Skip to main content
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1969 May;12(3):481–487. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-481

Inhibition and the operant

A review of Sensory inhibition by G. v. Békésy, and Mach Bands: quantitative studies on neural networks in the retina, by Floyd Ratliff1

Reviewed by: J E R Staddon
PMCID: PMC1338611

Full text

PDF

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brown P. L., Jenkins H. M. Conditioned inhibition and excitation in operant discrimination learning. J Exp Psychol. 1967 Oct;75(2):255–266. doi: 10.1037/h0024985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hearst E. Discrimination learning as the summation of excitation and inhibition. Science. 1968 Dec 13;162(3859):1303–1306. doi: 10.1126/science.162.3859.1303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. JENKINS H. M., HARRISON R. H. Generalization gradients of inhibition following auditory discrimination learning. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Oct;5:435–441. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. KALISH H. I., GUTTMAN N. Stimulus generalization after equal training on two stimuli. J Exp Psychol. 1957 Feb;53(2):139–144. doi: 10.1037/h0047916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. KALISH H. I., GUTTMAN N. Stimulus generalization after training on three stimuli: a test of the summation hypothesis. J Exp Psychol. 1959 Apr;57(4):268–272. doi: 10.1037/h0046433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Marsh G. D. Inverse relationship between discriminability and stimulus generalization as a function of number of test stimuli. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1967 Oct;64(2):284–289. doi: 10.1037/h0088032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. SHEPARD R. N. Stimulus and response generalization: deduction of the generalization gradient from a trace model. Psychol Rev. 1958 Jul;65(4):242–256. doi: 10.1037/h0043083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Singh D., Wickens D. D. Disinhibition in instrumental conditioning. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1968 Oct;66(2):557–559. doi: 10.1037/h0026359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Staddon J. E. Asymptotic behavior: the concept of the operant. Psychol Rev. 1967 Sep;74(5):377–391. doi: 10.1037/h0024877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Staddon J. E. Attention and temporal discrimination: factors controlling responding under a cyclic-interval schedule. J Exp Anal Behav. 1967 Jul;10(4):349–359. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1967.10-349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Terrace H. S. Discrimination learning and inhibition. Science. 1966 Dec 30;154(3757):1677–1680. doi: 10.1126/science.154.3757.1677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES