Summary
Skinks (family Scincidae) are one of the most widely distributed lizard groups, and hence they are likely subjected to varying selective pressures and metabolic demands. In this study, we assembled 16 complete mitochondrial genomes from skink species. Phylogenetic relationships and divergence times within Scincidae were reconstructed using these data. Subsequently, 36 distinct skink species were classified into five distinct clusters based on bioclimatic variables. Notably, positively selected sites were detected at amino acid position 93 of the ND2 gene in the cluster A (Chalcides ocellatus and C. sepsoides) and at position 267 of the ND1 gene in the cluster 2 (including members of Scincinae and Sphenomorphinae). Environmental correlation analyses revealed that temperature seasonality and precipitation seasonality exhibited the strongest statistical associations with mitochondrial protein-coding genes, particularly COX3 and ND1 genes. These results suggest that the mitochondrial genes of skinks may have been shaped by climate-driven selection.
Keywords: Scincidae, mitochondrial genome, climate-driven selection, positive selection, phylogenetic relationships, divergence time
Graphical abstract

Highlights
-
•
16 complete skink mitogenomes assembled, enabling phylogeny and divergence time estimation
-
•
36 skink species grouped into five distinct climatic clusters from seven bioclimatic variables
-
•
Positively selected sites detected at ND2 and ND1 in climate-defined clusters A and 2
-
•
Temperature seasonality and precipitation seasonality associations with COX3 and ND1 evolution
Zoology; Phylogenetics; Evolutionary biology; Phylogeny
Introduction
The family Scincidae currently comprises 1,993 recognized species (http://www.reptile-database.org, accessed on July 24, 2025). The high numbers reflect substantial species richness and taxonomic diversity.1,2 Skinks are characterized by a broad global distribution, occurring on all continents except Antarctica.3 Major centers of skink diversity are located in Southeast Asia, New Guinea, Oceania, Madagascar, and Central Africa.3
Despite their widespread distribution and high diversity, the phylogenetic relationships within the family Scincidae remain poorly resolved. Based on cranial morphology, Greer4 originally classified Scincidae into four subfamilies: Acontinae, Feylininae, Lygosominae, and Scincinae. However, with the advent of molecular phylogenetic approaches, subsequent studies5,6 have demonstrated that Feylininae is deeply nested within Scincinae, leading to the formal synonymization of Feylininae within Scincinae. The extensive species richness of Scincidae has posed significant challenges for its classification, resulting in overly inclusive higher taxonomic ranks, particularly at the genus level and above, thereby complicating taxonomic revisions and the description of new species. Notably, recent molecular phylogenies have provided robust support for certain previously contentious taxonomic groupings: the validity of Acontinae as a distinct subfamily has been confirmed; intergeneric relationships within Scincinae and Lygosominae remain largely unresolved or inconsistent across studies; and the monophyly of five informal groups within Lygosominae has been substantiated. Based on these findings, Hedges and Conn7 proposed a seven-subfamily classification system in 2012. They split the former Lygosominae into five distinct subfamilies: Egerniinae, Eugongylinae, Lygosominae, Mabuyinae, and Sphenomorphinae, while retaining Acontinae and Scincinae as separate subfamilies. Subsequently, in 2014, Hedges8 proposed adding two subfamilies, Ristellinae and Ateuchosaurus, bringing the total to nine families. In this study, we follow the skink classification system of Hedges.8 Inherent properties of mitochondrial sequences, including their relatively short length, rich gene polymorphism, and absence of recombination, make them well-suited for reconstructing phylogenetic relationships.9 To date, no complete mitochondrial genomes for representatives of Lygosominae are publicly available in NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, accessed on July 15, 2025). Therefore, the use of complete mitogenomes to infer the phylogenetic relationships among the six recognized subfamilies of Scincidae (Scincinae, Sphenomorphinae, Egerniinae, Mabuyinae, Lygosominae, and Eugongylinae) remains unexplored. Consequently, reconstructing the phylogeny of major Scincidae lineages using complete mitogenomic data represents a scientifically valuable pursuit.
The widespread distribution of skinks suggests that different species are frequently exposed to divergent environmental pressures, particularly climatic factors.10 Temporally variation in temperature and precipitation often serves as a potent selective pressure,11,12 promoting adaptive evolutionary responses that enhance fitness under specific climatic conditions. These adaptations may manifest at multiple biological levels, including behavioral, morphological, physiological, and metabolic traits.13,14,15 For example, in cold environments at high latitude and elevations, a greater proportion of skink species exhibit viviparity, as the maternal uterus provides superior thermal insulation compared with externally deposited eggs, thereby improving offspring survival under low ambient temperatures.16,17,18 Morphologically, skinks display extensive variation in body form and size, ranging from terrestrial species with broad heads, robust builds, and adaptations for inhabiting rock crevices (e.g., Plestiodon chinensis) to arboreal forms with slender limbs and agile locomotion (e.g., Dasia vittata) and to limbless forms characterized by reduced heads and elongated, cylindrical bodies (e.g., species within Acontinae). As ectotherms that depend primarily on external heat sources for thermoregulation,19,20 skinks are highly sensitive to fluctuations in ambient climatic conditions.21,22
Mitochondria play a central role in eukaryotic energy metabolism, generating the majority of cellular ATP23,24 while remaining highly sensitive to fluctuations in external temperature.25,26 As semi-autonomous organelles,27,28 mitochondria possess their own double-stranded, circular DNA molecule. The mitochondrial genome typically ranges from 15 to 20 kb in length and consists of 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs), 2 rRNA genes, 22 tRNA genes, and a control region.29,30 The proteins encoded by these 13 PCGs constitute essential subunits of the respiratory chain complexes.31 They mediate electron transfer through the electron transport chain and establish a proton gradient across the inner mitochondrial membrane, thereby driving oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) for ATP production.32,33 Consequently, mitochondrial PCGs serve as effective molecular markers for detecting natural selection.34,35 This is because species inhabiting different climatic zones experience divergent metabolic demands, which may subject mitochondrial PCGs to directional or adaptive selection. For example, selection pressure analyses comparing two Tetranychus (Acariformes, Acari) species from contrasting climates have revealed diversifying positive selection in ATP6 and ND4.36 Similarly, pronounced altitudinal and precipitation gradients in the Balkans may impose selection pressure on ND6 in Lepus europaeus (Lagomorpha, Mammalia), where one positively selected site was detected.37 Comparative mitogenomic analysis of decapods from contrasting environments (equatorial high-temperature and deep-sea low-oxygen habitats) has revealed signatures of positive selection in mitochondrial complex I, III, IV, and V genes, suggesting that local adaptation to temperature and oxygen levels drives adaptive evolution in Achelata (Decapoda, Malacostraca) mitochondrial PCGs.38
Accordingly, this study aims to achieve the following objectives: (1) generate multiple mitogenomes from the family Scincidae to reconstruct phylogenetic relationships and estimate divergence times among lineages, (2) quantify selection pressures across different clusters, and (3) evaluate the strength of associations between bioclimatic variables and mitochondrial PCGs.
Results
Mitochondrial genome statistics
A total of 16 mitochondrial genomes were obtained. Eight sequences were generated through de novo sequencing in this study, including Chalcides sepsoides (16,478 bp), Eutropis multifasciata (16,880 bp), Lipinia microcerca (17,494 bp), Scincella vandenburghi (17,169 bp), Sphenomorphus indicus (16,830 bp), Sp. cryptotis (17,351 bp), Sp. incognitus (17,115 bp), and Sp. maculatus (17,225 bp). The remaining eight mitogenomes were assembled from raw sequencing reads retrieved from the SRA database, including Eulamprus heatwolei (17,116 bp), Mesoscincus schwartzei (16,897 bp), Mochlus sundevallii (16,984 bp), Panaspis annettesabinae (17,176 bp), Tiliqua occipitalis (17,085 bp), Ti. scincoides (17,306 bp), Trachylepis maculilabris (17,073 bp), and Tr. striata (17,130 bp). This combination of newly sequenced and publicly available data maximized the representation of complete mitochondrial sequences across Scincidae subfamilies.
Among the 16 mitogenomes, overall sequence length variation was primarily attributed to differences in the D-loop region. The combined length of the 13 PCGs was highly conserved across species, ranging from 11,319 to 11,406 bp. All mitogenomes contained 13 PCGs, 2 rRNAs, and 22 tRNAs, with identical gene order. ND6 and eight tRNAs (trnQ, trnA, trnN, trnC, trnY, trnS2, trnE, and trnP) were located on the light strand, whereas the remaining genes were encoded on the heavy strand, which is consistent with the typical mitogenome architecture observed in Scincidae (Figure S1). The longest intergenic overlaps were consistently observed between ATP8-ATP6 (10 bp) and ND4L-ND4 (7 bp) across most species. The overlap between ND5 and ND6 varied from 4 to 16 bp. Major intergenic spacers were present in the regions between trnN-trnC, trnE-CYTB, CYTB-trnT, ND1-trnI, trnI-trnQ, and trnS2-trnD, exhibiting notable interspecific variation in length (Table S1).
The overall A + T content of the mitogenomes ranged from 55.9% to 61.0%, with AT-skew values between 0.056 and 0.155 and GC-skew values between −0.327 and −0.273. When restricted to the 13 PCGs, A + T content ranged from 55.5% to 60.7%, showing minimal variation compared with the whole mitogenome. AT-skew values for the PCGs ranged from −0.033 to 0.075, indicating a reduced bias toward adenine over thymine, while GC-skew values ranged from −0.338 to −0.277, reflecting a consistent preference for cytosine over guanine (Table S2). Initiation and termination codons usage was analyzed across all PCGs of species. COX1 consistently used GTG as the initiation codon in all species, whereas the remaining 12 PCGs uniformly initiated with ATG, demonstrating high conservation. Termination codon usage exhibited greater variability. ATP6, ATP8, and ND5 consistently terminated with TAA. Other genes used a combination of complete or incomplete stop codons, including TAA, TA, T, AGA, AGG, and TAG. Detailed codon usage patterns are provided in Table S3. Relative Synonymous Codon Usage (RSCU) analysis revealed moderate interspecific variation in codon usage bias, although shared patterns of preferred codon selection were evident (Table S4; Figure S2). The most frequently used codons included CUA (Leu1), CCA (Pro), CGA (Arg), UCA (Ser2), and ACA (Thr), all with RSCU values exceeding 2 in most species. Notably, CGG was not used in Tr. striata, where arginine was instead encoded predominantly by CGA and CGC, indicating a species-specific shift in codon preference.
Deep phylogenetic relationships within Scincidae are sensitive to taxonomic sampling
In the initial phylogenetic reconstruction using the full dataset (116 taxa), six subfamilies were recovered within Scincidae, with Ateuchosaurus positioned as sister to this clade. Multiple datasets (PCG123, PCG12, PCG123 + rRNA, and PCG12 + rRNA) and analytical conditions (with/without Lacertidae and different outgroups) were explored using both Bayesian inference (BI) and maximum likelihood (ML) methods. However, none of these analyses yielded a consistent and well-supported topology for the deep relationships within the family. Notably, across these analyses, Scincinae and Sphenomorphinae were frequently recovered as sister clades, a result that contradicts the widely accepted phylogeny in which Scincinae occupies the basal position within Scincidae. Given the persistent topological instability under various analytical frameworks, the PCG12 + rRNA dataset was selected for the final presentation of the complete phylogeny, as it provided improved nodal resolution and produced a topology partially congruent with some established relationships (Figure 1). In this topology, ML and BI analyses yielded congruent results for the ingroup. Scincinae and Sphenomorphinae formed a sister clade. Mabuyinae was recovered as the sister group to (Eugongylinae + Lygosominae), albeit with low statistical support (BI posterior probability (PP) = 0.65; ML bootstrap support (BP) = 44), whereas Egerniinae did not form a clade with Mabuyinae. The only notable discrepancy between methods concerned the placement of the outgroup Eublepharis macularius: ML placed it within a monophyletic gekkonid clade, whereas BI resolved its position as a polytomy at the base of Gekkota.
Figure 1.
Phylogenetic tree reconstructed from concatenated mitochondrial sequences (PCG12, 12S rRNA, and 16S rRNA) using both BI and ML methods
Branch support values indicate PP and BP. Subfamilies within Scincidae are color-coded.
A separate analysis was subsequently conducted using a reduced, ecologically focused dataset comprising 36 taxa, designed specifically for climatic analyses. The 36 sequences were selected to represent the family Scincidae exclusively and to avoid conspecific sequence duplication. This analysis recovered the classically accepted phylogenetic relationship, with Scincinae placed at the base of Scincidae, Eugongylinae and Lygosominae forming a clade, and Egerniinae resolved as the sister group to this clade (Figure 2). The discrepancies observed between results from the different datasets highlight the sensitivity and instability of deep phylogenetic relationships within Scincidae to taxonomic sampling, underscoring the need for additional genomic and taxonomic data to achieve robust resolution of these nodes.
Figure 2.
BI tree inferred from 13 PCGs across 38 mitochondrial sequences, with two outgroups deliberately excluded
Cluster are color-coded for visual distinction. Within the subfamily Scincinae only, cluster 1 is defined as cluster A, cluster 5 as cluster B, cluster 2 as cluster C, and cluster 3 as cluster D, for the purpose of using these different clusters as foreground branches in selection pressure analysis exclusively within Scincinae.
Molecular dating based on mitogenomes calibrates the origin times of Scincidae and other major lizard clades
Based on divergence time estimation, a subsequent analysis was conducted to examine temporal divergence at the family level. The results indicate that the 95% highest posterior density (HPD) interval for the divergence of Gekkota is estimated at 137.7–202.4 mya. For Scincidae, the 95% HPD for crown-group divergence is dated to 94.9–129.1 mya, and for Lacertidae, to 115.4–151.2 mya. The most recent common ancestor (MRCA) of these three clades is estimated to have existed between 163.7 and 225.7 mya (Figure 3). The addition of Lacertidae species was motivated by the scarcity of fossil evidence within Scincidae. Using fossil calibration points from Lacertidae allowed for more accurate estimation of divergence times for Scincidae and its subfamilies.
Figure 3.
Phylogenetic tree with evolutionary timescale
Node values represent median divergence times; blue bars indicate 95% HPD intervals. Geological timescale is calibrated at the base.
Gene-specific associations between mitochondrial genetic differentiation and climatic variables
After removing highly autocorrelated bioclimate variables, seven variables were retained: bio2 (mean diurnal temperature range), bio4 (temperature seasonality), bio5 (maximum temperature of the warmest month), bio8 (mean temperature of the wettest quarter), bio15 (precipitation seasonality), bio18 (precipitation of the warmest quarter), and bio19 (precipitation of the coldest quarter). Principal-component analysis (PCA) of these variables revealed that PC1 and PC2 explained 29.9% and 27.5% of the total variance, respectively. Hierarchical clustering grouped the species into five clusters containing 6, 13, 12, 2, and 3 species, respectively (Figure 4A; Table S5). The different clusters do not form monophyletic groups. Subsequent Mantel tests revealed a significant correlation between bio4 and COX3 (Mantel r = 0.174; adjusted p = 0.028; Figure 4C). Distance-based redundancy analysis (dbRDA), which accounts for phylogenetic relationships, identified a significant association between bio4 and ND1 (F = 2.012; adjusted p = 0.021; Figure 4D). Phylogenetic generalized least squares (PGLS) analysis detected significant relationships between bio15 with COX3 (estimate = 0.0035; adjusted p = 0.035; Figure 4E) and bio19 with principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) 3 of ND2 (estimate = 0.0218; adjusted p = 0.049; Figure 4F). Based on the results of PCA clustering, the occurrence records of each species were marked on the map with different colors according to their cluster assignments (Figure 5).
Figure 4.
PCA of skink species and correlation analyses between mitochondrial genes and bioclimatic variables
(A) PCA based on seven bioclimatic variables (bio2, bio4, bio5, bio8, bio15, bio18, and bio19) for 36 species of Scincidae. The ordination displays projections along the first two principal components, with clusters indicated by color.
(B) Variable loading plot corresponding to (A).
(C) Mantel tests were used to assess correlations between bioclimatic variables and genetic distances of mitochondrial genes.
(D) Distance-based redundancy analysis (dbRDA) was performed to examine correlations between bioclimatic variables and mitochondrial genetic distances while controlling for phylogenetic effects.
(E) Associations between bioclimatic variables and average genetic distance were tested using PGLS.
(F) PGLS was used to test associations between bioclimate variables and the first three PCoA axes of each gene. The PCoA axis is indicated by the number on the right.
Asterisks represent adjusted p values less than 0.05.
Figure 5.
Distribution map of the occurrence records used in this study
The species composition within each cluster corresponds to that shown in Figure 4A. See also Table S9.
Clade-specific selection analyses identify distinct evolutionary pressures on mitochondrial genes
Based on the grouping results, we performed clade model analyses on the 13 PCGs for each cluster. The results revealed significant purifying selection acting on all genes across all clusters. Notably, when the proportion of certain site classes was zero, it indicated that the estimation of ω was unstable, and the proportion of positively selected sites was extremely low (Table 1). In branch-site model analysis, several sites were identified as potentially under positive selection using the Bayes empirical Bayes (BEB) method. Specifically, site 267 threonine (Thr) in ND1 of cluster 2 was identified as significant. Subsequently, we selected a smaller taxonomic group, Scincinae, to examine positive selection at a finer taxonomic scale. Based on the previous climatic classification, clusters A, B, C, and D were delineated (Figure 2). Branch-site model analyses were conducted separately for each cluster (A, B, C, and D) designated as the foreground branch. In each respective run, the background branches comprised the remaining 36 species in the phylogeny. Positive selection was detected in ND2 within cluster A, with site 93 proline (Pro) showing a posterior probability >0.95 in the BEB analysis (Table 2). Finally, we performed branch-site unrestricted statistical test for episodic diversification (BUSTED) analysis on all species combined, as well as on each cluster individually as foreground branches. The results indicated that all p values were non-significant, suggesting strong purifying selection acting on all branches across each gene (Table 3).
Table 1.
Clade model analysis of 13 PCGs across climatic groups
| Gene | |2ΔlnL| | p valuea | Proportionb | ω1c | ω2 | ω3 | ω4 | ω5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATP6 | 428.346086 | 0.00000 | 0.31606 | 0.06739 | 0.09078 | 0.11198 | 0.14683 | 0.12272 |
| ATP8 | 217.075758 | 0.00000 | 0.45509 | 0.22519 | 0.30199 | 0.22185 | 0.25118 | 0.57921 |
| COX1 | 1041.172604 | 0.00000 | 0 | 3.00519 | 13.86561 | 12.60001 | 2.87917 | 2.23477 |
| COX2 | 283.05931 | 0.00000 | 0 | 3.85267 | 3.16329 | 3.42613 | 1.35691 | 1.65113 |
| COX3 | 47.730588 | 0.00000 | 0.14363 | 0.09537 | 0.17364 | 0.17703 | 0.11998 | 0.27621 |
| CYTB | 493.091758 | 0.00000 | 0.18956 | 0.10305 | 0.10033 | 0.14027 | 0.10364 | 0.15543 |
| ND1 | 717.713276 | 0.00000 | 0 | 8.83673 | 20.95496 | 30.46004 | 4.96286 | 10.77612 |
| ND2 | 595.386744 | 0.00000 | 0.44383 | 0.05995 | 0.10399 | 0.10589 | 0.08538 | 0.12046 |
| ND3 | 539.705412 | 0.00000 | 0 | 1.88953 | 1.98156 | 0.35960 | 0.00010 | 1.36378 |
| ND4 | 668.251264 | 0.00000 | 0 | 35.56995 | 48.26688 | 52.37260 | 5.81982 | 2.96933 |
| ND4L | 193.881574 | 0.00000 | 0.37645 | 0.10866 | 0.16914 | 0.11115 | 0.03517 | 0.16970 |
| ND5 | 927.373408 | 0.00000 | 0 | 6.35210 | 17.58442 | 19.27908 | 3.10357 | 3.44714 |
| ND6 | 1267.802998 | 0.00000 | 0 | 4.19371 | 11.10174 | 3.05072 | 2.23738 | 1.89639 |
Model comparison: Clade model C (CmC) vs. M2a_rel (number of parameters [np] = 75 vs. 70).
The p value represents the probability obtained from the likelihood ratio test (LRT) comparing the CmC model with the M2a_rel model. A p value of zero indicates a statistically significant difference between the models.
Proportion refers to the estimated fraction of sites subjected to positive selection. In cases where the proportion is zero, the resulting ω can be disregarded, indicating the absence of positively selected sites.
ω denotes the dN/dS ratio.
Table 2.
Branch-site model analysis of positive selection
| Cluster | Gene | Model A LnL | Model A null LnL | |2ΔlnL| | p-adjusteda | Positive sites (BEB analysis)a |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ND1 | −15547.08700 | −15547.08700 | 0 | 1 | 8 A 0.951∗ 32 I 0.983∗ |
| 1 | ND4 | −24781.64371 | −24781.64371 | 0 | 1 | 26 M 0.996∗∗ 442 C 0.984∗ |
| 1 | ND5 | −33247.28523 | −33247.28523 | 0 | 1 | 12 T 0.951∗ 197 M 0.998∗∗ 559 L 0.976∗ |
| 2 | ATP6 | −11251.58971 | −11251.58971 | 0 | 1 | 168 T 0.997∗∗ |
| 2 | ATP8 | −3399.62165 | −3399.62165 | 0 | 1 | 47 N 0.967∗ |
| 2 | ND1 | −15562.13006 | −15556.56692 | 11.12628 | 0.02809 | 267 T 0.967∗ |
| 2 | ND2 | −19224.86956 | −19224.86956 | 0 | 1 | 218 M 1.000∗∗ 222 T 0.958∗ |
| 2 | ND4 | −24777.30292 | −24777.30292 | 0 | 1 | 58 I 0.998∗∗ 438 I 0.998∗∗ |
| 2 | ND5 | −33238.32639 | −33238.32639 | 0 | 1 | 5 P 0.974∗ 47 T 1.000∗∗ 573 N 1.000∗∗ |
| 3 | ATP6 | −11254.00401 | −11254.00401 | 0 | 1 | 56 L 0.990∗ |
| 3 | COX1 | −20314.99341 | −20314.99341 | 0 | 1 | 489 S 0.999∗∗ 515 R 0.999∗∗ |
| 3 | CYTB | −17675.64219 | −17675.64219 | 0 | 1 | 374 L 0.983∗ |
| 3 | ND1 | −15551.61408 | −15551.61408 | 0 | 1 | 256 H 0.999∗∗ |
| 3 | ND2 | −19213.15612 | −19213.15612 | 0 | 1 | 93 P 0.998∗∗ 217 M 1.000∗∗ 313 H 0.998∗∗ |
| 3 | ND4 | −24761.95986 | −24761.95986 | 0 | 1 | 94 V 0.990∗ 171 M 0.976∗ 179 V 0.980∗ 359 A 0.999∗∗ |
| 3 | ND5 | −33228.01266 | −33228.01266 | 0 | 1 | 69 N 1.000∗∗ 184 F 1.000∗∗ 186 A 0.963∗ 563 L 0.985∗ 572 T 0.992∗∗ |
| 3 | ND6 | −9314.765692 | −9314.765692 | 0 | 1 | 101 L 0.992∗∗ 107 G 0.985∗ 109 V 0.999∗∗ |
| 5 | COX3 | −10883.21192 | −10882.74727 | 0.92928 | 1 | 153 E 0.986∗ |
| 5 | CYTB | −17698.94799 | −17698.94799 | 0 | 1 | 244 S 0.990∗ |
| 5 | ND1 | −15555.55487 | −15557.06952 | 3.02929 | 1 | 320 Q 1.000∗∗ |
| 5 | ND2 | −19232.43074 | −19232.67424 | 0.48700 | 1 | 4 T 0.979∗ 278 T 0.989∗ 320 K 0.967∗ |
| 5 | ND3 | −6475.71110 | −6475.71110 | 0 | 1 | 10 T 0.966∗ |
| 5 | ND4 | −24787.58404 | −24787.58404 | 0 | 1 | 74 V 0.973∗ 191 M 0.974∗ |
| 5 | ND4L | −5383.88615 | −5384.04780 | 0.32329 | 1 | 16 M 0.999∗∗ |
| 5 | ND5 | −33252.57660 | −33252.57660 | 0 | 1 | 409 L 0.963∗ 541 L 0.997∗∗ |
| 5 | ND6 | −9331.60076 | −9331.61458 | 0.02765 | 1 | 104 L 0.973∗ |
| A | ND2 | −19233.00533 | −19238.71498 | 11.41929 | 0.00509 | 93 P 0.985∗ |
| B | COX3 | −10885.56891 | −10887.26146 | 3.38509 | 0.23026 | 153 E 1.000∗∗ |
| B | ND6 | −9329.262089 | −9330.320451 | 2.11672 | 0.33996 | 104 L 0.996∗∗ |
| C | COX1 | −20319.17268 | −20319.17268 | 0 | 1 | 453 L 0.980∗ |
| C | ND4 | −24789.85375 | −24789.85375 | 0 | 1 | 191 M 0.958∗ |
| D | CYTB | −17692.96574 | −17692.96574 | 0 | 1 | 107 Y 0.993∗∗ |
| D | ND2 | −19238.01289 | −19238.01464 | 0.00349 | 1 | 336 I 0.981∗ |
Model comparison: model A vs. model A null (number of parameters [np] = 75 vs. 74). BEB, Bayes empirical Bayes. LnL, Log-likelihood.
We detected a large number of potentially positively selected sites, with posterior probabilities >0.95 based on BEB analysis. Among these, only the ND1 gene in cluster 2 and the ND2 gene in cluster A had adjusted p values <0.05 and were therefore subjected to focused analysis. The p value <0.05 justifies the application of the BEB method and supports the existence of positive selection in the dataset, while BEB >0.95 (marked with ∗) and >0.99 (marked with ∗∗) identify the specific residues involved.
Table 3.
BUSTED analysis for episodic positive selection
| Gene | Cluster 1a | Cluster 2 | Cluster 3 | Cluster 4 | Cluster 5 | Alla |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATP6 | 1.551 (0%)b | 3.670 (0.52%) | 1.214 (0%) | 7.186 (4.41%) | 1.664 (0%) | 1.787 (0.76%) |
| ATP8 | 1.146 (10.05%) | 2.315 (1.08%) | 1.444 (0%) | >100 (1.56%) | 1.003 (0%) | 2.861 (0%) |
| COX1 | 1.566 (0.04%) | 1.001 (0%) | 1.275 (0%) | 1.663 (0%) | 14.859 (0%) | 2.691 (0%) |
| COX2 | 1.685 (0%) | 1.000 (0.14%) | 1.729 (0%) | 4.613 (1.15%) | 1.630 (0%) | 2.302 (0%) |
| COX3 | 1.540 (0%) | >100 (0.23%) | 2.804 (0%) | 3.529 (3.14%) | >100 (0.21%) | 5.659 (0.08%) |
| CYTB | 1.860 (0.72%) | 1.000 (0.53%) | 19.308 (0.28%) | 1.432 (4.92%) | 1.001 (0%) | 2.108 (0.48%) |
| ND1 | 3.848 (0.36%) | 2.497 (0.19%) | 1.803 (0.87%) | 23.384 (0.41%) | 1.001 (0%) | 1.213 (0.56%) |
| ND2 | 1.818 (0%) | 1.759 (0.72%) | 4.748 (0.65%) | 11.030 (0%) | 2.550 (0%) | 1.787 (1%) |
| ND3 | 1.584 (0%) | 2.183 (0.65%) | 1.015 (0%) | 54.888 (4.29%) | 1.003 (0%) | 2.169 (0.11%) |
| ND4 | 2.228 (1.57%) | 1.959 (0%) | 1.738 (0.36%) | 3.495 (0%) | 3.909 (0%) | 1.719 (0.32%) |
| ND4L | 1.885 (0%) | 2.656 (0.56%) | 2.331 (0%) | 1.417 (0%) | 1.988 (0%) | 5.69 (0.27%) |
| ND5 | 2.361 (0.56%) | 1.346 (0.47%) | 2.408 (1.25%) | 1.500 (11.43%) | 3.300 (0.59%) | 2.083 (0.58%) |
| ND6 | 7.889 (0.44%) | 23.308 (0.16%) | 9.471 (1.28%) | 2.548 (0%) | 1.005 (0%) | 6.379 (0.39%) |
BUSTED, branch-site unrestricted statistical test for episodic diversification. All p values were non-significant after false discovery rate (FDR) correction (adjusted p > 0.05).
Analyses were performed with each cluster and all species combined designated as the foreground branch.
Values represent the ω estimate under episodic diversifying selection, with the proportion of sites under selection shown in parentheses.
The positively selected site in the ND2 gene is located within a transmembrane helix, corresponding to the initial residues of the fourth helix near the lipid-aqueous interface. At this site, the foreground branches encode glutamic acid (Glu) or glycine (Gly), whereas the background branches encode Pro. In contrast, the positively selected site in the ND1 gene lies within the central region of a transmembrane helix. Here, the foreground branches possess alanine (Ala), whereas the background branches possess Thr (Figure 6). We subsequently examined the hydrogen bonding interactions formed by the amino acid residues at this site with their surrounding residues, both before and after the amino acid substitution in ND1 (Figure 7).
Figure 6.
Protein structure diagrams of ND1 and ND2
The structure of ND1 was predicted based on P. elegans, and that of ND2 was predicted based on C. sepsoides. The residues 267Thr and 93Pro correspond to the positively selected amino acid sites.
Figure 7.
Hydrogen bonding interactions before and after the Thr to Ala substitution in ND1
(A) Hydrogen bonding interactions of residue 267Ala with surrounding amino acids at site 267 of ND1 in the foreground branch, predicted using P. elegans. Blue lines represent hydrogen bonds.
(B) Hydrogen bonding interactions of residue 267Thr with surrounding amino acids at the same site in the background branch, predicted using T. gigas gigas. Blue lines represent hydrogen bonds.
Discussion
Notably, a previous study also recovered Scincinae and Sphenomorphinae as sister clades, although based on limited datasets.39 In our initial tree reconstruction, Scincinae and Sphenomorphinae were represented by substantially more species than other subfamilies. This sampling disparity was particularly pronounced for Lygosominae and Eugongylinae, each represented by only one or two species, primarily due to the limited availability of complete mitogenomes for these groups in public databases. We hypothesize that this topology may reflect long-branch attraction (LBA) artifacts,40,41,42 as when taxon sampling was reduced for Scincinae and Sphenomorphinae in the secondary analysis, these groups no longer formed a clade. Therefore, reconstructing robust phylogenies within Scincidae using complete mitochondrial sequences requires expanded taxonomic sampling with balanced representation across subfamilies. Moreover, the inherently fast evolutionary rate and susceptibility to saturation of mitochondrial datasets may have contributed to these results. Thus, incorporating nuclear gene datasets in future studies could yield more robust phylogenetic resolution.
Subsequent divergence dating estimated the crown age of Squamata at 193.9 mya (163.7–225.7 mya), consistent with recent molecular estimates.43,44 Datta-Roy et al.45 recovered Scincidae as a clade originating at 98 mya (84–113 mya) using a dataset of six nuclear loci, including MKL1, PRLR, PTGER4, R35, RAG-1, and SNCAIP. Skinner et al.46 estimated its origin at 106 mya (83–131 mya) based on three nuclear genes (BDNF, c-mos, and PTPN12), while Chapple et al.47 dated it to 115.8 mya using a mixed dataset combining mitochondrial (ND2) and nuclear (RAG-1, c-mos) genes. In comparison, our mitochondrial-only dataset estimated its origin at 104.7 mya (94.9–129.1 mya). Comparison across these studies suggests that the choice of dataset type (nuclear, mitochondrial, or mixed) did not substantially impact the estimated divergence times. This variation may instead reflect differences in fossil calibrations applied, as well as the taxonomic composition and sampling effort of each study.
By the Mid-Cretaceous, insects had already undergone substantial diversification,48 as evidenced by abundant insect fossils preserved in Burmese amber.49 This period coincides with the Cretaceous Terrestrial Revolution (KTR, 80–125 mya), during which the radiation of flowering plants triggered major ecological shifts, driving the diversification of pollinators, herbivores, and their predators.50 Given that skinks are predominantly insectivorous, the ecological opportunities created by the KTR likely promoted their population expansion and lineage divergence.51,52
In the PCA, we removed climate variables with correlations >0.8 to reduce multicollinearity and used the silhouette coefficient to select the optimal k for hierarchical clustering. This yielded five clusters with uneven species numbers, including two clusters containing only two or three species. To characterize the climatic niches of each cluster, we generated a variable loading plot (Figure 4B) and a distribution map (Figure 5). Species in cluster 1 exhibited higher bio2 values (greater mean diurnal temperature range) and were distributed along the Mediterranean coast, southwestern Australia, and southern Australia. Cluster 2 species were characterized by higher bio18 values, indicating warm-season precipitation consistent with monsoon climate, and were distributed in southeastern and eastern Asia. Cluster 3 species were associated primarily with bio5 (high maximum temperature of the warmest month but low precipitation in the coldest quarter), with distributions largely overlapping tropical savanna regions, mainly in eastern Africa and northern and eastern Australia. Cluster 4 species were characterized by high contributions from both bio5 and bio19, characteristic of tropical rainforest climates, primarily located in the Indonesian Archipelago. Cluster 5 species exhibited high contributions from bio4 and bio15, indicating pronounced temperature and precipitation seasonality, and were also located in the monsoon regions of eastern Asia. These findings suggest that classifying skinks by climate type is informative. However, in Southeast Asia and southeastern Australia, species from different clusters overlapped geographically, indicating limitations in this analytical approach.
To avoid the instability of discrete cluster classification, we treated bioclimatic variables as continuous predictors without species clustering. Subsequently, we performed Mantel tests, dbRDA, and PGLS analyses, with dbRDA and PGLS accounting for phylogenetic relationships among species. All p values were corrected using false discovery rate (FDR). The results revealed significant correlations between bio4 and COX3, bio15 and COX3, and bio4 and ND1, but no single variable showed consistent significance across all methods. The p value for the association between bio19 and ND2 PCoA3 in Figure 4F approached 0.05, warranting cautious interpretation. Overall, we did not find widespread correlations between the seven climate variables and mitochondrial genes. The few significant findings were limited to bio4 and bio15. This suggests that temperature and precipitation seasonality may be weakly associated with genetic differentiation in skink mitochondrial genes. Additionally, COX3 and ND1 emerge as candidate genes for adaptive evolution under temperature or precipitation variation. We hypothesize that for skinks as ectotherms, temperature seasonality may impose selective pressure on mitochondrial genes involved in energy metabolism. Precipitation seasonality, often linked to primary productivity,53 promotes plant growth and consequently increases insect prey availability, which may also exert selective pressure on mitochondrial genes by altering energy demands. In a study on Lacertidae lizards, using the gradient forest approach, the R2-weighted importance of the ATP6, ATP8, and ND3 genes relative to the 19 bioclimatic variables was assessed. Bio3 (isothermality), bio4, bio13 (precipitation of the wettest month), and bio15 emerged as the most influential variables associated with environmental adaptation.54 These findings partially align with our results regarding bio4 and bio15, suggesting that these variables may play important roles in driving genetic variation among lizards. However, the contribution of climatic variables should be interpreted with caution, as correlation does not imply causation. In assessments of the combined impacts of deforestation and climate change on the geographic distribution of Notomabuya frenata (Mabuyinae, Scincidae), bio3 and bio19 were identified as making the most significant contributions.55 This study on South American skinks yielded different results from ours, likely because it did not use mitochondrial gene data but rather used multiple physiological datasets of N. frenata. This suggests that the influence of climatic variables on genetic markers differs from their effects on physiological traits and biogeographic distribution patterns, highlighting the importance of dataset type in shaping analytical outcomes.
Clade model and BUSTED analyses revealed that all clusters were under strong purifying selection, indicating significant selective constraints on the skink mitochondrial genome that likely prevent the accumulation of deleterious mutations. In the branch-site model analysis, we detected numerous potentially positively selected sites, two of which reached statistical significance and were examined in detail. Specifically, with species in cluster 2 designated as the foreground branch, a positive selection signal was detected at amino acid site 267 of ND1. With species in cluster A (C. ocellatus and C. sepsoides) served as the foreground branch, a positive selection signal was detected at amino acid site 93 of ND2. Species in cluster 2 are primarily distributed in East Asia, mostly within subtropical monsoon climate zones. In contrast, C. ocellatus and C. sepsoides are mainly distributed in North Africa, the Mediterranean region, and the Arabian Peninsula,56,57 where deserts are widespread.
These results suggest that the hot, arid desert environment and monsoon climate may exert distinct selective pressures on skink lineages inhabiting these regions. The ND1 and ND2 gene products are subunits of respiratory complex I, which mediates electron transfer from NADH to ubiquinone and drives proton translocation across the mitochondrial inner membrane.58,59,60 In ND2, the Pro at position 93 was replaced by Gly or Glu. This site is located within the initial residues of an alpha helix. According to the proline rule,61,62 proline at the N1 (N-terminal first) position of an alpha helix enhances protein thermostability due to its rigid pyrrolidine ring, which restricts backbone flexibility.63,64 Proline is indeed frequently observed at the N1 position.65 Therefore, while background branches retain Pro at this site, its substitution by Gly/Glu in the desert-adapted lineage suggests that enhanced thermostability was not the primary target of selection. This substitution may lead to increased local flexibility,66 potentially enabling the alpha helix to undergo necessary conformational changes more readily under high-temperature conditions, thereby facilitating the survival of species in desert regions. In the ND1 gene, Thr at position 267 was replaced by Ala, substituting a hydrophilic residue capable of hydrogen bonding (–OH group) with a hydrophobic one. This replacement leads to the loss of hydrogen bonds. Structural analysis revealed that the substitution of Thr with Ala abolishes two hydrogen bonds previously formed with Met at position 264 (Figure 7). This may reduce structural stability while increasing conformational flexibility. Such increased plasticity could facilitate adaptation to humid, seasonally variable monsoon climates, although further experimental validation is required. Indeed, amino acid substitution can lead to partial functional changes in proteins and facilitate adaptation to different environments. For instance, a previous study67 identified a single amino acid replacement (Glu183Lys) in the MC1R gene that is differentially fixed between dark and light populations of the lizard Phrynocephalus erythrurus, strongly associating with dorsal color variation. Functional assays revealed that this mutation enhances MC1R-α-MSH binding, increases intracellular cyclic AMP (cAMP) levels and cell surface expression, ultimately leading to elevated melanin synthesis and providing a mechanistic link between genotype and adaptive coloration in different environments. In another study,68 a conserved amino acid substitution at an allosteric site in Iguana iguana hemoglobin is hypothesized to underlie a previously unknown molecular mechanism that confers ADP-specific allosteric regulation. This enables oxygen-binding affinity to respond to metabolic changes (temperature, pH) and thereby facilitating survival across diverse thermal environments.
In summary, in this study, we extracted bioclimatic variables for different skink species and subsequently performed PCA, which grouped these species into five distinct climatic clusters. We then examined the selective pressures acting on skinks within each of these five climatic clusters. Additionally, we conducted correlation analyses between different mitochondrial genes and climatic variables. Furthermore, we reconstructed a phylogenetic tree of skinks based on mitochondrial genes and estimated their divergence times.
Limitations of the study
Complete mitochondrial genome sequences remain insufficient for the family Scincidae, with particularly sparse representation in several subfamilies. This limited sampling may contribute to the instability observed in the deep-level phylogenetic results. Furthermore, inherent limitations of mitochondrial datasets may also have influenced these phylogenetic inferences, and incorporating nuclear gene datasets in future studies should help resolve these uncertainties. With respect to the correlation analyses, although statistically significant, the correlation values were relatively low. This suggests that the associations between mitochondrial genes and bioclimatic variables, while detectable, likely result from polygenic effects with minor individual contributions. Future studies using more comprehensive approaches are required to substantiate these preliminary correlations. The mitochondrial sequences used were not optimally matched to the occurrence records, which may lead to discrepancies among populations of the same species. Where feasible, population-level analyses would provide more accurate insights into these relationships.
Resource availability
Lead contact
Requests for further information and resources should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the lead contact, Danna Yu (ydn@zjnu.cn).
Materials availability
This study did not generate new unique reagents.
Data and code availability
-
•
Nucleotide sequence data have been deposited at GenBank: PX933415, PX933416, PX933417, PX933418, PX933419, PX933420, PX933421, PP571910, BK083147, BK083148, BK083149, BK083150, BK083151, BK083152, BK083153, BK083154. The occurrence records dataset is available in Table S9 and has been deposited at Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20839769).
-
•
This paper does not report original code.
-
•
All other data reported in the manuscript will be shared by the lead contact upon request.
-
•
Any additional information required to reanalyze the data reported in this paper is available from the lead contact upon request.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to two anonymous reviewers for their comments on a previous version of this manuscript. We thank Huiyuan Wu for his assistance in mitogenome assembly and phylogenetic analysis. This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 31801963) and the 2025 Zhejiang Province College Student Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program (S202510345069).
Author contributions
X.W., L.Z., J.Z., and D.Y. conceived and designed the study; X.W., X.M., and L.Z. developed the methodology; X.W. performed the formal analysis; L.Z., L.D., L.C., R.Z., and J.Z. provided resources; D.Y. validated the findings and administered the project; X.W. wrote the original draft; X.W., J.Z., and D.Y. participated in reviewing and editing the manuscript; X.W. prepared the visualizations; J.Z. supervised the research; D.Y. and X.W. acquired the funding.
Declaration of interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
STAR★Methods
Key resources table
| REAGENT or RESOURCE | SOURCE | IDENTIFIER |
|---|---|---|
| Critical commercial assays | ||
| Animal Genomic DNA Purification Kit | Sangon Biotech | NO. B518251 |
| Deposited data | ||
| Chalcides sepsoides mitogenome | this study | GenBank: PX933415 |
| Eutropis multifasciata mitogenome | this study | GenBank: PX933416 |
| Lipinia microcerca mitogenome | this study | GenBank: PX933417 |
| Scincella vandenburghi mitogenome | this study | GenBank: PX933418 |
| Sphenomorphus indicus mitogenome | this study | GenBank: PX933419 |
| Sphenomorphus cryptotis mitogenome | this study | GenBank: PX933421 |
| Sphenomorphus incognitus mitogenome | this study | GenBank: PX933420 |
| Sphenomorphus maculatus mitogenome | this study | GenBank: PP571910 |
| Eulamprus heatwolei mitogenome | SRR12454791 | GenBank: BK083147 |
| Mesoscincus schwartzei mitogenome | SRR31187334 | GenBank: BK083148 |
| Mochlus sundevallii mitogenome | SRR30256543 | GenBank: BK083149 |
| Panaspis annettesabinae mitogenome | SRR30501129 | GenBank: BK083150 |
| Tiliqua occipitalis mitogenome | SRR31745583 | GenBank: BK083151 |
| Tiliqua scincoides mitogenome | SRR31749467 | GenBank: BK083152 |
| Trachylepis maculilabris mitogenome | SRR30716522 | GenBank: BK083153 |
| Trachylepis striata mitogenome | SRR30554492 | GenBank: BK083154 |
| Occurrence records database (Table S9) | this study | Zenodo: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20839769 |
| Software and algorithms | ||
| fastQC v0.11.6 | Andrews et al.69 | https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/ |
| NOVOPlasty v4.2 | Dierckxsens et al.70 | https://github.com/ndierckx/NOVOPlasty |
| GetOrganelle v1.7.1 | Jin et al.71 | https://github.com/Kinggerm/GetOrganelle |
| MitoZ v3.6 | Meng et al.72 | https://github.com/linzhi2013/MitoZ |
| MITOS | Bernt et al.73 | https://usegalaxy.eu/ |
| PhyloSuite v1.2.3 | Xiang et al.74 | https://github.com/dongzhang0725/PhyloSuite/releases/tag/1.2.3 |
| CGView | Grant et al.75 | https://proksee.ca/ |
| MAFFT | Katoh et al.76 | https://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/software/ |
| Gblocks | Castresana77 | https://github.com/atmaivancevic/Gblocks |
| PartitionFinder2 | Lanfear et al.78 | https://www.robertlanfear.com/partitionfinder/ |
| MrBayes v3.2 | Ronquist et al.79 | http://nbisweden.github.io/MrBayes/ |
| RAxML v8.2 | Stamatakis80 | https://github.com/stamatak/standard-RAxML |
| PAML v4.10.7 | Yang81 | https://github.com/abacus-gene/paml |
| Tracer v1.7.2 | Rambaut et al.82 | http://beast.community/tracer |
| ArcGIS v10.8 | Esri | https://www.esri.com |
| MEGA v11 | Tamura et al.83 | https://www.megasoftware.net/ |
| vegan R package | Oksanen et al.84 | https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan |
| ape R package | Paradis et al.85 | https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ape |
| terra R package | Hijmans et al.86 | https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=terra |
| caret R package | Max Kuhn87 | https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=caret |
| car R package | John et al.88 | https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=car |
| cluster R package | Maechler et al.89 | https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=cluster |
| phylolm R package | Ho et al.90 | https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=phylolm |
| HyPhy v2.5 | Kosakovsky Pond et al.91 | https://github.com/veg/hyphy |
| SWISS-MODEL | Waterhouse et al.92 | https://swissmodel.expasy.org/ |
| UCSF Chimera v1.19 | Pettersen et al.93 | https://www.cgl.ucsf.edu/chimera/ |
| Other | ||
| Illumina sequencing | Beijing BerryGenomics Co., Ltd. | Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform |
Experimental model and study participant details
All animal care protocols were approved by the Animal Care Committee of Zhejiang Normal University (protocol # ZSDW2024038). Skinks were collected, transported to the laboratory, and housed in identical plastic incubators (120 × 90 × 110 cm) under controlled conditions (25°C, 12 h light/dark cycle). They were fed a diet of mealworms (Tenebrio molitor). Water was regularly provided in a Petri dish, and occasionally the inner walls of the enclosures were sprayed with water to maintain humidity. A small piece of tail tissue was clipped from each skink for mitochondrial DNA analysis. Because mitochondrial genome sequences are generally considered to be stably inherited and not known to vary systematically with sex or age, a formal statistical analysis for the influence of sex or developmental stage on the sequence data was not performed.
Method details
Sample collection and DNA extraction
Specimens were collected from the following localities: C. sepsoides (Abu Rawash, Giza, Egypt), Eut. multifasciata (18°54′N 109°41′E, Wuzhishan, Hainan, China), L. microcerca (Phuc-son, Annam, Vietnam), Sc. vandenburghi (32°04′N 118°32′E, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China), Sp. indicus (29°57′N 120°33′E Shaoxing, Zhejiang, China), Sp. cryptotis (21°30′E 107°56′N, Shiwandasha, Guangxi, China), Sp. incognitus (23°10′N 113°17′E, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China), and Sp. maculatus (23°55′N 106°35′E, Baise, Guangxi, China). The specimens of the non-native species C. sepsoides and L. microcerca were collected in 2010 and are currently deposited in the Zoological Museum of Zhejiang Normal University under voucher numbers ZJNU-20100712-DWSX 012 and ZJNU-20100712-DWSX 013, respectively. The remaining six species were collected during the fieldwork from 2022 to 2024. All fluid-preserved specimens and freshly captured specimens were photographed prior to tissue sampling. Genomic DNA was then extracted from tail-clip samples using the Ezup Column Animal Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Mitogenome sequencing, assembly, and annotation
DNA samples with concentrations exceeding 25 μg/mL were submitted to Berry Genomics (Beijing, China) for next-generation sequencing. High-throughput sequencing was performed on the Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) using a 200 bp paired-end sequencing strategy. The quality of raw sequencing data was initially assessed using FastQC v0.11.6. Subsequently, low-quality reads and adapter sequences were filtered out using fastp. Sequencing data for additional species were retrieved from the SRA database: Eul. heatwolei (SRR12454791),94 Me. schwartzei (SRR31187334),95 Mo. sundevallii (SRR30256543),95 P. annettesabinae (SRR30501129),95 Ti. occipitalis (SRR31745583), Ti. scincoides (SRR31749467), Tr. maculilabris (SRR30716522),95 and Tr. striata (SRR30554492).95 A total of 16 mitochondrial genomes, including those newly generated and previously published sequences, were assembled using NOVOPlasty v4.2,70 GetOrganelle v1.7.1,71 or MitoZ v3.672 to ensure data accuracy and integrity. For all assemblies, the default parameters of each software package were used. The gene coordinates of all 37 mitochondrial genes were annotated using MITOS WebServer (https://usegalaxy.eu/, accessed on 26 June 2025)73 followed by manual curation to ensure annotation accuracy. Genomic features such as intergenic overlaps, intergenic spacers, A + T content, AT-skew, GC-skew, and RSCU values were calculated using PhyloSuite v1.2.3.74 Complete mitogenome maps were visualized using the CGView online server (https://proksee.ca/, accessed on 26 June 2025).75
Phylogenetic tree construction
A total of 100 additional mitochondrial sequences were downloaded from the NCBI database and combined with the 16 previously obtained sequences, resulting in a final total of 116. The final dataset included 59 Lacertidae sequences,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118 50 Scincomorpha sequences,34,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137 and seven Gekkota sequences138,139,140,141 (Table S6). The 13 PCGs and two rRNAs were extracted from all sequences, individually aligned using MAFFT,76 trimmed with Gblocks77 to remove ambiguously aligned regions, and concatenated into a single supermatrix using PhyloSuite v1.2.3. PartitionFinder278,142 was applied to determine the optimal partitioning schemes (the first and second codon positions were used for one analysis of 116 taxa, while the complete coding sequence was used for the second analysis of 38 taxa) and best-fit nucleotide substitution models (Table S7). Bayesian Inference (BI) analysis was performed in MrBayes v3.279 under the selected models, with 10 million generations with trees sampled every 1,000 generations. The initial 25% of sampled generations were discarded as burn-in, and convergence was confirmed by ensuring that the average standard deviation of split frequencies remained below 0.01. Maximum Likelihood (ML) analysis was conducted in RAxML v8.280 with 1,000 bootstrap replicates to evaluate nodal support.
In the initial phylogenetic analysis, ML and BI trees were constructed using a dataset comprising first- and second-codon positions of the 13 PCGs (PCG12) and rRNA sequences from 116 taxa. For the subsequent analysis, the dataset was restricted to species within Scincidae, and putative paralogous sequences were excluded, resulting in a refined set of 36 ingroup taxa. A new BI analysis was then conducted using the 13 mitochondrial PCGs from these 36 species along with two outgroup species (Smaug warreni114 and Lepidophyma flavimaculatum123) to reconstruct the phylogenetic relationships within the family Scincidae.
Divergence time estimation
Divergence times were estimated using the mcmctree module in PAML v4.10.7,81 with Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling conducted over 1 million generations and the initial 40% of samples discarded as burn-in. Four fossil-based calibration points were applied to constrain node ages. To compensate for the limited availability of reliable calibration points within Scincidae, external calibrations from Lacertidae and Gekkota were also incorporated. Following Heinicke et al.,143 the divergence between Gekkonidae and Phyllodactylidae was calibrated to a uniform prior of 97–110 Mya using an amber-preserved fossil representing the crown group Gekkota.144 Following Salvi et al.,145 the split between Gallotiinae and Lacertinae was constrained to a prior range of 40.4–150 Mya using the fossil Plesiolacerta lydekkeri (assigned to Lacertinae)146 and molecular estimates from the median crown age of Lacertoidea.147 The crown age of the Gallotiinae clade was calibrated to 28.1–61.6 Mya using both minimum and maximum fossil constraints.148,149 Following Ghosh et al.,150 the most recent common ancestor (MRCA) of Egerniinae was constrained to a uniform prior of 12.5–25 Mya. We used uniform distributions for fossil calibrations and employed the Birth-Death Process as the tree prior. All resulting time estimates were evaluated in Tracer v1.7.282 to confirm convergence and adequate sampling, with effective sample size (ESS) values exceeding 200 for all parameters (Table S8).
Climate analyses
Bioclimatic variables are derived from monthly total precipitation, monthly minimum temperature, and monthly maximum temperature, resulting in 19 variables that provide a basis for identifying key factors influencing species’ geographic distribution and environmental adaptation.151 We downloaded 19 bioclimatic layers from WorldClim 2.1151 (https://worldclim.org/data/, accessed on 20 June 2025) at a spatial resolution of 2.5 arc-minutes. Occurrence records for 36 species of Scincidae were subsequently obtained from GBIF152 (https://www.gbif.org/, accessed on 4 March 2026). To mitigate sampling bias, the occurrence data were thinned using a grid-based approach. A total of 2,341 occurrence points were retained after processing (Table S9). Species with fewer than five occurrence points included I. gyldenstolpei, Pa. annettesabinae, Pl. tunganus, and Tro. hangnam. For each species, the maximum number of occurrence points retained was limited to 100. A distribution map of occurrence records was generated using ArcGIS v10.8 (Esri, Redlands, CA, USA). The 19 bioclimatic variables were extracted for each occurrence point using the terra86 package in R. For each species, the mean value of each bioclimatic variable was calculated across all its occurrence points to represent the species’ climatic profile. To reduce multicollinearity among the 19 bioclimatic variables, a correlation analysis was performed using the caret87 R package. Variables with pairwise correlation coefficients greater than 0.8 were removed, retaining the following seven variables: bio2, bio4, bio5, bio8, bio15, bio18, and bio19. Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) for the remaining variables was calculated using the car88 package (with bio15 as the reference variable) to assess multicollinearity. All VIF values were below 5, except for bio18, which was slightly below 10 (Table S10). A PCA was subsequently conducted based on these seven bioclimatic variables, with data standardization applied prior to analysis. Hierarchical clustering was performed using the cluster89 R package, with the optimal number of clusters (k) automatically selected based on silhouette coefficients. Following cluster determination, 95% confidence ellipses and corresponding variable loading plots were generated for each cluster.
Each mitochondrial gene was individually aligned using MAFFT as implemented in MEGA v11.83 Genetic distance matrices for each gene were subsequently generated by calculating p-distances. Mantel tests, implemented in the vegan84 R package, were employed to assess pairwise correlations between each bioclimatic variable and the genetic distance matrices. The resulting p-values were adjusted using the FDR. Subsequently, a dbRDA was conducted using phylogenetic principal coordinates calculated from the phylogenetic tree using the ape85 package to account for phylogenetic non-independence. The dbRDA was used to analyze correlations between climatic variables and genetic distances, incorporating the first five phylogenetic principal coordinates as conditional variables to control for phylogenetic effects. Finally, p-values were subsequently adjusted using the FDR. We performed PCoA on each gene’s genetic distance matrix to extract the first three axes and calculated average genetic distance per species. PGLS models with Brownian motion (BM) evolution were then fitted using the phylolm90 R package, regressing these genetic diversity metrics against climate variables, with p-values adjusted using FDR. We performed PGLS analyses using the BM, OUfixedRoot, and lambda models, respectively. The estimate of λ in the lambda model hit the boundary of the parameter space, so the model was discarded. This behavior suggests that the BM model is likely more suitable. The BM model produced the lowest Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) value and was therefore selected.
Selection pressure analyses
Selection pressure analysis was conducted using CodeML in PAML v4.10.7 based on the BI tree after removing outgroup taxa. Five foreground branches, corresponding to the climatic groups, were designated on this topology. For each PCG, a Clade Model C (CMC) analysis was performed to compare the alternative model (CMC) against the restricted null model (M2a_rel). Branch-site Model A analysis was then performed individually for each climatic group, comparing the alternative model (model A) with its null counterpart (model A null) to detect episodic positive selection. Selective pressure across groups was quantified using the ω ratio (dN/dS), where ω = 1 indicates neutral evolution, ω > 1 suggests positive selection, and ω < 1 denotes purifying selection. The statistical significance of differences between alternative and null models was assessed using a likelihood ratio test (LRT), with p-values <0.05 considered statistically significant after FDR correction where applicable. Subsequently, selection pressure analysis was performed using BUSTED implemented in HyPhy v2.591 for all branches of each gene within each cluster, as well as across all species collectively. p-values were adjusted using FDR. 3D protein structure prediction was performed using SWISS-MODEL92 (https://swissmodel.expasy.org/, accessed on 20 July 2025) based on available homologous templates. We used UCSF Chimera v1.1993 to visualize protein structures and identify potential hydrogen bonds.
Quantification and statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were performed in R v4.4.3, and the FDR method was used for p-value adjustment. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Exact p values are reported in the tables or results unless p < 0.00001. All statistical tests used are indicated in the respective figure legends or tables (denoted as a, b, c). For phylogenetic reconstruction, datasets comprising 116 sequences and 38 sequences were used. For selection pressure analyses, 36 sequences from different species were used to test each of the 13 mitochondrial genes, with the species of interest designated as the foreground branch and all remaining species serving as the background branch.
Footnotes
Supplemental information can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2026.116789.
Supplemental information
References
- 1.Chapple D.G., Roll U., Böhm M., Aguilar R., Amey A.P., Austin C.C., Baling M., Barley A.J., Bates M.F., Bauer A.M., et al. Conservation status of the world’s skinks (Scincidae): Taxonomic and geographic patterns in extinction risk. Biol. Conserv. 2021;257 doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109101. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Yang C., Tang S., Luo Z. Distribution changes of chinese skink (Eumeces chinensis) in China: the Impacts of global climate change. Asian Herpetol. Res. 2020;11:132–138. doi: 10.16373/j.cnki.ahr.190058. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chapple D.G., Slavenko A., Tingley R., Farquhar J.E., Camaiti M., Roll U., Meiri S. Built for success: Distribution, morphology, ecology and life history of the world’s skinks. Ecol. Evol. 2023;13 doi: 10.1002/ece3.10791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Greer A.E. The systematics and evolution of the subsaharan Africa, Seychelles, and Mauritius Scincine scincid lizards. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 1970;140:1–24. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Brandley M.C., Schmitz A., Reeder T.W. Partitioned Bayesian analyses, partition choice, and the phylogenetic relationships of Scincid lizards. Syst. Biol. 2005;54:373–390. doi: 10.1080/10635150590946808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Whiting A. Phylogenetic relationships and limb loss in sub-Saharan African scincine lizards (Squamata: Scincidae) Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2003;29:582–598. doi: 10.1016/S1055-7903(03)00142-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hedges S.B., Conn C.E. A new skink fauna from Caribbean islands (Squamata, Mabuyidae, Mabuyinae) Zootaxa. 2012;3288:1–244. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.3288.1.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hedges S.B. The high-level classification of skinks (Reptilia, Squamata, Scincomorpha) Zootaxa. 2014;3765:317–338. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.3765.4.2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gissi C., Iannelli F., Pesole G. Evolution of the mitochondrial genome of Metazoa as exemplified by comparison of congeneric species. Heredity. 2008;101:301–320. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2008.62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Altunışık A., Yıldız M.Z., Tatlı H.H., Yalçınkaya D., Akman B. Life-history evolution in the orange-tailed skink populations living in different climates. Ecol. Evol. 2024;14 doi: 10.1002/ece3.11521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dufour P.C., Tsang T.P.N., Alston N., De Vos T., Clusella-Trullas S., Bonebrake T.C. High-resolution climate data reveal an increasing risk of warming-driven activity restriction for diurnal and nocturnal lizards. Ecol. Evol. 2024;14 doi: 10.1002/ece3.11316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Carretero M.A., Lopes E.P., Vasconcelos R. An ecophysiological background for biogeographic patterns of two island lizards? Sci. Nat. 2016;103 doi: 10.1007/s00114-016-1422-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Dupoué A., Brischoux F., Lourdais O. Climate and foraging mode explain interspecific variation in snake metabolic rates. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2017;284 doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.2108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sanabria-Urbán S., Song H., Oyama K., González-Rodríguez A., Serrano-Meneses M.A., Cueva Del Castillo R. Body Size Adaptations to Altitudinal Climatic Variation in Neotropical Grasshoppers of the Genus Sphenarium (Orthoptera: Pyrgomorphidae) PLoS One. 2015;10 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Nagy J. Biologia Futura: rapid diversification and behavioural adaptation of birds in response to Oligocene–Miocene climatic conditions. Biol. Futur. 2020;71:109–121. doi: 10.1007/s42977-020-00013-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zimin A., Zimin S.V., Shine R., Avila L., Bauer A., Böhm M., Brown R., Barki G., De Oliveira Caetano G.H., Castro Herrera F., et al. A global analysis of viviparity in squamates highlights its prevalence in cold climates. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2022;31:2437–2452. doi: 10.1111/geb.13598. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Blackburn D.G. Are viviparity and egg-guarding evolutionaeily labile in Squamates? Herpetologica. 1999;55:556–573. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Thompson M.B., Stewart J.R., Speake B.K., Hosie M.J., Murphy C.R. Evolution of viviparity: what can Australian lizards tell us? Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2002;131:631–643. doi: 10.1016/s1096-4959(02)00013-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Yuni L.P.E.K., Jones S.M., Wapstra E. Thermal biology of the spotted snow skink, Niveoscincus ocellatus, along an altitudinal gradient. Aust. J. Zool. 2019;66:235–246. doi: 10.1071/zo18014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hare K.M., Cree A. Exploring the consequences of climate-induced changes in cloud cover on offspring of a cool-temperate viviparous lizard. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2010;101:844–851. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2010.01536.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zhan L., He J., Meng S., Guo Z., Chen Y., Storey K.B., Zhang J., Yu D. Mitochondrial protein-coding gene expression in the lizard Sphenomorphus incognitus (Squamata:Scincidae) responding to different temperature stresses. Animals. 2024;14:1671. doi: 10.3390/ani14111671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wang J.Y., Zhang L.H., Hong Y.H., Cai L.N., Storey K.B., Zhang J.Y., Zhang S.S., Yu D.N. How does mitochondrial protein-coding gene expression in Fejervarya kawamurai (Anura: Dicroglossidae) respond to extreme temperatures? Animals. 2023;13:3015. doi: 10.3390/ani13193015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bergman O., Ben-Shachar D. Mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation system (OXPHOS) deficits in schizophrenia: Possible interactions with cellular processes. Can. J. Psychiatry. 2016;61:457–469. doi: 10.1177/0706743716648290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mani S., Saxena N., Taneja N., Shome P. Mitochondrial donation: A boon or curse for the treatment of incurable mitochondrial diseases. J. Hum. Reprod. Sci. 2018;11:3. doi: 10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_54_17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wiens L., Banh S., Sotiri E., Jastroch M., Block B.A., Brand M.D., Treberg J.R. Comparison of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species production of ectothermic and endothermic fish muscle. Front. Physiol. 2017;8 doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Martinez E., Menze M.A., Torres J.J. Mitochondrial energetics of benthic and pelagic Antarctic teleosts. Mar. Biol. 2013;160:2813–2823. doi: 10.1007/s00227-013-2273-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Cummins J.M. The role of mitochondria in the establishment of oocyte functional competence. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2004;115:S23–S29. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Cao X., Qin Y. Mitochondrial translation factors reflect coordination between organelles and cytoplasmic translation via mTOR signaling: Implication in disease. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2016;100:231–237. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2016.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Taanman J.W. The mitochondrial genome: structure, transcription, translation and replication. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Bioenerg. 1999;1410:103–123. doi: 10.1016/s0005-2728(98)00161-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Boore J.L. Animal mitochondrial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999;27:1767–1780. doi: 10.1093/nar/27.8.1767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.McKenzie M., Lazarou M., Thorburn D.R., Ryan M.T. Analysis of mitochondrial subunit assembly into respiratory chain complexes using Blue Native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Anal. Biochem. 2007;364:128–137. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2007.02.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Papa S., Martino P.L., Capitanio G., Gaballo A., De Rasmo D., Signorile A., Petruzzella V. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. Springer Netherlands; 2012. The oxidative phosphorylation system in mammalian mitochondria; pp. 3–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sabini E., Arboit L., Khan M.P., Lanzolla G., Schipani E. Oxidative phosphorylation in bone cells. Bone Rep. 2023;18 doi: 10.1016/j.bonr.2023.101688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Zhan L., Chen Y., He J., Guo Z., Wu L., Storey K.B., Zhang J., Yu D. The phylogenetic relationships of major lizard families using mitochondrial genomes and selection pressure analyses in Anguimorpha. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024;25:8464. doi: 10.3390/ijms25158464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hong Y.H., Huang H.M., Wu L., Storey K.B., Zhang J.Y., Zhang Y.P., Yu D.N. Characterization of two mitogenomes of Hyla sanchiangensis (Anura: Hylidae), with phylogenetic relationships and selection pressure analyses of Hylidae. Animals. 2023;13:1593. doi: 10.3390/ani13101593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sun J.T., Jin P.Y., Hoffmann A.A., Duan X.Z., Dai J., Hu G., Xue X.F., Hong X.Y. Evolutionary divergence of mitochondrial genomes in two Tetranychus species distributed across different climates. Insect Mol. Biol. 2018;27:698–709. doi: 10.1111/imb.12501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Stefanović M., Djan M., Veličković N., Beuković D., Lavadinović V., Zhelev C.D., Demirbaş Y., Paule L., Gedeon C.I., Mamuris Z., et al. Positive selection and precipitation effects on the mitochondrial NADH dehydrogenase subunit 6 gene in brown hares (Lepus europaeus) under a phylogeographic perspective. PLoS One. 2019;14 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Baker A.M., Stephens N.C., Diniz F.M., León F.J.G.d., Baeza J.A. The mitochondrial genomes of the reef-dwelling spiny lobsters Panulirus echinatus and Panulirus interruptus with insights into the phylogeny and adaptive evolution of protein-coding genes in the Achelata. Coral Reefs. 2024;43:1857–1877. doi: 10.1007/s00338-024-02569-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Chen L., Lin Y., Xiao Q., Lin Y., Du Y., Lin C., Ward-Fear G., Hu C., Qu Y., Li H. Characterization of the complete mitochondrial genome of the many-lined sun skink (Eutropis multifasciata) and comparison with other Scincomorpha species. Genomics. 2021;113:2526–2536. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2021.05.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Susko E., Roger A.J. Long branch attraction biases in phylogenetics. Syst. Biol. 2021;70:838–843. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syab001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Watanabe T., Nakata S., Horiike T. Influence of long-branch bias on phylogenetic analysis. Genes Genet. Syst. 2025;100 doi: 10.1266/ggs.24-00151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Wiens J.J. Can incomplete taxa rescue phylogenetic analyses from long-branch attraction? Syst. Biol. 2005;54:731–742. doi: 10.1080/10635150500234583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Simões T.R., Caldwell M.W., Tałanda M., Bernardi M., Palci A., Vernygora O., Bernardini F., Mancini L., Nydam R.L. The origin of squamates revealed by a Middle Triassic lizard from the Italian Alps. Nature. 2018;557:706–709. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0093-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Tałanda M., Fernandez V., Panciroli E., Evans S.E., Benson R.J. Synchrotron tomography of a stem lizard elucidates early squamate anatomy. Nature. 2022;611:99–104. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05332-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Datta-Roy A., Brandley M.C., Austin C.C., Bauer A.M., Harris D.J., Carranza S., Ukuwela K.D.B., De Silva A., Tolley K.A., Karanth K.P., Sil M. The contemporary distribution of Scincine lizards does not reflect their biogeographic origin. J. Biogeogr. 2025;52:767–779. doi: 10.1111/jbi.15061. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Skinner A., Hugall A.F., Hutchinson M.N. Lygosomine phylogeny and the origins of Australian scincid lizards. J. Biogeogr. 2011;38:1044–1058. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2010.02471.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Chapple D.G., Chapple S.N.J., Smith S.A., Shea G.M., Brennan I.G., Sadlier R.A. Phylogenetic relationships in the Eugongylini (Squamata: Scincidae): generic limits and biogeography. Aust. J. Zool. 2023;70:165–203. doi: 10.1071/zo23007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kawahara A.Y., Storer C., Carvalho A.P.S., Plotkin D.M., Condamine F.L., Braga M.P., Ellis E.A., St Laurent R.A., Li X., Barve V., et al. A global phylogeny of butterflies reveals their evolutionary history, ancestral hosts and biogeographic origins. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2023;7:903–913. doi: 10.1038/s41559-023-02041-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Lu X., Stubbs T.L., Zhuo D., Xu C., Donoghue P.C.J., Liu X. New Cretaceous snakeflies highlight the morphological disparity of Mesoraphidiidae and its response to the Cretaceous Terrestrial Revolution. Insect Syst. Divers. 2024;8:8. doi: 10.1093/isd/ixae016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Barba-Montoya J., Dos Reis M., Schneider H., Donoghue P.C.J., Yang Z. Constraining uncertainty in the timescale of angiosperm evolution and the veracity of a Cretaceous Terrestrial Revolution. New Phytol. 2018;218:819–834. doi: 10.1111/nph.15011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Herrera-Flores J.A., Stubbs T.L., Benton M.J. Ecomorphological diversification of squamates in the Cretaceous. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2021;8 doi: 10.1098/rsos.201961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Bolet A., Stubbs T.L., Herrera-Flores J.A., Benton M.J. The Jurassic rise of squamates as supported by lepidosaur disparity and evolutionary rates. eLife. 2022;11 doi: 10.7554/eLife.66511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Jiang P., Yuan Y., Li Q. Advanced precipitation enhances vegetation primary productivity in Central Asia. Ecol. Indic. 2024;166 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112276. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Zhang X., Chen J., Luo H.Y., Chen X., Zhong J., Ji X. Climate-driven mitochondrial selection in lacertid lizards. Ecol. Evol. 2024;14 doi: 10.1002/ece3.11176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Pio Caetano Machado L., De Oliveira Caetano G.H., Lacerda Cavalcante V.H., B. Miles D., Rinaldi Colli G. Climate change shrinks environmental suitability for a viviparous Neotropical skink. Conserv. Sci. Pract. 2023;5 doi: 10.1111/csp2.12895. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Lavin B.R., Papenfuss T.J. The phylogenetic position of Chalcides ocellatus (Squamata: Scincidae) from Yemen and Somalia. Zootaxa. 2012;3221:26–36. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.3221.1.2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Carranza S., Arnold E.N., Geniez P., Roca J., Mateo J.A. Radiation, multiple dispersal and parallelism in the skinks, Chalcides and Sphenops (Squamata: Scincidae), with comments on Scincus and Scincopus and the age of the Sahara Desert. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2008;46:1071–1094. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2007.11.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Efremov R.G., Baradaran R., Sazanov L.A. The architecture of respiratory complex I. Nature. 2010;465:441–445. doi: 10.1038/nature09066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Hirst J. Towards the molecular mechanism of respiratory complex I. Biochem. J. 2010;425:327–339. doi: 10.1042/bj20091382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Baradaran R., Berrisford J.M., Minhas G.S., Sazanov L.A. Crystal structure of the entire respiratory complex I. Nature. 2013;494:443–448. doi: 10.1038/nature11871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Watanabe K., Kitamura K., Suzuki Y. Analysis of the critical sites for protein thermostabilization by proline substitution in oligo-1,6-glucosidase from Bacillus coagulans ATCC 7050 and the evolutionary consideration of proline residues. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1996;62:2066–2073. doi: 10.1128/aem.62.6.2066-2073.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Land H., Campillo-Brocal J.C., Svedendahl Humble M., Berglund P. B-factor guided proline substitutions in Chromobacterium violaceum amine transaminase: Evaluation of the proline rule as a method for enzyme stabilization. Chembiochem. 2019;20:1297–1304. doi: 10.1002/cbic.201800749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.MacArthur M.W., Thornton J.M. Influence of proline residues on protein conformation. J. Mol. Biol. 1991;218:397–412. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90721-H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Watanabe K., Masuda T., Ohashi H., Mihara H., Suzuki Y. Multiple proline substitutions cumulatively thermostabilize Bacillus Cereus ATCC7064 oligo-1,6-glucosidase: irrefragable proof supporting the proline rule. Eur. J. Biochem. 1994;226:277–283. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1994.tb20051.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Richardson J.S., Richardson D.C. Amino acid preferences for specific locations at the ends of α helices. Science. 1988;240:1648–1652. doi: 10.1126/science.3381086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Schramm A.M., Mehra-Chaudhary R., Furdui C.M., Beamer L.J. Backbone Flexibility, Conformational Change, and Catalysis in a Phosphohexomutase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Biochemistry. 2008;47:9154–9162. doi: 10.1021/bi8005219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Tong H., Shao G., Wang L., Li J., Wang T., Zhang L., Lv Y., Ye F., Fu C., Jin Y. Association of a single amino acid replacement with dorsal pigmentation in a lizard from the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023;242 doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.124907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Teixeira C.S., Cabral M.E.S., Carneiro R.F., Brito S.V., Nagano C.S., Silva A.L.C., Garcia W., Almeida W.O., Sampaio A.H., Delatorre P., et al. Structural aspects and physiological implications of the hemoglobin of green iguana (Iguana iguana) Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018;120:1275–1285. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.08.174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Andrews S. FastQC: A Quality Control Tool for High Throughput Sequence Data. 2010. https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/
- 70.Dierckxsens N., Mardulyn P., Smits G. NOVOPlasty: de novo assembly of organelle genomes from whole genome data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;45 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Jin J.-J., Yu W.-B., Yang J.-B., Song Y., dePamphilis C.W., Yi T.-S., Li D.-Z. GetOrganelle: a fast and versatile toolkit for accurate de novo assembly of organelle genomes. Genome Biol. 2020;21 doi: 10.1186/s13059-020-02154-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Meng G., Li Y., Yang C., Liu S. MitoZ: a toolkit for animal mitochondrial genome assembly, annotation and visualization. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:e63. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Bernt M., Donath A., Jühling F., Externbrink F., Florentz C., Fritzsch G., Pütz J., Middendorf M., Stadler P.F. MITOS: Improved de novo metazoan mitochondrial genome annotation. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2013;69:313–319. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2012.08.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Xiang C., Gao F., Jakovlić I., Lei H., Hu Y., Zhang H., Zou H., Wang G., Zhang D. Using PhyloSuite for molecular phylogeny and tree-based analyses. iMeta. 2023;2 doi: 10.1002/imt2.87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Grant J.R., Stothard P. The CGView Server: a comparative genomics tool for circular genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:W181–W184. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Katoh K., Standley D.M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013;30:772–780. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Castresana J. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2000;17:540–552. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Lanfear R., Frandsen P.B., Wright A.M., Senfeld T., Calcott B. PartitionFinder 2: New methods for selecting partitioned models of evolution for molecular and morphological phylogenetic analyses. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016;34:772–773. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Ronquist F., Teslenko M., Van Der Mark P., Ayres D.L., Darling A., Höhna S., Larget B., Liu L., Suchard M.A., Huelsenbeck J.P. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 2012;61:539–542. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/sys029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:1312–1313. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Yang Z. PAML 4: Phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2007;24:1586–1591. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msm088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Rambaut A., Drummond A.J., Xie D., Baele G., Suchard M.A. Posterior summarization in Bayesian phylogenetics using Tracer 1.7. Syst. Biol. 2018;67:901–904. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syy032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Tamura K., Stecher G., Kumar S. MEGA11: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021;38:3022–3027. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msab120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Oksanen J., Simpson G.L., Blanchet F.G., Kindt R., Legendre P., Minchin P.R., O’Hara R.B., Solymos P., Stevens M.H.H., Szoecs E., et al. vegan: Community Ecology Package. 2001. [DOI]
- 85.Paradis E., Schliep K. ape 5.0: an environment for modern phylogenetics and evolutionary analyses in R. Bioinformatics. 2019;35:526–528. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Hijmans R.J., Brown A., Barbosa M. terra: Spatial Data Analysis. 2020. [DOI]
- 87.Kuhn M. Building Predictive Models in R Using the caret Package. J. Stat. Softw. 2008;28:1–26. doi: 10.18637/jss.v028.i05. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Fox J., Weisberg S., Price B. car: Companion to Applied Regression. 2001. [DOI]
- 89.Maechler M., Rousseeuw P., Struyf A., Hubert M. cluster: “Finding Groups in Data”: Cluster Analysis Extended Rousseeuw et al. 1999. [DOI]
- 90.Ho L.S.T., Ane C. phylolm: Phylogenetic Linear Regression. 2013. [DOI]
- 91.Kosakovsky Pond S.L., Poon A.F.Y., Velazquez R., Weaver S., Hepler N.L., Murrell B., Shank S.D., Magalis B.R., Bouvier D., Nekrutenko A., et al. HyPhy 2.5—A Customizable Platform for Evolutionary Hypothesis Testing Using Phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2020;37:295–299. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msz197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Waterhouse A., Bertoni M., Bienert S., Studer G., Tauriello G., Gumienny R., Heer F.T., de Beer T.A.P., Rempfer C., Bordoli L., et al. SWISS-MODEL: homology modelling of protein structures and complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:W296–W303. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Pettersen E.F., Goddard T.D., Huang C.C., Couch G.S., Greenblatt D.M., Meng E.C., Ferrin T.E. UCSF Chimera—A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 2004;25:1605–1612. doi: 10.1002/jcc.20084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Cornejo-Páramo P., Dissanayake D.S.B., Lira-Noriega A., Martínez-Pacheco M.L., Acosta A., Ramírez-Suástegui C., Méndez-de-la-Cruz F.R., Székely T., Urrutia A.O., Georges A., Cortez D. Viviparous reptile regarded to have temperature-dependent sex determination has old XY chromosomes. Genome Biol. Evol. 2020;12:924–930. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evaa104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Colston T.J., Pirro S., Pyron R.A. The complete genome sequences of 101 species of reptiles. Biodivers. Genomes. 2025 doi: 10.56179/001c.129597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Kirchhof S., Lyra M.L., Rodríguez A., Ineich I., Müller J., Rödel M.-O., Trape J.-F., Vences M., Boissinot S. Mitogenome analyses elucidate the evolutionary relationships of a probable Eocene wet tropics relic in the xerophilic lizard genus Acanthodactylus. Sci. Rep. 2021;11:4858. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-83422-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Murtskhvaladze M., Tarkhnishvili D., Anderson C.L., Kotorashvili A. Phylogeny of caucasian rock lizards (Darevskia) and other true lizards based on mitogenome analysis: Optimisation of the algorithms and gene selection. PLoS One. 2020;15 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Komissarov A., Korchagin V., Kliver S., Dobrynin P., Semyenova S., Vergun A., O’Brien S., Ryskov A. The complete mitochondrial genome of the parthenogenetic Caucasian rock lizard Darevskia unisexualis (Squamata: lacertidae) contains long tandem repeat formed by 59 bp monomer. Mitochondrial DNA Part B. 2016;1:875–877. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2016.1253040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Wang S., Liu J., Zhang B., Guo X. The complete mitochondrial genome of Eremias dzungarica (Reptilia, Squamata, Lacertidae) from the Junggar Basin in Northwest China. Mitochondrial DNA Part B. 2021;6:2012–2014. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2021.1923417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Guo X., Huo X., Liu J., Chirikova M.A. Complete mitochondrial genome of the Kyrghyz racerunner (Eremias nikolskii Bedriaga, 1905) from Kyrgyzstan. Mitochondrial DNA Part B. 2022;7:983–985. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2022.2080599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Du Y., Qiu Q.B., Tong Q.L., Lin L.H. The complete mitochondrial genome of Eremias przewalskii (Squamata: Lacertidae) Mitochondrial DNA Part A. 2016;27:1918–1919. doi: 10.3109/19401736.2014.971286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Tian L., Guo X. Complete mitochondrial genomes of five Racerunners (Lacertidae: Eremias) and comparison with other lacertids: Insights into the structure and evolution of the control region. Genes. 2022;13:726. doi: 10.3390/genes13050726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Zhou T., Li D., Dujsebayeva T.N., Liu J., Guo X. Complete mitochondrial genome of Stummer’s Racerunner (Eremias stummeri) from Kazakhstan. Mitochondrial DNA Part A. 2016;27:4340–4341. doi: 10.3109/19401736.2015.1089491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Tong Q.L., Yao Y.T., Lin L.H., Ji X. The complete mitochondrial genome of Eremias vermiculata (Squamata: Lacertidae) Mitochondrial DNA Part A. 2016;27:1447–1448. doi: 10.3109/19401736.2014.953086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Zhou T., Wan X., Guo X. Sequencing and analysis of the whole mitochondrial genome of a variegated racerunner from Taklamakan Desert. Mitochondrial DNA Part A. 2016;27:3041–3042. doi: 10.3109/19401736.2015.1063125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Zhou T., Liu J., Guo X. Complete mitogenome of a variegated racerunner, Eremias vermiculata, from north of Tianshan Mountains, Xinjiang, China. Mitochondrial DNA Part A. 2016;27:2765–2766. doi: 10.3109/19401736.2015.1053055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Wang S., Liu J., Chirikova M.A., Zhang B., Guo X. The complete mitochondrial genome of Eremias yarkandensis (Reptilia, Squamata, Lacertidae) from Kyrgyzstan. Mitochondrial DNA Part B. 2022;7:443–445. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2022.2047119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Kolora S.R., Faria R., Weigert A., Schaffer S., Grimm A., Henle K., Sahyoun A.H., Stadler P.F., Nowick K., Bleidorn C., Schlegel M. The complete mitochondrial genome of Lacerta bilineata and comparison with its closely related congener L. Viridis. Mitochondrial DNA Part A. 2017;28:116–118. doi: 10.3109/19401736.2015.1111349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Böhme M.U., Fritzsch G., Tippmann A., Schlegel M., Berendonk T.U. The complete mitochondrial genome of the Green Lizard Lacerta viridis viridis (Reptilia: Lacertidae) and its phylogenetic position within squamate reptiles. Gene. 2007;394:69–77. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2007.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Podnar M., Pinsker W., Mayer W. Complete mitochondrial genomes of three lizard species and the systematic position of the Lacertidae (Squamata) J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 2009;47:35–41. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0469.2008.00515.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Ma W.W., Liu H., Zhao W.G., Liu P. The complete mitochondrial genome of Takydromus amurensis (Squamata: Lacertidae) Mitochondrial DNA Part B. 2016;1:214–215. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2016.1155091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Hu J.G., Peng L.F., Tang X.S., Huang S. The complete mitochondrial genome of Takydromus septentrionalis (Reptilia: Lacertidae) Mitochondrial DNA Part B. 2019;4:2193–2194. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2019.1623123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Qin P.S., Zeng D.L., Hou L.X., Yang X.W., Qin X.M. Complete mitochondrial genome of Takydromus sexlineatus (Squamata, Lacertidae) Mitochondrial DNA. 2015;26:465–466. doi: 10.3109/19401736.2013.830299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Kumazawa Y., Nishida M. Variations in mitochondrial tRNA gene organization of reptiles as phylogenetic markers. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1995;12:759–772. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Sun Y., Kurisaki M., Hashiguchi Y., Kumazawa Y. Variation and evolution of polyadenylation profiles in sauropsid mitochondrial mRNAs as deduced from the high-throughput RNA sequencing. BMC Genom. 2017;18:665. doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-4080-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Yu D.N., Ji X. The complete mitochondrial genome of Takydromus wolteri (Squamata: Lacertidae) Mitochondrial DNA. 2013;24:3–5. doi: 10.3109/19401736.2012.710223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Liu P., Zhu D., Zhao W.G., Ji X. The complete mitochondrial genome of the common lizard Zootoca vivipara (Squamata: Lacertidae) Mitochondrial DNA Part A. 2016;27:1944–1945. doi: 10.3109/19401736.2014.971299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Rui J., Wang Y., Nie L. The complete mitochondrial DNA genome of Eremias brenchleyi (Reptilia: Lacertidae) and its phylogeny position within squamata reptiles. Amphib. Reptil. 2009;30:25–35. doi: 10.1163/156853809787392793. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Duangjai S., Srisodsuk S., Chuaynkern C., Chuaynkern Y. Complete mitochondrial genome of Tropidophorus hangnam (Squamata: Scincidae) with phylogenetic analysis. Mitochondrial DNA Part B. 2020;5:3683–3684. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2020.1832928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Hanrahan B.J., Alreja K., Reis A.L.M., Chang J.K., Dissanayake D.S.B., Edwards R.J., Bertozzi T., Hammond J.M., O’Meally D., Deveson I.W., et al. A genome assembly and annotation for the Australian alpine skink Bassiana duperreyi using long-read technologies. G3 Genes Genomes Genet. 2025;15:jkaf046. doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkaf046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.He J., Zhan L., Meng S., Wang Z., Gao L., Wang W., Storey K.B., Zhang Y., Yu D. Differential mitochondrial genome expression of three sympatric lizards in response to low-temperature stress. Animals. 2024;14:1158. doi: 10.3390/ani14081158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Wu L., Tong Y., Ayivi S.P.G., Storey K.B., Zhang J.Y., Yu D.N. The complete mitochondrial genomes of three Sphenomorphinae species (Squamata: Scincidae) and the selective pressure analysis on mitochondrial genomes of limbless Isopachys gyldenstolpei. Animals. 2022;12:2015. doi: 10.3390/ani12162015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Kumazawa Y. Mitochondrial genomes from major lizard families suggest their phylogenetic relationships and ancient radiations. Gene. 2007;388:19–26. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2006.09.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Chen M., Liu J., Chen D., Guo X. Complete mitochondrial genome of a blue-tailed skink Plestiodon capito (Reptilia, Squamata, Scincidae) and comparison with other Scincidae lizards. Genetica. 2020;148:229–241. doi: 10.1007/s10709-020-00107-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Zhan L., He J., Ding L., Storey K.B., Zhang J., Yu D. Comparison of mitochondrial genome expression differences among four skink species distributed at different latitudes under low-temperature stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024;25 doi: 10.3390/ijms251910637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Zhang C., Sun X., Chen L., Xiao W., Zhu X., Xia Y., Chen J., Wang H., Zhang B. The complete mitochondrial genome of Eumeces chinensis (Squamata: Scincidae) and implications for Scincidae taxonomy. Mitochondrial DNA Part A. 2016;27:4691–4692. doi: 10.3109/19401736.2015.1106505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Song T., Zhang C., Huang X., Zhang B. Complete mitochondrial genome of Eumeces elegans (Squamata: Scincidae) Mitochondrial DNA Part A. 2016;27:719–720. doi: 10.3109/19401736.2014.913158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Chen M., Liu J., Chen D., Guo X. The complete mitochondrial genome of a blue-tailed skink (Plestiodon tunganus) endemic to Sichuan Basin. Mitochondrial DNA Part B. 2019;4:1109–1110. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2019.1586495. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Park J., Koo K.-S., Kim I.H., Park D. Complete mitochondrial genomes of Scincella vandenburghi and S. huanrenensis (Squamata: Scincidae) Mitochondrial DNA Part B. 2016;1:237–238. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2016.1156490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Zhong J., Ma L., Guo K., Du Y. Complete mitochondrial genome of Scincella modesta (Squamata: Scincidae) and phylogenetic analysis. Mitochondrial DNA Part B. 2020;5:373–374. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2019.1703579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Chen L., Lin Y., Lin Y., Hu Y., Xiao Q., Zhou X., Liu Y., Li H. Complete mitochondrial genome of Scincella modesta (Squamata: Scincidae) Mitochondrial DNA Part B. 2020;5:676–677. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2020.1713919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Zhong J., Guo K., Ma L. First record of mitochondrial genome of Scincella reevesii (Squamata: Scincidae) and phylogenetic analysis. Mitochondrial DNA Part B. 2021;6:564–565. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2021.1875903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Tang X.S., Yang D.C., Lin Y.J., Dai L.L. The complete mitochondrial genome of Sphenomorphus indicus (Reptilia: Scincidae) Mitochondrial DNA Part B. 2019;4:2727–2728. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2019.1644979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Tang X.S., Yang D.C., Huang S. The complete mitochondrial genome of Sphenomorphus incognitus (Reptilia: Scincidae) Mitochondrial DNA Part B. 2019;4:307–308. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2018.1542998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Rivera D., Henderson J.B., Lam A.W., Hostetter N.J., Collazo J.A., Bell R.C. High-Quality, Chromosome-Level Reference Genomes of the Viviparous Caribbean Skinks Spondylurus nitidus and S. culebrae. Genome Biol. Evol. 2024;16 doi: 10.1093/gbe/evae079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Thuo D., Macgregor N.A., Merson S.D., Scopel D., Keogh J.S., Kenny J., Williams J.L., Guest T., Swan S., McAlpin S., Joseph L. Metabarcoding clarifies the diet of the elusive and vulnerable Australian tjakura (Great Desert Skink, Liopholis kintorei) Front. Ecol. Evol. 2024;12 doi: 10.3389/fevo.2024.1354138. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Wu N., Cai B., Chen M., Guo X. Next-generation sequencing yields a nearly complete mitochondrial genome of Plestiodon liui (Reptilia, Squamata, Scincidae) endemic to China. Mitochondrial DNA Part B. 2020;5:3637–3638. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2020.1832594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Pinto B.J., Gamble T., Smith C.H., Keating S.E., Havird J.C., Chiari Y. The revised reference genome of the leopard gecko (Eublepharis macularius) provides insight into the considerations of genome phasing and assembly. J. Hered. 2023;114:513–520. doi: 10.1093/jhered/esad016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Hao S., Ping J., Zhang Y. Complete mitochondrial genome of Gekko chinensis (Squamata, Gekkonidae) Mitochondrial DNA Part A. 2016;27:4226–4227. doi: 10.3109/19401736.2015.1022751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Yan J., Tian C., Lv L., Bauer A.M., Zhou K. Complete mitochondrial genome of the San Lucan gecko, Phyllodactylus unctus (Sauria, Gekkota, Phyllodactylidae), in comparison with Tarentola mauritanica. Mitochondrial DNA. 2014;25:202–203. doi: 10.3109/19401736.2013.796464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Hao S., Yu D., Ping J., Zhou H., Zhang Y. Complete mitochondrial genomes of two gecko species, Gekko hokouensis and Gekko japonicus (Squamata, Gekkonidae) Mitochondrial DNA Part B. 2016;1:346–347. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2015.1137809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Lanfear R., Calcott B., Ho S.Y.W., Guindon S. PartitionFinder: Combined selection of partitioning schemes and substitution models for phylogenetic analyses. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2012;29:1695–1701. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mss020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Heinicke M.P., Greenbaum E., Jackman T.R., Bauer A.M. Phylogeny of a trans-Wallacean radiation (Squamata, Gekkonidae, Gehyra) supports a single early colonization of Australia. Zool. Scr. 2011;40:584–602. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-6409.2011.00495.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Arnold E.N., Poinar G. A 100 million year old gecko with sophisticated adhesive toe pads, preserved in amber from Myanmar. Zootaxa. 2008;1847:62–68. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.1847.1.5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Salvi D., Pinho C., Mendes J., Harris D.J. Fossil-calibrated time tree of Podarcis wall lizards provides limited support for biogeographic calibration models. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2021;161 doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2021.107169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Čerňanský A., Augé M.L. New species of the genus Plesiolacerta (Squamata: Lacertidae) from the upper Oligocene (MP28) of Southern Germany and a revision of the type species Plesiolacerta lydekkeri. Palaeontology. 2013;56:79–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4983.2012.01167.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Jones M.E.H., Anderson C.L., Hipsley C.A., Müller J., Evans S.E., Schoch R.R. Integration of molecules and new fossils supports a Triassic origin for Lepidosauria (lizards, snakes, and tuatara) BMC Evol. Biol. 2013;13:208. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-13-208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Augé M.L. Évolution des lézards du Paléogène en Europe. Mém. Muséum Natl. Hist. Nat. 2005;192:1–369. [Google Scholar]
- 149.Augé M.L., Hervet S. Fossil lizards from the locality of Gannat (late Oligocene–early Miocene, France) and a revision of the genus Pseudeumeces (Squamata, Lacertidae) Paleobiodivers. Paleoenviron. 2009;89:191–201. doi: 10.1007/s12549-009-0009-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Ghosh A., Sil M., Ukuwela K.D.B., Datta-Roy A. Independent origins or single dispersal? Phylogenetic study supports early Cenozoic origin of three endemic Indo-Sri Lankan Lygosomine skink genera. Zool. Scr. 2024;53:113–128. doi: 10.1111/zsc.12635. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Fick S.E., Hijmans R.J. WorldClim 2: new 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 2017;37:4302–4315. doi: 10.1002/joc.5086. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 152.GBIF.org User Occurrence Download. (The Global Biodiversity Information Facility) 2026. [DOI]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
-
•
Nucleotide sequence data have been deposited at GenBank: PX933415, PX933416, PX933417, PX933418, PX933419, PX933420, PX933421, PP571910, BK083147, BK083148, BK083149, BK083150, BK083151, BK083152, BK083153, BK083154. The occurrence records dataset is available in Table S9 and has been deposited at Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20839769).
-
•
This paper does not report original code.
-
•
All other data reported in the manuscript will be shared by the lead contact upon request.
-
•
Any additional information required to reanalyze the data reported in this paper is available from the lead contact upon request.







