Skip to main content
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1966 Nov;9(6):641–647. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1966.9-641

Free operant avoidance as a function of the response-shock=shock-shock interval1

Fogle C Clark, Larry D Hull
PMCID: PMC1338257  PMID: 5970385

Abstract

Two temporal parameters of free operant or Sidman avoidance behavior are the interval by which responses postpone shocks (Response-Shock interval) and the interval between shocks when no responses occur (Shock-Shock interval). Avoidance behavior was examined in three white rats under conditions where the Response-Shock and Shock-Shock intervals were always equal. With intervals from 10 to 60 sec response rates and shock rates were similar, decreasing, negatively accelerated functions of increasing Response-Shock=Shock-Shock interval. Over this range, response and shock rates were linearly related to the reciprocal of the Response-Shock=Shock-Shock interval. It was shown, however, that this relation cannot hold at extremely long intervals. Both the ratio of responses emitted to shocks received and the percentage of shocks possible which were avoided increased at long Response-Shock=Shock-Shock intervals. These findings may be related to the fact that long intervals provide optimal conditions for conditioning avoidance behavior in the rat.

Full text

PDF
641

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ANGER D. The role of temporal discriminations in the reinforcement of Sidman avoidance behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Jul;6(3):477–506. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-s477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BOREN J. J., SIDMAN M. Maintenance of avoidance behaviour with intermittent shocks. Can J Psychol. 1957 Sep;11(3):185–192. doi: 10.1037/h0083704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. DINSMOOR J. A. Punishment. I. The avoidance hypothesis. Psychol Rev. 1954 Jan;61(1):34–46. doi: 10.1037/h0062725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. HERRNSTEIN R. J. Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Jul;4:267–272. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Herrnstein R. J., Brady J. V. Interaction among components of a multiple schedule. J Exp Anal Behav. 1958 Oct;1(4):293–300. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1958.1-293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. SIDMAN M. Two temporal parameters of the maintenance of avoidance behavior by the white rat. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1953 Aug;46(4):253–261. doi: 10.1037/h0060730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. VERHAVE T. Avoidance responding as a function of simultaneous and equal changes in two temporal parameters. J Exp Anal Behav. 1959 Jul;2:185–190. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1959.2-185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. VERHAVE T. Technique for differential reinforcement of rate of avoidance responding. Science. 1959 Apr 10;129(3354):959–960. doi: 10.1126/science.129.3354.959-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES