Abstract
In two experiments, the free-operant shock-avoidance behavior of rats was punished by electric shock. Two aspects of the schedule of response-produced shock were varied: the frequency of punishment over time (punishment density) and the temporal interval between the punished response and the punishment (punishment delay). The general finding was that response-produced shock suppressed avoidance responding under most of the density-delay combinations studied, and suppression increased as a function of increases in density and decreases in delay. Rate increases of small magnitude also were observed, usually as an initial reaction to the lesser densities and longer delays. Response suppression, while decreasing the number of punishment shocks received, also increased the number of avoidance shocks, so that the total number of shocks received usually was greater than the minimal number possible. The results were discussed from the standpoint of similarities between the effects of punishing positively and negatively reinforced behavior. The finding that subjects did not minimize the total number of shocks suggested that when avoidance behavior is punished, responding is controlled more by the local consequences of responding than by overall shock frequencies during the course of the session.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Appel J. B. Fixed-interval punishment. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Nov;11(6):803–808. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- BARON A. DELAYED PUNISHMENT OF A RUNWAY RESPONSE. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1965 Aug;60:131–134. doi: 10.1037/h0022326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Byrd L. D. Responding in the cat maintained under response-independent electric shock and response-produced electric shock. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Jan;12(1):1–10. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Camp D. S., Raymond G. A., Church R. M. Temporal relationship between response and punishment. J Exp Psychol. 1967 May;74(1):114–123. doi: 10.1037/h0024518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- KAMIN L. J. The delay-of-punishment gradient. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1959 Aug;52:434–437. doi: 10.1037/h0045089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kelleher R. T., Morse W. H. Schedules using noxious stimuli. III. Responding maintained with response-produced electric shocks. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Nov;11(6):819–838. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McIntire R. W., Davis H., Cohen S. I., Franch E. O. Sidman avoidance performance under punishment and non-contingent shock conditions. Psychol Rep. 1968 Jun;22(3):897–903. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1968.22.3.897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McKearney J. W. Maintenance of responding under a fixed-interval schedule of electric shock-presentation. Science. 1968 Jun 14;160(3833):1249–1251. doi: 10.1126/science.160.3833.1249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Powell R. W., Morris G. Continuous punishment of free-operant avoidance in the rat. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Jan;12(1):149–157. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- SIDMAN M. Two temporal parameters of the maintenance of avoidance behavior by the white rat. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1953 Aug;46(4):253–261. doi: 10.1037/h0060730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]