Abstract
The authors report the results of a symposium on improving the standards of care for patients with cancer pain. The symposium was sponsored by the Advisory Committee on Cancer Control of the National Cancer Institute of Canada and was held Apr. 8 to 10, 1994, in Toronto. Participants included experts on control of cancer pain and on diffusion techniques, patients with cancer and representatives of regulatory agencies. They suggested the following strategies to improve outcomes in patients with cancer pain. Processes for accreditation of health care institutions should require documentation of cancer pain, its treatment and its outcome. Tertiary care facilities that provide cancer treatment should have expert, subspecialty, multidisciplinary programs for pain control and should provide adequate psychosocial support to patients suffering cancer pain. The Canadian Cancer Society should conduct a public-education campaign to encourage patients to report pain to health care providers. The National Cancer Institute of Canada should foster research on cancer pain by restructuring its process for review of pain-research protocols. Examinations for professionals who care for patients with cancer should include a defined number of questions concerning pain and symptom control. Provincial programs to monitor prescribing through the use of triplicate prescription pads should have an educational as well as regulatory purpose.
Full text
PDFSelected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Austoker J. Cancer prevention in primary care. Screening for cervical cancer. BMJ. 1994 Jul 23;309(6949):241–248. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6949.241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bruera E., Brenneis C., MacDonald R. N. Continuous Sc infusion of narcotics for the treatment of cancer pain: an update. Cancer Treat Rep. 1987 Oct;71(10):953–958. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bruera E., Kuehn N., Miller M. J., Selmser P., Macmillan K. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): a simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients. J Palliat Care. 1991 Summer;7(2):6–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cleeland C. S., Gonin R., Hatfield A. K., Edmonson J. H., Blum R. H., Stewart J. A., Pandya K. J. Pain and its treatment in outpatients with metastatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 1994 Mar 3;330(9):592–596. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199403033300902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Faries J. E., Mills D. S., Goldsmith K. W., Phillips K. D., Orr J. Systematic pain records and their impact on pain control. A pilot study. Cancer Nurs. 1991 Dec;14(6):306–313. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ferrell B. R. The challenge for leadership in the national agenda for relief of cancer pain. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Jul 7;85(13):1034–1037. doi: 10.1093/jnci/85.13.1034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grond S., Zech D., Schug S. A., Lynch J., Lehmann K. A. Validation of World Health Organization guidelines for cancer pain relief during the last days and hours of life. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1991 Oct;6(7):411–422. doi: 10.1016/0885-3924(91)90039-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hazzard W. R. Dyslipoproteinemia in the elderly. Should it be treated? Clin Geriatr Med. 1992 Feb;8(1):89–102. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jacox A., Carr D. B., Payne R. New clinical-practice guidelines for the management of pain in patients with cancer. N Engl J Med. 1994 Mar 3;330(9):651–655. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199403033300926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MacDonald N. Research--a neglected area of palliative care. J Palliat Care. 1992 Spring;8(1):54–58. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MacKillop H. I. Effects of seatbelt legislation and reduction of highway speed limits in Ontario. Can Med Assoc J. 1978 Nov 18;119(10):1154–1158. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McMillan S. C., Williams F. A., Chatfield R., Camp L. D. A validity and reliability study of two tools for assessing and managing cancer pain. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1988 Nov-Dec;15(6):735–741. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moore M. K. Dying at home: a way of maintaining control for the person with ALS/MND. Palliat Med. 1993;7(4 Suppl):65–68. doi: 10.1177/0269216393007004S10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moulin D. E., Johnson N. G., Murray-Parsons N., Geoghegan M. F., Goodwin V. A., Chester M. A. Subcutaneous narcotic infusions for cancer pain: treatment outcome and guidelines for use. CMAJ. 1992 Mar 15;146(6):891–897. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stjernswärd J., Teoh N. Current status of the Global Cancer Control Program of the World Health Organization. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1993 Aug;8(6):340–347. doi: 10.1016/0885-3924(93)90050-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ventafridda V., Tamburini M., Caraceni A., De Conno F., Naldi F. A validation study of the WHO method for cancer pain relief. Cancer. 1987 Feb 15;59(4):850–856. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19870215)59:4<850::aid-cncr2820590432>3.0.co;2-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ward S. E., Goldberg N., Miller-McCauley V., Mueller C., Nolan A., Pawlik-Plank D., Robbins A., Stormoen D., Weissman D. E. Patient-related barriers to management of cancer pain. Pain. 1993 Mar;52(3):319–324. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(93)90165-L. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]