Abstract
Pigeons were trained under a schedule in which reinforcement was made available at varying periods of time after a prior reinforcement. The first key peck after a reinforcer was available began a timer and a second key peck, which exceeded a specified minimal time interval, produced the reinforcer. It was shown that a contingency which contains a minimal interresponse time does not necessarily weaken stimulus control by an exteroceptive stimulus.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- HEARST E., KORESKO M. B., POPPEN R. STIMULUS GENERALIZATION AND THE RESPONSE-REINFORCEMENT CONTINGENCY. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 Sep;7:369–380. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HISS R. H., THOMAS D. R. Stimulus generalization as a function of testing procedure and response measure. J Exp Psychol. 1963 Jun;65:587–592. doi: 10.1037/h0048117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yarczower M., Dickson J. F., Gollub L. R. Some effects on generalization gradients of tandem schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1966 Nov;9(6):631–639. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1966.9-631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]