Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2026 May 27;65(30):e7126664. doi: 10.1002/anie.7126664

Highly Emissive and Stable Ge(II)‐ and Sn(II)‐Based Vacancy‐Ordered Iodide Double Perovskites

Le Ye 1, Yarou Duan 1, Jun Luo 1,2, Yutong Lin 1,2, Mengqiu Cai 3, Lingling Mao 1,2,✉
PMCID: PMC13383169  PMID: 42199032

ABSTRACT

Vacancy‐ordered double perovskites (VODPs) of the A 2 B□X 6 type (□ = ordered B‐site vacancy) incorporating stereochemically active ns2 metals are promising lead‐free self‐trapped exciton (STE) emitters. However, efficient and stable iodide VODPs with ns2 metals as the lattice centers remain rare. Here, we develop N‐alkylated 1,4‐diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (dabco)‐derived diammonium cations Rdabco2+ (R = Me, Et, or Pr; mono‐alkylated or N,N′‐dialkylated), to access iodide VODPs (Rdabco)2 B□I6 with B = Ge(II) or Sn(II). Varying the R group and alkylation across six cations effectively tunes the steric hindrance and lattice strain, enhancing oxidation tolerance and yielding zero‐dimensional lattices of isolated [BI6] 4 − octahedra. The materials exhibit bright room‐temperature STE emission with photoluminescence quantum yields (PLQYs) up to 35.0% for Ge and 36.8% for Sn. Notably, the highest PLQY of the Ge VODP is approximately seven times that of the highest reported Ge(II) iodide compounds. Structure–photophysics correlations reveal distinct determinants: the Ge PLQYs correlate with [GeI6] 4 − octahedral distortion, whereas the Sn PLQYs reflect a more complex balance between radiative and nonradiative relaxation channels rather than a single distortion metric. These materials exhibit high ambient stability up to two months whereas the 3D perovskite analogs decompose within three days.

Keywords: lead‐free luminescence, ns2 metals, octahedral symmetry, self‐trapped excitons, vacancy‐ordered double perovskites


We report a series of new iodide vacancy‐ordered double perovskites (Rdabco)2 B□I6 (B = GeII or SnII), incorporating N‐alkylated dabco‐derived organic cations. By systematically varying the cation, we control the octahedral distortion and crystal symmetry, which directly tune and enhance the emission properties with record‐setting PLQY for the Ge(II) iodides. We further reveal that reduced octahedral distortion effectively suppresses nonradiative decay, while the zero‐dimensional isolated‐octahedra architecture ensures exceptional stability, establishing a versatile platform for efficient, stable, lead‐free luminescent materials.

graphic file with name ANIE-65-e7126664-g003.jpg

1. Introduction

Lead‐free double perovskites, A 2 B′B″X 6, and their derivatives provide chemically robust and compositionally tunable halide frameworks for optoelectronic materials design [1, 2]. However, intrinsic photoluminescence (PL) is often weak because many lead‐free double perovskites possess indirect band gaps and/or weakly allowed band‐edge transitions (including symmetry‐limited transition strength), which together suppress radiative recombination [2, 3, 4, 5]. Although lanthanide doping can introduce narrow f–f emission [6] or enable multi‐channel luminescence (e.g., in high‐entropy double perovskites) [7], and self‐trapped‐exciton (STE)‐type luminescence has been established in selected double perovskites under strong electron–phonon coupling [4]. Yet, efficient dopant‐free visible emission from the host lattice remains uncommon. Vacancy‐ordered double perovskites (VODPs) with composition A 2 B□X 6 (□ denotes an ordered B‐site vacancy), by contrast, comprise a face‐centered lattice of isolated [BX6] units [8, 9, 10], which promotes carrier localization and strong electron–phonon coupling—key ingredients for self‐trapping and dopant‐free broadband emission [11, 12]. Nevertheless, most reported A 2 B IV X 6 hosts feature closed‐shell ns0/d0 B‐site ions (e.g., Sn4+, Zr4+, Ti4+) and consequently lack strong intrinsic visible emission, as illustrated by Cs2SnI6 (Figure 1a) [8, 9]. As a result, intrinsic B‐site emission from undoped VODPs remains rare, motivating the exploration of lattice–composition strategies that combine intrinsically emissive centers with structural motifs that mitigate nonradiative losses [8, 9, 10].

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Structural comparison of vacancy‐ordered double perovskites. (a) Conventional ns0/d0 VODPs (A 2 B IV X 6) exemplified by Cs2SnI6, showing weak host emission that requires doping for efficient luminescence. (b) ns2 lone‐pair‐active VODPs developed in this work: (Rdabco)2 B III6 with B = Ge, Sn, showing (Mdabco)2GeI6 as representative structure. Isolated [BI6]4 − octahedra enable bright dopant‐free emission.

ns2 metal ions offer a promising route to intrinsic host‐lattice emission because stereochemically active lone pairs can induce local lattice distortion and strengthen electron–phonon coupling, thereby promoting exciton self‐trapping [13, 14, 15]. Nevertheless, widely used ns2 centers—including Pb2+, Sb3+, and Bi3+—each face distinct practical constraints—toxicity, limited spectral tunability and emission efficiency across many host lattices [4, 16, 17, 18, 19]. Sn2+ and Ge2+ are attractive alternatives owing to their ns2 electronic configurations and lower toxicity; however, their susceptibility to oxidation under O2/H2O can trigger local reorganization and increased nonradiative loss, ultimately compromising emission efficiency and long‐term stability [20, 21, 22, 23]. Accordingly, achieving efficient and durable ns2‐based emission requires not only selecting the appropriate B‐site ion but also structurally isolating and constraining [BX6] units to help limit oxidant ingress and suppress deleterious local rearrangements [24, 25, 26, 27]. Prior work on Sn2+‐based VODPs in bromide frameworks provides useful precedent [28]. Iodide frameworks are particularly attractive for visible emission owing to their narrower band gaps compared to bromide or chloride analogues [29, 30]. For comparison, bulk Cs4SnI6, the closest fully inorganic analogue, shows no room‐temperature photoluminescence, and only Cs4SnI6 nanocrystals achieve a PLQY of 27% through surface‐induced symmetry breaking [11, 12]. Fully inorganic zero‐dimensional Ge(II) iodide phases remain unreported.

Here we introduce divalent N‐alkylated 1,4‐diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (dabco)‐derived diammonium cations, Rdabco2+ (R = methyl, ethyl, or propyl; spanning mono‑ and N,N′‑disubstituted variants), [28, 31, 32] to access iodide VODPs (Rdabco)2 BI6 with B = Ge(II) or Sn(II). These A 2 B II X 6‑type lattices adopt a zero‑dimensional (0D) architecture featuring discrete, electronically isolated [BI6]4 − octahedra separated by bulky organic cations and ordered B‑site vacancies, a structural motif that is widely associated with strong carrier localization and STE emission in low‑dimensional metal halides [33, 34, 35]. Figure 1b highlights (Mdabco)2GeI6 (Mdabco = N‐methylated dabco) as a representative member. Systematic cation tuning improves air/moisture tolerance and suppresses local rearrangement in this iodide VODP series. The materials show 575–689 nm STE emission with PLQYs up to 35.0% for the Ge series and 36.8% for the Sn series; the Ge(II) PLQY is about seven times prior Ge(II)–iodide emitters (∼5%) [15, 25, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41]. Structure–photophysics trends are metal‐dependent: Ge PLQYs increase as the [GeI6]4 − octahedra become more symmetric, whereas Sn PLQYs are governed by radiative–nonradiative kinetic branching rather than a single distortion metric. Together, these results provide a molecular design route to efficient, durable ns2‑metal‑centered emitters and clarify structure–photophysics–exciton‐dynamics relationships in low‐dimensional metal halides [42, 43, 44, 45, 46].

2. Results and Discussion

Ge(H2PO2)I and Rdabco diiodide salts were prepared as described in the Supporting Information (Section S1), with the diiodide salts synthesized following established literature procedures [28, 31, 32]. Representative Ge(H2PO2)I was confirmed by single‐crystal and powder X‐ray diffraction (Figure S1, Table S1). Single crystals of vacancy‐ordered double perovskites, (Rdabco)2 BI6 with B = Ge(II) or Sn(II), were obtained from these reagents using solution‐based routes, including slow cooling from HI/H3PO2 at 100°C (∼1 day), solvent evaporation (several days), and vapor diffusion (several days). Figure S2 shows representative millimeter‐scale crystals (0.5–3 mm) grown by the slow‐cooling method. Despite providing crystals suitable for structural analysis, these solution approaches are time‐consuming, solvent‐intensive, and give modest isolated yields (30%–50%).

To enable rapid synthesis with reduced solvent usage, we developed a solvent‐assisted solid‐state grinding (SAG) protocol that delivers phase‐pure products within 15 min at room temperature via mechanochemical activation. Using (DMdabco)2GeI6 as an example (DMdabco = N,N′‐dimethylated dabco), Ge(H2PO2)I (pale yellow) and DMdabcoI2 (white) were ground thoroughly in an agate mortar. With continued grinding, faint orange emission emerged under 365 nm irradiation, indicating formation of the emissive phase. A catalytic amount of an HI/H3PO2 mixture (∼0.3 mL) was then added; H3PO2 helps preserve the Ge2+/Sn2+ oxidation state under reducing conditions, while HI provides additional iodide to drive the reaction to completion. Further grinding yielded a homogeneous paste exhibiting bright orange emission under 365 nm light, consistent with near‐quantitative conversion (Figure S3). The resulting microcrystalline product was isolated by drying at 80°C and washing with hot ethanol to remove residual reagents, and was stored in sealed containers. This SAG protocol is general across all twelve compositions, affording phase‐pure materials in 75%–95% yield and enabling rapid screening and scalable preparation.

Having established an efficient synthetic route for all twelve compounds, we performed single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction (SCXRD) analysis to elucidate how systematic variations in the organic cation modulate the resulting crystal architectures (crystallographic data in Tables S2–S5). Powder X‐ray diffraction (PXRD) confirms that SAG‐prepared materials are phase‐pure and crystallographically identical to solution‐grown single crystals (Figures S4 and S5).

As shown in Figure 2a, six N‐alkylated dabco derivatives serve as A‐site cations: Mdabco (monomethyl), Edabco (monoethyl), DMdabco (dimethyl), Pdabco (monopropyl), MEdabco (methyl‐ethyl), and DEdabco (diethyl). This series enables systematic tuning of steric hindrance and molecular symmetry. All twelve compounds crystallize in the K2PtCl6‐type vacancy‐ordered double perovskite structure with an anti‐fluorite arrangement [47], in which [BI6]4 − octahedra alternate with ordered vacancies in a three‐dimensional checkerboard pattern (Figures 2b, S6 and S7). The B‐site cations (Ge2+ or Sn2+) are octahedrally coordinated by iodide to form discrete [BI6]4 − units that are spatially separated by the ordered vacancies, yielding a zero‐dimensional (0D) inorganic sublattice with electronically isolated octahedra. The organic diammonium cations occupy the cavities between neighboring inorganic units, providing charge balance while simultaneously templating the framework packing.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Molecular design and crystallographic features of (Rdabco)2BI6 vacancy‐ordered double perovskites. (a) Molecular structures of six N‐alkylated dabco derivatives (abbreviated as MD = Mdabco, ED = Edabco, DMD = DMdabco, PD = Pdabco, MED = MEdabco, DED = DEdabco). (b) Representative crystal structure showing isolated [BI6]4 − octahedra alternating with ordered vacancies, with N‐alkylated dabco cations occupying A‐site positions. (c) Unit cell volume (normalized to Z = 4) and density as a function of organic cation for Ge‐ and Sn‐based compounds.

Crystallographic analysis shows that Ge‐based compounds exhibit shorter B–I bond lengths (3.04–3.08 Å) than the Sn‐based analogues (3.17–3.25 Å), consistent with the smaller ionic radius of Ge2+ relative to Sn2+ (Tables S6 and S7). [39] As shown in Figure 2c, the unit‐cell volume (normalized to Z = 4) increases monotonically from the Mdabco to DEdabco derivatives for both metal centers, spanning 2814–3398 Å3 (density: 2.57–2.30 g cm− 3) for the Ge series and 2876–3440 Å3 (density: 2.63–2.36 g cm− 3) for the Sn series, corresponding to volume expansions of 20.8% and 19.6%, respectively. This monotonic increase indicates that lattice expansion is governed primarily by the increasing steric demand of the organic cations.

Beyond lattice expansion, cation substitution also exerts a pronounced influence on crystallographic symmetry. The space group tracks the molecular symmetry of the organic cations: Mdabco‐ and DMdabco‐based compounds crystallize in the cubic space group Pa3¯, whereas Edabco‐, Pdabco‐, and MEdabco‐based Ge/Sn derivatives, together with the Sn‐based DEdabco analogue, all crystallize in the orthorhombic space group Pbca. In contrast, (DEdabco)2GeI6 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P21/n, consistent with reduced cation symmetry coupled with tighter packing constraints imposed by the smaller Ge2+ ion. Overall, the systematic symmetry reduction from cubic to orthorhombic to monoclinic mirrors decreasing molecular symmetry and increasing conformational complexity of the organic cations, highlighting the strong coupling between cation design and lattice symmetry.

Crystal packing density governs organic–inorganic interactions, and exciton confinement in hybrid perovskites, thereby influencing stability and optoelectronic properties [48, 49, 50]. We calculated void fractions using Mercury software [51] to quantify cation‐induced packing variations (Section S1, Supporting Information). Void‐fraction analysis reveals systematic trends across the series (Figure S8). Compounds with smaller cations (Mdabco, Edabco) exhibit accessible void fractions of 3.6%–8.6%, with Sn‐based compounds displaying systematically lower void fractions than Ge analogues, consistent with more efficient packing afforded by the larger Sn2+ ionic radius. In contrast, larger‐cation compounds (DMdabco, Pdabco, MEdabco, and DEdabco) show negligible accessible void space, with the organic cations occupying essentially all available volume. This evolution from open to densely packed structures demonstrates continuous tuning of packing density through cation size, establishing a structural design principle for property control in this materials family.

To elucidate how cation structure modulates [BI6]4 − octahedral geometry, we analyzed coordination environments and distortion metrics for representative structures (Figures 3, S9 and S10; Tables S6 and S7). Progressing from monoalkylated (Mdabco2+) to symmetric dialkylated (DMdabco2+) and bulkier dialkylated cations (DEdabco2+) produces clear changes in local contacts (hydrogen bonding versus steric packing) that are accompanied by systematic variations in octahedral distortion.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Crystal structures and [GeI6]4 − octahedral coordination environments showing non‐monotonic distortion trends (two cations and hydrogen atoms omitted for clarity). (a) (Mdabco)2GeI6: asymmetric N‐H···I hydrogen bonding induces angular distortion (σ 2 = 7.18°2). (b) (DMdabco)2GeI6: optimal size matching achieves minimal distortion (σ 2 = 0.66°2). (c) (DEdabco)2GeI6: steric overload causes symmetry‐breaking and maximum distortion (σ 2 = 5.40°2, Δd = 0.00439).

As shown in Figure 3a, (Mdabco)2GeI6 crystallizes in the cubic Pa3¯ space group. Weak N‐H···I hydrogen bonding (N···I = 3.825 Å) links the protonated nitrogen to the [GeI6]4 − octahedra, whereas the methylated site engages primarily through van der Waals contacts. This asymmetric interaction mode is associated with pronounced angular distortion: while all Ge–I bond lengths remain equivalent (3.04 Å), the twelve I–Ge–I angles split into two sets of six (87.44° and 92.56°), deviating substantially from the ideal 90° and yielding a large bond‐angle variance (σ 2 = 7.18°2). In contrast, (DMdabco)2GeI6 (Figure 3b) also adopts Pa3¯ but exhibits markedly reduced distortion. The high‐symmetry DMdabco2+ cation lacks N–H groups, replacing directional N–H···I bonding with weaker, more isotropic C–H···I contacts and van der Waals interactions. Despite the absence of strong directional bonding, the cation size matches the [GeI6]4 − cavity, efficiently filling the available volume and enforcing a well‐defined orientation. Accordingly, the octahedra are significantly more regular: the I–Ge–I angles cluster near 90° (90.77° and 89.23°), giving the lowest bond‐angle variance in the Ge series (σ 2 = 0.66°2). For the larger (DEdabco)2GeI6 (Figure 3c), the longer ethyl substituents drive a symmetry reduction to monoclinic P21/n. Relative to Figure 3a,b (dashed arrows), the cation–framework contacts reorient substantially, and the [GeI6]4 − octahedra undergo strong steric‐induced distortion. Ge–I distances split into three pairs (3.100, 3.080, and 3.060 Å), and the I–Ge–I angles span 86.91–93.09°, further departing from 90°. This member exhibits the highest distortion index (Δd = 0.00439) and a large bond‐angle variance (σ 2 = 5.40°2) among the Ge‐based compounds, providing a structural basis for investigating how ground‐state octahedral irregularity influences excited‐state dynamics and emission efficiency.

The remaining Ge‐based compounds (Edabco2+, Pdabco2+, and MEdabco2+; Figure S9) and all Sn‐based analogues (Figure S10) follow the same nonmonotonic trend (Tables S6 and S7): octahedral regularity improves from Mdabco2+ to DMdabco2+ as cation size and symmetry better match the cavity, but decreases for bulkier cations as steric constraints dominate. Beyond packing effects, ns2 B‐site ions such as Ge2+ and Sn2+ are intrinsically susceptible to symmetry‐lowering distortions via the second‐order Jahn–Teller effect (SOJT), which enables s–p mixing and electronic stabilization [52, 53]. These structural variations are expected to modulate band‐edge character and electron–phonon coupling, influencing the photophysical properties examined below [54, 55].

To investigate how structural variation influences luminescence, we characterized the photophysical properties of all 12 compounds. For the Ge‐based series (Figure 4), optical bandgaps estimated from UV–vis diffuse‐reflectance spectra using the Kubelka–Munk transformation span 2.87–3.45 eV (Figure 4a). DFT‐calculated band structures are provided in Figure S11. Under 365 nm excitation, all Ge‐based compounds exhibit bright photoluminescence spanning orange to deep red (Figure 4b). The emission maximum progressively red‐shifts from 625 nm for (Mdabco)2GeI6 to 689 nm for (Edabco)2GeI6 (Figure 4c), and the longest‐wavelength emitters approach the visible/NIR‐I boundary (∼700 nm), a spectral region relevant to in vivo fluorescence imaging [56, 57]. The close correspondence between PLE spectra and absorption onsets supports host‐lattice excitation of the isolated [GeI6]4 − units rather than extrinsic impurity centers. Consistent with STE emission, these compounds display characteristic features summarized in Table S8: large Stokes shifts (1.41–1.51 eV), broad emission bands (FWHM = 121–153 nm), and sub‐microsecond lifetimes (0.14–0.82 µs; Figure 4d), indicative of strong exciton–phonon coupling and substantial excited‐state lattice relaxation [58].

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Photophysical properties of Ge‐based (Rdabco)2GeI6 vacancy‐ordered iodide perovskites. (a) Optical band gaps (2.87–3.45 eV) obtained from UV–vis diffuse reflectance spectra using the Kubelka–Munk transformation. (b) Photographs of representative single crystals under 365 nm excitation and the corresponding room‐temperature PLQYs. (c) Normalized absorption (Abs., dashed), excitation (Ex.), and emission (Em.) spectra. (d) Time‐resolved photoluminescence decay traces (symbols) with biexponential fits (solid lines); average lifetimes (τ ave) are indicated.

Room‐temperature PLQY measurements show substantial variation across the Ge‐based series (Figure 4b, Table S8). (DMdabco)2GeI6 exhibits the highest PLQY (35.0%), followed by (Pdabco)2GeI6 (21.4%) and (Mdabco)2GeI6 (14.2%). In contrast, (Edabco)2GeI6, (MEdabco)2GeI6, and (DEdabco)2GeI6 display much lower PLQYs of 4.6%, 3.2%, and 1.7%, respectively, corresponding to a >20‐fold spread across the series. Although all members share the same 0D structural motif of isolated [GeI6]4 − octahedra, the PLQY trend correlates with the cation‐dependent evolution of octahedral distortion and crystallographic symmetry. For example, the most efficient emitter, (DMdabco)2GeI6 (cubic Pa3¯, σ 2 = 0.66°2, Δd = 0), features the smallest bond‐angle variance and negligible bond‐length distortion, whereas (DEdabco)2GeI6 (monoclinic P21/n, σ 2 = 5.40 °2, Δd = 0.00439) shows markedly reduced PLQY (1.7%) alongside pronounced distortion (Tables S6 and S8). These results suggest that ground‐state octahedral regularity influences emission efficiency, with the mechanistic link between structural distortion and nonradiative losses further elucidated through excited‐state geometry analysis (vide infra). By contrast, metal–metal separations do not account for the PLQY spread: Ge–Ge distances (9.68–10.98 Å) and Sn–Sn distances (10.06–10.86 Å) vary within a relatively narrow window and do not correlate with the >20‐fold PLQY variation (Table S6).

The emission lifetimes vary systematically across the Ge‐based series (0.14–0.82 µs; Figure 4d) and are generally longer for higher‐PLQY compositions. For (Edabco)2GeI6 and (MEdabco)2GeI6, SCXRD indicates pronounced cation disorder/dynamics (Figure S12), evidenced by unusually large anisotropic displacement parameters (ADPs) and positional disorder of the alkyl substituents (coexisting flipped conformations). Such dynamic disorder can amplify local lattice fluctuations and strengthen electron–phonon coupling, thereby facilitating additional nonradiative decay pathways, consistent with the shortened lifetimes and reduced quantum efficiencies [59, 60].

To elucidate the microscopic origin of the PLQY variations, we extracted radiative (kr) and nonradiative (knr) decay rates from the measured PLQYs and lifetimes (Table S9). Across the Ge‐based series, PLQY differences are governed primarily by changes in knr rather than kr. The high‐efficiency emitter, (DMdabco)2GeI6 (PLQY = 35.0%), combines a relatively fast radiative rate (kr ≈ 0.43 × 106 s− 1) with the lowest nonradiative rate in the series (knr ≈ 0.79 × 106 s− 1). In contrast, low‐efficiency members such as (MEdabco)2GeI6 (3.2%) and (Edabco)2GeI6 (4.6%) exhibit smaller kr values (∼0.23 × 106 s− 1) together with substantially elevated knr values (>4.7 × 106 s− 1). Overall, knr spans 0.79–6.91 × 106 s− 1, whereas kr varies over a narrower range of 0.23–0.43 × 106 s− 1, indicating that suppression of nonradiative decay is the dominant determinant of quantum efficiency in this family.

To establish the mechanistic link between ground‐state structural regularity and nonradiative decay rates, we performed DFT optimization of excited‐state geometries based on the experimental ground‐state structures from SCXRD for the highest‐PLQY (DMdabco)2GeI6 and lowest‐PLQY (DEdabco)2GeI6 representatives (Figure S13). Upon photoexcitation, both compounds undergo Jahn–Teller distortion of the [GeI6]4 −octahedra, but the extent of structural reorganization differs markedly. (DEdabco)2GeI6 exhibits pronounced distortion with axial Ge–I bonds elongating by ∼1.0 Å (from ∼3.08 Å to ∼4.09 Å) and asymmetric equatorial compression, whereas (DMdabco)2GeI6 undergoes substantially reduced reorganization with axial elongation of only ∼0.6 Å (from ∼3.06 Å to ∼3.66 Å) and uniform equatorial compression. The substantially larger excited‐state reorganization in (DEdabco)2GeI6 compared to (DMdabco)2GeI6 is consistent with its markedly reduced PLQY and inefficient emission, establishing that compounds with symmetric, well‐matched ground‐state octahedra experience smaller excited‐state lattice reorganization and consequently exhibit lower nonradiative recombination losses. The correlation between ground‐state octahedral regularity (σ 2) and excited‐state reorganization energy thus provides a unified structure–dynamics–efficiency relationship across the Ge‐based series. Collectively, organic‐cation selection enables concurrent tuning of radiative and nonradiative pathways, with the highest‐PLQY compositions achieving a favorable combination of relatively fast kr and strongly suppressed knr through minimized excited‐state structural reorganization. Notably, even polycrystalline powders prepared by the rapid SAG method retain high PLQYs of 28.9% for (DMdabco)2GeI6 and 20.6% for (Pdabco)2GeI6 (Table S8), indicating that the high quantum efficiency is intrinsic to these compositions and underscoring the generality of the SAG route.

Compared with the Ge analogues, the Sn‐based (Rdabco)2SnI6 series shows a narrower bandgap tunability (2.83–2.99 eV; Figure 5a), consistent with stronger Sn–I orbital hybridization and the stereochemically active 5s2 lone pair of Sn2+, which can favor SOJT‐type symmetry‐lowering distortions [14, 53, 61]. DFT calculations reproduce the experimentally observed bandgap trend (Figure S14). Under 365 nm excitation, all Sn compounds display intense broadband emission from 575 to 650 nm (Figure 5c), and the PLE spectra closely follow the absorption edges, supporting intrinsic emission from isolated [SnI6]4 − octahedra. The Sn series retains the hallmarks of STE emission (Table S10), including large Stokes shifts (1.02–1.40 eV), broad bandwidths (FWHM = 121–136 nm), and sub‐microsecond lifetimes (0.11–0.37 µs; Figure 5d). Relative to the Ge series, the shorter lifetimes and smaller Stokes shifts of the Sn compounds indicate faster excited‐state decay dynamics, consistent with stronger spin–orbit coupling (SOC) of the heavier ns2 center and enhanced singlet–triplet mixing in Sn‐based lattices [15].

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Photophysical properties of Sn‐based (Rdabco)2SnI6 vacancy‐ordered iodide perovskites. (a) Optical band gaps (2.83–2.99 eV) obtained from UV–vis diffuse reflectance spectra using the Kubelka–Munk transformation. (b) Photographs of representative single crystals under 365 nm excitation and the corresponding room‐temperature PLQYs. (c) Normalized absorption (Abs., dashed), excitation (Ex.), and emission (Em.) spectra. (d) Time‐resolved photoluminescence decay traces (symbols) with biexponential fits (solid lines); τ ave values are indicated.

The PLQY distribution of the Sn series differs from that of the Ge analogues (Figure 5b, Table S10). (Pdabco)2SnI6 reaches the highest PLQY of 36.8%, while (DEdabco)2SnI6, (DMdabco)2SnI6, (Mdabco)2SnI6, (Edabco)2SnI6, and (MEdabco)2SnI6 exhibit PLQYs of 18.1%, 16.1%, 16.0%, 14.5%, and 9.4%, respectively. Overall, the PLQY spread in the Sn series (∼4‐fold) is markedly smaller than that observed for the Ge series (∼20‐fold), with multiple compositions clustering in a narrow range (14%–18%), indicating a reduced sensitivity of Sn emitters to cation‐driven structural perturbations.

Consistent with the compressed PLQY distribution, the Sn lifetimes span a narrower window (0.11–0.37 µs; Figure 5d). To probe the determinants of efficiency, we extracted kr and knr for the Sn series (Table S11). Unlike the Ge series, where the PLQY spread is dominated by knr, the Sn series exhibits comparable variations in kr and knr, and similar PLQYs can arise from distinct rate combinations. For example, (Pdabco)2SnI6 achieves the highest PLQY through a favorable combination of the lowest nonradiative loss in the series, whereas other members reach comparable efficiencies through different balances between radiative and nonradiative channels. These results suggest that Sn emission efficiencies are governed by competition among multiple relaxation pathways rather than by a single structural descriptor. (Edabco)2SnI6 and (MEdabco)2SnI6 show positional disorder of the ethyl substituents (Figure S15), which may contribute to their comparatively lower PLQYs. Notably, SAG‐prepared polycrystalline powders retain high efficiencies (e.g., PLQY = 30.7% for (Pdabco)2SnI6; Table S10), and SAG‐ and solution‐grown samples exhibit nearly identical PL and PLE peak positions for both the Ge and Sn series (Figures S16 and S17), indicating that the synthetic route does not alter the intrinsic photophysical characteristics.

Remarkably, the Ge(II) iodide VODP (DMdabco)2GeI6 achieves a room‐temperature PLQY of 35.0%, setting a new benchmark for Ge(II)‐based metal‐halide emitters [15, 25, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 62]. This value exceeds the prior Ge(II)–iodide record, [(PEA)6GeI8(Bz)2] (PLQY = 5.0%) [25], and also surpasses the best reported Ge(II)–bromide emitter, (C5N2H14)GeBr4 (PLQY = 7.15%) [62]. By comparison, (Pdabco)2SnI6 reaches a PLQY of 36.8%, placing it among the highest‐efficiency low‐dimensional Sn(II) iodide emitters [14, 15, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28]. These high efficiencies are consistent with the present structural design: N‐alkylated dabco cations template a vacancy‐ordered 0D lattice of electronically isolated [BI6]4 − octahedra, providing an effective host for ns2‐centered luminescence.

To probe the electronic origin of the optical transitions, we analyzed the projected density of states (PDOS) (Figures S18 and S19). The valence‐band maximum is dominated by I 5p states with antibonding contributions from metal ns2‐derived lone‐pair states, whereas the conduction‐band minimum mainly originates from metal np states. In contrast, the organic‐cation states lie far from the band edges and contribute negligibly to the frontier electronic structure. These results indicate that optical absorption and emission are governed by transitions within the isolated [BI6]4 − units, while the organic cations modulate luminescence indirectly through structural effects such as packing and local distortion.

To elucidate the STE emission mechanism and compare exciton dynamics in Ge‐ and Sn‐centered lattices, we performed variable‐temperature PL and TRPL measurements on the highest‐PLQY representatives, (DMdabco)2GeI6 and (Pdabco)2SnI6, over 83–325 K (Figures 6 and 7). The packing views (Figures 6a and 7a) highlight the vacancy‐ordered framework that spatially isolates the [BI6]4 − octahedra, establishing a 0D structural motif conducive to exciton localization and self‐trapping. Below, we first describe the key temperature‐dependent spectral and kinetic signatures (Figures 6b,c and 7b,c) and then quantify thermal quenching and exciton–phonon coupling using fits to the integrated intensity and linewidth data (Figures 6d–f and 7d–f).

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6

Temperature‐dependent STE emission analysis of (DMdabco)2GeI6. (a) Crystal packing highlighting the vacancy‐ordered lattice and isolated [GeI6]4 − units. (b) PL spectra (83–325 K). (c) TRPL decay traces with biexponential fits; τ ave values are indicated. (d) Arrhenius analysis of thermal quenching, yielding Ea and Eb (shown). (e) FWHM versus temperature fitted to extract S and ħωphonon (shown). (f) FWHM versus 1/T analysis to evaluate Γ op (shown).

FIGURE 7.

