Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1966 Jul;9(4):377–384. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1966.9-377

The role of discrimination training in the generalization of punishment1

Werner K Honig
PMCID: PMC1338236  PMID: 5961506

Abstract

Pigeons were trained to respond equally to various orientations of three parallel lines projected on a response key. One group was then punished for responding to the vertical lines, but not punished in a line-absent condition. Two other groups were also punished but had no opportunity to make such a discrimination. Orderly generalization gradients were obtained from the discrimination group during recovery from punishment, with least responding to the vertical lines and higher rates to other orientations. Gradients obtained from the non-discrimination groups were flat. A discrimination of punishment contingencies appears to be necessary for a stimulus correlated with punishment to acquire control over its reductive effects.

Full text

PDF
377

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. AZRIN N. H., HOLZ W. C., HAKE D. F. Fixed-ratio punishment. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Apr;6:141–148. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BRETHOWER D. M., REYNOLDS G. S. A facilitative effect of punishment on unpunished behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Apr;5:191–199. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BUTTER C. M. Stimulus generalization along one and two dimensions in pigeons. J Exp Psychol. 1963 Apr;65:339–346. doi: 10.1037/h0040258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. GUTTMAN N., KALISH H. I. Discriminability and stimulus generalization. J Exp Psychol. 1956 Jan;51(1):79–88. doi: 10.1037/h0046219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. HEARST E., KORESKO M. B., POPPEN R. STIMULUS GENERALIZATION AND THE RESPONSE-REINFORCEMENT CONTINGENCY. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 Sep;7:369–380. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. HOFFMAN H. S. A flexible connector for delivering shock to pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav. 1960 Oct;3:330–330. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. HOFFMAN H. S., FLESHLER M. STIMULUS ASPECTS OF AVERSIVE CONTROLS: THE EFFECTS OF RESPONSE CONTINGENT SHOCK. J Exp Anal Behav. 1965 Mar;8:89–96. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1965.8-89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. HONIG W. K., SLIVKA R. M. STIMULUS GENERALIZATION OF THE EFFECTS OF PUNISHMENT. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 Jan;7:21–25. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. JENKINS H. M., HARRISON R. H. Effect of discrimination training on auditory generalization. J Exp Psychol. 1960 Apr;59:246–253. doi: 10.1037/h0041661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. NEWMAN F. L., BARON M. R. STIMULUS GENERALIZATION ALONG THE DIMENSION OF ANGULARITY: A COMPARISON OF TRAINING PROCEDURES. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1965 Aug;60:59–63. doi: 10.1037/h0022334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Slivka R. M., Honig W. K. Abstracts from SEAB Fall Conference: Stimulus generalization and inhibitory control the stimulus generalization of punishment. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 Mar;7(2):165–170. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES