Abstract
Background:
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) is a growing public health issue, particularly in Indonesia, due to its increasing prevalence and serious complications like diabetic ulcers. This study investigated the relationship between self-management behaviors and the incidence of diabetic ulcers in T2DM patients.
Materials and Methods:
A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted from March to December 2024 at Sari Mulia Hospital. From 432 registered T2DM patients, 220 were selected through purposive sampling based on inclusion criteria. Data were collected using the Diabetes Self-Management Questionnaire (DSMQ) and analyzed with Chi-square tests.
Results:
Diabetic ulcers were identified in 34.5% of participants with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Significant associations were found between poor self-management behaviors and ulcer incidence. Patients who did not regularly monitor their blood glucose levels had a 9.5-fold increased risk of developing diabetic ulcers (χ2 (1) =7.52, p = 0.006). Non-compliance with dietary recommendations was associated with a 13.93-fold increased risk (χ2 (1) = 9.40, p = 0.002), while low physical activity was linked to a 14.57-fold increased risk (χ2 (1) = 9.44, p = 0.002). These findings highlight the critical role of self-management behaviors in preventing diabetic foot ulcers.
Conclusions:
Self-management behaviors strongly influence diabetic ulcer occurrence in T2DM patients. Promoting regular blood glucose monitoring, dietary compliance, and physical activity is essential in ulcer prevention. Future research should assess the long-term impact of educational interventions in broader patient populations to improve diabetes care outcomes.
Keywords: Behavior, foot ulcer, primary prevention, self-management, type 2 diabetes mellitus
Introduction
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) is a chronic metabolic disorder that continues to pose a significant global health challenge. As of 2022, an estimated 150 million people worldwide were living with diabetes, and this number is projected to double by 2025.[1,2] The condition contributes substantially to the burden of non-communicable diseases due to its long-term complications. In Indonesia, the prevalence of diabetes has increased sharply in recent years. For instance, in South Kalimantan, diagnosed cases rose from 29.9% in 2021 to 44.9% in 2025.[3,4] This trend reflects broader national concerns influenced by changes in lifestyle, aging populations, and urbanization.
One of the most severe and costly complications of T2DM is diabetic foot ulceration, which typically results from peripheral neuropathy, impaired circulation, and poor glycemic control.[5,6,7] Diabetic ulcers not only increase the risk of infection and lower limb amputation but also significantly reduce quality of life and escalate healthcare costs. Numerous studies have emphasized that effective self-management behaviors—such as regular blood glucose monitoring, adherence to a diabetes-specific diet, consistent physical activity, and proper foot care—can significantly reduce the risk of such complications.[8,9]
Research utilizing the Diabetes Self-Management Questionnaire (DSMQ) has shown that improved self-care practices are strongly associated with better glycemic control and fewer complications.[10] However, despite this growing body of evidence, limited research has explored the relationship between self-management behaviors and the incidence of diabetic ulcers, particularly among the Indonesian population.
Therefore, this study aims to examine the association between self-management behaviors and the incidence of diabetic ulcers in patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, thereby contributing to improved strategies for diabetes care and complication prevention in Indonesia. Therefore, this study aims to examine the association between self-management behaviors and the incidence of diabetic foot ulcers in patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. This study investigated the relationship between self-management behaviors and the incidence of diabetic ulcers in T2DM patients.
Materials and Methods
This study employed a quantitative cross-sectional analytical design and was conducted at Sari Mulia Hospital in South Kalimantan, Indonesia, from January to February 2024. The study population comprised 432 patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) registered at the hospital. Based on predetermined inclusion criteria, 220 participants were selected using a purposive sampling technique The sample size was calculated using the Lemeshow formula for estimating proportions in cross-sectional studies, ensuring adequate power and precision. Inclusion criteria included: (1) patients clinically diagnosed with T2DM; (2) those who had received diabetes-related education or instructions; (3) individuals with or without diabetic ulcers; and (4) willingness to participate voluntarily. Patients were excluded if they withdrew consent during the data collection process.
