Abstract
A progressive-ratio reinforcement schedule, in which successive reinforcements required an additional 50 responses, was programmed on one key. A response on a second key reset the progressive-ratio schedule to the first step. Before punishment, all pigeons consistently reset the schedule after reinforcement on the first step, thereby minimizing the number of responses required for reinforcement. Punishment was a brief electric shock contingent upon each response on the reset key. The first effect of punishment was to change the frequency of extra responses on the reset key. Under higher intensities of punishment, the pigeons completed the advanced steps of the progressive-ratio schedule before resetting to the first step. Completions of advanced steps were accompanied by decreases in the overall rate of responding and the rate of reinforcement. When the punishment contingency was removed, the major features of pre-punishment performance were recovered.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- APPEL J. B. Aversive aspects of a schedule of positive reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Jul;6:423–428. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- AZRIN N. H. A technique for delivering shock to pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav. 1959 Apr;2:161–163. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1959.2-161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- AZRIN N. H., HAKE D. F., HOLZ W. C., HUTCHINSON R. R. MOTIVATIONAL ASPECTS OF ESCAPE FROM PUNISHMENT. J Exp Anal Behav. 1965 Jan;8:31–44. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1965.8-31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- AZRIN N. H., HUTCHINSON R. R., SALLERY R. D. PAIN-AGGRESSION TOWARD INANIMATE OBJECTS. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 May;7:223–228. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- AZRIN N. H. Time-out from positive reinforcement. Science. 1961 Feb 10;133(3450):382–383. doi: 10.1126/science.133.3450.382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DARDANO J. F., SAUERBRUNN D. SELECTIVE PUNISHMENT OF CONCURRENT PROGRESSIVE RATIO BEHAVIOR. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 Jan;7:51–65. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Findley J. D. Preference and Switching under Concurrent Scheduling. J Exp Anal Behav. 1958 Apr;1(2):123–144. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1958.1-123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HODOS W., KALMAN G. Effects of increment size and reinforcer volume on progressive ratio performance. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Jul;6:387–392. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- THOMPSON D. M. ESCAPE FROM SD ASSOCIATED WITH FIXED-RATIO REINFORCEMENT. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 Jan;7:1–8. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- THOMPSON D. M. PUNISHMENT BY SD ASSOCIATED WITH FIXED-RATIO REINFORCEMENT. J Exp Anal Behav. 1965 May;8:189–194. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1965.8-189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- VERHAVE T. TOWARDS AN EMPIRICAL CALCULUS OF REINFORCEMENT VALUE. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Oct;6:525–536. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weiner H. Preference and switching under ratio contingencies with humans. Psychol Rep. 1966 Feb;18(1):239–246. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1966.18.1.239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- ZIMMERMAN J., FERSTER C. B. SOME NOTES ON TIME OUT FROM REINFORCEMENT. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 Jan;7:13–19. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]