Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1988 Mar;49(2):201–211. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1988.49-201

Self-control in male and female rats

Frans Van Haaren, Annemieke Van Hest, Nanne E Van De Poll
PMCID: PMC1338807  PMID: 16812536

Abstract

Eight male and 8 female Wistar rats were exposed to a discrete-trial procedure in which they chose between the presentation of a small (one pellet) or a large (three pellets) reinforcer. The delay to the small and large reinforcer was 6.0 s in the first condition of Experiment 1. Subjects consistently chose the large reinforcer. When the delay to the small reinforcer was decreased to 0.1 s in the next experimental condition, all subjects continued to choose the large 6.0-s delayed reinforcer. When the contingencies correlated with the two levers were reversed in the next experimental condition, the majority of subjects (5 males and 6 females) still chose the large delayed reinforcer over the small immediately presented reinforcer. The delay to the small reinforcer was maintained at 6.0 s, but the delay to the large reinforcer was varied among 9.0, 15.0, 24.0, and 36.0 s in Experiment 2, in which 4 males and 4 females participated. Most subjects consistently chose the large increasingly delayed reinforcer, although choice for the small 6.0-s delayed reinforcer developed in some females when the large reinforcer was delayed for 24.0 or 36.0 s. These choice patterns were not predicted from a literal application of a model that says choice should favor the alternative correlated with the higher (amount/delay) ratio.

Keywords: discrete-trial procedure, amount of reinforcement, delay of reinforcement, self-control, lever press, male and female rats

Full text

PDF
201

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ainslie G. W. Impulse control in pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 May;21(3):485–489. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ainslie G. Specious reward: a behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. Psychol Bull. 1975 Jul;82(4):463–496. doi: 10.1037/h0076860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baum W. M., Rachlin H. C. Choice as time allocation. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Nov;12(6):861–874. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Beatty W. W. Gonadal hormones and sex differences in nonreproductive behaviors in rodents: organizational and activational influences. Horm Behav. 1979 Apr;12(2):112–163. doi: 10.1016/0018-506x(79)90017-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Green L., Snyderman M. Choice between rewards differing in amount and delay: Toward a choice model of self control. J Exp Anal Behav. 1980 Sep;34(2):135–147. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1980.34-135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Grosch J., Neuringer A. Self-control in pigeons under the Mischel paradigm. J Exp Anal Behav. 1981 Jan;35(1):3–21. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1981.35-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Heinsbroek R. P., van Haaren F., Zantvoord F., van de Poll N. E. Sex differences in response rates during random ratio acquisition: effects of gonadectomy. Physiol Behav. 1987;39(2):269–272. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(87)90020-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Herrnstein R. J. On the law of effect. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Mar;13(2):243–266. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hurwitz H. M., Davis H. Depriving rats of food: A reappraisal of two techniques. J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 Sep;40(2):211–213. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1983.40-211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. LOGAN F. A. DECISION MAKING BY RATS: DELAY VERSUS AMOUNT OF REWARD. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1965 Feb;59:1–12. doi: 10.1037/h0021633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Logue A. W., Peña-Correal T. E. Responding during reinforcement delay in a self-control paradigm. J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 May;41(3):267–277. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1984.41-267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Logue A. W., Peña-Correal T. E., Rodriguez M. L., Kabela E. Self-control in adult humans: variation in positive reinforcer amount and delay. J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 Sep;46(2):159–173. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.46-159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Logue A. W., Rodriguez M. L., Peña-Correal T. E., Mauro B. C. Choice in a self-control paradigm: Quantification of experience-based differences. J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 Jan;41(1):53–67. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1984.41-53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lopatto D., Lewis P. Contributions of elicitation to measures of self-control. J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 Jul;44(1):69–77. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.44-69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mazur J. E. Choice between single and multiple delayed reinforcers. J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 Jul;46(1):67–77. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.46-67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mazur J. E. Fixed and variable ratios and delays: further tests of an equivalence rule. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1986 Apr;12(2):116–124. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Mazur J. E., Logue A. W. Choice in a "self-control" paradigm: effects of a fading procedure. J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 Jul;30(1):11–17. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.30-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mazur J. E., Snyderman M., Coe D. Influences of delay and rate of reinforcement on discrete-trial choice. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1985 Oct;11(4):565–575. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Rachlin H., Green L. Commitment, choice and self-control. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 Jan;17(1):15–22. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.17-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Shettleworth S. J. Handling time and choice in pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 Sep;44(2):139–155. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.44-139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. van Haaren F., Wouters M., van de Poll N. E. Absence of behavioral differences between male and female rats in different radial-maze procedures. Physiol Behav. 1987;39(3):409–412. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(87)90243-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. van Haaren F., van de Poll N. E. Effects of light intensity on passive avoidance behavior of male and female Wistar rats. Physiol Behav. 1986 Jan;36(1):123–125. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(86)90084-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. van Haaren F., van de Poll N. E. The effect of a choice alternative on sex differences in passive avoidance behavior. Physiol Behav. 1984 Feb;32(2):211–215. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(84)90131-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. van Haaren F., van de Poll N. E. The number of pre-shock trials affects sex differences in passive avoidance behavior. Physiol Behav. 1984 Aug;33(2):269–272. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(84)90110-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. van Hest A., van Haaren F., van de Poll N. E. Behavioral differences between male and female Wistar rats in food rewarded lever holding. Physiol Behav. 1987;39(2):263–267. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(87)90019-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. van Hest A., van Haaren F., van de Poll N. E. Behavioral differences between male and female Wistar rats on DRL schedules: effect of stimuli promoting collateral activities. Physiol Behav. 1987;39(2):255–261. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(87)90018-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES