Skip to main content
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1969 Mar;12(2):293–299. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-293

Compounding of pre-aversive stimuli1

Laurence Miller
PMCID: PMC1338561  PMID: 16811356

Abstract

When two discriminative stimuli, each capable of maintaining a response, are combined, their compound will maintain a frequency of response greater than the frequencies maintained by the individual stimuli. This has been called additive summation. The present experiments extended the investigation of this phenomenon to a converse situation in which two pre-aversive stimuli were combined. Each pre-aversive stimulus was capable of reducing the frequency of an ongoing response. The combination of these stimuli reduced the relative frequency of response below that resulting from either stimulus. Furthermore, the compounding of two highly suppressive stimuli produced more suppression than the compounding of two less-suppressive stimuli. Evidence was also presented to suggest that the compound continued to reduce responding even when the single stimuli were no longer effective. A fourth experiment demonstrated that summation of response tendencies could not be accounted for in terms of stimulus intensity or sensory interaction.

Full text

PDF
293

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. KESSEN W. Response strength and conditioned stimulus intensity. J Exp Psychol. 1953 Feb;45(2):82–86. doi: 10.1037/h0057700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. KIEFFER J. D. DIFFERENTIAL RESPONSE RATES CORRELATED WITH THE PRESENCE OF "NEUTRAL" STIMULI. J Exp Anal Behav. 1965 Jul;8:227–229. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1965.8-227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. LONDON I. D. Research on sensory interaction in the Soviet Union. Psychol Bull. 1954 Nov;5(6):531–568. doi: 10.1037/h0056730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Stein L., Sidman M., Brady J. V. Some effects of Two Temporal Variables on Conditioned Suppression. J Exp Anal Behav. 1958 Apr;1(2):153–162. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1958.1-153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. WEISS S. J. SUMMATION OF RESPONSE STRENGTHS INSTRUMENTALLY CONDITIONED TO STIMULI IN DIFFERENT SENSORY MODALITIES. J Exp Psychol. 1964 Aug;68:151–155. doi: 10.1037/h0049180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. WOLF M. M. Some effects of combined S-DS. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Jul;6:343–347. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES