Skip to main content
NCBI home page
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal logoLink to CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal
. 1994 Sep 1;151(5):575–580.

Regionalized delivery and variable utilization of coronary artery bypass grafting in Ontario from 1981 to 1991.

A M Ugnat 1, C D Naylor 1
PMCID: PMC1337192  PMID: 8069802

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the geographic variation in the rates of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) between 1981 and 1991. DESIGN: Retrospective study of discharge abstracts (from the provincial hospital discharge database) for odd fiscal years. SETTING: Ontario. PARTICIPANTS: All Ontario residents undergoing CABG between 1981 and 1991. OUTCOME MEASURES: Age- and sex-standardized median, maximum and minimum (plus 25th and 75th percentile) rates of CABG per 100,000 population aged 20 years and over, as well as interregional variation. RESULTS: The median rate of CABG rose from 46.2 to 72.7 per 100,000 adults between 1981 and 1991. The minimum rate varied from 1.9 to 12.4 per 100,000 and the maximum rate from 110.4 to 172.1 per 100,000 during the study period. Variations in the area-specific rates were significant in all years (p < 0.0001, based on the likelihood ratio chi 2 test after adjustment for age and sex). None of the four summary statistical measures showed any obvious diminution between 1981 and 1989, nor was there a change in the utilization pattern during the waiting-list crisis years of 1987 and 1989. However, the summary measures did reach their lowest level in 1991. The relative consistency of local practice patterns was tested by means of ranking area-specific rates and comparing the rankings for different years. Correlation coefficients varied from 0.50 to 0.82 (p < 0.0001); the correlation coefficient for 1991 on 1981 was 0.61 (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Consistent and marked variations in the use of CABG existed across the counties of Ontario from 1981 to 1991. Despite a major expansion in provincial caseload capacity and planned regionalization of CABG as a surgical service, incremental resources were apparently not allocated in a manner that reduced interregional discrepancies.

Full text

PDF
575

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson G. M., Lomas J. Regionalization of coronary artery bypass surgery. Effects on access. Med Care. 1989 Mar;27(3):288–296. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198903000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blais R. Variations in surgical rates in Quebec: does access to teaching hospitals make a difference? CMAJ. 1993 May 15;148(10):1729–1736. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brook R. H., Kosecoff J. B., Park R. E., Chassin M. R., Winslow C. M., Hampton J. R. Diagnosis and treatment of coronary disease: comparison of doctors' attitudes in the USA and the UK. Lancet. 1988 Apr 2;1(8588):750–753. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(88)91550-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Diehr P., Cain K. C., Kreuter W., Rosenkranz S. Can small-area analysis detect variation in surgery rates? The power of small-area variation analysis. Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):484–502. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199206000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Diehr P., Cain K., Connell F., Volinn E. What is too much variation? The null hypothesis in small-area analysis. Health Serv Res. 1990 Feb;24(6):741–771. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Leape L. L., Park R. E., Solomon D. H., Chassin M. R., Kosecoff J., Brook R. H. Does inappropriate use explain small-area variations in the use of health care services? JAMA. 1990 Feb 2;263(5):669–672. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. McPherson K., Wennberg J. E., Hovind O. B., Clifford P. Small-area variations in the use of common surgical procedures: an international comparison of New England, England, and Norway. N Engl J Med. 1982 Nov 18;307(21):1310–1314. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198211183072104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Naylor C. D. A different view of queues in Ontario. Health Aff (Millwood) 1991 Fall;10(3):110–128. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.10.3.110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Naylor C. D., Ugnat A. M., Weinkauf D., Anderson G. M., Wielgosz A. Coronary artery bypass grafting in Canada: What is its rate of use? Which rate is right? CMAJ. 1992 Mar 15;146(6):851–859. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Peters S., Chagani K., Paddon P., Nair C. Coronary artery bypass surgery in Canada. Health Rep. 1990;2(1):9–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Roos L. L., Sharp S. M. Innovation, centralization, and growth. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery in Manitoba. Med Care. 1989 May;27(5):441–452. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ugnat A. M., Naylor C. D. Trends in coronary artery bypass grafting in Ontario from 1981 to 1989. CMAJ. 1993 Feb 15;148(4):569–575. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Vayda E., Barnsley J. M., Mindell W. R., Cardillo B. Five-year study of surgical rates in Ontario's counties. Can Med Assoc J. 1984 Jul 15;131(2):111–115. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wennberg J. E. Dealing with medical practice variations: a proposal for action. Health Aff (Millwood) 1984 Summer;3(2):6–32. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.3.2.6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Wennberg J., Gittelsohn A. Variations in medical care among small areas. Sci Am. 1982 Apr;246(4):120–134. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0482-120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association

RESOURCES