Primary data were collected using the Diabetes Self-Management Questionnaire (DSMQ), a validated instrument developed by.[11,12,13] and subsequently adapted for the Indonesian population.[14,15] The DSMQ evaluates four domains of diabetes self-care: glucose management, dietary control, physical activity, and healthcare utilization. It consists of 16 items, scored on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (does not apply to me) to 3 (applies to me very much), with higher scores indicating better self-management behaviors. Face-to-face structured interviews were conducted by trained enumerators to complete the DSMQ with each participant. The study did not implement any educational or behavioral intervention. Instead, it aimed to observe the existing association between self-management behaviors and the incidence of diabetic ulcers. Data regarding the presence or absence of diabetic foot ulcers were extracted from patient medical records and clinical examination notes. Based on this information, participants were categorized into two groups: those with diabetic foot ulcers and those without.
Data were analyzed using Chi-square tests to examine the association between self-management behaviors and the incidence of diabetic ulcers. The DSMQ’s validity and reliability were confirmed in prior studies conducted in Indonesia. Specifically, the instrument demonstrated a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.889, indicating high internal consistency, and a p value > 0.05 in construct validity testing, supporting its applicability in the current population.
To enhance internal validity, potential confounders were considered, including age, gender, duration of diabetes, comorbidities, socioeconomic status, and medication adherence. These variables were accounted for during analysis to isolate the true association between self-management behaviors and diabetic ulcer incidence.
Ethical consideration
The process underwent a review and obtained ethical approval (Number: 1211-KEPK) from the Indonesian Health Research Ethics Commission, overseen by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Banua Institute, Indonesia, on January 19, 2025.
Results
Table 1 summarizes the demographic and health characteristics of participants diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The mean (SD) age of participants was 52.39 (7.39) years, with an age range of 36 to 69 years. The mean (SD) duration of illness was 5.50 (1.98) years, ranging from 3 to 10 years. Most participants (40.45%) had completed junior high school, and males represented 55.45% of the sample. A total of 65% of respondents were engaged in employment. The overall prevalence of diabetic ulcers among the study population was 34.50%.
Table 1.
Demographic characteristics of respondents n=220
| Demographics | n (%) | M (SD) |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 52.39 (7.387) | |
| <30 | 31 (14.10) | |
| 31–45 | 75 (34.10) | |
| 46–55 | 83 (37.70) | |
| >55 | 31 (14.10) | |
| Total | 220 | |
| Duration of illness (years) (range: 3–10 years) | 220 | 5.50 (1.983) |
| Gender | ||
| Man | 122 (55.45) | |
| Woman | 98 (44.55) | |
| Education | ||
| Elementary school | 56 (25.45) | |
| Junior high school | 89 (40.45) | |
| Senior high school | 71 (32.27) | |
| College | 4 (1.83) | |
| Work | ||
| Does not work | 77 (35) | |
| Work | 143 (65) | |
| Incidence of diabetic ulcers | ||
| Diabetic ulcers occur | 76 (34.5) | |
| No diabetic ulcers | 144 (65.5) | |
| Monitoring blood sugar levels | ||
| Not a routine | 71 (32.3) | |
| Routine | 149 (67.7) | |
| Diabetes diet compliance | ||
| Not obey | 72 (36) | |
| Obedient | 148 (74) | |
| Physical activity | ||
| Bad | 98 (44.5) | |
| Good | 122 (55.5) |
Table 2 presents the relationship between self-management behaviors, including blood glucose monitoring, diet compliance, and physical activity, and the incidence of diabetic ulcers among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. This study identified a significant association between non-routine blood glucose monitoring and the incidence of diabetic ulcers (OR = 9.50, p = 0.06). Participants who did not regularly monitor their blood sugar levels had a substantially higher risk of developing diabetic ulcers compared to those who consistently performed routine monitoring. Similarly, poor adherence to a diabetes-specific diet was strongly associated with an increased risk of ulceration (OR = 13.933, p = 0.002). Participants who failed to comply with dietary recommendations exhibited nearly 14 times greater odds of developing diabetic ulcers than those who adhered to prescribed dietary regimens.
Table 2.
Relationship of variables with the incidence of diabetic ulcers n=220
| Variables | The incidence of diabetic ulcers | Total | p | OR (95% CI) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| Ulcers occur | No ulcers | ||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| n | (%) | n | % | n (%) | |||
| Monitoring blood sugar levels | |||||||
| Not a routine | 27 | (10.20) | 47 | 22.1 | 71 (23.30) | 0.006 | 9,500 (2,075–43,502) |
| Routine | 51 | (20.10) | 98 | 47.6 | 149 (67.70) | ||
| Diabetes diet compliance | |||||||
| Not obey | 24 | (13.50) | 48 | 22.5 | 72 (36) | 0.002 | 13,933 (2,778–69,881) |
| Obedient | 52 | (27.70) | 96 | 46.3 | 148 (74) | ||
| Physical activity | |||||||
| Bad | 42 | (21.30) | 56 | 23.2 | 98 (44.5) | 0.002 | 14,571 (2,566–82,732) |
| Good | 34 | (18,10) | 88 | 37.4 | 122 (55.5) | ||
Low levels of physical activity were also significantly linked to the occurrence of diabetic ulcers (OR = 14.57, P = 0.02). Participants categorized as having inadequate physical activity had over 14 times greater odds of developing ulcers than those who engaged in regular, moderate physical exercise. These findings underscore the importance of three interrelated self-management behaviors—routine blood glucose monitoring, dietary compliance, and physical activity—in mitigating the risk of diabetic foot complications in individuals with T2DM.
Further examination of physical activity levels revealed that among the 98 participants with low physical activity, 42 individuals (21.30%) developed diabetic ulcers, while 56 (23.20%) did not. In contrast, of the 122 participants categorized as having adequate physical activity, 34 (18.10%) had ulcers, and 88 (37.40%) did not. The Chi-square analysis confirmed a statistically significant association (p = 0.002), reinforcing that low physical activity levels markedly increase the risk of diabetic ulceration. The corresponding odds ratio (OR = 14.571) indicates that participants with low physical activity were over 14 times more likely to develop diabetic ulcers compared to those who maintained adequate activity levels.
Discussion
The present study demonstrated a diabetic ulcer prevalence of 34.5% among individuals with T2DM, underscoring the continued burden of diabetes-related complications in clinical settings. This finding is consistent with existing literature, which indicates that diabetic foot ulcers remain a significant contributor to morbidity and healthcare costs due to their association with peripheral neuropathy, poor glycemic control, and vascular impairment.
The study identified significant associations between key self-management behaviors—blood glucose monitoring, dietary compliance, and physical activity—and the incidence of diabetic ulcers. Specifically, patients who did not routinely monitor their blood glucose levels exhibited a 9.5-fold increased risk of developing diabetic ulcers (p = 0.006). This association reinforces existing evidence that regular glycemic monitoring is critical for maintaining metabolic stability and preventing microvascular complications.[11,12,13] Routine monitoring enables early detection of abnormal glucose fluctuations, allowing for timely clinical intervention that may mitigate the progression to ulceration.
In addition, non-compliance with dietary recommendations was associated with a 13.9-fold increase in the likelihood of diabetic ulcer development (p = 0.002). This finding supports previous research that emphasizes the role of medical nutrition therapy in achieving glycemic targets. Dietary indiscretions—particularly high intake of refined carbohydrates and saturated fats—are well-established contributors to poor glucose control and systemic inflammation, both of which impair wound healing and increase susceptibility to foot ulcers.[19,20,21]
Physical inactivity was also strongly associated with the occurrence of diabetic ulcers. Participants with inadequate physical activity levels had 14.6 times higher odds of ulcer development compared to their more active counterparts (p = 0.002). This is in alignment with prior studies demonstrating that regular exercise improves insulin sensitivity, enhances peripheral circulation, and reduces the risk of diabetes-related vascular complications.[22,23,24] Structured physical activity is known to support glucose uptake by skeletal muscle, reduce lipid accumulation, and improve endothelial function, all of which are protective against foot ulceration.[25,26,27]
The interrelated nature of these self-management behaviors suggests that an integrated approach to diabetes care is essential. Patients who consistently monitor their glucose, adhere to dietary guidelines, and engage in physical activity are significantly less likely to develop diabetic ulcers. Conversely, failure in any one of these areas may increase vulnerability, even if other aspects of self-care are maintained.[28] These findings underscore the necessity of comprehensive Diabetes Self-Management Education (DSME) programs that holistically address multiple behavioral domains.
Notably, a subset of participants who were non-compliant with certain aspects of diabetes management but engaged in other positive health behaviors (e.g., regular exercise or foot hygiene) did not develop ulcers. This observation suggests the potential for compensatory effects and highlights the need for individualized care strategies that reinforce patients’ strengths while addressing gaps.
Despite the important findings, this study has several limitations. Its cross-sectional design precludes causal inference, and the reliance on self-reported data may introduce recall or social desirability bias. Additionally, while efforts were made to control for potential confounders such as age, gender, and duration of diabetes, residual confounding cannot be entirely excluded.[29,30,31] Future research should employ longitudinal designs and include broader sociodemographic and clinical variables to further elucidate the causal pathways linking self-management practices and diabetic ulcer development. In conclusion, this study reinforces the critical role of blood glucose monitoring, dietary adherence, and physical activity in the prevention of diabetic foot ulcers among patients with T2DM. These findings highlight the need for targeted DSME interventions, routine foot assessments, and multidisciplinary care strategies to reduce the burden of diabetic ulcers and improve overall patient outcomes. Limitations This study has several limitations. First, its cross-sectional design restricts the ability to infer causality between self-management behaviors and the incidence of diabetic ulcers. Although associations were identified, longitudinal or interventional studies are required to establish causal relationships. Second, the reliance on self-reported data through structured interviews may introduce recall bias or social desirability bias, potentially affecting the accuracy of participants’ responses regarding their self-care behaviors. Third, while several potential confounders were considered during analysis (such as age, gender, duration of illness, and comorbidities), residual confounding due to unmeasured variables (e.g., psychological factors, socioeconomic status, access to care) may still exist. Additionally, the study was conducted in a single hospital setting in South Kalimantan, limiting the generalizability of the findings to broader or more diverse populations. Lastly, the DSMQ tool, although previously validated, may not fully capture cultural or contextual nuances in diabetes self-management among Indonesian patients. Future studies should consider multicenter or community-based settings, use longitudinal designs, and incorporate mixed methods approaches to deepen understanding and strengthen evidence on the role of self-management in diabetic ulcer prevention.
This study has several limitations that should be acknowledged. First, its cross-sectional design restricts the ability to infer causality between self-management behaviors and the incidence of diabetic ulcers. Although associations were identified, longitudinal or interventional studies are required to establish causal relationships. Second, the reliance on self-reported data through structured interviews may introduce recall bias or social desirability bias, potentially affecting the accuracy of participants’ responses. Third, although potential confounders such as age, gender, duration of illness, and comorbidities were considered, residual confounding from unmeasured variables (e.g., psychological stress, socioeconomic status, or access to care) may still be present. Fourth, the study was conducted in a single hospital setting in South Kalimantan, which may limit the generalizability of the findings to other populations in Indonesia or internationally. Lastly, the DSMQ tool, while validated, may not fully capture cultural or contextual nuances in diabetes self-management specific to the Indonesian population. Future research should address these limitations by adopting multicenter or community-based longitudinal designs and incorporating mixed methods to provide deeper insight into the dynamics of diabetes self-care and ulcer prevention.
Conclusion
This study identified significant associations between key self-management behaviors and the incidence of diabetic foot ulcers in individuals with T2DM. Specifically, irregular blood glucose monitoring, non-adherence to dietary recommendations, and low levels of physical activity were each independently associated with a markedly increased risk of ulcer development. These findings emphasize the critical role of comprehensive self-management practices in the prevention of diabetic complications, particularly foot ulcers, which are among the most serious and costly outcomes of poorly controlled diabetes. The results underscore the importance of integrating structured DSME into routine clinical care. Interventions should prioritize empowering patients with the knowledge and skills required to maintain glycemic control, adhere to nutritional guidelines, engage in regular physical activity, and perform consistent foot care. Additionally, the development of individualized and culturally appropriate education programs may further enhance patient adherence and health outcomes. Future research should explore the longitudinal effects of DSME interventions and investigate the role of additional factors such as health literacy, social support, and healthcare accessibility in influencing self-care behaviors. Multidisciplinary collaboration and community-based strategies may also be beneficial in promoting sustainable behavior change and reducing the long-term burden of diabetic foot ulcers.
Conflicts of interest
Nothing to declare.
Acknowledgments
Gratitude is extended to Universitas Airlangga in Surabaya and Universitas Lambung Mangkurat in Banjarmasin, as well as the Directorate of Technology Research Republic of Indonesia (DRTPM) for their unwavering support during the course of this study (Project Number: 1798/B/UN3.LPPM/PT.01.03/2025). This research was financially supported by DRTPM under the approved project number. The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this study.
Funding Statement
Nil.
References
- 1.Al-Mawali A, Al-Harrasi A, Pinto AD, Jayapal SK, Morsi M, Al-Shekaili W, et al. Assessment of total cardiovascular risk using WHO/ISH risk prediction chart among adults in Oman: A nationally representative survey. Oman Med J. 2023;38:e501. doi: 10.5001/omj.2023.70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Osborne RH, Elmer S, Hawkins M, Cheng CC, Batterham RW, Dias S, et al. Health literacy development is central to the prevention and control of non-communicable diseases. BMJ Glob Health. 2022;7:e010362. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ningsih E, Negara C, Septiany M, Firdausi R. Effect of virtual reality-based health education on the prevention of gestational diabetes mellitus in pregnant women in the first trimester. Health Educ Health Promot. 2025;13:89–94. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mahumud RA, Sahle BW, Owusu-Addo E, Chen W, Morton RL, Renzaho AMN. Association of dietary intake, physical activity, and sedentary behaviours with overweight and obesity among 282,213 adolescents in 89 low and middle income to high-income countries. Int J Obes (Lond) 2021;45:2404–18. doi: 10.1038/s41366-021-00908-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Al-Jawaldeh A, Abbass MMS. Unhealthy dietary habits and obesity: The major risk factors beyond non-communicable diseases in the eastern mediterranean region. Front Nutr. 2022;9:817808. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.817808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yu M, Zhan X, Yang Z, Huang Y. Measuring the global, regional, and national burden of type 2 diabetes and the attributable risk factors in all 194 countries. J Diabetes. 2021;13:613–39. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.13159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sivaprasad S. Epidemiological study on complications of diabetes and its treatment options. Asian J Pharm Technol. 2022;12:38–40. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tuglo LS, Nyande FK, Agordoh PD, Nartey EB, Pan Z, Logosu L, et al. Knowledge and practice of diabetic foot care and the prevalence of diabetic foot ulcers among diabetic patients of selected hospitals in the Volta Region, Ghana. Int Wound J. 2022;19:601–14. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chen P, Vilorio NC, Dhatariya K, Jeffcoate W, Lobmann R, McIntosh C, et al. Effectiveness of interventions to enhance healing of chronic foot ulcers in diabetes: A systematic review. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2024;40:e3786. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Armstrong DG, Tan TW, Boulton AJM, Bus SA. Diabetic foot ulcers. JAMA. 2023;330:62–75. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.10578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Negara CK, Sukartini T, Dewi YS, Nursalam, Pertiwiwati E, Chrismilasari LA, et al. Correlation of blood glucose levels with profiles hematology on patient diabetes mellitus with ulcer diabetes. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2025;30:373–8. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_294_23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Edmonds M, Manu C, Vas P. The current burden of diabetic foot disease. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021;17:88–93. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.01.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ntontis E, Drury J, Amlôt R, Rubin GJ, Williams R. Emergent social identities in a flood: Implications for community psychosocial resilience. J Community Appl Soc Psychol. 2018;28:3–14. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Negara C, Sukartini T, Dewi Y, Nursalam N, Yunara Y. Effect of Animaker and augmented reality on knowledge, attitude, and behavior toward non-ulcer foot care in patients with type 2 diabetes. Health Educ Health Promot. 2024;12:399–405. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rewa NE, Lea AI, Febriyanti E. Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi dukungan keluarga terhadap motivasi berobat penderita kusta di wilayah kerja puskesmas se-kota kupang. CHMK Appl Sci J. 2021;4:1–19. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Miller MJ, Mealer ML, Cook PF, So N, Morris MA, Christiansen CL. Qualitative analysis of resilience characteristics of people with unilateral transtibial amputation. Disabil Health J. 2020;13:100925. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2020.100925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jamini T, Negara CK, Herawati H. The effect of supportive education system (SES) on knowledge of diabetic foot ulcer prevention among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Health Educ Health Promot. 2025;13:1001–9. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yunir E, Tahapary DL, Tarigan TJE, Harbuwono DS, Oktavianda YD, Kristanti M, et al. Non-vascular contributing factors of diabetic foot ulcer severity in national referral hospital of Indonesia. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2021;20:805–13. doi: 10.1007/s40200-021-00827-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Raghav SS, Kumar B, Sethiya NK, Lal DK. Diabetic foot ulcer management and treatment: An overview of published patents. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2024;20:e120623217906. doi: 10.2174/1573399820666230612161846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Jais S. Various types of wounds that diabetic patients can develop: A narrative review. Clin Pathol. 2023;16:2632010X231205366. doi: 10.1177/2632010X231205366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Dritsas E, Alexiou S, Konstantoulas I, Moustakas K. Short-term glucose prediction based on oral glucose tolerance test values. Proceedings of the 15th International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies. SCITEPRESS-Science and Technology Publications. 2022:249–55. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Khalili D, Khayamzadeh M, Kohansal K, Ahanchi NS, Hasheminia M, Hadaegh F, et al. Are HOMA-IR and HOMA-B good predictors for diabetes and pre-diabetes subtypes? BMC Endocr Disord. 2023;23:39. doi: 10.1186/s12902-023-01291-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hashemi Moghanjoughi P, Neshat S, Rezaei A, Heshmat-Ghahdarijani K. Is the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio an exceptional indicator for metabolic syndrome disease and outcomes? Endocr Pract. 2022;28:342–8. doi: 10.1016/j.eprac.2021.11.083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ramírez-Manent JI, Jover AM, Martinez CS, Tomás-Gil P, Martí-Lliteras P, López-González ÁA. Waist circumference is an essential factor in predicting insulin resistance and early detection of metabolic syndrome in adults. Nutrients. 2023;15:257. doi: 10.3390/nu15020257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Negara CK, Sukartini T, Dewi YS, Nursalam N, Yunara Y. Animaker and augmented reality (AR) media for foot care education on behavior to avoid ulcer complications in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Health Educ Health Promot. 2024;12:399–405. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Magkos F, Reeds DN, Mittendorfer B. Evolution of the diagnostic value of “the sugar of the blood”: Hitting the sweet spot to identify alterations in glucose dynamics. Physiol Rev. 2023;103:7–30. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00015.2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lubowiecki-Vikuk A, Dąbrowska A, Machnik A. Responsible consumer and lifestyle: Sustainability insights. Sustain Prod Consum. 2021;25:91–101. doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2020.08.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Khalid S. Association of unhealthy food practices with nutritional status of adolescents. Biomed J Sci Tech Res. 2021;33:25766–78. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Negara C, Sukartini T, Setiya D, Nursalam N. Effectiveness of diabetes self-management education on non-ulcer diabetic foot incidents. Health Educ Health Promot. 2024;12:53–8. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ahmad E, Sargeant JA, Yates T, Webb DR, Davies MJ. Type 2 diabetes and impaired physical function: A growing problem. Diabetology. 2022;3:30–45. [Google Scholar]
- 31.American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. 8. Obesity and weight management for the prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes: Standards of medical care in diabetes-2022. Diabetes Care. 2022 Jan 1;45(Suppl 1):S113–S124. doi: 10.2337/dc22-S008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
