Skip to main content
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1966 Sep;9(5):547–552. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1966.9-547

A conditioned reinforcer maintained by temporal association with the termination of shock

James A Dinsmoor, Marilyn H Clayton
PMCID: PMC1338212  PMID: 5964511

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to determine whether a stimulus can be established as a positive conditioned reinforcer by associating it with the termination of shock, but without training the animal to make any response in its presence. In the first, six rats were conditioned to press a bar to terminate shock on a variable ratio schedule; white noise was then substituted as the immediate consequence, with the shock terminating 30 sec after the last press in its presence. It was found that the rate of pressing in the absence of noise depended on the contingency between the pressing and the noise. The second experiment sought to determine whether the difference in rates before and after the onset of the noise was due to the reinforcement of prior responding by the onset of the noise or to the suppression of subsequent responding by differential reinforcement of competing behavior. Six more rats were trained in the same manner, but with shock terminating 30 sec after the onset of the noise, regardless of what the animal did in its presence. Again the rate was higher before the onset of the noise, indicating that pressing was indeed maintained by the noise as a conditioned reinforcer.

Full text

PDF

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BECK R. C. On secondary reinforcement and shock termination. Psychol Bull. 1961 Jan;58:28–45. doi: 10.1037/h0044276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. DINSMOOR J. A. A wide-range, constant-current shock stimulator. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Jul;4:273–274. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. DINSMOOR J. A., CLAYTON M. H. Chaining and secondary reinforcement based on escape from shock. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Jan;6:75–80. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. DINSMOOR J. Arc suppression in shock circuits. J Exp Anal Behav. 1960 Jan;3:15–16. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1960.3-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. KELLEHER R. T., GOLLUB L. R. A review of positive conditioned reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Oct;5:543–597. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-s543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. MYERS J. L. Secondary reinforcement: a review of recent experimentation. Psychol Bull. 1958 Sep;55(5):284–301. doi: 10.1037/h0046125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES