Skip to main content
Thieme Open Access logoLink to Thieme Open Access
. 2026 Jul 13;58(Suppl 4):E822–E823. doi: 10.1055/a-2901-6737

Ligation-assisted mucosal unroofing and snare resection: a simplified and cost-effective technique for gastric submucosal tumors

Qizheng Lu 1, Peng Xie 1, Qinyi Liu 1, Shaoyan Guo 1, Lifang Ye 1, Jiachuan Wu 1,✉
PMCID: PMC13384754  PMID: 42442399

A case description

Video 1 Ligation-assisted mucosal unroofing and snare resection of a gastric submucosal tumor arising from the muscularis propria using standard polypectomy equipment.

Download video file (47.8MB, mp4)

Endoscopic submucosal excavation (ESE) is a well-established treatment for gastric submucosal tumors (SMTs). 1​ ​2​ However, for small lesions (8–15 mm), ESE remains technically demanding, time-consuming, and resource-intensive, often associated with a steep learning curve. 3​ ​4​ Therefore, a standardized and more accessible strategy is clinically warranted. Herein, we demonstrate a novel technique that effectively addresses these limitations, requiring only standard polypectomy equipment ( Video 1 ).

The initial steps involved marking the tumor ( Fig. 1a ) margins and mounting the over-the-scope band ligator (SureFire, MBLS-6, MICRO-TECH, Nanjing, China). The mucosa overlying the SMT was grasped with forceps ( Fig. 1b ) and retracted into the cap ( Fig. 1c ), allowing for successful ligation ( Fig. 1d ). A forceps-assisted approach ensures targeted capture without involving adjacent tissues or damaging the tumor body. A snare was then utilized to incise the ligated mucosa using electrocautery ( Fig. 1e ), effectively creating a mucosal window to expose the underlying tumor ( Fig. 1f ). Unroofing allows the tumor to be aspirated under direct vision, facilitating easier and more accurate ligation of the tumor base. Subsequently, the ligator was reapplied to capture the denuded tumor, deploying a band precisely at its base to ensure mechanical isolation ( Fig. 1g ). Finally, en bloc resection of the tumor was then achieved via snare electrocautery ( Fig. 1h ). In our case, the measured specimen size is about 12 mm×10 mm ( Fig. 2 ).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Schematic representation of the novel SMT endoscopic technique. ( a ) Tumor. ( b ) Grasping the overlying mucosa. ( c ) Retracting the mucosa into the cap. ( d ) Ligation of the overlying mucosa. ( e ) Incision of the ligated mucosa. ( f ) Exposure of the underlying tumor. ( g ) Ligation of the tumor. ( h ) En bloc resection of the tumor.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

En bloc resection of the gastric submucosal tumor measuring 12 mm×10 mm.

In our practice, this approach required an average procedural time of only 10 to 15 minutes, yielding an uneventful postoperative course without complications. By obviating the need for specialized electrosurgical knives and advanced dissection skills, this technique significantly minimizes procedural costs and flattens the learning curve. Leveraging fundamental banding and polypectomy proficiency, it offers a safe, efficient, and readily adoptable strategy for gastric SMT treatment, particularly in non-tertiary centers.

Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AO_2AG

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Contributorsʼ Statement Qizheng Lu: methodology, visualization, and writing – review and editing. Peng Xie: methodology. Qinyi Liu: resources and supervision. Shaoyan Guo: resources. Lifang Ye: methodology and supervision. Jiachuan Wu: conceptualization, methodology, resources, and supervision.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient to publish these images and video.

References

  • 1.Casali P G, Abecassis N, Aro H T et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: ESMO-EURACAN Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2018;29:iv68–iv78. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cheng B Q, Du C, Li H K et al. Endoscopic resection of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Dig Dis. 2024;25:550–558. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.13217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hwang J H, Rulyak S D, Kimmey M B. American Gastroenterological Association Institute technical review on the management of gastric subepithelial masses. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:2217–2228. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.04.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Huang L, Jia Y X, Lyu B et al. Effects of Endoscopic Submucosal Excavation With Non-Submucosal Injection on Stromal Tumors in Stomach. Front Oncol. 2022;12:792445. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.792445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Endoscopy are provided here courtesy of Thieme Medical Publishers

RESOURCES