Skip to main content
Veterinary Medicine and Science logoLink to Veterinary Medicine and Science
. 2026 Jul 15;12(4):e71084. doi: 10.1002/vms3.71084

Mitochondrial COI and cytb Characterisation of K‐Lineage Varroa destructor Isolates From Kastamonu, Türkiye

Mübeccel Atelge 1,✉, Nuri Ercan 2, Abdullah İnci 3, Alparslan Yıldırım 3
PMCID: PMC13372012  PMID: 42455587

ABSTRACT

Background

Varroa destructor is the most important ectoparasitic mite of the western honeybee (Apis mellifera) and remains a major threat to apiculture worldwide. Molecular characterisation of local mite populations is essential for understanding lineage composition and for establishing sequence‐based epidemiological baseline data.

Objectives

This study aimed to determine the haplotypes and phylogenetic relationships of representative V. destructor isolates collected from Kastamonu Province in the Western Black Sea region of Türkiye using mitochondrial COI and cytb markers.

Methods

A total of 100 adult female mites were collected from 10 locations, and one representative high‐quality isolate from each locality (n = 10 per locus) was selected for bidirectional sequencing. Partial mitochondrial COI and cytb regions were amplified by PCR and sequenced. Consensus sequences were compared with GenBank records using BLASTn, and separate comparative datasets were constructed for each marker. Multiple‐sequence alignments were generated with MAFFT, substitution models were selected with ModelFinder, and phylogenetic relationships were inferred using Maximum‐likelihood and Bayesian approaches.

Results

All sequenced Kastamonu representatives were completely identical within each marker, indicating mitochondrial homogeneity among the analysed isolates. In both the COI and cytb datasets, the study isolates clustered within the invasive K (Korean) lineage of V. destructor. In the COI analysis, the Kastamonu sequence grouped clearly with K‐lineage references and separately from J‐lineage sequences. The cytb analysis supported the same lineage assignment and likewise revealed no local mitochondrial subdivision within the sequenced representative subset. Comparative diversity analyses showed that, although the broader global datasets retained regional variation, the Kastamonu isolates analysed in this study were represented by a single mitochondrial background at both loci.

Conclusion

The representative V. destructor isolates analysed from Kastamonu were identical at both mitochondrial markers analysed and belonged exclusively to the invasive K‐lineage. These findings provide sequence‐based confirmation of the maternal lineage detected among the sequenced mites and establish a regional molecular baseline for future surveillance of V. destructor populations in Türkiye. However, these findings should be interpreted within the limits of the representative sequencing design and should not be considered a definitive estimate of population‐wide genetic diversity.

Keywords: COI, cytb, haplotype, phylogeny, Türkiye, Varroa destructor


This study provides the molecular characterisation and phylogenetic analysis of Varroa destructor collected in Kastamonu, Türkiye. Using mitochondrial COI and cytb markers, the research identifies an identical K‐lineage, offering critical insights into the genetic diversity and evolutionary relationships within the region's mite populations.

graphic file with name VMS3-12-e71084-g002.jpg

1. Introduction

Beekeeping, one of the oldest agricultural practices, is of major importance for both food security and ecosystem stability because the Western honeybee, Apis mellifera, is a key pollinator of wild and cultivated plants. In addition to their ecological role, honeybees provide economically valuable products such as honey, propolis, and royal jelly. However, A. mellifera populations have been declining worldwide under the combined pressure of habitat degradation, pesticide exposure, climate change, nutritional stress, and infectious and parasitic diseases. Among these stressors, parasitic infestations and pathogen transmission are among the most important causes of colony weakening and loss (Altay et al. 2025; Glenny et al. 2017; Lannutti et al. 2022; Utuk et al. 2022).

Varroa destructor (Acari: Varroidae) is regarded as the most damaging ectoparasite of honeybees and one of the principal biological threats to modern apiculture worldwide (Sammataro et al. 2000). Originally associated with the eastern honeybee, Apis cerana, this mite shifted to A. mellifera during the twentieth century and subsequently spread globally through apicultural trade and colony movements, causing severe biological and economic losses (Dietemann et al. 2019). The global invasion of V. destructor has largely been attributed to a limited number of successful maternal lineages, particularly those capable of reproducing efficiently on A. mellifera, which explains both its epidemiological success and the relatively low diversity reported in many invaded regions (Anderson and Trueman 2000; Navajas et al. 2010; Solignac et al. 2005). In Türkiye, the parasite was first reported in 1976 after entering through Bulgaria and then spread rapidly from Thrace to the rest of the country, largely through migratory beekeeping practices (Aydın et al. 2007; Balkaya et al. 2016).

Türkiye is one of the leading apicultural countries in the world and ranks among the top countries in terms of colony numbers (FAOSTAT 2023; TÜİK 2023). Nevertheless, as in many other parts of the world, V. destructor remains the most important parasitic threat to colony health and sustainable beekeeping in the country (Aydın et al. 2007; Mayack and Hakanoglu 2022; Seven Çakmak and Çakmak 2016; Sürsal Şimşek and Şimşek 2025). Because the spread, persistence, and control failure of this mite are closely linked to its population structure and dispersal history, sustainable management depends not only on physical, biological, and chemical control, but also on molecular epidemiological surveillance and genetic characterisation of circulating populations (Hua et al. 2023; Jeyapriya et al. 2025; Rosenkranz et al. 2010).

Understanding the genetic diversity of V. destructor is therefore essential for phylogenetic inference, epidemiological tracking, and the interpretation of regional spread patterns. Mitochondrial markers have played a central role in this field, and among them, COI and cytb are particularly informative for detecting haplotypic variation and reconstructing maternal lineages. Early studies demonstrated that the K and Japanese (J) haplotypes are the major lineages associated with infestation of A. mellifera, while subsequent analyses using broader mitochondrial datasets revealed additional Asian variants and highlighted the evolutionary significance of host‐shift‐related bottlenecks (Lannutti et al. 2022; Morfin et al. 2023; Navajas et al. 2010; Utzeri et al. 2019). More recent work has further shown that analysis based on concatenated or complementary COI and cytb data improves phylogenetic resolution, reveals cryptic variation, and helps identify region‐specific haplotypes and microevolutionary patterns that may remain undetected in single‐locus approaches (Gajić et al. 2013, 2016, 2019; Günyaktı Kılınç et al. 2025; Lin et al. 2021).

Previous studies from different parts of Türkiye have investigated the molecular identity of V. destructor populations using PCR‐RFLP and sequence‐based approaches (Altay et al. 2025; Ayan and Aldemir 2018; Ayan et al. 2017a, 2017b; Aydın et al. 2007; Gürler et al. 2024; Kesik et al. 2025; Koç et al. 2021; Utuk et al. 2022; Warrit et al. 2004). These investigations consistently support the predominance of the K haplotype in the country. In Kastamonu, likewise, only the K haplotype has been reported to date (Gürler et al. 2024; Warrit et al. 2004). However, despite this growing body of evidence, sequence‐based data from Kastamonu populations remain absent from GenBank, and multilocus mitochondrial characterisation of regional isolates is still lacking. This gap is important because even populations that appear homogeneous at first glance may contain informative polymorphisms or locally distributed variants detectable only through direct sequencing of more than one mitochondrial marker (Gajić et al. 2013, 2016; Günyaktı Kılınç et al. 2025; Lin et al. 2021).

Therefore, the present study aimed to characterise representative V. destructor isolates collected from different localities in Kastamonu Province by sequencing two mitochondrial markers, COI and cytb, in order to determine the mitochondrial sequence types detected among the analysed isolates, assess their phylogenetic relationships, and provide the first multilocus sequence records for this region to the GenBank database.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area and Mite Collection

Kastamonu, located in the Western Black Sea region of Türkiye, is characterised by rugged topography and extensive forest cover. The province covers 13,108 km2 and has a mean elevation of approximately 775 m. Its rich forest structure, protected natural areas, and high plant diversity provide favourable conditions for apicultural activities.

A total of 100 adult female V. destructor mites were collected from 10 localities in Kastamonu province, with 10 mites sampled per locality, from apiaries where beekeeping is widely practiced (Figure 1). This sampling scheme was designed to obtain a geographically distributed mite collection across the study area and to ensure that each selected locality was represented in the subsequent molecular characterisation. All specimens were transported to the Parasitology Laboratory, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kastamonu University, and preserved in 70% ethanol at −20°C until molecular analysis.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Map of the study area showing the collection sites of the Varroa destructor isolates.

2.2. Genomic DNA Extraction

Before genomic DNA (gDNA) extraction, each mite was individually homogenised in a sterile microcentrifuge tube using a disposable pestle under liquid nitrogen. Genomic DNA was extracted using the PureLink Genomic DNA Mini Kit (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

2.3. Amplification of the COI and cytb Regions

Two mitochondrial loci were targeted for molecular characterisation and phylogenetic analysis: a 376‐bp fragment of the COI gene amplified with the primer pair described by Solignac et al. (2005), and an approximately 985‐bp fragment of the cytb gene amplified with the primer pair described by Navajas et al. (2010). PCR was carried out in a final volume of 25 µL containing 2× DreamTaq Green PCR Master Mix (Thermo Scientific, K1081, USA), 0.5 µM of each primer, and 10–20 ng of template DNA. Thermal cycling conditions were identical for both loci and consisted of an initial denaturation at 95°C for 4 min, followed by 35 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 52°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 1 min, with a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. PCR products were separated on 1.5% agarose gels and visualised using a CLP Gel Documentation System with GeneSnap software (Syngene, UVP Inc., Upland, CA, USA).

2.4. Sequencing and Sequence Editing

To represent the genetic profile of each sampling locality, one high‐quality amplicon per locality was selected for bidirectional Sanger sequencing for each marker (n = 10 per locus; Macrogen Europe). Although 100 adult female mites were collected to obtain a geographically distributed specimen set from Kastamonu Province, the sequencing component of the study was designed as a locality‐based representative molecular characterisation rather than a comprehensive population‐genetic survey. Therefore, considering the project scope, available sequencing budget, and the objective of generating regional baseline sequence data, one high‐quality representative mite from each locality was selected for bidirectional sequencing of each mitochondrial marker. Forward and reverse chromatograms were assembled and edited in Geneious Prime, and consensus sequences were generated after manual inspection of base calls and ambiguous positions. Sequence assembly and editing were performed following the general workflow implemented in Geneious Prime (Kearse et al. 2012).

2.5. Sequence Identification and Reference Retrieval

The resulting consensus sequences were queried against the NCBI GenBank nucleotide database using the BLASTn algorithm to confirm marker identity and to retrieve homologous reference sequences for comparative analyses (Altschul et al. 1990). For both markers, reference sequences were selected by considering BLAST similarity, locus correspondence, annotation quality, and overlap with the sequence region generated in this study.

2.6. Reference Sequence Selection and Dataset Curation

The COI and cytb datasets were analysed separately rather than as a concatenated matrix because locus‐specific reference selection, curation procedures, and rooting strategy differed between the two markers.

For the COI dataset, geographically diverse V. destructor reference sequences were selected from GenBank on the basis of BLAST similarity and manual curation. Only reference sequences overlapping the COI fragment generated in this study were retained in the curated comparative dataset. This approach was used to ensure that phylogenetic and diversity analyses were based on comparable COI sequence regions. The Varroa jacobsoni sequence AF106905, which overlapped with the study fragment, was included as the outgroup for the COI phylogenetic analyses. Because the COI fragment used in this study corresponds to the mitochondrial marker widely employed to distinguish invasive mitotypes of V. destructor, the curated COI dataset was used to assess the placement of the Kastamonu isolate within the K mitotype assemblage (Navajas et al. 2010; Solignac et al. 2005).

For the cytb dataset, the newly generated Kastamonu isolate PV033722 (KU‐VdesCytB) was used as the focal query sequence. Homologous cytb sequences were retrieved from GenBank using BLASTn, and approximately 20–25 geographically diverse V. destructor reference isolates were retained after manual inspection of sequence identity, query coverage, annotation quality, and locus correspondence. The cytb dataset was further curated by removing unsuitable or problematic records before diversity calculations. Because the most distant external record compressed ingroup branch‐length variation in preliminary phylogenetic visualisations, the final cytb trees were presented as midpoint‐rooted ingroup trees.

The regional diversity summaries were based on the curated comparative alignments used for phylogenetic analysis. These datasets included the newly generated representative Kastamonu sequence for each marker together with selected GenBank reference sequences; therefore, they should not be interpreted as diversity estimates for the 100 field‐collected mites or for the entire Kastamonu population. For COI, diversity indices were calculated using the comparable V. destructor dataset composed of sequences overlapping the study fragment, whereas the V. jacobsoni outgroup was used only for phylogenetic rooting and was not included in the diversity summary. For cytb, diversity indices were calculated using the corrected curated comparative dataset after removal of unsuitable/problematic records.

2.7. Multiple‐Sequence Alignment and Model Selection

Separate multiple‐sequence alignments were generated for COI and cytb using MAFFT v7 with the automatic strategy option (Katoh and Standley 2013). The best‐fitting nucleotide substitution model for each alignment was selected under the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) using ModelFinder as implemented in IQ‐TREE (Kalyaanamoorthy et al. 2017). Prior to diversity calculations, alignments were inspected manually and trimmed to a common comparable region to minimise the effects of unequal sequence lengths, missing data, and terminal gaps. For the COI dataset, the final comparative alignment used for diversity analysis was restricted to V. destructor sequences overlapping the COI fragment generated in this study. The V. jacobsoni outgroup used for COI phylogenetic rooting was not included in the COI diversity summary. For cytb, diversity calculations were performed using the corrected curated comparative alignment after removal of unsuitable or problematic records.

2.8. Phylogenetic Analyses

Phylogenetic analyses were performed independently for the COI and cytb datasets using both maximum‐likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) approaches. ML trees were reconstructed in RAxML‐NG, and nodal support was assessed with 1000 bootstrap replicates (Kozlov et al. 2019). Bayesian analyses were conducted in MrBayes 3.2 using two independent runs with four Markov chains each under locus‐specific substitution settings inferred from model testing (Ronquist et al. 2012). For final tree visualisation, bootstrap support values ≥ 50 and posterior probabilities ≥ 0.50 were displayed. The COI trees were rooted using V. jacobsoni AF106905 as the outgroup. For the curated cytb ingroup dataset, midpoint rooting was used in the final figures to improve visualisation of among‐isolate relationships.

3. Results

Target amplicons of the mitochondrial COI and cytb loci were successfully obtained and bidirectionally sequenced from all examined V. destructor isolates. Sequence comparison among the 10 sequenced Kastamonu representatives showed complete identity within each marker, indicating that the analysed representative isolates represented a single mitochondrial sequence type for COI and likewise a single mitochondrial sequence type for cytb. Accordingly, one representative sequence per locus was used for comparative analyses and deposited in GenBank under accession numbers PV021105 (KU‐VdesCOI) and PV033722 (KU‐VdesCytB).

3.1. COI Sequence Diversity and Phylogenetic Relationships

When the Kastamonu COI sequence was analysed together with comparable GenBank references retained in the curated COI alignment, the Turkish study isolate was placed within the widely distributed V. destructor K mitotype assemblage (Figure 2). In both ML and BI analyses, the Turkish study isolate clustered with other Turkish sequences and with reference isolates from Europe, Asia, and South America within the larger V. destructor clade. The V. jacobsoni reference sequence AF106905 was used as the outgroup and was clearly separated from the V. destructor sequences after rooting. Overall, the ML and BI topologies were congruent and supported the assignment of the Kastamonu COI isolate to the K mitotype (Figure 2).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Maximum‐likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) phylogenetic trees inferred from mitochondrial COI sequences of V. destructor isolates using the curated comparative alignment overlapping the COI fragment generated in this study. The newly generated Kastamonu isolate is shown in red, other Turkish isolates are shown in blue, and non‐Turkish reference isolates are shown in black. Bootstrap support values for the ML tree and posterior probabilities for the BI tree are indicated at the relevant nodes. The trees show the placement of the study isolate within the K mitotype of Varroa destructor. Varroa jacobsoni AF106905 was used as the outgroup.

The regional diversity summary of the COI dataset is presented in Table 1. For the COI analyses, the curated comparative dataset was constructed using reference sequences that overlapped with the COI fragment generated in this study. Therefore, the diversity indices presented in Table 1 summarise variation within this comparable COI dataset and should not be interpreted as diversity estimates for all field‐collected mites or for the entire Kastamonu population. Therefore, the diversity indices presented in Table 1 summarise variation within the curated comparative COI dataset and should not be interpreted as diversity estimates for all field‐collected mites or for the entire Kastamonu population. Across all analysed COI sequences, 17 samples comprised 4 haplotypes, with 5 polymorphic sites, an average number of nucleotide differences (k) of 1.162, haplotype diversity (hd) of 0.493 (0.121), and nucleotide diversity (Pi) of 0.00374 (0.00450) (Table 1). The Turkish COI subset contained 3 sequences representing a single haplotype, with no segregating sites detected (S = 0), k = 0.000, hd = 0.000 (0.000), and Pi = 0.00000 (0.00000). In contrast, the Asian subset showed the highest variability, with 4 haplotypes among 5 sequences and 5 polymorphic sites (k = 2.000; Pi = 0.00643) (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

Summary of molecular diversity indices of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) sequences.

Localities N No. S k hd (±SD) Pi (±SD)
Türkiye 3 1 0 0.000 0.000 (0.000) 0.00000 (0.00000)
Europe 3 1 0 0.000 0.000 (0.000) 0.00000 (0.00000)
Asia 5 4 5 2.000 0.900 (0.134) 0.00643 (0.00455)
South America 4 1 0 0.000 0.000 (0.000) 0.00000 (0.00000)
Other 2 1 0 0.000 0.000 (0.000) 0.00000 (0.00000)
All samples 17 4 5 1.162 0.493 (0.121) 0.00374 (0.00450)

3.2. Cytb Sequence Diversity and Phylogenetic Relationships

The cytb dataset was analysed independently and, after curation of unsuitable reference records, the final ingroup tree was presented as a midpoint‐rooted phylogeny in order to improve visualisation of relationships among V. destructor isolates (Figure 3). As in the COI analysis, the Kastamonu cytb isolate grouped with other Turkish sequences and fell within the broader V. destructor assemblage rather than forming a distinct lineage. The ML and BI trees showed broadly concordant topologies, with the Turkish‐rich cluster placed together with isolates from Serbia, France, Syria, Japan, South Korea, and Canada, whereas several East and Southeast Asian references occupied more distant positions in the tree (Figure 3). Bayesian support for the principal internal groupings was moderate to high, with posterior probabilities of 0.99, 0.90, and 0.84 at the main internal nodes shown on the final tree, while the corresponding ML analysis recovered the same general branching pattern with comparable structure (Figure 3).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Maximum‐likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) phylogenetic trees inferred from mitochondrial cytb sequences of Varroa destructor isolates using the curated comparative cytb alignment. The newly generated Kastamonu isolate is shown in red, other Turkish isolates are shown in blue, and non‐Turkish reference isolates are shown in black. Bootstrap support values for the ML tree and posterior probabilities for the BI tree are indicated at the relevant nodes.

The regional diversity summary of the cytb dataset is shown in Table 2. As with the COI dataset, the cytb diversity indices were calculated from a curated comparative alignment containing the newly generated representative Kastamonu sequence and selected GenBank reference sequences. These values therefore summarise variation within the comparative dataset and should not be interpreted as estimates of genetic diversity among the 100 field‐collected mites or across the wider Kastamonu population. Across all analysed cytb sequences, 24 samples yielded 4 haplotypes and 8 polymorphic sites, with an average k value of 1.033, hd = 0.239 (0.087), and Pi = 0.00164 (0.00310) (Table 2). Within the Turkish cytb subset, 14 sequences represented a single haplotype, with no segregating sites detected (S = 0), k = 0.000, hd = 0.000 (0.000), and Pi = 0.00000 (0.00000). In contrast, the Asian subset showed the highest regional variability, with 4 haplotypes among 6 samples and 8 polymorphic sites (k = 3.400; Pi = 0.00541) (Table 2).

TABLE 2.

Summary of molecular diversity indices of mitochondrial cytochrome b (cytb) sequences.

Localities N No. S k hd (±SD) Pi (±SD)
Türkiye 14 1 0 0.000 0.000 (0.000) 0.00000 (0.00000)
Europe 2 1 0 0.000 0.000 (0.000) 0.00000 (0.00000)
Asia 6 4 8 3.400 0.800 (0.163) 0.00541 (0.00339)
North America 1 1 0 NA NA NA
Other 1 1 0 NA NA NA
All samples 24 4 8 1.033 0.239 (0.087) 0.00164 (0.00310)

3.3. Overall Interpretation

Taken together, both mitochondrial markers support the placement of the sequenced representative Kastamonu isolates within the widespread K‐type V. destructor lineage. The COI analysis placed the Turkish study isolate within the K mitotype assemblage together with other Turkish and geographically diverse reference sequences, while V. jacobsoni AF106905 was clearly separated as the outgroup (Figure 2). The cytb analysis provided additional resolution among ingroup V. destructor sequences and showed that the Kastamonu isolate clustered with Turkish and western Eurasian reference sequences, whereas several East/Southeast Asian references occupied more distant positions in the tree (Figure 3). The diversity summaries indicate that the sequenced Kastamonu representatives were homogeneous for both mitochondrial markers, while the broader curated comparative datasets retained haplotypic and geographic variation (Tables 1 and 2).

4. Discussion

The present study showed mitochondrial uniformity among the sequenced representative Kastamonu V. destructor isolates at both COI and cytb loci. The representative sequences generated from different localities shared a single sequence type within each marker, and both phylogenetic datasets placed the study isolates within the widespread K‐type V. destructor lineage. This concordance across two mitochondrial markers strengthens the interpretation that the sequenced Kastamonu representatives belong to the globally invasive maternal background most commonly associated with A. mellifera infestations (Navajas et al. 2010; Lin et al. 2021).

Our findings are consistent with the long‐standing view that mitochondrial diversity in V. destructor populations established on A. mellifera is often limited by strong founder effects associated with host shift and subsequent spread. Navajas et al. (2010) showed that although substantial diversity exists in Asian populations overall, the mites reproducing on A. mellifera represent a narrower subset of that variation. In the same direction, the uniformity observed among the sequenced Kastamonu representatives is compatible with the bottleneck scenario proposed for the globally invasive lineages after transfer from A. cerana to A. mellifera (Navajas et al. 2010). However, given the representative sequencing design, these results should be interpreted as evidence of mitochondrial uniformity among the analysed isolates rather than as a definitive estimate of population‐wide diversity across Kastamonu.

The COI results are especially important because this marker placed the Kastamonu isolate within the K mitotype assemblage. This agrees with the broader literature showing that the K‐lineage remains the dominant invasive background in many A. mellifera populations worldwide (Gunyakti Kilinc et al. 2025; Navajas et al. 2010). At the same time, our results underline why direct sequencing remains essential. Mitochondrial uniformity alone does not identify the lineage; for example, Hua et al. (2023) found that all A. mellifera‐derived mites sampled in Taiwan were also identical at COI, but belonged to the J type rather than the K/R type. Thus, in our case, the conclusion depends not on homogeneity itself but on the phylogenetic placement of the Turkish sequence within the K‐type assemblage.

The cytb data support the same interpretation and add confidence to the conclusion. In our dataset, inclusion of a second mitochondrial marker did not reveal additional mitochondrial variation among the sequenced Kastamonu representatives; instead, it confirmed the same homogeneous pattern seen in COI. This is relevant because cytb has proven informative in studies where additional regional variants are present. For instance, Gajić et al. (2013) distinguished the Serbian S1 and P1 haplotypes from the K haplotype using single nucleotide differences in COI and cytb, and Gajić et al. (2016) later showed that these marker‐defined haplotypes could also coexist with mitochondrial heteroplasmy. The absence of comparable cytb‐defined variation among the analysed Kastamonu representatives suggests a simpler mitochondrial pattern in the sequenced material, at least at the mitochondrial level, than the more heterogeneous Serbian populations described to date.

This contrast with Serbia is particularly informative. In Serbia, sequencing‐based studies detected coexistence of the K haplotype with additional mitochondrial variants, and later work documented coexistence of multiple haplotypes within localities and even within colonies (Gajić et al. 2013, 2016, 2019). In our study, by contrast, neither COI nor cytb revealed evidence of coexisting maternal lineages among the sequenced representative isolates. This difference suggests that the Kastamonu isolates analysed here do not show the same mitochondrial heterogeneity reported from some southeastern European settings. Rather, they appear to represent a uniform K‐lineage mitochondrial background within the limits of the analysed material. In that respect, our findings provide a useful regional reference point for future Turkish surveillance studies that may test whether this pattern is maintained over time or differs among provinces.

The comparative diversity summaries also support this interpretation. In our study, the Turkish subsets were notably less variable than the broader global comparison sets, especially for cytb, whereas the overall datasets retained geographic diversity. This agrees with the broader in silico synthesis of Gunyakti Kilinc et al. (2025), who found considerable global haplotype diversity and regional structure when large GenBank‐derived COI and cytb datasets were analysed. Our results therefore should not be read as evidence that V. destructor is globally uniform, but rather that the sequenced Kastamonu representatives correspond to a locally uniform fraction of a broader and geographically structured species complex.

Another important point is methodological. In our material, COI and cytb converged on the same biological conclusion, but this does not reduce the value of using both markers. On the contrary, the agreement between them increases confidence that the observed uniformity among the sequenced representatives is not simply a consequence of limited resolution of a single locus. This is especially relevant in light of studies showing that additional mitochondrial structure can emerge when more than one marker is examined (Gajić et al. 2013; Navajas et al. 2010). Therefore, although our final result is one of mitochondrial uniformity among the analysed isolates, the multilocus approach remains justified because it allows a more robust assessment of marker‐specific variation.

From an epidemiological perspective, the detection of the K‐lineage in Kastamonu is important because this lineage has been strongly associated with the global expansion of V. destructor on A. mellifera (Navajas et al. 2010; Lin et al. 2021). Our study did not evaluate virulence or acaricide resistance directly, so those traits should not be inferred from mitochondrial identity alone. Nevertheless, documenting the presence of the K‐lineage in this region is still valuable because it establishes a sequence‐based baseline for future studies on population turnover, emergence of local variants, or possible introduction of additional lineages. In that sense, the main contribution of the present study is not the discovery of a novel haplotype, but the demonstration that the sequenced representative isolates from Kastamonu belong to the globally successful invasive K background and showed no detectable mitochondrial subdivision at the two loci examined.

5. Conclusion

In conclusion, the sequenced representative V. destructor isolates from Kastamonu showed mitochondrial uniformity at both COI and cytb loci and were assigned to the widely distributed invasive K lineage. No mitochondrial variation was detected among the analysed representatives at either marker. The congruent COI and cytb results indicate that the analysed Kastamonu isolates share a common K‐lineage maternal background, while the broader curated comparative datasets retain haplotypic and geographic diversity.

Although no novel haplotype was identified, this study provides validated COI and cytb sequence data from a region where direct nucleotide‐based evidence has been limited. These data establish a regional molecular baseline for future surveillance studies and may support monitoring of temporal shifts, emergence of local variants, or introduction of additional mitochondrial backgrounds into Turkish V. destructor populations.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation: Mübeccel Atelge, Alparslan Yıldırım. Methodology: Mübeccel Atelge, Nuri Ercan, Abdullah İnci, Alparslan Yıldırım. Investigation: Mübeccel Atelge, Nuri Ercan. Data curation: Mübeccel Atelge, Nuri Ercan. Formal analysis: Mübeccel Atelge, Nuri Ercan, Alparslan Yıldırım. Supervision: Mübeccel Atelge, Alparslan Yıldırım. Visualisation: Mübeccel Atelge, Nuri Ercan, Alparslan Yıldırım. Writing – original draft: Mübeccel Atelge. Writing – review & editing: Mübeccel Atelge, Nuri Ercan, Abdullah İnci, Alparslan Yıldırım.

Funding

This research has been supported by Kastamonu University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit. Project Number: KÜBAP‐01/2023‐26.

Ethics Statement

The authors confirm that the ethical policies of the journal, as noted on the journal's author guidelines page, have been adhered to. No ethical approval was required because the study involved the collection and molecular characterisation of ectoparasitic mites and did not include experimental procedures on vertebrate animals.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Data Availability Statement

The sequence data generated in this study have been deposited in GenBank under accession numbers PV021105 (KU‐VdesCOI) and PV033722 (KU‐VdesCytB). Additional data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Altay, K. , Isidan H., Erol U., et al. 2025. “Molecular Survey and Phylogenetic Analysis of Bee Pathogens; With a Note First Detection of Apis mellifera Filamentous Virus, Varroa destructor Virus‐1, Apis Rhabdovirus‐1, and Apis Rhabdovirus‐2 in Türkiye.” Journal of Apicultural Research 64, no. 5: 1318–1320. 10.1080/00218839.2024.2423456. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Altschul, S. F. , Gish W., Miller W., Myers E. W., and Lipman D. J.. 1990. “Basic Local Alignment Search Tool.” Journal of Molecular Biology 215, no. 3: 403–410. 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson, D. L. , and Trueman J. W. H.. 2000. “ Varroa jacobsoni (Acari: Varroidae) Is More Than One Species.” Experimental and Applied Acarology 24, no. 3: 165–189. 10.1023/A:1006456720416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ayan, A. , and Aldemir O. S.. 2018. “Genetic Characterization of Varroa destructor (Family: Varroidae) Prevalent in Honeybees (Apis mellifera) in the Province of Aydın in Turkey.” MAKU Journal of Health Sciences Institue 6, no. 1: 26–32. doi: 10.24998/maeusabed.435383. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ayan, A. , Aldemir O. S., and Selamoglu Z.. 2017b. “Analysis of COI Gene Region of Varroa destructor in Honey Bees (Apis mellifera) in Province of Siirt.” Turkish Journal of Veterinary Research 1, no. 1: 20–23. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ayan, A. , Ural D. A., Aldemir O. S., and Tutun H.. 2017a. “Van Bölgesindeki Bal Arılarında (Apis mellifera) Görünen Varroa destructor'un Genetik Karakterizasyonunun Belirlenmesi.” Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi 5, no. 2: 78–84. doi: 10.24998/maeusabed.348635. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Aydın, L. , Güleğen E., Çakmak İ., and Girişgin A. O.. 2007. “The Occurrence of Varroa destructor Anderson and Trueman, 2000 on Honey Bees (Apis mellifera) in Turkey.” Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 31, no. 3: 189–191. [Google Scholar]
  8. Balkaya, İ. , Gülbaz H., Avcıoğlu H., and Güven E.. 2016. “Honeybee (Apis mellifera) Diseases in Turkey.” Atatürk Üniversitesi Veteriner Bilimleri Dergisi 11, no. 3: 339–347. 10.17094/ataunivbd.282993. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dietemann, V. , Beaurepaire A., Page P., et al. 2019. “Population Genetics of Ectoparasitic Mites Varroa spp. in Eastern and Western Honey Bees.” Parasitology 146, no. 11: 1429–1439. 10.1017/S003118201900091X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. FAOSTAT . 2023. “Honey and Beeswax Statistics.” Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data. [Google Scholar]
  11. Gajić, B. , Muñoz I., De la Rúa P., et al. 2019. “Coexistence of Genetically Different Varroa destructor in Apis mellifera Colonies.” Experimental and Applied Acarology 78, no. 3: 315–326. 10.1007/s10493-019-00395-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gajić, B. , Radulović Ž., Stevanović J., et al. 2013. “Variability of the Honey Bee Mite Varroa destructor in Serbia, Based on mtDNA Analysis.” Experimental and Applied Acarology 61, no. no. 1: 97–105. 10.1007/s10493-013-9683-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gajić, B. , Stevanović J., Radulović Ž., et al. 2016. “Haplotype Identification and Detection of Mitochondrial DNA Heteroplasmy in Varroa destructor Mites Using ARMS and PCR‐RFLP Methods.” Experimental and Applied Acarology 70, no. 3: 287–297. 10.1007/s10493-016-0086-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Glenny, W. , Cavigli I., Daughenbaugh K. F., Radford R., Kegley S. E., and Flenniken M. L.. 2017. “Honey Bee (Apis mellifera) Colony Health and Pathogen Composition in Migratory Beekeeping Operations Involved in California Almond Pollination.” PLoS ONE 12, no. 8: e0182814. 10.1371/journal.pone.0182814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Günyaktı Kılınç, Ş. , Çelik F., Kesik H. K., and Şimşek S.. 2025. “In Silico Identification of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in the Varroa destructor Cytochrome c Oxidase Subunit 1 (COI) and Cytochrome b (cytb) Genes, Haplotype Analysis, and Assessment of Population Structure.” Annals of Applied Biology 187, no. 3: 444–454. 10.1111/aab.70043. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gürler, A. T. , Koç Akpınar R., Yiğit S., et al. 2024. “Investigation of Honey Bee Colonies in Terms of Mesostigmatid Mites in Turkey.” Journal of Apicultural Research 63, no. 2: 350–356. 10.1080/00218839.2024.2309765. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hua, T. , Chantawannakul P., Tsai C. L., and Yeh W. B.. 2023. “Genetic Profile of the Parasitic Varroan Mite Varroa destructor in Taiwan: A New Taiwanese Haplotype Intermediate between the Highly Virulent Russian and Less Virulent Japanese Types Identified in the Honey Bee Host Apis cerana .” Zoological Studies 62: 11. 10.6620/ZS.2023.62-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Jeyapriya, G. , Sumathi E., Saminathan V. R., et al. 2025. “Parasitic Mites of Honey Bees (Apis spp.): A Detailed Review of Varroa destructor in Parasitism, Pathogen Transmission and Its Management.” Acta Parasitologica 70, no. 5: 184. 10.1007/s11686-025-01124-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kalyaanamoorthy, S. , Minh B. Q., Wong T. K. F., von Haeseler A., and Jermiin L. S.. 2017. “ModelFinder: Fast Model Selection for Accurate Phylogenetic Estimates.” Nature Methods 14, no. 6: 587–589. 10.1038/nmeth.4285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Katoh, K. , and Standley D. M.. 2013. “MAFFT Multiple Sequence Alignment Software Version 7: Improvements in Performance and Usability.” Molecular Biology and Evolution 30, no. 4: 772–780. 10.1093/molbev/mst010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kearse, M. , Moir R., Wilson A., et al. 2012. “Geneious Basic: An Integrated and Extendable Desktop Software Platform for the Organization and Analysis of Sequence Data.” Bioinformatics 28, no. 12: 1647–1649. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kesik, H. K. , Kilinc S. G., Celik F., Gul A., and Simsek S.. 2025. “A Preliminary Study on the Molecular Variabilities in Varroa destructor and Its Effect on the Body Measurements.” Veterinary Research Communications 49, no. 1: 55. 10.1007/s11259-024-10619-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Koç, N. , İnak E., Jonckheere W., and Van Leeuwen T.. 2021. “Genetic Analysis and Screening of Pyrethroid Resistance Mutations in Varroa destructor Populations from Turkey.” Experimental and Applied Acarology 84, no. 2: 543–557. 10.1007/s10493-021-00626-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kozlov, A. M. , Darriba D., Flouri T., Morel B., and Stamatakis A.. 2019. “RAxML‐NG: A Fast, Scalable and User‐Friendly Tool for Maximum Likelihood Phylogenetic Inference.” Bioinformatics 35, no. 21: 4453–4455. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lannutti, L. , Gonzales F. N., Dus Santos M. J., Florin‐Christensen M., and Schnittger L.. 2022. “Molecular Detection and Differentiation of Arthropod, Fungal, Protozoan, Bacterial and Viral Pathogens of Honeybees.” Veterinary Sciences 9, no. 5: 221. 10.3390/vetsci9050221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lin, Z. , Wang S., Neumann P., et al. 2021. “Population Genetics and Host Specificity of Varroa destructor Mites Infesting Eastern and Western Honeybees.” Journal of Pest Science 94: 1487–1504. 10.1007/s10340-020-01322-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Mayack, C. , and Hakanoğlu H.. 2022. “Honey Bee Pathogen Prevalence and Interactions within the Marmara Region of Turkey.” Veterinary Sciences 9, no. 10: 573. 10.3390/vetsci9100573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Morfin, N. , Goodwin P. H., and Guzman‐Novoa E.. 2023. “ Varroa destructor and Its Impacts on Honey Bee Biology.” Frontiers in Bee Science 1: 1272937. 10.3389/frbee.2023.1272937. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Navajas, M. , Anderson D. L., de Guzman L. I., et al. 2010. “New Asian Types of Varroa destructor: A Potential New Threat for World Apiculture.” Apidologie 41: 181–193. 10.1051/apido/2009068. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ronquist, F. , Teslenko M., van der Mark P., et al. 2012. “MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian Phylogenetic Inference and Model Choice Across a Large Model Space.” Systematic Biology 61, no. 3: 539–542. 10.1093/sysbio/sys029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Rosenkranz, P. , Aumeier P., and Ziegelmann B.. 2010. “Biology and Control of Varroa destructor .” Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 103: S96–S119. 10.1016/j.jip.2009.07.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Sammataro, D. , Gerson U., and Needham G.. 2000. “Parasitic Mites of Honey Bees: Life History, Implications, and Impact.” Annual Review of Entomology 45: 519–548. 10.1146/annurev.ento.45.1.519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Seven Çakmak, S. , and Çakmak İ.. 2016. “Beekeeping and Recent Colony Losses in Turkey.” Uludağ Arıcılık Dergisi 16, no. 1: 31–48. 10.31467/uluaricilik.379276. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Solignac, M. , Cornuet J.‐M., Vautrin D., et al. 2005. “The Invasive Korea and Japan Types of Varroa destructor, Ectoparasitic Mites of the Western Honeybee (Apis mellifera), Are Two Partly Isolated Clones.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B 272, no. 1561: 411–419. 10.1098/rspb.2004.2853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Sürsal Şimşek, N. , and Şimşek E.. 2025. “Investigation of the Prevalence of Varroasis and Nosemosis in Honey Bees in Aksaray, Türkiye.” Journal of Advances in VetBio Science and Techniques 10, no. 2: 92–99. 10.31797/vetbio.1628717. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. TÜİK . 2023. “Arıcılık İstatistikleri.” Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. https://arastirma.tarimorman.gov.tr/aricilik/Link/2/Aricilik‐Istatistikleri. [Google Scholar]
  37. Utuk, A. E. , Doğan O., Tokgöz E. A., Girişgin A. O., Özüklü M., and Saygın B.. 2022. “A Preliminary Molecular Study on the Haplotypes of Varroa destructor in Turkey.” Israel Journal of Veterinary Medicine 77, no. 2: 81–85. [Google Scholar]
  38. Utzeri, V. J. , Schiavo G., Ribani A., Bovo F., Fontanesi C., and Galimberti B.. 2019. “A Next Generation Sequencing Approach for Targeted Varroa destructor (Acari: Varroidae) Mitochondrial DNA Analysis Based on Honey Derived Environmental DNA.” Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 161: 47–53. 10.1016/j.jip.2019.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Warrit, N. , Hagen T. A. R., Smith D. R., and Çakmak İ.. 2004. “A Survey of Varroa destructor Strains on Apis mellifera in Turkey.” Journal of Apicultural Research 43, no. 4: 190–191. 10.1080/00218839.2004.11101137. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The sequence data generated in this study have been deposited in GenBank under accession numbers PV021105 (KU‐VdesCOI) and PV033722 (KU‐VdesCytB). Additional data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Veterinary Medicine and Science are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES