Abstract
Rats responded on a two-component chain schedule in which a response-contingent electric shock at the end of the first component was either positively correlated, negatively correlated, or uncorrelated with reinforcement availability in the second component. With 0.4-ma shocks, rate in the first component depended on the shock-reinforcement correlation: when shock and reinforcement availability were positively correlated, after extended exposure to the contingencies, rates exceeded those in the absence of shock; when shock and reinforcement availability were negatively correlated, responding was generally suppressed throughout. The discriminative control of shock over responding in the second component, in which reinforcement was available 50% of the time, also depended somewhat on correlation. However, rate change in the first component was not specifically related to discrimination in the second component. With 0.8-ma shocks, responding was substantially suppressed in the first component at all three values of shock-reinforcement correlations.
Full text
PDFdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6bdf5/6bdf54a3d4121e85b380b62ac97b77229e9aaede" alt="301"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/64208/64208bfd4fa6788d2bae57ef302f509b51e8c7b3" alt="302"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e5271/e527187f14b2e5707c1c4f792ca67eca5da15502" alt="303"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4e0e3/4e0e3a7396dff93038fc3dbb378f0988daf5c87e" alt="304"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3edd/a3eddc1bbfa0e4a08d5b03d2c2e96689dba6f60e" alt="305"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/497f9/497f9d158dd31199230d22ac8ba28bb893702a65" alt="306"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e6c38/e6c38bdfad4ab7f9dd2443affb361d27cd0ee02f" alt="307"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3b1ce/3b1ce03b505d3b8f17c17fd70ee5321ed511a57c" alt="308"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/af663/af66346719c41f94507dc17eb3732c3ed6737417" alt="309"
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- HOLZ W. C., AZRIN N. H. Discriminative properties of punishment. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Jul;4:225–232. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HOLZ W. C., AZRIN N. H. Interactions between the discriminative and aversive properties of punishment. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Apr;5:229–234. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- KELLEHER R. T., GOLLUB L. R. A review of positive conditioned reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Oct;5:543–597. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-s543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- NEVIN J. A. TWO PARAMETERS OF CONDITIONED REINFORCEMENT IN A CHAINING SITUATION. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1964 Dec;58:367–373. doi: 10.1037/h0046266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Williams D. R., Barry H., 3rd Counter conditioning in an operant conflict situation. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1966 Feb;61(1):154–156. doi: 10.1037/h0022872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]