Abstract
Carbon membranes yielding high selectivity as well as high permeance are attractive to advance the membrane-based gas separation. Herein, we report ultrathin carbon membranes (UCMs) which deliver enhanced gas separation performance through oxygen-modulated pyrolysis of poly(4-vinylpyridine) precursor. We show that O2 in pyrolysis environment, transforms the otherwise uniform carbon network featuring a ~ 3.9 Å characteristic interlayer spacing into disrupted UCMs (d-UCMs). These d-UCMs possess a multimodal ultramicroporous structure characterized by distinct d-spacings of ~3.4 Å, 3.9 Å, and 5.5 Å. This optimized distribution of free volume in a 10-nm-thick membrane enables a record combination of H2 permeance exceeding 10,000 gas permeation units (GPUs) and H2/N2 mixture selectivity surpassing 200. Meanwhile, d-UCM exhibits physical and thermal stability, showing no aging over 7 days of elevated temperature permeance testing, which overcomes the common issue of rapid aging in carbon membranes. Mechanistic investigations reveal that O2 pyrolysis environment selectively removes relatively weakly-bound carbon species, altering pyrolysis intermediates, resulting in a nitrogen-rich framework with disordered nanodomains and heterogeneous ultramicroporosity. This work advances the material chemistry of ultrathin carbon membranes, attractive for ultrafast and high-precision molecular-sieving for molecular separation.
Subject terms: Synthesis and processing, Chemical engineering
Researchers develop 10-nm-thick carbon membranes with oxygen-induced multimodal pore structures that enable rapid, selective and thermally stable hydrogen separation.
Introduction
Efficient gas separation is a key challenge in a variety of industrial applications, such as hydrogen recovery1, natural gas purification2, biomass gasification3, and ammonia production4. Membrane-based separation technologies are particularly attractive due to their energy efficiency and operational simplicity compared to conventional thermally-driven methods like cryogenic distillation or pressure swing adsorption5. However, the development of membranes that exhibit both high selectivity and permeance remains a significant challenge in membrane research, due to the inherent permeance-selectivity trade-off4.
Carbon-based membranes, especially carbon molecular sieve (CMS) membranes, have shown great promise in overcoming this limitation, owing to their thermal stability, mechanical robustness, and tunable chemical and structural properties. Recent advances have brought CMS membrane performance close to industrial separation applications6, combining excellent selectivity7–13 with increasing maturity in fabrication14. Currently, two primary configurations dominate the CMS landscape: supported thin-film composites on robust porous substrates15–17 and asymmetric hollow fibers, which provide high packing density and a self-supporting structure18–22. Both benefit from well-established manufacturing processes originally developed for industrial-scale polymeric and ceramic membranes, providing significant scalability advantages. However, regardless of their geometry, most CMS membranes feature a 3–10 μm thick selective layer to prevent defect formation during the pyrolysis process4, which inherently limits gas permeance. To address this, significant efforts have been made in substrate engineering7,16,23–25 and precursor optimization10,26 to push the thickness limit into the sub-micron range for higher permeance. For instance, asymmetric microporous alumina supports were demonstrated to prevent precursor intrusion, yielding 125-nm-thick CMS membranes with high H2 permeance (~2000 GPU, 1 GPU = 3.35 × 10−10 mol m−2 s−1 Pa−1) and H2/N2 selectivity (73.5)16. A dual-layer hollow fiber was reported with selective layer thickness down to 500 nm, yielding attractive CO2 permeance (up to ~2500 GPU) and CO2/CH4 selectivity (up to 37)26. While the potential of reducing selective layer thickness to improve permeance is well recognized, fabricating nanometer-thick CMS membranes without compromising selectivity remains a significant challenge.
Carbon nanomembranes (CNMs) represent another emerging class of carbon-based membranes with thicknesses in the nanometer range. Fabricated via controlled monolayer self-assembly followed by electron-induced cross-linking, these membranes can achieve thicknesses as low as 1–2 nm27–29. High gas permeance is obtained owing to their nanometric thickness and minimal transport path length. However, low gas-pair selectivity (for example, H2/N2 selectivity near 10) limits their practical separation application30. This performance gap between ultrathin CNMs and micrometer-thick CMS membranes underscores a critical opportunity: to develop ultrathin, carbon-based membranes that combine the high permeance of CNMs with the molecular selectivity of CMS materials. Despite extensive efforts16,17,24–26, however, fabricating ultrathin carbon membranes with both high selectivity and structural stability remains an unresolved challenge, largely due to the difficulty in controlling pore architecture and preventing defect formation at the nanometer scale7,31.
Herein, we introduce a class of ultrathin (10-nm-thick) carbon membranes, referred to here as d-UCMs, with nanopore architecture engineered via optimized oxidative pyrolysis. This approach demonstrates carbon membranes at 10-nm-thickness scale exhibiting CMS-level selectivity. Unlike conventional oxidative pyrolysis, which typically aims to functionalize the carbon matrix through oxygen doping or pore wall widening16,25,32,33, our approach utilizes oxygen molecules as molecular scissors that selectively cleave weakly bound carbon linkages during pyrolysis and alter the pyrolysis intermediates during carbonization. This mechanism created disordered nanodomains and heterogeneous ultramicroporosity within the ultrathin carbon film, enabling ultrafast and highly selective gas separation.
As a result, d-UCMs exhibit enhanced gas separation performance, with H2 permeance exceeding 10,000 GPU and H2/N2 mixture selectivity surpassing 200, significantly surpassing the permeability–selectivity trade-off of polymeric membranes and even outperforming most CMS membranes. Moreover, the membranes exhibit excellent long-term thermal stability, maintaining performance without aging over 7 days of continuous high-temperature operation. Overall, this work introduces a strategy that combines ultrathin carbon membrane synthesis and precise microstructure sculpting, enabling the scalable platform to fabricate stable membranes with high hydrogen permeance and selectivity for gas separation.
Results
Synthesis and structure characterization of the ultrathin carbon membrane
UCMs were synthesized using a simple, user-friendly, and rapid method (Fig. 1). The pyrolysis environment could be simply regulated by changing the gas environment with a controlled gas dosing system. Poly(4-vinylpyridine) (P4VP) served as the carbon precursor, and nickel served as a substrate for the deposition of an ultrathin carbon film. The synthesis started by simply placing P4VP powder in a boat below a nickel foil. Upon pyrolysis under rapid, atmospheric pressure conditions, volatile decomposition products of P4VP deposited onto a nickel substrate, forming a carbon film.
Fig. 1. One-step synthesis of pristine and oxygen-disrupted ultrathin carbon membranes (UCMs).

Schematic illustration of the one-step synthesis of ultrathin carbon membranes on a nickel substrate, with tunable O2 dosing amount from 0 vol% to 0.8 vol%, yielding pristine UCMs (p-UCMs) or disrupted UCMs (d-UCMs).
To investigate the influence of oxidative pyrolysis, a static gas environment with O2 dosing (0–0.8 vol%) was created (Supplementary Figs. 1, 2, and Supplementary Note 1). This static gas environment enabled simple control over the composition. A two-stage pyrolysis process was implemented, involving an initial rapid ramp to 400 °C within 25 min, near the decomposition temperature of P4VP, to promote rapid polymer decomposition, followed by a ramp to 500 °C to facilitate homogeneous carbon layer formation. Following this, the reaction was quenched rapidly. The entire process, including cooling to room temperature, was completed in less than 2.5 h.
Two distinct types of UCMs were investigated: the pristine UCMs (p-UCMs) prepared under oxygen-free conditions and the disrupted UCMs synthesized in the presence of oxygen. A 1 cm × 1 cm d-UCM film was transferred to a silicon wafer for optical inspection. The representative optical image (Fig. 2a) shows uniform contrast across the entire area, indicating high film uniformity. Further structural analysis was conducted by transferring the film onto a transmission electron microscopy (TEM) grid. A free-standing film suspended over 100-µm-sized holes indicated that the film is mechanically robust (Fig. 2b). Nanoindentation measurements on the film resting on a silicon wafer revealed that both p-UCM and d-UCM films possess high mechanical strength, with elastic moduli of 10.5 ± 1.9 and 3.2 ± 0.6 GPa, respectively (Fig. 2c, Supplementary Fig. 3, and Supplementary Note 2). The lower Young’s modulus of the d-UCM suggests higher porosity of the d-UCM. Nonetheless, the high elastic modulus, comparable to that of polybenzimidazole (PBI, ~2 GPa34,35), a state-of-the-art polymeric membrane for H2 separation, makes UCMs suitable for integration into a practical membrane.
Fig. 2. Structural characterization of ultrathin carbon membranes.
a Optical image of a 1 cm × 1 cm disrupted UCM (d-UCM) film transferred onto a Si wafer. b Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of a free-standing d-UCM film on a hexagonal copper grid. c Elastic modulus of pristine UCM (p-UCM, synthesized with 0 vol% O2 dosing) and d-UCM (synthesized with 0.8 vol% O2 dosing), compared with hydrogen-selective polymeric films (polybenzimidazole (PBI)) and carbon molecular sieve membranes reported in the literature21,34,35,50,55. Error bars for p-UCM and d-UCM represent standard deviation based on three measurements. d Top-view high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) image of the free-standing d-UCM and the corresponding diffraction pattern from the same area. e Cross-sectional HRTEM image of the d-UCM on a Ni substrate and the corresponding higher-magnification cross-sectional HRTEM image showing the d-UCM thickness of 10 nm and its amorphous carbon structure.
Selected-area electron diffraction and high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) image (Fig. 2d) revealed that the carbon film is not graphitic but amorphous, with characteristic broad diffuse rings of amorphous carbon. Similar morphology and amorphous structure are also observed in p-UCMs (Supplementary Fig. 4). Cross-sectional analysis of a specimen prepared by focused-ion beam (FIB) using HRTEM revealed the ultrathin nature of the film with a thickness of ~10 nm (Fig. 2e), which was further verified by edge height measurements via atomic force microscopy (AFM) (Supplementary Fig. 5). These ultrathin yet mechanically robust UCMs represent promising candidates for gas separation applications.
UCMs as highly permeable membranes for gas separation
Crack-free UCM membranes could be successfully prepared by transferring UCM from Ni foil onto a macroporous support using a mechanically-reinforcing film (MRF, Supplementary Fig. 6 and Supplementary Table 1). The MRF was a 250-nm-thick film of poly(1-trimethylsilyl 1-propyne) (PTMSP). The UCM membranes were then sealed in a homemade permeation cell to ensure leak-tight gas transport measurements. Single-gas permeation tests of transport study from p-UCM membranes (0 vol% O2) exhibited an average H2/N2 ideal selectivity of ~12 with an average H2 permeance of 1700 GPU at 35 °C (Fig. 3a, b). When the temperature was elevated to 150 °C, the average H2/N2 ideal selectivity and H2 permeance increased to 28 and 4500 GPU, respectively. This is typical when temperature-activated transport dominates from subnanometer-sized pores36. The standalone MRF layer has negligible H2/N2 selectivity (Supplementary Table 2), demonstrating that the observed selectivity originates from the carbon films. Compared to the CNM-based membranes for H2/N2 separation in literature, where permeance was tested at a low transmembrane pressure difference (0.11–0.28 bar)30, UCM membranes maintained selectivity under pressurized conditions ( of 2 bar). This makes UCM highly attractive for membrane-based separation.
Fig. 3. Gas separation performance, transport activation, pressure stability, and benchmarking of ultrathin carbon membranes.
Influence of O2 concentration during the synthesis on H2 permeance in gas permeation units (GPUs) (a) and H2/N2 ideal selectivity (b) measured at 35 and 150 °C. Error bars represent the standard deviation from three measurements. c Single-gas permeance of He, H2, CO2, N2, and CH4 measured at 90, 120, 150, and 180 °C at a feed pressure of 2 bar. d Apparent activation energy for gas permeation (), plotted as a function of gas kinetic diameter of He, H2, CO2, N2, and CH4. Dashed lines highlight the values for H2 and CH4, and denotes the difference between them. e H2/N2 separation performance at 60 °C with a single-gas feed at increasing transmembrane pressure difference, . f Stability test of a d-UCM membrane using a 50/50 H2/N2 gas mixture over 190 h at 150 °C. g Comparison of H2/N2 ideal selectivity and H2 permeance, with reported state-of-the-art membranes, including carbon molecular sieve membranes (CMS)9,16,56–60, carbon nanomembranes (CNMs)30, metal-organic frameworks (MOFs)61–64, silica65, zeolite66, graphene oxide (GO)67, conjugated microporous polymers (CMP)68, graphene69, boron nitride and graphene nanosheets (BNGs)70, 2-dimensional zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (2DZIFs)71, hydrogen-bonded organic framework (HOF)72, and this work (d-UCM), where circles and stars correspond to data at 35 and 150 °C, respectively.
Oxidative pyrolysis significantly improved the separation performance. As the O2 content increased from 0 to 0.8 vol%, both H2 permeance and the H2/N2 ideal selectivity improved simultaneously (Fig. 3a, b). Specifically, the average H2 permeance increased from 1700 to 2800 GPU at 35 °C, and from 4500 to 10,500 GPU at 150 °C. Correspondingly, average H2/N2 ideal selectivity improved from 12 to 66 at 35 °C and from 28 to 132 at 150 °C. The 0.8 vol% case led to the best performance. For example, a membrane exhibited an ideal selectivity of 189 with a H2 permeance of 11,145 GPU at 150 °C. To evaluate the separation performance under industrially relevant conditions, binary mixed-gas tests were conducted with varied feed compositions (Supplementary Fig. 7). The resulting mixed-gas permeance and H2/N2 selectivity remained comparable to single-gas results, which suggests that competitive transport and sorption effects are negligible in the d-UCM membranes. This is consistent with the gas adsorption data obtained via a quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) for the d-UCM film (Supplementary Fig. 8). The N2 adsorption capacity was ~0.25 mmol/g at 2 bar, while the H2 adsorption was below the detection limit. These results suggest the weak binding affinity between the gas molecules and the carbon framework. Notably, all membranes exhibited higher H2 permeance and higher H2/N2 selectivity at elevated temperatures, indicating a temperature-activated H2 transport. Since the 0.8 vol% case was the most attractive, the temperature-dependent gas transport was studied between 90 and 180 °C (Fig. 3c). The resulting gas permeance, , was fitted with the Arrhenius relationship (Eq. 1) to extract the apparent activation energy () for gas transport:
| 1 |
where is the pre-exponential coefficient, is the universal gas constant, and is the temperature. Permeance for all gases increased with temperature, with molecules with smaller kinetic diameter (kd), such as H2 (kd of 2.89 Å) and He (kd of 2.60 Å) showing stronger temperature dependence with higher . Specifically, the for H2 was the highest (15 kJ/mol). In comparison, larger molecules like N2 (kd of 3.64 Å) and CH4 (kd of 3.80 Å) exhibited lower activation energies (8 kJ/mol and 7, respectively). This explains the increase in H2/N2 permselectivity with temperature (Fig. 3d). The lower apparent activation energies for N2 and CH4 suggest that transport of these larger molecules is likely through a small population of defects, due to their poor accessibility to the ultramicropores25.
Permeation experiments indicate that the d-UCM is highly suitable for H2/N2 separation, especially at elevated temperatures. Pressure-dependent permeation tests at 60 °C demonstrated the d-UCM with high H2/N2 selectivity and permeance under transmembrane pressure differences up to 5 bar (Fig. 3e). A 190-h (over 7 days) continuous permeation test using H2/N2 gas mixture (50/50) at 150 °C confirmed membrane stability and resistance to aging, with H2 permeance above 10,000 GPU and H2/N2 mixture selectivity above 200 (Fig. 3f). This combination of thermal stability and high separation efficiency positions UCMs as attractive for hydrogen purification in ammonia cracking and related industrial applications37,38. This class of ultrathin carbon membranes with enhanced gas separation performance effectively bridges the performance gap between CMS and CNMs while showing competitiveness against other organic and inorganic membranes (Fig. 3g).
Oxygen-induced multimodal ultramicroporous structure in ultrathin carbon membranes
Mechanistic studies were conducted to elucidate the structural differences responsible for the enhanced performance of d-UCMs prepared in the presence of O2. Two potential roles of O2 can be: (1) it acts as a chemical dopant, and incorporates into the carbon membrane structure, potentially shrinking pore sizes or modifying the carbon matrix to enhance selectivity, or (2) it influences the pyrolysis or changes the pyrolysis products39,40, leading to structural changes in the pyrolyzed film. To investigate this, we characterized and compared the properties of p-UCM (0 vol% O2) and d-UCM (0.8 vol% O2).
Surface morphology and thickness analyses of the membranes via AFM showed that both p-UCMs and d-UCMs share nearly identical thicknesses (~10 nm) and comparable surface roughness (Fig. 4 and Supplementary Fig. 5). The root mean square roughness measured over a 0.78 μm × 0.78 μm area was similar for p-UCM (0.9 nm) and d-UCM (1.2 nm). These findings highlight that oxidative pyrolysis does not significantly modify the film morphology or thickness, which rules out the possibility that the higher gas permeance observed in d-UCMs is due to a thinner selective layer or a morphology change.
Fig. 4. Surface morphology comparison between p-UCM and d-UCM films by atomic force microscopy (AFM).
AFM images of the p-UCM film (a) and the d-UCM film (b) on a Si wafer, together with the corresponding 3D surface profiles of the boxed regions used for root mean square roughness analysis. The pink box corresponds to the selected region in p-UCM, and the blue box corresponds to the selected region in d-UCM. The root mean square roughness values (), film thicknesses, and thickness standard deviations are indicated in the figure. The color gradient represents surface height. The scale bars in the AFM images are 1 μm, while the z-scale bars in the 3D profiles represent 5 nm.
High-resolution X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was carried out to understand the differences in chemical environment between p-UCM and d-UCM. N 1s, and O 1s signals were identified, in addition to C 1s signal, with sources of N and O being P4VP and O2 in the pyrolysis environment, respectively (Fig. 5b). Initial surface scans revealed nearly identical elemental compositions and bonding environments between the p-UCM and d-UCM films (Supplementary Fig. 9), suggesting either a true surface similarity or the masking of underlying differences by ambient contamination. To rule out potential surface contamination effects and further probe the elemental distribution into the material, depth-profiling XPS was performed (Fig. 5c, d). The first point was collected on the as-synthesized surface of p-UCM and d-UCM, where the highest O concentration was observed (5.5 and 3.7% for p-UCM and d-UCM, respectively). Immediately after sputtering, the oxygen concentration decreased to 2% in both films and remained constant throughout the bulk material. Despite the inherent limitations of Ar-ion sputtering, such as potential preferential sputtering or redistribution of light elements, the results provide a reliable qualitative comparison between the two samples. The consistently low and identical oxygen concentrations for p-UCM and d-UCM in their bulk confirm that O2 exposure does not result in O incorporation, thereby effectively excluding O2 as a dopant.
Fig. 5. Structural and chemical modifications in UCM films induced by oxidative dosing.
a Conceptual illustration of the structural evolution in UCM films where oxidative pyrolysis leads to a disrupted and more disordered carbon framework (as indicated by d-spacing shifts) and thus changing the gas permeation behavior. b Survey X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) on p-UCM and d-UCM. In-depth XPS analysis showing the evolution of C 1s, N 1s, and O 1s concentrations with increasing sputtering depth for c p-UCM and d d-UCM. Two-dimensional grazing-incidence wide-angle X-ray scattering (2D-GIWAXS) patterns for e p-UCM and g d-UCM with the corresponding f one-dimensional wide-angle X-ray scattering (1D-WAXS) profiles, with dashed vertical lines indicating the characteristic d-spacing positions. The color bar indicates the relative scattering intensity in the GIWAXS patterns.
In contrast, nitrogen and carbon concentrations exhibited distinct differences between the two films. Nitrogen content was consistently higher in d-UCM, both at the surface (7.6 and 8.4% for p-UCM and d-UCM, respectively) and in the bulk (3.5 and 5.6%, respectively). Given the absence of an external nitrogen source during pyrolysis, the increase in nitrogen concentration reflects a relative loss of carbon in the film. This shift in elemental composition suggests that oxygen selectively removes carbon during pyrolysis, enriching the remaining structure in nitrogen. This is further supported by the elevated CO2 evolution observed under oxidative pyrolysis, as discussed later in the thermogravimetric analysis coupled with mass spectrometry (TGA-MS) analysis. Building on these results, we propose that oxygen regulates the membrane microstructure during pyrolysis rather than acting as a dopant, prompting a closer investigation of structural features.
Synchrotron-based two-dimensional grazing incidence wide-angle X-ray scattering (2D-GIWAXS) provided further insight into the structural effects of O2 modification. Given the ultrathin nature of the membrane, the synchrotron beam is very helpful as it can probe a large area (6–8 mm2, Supplementary Fig. 10 and Supplementary Note 3) by using a small grazing angle with the high-intensity synchrotron beam. A single diffuse ring at d(002) = 3.9 Å was observed in p-UCM (Fig. 5e–g), which is significantly larger than that of well-ordered graphite (3.4 Å), reflecting the expanded and disordered nature of carbon domains41–43. The diffusivity of the ring suggests the presence of small, randomly oriented carbon domains44. In contrast, d-UCM exhibited a more complex structure with a broader diffusive ring with three featuring rings at 3.4, 3.9, and 5.5 Å (Fig. 5g). This broad distribution of interlayer spacings indicates increased structural heterogeneity, which further supports the role of O2 in disrupting the carbon network and promoting the formation of a multimodal ultramicroporous structure.
This multimodal ultramicroporous structure of d-UCMs explains the observed high H2/N2 separation performance. Unlike O-doping strategies typically used for CMS membranes, where pore networks become narrow and where permeance is sacrificed for selectivity, d-UCM synthesis in the oxygen environment leads to a multimodal ultramicroporous structure, improving both permeance and selectivity. Tightly packed carbon regions (d-spacing of 3.38 Å) represent compact structural motifs that correlate with enhanced size-sieving transport, consistent with the preferential permeation of H2 (kd of 2.89 Å) over large N2 molecules (kd of 3.64 Å). Adjacent broader disordered domains (d-spacing of 5.46 Å) indicate more open structural motifs associated with low-resistance diffusion pathways. This combination of selective sieving and rapid transport allows d-UCMs to achieve significantly enhanced permeance while retaining high selectivity.
Further insights into the pyrolysis mechanism come from the decomposition behavior of P4VP tracked by TGA-MS. We studied two pyrolysis environments with the oxygen-free environment under nitrogen flow, and the oxygen environment under a flow of nitrogen/oxygen (Fig. 6a, b). In the oxygen-free atmosphere, the maximum decomposition temperature () was 402 °C, whereas the introduction of oxygen lowered to 394 °C. The MS spectrum of deposition products in N2 at = 402 °C (Fig. 6c) identified vinylpyridine (m/z = 105) and pyridine (m/z = 79) as the primary products, along with pyridine fragments in MS (m/z = 53, 63), methylpyridine (m/z = 93), and propenylpyridine (m/z = 119) as minor products, consistent with previous studies on P4VP decomposition in inert atmospheres45,46. To confirm these assignments and avoid potential interference from ion fragmentation in the MS, the identification of these volatile species was further cross-validated using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) (Supplementary Fig. 11). Upon introduction of oxygen, while the yields of pyridine and vinylpyridine remained consistent across atmospheres, a notable increase in CO2 (m/z = 44), methylpyridine, and propenylpyridine was observed. To further investigate how these decomposition products evolved over temperature in different atmospheres, their MS intensities were tracked from 25 to 420 °C (Fig. 6d), covering the temperature range where most decomposition took place. The results revealed that the evolution of pyridine and vinylpyridine aligned closely with the TGA profiles, with an oxygen-induced shift in and increased intensity in their evolution curves. Notably, in the oxygen-containing atmosphere, CO2 production began as early as 200 °C, while the yield of extra intermediates, such as methylpyridine and propenylpyridine, increased only during major decomposition around 400 °C. The same trend was further supported by GC-MS quantitative analysis of the condensates collected from two pyrolysis atmospheres (Supplementary Fig. 11). These findings indicate that the oxygen environment increases precursor concentration and increases their availability at lower temperatures.
Fig. 6. Pyrolysis behavior and decomposition pathways of poly(4-vinylpyridine) (P4VP) in oxidative and oxygen-free atmospheres.
a Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) curve of P4VP pyrolyzed in O2/N2 and N2 atmospheres, showing weight loss as a function of temperature. b Derivative thermogravimetric (DTG) curves of P4VP highlighting the rate of weight loss and the maximum decomposition temperature () in different atmospheres. c Mass spectra from TGA-MS analysis at , showing the major pyrolysis products with their corresponding chemical structures and their / values labeled in brackets. d Evolution of MS signal intensity as a function of temperature for major decomposition products, including pyridine (/ = 73–79), methylpyridine (/ = 86–88), vinylpyridine (/ = 104–106), and propenylpyridine (/ = 117–119) under O2/N2 and N2 pyrolysis conditions. The intensity of each species was obtained by integrating the MS signal over the corresponding / range, providing a quantitative measure of its total release during pyrolysis. e Proposed mechanism for disrupted UCM formation through oxygen-mediated vapor-phase structural modifications.
The distinct carbon intermediates observed in the two atmospheres reveal how O2 disrupts carbon structure evolution (Fig. 6e). During p-UCMs synthesis, the dominant intermediates are vinylpyridine (m/z = 105) and pyridine (m/z = 79), accounting for the predominant structural motif (~3.9 Å) observed in p-UCMs, a feature that is also displayed in d-UCMs due to their shared intermediates. This interpretation is further supported by prior studies on π–π stacking distances of pyridine (~3.6 Å) and vinylpyridine (~4.2 Å) dimers47,48, suggesting that the 3.9 Å characteristic spacing arises from stacking interactions between these species. In contrast, TGA-MS analysis of d-UCMs exhibited an abrupt CO2 release at ~200 °C and an elevated weight loss rate (6 and 9% for p-UCM and d-UCM, respectively, Fig. 6b), consistent with the higher nitrogen content due to carbon loss detected by XPS. These results suggest that oxidative pyrolysis preferentially removes less-stable carbon fragments, promoting denser carbon stacking (3.4 Å), which is close to the interlayer spacing of graphitic carbon. Meanwhile, the accumulation of larger pyrolysis intermediates in d-UCMs, such as propenylpyridine (m/z = 119) and methylpyridine (m/z = 93) with extended side chains, disrupts π–π stacking during carbonization49, leading to the formation of expanded interlayer spacing beyond 3.9 Å in the UCMs.
These insights advance the mechanistic understanding of the role of O2 by revealing that it facilitates side-chain scission while leaving the relatively thermally stable pyridine ring largely intact. This leads to a more disordered carbon framework with multimodal ultramicroporous structure, in contrast with the more uniform structure of p-UCMs. Together, these findings present a complete mechanism showing how O2 regulates the carbonization behavior and ultimately sculpts the nanostructure and functionality of the resulting UCMs, offering a strategy for nanostructure engineering in carbon-based membranes.
Discussion
We report a strategy for synthesizing ultrathin carbon membranes with enhanced hydrogen separation performance via oxidative pyrolysis of P4VP on nickel substrates. The synthesis protocol is simple, involving rapid pyrolysis (<2.5 h) under relatively low temperature (500 °C), as compared to CMS membranes, where pyrolysis is often carried out at 600–1000 °C11,43,50,51. Controlled oxygen exposure during pyrolysis selectively removes labile carbon bonds while preserving nitrogen-rich domains, resulting in disordered nanostructures with multimodal ultramicroporous networks. Mechanistic studies combining spectroscopy, microscopy, and gas transport analysis confirm that oxygen acts not as a dopant but as a structural modifier, reshaping the carbon framework through oxidative cleavage and side-chain evolution. This work introduces a general and scalable approach to engineer nanostructure in ultrathin carbon films through atmosphere control, bridging the performance gap between CMS membranes and CNMs. The findings have broad implications for advancing membrane-based separations in hydrogen production, carbon capture, and other gas purification technologies.
Methods
Materials
Ni foil (25 μm, 99.9%) was purchased from Goodfellow. P4VP (Mw ~160,000 g/mol), FeCl3 (97%), and toluene were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. PTMSP was purchased from abcr. Hydrogen chloride (32%) and isopropanol (99%) were purchased from Reactolab S.A. Acetone was purchased from Thommen-Furler AG.
Substrate preparation
The Ni foil substrate was washed and ultrasonicated in acetone and isopropanol for 15 min. After that, the dried Ni foil was annealed in a CO2 atmosphere at 1000 °C for 20 min to remove organic contaminations. Then it was annealed at 1100 °C for 2 h in H2 atmosphere at 760 Torr. After cooling down, a Cu protection layer was sputtered at the backside of the Ni by sputtering Cu for 800 s, at an average sputtering rate of 12.6 Å/s in Alliance-Concept DP 650, which resulted in a 1 μm-thick protection Cu film.
Ultrathin carbon membranes synthesis
The ~10 nm selective layer of ultrathin carbon membranes (UCMs) were synthesized using an atmospheric pressure pyrolysis procedure inside a chemical vapor deposition (CVD) furnace. 0.1 g P4VP was placed in a copper boat, and the nickel substrate was placed on top of the copper boat. The assembly was sealed and put inside a quartz CVD tube (inner diameter = 2.1 cm, length = 100 cm), which was then evacuated to remove all gas. To establish the pyrolysis atmosphere, a gas mixture of argon (300 sccm, 5 min, 99% of the atmosphere), hydrogen (7.5 sccm, 1 min, 0.5% of the atmosphere), and varying amounts of oxygen (4 sccm, 1 min, and 1.5 min O2 exposure, corresponding to 0.3 vol% and 0.8 vol% of the atmosphere) was introduced into the system to reach atmospheric pressure (Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2). After conditioning the atmosphere, all gas flows were halted, and the sample was heated in two stages: first from 25 to 400 °C at a rate of 15 °C/min over 25 min, followed by a slower ramp from 400 °C to 500 °C at a rate of 1 °C/min over 100 min. The temperature was then held at 500 °C for 10 min before the system was rapidly cooled to 25 °C using a compressed air gun.
The resulting carbon film on Ni was coated with 1.5 wt% PTMSP dissolved in toluene by spin coating. A 250-nm-thick layer was formed and left to dry overnight in a clean hood to prepare for subsequent fabrication steps. The PTMSP-coated carbon membrane was floated in 1 M FeCl3 solution for 1 h to completely etch away the Ni substrate, allowing the membrane to float on the FeCl3 solution. The membrane was then carefully transferred using a glass slide to a 1 M HCl solution for 1 h, followed by rinsing in H2O for another 1 h to thoroughly clean the membrane. Finally, the cleaned membrane was transferred onto a macroporous tungsten (W) substrate hosting 5-μm-sized pore arrays as previously reported25,52,53 and left to dry overnight under ambient conditions, in preparation for gas permeation measurements.
Membrane test
The gas permeation properties of the membranes were evaluated using a custom-built permeation setup following our previously reported design53. The membrane, supported on a tungsten, was securely sealed within the VCR membrane module (Swagelok) to ensure leak-tight connections.
For single-gas permeation tests, the flow rate for each pure gas (H2, N2, CO2, CH4, and He) was maintained at 30 mL/min, with the feed pressure set at 2 bar. Mixed-gas measurements (only for stability evaluation) employed a 50/50 H2/N2 mixture with a total flow rate of 60 mL/min, corresponding to 1 bar partial pressure for each component at a total feed pressure of 2 bar. The permeate side was swept with argon at a controlled flow rate (ranging from 15 to 50 mL/min).
During each measurement, the membrane was first activated at 150 °C and then cooled down to 35 °C for testing. For temperature-dependent gas transport studies, the membrane was first heated to 180 °C and then sequentially cooled to 150, 120, and 90 °C. Permeation data were recorded after reaching steady-state conditions. The permeate stream was then analyzed using a Hiden HPR-20 R&D mass spectrometer to determine the permeation rates of different gases through the membrane.
Characterization
Focused ion beam and TEM lamella preparation
A gold (Au) layer was sputtered onto the UCM on nickel, followed by a carbon (C) layer deposited on the Au to protect the UCM layer from the ion beam damage. Carbon deposition involved 40 min of electron beam deposition at 30 kV, followed by ion beam deposition at 30 kV, with 40 pA for the initial 100 nm and 150 pA for the subsequent 900 nm. Coarse milling and thinning were carried out at 30 kV using a 13 nA ion beam for milling, followed by sequential thinning steps with 6.5, 3, 1.5, and 0.7 nA beams. Final polishing was performed at 5 kV with 30/80 pA ion beams for 10–20 s, ensuring the lamella met the requirements for TEM imaging.
Transmission electron microscopy
The UCM sample was prepared by etching away the nickel using the same procedure as described in membrane fabrication and transferred to a clean Cu grid (400 lines/inch, hexagonal holes). The high magnification high-resolution TEM image and diffraction pattern were achieved in Talos F200S G2 and Spectra 200 S/TEM transmission electron microscope at an acceleration voltage of 200 kV. The low magnification image was achieved using an FEI Tecnai G2 Spirit transmission electron microscope at an acceleration voltage of 120 kV.
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and in-depth XPS
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy was performed using a Kratos Analytical Axis Supra instrument. Samples were electrically grounded to the sample stage inside the ultra-high vacuum (UHV) chamber. Measurements were conducted using the monochromated Kα line of an aluminium X-ray source (1486.6 eV) with the analyzer set at a pass energy of 20 eV. High-resolution spectra for N 1s, C 1s, and O 1s were acquired with a pass energy of 80 eV and a step size of 0.2 eV.
In-depth XPS analysis was performed using 2 keV Ar+ ion sputtering across a 2.5 × 2.5 mm2 analysis area in cycles of 30 s, enabling depth-resolved elemental composition analysis. The sputtering rate was calibrated using a 10-nm UCM reference film deposited on silicon, yielding a calculated sputtering rate of 0.0238 nm/s. (Supplementary Fig. 12 and Supplementary Note 4)
Atomic force microscopy
AFM and nanoindentation measurements were recorded on a Bruker MultiMode 8 AFM instrument with a SCANASYST-AIR probe, featuring a tip radius of 2 nm, a frequency of 70 ± 25 kHz, and a spring constant of approximately 0.4 N/m. For nanoindentation measurements, the radius of the tip and spring constant were calibrated to be 9.394 nm and 0.3869 N/m, respectively. For the Hertzian fitting, 0.25 was used as Poisson’s ratio in this study for amorphous carbon materials54.
Grazing incidence wide-angle X-ray scattering
Grazing incidence wide-angle X-ray scattering measurements were performed at the Swiss–Norwegian Beamlines (SNBL) at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF). The optimal incidence angles for the membranes used were 0.03° for the p-UCM (without O2) and 0.05° for the d-UCM. The synchrotron beam wavelength was 1.04459 Å for membrane measurements, while substrate measurements were conducted using a beam wavelength of 0.72538 Å. These parameters were optimized to probe the structural properties of the ultrathin carbon membranes while minimizing substrate interference.
Thermogravimetric analysis-mass spectrometry
TGA-MS was performed using a TG 209 F1 Libra coupling to QMS 403 Aëolos Quadro quadrupole mass spectrometer. Approximately 5 mg of P4VP was loaded into a tared ceramic crucible and pyrolyzed under different atmospheres, including O2 (20%)/N2 mixtures and pure N2, with a flow rate of 20 mL/min. The heating program replicated the membrane synthesis conditions: heating from 25 to 400 °C at 15 °C/min, followed by a slower ramp to 500 °C at 1 °C/min, holding at 500 °C for 10 min, and then rapidly cooling to 25 °C. This setup enabled simultaneous monitoring of mass loss and identification of decomposition products, providing insights into the pyrolysis mechanism and the role of oxygen in the process.
Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry
The condensates obtained under two different pyrolysis conditions (with and without O2 dosing) were collected and analyzed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) to determine their chemical composition. Gas chromatographic analyses were performed using a Thermo Scientific TRACE 1300 gas chromatograph coupled to a TSQ 8000 Triple Quadrupole GC-MS/MS system equipped with an electron ionization (EI) source and a TriPlus RSH autosampler. Separation was achieved on a MEGA-5 MS XII capillary column (5% phenyl-methylpolysiloxane, 30 m × 0.25 mm i.d., 0.25 µm film thickness). Helium was used as the carrier gas in constant flow mode at 1.2 mL/min. Samples were injected in splitless mode (inlet temperature 250 °C, splitless time 1.0 min, injection volume 1 µL).
The GC oven temperature program was as follows: initial temperature 35 °C, held for 3 min, ramped at 15 °C/min to 150 °C, then ramped at 15 °C/min to 250 °C with a final hold of 3 min. The maximum oven temperature was set to 350 °C.
The MS transfer line and ion source temperatures were both set to 250 °C. The mass spectrometer was operated in electron ionization (EI) mode, with data acquired in full-scan mode over the m/z range 50–375. Data acquisition and instrument control were performed using Xcalibur software, and compound identification was based on mass spectral matching against reference libraries. Samples were diluted ten times in MeOH before injection.
Gas adsorption measurements through quartz crystal microbalance
Gas adsorption of the ultrathin d-UCM film was measured using a QCM with Dissipation monitoring (QCM‑D, open QCM, Italy) setup capable of recording multiple overtones simultaneously inside a vacuum chamber (Supplementary Fig. 13). The UCM sample was transferred onto a 5 MHz gold-coated quartz sensor using the same method as used for the membrane preparation. After drying at 100 °C and evacuating the system to achieve a stable baseline, the chamber was gradually pressurized with the target gas (H2 or N2) up to 2 bar. The mass change (Δm) due to gas adsorption was calculated from the frequency shift (Δf) using the Sauerbrey equation:
where C is the mass sensitivity constant and n is the overtone number. A control experiment with a bare gold sensor showed negligible frequency change, confirming that the observed signals originated from adsorption on the UCM films.
Supplementary information
Source data
Acknowledgements
We express our gratitude to Dmitry Chernyshov at beamline BM01 of the Swiss–Norwegian Beamlines (SNBL) at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF) for his assistance with the synchrotron GIXRD measurements (10.15151/ESRF-ES-1430229321, https://doi.esrf.fr/10.15151/ESRF-ES-2003417825). We thank Shuqing Song and Ranadip Goswami for their support with GIWAXS measurements. We are also grateful to Pascal Schouwink, Lucie Navratilova, Aurélien Bornet, Laura Piveteau, Mounir Mensi, and Emad Oveisi for their help with sample characterization.
Author contributions
Y.S. carried out the experiments, including membrane fabrication and testing, XPS, TEM, AFM, FIB lamella preparation, electron diffraction analysis, GIWAXS measurements, TGA-MS measurements, and data analysis. Y.S. wrote the manuscript. C.V.G. contributed to both experimental work and scientific discussions. H.-Y.C helped with GIWAXS measurements. Y.L. carried out TGA-MS measurements. L.L., N.B., A.S., and S.H. designed and performed the QCM gas adsorption experiments; S.H. also contributed to the conceptual development of the study, in particular with mechanistic investigations. K.-J.H. contributed to XPS analysis. D.O.T., N.G. performed the GC-MS experiments. K.V.A. conceived and supervised the project and revised the manuscript with the input from all coauthors.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Xuezhong He and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Funding
K.V.A. discloses support for the research of this work from EPFL. K.V.A., H.-Y.C. disclose support for the research of this work from the Swiss National Science Foundation Project Funding [grant number 200021_192005]. S.H. discloses support for the research of this work from the University of Bath and faculty support for the international research collaboration. The other authors declare no relevant funding.
Data availability
The data supporting the findings of this study are included in the paper and its Supplementary Information files. Source data are provided with this paper.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Shiqi Huang, Email: sh3292@bath.ac.uk.
Kumar Varoon Agrawal, Email: kumar.agrawal@epfl.ch.
Supplementary information
The online version contains Supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-026-73556-5.
References
- 1.Al-Mufachi, N. A., Rees, N. V. & Steinberger-Wilkens, R. Hydrogen selective membranes: a review of palladium-based dense metal membranes. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.47, 540–551 (2015). [Google Scholar]
- 2.Chen, X., Liu, G. & Jin, W. Natural gas purification by asymmetric membranes: an overview. Green Energy Environ.6, 176–192 (2021). [Google Scholar]
- 3.Parsley, D. et al. Field evaluation of carbon molecular sieve membranes for the separation and purification of hydrogen from coal- and biomass-derived syngas. J. Membr. Sci.450, 81–92 (2014). [Google Scholar]
- 4.Genduso, G., Ogieglo, W., Wang, Y. & Pinnau, I. Carbon molecular sieve gas separation materials and membranes: a comprehensive review. J. Membr. Sci.699, 122533 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 5.Adhikari, S. & Fernando, S. Hydrogen membrane separation techniques. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.45, 875–881 (2006). [Google Scholar]
- 6.Liu, Z., Cao, Y. & Koros, W. J. Polyimide-derived carbon molecule sieve membranes for gas separations. Nat. Chem. Eng.1, 119–123 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ogieglo, W., Puspasari, T., Ma, X. & Pinnau, I. Sub-100 nm carbon molecular sieve membranes from a polymer of intrinsic microporosity precursor: physical aging and near-equilibrium gas separation properties. J. Membr. Sci.597, 117752 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zhang, C. & Koros, W. J. Ultraselective carbon molecular sieve membranes with tailored synergistic sorption selective properties. Adv. Mater.29, 1701631 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Park, H. B. et al. Pyrolytic carbon membranes containing silica derived from poly(imide siloxane): the effect of siloxane chain length on gas transport behavior and a study on the separation of mixed gases. J. Membr. Sci.235, 87–98 (2004). [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kumar, R., Zhang, C., Itta, A. K. & Koros, W. J. Highly permeable carbon molecular sieve membranes for efficient CO2/N2 separation at ambient and subambient temperatures. J. Membr. Sci.583, 9–15 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- 11.Iyer, G. M., Ku, C.-E. & Zhang, C. Hyperselective carbon membranes for precise high-temperature H2 and CO2 separation. Sci. Adv.11, eadt7512 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hu, L. et al. Hierarchically porous and single Zn atom-embedded carbon molecular sieves for H2 separations. Nat. Commun.15, 5688 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hu, L. et al. Atomically fine-tuning organic–inorganic carbon molecular sieve membranes for hydrogen production. ACS Nano19, 4663–4671 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Karvan, O., Johnson, J. R., Williams, P. J. & Koros, W. J. A pilot-scale system for carbon molecular sieve hollow fiber membrane manufacturing. Chem. Eng. Technol.36, 53–61 (2013). [Google Scholar]
- 15.Jiao, W. et al. Gas separation performance of supported carbon molecular sieve membranes based on soluble polybenzimidazole. J. Membr. Sci.533, 1–10 (2017). [Google Scholar]
- 16.Richter, H. et al. High-flux carbon molecular sieve membranes for gas separation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.56, 7760–7763 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ma, X., Lin, Y. S., Wei, X. & Kniep, J. Ultrathin carbon molecular sieve membrane for propylene/propane separation. AIChE J.62, 491–499 (2016). [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ma, C. & Koros, W. J. Ester-cross-linkable composite hollow fiber membranes for CO2 removal from natural gas. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.52, 10495–10505 (2013). [Google Scholar]
- 19.Qiu, W. et al. Hyperaging tuning of a carbon molecular-sieve hollow fiber membrane with extraordinary gas-separation performance and stability. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.58, 11700–11703 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ma, C. et al. Thin-skinned intrinsically defect-free asymmetric mono-esterified hollow fiber precursors for crosslinkable polyimide gas separation membranes. J. Membr. Sci.493, 252–262 (2015). [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lei, L. et al. Carbon hollow fiber membranes for a molecular sieve with precise-cutoff ultramicropores for superior hydrogen separation. Nat. Commun.12, 268 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lei, L. et al. Screening cellulose spinning parameters for fabrication of novel carbon hollow fiber membranes for gas separation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.58, 13330–13339 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- 23.He, K. et al. Metal oxyhydroxide nanosheet-assisted fabrication of ultrathin carbon molecular sieve membrane for hydrogen separation. J. Mater. Chem. A10, 18095–18102 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hou, J. et al. Carbon nanotube networks as nanoscaffolds for fabricating ultrathin carbon molecular sieve membranes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces10, 20182–20188 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Huang, S. et al. Ultrathin carbon molecular sieve films and room-temperature oxygen functionalization for gas-sieving. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces11, 16729–16736 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zhang, C., Kumar, R. & Koros, W. J. Ultra-thin skin carbon hollow fiber membranes for sustainable molecular separations. AIChE J.65, e16611 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- 27.Turchanin, A. & Gölzhäuser, A. Carbon nanomembranes. Adv. Mater.28, 6075–6103 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Yang, Y. et al. Rapid water permeation through carbon nanomembranes with sub-nanometer channels. ACS Nano12, 4695–4701 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Stroganov, V. et al. Gas transport mechanisms through molecular thin carbon nanomembranes. Small19, e2300282 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ai, M. et al. Carbon nanomembranes (CNMs) supported by polymer: mechanics and gas permeation. Adv. Mater.26, 3421–3426 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Huang, Y. & Paul, D. R. Physical aging of thin glassy polymer films monitored by gas permeability. Polymer45, 8377–8393 (2004). [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kiyono, M., Williams, P. J. & Koros, W. J. Generalization of effect of oxygen exposure on formation and performance of carbon molecular sieve membranes. Carbon48, 4442–4449 (2010). [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kiyono, M., Williams, P. J. & Koros, W. J. Effect of pyrolysis atmosphere on separation performance of carbon molecular sieve membranes. J. Membr. Sci.359, 2–10 (2010). [Google Scholar]
- 34.Franceschini, E. A. & Corti, H. R. Elastic properties of Nafion, polybenzimidazole and poly [2,5-benzimidazole] membranes determined by AFM tip nano-indentation. J. Power Sources188, 379–386 (2009). [Google Scholar]
- 35.Zhang, L., Ni, Q., Shiga, A., Fu, Y. & Natsuki, T. Synthesis and mechanical properties of polybenzimidazole nanocomposites reinforced by vapor grown carbon nanofibers. Polym. Compos.31, 491–496 (2010). [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ning, X. & Koros, W. J. Carbon molecular sieve membranes derived from Matrimid® polyimide for nitrogen/methane separation. Carbon66, 511–522 (2014). [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lamb, K. E., Dolan, M. D. & Kennedy, D. F. Ammonia for hydrogen storage; a review of catalytic ammonia decomposition and hydrogen separation and purification. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy44, 3580–3593 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- 38.Morlanés, N. et al. A technological roadmap to the ammonia energy economy: current state and missing technologies. Chem. Eng. J.408, 127310 (2021). [Google Scholar]
- 39.Fu, W. et al. Oxidative pyrolysis of plywood waste: effect of oxygen concentration and other parameters on product yield and composition. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis173, 106068 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 40.Butt, D. A. E. Formation of phenols from the low-temperature fast pyrolysis of radiata pine (Pinus radiata). J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis76, 55–59 (2006). [Google Scholar]
- 41.Davidová, M. et al. Graphite and multi-layer graphene from a low molecular weight carbon source. Carbon230, 119662 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kalanaki, S., Abdi, Y. & Rahsepar, F. R. Crystallization retardation and synergistic trap passivation in perovskite solar cells incorporated with magnesium-decorated graphene quantum dots. ACS Omega8, 38345–38358 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Hazazi, K. et al. Precise molecular sieving of ethylene from ethane using triptycene-derived submicroporous carbon membranes. Nat. Mater.22, 1218–1226 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Steele, J. A. et al. How to GIWAXS: grazing incidence wide angle X-ray scattering applied to metal halide perovskite thin films. Adv. Energy Mater.13, 2300760 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 45.Audisio, G. & Severini, F. Pyrolysis of poly-4-vinylpyridine: degradation mechanism and structural analysis. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis12, 135–147 (1987). [Google Scholar]
- 46.Elmaci, A. & Hacaloglu, J. Thermal degradation of poly(vinylpyridine)s. Polym. Degrad. Stab.94, 738–743 (2009). [Google Scholar]
- 47.Mishra, B. K. & Sathyamurthy, N. π−π Interaction in pyridine. J. Phys. Chem. A109, 6–8 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Li, J.-D. et al. Self-aggregating behavior of poly(4-vinyl pyridine) and the potential in mitigating sand production based on π-π stacking interaction. Pet. Sci.19, 2165–2174 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- 49.Jing, L., Li, P., Li, Z., Ma, D. & Hu, J. Influence of π–π interactions on organic photocatalytic materials and their performance. Chem. Soc. Rev.54, 2054–2090 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Hu, L. et al. Tailoring sub-3.3 Å ultramicropores in advanced carbon molecular sieve membranes for blue hydrogen production. Sci. Adv.8, eabl8160 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Gao, Z. et al. Tuning fluorination of carbon molecular sieve membranes with enhanced reverse-selective hydrogen separation from helium. Small21, 2411664 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Huang, S. et al. Single-layer graphene membranes by crack-free transfer for gas mixture separation. Nat. Commun.9, 2632 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Zhao, J. et al. Etching gas-sieving nanopores in single-layer graphene with an angstrom precision for high-performance gas mixture separation. Sci. Adv.5, eaav1851 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Marques, F. C. et al. Thermal expansion coefficient of hydrogenated amorphous carbon. Appl. Phys. Lett.83, 3099–3101 (2003). [Google Scholar]
- 55.Wang, K. et al. Adsorption-enhanced carbon membranes derived from copolyimide for ultrafast subangstrom discriminating CO2 separation. Sci. Adv.11, eadv8650 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Rodrigues, S. C., Whitley, R. & Mendes, A. Preparation and characterization of carbon molecular sieve membranes based on resorcinol–formaldehyde resin. J. Membr. Sci.459, 207–216 (2014). [Google Scholar]
- 57.Yoshimune, M. & Haraya, K. Simple control of the pore structures and gas separation performances of carbon hollow fiber membranes by chemical vapor deposition of propylene. Sep. Purif. Technol.223, 162–167 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- 58.Llosa Tanco, M. A., Pacheco Tanaka, D. A., Rodrigues, S. C., Texeira, M. & Mendes, A. Composite-alumina-carbon molecular sieve membranes prepared from novolac resin and boehmite. Part I: preparation, characterization and gas permeation studies. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy40, 5653–5663 (2015). [Google Scholar]
- 59.Sazali, N. et al. Influence of intermediate layers in tubular carbon membrane for gas separation performance. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy44, 20914–20923 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- 60.Wang, L.-J. & Hong, F. C.-N. Carbon-based molecular sieve membranes for gas separation by inductively-coupled-plasma chemical vapor deposition. Microporous Mesoporous Mater.77, 167–174 (2005). [Google Scholar]
- 61.Huang, K., Wang, B., Chi, Y. & Li, K. High propylene selective metal-organic framework membranes prepared in confined spaces via convective circulation synthesis. Adv. Mater. Interfaces5, 1800287 (2018). [Google Scholar]
- 62.Li, W. et al. Transformation of metal-organic frameworks for molecular sieving membranes. Nat. Commun.7, 11315 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Zhong, Z. et al. Carbon composite membrane derived from a two-dimensional zeolitic imidazolate framework and its gas separation properties. Carbon72, 242–249 (2014). [Google Scholar]
- 64.Eum, K. et al. ZIF-8 membrane separation performance tuning by vapor phase ligand treatment. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.58, 16390–16394 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.De Vos, R. M. & Verweij, H. High-selectivity, high-flux silica membranes for gas separation. Science279, 1710–1711 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Poshusta, J. C., Tuan, V. A., Falconer, J. L. & Noble, R. D. Synthesis and permeation properties of SAPO-34 tubular membranes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.37, 3924–3929 (1998). [Google Scholar]
- 67.Guo, H. et al. Cross-linking between sodalite nanoparticles and graphene oxide in composite membranes to trigger high gas permeance, selectivity, and stability in hydrogen separation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.59, 6284–6288 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Liu, W. et al. A solution-processable and ultra-permeable conjugated microporous thermoset for selective hydrogen separation. Nat. Commun.11, 1633 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Huang, S. et al. Millisecond lattice gasification for high-density CO2 - and O2 -sieving nanopores in single-layer graphene. Sci. Adv.7, eabf0116 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Wang, R. et al. Pyro-layered heterostructured nanosheet membrane for hydrogen separation. Nat. Commun.14, 2161 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Liu, Q. et al. Unit-cell-thick zeolitic imidazolate framework films for membrane application. Nat. Mater.22, 1387–1393 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Feng, S. et al. Fabrication of a hydrogen-bonded organic framework membrane through solution processing for pressure-regulated gas separation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.59, 3840–3845 (2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data supporting the findings of this study are included in the paper and its Supplementary Information files. Source data are provided with this paper.