FIGURE 7

Temperature‐dependent STE emission analysis of (Pdabco)2SnI6. (a) Crystal packing highlighting the vacancy‐ordered lattice and isolated [SnI6]4 − units. (b) PL spectra (83–325 K). (c) TRPL decay traces with biexponential fits; τ ave values are indicated. (d) Arrhenius analysis of thermal quenching, yielding Ea and Eb (shown). (e) FWHM versus temperature fitted to extract S and ħωphonon (shown). (f) FWHM versus 1/T analysis to evaluate Γ op (shown).

Consistent with STE emission, both compounds exhibit pronounced thermal quenching in their variable‐temperature PL spectra (Figures 6b and 7b). Upon heating from 83 to 325 K, the integrated PL intensity decreases substantially, with I(83 K)/I(325 K) ≈ 44 for (DMdabco)2GeI6 and ≈ 12 for (Pdabco)2SnI6, indicative of thermally activated nonradiative relaxation pathways [26]. The Ge compound shows an essentially invariant emission maximum (622 nm at 83 K vs 625 nm at 325 K; Δλ = 3 nm), whereas the Sn compound displays a modest shift to shorter wavelength at low temperature (587 nm at 325 K to 578 nm at 83 K), suggesting a more temperature‐sensitive emissive profile. In both cases, the emission linewidth increases markedly upon heating (Ge: 73 → 141 nm; Sn: 76 → 128 nm), consistent with increased phonon population and enhanced exciton–phonon interactions at elevated temperature [23].

Time‐resolved PL (TRPL) measurements further clarify the temperature‐dependent dynamics (Figures 6c and 7c). Upon heating from 83 to 325 K, τ ave decreases markedly—from 3.34 to 0.27 µs for (DMdabco)2GeI6 and from 1.13 to 0.16 µs for (Pdabco)2SnI6—paralleling the steady‐state intensity quenching and confirming that nonradiative losses dominate at elevated temperature. Temperature‐dependent average lifetimes plotted over the full 83–325 K range further confirm the onset of thermally activated de‐trapping above ∼225 K, consistent with enhanced electron–phonon coupling at elevated temperatures (Figure S20) [26].

To quantify the energetics underlying thermal quenching, we fitted the temperature‐dependent integrated PL intensity using an Arrhenius model (Figures 6d and 7d) [63, 64]. For (DMdabco)2GeI6, the fit yields Ea = 470.90 meV and Eb = 75.53 meV (R2 = 0.9989), whereas for (Pdabco)2SnI6, Ea = 341.99 meV and Eb = 31.56 meV (R2 = 0.9977). The large Ea values (>300 meV) for both compounds are consistent with deep self‐trapping, and the larger Ea for the Ge compound indicates a deeper trapping potential and a higher energetic barrier against thermal deactivation.

Temperature‐dependent full width at half maximum (FWHM) analysis provides further evidence for strong exciton–phonon coupling underlying the broadband STE emission (Figures 6e and 7e). Fitting the FWHM(T) dependence yields large Huang–Rhys factors [65] of S = 52.45 for (DMdabco)2GeI6 and S = 43.45 for (Pdabco)2SnI6, indicative of very strong coupling and deep self‐trapping. The extracted effective phonon energies are ℏωphonon = 11.31 meV (Ge) and 15.46 meV (Sn), consistent with low‐energy lattice vibrations associated with the [BI6]4 − octahedra that participate in the self‐trapping and emission processes [66].

Notably, despite similarly large Huang–Rhys factors, the two systems show markedly different linewidth–temperature behavior in the 1/T representation (Figures 6f and 7f). The extracted optical‐phonon broadening parameter, Γo p , is 149 meV for (DMdabco)2GeI6 but increases to 420 meV for (Pdabco)2SnI6 [67, 68]. This difference is consistent with more pronounced phonon‐assisted dephasing/broadening in the Sn compound and points to different excited‐state relaxation behavior in Ge‐ versus Sn‐centered STEs that is not fully captured by S alone.

Taken together, the variable‐temperature analysis and the structure–photophysics dataset across all twelve compounds point to a clear difference between the Ge and Sn series: Ge emitters display a much stronger dependence of PLQY on octahedral distortion, whereas Sn emitters maintain comparatively high efficiencies over a wider distortion range. For example, (DMdabco)2GeI6 (cubic Pa3¯) features a minimally distorted [GeI6]4 − unit (Δd = 0, σ 2 = 0.66°2) with six equivalent Ge–I bonds (3.0554 Å) and delivers the highest PLQY (35.0%) together with the lowest kn r (0.79 × 106 s− 1), in line with its relatively small linewidth‐broadening term (Γop = 149 meV). In contrast, (DEdabco)2GeI6 exhibits larger distortion metrics (Δd = 0.00439; σ 2 = 5.41 °2) accompanied by pronounced excited‐state reorganization (∼1.0 Å axial elongation), resulting in a much lower PLQY (1.7%; >20 times lower). In the Sn series, efficient emission is retained even at appreciable distortion, as exemplified by (Pdabco)2SnI6 (PLQY = 36.8%; σ 2 = 2.31 °2) and (DEdabco)2SnI6 (PLQY = 18.1%; σ 2 = 11.69 °2), indicating that Sn2+ emitters are less sensitive to ground‐state structural irregularity owing to the reduced stereochemical expression of the 5s2 lone pair.

The STE formation and emission pathways are illustrated in the configuration‐coordinate diagrams in Figure 8. Both compounds exhibit broadband emission with large Stokes shifts (1.48 eV for (DMdabco)2GeI6 and 1.10 eV for (Pdabco)2SnI6), consistent with the characteristic of pronounced lattice relaxation during STE formation. Upon photoexcitation, the excited electrons relax from the excited state to the minimum energy state of STEs, followed by radiative recombination to the ground state. The larger Stokes shift and higher activation energy of (DMdabco)2GeI6 (Ea = 470.90 meV) relative to (Pdabco)2SnI6 (Ea = 341.99 meV) reflect a deeper self‐trapping potential well and stronger lattice reorganization in the Ge‐centered system.

FIGURE 8.

FIGURE 8

Configuration‐coordinate diagrams illustrating STE formation and emission in (a) (DMdabco)2GeI6 and (b) (Pdabco)2SnI6. GS and ES denote the ground state and excited state, respectively.

The difference in distortion dependence may reflect the distinct stereochemical activity of the ns2 lone pair and its coupling to excited‐state lattice relaxation. Ge2+ (4s2) is often considered to exhibit stronger stereochemical activity, such that local symmetry breaking can more readily open additional nonradiative relaxation pathways and increase phonon‐assisted energy loss.[13, 55] In Sn2+ (5s2) systems, the stereochemical expression of the lone pair is weaker, and the heavier cation can introduce stronger SOC that promotes singlet–triplet mixing within the STE manifold, thereby partially offsetting distortion‐induced nonradiative loss [11, 12, 15, 24, 25, 26, 27]. Together with the suppression of exciton migration by the electronically isolated [BI6]4 − motif in 0D structure, the above factors provide a plausible rationale for why Ge‐based emitters require higher structural regularity, whereas Sn analogues maintain relatively high luminescence efficiency across a wider range of distortion [24, 25, 26, 27].

Overall, the variable‐temperature analysis across the full compositional series underscores a clear contrast between the two families: Ge emitters are more sensitive to octahedral irregularity, whereas Sn emitters retain comparatively high efficiencies over a broader distortion window. Variable‐temperature data collected for four additional compositions support this conclusion (Figure S21). Specifically, (DMdabco)2SnI6 and (Pdabco)2GeI6 display the same qualitative signatures as the benchmark compounds—pronounced thermal quenching upon heating, concomitant lifetime shortening, and progressive linewidth broadening—whereas (Edabco)2GeI6 and (Edabco)2SnI6 show an unusual blue shift of the emission maximum (∼40 nm) upon cooling. This anomalous shift may reflect temperature‐dependent changes in cation dynamics (e.g., partial freezing of ethyl‐substituent disorder) that perturb the local octahedral environment and, in turn, reshape the STE energy landscape [59, 60].

The structural analysis above establishes that high PLQY correlates with low octahedral distortion and high crystal symmetry. To verify whether these structural features can enhance environmental stability, we monitored phase stability under ambient laboratory conditions using PXRD (Figure 9).

FIGURE 9.

FIGURE 9

Environmental stability of 3D hybrid perovskites and 0D vacancy‐ordered double perovskites. (a, b) PXRD of (MA)GeI3 and (MA)SnI3 with degradation peaks (*). (c, d) PXRD of (DMdabco)2GeI6 and (Pdabco)2SnI6 stable for 60 days. (e, f) Structures showing 3D corner‐sharing distorted [GeI6]4 − octahedra (faded octahedra indicate neighboring units) with small MA+ and 0D isolated perfect [GeI6]4 − octahedra protected by large DMdabco2+ spatial barrier.

For Ge/Sn‐based 3D hybrid perovskites, rapid degradation under ambient exposure is well documented and is commonly associated with moisture‐assisted decomposition and oxidation of the metal–halide framework [69, 70, 71]. (MA)GeI3 shows impurity peaks (marked with asterisks) within one day (Figure 9a), while (MA)SnI3 degrades within 3 days (Figure 9b). In stark contrast, the 0D compounds exhibit exceptional stability. (DMdabco)2GeI6 (Figure 9c) and (Pdabco)2SnI6 (Figure 9d) both retain phase purity with no detectable impurity reflections after 60 days of continuous ambient exposure, with no obvious loss of diffraction intensity. Additional stability tests were conducted to further assess the structural and optical stability of both compounds. After heating at 105°C for 24 h, the PXRD patterns show no noticeable changes, indicating that the crystal structures remain intact under thermal treatment (Figure S22). Both powders also remain light‐colored under daylight and highly emissive under 365 nm UV irradiation after the stability tests (Figure S23). After exposure to 100% relative humidity for 7 days, no obvious change is observed in the PL emission profile or intensity for either compound. In contrast, after thermal treatment, both compounds show reduced PL intensity and PLQY, whereas the emission profiles remain largely unchanged. These results indicate that thermal treatment affects the emission efficiency without altering the overall crystal structure.

The structural origins of this stability difference are illustrated in Figure 9e,f. (MA)GeI3 adopts a 3D corner‐sharing metal–iodide network with small MA+ cations (Figure 9e), which provides continuous pathways and accessible surfaces for interaction with environmental degradants [70]. In contrast, (DMdabco)2GeI6 features 0D isolated [GeI6]4 − octahedra completely surrounded by large DMdabco2+ cations (Figure 9f). The large organic cations are expected to hinder H2O/O2 ingress by reducing accessible free volume and interrupting diffusion pathways, while the highly regular octahedral geometry (σ 2 = 0.66°2) may further mitigate distortion‐driven bond rearrangements that promote nonradiative and chemical degradation.

Thermal stability measurements further confirm the robustness of these materials, with decomposition temperatures of 245°C for (DMdabco)2GeI6 and 200°C for (Pdabco)2SnI6 (Figure S24). The combination of 0D structural isolation, protective cation encapsulation, and optimized octahedral geometry establishes exceptional stability while maintaining high PLQYs (35.0% for Ge, 36.8% for Sn), positioning these materials as promising candidates for solid‐state lighting and scintillator applications [72, 73].

3. Conclusion

In conclusion, we report a series of highly emissive and stable iodide vacancy‐ordered double perovskites, (Rdabco)2BI6, spanning twelve compositions assembled from six N‐alkylated dabco‐derived cations and stereochemically active ns2 Ge(II) and Sn(II) centers. Rapid solvent‐assisted grinding provides a convenient route to phase‐pure powders for comparative measurements across the compositional series. Cation engineering tunes crystal symmetry, octahedral distortion, and emission wavelength, delivering 575–689 nm self‐trapped exciton emission with photoluminescence quantum yields up to 35.0% for the Ge series and 36.8% for the Sn series. Across the series, higher PLQYs coincide with reduced nonradiative decay and lower octahedral distortion, highlighting symmetry control as an effective handle to suppress nonradiative losses. The 0D lattice of isolated octahedra, together with bulky organic cations, imparts robust environmental and thermal stability. This work establishes iodide vacancy‐ordered double perovskites as a tunable platform for efficient, stable, lead‐free emitters enabled by cation control of ns2 metal–halide units.

Author Contributions

Le Ye: methodology, conceptualization, investigation, visualization, validation, formal analysis, data curation, software, writing – original draft. Yarou Duan: writing – original draft, investigation, methodology, validation, software, formal analysis, data curation. Jun Luo: methodology, software, validation, visualization, writing – original draft. Yutong Lin: methodology, investigation, validation. Mengqiu Cai: software, validation, supervision. Lingling Mao: conceptualization, investigation, funding acquisition, writing – review and editing, writing – original draft, methodology, validation, visualization, supervision, project administration, resources.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Supporting information

Supporting File 1: anie72845‐sup‐0001‐SuppMat.docx.

Supporting File 2: anie72845‐sup‐0002‐Data.zip.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under Grants (22275077, 22575111, 22461160285) and high level of special funds (G03034K001) at SUSTech. The authors are grateful for the assistance of SUSTech Core Research Facilities.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • 1. Muscarella L. A. and Hutter E. M., “Halide Double‐Perovskite Semiconductors Beyond Photovoltaics,” ACS Energy Letters 7 (2022): 2128–2135, 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c00811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Zhao X.‐G., Yang D., Ren J.‐C., Sun Y., Xiao Z., and Zhang L., “Rational Design of Halide Double Perovskites for Optoelectronic Applications,” Joule 2 (2018): 1662–1673, 10.1016/j.joule.2018.06.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Connor B. A., Leppert L., Smith M. D., Neaton J. B., and Karunadasa H. I., “Layered Halide Double Perovskites: Dimensional Reduction of Cs2 AgBiBr6 ,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 140 (2018): 5235–5240, 10.1021/jacs.8b01543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Luo J., Wang X., Li S., et al., “Efficient and Stable Emission of Warm‐White Light From Lead‐Free Halide Double Perovskites,” Nature 563 (2018): 541–545, 10.1038/s41586-018-0691-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Zhou J., Xie P., Wang C., et al., “Hybrid Double Perovskite Derived Halides Based on Bi and Alkali Metals (K, Rb): Diverse Structures, Tunable Optical Properties and Second Harmonic Generation Responses,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 62 (2023): e202307646, 10.1002/anie.202307646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Zhang L. and Yuan M., “Lanthanide Doped Lead‐Free Double Perovskites as the Promising Next Generation Ultra‐Broadband Light Sources,” Light: Science and Applications 11 (2022): 99, 10.1038/s41377-022-00782-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Xue J., Luo J., Chang K. T., et al., “High‐Entropy Double Perovskites With Tailored Multichannel Luminescence,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 147 (2025): 47764–47772, 10.1021/jacs.5c18097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Maughan A. E., Ganose A. M., Bordelon M. M., Miller E. M., Scanlon D. O., and Neilson J. R., “Defect Tolerance to Intolerance in the Vacancy‐Ordered Double Perovskite Semiconductors Cs2 SnI6 and Cs2 TeI6 ,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 138 (2016): 8453–8464, 10.1021/jacs.6b03207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Maughan E., Ganose A. M., Scanlon D. O., and Neilson J. R., “Perspectives and Design Principles of Vacancy‐Ordered Double Perovskite Halide Semiconductors,” Chemistry of Materials 31 (2019): 1184–1195, 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b05036. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Evans H. A., Fabini D. H., Andrews J. L., et al., “Hydrogen Bonding Controls the Structural Evolution in Perovskite‐Related Hybrid Platinum(IV) Iodides,” Inorganic Chemistry 57 (2018): 10375–10382, 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b01597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Benin M., Dirin D. N., Morad V., et al., “Highly Emissive Self‐Trapped Excitons in Fully Inorganic Zero‐Dimensional Tin Halides,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 57 (2018): 11329–11333, 10.1002/anie.201806452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Xu K., Wei Q., Wang H., et al., “The 3D‐Structure‐Mediated Growth of Zero‐Dimensional Cs4 SnX6 Nanocrystals,” Nanoscale 14 (2022): 2248–2255, 10.1039/D1NR06497E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Fu Y., Jin S., and Zhu X.‐Y., “Stereochemical Expression of ns2 Electron Pairs in Metal Halide Perovskites,” Nature Reviews Chemistry 5 (2021): 838–852, 10.1038/s41570-021-00335-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. McCall K. M., Morad V., Benin B. M., and Kovalenko M. V., “Efficient Lone‐Pair‐Driven Luminescence: Structure–Property Relationships in Emissive 5s2 Metal Halides,” ACS Materials Letters 2 (2020): 1218–1232, 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.0c00211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Morad V., Shynkarenko Y., Yakunin S., Brumberg A., Schaller R. D., and Kovalenko M. V., “Disphenoidal Zero‐Dimensional Lead, Tin, and Germanium Halides: Highly Emissive Singlet and Triplet Self‐Trapped Excitons and X‐ray Scintillation,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 141 (2019): 9764–9768, 10.1021/jacs.9b02365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Ke W. and Kanatzidis M. G., “Prospects for Low‐Toxicity Lead‐Free Perovskite Solar Cells,” Nature Communications 10 (2019): 965, 10.1038/s41467-019-08918-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Slavney A. H., Hu T., Lindenberg A. M., and Karunadasa H. I., “A Bismuth‐Halide Double Perovskite With Long Carrier Recombination Lifetime for Photovoltaic Applications,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 138 (2016): 2138–2141, 10.1021/jacs.5b13294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Sun C., Deng Z., Li Z., et al., “Achieving Near‐Unity Photoluminescence Quantum Yields in Organic‐Inorganic Hybrid Antimony (III) Chlorides With the [SbCl5 ] Geometry,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 62 (2023): e202216720, 10.1002/anie.202216720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Wang Z., Huang D., Liu Y., et al., “Vacancy Effect on the Luminescent and Water Responsive Properties of Vacancy‐Ordered Double Perovskite Derivatives,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 63 (2024): e202412346, 10.1002/anie.202412346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Li X., Gao X., Zhang X., et al., “Lead‐Free Halide Perovskites for Light Emission: Recent Advances and Perspectives,” Advanced Science 8 (2021): 2003334, 10.1002/advs.202003334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Chiara R., Morana M., and Malavasi L., “Germanium‐Based Halide Perovskites: Materials, Properties, and Applications,” ChemPlusChem 86 (2021): 879–888, 10.1002/cplu.202100191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Lanzetta L., Webb T., Zibouche N., et al., “Degradation Mechanism of Hybrid Tin‐Based Perovskite Solar Cells and the Critical Role of Tin (IV) Iodide,” Nature Communications 12 (2021): 2853, 10.1038/s41467-021-22864-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Li X., Guan Y., Li X., and Fu Y., “Stereochemically Active Lone Pairs and Nonlinear Optical Properties of Two‐Dimensional Multilayered Tin and Germanium Iodide Perovskites,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 144 (2022): 18030–18042, 10.1021/jacs.2c07535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Zhou C., Lin H., Tian Y., et al., “Luminescent Zero‐Dimensional Organic Metal Halide Hybrids With Near‐Unity Quantum Efficiency,” Chemical Science 9 (2018): 586–593, 10.1039/C7SC04539E. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Zheng N., Cao S., Zhang T., et al., “Synthesis of Zero‐Dimensional Octahedral Metal Halides Through Solvent Incorporation and Their Photophysical Properties,” Nature Chemistry 17 (2025): 1401–1409, 10.1038/s41557-025-01869-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Yakunin S., Benin B. M., Shynkarenko Y., et al., “High‐Resolution Remote Thermometry and Thermography Using Luminescent Low‐Dimensional Tin‐Halide Perovskites,” Nature Materials 18 (2019): 846–852, 10.1038/s41563-019-0416-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Teng Q., Tan Q., Hou M., Zhang J., and Yuan F., “Bright and Stable Zero‐Dimensional Hexagonal Organic–Inorganic Tin Iodide Perovskites for High Color Rendering Index White Light‐Emitting Diodes,” ACS Energy Letters 10 (2025): 3691–3699, 10.1021/acsenergylett.5c01627. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Zhang L., Luo Z., Wang W., Liu Y., He X., and Quan Z., “Organic Cation‐Directed Modulation of Emissions in Zero‐Dimensional Hybrid Tin Bromides,” Inorganic Chemistry 61 (2022): 14857–14863, 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c02438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Eperon G. E., Hörantner M. T., and Snaith H. J., “Metal Halide Perovskite Tandem and Multiple‐Junction Photovoltaics,” Nature Reviews Chemistry 1 (2017): 0095, 10.1038/s41570-017-0095. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. McMeekin D. P., Sadoughi G., Rehman W., et al., “A Mixed‐Cation Lead Mixed‐Halide Perovskite Absorber for Tandem Solar Cells,” Science 351 (2016): 151–155, 10.1126/science.aad5845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Ye H.‐Y., Tang Y.‐Y., Li P.‐F., et al., “Metal‐Free Three‐Dimensional Perovskite Ferroelectrics,” Science 361 (2018): 151–155, 10.1126/science.aas9330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Liang M., Gang K., Li L., et al., “Ligand‐Engineered All‐in‐One Cu(I) Iodide Complex Enables Near‐Unity Photoluminescence and Advanced 3D X‐Ray Image Reconstruction,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 64 (2025): e202512471, 10.1002/anie.202512471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Rahim W., Cheng A., Lyu C., et al., “Geometric Analysis and Formability of the Cubic A2 BX6 Vacancy‐Ordered Double Perovskite Structure,” Chemistry of Materials 32 (2020): 9573–9583, 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c02806. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Maughan A. E., Ganose A. M., Candia A. M., Granger J. T., Scanlon D. O., and Neilson J. R., “Anharmonicity and Octahedral Tilting in Hybrid Vacancy‐Ordered Double Perovskites,” Chemistry of Materials 30 (2018): 472–483, 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b04516. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Li M. and Xia Z., “Recent Progress of Zero‐Dimensional Luminescent Metal Halides,” Chemical Society Reviews 50 (2021): 2626–2662, 10.1039/D0CS00779J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Stoumpos C. C., Frazer L., Clark D. J., et al., “Hybrid Germanium Iodide Perovskite Semiconductors: Active Lone Pairs, Structural Distortions, Direct and Indirect Energy Gaps, and Strong Nonlinear Optical Properties,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 137 (2015): 6804–6819, 10.1021/jacs.5b01025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Najarian A. M., Dinic F., Chen H., et al., “Homomeric Chains of Intermolecular Bonds Scaffold Octahedral Germanium Perovskites,” Nature 620 (2023): 328–335, 10.1038/s41586-023-06209-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Wang H., Li J., Lu H., et al., “Chiral Hybrid Germanium(II) Halide With Strong Nonlinear Chiroptical Properties,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 62 (2023): e202309600, 10.1002/anie.202309600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Li X., Tao Y., Jiang X., et al., “Optical Bandgap Anomaly With Tuning Dimensionality in Germanium Perovskites: Interplay Between Quantum Confinement and Lone Pair Expression,” Chem 10 (2024): 891–909, 10.1016/j.chempr.2023.11.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Chen J., Chen C., Lin Y., et al., “Hydrogen‐Bond‐Directed Assembly of Steric Networks in Two‐Dimensional Germanium, Tin, and Lead Halide Perovskites: Highly Efficient, Ultranarrow Emission and Nonlinear Optical Properties,” Small Structures 7 (2025): e202500675. [Google Scholar]
  • 41. VanOrman Z. A., Savinson B., Deshpande T., et al., “Narrow‐Linewidth Emission and Weak Exciton‐Phonon Coupling in 2D Layered Germanium Halide Perovskites,” Advanced Materials 37 (2025): 2419879, 10.1002/adma.202419879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Li T., Luo S., Wang X., and Zhang L., “Alternative Lone‐Pair ns2 ‐Cation‐Based Semiconductors Beyond Lead Halide Perovskites for Optoelectronic Applications,” Advanced Materials 33 (2021): 2008574, 10.1002/adma.202008574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Fabini D. H., Seshadri R., and Kanatzidis M. G., “The Underappreciated Lone Pair in Halide Perovskites Underpins Their Unusual Properties,” MRS Bulletin 45 (2020): 467–477, 10.1557/mrs.2020.142. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Shi H., Han D., Chen S., and Du M.‐H., “Impact of Metal ns2 Lone Pair on Luminescence Quantum Efficiency in Low‐Dimensional Halide Perovskites,” Physical Review Materials 3 (2019): 034604, 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.034604. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Sun S., Lu M., Gao X., et al., “0D Perovskites: Unique Properties, Synthesis, and Their Applications,” AdvancedScience 8 (2021): 2102689, 10.1002/advs.202102689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Sun H.‐Y., Xiong L., and Jiang H., “Toward First‐Principles Approaches for Mechanistic Study of Self‐Trapped Exciton Luminescence,” Chemical Physics Reviews 4 (2023): 031302, 10.1063/5.0147710. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Mao L., Chen J., Vishnoi P., and Cheetham A. K., “The Renaissance of Functional Hybrid Transition‐Metal Halides,” Accounts of Materials Research 3 (2022): 439–448, 10.1021/accountsmr.1c00270. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Mauck C. M. and Tisdale W. A., “Excitons in 2D Organic–Inorganic Halide Perovskites,” Trends in Chemistry 1 (2019): 380–393, 10.1016/j.trechm.2019.04.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Leung T. L., Ahmad I., Syed A. A., Ng A. M. C., Popović J., and Djurišić A. B., “Stability of 2D and Quasi‐2D Perovskite Materials and Devices,” Communications Materials 3 (2022): 63, 10.1038/s43246-022-00285-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Li S., Li X., Kocoj C. A., et al., “Ultrafast Excitonic Response in Two‐Dimensional Hybrid Perovskites Driven by Intense Midinfrared Pulses,” Physical Review Letters 129 (2022): 177401, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.177401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Macrae C. F., Sovago I., Cottrell S. J., et al., “Mercury 4.0: From Visualization to Analysis, Design and Prediction,” Journal of Applied Crystallography 53 (2020): 226–235, 10.1107/S1600576719014092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Bersuker I. B., “Pseudo‐Jahn–Teller Effect—A Two‐State Paradigm in Formation, Deformation, and Transformation of Molecular Systems and Solids,” Chemical Reviews 113 (2013): 1351–1390, 10.1021/cr300279n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Bersuker I. B., “Jahn–Teller and Pseudo‐Jahn–Teller Effects: From Particular Features to General Tools in Exploring Molecular and Solid State Properties,” Chemical Reviews 121 (2021): 1463–1512, 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Caicedo‐Dávila S., Cohen A., Motti S. G., et al., “Disentangling the Effects of Structure and Lone‐Pair Electrons in the Lattice Dynamics of Halide Perovskites,” Nature Communications 15 (2024): 4184, 10.1038/s41467-024-48581-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Huang X., Li X., Tao Y., et al., “Understanding Electron–Phonon Interactions in 3D Lead Halide Perovskites From the Stereochemical Expression of 6s2 Lone Pairs,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 144 (2022): 12247–12260, 10.1021/jacs.2c03443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Hong G., Antaris A. L., and Dai H., “Near‐Infrared Fluorophores for Biomedical Imaging,” Nature Biomedical Engineering 1 (2017): 0010, 10.1038/s41551-016-0010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Wang F., Zhong Y., Bruns O., Liang Y., and Dai H., “In Vivo NIR‐II Fluorescence Imaging for Biology and Medicine,” Nature Photonics 18 (2024): 535–547, 10.1038/s41566-024-01391-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Xu B., Li Y., Hong P., et al., “Pressure‐Controlled Free Exciton and Self‐Trapped Exciton Emission in Quasi‐One‐Dimensional Hybrid Lead Bromides,” Nature Communications 15 (2024): 7403, 10.1038/s41467-024-51836-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Munson K. T., Kennehan E. R., Doucette G. S., and Asbury J. B., “Dynamic Disorder Dominates Delocalization, Transport, and Recombination in Halide Perovskites,” Chemistry 4 (2018): 2826–2843, 10.1016/j.chempr.2018.09.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Kim D.‐H., Woo S.‐J., Huelmo C. P., et al., “Surface‐Binding Molecular Multipods Strengthen the Halide Perovskite Lattice and Boost Luminescence,” Nature Communications 15 (2024): 6245, 10.1038/s41467-024-49751-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Lim V. J.‐Y., Righetto M., Farrar M. D., et al., “Optically Determined Hole Effective Mass in Tin‐Iodide Perovskite Films,” ACS Energy Letters 10 (2025): 4589–4595, 10.1021/acsenergylett.5c02283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. He N., Gong P., Zhang X., Liu Y., Dong L., and Lin Z., “(C5 N2 H14 )GeBr4: A 2D Organic Germanium Bromide Perovskite With Strong Orange Photoluminescence Properties,” Inorganic Chemistry 62 (2023): 823–829, 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c03432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Blasse G., “Thermal Quenching of Characteristic Fluorescence,” Journal of Chemical Physics 51 (1969): 3529–3530, 10.1063/1.1672543. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Blasse G., “Thermal Quenching of Characteristic Luminescence. II,” Journal of Solid State Chemistry 9 (1974): 147–151, 10.1016/0022-4596(74)90066-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Huang K. and Rhys A., “Theory of Light Absorption and Non‐Radiative Transitions in F‐Centres,”Proceedings of the Royal Society A 204 (1950): 406–423. [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Blasse G. and Grabmaier B. C., Luminescent Materials (Springer‐Verlag, 1994), 10.1007/978-3-642-79017-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Rudin S., Reinecke T. L., and Segall B., “Temperature‐Dependent Exciton Linewidths in Semiconductors,” Physical Review B 42 (1990): 11218–11231, 10.1103/PhysRevB.42.11218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Toyozawa Y., “Theory of Line‐Shapes of the Exciton Absorption Bands,” Progress of Theoretical Physics 20 (1958): 53–81, 10.1143/PTP.20.53. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Kore B. P., Jamshidi M., and Gardner J. M., “The Impact of Moisture on the Stability and Degradation of Perovskites in Solar Cells,” Materials Advances 5 (2024): 2200–2217, 10.1039/D3MA00828B. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Sun P.‐P., Chi W.‐J., and Li Z.‐S., “Effects of Water Molecules on the Chemical Stability of MAGeI3 Perovskite Explored From a Theoretical Viewpoint,” Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 18 (2016): 24526–24536, 10.1039/C6CP04344E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Hien V. X., Hung P. T., Han J., Lee S., Lee J.‐H., and Heo Y.‐W., “Growth and Gas Sensing Properties of Methylammonium Tin Iodide Thin Film,” Scripta Materialia 178 (2020): 108–113, 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2019.10.049. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Wibowo A., Sheikh M. A. K., Diguna L. J., et al., “Development and Challenges in Perovskite Scintillators for High‐Resolution Imaging and Timing Applications,” Communications Materials 4 (2023): 21, 10.1038/s43246-023-00348-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Zhou Y., Chen J., Bakr O. M., and Mohammed O. F., “Metal Halide Perovskites for X‐Ray Imaging Scintillators and Detectors,” ACS Energy Letters 6 (2021): 739–768, 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c02430. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting File 1: anie72845‐sup‐0001‐SuppMat.docx.

Supporting File 2: anie72845‐sup‐0002‐Data.zip.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Angewandte Chemie (International Ed. in English) are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES