Abstract
In Experiment 1 rats were trained to press a lever on a variable-ratio schedule of food presentation and were then exposed to progressively increasing magnitudes of food reinforcement. Response running rates (rates exclusive of the postreinforcement pause) were found to increase as a function of increasing reinforcement magnitudes. The effect of reinforcement magnitude on response rates inclusive of the postreinforcement pause, however, was less pronounced. Increases in the magnitude of reinforcement were also found to increase the length of the postreinforcement pause. Rats in Experiment 2 were trained to respond on a chained differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate variable-ratio schedule, and were exposed to increasing magnitudes of reinforcement as in Experiment 1. Response running rates increased in the variable-ratio component but decreased in the other component of the schedule. The results are discussed with reference to incentive accounts of reinforcement and the action of reinforcement on the response units generated by the operative contingencies.
Keywords: reinforcement magnitude, arousal, response shaping, variable ratio, differential reinforcement of low rates, chained schedule, lever press, rats
Full text
PDF![75](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddeb/1338827/20f6d32dba5c/jeabehav00036-0076.png)
![76](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddeb/1338827/6cb14863ce4a/jeabehav00036-0077.png)
![77](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddeb/1338827/e224bce0260b/jeabehav00036-0078.png)
![78](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddeb/1338827/ad463e066119/jeabehav00036-0079.png)
![79](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddeb/1338827/bf7d0725d1c6/jeabehav00036-0080.png)
![80](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddeb/1338827/56518681bc87/jeabehav00036-0081.png)
![81](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddeb/1338827/29cd0b5dabf3/jeabehav00036-0082.png)
![82](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddeb/1338827/012c2d22371b/jeabehav00036-0083.png)
![83](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddeb/1338827/7176d90f7a55/jeabehav00036-0084.png)
![84](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddeb/1338827/0595843f9b92/jeabehav00036-0085.png)
![85](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddeb/1338827/4b859e56ced0/jeabehav00036-0086.png)
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- ANGER D. The dependence of interresponse times upon the relative reinforcement of different interresponse times. J Exp Psychol. 1956 Sep;52(3):145–161. doi: 10.1037/h0041255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baum W. M. The correlation-based law of effect. J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 Jul;20(1):137–153. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.20-137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cruse D. B., Vitulli W., Dertke M. Discriminative and reinforcing properties of two types of food pellets. J Exp Anal Behav. 1966 May;9(3):293–303. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1966.9-293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- D'AMATO M. R. Secondary reinforcement and magnitude of primary reinforcement. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1955 Oct;48(5):378–380. doi: 10.1037/h0041068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Green L., Snyderman M. Choice between rewards differing in amount and delay: Toward a choice model of self control. J Exp Anal Behav. 1980 Sep;34(2):135–147. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1980.34-135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harzem P., Lowe C. F., Priddle-Higson P. J. Inhibiting function of reinforcement: magnitude effects on variable-interval schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 Jul;30(1):1–10. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.30-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- KEESEY R. E., KLING J. W. Amount of reinforcement and free-operant responding. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Apr;4:125–132. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Killeen P. R. Incentive theory: IV. Magnitude of reward. J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 May;43(3):407–417. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.43-407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Logue A. W., Rodriguez M. L., Peña-Correal T. E., Mauro B. C. Choice in a self-control paradigm: Quantification of experience-based differences. J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 Jan;41(1):53–67. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1984.41-53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Powell R. W. The effect of reinforcement magnitude upon responding under fixed-ratio schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Jul;12(4):605–608. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Richardson W. K. A test of the effectiveness of the differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate schedule. J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 Nov;20(3):385–391. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.20-385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]