Abstract
Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) remains a major public health concern. Beyond canonical virulence determinants, biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) for specialized metabolites (SMs) and primary metabolic adaptations may shape fitness in community settings. In this study, we analyzed 123 CA-MRSA isolates from Egypt (2020–2021) alongside three reference genomes using a combined genomics workflow: antiSMASH and PRISM for homology-based specialized BGCs and predicted structures, GECCO for de novo BGC detection, BiG-SCAPE for gene-cluster family (GCF) networks and gutSMASH for primary-metabolism clusters detection. Assemblies were generated from Illumina MiSeq data and annotated with Prokka; sequence types and clonal complexes were assigned with FastMLST. antiSMASH identified a total of 934 BGCs (median 8 per genome), dominated by the following BGC types: NRPS-independent siderophores (NIS) (n = 312; IucA/IucC-like siderophores), non-ribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS) (n = 132), and opine-like metallophores (n = 123). GECCO detected 415 BGCs, including 287 unclassified and 101 NRPS-associated clusters. GutSMASH recovered 582 primary metabolism gene clusters (GCs), with fumarate-to-succinate (n = 96), arginine-to-bicarbonate (n = 89; ADI) and nitrate-reductase (n = 84) energy-capturing modules being the most frequent. NRPS and NIS content varied widely among isolates, exceeding reference genome diversity, and BiG-SCAPE networks suggested multiple isolate-specific GCFs lacking MIBiG matches. Egyptian CA-MRSA displays a rich repertoire of iron-acquisition, peptide, and metallophore BGCs alongside anaerobic/energy-efficiency primary metabolism GCs that may support survival and competitiveness in community niches. While experimental validation is needed, these pathways nominate tractable targets for anti-virulence or metabolism-directed interventions and provide a genomic baseline for CA-MRSA in the North African region.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12864-026-13121-y.
Keywords: MRSA, Biosynthetic gene clusters, Siderophore, Metallophores, NRPS
Introduction
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a major antimicrobial resistance threat and has been designated a superbug due to its ability to withstand multiple antibiotics and cause diverse, often severe infections [1–3]. Resistance originates from the acquisition of the Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec), which encodes the altered penicillin-binding protein PBP2a and associated regulatory elements, conferring resistance to nearly all β-lactams [1, 2]. MRSA initially emerged in hospitals (HA-MRSA) but has now spread widely in community settings. Community-acquired MRSA (CA-MRSA) is typically associated with SCCmec types IV/V and, in many lineages, the Panton–Valentine leukocidin (PVL) toxin [4, 5]. These strains often infect otherwise healthy individuals and have contributed to the global expansion of invasive MRSA disease.
The success of MRSA reflects the interplay of classical virulence factors, biofilm formation, and horizontal gene transfer, combined with lineage-specific adaptations that shape regional epidemiology [6–9]. Genome-wide association studies have highlighted the role of proteases and other extracellular factors in S. aureus virulence [1], while comparative clinical genomics studies show that both methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive hyper-virulent lineages contribute to poor outcomes [4]. Beyond healthcare-associated contexts, recombination-driven host adaptation has been reported in avian S. aureus [3], illustrating the broad adaptive potential of this species.
CA-MRSA lineages frequently carry mobile genetic elements (MGEs) encoding toxins, adhesins, and enzymes that facilitate host colonization, tissue invasion, and immune evasion [7]. For example, PVL and other cytotoxins disrupt host cells, while proteases and nucleases aid dissemination. Protein A and biofilm matrix components help MRSA resist immune clearance and antibiotic treatment. These traits enhance persistence and transmission, but their distribution varies among clonal complexes, influencing patterns of disease [4].
Beyond these well-characterized virulence determinants, S. aureus also encodes biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) that direct the production of specialized metabolites (SMs). These include non-ribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS) products [10, 11], ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptides (RiPPs) [12–15], siderophores [16–19], and metallophores [18]. Within the last few years, increasing numbers of bacteriocins have been isolated and identified from Gram-positive microorganisms, underscoring renewed interest in RiPP-associated BGCs and their ecological and antimicrobial roles [20]. Accordingly, SM BGCs identified in S. aureus and MRSA genomes include those responsible for staphylobactin and staphyloferrin A biosynthesis, the NRPS-derived aureusimine pathway, as well as bacteriocin-encoding clusters [20–22].Such metabolites can promote iron and metal acquisition, shape interbacterial competition and support niche adaptation by modulating host–pathogen interactions [23, 24]. At the same time, clusters involved in primary metabolism, such as fumarate-to-succinate [13], arginine deiminase (arginine-to-bicarbonate) [14], nitrate reductase [15] and thiamine pyrophosphate (TPP)-dependent amino acid metabolism [16] may optimize energy capture and redox balance under hypoxia, nutrient limitation, or host-imposed stress [17]. Together, these pathways extend the metabolic repertoire of MRSA and may underpin its ecological versatility.
While the role of individual toxins and biofilm determinants in MRSA pathogenicity is well-studied, large-scale mapping of BGC repertoires in CA-MRSA remains limited, particularly in regions such as North Africa where genomic data are scarce. Recent work has shown the emergence of novel multidrug-resistant S. aureus sub-lineages in South Asia [5], highlighting the importance of global surveillance. Comprehensive surveys of both specialized and primary metabolic gene clusters (GCs) could reveal lineage-specific adaptations that contribute to survival, virulence, and transmission in community settings.
Genome-mining is advancing quickly which helped in developing multiple existing bioinformatics tools which identify the different types of BGCs. Some of the tools are rule-based, which are capable of identifying BGCs using known motifs. Other tools use machine learning approaches to identify or predict novel clusters. Finally, some tools work on comparative and phylogenetic tools to link the clusters between species. An example of a rule-based tool is antibiotics and Secondary Metabolite Analysis SHell (antiSMASH) [12, 25]. AntiSMASH is the gold standard for genome-mining for BGC detection, it comprises known BGCs, and is comprehensive of several BGC types [26]. BGC prediction with Conditional Random Fields (GECCO) is another tool that uses machine learning for the identification and prediction of novel BGCs [17]. GECCO can predict novel BGCs that share similar patterns with known BGCs. Specialized Metabolic Analysis of Specialized gene clusters from the Human gut microbiome (gutSMASH) is a more specialized tool, which detected primary metabolism GCs, and was mainly built using human gut-associated bacterial with special focus on common anaerobic pathways [15]. Biosynthetic Gene Similarity Clustering and Prospecting Engine (BiG-SCAPE) is a clustering engine that groups the outputs from the former tools in gene cluster families (GCFs) [27]. Clinker visualizes the alignments between samples [23]. Prediction of genetically encoded natural product structures based on microbial genomes (PRISM) is a specialized tool for the prediction of chemical structures of the metabolites produced by NRPS and PKS gene clusters. It uses multiple search approaches; library-based approach using Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) to identify enzyme substrates, combinatorial chemical prediction to produce a library of possible molecules and structure scoring to predict molecular weight and chemical formula [16]. Other specialized tools like are also developed; namely BActeriocin GEnome mining tool (BAGEL) that specializes in mining of RiPPs and Bacteriocins [28] and DeepBGC that uses deep learning to identify novel BGCs [29].
Egyptian CA-MRSA isolates are interesting to study, as it is a unique epidemiological sample and clinically relevant. Community-acquired MRSA (CA-MRSA) has emerged as a significant public health threat distinct from its healthcare-associated counterpart (HA-MRSA), capable of infecting immunocompetent individuals outside clinical settings. In Egypt, CA-MRSA strains have been increasingly reported [30], yet their genomic characteristics, virulence potential, and metabolic gene cluster repertoire remain insufficiently characterized compared to globally dominant lineages such as USA300.
Here, we analyse 123 CA-MRSA isolate genomes from Egypt using an integrated genome-mining pipeline (antiSMASH, GECCO, gutSMASH, BiG-SCAPE, Clinker, and PRISM). Our aims were to (i) catalogue the diversity of specialized and primary BGCs, (ii) compare their distribution across clonal complexes and (iii) highlight candidate pathways for experimental validation and potential therapeutic targeting. We hypothesize that studying the BGCs of the CA-MRSA isolates in Egypt would possibly lead to a unique BGC profile that would in the future pave the way for better understanding of this pathogen and hence better targeting of it.
Materials and methods
Bacterial cultures
A total of 123 representative non-duplicate Staphylococcus aureus was previously obtained from a clinical diagnostic center in Alexandria, Egypt, which serves multiple screening laboratories. The collection period spanned from August 2020 to April 2021. The isolates were collected prior to the study period as part of historical sampling; therefore, ethics approval and patient consent were not required. To ensure diversity and minimize the inclusion of genetically related isolates, a random sampling approach was employed, considering the month of isolation and isolate source. The historical isolates were derived from various clinical specimens, such as aspirate, wound, pus and mini-bronchoalveolar lavage (mini-BAL).
Classification as CA-MRSA followed the standard epidemiological criteria established by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which defines CA-MRSA infections as those occurring within 48 h of hospital admission in individuals with no prior history of hospitalization, surgery, or positive cultures. MRSA confirmation was conducted using established morphological, biochemical, and molecular methods. Methicillin resistance was initially determined phenotypically based on resistance to cefoxitin according to CLSI guidelines (CLSI M100). Molecular detection of mecA was used to further characterize methicillin resistance mechanisms but was not the sole criterion for CA-MRSA designation [7–9, 31]. All isolates were preserved at –80 °C in brain heart broth supplemented with 15% (v/v) glycerol for future analysis. The whole study workflow is depicted in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Study pipeline.
DNA extraction and whole genome sequencing
Genomic DNA was extracted from bacterial isolates using the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, UK) by following the manufacturer’s protocol, with modifications to optimize the yield. The optimization included increasing the initial bacterial suspension volume to 2 mL and pre-warming the elution buffer to 60 °C. To enhance cell lysis, 200 μL of 20 mg/mL lysostaphin (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) was added to the lysis buffer. DNA was eluted in 100 μL of elution buffer and then quantified using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Library preparation was carried out using NexteraXT kits (Illumina, San Diego, CA) as per the manufacturer's guidelines, with barcoding applied to batches of 48 isolate gDNA samples. Sequencing was performed on Illumina's MiSeq platform using MiSeq run kits (v3) to generate 2 × 300 base paired-end reads. Quality control, adapter trimming, and quality filtering of the resulting FASTQ data were managed using the Fastp command-line tool, utilizing the error correction parameter (C) for paired-end overlap analysis [32]. De novo genome assembly was performed using SPAdes (version 3.13.0) with the careful command [33]. Assembly statistics were calculated on the filtered assembly with QUAST 4.4 [34], and the resulting assemblies underwent five rounds of polishing with Pilon to [35]. The average size of the polished assemblies was 2.71 ± 0.4 Mbp (Supplementary table S1-A). The completeness of the assemblies was subsequently evaluated using BUSCO (v5.2.2) [36] against the bacteria_odb10 lineage dataset (n = 124 conserved markers), to assess the proportion of complete, fragmented, and missing single-copy orthologs and confirm assembly integrity prior to downstream annotation (Supplementary table S1-B).
Data availability
Short-read data are available in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Sequence Read Archive, associated with BioProject PRJNA1135495 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/?term=PRJNA1135495). Assembled genomes data and individual accession numbers are detailed in Supplementary Table (3).
Detection of homology-based specialized metabolism GCs
After filtration and quality checking for the 123 genomic files, their FASTA files were uploaded to antiSMASH [12] to detect the homology-based specialized metabolism GCs. The used algorithms were KnownClusterBlast, SubClusterBlast, ActiveSiteFinder, RREFinder, and TFBSanalysis. The detection strictness was adjusted to relaxed. Three reference genomes were chosen from the assembled genomes for Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) on NCBI genome database. These reference genomes were; the main reference genome on NCBI genome database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/datasets/genome/?taxon=1280) for Staphylococcus aureus ASM1342v1 (NCTC 8325), in addition to two other assemblies ASM609491v1 (ATCC 12600 strain) which is widely used in antibiotic resistance, biofilm formation, and metabolic characterization research [37–39], and ASM289538v1 (MRSA107) which represented MRSA in clinical and environmental research in regional studies [40–42]. The three reference genomes were onwards referred to as Ref-1, Ref-2 and Ref-3, respectively. These three references had single scaffolds and had their genomes completely sequenced.
To visualize the distribution of antiSMASH-detected GCs across clonal complexes (CCs) and across samples in community-acquired Staphylococcus aureus, we used Rstudio (Version 4.5.1). Using tidyverse package, antiSMASH GC data were imported from an Excel file and converted from wide to long format to summarize the total presence of each specialized metabolism GCs within each CC. We then generated a heatmap using ComplexHeatmap [13, 14] with clonal complexes on the x-axis and specialized metabolism GC types on the y-axis.
Detection of homology-based primary metabolism GCs, SM structures & de novo specialized metabolism GCs
The genomic fasta files were run using gutSMASH [15] for the detection of homology-based primary metabolism GCs. KnownClusterBlast and Annotation for Functional Gene Categories were the additional analysis used with the server. Then PRISM 4 [16] was used to predict the chemical structures of BGCs. The command line version of GECCO software version 0.9.10 [17] was used to examine BGCs with conditional random fields (CRFs) model on the fasta files from both the isolates and the reference genomes.
To visualize the distribution of the primary metabolism GCs from gutSMASH across clonal complexes (CCs) and across samples in CA-MRSA, the same methodology of drawing the heatmap was used, as aforementioned.
Annotation and typing
Prokka, a rapid prokaryotic genome annotation tool, was utilized to identify coding sequences (CDSs), rRNAs, tRNAs, and other genomic features. Prokka was run with default parameters to ensure consistency across all genomes, generating standardized GenBank-formatted output files for downstream analysis [18]. FastMLST, a multilocus sequence typing tool that uses BLASTn to perform PubMLST searches [19], was used to determine the sequence type (ST), allelic profile and clonal complex (CC) for the draft assemblies [19].
Alignment of the detected NRPS GCs
The NRPS GC GenBank files generated by antiSMASH were then uploaded to the online server of the Clinker software [23]. Clusters were labeled according to gene function and links were made between similar clusters. The GenBank files for all the isolates and references were analyzed together.
Detection of sequence similarity networks of GCs and grouping into GCFs
Using Galaxy server with Galaxy Version 1.1.9 + galaxy2 [43], Biosynthetic Gene Similarity Clustering and Prospecting Engine (BiG-SCAPE) software was utilized to construct networks of sequence similarity between GCs in isolates and in reference genomes [27]. BiG-SCAPE grouped the isolates and the reference genomes into gene cluster families (GCFs).
Multiple alignment and phylogenetic tree for NRPS and NI-siderophore GCs
Sequences for NRPS and NI-Siderophore were extracted according to the coordinates from antiSMASH output for both isolates and references using codes stored in a GitHub repository (https://github.com/AhmedAboushanab/Genomic-Insights-into-Specialized-and-Primary-Metabolism-Gene-Clusters). The extracted sequences were used in building an NRPS-based phylogenetic tree and an NI-Siderophore-based phylogenetic tree using multiple alignment program for amino acid or nucleotide sequences (MAFFT) online server version 7 (https://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/server/) [44, 45].
Several tools (PRISM, GECCO, Clinker, and MAFFT) were used with their default options to allow for reproducibility, decrease the risk of bias, accelerate and benchmark the pipeline.
Statistical analysis and BGC enrichment
Fisher’s exact test was used to calculate BGC enrichment in each CC using Rstudio (Version 4.5.1). In addition, it was also used to Jaccard co-occurrence matrix for top specialized metabolites, and top 19 primary metabolites. Finally, Logistic for presence and absence of NIS and metallophore in CC after normalization by genome size.
Results
Siderophore, NRPS and metallophore GCs were the most abundantly detected specialized metabolism GCs
Compared to the reference genomes, the screened isolates revealed higher diversity of specialized metabolism GCs with fifteen distinctly detected GC types (Figs. 2A and 3A). The NI-siderophore GC exhibited the highest prevalence, particularly in CC1 and CC121, with a median of two per CC, maximum of five per CC, and range from zero to five per genome within 120 samples that are having more than one NI-Siderophore in their genomes similar to what is observed in the references, indicating a strong siderophore biosynthetic potential in these clonal complexes. This suggests enhanced capabilities for iron acquisition, which may contribute to virulence and adaptability. Additionally, NRPS, and Opine-like-metallophore clusters showed moderate to high presence across several CCs, with a median of one per CC, maximum of three per CC, and range of zero to three per sample within six samples that are having more than one NRPs in their genomes which is more than what was observed in the references, reflecting their widespread distribution and possible roles in SM production. On the other hand, four GCs -lassopepetide, betalactone, NRPS-like, and LAP- were the least abundant GCs. These four lowest GCs were not detected in the reference genomes, suggesting limited involvement in the metabolic repertoire of the studied isolates. Clonal complexes CC1 and CC121 demonstrated greater GC diversity, whereas CC5, CC8, and CC97 showed moderate diversity with specific GC enrichments.
Fig. 2.
Predicted metabolism GCs in the clonal complexes of CA-MRSA isolates. A Specialized metabolism GCs. B Primary metabolism GCs. The heatmaps illustrate the presence and distribution of various GCs across different clonal complexes (CCs) in community-acquired MRSA isolates. The color gradient from light blue (low presence) to black (high presence) represents the GC presence count
Fig. 3.
Metabolism Gene clusters detected per sample in the clonal complexes. A Specialized metabolism GCs. B Primary metabolism GCs. The heatmaps represent the distribution of the detected GCs across different samples. The color gradient from light blue (low presence) to black (high presence) represents the GC presence count
Furthermore, lanthipeptide-class-I, T3PKS_terpene, and cyclic-lactone-autoinducer had much lower abundance of 3%, 2%, and 6% in the 123 isolates compared to 16% in the three reference genomes, respectively. New GCs were also found in the isolates. Terpene, T3PKS, RiPP-like, terpene_ T3PKS, NRPS-like, REE-containing GCs were uniquely detected in the isolate genomes only. Terpene and T3PKS represented about 19% of GCs compared to less than 12% represented by Lanthipeptide-class-I, (T3PKS, terpene), and Cyclic-lactone-autoinducer in the GCs detected in the isolates.
Six GC types were detected in the reference genomes. The most abundant GC was NRPS-independent-siderophore with 25%, while the least abundant was NRPS with 10% in the entirety of the GCs (Fig. 3A). Surprisingly, the four other GC (Opine-like-metallophore, Lanthipeptide-class-I, (T3PKS, terpene), and Cyclic-lactone-autoinducer) were equally distributed with 16% each in the three reference genomes.
As shown in the NRPS-based phylogenetic tree in Figure S7A, almost each of the screened isolates in addition to the references has a single NRPS GC except for isolates (CA_24, CA_44, CA_94, CA_148) that have two NRPS GCs per isolate, and isolate CA_101 that has three NRPS GCs. Yet the isolates were very different from the references and from each other in both the length and sequence of the NRPS GCs. Almost the same was observed in Figure S7B, for the phylogenetic tree based on NI-Siderophore GCs. The three references contain two NI-Siderophore GCs, while the isolates differ in their NI-Siderophore GCs content with several of them having up to four NI-Siderophore GCs per isolate such as CA_68, CA_107, CA_129, and CA_146.
Fumarate to succinate, arginine to Hcarbonate pathways and nitrate reductase energy-capturing GC were the most abundantly detected primary metabolism GCs
Upon analyzing the isolates, a higher diversity of primary metabolism GCs were detected, (Figs. 2B and 3B) [15]. Nineteen different primary metabolism GCs were detected in the isolate genomes. On the other hand, the reference genomes had six primary metabolism GCs. All of them had the same relative abundance of %16—%17 per reference genome. They were Fumarate2succinate, TPP_AA_metabolism, Nitrate_reductase, TPP_fatty_acids, Arginine2_Hcarbonate, and GR_fatty_acids, Pyruvate2acetate-formate, fatty_acids_unassigned.
In the isolates, the primary metabolism GCs Fumarate2succin, Arginine2Hcarbonate, and Nitrate_reductase showed the highest prevalence, with higher prevalence in CC1, CC121, and undetermined (UD). This pattern may indicate an enhanced capacity for alternative energy metabolism, particularly anaerobic respiration and nitrogen metabolism, which may support survival under diverse environmental conditions. Pathways like TPP_FA and TPP_AA_metabolism were consistently present across multiple CCs, highlighting their essential roles in fundamental metabolic processes. In contrast, Succin2prop,Putt2sper and Oxidative_glycerol exhibited limited presence, suggesting specialized functions or restricted distribution among specific lineages.
Interestingly, combinations of metabolic clusters, such as GR_FA, Pyr2acet-formate, FA-unasgd, and Caffeate_respir., frequently co-occurred, implying potential co-regulation or metabolic interdependence. Overall, CC1 and CC121 displayed the highest metabolic diversity, while CC5, CC8, and CC97 exhibited more specialized profiles. These findings highlight the metabolic versatility and potential adaptive advantages of specific MRSA clonal complexes, which may influence their ecological fitness and pathogenicity in community settings.
De novoGC prediction detected mostly unknown and NRP types
NRP, RiPP, Saccharide, and Terpene GCs were identified by a de novo GC prediction tool in the isolates (Fig. 4A), besides identifying two known GCs in the reference genomes; RiPP, and NRP (Fig. 4B). In both the reference and the screened genomes, several GCs were not specifically labeled and were hence labeled Unknown.
Fig. 4.
De novo specialized metabolism GCs detected by GECCO. A GCs detected in the isolate genomes. B GCs detected in the reference genomes
Using BiG-SCAPE to cluster BGCs into gene cluster families, several distance matrixes were generated to show the clustered families on the horizontal axis and the samples in each cluster on the vertical axes (axis and trees) with each BGC per sample represented as a red square (Supplementary Figures S2-S6). The reference genomes had three NRPS families clustered with an average number of one GC per family with a max number of one GC per family. Two RiPPs families were clustered with an average number of two GCs per family with a max number of two GCs per family and one family of MIBiG reference GCs. Moreover, three Terpene families were clustered with an average number of one GC per family and a max number of one GC per family. Additionally, three PKSother families were clustered with an average number of one GC per family and a maximum number of one GC per family. And lastly, another GC family with an average number of three GCs per family and a max number of one GC per family as in of GCF clusters based on absence and presence of genomes and families.
Then, upon running BiG-SCAPE on the CA-MRSA isolate genomes, twelve NRPS families were detected, with an average number of ten GCs per family with a maximum number of 35 GCs per family. Also, nine RiPPs families were found with an average number of nine GCs per family with a maximum number of 24 GCs per family. Ten further Terpene families were detected with an average number of ten GCs per family with a maximum number of 32 GCs per family. Moreover, eighty-one PKS other families were found with an average number of two GCs per family with a maximum number of 18 GCs per family. Finally, eleven Others GC family was found with an average number of eleven GCs per family with a maximum number of 35 GCs per family as in of GCF clusters based on absence and presence of genomes and families. No GCFs were detected from MIBiG reference GCs.
Being among the top abundant GC groups detected in both the isolates and the references, NRPS GCs were selected to display their alignments in both the reference and isolate genomes in Supplementary Figs. 3, S1.
Predicted SM structures
PRISM 4 was run on all of the isolates, including the three genomic reference sequences (Table S4). 580 GC clusters were detected in the comprised isolates which were pertaining to the following SM types: 312 NRPS-independent siderophore synthase clusters, 132 non ribosomal peptide clusters, 71 autoinducing peptide clusters, 29 class I lanthipeptide clusters, 24 Class II/III Confident Bacteriocin clusters, 5 bacterial head-to-tail cyclized peptide clusters, 5 of the unknown thiotemplated cluster type, 1 class II lanthipeptide cluster and 1 polyketide cluster.
Statistical analysis
Several BGC types showed enrichment in CC8 (TPS, odds-ratio = 4, p-value = 0.0208), CC15 (Ripp-Like, odds-ratio = 11.235, p-value = 0.0225), and CC121 (Ripp-Like, odds-ratio = 8.951, p-value = 0.0369), Figure S10 and Table S9. Jaccard co-occurrence showed that NRPS, NI-Siderophore, T3PKS, opine-like Metallophore, and TPS have strong correlations as BGCs and are found together in most of the samples, Figure S11 and Table S10. While it also shows that some specialized GCs are found together as well like Fumarate to succinate, Figure S12 and Table S11. Logistic regression analysis showed non-significant correlation between clonal complexes, and the presence of absence of metallophone or NI-Siderophore even after normalization by genome size Tables S12 and S13, respectively.
Discussion
Comprehensive genomic analysis of bacterial pathogens is essential for computationally predicting the molecular determinants of virulence and for identifying potential novel therapeutic targets to combat antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Among the pathways of interest are BGCs that encode SMs [46]. These metabolites can act as virulence factors, as shown for staphyloxanthin in S. aureus [47], and we have previously reported lineage-specific BGC signatures in Gram-negative pathogens [48]. Here, we extend this framework to a Gram-positive pathogen, namely community-acquired MRSA (CA-MRSA), for strains isolated from Egypt, and demonstrate that both specialized and primary metabolism GCs contribute to a diverse metabolic repertoire. Such studies, when later coupled with experimental validation, pave the way for discovery of novel antimicrobial agents targeting multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens. Homology-based detection indicated that non-ribosomal siderophore (NIS) clusters were the most abundant specialized metabolism GCs in both screened isolate and reference genomes (Figs. 2 and 3). This result, consistent across antiSMASH and PRISM, may highlight the central role of iron acquisition in MRSA. NIS clusters encode IucA/IucC-like synthetases that produce high-affinity ferric iron chelators, enabling survival in host environments with restricted iron [49–52]. The consistent presence of aerobactin-, desferrioxamine-, and rhizobactin-like clusters may suggest functional redundancy and highlights siderophores as candidate virulence factors requiring experimental validation. Moreover, clustering of reference genomes -on different branches of the phylogenetic trees- away from clinical isolates based on their NIS and NRPS repertoires (Figure S7) may indicate lineage-specific metabolic variation, a pattern consistent with reports of variability in Staphylococcus pathogenicity islands [53].
Primary metabolism analysis revealed that the majority of the clusters were shared between isolate and reference genomes (Figs. 2B and 3B), with fumarate-to-succinate, arginine deiminase (ADI), and nitrate reductase pathways particularly abundant. The rare detection of hybrid clusters combining glycerolipid synthesis, pyruvate-to-acetate/formate, and fatty acid biosynthesis [54, 55] is notable, -which is in accordance with other previous experimental studies, in which lipid modification and altered fermentation pathways have been linked to biofilm formation, immune evasion and AMR, and is yet to be proven experimentally in the included isolates [56–58]. Similar associations between biofilm traits and population structure have been observed in S. epidermidis [59]. The fumarate-to-succinate cluster represents a key tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle reaction catalysed by succinate dehydrogenase [60], while the predicted ADI pathway would potentially support anaerobic survival by generating ATP and bicarbonate [61]. The frequent detection of nitrate reductase clusters [27, 62–65] further underscores the predicted possible adaptation of CA-MRSA to oxygen-limited environments. Thiamine pyrophosphate (TPP)-dependent amino acid and fatty acid modules were also common, reflecting their potential essential role in central metabolism [66–68]. Together, these findings may point to metabolic plasticity that may enhance survival in abscesses, inflamed tissue and biofilm niches.
De novo BGC prediction with GECCO revealed NRPS and RiPP clusters as the most abundant classes (Fig. 4), which is consistent with their roles in producing antibiotics, immunomodulators and other bioactive SMs in previous studies [69, 70]. Occasional detection of saccharide and terpene clusters may further extend the potential metabolic repertoire [48, 71, 72], with possible applications in drug discovery and biotechnology. Importantly, BiG-SCAPE clustering revealed many GCFs lacking MIBiG hits (Figures S2–S6), supporting the presence of potentially novel or under-characterized SM pathways. Similar expansions of metabolic diversity linked to clinical outcome have been reported in S. epidermidis device-related infections [73, 74]. The observed enrichment of NRPS and RiPP families in Egyptian CA-MRSA compared with reference genomes may suggest that local lineages could potentially harbour unique metabolic traits relevant to virulence or community adaptation.
Alignments with Clinker (Fig. 5 and Fig. S1) with the distance matrix plots (Figures S2 – S6) suggest that NRPS clusters are colocalized across all the isolates. On the other hand, clusters like (RiPPs, and Terpenes) differ in their composition across the isolates. In addition, the raincloud plots (Figures S8 – S9), together with Fisher’s exact test (Figure S10), and the logistic regression tables (S12 – S13) suggest that BGCs -subsequent to normalizing for genome size- are not distributed randomly across the different clonal complexes. Specific CCs are enriched in specific BGCs, especially the iron acquisition BGC types; metallophores and NISs.
Fig. 5.
Selected NRPS GC alignment in the isolate and reference genomes
The Jaccard metrices (Tables S10 – S11, Figures S11 – S12) show that these BGCs (NIS, NRPS and T3PKS) tend to be found together (Jaccard ~ 1) in the same genomes. This may be due to either co-selection pressure or functional linkage. This is reinforced by the pairwise Fisher’s test (Table S9) that shows statistical significance of non-random occurrence between specific BGC pairs. Our findings align with prior reports of variable BGC content in bacterial pathogens [25, 29, 75] but extend this work by showing lineage-specific enrichment of siderophores and NRPS clusters in CA-MRSA clonal complexes. The identification of hybrid and rare primary metabolism GCs (e.g., GR-fatty-acid, pyruvate formate lyase modules) may suggest potential links to virulence and AMR, though functional significance requires validation. Persistent S. aureus isolates often display enhanced fitness and immune evasion [76], and traits that may interact with the metabolic adaptations described here. Zoonotic and livestock-associated S. aureus lineages also carry distinctive genomic features [77], underscoring the need to examine how environmental and host contexts shape BGC repertoires. Metabolic flexibility may further support persister and dormant cell survival [78], complementing SM strategies in chronic infection.
For BGC prioritization, experimental validation is needed, however, we recommend focusing on the unique BGCs, especially if they are shared between the CA-MRSA isolates, and possible wider comparison studies with other MRSA strains and also with non-pathogenic bacteria. Thus, concerning clinical and translational implications, focusing on the enriched BGCs, as well as unique BGCs that are only detected in the samples -perhaps also primary metabolism GCs as well- stand to be the most promising BGCs as anti-virulence targets of CA-MRSA isolates.
Comparison of detection tools underscored complementary strengths. AntiSMASH [12] provided detailed classifications of known BGCs, while GECCO [17] identified additional, less characterized clusters with less confident class labels, albeit with more “unknown” labels. In a future needed step, the BGCs that were classified as unknown would need first perhaps functional prediction such as using NCBI BLAST tool or similar function prediction tools. GutSMASH [15] enabled specific mapping of primary metabolism modules, and BiG-SCAPE [27] facilitated GCF-level comparisons. Collectively, these approaches detected 934 clusters across isolates (median 8 per genome), revealing both conserved modules and lineage-specific diversity. Horizontal gene transfer between S. aureus and coagulase-negative Staphylococci [79] may explain the mosaic distribution of BGCs, consistent with broader patterns of mobile element exchange.
Nonetheless, each of the tools used in this research has its own bias and limitations. Despite being the gold standard for the BGC computational detection research field, antiSMASH is highly biased for known classes as a result of being rule-based. This decreases its ability to detect novel BGCs and may lead to false cluster boundaries. Pertaining to the present study, the bias of the BGCs detected by antiSMASH would possibly be that the BGCs with alignment to known and well-characterized BGCs would be more detected and thus more abundant than others, and longer contigs would have more BGCs detected. GECCO has higher probabilities for detection of novel BGCs yet still has bias towards any data similar to its training data. This causes higher rate of false positives than antiSMASH. Predicted bias in GECCO-predicted BGCs would be that more BGCs similar to the data it has been based on would be more detected than others. GutSMASH has a narrow scope that limits its ability to detect novel GCs. Hence, the primary metabolism GCs detected by gutSMASH tool would generate bias towards known GCs in anaerobic gut microbes and other GCs would remain undetected. Clinker has intensive computational needs upon using larger datasets, although false alignments can occur if non-similar proteins were aligned together, and would hence be possible in the case of the included dataset. Finally, BiG-SCAPE can group different clusters into similar families, if the cutoff is set too high. This would possibly result into categorizing clusters with different chemical products into the same gene cluster family, which is also an inherent possible grouping occurrence in our present study.
The use of short-read assemblies is a limitation, as reads can fragment multi-kilobase BGCs and obscure structural predictions, while Nextera XT library preparation may introduce locus-specific bias. Assembly completeness was evaluated using BUSCO against the bacteria_odb10 lineage dataset, which provides a more biologically meaningful measure of gene space integrity than contiguity metrics such as N50 alone [80]. While N50 reflects assembly fragmentation and size distribution, a high BUSCO score can occur independently of a high N50, indicating that an assembly may exhibit gaps in contiguity yet still retain the majority of expected conserved single-copy orthologs; conversely, a high N50 does not guarantee gene completeness [81]. Nonetheless, the bacteria_odb10 marker set (n = 124) represents a narrow and conserved subset of genes, and a high completeness score does not preclude assembly errors, collapsed repeats, or missing genomic regions outside the marker set. Furthermore, BUSCO scores may be influenced by phylogenetic distance between the query organism and the reference lineage, and the tool does not detect misassemblies or chimeric contigs that nonetheless harbor intact marker genes, requiring cautious interpretation of completeness estimates alongside complementary quality metrics. Predictions remain computational; no expression or metabolite or phenotypic data were measured, and functional roles cannot be assumed. Also, no correction for multiple testing was applied, therefore, causation cannot be implied from the reported associations in infection outcomes. In addition, our dataset represents a single geographic region and timeframe, and results may not extrapolate to other CA-MRSA populations. Nonetheless, the consistent detection of NIS, NRPS, and metallophore clusters across diverse clonal complexes suggests these features are robust and biologically relevant. Additional constraints also exist, including assembly fragmentation, as they are currently draft MRSA genomes, and this would possibly affect NRPS modularity. Further phenotypic assays need to be conducted to confirm the functions of the BGCs.
Future studies would optimally combine genomics with transcriptomics, metabolomics, and phenotypic assays to confirm the activity of predicted clusters. Linking BGC content to clinical data such as infection type or treatment outcome would clarify their role in pathogenicity. Expanding analyses to MRSA from other regions and to related pathogens will provide comparative context and may reveal convergent metabolic strategies. Ultimately, targeting BGC-encoded products, particularly those involved in iron acquisition and anaerobic survival, offers a promising anti-virulence strategy. Such approaches could attenuate virulence without imposing strong bactericidal selection, thereby helping to reduce the emergence of further resistance.
Conclusions
In conclusion, Egyptian CA-MRSA isolates harbour a rich and varied repertoire of specialized and primary metabolism BGCs. Prominent siderophore, NRPS, and metallophore clusters, combined with versatile anaerobic metabolic pathways, likely enhance adaptation to host environments and persistence in the community. This work highlights the importance of BGC mapping in understanding MRSA biology and opens new avenues for therapeutic exploration.
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Material 1: Table S1-A: Assembly statistics for the included CA-MRSA isolates. Table S1-B: BUSCO assembly completeness assessment of polished genomic assemblies of MRSA isolates. Table S2: Typing results for 123 CA-MRSA isolates. Table S3: Individual accession numbers of the included CA_MRSA isolates. Table S4: PRISM results for all the isolates. Table S5: AntiSMASH_results for all samples. Table S6: gutSMASH_results for all samples. Table S7: AntiSMASH_results for all samples + Genome Size. Table S8: Clonal Complexes vs BGCs. Table S9: Pairwise Fisher Test. Table S10: Jaccard Matrix for Specialized Metabolites. Table S11: Jaccard Matrix for Primary Metabolites. Table S12: Logistic Regression for Presence/Absence of metallophore per clonal complex normalized by genome size. Table S13: Logistic Regression for Presence/Absence of NI-Siderophore per clonal complex normalized by genome size.
Supplementary Material 2: Figure S1: Alignments of different NRPS clusters using Clinker. It shows different gene clusters per sample and align it with other samples to show if they have similar order and direction. Figure S2: Distance matrix plots for the NRPS GCFs. (A) Plot for the isolate genomes. (B) Plot for the reference genomes. Figure S3: Distance matrix plots for the RiPP GCFs. (A) Plot for the isolate genomes. (B) Plot for the reference genomes. Figure S4: Distance matrix plots for the Terpene GCFs. (A) Plot for the isolate genomes. (B) Plot for the reference genomes. Figure S5: Distance matrix plots for the PKSother GCFs. (A) Plot for the isolate genomes. (B) Plot for the reference genomes. Figure S6: Distance matrix plots for the Others GCFs. (A) Plot for the isolate genomes. (B) Plot for the reference genomes. Figure S7: Phylogenetic trees for the isolate and reference genomes based on multiple sequence alignment of selected GCs. (A) NRPS-based phylogenetic tree. (B) NI-siderophore-based phylogenetic tree. Figure S8: Raincloud plot of BGCs per genome by clonal complex. Figure S9: Raincloud plot of BGC counts across clonal complexes. Figure S10: Fisher’s exact test: BGC enrichment in each CC vs others. Unccorrected p-values and should be interpreted as preliminary observations. Figure S11: Jaccard_Top 10 Specialized Metabolites. Figure S12: Jaccard_Top 19 Primary Metabolites.
Supplementary Material 3: Table S4: PRISM results for all the isolates.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Abbreviations
- MRSA
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
- CA-MRSA
Community-Acquired MRSA
- SMs
Specialized Metabolites
- GCs
Gene Clusters
- NI
NRPS-independent
- NRP
Non-Ribosomal Peptide
- NIS
Non-ribosomal peptide synthetase-independent siderophore
- MSSA
Methicillin-Sensitive S. aureus
- SCCmec
Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec
- PBP2a (PBP2′)
Penicillin-Binding Protein
- HA-MRSA
Hospital-associated MRSA
- PVL
Panton–Valentine leucocidin
- MGEs
Mobile Genetic Elements
- NRPS
Non-Ribosomal Peptide Synthetase
- RiPPs
Ribosomally Synthesized and Post-translationally Modified Peptides
- T3PKS
Type III Polyketide Synthase
- MDR
Multi-Drug Resistant
- CDC
US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- NCBI
National Center for Biotechnology Information
- antiSMASH
Antibiotics and Secondary Metabolite Analysis SHell
- gutSMASH
Specialized Metabolic Analysis of Specialized gene clusters from the Human gut microbiome
- CCs
Clonal Complexes
- PRISM
Prediction of genetically encoded natural product structures based on microbial genomes
- GECCO
Biosynthetic Gene Cluster prediction with Conditional Random Fields.
- CRFs
Conditional Random Fields
- Prokka
Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Tool
- ST
Sequence Type
- BiG-SCAPE
Biosynthetic Gene Similarity Clustering and Prospecting Engine
- GCFs
Gene cluster families
- MAFFT
Multiple Alignment program for amino acid or nucleotide sequences.
- NI-siderophore
NRPS-independent, IucA/IucC-like siderophores (siderophore prior to 7.0)
- lanthipeptide-class-I
Class I lanthipeptides like nisin
- UD
Undetermined
- NA
Unclassified
- MIBiG
Minimum Information about a Biosynthetic Gene cluster
- AMR
Antimicrobial Resistance
- NIS synthetases
NI-siderophore synthetases
- TCA
Tricarboxylic Acid cycle
- SDH
Succinate Dehydrogenase
- ADI
Arginine deiminase
- DNR
Dissimilatory Nitrate Reductase
- TPP
Thiamine pyrophosphate
- PCP
Peptidyl Carrier Protein
- gDNA
Genomic DNA
- CDSs
Coding Sequences
- LAP
Linear azol(in)e-containing peptides
- REE-containing
RRE-element containing cluster
- FA
Fatty Acid
- ANR
Assimilatory nitrate reductase
- PKSs
Polyketide Synthases
- TPS
Terpene
- cyc-lac-autoinducer
Cyclic-lactone-autoinducer
- FA
Fatty Acid
- Pyr
Pyruvate
- Acet
Acetate
- Unasgd
Unassigned
- Acet
Acetate
- But
Butyrate
- Arg
Arginine
- Succin
Succinatte
- Caf
Caffeate
- Nit_Reduct
Nitrate Reductase
- Putr2sper
Putrescine2spermidine
- Oxid_gly
Oxidative_glycerol
- HMMs
Hidden Markov Models
Authors’ contributions
L.Z. & M.E. generated the main ideas and workflow of the study, and supervised the team, and they also revised the manuscript. A. A. generated the figures for the BGCs and wrote the main manuscript draft with N. A. S., S. Salem and S. S. E. Additionally, R. A. E. analyzed the raw data from the WGS. N. A. S. performed data analysis, data visualization & writing. B. P. and S. Sheppard did the sequencing and reviewed the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Funding
This work was partially supported by the Jesor Program of the Academy of Scientific Research and Technology, and by the Science, Technology and Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) through the One Health Research and Innovation Grant (OHRIG), Project ID: 48072.
Data availability
All the data associated with the manuscript are included in the figures and supplementary figures. Additionally, the used codes are stored in a GitHub repository (https://github.com/AhmedAboushanab/Genomic-Insights-into-Specialized-and-Primary-Metabolism-Gene-Clusters). For the assembly sequences, they can be accessed from the following: BioProject PRJNA1135495 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/?term=PRJNA1135495).
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This retrospective study involved genomic characterization of historical strains collected during the study period, with no collection of patient data. The Ethics approval for this study was waived by the Ethics committee Zewail City IRB in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Mohamed Elhadidy, Email: melhadidy@zewailcity.edu.eg.
Laila Ziko, Email: l.adel@gaf.edu.eg.
References
- 1.Li S, Monteith W, Rudolph E, Sheppard SK, Laabei M. Genome-wide association analysis provides insights into the genomics and extracellular expression of Staphylococcus aureus proteases. Virulence. 2025;16:2543116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ippolito G, Leone S, Lauria FN, Nicastri E, Wenzel RP. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: the superbug. Int J Infect Dis. 2010;14:S7–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Murray S, Pascoe B, Meric G, Mageiros L, Yahara K, Hitchings MD, et al. Recombination-mediated host adaptation by avian Staphylococcus aureus. Genome Biol Evol. 2017;9:830–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Post V, Pascoe B, Hitchings MD, Erichsen C, Fischer J, Morgenstern M, et al. Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus lineages contribute towards poor patient outcomes in orthopaedic device-related infections. Microb Genom. 2025;11:001390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Abrudan MI, Shamanna V, Prasanna A, Underwood A, Argimón S, Nagaraj G, et al. Novel multidrug-resistant sublineages of Staphylococcus aureus clonal complex 22 discovered in India. mSphere. 2023;8:e00185-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bukharie HA. A review of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus for primary care physicians. J Family Community Med. 2010;17:117–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Pillai MM, Latha R, Sarkar G. Detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus by polymerase chain reaction and conventional methods: a comparative study. J Lab Physicians. 2012;4:83–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kateete DP, Kimani CN, Katabazi FA, Okeng A, Okee MS, Nanteza A, et al. Identification of Staphylococcus aureus: DNase and Mannitol salt agar improve the efficiency of the tube coagulase test. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2010;9:23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Keim KC, George IK, Reynolds L, Smith AC. The clinical significance of Staphylococcus aureus small colony variants. Lab Med. 2023;54:227–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lindsay JA, Holden MTG. Understanding the rise of the superbug: investigation of the evolution and genomic variation of Staphylococcus aureus. Funct Integr Genomics. 2006;6:186–201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Petit RA III, Read TD. Staphylococcus aureus viewed from the perspective of 40,000+ genomes. PeerJ. 2018;6:e5261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Blin K, Shaw S, Augustijn HE, Reitz ZL, Biermann F, Alanjary M, et al. antiSMASH 7.0: new and improved predictions for detection, regulation, chemical structures and visualisation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51:W46–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gu Z. Complex heatmap visualization Imeta. 2022;1:e43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gu Z, Eils R, Schlesner M. Complex heatmaps reveal patterns and correlations in multidimensional genomic data. Bioinformatics. 2016;32:2847–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Pascal Andreu V, Roel-Touris J, Dodd D, Fischbach MA, Medema MH. The gutSMASH web server: automated identification of primary metabolic gene clusters from the gut microbiota. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:W263–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Skinnider MA, Johnston CW, Gunabalasingam M, Merwin NJ, Kieliszek AM, MacLellan RJ, et al. Comprehensive prediction of secondary metabolite structure and biological activity from microbial genome sequences. Nat Commun. 2020;11:6058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Accurate de novo identification of biosynthetic gene clusters with GECCO. Carroll L. M., Larralde M., Fleck J. S., Ponnudurai R.,Milanese A., Cappio E. and Zeller G. bioRxiv 2021.05.03.442509. 10.1101/2021.05.03.442509.
- 18.Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2068–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Guerrero-Araya E, Muñoz M, Rodríguez C, Paredes-Sabja D. FastMLST: a multi-core tool for multilocus sequence typing of draft genome assemblies. Bioinform Biol Insights. 2021;15:11779322211059238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Fernández-Fernández R, Elsherbini AMA, Lozano C, Martínez A, de Toro M, Zarazaga M, et al. Genomic Analysis of Bacteriocin-Producing Staphylococci: High Prevalence of Lanthipeptides and the Micrococcin P1 Biosynthetic Gene Clusters. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2025;17. 10.1007/s12602-023-10119-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 21.Naorem RS, Blom J, Fekete C. Genome-wide comparison of four MRSA clinical isolates from Germany and Hungary. PeerJ. 2021;9. 10.7717/peerj.10185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 22.Beasley FC, Vinés ED, Grigg JC, Zheng Q, Liu S, Lajoie GA, et al. Characterization of staphyloferrin A biosynthetic and transport mutants in Staphylococcus aureus. Mol Microbiol. 2009;72. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06698.x. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 23.van den Belt M, Gilchrist C, Booth TJ, Chooi Y-H, Medema MH, Alanjary M. CAGECAT: The CompArative GEne Cluster Analysis Toolbox for rapid search and visualisation of homologous gene clusters. BMC Bioinform. 2023;24:181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.The Galaxy Community, The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible, and collaborative data analyses: 2024 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024;52(W1):W83–94. 10.1093/nar/gkae410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 25.Blin K, Shaw S, Kloosterman AM, Charlop-Powers Z, Van Wezel GP, Medema MH, et al. antiSMASH 6.0: improving cluster detection and comparison capabilities. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:W29–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Blin K, Shaw S, Medema MH, Weber T. The antiSMASH database version 5. Nucleic Acids Res. 2026;54:D522–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Navarro-Muñoz JC, Selem-Mojica N, Mullowney MW, Kautsar SA, Tryon JH, Parkinson EI, et al. A computational framework to explore large-scale biosynthetic diversity. Nat Chem Biol. 2020;16:60–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.van Heel AJ, de Jong A, Song C, Viel JH, Kok J, Kuipers OP. BAGEL4: a user-friendly web server to thoroughly mine RiPPs and bacteriocins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:W278–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hannigan GD, Prihoda D, Palicka A, Soukup J, Klempir O, Rampula L, et al. A deep learning genome-mining strategy for biosynthetic gene cluster prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:e110–e110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Abdel-Maksoud M, El-Shokry M, Ismail G, Hafez S, El-Kholy A, Attia E, et al. Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Recovered from Healthcare- and Community-Associated Infections in Egypt. Int J Bacteriol. 2016;2016. 10.1155/2016/5751785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 31.Keim KC, Horswill AR. Staphylococcus aureus. Trends Microbiol. 2023;31:1300–1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics. 2018;34:i884–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Prjibelski A, Antipov D, Meleshko D, Lapidus A, Korobeynikov A. Using SPAdes de novo assembler. Curr Protoc Bioinform. 2020;70:e102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:1072–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Walker BJ, Abeel T, Shea T, Priest M, Abouelliel A, Sakthikumar S, et al. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e112963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Manni M, Berkeley MR, Seppey M, Simão FA, Zdobnov EM. BUSCO update: novel and streamlined workflows along with broader and deeper phylogenetic coverage for scoring of eukaryotic, prokaryotic, and viral genomes. Mol Biol Evol. 2021;38:4647–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Hou J, Veeregowda DH, van de Belt-Gritter B, Busscher HJ, van der Mei HC. Extracellular polymeric matrix production and relaxation under fluid shear and mechanical pressure in Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2018;84:e01516-e1517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Swarupa V, Yeswanth S, Prasad UV, Vasu D, Venkatesh K, Srikanth L, et al. Characterization of succinate dehydrogenase flavoprotein from Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 12600. J Clin Sci Res. 2013;2:81–7. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Swarupa V, Sundari AR, Prasad UV, Yeswanth S, Sarma PVGK. Induced mutagenesis in staphylococcus aureus ATCC 12600 resulting over expression of streptomycin 3"-adenylyltransferase 1. J Pure Appl Microbiol. 2013;7(3):2417–22.
- 40.Monecke S, Bedewy AK, Müller E, Braun SD, Diezel C, Elsheredy A, et al. Characterisation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from Alexandria. Egypt Antibiotics. 2023;12:78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Alseqely M, Newton-Foot M, Khalil A, El-Nakeeb M, Whitelaw A, Abouelfetouh A. Association between fluoroquinolone resistance and MRSA genotype in Alexandria. Egypt Sci Rep. 2021;11:4253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Mouftah S, Elhadidy M. Genomic overview into the evolving epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Mansoura Vet Med J. 2020;21:125–31. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Afgan E, Baker D, Batut B, Van Den Beek M, Bouvier D, Ech M, et al. The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2018 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46. 10.1093/nar/gky379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 44.Kuraku S, Zmasek CM, Nishimura O, Katoh K. aLeaves facilitates on-demand exploration of metazoan gene family trees on MAFFT sequence alignment server with enhanced interactivity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:W22–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Katoh K, Rozewicki J, Yamada KD. MAFFT online service: multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Brief Bioinform. 2019;20:1160–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Lau WYV, Taylor PK, Brinkman FSL, Lee AHY. Pathogen-associated gene discovery workflows for novel antivirulence therapeutic development. EBioMedicine. 2023;88:104429. 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104429. PMID: 36628845; PMCID: PMC9843249. Epub 9 Jan 2023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 47.Abdelsalam NA, Elhadidy M, Saif NA, Elsayed SW, Mouftah SF, Sayed AA, et al. Biosynthetic gene cluster signature profiles of pathogenic Gram-negative bacteria isolated from Egyptian clinical settings. Microbiol Spectr. 2023;11:e01344-e1423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Blanco Nouche C, Paris C, Dhalleine T, Oger P, Turpault M-P, Uroz S. The non-ribosomal peptide synthetase-independent siderophore (NIS) rhizobactin produced by Caballeronia mineralivorans PML1 (12) confers the ability to weather minerals. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2023;89:e00453-e523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Bailey DC, Alexander E, Rice MR, Drake EJ, Mydy LS, Aldrich CC, et al. Structural and functional delineation of aerobactin biosynthesis in hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae. J Biol Chem. 2018;293:7841–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Narh Mensah DL, Wingfield BD, Coetzee MPA. Two distinct non-ribosomal peptide synthetase-independent siderophore synthetase gene clusters identified in Armillaria and other species in the Physalacriaceae. G3 Genes Genom Genet. 2023;13:jkad205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Vance DE, Vance JE. Biochemistry of lipids, lipoproteins and membranes. Elsevier; 1996.
- 52.Banaszkiewicz S, Calland JK, Mourkas E, Sheppard SK, Pascoe B, Bania J. Genetic diversity of composite enterotoxigenic Staphylococcus epidermidis pathogenicity islands. Genome Biol Evol. 2019;11:3498–509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Rock CO, Cronan JE. Escherichia coli as a model for the regulation of dissociable (type II) fatty acid biosynthesis. Biochim Biophys Acta (BBA) Lipids Lipid Metab. 1996;1302:1–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Iurchenko TS, Bolotova SB, Loginova AA, Kargov IS, Atroshenko DL, Savin SS, et al. Study of the structure-function relationship of formate dehydrogenase–an important enzyme for Staphylococcus aureus biofilms by rational design. Biochimie. 2024;216:194–204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Tomasiak TM, Cecchini G, Iverson TM. Succinate as donor; fumarate as acceptor. EcoSal Plus. 2007;2:10–1128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Ahmad S, Rahman H, Mumtaz S, Qasim M, Rahman ZU, Alsuwat MA, et al. mecA and fdh: markers of pathogenicity and commensalism in Staphylococcus epidermidis of pediatric origin from Pakistan. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2024;108:116109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Harris LG, Murray S, Pascoe B, Bray J, Meric G, Magerios L, et al. Biofilm morphotypes and population structure among Staphylococcus epidermidis from commensal and clinical samples. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0151240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Maghnouj A, Abu-Bakr AAW, Baumberg S, Stalon V, Vander WC. Regulation of anaerobic arginine catabolism in Bacillus licheniformis by a protein of the Crp/Fnr family. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2000;191:227–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Berger A, Boscari A, HortaAraújo N, Maucourt M, Hanchi M, Bernillon S, et al. Plant nitrate reductases regulate nitric oxide production and nitrogen-fixing metabolism during the Medicago truncatula–Sinorhizobium meliloti symbiosis. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:1313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Sparacino-Watkins C, Stolz JF, Basu P. Nitrate and periplasmic nitrate reductases. Chem Soc Rev. 2014;43:676–706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Simon J, Klotz MG. Diversity and evolution of bioenergetic systems involved in microbial nitrogen compound transformations. Biochim Biophys Acta (BBA) Bioenergetics. 2013;1827:114–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Drebes J, Künz M, Windshügel B, Kikhney AG, Müller IB, Eberle RJ, et al. Structure of ThiM from Vitamin B1 biosynthetic pathway of Staphylococcus aureus–Insights into a novel pro-drug approach addressing MRSA infections. Sci Rep. 2016;6:22871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Kwong WK, Zheng H, Moran NA. Convergent evolution of a modified, acetate-driven TCA cycle in bacteria. Nat Microbiol. 2017;2:1–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Molinari G. Natural products in drug discovery: present status and perspectives. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2009;655:13–27. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 65.Li H, Ding W, Zhang Q. Discovery and engineering of ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptide (RiPP) natural products. RSC Chem Biol. 2023;5(2):90–108. 10.1039/d3cb00172e. PMID: 38333193; PMCID: PMC10849128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 66.Newman DJ, Cragg GM. Natural products as sources of new drugs over the nearly four decades from 01/1981 to 09/2019. J Nat Prod. 2020;83:770–803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Sun Y, Gerke J, Becker K, Kuhnert E, Verwaaijen B, Wibberg D, et al. Rapid discovery of terpene tailoring enzymes for total biosynthesis. Chem Sci. 2023;14:13463–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Yan X-M, Zhou S-S, Liu H, Zhao S-W, Tian X-C, Shi T-L, et al. Unraveling the evolutionary dynamics of the TPS gene family in land plants. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1273648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Méric G, Mageiros L, Pensar J, Laabei M, Yahara K, Pascoe B, et al. Disease-associated genotypes of the commensal skin bacterium Staphylococcus epidermidis. Nat Commun. 2018;9:5034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Post V, Harris LG, Morgenstern M, Mageiros L, Hitchings MD, Méric G, et al. Comparative genomics study of Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates from orthopedic-device-related infections correlated with patient outcome. J Clin Microbiol. 2017;55:3089–103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Cimermancic P, Medema MH, Claesen J, Kurita K, Brown LCW, Mavrommatis K, et al. Insights into secondary metabolism from a global analysis of prokaryotic biosynthetic gene clusters. Cell. 2014;158:412–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Richards RL, Haigh RD, Pascoe B, Sheppard SK, Price F, Jenkins D, et al. Persistent Staphylococcus aureus isolates from two independent cases of bacteremia display increased bacterial fitness and novel immune evasion phenotypes. Infect Immun. 2015;83:3311–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Yan X, Li Z, Chlebowicz MA, Tao X, Ni M, Hu Y, et al. Genetic features of livestock-associated Staphylococcus aureus ST9 isolates from Chinese pigs that carry the lsa (E) gene for quinupristin/dalfopristin resistance. Int J Med Microbiol. 2016;306:722–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Pascoe B, Dams L, Wilkinson TS, Harris LG, Bodger O, Mack D, et al. Dormant cells of Staphylococcus aureus are resuscitated by spent culture supernatant. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e85998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Meric G, Miragaia M, De Been M, Yahara K, Pascoe B, Mageiros L, et al. Ecological overlap and horizontal gene transfer in Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Genome Biol Evol. 2015;7:1313–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Thrash A, Hoffmann F, Perkins A. Toward a more holistic method of genome assembly assessment. BMC Bioinformatics. 2020;21:249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Jauhal AA, Newcomb RD. Assessing genome assembly quality prior to downstream analysis: N50 versus BUSCO. Mol Ecol Resour. 2021;21:1416–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Carroll CS, Moore MM. Ironing out siderophore biosynthesis: a review of non-ribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS)-independent siderophore synthetases. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2018;53:356–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Leibig M, Liebeke M, Mader D, Lalk M, Peschel A, Götz F. Pyruvate formate lyase acts as a formate supplier for metabolic processes during anaerobiosis in Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol. 2011;193:952–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Lucas SK, Villarreal AR, Ahmad MM, Itabiyi A, Feddema E, Boyer HC, Hunter RC. Anaerobic microbiota derived from the upper Airways impact staphylococcus aureus physiology. Infect Immun. 2021 Aug 16;89(9):e0015321. 10.1128/IAI.00153-21. PMID: 34125598; PMCID: PMC8370671. Epub 16 Aug 2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 81.de Jong L, Meng Y, Dent J, Hekimi S. Thiamine pyrophosphate biosynthesis and transport in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 2004;168:845–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supplementary Material 1: Table S1-A: Assembly statistics for the included CA-MRSA isolates. Table S1-B: BUSCO assembly completeness assessment of polished genomic assemblies of MRSA isolates. Table S2: Typing results for 123 CA-MRSA isolates. Table S3: Individual accession numbers of the included CA_MRSA isolates. Table S4: PRISM results for all the isolates. Table S5: AntiSMASH_results for all samples. Table S6: gutSMASH_results for all samples. Table S7: AntiSMASH_results for all samples + Genome Size. Table S8: Clonal Complexes vs BGCs. Table S9: Pairwise Fisher Test. Table S10: Jaccard Matrix for Specialized Metabolites. Table S11: Jaccard Matrix for Primary Metabolites. Table S12: Logistic Regression for Presence/Absence of metallophore per clonal complex normalized by genome size. Table S13: Logistic Regression for Presence/Absence of NI-Siderophore per clonal complex normalized by genome size.
Supplementary Material 2: Figure S1: Alignments of different NRPS clusters using Clinker. It shows different gene clusters per sample and align it with other samples to show if they have similar order and direction. Figure S2: Distance matrix plots for the NRPS GCFs. (A) Plot for the isolate genomes. (B) Plot for the reference genomes. Figure S3: Distance matrix plots for the RiPP GCFs. (A) Plot for the isolate genomes. (B) Plot for the reference genomes. Figure S4: Distance matrix plots for the Terpene GCFs. (A) Plot for the isolate genomes. (B) Plot for the reference genomes. Figure S5: Distance matrix plots for the PKSother GCFs. (A) Plot for the isolate genomes. (B) Plot for the reference genomes. Figure S6: Distance matrix plots for the Others GCFs. (A) Plot for the isolate genomes. (B) Plot for the reference genomes. Figure S7: Phylogenetic trees for the isolate and reference genomes based on multiple sequence alignment of selected GCs. (A) NRPS-based phylogenetic tree. (B) NI-siderophore-based phylogenetic tree. Figure S8: Raincloud plot of BGCs per genome by clonal complex. Figure S9: Raincloud plot of BGC counts across clonal complexes. Figure S10: Fisher’s exact test: BGC enrichment in each CC vs others. Unccorrected p-values and should be interpreted as preliminary observations. Figure S11: Jaccard_Top 10 Specialized Metabolites. Figure S12: Jaccard_Top 19 Primary Metabolites.
Supplementary Material 3: Table S4: PRISM results for all the isolates.
Data Availability Statement
Short-read data are available in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Sequence Read Archive, associated with BioProject PRJNA1135495 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/?term=PRJNA1135495). Assembled genomes data and individual accession numbers are detailed in Supplementary Table (3).
All the data associated with the manuscript are included in the figures and supplementary figures. Additionally, the used codes are stored in a GitHub repository (https://github.com/AhmedAboushanab/Genomic-Insights-into-Specialized-and-Primary-Metabolism-Gene-Clusters). For the assembly sequences, they can be accessed from the following: BioProject PRJNA1135495 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/?term=PRJNA1135495).





