Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1989 Mar;51(2):259–276. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1989.51-259

Discrimination theory of rule-governed behavior

Daniel T Cerutti
PMCID: PMC1338855  PMID: 16812579

Abstract

In rule-governed behavior, previously established elementary discriminations are combined in complex instructions and thus result in complex behavior. Discriminative combining and recombining of responses produce behavior with characteristics differing from those of behavior that is established through the effects of its direct consequences. For example, responding in instructed discrimination may be occasioned by discriminative stimuli that are temporally and situationally removed from the circumstances under which the discrimination is instructed. The present account illustrates properties of rule-governed behavior with examples from research in instructional control and imitation learning. Units of instructed behavior, circumstances controlling compliance with instructions, and rule-governed problem solving are considered.

Keywords: discrimination, rule-governed behavior, contingency-shaped behavior, instructed discrimination, collateral contingencies, performance description, contingency description, compliance, problem solving

Full text

PDF
259

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. AYLLON T., AZRIN N. H. REINFORCEMENT AND INSTRUCTIONS WITH MENTAL PATIENTS. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 Jul;7:327–331. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Azrin N. H. Some Effects of Noise on Human Behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1958 Apr;1(2):183–200. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1958.1-183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BANDURA A. INFLUENCE OF MODEL'S REINFORCEMENT CONTINGENCIES ON THE ACQUISITION OF IMITATIVE RESPONSES. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1965 Jun;1:589–595. doi: 10.1037/h0022070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baer D. M., Peterson R. F., Sherman J. A. The development of imitation by reinforcing behavioral similarity to a model. J Exp Anal Behav. 1967 Sep;10(5):405–416. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1967.10-405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bem S. L. Verbal self-control: the establishment of effective self-instruction. J Exp Psychol. 1967 Aug;74(4):485–491. doi: 10.1037/h0024822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bentall R. P., Lowe C. F., Beasty A. The role of verbal behavior in human learning: II. Developmental differences. J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 Mar;43(2):165–181. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.43-165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Burgess R. L., Burgess J. M., Esveldt K. C. An analysis of generalized imitation. J Appl Behav Anal. 1970 Spring;3(1):39–46. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1970.3-39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Catania A. C., Matthews B. A., Shimoff E. Instructed versus shaped human verbal behavior: Interactions with nonverbal responding. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Nov;38(3):233–248. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.38-233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Constantine B., Sidman M. Role of naming in delayed matching-to-sample. Am J Ment Defic. 1975 May;79(6):680–689. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Foss D. J. An analysis of learning in a miniature linguistic system. J Exp Psychol. 1968 Mar;76(3):450–459. doi: 10.1037/h0025506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. GRINGS W. W., LOCKHART R. A. EFFECTS OF ''ANXIETY-LESSENING'' INSTRUCTIONS AND DIFFERENTIAL SET OF DEVELOPMENT ON THE EXTINCTION OF GSR. J Exp Psychol. 1963 Sep;66:292–299. doi: 10.1037/h0045094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Galizio M. Contingency-shaped and rule-governed behavior: instructional control of human loss avoidance. J Exp Anal Behav. 1979 Jan;31(1):53–70. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1979.31-53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Garcia E., Baer D. M., Firestone I. The development of generalized imitation within topographically determined boundaries. J Appl Behav Anal. 1971 Summer;4(2):101–112. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1971.4-101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Goldstein H. Training generative repertoires within agent-action-object miniature linguistic systems with children. J Speech Hear Res. 1983 Mar;26(1):76–89. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2601.76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hayes S. C., Brownstein A. J., Zettle R. D., Rosenfarb I., Korn Z. Rule-governed behavior and sensitivity to changing consequences of responding. J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 May;45(3):237–256. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.45-237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hayes S. C., Rosenfarb I., Wulfert E., Munt E. D., Korn Z., Zettle R. D. Self-reinforcement effects: An artifact of social standard setting? J Appl Behav Anal. 1985 Fall;18(3):201–214. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1985.18-201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Herman L. M., Richards D. G., Wolz J. P. Comprehension of sentences by bottlenosed dolphins. Cognition. 1984 Mar;16(2):129–219. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(84)90003-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. LOVAAS O. I. CUE PROPERTIES OF WORDS: THE CONTROL OF OPERANT RESPONDING BY RATE AND CONTENT OF VERBAL OPERANTS. Child Dev. 1964 Mar;35:245–256. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1964.tb05934.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lowe C. F., Beasty A., Bentall R. P. The role of verbal behavior in human learning: infant performance on fixed-interval schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 Jan;39(1):157–164. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1983.39-157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lowe C. F., Harzem P., Bagshaw M. Species differences in temporal control of behavior II: human performance. J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 May;29(3):351–361. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.29-351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lowe C. F., Harzem P., Hughes S. Determinats of operant behavior in humans: some differences from animals. Q J Exp Psychol. 1978 May;30(2):373–386. doi: 10.1080/14640747808400684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. MILGRAM S. BEHAVIORAL STUDY OF OBEDIENCE. J Abnorm Psychol. 1963 Oct;67:371–378. doi: 10.1037/h0040525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Martin J. A. The effect of incongruent instructions and consequences on imitation in retarded children. J Appl Behav Anal. 1972 Winter;5(4):467–475. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1972.5-467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Matthews B. A., Catania A. C., Shimoff E. Effects of uninstructed verbal behavior on nonverbal responding: Contingency descriptions versus performance descriptions. J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 Mar;43(2):155–164. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.43-155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Matthews B. A., Shimoff E., Catania A. C., Sagvolden T. Uninstructed human responding: sensitivity to ratio and interval contingencies. J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 May;27(3):453–467. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1977.27-453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Michael J. Distinguishing between discriminative and motivational functions of stimuli. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Jan;37(1):149–155. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.37-149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Miller L. K. Some punishing effects of response-force. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Mar;13(2):215–220. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ollendick T. H., Dailey D., Shapiro E. S. Vicarious reinforcement: Expected and unexpected effects. J Appl Behav Anal. 1983 Winter;16(4):485–491. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1983.16-485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1979.31-161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  30. Premack D. A functional analysis of language. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Jul;14(1):107–125. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.14-107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Risley T. R., Hart B. Developing correspondence between the non-verbal and verbal behavior of preschool children. J Appl Behav Anal. 1968 Winter;1(4):267–281. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Scobie S. R., Kaufman A. Intermittent punishment of human responding maintained by intermittent reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Jan;12(1):137–147. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Shimoff E., Catania A. C., Matthews B. A. Uninstructed human responding: Sensitivity of low-rate performance to schedule contingencies. J Exp Anal Behav. 1981 Sep;36(2):207–220. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1981.36-207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Shimoff E., Matthews B. A., Catania A. C. Human operant performance: Sensitivity and pseudosensitivity to contingencies. J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 Sep;46(2):149–157. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.46-149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Sidman M., Cresson O., Jr, Willson-Morris M. Acquisition of matching to sample via mediated transfer. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Sep;22(2):261–273. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Sidman M., Tailby W. Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: an expansion of the testing paradigm. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Jan;37(1):5–22. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.37-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Straub R. O., Seidenberg M. S., Bever T. G., Terrace H. S. Serial learning in the pigeon. J Exp Anal Behav. 1979 Sep;32(2):137–148. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1979.32-137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Striefel S., Wetherby B. Instruction-following behavior of a retarded child and its controlling stimuli. J Appl Behav Anal. 1973 Winter;6(4):663–670. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1973.6-663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Striefel S., Wetherby B., Karlan G. R. Establishing generalized verb-noun instruction-following skills in retarded children. J Exp Child Psychol. 1976 Oct;22(2):247–260. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(76)90005-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Thelen M. H., Rennie D. L. The effect of vicarious reinforcement on imitation: a review of the literature. Prog Exp Pers Res. 1972;6:83–108. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Thompson C. R., Church R. M. An explanation of the language of a chimpanzee. Science. 1980 Apr 18;208(4441):313–314. doi: 10.1126/science.7367862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Vaughan M. E. Repeated acquisition in the analysis of rule-governed behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 Sep;44(2):175–184. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.44-175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Weiner H. Instructional control of human operant responding during extinction following fixed-ratio conditioning. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 May;13(3):391–394. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Whitman T. L., Zakaras M., Chardos S. Effects of reinforcement and guidance procedures on instruction-following behavior of severely retarded children. J Appl Behav Anal. 1971 Winter;4(4):283–290. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1971.4-283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES