Skip to main content
Parasites & Vectors logoLink to Parasites & Vectors
. 2026 May 27;19:297. doi: 10.1186/s13071-026-07400-6

Mosquito- and biting-midge-borne arboviruses in Western Yunnan’s border region, China

Yiling Yang 1,2,#, Yuwen He 3,#, Yantao Zhu 1,4,#, Jing Wu 3, Keping Zhao 5, Zhao Li 6, Zhengxing Yang 3, Jianzhong Yin 1,✉, Jinglin Wang 1,3,✉
PMCID: PMC13393271  PMID: 42204648

Abstract

Background

Arboviruses that infect humans and other mammals pose significant public health challenges worldwide, particularly in developing countries. The border region of Yunnan Province, a key entry point for imported arboviruses into China, is characterized by a subtropical climate and a rich diversity of mosquito and biting midge species, making it a high-risk area for arbovirus transmission. While some studies have focused on mosquito-borne viruses in this region, research on midge-borne viruses, particularly those with zoonotic relevance, remains limited. This study aimed to systematically investigate the diversity of arboviruses in both vector groups and to address critical gaps in the assessment of spillover risk.

Methods

In July 2018, mosquitoes and biting midges were collected from Mangshi, Yingjiang, Lushui, and Tengchong in the border region of western Yunnan Province, China. Following morphological classification, specimens were pooled for virus isolation using BHK-21 and C6/36 cells. Viral isolates were identified by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) using virus-specific primers, and sequence analyses were performed using Clustal X, DNASTAR, and MEGA-X.

Results

A total of 8581 mosquitoes (8 species in 4 genera) and 18,298 biting midges (19 species) were collected. Culex tritaeniorhynchus dominated the mosquito populations in Mangshi (92.11%) and Yingjiang (97.23%), whereas Anopheles sinensis was predominant in Lushui (44.01%) and Tengchong (59.23%). Biting midge composition varied among regions, with Culicoides tainanus predominating in Mangshi (59.79%) and C. arakawai in Lushui (48.11%). In total, 189 viral strains representing 10 virus species in 8 families were isolated. Tibet orbivirus (TIBOV) was the most widely distributed virus (83 strains), occurring in all four regions, with biting midges accounting for most isolates (50/83 strains). Biting midges also contributed substantially to arbovirus diversity, yielding 13 Yunnan orbivirus (YUOV) strains, 4 Banna virus (BAV) strains, and the only Akabane virus (AKAV) isolate. In contrast, mosquitoes mainly harbored insect-specific viruses (ISVs), including 53 Manglie virus (MAV) strains. Novel viruses such as Culex-originated Tymoviridae-like virus (CuTLV) and Armigeres iflavirus (ArIFV) were identified in both vectors. These findings highlight biting midges as important yet understudied vectors, harboring distinct zoonotic and vector-associated viruses in this border region.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates the circulation of diverse arboviruses in both mosquitoes and biting midges in the border region of western Yunnan Province. Notably, biting midges harbored multiple arboviruses, including several viruses with zoonotic potential or known pathogenicity, such as Tibet orbivirus (TIBOV), Yunnan orbivirus (YUOV), Banna virus (BAV), and Akabane virus (AKAV). These findings emphasize the important role of biting midges, alongside mosquitoes, in maintaining and potentially spreading these viruses in the local arboviral ecosystem. The study underscores the importance of including midge-borne viruses in future surveillance efforts, as they contribute substantially to the diversity and epidemiology of arboviral transmission in the region, with potential implications for public health.

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name 13071_2026_7400_Figa_HTML.jpg

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13071-026-07400-6.

Keywords: Mosquitoes, Biting midges, Arboviruses, Isolation, Identification

Background

Arthropod-borne viruses (arboviruses) represent a growing global health threat, particularly in tropical and subtropical regions, where climate change, human migration, and increased economic exchanges accelerate their emergence and spread [1, 2]. More than 600 arboviruses have been identified, many of which cause significant diseases in humans and animals, including dengue virus (DENV) and Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) [3, 4]. DENV, first isolated in 1943, now circulates in more than 100 countries worldwide [5]. JEV, the leading cause of viral encephalitis in Asia, infects an estimated 69,000 individuals annually, with a 20–30% mortality rate among severe cases [6, 7]. While mosquitoes (Culicidae) are well documented as the primary vectors of many arboviruses [8], biting midges (Ceratopogonidae) are increasingly recognized for their role in zoonotic disease transmission. More than 50 viruses transmitted by biting midges, including bluetongue virus (BTV), African horse sickness virus (AHSV), and Akabane virus (AKAV), significantly impact livestock and agriculture [9, 10]. Furthermore, insect-specific viruses (ISVs), which do not infect vertebrates, are prevalent in vector populations and may influence the transmission dynamics of pathogenic arboviruses by modulating vector competence [11, 12]. Similarly, midge-specific viruses (MSVs) have also been identified in Culicoides populations through metagenomic and transcriptomic studies. Recent investigations in Yunnan Province revealed a diverse range of insect-specific viruses (ISVs) in biting midges, including members of the families Nodaviridae, Partitiviridae, Totiviridae, and Iflaviridae [13]. Unlike arboviruses that replicate in both insect vectors and vertebrate hosts, these midge-specific viruses are restricted to their insect hosts and are believed to be maintained primarily through vertical transmission. Although their biological significance remains largely unexplored, emerging evidence suggests that insect-specific viruses may modulate vector competence by influencing the replication and transmission of pathogenic arboviruses through phenomena such as superinfection exclusion. The growing recognition of midge-specific viruses highlights the need for comprehensive virome surveillance in Culicoides populations, particularly in arbovirus-endemic regions such as Yunnan Province.

Yunnan Province, located in southwestern China, is a high-risk hotspot for arboviral transmission due to its subtropical monsoon climate, rich biodiversity, and its 4061-km border with Vietnam, Laos, and Myanmar [14]. These geographic and climatic factors facilitate the proliferation of vector species and the cross-border exchange of pathogens [1]. Over the past three decades, Yunnan has reported the emergence of multiple novel arboviruses, often linked to trade and population movement with Southeast Asia [15]. Despite the region’s significance in the context of arboviral diseases, research has predominantly focused on mosquitoes [16–19], with biting midges, particularly those transmitting zoonotic viruses that affect livestock, remaining underexplored.

In this study, we conducted a comprehensive survey of mosquitoes and midges from four western border regions of Yunnan—Mangshi, Yingjiang, Tengchong, and Lushui—in 2018. Through a combination of morphological identification, viral isolation, and phylogenetic analysis, our study provides a detailed understanding of the diversity of arboviruses in midge populations, evaluates their potential role in zoonotic spillover, and offers valuable data to inform public health strategies aimed at controlling arboviral transmission in the region. This research highlights the importance of addressing both mosquito and midge-borne pathogens in the development of more effective vector control programs and the prevention of arboviral outbreaks.

Methods

Sample collection

From 23–26 July 2018, mosquitoes and biting midges were collected from multiple sites in the western border region of Yunnan Province, China. The sampling sites included a dairy farm and a cattle cooperative in Mangbing Village, Mangshi (24°6′N, 98°35′E); a cattle farm and a pig farm in Mangzhang Village, Yingjiang County (24°41′N, 97°58′E); fish ponds, pigpens, and cattle sheds in Hejiazai Village, Tengchong City (24°43′N, 98°27′E); and pigpens, chicken coops, and cattle pens in Fuba Village, Lushui City (25°42′N, 98°52′E) (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Geographical locations of the sampling sites in the western border region of Yunnan Province, China

Mosquitoes and biting midges were collected using mosquito traps (Kongfu Xiaoshuai, 12 V, 300 mA; Wuhan, Hubei, China). The traps were operated daily from 6:00 PM to 7:00 AM the following morning. At each sampling site, one trap was deployed per night and positioned 1.5–1.8 m above the ground in sheltered locations near animal enclosures. After collection, the insects were immobilized at −20 °C for 20 min. Specimens were then sorted and morphologically identified under a dissecting microscope. Mosquitoes were identified to species level, whereas biting midges were initially sorted as Culicoides spp. for routine pooling and virus isolation. Representative specimens were subsequently identified to species level for species-composition analysis. Sex was not recorded during pooling. Finally, the samples were pooled into separate tubes according to species (for mosquitoes) or genus (for biting midges), with approximately 50 mosquitoes or 100 biting midges per tube, and stored in liquid nitrogen for subsequent virus isolation.

