) penetration influenced by surface properties and protein corona composition (Kopatz et al., 2023).

In addition to gastrointestinal uptake, inhaled MNPs can deposit in the respiratory tract, where smaller particles may translocate into systemic circulation. Once internalized, MNPs may accumulate in organs including the liver, spleen, and brain, raising concerns regarding chronic low-dose exposure and long-term biological effects (Lee et al., 2025; Ali et al., 2024).

3.3. Tissue distribution, brain accumulation, and biological persistence

The ability of NPs to reach and persist in neural tissue represents a key feature linking environmental plastic exposure to neurobiological outcomes. Following systemic distribution, NPs can cross the BBB and accumulate within the central nervous system. In the brain, these particles may act as persistent sources of oxidative stress and immune activation, interacting with neurons and glial cells (Medley et al., 2023; Anifowoshe et al., 2025).

At the cellular level, NPs can localize to mitochondria and lysosomes, where they disrupt energy metabolism, impair autophagic flux, and promote reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation (Lai et al., 2022; Jahedi and Jaafarzadeh Haghighi Fard, 2025). These processes are closely associated with pathways implicated in neurodegenerative diseases, including α-synuclein misfolding and aggregation. Importantly, NP-induced impairment of autophagic digestion may compromise the clearance of aberrant protein aggregates, including α-synuclein, thereby promoting its intracellular accumulation, a core pathological feature of PD (Park et al., 2020).

MPs are less likely to directly access neural tissue due to size constraints. However, they may indirectly contribute to systemic and neuroinflammatory processes by acting as continuous sources of smaller particles and associated toxicants. Therefore, while MPs represent the primary environmental reservoir of exposure, NPs constitute the fraction most capable of penetrating biological systems and eliciting cellular responses (Lin et al., 2026; Lai et al., 2022; Jahedi and Jaafarzadeh Haghighi Fard, 2025; Fang et al., 2025; Yee et al., 2021; Casella and Ballaz, 2024). This distinction helps explain how plastic particles may contribute to neuroimmune dysregulation and neurodegenerative diseases such as PD.

4. Immunotoxic effects of MNPs

MNPs are increasingly recognized as immunotoxic agents capable of disrupting both innate and adaptive immune responses. Their small size, high surface area, and capacity to adsorb environmental pollutants and plastic additives enable them to interact with immune cells. These properties may drive oxidative stress and amplify chronic inflammatory signaling (Yang et al., 2022; Leslie et al., 2022). These effects are particularly relevant in PD, where sustained immune activation and neuroinflammation contribute to progressive neurodegeneration. The major immunotoxic mechanisms induced by MNPs are summarized in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Diagram illustrating how micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs), protein corona, and pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) can trigger mitochondrial dysfunction and NLRP3 inflammasome activation, leading to pro-inflammatory cytokine release and T cell polarization, contributing to gut dysbiosis, leaky gut, systemic inflammation, and neuroinflammation via the vagus nerve.

Immunotoxic cascade of micro- and nanoplastics in Parkinson’s disease. Micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs) enter the body primarily via ingestion and inhalation, disrupting gut microbiota and intestinal barrier integrity. Resultant dysbiosis promotes Th17 polarization and Treg suppression, while enteric α-synuclein aggregation propagate to the central nervous system via the vagus nerve. At the cellular level, MNPs are recognized by pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) and internalized by innate immune cells, where they induce lysosomal destabilization, mitochondrial dysfunction, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, leading to NLRP3 inflammasome activation and pro-inflammatory cytokine release. In parallel, oxidative stress and inflammation promote α-synuclein misfolding and aggregation, establishing feed-forward loops that amplify neuroinflammation and dopaminergic neuron loss.

4.1. Innate immune activation

Innate immune responses represent the first line of defense against particulate exposure and are central to MNP-induced immunotoxicity. The interaction between MNPs and innate immune cells is initiated by particle recognition and uptake. Pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), including Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and scavenger receptors, are thought to mediate the sensing and internalization of plastic particles. In biological environments, the formation of a protein corona further modifies particle identity and influences immune recognition, cellular uptake, and downstream signaling (Panico et al., 2022; Antunes et al., 2023).

Following internalization, nanoscale plastic particles can induce cellular stress responses through multiple interconnected pathways. A key mechanism involves lysosomal destabilization. Particle accumulation within endolysosomal compartments damages the membrane and releases cathepsins into the cytosol, which in turn triggers NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome represents an important downstream event linking MNP exposure to neuroinflammation. Given the established role of NLRP3 signaling in microglia-driven dopaminergic neuron loss in PD (Nguyen et al., 2022; Koprich et al., 2008), nanoparticle-induced inflammasome activation provides a mechanistic bridge between environmental plastic exposure and neurodegenerative vulnerability.

Concurrently, mitochondrial dysfunction and excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS) production activate redox-sensitive pathways such as NF-κB and MAPK signaling (Nguyen et al., 2022; Chang and Chen, 2020). This leads to the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α (Koprich et al., 2008), a neurotoxic milieu that can exacerbate microglial activation and α-synuclein aggregation, which are both central to PD pathogenesis.

Importantly, α-synuclein itself differentially affects innate immune subsets. In monocytes, it enhances migration and inflammatory responses, whereas in macrophages it impairs autophagy and promotes exaggerated cytokine release (Schonhoff et al., 2023; Limanaqi et al., 2024). MNPs may synergize with α-synuclein–mediated immune dysfunction and amplify sterile inflammation.

4.2. Adaptive immune dysregulation

Beyond innate immunity, MNP exposure can disrupt adaptive immune balance, contributing to systemic immune dysregulation. Studies indicate that nanoscale plastic particles skew T-cell differentiation toward pro-inflammatory phenotypes, particularly Th17 and Th2 responses, while suppressing regulatory T-cell (Treg) function. This shift compromises immune tolerance and promotes chronic inflammation (Yang Q. et al., 2023).

Such immune imbalance is central to PD, where increased Th17 activity and impaired Treg function are hallmarks of disease-associated immune dysfunction. By lowering the threshold for aberrant immune activation, MNP-driven adaptive dysregulation may facilitate autoimmune-like responses against neuronal antigens, including α-synuclein (Ali et al., 2024; Cheng et al., 2024). In addition, MNP exposure has been associated with alterations in cytotoxic CD8+ T-cell responses and peripheral immune priming, which may further amplify neuroinflammatory and neuronal injury (Greenland et al., 2025; Moquin-Beaudry et al., 2025).

4.3. Gut microbiota–immune interactions

Gut dysbiosis is a recognized feature of PD and may precede motor symptoms (Huang et al., 2021; Huang et al., 2023). It is characterized by depletion of short-chain fatty acid–producing anti-inflammatory bacteria and enrichment of pro-inflammatory taxa (Huang et al., 2023). This imbalance promotes intestinal barrier disruption, systemic inflammation, α-synuclein aggregation, and altered levodopa metabolism (Berthouzoz et al., 2023). Mechanistically, gut dysbiosis promotes increased intestinal permeability (“leaky gut”), facilitating the translocation of microbial products such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS) into systemic circulation (Di Vincenzo et al., 2024; Zhao et al., 2025). This systemic inflammatory state primes peripheral immune cells and enhances their capacity to infiltrate the central nervous system or modulate microglial activation. In parallel, dysbiosis-induced α-synuclein aggregation in the enteric nervous system may propagate to the brain via the vagus nerve, thereby linking peripheral immune activation with central neurodegeneration (Lei et al., 2021; Chen et al., 2019; Cheng and Chiang, 2025).

Intestinal barrier integrity is compromised in PD, evidenced by reduced colonic expression of tight junction proteins such as ZO-1 (van IJzendoorn and Derkinderen, 2019). Decreased expression of microbial metabolite receptors (FFAR2/FFAR3) further supports impaired host–microbiota signaling (Liao et al., 2024).

MNP exposure may exacerbate these processes at multiple levels. Ingestion of MNPs can alter gut microbial composition, induce oxidative stress, and promote pro-inflammatory immune polarization, often skewing toward Th17- and Th2-dominant responses while suppressing Treg activity (Yang et al., 2022; Li et al., 2022). Polyethylene terephthalate and polystyrene particles stimulate IL-1β and IL-6 release and induce cytotoxicity, particularly when environmentally aged and coated with adsorbed pollutants (Bishop et al., 2025).

Therapeutic strategies targeting the gut microbiome—including probiotics, prebiotics, and dietary interventions—have shown potential to restore microbial balance and alleviate gastrointestinal symptoms in PD (Yadav and Raj, 2025). However, their effects on disease progression remain limited, highlighting the need for a more comprehensive understanding of gut–immune–brain interactions (Tansey et al., 2022; Tan et al., 2021; Jin et al., 2024).

It should be noted that most studies reporting these effects have utilized pristine polystyrene nanoparticles at concentrations (typically 10–100 μg/mL) that exceed estimated environmental exposure levels by several orders of magnitude (Hernandez et al., 2025). Whether similar effects occur with environmentally aged particles or at chronic low doses remains to be established. Although the immunotoxic effects described derive primarily from in vitro or animal studies using acute, high-dose exposures that may not reflect chronic, low-dose environmental conditions, these findings collectively suggest that MNPs can disrupt immune homeostasis at multiple levels, from cellular stress responses and immune sensing to systemic immune imbalance, thereby creating a permissive environment for neuroinflammatory and neurodegenerative processes. Where available, we note discrepancies between experimental and estimated environmental concentrations.

5. Convergence of MNPs and neuroimmunity in PD: a hypothetical gut–brain axis framework

Emerging evidence supports a multi-level convergence between environmental plastic exposure and neuroimmune dysregulation in PD (Lin et al., 2026; Casella and Ballaz, 2024; Zhu et al., 2025; Muhammad et al., 2026; Liang X. et al., 2025; Liang et al., 2022; Jeong et al., 2024). Rather than acting as isolated toxic agents, MNPs appear to intersect with key pathogenic pathways—including innate immune activation, adaptive immune imbalance, mitochondrial dysfunction, and α-synuclein pathology—across peripheral and central compartments (Mans et al., 2025). PD may be particularly susceptible to chronic MNP exposure because several core pathogenic mechanisms in PD—including mitochondrial vulnerability, oxidative stress amplification, gut dysbiosis, and persistent microglial priming—closely overlap with the dominant biological effects induced by MNPs.

We propose a conceptual model as a hypothetical framework to guide future research, in which MNPs function as environmental amplifiers within a gut–brain axis. A central feature of this model (Figure 2) is this axis as an early and permissive interface for MNP-induced effects. Ingestion of MNPs may alter gut microbial composition, disrupt intestinal barrier integrity, and promote systemic immune activation. This “leaky gut” state can facilitate the translocation of microbial products and inflammatory mediators into circulation, priming peripheral immune cells and lowering the threshold for neuroinflammatory responses. Simultaneously, MNP-induced dysbiosis may promote α-synuclein aggregation within the enteric nervous system, which can propagate to the brain via the vagus nerve, thereby linking environmental exposure to central neurodegeneration.

Figure 2.

Infographic illustrating the relationship between micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs), gut-brain axis, neuroimmune dysregulation, and Parkinson’s disease (PD). Key concepts include immune and mitochondrial dysfunction, gut dysbiosis, barrier penetration, and neurodegeneration, with diagrammatic connections among gut, brain, MNPs, and relevant biological pathways.

Convergence of micro- and nanoplastics with neuroimmune pathways in Parkinson’s disease. Schematic of a gut–brain model linking micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs) may modulate Parkinson’s disease (PD) pathogenesis. MNPs disrupt intestinal barrier integrity and microbiota composition, promoting enteric α-synuclein aggregation and systemic immune activation. Misfolded α-synuclein propagates to the brain via the vagus nerve. In parallel, NPs enter circulation, cross the blood–brain barrier (BBB), and activate microglia, inducing oxidative stress and inflammatory signaling. These peripheral and central pathways converge to amplify neuroinflammation and dopaminergic neuron degeneration, positioning MNPs as environmental amplifiers of PD pathogenesis.

At the central level, experimental systems indicate that NPs can directly interact with microglia and astrocytes. Internalization of nanoscale particles induces lysosomal damage, mitochondrial dysfunction, and oxidative stress, leading to activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome and NF-κB signaling pathways. These events promote a shift toward pro-inflammatory microglial states, including DAM, which in turn drive astrocytic A1 polarization and amplify neuroinflammation. This glial crosstalk reinforces α-synuclein aggregation and dopaminergic neuron vulnerability (Paing et al., 2024; Kiran et al., 2025; Miyazaki and Asanuma, 2020).

Peripheral immune dysregulation further contributes to this convergence. MNP exposure might promote Th17-skewed responses and impair regulatory T-cell function, thereby compromising immune tolerance and facilitating chronic inflammation. These systemic alterations may enhance immune cell infiltration into the central nervous system or modulate microglial activation, establishing a bidirectional feedback loop between peripheral and central immunity (Greenland et al., 2025; Moquin-Beaudry et al., 2025).

Oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction represent a shared mechanistic intersection across these pathways. In PD, impaired mitophagy and excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS) production promote α-synuclein misfolding and inflammatory signaling (Chang and Chen, 2020; Borsche et al., 2021; Wu et al., 2024; Kadac-Czapska et al., 2024). MNP-induced cellular stress may exacerbate these processes, reinforcing a feed-forward cycle of mitochondrial damage, immune activation, and neurodegeneration (Borsche et al., 2021; Zaman et al., 2021; Henrich et al., 2023).

Finally, MPs alter gut microbiota composition and intestinal immune tone (Sofield et al., 2024). Given the established role of the gut–brain axis in PD, microbiome disruption may represent an additional pathway through which environmental plastic exposure converges with neuroimmune dysfunction.

This convergence model positions MNPs not as primary etiological drivers, but as modulators that lower the threshold for neuroimmune activation in susceptible individuals. By integrating environmental exposure with gut, immune, and neural pathways, this framework provides a unifying perspective on how plastic pollution may contribute to PD pathogenesis.

6. Limitations, clinical implications and future directions

Several recent reviews have addressed MNP neurotoxicity, neuroinflammation, and gut dysbiosis in the context of neurodegenerative diseases. However, most existing syntheses examine these topics broadly across multiple disorders or focus on general neurotoxic mechanisms. The present review is specifically focused on PD-relevant neuroimmune pathways, with three distinctive features: (1) a detailed integration of central (microglial/astrocytic), peripheral (T cell, monocyte, NK cell), and enteric immune compartments within a unified PD framework; (2) a critical examination of the size-dependent paradigm distinguishing MPs (exposure burden) from NPs (biologically active fraction); and (3) a conceptual model positioning MNPs as environmental amplifiers within the gut–brain axis rather than primary etiological drivers. Where prior reviews have provided broad overviews of MNP neurotoxicity, we aim to offer a mechanistic, PD-specific synthesis that identifies specific immune nodes vulnerable to MNP modulation.

Despite growing mechanistic evidence, several critical challenges limit our current understanding of the relationship between MNP exposure and PD. First, the lack of standardized methodologies for detecting and quantifying MNPs in human tissues hampers reproducibility and cross-study comparisons. Variability in sampling, analytical techniques, and reporting metrics remains a major barrier to establishing reliable exposure–response relationships.

Second, most experimental studies rely on acute or high-dose exposures (typically 10–100 μg/mL in vitro or 0.1–10 mg/kg in vivo) that may not accurately reflect chronic, low-dose environmental conditions. Moreover, such high-dose studies cannot reliably inform risk assessment without dose–response data spanning environmentally relevant ranges. Given that PD develops over decades, understanding the long-term cumulative effects of MNP exposure is essential. In addition, current in vitro and animal models fail to fully capture the complex, multi-system interactions among the gut, immune system, and brain that characterize human disease. Reported organ accumulation frequently reflects transient detection rather than true long-term persistence, with limited distinction between parenchymal internalization and vascular sequestration.

Third, the heterogeneity of MNPs presents a significant challenge. Differences in particle size, polymer composition, surface chemistry, and associated contaminants complicate the attribution of biological effects to specific components. Most studies employ pristine, spherical, monodisperse polystyrene particles, whereas environmental MNPs are irregular in shape, polydisperse, chemically heterogeneous, and coated with environmental contaminants, microbial biofilms, and a protein corona that fundamentally alters their biological identity and toxicity. Contamination artifacts (e.g., airborne fibers, leaching from labware) are often inadequately controlled. Disentangling the relative contributions of MPs, NPs, and plastic-associated chemicals remains a key unresolved issue.

From a clinical and translational perspective, recognizing MNPs as potential environmental modifiers of neuroimmune vulnerability may expand current frameworks of PD risk. This perspective shifts the focus from genetic predisposition and classical toxins toward chronic, low-grade environmental exposures that interact with aging and immune dysregulation. To date, no prospective cohort studies or case–control studies have examined associations between measured MNP exposure and PD risk. This represents a critical gap, as the proposed model cannot be adequately tested without human data.

Future research should prioritize the following directions:

  • 1) Longitudinal epidemiological studies: Large-scale, prospective cohorts are needed to evaluate associations between microplastic exposure and PD risk while controlling for demographic, genetic, occupational, and lifestyle confounders. Such studies would help identify susceptible populations and clarify dose–response relationships.

  • 2) Mechanistic investigations: Further research should delineate the molecular pathways through which MPs and their associated additives influence neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and α-synuclein aggregation. Particular emphasis should be placed on neuron–microglia–astrocyte interactions and systemic immune–brain crosstalk.

  • 3) Standardized exposure assessment tools: Development of harmonized analytical methods, advanced imaging technologies, and validated biomarkers of internal microplastic burden is essential for improving exposure quantification and clinical translation.

  • 4) Therapeutic and preventive strategies: A better understanding of how MPs amplify neuroinflammatory cascades may inform targeted interventions aimed at modulating immune and mitochondrial pathways in PD. Preventive measures—such as dietary modifications, reduction of plastic use, and improved air and water filtration systems—also warrant systematic evaluation as potential long-term risk mitigation strategies.

7. Conclusion

MNPs represent an emerging class of environmental factors with the potential to interact with key neuroimmune pathways implicated in PD. The role of MNPs in PD may be best understood not as direct toxicity but as environmental modifiers that integrate with aging, genetic susceptibility, and immune imbalance to shape disease vulnerability.

This review highlights two interconnected insights: first, a size-dependent paradigm in which MPs represent exposure burden while NPs drive biological effects; second, the gut–brain axis as a critical interface through which these particles may influence neurodegeneration.

By converging on shared pathways—including oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, innate and adaptive immune activation, and α-synuclein pathology—MNPs may lower the threshold for neuroinflammatory processes and accelerate disease progression in susceptible individuals. Although causality remains to be established, this integrative framework highlights the importance of considering chronic environmental exposures in models of neurodegenerative disease.

Understanding how MNPs interact with neuroimmune systems may not only refine our view of PD pathogenesis but also inform future strategies for prevention and intervention. More broadly, this perspective underscores a paradigm shift in which environmental micro-scale pollutants are recognized as active participants in complex, multi-system disease processes.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.

Footnotes

Edited by: Dan Xiao, Harbin Institute of Technology, China

Reviewed by: Santiago J. Ballaz, Yachay Tech University, Ecuador

Kinga Vojnits, University of British Columbia, Okanagan, Canada

Author contributions

SQ: Writing – original draft. FG: Writing – review & editing. PW: Writing – review & editing.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that Generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  1. Ali N., Katsouli J., Marczylo E. L., Gant T. W., Wright S., Bernardino de la Serna J. (2024). The potential impacts of micro-and-nano plastics on various organ systems in humans. EBioMedicine 99:104901. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104901, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anifowoshe A. T., Akhtar M. N., Majeed A., Singh A. S., Ismail T. F., Nongthomba U. (2025). Microplastics: a threat to Fetoplacental unit and reproductive systems. Toxicol. Rep. 14:101938. doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2025.101938, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Antunes J., Sobral P., Martins M., Branco V. (2023). Nanoplastics activate a TLR4/p38-mediated pro-inflammatory response in human intestinal and mouse microglia cells. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 104:104298. doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2023.104298, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Badanjak K., Fixemer S., Smajic S., Skupin A., Grunewald A. (2021). The contribution of microglia to Neuroinflammation in Parkinson's disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22:4676. doi: 10.3390/ijms22094676, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bai X. B., Xu S., Zhou L. J., Meng X. Q., Li Y. L., Chen Y. L., et al. (2023). Oral pathogens exacerbate Parkinson's disease by promoting Th1 cell infiltration in mice. Microbiome 11:254. doi: 10.1186/s40168-023-01685-w, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bellini G., D'Antongiovanni V., Palermo G., Antonioli L., Fornai M., Ceravolo R., et al. (2025). Alpha-Synuclein in Parkinson's disease: from bench to bedside. Med. Res. Rev. 45, 909–946. doi: 10.1002/med.22091, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Berthouzoz E., Lazarevic V., Zekeridou A., Castro M., Debove I., Aybek S., et al. (2023). Oral and intestinal dysbiosis in Parkinson's disease. Rev. Neurol. (Paris) 179, 937–946. doi: 10.1016/j.neurol.2022.12.010, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bishop B., Webber W. S., Atif S. M., Ley A., Pankratz K. A., Kostelecky R., et al. (2025). Micro- and nano-plastics induce inflammation and cell death in human cells. Front. Immunol. 16:1528502. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1528502, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Booth H. D. E., Hirst W. D., Wade-Martins R. (2017). The role of astrocyte dysfunction in Parkinson's disease pathogenesis. Trends Neurosci. 40, 358–370. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2017.04.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Borsche M., Pereira S. L., Klein C., Grunewald A. (2021). Mitochondria and Parkinson's disease: clinical, molecular, and translational aspects. J. Parkinsons Dis. 11, 45–60. doi: 10.3233/JPD-201981, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Capelle C. M., Cire S., Hedin F., Hansen M., Pavelka L., Grzyb K., et al. (2023). Early-to-mid stage idiopathic Parkinson's disease shows enhanced cytotoxicity and differentiation in CD8 T-cells in females. Nat. Commun. 14:7461. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-43053-0, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Casella C., Ballaz S. J. (2024). Genotoxic and neurotoxic potential of intracellular nanoplastics: a review. J. Appl. Toxicol. 44, 1657–1678. doi: 10.1002/jat.4598, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chang K. H., Chen C. M. (2020). The role of oxidative stress in Parkinson's disease. Antioxidants (Basel) 9:597. doi: 10.3390/antiox9070597, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chao Y. X., Gulam M. Y., Chia N. S. J., Feng L., Rotzschke O., Tan E. K. (2020). Gut-brain Axis: potential factors involved in the pathogenesis of Parkinson's disease. Front. Neurol. 11:849. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00849, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Chen Q. Q., Haikal C., Li W., Li J. Y. (2019). Gut inflammation in association with pathogenesis of Parkinson's disease. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 12:218. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2019.00218, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Chen M., Mor D. E. (2023). Gut-to-brain α-synuclein transmission in Parkinson’s disease: evidence for prion-like mechanisms. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24:7205. doi: 10.3390/ijms24087205, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Chen Z., Shi X., Zhang J., Wu L., Wei W., Ni B. J. (2023). Nanoplastics are significantly different from microplastics in urban waters. Water Res. X 19:100169. doi: 10.1016/j.wroa.2023.100169, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Cheng Y. K., Chiang H. S. (2025). The interrelationship between intestinal immune cells and enteric alpha-synuclein in the progression of Parkinson's disease. Neurol. Sci. 46, 2965–2977. doi: 10.1007/s10072-025-08114-w, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Cheng Y., Yang Y., Bai L., Cui J. (2024). Microplastics: an often-overlooked issue in the transition from chronic inflammation to cancer. J. Transl. Med. 22:959. doi: 10.1186/s12967-024-05731-5, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Daneshjou D., Nabavi S. M., Shams P., Faranoush P., Salari M., Ebrahimi M. (2025). The double-edged sword role of natural killer cells in Parkinson's disease. Cell. Immunol. 409-410:104928. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2025.104928, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. de Fabregues O., Selles M., Ramos-Vicente D., Roch G., Vila M., Bove J. (2023). Relevance of tissue-resident memory CD8 T cells in the onset of Parkinson's disease and examination of its possible etiologies: infectious or autoimmune? Neurobiol. Dis. 187:106308. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2023.106308, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Deczkowska A., Keren-Shaul H., Weiner A., Colonna M., Schwartz M., Amit I. (2018). Disease-associated microglia: a universal immune sensor of neurodegeneration. Cell 173, 1073–1081. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.05.003, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. DeMaio A., Mehrotra S., Sambamurti K., Husain S. (2022). The role of the adaptive immune system and T cell dysfunction in neurodegenerative diseases. J. Neuroinflammation 19:251. doi: 10.1186/s12974-022-02605-9, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Di Vincenzo F., Del Gaudio A., Petito V., Lopetuso L. R., Scaldaferri F. (2024). Gut microbiota, intestinal permeability, and systemic inflammation: a narrative review. Intern. Emerg. Med. 19, 275–293. doi: 10.1007/s11739-023-03374-w, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Earls R. H., Lee J. K. (2020). The role of natural killer cells in Parkinson's disease. Exp. Mol. Med. 52, 1517–1525. doi: 10.1038/s12276-020-00505-7, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Fang S. J., Yin Z. D., Li L. F., Cai Q., Zheng P. F., Chen L. Z. (2025). Overall effects of microplastics on brain. Front. Toxicol. 7:1619096. doi: 10.3389/ftox.2025.1619096, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Gao C., Jiang J., Tan Y., Chen S. (2023). Microglia in neurodegenerative diseases: mechanism and potential therapeutic targets. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 8:359. doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01588-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Greenland J. C., Holbrook J., Kahanawita L., Camacho M., Fryer T. D., Hong Y. T., et al. (2025). Peripheral-central immune crosstalk in Parkinson's disease and its association with clinical severity. Brain Behav. Immun. 128, 558–570. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2025.04.028, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Grozdanov V., Bliederhaeuser C., Ruf W. P., Roth V., Fundel-Clemens K., Zondler L., et al. (2014). Inflammatory dysregulation of blood monocytes in Parkinson's disease patients. Acta Neuropathol. 128, 651–663. doi: 10.1007/s00401-014-1345-4, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Grumelot S., Ashkarran A. A., Jiwani Z., Ibrahim R., Mahmoudi M. (2024). Identification of pristine and protein Corona coated Micro- and Nanoplastic particles with a colorimetric sensor Array. ACS Omega 9, 39188–39194. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.4c06166, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Guo S., Wang H., Yin Y. (2022). Microglia polarization from M1 to M2 in neurodegenerative diseases. Front. Aging Neurosci. 14:815347. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.815347, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Henrich M. T., Oertel W. H., Surmeier D. J., Geibl F. F. (2023). Mitochondrial dysfunction in Parkinson's disease - a key disease hallmark with therapeutic potential. Mol. Neurodegener. 18:83. doi: 10.1186/s13024-023-00676-7, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Hernandez A. F., Lacasana M., Tsatsakis A. M., Docea A. O. (2025). Cellular and molecular mechanisms of Micro- and Nanoplastics driving adverse human health effects. Toxics 13:921. doi: 10.3390/toxics13110921, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Hobson B. D., Sulzer D. (2022). Neuronal presentation of antigen and its possible role in Parkinson's disease. J. Parkinsons Dis. 12, S137–S147. doi: 10.3233/JPD-223153, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Hu K., Yang Y., Zuo J., Tian W., Wang Y., Duan X., et al. (2022). Emerging microplastics in the environment: properties, distributions, and impacts. Chemosphere 297:134118. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134118, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Huang B., Chau S. W. H., Liu Y., Chan J. W. Y., Wang J., Ma S. L., et al. (2023). Gut microbiome dysbiosis across early Parkinson's disease, REM sleep behavior disorder and their first-degree relatives. Nat. Commun. 14:2501. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-38248-4, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Huang Y., Liao J., Liu X., Zhong Y., Cai X., Long L. (2021). Review: the role of intestinal Dysbiosis in Parkinson's disease. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 11:615075. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.615075, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Isik S., Yeman Kiyak B., Akbayir R., Seyhali R., Arpaci T. (2023). Microglia mediated Neuroinflammation in Parkinson's disease. Cells 12:1012. doi: 10.3390/cells12071012, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Jahedi F., Jaafarzadeh Haghighi Fard N. (2025). Micro- and nanoplastic toxicity in humans: exposure pathways, cellular effects, and mitigation strategies. Toxicol. Rep. 14:102043. doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2025.102043, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Jeong A., Park S. J., Lee E. J., Kim K. W. (2024). Nanoplastics exacerbate Parkinson's disease symptoms in C. Elegans and human cells. J. Hazard. Mater. 465:133289. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.133289, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Jin X., Dong W., Chang K., Yan Y., Liu X. (2024). Efficacy of probiotic supplements on Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Complement. Ther. Med. 82:103045. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2024.103045, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Kadac-Czapska K., Osko J., Knez E., Grembecka M. (2024). Microplastics and oxidative stress-current problems and prospects. Antioxidants (Basel) 13:579. doi: 10.3390/antiox13050579 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Kam T. I., Hinkle J. T., Dawson T. M., Dawson V. L. (2020). Microglia and astrocyte dysfunction in parkinson's disease. Neurobiol. Dis. 144:105028. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2020.105028, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Karlsen K., Larsen J. P., Tandberg E., Jorgensen K. (1999). Fatigue in patients with Parkinson's disease. Mov. Disord. 14, 237–241. doi: 10.1002/1531-8257(199903)14:2<237::AID-MDS1006>3.0.CO;2-X, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Kiran S., Thilanka U., Xue Y., Sang Q. A. (2025). Polystyrene micro- and nanoplastic exposure triggers an activation and stress response in human astrocytes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 26:11273. doi: 10.3390/ijms262311273, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Kopatz V., Wen K., Kovacs T., Keimowitz A. S., Pichler V., Widder J., et al. (2023). Micro- and nanoplastics breach the blood-brain barrier (BBB): biomolecular corona's role revealed. Nano 13:1404. doi: 10.3390/nano13081404, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Koprich J. B., Reske-Nielsen C., Mithal P., Isacson O. (2008). Neuroinflammation mediated by IL-1β increases susceptibility of dopamine neurons to degeneration in an animal model of Parkinson's disease. J. Neuroinflammation 5:8. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-5-8, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Kouli A., Torsney K. M., Kuan W. L. (2018). “Parkinson's disease: etiology, neuropathology, and pathogenesis,” in Parkinson's Disease: Pathogenesis and Clinical Aspects, eds. Stoker T. B., Greenland J. C. (Brisbane (AU): Codon Publications; ). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Lai H., Liu X., Qu M. (2022). Nanoplastics and human health: Hazard identification and biointerface. Nanomaterials (Basel) 12:1298. doi: 10.3390/nano12081298, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Lee S. E., Kim D. Y., Jeong T. S., Park Y. S. (2025). Micro- and nano-plastic-induced adverse health effects on lungs and kidneys linked to oxidative stress and inflammation. Life 15:392. doi: 10.3390/life15030392, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Lei Q., Wu T., Wu J., Hu X., Guan Y., Wang Y., et al. (2021). Roles of alpha-synuclein in gastrointestinal microbiome dysbiosis-related Parkinson's disease progression (review). Mol. Med. Rep. 24:734. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2021.12374, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Leslie H. A., van Velzen M. J. M., Brandsma S. H., Vethaak A. D., Garcia-Vallejo J. J., Lamoree M. H. (2022). Discovery and quantification of plastic particle pollution in human blood. Environ. Int. 163:107199. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107199, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Li W., Luo Y., Xu H., Ma Q., Yao Q. (2021). Imbalance between T helper 1 and regulatory T cells plays a detrimental role in experimental Parkinson's disease in mice. J. Int. Med. Res. 49:300060521998471. doi: 10.1177/0300060521998471, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Li N., Wang J., Liu P., Li J., Xu C. (2022). Multi-omics reveals that Bifidobacterium breve M-16V may alleviate the immune dysregulation caused by nanopolystyrene. Environ. Int. 163:107191. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107191, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Li Y., Xia Y., Yin S., Wan F., Hu J., Kou L., et al. (2021). Targeting microglial alpha-Synuclein/TLRs/NF-kappaB/NLRP3 Inflammasome Axis in Parkinson's disease. Front. Immunol. 12:719807. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.719807, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Li J., Zhao J., Chen L., Gao H., Zhang J., Wang D., et al. (2023). Alpha-Synuclein induces Th17 differentiation and impairs the function and stability of Tregs by promoting RORC transcription in Parkinson's disease. Brain Behav. Immun. 108, 32–44. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2022.10.023, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Liang X., Huang G., Wang Y., Andrikopoulos N., Tang H., Ding F., et al. (2025). Polystyrene Nanoplastics hitch-hike the gut-brain Axis to exacerbate Parkinson's pathology. ACS Nano 19, 5475–5492. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.4c13914, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Liang B., Huang Y., Zhong Y., Li Z., Ye R., Wang B., et al. (2022). Brain single-nucleus transcriptomics highlights that polystyrene nanoplastics potentially induce Parkinson's disease-like neurodegeneration by causing energy metabolism disorders in mice. J. Hazard. Mater. 430:128459. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.128459, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Liang J. Y., Yuan X. L., Jiang J. M., Zhang P., Tan K. (2025). Targeting the NLRP3 inflammasome in Parkinson's disease: from molecular mechanism to therapeutic strategy. Exp. Neurol. 386:115167. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2025.115167, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Liao P. H., Tung H. Y., Lim W. S., Jang J. R., Li H., Shun C. T., et al. (2024). Impaired gut barrier integrity and reduced colonic expression of free fatty acid receptors in patients with Parkinson's disease. Neurol. Sci. 45, 5297–5307. doi: 10.1007/s10072-024-07641-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Limanaqi F., Zecchini S., Ogno P., Artusa V., Fenizia C., Saulle I., et al. (2024). Alpha-synuclein shapes monocyte and macrophage cell biology and functions by bridging alterations of autophagy and inflammatory pathways. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 12:1421360. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1421360, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Lin L., Li J., Zhu S., Zhang Z., Li Z., Xu P., et al. (2026). Micro-nanoplastics and Parkinson's disease: evidence and perspectives. NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 12:56. doi: 10.1038/s41531-026-01272-4, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Liu S., He Y., Yin J., Zhu Q., Liao C., Jiang G. (2024). Neurotoxicities induced by micro/nanoplastics: a review focusing on the risks of neurological diseases. J. Hazard. Mater. 469:134054. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.134054, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Mans R. A., Kelehear H., Rotschafer S., Ganas C., Uche-Moon B., Call G., et al. (2025). Exposure to a nanoplastic-enriched diet for fourteen days increases microglial immunoreactivity in the zebrafish telencephalon. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 18:1563086. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2025.1563086, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. McQuade R. M., Singleton L. M., Wu H., Lee S., Constable R., Di Natale M., et al. (2021). The association of enteric neuropathy with gut phenotypes in acute and progressive models of Parkinson's disease. Sci. Rep. 11:7934. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86917-5, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Medley E. A., Spratlen M. J., Yan B., Herbstman J. B., Deyssenroth M. A. (2023). A systematic review of the placental translocation of Micro- and Nanoplastics. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 10, 99–111. doi: 10.1007/s40572-023-00391-x, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Miyazaki I., Asanuma M. (2020). Neuron-astrocyte interactions in Parkinson's disease. Cells 9:2623. doi: 10.3390/cells9122623, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Montanari M., Imbriani P., Bonsi P., Martella G., Peppe A. (2023). Beyond the microbiota: understanding the role of the enteric nervous system in Parkinson's disease from mice to human. Biomedicine 11:1560. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11061560, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Moquin-Beaudry G., Andriamboavonjy L., Audet S., Hamilton L. K., Duquette A., Chouinard S., et al. (2025). Mapping the peripheral immune landscape of Parkinson's disease patients with single-cell sequencing. Brain 148, 2847–2860. doi: 10.1093/brain/awaf066, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Mortensen N. P., Fennell T. R., Johnson L. M. (2021). Unintended human ingestion of nanoplastics and small microplastics through drinking water, beverages, and food sources. NanoImpact 21:100302. doi: 10.1016/j.impact.2021.100302, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Muhammad K. N., Woodlief T., Wu X. (2026). Micro- and nanoplastics influences in Parkinson's disease: lessons from human stem cell models. Front. Toxicol. 8:1723092. doi: 10.3389/ftox.2026.1723092, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Muller L., Di Benedetto S. (2025). Bridging the brain and gut: neuroimmune mechanisms of neuroinflammation and therapeutic insights. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 19:1590002. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2025.1590002, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Nguyen L. T. N., Nguyen H. D., Kim Y. J., Nguyen T. T., Lai T. T., Lee Y. K., et al. (2022). Role of NLRP3 Inflammasome in Parkinson's disease and therapeutic considerations. J. Parkinsons Dis. 12, 2117–2133. doi: 10.3233/JPD-223290, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Paing Y. M. M., Eom Y., Song G. B., Kim B., Choi M. G., Hong S., et al. (2024). Neurotoxic effects of polystyrene nanoplastics on memory and microglial activation: insights from in vivo and in vitro studies. Sci. Total Environ. 924:171681. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171681, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Panico S., Capolla S., Bozzer S., Toffoli G., Dal Bo M., Macor P. (2022). Biological features of nanoparticles: protein Corona formation and interaction with the immune system. Pharmaceutics 14:2605. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14122605, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Park H., Kang J. H., Lee S. (2020). Autophagy in neurodegenerative diseases: a hunter for aggregates. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21:3369. doi: 10.3390/ijms21093369, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Park S. Y., Yang H., Kim S., Yang J., Go H., Bae H. (2023). Alpha-Synuclein-specific regulatory T cells ameliorate Parkinson's disease progression in mice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24:15237. doi: 10.3390/ijms242015237, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Perez-Pardo P., Hartog M., Garssen J., Kraneveld A. D. (2017). Microbes tickling your tummy: the importance of the gut-brain Axis in Parkinson's disease. Curr. Behav. Neurosci. Rep. 4, 361–368. doi: 10.1007/s40473-017-0129-2, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Principi N., Argentiero A., Campana B. R., Seferi H., Cinti E., Esposito S. (2025). Plastic pollution and child health: a narrative review of Micro- and Nanoplastics, additives, and developmental risks. J. Clin. Med. 14:8399. doi: 10.3390/jcm14238399, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Santos S. F., de Oliveira H. L., Yamada E. S., Neves B. C., Pereira A., Jr. (2019). The gut and Parkinson's disease-a bidirectional pathway. Front. Neurol. 10:574. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00574, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Schaeffer E., Kluge A., Bottner M., Zunke F., Cossais F., Berg D., et al. (2020). Alpha synuclein connects the gut-brain axis in Parkinson's disease patients - a view on clinical aspects, cellular pathology and analytical methodology. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 8:573696. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.573696, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Schonhoff A. M., Figge D. A., Williams G. P., Jurkuvenaite A., Gallups N. J., Childers G. M., et al. (2023). Border-associated macrophages mediate the neuroinflammatory response in an alpha-synuclein model of Parkinson disease. Nat. Commun. 14:3754. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39060-w, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Sofield C. E., Anderton R. S., Gorecki A. M. (2024). Mind over microplastics: exploring microplastic-induced gut disruption and gut-brain-Axis consequences. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 46, 4186–4202. doi: 10.3390/cimb46050256, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Su R., Zhou T. (2021). Alpha-Synuclein induced immune cells activation and associated therapy in Parkinson's disease. Front. Aging Neurosci. 13:769506. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.769506, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Sun X., Gu R., Bai J. (2024). Differentiation and regulation of CD4(+) T cell subsets in Parkinson's disease. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 81:352. doi: 10.1007/s00018-024-05402-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Tan A. H., Hor J. W., Chong C. W., Lim S. Y. (2021). Probiotics for Parkinson's disease: current evidence and future directions. JGH Open 5, 414–419. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.12450, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Tansey M. G., Wallings R. L., Houser M. C., Herrick M. K., Keating C. E., Joers V. (2022). Inflammation and immune dysfunction in Parkinson disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 22, 657–673. doi: 10.1038/s41577-022-00684-6, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. van IJzendoorn S. C. D., Derkinderen P. (2019). The intestinal barrier in Parkinson's disease: current state of knowledge. J. Parkinsons Dis. 9, S323–S329. doi: 10.3233/JPD-191707 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Wang N., Xiao X., Chen Z., Xu K., Cao X., Kou D., et al. (2025). Glial cell crosstalk in Parkinson's disease: mechanisms, implications, and therapeutic strategies. Fundam. Res. 5, 2960–2974. doi: 10.1016/j.fmre.2024.12.023, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Wu J., Wu J., Chen T., Cai J., Ren R. (2024). Protein aggregation and its affecting mechanisms in neurodegenerative diseases. Neurochem. Int. 180:105880. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2024.105880, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Yadav S., Raj R. G. (2025). Parkinson's disease and the gut microbiota connection: unveiling dysbiosis and exploring therapeutic horizons. Neuroscience 581, 1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2025.07.003, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Yang Q., Dai H., Cheng Y., Wang B., Xu J., Zhang Y., et al. (2023). Oral feeding of nanoplastics affects brain function of mice by inducing macrophage IL-1 signal in the intestine. Cell Rep. 42:112346. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112346, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Yang Z., DeLoid G. M., Zarbl H., Baw J., Demokritou P. (2023). Micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs) and their potential toxicological outcomes: state of science, knowledge gaps and research needs. NanoImpact 32:100481. doi: 10.1016/j.impact.2023.100481, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Yang W., Jannatun N., Zeng Y., Liu T., Zhang G., Chen C., et al. (2022). Impacts of microplastics on immunity. Front. Toxicol. 4:956885. doi: 10.3389/ftox.2022.956885, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Yee M. S., Hii L. W., Looi C. K., Lim W. M., Wong S. F., Kok Y. Y., et al. (2021). Impact of microplastics and nanoplastics on human health. Nanomaterials (Basel) 11:496. doi: 10.3390/nano11020496, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Yun S. P., Kam T. I., Panicker N., Kim S., Oh Y., Park J. S., et al. (2018). Block of A1 astrocyte conversion by microglia is neuroprotective in models of Parkinson's disease. Nat. Med. 24, 931–938. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0051-5, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Zaman V., Shields D. C., Shams R., Drasites K. P., Matzelle D., Haque A., et al. (2021). Cellular and molecular pathophysiology in the progression of Parkinson's disease. Metab. Brain Dis. 36, 815–827. doi: 10.1007/s11011-021-00689-5, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Zhang L., Zhang Y., Fan D. (2022). Pathological role of natural killer cells in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review. Front. Aging Neurosci. 14:890816. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.890816, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Zhao H., Tao L., Tang C., Cai W., Shen W. (2025). Do immune system and microbiome-gut-brain axis interactions associate with major depressive disorder? J. Transl. Med. 23:1279. doi: 10.1186/s12967-025-07176-w, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Zhou L., Ran L., He Y., Huang Y. (2025). Mechanisms of microplastics on gastrointestinal injury and liver metabolism disorder (review). Mol. Med. Rep. 31, 1–12. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2025.13463, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Zhu M., Liu X., Ye Y., Yan X., Cheng Y., Zhao L., et al. (2022). Gut microbiota: a novel therapeutic target for Parkinson's disease. Front. Immunol. 13:937555. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.937555, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Zhu Y., Wu J., Zhao S., Yang J., Huang M., Liu N., et al. (2025). Environmentally relevant concentrations of polystyrene nanoplastics induce Parkinson's-like neurotoxicity in C. elegans via oxidative stress. Environ. Int. 206:109926. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2025.109926, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Neuroscience are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES