Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1988 Mar;49(2):229–237. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1988.49-229

Information on response requirements compared with information on food density as a reinforcer of observing in pigeons

James A Dinsmoor, Craig A Bowe, Leonard Green, John Hanson
PMCID: PMC1338809  PMID: 16812538

Abstract

On a variable-interval schedule, pecking the key to the pigeon's right (observing response) produced red or green displays relating to the delivery of grain and its dependence on pecking the key to the left (food key). During various blocks of sessions, mixed (no stimulus change) schedules including the following pairs of components were temporarily converted by the observing response to their corresponding multiple (correlated stimuli) schedules: variable-interval 60-s, extinction; variable-interval 60-s, variable-time (response-independent) 60-s; extinction, variable-time 60-s. Differences in food delivery maintained substantial rates of responding on the observing key, without regard to pecking requirements on the food key. Although stimuli correlated with differences in the response requirement on the food key maintained higher observing rates than those maintained by uncorrelated stimuli, they were much lower than those based on food. The value of predictive stimuli as reinforcers is determined by the value of the events predicted. In particular, the cost of pecking appears to be low, and this may place limitations on the applicability of energy-based and economic models of behavior.

Keywords: observing, response cost, response-independent reinforcement, information, conditioned reinforcement, expectancy, optimization, key peck, pigeons

Full text

PDF
229

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BERLYNE D. E. Uncertainty and conflict: a point of contact between information-theory and behavior-theory concepts. Psychol Rev. 1957 Nov;64, Part 1(6):329–339. doi: 10.1037/h0041135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bowe C. A., Dinsmoor J. A. Spatial and temporal relations in conditioned reinforcement and observing behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 Mar;39(2):227–240. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1983.39-227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bower G., McLean J., Meacham J. Value of knowing when reinforcement is due. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1966 Oct;62(2):184–192. doi: 10.1037/h0023682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. COLLIER G. Some properties of saccharin as a reinforcer. J Exp Psychol. 1962 Aug;64:184–191. doi: 10.1037/h0048795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Case D. A., Fantino E., Wixted J. Human observing: maintained by negative informative stimuli only if correlated with improvement in response efficiency. J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 May;43(3):289–300. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.43-289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. D'Amato M. R., Etkin M., Fazzaro J. Cue-producing behavior in the Capuchin monkey during reversal, extinction, acquisition, and overtraining. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Jul;11(4):425–433. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dinsmoor J. A., Browne M. P., Lawrence C. E. A test of the negative discriminative stimulus as a reinforcer of observing. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 Jul;18(1):79–85. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.18-79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dinsmoor J. A. The role of observing and attention in establishing stimulus control. J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 May;43(3):365–381. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.43-365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. FLESHLER M., HOFFMAN H. S. A progression for generating variable-interval schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Oct;5:529–530. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hirota T. T. The relationship between observing behavior and food-key response rates under mixed and multiple schedules of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Mar;21(2):259–266. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. MACCORQUODALE K., MEEHL P. E. Preliminary suggestions as to a formalization of expectancy theory. Psychol Rev. 1953 Jan;60(1):55–63. doi: 10.1037/h0057598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Moore J., Fantino E. Choice and response contingencies. J Exp Anal Behav. 1975 May;23(3):339–347. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1975.23-339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mueller K. L., Dinsmoor J. A. Testing the reinforcing properties of S-: a replication of Lieberman's procedure. J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 Jan;41(1):17–25. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1984.41-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mueller K. L., Dinsmoor J. A. The effect of negative stimulus presentations on observing-response rates. J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 Nov;46(3):281–291. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.46-281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Perone M., Baron A. Reinforcement of human observing behavior by a stimulue correlated with extinction or increased effort. J Exp Anal Behav. 1980 Nov;34(3):239–261. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1980.34-239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. SEIDEL R. J. A review of sensory preconditioning. Psychol Bull. 1959 Jan;56(1):58–73. doi: 10.1037/h0040776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. SHEFFIELD F. D., ROBY T. B. Reward value of a non-nutritive sweet-taste. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1950 Dec;43(6):471–481. doi: 10.1037/h0061365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. THISTLETHWAITE D. A critical review of latent learning and related experiments. Psychol Bull. 1951 Mar;48(2):97–129. doi: 10.1037/h0055171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. WYCKOFF L. B., Jr The role of observing responses in discrimination learning. Psychol Rev. 1952 Nov;59(6):431–442. doi: 10.1037/h0053932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES