Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2026 Jul 15;16:22282. doi: 10.1038/s41598-026-61599-z

Enhancement of neem growth and wood quality via humic acid and seaweed extract application under treated wastewater irrigation in arid environments

Sabri Salaheldin 1, Mohamed A Selim 1, Wagdi Saber Soliman 1,✉, Abd-Allah Gahory 1
PMCID: PMC13373162  PMID: 42457809

Abstract

Wastewater-irrigated forestry is an important strategy for sustainable water resource management, biomass production, and ecosystem restoration in arid and semi-arid regions. A field experiment was conducted from September 2023 to June 2025 in Balana, Nasr El-Nuba District, Aswan Governorate, Egypt, to investigate the effectiveness of humic acid (HA) and seaweed extract (SWE) as biostimulants on the growth performance, physiological responses, heavy metal accumulation, and wood properties of Azadirachta indica irrigated with treated wastewater. The study followed a completely randomized block design with five treatments: control, HA at 1 and 2 mL L−1, and SWE at 1 and 2 g L−1. Measurements were recorded at 9 and 21 months after planting. Biostimulant application significantly enhanced vegetative growth, chlorophyll content, and wood quality compared with untreated plants. Seaweed extract at 2 g L−1 produced the greatest improvements in stem length by 7.7 and 11.3%, stem diameter by 35.4 and 10.7%, and chlorophyll content by 13.6 and 14.75 compared to control at 9 and 21 months, respectively. Also, it increased wood density by 10%, and reduced moisture by 9%. Whereas humic acid at 2 mL L−1 resulted in higher cellulose, hemicellulose, and holocellulose contents by 4, 6.4 and 10.2%, while reducing lignin and ash by 12.1 and 9.5% compared to control. Heavy metals (Pb, Cd, Cu, Fe, and Zn) accumulated in all plant organs, with accumulation patterns varying according to the element and biostimulant treatment. Most metals were preferentially retained in the roots, whereas Fe accumulated predominantly in the leaves, indicating different uptake and sequestration strategies. Despite continuous irrigation with treated wastewater, soil heavy metal concentrations declined over the experimental period, demonstrating the capacity of neem trees to remediate metals from contaminated soils. These findings demonstrate that integrating treated wastewater irrigation with biostimulant application can simultaneously improve tree productivity, wood quality, and environmental remediation. Seaweed extract at 2 g L−1 is recommended for maximizing tree growth and wood physical properties, while humic acid at 2 mL L−1 is preferable for improving wood chemical quality, highlighting the potential of this integrated approach for sustainable woody plantations in water-limited regions.

Keywords: Arid regions, Azadirachta indica, Biomass productivity, Heavy metal translocation, Phytoremediation

Subject terms: Environmental sciences, Plant sciences

Introduction

Water is fundamental to human civilization and remains essential for agricultural productivity, industrial development, and socio-economic stability1. However, rapid population growth—projected to reach 9.7 billion by 2050—has increased pressure on freshwater resources, making water scarcity one of the most critical environmental challenges of the twenty-first century2. Agriculture accounts for nearly 70% of global freshwater withdrawals, highlighting the need for sustainable water management strategies. One promising solution is the reuse of treated wastewater for irrigation, which conserves freshwater while enabling nutrient recycling in agricultural systems. In Egypt, wastewater production is expected to reach approximately 11.673 billion cubic meters by 2030, emphasizing its potential as an important non-conventional water resource3.

Alongside water reuse initiatives, afforestation has gained importance as a strategy for mitigating environmental degradation, restoring marginal lands, and enhancing carbon sequestration. Beyond ecological benefits, afforestation programs contribute to rural development, employment opportunities, and improved living standards, particularly in arid and semi-arid regions4. Assessing tree biomass and volume is essential for sustainable forest management, climate change mitigation, and ecosystem service assessment5. Therefore, selecting resilient and multipurpose tree species capable of thriving under harsh environmental conditions is essential for achieving environmental and economic sustainability.

Among such species, Azadirachta indica (neem) is a highly adaptable evergreen tree belonging to the Meliaceae family. Native to tropical and subtropical regions, neem grows well in diverse soil types, particularly sandy and deep soils, and tolerates extreme temperatures up to 47 °C without significant loss of bioactivity. The species is widely recognized for its cultural and economic importance, often referred to as the “village pharmacy” in India and the “Forty Tree” in Africa due to its numerous medicinal applications6. Its primary bioactive compound, azadirachtin, possesses strong pesticidal properties, making neem-based products widely used in organic agriculture, particularly in Europe. In addition, neem contributes to pharmaceutical, cosmetic, agricultural, and environmental industries7.

Heavy metals are major environmental pollutants primarily released through anthropogenic activities, including industrialization, fossil fuel combustion, urbanization, waste disposed, and agricultural practices8,9. Their accumulation in soils and groundwater poses significant ecological risks, as even low concentrations can impair plant growth by inducing oxidative stress, disrupting photosynthesis, interfering with essential metabolic processes, and accelerating senescence10,11.

Despite its adaptability, irrigation with treated wastewater may expose plants to residual concentrations of heavy metals and other contaminants that are not completely removed during the treatment process. In this context, phytoremediation has emerged as a sustainable method for mitigating pollutants through mechanisms such as phytoextraction, phytostabilization, phytodegradation, and phytovolatilization10,12. Plants, together with rhizospheric microorganisms, can absorb, transform, or immobilize contaminants, thereby improving soil and water quality13. However, the efficiency of phytoremediation is often limited by plant tolerance and environmental conditions.

To enhance plant resilience and productivity under such stress conditions, natural biostimulants have received increasing attention. Humic acid, a high-molecular-weight organic compound formed from the microbial decomposition of plant and animal residues, is abundant in soils and organic matter14. Humic acid improves soil structure, water-holding capacity, microbial activity, and nutrient availability, thereby promoting plant growth and physiological processes. However, its effectiveness may vary depending on its origin and chemical composition15–17.

Humic acid has recently gained considerable attention as an effective organic amendment for remediating contaminated soils. Humic acid fertilizers might help reduce the uptake of heavy metals by immobilizing heavy metals in the root zone and decrease their relative bioavailability18. It contains functional groups such as carboxyl, carbonyl, and quinone that interact with nutrients and heavy metals through chelation and adsorption processes19. The effectiveness of humic acid in remediating heavy metal-contaminated soils has been proved under various environmental conditions, including those in the Middle East. Previous research has reported significant reductions in heavy metal bioavailability following humic acid application under similar climatic conditions20. Furthermore, recent investigations have provided deeper insights into the interactions between humic acid and heavy metals, highlighting their role in regulating metal mobility and plant uptake mechanisms21.

Similarly, seaweed extracts derived from marine macroalgae are widely recognized as eco-friendly biostimulants rich in polysaccharides, phytohormones, vitamins, fatty acids, and mineral nutrients22,23. These extracts are considered sustainable alternatives to synthetic agrochemicals24–26. One of the most widely used species in commercial formulations is Ascophyllum nodosum, a brown alga native to the North Atlantic intertidal zones27. Its extracts typically contain carbohydrates, proteins, lipids, ash, and polyphenols that contribute to their growth-promoting effects28.

Seaweed extracts have beneficial effects on plant growth as well as improving their resistance to several biotic and abiotic stresses. Khattabi29 demonstrated that the aqueous extracts of Fucus spiralis and Cystoseira ericoides improved the plant response to heavy metals stress, highlighting the potential use of these seaweeds in phytoremediation processes. Recent studies have also documented seaweed extract ability to counteract the deleterious effects of pollutants on plants, thus increasing the phytoremediation efficiency of some species30–32. Given the increasing demand for sustainable water use and resilient afforestation systems in arid regions, integrating treated wastewater irrigation with natural biostimulants represents a promising strategy.

Previous studies mainly focused on vegetative growth and physiological responses of tree seedlings following biostimulant application, whereas little information exists on the effects of humic acid and seaweed extract on juvenile wood quality, including wood density, cellulose, lignin composition, and heavy metal accumulation under wastewater irrigation. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of treated wastewater irrigation on the growth performance, biochemical composition, and wood properties of A. indica and to assess the effectiveness of humic acid and seaweed extract in enhancing tree growth and wood quality under these conditions.

Materials and methods

Experimental site and plant materials

The field experiment was conducted at a forest plantation of the wastewater irrigation facility in Balana, Nasr El-Nuba District, Aswan Governorate, Egypt, operated by the Aswan Drinking Water and Wastewater Company. One-year-old neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss.) seedlings were obtained from the Tropical Farm, Kom Ombo, Aswan, Horticultural Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt. Uniform seedlings (≈ 25 cm height and 0.5 cm stem diameter) were transplanted on 15 September 2023 at a spacing of 5 × 5 m, with ten seedlings per plot.

Before and 21 months of planting, soil samples (0–30 cm depth) represented the experimental plot, regardless of the biostimulant treatments, were collected and analyzed (Table 1). In addition, irrigation water were collected and analyzed for physical, chemical, and heavy metal characteristics (Table 2) according to standard procedures33,34. Soil texture was sandy with pH 7.87 and Ec of 1.4 dS m−1. The experiment was conducted at a governmental research site officially designated for treated wastewater irrigation, and all experimental activities were performed under the authorization of the Aswan Drinking Water and Wastewater Company.

Table 1.

Heavy metals concentrations (mg kg−1) of soil before and 21 months after planting.

Element Pb Cd Cu Fe Zn
Before planting 7.16 0.417 23.7 31558 54.6
21 months after planting 4.15 0.322 6.5 28190 29.2

Table 2.

Physical, chemical, and heavy metal properties of studied irrigation water compared to Egyptian standard (Code 501/2015).

Parameter/ Element Balana Value Egyptian Limit Status
Total Dissolved Solids 760 mg L−1 < 2000 mg L−1 ✓ Acceptable
Total Suspended Solids 48 mg L−1 < 50 mg L−1 ✓ Acceptable
Biochemical Oxygen Demand 38 mg L−1 < 40 mg L−1 ✓ Acceptable
Chemical Oxygen Demand 70 mg L−1 < 100 mg L−1 ✓ Acceptable
pH 8.2 6.5–8.5 ✓ Acceptable
Lead 0.004 (mg L−1) < 5 (mg L−1) ✓ Safe
Cadmium 0.002 (mg L−1) < 0.01 (mg L−1) ✓ Safe
Copper 0.177 (mg L−1) < 0.2 (mg L−1) ✓ Safe
Iron 4.354 (mg L−1) < 5.0 (mg L−1) ✓ Safe
Zinc 3.480 (mg L−1) < 5.0 (mg L−1) ✓ Safe

Experimental design and the sources of used bio-stimulants

The experiment was conducted over two growing seasons (15 September 2023–15 June 2025) Using a completely randomized block design with five treatments and three replicates. The treatments consisted of: (1) control (no amendment), (2) 1 mL L−1 humic acid, (3) 2 mL L−1 humic acid, (4) 1 g L−1 seaweed extract, and (5) 2 g L−1 seaweed extract.

Humic acid (Canada Humax) was supplied by the Egyptian Canadian Company for Humate Technology and Agricultural Consultancy. According to the manufacturer’s specifications, the product contains 5% total potassium, present as potassium fulvate and potassium humate. The seaweed extract was derived from marine algae. Amendments as soil drenches (50 mL per seedling) were applied directly around the seedling root zone five times annually from March to June (2024 and 2025) at three-week intervals.

Growth and physiological parameters

Measurements were performed 9 months (first season) and 21 months (second season) after transplanting. Three plants were randomly selected from each plot to determine stem length, stem diameter, leaf thickness, leaf relative water content (RWC), and total chlorophyll content.

Leaf thickness was estimated from leaf volume and leaf area determined using displacement method and ImageJ software, respectively. Leaf thickness has been calculated according to the following equation:

graphic file with name d33e622.gif

Relative water content was calculated according to Zhou et al.35. Relative water content was calculated as following:

graphic file with name d33e634.gif

as FW, DW, and TW represent fresh weight, dry weight, and turgid weight, respectively.

Total chlorophyll content was estimated using a SPAD-502 Plus chlorophyll meter and converted to chlorophyll concentration using the calibration equation of Dash et al.36:

graphic file with name d33e648.gif

Where; x represented SPAD value.

Heavy metal analysis

Dried leaf sampled were wet digested using a nitric acid-perchloric acid mixture following the standard procedures37,38. Concentrations of lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), copper (Cu), iron (Fe), and zinc (Zn) were determined by atomic absorption spectrophotometer using flame and graphite furnace atomization, depending on the element concentrations, following U.S. Environmental Protection Agency38 recommendations.

Wood physical and chemical properties

At the end of the experiment (21 months), three trees per plot were destructively sampled for wood analyses. Ten wood specimens representing sapwood and heartwood were prepared from each sample for laboratory evaluation.

Moisture content (%),Wood density (g cm−3), and ash (%)

Wood moisture content was determined according to Desch and Dinwoodie39. Samples were oven-dried at 103 ± 2 °C to a constant weight, and moisture content was calculated as:

graphic file with name d33e686.gif

where Mi is the initial weight (g) and Mo is the oven-dry weight (g).

Wood density was determined following the method described by Haygreen and Bowyer40 based on the air-dried weight (12–14% moisture content) and corresponding volume measured by the water displacement method. Density was calculated as:

graphic file with name d33e700.gif

where W is the air-dried weight (g), Vb is the water volume before immersion (cm3), and Va is the water volume after immersion (cm3).

Each air-dried wood was weighed to obtain dry weight and then inserted into a digital muffle furnace (F-27, Carbolite, Shfld.) set at 525 °C for 6 h to determine the ash content (%).

Determination of cellulose, holocellulose, and hemicellulose contents (%)

Cellulose content was estimated following the method of Sadasivam and Manickam41. Finely powdered, pre-extracted sawdust samples were analyzed using the anthrone colorimetric method, and absorbance was measured at 630 nm using a spectrophotometer. Cellulose concentration was calculated using a standard curve prepared using known cellulose standards.

Holocellulose content was determined according the sodium chlorite method of Erickson42. Oven-dried, extractive-free wood samples were delignified under acidic conditions, and the holocellulose fraction was recovered, dried to constant weight, and expressed as a percentage of the oven-dry sample weight. Hemicellulose (%) content was calculated as the difference between holocellulose and cellulose contents:

graphic file with name d33e726.gif
graphic file with name d33e729.gif

Determination of lignin content (%)

Lignin content was determined following the TAPPI T222 om-02 standard method43. Extractive-free, oven-dried wood samples were hydrolyzed with sulfuric acid, and the acid-insoluble lignin residue was recovered and oven-dried to constant weight. Lignin content was expressed as a percentage of oven-dry sample weight.

Statistical analysis

Experimental data were subjected to statistical analysis using the F-test as described by Snedecor and Cochran44 to evaluate treatment significance. Differences among the treatments were assessed using Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) test at 5% level, following the procedure described by Gomez and Gomez45. The values represent the mean of independent replicates ± standard deviation. Statistical analysis was performed using JMP software (versions 16.0; SAS Institute Inc., USA).

Results

Growth and physiological parameters

Biostimulant treatments significantly improved vegetative growth of A. indica seedlings compared with the untreated trees (Fig. 1). Seaweed extract at 2 g L−1 produced the greatest growth responses, followed closely by humic acid at 2 mL L−1.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Effect of humic acid (HA) and seaweed extract (SWE) on the stem length (m) and stem diameter (cm) of Azadirachta indica seedlings 9 and 21 months after planting under treated wastewater irrigation. Each value represents the mean of independent replicates ± standard deviation. Different letter represent significant difference among treatments.

Both seaweed extract and humic acid led to significant increments in stem length and diameter (p < 0.001 at 9 months; p = 0.0012 and 0.0219 at 21 months, respectively). Seaweed extract at 2 g L−1 resulted in the highest stem length (1.40 and 3.03 m), followed by humic acid at 2 mL L−1 (1.40 and 2.89 m), while the control recorded the lowest values (1.30 and 2.73 m) at 9 and 21 months, respectively. A similar trend was observed for stem diameter. Seaweed extract at 2 g L−1 produced the largest diameters (3.15 and 3.95 cm), followed by humic acid at 2 mL L−1 (3.12 and 3.74 cm), whereas the control showed the smallest diameters (2.41 and 3.54 cm) at 9 and 21 months after planting.

Leaf morphological traits also responded to treatments; humic acid at 1 mL L−1 produced the thickest leaves (0.289 and 0.287 mm with p = 0.0014 and 0.016 at 9 and 21 months, respectively), while the control exhibited the thinnest leaves (0.216 and 0.213 mm). In contrast, leaf relative water content (RWC) was significantly influenced by treatments, p = 0.0299 at 9 months and 0.5717 at 21 months (Fig. 2). Control plants recorded the highest RWC (87.2% and 87.3% at 9 and 21 months), whereas seaweed extract at 2 g L−1 resulted in the lowest values (81.9% and 81.5%).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Effect of humic acid and seaweed extract on leaf thickness (mm), leaf water content (%), and total chlorophyll (mg m−2) of Azadirachta indica seedlings 9 and 21 months after planting under treated wastewater irrigation. Each value represents the mean of independent replicates ± standard deviation. Different letter represent significant difference among treatments.

Total chlorophyll content was significantly affected by biostimulant application, p = 0.0538 and 0.0169 at 9 and 21 months, respectively (Fig. 2). Chlorophyll levels remained relatively stable across sampling periods. The control showed a slight decrease (177.3 to 174.6 mg m−2), whereas seaweed extract at 2 g L−1 maintained consistently high values (221.6 and 221.7 mg m−2), indicating sustained photosynthetic capacity in treated plants.

Heavy metals (mg kg−1)

Biostimulants significantly (P < 0.001) influenced the accumulation of Pb, Cd, Cu, Fe, and Zn in leaves, stems, and roots of neem seedlings irrigated with treated wastewater. The highest Pb concentrations in roots (2.70 mg kg−1) and leaves (0.74 mg kg−1) were recorded with humic acid at 2 mL L−1, while the control produced the highest Pb level in stems (1.48 mg kg−1). Cadmium accumulation was greatest in stems of control plants (0.38 mg kg−1), whereas seaweed extract at 2 g L−1 resulted in the highest Cd concentrations in roots (0.34 mg kg−1) and leaves (0.13 mg kg−1). The lowest Cd value (0.04 mg kg−1) occurred in leaves treated with humic acid at 2 mL L−1 (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Effect of humic acid and seaweed extract on Pb and Cd (mg kg−1) contents in different parts of Azadirachta indica seedlings under treated wastewater irrigation. Each value represents the mean of independent replicates ± standard deviation. Different letter represent significant difference among treatments.

Copper concentrations were highest in roots (50.82 mg kg−1) and stems (41.20 mg kg−1) of control plants, while the highest leaf Cu content (26.57 mg kg−1) occurred with humic acid at 2 mL L−1. Seaweed extract at 1 g L−1 produced the lowest Cu levels across plant organs. Humic acid at 2 mL L−1 also produced the highest Fe concentrations in leaves (230.40 mg kg−1) and roots (192.50 mg kg−1). Zinc accumulation generally followed the order roots > stems > leaves. The highest root Zn concentration was recorded with humic acid at 2 mL L−1, while untreated plants showed the highest stem Zn level (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Effect of humic acid and seaweed extract on Cu, Fe and Zn (mg kg−1) contents in different parts of Azadirachta indica seedlings under treated wastewater irrigation. Each value represents the mean of independent replicates ± standard deviation. Different letter represent significant difference among treatments.

Physical and chemical wood properties

Both biostimulants significantly affected the physical properties of neem wood (Fig. 5). All treatments reduced wood moisture content compared with the control (p < 0.001). The lowest moisture content (47.60%) was recorded with seaweed extract at 2 g L−1 and humic acid at 2 mL L−1. In contrast, wood density increased with biostimulant application, reaching the highest value with seaweed extract at 2 g L−1 (0.77 g cm−3; p < 0.001), compared with 0.70 g cm−3 in the control.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Effect of humic acid and seaweed extract on moisture content (%), wood density (g cm−3), and ash content (%) of Azadirachta indica wood under treated wastewater irrigation. Each value represents the mean of independent replicates ± standard deviation. Different letter represent significant difference among treatments.

Chemical analysis (Fig. 6) showed that biostimulant treatments increased cellulose and hemicellulose contents, particularly with humic acid at 2 mL L−1 (41.82%; p = 0.083 cellulose and 27.77%; p < 0.001 hemicellulose). Consequently, holocellulose content increased to 69.58% compared with 65.40% in the control (p < 0.001). In contrast, lignin and ash contents were highest in untreated plants (34.60%; p < 0.001 and 1.75%; p = 0.0429) and decreased with biostimulant application, reaching their lowest values under humic acid at 2 mL L−1 (30.42% and 1.59%).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Effect of humic acid and seaweed extract on some chemical wood properties of Azadirachta indica. Each value represents the mean of independent replicates ± standard deviation. Different letter represent significant difference among treatments.

Overall, humic acid, especially at 2 mL L−1, enhanced structural holocellulose while reducing lignin and ash, indicating improved wood chemical quality.

DIscussion

Effects of heavy metal accumulation and biostimulants on plant growth and physiological responses

Extensive accumulation of elements in plant tissues has diverse effects on plant growth and physiological metabolism, whether toxic non-essential metals or essential micronutrients. Lead (Pb) is a non-essential toxic metal that impairs photosynthesis, chlorophyll biosynthesis, nutrient uptake, respiration, and enzyme activities, leading to oxidative stress, membrane damage, and reduced plant growth. Plants mitigate Pb toxicity by enhancing antioxidant defenses, producing metal-chelating compounds, and sequestering Pb into vacuoles and cell walls10,12. Also, cadmium (Cd) is a non-essential, highly phytotoxic metal that inhibits photosynthesis, nutrient uptake, respiration, and nitrogen metabolism while inducing oxidative stress and reducing plant growth and productivity. Plants tolerate Cd stress by activating antioxidant systems, synthesizing, and compartmentalizing Cd into vacuoles to limit cellular damage10,12.

On the other hand, copper (Cu) is an essential micronutrient required for normal plant growth and development; however, excessive Cu accumulation in contaminated soils becomes phytotoxic, inhibiting plant growth, reducing crop quality, and compromising the medicinal properties of plants. To mitigate Cu toxicity, plants employ adaptive mechanisms including limiting Cu uptake through root barriers, accumulating protective metabolites, and activating physiological and molecular defense responses that reduce Cu-induced oxidative damage11,46. Iron (Fe) is also an essential micronutrient that promotes chlorophyll biosynthesis, photosynthetic electron transport, chloroplast function, and key metabolic processes, including respiration, nitrogen metabolism, antioxidant defense, and redox homeostasis, thereby enhancing plant growth, productivity, and tolerance to environmental stresses47,48. However, both Fe deficiency and excess impair plant performance; deficiency disrupts chlorophyll synthesis and photosynthetic metabolism, whereas excess Fe induces ROS formation through Fenton reactions, causing oxidative stress, membrane damage, enzyme inhibition, and reduced plant productivity47,49.

In addition, zinc is an essential micronutrient involved in plant growth, nucleic acid metabolism, protein synthesis, membrane stability, hormone biosynthesis, and photosynthesis. It plays vital structural and regulatory roles in RNA and DNA while enhancing antioxidant defenses against ROS. Zinc also contributes to abiotic stress tolerance by regulating proline metabolism and activating antioxidant enzymes such as Cu-Zn superoxide dismutase, which detoxifies superoxide radicals and reduces oxidative damage under stress conditions50–52. Zinc deficiency weakens ROS scavenging systems, increasing oxidative stress, whereas excessive zinc inhibits cell division and elongation, reducing biomass production53. High zinc concentrations can also disrupt soil microbial diversity, decrease metal bioavailability, and impair soil fertility, crop quality, plant growth, and overall agricultural productivity25,54,55.

Biostimulants have been widely reported to enhance plant growth and physiological processes24,56,57. Humic acids convert minerals into organic forms that plants can easily absorb. Their main effects include improved root growth and morphology, enhanced nutrient uptake and utilization efficiency, and overall better plant growth through influence physiological processes such as photosynthesis, carbohydrate and protein synthesis, enzyme activity, and nucleic acid formation24,58. Similar benefits of humic acids in improving plant growth under adverse conditions17,21. In addition, seaweed extracts from marine macroalgae have been increasingly used due to their beneficial properties25,57. These extracts act as natural substances that reduce abiotic stress and enhance plant growth and productivity. They are obtained from various macroalgal species, producing complex mixtures of bioactive compounds depending on the extraction method59. Macroalgae are also effective biostimulants for plants grown under stress conditions60. Similar positive effects have been reported for several plants, including Calotropis procera61, Moringa oleifera62, and peach seedlings63.

In this study, biostimulants, particularly the higher concentration of seaweed extract, had a positive effect on the growth and physiological characteristics of neem trees irrigated with treated wastewater. The results showed that seaweed extract at 2 g L−1 increased plant height by 7.7% and 11.3%, stem diameter by 35.4% and 10.7%, and leaf thickness by 24.7% and 26.9%, accompanied by increases in total chlorophyll content of 13.6% and 14.7% during the first and second years, respectively. Notably, the increase in total chlorophyll content was positively associated with Fe accumulation in the leaves, reflecting the key role of Fe in chlorophyll synthesis and photosynthetic process47,48. In contrast, untreated plants exhibited slightly higher leaf relative water content; this does not necessarily indicate superior water status. Biostimulant-treated plants likely exhibited enhanced stomatal regulation, greater transpiration efficiency, improved osmotic adjustment, and increased biomass production, resulting in relatively lower leaf water content despite improved overall physiological performance. Similar responses have been reported in previous studies where enhanced metabolic activity reduced tissue water content while improving biomass24,25,57.

Biostimulants may act similarly to plant hormones, enhancing nitrogen uptake and plant performance, which increases biomass, leaf nitrogen, and chlorophyll content64. They also improve scion growth and chlorophyll concentration65. Positive effects on chlorophyll content and chemical composition were also observed in woody nursery trees such as Cupressus × leylandii, Quercus virginiana, and Ulmus parvifolia66.

Heavy metal accumulation and phytoremediation potential of neem trees

Although the analysis of the treated wastewater indicated that the concentrations of heavy metals were within the permissible limits (Table 2), this does not necessarily imply that neem trees were not subjected to heavy metal stress. Even when present at low concentrations, heavy metals can gradually accumulate in the soil under long-term irrigation with treated wastewater, as occurred in the present study over approximately two years. On the other hand, soil analysis revealed a reduction in heavy metal concentrations after 21 months of cultivation compared with the initial pre-planting levels (Table 1). It is important to note that this reduction does not merely represent the difference between the initial and final soil concentrations; it also accounts for the continuous input of heavy metals introduced through treated wastewater irrigation throughout the 21-month experimental period. Therefore, the observed decline in soil heavy metal concentrations, despite the ongoing external inputs, strongly suggests that neem trees effectively absorbed and accumulated these metals, irrespective of the biostimulant treatments. These findings provide compelling evidence for the considerable phytoremediation potential of neem trees, highlighting their capacity to remove heavy metals from soils irrigated with treated wastewater over extended periods. Several studies proved the importance role of woody tree in phytoremediation and absorbtion of heavy metals from polluted water and soil10–12.

Phytoremediation is a sustainable approach that uses plants and their associated soil microorganisms to remove, immobilize, or reduce the toxicity of environmental pollutants. Plant species that absorb and accumulate high concentrations of metals in their above-ground biomass are suitable for phytoextraction, whereas species that limit metal mobility and bioavailability are effective for phytostabilization10,67. In this study, neem trees accumulated all the investigated heavy metals in different plant organs. The capacity of the plants to accumulate heavy metals varied depending on the biostimulant treatment. Notably, metal accumulation also differed according to the type of element, with most metals accumulating at higher levels in the roots than in the stems and leaves. Iron was the exception, showing greater accumulation in the leaves than in the stems and roots. These findings indicate that neem trees employ different phytoremediation mechanisms depending on the specific heavy metal.

Several studies have shown that biostimulants can reduce heavy metal toxicity in plants. For example, humic acid increased the adsorption capacity of mangrove sediments for Cd, Cu, and Pb68. In mangrove (Avicennia germinans) seedlings grown under Cd stress, humic acid improved root anatomy and architecture, enhancing root length and surface area and supporting phytoremediation processes69. Root growth stimulation generally occurs at low HA concentrations, whereas higher doses may inhibit growth70.

Seaweed extracts also act as agricultural biostimulants due to their bioactive polymers, which help plants cope with biotic and abiotic stresses50,51,57,71. Hu reported that a commercial seaweed biostimulant enhanced Cd uptake by roots of the accumulator Nasturtium officinale while reducing Cd translocation to shoots. Although this effect may limit its use for phytoremediation, it suggests potential benefits for cultivating crops in Cd-contaminated soils.

Effects of heavy metal accumulation and biostimulants on wood properties

In this study, biostimulants significantly affected the physical and chemical wood properties of the studied tree species, with superior to seaweed extract. SWE at 2 g L−1 increased wood density by 10% compared to control. Meanwhile, HA at 2 ml L−1 decreased wood moisture content by 9%, ash by 9.5%, and lignin by 12.1%. In contrast, HA at 2 ml L−1 increased cellulose, hemicellulose and holocellulose by 4, 10.2, and 6.4% compared to control, respectively. Such variations may result from factors such as tree age and genotype, as well as geographic conditions including latitude, temperature, and precipitation72. These results proved the important role of seaweed extract not only in improving growth and physiological metabolism, but also for improving wood quality. In addition, the ability to obtain high wood quality by using irrigating woody trees with treated wastewater.

Regarding wood chemical composition, biostimulant treatments increased cellulose, hemicellulose, and holocellulose percentages compared with untreated plants. The highest values were recorded with HA at 2 ml L⁻¹, while lignin and ash contents were higher in the control. Wood chemical composition varies among species and growing conditions. In the present study, differences in chemical properties among tree species and treatments may be related to variations in growth rate. (Shanbhag and Sundararaj,73) reported that cellulose contents ranging from 43% in Tectona grandis (Myanmar) to 59% in Shorea marcoptera (Malaysia), while lignin ranged from 22% in Fagus sylvatica and Acer pseudoplatanus to 36% in T. grandis. Growth and wood characteristics may respond to fertilization for several years depending on fertilizer level and stand management.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that the application of biostimulants can substantially improve the performance of Azadirachta indica irrigated with treated wastewater while simultaneously enhancing its potential for sustainable environmental remediation. Among the tested treatments, seaweed extract at 2 g L−1 was the most effective in promoting vegetative growth, maintaining higher chlorophyll content, increasing wood density, and improving overall wood quality. In contrast, humic acid at 2 mL L−1 was particularly effective in enhancing cellulose, hemicellulose, and holocellulose contents while reducing lignin and ash, thereby improving the chemical quality of the wood. The results further confirm that neem trees effectively accumulate heavy metals from soils irrigated with treated wastewater, supporting their suitability as a phytoremediation species. Importantly, biostimulant application enhanced tree growth and wood quality without compromising this phytoremediation capacity, indicating that improved biomass production and environmental cleanup can be achieved simultaneously. These findings suggest that the integration of treated wastewater irrigation with appropriate biostimulant application represents a practical and sustainable strategy for establishing productive woody plantations in water-limited regions. Based on the experimental findings, seaweed extract at 2 g L−1 is recommended when the primary objective is to maximize tree growth and wood physical quality, whereas humic acid at 2 mL L−1 is preferable when improving wood chemical composition is the priority.

Study limitations

This study did not evaluate physiological and biochemical stress indicators, such as proline, H₂O₂, malondialdehyde, or antioxidant enzyme activities. In addition, the study did not investigate the effect of different biostimulants on physical and chemical of soil. Including these parameters would provide a better understanding of the mechanisms by which humic acid and seaweed extract alleviate stress under long-term treated wastewater irrigation. Future studies should integrate these biomarkers with growth and heavy metal accumulation assessments.

Author contributions

Concept, SS, AG, MAS, and WSS; methodology, SS, AG, MAS and WSS; formal analysis, SS, AG, MAS, and WSS; investigation, SS, AG, and MAS; software and validation, WSS; resources, SS, AG, and MAS; data collection, MAS; visualization, SS, AG, and MAS; writing—original draft preparation, SS, AG, and MAS; writing—review and editing, WSS; supervision, funding acquisition and project management, SS, and AG. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).

Data availability

All needed data is combined in the main text, and any other information can be given by the corresponding author.

Declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Hussain, M. I., Muscolo, A., Farooq, M. & Ahmad, W. Sustainable use and management of non-conventional water resources for rehabilitation of marginal lands in arid and semiarid environments. Agric. Water Manage.221, 462–476. 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.04.014 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 2.FAO. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Water for sustainable food and agriculture: A report produced for the G20 Presidency of Germany (FAO, 2017).
  • 3.Aty, M. A. Managing risks on Egypt water resources security: Climate change and grand Ethiopian renaissance dam (GERD) as challenging aspects. Water Security Under Climate Change (eds Biswas, A. K. & Tortajada, C.) 313–330 (Springer, 2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wang, R., Li, C., An, Z. & Chang, S. X. Climate-smart forestry: Strategies, policies, and technologies for enhancing climate change mitigation and ecosystem sustainability. Clim. Smart Agric.3(2), 100110. 10.1016/j.csag.2026.100110 (2026). [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Munteanu, D., Moldovanu, S., Murariu, G. & Dinca, L. Sustainable Estimation of tree biomass and volume using UAV imagery: a comprehensive review. Sustainability18(2), 1095. 10.3390/su18021095 (2026). [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bello, A. M., Aliabad, K. K., Saravi, A. T., Zade, S. & H Determination of the best culture medium and plant growth regulators for micropropagation of neem tree (Azadirachta indica A. Juss). Int. J. Hortic. Sci. Technol.9(2), 237–245. 10.22059/ijhst.2021.322456.463 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dhakad, A. K. et al. Traditional to modern perspectives on neem (Azadirachta indica): A gateway to bioactive compounds, sustainable agrochemicals and industrial applications. Ind. Crops Prod.231, 121155. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2025.121155 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Nazir, A., Shafiq, M. & Bareen, F. E. Fungal biostimulant-driven phytoextraction of heavy metals from tannery solid waste contaminated soils. Int. J. Phytoremediat. 24, 47–58 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Vareda, J. P., Valente, A. J. & Durães, L. Assessment of heavy metal pollution from anthropogenic activities and remediation strategies: A review. J. Environ. Manag. 246, 101–118 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Abbas, A. M. et al. Capability of the invasive tree Prosopis glandulosa Torr. to remediate soil treated with sewage sludge. Sustainability11(9), 2711. 10.3390/su11092711 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Abbas, A. M., Hammad, S. & Soliman, W. S. Influence of copper and lead on germination of three Mimosoideae plant species. Asian J. Agric. Biology. 5(4), 320–327 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nouman, W. et al. Metalliferous conditions induce regulation in antioxidant activities, polyphenolics and nutritional quality of Moringa oleifera L. Int. J. Phytoremediation. 22(13), 1348–1361. 10.1080/15226514.2020.1775547 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wei, Z. et al. A review on phytoremediation of contaminants in air, water and soil. J. Hazard. Mater.403, 123658. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123658 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Nabi, F., Sarfaraz, A., Kama, R., Kanwal, R. & Li, H. Structure-based function of humic acid in abiotic stress alleviation in plants: A Review. Plants14(13), 1916. 10.3390/plants14131916 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 15.Ampong, K., Thilakaranthna, M. S. & Gorim, L. Y. Understanding the role of humic acids on crop performance and soil health. Front. Agron., 4. (2022).
  • 16.Sible, C. N., Seebauer, J. R. & Below, F. E. Plant biostimulants: A categorical review, their implications for row crop production, and relation to soil health indicators. Agronomy11(7), 1297. 10.3390/agronomy11071297 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yang, F., Tang, C. & Antonietti, M. Natural and artificial humic substances to manage minerals, ions, water, and soil microorganisms. Chem. Soc. Rev.50, 6221–6239. 10.1039/D0CS01363C (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Abdurrahman, P. M., Alawe, M. & Qasem, J. Effect of humic acid on growth and heavy metal uptake in fig seedlings (Ficus carica L.) cultivated in contaminated soil from the Kirkuk oil refinery region, Iraq. Int. J. Des. Nat. Ecodyn.21(4), 1211–1217. 10.18280/ijdne.210427 (2026). [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lee, H., Coulon, F. & Wagland, S. T. The influence of humic acid on metal(loid)s leaching in landfill leachate for enhancing landfill mining. Sci. Total Environ. 896. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165250 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 20.Xu, S., Zhou, Z. & Liu, K. Multi-evolutionary game research on heavy metal pollution control in soil: based on a third-party perspective. Sustainability12(13), 5306. 10.3390/su12135306 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhang, Y., Liu, G., Gao, S., Zhang, Z. & Huang, L. Effect of humic acid on phytoremediation of heavy metal contaminated sediment. J. Hazard. Mater. Adv.9, 100235. 10.1016/j.hazadv.2023.100235 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ali, O., Ramsubhag, A. & Jayaraman, J. Biostimulant properties of seaweed extracts in plants: Implications towards sustainable crop production. Plants10(3), 531. 10.3390/plants10030531 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Shukla, P. S. et al. Ascophyllum nodosum-based biostimulants: Sustainable applications in agriculture for the stimulation of plant growth, stress tolerance, and disease management. Front. Plant Sci.10, 655. 10.3389/fpls.2019.00655 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gahory, A-A., Soliman, W. S., Sayed, R., Abbas, A. M. & Salaheldin, S. Impact of Sustainable Biostimulators on Yield and Phytochemical Traits of Bottle Gourd (Lagenaria siceraria L). Horticulturae11(3), 299. 10.3390/horticulturae11030299 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hassanein, Y. Z., Abdel-Rahman, S. S. A., Soliman, W. S. & Salaheldin, S. Growth, yield, and quality of roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) plants as affected by nano zinc and bio-stimulant treatments. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol.62, 879–890. 10.1007/s13580-021-00371-w (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Nanda, S., Kumar, G. & Hussain, S. Utilization of seaweed-based biostimulants in improving plant and soil health: Current updates and future prospective. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol.19, 12839–12852. 10.1007/s13762-021-03568-9 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Pereira, L., Morrison, L., Shukla, P. S. & Critchley, A. T. A concise review of the brown macroalga Ascophyllum nodosum (Linnaeus) Le Jolis. J. Appl. Phycol.32, 3561–3584. 10.1007/s10811-020-02246-6 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kumar, G. et al. Seaweed extracts: enhancing plant resilience to biotic and abiotic stresses. Front. Mar. Sci.11, 1457500. 10.3389/fmars.2024.1457500 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 29.El Khattabi, O. et al. Seaweed extracts as promising biostimulants for enhancing lead tolerance and accumulation in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). J. Appl. Phycol.35, 459–469. 10.1007/s10811-022-02849-1 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bartucca, M. L., Cerri, M., Del Buono, D. & Forni, C. Use of biostimulants as a new approach for the improvement of phytoremediation performance: A review. Plants11(15), 1946. 10.3390/plants11151946 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 31.Gibilisco, P. E., Negrin, V. L. & Idaszkin, Y. L. Assessing the use of two halophytes species and seaweed composting in Cu-pollution remediation strategies. Mar. Pollut. Bull.176, 113413. 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113413 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hussein, A. A., Sarabi, B. & Weisany, W. Physiological and biochemical responses of fenugreek (Trigonella Foenum-graecum L.) to arsenic stress and organic fertilizer amendments. J. Soil. Sci. Plant. Nutr.25, 762–783. 10.1007/s42729-024-02165-2 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Black, C. A. et al. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties 2nd Edn (Soil Sci., Soc. of Am. Inc. Publ., 1982).
  • 34.Jackson, M. L. Soil Chemical Analysis pp. 498 (Prentice-Hall of Indian Private, 1973).
  • 35.Zhou, Y., Srinivasan, S. & Condon, B. Leaf-GP: An open and automated software application for measuring growth phenotypes. Plant. Methods. 13(1), 1–10. 10.1186/s13007-017-0266-3 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Dash, J. et al. The relationship between the MERIS terrestrial chlorophyll index and chlorophyll content. In Second ENVISAT Symposium, ESA, SP-636. (Europian Space Agency, 2007).
  • 37.Soil and Plant Analysis Council. Soil Analysis Handbook of Reference Methods (CRC, 2000).
  • 38.U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Method 7000B: Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry. SW-846 (2007). https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-12/documents/7000b.pdf
  • 39.Desch, H. E. & Dinwoodie, J. M. Timber: Structure, Properties, Conversion and Use 7th edn (Macmillan Press Ltd., 1996).
  • 40.Haygreen, J. G. & Bowyer, J. L. Forest Products and Wood Science: An Introduction 3rd edn (Iowa State University, 1996).
  • 41.Sadasivam, S. & Manickam, A. Biochemical Methods 3rd edn (New Age International, 2005).
  • 42.Erickson, H. D. Some aspects of method in determining cellulose in wood. Tappi J.45, 710–719 (1962). [Google Scholar]
  • 43.TAPPI (Technical Association of the Pulp and Paper Industry, US). Standard test for acid-insoluble lignin in wood and pulp. Tappi T 222 om-02 revised (2002).
  • 44.Snedecor, G. W. & Cochran, W. G. Statistical Methods 8th edn (Iowa State University, 1989).
  • 45.Gomez, K. A. & Gomez, A. A. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research 2nd edn (Wiley, 1984).
  • 46.Liu, C. et al. Mechanisms of copper stress response in plants: Implications for the medicinal plant Platycodon grandiflorus. Biology15(12), 934. 10.3390/biology15120934 (2026). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Li, M., Watanabe, S., Gao, F. & Dubos, C. Iron nutrition in plants: Towards a new paradigm? Plants12(2), 384. 10.3390/plants12020384 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 48.Müller, B. Iron transport mechanisms and their evolution focusing on chloroplasts. J. Plant Physiol.288, 154059. 10.1016/j.jplph.2023.154059 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Kermeur, N., Pédrot, M. & Cabello-Hurtado, F. Iron availability and homeostasis in plants: A review of responses, adaptive mechanisms, and signaling. In Plant Abiotic Stress Signaling (Methods in Molecular Biology) (ed Couée, I.) Vol. 2642 41–58 (Humana, 2023). 10.1007/978-1-0716-3044-0_3 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 50.Mushtaq, N. U. et al. Exogenous zinc mitigates salinity stress by stimulating proline metabolism in proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L). Front. Plant Sci.14, 1053869. 10.3389/fpls.2023.1053869 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Soliman, W. S., El-Soghayer, M. H., Salaheldin, S., Abbas, A. M. & Gahory, A. A. Salinity stress in Calendula officinalis: Negative growth impacts offset by increased flowering yield and the mitigating role of zinc. Horticulturae10(12), 1357. 10.3390/horticulturae10121357 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Soliman, Y. M., Soliman, W. S., Abbas, A. M. & Novak, S. J. Foliar application of silicon and zinc improves growth, productivity, and essential oil content of sweet basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) experiencing drought. Agronomy16(12), 1155. 10.3390/agronomy16121155 (2026a). [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Hassan, M. U. et al. The critical role of zinc in plants facing drought stress. Agriculture10(9), 396. 10.3390/agriculture10090396 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Hussain, S. et al. Zinc essentiality, toxicity, and its bacterial bioremediation: A comprehensive insight. Front. Microbiol.13, 900740. 10.3389/fmicb.2022.900740 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kaur, H., Srivastava, S., Goyal, N. & Walia, S. Behavior of zinc in soils and recent advances on strategies for ameliorating zinc phytotoxicity. Environ. Exp. Bot.220, 105676. 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2024.105676 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Salim, H. K. M. & Taha, S. M. Effect of biostimulant and humic acid on tree growth and fruit characteristics of olive (Olea europaea L.) cv. Arbequina. Kirkuk Univ. J. Agricultural Sci.13(3), 239–254 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Soliman, Y. M., Soliman, W. S. & Abbas, A. M. Biochar–NPK–seaweed integration as a sustainable strategy to boost productivity of spearmint in sandy soils. Sustainability18(3), 1665. 10.3390/su18031665 (2026b). [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Samy, A., Soliman, S. S., Abdel-Rahman, S. S. A., Soliman, W. S. & Abbas, A. M. Influence of sowing date and humic acid application on Foeniculum vulgare Mill. growth, yield, and essential oil composition. Horticulturae11(1), 18. 10.3390/horticulturae11010018 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 59.El Boukhari, M. E. M., Barakate, M., Bouhia, Y. & Lyamlouli, K. Trends in seaweed extract based biostimulants: Manufacturing process and beneficial effect on soil-plant systems. Plants9, 359 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Petropoulos, S. A. Practical applications of plant biostimulants in greenhouse vegetable crop production. Agronomy10, 1569 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Jafarlou, M., Pilehvar, B. & Modaresi, M. Seaweed liquid extract as an alternative biostimulant for the amelioration of salt-stress effects in Calotropis procera. J. Plant Growth Regul.42, 449–464. 10.1007/s00344-021-10566-1 (2022). Aiton) W.T. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Bayomy, H. et al. Response of Moringa oleifera trees to salinity stress conditions in Tabuk region, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 30. 10.1016/j.sjbs.2023.103810 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 63.Comin, S. et al. Growth, Physiology, and Root Development in Seedlings of Woody Species Treated with a Seaweed Extract (Arboriculture & Urban Forestry, 2024). 10.48044/jauf.2024.013
  • 64.Colla, G., Rouphael, Y., Canaguier, R., Svecova, E. & Cardarelli, M. Biostimulant action of a plant-derived protein hydrolysate produced through enzymatic hydrolysis. Front. Plant. Sci.5, 448. 10.3389/fpls.2014.00448 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Morales-Payan, J. P. Growth of ‘Parvin’ mango in nursery as affected by a peptide-based biostimulant applied to the soil. Acta Hort. 1075, 161–164 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Popenoe, J., Wilber, L. & Chen, J. Biostimulants have minimal effects on growth of some woody nursery plants. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc.130, 240–244 (2017).
  • 67.Soliman, W. S. & Sugiyama, S. Phytoremediation and tolerance capacity of moringa to cadmium and its relation to nutrients content. Pollution Res.35(1), 23–27 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Pittarello, M., Busato, J. G., Carletti, P., Sodré, F. F. & Dobbss, L. B. Dissolved humic substances supplied as potential enhancers of Cu, Cd, and Pb adsorption by two different mangrove sediments. J. Soils Sediment.19, 1554–1565 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Pittarello, M. et al. Effects of different humic substances concentrations on root anatomy and Cd accumulation in seedlings of Avicennia germinans (black mangrove). Mar. Pollut Bull.130, 113–122 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Dobbss, L. B. et al. Alleviation of iron toxicity in Schinus terebinthifolius Raddi (Anacardiaceae) by humic substances. Environ. Sci. Pollut Res.25, 9416–9425 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Hu, R. et al. An algal biostimulant promotes growth and decreases cadmium uptake in accumulator plant Nasturtium officinale. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. (2020).
  • 72.Abbas, A. M., Al-Kahtani, M., Novak, S. J. & Soliman, W. S. Abundance, distribution, and growth characteristics of three keystone Vachellia trees in Gebel Elba National Park, south-eastern Egypt. Sci. Rep.11, 1284. 10.1038/s41598-020-79542-1 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Shanbhag, R. R. & Sundararaj, R. Physical and chemical properties of some imported woods and their degradation by termites. J. Insect Sci.13, 63 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All needed data is combined in the main text, and any other information can be given by the corresponding author.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES