Skip to main content
Frontiers in Microbiology logoLink to Frontiers in Microbiology
. 2026 Jul 8;17:1872113. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2026.1872113

Isolation and characterization of novel microorganisms producing natural compounds of possible industrial interest: an integrated genomic and metabolomic approach

Andrea Nicolò Dell’Acqua 1,2, Giorgia Palladino 1,2, Simone Rampelli 1,2, Daniela Leuzzi 1,2, Daniel Scicchitano 1,2, Rosa Doménech 3, Ana Mencher 3, Thais Delgado 3, Martín Perales 3, Cinzia Corinaldesi 4, Arianna Mancuso 2,5, Stefano Goffredo 2,5, Emanuele Porru 6, Jessica Fiori 7, Marco Candela 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC13388484  PMID: 42487708

Abstract

Background

This study investigates the discovery of bioactive natural compound (BNC)-producing microorganisms from diverse, marine and terrestrial extreme environments using an integrated genomic and metabolomic approach. BNCs, including pigments, antimicrobials, and antioxidants, play pivotal roles in microbial adaptation and constitute valuable resources for applications spanning pharmaceuticals to sustainable materials. To enhance the likelihood of isolating BMC producers, a pigmentation-guided strategy was applied across three ecologically distinct and extreme environments: alpine glacier snow, volcanic marine sediments, and marine holobionts exposed to natural CO2 emissions.

Results

This approach yielded 51 pigmented microbial isolates, encompassing both bacteria and fungi across multiple phyla. From this collection, seven representative strains exhibiting high growth rate and consistent and intense pigmentation were selected for in-depth characterization. Whole-genome sequencing and biosynthetic gene cluster (BGC) analysis revealed extensive biosynthetic potential, with 61 BGCs identified, including pathways associated with terpenes, polyketide synthases (PKS), and non-ribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPS). Complementary metabolomic profiling via UPLC-QTOF-MS confirmed the production of a broad spectrum of BNC, with 58 natural products being detected, including carotenoids, antimicrobial compounds, biosurfactants, and polyketide-derived pigments. Functional assays further demonstrated the ability of these strains to metabolize amylaceous substrates and plant-derived carbohydrates, highlighting their suitability for sustainable biotechnological processes based on renewable feedstocks. Notably, two isolates affiliated with Alkalihalobacillus algicola and Cytobacillus oceanosediminis exhibited genomic divergence below species-level thresholds, suggesting the presence of previously uncharacterized lineages.

Conclusion

Overall, this work underscores the effectiveness of coupling pigmentation-based screening with omics-driven analyses to uncover microorganisms as candidate cell factory for BNC production. The identified strains represent promising candidates for sustainable biotechnological applications, including the production of natural pigments, antimicrobials, and bio-based materials, thereby contributing to the advancement of circular and eco-friendly industrial systems.

Keywords: bioactive natural compounds, extreme environments, microorganisms isolation, omics-driven analysis, pigmented microorganisms, sustainable production

1. Background

Bioactive natural compounds (BNCs) refer to molecules produced by plants, fungi, microorganisms, or other natural sources that demonstrate a biologically relevant activity (Jin et al., 2016; Denaro et al., 2020). These compounds, generated by means of secondary metabolism, are not directly involved in energy production and cellular growth, lacking a role in the internal economy of the producing organisms (Williams et al., 1989; Williams and Maplestone, 1992). Conversely, BNCs are crucial for the survival in the natural environment, as they represent a strategic adaptive and defensive system against varying biotic or abiotic stressors, ultimately increasing fitness (Firn and Jones, 2000; Tyc et al., 2017). As such, BNCs are not part of a single molecular class, but of a range of widely chemically different classes, showing properties such as antimicrobial, antiviral, antifouling, cytotoxic, antioxidant, UV-protective compounds or siderophores (Atanasov et al., 2021). Historically, research on BNCs focused primarily on health-related and clinical applications, where they constituted over 70% of antibacterial drugs available on the market as of 2014 (Khan et al., 2014; Newman and Cragg, 2016). More recently, the use of BNCs is expanding to different sectors, other than pharmaceuticals, for example with applications in the cosmetic sector, where BNCs as carotenoids and flavonoids can be used to improve the final appearance of the product or provide a skin lightening effect (Dasgupta Mandal and Majumdar, 2023; Sharma et al., 2024). BNCs can also be used as food additives, where they are used as natural dyes or antioxidants compounds for the formulation of food supplements and nutraceuticals (Al-Obaidi et al., 2021; Barsby et al., 2021; López-Rodríguez et al., 2022). Secondary metabolites, such as carotenoids, can also be employed for the production of intelligent packages, where their addition in protective films can reduce oxidation and increase the preservation of food, or where they could act as sensors, indicating when a significative change in the quality of food has occurred (Leccese et al., 2023; Roy et al., 2023). Lastly, pigmented BNCs are being investigated as potential natural substitutes for artificial pigments and dyes in the textile industry. Artificial pigments currently represent a major source of environmental and water pollution (De Oliveira et al., 2013). With their excellent color fastness, properties and ability to meet industry standards, natural pigments represent promising candidates as sustainable alternatives (Ackacha et al., 2003; Duval et al., 2016).

From the genomic perspective, microbial BNCs are produced by biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs), complex assemblies of clustered biosynthetic and regulatory genes that encode for the complete machinery for BNC production. BGCs are usually organized around a core biosynthetic gene, encoding for a key multimodule protein responsible for the production of BNC molecular scaffold. Accessory genes encoding tailoring enzymes transporters, resistance genes, and regulatory elements are typically associated with the core biosynthetic genes (Cimermancic et al., 2014). Depending on the specific BGCs class, the core gene may encode non-ribosomal peptide synthases (NRPS) or polyketide synthases (PKS). Other known BCN classes include terpenes and ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptide (RiPPs) (Sedkova et al., 2005; Oldfield and Lin, 2012; Zdouc et al., 2023; Li H. et al., 2024).

In our work, we explored diverse microbiomes from marine and terrestrial extreme environments to identify novel BNC producers, given that BNCs are frequently produced in response to specific environmental stressors. The selected microbiomes included: (i) microbial communities from glacier ecosystems, characterized by low temperatures, high UV radiation, and oligotrophic conditions; (ii) microbiomes from volcanic coastal marine sediments influenced by shallow hydrothermal CO2 rich venting, with locally sulfidic conditions near active seeps and (iii) microbiomes associated with marine holobionts, such as corals, that rely on their associated microbiomes for acclimatization and functional resilience under chronic acidification stress (Palladino et al., 2022). These included the corals Balanophyllia europaea and Caryophyllia inornata, inhabiting naturally acidified waters near CO2 vents and vent caves, as well as the seagrass Posidonia oceanica, living approximately 30 m from the vent. To enrich for secondary-metabolite producers, we used a pigmentation-guided isolation strategy, where colony color served as a proxy for active secondary metabolism (Pailliè-Jiménez et al., 2020; Mussagy et al., 2022; Dasgupta Mandal and Majumdar, 2023; Sharma et al., 2024). Fermentable pigmented isolates were selected for in-depth investigation as microbial cell factories through an integrated approach combining whole-genome sequencing, BGCs mining, and Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (UPLC–MS) profiling of secondary metabolites. This strategy enabled the discovery of novel microorganisms that might be implemented as inherently robust platforms for the sustainable production of pigments and bioactive compounds.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Sites description and samples collection

For the isolation of novel bioactive natural compounds (BNCs) producing microbial strains, three different extreme environments were selected. The Presena Glacier, located in Trentino Alto Adige, Italy, reaches an altitude of 3,000 m a.s.l. and is characterized by freezing temperatures, high UV radiation exposure, freeze-thaw cycles in the upper ice layers, and limited nutrients availability (Rekadwad et al., 2024; Crosta et al., 2025). Snow at the Presena Glacier was collected in “Passo Presena” inside 2 L sterile bottles using sterilized tools. Samples were transported frozen to the laboratory and kept at -20 °C until further processing. Coastal marine sediments at the volcanic island of Vulcano were influenced by shallow hydrothermal CO2 rich venting with sulfidic conditions, located off the coasts of Sicily, Italy. The presence of volcanic activity in the form of sulphureous fumaroles confers the surrounding water with a unique composition of dissolved minerals and more acidic pH (Rusch et al., 2005; Kerfahi et al., 2014). Samples were retrieved using three 50 mL sterile falcon tubes and transported at 4 °C to the lab, where they were immediately processed. Further, potential BNCs producing microorganisms were retrieved from individuals of the corals Balanophyllia europaea and Caryophyllia inornata, and from leaves of the seagrass Poseidonia oceanica, located at different underwater sites in Panarea island, Sicily, Italy. Five B. europaea individuals and 10 P. oceanica individuals were collected at an underwater CO2 crater at 10 m depth, releasing persistent gaseous emissions (98–99% CO2 without instrumentally detectable taxic compounds) as described by Palladino et al. (2022). Sampling sites along this gradient match mean pH values projected for 2,100 under different IPCC scenarios (Chen et al., 2021). Five individuals of C. inornata were collected at a submerged cave located at a depth of 14 m off Basiluzzo Island. The site is characterized by hydrothermal emissions sweeping from the seabed in proximity and within the cave, as described by Cassarino et al. (2025). Coral and seagrass samples were transported alive to the laboratory inside 1 L seawater tanks 2 days after the sampling. Seawater was changed daily using fresh backup seawater collected from the same sampling site, and samples were processed immediately upon arrival.

2.2. Isolation of pigmented microorganisms

For the isolation of pigmented microorganisms, samples were processed according to the matrix type. Snow collected at the Presena Glacier was melted at 4 °C and centrifuged at 9,000 g for 5 min. The resulting pellet was resuspended in 10 mL of sterile water. 100 μL of resuspended sample were plated on TSA and Vogel’s medium N and incubated at 18 °C (Mortazavi et al., 2008; Mortazavi et al., 2014). For isolation from marine sediments, 10-fold serial dilutions from 10–1 to 10–5 were prepared in artificial seawater (ASW). Starting from 1 g of resuspended sediments, 100 μL of each dilution were plated on TSA, MA, and Vogel’s medium N agar (Romanenko et al., 2023) and incubated at 22 °C (Radovanović et al., 2018; Romanenko et al., 2023). For both B. europaea and C. inornata, individual polyps were separated and cleaned of algae and debris using sterile tweezers and scalpels. Surface sterilization was performed by rinsing in sterile ASW, immersion in 70% ethanol for 3 s, and a final rinse in new sterile ASW. Following surface sterilization, each polyp was ground using a mortar and pestle to obtain a homogeneous paste. The coral paste was then serially diluted using ASW (Kjer et al., 2010). The same protocol was applied to Posidonia oceanica leafes with 1 s immersion in 70% ethanol. Samples of ground up corals and seagrass were serially diluted in ASW from 10–1 to 10–5. 100 μL of each dilution were plated on TSA, MA, and Vogel’s medium N plates and incubated at 25 °C (Kjer et al., 2010; Susilowati et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2022). Isolated pigmented microbial colonies of interest were picked, streaked onto new plates of the same medium, and incubated under the same conditions as isolation. From pure culture plates, flask liquid cultures were prepared using 30 mL of non-agarized medium (same type and temperature as isolation), with agitation at 100 rpm.

2.3. Taxonomical identification and whole genome sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted from 3 mL of liquid culture for each strain after pelleting at 9,000 g × 5 min using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (QIAGEN) following manufacturer’s instructions and quantified using a NanoDrop ND1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE, United States). DNA was then diluted in PCR-grade water to a final concentration of 5 ng/μL prior to PCR amplification. The bacterial 16S rRNA gene and fungal ITS regions were targeted for PCR amplicons using universal primers Bact-27F (5’-AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG-3’)/Bact-1492R (5′- TACGGCTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′) and ITS-1F (5′-CTTGGTCATTTAGAGGAAGTAA-3′)/ITS-4R (5′-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3′) for bacteria and fungi, respectively. Amplicons were purified and sequenced on the Sanger platform. Raw sequencing data were visualized and quality-trimmed using Teal (Rausch et al., 2020). Validated reads were queried against the NCBI nucleotide database via BLASTn (Altschul et al., 1990). Taxonomic assignments were based on hits with > 95% query coverage and percent identity, with E-values < 10–5. For 16S rRNA and ITS phylogenetic analyses, the 16S rRNA gene and ITS sequences obtained from the isolates were compared against reference sequences retrieved from LPSN and UNITE databases for bacteria and fungi. To improve tree readability while preserving taxonomic context, for each isolate the closest available reference sequence was selected preferentially at the species level and, when unavailable, at the genus level. Sequences were aligned using MAFFT v7 (Katoh and Standley, 2013) with automatic parameter selection. The resulting alignments were refined using TrimAl v1.4 (Capella-Gutiérrez et al., 2009) with the automated1 option to remove poorly aligned regions. Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic trees were inferred using IQ-TREE v2 (Minh et al., 2020). The best-fit nucleotide substitution model was selected using ModelFinder, and node support was assessed with 1,000 ultrafast bootstrap replicates and 1,000 SH-aLRT replicates. The resulting trees were used to evaluate the phylogenetic relationships between the isolates and their closest reference strains. Seven pigmented microbial isolates were selected for downstream analyses based on their intense and stable pigmentation and robust growth in liquid culture (Supplementary Figure 1): Rhodosporidiobolus colostri, Cytobacillus oceanosediminis, Micrococcus yunnanensis, and Alkalihalobacillus algicola, Paracoccus marcusii, Planococcus glaciei, and Cladosporium sp. Each selected strain was processed for shotgun genomic sequencing. DNA libraries were prepared using the QIAseq FX DNA library kit (QIAGEN) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, 100 ng of input DNA was enzymatically fragmented to 450 bp size, end-repaired, and A-tailed using FX enzyme mix with the following thermal cycle: 4°C for 1 min, 32°C for 8 min, and 65°C for 30 min. Adapter ligation was performed by incubating DNA samples at 20°C for 15 min with DNA ligase and Illumina adapter barcodes. A first purification step was performed usign Agencourt AMPure XP magnetic beads (Backman Coulter), followed by library amplification with limited-cycle PCR according to manufacturer’s instruction, and a further purification step. Samples were then pooled at 4 nM to obtain the final library, and sequencing was performed on an Illumina NextSeq platform using a 2 × 150-bp paired-end protocol, following the manufacturer’s instructions (Illumina, San Diego, CA, United States).

2.4. Genome assembly, phylogenetic reconstruction, BGCs mining and Carbohydrate active enzymes (CAZymes) profiling

Raw paired-end reads Illumina reads were quality-filtered using fastp (Chen et al., 2018; v.0.20.1) with parameters –detect_adapter_for_pe –cut_tail -c -D for adapter trimming, low-quality base removal, read deduplication, and base correction. High quality reads were assembled de novo with Unicycler (v.0.5.0; Wick et al., 2017), to optimize contig bridging and assembly completeness. Assemblies were evaluated with QUAST (Gurevich et al., 2013; v.5.0.2) for quality metrics (N50, L50, contigs longer than 1,000 bp). Taxonomic classification was performed using GTDB-Tk (v.2.1.1—Genome Taxonomy Database, release 214) (Chaumeil et al., 2020) to confirm Sanger’s results for bacteria. Reference genomes for Alkalihalobacillus, Cytobacillus, Micrococcus, Paracoccus, and Planococcus genera were downloaded from NCBI RefSeq (last access March 2026) and dereplicated against our assemblies using dRep (Olm et al., 2017; v.3.5.0) with the following parameters -comp 90 -con 5 -sa 0.99 -pa 0.90. Fungal genomes (Cladosporium and Rhodosporidiobolus) were sourced from NCBI GenBank, quality-checked with BUSCO (Manni et al., 2021; Zdobnov et al., 2021; v.5.0.0; fungi_odb10) and dereplicated against our assemblies using dRep (-sa 0.95, –ignoreGenomeQuality). Secondary metabolite BGCs were predicted using antiSMASH (v.7.1.0) (Blin et al., 2023) with parameters –cb-knownclusters –cb-subclusters –rre –cc-mibig –genefinding-tool prodigal –fullhmmer. Average nucleotide identity (ANI) based distance matrices informed preliminary clustering and dendrogram construction. Clustering was performed using the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean and resulting dendrograms were visualized and annotated. The topology of the dendrograms was used to assess the relationships between the isolates and their closest reference genomes, according to the ANI distance values. For CAZymes profiling, Open Reading Frames (ORFs) were predicted from bacterial metagenomic assemblies using Prodigal (v2.6.3; Hyatt et al., 2010), whereas Funannotate (v1.8.17; Palmer and Stajich, 2020) for fungal assemblies. ORFs were subsequently annotated against the dbCAN database using the rundbCAN tool (v5.2.9; Zheng et al., 2023) to identify CAZymes families. For Cytobacillus oceanisediminis and Micrococcus yunnanensis, for which > 20 sequenced genomes were available in public databases, an in-deep comparative genomic assessment was carried out. To this aim, the genomes assemblies generated in this study, together with publicly available genomes retrieved from GenBank, were structurally and functionally annotated using Prokka v1.14 (Seemann, 2014). The resulting GFF annotation files were used as input for Panaroo v1.5 with default parameters (Tonkin-Hill et al., 2020) to reconstruct the pangenome and generate a binary gene presence/absence matrix. Genome similarity was evaluated using the Jaccard distance calculated from the gene presence/absence matrix. Relationships among genomes were explored through Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA) based on the Jaccard distance matrix. In addition, Neighbor-Joining (NJ) and Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic Mean (UPGMA) clustering trees were generated from the same distance matrix to visualize the overall genomic and genetic relatedness among isolates and reference strains. All graphical representations were generated in R using the packages ggplot2 (Wickham, 2016), ggtree (Yu et al., 2017), ape (Paradis and Schliep, 2019), and vegan (Oksanen et al., 2013).

2.5. Carbon source utilization and growth kinetics

The ability of each strain to utilize different carbon sources under aerobic conditions was evaluated using API 50 CH strips (bioMérieux, Marcy-l’Étoile, France) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, a single colony from each strain was suspended in the provided CBH/E medium and inoculated into all cupules of the strips. Assembled strips were incubated at 25 °C and monitored after 24 and 48 h with color changes recorded for substrate utilization. Growth kinetics were determined for all strains except Cladosporium sp. in liquid culture. Strains were grown in tryptone soya broth (TSB) (Micrococcus yunnannensis and Cytobacillus oceanosediminis at 30°C, Rhodosporidiobolus colostri at 20°C) or marine broth (MB) (Alkalihalo algicola at 30°C, Planococcus glacei and Paracoccus marcusii at 25°C). All cultures were incubated in baffled flasks for 34 h, 100 RPM, in a volume of 30 mL of liquid media, with optical density measured at 600 nm (OD600) every 2 h using a spectrophotomer. Growth curves were fitted in R (v4.5.0) using the “growthcurver” package (v.0.3.1; Sprouffske and Wagner, 2016). For biomass production at lab scale, Cladosporium was cultured with 3 mm glass beads in the flask to further release of mycelia fragments, thus, improving it’s dispersion in the culture broth. All flasks were cultured with passive aeration, by providing the culture flasks with cotton caps, hence allowing the oxygen diffusion.

2.6. Biomass preparation and analytical profiling of secondary metabolites

Batch fermentations (96 h) were performed for each strain under the same conditions used for growth kinetics. Fermentations were further scaled up (1 L) under laboratory-scale conditions to assess pigment recovery and analytical profiling in volumes relevant for downstream processing. Post-fermentation, cells were harvested by centrifugation at 9,000 g for 5 min and wet biomass weight determined. Biomass was resuspended (1 g in 3 mL distilled H2O) and lysed via sonication (Branson Sonifier 250 equipped with ½-inch titanium disruptor horn; Branson, Brookfield, Connecticut). Lysed biomass (3 mL) was extracted sequentially: first, mixed with 6 mL H2O and 9 mL hexane, vortexed (2 min), sonicated (bath, 15 min) and centrifuged (20,000 g × 5 min). Hexane and aqueous phases were discarded and pellets were resuspended in 12 mL acetonitrile:methanol (5:2 v/v), vortexed (2 min), sonicated (cooled bath, 1 h), centrifuged (20,000 g × 5 min), and the supernatant filtered (0.22 μM PTFE syringe filter) (Lech and Jarosz, 2011; Barrera Vázquez et al., 2014; Shi et al., 2014; Duval et al., 2016; Patel et al., 2019; Chia et al., 2020; Gurkok, 2022). For P. marcusii and Cladosporium sp. pigments were released in the liquid media during fermentation. After initial removal of cellular biomass via centrifugation, the cell-free supernatant (CFS, 10 mL) was extracted with 90 mL of ethanol, rested (5 min), centrifuged (20,000 g × 5 min), and the pigmented supernatant filtered as above (Shi et al., 2014; Duval et al., 2016; Patel et al., 2019). Extracts were analyzed by UPLC-QTOF-MS (Waters G2-XS QTOF, Milford, MA, United States) in ESI– and full scan mode with a scan range m/z from 100 to 1,000 Da. Separation was performed with the following parameters. Acuity UPLC BEH C18 column (1.7 μm, 2.1 × 100 mm); mobile phases A (H2O + 0.5% NH4OH), and B (MeOH + 0.5% NH4OH). Gradient (flow 0.3 mL/min, injection 10 μL): 0–3 min 5% B, 3–6 min 25% B, 6–10 min 25% B, 10–16 min 66% B, 16–20 min 100% B, 20–21 min 5% B. Feature detection, blank filtering, and exact-mass matching ( ± 5 ppm against theoretical monoisotopic masses) were performed in UNIFI (v. 3.15.1) against a curated PubChem-derived list of candidate compounds (Kim et al., 2025).

3. Results

3.1. Isolation, taxonomic identification, and selection of pigmented strains

Pigmented microbial strains with the potential for BNCs production were isolated from environmental and host-associated microbiomes collected across diverse natural ecosystems in Italy. The sampling sites and stations investigated in this study are reported in Figure 1. The selected sites encompass a range of ecologically distinct extreme habitats, including: the Presena Glacier, volcanic coastal marine sediments from Vulcano Island, and different marine holobionts (B. europaea, C. inornata, and P. oceanica) living in proximity to natural CO2 emission sources in Panarea Island (Figure 2). Two distinct pigmented colonies were successfully isolated from glacier samples; 15 from coastal volcanic marine sediments; 34 from marine holobionts, comprising 13 from B. europaea, 13 from C. inornata, and 8 from P. oceanica. These 51 isolates underwent molecular identification via 16S rRNA sequencing (bacteria) or ITS sequencing (fungi), as reported in Supplementary Table 1. Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA (bacteria) or ITS gene (fungi) sequences revealed that all pigment-producing isolates clustered closely with their respective reference taxa, confirming their taxonomic assignment across a broad range of bacterial and fungal genera (Supplementary Figure 2). In Figure 3 we provide the visual appearance of stationary-phase cellular pellets obtained from the identified pigmented isolates.

FIGURE 1.

Panel A shows a map of Italy with three numbered markers labeled 1, 2, and 3. Panel B presents a close-up map of a region outlined in red with a single location marked. Panel C displays two islands on a blue background with markers labeled 1 and 2. Panel D offers a zoomed-in view of one island, highlighting a specific location near the northern part.

Map of sampling sites. (A) Location of the three sampling sites in Italy: site (1) Presena glacier; site (2) Panarea island; site (3) Vulcano island. (B) Specific location of sampling station within Presena glacier: “Passo presena” within the municipality of Vermiglio (highlighted as red area), Trentino-Alto Adige, Italy. (C) Specific location of the two sampling stations off the coast of Panarea island, Sicily, Italy. Station 1: underwater CO2 crater at 10 m depth; station 2: submerged cave located at a depth of 14 m off Basiluzzo Island. (D) Specific location of sampling station off the coast of Vulcano island, Italy.

FIGURE 2.

Panel A shows a snowy mountain landscape under a cloudy sky. Panel B displays a sow-covered mountain peak with blue sky and clouds. Panel C depicts a dark underwater scene with CO2 emission bubbles. Panel D illustrates the seafloor of the volcanic Island of Vulcano, Sicily, Italy. Panel E presents a bottle container with single polips of the coral Balanophyllia europaea. Panel F presents a white background with individual polips of the coral Cariophylla inornata.

Overview of extreme environments sampled in this study as sources for the isolation of novel BNC-producing microorganism. (A,B) Presena Glacier, 3,000 m a.s.l., Trentino Alto Adige, Italy; (C,D) volcanic coastal marine sediments influenced by shallow hydrothermal CO2 rich venting from the volcanic island of Vulcano, Sicily, Italy; (E) picture of Balanophyllia europaea specimens retrieved from Panarea Island, Sicily, Italy; (F) picture of Caryophylla inornata specimens retrieved from Panarea Island, Sicily, Italy.

FIGURE 3.

Color chart illustration displays rectangular swatches in shades of yellow, orange, brown, and tan, each labeled with scientific names of bacteria and their isolation locations, such as Presena glacier or Vulcano island.

Chromatic diversity of the pigmented isolates. For each isolate, taxonomic classification, origin, and representative images of stationary-phase cellular pellets are provided.

Pigmented isolates recovered from the glacier microbiome were identified as Pseudomonas sp. (yellow-pigmented bacterium) and Rhodosporidiobolus colostri (red-pigmented yeast). Among the isolates obtained from volcanic coastal marine sediments, 9 bacterial strains exhibiting a yellow colony phenotype were identified as Cytobacillus dafuensis, Niallia circulans, Alkalihalophilus pseudofirmus, Sporosarcina luteola, Psychrobacter alimentarius, Neobacillus bataviensis, Bacillus timonensis, Micrococcus yunnanensis, and Bacillus aerius. The remaining 6 isolates from the same environment displayed an orange pigmentation and were identified as Alkalihalobacillus algicola, Cytobacillus oceanisediminis, Brevibacillus halotolerans (two distinct strains), Rossellomorea aquimaris, and Aureobasidium namibiae. Among the 34 pigmented isolates recovered from host-associated microbiomes, 13 yellow-pigmented strains were annotated as Cobetia amphilecti, Metabacillus idriensis, Planococcus glaciei, Kocuria palustris, Aureimonas altamirensis, Staphylococcus warneri, Qipengyuania flava, and Qipengyuania qiaonensis; 9 orange-pigmented isolates were assigned to Planococcus glaciei, Pseudoalteromonas lipolytica, Paracoccus marcusii, Microbacterium paraoxydans, Myrmecridium normannianum, Shewanella japonica, Vreelandella piezotolerans, and Vreelandella sulfidaeris; 6 red-pigmented isolates were identified as Bacillus weihaiensis, Vreelandella aquamarina, Psychrobacter pacificensis, Alternaria sp., Cladosporium sp., and Leohumicola sp.; and 6 black-pigmented colonies were annotated as Cladosporium sp. and Cladosporium aggregatocicaticatum, both represented by multiple strains.

Eight pigmented isolates retrieved from P. oceanica were identified as Paracoccus marcusii, Microbacterium paraoxydans, Myrmecridium normannianum, Shewanella japonica, and Leohumicola minima, all exhibiting an orange colony phenotype. Yellow-pigmented isolates were assigned to Kocuria palustris, Aureimonas altamirensis, and Staphylococcus warneri (two distinct strains).

Overall, seven pigmented isolates, representing diverse environmental sources, displaying intense and stabile pigmentation and growing well in liquid culture (Supplementary Figure 1), were selected for downstream analyses. These comprised Rhodosporidiobolus colostri (glacier), Cytobacillus oceanosediminis, Micrococcus yunnanensis, and Alkalihalobacillus algicola (volcanic marine sediments), Paracoccus marcusii (P. oceanica-associated), and Planococcus glaciei and Cladosporium sp. (C. inornata-associated).

3.2. Genome assemblies, comparative genomics, BGC prediction and CAZymes profiles

Whole-genome sequences were obtained for the seven selected strains. Assembly statistics (length, completeness, contamination, largest contig, number of contigs, N50, L50, GC content, predicted ORF, coverage depth, ANI values and reference assembly) are provided in Table 1. Overall, the assembled genomes exhibited high quality, with completeness values ranging from 80 to 100% and low contamination levels (<1.3% in all cases). Most bacterial genomes showed high completeness (95–100%), low contamination, and relatively low numbers of contigs, indicating robust assemblies suitable for downstream genomic analyses. Although the fungal genomes were more fragmented, their completeness remained sufficiently high (98 and 80%, respectively) to support comparative genomic inference. For the sequenced strains we reconstructed the ANI distance profiles against NCBI RefSeq/GenBank reference genomes (Supplementary Figure 3). ANI values were: P. marcusii 97.58% (vs. ASM2862171v1); M. yunnanensis 98.06% (vs. ASM5297846v1); P. glaciei 98.40% (vs. ASM1336877v1). Interestingly, the genomes of A. algicola and C. oceanosediminis displayed ANI distance values below the 95% (the species delineation threshold) when compared with their closest references, suggesting that these isolates may represent novel genomic lineages within their respective species. Regarding the fungal isolates, R. colostri showed 99.05% ANI distance with the reference genome ASM5347719v1, and Cladosporium sp. isolate exhibited an ANI distance of 95.98% relative to Cladosporium allicinum ASM5257632v1, supporting its taxonomic placement and complementing the ITS-based identification. For C. oceanisediminis and M. yunnanensis, for which more than 20 genomes were available in public databases, an in-depth comparative genomic assessment was performed (Supplementary Figure 4). The M. yunnanensis isolate displayed an overall genomic profile largely consistent with those of previously sequenced strains. In contrast, the C. oceanisediminis isolate exhibited a markedly distinct genomic architecture compared with publicly available genomes, suggesting a substantial degree of genomic novelty. This pattern was consistently supported by the PCoA, Neighbor-Joining, and UPGMA analyses, in which the isolate from the present study formed a clearly differentiated cluster relative to the currently available C. oceanisediminis genomes, highlighting

TABLE 1.

Whole-genome sequences of assembly statistics for the seven selected microbial strains.

Isolate Length Completeness Contamination Largest contig Number of contigs N50 L50 GC content Number of ORFs Coverage depth ANI Value Assembly
Rhodosporidiobolus colostri 24.41 Mb 98% 0.30% 227,999 b 1244 43,781 b 165 59.90% 8,756 56 99.05% ASM5347719v1
Cytobacillus oceanisediminis 4.8 Mb 87% 0.64% 707,829 b 35 515,084 b 4 46.01% 4,919 153 71.58% ASM783023v1
Alkalihalobacillus algicola 4.1 Mb 100% 0.40% 308,061 b 50 187,244 b 9 40.58% 4,360 154 94.57% ASM2017180v1
Micrococcus yunnanensis 2.4 Mb 96% 0.00% 362,215 b 42 268,519 b 4 73.12% 2,223 328 98.06% ASM5297846v1
Paracoccus marcusii 4.2 Mb 100% 0.91% 1,121,956 b 91 265,798 b 4 66.10% 4,069 158 97.58% ASM2862171v1
Cladosporium sp. (strain 1) 25.1 Mb 80% 0.20% 208,515 b 1060 50,247 b 165 53.71% 9,204 45 95.98% ASM5257632v1
Planococcus glaciei (strain 1) 3.9 Mb 95% 1.24% 1,305,237 b 19 849,506 b 2 46.78% 3,892 255 98.40% ASM1336877v1

Genome assembly statistics for the seven pigmented microbial isolates are reported. Metrics include assembly length, completeness, contamination, largest contig, number of contigs, N50, L50, GC content, predicted ORFs, sequencing coverage depth, ANI values and reference assembly. For organisms that have been isolated multiple times, selected strains are reported in brackets. ORFs, Open Reading Frames.

its unique genomic features. In order to profile the biosynthetic potential of BNC for the selected taxa, the sequenced genomes were analyzed for their BGCs content with antiSMASH (Table 2). We identified five BGCs in R. colostri, three classified as terpene-related, and two as NRPS-like clusters. Among the terpene-related BGCs, one was assigned to ascofuranone biosynthesis (a yellow pigmented compound), one to carotenoid biosynthesis, and one unassigned. Five BGCs were identified for C. oceanosediminis, three classified as terpene-related, one as a Type (T) 3 PKS cluster, and one as a class II lanthipeptide cluster. Among the terpene-related, one was putatively assigned to alkylresorcinol biosynthesis, one to carotenoid biosynthesis, one unassigned. The T3PKS cluster was predicted to be involved in fumihopaside A biosynthesis. For M. yunnannensis, we identified a heterogeneous repertoire of 6 BGCs spanning distinct families. These comprised one cluster assigned to ectoine biosynthesis, one RRE-containing cluster, one β-lactone cluster, one terpene cluster, one NAPAA-class cluster, and one Ni-siderophore cluster. A. algicola harbored 6 BGCs, two terpene-related clusters (fumihopaside A biosynthesis and production of a carotenoid-like compound), one β-lactone cluster, one Ni-containing siderophore cluster, one RRE-containing cluster, and one T3PKS cluster (biosynthesis of an alkylresorcinol). We identified nine BGCs in P. marcusii, a terpene cluster (putatively assigned to the biosynthesis of a carotenoid), T3PKS (alkylresorcinol production), and a hybrid NRPS–PKS cluster (biosynthesis of an obafluorin-like compound). In P. glacei, 4 BGCs were identified: one T3PKS cluster (alkylresorcinol biosynthesis), and three terpene clusters (production of carotenoid-like compounds). Analysis of the Cladosporium sp. genome revealed a remarkable repertoire of 26 BGCs. Seven of these were associated with classes potentially involved in pigment production, encompassin two T1PKS clusters, three terpene clusters, and two hybrid NRPS–T1PKS clusters. More specifically, the first T1PKS cluster was associated with the putative production of a betaenone-like compound. The second T1PKS cluster showed similarity to 1,3,6,8-tetrahydroxynaphthalene biosynthetic clusters, suggesting the potential production of naphthalene-type molecules. Among the hybrid NRPS–T1PKS clusters, one was predicted to direct the biosynthesis of a tetralin-derived compound, whereas the second could not be confidently linked to a specific product. Finally, of the three terpene clusters, one could not be assigned to any known metabolite; the second was associated with the putative production of a fumihopaside-like compound, and the third was linked to the biosynthesis of a carotenoid-type molecule. To assess the degree of BGC novelty characterizing the isolate genomes, the predicted BGC repertoires were compared with those identified in the corresponding reference genomes (Supplementary Table 2). This comparative analysis revealed that Cladosporium sp., R. colostri, C. oceanisediminis, and P. marcusii exhibit BGC profiles that differ substantially from those of their respective reference genomes, indicating a degree of novelty in their biosynthetic potential. These differences suggest the presence of unique secondary metabolite biosynthetic capabilities. Finally, a CAZyme family profile was generated for each isolate (Supplementary Figure 5). The results revealed a highly heterogeneous glycobiome architecture across the different isolates. Among the fungal strains, Cladosporium sp. and R. colostri exhibited the greatest CAZyme diversity, with 74 and 64 annotated CAZyme families, respectively, including 32 and 27 glycoside hydrolase (GH) families. In contrast, the bacterial isolates generally displayed a lower, yet still substantial, glycobiome diversity. Among them, C. oceanosediminis showed the richest CAZyme repertoire, harboring 43 CAZyme families, including 19 GH families. P. marcusii, A. algicola, and P. glacei possessed 35, 33, and 30 CAZyme families, respectively, of which 13, 12, and 14 belonged to the GH class. M. yunnanensis exhibited the lowest glycobiome diversity, with only 14 CAZyme families identified, including 6 GH families.

TABLE 2.

Biosynthetic potential of bioactive natural compounds production for the selected strains.

Selected isolate Region Start position End position Total length (nt) AntiSMASH class Associated product Score Most similar cluster
Rhodosporidiobolus colostri 33.1 1 24,274 24,274 Terpene Ascofuranone 0.23 BGC0001924
73.1 36,059 69,288 33,230 NRPS-like Myxochelin 0.09 BGC0002324
229.1 1 18,145 18,145 Terpene Carotenoid 0.32 BGC0000647
234.1 1 20,121 20,121 Terpene / / /
343.1 1 24,319 24,319 NRPS-like Livipeptin 0.20 BGC0001168
Cytobacillus oceanisediminis 1.1 119,735 140,553 20,819 Terpene / / /
2.1 127,642 168,727 41,086 T3PKS Alkylresorcinol 0.34 BGC0000282
5.1 46,557 75,614 29,058 Lanthipeptide SmbA 0.34 BGC0000552
7.1 5,571 76,606 20,897 Terpene Carotenoid 0.36 BGC0000647
19.1 10,218 32,104 21,887 Terpene Fumihopaside A 0.24 BGC0002173
Micrococcus yunnanensis 3.1 73,315 83,686 10,372 Ectoine Ectoine 0.31 BGC0002405
4.1 49,547 69,879 20,333 RRE-containing Tetrabromopyrrole 0.07 BGC0001464
5.1 87,476 114,353 26,878 betalactone Deoxyhangtaimycin 0.24 BGC0002657
8.1 109,342 130,238 20,897 Terpene Carotenoid 0.35 BGC0000644
12.1 643 3,465 34,008 NAPAA ε-Poly-L-lysine 0.38 BGC0002174
15.1 1 21,566 21,566 NI-siderophore Desferrioxamine 0.50 BGC0001478
Alkalihalobacillus algicola 1.1 15,105 171,886 20,837 Terpene Carotenoid 0.41 BGC0000645
4.1 209,091 229,351 20,261 RRE-containg Exopolisaccaride 0.25 BGC0000742
7.1 170,849 192,669 21,821 Terpene Fumihopaside A 0.23 BGC0002173
18.1 10,084 39,419 29,336 Betalactone Fosfomycin 0.24 BGC0001859
26.1 22,232 45,182 22,951 Ni-siderophore Vibrioferrin 0.36 BGC0002527
37.1 1 15,958 15,958 T3PKS Alkylresorcinol 0.35 BGC0000282
Paracoccus marcusii 1.1 276,892 302,832 25,941 Betalactone Corynecin 0.22 BGC0002284
1.2 757,803 795,062 37,260 Ectoine Ectoine 0.91 BGC0000860
2.1 144,827 167,002 22,176 RiPP Aborycin 0.32 BGC0002285
3.1 351,388 374,961 23,574 Terpene Carotenoid 0.88 BGC0000635
3.2 392,446 431,934 39,489 T3PKS Alkylresorcinol 0.34 BGC0000282
7.1 48,874 70,115 21,242 RRE-containing Exopolisaccaride 0.20 BGC0000756
7.2 140,77 151,615 10,846 RiPP-like Pseudopyronine 0.12 BGC0001285
7.3 151,631 228,287 76,657 Hybrid NRPS-T1PKS Pyreudione 0.95 BGC0002075
14.1 6,674 27,264 20,591 Homoserine lactone Carnocyclin 0.18 BGC0000487
Planococcus glaciei (strain 1) 2.1 737,259 758,092 20,834 Terpene Carotenoid 0.52 BGC0000645
3.1 205,564 246,634 41,071 T3PKS Alkylresorcinol 0.29 BGC0000282
3.2 356,613 377,443 20,831 Terpene (2R,3S,4S)-5-fluoro-2,3,4-trihydroxypentanoic acid 0.33 BGC0001928
5.1 200,728 221,585 20,858 Terpene Carotenoid 0.33 BGC0000647
Cladosporium sp. (strain 1) 7.1 111,984 142,252 30,269 NRPS-like Livipeptin 0.20 BGC0001168
8.1 96,026 139,532 43,507 NRPS-like Choline 0.26 BGC0002276
9.1 1 26,323 26,323 T1PKS Betaenone 0.21 BGC0001264
9.2 43,504 10,672 63,217 NRP-metallophore Epichloenin 0.61 BGC0001250
15.1 1 100,734 100,734 NRPS Cyclic tetrapeptide 0.29 BGC0000357
18.1 1,828 63,541 45,262 NRPS-like Asperipin 2a 0.16 BGC0001306
22.1 53,742 87,417 33,676 NAPAA Betaestacin 0.36 BGC0001528
24.1 945 46,551 45,607 NRPS Ferrichrome 0.42 BGC0000900
26.1 1 29,205 29,205 NRPS-like Choline 0.45 BGC0002276
36.1 1 32,625 32,625 NRPS Tacrolimus 0.09 BGC0000353
49.1 6,235 82,487 76,253 Hybrid NRPS-T1PKS Burnettiene 0.70 BGC0002139
59.1 38,769 76,811 38,043 NRPS-like Orsellinic acid 0.11 BGC0002212
62.1 1 75,766 75,766 NRPS Asperphenamate 0.35 BGC0001517
67.1 1 1,796 17,960 Indole Haloduracin 0.13 BGC0000517
128.1 1 30,238 30,238 NRPS-like Aspulvinone E 0.33 BGC0002348
147.1 1 16,244 16,244 Terpene Carotenoid 0.32 BGC0000647
166.1 8,917 50,232 41,316 NRPS-like Fosfonochlorin 0.29 BGC0002670
213.1 1 4,359 43,590 Hybrid NRPS-T1PKS Depudecin 0.52 BGC0000046
220.1 1 34,909 34,909 NRPS Tenuazonic acid 0.19 BGC0002158
284.1 1 33,725 33,725 NRPS Surfactin 0.06 BGC0000433
301.1 9,196 33,476 24,281 betalactone Corynecin 0.17 BGC0002284
335.1 5,760 29,895 24,136 NRPS Kolossin 0.20 BGC0001641
361.1 1 26,852 26,852 NRPS-like Nidulanin A 0.17 BGC0001699
525.1 1 12,293 12,293 Terpene Fumihopaside A 0.18 BGC0002173
592.1 1 8,685 8,685 Terpene / / /
633.1 1 664 6,640 T1PKS 1,3,6,8-tetrahydroxynaphthalene 0.20 BGC0001258

AntiSMASH results are reported for each isolated strain (column 1). Columns 2–5 refer to the genomic region where the biosynthetic gene cluster (BGC) is found. Columns 6–9 report to the BGC class as predicted by AntiSMASH, associated products and most similar clusters, with the respective score, deposited in MIBiG.

3.3. Carbohydrate utilization profile and growth kinetics

Carbohydrate metabolism was assessed for the seven selected stains using API 50 Ch strips under aerobic conditions (Supplementary Table 3). According to our findings, R. colostri showed the capacity to catabolize different monosaccharides (namely, galactose, glucose, fructose, and mannose), several phenolic glycosidic compounds (i.e., amygdalin, esculin, and salicin), as well as the disaccharides maltose, lactose and sucrose. Similarly, C. oceanosediminis utilized various monosaccharides, including galactose, glucose, and fructose, phenolic glycosidic compounds, as well as several disaccharides, such as cellobiose, maltose, lactose, melibiose, and sucrose, and the plant-derived trisaccharide raffinose and starch. These findings indicate a broad in vitro capacity to degrade both amylaceous and cellulosic substrates, such as plant-associated carbohydrates and glycosides. Conversely, M. yunnannensis carbohydrate metabolism was limited to few disaccharides, such as maltose, sucrose, and trehalose. A. algicola utilized monosaccharides (galactose, glucose, fructose, and mannose), disaccharides (maltose, sucrose, and trehalose), the plant-derived trisaccharide melezitose, as well as starch and glycogen, indicating the potential to catabolize amylaceous substrates and plant carbohydrates. P. marcusii showed the broadest versatility, being able to metabolize several monosaccharides, both pentoses and hexoses, as well as plant-derived phenolic glycosides. In addition, P. marcusii utilized disaccharides and trisaccharides of plant origin, starch, and glycogen. Finally, Cladosporium was able to catabolize several plant-derived glycosidic phenolic compounds, including amygdalin, arbutin, esculin, and salicin, disaccharides, such as melibiose and trehalose, as well as the plant-derived trisaccharides melezitose and raffinose. These findings further support the capacity of Cladosporium to utilize structurally diverse plant-associated carbohydrates and glycosides under in vitro conditions. The observed ability of R. colostri, C. oceanosediminis, A. algicola, P. marcusii, and Cladosporium sp. strains to metabolize plant-derived carbohydrates is consistent with the diversity of CAZyme families, particularly glycoside hydrolases (GHs), identified in their genomes.

For six out of the seven selected strains, batch culture growth parameters were obtained (Table 3). For R. colostri, the specific growth rate (μ) in TBS medium at 20°C was 0.35 h−1, with a carrying capacity (K) of 7.28 absorbance units (AU). The estimated doubling time (t_d) was 1 h 59 min. For C. oceanosediminis, the μ in TBS medium at 30°C was 0.39 h−1, with a K of 3.87 AU, and estimated d_t 1 h 47 min. M. yunnannensis showed a μ of 0.3 h−1 (TBS, 30°C), with K = 19.7 AU and d_t = 2 h and 17 min. P. glacei growth parameters were μ = 0.31 h−1 (MB, 25°C), K = 8.67 AU, d = t = 2 h and 16 min. Kinetic parameters for A. algicola (MB, 30°C) were μ = 0.28 h−1, K = 7.28 AU, d_t = 2 h and 31 min. P. marcusii showed μ = 0.37 h−1 (MB, 25°C), K = 6.75 AU, and d_t = 1 h and 53 min.

TABLE 3.

Batch culture growth parameters of the selected strains.

Isolate Growth rate (μ) Carrying capacity (K) Doubling time Temperature Media
Rhodosporidiobolus colostri 0.35 h−1 7.28 1 h 59 min 20°C TSB
Cytobacillus oceanisediminis 0.39 h−1 3.87 1 h 47 min 30°C TSB
Alkalihalobacillus algicola 0.28 h−1 7.28 2 h 31 min 30°C MB
Micrococcus yunnanensis 0.30 h−1 19.7 2 h 17 min 30°C TSB
Paracoccus marcusii 0.37 h−1 6.75 1 h 53 min 25°C MB
Planococcus glaciei (strain 1) 0.31 h−1 8.67 2 h 16 min 25°C MB

Kinetic parameters of specific growth rate (μ), carrying capacity (K), and doubling time were obtained from fitting each strain growth on a logistic curve model. Carrying capacity is reported as an absorbance value. Abbreviations: TSB = triptone soya broth; MB = marine broth.

3.4. UPLC-MS profiles of secondary metabolites

UPLC-MS profiling of batch fermentation extracts revealed distinct secondary metabolites production potential across selected strains (Table 4). For R. colostri we detected antheraxanthin, torularhodin, adonirubin, and 2-hydroxytorularhodin, compounds belonging to the carotenoid family, a class of pigments responsible for yellow, orange, and red coloration, consistent with the characteristic pigmentation observed in this strain. C. oceanosediminis analysis detected (2R, 3S, 3’S)-2-hydroxy astaxanthin, echinenone, canthaxanthin (carotenoids), chrysophanol (anthraquinone), macrolactin H, and bacillaene. The presence of multiple carotenoids indicates an active carotenoid biosynthetic pathway, explaining the orange–red pigmentation observed in the biomass or crude extracts. In addition, chrysophanol may contribute to yellow–orange tones, potentially modulating the overall coloration when co-produced with carotenoids. A. algicola extracts analysis revealed the presence of chrysophanol, bacillaene, macrolactin H, surfactin A, 7-deoxypactamycin, difficidin, and bacilysin. In P. marcusii extracts, we detected ethyl troposulfenin, roseobacticide, paracentrone, tryptanthrin, rhamnolipid, adonirubin, 2-hydroxyastaxanthin, adonixanthin 3-glucoside, and adonixanthin, with the last four compounds belonging to the xanthophyll subclass of carotenoids and carrying extended conjugated double-bond systems, which absorb visible light and confer yellow, orange, or red coloration. P. glacei analysis detected histidyl-proline diketopiperazine, lisinopril R,S,S-diketopiperazine, the glycosylated apocarotenoid methyl 5-glucosyl-5,6-dihydro-apo-4,4’-lycopenoate, rhamnolipid, and decaprenoxanthin. The detection of both an apocarotenoid and decaprenoxanthin provides evidence of an active carotenoid biosynthetic pathway in P. glacei, supporting its yellow to orange coloration. For M. yunnannensis several secondary metabolites were detected, including carotenoids (2R, 3S, 3’S)-2-hydroxy astaxanthin, echinenone, adonirubin, and paracentrone, as well as several antimicrobial peptides, such as N-acetyldehydro-phe-pro diketopiperazine, phenylalanyl-prolyl diketopiperazine, histidyl-proline diketopiperazine, and the biosurfactant rhamnolipid. Finally, extracts of Cladosporium sp. revealed a remarkable diversity of secondary metabolites, including isocladosporin, cladosporin, endocrocin, 1,8-dihydroxynaphthalene, cladosacid, cladospolide, cladofulvin, 2-(4-hydroxy-1,3-dihydro-2-benzofuran-1-yl) acetic acid, 3-phenyllactic acid, cladosin, cladosporol, calphostin, cladochrome, haematocin, cladodionen, and cladosporiumin. Among these, several compounds (i.e., endocrocin, cladofulvin, and cladochrome) are polyketide-derived pigments (including anthraquinones and possibly melanin precursors) consistent with the well-known chromogenic potential of Cladosporium species.

TABLE 4.

Secondary metabolites production during batch fermentation of the selected strains.

Isolate Name Mass
Rhodosporidiobolus colostri Canthaxanthin 564.80
Adonirubin 580.80
Torularhodin 564.80
2-hydroxytorularhodin 580.80
Cytobacillus ocenosediminis Chysophanol 254.24
Canthaxanthin 564.80
(2R, 3S, 3S)-2-hydroxyastaxanthin 612.80
Bacillaene 580.80
Macrolactin H 402.50
Echinenone 550.90
Alkalihalobacillus algicola 7-Deoxypactamycin 542.60
Difficidin 544.70
Bacillaene 580.80
Macrolactin H 402.50
Surfactin A 1007.65
Bacilysin 270.28
Chysophanol 254.24
Micococcus yunnanensis (2R, 3S, 3S)-2-hydroxyastaxanthin 612.80
Echinenone 550.90
Adonirubin 580.80
Paracentrone 462.70
N-Acetyldehydro-phe-pro diketopiperazine 284.31
Phenylalanyl-prolyl diketopiperazine 244.29
Histidyl-proline diketopiperazine 248.28
Ramonolipid C10 334.40
Paracoccus marcusii Adonirubin 580.80
Paracentrone 462.70
Tryptanthrin 248.24
Roseobacticide H 362.40
Methyl troposulfenin 226.30
(2R, 3S, 3S)-2-hydroxyastaxanthin 612.80
Adonixanthin 3-glucoside 745.00
Adonixanthin 582.90
1-Tridecanol 398.70
Roseobacticide C 307.40
Rhamnolipid R1 650.80
Cladosporium sp. (strain 1) Calphostin 790.80
Cladochrome 774.80
Cladosporol 350.30
Isocladosporin 292.33
Cladosporin 292.33
Cladosporide 386.60
Cladosin 282.34
Cladosacid 250.33
Endocrocin 314.25
1,8-dihydroxynaphthalene 160.17
Cladofulvin 538.50
(+-)-3-Phenyllactic acid 166.17
2-(4-hydroxy-1,3-dihydro-2-benzofuran-1-yl) acetic acid 194.18
Cladospolide 228.28
Haematocin 502.60
Cladodionen 233.26
Cladosporiumin 349.40
Malettinin 288.29
Planococcus glaciei (strain 1) Decaprenoxanthin 705.10
5-glucosyl-5,6-dihydro-4,4′-diapolycopenene 766.30
Histidyl-proline diketopiperazine 248.28
Lisinopril R,S,S-diketopiperazine 387.50

Column two reports for all compounds identified via UPLC-MS for each strain. Column three reports mass values for the compounds as measured by Mass detector.

4. Discussion

In our work, we successfully isolated, identified, and characterized BNC-producing microorganisms from diverse natural ecosystems such as, a glacier, volcanic coastal marine sediments and different marine holobionts (B. europaea, C. inornata, and P. oceanica) living in proximity to natural CO2 emission sources. These ecosystems were selected as representative contexts favoring microbial with BNCs producing capabilities (Tyc et al., 2017). To enrich microbial taxa able to produce BNCs also in laboratory condition, a pigmentation-guided isolation strategy was employed. Our approach resulted in the isolation of 51 pigmented microorganisms (39 bacteria and 12 fungi) from five natural microbiomes, including a glacier ecosystem, volcanic coastal marine sediments, and host-associated microbiomes from corals (B. europaea and C. inornata) and the seagrass P. oceanica. Overall, the pigmented isolates displayed a substantial phylogenetic diversity and were distributed across three major phyla. Among bacteria, 14 isolates belonged to Bacillota, 8 to Pseudomonadota, and 4 to Actinomycetota. Fungal isolates were affiliated with two phyla, with 7 strains assigned to Ascomycota and 1 strain to Basidiomycota. The extensive phylogenetic diversity of the pigment-producing isolates underscores the widespread occurrence of pigment biosynthesis across bacterial and fungal taxa. This finding suggests that pigment production represents a common adaptive ecological trait in both environmental and host-associated microbiomes, rather than being restricted to particular evolutionary lineages or ecological niches. Seven pigmented isolates, representative of diverse isolation sources and colony colors, and exhibiting stable growth and consistent pigmentation in liquid culture, were selected for in-depth bioprospecting as candidate microbial cell factories for the sustainable production of pigments and bioactive compounds.

From the Presena Glacier, one red-pigmented isolate was selected for downstream analysis, identified as Rhodosporidiobolus colostri. Genomic assessment placed the isolate within the same clade as the reference strain R. colostri ASM5347719, with an ANI value of 99.05%. R. colostri is a cold-adapted, carotenoid-producing basidiomycetous yeast commonly associated with soil and plant-related habitats and capable of persisting in exposed, low-temperature environments such as alpine snow (Turchetti et al., 2018; Urbina and Aime, 2018). R. colostri whole genome sequencing revealed the presence of five BGCs, two of which were annotated as carotenoid-biosynthetic clusters. Consistent with the genome mining results, batch fermentation experiments demonstrated that this strain produces multiple carotenoids, including antheraxanthin, torularhodin, adonirubin, and 2-hydroxytorularhodin. These yellow-orange pigments are known to exert important biological functions, including photoprotection and resistance to oxidative stress (Sakaki et al., 2000; Sakaki et al., 2001; Maoka et al., 2013). Such functions are likely advantageous for survival in glacier ecosystems, where microorganisms are exposed to high levels of UV-radiation, low temperatures, and oxidative stress associated with freeze-thaw cycles (Rekadwad et al., 2024; Crosta et al., 2025). Beyond their ecological relevance, these compounds represent bio-based colorants with promising bioprospecting potential. Microbial carotenoids are increasingly investigated as sustainable alternatives to synthetic pigments for industrial applications, including dyes, food additives,

and cosmetics (Pereira Da Costa and Campos Miranda-Filho, 2020; Dasgupta Mandal and Majumdar, 2023). In this context, the R. colostri isolate demonstrated an impressive CAZymes diversity, as well as the ability to catabolize plant-derived phenolic compounds and plant disaccharides. Besides being consistent with adaptation to litter decomposition in alpine soils, these metabolic capabilities also support the potential of this strain as a candidate for sustainable biotechnological production processes, particularly in the valorization of plant-derived substrates and agro-industrial residues.

From volcanic coastal marine sediments, three pigmented microbial isolates were selected for in-depth bioprospecting. The first isolate, characterized by intense yellow pigmentation, was identified as Micrococcus yunnanensis and clustered within the same phylogenetic clade as the reference strain ASM529784. M. yunnanensis is a Gram-positive, aerobic actinobacterium belonging to the genus Micrococcus, typically isolated from diverse environmental habitats and known for its tolerance to stress conditions (Rasuk et al., 2017; Aroumougame, 2026). Whole genome sequencing of the isolate revealed six BGCs, three of which were associated with known BNC classes: (i) ectoine, known to confer protection against osmotic, oxidative, and thermal stress (Kunte et al., 2014); (ii) a β-lactone (quorum sensing related molecule); and (iii) a Ni-siderophore The capacity to produce Ni-binding siderophores may enhance the fitness of M. yunnanensis in volcanic coastal marine sediments by regulating nickel bioavailability, facilitating its acquisition as an essential micronutrient, and reducing metal toxicity through sequestration under high-nickel conditions. Consistent with genome mining predictions, metabolomic profiling of the batch fermentation broth revealed the presence of several secondary metabolites, including multiple carotenoids (zeaxanthin, astaxanthin, echinenone, adonirubin, adonixanthin, and paracentrone) and antimicrobial peptides (N-acetyldehydro-phe-pro diketopiperazine, phenylalanyl-prolyl diketopiperazine, and histidyl-proline diketopiperazine). The second isolate, exhibiting orange pigmentation, was identified as Alkalihalobacillus algicola. Notably, this isolate displayed an ANI value below the 95% threshold, suggesting that these isolates may represent novel genomic lineages. A. algicola is a Gram-positive, spore-forming, aerobic bacterium within the family Bacillaceae, typically associated with marine or saline environments and adapted to alkaline conditions (Ivanova et al., 2004; Joshi et al., 2022). Genome sequencing of this novel isolate revealed five distinct BGCs associated with several BNCs, including fumihopaside A, a triterpenoid glycoside reported to confer resistance to UV radiation and high temperature (Seo et al., 2024), carotenoids, alkylresorcinol, an antimicrobial-PKS (Kanda et al., 1975; Gadea et al., 2022), and a siderophore. Batch fermentation experiments confirmed the production of multiple bioactive secondary metabolites, including compounds with reported antibacterial, antiviral, and anti-inflammatory activities. Among these were the polyketide-derived macrolactin H, difficidin, and 7-deoxypactamycin, as well as the nonribosomal antimicrobial dipeptide bacilysin (Fazle Rabbee and Baek, 2020). Additionally, surfactin A, an NRPS-derived biosurfactant, and chrysophanol, a yellow orange anthraquinone-type polyketide with antioxidant properties (Shi et al., 2014; Duval et al., 2016), were detected. Finally, the third isolate from volcanic marine sediments, also exhibiting orange pigmentation, was assigned to Cytobacillus oceanisediminis. This strain displayed an ANI value below 95% compared with available reference genome, indicating a potentially novel genomic lineage within the species. Comparative genomic analyses revealed that this newly isolated C. oceanisediminis strain harbors substantial genomic novelty relative to currently available genomes. The marked genomic divergence observed in the isolate initially assigned to C. oceanisediminis suggests that it may represent a distinct genomic lineage and potentially belong to a different species, highlighting the need for further taxonomic investigation. C. oceanisediminis is a Gram-positive, rod-shaped, spore-forming, aerobic bacterium originally isolated from marine sediments inhabiting mesophilic and saline benthic environments (Zhang et al., 2010). Genome mining of this new isolate identified five BGCs associated with three main BNC classes: carotenoids, fumihopaside A, and alkylresorcinol, a phenolic polyketide with antimicrobial properties (Kanda et al., 1975; Gadea et al., 2022). Batch fermentation experiments confirmed the production of several secondary metabolites of potential industrial relevance. These included: (i) the carotenoids echinenone and canthaxanthin, yellow-orange pigments known for their antioxidant and photoprotective properties; (ii) antimicrobial polyketides such as macrolactin H and bacillaene (Karpiñski, 2019; Ortiz and Sansinenea, 2020; Miao et al., 2023; Pedroza-Padilla et al., 2025; Vasilchenko et al., 2025); and (iii) chrysophanol, an anthraquinone-type polyketide characterized by yellow-orange pigmentation and antioxidant activity (Shi et al., 2014; Duval et al., 2016). Taken together, our findings indicate that isolates from volcanic coastal marine sediments possess the capacity to synthesize a diverse portfolio of BNCs, including pigments, antimicrobial molecules, and antioxidants metabolites. Such metabolic versatility likely represents an adaptive response to the physiochemical characteristic of volcanic sediments’ environments. At the same time, the production of these bioactive compounds highlights the promising biotechnological potential of these microorganisms. In particular, the putative novel lineages identified within the A. algicola and C. oceanisediminis demonstrated a relevant glycobiome diversity, as well as the ability to metabolize amylaceous substrates and plant-derived carbohydrates. Besides conferring a selective advantage in marine sediments through the exploitation of the diverse carbon sources available within the sediment matrix, these catabolic capabilities also highlight the potential of these strains for sustainable biotechnological applications, particularly processes based on the conversion of renewable feedstocks into value-added products.

Selected isolates from host-associated microbiomes included the orange-pigmented Planococcus glaciei and Paracoccus marcusii, the former recovered from C. inornata and the latter from Posidonia oceanica, as well as the black-pigmented Cladosporium sp., isolated from C. inornata. Genomic analysis showed that the three strains clustered within the same clades as their respective reference genomes, namely ASM1336877 (98.40% ANI), ASM2862171 (97.58% ANI), and ASM5257632 (95.98% ANI), the latter corresponding to Cladosporium allicinum. P. glaciei is an aerobic Gram-positive bacterium that, to the best of our knowledge, has not previously been reported from coral tissues. Genome mining of the sequenced isolate predicted four BGCs, associated with the production of carotenoid compounds and the antimicrobial polyketide alkylresorcinol (Kanda et al., 1975; Gadea et al., 2022). Metabolomic analysis of the batch fermentation culture revealed the production of several yellow-orange carotenoids, including methyl 5-glucosyl-5,6-dihydro-apo-4,4′-lycopenoate and decaprenoxanthin. In addition, antimicrobial compounds were detected, such as the quorum-sensing disruptor histidyl-proline diketopiperazine (NRPS-derived) and the biosurfactant rhamnolipid (Chen et al., 2017; Zink et al., 2021; Bailly, 2025). Conversely, P. marcusii is a pigment-producing marine heterotroph previously isolated from marine crustaceans (Leinberger et al., 2021), although, to the best of our knowledge, it has not been reported from seagrass tissues. Our findings revealed broad biosynthetic potential for this strain. Whole genome sequencing identified nine BGCs, three of which were assigned to known BNC classes: alkylresorcinol, a PKS-deived antimicrobial compound (Kanda et al., 1975; Gadea et al., 2022), an obafluorin-like NRPS-PKS encoding a tRNA synthesis inhibitor (Scott et al., 2019), and a carotenoid. Consistent with these predictions, several secondary metabolites were detected during batch fermentation, including (i) the antibacterial polyketide troposulfenin (Phippen et al., 2019); (ii) aromatic antimicrobial compounds such as roseobacticide and paracentrone (Duan et al., 2020); (iii) the biosurfactant glycolipid rhamnolipid (Chen et al., 2017); and (iv) multiple pigments, including the yellow-orange carotenoids adonirubin, 2-hydroxyastaxanthin, and adonixanthin, as well as tryptanthrin, a yellow-orange alkaloid with reported antibacterial and antifungal activities (Jahng, 2013). Finally, Cladosporium allicinum is an environmental filamentous fungus typically associated with terrestrial habitats and airborne spore communities, although it has also been reported from marine sediments (Lee et al., 2023). Genome mining and fermentation metabolite profiling revealed an extensive biosynthetic repertoire in this isolate, with the detection of 26 BGCs encoding pigments and a wide range of antimicrobial compounds, supporting its role as a naturally optimized microbial cell factory capable of producing multiple classes of high-value secondary metabolites. Consistent with these predictions, several secondary metabolites were detected, including (i) multiple antimicrobial PKSs, such as isocladosporin, cladosporin, cladospolide, cladosporol, cladodionen, and cladosporiumin (Wang et al., 2020; Salvatore et al., 2021; Li H. et al., 2024); (ii) the orange-red pigmented anthraquinone endocrocin, whose ecological role remains incompletely understood but whose related compounds often contribute to UV protection (Raffa and Keller, 2019); and (iii) 1,8-dihydroxynaphthalene, a polyketide-derived precursor of melanin associated with brown to black pigmentation, involved in the protection against UV radiation and oxidative stress (Singh et al., 2021). Taken together, the characterization of isolates obtained from host-associated marine microbiomes highlight the ecological importance of microbial symbionts as protective partner within marine holobionts (Kanda et al., 1975; Duan et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2020; Salvatore et al., 2021; Singh et al., 2021; Gadea et al., 2022; Bailly, 2025). These microorganisms can provide hosts with a diverse arsenal of bioactive metabolites, including antimicrobial compounds for defense against pathogens and protective pigments that shield against UV radiation and oxidative stress. From a biotechnological perspective, this diversity represents a promising source of natural products for the sustainable production of new antimicrobials, preservatives, biomaterials, and natural pigments, the latter for applications in the cosmetic and textile sectors. In particular, the isolates belonging to the species P. mancusii and Cladosporium combine the capacity to produce multiple BNCs, a relevant diversity of CAZymes and the ability to metabolize plant-derived polysaccharides, thereby suggesting potential applications in circular and sustainable biotechnological production processes. From an ecological perspective, these catabolic capabilities may facilitate adaptation to marine holobionts, where coral mucus and algal exudates provide abundant carbohydrate-based nutrients that can support host colonization and persistence.

5. Conclusion

The integration of genomic and metabolomic approaches provides complementary information for the identification and characterization of microorganisms with biotechnological potential. While discrepancies between predicted and detected secondary metabolites may occur due to the complexity of BGC annotation and functional assignment, the combination of these approaches links biosynthetic potential to its actual in vitro expression, offering a more reliable assessment of the microorganisms’ biotechnological value. In our work, the combined genomic and metabolomic approach enabled the identification of diverse microorganisms from natural microbiomes with significant biotechnological potential. These strains represent promising microbial cell factories, combining biosynthetic potential for novel BNCs, robust biosynthetic capabilities in laboratory condition, rapid growth, stable biomass accumulation in liquid media, and the production of industrially relevant pigments and bioactive compounds. Among them, a C. allicinium strain isolated from the coral C. inornata emerged as a particularly promising candidate due to its extensive biosynthetic repertoire, including numerous antimicrobial compounds and pigmented anthraquinones. Similarly, a P. marcusii strain associated with the seagrass P. oceanica demonstrated the ability to produce multiple carotenoids from plant-derived substrates, highlighting its potential for sustainable pigment production. In addition, two putative novel genomic lineages affiliated with A. algicola and C. oceanosediminis, isolated from volcanic coastal marine sediments, exhibited strong potential for exploitation in circular bioprocesses aimed at the valorization of agro-industrial side streams into antimicrobials, biosurfactants, and pigmented anthraquinones and carotenoids. Such bio-based outputs could address multiple industrial demands, including pharmaceuticals, feed and food additives, cosmetics, and sustainable textile dyeing. Overall, these findings demonstrate how omics-driven discovery—supported by batch fermentation and scale-aware analytical workflows—can unlock new biotechnological potential of underexplored microbiomes, enabling the identification of metabolically versatile microorganisms capable of supporting circular bioprocessing strategies. By linking microbial diversity with functional biosynthetic capacity, this approach highlights natural microbiomes as valuable reservoirs of next-generation microbial cell factories supporting sustainable and circular bioprocessing strategies.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. Funded by the European Union, Next Generation EU, Mission 4, Component 2, Investment 3.3 (Ministerial Decree 117/2023) CUP J33C22001450009 and Trinovation Italy S.R.L. in Via Briantea 16-36010 Carré (VI), Italy.

Footnotes

Edited by: Basanta Kumar Biswal, National University of Singapore, Singapore

Reviewed by: Oier Etxebeste, University of the Basque Country, Spain

Pablo de Jesus Suárez-Moo, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico

Data availability statement

All sequencing data are openly available in European Nucleotide Archive (ENA), reference number PRJEB112291.

Author contributions

AD’A: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft. GP: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – original draft. SR: Writing – review & editing. DL: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. DS: Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing. RD: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. AM: Writing – review & editing. TD: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. MP: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. CC: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. AM: Writing – review & editing. SG: Writing – review & editing. EP: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. JF: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. MC: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – original draft.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that Generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2026.1872113/full#supplementary-material

Data_Sheet_1.pdf (346.5KB, pdf)
Data_Sheet_2.pdf (171.4KB, pdf)
Data_Sheet_3.pdf (204.2KB, pdf)
Data_Sheet_4.pdf (165.9KB, pdf)
Data_Sheet_5.pdf (2.1MB, pdf)
Table_1.xlsx (38.5KB, xlsx)

References

  1. Ackacha M. A., Połeć-Pawlak K., Jarosz M. (2003). Identification of anthraquinone coloring matters in natural red dyestuffs by high performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet and electrospray mass spectrometric detection. J. Separat. Sci. 26 1028–1034. 10.1002/jssc.200301484 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Al-Obaidi J. R., Alobaidi K. H., Al-Taie B. S., Wee D. H.-S., Hussain H., Jambari N. N., et al. (2021). Uncovering prospective role and applications of existing and new nutraceuticals from bacterial, fungal, algal and cyanobacterial, and plant sources. Sustainability 13:3671. 10.3390/su13073671 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Altschul S. F., Gish W., Miller W., Myers E. W., Lipman D. J. (1990). Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215 403–410. 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Aroumougame S. (2026). The cytotoxic effect of a carotenoid pigment from the marine isolate Micrococcus yunnanensis SB2 on the proliferation of cancer cells. Next Res. 5:101312. 10.1016/j.nexres.2026.101312 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Atanasov A. G., Zotchev S. B., Dirsch V. M., Orhan I. E., Banach M., Rollinger J. M., et al. (2021). Natural products in drug discovery: Advances and opportunities. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 20 200–216. 10.1038/s41573-020-00114-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bailly C. (2025). Insights into the bioactivities and mechanism of action of the microbial diketopiperazine cyclic dipeptide Cyclo(L-leucyl-L-prolyl). Mar. Drugs 23:397. 10.3390/md23100397 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Barrera Vázquez M. F., Comini L. R., Martini R. E., Núñez Montoya S. C., Bottini S., Cabrera J. L. (2014). Comparisons between conventional, ultrasound-assisted and microwave-assisted methods for extraction of anthraquinones from Heterophyllaea pustulata Hook f. (Rubiaceae). Ultrason. Sonochem. 21 478–484. 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2013.08.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Barsby J. P., Cowley J. M., Leemaqz S. Y., Grieger J. A., McKeating D. R., Perkins A. V., et al. (2021). Nutritional properties of selected superfood extracts and their potential health benefits. PeerJ 9:e12525. 10.7717/peerj.12525 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Blin K., Shaw S., Medema M. H., Weber T. (2023). The antiSMASH database version 4: Additional genomes and BGCs, new sequence-based searches and more. Nucleic Acids Res. 52 D586–D589. 10.1093/nar/gkad984 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Capella-Gutiérrez S., Silla-Martínez J. M., Gabaldón T. (2009). trimAl: A tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 25 1972–1973. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp348 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cassarino C., Mancuso A., Prada F., Sani T., Dall’Ara S., Wallnoefer O., et al. (2025). Newly discovered CO2 (carbon dioxide) vent cave drives r-strategy shift in a Mediterranean aphotoendosymbiotic coral. Sci. Total Environ. 1005:180858. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.180858 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chaumeil P. A., Mussig A. J., Hugenholtz P., Parks D. H. (2020). GTDB-Tk: A toolkit to classify genomes with the Genome Taxonomy Database. Bioinformatics 36 1925–1927. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz848 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chen D., Rojas M., Samset B. H., Cobb K., Niang A. D., Edwards P., et al. (2021). “Framing, context, and methods Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis,” in Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, eds Masson-Delmotte V., et al. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; ). [Google Scholar]
  14. Chen J., Wu Q., Hua Y., Chen J., Zhang H., Wang H. (2017). Potential applications of biosurfactant rhamnolipids in agriculture and biomedicine. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 101 8309–8319. 10.1007/s00253-017-8554-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Chen S., Zhou Y., Chen Y., Gu J. (2018). fastp: An ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34 i884–i890. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Chia S. R., Chew K. W., Leong H. Y., Manickam S., Show P. L., Nguyen T. H. P. (2020). Sonoprocessing-assisted solvent extraction for the recovery of pigment-protein complex from Spirulina platensis. Chem. Eng. J. 398:125613. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.125613 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Cimermancic P., Medema M. H., Claesen J., Kurita K., Wieland Brown L. C., Mavrommatis K., et al. (2014). Insights into secondary metabolism from a global analysis of prokaryotic biosynthetic gene clusters. Cell 158 412–421. 10.1016/j.cell.2014.06.034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Crosta A., Valle B., Caccianiga M., Gobbi M., Ficetola F. G., Pittino F., et al. (2025). Ecological interactions in glacier environments: A review of studies on a model Alpine glacier. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 100 227–244. 10.1111/brv.13138 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Dasgupta Mandal D., Majumdar S. (2023). Bacteria as biofactory of pigments: Evolution beyond therapeutics and biotechnological advancements. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 135 349–358. 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2023.01.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. De Oliveira D. P., Zanoni M. V., Chequer F., Oliveira G., Cardoso J., Ferraz E. (2013). “Textile dyes: Dyeing process and environmental impact” in Eco-Friendly Textile Dyeing and Finishing, ed. Günay M. (London: InTech; ), 151. [Google Scholar]
  21. Denaro M., Smeriglio A., Barreca D., De Francesco C., Occhiuto C., Milano G., et al. (2020). Antiviral activity of plants and their isolated bioactive compounds: An update. Phytother. Res. 34 742–768. 10.1002/ptr.6575 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Duan Y., Petzold M., Saleem-Batcha R., Teufel R. (2020). Bacterial tropone natural products and derivatives: Overview of their biosynthesis, bioactivities, ecological role and biotechnological potential. Chembiochem 21 2384–2407. 10.1002/cbic.201900786 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Duval J., Pecher V., Poujol M., Lesellier E. (2016). Research advances for the extraction, analysis and uses of anthraquinones: A review. Indust. Crops Products 94 812–833. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.09.056 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Fazle Rabbee M., Baek K. H. (2020). Antimicrobial activities of lipopeptides and polyketides of Bacillus velezensis for agricultural applications. Molecules 25:4973. 10.3390/molecules25214973 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Firn R. D., Jones C. G. (2000). The evolution of secondary metabolism - a unifying model. Mol. Microbiol. 37 989–994. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.02098.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Gadea A., Khazem M., Gaslonde T. (2022). Current knowledge on chemistry of proteaceae family, and biological activities of their bis-5-alkylresorcinol derivatives. Phytochem. Rev. 21 1969–2005. 10.1007/s11101-022-09821-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Gurevich A., Saveliev V., Vyahhi N., Tesler G. (2013). QUAST: Quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29 1072–1075. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Gurkok S. (2022). A novel carotenoid from Metabacillus idriensis LipT27: Production, extraction, partial characterization, biological activities and use in textile dyeing. Arch. Microbiol. 204:296. 10.1007/s00203-022-02922-w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Hyatt D., Chen G. L., Locascio P. F., Land M. L., Larimer F. W., Hauser L. J. (2010). Prodigal: Prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinform. 11:119. 10.1186/1471-2105-11-119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ivanova E. P., Alexeeva Y. A., Zhukova N. V., Gorshkova N. M., Buljan V., Nicolau D. V., et al. (2004). Bacillus algicola sp. nov., a novel filamentous organism isolated from brown alga Fucus evanescens. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 27 301–307. 10.1078/0723-2020-00269 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Jahng Y. (2013). Progress in the studies on tryptanthrin, an alkaloid of history. Arch. Pharm. Res. 36 517–535. 10.1007/s12272-013-0091-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Jin L., Quan C., Hou X., Fan S. (2016). Potential pharmacological resources: Natural bioactive compounds from marine-derived fungi. Mar. Drugs 14:76. 10.3390/md14040076 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Joshi A., Thite S., Karodi P., Joseph N., Lodha T. (2022). Corrigendum: Alkalihalobacterium elongatum gen. nov. sp. nov.: An antibiotic-producing bacterium isolated from lonar lake and reclassification of the genus alkalihalobacillus into seven novel genera. Front. Microbiol. 13:871596. 10.3389/fmicb.2022.871596 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Kanda N., Ishizaki N., Inoue N., Oshima M., Handa A. (1975). DB-2073, a new alkylresorcinol antibiotic. I. Taxonomy, isolation and characterization. J. Antibiot. 28 935–942. 10.7164/antibiotics.28.935 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Karpiñski T. M. (2019). Marine macrolides with antibacterial and/or antifungal activity. Mar. Drugs 17:241. 10.3390/md17040241 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Katoh K., Standley D. M. (2013). MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30 772–780. 10.1093/molbev/mst010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Kerfahi D., Hall-Spencer J. M., Tripathi B. M., Milazzo M., Lee J., Adams J. M. (2014). Shallow water marine sediment bacterial community shifts along a natural CO2 gradient in the Mediterranean Sea off Vulcano. Italy. Microb. Ecol. 67 819–828. 10.1007/s00248-014-0368-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Khan A. A., Bacha N., Ahmad B., Lutfullah G., Farooq U., Cox R. J. (2014). Fungi as chemical industries and genetic engineering for the production of biologically active secondary metabolites. Asian Pacific J. Trop. Biomed. 4 859–870. 10.12980/APJTB.4.2014APJTB-2014-0230 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Kim S., Chen J., Cheng T., Gindulyte A., He J., He S., et al. (2025). PubChem 2025 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 53 D1516–D1525. 10.1093/nar/gkae1059 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Kjer J., Debbab A., Aly A. H., Proksch P. (2010). Methods for isolation of marine-derived endophytic fungi and their bioactive secondary products. Nat. Protoc. 5 479–490. 10.1038/nprot.2009.233 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Kunte H., Lentzen G., Galinski E. (2014). Industrial production of the cell protectant ectoine: Protection mechanisms, processes, and products. Curr. Biotechnol. 3 10–25. 10.2174/22115501113026660037 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Leccese S., Calcinoni A., Wilson A., Kirilovsky D., Carbonera D., Onfroy T., et al. (2023). Orange carotenoid protein in mesoporous silica: A new system towards the development of colorimetric and fluorescent sensors for ph and temperature. Micromachines 14:1871. 10.3390/mi14101871 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Lech K., Jarosz M. (2011). Novel methodology for the extraction and identification of natural dyestuffs in historical textiles by HPLC-UV-Vis-ESI MS. Case study: Chasubles from the Wawel Cathedral collection. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 399 3241–3251. 10.1007/s00216-010-4591-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Lee W., Kim J. S., Seo C. W., Lee J. W., Kim S. H., Cho Y., et al. (2023). Diversity of Cladosporium (Cladosporiales, Cladosporiaceae) species in marine environments and report on five new species. MycoKeys 98 87–111. 10.3897/mycokeys.98.101918 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Leinberger J., Holste J., Bunk B., Freese H. M., Spröer C., Dlugosch L., et al. (2021). High potential for secondary metabolite production of Paracoccus marcusii CP157. isolated from the Crustacean Cancer pagurus. Front. Microbiol. 12:688754. 10.3389/fmicb.2021.688754 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Li H., Ding W., Zhang Q. (2024). Discovery and engineering of ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptide (RiPP) natural products. RSC Chem. Biol. 5 90–108. 10.1039/d3cb00172e [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Li Y., Wang Y., Wang H., Shi T., Wang B. (2024). The genus cladosporium: A prospective producer of natural products. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 25:1652. 10.3390/ijms25031652 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. López-Rodríguez R., Domínguez L., Fernández-Ruiz V., Cámara M. (2022). Extracts rich in nutrients as novel food ingredients to be used in food supplements: A proposal classification. Nutrients 14:3194. 10.3390/nu14153194 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Manni M., Berkeley M. R., Seppey M., Simão F. A., Zdobnov E. M. (2021). BUSCO update: Novel and streamlined workflows along with broader and deeper phylogenetic coverage for scoring of eukaryotic, prokaryotic, and viral genomes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 38 4647–4654. 10.1093/molbev/msab199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Maoka T., Yasui H., Ohmori A., Tokuda H., Suzuki N., Osawa A., et al. (2013). Anti-oxidative, anti-tumor-promoting, and anti-carcinogenic activities of adonirubin and adonixanthin. J. Oleo Sci. 62 181–186. 10.5650/jos.62.181 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Miao S., Liang J., Xu Y., Yu G., Shao M. (2023). Bacillaene, sharp objects consist in the arsenal of antibiotics produced by Bacillus. J. Cell Physiol. 239:e30974. 10.1002/jcp.30974 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Minh B. Q., Schmidt H. A., Chernomor O., Schrempf D., Woodhams M. D., von Haeseler A., et al. (2020). 2: New models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Mol. Biol. Evol. 37 1530–1534. 10.1093/molbev/msaa015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Mortazavi R., Attiya S., Ariya P. (2014). A next generation sequencing of Arctic bacteria in snow and frost flowers: Identification, abundance and freezing nucleation. Atmospheric Chem. Phys. Discuss. 14 32093–32131. 10.5194/acpd-14-32093-2014 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  54. Mortazavi R., Hayes C. T., Ariya P. A. (2008). Ice nucleation activity of bacteria isolated from snow compared with organic and inorganic substrates. Environ. Chem. 5 373–381. 10.1071/EN08055 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. Mussagy C. U., Khan S., Kot A. M. (2022). Current developments on the application of microbial carotenoids as an alternative to synthetic pigments. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 62 6932–6946. 10.1080/10408398.2021.1908222 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Newman D. J., Cragg G. M. (2016). Natural products as sources of new drugs from 1981 to 2014. J. Nat. Prod. 79 629–661. 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.5b01055 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Oksanen J., Blanchet F. G., Kindt R., Legendre P., Minchin P. R., O’hara R. B., et al. (2013). Package ‘vegan’. Community ecology package, version. [Google Scholar]
  58. Oldfield E., Lin F. Y. (2012). Terpene biosynthesis: Modularity rules. Angew Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 51 1124–1137. 10.1002/anie.201103110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Olm M. R., Brown C. T., Brooks B., Banfield J. F. (2017). dRep: A tool for fast and accurate genomic comparisons that enables improved genome recovery from metagenomes through de-replication. ISME J. 11 2864–2868. 10.1038/ismej.2017.126 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Ortiz A., Sansinenea E. (2020). Macrolactin antibiotics: Amazing natural products. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 20 584–600. 10.2174/1389557519666191205124050 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Pailliè-Jiménez M. E., Stincone P., Brandelli A. (2020). Natural pigments of microbial origin. Front. Sustainable Food Syst. 4:590439. 10.3389/fsufs.2020.590439 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  62. Palladino G., Caroselli E., Tavella T., D’Amico F., Prada F., Mancuso A., et al. (2022). Metagenomic shifts in mucus, tissue and skeleton of the coral Balanophyllia europaea living along a natural CO2 gradient. ISME Commun. 2:65. 10.1038/s43705-022-00152-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Palmer J. M., Stajich J. (2020). Funannotate v1. 8.1: Eukaryotic Genome Annotation. Zenodo: Geneva. [Google Scholar]
  64. Paradis E., Schliep K. (2019). ape 5.0: An environment for modern phylogenetics and evolutionary analyses in R. Bioinformatics 35 526–528. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty633 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Patel A., Arora N., Pruthi V., Pruthi P. A. A. (2019). novel rapid ultrasonication-microwave treatment for total lipid extraction from wet oleaginous yeast biomass for sustainable biodiesel production. Ultrason. Sonochem. 51 504–516. 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2018.05.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Pedroza-Padilla C. J., Orduz S., Moraes L. A. B. (2025). Isolation and identification of antimicrobial compounds produced by Bacillus nakamurai CBAS-959 and their activity against phytopathogenic bacteria. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agriculture 12:11. 10.1186/s40538-025-00828-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  67. Pereira Da Costa D., Campos Miranda-Filho K. (2020). The use of carotenoid pigments as food additives for aquatic organisms and their functional roles. Rev. Aquaculture 12 1567–1578. 10.1111/raq.12398 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  68. Phippen C. B. W., Jørgensen C. M., Bentzon-Tilia M., Gotfredsen C. H., Larsen T. O., Gram L., et al. (2019). Isolation of Methyl Troposulfenin from Phaeobacter inhibens. J. Nat. Prod. 82 1387–1390. 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.8b01097 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Radovanović N., Milutinović M., Mihajlovski K., Jović J., Nastasijević B., Rajilić-Stojanović M., et al. (2018). Biocontrol and plant stimulating potential of novel strain Bacillus sp. PPM3 isolated from marine sediment. Microb. Pathog 120 71–78. 10.1016/j.micpath.2018.04.056 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Raffa N., Keller N. P. (2019). A call to arms: Mustering secondary metabolites for success and survival of an opportunistic pathogen. PLoS Pathog 15:e1007606. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007606 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Rasuk M. C., Ferrer G. M., Kurth D., Portero L. R., Farías M. E., Albarracín V. H. (2017). UV-Resistant actinobacteria from high-altitude andean lakes: Isolation, characterization and antagonistic activities. Photochem. Photobiol. 93 865–880. 10.1111/php.12759 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Rausch T., Fritz M. H., Untergasser A., Benes V. (2020). Tracy: Basecalling, alignment, assembly and deconvolution of sanger chromatogram trace files. BMC Genom. 21:230. 10.1186/s12864-020-6635-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Rekadwad B. N., Shouche Y. S., Jangid K. (2024). Exploring glaciers and glacier environments as potential habitats for cold-loving bacterial taxa with diverse industrial and environmental implications. Environ. Sustainabil. 7 279–286. 10.1007/s42398-024-00319-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  74. Romanenko L., Otstavnykh N., Tanaka N., Kurilenko V., Svetashev V., Tekutyeva L., et al. (2023). Characterization and Genomic Analysis of Fererhizobium litorale gen. nov., sp. nov., Isolated from the Sandy Sediments of the Sea of Japan Seashore. Microorganisms 11:2385. 10.3390/microorganisms11102385 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Roy S., Deshmukh R. K., Tripathi S., Gaikwad K. K., Das S. S., Sharma D. (2023). Recent advances in the carotenoids added to food packaging films: A review. Foods 12:4011. 10.3390/foods12214011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Rusch A., Walpersdorf E., deBeer D., Gurrieri S., Amend J. P. (2005). Microbial communities near the oxic/anoxic interface in the hydrothermal system of Vulcano Island, Italy. Chem. Geol. 224 169–182. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2005.07.026 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  77. Sakaki H., Nakanishi T., Komemushi S., Namikawa K., Miki W. (2001). Torularhodin as a potent scavenger against peroxyl radicals isolated from a soil yeast, Rhodotorula glutinis. J. Clin. Biochem. Nutrit. 30 1–10. 10.3164/jcbn.30.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  78. Sakaki H., Nakanishi T., Satonaka K., Miki W., Fujita T., Komemushi S. (2000). Properties of a high-torularhodin-producing mutant of Rhodotorula glutinis cultivated under oxidative stress. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 89 203–205. 10.1016/s1389-1723(00)88739-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Salvatore M. M., Andolfi A., Nicoletti R. (2021). The genus cladosporium: A rich source of diverse and bioactive natural compounds. Molecules 26:3959. 10.3390/molecules26133959 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Scott T. A., Batey S. F. D., Wiencek P., Chandra G., Alt S., Francklyn C. S., et al. (2019). Immunity-Guided identification of Threonyl-tRNA synthetase as the molecular target of obafluorin, a β-lactone antibiotic. ACS Chem. Biol. 14 2663–2671. 10.1021/acschembio.9b00590 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Sedkova N., Tao L., Rouvière P. E., Cheng Q. (2005). Diversity of carotenoid synthesis gene clusters from environmental Enterobacteriaceae strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71 8141–8146. 10.1128/AEM.71.12.8141-8146.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Seemann T. (2014). Prokka: Rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30 2068–2069. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Seo H. W., Wassano N. S., Amir Rawa M. S., Nickles G. R., Damasio A., Keller N. P. (2024). A timeline of biosynthetic gene cluster discovery in Aspergillus fumigatus: From characterization to future perspectives. J. Fungi 10:266. 10.3390/jof10040266 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Sharma N., Shekhar P., Kumar V., Kaur H., Jayasena V. (2024). Microbial pigments: Sources, current status, future challenges in cosmetics and therapeutic applications. J. Basic Microbiol. 64 4–21. 10.1002/jobm.202300214 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Shi Y. B., Li H. L., Wang H. Q., Yang Y. B., Zhang X. Y., Wang H., et al. (2014). Simultaneous determination of five anthraquinones in a Chinese traditional preparation by RP-HPLC using an improved extraction procedure. J. Integr. Med. 12 455–462. 10.1016/S2095-4964(14)60037-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Singh S., Nimse S. B., Mathew D. E., Dhimmar A., Sahastrabudhe H., Gajjar A., et al. (2021). Microbial melanin: Recent advances in biosynthesis, extraction, characterization, and applications. Biotechnol. Adv. 53:107773. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2021.107773 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Sprouffske K., Wagner A. (2016). Growthcurver: An R package for obtaining interpretable metrics from microbial growth curves. BMC Bioinform. 17:172. 10.1186/s12859-016-1016-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Susilowati P. E., Ardianti D., Kartini S., Sudiana I. N., Zaeni A. (2021). Isolation of ureolytic bacteria of soft coral and their potential in Microbially Induced Calcite Precipitation (MICP). J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1899:012003. 10.1088/1742-6596/1899/1/012003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  89. Tonkin-Hill G., MacAlasdair N., Ruis C., Weimann A., Horesh G., Lees J. A., et al. (2020). Producing polished prokaryotic pangenomes with the Panaroo pipeline. Genome Biol. 21:180. 10.1186/s13059-020-02090-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Turchetti B., Selbmann L., Gunde-Cimerman N., Buzzini P., Sampaio J. P., Zalar P. (2018). Cystobasidium alpinum sp. nov. and Rhodosporidiobolus oreadorum sp. nov. from European Cold environments and arctic region. Life 8:9. 10.3390/life8020009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Tyc O., Song C., Dickschat J. S., Vos M., Garbeva P. (2017). The ecological role of volatile and soluble secondary metabolites produced by soil bacteria. Trends Microbiol. 25 280–292. 10.1016/j.tim.2016.12.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Urbina H., Aime M. C. (2018). A closer look at sporidiobolales: Ubiquitous microbial community members of plant and food biospheres. Mycologia 110 79–92. 10.1080/00275514.2018.1438020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Vasilchenko A. S., Lukyanov D. A., Dilbaryan D. S., Usachev K. S., Poshvina D. V., Taldaev A. K., et al. (2025). Macrolactin a is an inhibitor of protein biosynthesis in bacteria. Biochimie 232 25–34. 10.1016/j.biochi.2025.01.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Wang G., Liu J., Li Y., Li J., Luo J., Chen B., et al. (2022). Description of Prasinibacter corallicola gen. nov., sp. nov., a zeaxanthin-producing bacterium isolated from stony coral Porites lutea. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 115 933–941. 10.1007/s10482-022-01747-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Wang M., Zhao L., Wu H., Zhao C., Gong Q., Yu W. (2020). Cladodionen is a potential quorum sensing inhibitor against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mar. Drugs 18:205. 10.3390/md18040205 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Wick R. R., Judd L. M., Gorrie C. L., Holt K. E. (2017). Unicycler: Resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput. Biol. 13:e1005595. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Wickham H. (2016). ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Cham: Springer international publishing. [Google Scholar]
  98. Williams D. H., Maplestone R. A. (1992). Why are secondary metabolites biosynthesized? Sophistication in the inhibition of cell wall biosynthesis by vancomycin group antibiotics. Ciba Found Symp. 171 45–59; discussion 59–63. 10.1002/9780470514344.ch4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Williams D. H., Stone M. J., Hauck P. R., Rahman S. K. (1989). Why are secondary metabolites (natural products) biosynthesized? J. Nat. Prod. 52 1189–1208. 10.1021/np50066a001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Yu G., Smith D. K., Zhu H., Guan Y., Lam T. T. Y. (2017). ggtree: An R package for visualization and annotation of phylogenetic trees with their covariates and other associated data. Methods Ecol. Evol. 8 28–36. 10.1111/2041-210X.12628 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  101. Zdobnov E. M., Kuznetsov D., Tegenfeldt F., Manni M., Berkeley M., Kriventseva E. V. (2021). OrthoDB in 2020: Evolutionary and functional annotations of orthologs. Nucleic Acids Res. 49 D389–D393. 10.1093/nar/gkaa1009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Zdouc M. M., van der Hooft J. J. J., Medema M. H. (2023). Metabolome-guided genome mining of RiPP natural products. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 44 532–541. 10.1016/j.tips.2023.06.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Zhang J., Wang J., Fang C., Song F., Xin Y., Qu L., et al. (2010). Bacillus oceanisediminis sp. nov., isolated from marine sediment. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 60 2924–2929. 10.1099/ijs.0.019851-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Zheng J., Ge Q., Yan Y., Zhang X., Huang L., Yin Y. (2023). dbCAN3: Automated carbohydrate-active enzyme and substrate annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 51 W115–W121. 10.1093/nar/gkad328 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Zink K. E., Ludvik D. A., Lazzara P. R., Moore T. W., Mandel M. J., Sanchez L. M. (2021). A small molecule coordinates symbiotic behaviors in a host organ. mBio 12:e03637-20. 10.1128/mBio.03637-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data_Sheet_1.pdf (346.5KB, pdf)
Data_Sheet_2.pdf (171.4KB, pdf)
Data_Sheet_3.pdf (204.2KB, pdf)
Data_Sheet_4.pdf (165.9KB, pdf)
Data_Sheet_5.pdf (2.1MB, pdf)
Table_1.xlsx (38.5KB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement

All sequencing data are openly available in European Nucleotide Archive (ENA), reference number PRJEB112291.


Articles from Frontiers in Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES