Skip to main content
IMA Fungus logoLink to IMA Fungus
. 2026 Jul 10;17:e182174. doi: 10.3897/imafungus.17.182174

Unveiling the diversity of the families Cyphellaceae and Mycenaceae from Southeast Asia

Long Fei Fan 1,✉, Arooj Naseer 2,✉, Ammara Khalid 2, Abdul Nasir Khalid 2, Yan Deng 1, Chen Yan Wang 1, Yuan Wang 1, Si Xuan Ma 1
PMCID: PMC13379713  PMID: 42471995

Abstract

Nine new species of the families Cyphellaceae and Mycenaceae are described from Asia, China, and Pakistan on the basis of detailed morphological and molecular investigations. Seven species belong to the genus Mycena (M. albomarginata, M. oblongispora, M. lavendula, M. longnanensis, M. minispora, M. pakistanica, and M. tephroleuca), and one species each belongs to Atheniella and Phloeomana. These Mycena species belong to three sections. Five Mycena species, i.e., M. lavendula, M. longnanensis, M. minispora, M. pakistanica, and M. tephroleuca, have been assigned to Mycena sect. Calodontes, while one species (M. albomarginata) belongs to Mycena sect. Mycena and one (M. oblongispora) to Mycena sect. Fragilipedes. All of the new species are supported by phylogenetic analyses based on the nuclear internal transcribed spacer (ITS) of nuclear ribosomal DNA and translation elongation factor 1-alpha (tef1-α).

Key words: Diversity, mycenoid fungi, systematics

Introduction

The family Mycenaceae Overeem consists of small, fragile, white-spored saprotrophic fungi that are widely distributed worldwide across a variety of ecological communities. Mycena (Pers.) Roussel (Mycenaceae, Agaricales, Basidiomycota) is a large, widely distributed genus comprising approximately 1,312 species (He et al. 2019; Kalichman et al. 2020; Zhang et al. 2024; Aronsen 2025). It is characterized by fragile, small basidiomata, a thin, convex pileus with a sulcate margin, non-deliquescent lamellae, and a hollow stipe (Persoon 1797). Species of Mycena play important roles in ecosystems; they include edible and saprotrophic taxa; form symbiotic associations with Orchidaceae seeds (as orchidoid mycorrhizae) that enhance germination (Lee et al. 2017; Liu et al. 2025); function as decomposers (Guerreiro et al. 2023); help promote nutrient cycling, forest metabolism, and natural renewal; include bioluminescent taxa (Cortés-Pérez et al. 2019, 2023; Lu et al. 2024); and represent promising sources of bioactive secondary metabolites (Jaeger and Spiteller 2010).

The genus Mycena has been divided into multiple clades based on multilocus phylogenetic analyses using internal transcribed spacer (ITS), nuclear large subunit (nLSU), and small subunit (SSU) markers and into 23 sections according to their morphological features (Na et al. 2022; Cortés-Pérez et al. 2023). The taxa described during this study cluster into three Mycena sections: Mycena sect. Fragilipedes (Fr.) Quél. (M. oblongispora), Mycena sect. Calodontes (Fr. ex Berk.) Quél. (M. lavendula, M. longnanensis, M. minispora, M. pakistanica, and M. tephroleuca) and Mycena sect. Mycena (Pers.) Roussel (M. albomarginata).

Mycena sect. Calodontes is characterized by a pinkish, reddish, purplish to brownish, and mostly hygrophanous pileus, interveined lamellae, smooth cheilocystidia and pleurocystidia (when present), and mostly amyloid spores (Fries 1821; Berkeley 1836; Maas Geesteranus 1992a, 1992b; Harder et al. 2010). In contrast, Mycena sect. Fragilipedes, the largest section, is distinguished by its grayish-brown to dark brown pileus, along with smooth cystidia and a pileipellis typically covered with excrescences, as well as amyloid basidiospores. On the other hand, Mycena sect. Mycena is characterized by its relatively large and robust basidiomata, a typically grayish to brownish pileus with a lubricous or viscid surface, and a rigid, often rooting stipe. Microscopically, it is distinguished by having cheilocystidia that are often covered with short or long, simple to branched excrescences, which are characteristic of this section (Maas Geesteranus 1985, 1992a; Aronsen and Læssøe 2016).

The genus Mycena has been recognized as highly polyphyletic (Moncalvo et al. 2002; Aronsen and Læssøe 2016). In recent years, several new genera have been proposed to accommodate non-amyloid species formerly placed within Mycena, such as Atheniella Redhead, Moncalvo, Vilgalys, Desjardin & B.A. Perry, Phloeomana Redhead (Redhead 2012, 2013), Pruinomycena Kun L. Yang, Jia Y. Lin & Zhu L. Yang (Yang et al. 2025), and amyloid species such as Chrysomycena Vizzini, Picillo, Perrone & Dovana (Vizzini et al. 2019; Villarreal et al. 2021).

Recent phylogenetic studies have placed these fungal taxa across several independent evolutionary lineages (the “hydropoid fungi”) within the families Porotheleaceae Murrill and Cyphellaceae Lotsy (Eberhardt et al. 2018). These families belong to the suborder Marasmiineae Aime, Dentinger & Gaya, as circumscribed on a phylogenomic basis by Dentinger et al. (2016), a grouping that corresponds to the Marasmioid clade sensuMatheny et al. (2006) and Binder et al. (2010).

The family Cyphellaceae, typified by Cyphella Fr., is a small monophyletic family comprising a heterogeneous assemblage of lignicolous fungi with diverse macromorphology, including agaricoid, cyphelloid, clavarioid/typhuloid, pleurotoid, corticioid, or stereoid basidiomata. Among these, the agaricoid–mycenoid forms are represented by six genera: Atheniella, Hemimycena, Mycenella, Mycopan, Phloeomana, and Pleurella. In the present study, two new species belonging to the genera Atheniella and Phloeomana are described.

The genus Atheniella, typified by Atheniella adonis (Bull.) Redhead, Moncalvo, Vilgalys, Desjardin & B.A. Perry, is characterized by its brightly colored pileus, inamyloid tissues, and pileipellis covered with simple to branched excrescences. It is a recently introduced genus that was elevated from Mycena sect. Adonideae (Fr.) Quél. (Redhead 2012). It shares characteristics with Mycena, such as small basidiomata, white lamellae, a hollow stipe, and a saprotrophic habit on rotten wood or plant debris. However, Atheniella is differentiated from Mycena by a brightly colored pileus (e.g., yellow, orange, pink, or red) and all tissues unreactive in Melzer’s reagent (Redhead 2012).

The genus Phloeomana Redhead, typified by Phloeomana speirea (Fr.) Redhead, is characterized by its mycenoid basidiomata, non-amyloid basidiospores, and pileipellis hyphae with branched excrescences. Previously, Phloeomana was placed in the family Porotheleaceae (order Agaricales), formally proposed by Murrill (1916), which comprises saprotrophic, mainly wood-decaying fungi that are primarily agarics but also include cyphelloid fungi. Recently, however, the genus has been reassigned to the family Cyphellaceae (Eberhardt et al. 2018).

During various field surveys to collect fungal fruiting bodies for different research projects, researchers in China and Pakistan obtained several collections. Some taxa, morphologically similar to Mycena and allied species, were separated and analyzed both morphologically and through DNA sequencing (ITS and tef1-α regions). Several collections were found to have unique morphological characteristics. Phylogenetic tree reconstruction indicated that these collections are new species, clearly distinguished from closely related known species in Atheniella, Mycena, and Phloeomana, and are presented here as new species.

Materials and methods

Sampling and morphological observations

Basidiomata were collected and photographed in the field, and key morphological features—such as size, shape, and color—were noted fresh. Color codes were recorded using Munsell color charts (Munsell Color 1975). Basidiomata were dried with hot air and preserved in zip-lock bags. Micromorphological features were noted using an MX4300H microscope by mounting sections of various tissues in 5% KOH, Phloxine B (C20H2Br4Cl4Na2O5), and Melzer’s reagent. Photographs and measurements were obtained using calibrated Motic Images Plus 2.0 software. The abbreviation (n/m/p) refers to the number of basidiospores measured (n), the number of basidiomata (m), and the number of collections examined (p). Basidiospore dimensions are presented as (a) b–c (d), where (a) and (d) represent the extreme minimum and maximum values, and the range b–c includes at least 90% of all measured spores. Q denotes the length-to-width (L/W) ratio of individual spores, and av. Q represents the average Q value across all measured spores. Hyphal measurements are provided as ranges.

Molecular phylogenetic study

For molecular analysis, genomic DNA was extracted using the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method (Bruns and Grunert 1995). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of the ITS region was carried out using primer pairs ITS1F or ITS5 with ITS4 (White et al. 1990), following the thermal cycling conditions described by Gardes and Bruns (1993). For the tef1-α gene region, primer pairs 983F/1567R were used. The PCR products were purified and sequenced, and consensus sequences were assembled. The resulting sequences were queried using BLAST at NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) to assess sequence homology, and closely related ITS and tef1-α sequences were downloaded. A combined ITS + tef1-α dataset was constructed to confirm the phylogenetic relationships of the new species. Additional sequences from published literature were incorporated to maximize taxon sampling and improve nucleotide-level comparisons. Xeromphalina campanella (Batsch) Kühner & Maire was chosen as the outgroup for rooting the phylogenetic tree (Na et al. 2022). All sequences were aligned separately using the MUSCLE algorithm available through the EMBL-EBI web platform (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/). Details of all sequences included in this study are shown in Table 1. The best-fit evolutionary model for the combined ITS + tef1-α dataset was determined using MrModeltest 2.3 (Nylander 2004).

Table 1.

Specimens included in molecular phylogenetic analyses and their corresponding GenBank accession numbers.

Species Sample No. Locality GenBank Accession No. References
ITS Tef-1α
Atheniella adonis HMJAU 43213 China MK309771 – Ge et al. 2021
A. adonis HMJAU 43193 China MK309770 – Ge et al. 2021
A. amabillissima AFTOL–ID 1686 USA DQ490644 Matheny et al. 2006
A. amabillissima BD–2020a FINLAND MW540733 Ge et al. 2021
A. aurantiidisca AFTOL-ID 1685 USA DQ490646 – Ge et al. 2021
A. aurantiidisca PBM1282 USA – GU187728 Binder et al. 2010
A. flavida FFAAS0350 China MW969653 Ge et al. 2021
A. flavida FFAAS0355 China MW969654 Ge et al. 2021
A. flavoalba CBS:258.53 Netherlands MH857185 – Ge et al. 2021
A. flavoalba CBS:359.50 Netherlands MH856659 – Ge et al. 2021
A. rutila FFAAS0354 China MW969658 – Ge et al. 2021
A. rutila FFAAS0356 China MW969659 Ge et al. 2021
A. taoyao FFAAS0352 China MW969656 – Ge et al. 2021
A. taoyao FFAAS0353 China MW969657 – Ge et al. 2021
Leucoinocybe auricoma HKAS126433 China OQ025169 – Antonín et al. 2019
L. auricoma AFTOL-ID 1341 USA DQ490647 – Antonín et al. 2019
M. “amygdalina” HMJAU 43700 China MT497545 – Na and Bau 2020
M. “amygdalina” HMJAU 43700R China MT497544 – Na and Bau 2020
M. acicula AH56040 Spain OQ633209 – Unpublished
M. acicula H6036823 Hungary MW540677 – Unpublished
M. aff. pura TL8052 Ecuador FN394623 KF723641 Fan et al. 2024
M. aff. pura TL9433 Ecuador FN394622 KF723642 Fan et al. 2024
M. aff. pura TL9450 Ecuador KJ144653 KF723643 Fan et al. 2024
M. aff. pura TL9678 Ecuador FN394621 KF723644 Fan et al. 2024
M. algeriensis HKAS 134295 China PV706731 – Lu et al. 2025
M. alnetorum AH57250 Spain PP868141 – Villarreal et al. 2024
M. alphitophora NX0491 China MH136830 – Na and Bau 2019
M. alphitophora NX0679 China MH136831 – Na and Bau 2019
M. brunneoviolacea BAP594 Africa MH414546 – Fan et al. 2024
M. cahaya ACL134 Malaysia KF537248 – Fan et al. 2024
M. cf. pura I CBH039 Denmark FN394588 KF723634 Fan et al. 2024
M. cf. pura II CBH105 Denmark FN394581 KF723625 Fan et al. 2024
M. cf. pura II CBH366 Denmark FN394572 KF723627 Fan et al. 2024
M. cf. pura III CBH019 Denmark FN394605 KF723629 Fan et al. 2024
M. cf. pura III CBH022 Denmark FN394574 KF723630 Fan et al. 2024
M. cf. pura IV CBH410 Denmark FN394595 KF723621 Fan et al. 2024
M. cf. pura IV JV06979 Denmark FN394585 KF723622 Fan et al. 2024
M. cf. pura IX CBH166 Denmark FN394607 KF723655 Fan et al. 2024
M. cf. pura IX CBH358 Denmark FN394608 KF723656 Fan et al. 2024
M. cf. pura V CBH226 Denmark FN394604 KF723618 Fan et al. 2024
M. cf. pura V TL5614 Denmark FN394602 KF723620 Fan et al. 2024
M. cf. pura VI BAP132 USA FN394561 KF723614 Fan et al. 2024
M. cf. pura VII IS10/11/2000 USA FN394611 – Fan et al. 2024
M. cf. pura VIII CBH216 Denmark FN394598 KF723616 Fan et al. 2024
M. cf. pura VIII CBH402 Denmark FN394599 KF723617 Fan et al. 2024
M. cf. pura X BAP165A USA FN394563 KF723652 Fan et al. 2024
M. cf. pura XI CBH187 Sweden FN394564 KF723632 Fan et al. 2024
M. cf. pura XI CBH386 Denmark – KF723633 Fan et al. 2024
M. clavicularis HMJAU43611 China ON791480 – Wei et al. 2024
M. clavicularis HMJAU43616 China ON791479 – Unpublished
M. diosma CBH400 Denmark FN394617 KF723653 Fan et al. 2024
M. diosma LK1191/2000 Germany FN394619 KF723654 Fan et al. 2024
M. dura 10315 Austria FN394560 KF723648 Fan et al. 2024
M. epipterygia olrim523 Sweden AY805613 – Unpublished
M. epipterygia JB13 Sweden GU234008 – Unpublished
M. filopes HMJAU43445 China MH396634 – Unpublished
M. filopes HMJAU43562 China MH396635 – Zhang et al. 2024
M. flos-nivium CBS:260.53 Netherlands MH857186 – Corriol and Jargeat 2023
M. flos-nivium CBS:364.50 Netherlands MH856661 – Vu et al. 2019
M. glabra FLF449 China PP949212 PP967101 Fan et al. 2024
M. glabra WBY449 China PP949213 PP967102 Fan et al. 2024
M. griseotincta HMJAU43805 China MK309782 – Na and Bau 2019
M. griseotincta HMJAU43800 China MK309783 – Na and Bau 2019
M. haematopus 420526MF0200 China MH142012 – Unpublished
M. haematopus 420526MF0193 China MH142010 – Unpublished
M. heteracantha HMJAU 43711 China MK309786 – Na and Bau 2019
M. heteracantha HMJAU 43709 China MK309785 – Na and Bau 2019
M. hyalinostipitata NX0686 China MH136828 – Na and Bau 2019
M. hyalinostipitata NX0694 China MH136829 – Na and Bau 2019
M. hygrophoroides HMJAU43417 China MK309780 – Na and Bau 2019
M. hygrophoroides HMJAU43421 China MK309781 – Na and Bau 2019
M. interrupta HMJAU43791 China MK733300 – Wei et al. 2024
M. interrupta HMJAU43849 China MK733301 – Wei et al. 2024
M. laevigata HMJAU43604 China MK733303 – Wei et al. 2024
M. laevigata HMJAU43187 China MK733302 – Wei et al. 2024
M. lammiensis TUR165927 Finland FN394552 KF723651 Fan et al. 2024
M. laurisilvae AH56022 Spain OP382886 Ge et al. 2021
M. laurisilvae AH56029 Spain OP382887 Ge et al. 2021
M. laurisilvae AH56030 Spain OP382888 Ge et al. 2021
M. lavendula FLF1785 China PX612289 PX684295 This study
M. lavendula MSX1785 China PX612290 PX684296 This study
M. leaiana HKAS79900 China ON791476 – Xiao et al. 2025
M. leaiana HKAS126400 China OQ025147 – Xiao et al. 2025
M. longnanensis FLF1804 China PX612291 PX684297 This study
M. longnanensis MSX1804 China PX612292 PX684298 This study
M. luceata ACP2116 Mexico OR233614 OR233755 Fan et al. 2024
M. luceata ACP2126 Mexico OR233613 OR233754 Fan et al. 2024
M. luciferina ACP2114 Mexico OR233612 – Fan et al. 2024
M. lucisnieblae ACP2140 Mexico OR233610 OR233752 Fan et al. 2024
M. lucisnieblae ACP2139 Mexico OR233611 OR233753 Fan et al. 2024
M. luxmanantlan ACP2160 Mexico OR233603 OR233747 Fan et al. 2024
M. luxmanantlan ACP2159 Mexico OR233604 OR233748 Fan et al. 2024
M. maculata HMJAU 43111 China MK309792 – Xiao et al. 2025
M. maculata HMJAU 43009 China MK309791 – Xiao et al. 2025
M. metata HMJAU43625 China MH396636 – Xiao et al. 2025
M. metata HMJAU43680 China MH396637 – Unpublished
M. minispora FLF1223 China PX612293 – This study
M. minispora FLF1244 China PX612294 PX684299 This study
M. miscanthi HMJAU43573 China MK309777 – Na and Bau 2019
M. miscanthi HMJAU43582 China MK309778 – Na and Bau 2019
M. oblongispora FLF1861 China PX612295 PX684300 This study
M. oblongispora MSX1861 China PX612296 PX684301 This study
M. pakistanica KB16 Pakistan PX612297 – This study
M. pearsoniana CBH068 Germany FN394614 KF723645 Fan et al. 2024
M. pearsoniana LK880/2002 Germany FN394613 KF723647 Fan et al. 2024
M. pelianthina CBH015 Denmark FN394549 KF723649 Fan et al. 2024
M. pelianthina CBH016 Denmark FN394547 KF723650 Fan et al. 2024
M. picta iNat64022635 USA OP345850 – Xiao et al. 2025
M. picta TUR194167 Hungary MW540717 – Xiao et al. 2025
M. pluteoides HMJAU43765 China MK733306 – Xiao et al. 2025
M. pluteoides HMJAU43771 China MK733307 – Xiao et al. 2025
M. polycystidiata FFAAS0417 China ON427731 ON468469 Fan et al. 2024
M. polycystidiata FFAAS0418 China ON427732 ON468470 Fan et al. 2024
M. polygramma H6039079 Hungary MW540711 – Unpublished
M. polygramma H6039058 Hungary MW540703 – Unpublished
M. polyspora FLF744 China PX612298 PX684302 This study
M. polyspora MSX744 China PX612299 PX684303 This study
M. purpureofusca oka284 Turkey ON707205 – Kaygusuz 2022
M. purpureofusca oka283 Turkey ON707204 – Kaygusuz 2022
M. qilianensis FLF1269 China PX612300 PX684304 This study
M. qilianensis FLF1582 China PX612301 – This study
M. rosea CBH097 Denmark FN394556 KF723635 Fan et al. 2024
M. rosea CBH409 Denmark FN394551 KF723637 Fan et al. 2024
M. rufobrunnea FFAAS0415 China ON427729 ON468467 Fan et al. 2024
M. rufobrunnea FFAAS0416 China ON427730 ON468468 Fan et al. 2024
M. sanguinolenta CBHHK098 Norway MT153147 – Thoen et al. 2020
M. sanguinolenta ASIS21424 Korea KF668294 – Unpublished
M. seminau ACL136 Malaysia KF537250 – Fan et al. 2024
M. seminau ACL308 Malaysia KF537252 – Fan et al. 2024
M. semivestipes HMJAU43825 China MK733308 – Wei et al. 2024
M. semivestipes HMJAU43830 China MK733309 – Wei et al. 2024
M. shengshanensis FFAAS0424 China ON427739 ON468477 Fan et al. 2024
M. shengshanensis FFAAS0425 China ON427740 ON468478 Fan et al. 2024
M. silvae-nigrae 515 USA JF908452 Ge et al. 2021
M. silvae-nigrae CC13-12 USA KF359604 Ge et al. 2021
M. sinar ACL092 Malaysia KF537247 – Fan et al. 2024
M. sinar ACL135 Malaysia KF537249 – Fan et al. 2024
M. sinar ACL307 Malaysia KF537251 – Fan et al. 2024
M. sophiae ACP2157 Mexico OR233606 OR233749 Fan et al. 2024
M. sophiae ACP2161 Mexico OR233605 OR233757 Fan et al. 2024
M. squamulosa FLF1971 China PX612302 PX684305 This study
M. squamulosa MSX1971 China PX612303 PX684306 This study
M. stipata AH57256 Spain PP868150 Unpublished
M. strobilinoidea NX0647 China MG654743 – Zhang et al. 2024
M. strobilinoidea NX0648 China MG654744 – Zhang et al. 2024
M. stylobates JS1511302 China MH400929 – Sandoval et al. 2025
M. stylobates JS151130 China MH400928 – Sandoval et al. 2025
M. subfloridula FLF1713 China PX612304 PX684307 This study
M. subfloridula MSX1713 China PX612305 PX684308 This study
M. substylobates NX0574 China MH216190 – Na and Bau 2019
M. substylobates NX0571 China MH216189 – Na and Bau 2019
M. subulata FFAAS0419 China ON427735 ON468473 Fan et al. 2024
M. subulata FFAAS0423 China ON427737 ON468475 Fan et al. 2024
M. tenerrima HMJAU43646 China MK309795 – Na and Bau 2019
M. tenerrima HMJAU43816 China MK309796 – Na and Bau 2019
M. tephroleuca FLF1816 China PX612306 PX684309 This study
M. tephroleuca MSX1816 China PX612307 PX684310 This study
M. yuezhuoi FFAAS0344 China MW581490 MW882249 Fan et al. 2024
M. yuezhuoi FFAAS0347 China MW581493 MW882252 Fan et al. 2024
M. zephirus HMJAU 43106 China MT497550 – Na and Bau 2020
M. zephirus KA13-1265 Korea KR673722 – Na and Bau 2020
P. speirea PRM:922296 Czech LT671445 – Na and Bau 2020
P. speirea PRM 860810 Czech LT671446 Na and Bau 2020
Xeromphalina campanella TFB7283A Sweden KM024575 – Na et al. 2022
Xeromphalina campanella TFB14487 Czech KP835678 – Na et al. 2022

Phylogenetic analyses using maximum likelihood (ML), maximum parsimony (MP), and Bayesian inference (BI) were conducted through the CIPRES Science Gateway v. 3.3 (Miller et al. 2012). ML analyses were performed with RAxML-HPC BlackBox 8.2.6, MP analyses with PAUP on XSEDE (v. 4.a165), and BI analyses with MrBayes on XSEDE 3.2.6. All characters were equally weighted, and gaps were treated as missing data. Tree searches employed heuristic methods with tree bisection and reconnection (TBR) branch swapping and 1,000 random sequence additions. For Bayesian analyses, four Markov chains were run in two independent runs, starting from random trees, for 2 million generations. Trees were sampled every 100 generations, and runs were continued until the average standard deviation of split frequencies fell below 0.01. Phylogenetic trees were visualized in FigTree v. 1.4.2 (Rambaut 2012) and further edited in Adobe Illustrator CS6 (Guide 2012). Branches receiving bootstrap support ≥50% in MP (BP) and ML (BS) analyses, and Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP) ≥0.90, were considered significantly supported. The MP, ML, and BI analyses produced largely congruent topologies; therefore, only the ML tree is presented (Fig. 1), with support values shown in the order BP/BS/BPP. The final concatenated ITS + tef1-α alignments were deposited in TreeBase (https://treebase.org/treebase-web/home.html, submission ID XXXX), and the taxonomic novelties were registered in MycoBank (http://www.MycoBank.org).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Phylogenetic consensus tree inferred from the ML analysis based on the concatenated ITS and tef1-α dataset. The tree is rooted with Xeromphalina campanella. Studied genera are indicated in different colors, and sequences generated in this study are highlighted in bold.

Results

Molecular phylogenetic analyses

The ITS + tef1-α dataset involved in the phylogenetic analysis comprised 152 taxa, including 140 taxa of Mycena, eight taxa of Atheniella, and two taxa of Phloeomana. The aligned matrix contained 1,474 characters, including gaps, of which 537 characters were constant, 35 were variable but parsimony-uninformative, and 902 were parsimony-informative. MP analysis yielded 11 equally parsimonious trees (TL = 3,779, CI = 0.439, RI = 0.812, RC = 0.356, HI = 0.561). The best-fit substitution model selected for the ITS + tef1-α dataset and applied in the BI analysis was GTR + I + G. BI and ML analyses generated topologies similar to the MP analysis, with an average standard deviation of split frequencies of 0.009845 (BI). The best ML tree, including BP, BS, and BPP support values, is shown in Fig. 1. The resulting phylogeny shows that the 10 newly described species each form distinct, well-supported lineages separated from Atheniella, Mycena, and Phloeomana (Fig. 1).

Taxonomy

1. Atheniella parvispora

S. X. Ma, A. Naseer, A. N. Khalid & L. F. Fan sp. nov.

9FB85940-DD08-53AF-AB1D-D0DD3B2B48C7

860938

Figs 2, 3

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Morphological features of Atheniella parvispora, sp. nov., showing the pileus and stipe. Scale bar: 1 cm.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Anatomical characters of Atheniella parvispora, sp. nov. A Basidiospores, B probasidia, C basidia, D cheilocystidia, E hyphae of the pileipellis, F hymenium. Scale bar: 10 μm.

Etymology.

The specific epithet “parvispora” refers to small size of basidiospores.

Diagnosis.

The species is characterized by papillate, umbilicate, orangish yellow pileus with off white margins, lacrymoid, ovoid to subcylindrical, small basidiospores (6.71 × 3.70 µm) and abundant fusiform cheilocystidia.

Holotype.

CHINA, Gansu Province, Gannan Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, Lintan County, Lianhuashan National Forest Park, 34°57'N, 103°30'E, on broad-leaved forests land, 2 September 2024, FLF1713 (GenBank ITS = PX612304; tef1-α = PX684307)

Description.

Basidiomata small-sized. Pileus 1.0–1.3 cm in diameter, orangish yellow (2.5R 8/4), margins off white (10R 8/1) in circular ring, papillate, umbilicate, dry, smooth at center, fibrillose towards margins, plicate to split, margin decurved to incurved. Context thin, white. Lamellae adnate with decurrent tooth, chalky white (10R 8/1), narrow, subdistant, thin, unequal, even. Lamellulae, in two tiers, alternating with lamellae. Stipe ca. 5.3 cm, chalky white (10R 8/1) to smoky white (2.5YR 8/1), central, equal to slightly flexuous at base, surface scurfy to canescent. Hyphal system composed of generative clamped hyphae, IKI–, inflated in KOH, thin-walled, occasionally branched, subregular to irregularly arranged, 2.74–12.24 µm in diameter.

Basidiospores 5.32–8.19 × 2.91–4.91 µm, av. L × av. W = 6.71 × 3.70 µm, Q = 1.75–1.81, lacrymoid, ovoid to subcylindrical with an apiculus and oil drop, smooth, hyaline in 5% KOH, IKI–, guttulated, thin-walled. Probasidia cylindrical to clavate, thin-walled. Basidia 22.56–26.53 × 5.58–7.32 µm, av. L × av. W = 24.82 × 6.34 µm, Q = 3.91, clavate to narrowly clavate, guttulated, hyaline, thin-walled, bi to tetra-sterigmated. Cheilocystidia 46.44–55.01 × 8.81–12.30 µm, av. L × av. W = 51.45 × 9.88 µm, abundant, fusiform, ventricose-rostrate, with an obtuse apex, short- to long-stalked, smooth, hyaline in 5% KOH, thin–walled. Pleurocystidia not observed. Pileipellis a cutis of inflated, clavate, hyphae, hyphae 10.53–20.11 µm in diameter, thin-walled, with branched excrescences.

Additional specimen (isotype) examined.

CHINA, Gansu Province, Gannan Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, Lintan County, Lianhuashan National Forest Park, 34°57'N, 103°30'E on broad-leaved forests land, 2 September 2024, MSX1713 (GenBank ITS = PX612305; tef1-α = PX684308).

Notes.

The presence of a brightly colored pileus, an inamyloid hymenophoral trama, and pileipellis covered with simple to branched excrescences suggests that this species belongs to the genus Atheniella. It is characterized by small basidiomata, a pileus with white margins to orangish yellow, thin and white context, a chalky white to smoky white hollow stipe with a scurfy to canescent surface, thin-walled and clamped hyphae inflated in KOH, lacrymoid, ovoid to subcylindrical, small basidiospores (6.71 × 3.70 μm) with an apiculus and oil drop, and abundant fusiform cheilocystidia.

In the combined ITS + tef1-α phylogram, Atheniella parvispora is separated from M. floridula (Fr.) Quél. and A. flavoalba (Fr.) Redhead, Moncalvo, Vilgalys, Desjardin & B.A. Perry. The latter two species were formerly classified in Mycena sect. Adonideae. Redhead (2012) proposed that M. floridula was a synonym of A. adonis (Bull.) Redhead, Moncalvo, Vilgalys, Desjardin & B.A. Perry; however, more recently, M. floridula sensu Kühner has been considered a pink-capped form of M. flavoalba (Kühner and Maire 1938; Aronsen and Læssøe 2016).

In the phylogeny, the new species forms a sister group to Atheniella adonis (previously named M. floridula). Although morphologically similar in terms of basidiospores, A. parvispora can be differentiated from A. adonis by its papillate, umbilicate, and plicate pileus with a circular ring at the margin, as well as its scurfy to canescent stipe. Anatomically, A. adonis possesses pseudofusiform or lageniform pleurocystidia with a distended venter. Furthermore, A. parvispora has smaller basidiospores (6.71 × 3.70 μm) than the larger ones of A. adonis (7–9.5 × 3.5–5 μm). The close relative is A. flavoalba, which is the most widely distributed species in the Northern Hemisphere and can be easily differentiated by its narrowly ellipsoid basidiospores and larger caulocystidia (up to 60 μm) (Aronsen and Læssøe 2016; Na and Bau 2019).

2. Mycena albomarginata

S. X. Ma, A. Naseer, A. N. Khalid & L. F. Fan sp. nov.

95C0829A-2CEA-542D-BE4C-A8AA8936E3C8

860899

Figs 4, 5

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Morphological features of Mycena albomarginata, showing the stipe, pileus, and lamellae. Scale bars: 1 cm.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Anatomical characters of Mycena albomarginata. A Basidiospores, B probasidia, C basidia, D cheilocystidia, E hyphae of the pileipellis, F hymenium. Scale bar: 10 μm.

Etymology.

The specific epithet “albomarginata” refers to the white margins of pileus.

Diagnosis.

The species is characterized by virgate to sulcate, brownish gray pileus with white margins, brownish gray stipe with pruinose apex, free to adnexed lamellae, narrowly clavate cheilocystidia with slightly long base, larger (9.08 × 5.51 µm), ellipsoid basidiospores, and bi-sterigmated basidia.

Holotype.

CHINA, Gansu Province, Tianzhu Tibetan Autonomous County, Xidatan Town, 37°28'N, 103°16'E, in mixed coniferous, broadleaf forest, 19th September 2024, FLF1971 (GenBank ITS = PX612302; tef1-α = PX684305).

Description.

Basidiomata small-sized. Pileus 1.9–2.2 cm in diameter, pigeon gray (N 9/0) to gray (7.5Y 5/1), brown, margins white (6.9GY 7/1), in circular ring, conical to parabolic, dry, smooth in center, glabrous, virgate to sulcate, margins smooth, even, entire, regular, slightly recurved to straight. Context thin, gray. Lamellae regular, free to adnexed, fimbriate, gray (7.5Y 6/1), broad, subdistant, thick, wavy. Lamellulae of two different size, in two tiers, alternating with lamellae. Stipe approximately 4.5 cm long, brownish gray (10Y 6/1) with white pruinose apex, upper 3rd part of stipe is white, central, cylindrical to flexuous, only apex floccose, smooth towards base, base white and slightly bulbous. Hyphal system composed of hyphae without clamp connections, dextronoid, inflated in KOH, thin-walled, branched, septate, regular to subregular arrangement, 4.84–8.29 µm in diameter.

Basidiospores 7.56–10.43 × 5.5–6.90 µm, av. L × av. W = 9.08 × 5.51 µm, Q = 1.54–1.66, broadly ellipsoid with apiculus and oil drop, smooth, hyaline in 5% KOH, amiloid, thin-walled. Probasidia cylindrical to clavate, thin-walled. Basidia 24.49–37.44 × 6.18–8.67 µm, av. L × av. W = 32.30 × 7.39 µm, Q = 4.25–4.36, clavate, guttulated, hyaline, thin-walled, two-spored. Cheilocystidia 27.84–33.63 × 5.28–6.67 µm, av. L × av. W = 31.84 × 5.99 µm, abundant, narrowly clavate with slightly long base, smooth, hyaline in 5% KOH, thin-walled, in groups. Pileipellis a cutis; hyphae 11.4–20.1 µm in diam., inflated, thin-walled, predominantly smooth but with scattered excrescences.

Additional specimens examined.

CHINA, Gansu Province, Tianzhu Tibetan Autonomous County, Xidatan Town, 37°25'N, 102°58'E, in mixed coniferous-broadleaf forests, 29 September 2024, MSX1971 (GenBank ITS = PX612303; tef1-α = PX684306).

Notes.

Mycena albomarginata belongs to Mycena sect. Mycena. The species is characterized by a virgate to sulcate, brownish-gray pileus with white margins, a brownish-gray stipe with a pruinose apex, free to adnexed gray lamellae, narrowly clavate cheilocystidia with a slightly elongated base, larger, ellipsoid basidiospores (9.08 × 5.51 μm), and 2-sterigmated basidia. In the phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 1), M. albomarginata forms a sister group with M. semivestipes (Peck) A.H. Sm., sharing similar pileus and stipe morphology as well as spore shape. However, M. albomarginata is distinguished by a smaller (2.2 cm), brownish-gray pileus with white margins and gray lamellae, whereas M. semivestipes possesses a dark brown to nearly black pileus with darker margins and white to pink lamellae. Anatomically, M. albomarginata has larger basidiospores (9.08 × 5.51 μm) and larger, 2-spored basidia (24.5–37.4 × 6.2–8.7 μm), whereas M. semivestipes has smaller, 4-spored basidia (21–30 × 4.5–5.4 μm) (Bessette et al. 1995).

Another close relative is M. flos-nivium Kühner, which can be easily distinguished in the field by the presence of a stipe base densely and conspicuously covered with long, coarse, flexuous, whitish fibrils. Both species share similarities in pileus morphology and coloration, exhibiting very dark sepia brown to dark brown tones that become paler toward the margins. Mycena albomarginata has larger basidiospores (9.08 × 5.51 μm) and smaller, smooth, narrowly clavate cheilocystidia (27.8–33.6 × 5.3–6.7 μm) with a slightly elongated base. In contrast, M. flos-nivium possesses smaller basidiospores (8–11.5 × 4–5 μm) and larger cheilocystidia (20–80 × 6–12 μm) that are clavate, with some very long-stalked and covered with fairly few, unevenly spaced, usually rather coarse, simple to branched, straight to curved excrescences (Na and Bau 2020).

3. Mycena oblongispora

S. X. Ma, A. Naseer, A. N. Khalid & L. F. Fan sp. nov.

78D64CFC-46F8-56D2-B8C1-72101EC001AB

860937

Figs 6, 7

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Morphological features of Mycena oblongispora, sp. nov., showing the pileus, stipe, and lamellae. Scale bar: 1 cm.

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Anatomical characters of Mycena oblongispora, sp. nov. A Basidiospores, B probasidia, C basidia, D cheilocystidia, E hyphae of the pileipellis, F hymenium. Scale bar: 10 μm.

Etymology.

The specific epithet “oblongispora” refers to the oblong shape of spores.

Diagnosis.

It is characterized by grayish brown pileus having brownish black fibrils, gray, free to remote lamellae, with rhizomorphs at the base stipe, growing on decaying logs, smaller (7.25 × 4.96 µm), subglobose to ellipsoid to oblong basidiospores, smooth, smaller (35.27 × 12.40 µm) cheliocystidia and with scattered excrescences in pileipellis.

Holotype.

CHINA, Gansu Province, Longnan City, Guan’e gully national forest park, 33°9'N, 104°2'E, grow on decaying logs in mixed coniferous-broadleaf forests, 5 September 2024, FLF1861 (GenBank ITS = PX612295; tef1-α = PX684300).

Description.

Basidiomata small-sized. Pileus 1.2–1.9 cm in diameter, with brownish black (10YR 2/2) fibrils on a grayish brown (10YR 4/2) context, parabolic, dry, sulcate to plicate, striated, striation expands towards margins, margins slightly uplifted to straight, even, entire. Context thin, white to grayish brown (10YR 4/2). Lamellae free to remote, even, entire, gray (2.5GY 7/1), broad, subdistant, average, unequal to forked. Lamellulae regular, of two different sizes, alternating with lamellae, in two tiers. Stipe 2.5–3.9 cm long, central, cylindrical to flexuous, smooth to virgate with maturity, apex gray (2.5GY 7/1), becoming black (10YR 3/2) to dark brown (10YR 2/3) towards the base whitish (10R 8/1) with distinct rhizomorphs. Hyphal system composed of generative hyphae with clamp connections, dextrinoid, inflated in KOH, thin-walled, branched, regultar to subregularly arranged, 1.94–6.32 µm in diameter.

Basidiospores 5.94–8.94 × 3.38–7.06 µm, av. L × av. W = 7.25 × 4.96 µm, Q = 1.34–1.46, subglobose to oblong ellipsoid or slightly ovoid with an apiculus and oil drop, smooth, hyaline in 5% KOH, amyloid, thin-walled. Probasidia cylindrical to clavate, elongated and slender at the base, thin-walled. Basidia 23.98–34.59 × 5.78–9.88 µm, av. L × av. W = 28.83 × 8.76 µm, Q = 2.28, clavate, guttulated, hyaline, thin-walled, two to four spored. Cheilocystidia 29.60–43.74 × 8.46–14.87 µm, av. L × av. W = 35.27 × 12.40 µm, abundant, clavate with capitate apex, smooth, hyaline in 5% KOH, thin-walled. Pleurocystidia not observed. Hyphae of the pileipellis 5.87–16.77 µm, inflated, thin-walled, with scattered excrescences.

Additional specimen (isotype) examined.

CHINA. Gansu Province, Longnan City, Guan’e gully national forest park, 33°93'N, 104°2'E, grow on decaying logs in mixed coniferous-broadleaf forests, 5 September 2024, MSX1861. (GenBank ITS = PX612296; tef1-α = PX684301).

Notes.

This new species belongs to Mycena sect. Fragilipedes. It is characterized by a grayish-brown pileus with brownish-black fibrils, gray, free to remote lamellae, and a stipe base with distinct rhizomorphs. Ecologically, it grows on decaying logs. Microscopically, it is distinguished by its smaller, subglobose to oblong-ellipsoid basidiospores (av. 7.25 × 4.96 μm) and hyphae of the pileipellis with scattered excrescences. Mycena stipata Maas Geest. & Schwöbel shares similarities with M. oblongispora, as both possess a brownish-beige to blackish-brown pileus. However, M. oblongispora can be distinguished by its fibrillose pileus (smooth in M. stipata), gray, free to remote lamellae (adnate to adnexed in M. stipata), clavate cheilocystidia with a capitate apex (fusiform to lageniform in M. stipata), and smaller basidiospores (7.25 × 4.96 μm).

Another close relative, Mycena silvae-nigrae Maas Geest. & Schwöbel, shares several similarities, such as a blackish-brown pileus, whitish to grayish lamellae, and the presence of excrescences in the pileipellis. However, M. oblongispora has smaller basidiospores (7.25 × 4.96 μm) and smaller cheilocystidia (29.60–43.74 × 8.46–14.87 μm) with a rounded apex, while M. silvae-nigrae has larger basidiospores (9.5 × 9 μm) and larger cheilocystidia (20–73 × 7–20 μm) (Osmundson et al. 2013).

4. Mycena lavendula

S. X. Ma, A. Naseer, A.N. Khalid & L. F. Fan sp. nov.

8D4BAEF2-AB61-5AED-A66A-9F6F69369DC5

860920

Figs 8, 9

Figure 8.

Figure 8.

Morphological features of Mycena lavendula, sp. nov., showing the pileus, stipe, and lamellae. Scale bar: 1 cm.

Figure 9.

Figure 9.

Anatomical characters of Mycena lavendula, sp. nov. A Basidiospores, B probasidia, C basidia, D cheilocystidia, E hyphae of the pileipellis, F hymenium. Scale bar: 10 μm.

Etymology.

The specific epithet “lavendula” refers to the lilac color of basidio­mata.

Diagnosis.

Mycena lavendula is characterized by a subcylindrical to ellipsoid basidiospores (6.68 × 2.56 µm), polymorphic cheilocystidia with rounded apex and generative hyphae with clamp connections.

Holotype.

CHINA, Gansu Province, Tibetan Autonomous of Gannan, Taohe National Nature Reserve, 34°40'70"N, 103°53'26"E, in mixed coniferous and broadleaf forests, 3rd September 2024 FLF1785 (GenBank ITS = PX612289; tef1-α = PX684295)

Description.

Basidiomata medium-sized. Pileus 2.1–2.4 cm in diameter, lilac (10P 8/2), hemispherical to convex, becoming plano-convex, sticky, glabrous to sericeous, margin incurved, with purple (10P 6/10) fibrills, and smooth, entire. Context thin, lilac. Lamellae subdecurrent, lilac (10P 8/2), narrow, crowded, thick, edges even, entire to eroded. Lamellulae abundant, irregular, of varying lengths, in more than two tiers, alternating with lamellae. Stipe 3.4–3.8 cm long, reddish purple (2.5RP 2/2) at the apex and darker than the base, lilac (10P 8/2) at the base, central, cylindrical to flexuous, slightly pruinose, longitudinally striate, hollow, context lilac (10P 8/2). Hyphal system composed of generative hyphae with clamp connections, dextrinoid, inflated in KOH, thin-walled, occasionally branched, regular to subregularly arranged, 4.1–10.8 µm in diameter.

Basidiospores 4.95–8.31 × 2.56–5 µm, av. L × av. W = 6.68 × 2.56 µm, Q = 1.76–1.88, subcylindrical to ellipsoid with an apiculus and oil drop, amyloid, smooth, hyaline in 5% KOH, amyloid, thin-walled. Probasidia subclavate to clavate, thin-walled. Basidia 22.36–35.12 × 7.64–8.73 µm, av. L × av. W = 30.60 × 8.05 µm, Q = 3.58–3.79, broadly clavate to slightly pyriform, smooth, hyaline in 5% KOH, thin-walled, four-spored. Cheilocystidia 28.32–44.76 × 8.56–13.75, av. L × av. W = 35.99 × 11.81 µm, abundant, polymorphic, clavate, fusiform, pyriform, some with a rounded apex, smooth, hyaline in 5% KOH, thin-walled. Pleurocystidia not observed. Pileipellis a cutis of irregular and inflated smooth hyphae, thin-walled, 17.32–23.93 µm in diameter.

Additional specimen (paratype) examined.

CHINA. Gansu Province, Tibetan Autonomous of Gannan, Taohe National Nature Reserve, 34°40'70"N, 103°53'26"E, mossy ground in mixed forests, 4 September 2024, MSX1785. (GenBank ITS = PX612290; tef1-α = PX684296).

Notes.

Species of Mycena sect. Calodontes are easily recognized by the pinkish, reddish, purplish to brownish pileus and large-sized basidiomata. Mycena lavendula is characterized by its lilac pileus and reddish-purple stipe that becomes lilac toward the base, is longitudinally striated, and has a pruinose apex. Microscopically, it is distinguished by small, subcylindrical to ellipsoid basidiospores (av. 6.68 × 2.56 μm) with an oil drop, polymorphic cheilocystidia, and clamped generative hyphae.

Mycena lavendula resembles M. luciferina Cortés-Pérez, Guzm.-Dáv. & Ram.-Cruz., a recently described bioluminescent species from Mexico, in the shape and size of its basidiospores and cheilocystidia with rounded apices. However, M. lavendula can be differentiated from M. luciferina by its unique pileus and stipe morphology. Mycena luciferina has a reddish-pink pileus and white stipe, whereas M. lavendula has a lilac pileus and a reddish-purple stipe with a pruinose apex. Anatomically, M. lavendula differs from M. luciferina by its larger basidia (22.36–35.12 × 7.64–8.73 μm vs. 15.2–27.2 × 4.5–5.6 μm). Furthermore, M. luciferina has larger basidiospores (7.4 × 3.8 μm), whereas M. lavendula possesses smaller ones (6.68 × 2.56 μm) (Cortés-Pérez et al. 2023). In the phylogenetic tree, Mycena lavendula is separated from M. oblongispora, another species described in this study, and forms a sister clade with it. Mycena oblongispora can be differentiated from M. lavendula by its grayish-brown pileus with brownish-black fibrils, clavate cheilocystidia, and larger basidiospores, whereas M. lavendula has a lilac pileus, polymorphic cheilocystidia, and smaller basidiospores (6.68 × 2.56 μm vs. 7.25 × 4.96 μm).

5. Mycena longnanensis

S. X. Ma, A. Naseer, A. N. Khalid & L. F. Fan sp. nov.

E31A1660-371D-52C4-9AAB-FDEE389D14B0

860921

Figs 10, 11

Figure 10.

Figure 10.

Morphological features of Mycena longnanensis, sp. nov., showing the stipe, pileus, and lamellae. Scale bar: 1 cm.

Figure 11.

Figure 11.

Anatomical characters of Mycena longnanensis, sp. nov. A Basidiospores, B probasidia, C basidia, D cheilocystidia, E hyphae of the pileipellis, F hymenium. Scale bar: 10 μm.

Etymology.

The specific epithet “longnanensis” refers to type locality Longnan.

Diagnosis.

The species is characterized by an umbonate, radially fibrillose, lilac to dark purple pileus, decurrent and lilac lamellae, ellipsoid to subcylindrical basidiospores (6.75 × 3.45 µm), and spheropedunculate, small cheilocystidia (39 × 14.21 µm), with a slightly long tail and a round base.

Holotype.

CHINA, Gansu Province, Longnan City, Dangchang County, 34°N, 103°8'E, in mixed coniferous-broadleaf forests, 4 September 2024, FLF1804 (GenBank ITS = PX612291; tef1-α = PX684297).

Description.

Basidiomata medium-sized. Pileus 2.2–2.4 cm in diameter, grayish lilac (5P 18) to dark purple (7.5P 5/10), campanulate, with a round and prominent lilac (10P 8/2) umbo. Surface radially fibrillose and sticky. Margin decurved to incurved, sulcate to slightly undulating, dark purple (7.5P 5/10) in a ring, followed by a lilac (10P 8/2) circle. Context thin, grayish lilac. Lamellae uncinate, deeply decurrent, lilac (10P 8/2), broad, crowded, thick, even, crenate, forking. Lamellulae frequent, irregular, in more than two tiers, alternating with lamellae. Stipe c. 4.3 cm long, reddish purple (2.5RP 2/2) to dark purple brown (10YR 2/3) with lilac (10P 8/2) ting at base, central, flexuous, cylindrical, tapering towards the base, fibrillose, fine appressed longitudinal fibrils, solid.

Hyphal system composed of generative clamped hyphae, dextrinoid, inflated in KOH, thin-walled, occasionally branched, regularly to subregularly arranged, 5.87–14.94 µm in diameter.

Basidiospores 5.73–8.28 × 2.75–4.39 µm, av. L × av. W = 6.75 × 3.45 µm, Q = 1.85–1.96, long-ellipsoid to subcylindrical with an apiculus and oil drop, smooth, hyaline in 5% KOH, amyloid, thin-walled. Probasidia cylindrical to clavate, thick-walled. Basidia 22.83–31.92 × 4.68–6.75 µm, av. L × av. W = 27.88 × 5.92 µm, Q = 4.95, narrowly clavate, smooth, hyaline in 5% KOH, thin-walled, two or four-spored. Cheilocystidia 31.61–47.81 × 10.79–17.70 µm, av. L × av. W = 39.00 × 14.21 µm, abundant, spheropedunculate with slightly long tail, round apex, smooth, hyaline in 5% KOH, thin-walled. Pleurocystidia not observed. Pileipellis a cutis of smooth, thin-walled and clamped hyphae of 12.15–18.21 µm in diameter.

Additional specimen (isotype) examined.

CHINA. Gansu Province, Longnan City, Dangchang County, 34°N, 103°8'E, in mixed coniferous-broadleaf forests, 4 September 2024, MSX1804. (GenBank ITS = PX612292; tef1-α = PX684298).

Notes.

The new species is characterized by an umbonate, radially fibrillose, lilac to dark purple pileus, decurrent and lilac lamellae, ellipsoid to subcylindrical basidiospores (6.75 × 3.45 μm), and smaller, spheropedunculate cheilocystidia (39 × 14.21 μm) with a slightly elongated tail and rounded apex. It resembles M. brunneoviolacea A.C. Cooper, Desjardin & B.A. Perry in its pileus and stipe morphology. However, the new species is distinguished by a grayish-lilac umbo and a radially fibrillose pileus. Furthermore, M. brunneoviolacea possesses ascending to adnate, white to pale gray lamellae, whereas M. longnanensis features uncinate, deeply decurrent, lilac lamellae. Anatomically, M. longnanensis can be differentiated by its unique, smaller, spheropedunculate cheilocystidia (av. 39.0 × 14.2 μm), whereas Mycena brunneoviolacea possesses larger, lageniform cheilocystidia (32–72 × 9.6–18.4 μm) (Cooper et al. 2018). Another similar species is M. diosma Krieglst. & Schwöbel, which features basidiomata with a dark violet-brown or reddish-purple, hygrophanous pileus. Furthermore, M. diosma is distinguished by its dark brownish-violet to dark violet lamellae and larger cheilocystidia [20–60(–80) × 3.5–20 μm] (Aronsen and Læssøe 2016). Another species in the same clade is M. cahaya A.L.C. Chew & Desjardin, which has a brown pileus, elongated basidiospores (av. 7.1 × 3.8 μm), and abundant clavate to ventricose cheilocystidia (Chew et al. 2014). Mycena longnanensis resembles M. glabra in having long-ellipsoid to subcylindrical basidiospores and bi- or tetrasporic basidia. However, M. longnanensis is distinguished by its dark purple pileus, lilac lamellae, and reddish-purple to dark purple-brown stipe, whereas M. glabra has white to cream basidiomata, white to pale pink-yellow lamellae, and a white to pale wax-yellow stipe. Anatomically, M. longnanensis is distinguished from M. glabra by its narrower basidiospores (2.75–4.39 μm vs. 3.7–5.5 μm), significantly smaller basidia (22.83–31.92 × 4.68–6.75 μm vs. 29.0–45.0 × 6.3–12.0 μm), and shorter cheilocystidia (31.61–47.81 × 10.79–17.70 μm vs. 48.0–77.4 × 10.0–16.4 μm) (Fan et al. 2024).

6. Mycena minispora

S. X. Ma, A. Naseer, A. N. Khalid & L. F. Fan sp. nov.

CD21CCB0-AA89-520B-BE1C-426C2E20F8E8

860922

Figs 12, 13

Figure 12.

Figure 12.

Morphological features of Mycena minispora, sp. nov., showing the stipe, pileus, and lamellae. Scale bars: 1 cm.

Figure 13.

Figure 13.

Anatomical characters of Mycena minispora, sp. nov. A Basidiospores, B probasidia, C basidia, D cheilocystidia, E hyphae of the pileipellis, F hymenium. Scale bar: 10 μm.

Etymology.

The specific epithet minispora” refers to the small-sized basidiospores.

Diagnosis.

Mycena minispora is characterized by its glutinous, fibrillose golden-brown pileus with a low obtuse umbo, milky-yellow lamellae, smaller (6.04 × 3.13 µm) amyloid basidiospores and fusiform to subclavate cheilocystidia with blunt and rounded apices.

Holotype.

CHINA, Gansu Province, Gannan Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, Yeliguan National Forest Park, 34°95'N, 103°60'E, in mixed coniferous, broadleaf forests, 5 July 2024, FLF1223 (GenBank ITS = PX612293).

Description.

Basidiomata large-sized. Pileus 3.5–3.7 cm in diameter, brown (7.5YR 6/8) with a light golden-brown (2.5Y 7/8) umbo and margins; plane to slightly convex with a low, obtuse, non-prominent umbo; surface glutinous to viscid, hygrophanous, and fibrillose; margin straight to very slightly uplifted, plicate. Context thin, white to gray. Lamellae sinuate, edges eroded to crenate, milky-yellow (5Y 8/1), broad, close, thick, even, unequal. Lamellulae frequent, intervenose, irregular, arranged in more than two tiers and alternating with the lamellae. Stipe approximately 4.7 cm long, eccentric, terete and cylindrical, firm, ribbed or costate, pale yellow (5Y 8/4) with a light green (7.5GY 8/2) tinge at the base; apex slightly pruinose.

Hyphal system composed of generative clamped hyphae, dextrinoid, inflated in KOH, thin-walled, septate, regular to subregularly arranged, 6.28–10.59 µm in diameter.

Basidiospores 4.61–6.92 × 2.28–4.04 µm, av. L × av. W = 6.04 × 3.13 µm, Q = 1.89–1.95, ellipsoid to subcylindrical with a distinct apiculus and oil drop, smooth, pale yellow in 5% KOH, amyloid, thin-walled, guttulated. Probasidia subclavate to clavate, thin-walled. Basidia 17.28–26.82 × 4.67–6.46 µm, av. L × av. W = 23.96 × 5.62 µm, Q = 4.21–4.25, narrowly clavate, pale yellow in 5% KOH, thin-walled, four-spored. Cheilocystidia 35.82–59.93 × 12.86–20.37 µm, av. L × av. W = 48.76 × 16.18 µm, abundant fusiform to subclavate with a blunt, rounded apex, smooth, pale yellow in 5% KOH, thin-walled. Pleurocystidia not observed. Pileipellis a cutis, made up smooth, thin-walled and clamped hyphae of 13.62–21.32 µm in diameter.

Additional specimen examined.

CHINA. Gansu Province, Gannan Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, Yeliguan National Forest Park, 34°95'N, 103°50'E, in mixed coniferous-broadleaf forests, 5 July 2024, FLF1244. (GenBank ITS = PX612294; tef1-α = PX684299).

Notes.

The presence of a hygrophanous, brownish pileus, intervenose lamellae, smooth cheilocystidia, and amyloid basidiospores confirms the placement of M. minispora within Mycena sect. Calodontes. Phylogenetic analyses based on ITS and tef1-α further support this taxonomic position.

Mycena minispora is characterized by a brown pileus with a light golden-brown umbo, milky yellow, sinuate lamellae with eroded to crenate edges, and a pale-yellow stipe exhibiting a light green tinge at the base. Microscopically, the species possesses small, ellipsoid to subcylindrical basidiospores (6.04 × 3.13 μm) and fusiform or pyriform cheilocystidia. Mycena minispora can be readily distinguished from M. pura (Pers.) P. Kumm, which has larger basidiospores (6–9.5 × 4–5.2 μm) and pink to violet lamellae. Mycena minispora is separated from M. luciferina, which is characterized by a campanulate, reddish-pink to pale pink pileus and white intervenose lamellae. In contrast, M. minispora possesses a hygrophanous, brownish pileus, a yellow stipe with a light green base, and smaller basidiospores (6.04 × 3.13 μm vs. 7.4 × 3.8 μm; Cortés-Pérez et al. 2023).

Another morphologically similar species is M. shengshanensis, which shares several features with M. minispora, including a convex pileus with an obtuse, disc-like umbo, a paler striate margin, golden-brown to brown coloration, sinuate and irregularly serrulate lamellae, and a central, cylindrical stipe. However, M. minispora differs by having a larger pileus (3.5–3.7 cm vs. 1.3–2.6 cm) and a pale-yellow stipe with a light green tinge at the base, whereas M. shengshanensis possesses a reddish-brown to brownish-gray stipe. Anatomically, M. minispora is further distinguished by its smaller basidiospores and basidia (4.61–6.92 × 2.28–4.04 μm vs. 6.10–8.10 × 3.40–4.40 μm for basidiospores; 17.28–26.82 × 4.67–6.46 μm vs. 22–32 × 6–8 μm for basidia; Liu et al. 2022).

7. Mycena pakistanica

A. Naseer, A. Khalid, A.N. Khalid, S. X. Ma & L. F. Fan sp. nov.

31266469-4D51-548A-B9C0-BD61FFEA5B60

860923

Figs 14, 15

Figure 14.

Figure 14.

Morphological features of Mycena pakistanica sp. nov. showing the stipe, pileus, and lamellae. Scale bar: 0.9 cm.

Figure 15.

Figure 15.

Anatomical characters of Mycena pakistanica sp. nov. A Hyphae of the pileipellis, B hyphae of the stipitipellis, C basidia, D cheilocystidia, E pleurocystidia, F basidiospores, G, H hymenium in KOH. Scale bars: 25.6 μm (A); 29.2 μm (B); 17.1 μm (C, D); 10 μm (E); 4.7 μm (F); 15.4 μm (G); 15.5 μm (H).

Etymology.

The specific epithet “pakistanica” refers to the country name, Pakistan.

Diagnosis.

The species is characterized by a lavender pileus with grape wine fibrils, larger (12 cm) stipe, lacrymoid subcylindrical to ellipsoid, smaller (5.9 × 2.6 µm) basidiospores, spathulate pleurocystidia, and fusiform to sublageniform cheilocystidia with both sharp ends.

Holotype.

PAKISTAN, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province, Abbottabad district, Kala Bagh, 34°2'0"N, 73°25'0"E, in mixed coniferous forest, found on wood, 11 August 2024, Arooj Naseer, KB–16 (GenBank ITS = PX612297).

Description.

Basidiomata large-sized, solitary, or scattered. Pileus 2.0–2.9 cm in diameter, lavender (7.5R 5/3) with grape-wine (7.5R 6/2) fibrils; shape conical to parabolic, becoming planate when mature; surface dry, fibrillose, with distinct veil remnants; margin decurved, becoming slightly incurved with age, varying from plicate or undulating when young to sulcate and entire at maturity. Context thin, lavender. Lamellae emerginate, light grayish-purple (N 7/0), ventricose, thick, and subdistant, unequal to forked; Lamellulae frequent, irregular, arranged in one to two tiers alternating with the lamellae. Stipe 8.0–12.0 × 0.1–0.3 cm, central, equal to slightly flexuous, fragile; surface smooth to fibrillose towards the base, light grayish-purple (N 7/0) at the apex, becoming dark purplish-brown (7.5YR 3/4) towards the base.

Hyphal system composed of generative clamped hyphae, dextrinoid, inflated in KOH. generative hyphae in context brown to reddish brown, thin-walled, occasionally branched, septate, irregularly arranged, 2.2–11.8 µm in diameter. Generative hyphae in lamella hyaline in KOH, thin-walled, occasionally branched, irregularly arranged, 2–8 µm in diameter.

Basidiospores (4.4–)4.9 – 7.3(–7.4) × (2.2–)2.4 – 2.8(–3) µm, av. L × av. W = 5.9 × 2.6 µm, Q = 1.8 – 3.3, av. Q. = 2.3, lacrymoid, subcylindrical to ellipsoid, with suprahilar depression, phaseoliform in side view, oblong in frontal view, apiculate, smooth, hyaline to light yellow in 5% KOH, amyloid, thin-walled. Basidia (18.6–)18.8 – 22.3(–22.9) × (4.5–)4.6 – 5.7(–6) µm, av. L × av. W = 20.1 × 5.4 µm, clavate to slightly pyriform, smooth, hyaline in 5% KOH, thick-walled, mostly four-spored. Cheilocystidia (57.8–)58.2 – 78.4(–91) × (11.2–)12.7 – 16.2(–16.4) µm, av. L × av. W = 71.6 × 13.9 µm, frequently present, mostly clavate to broadly clavate with acute apices, fusiform to sublageniform with both sharp ends, rarely lecythiform, mucronate, smooth, hyaline to light brown in 5% KOH, thick-walled. Pleurocystidia (49.5–)54.2 – 72(–74) × (9.5–)10 – 17.6(–19.5) µm, av. L × av. W = 62.3 × 14.3 µm, similar in shape to cheilocystidia but smaller, mostly clavate to spathulate with knob-like outgrowth, narrowly lageniform to mucronate or with cylindrical outgrowth, smooth, hyaline to light brown in 5% KOH, thin to rarely thick-walled. Pileipellis a cutis, made up of irregular, branched 1.6–7.6 µm, average width 4.02 µm, inflated, hyaline to pale yellow in 5% KOH, septate, thick-walled.

Notes.

The presence of a pinkish, reddish, purplish to brownish pileus, large-sized basidiomata, and smooth hymenial cystidia supports the placement of M. pakistanica within Mycena sect. Calodontes. Mycena pakistanica is characterized by a lavender pileus with grape-wine fibrils, a long stipe (up to 12 cm), and small, lacrymoid, subcylindrical to ellipsoid basidiospores (av. 5.9 × 2.6 μm). Additionally, it features spathulate pleurocystidia and fusiform to sublageniform cheilocystidia with acute apices.

Mycena pakistanica shares morphological similarities with Mycena pura, including light purplish-gray lamellae, a dark purplish-brown, smooth, and equal stipe, and clavate to fusiform cheilocystidia. However, M. pakistanica can be distinguished from M. pura by its smaller (2.9 cm in diameter), conical to flat, fibrillose pileus with plicate to sulcate margins and emarginate lamellae. Additionally, M. pakistanica possesses a longer (12 cm in length) stipe that is fibrillose toward the base, whereas M. pura has a relatively shorter stipe (up to 11 cm) that is pruinose to glabrescent. Anatomically, M. pakistanica is distinguished by its smaller, lacrymoid, subcylindrical to ellipsoid basidiospores (av. 5.9 × 2.6 μm), whereas M. pura possesses larger, narrowly ellipsoid to cylindrical basidiospores (av. 8.4 × 4 μm) (Perry 2002). Moreover, M. pakistanica has larger, sublageniform cheilocystidia with both ends sharp and mucronate (up to 91 μm) and spathulate pleurocystidia (up to 74 μm).

Mycena pakistanica is also comparable with M. pelianthina (Fr.) Quél. (1872). Both share a dark brown pileus, purple lamellae, an equal and fibrillose stipe, thin-walled clavate basidia, and fusiform cheilocystidia. However, M. pelianthina differs from M. pakistanica mainly in its larger (up to 50 mm), hemispherical to campanulate pileus with a glabrous surface that is slightly lubricous when moist. Furthermore, M. pelianthina features adnate to decurrent lamellae and a longer (up to 120 mm), whitish to lilaceous stipe that is striate with dark fibrils. Microscopically, M. pelianthina is distinguished by larger pip-shaped basidiospores (av. 7 × 3.8 μm), smaller cheilo- and pleurocystidia (up to 70 μm), and smooth cortical hyphae in the pileipellis (Harder et al. 2010, 2012).

8. Mycena tephroleuca

S. X. Ma, A. Naseer, A. N. Khalid & L. F. Fan sp. nov.

8899FD5B-D59C-5D5C-885F-3F42F483F6A6

860925

Figs 16, 17

Figure 16.

Figure 16.

Morphological features of Mycena tephroleuca sp. nov., showing the pileus, stipe, and lamellae. Scale bar: 1 cm.

Figure 17.

Figure 17.

Anatomical characters of Mycena tephroleuca sp. nov. A Basidiospores, B probasidia, C basidia, D cheilocystidia, E hyphae of the stipitipellis, F hymenium. Scale bar: 10 μm.

Etymology.

The specific epithet “tephroleuca” refers to color of the basidiomata.

Diagnosis.

The species is characterized by white to grayish-white pileus, adnate lamellae with a decurrent tooth, a white stipe with brown tinge at base, thin-walled hyphae and clamped, and the presence of clavate to narrowly fusiform or utriform cheilocystidia with cylindrical outgrowths.

Holotype.

CHINA, Gansu Province, Gannan Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, Diebu County, Lazikou Forest Protection Station, 33°85'N, 104°55'E, in broad-leaved forests, 4th September 2024, FLF1816 (GenBank ITS = PX612306; Tef1-α = PX684309).

Description.

Basidiomata small-sized. Pileus 0.7–1.5 cm in diameter, chalky white (10R 8/1) to chalky white (10R 8/1), pulvinate, slightly sticky, glabrous in center, marginally fibrillose, even, entire to plicate, margins incurved to straight. Context thin, white. Lamellae adnate with decurrent tooth, fimbriate, chalky white (10R 8/1), broad, subdistant, thick, unequal, wavy. Lamellulae are of two different sizes, in two tiers, alternating with lamellae. Stipe 3.8–4.3 cm long, chalky white (10R 8/1) to smoky white (2.5YR 8/1), flexuous, equal, surface smooth, with some brown tinge at base, white rhizomorphs, central.

Hyphal system composed of generative hyphae with clamp connections, dextrinoid, inflated in KOH, thin-walled, regular to subregularly arranged, 1.26–9.20 µm in diameter.

Basidiospores 7–8.77 × 3.8–5.9 µm, av. L × av. W = 7.73 × 4.79 µm, Q = 1.61–1.73, oblong to elliptical, with an apiculus and oil drop, smooth, hyaline in 5% KOH, amyloid, thin-walled. Basidia 24.97–32.57 × 7.38–9.16 µm, av. L × av. W = 29.45 × 8.19 µm, clavate, guttulated, hyaline, thin-walled, two to four-spored. Cheilocystidia 48.22–54.80 × 13.04–18.80 µm, av. L × av. W = 14.26 × 14.7 µm, clavate, narrowly fusiform, utriform, mucronate or with a cylindrical outgrowth, smooth, hyaline in 5% KOH, thin-walled. Pleurocystidia not observed. Pileipellis a cutis made up clamped hyphae of 10.08–24.14 µm in diameter, smooth, thin-walled.

Additional specimen (paratype) examined.

CHINA. Gansu Province, Gannan Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, Lazikou Forest Protection Station, Laolong Gully, 33°85'N, 104°55'E, in broad-leaved forests, 4 September 2024, MSX1816. (GenBank ITS = PX612307; tef1-α = PX684310).

Notes.

The species is characterized by small-sized basidiomata, a chalky-white to grayish-white pileus, adnate lamellae with a decurrent tooth, a chalky-white to smoky-white stipe with some brown tinge at the base, a pileipellis as a cutis made up of clamped hyphae 10.08–24.14 μm in diameter, smooth, thin-walled hyphae, and abundant, smooth, clavate to narrowly fusiform or utriform cheilocystidia with cylindrical outgrowths.

Mycena tephroleuca shows similarity to M. cahaya in the size of its basidiospores and two- or four-spored basidia. However, M. tephroleuca possesses a pulvinate, marginally fibrillose pileus with entire to plicate margins and a brown tinge at the stipe base with white rhizomorphs, whereas M. cahaya possesses a parabolic to convex or campanulate, uneven to slightly wrinkled pileus and a yellowish-gray to beige, glabrous stipe. Anatomically, M. tephroleuca is distinguished by spherical to phaseoliform basidiospores and broader basidia, whereas M. cahaya has elongate to cylindrical basidiospores and narrower basidia (7.38–9.16 μm vs. 4.0–6.4 μm) (Chew et al. 2014).

Mycena tephroleuca the novel species described in this study, forms a sister group to M. glabra B.Y. Wang, T.F. Ma & L.F. Fan in the phylogenetic analysis, sharing similarities in its long ellipsoid basidiospores and comparable basidial size and shape. Morphologically, M. tephroleuca possesses a chalky-white to grayish-white, pulvinate pileus that is glabrous at the center and fibrillose at the margin, with fimbriate lamellae, whereas M. glabra features a white to cream pileus with vertical stripes or grooves and subdecurrent lamellae. In M. tephroleuca, the stipe is flexuous, chalky-white to smoky-white with brown tinges at the base, and covered with white rhizomorphs, whereas M. glabra has a smooth, white to cream stipe that is pale wax-yellow at the base. Anatomically, M. tephroleuca has broader cheilocystidia (13.04–18.80 μm), whereas M. glabra has narrower cheilocystidia (10.0–16.4 μm).

Mycena rufobrunnea shares morphological affinities with Mycena tephroleuca, particularly in small-sized basidiomata with a relatively thin, white pileus context, basidiospore dimensions, and the absence of pleurocystidia. However, M. rufobrunnea is readily distinguished by its vividly colored stipe, ranging from grayish-magenta to dark purple, in contrast to the entirely chalky-white to smoky-white stipe of M. tephroleuca. Anatomically, M. tephroleuca possesses smaller basidiospores (7.73 × 4.79 μm) and larger cheilocystidia (48.22–54.80 × 13.04–18.80 μm) that are more morphologically diverse, including mucronate forms and cylindrical outgrowths. In contrast, M. rufobrunnea has larger basidiospores (8.3 × 4.4 μm) and smaller, utriform to clavate cheilocystidia (23–44 × 7–17 μm) (Wei et al. 2024). This species also shares similarities with another taxon described in this study, Mycena lavendula, which is characterized by a lilac pileus and reddish-purple stipe with a lilac base, longitudinal striations, and a pruinose apex. Anatomically, M. lavendula has subcylindrical to ellipsoid basidiospores (6.68 × 2.56 μm), polymorphic cheilocystidia with rounded apices, and clamped generative hyphae.

9. Phloeomana qilianensis

S. X. Ma, A. Naseer, A. N. Khalid & L. F. Fan sp. nov.

D767F70A-4551-5F74-9344-561B1D007542

860924

Figs 18, 19

Figure 18.

Figure 18.

Morphological features of Phloeomana qilianensis sp. nov., showing the stipe and lamellae. Scale bar: 1 cm.

Figure 19.

Figure 19.

Anatomical characters of Phloeomana qilianensis sp. nov. A Basidiospores, B probasidia, C basidia, D cheilocystidia, E hyphae of the stipitipellis, F hymenium. Scale bar: 10 μm.

Etymology.

The specific epithet “qilianensis” refers to the type locality, Qilian.

Diagnosis.

Phloeomana qilianensis is characterized by small (up to 1 cm) basidiomata, an off-white to pale yellow pileus, fimbriate lamellae, a furfuraceous stipe, lacrymoid basidiospores (7.39 × 3.99 µm), and abundant, fusiform to ventricose-rostrate cheilocystidia with an obtuse apex and tapered base.

Holotype.

CHINA, Gansu Province, Zhangye City, Qilian Mountains National Nature Reserve, Qinglong Resource Conservation Station, 38°68'N, 99°92'E, in mixed coniferous-broadleaf forests, 3 August 2024, FLF1582. (GenBank ITS = PX612301).

Description.

Basidiomata small, in cluster. Pileus 0.4–1.0 cm in diameter, off-white (10R 8/1) when young, becoming pale yellow (2.5R 8/4) with age, campanulate to parabolic, dry, sometimes viscid, smooth at the center, fibrillose towards margins, plicate to split, margin incurved to slightly uplifted. Context thin, white. Lamellae regular, fimbriate, off-white (10R 8/1), narrow, subdistant, thick, unequal, even. Lamellulae of two lengths, arranged in two tiers, alternating with the lamellae. Stipe central, flexuous, cylindrical to slightly bulbous towards base 2.1–3.4 cm, smoky-white (2.5YR 8/1) with a white pruinose cpating, surface scurfy, branny, furfuraceous.

Hyphal system composed of generative hyphae with clamp connections, IKI–, inflated in KOH, thin-walled, occasionally branched, septate, regular to subregularly arranged, 3.31–3.94 µm in diameter.

Basidiospores 6–8.5 × 3.43–4.72 µm, av. L × av. W = 7.39 × 3.99 µm, Q = 1.72–1.85, lacrymoid, oblong ellipsoid to subcylindrical with an apiculus and oil drop, smooth, hyaline in 5% KOH, IKI–, guttulated, thin-walled. Probasidia cylindrical to clavate, thin-walled. Basidia 21.01–33.21 × 5.21–6.56 cm, av. L × av. W = 28.16 × 5.92 µm, Q = 4.75, narrowly clavate, guttulated, hyaline, thin–walled, two or four–spored. Cheilocystidia 24.65–28.56 × 3.13–3.87 µm, av. L × av. W = 27.04 × 3.37 µm, abundant, fusiform, ventricose-rostrate, with obtuse apex, base tapered, with short to long stalk, smooth, hyaline in 5% KOH, thin-walled. Pleurocystidia not observed. Pileipellis a cutis of smooth, thin-walled hyphae of 3.64–11.55 µm in diameter, with clavate terminal cells.

Additional specimen examined.

CHINA. Gansu Province, Qilian Mountains National Nature Reserve, Tianzhu Tibetan Autonomous County, Dongdatan, Xichakou Village, 37°32'N, 102°7'23"E, in mixed coniferous-broadleaf forests, 28 July 2024, FLF1269. (GenBank ITS = PX612300; tef1-α = PX684304).

Notes.

The presence of horizontal to arcuate lamellae with straight or concave edges, smooth cheilocystidia, and inamyloid spores confirms that the new species belongs to the genus Phloeomana Redhead. The new species is characterized by small, clustered basidiomata, an off-white to pale yellow pileus, fimbriate lamellae, a scurfy, furfuraceous stipe, lacrymoid to oblong-ellipsoid or subcylindrical basidiospores, and abundant, fusiform, ventricose-rostrate cheilocystidia with an obtuse apex and a tapered base.

Phloeomana qilianensis resembles P. speirea (Fr.) Redhead in having small basidiomata with furfuraceous surfaces and ellipsoid basidiospores. However, P. qilianensis can be distinguished from P. speirea by its off-white to pale yellow pileus and smoky-white stipe covered with white dust, whereas P. speirea displays a pale gray-brown to pale yellowish-brown pileus and a stipe that is densely but minutely puberulous throughout. Both species share similar cheilocystidia in terms of abundance and general fusiform shape, but they differ in apex morphology—P. qilianensis has ventricose-rostrate cheilocystidia with tapered bases and obtuse apices, whereas P. speirea features utriform or somewhat irregularly shaped cheilocystidia, usually simple but sometimes furcated, lobed, or bearing a few excrescences, and often curved to somewhat flexuous.

Conclusion

According to preliminary molecular and morphological studies on the specimens collected from China and Pakistan, the species diversity of mycenoid taxa in Asia is underestimated, and many additional new species remain to be described. From Pakistan, only eight species of Mycena have been described based on morpho-anatomical characters. With further fieldwork and the availability of more collections, additional new taxa will undoubtedly be revealed.

Furthermore, the phylogenetic framework of Mycena s.l. should be continuously refined and improved based on specimens and sequences from a broader geographic range, particularly through the inclusion of an increasing number of type materials. In recent years, some new genera have been proposed to accommodate some non-amyloid species formerly placed within Mycena, e.g., Atheniella Redhead, Moncalvo, Vilgalys, Desjardin & B.A. Perry, Phloeomana Redhead (Redhead 2012, 2013), Leucoinocybe Singer ex Antonín, Borov., Holec & Kolařík (Antonín et al. 2019), and Pruinomycena Kun L. Yang, Jia Y. Lin & Zhu L. Yang (Yang et al. 2025).

However, several unresolved clades still persist, and the phylogenetic relationships within the genus Mycena remain unclear (Yang et al. 2025). At present, the ITS region remains the most effective DNA barcode for identifying mycenoid fungi. Nevertheless, additional specimens accompanied by multigene data, such as SSU, LSU, rpb1, and rpb2, are needed to further investigate species diversity and the phylogenetic relationships within Mycena s.l. Such data will help clarify the framework of Mycena s.l., especially as more sequences from type materials become available.

Mycologists should devote greater attention to material collected from specific habitats. Northwest China contains the largest tracts of virgin forest in the country, which serve as essential refuges for a wide variety of unusual macrofungi.

Supplementary Material

XML Treatment for Atheniella parvispora
XML Treatment for Mycena albomarginata
XML Treatment for Mycena oblongispora
XML Treatment for Mycena lavendula
XML Treatment for Mycena longnanensis
XML Treatment for Mycena minispora
XML Treatment for Mycena pakistanica
XML Treatment for Mycena tephroleuca
XML Treatment for Phloeomana qilianensis

Acknowledgments

The authors express their gratitude to Bing Chen, Ying Yang, and Xiusheng Liu for their help during field collections. The authors also thank the anonymous reviewers and the responsible editors whose corrections and suggestions enabled this work to be published. This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 32460005) and the Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province (No. 25JRRA375).

Citation

Fan LF, Naseer A, Khalid A, Khalid AN, Deng Y, Wang CY, Wang Y, Ma SX (2026) Unveiling the diversity of the families Cyphellaceae and Mycenaceae from Southeast Asia. IMA Fungus 17: e182174. https://doi.org/10.3897/imafungus.17.182174

Funding Statement

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 32460005) and the Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province (Nos. 25JRRA375).

Contributor Information

Long Fei Fan, Email: fanlf@gsau.edu.cn.

Arooj Naseer, Email: arooj.hons@pu.edu.pk.

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) use

The authors accept full responsibility for the content of the manuscript, including the disclosure of any use of AI.

No AI tools were used in the preparation of this manuscript.

Adherence to national and international regulations

All the fungal strains used in this study have been legally obtained, respecting the Convention on Biological Diversity (Rio Convention).

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 32460005) and the Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province (Nos. 25JRRA375).

Author contributions

Formal analysis: L.F. Fan, A. Khalid, Y. Deng, S.X. Ma. Funding acquisition: L.F. Fan. Investigation: A.N. Khalid, A. Naseer, L.F. Fan, Y. Deng, C.Y. Wang, Y. Wang, S.X. Ma. Methodology: S.X. Ma. Project administration: L.F. Fan. Writing - original draft: L.F. Fan, A. Naseer. Writing - review and editing: L.F. Fan, A. Naseer.

Author ORCIDs

L.F. Fan https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9784-758X

A. Naseer https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4458-9043

A. Khalid https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7656-0392

A.N. Khalid https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5635-8031

Data availability

The sequences generated in this study are deposited in NCBI GenBank (see Table 1).

Supplementary materials

Supplementary material 1

Alignment for Fig. 1

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.

Long Fei Fan, Arooj Naseer, Ammara Khalid, Abdul Nasir Khalid, Yan Deng, Chen Yan Wang, Yuan Wang, Si Xuan Ma

Data type

pdf

Explanation note

Alignment of ITS and tef1-α used to generate the phylogeny in Fig. 1.

Supplementary material 2

Model Test Output 1

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.

Long Fei Fan, Arooj Naseer, Ammara Khalid, Abdul Nasir Khalid, Yan Deng, Chen Yan Wang, Yuan Wang, Si Xuan Ma

Data type

pdf

Explanation note

The result of best-fit evolution model test.

References

  1. Antonín V, Borovička J, Holec J et al. (2019) Taxonomic update of Clitocybula sensu lato with a new generic classification. Fungal Biology 123(6): 431–447. 10.1016/j.funbio.2019.03.004 [DOI] [PubMed]
  2. Aronsen A (2025) Studies in Mycena–3. Additions and corrections to the genus Mycena (Agaricales) in Norway. Agarica 46: 7–25. 10.5617/agarica.12390 [DOI]
  3. Aronsen A, Læssøe T (2016) The genus Mycena s. l. In The Fungi of Northern Europe 5; Svampetryk: Copenhagen, Denmark 5: 1–373. https://www.zobodat.at/pdf/Z-Mykologie_83_2017_0167-0172.pdf
  4. Berkeley MJ (1836) Fungi. In: Smith JE (Eds) The English flora 5. Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, Brown, and Green, London 5(2): 43.
  5. Bessette A, Miller Jr OK, Bessette AR et al. (1995) Mushrooms of North America in Color: A Field Guide Companion to Seldom-Illustrated Fungi. Syracuse, New York: Syracuse University Press. 1–184.
  6. Binder M, Larsson KH, Matheny PB et al. (2010) Amylocorticiales ord. nov. and Jaapiales ord. nov.: early diverging clades of Agaricomycetidae dominated by corticioid forms. Mycologia 201: 865–880. 10.3852/09-288 [DOI] [PubMed]
  7. Bruns K, Grunert KG (1995) Development and Testing of a Cross-Culturally Valid Instrument: Food-Related Life Style. Advances in Consumer Research 22: 475–480.
  8. Chew AL, Tan YS, Desjardin DE et al. (2014) Four new bioluminescent taxa of Mycena sect. Calodontes from Peninsular Malaysia. Mycologia 106(5): 976–988. 10.3852/13-274 [DOI] [PubMed]
  9. Cooper AC, Desjardin DE, Perry BA (2018) The genus Mycena (Basidiomycota, Agaricales, Mycenaceae) and allied genera from the Republic of São Tomé and Príncipe, West Africa. Phytotaxa 383(1): 1–47. 10.11646/phytotaxa.383.1.1 [DOI]
  10. Corriol G, Jargeat P (2023) Mycena pasvikensis, une espèce boréo-subalpine nouvelle pour l’arc alpin. Bulletin Trimestriel de la Fédération Mycologique Dauphiné-Savoie, (249): 49–55. https://hal.science/hal-04870764v1
  11. Cortés-Pérez A, Desjardin DE, Perry BA et al. (2019) New species and records of bioluminescent Mycena from Mexico. Mycologia 111(2): 1–20. 10.1080/00275514.2018.1554172 [DOI] [PubMed]
  12. Cortés-Pérez A, Guzmán-Dávalos L, Ramírez-Cruz V et al. (2023) New species of bioluminescent Mycena sect. Calodontes (Agaricales, Mycenaceae) from Mexico. Journal of Fungi 9(9): 902. 10.3390/jof9090902 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  13. Dentinger BTM, Gaya E, Brien HO et al. (2016) Tales from the crypt: genome mining from fungarium specimens improves resolution of the mushroom tree of life. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 117(1): 11–32. 10.1111/bij.12553 [DOI]
  14. Eberhardt U, Schütz N, Krause C et al. (2018) Hebelomina (Agaricales) revisited and abandoned. Plant Ecology and Evolution 151(1): 96–109. 10.5091/plecevo.2018.1361 [DOI]
  15. Fan LF, Wang BY, Ma TF et al. (2024) Three new species of Gymnopus and Mycena (Agaricales, Basidiomycota) from Northwestern China. Frontiers in Microbiology 15: 1487598. 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1487598 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  16. Fries EM (1821) Systema mycologicum. Office Berlingiana, Lund, Greifswald 3: 1794–1878. 10.5962/bhl.title.5378 [DOI]
  17. Gardes M, Bruns TD (1993) ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes–application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Molecular Ecology 2: 113–118. 10.1111/j.1365-294x.1993.tb00005.x [DOI] [PubMed]
  18. Ge Y, Liu Z, Zeng H et al. (2021) Updated description of Atheniella (Mycenaceae, Agaricales), including three new species with brightly coloured pilei from Yunnan Province, southwest China. MycoKeys 81: 139–164. 10.3897/mycokeys.81.67773 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  19. Guerreiro MA, Kambach S, Stoll R et al. (2023) Linking processes to community functions—insights into litter decomposition combining fungal metatranscriptomics and environmental NMR profiling. Mycological Progress 22(2): 1–21. 10.1007/s11557-022-01859-0 [DOI]
  20. Guide S (2012) Adobe® illustrator® cs6. https://www.adobe.com/products/illustrator.html
  21. Harder CB, Læssøe T, Kjøller R et al. (2010) A comparison between ITS phylogenetic relationships and morphological species recognition within Mycena sect. Calodontes in Northern Europe. Mycological Progress 9(3): 395–405. 10.1007/s11557-009-0648-7 [DOI]
  22. Harder CB, Lodge DJ, Petersen RH et al. (2012) Amyloidity is not diagnostic for species in the Mycena pearsoniana complex (Mycena section Calodontes). Mycological Progress 2012(11): 725–732. 10.1007/s11557-011-0782-x [DOI]
  23. He MQ, Zhao RL, Hyde KD et al. (2019) Notes, outline and divergence times of Basidiomycota. Fungal Diversity 99(1): 105–367. 10.1007/s13225-019-00435-4 [DOI]
  24. Jaeger RJ, Spiteller P (2010) Mycenaaurin A, an antibacterial polyene pigment from the fruiting bodies of Mycena aurantiomarginata. Journal of Natural Products 73(8): 1350–1354. 10.1021/np100155z [DOI] [PubMed]
  25. Kalichman J, Kirk PM, Matheny PB (2020) A compendium of generic names of agarics and Agaricales. Taxon 69(3): 425–447. 10.1002/tax.12240 [DOI]
  26. Kaygusuz O (2022) New locality record of Mycena purpureofusca (mycenaceae: agaricomycetes) from relict endemic forest of turkey. International conference on agriculture, Azerbaijan State Agrar University, June 04–06.
  27. Kühner R, Maire R (1938) Le Genre Mycena (Fries): Etude Cytologique et Systématique Des Espèces d’Europe et d’Amérique Du Nord; Encyclopédie Mycologique; Paul Lechevalier: Paris, France, 1–710.
  28. Lee HR, Han M, Choi MN et al. (2017) Enhancement of the germination efficiency of Gastrodia elata seeds using a new Mycena species. Journal of Plant Biotechnology 44(1): 56–60. 10.5010/jpb.2017.44.1.056 [DOI]
  29. Liu LN, Shen AR, Shen BM et al. (2025) Preliminary study on species diversity of symbiotic Mycena sensu lato promoting Gastrodia elata seed germination. Acta Edulis Fungi 32(1): 65–76. 10.16488/j.cnki.1005-9873.2025.01.008 [DOI]
  30. Liu Z, Ge Y, Zeng H et al. (2022) Four new species of Mycena sect. Calodontes (Agaricales, Mycenaceae) from northeast China. MycoKeys 93: 23–56. 10.3897/mycokeys.93.86580 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  31. Lu JR, Lei L, Yu FM et al. (2025) Diversity of macrofungi in southeast Xizang, China 2. Mycology 1–57. 10.1080/21501203.2025.2525864 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  32. Lu W, Priyashantha AKH, Galappaththi MC et al. (2024) Fungal bioluminescence: Past, present, and future. Diversity 16(9): 539. 10.3390/d16090539 [DOI]
  33. Maas Geesteranus RA (1985) Studies in Mycena 148–167. Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen: Series C, 1985: 88(1): 47–62.
  34. Maas Geesteranus RA (1992a) Mycenas of the Northern Hemisphere I. Studies in Mycenas and other papers. Proceedings van de Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Amsterdam, North-Holland. 309–310. 10.2307/3760665 [DOI]
  35. Maas Geesteranus RA (1992b) Mycenas of the Northern Hemisphere II. Conspectus of the Mycenas of the Northern Hemisphere. Proceedings van de Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Amsterdam, North-Holland.
  36. Matheny PB, Curtis JM, Hofstetter V et al. (2006) Major clades of Agaricales: a multilocus phylogenetic overview. Mycologia 98(6): 982–995. 10.1080/15572536.2006.11832627 [DOI] [PubMed]
  37. Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T (2012) The CIPRES science gateway: enabling high-impact science for phylogenetics researchers with limited resources. In: proceedings of the 1st conference of the extreme science and engineering discovery environment: bridging from the extreme to the campus and beyond, 1–8. 10.1145/2335755.2335836 [DOI]
  38. Moncalvo JM, Vilgalys R, Redhead SA et al. (2002) One hundred and seventeen clades of euagarics. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 23(3): 357–400. 10.1016/s1055-7903(02)00027-1 [DOI] [PubMed]
  39. Munsell Color [Firm] (1975) Munsell soil color charts. Munsell Color.
  40. Murrill WA (1916) Pleurotus, Omphalia, Mycena and Collybia published in North American Flora. Mycologia 8(4): 218–221.
  41. Na Q, Bau T (2019) Recognition of Mycena sect. Amparoina sect. nov. (Mycenaceae, Agaricales), including four new species and revision of the limits of sect. Sacchariferae. MycoKeys 52: 103–124. 10.3897/mycokeys.52.34647 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  42. Na Q, Bau T (2020) Ten new records of Mycena from China. Mycosystema 39(9): 1783–1808. 10.13346/j.mycosystema.200214 [DOI]
  43. Na Q, Liu ZW, Zeng H et al. (2022) Taxonomic studies of bluish Mycena (Mycenaceae, Agaricales) with two new species from northern China. MycoKeys 90: 119–145. 10.3897/mycokeys.90.78880 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  44. Nylander JAA (2004) MrModeltest v2. Program distributed by the author. Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala. http://www.abc.se/nylander/mrmodeltest2/mrmodeltest2.html
  45. Osmundson TW, Robert VA, Schoch CL et al. (2013) Filling gaps in biodiversity knowledge for macrofungi: Contributions and assessment of an herbarium collection DNA Barcode sequencing project. PLoS ONE 8(4): e62419. 10.1371/journal.pone.0062419 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  46. Perry BA (2002) A taxonomic investigation of Mycena in California. Doctoral dissertation, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, the United States.
  47. Persoon CH (1797) Tentamen dispositionis methodicae fungorum. Petrum Philippum Wolf Leipzig 8(1): 1–76. 10.5962/bhl.title.42674 [DOI]
  48. Rambaut A (2012) FigTree, Version 1.4 https://www.softpedia.com/get/Science-CAD/FigTree-AR.shtml
  49. Redhead SA (2012) Nomenclatural novelties. Index Fungorum 14: 1.
  50. Redhead SA (2013) Nomenclatural novelties. Index Fungorum 15: 1–2.
  51. Sandoval LP, Adriana C, Nicolas N et al. (2025) Mycena luxaustralis, a new bioluminescent species in section Sacchariferae from southern Chile. Plant and Fungal Systematics 70.1: 17–27. 10.35535/pfsyst-2025-0003 [DOI]
  52. Thoen E, Harder CB, Kauserud H et al. (2020) In vitro evidence of root colonization suggests ecological versatility in the genus Mycena. New Phytologist 227(2). 10.1111/nph.16545 [DOI] [PubMed]
  53. Villarreal M, Esteve-Raventós F, Sánchez F et al. (2021) Chrysomycena dunicola, comb. nov. (Agaricales, Porotheleaceae), un nombre prioritario sobre Chrysomycena perplexa. Boletin de la Sociedad Micologica de Madrid 45: 43–52.
  54. Villarreal M, Couceiro A, Sos C et al. (2024) Mycena dasypus (Agaricales, Mycenaceae), primer registro en la Península Ibérica. Boletin de la Sociedad Micologica de Madrid 48: 63–70.
  55. Vizzini A, Picillo B, Perrone L et al. (2019) Chrysomycena perplexa gen. et sp. nov. (Agaricales, Porotheleaceae), a new entity from the Lazio Region. Rivista Micologica Romana 107(2): 96–107.
  56. Vu D, Groenewald M, De VM et al. (2019) Large-scale generation and analysis of filamentous fungal DNA barcodes boosts coverage for kingdom fungi and reveals thresholds for fungal species and higher taxon delimitation. Studies in Mycology 92(1): 135–154. 10.1016/j.simyco.2018.05.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  57. Wei RX, Ge YP, Qi LL et al. (2024) Revealing brownish Mycena diversity in China: new discoveries and taxonomic insights. Journal of Fungi 10(6): 439. 10.3390/jof10060439 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  58. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S et al. (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis, Seliger H, Gelfand DH, Sinsky JJ, White TJ (Eds) PCR Protocols: a Guide to Methods and Applications, 315–322. 10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1 [DOI]
  59. Xiao YX, Liu LN, Tan ZM et al. (2025) Additions to the genus Mycena (Mycenaceae, Agaricales): Descriptions of five new taxa in Hunan Province, China. MycoKeys 28(115): 327–362. 10.3897/mycokeys.115.144137 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  60. Yang KL, Xiong XN, Luo ZJ et al. (2025) Human Activity Impacts on Macrofungal Diversity: A Case Study of Grazing in Subtropical Forests. Journal of Fungi 11: 1–66. 10.3390/jof11100749 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  61. Zhang H, Xiao Y, Tan Z et al. (2024) Mycena brunnescens (Basidiomycota, Mycenaceae), a new species of Mycena sect. Pterigenae from China. Biodiversity Data Journal 12: e125570. 10.3897/BDJ.12.e125570 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

XML Treatment for Atheniella parvispora
XML Treatment for Mycena albomarginata
XML Treatment for Mycena oblongispora
XML Treatment for Mycena lavendula
XML Treatment for Mycena longnanensis
XML Treatment for Mycena minispora
XML Treatment for Mycena pakistanica
XML Treatment for Mycena tephroleuca
XML Treatment for Phloeomana qilianensis
Supplementary material 1

Alignment for Fig. 1

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.

Long Fei Fan, Arooj Naseer, Ammara Khalid, Abdul Nasir Khalid, Yan Deng, Chen Yan Wang, Yuan Wang, Si Xuan Ma

Data type

pdf

Explanation note

Alignment of ITS and tef1-α used to generate the phylogeny in Fig. 1.

Supplementary material 2

Model Test Output 1

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.

Long Fei Fan, Arooj Naseer, Ammara Khalid, Abdul Nasir Khalid, Yan Deng, Chen Yan Wang, Yuan Wang, Si Xuan Ma

Data type

pdf

Explanation note

The result of best-fit evolution model test.

Data Availability Statement

The sequences generated in this study are deposited in NCBI GenBank (see Table 1).


Articles from IMA Fungus are provided here courtesy of The International Mycological Association

RESOURCES