Virus isolation

Prior to inoculation, 24-well plates containing confluent monolayers of BHK-21 and C6/36 cells, together with the homogenization medium, were transferred into a biosafety level 2 laboratory. Inside a biosafety cabinet, the wells were sequentially numbered and the original culture medium was removed. Subsequently, 150 µL of the homogenization medium was added to each well of both cell lines, while 150 µL of MEM was added to the negative-control wells. The plates were gently agitated to ensure thorough mixing and then placed in an incubator for viral adsorption. After 2 h of incubation, the inoculum was discarded and 1 mL of maintenance medium was added to each well. The plates were returned to the incubator for further cultivation. This procedure constituted the first passage of virus isolation. Each passage was observed daily for at least 7 days, and the time of appearance and characteristics of any cytopathic effect (CPE) were recorded. At the end of the 7-day observation period, the cell culture plates were subjected to three freeze–thaw cycles at −80 °C. The lysates were then used to inoculate the next passage. Both cell lines were blindly passaged for a total of five passages. From the third passage onward, the culture supernatant from C6/36 cells was also inoculated onto BHK-21 monolayers. This was designated as the first passage of the C6/36-to-BHK-21 transfer, and this procedure was carried out for at least three passages. When CPE reached approximately 75%, the supernatant was collected, transferred to a sterile centrifuge tube, and stored at −80 °C for future use. Virus isolates were identified using virus-specific reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Viral RNA was extracted from 200 µL of viral supernatant using TRIzol reagent (TaKaRa), yielding an eluted volume of 35 µL. Complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized using the M-MLV (RNase H-) Reverse Transcriptase kit (TaKaRa), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Primers targeting the following viruses or genera were selected on the basis of published literature: Densovirus (DNV), Banna virus (BAV), Tibet orbivirus (TIBOV), Yunnan orbivirus (YUOV), Alphavirus, and Flavivirus. Additionally, primers specific to Negevirus and Nam Dinh virus (NDiV) were designed using reference genome sequences (Table S1).

The pool positivity rate was calculated as (number of positive pools/total number of pools) × 100%. To enable comparison between vector groups with different pool sizes, the minimum infection rate (MIR) was also calculated as (number of positive pools/total number of specimens tested) × 1000 assuming one infected specimen per positive pool. This provides a conservative estimate of the lower bound of infection prevalence.

The PCR amplification mixture (25 µL total volume) contained 0.5 µL each of forward and reverse primers, 2.0 µL of 2.5 mM dNTPs, 2.5 µL of 10 × Ex Taq Buffer, 0.15 µL of Ex Taq polymerase (TaKaRa), 2.5 µL of cDNA template, and 16.85 µL of RNase-free ddH₂O. The thermal cycling conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min; 30 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 50–60 °C for 30 s, extension at 72 °C for 30–75 s (Table S1); and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel. Positive bands were purified and sent to Shanghai Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd. for sequencing.

Virus identification

Virus isolates were identified using virus-specific reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Viral RNA was extracted from 200 µL of viral supernatant using TRIzol reagent (TaKaRa), yielding an eluted volume of 35 µL. Complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized using the M-MLV (RNase H–) Reverse Transcriptase kit (TaKaRa), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Primers targeting the following viruses or genera were designed on the basis of published literature: Densovirus (DNV), BAV, TIBOV, YUOV, Alphavirus, and Flavivirus. Additionally, primers specific to Negevirus and NDiV were designed using reference genome sequences (Table S1).

The PCR amplification mixture (25 µL total volume) contained 0.5 µL each of forward and reverse primers, 2.0 µL of 2.5 mM dNTPs, 2.5 µL of 10 × Ex Taq Buffer, 0.15 µL of Ex Taq polymerase (TaKaRa), 2.5 µL of cDNA template, and 16.85 µL of RNase-free ddH₂O. The thermal cycling conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min; 30 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 50–60 °C for 30 s, extension at 72 °C for 40–75 s; and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel. Positive bands were purified and sent to Shanghai Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd. for sequencing.

Sequence alignment and analysis

Initial sequence assembly was performed using SeqMan in the DNASTAR Lasergene software package (version 7.1.0; DNASTAR Inc., Madison, WI, USA). The assembled sequences were compared with the GenBank database using the National Center for Biotechnology Information Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (NCBI BLAST) tool to identify viral species. Relevant reference sequences were subsequently downloaded. Nucleotide and amino acid sequence alignments, together with homology analyses, were conducted using Clustal X (version 2.1) and the MegAlign module of the DNASTAR software suite. Maximum-likelihood (ML) phylogenetic trees were constructed using MEGA-X software with 1000 bootstrap replicates to assess branch support.

Results

Mosquito species and population composition

Biting midges were collected from all four sampling sites: Mangshi, Yingjiang, Lushui, and Tengchong. A total of 18,298 biting midges were collected across all sites. All biting midges collected were morphologically identified as belonging to the genus Culicoides; no other biting midge genera were detected in this survey. In July 2018, a total of 8581 mosquitoes representing 8 mosquito species in 4 genera were collected from Mangshi, Yingjiang, Lushui, and Tengchong in border regions of western Yunnan Province: Culex, Anopheles, Armigeres, and Aedes. Culex tritaeniorhynchus was the dominant mosquito species in both Mangshi and Yingjiang, comprising 92.11% and 97.23% of the total mosquito population at those sites, respectively. In contrast, Anopheles sinensis was the most prevalent species in Lushui and Tengchong, accounting for 44.01 and 59.23% of the total mosquito populations in those regions, respectively (Fig. 2A).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

a. Mosquito species composition at different sampling sites in the western border region of Yunnan Province, China. b. Culicoides species composition in Mangshi. c. Culicoides species composition in Lushui

Biting midge species and population composition

In July 2018, a total of 7396 biting midges representing 19 species were collected in Mangshi. The five most prevalent species were C. tainanus (59.79%, 4422/7396), Culicoides humeralis (15.10%, 1117/7396), Culicoides jacobsoni (14.79%, 1094/7396), C. oxystoma (3.20%, 237/7396), and Culicoides kinabaluensis (3.11%, 230/7396). The remaining Culicoides species each contributed less than 5% to the total population (Fig. 2B).

In Lushui, 4602 biting midges of 15 species were collected. The top five species were Culicoides arakawai (48.11%, 2214/4602), C. oxystoma (14.54%, 669/4602), Culicoides orientalis (13.89%, 639/4602), C. jacobsoni (6.65%, 306/4602), and C. tainanus (6.06%, 279/4602). The remaining Culicoides species each had a composition ratio of less than 5% (Fig. 2C).

Virus isolation and identification

For virus isolation, mosquitoes were first grouped by species, collection site, and collection date, with each species-specific group subsequently divided into pools of approximately 50 individuals, yielding a total of 170 pools from 8581 mosquitoes. Biting midges were initially sorted as Culicoides spp. for pooling and were grouped by collection event (same trap and night), with each pool containing approximately 100 individuals, resulting in 203 pools from 18,298 biting midges. From these pools, a total of 189 virus strains representing 10 virus species from 8 families and 9 genera were detected, including 83 Tibet orbivirus (TIBOV), 33 Yunnan orbivirus (YUOV), 6 Banna virus (BAV), 5 Nam Dinh virus (NDiV), 1 Akabane virus (AKAV), 53 Manglie virus (MAV), 2 Yunnan Culex flavivirus (YCxFV), 4 Culex pipiens pallens densovirus (CppDNV), 1 Culex-originated Tymoviridae-like virus (CuTLV), and 1 Armigeres iflavirus (ArIFV) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Virus isolation from mosquitoes and biting midges in western Yunnan

Collection site (county/district) Sample type Sample size Isolation batch Total Pool positivity rate MIR (‰)
Mangshi Mosquitoes 4408 88 42 47.73% 9.53
Culicoides 7396 85 47 55.29% 6.35
Yingjiang Mosquitoes 941 16 0 0.00% 0.00
Culicoides 1100 11 2 18.18% 1.82
Lushui Mosquitoes 534 11 4 36.36% 7.49
Culicoides 4602 55 11 20.00% 2.39
Tengchong Mosquitoes 2698 55 3 5.45% 1.11
Culicoides 5200 52 3 5.77% 0.85
Total Mosquitoes 8581 170 49 28.82% 5.71
Culicoides 18,298 203 63 31.03% 3.44

Isolation batch refers to the number of pools processed for virus isolation from each sample type and location. Total indicates the number of pools that yielded viral isolates. Pool positivity rate was calculated as (number of positive pools/total number of pools) × 100%. Minimum infection rate (MIR) was calculated as (number of positive pools/total number of specimens tested) × 1000, assuming one infected specimen per positive pool. This provides a conservative estimate of infection prevalence and allows for comparison between vector groups with different pool sizes (50 mosquitoes versus 100 biting midges per pool)

A total of 33 strains of TIBOV, 20 strains of YUOV, 2 strains of BAV, 1 strain of NDiV, 29 strains of MAV, 2 strains of CppDNV, 2 strains of YCxFV, and 2 strains of CuTLV were isolated from mosquitoes (including Cx. tritaeniorhynchus, An. sinensis, and Cx. pseudovishnui). Additionally, 50 strains of TIBOV, 13 strains of YUOV, 4 strains of BAV, 1 strain of AKAV, 4 strains of NDiV, 24 strains of MAV, 2 strains of CppDNV, and 1 strain of ArIFV were isolated from Culicoides (including C. arakawai, C. oxystoma, C. tainanus, C. humeralis, C. jacobsoni, and undetermined Culicoides spp.) (Table 2).

Table 2.

Identification results of arboviruses in border areas of western Yunnan

TIBOV YUOV BAV AKAV NDiV MAV CppDNV YCxFV CuTLV ArIFV
Mosquitoes Cx. tritaeniorhynchus 30 20 2 0 0 29 2 2 1 0
An. sinensis 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Cx. pseudovishnui 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Culicoides C. arakawai 4 0 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 1
C. oxystoma 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
C. tainanus 21 13 0 0 0 15 2 0 0 0
C. humeralis 9 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0
C. jacobsoni 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Undetermined Culicoides spp. 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 83 33 6 1 5 53 4 2 1 1

Identification of the Orbivirus

Identification of the Tibet orbivirus (TIBOV)

The identification of TIBOV was carried out using VP7-specific primers, which successfully amplified 83 strains. The VP7 gene sequences obtained, consisting of 480 nucleotides, exhibited nucleotide homology ranging from 70.0% to 99.8%. A representative strain, selected from these isolates, was used alongside the corresponding sequences of TIBOV strains downloaded from the GenBank database to construct a phylogenetic tree (Fig. 3A).

Fig. 3 .

Fig. 3

Fig. 3

a Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree based on partial nucleotide sequences of the VP7 gene of Tibet orbivirus (TIBOV) and related orbiviruses (480 bp). Red triangles indicate the newly isolated TIBOV strains identified in this study. The best-fit maximum-likelihood evolutionary model was the Kimura 2-parameter model with a proportion of invariant sites (K2 + I). Bootstrap values were calculated from 1000 replicates. b. Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree based on partial nucleotide sequences of the VP7 gene of Yunnan orbivirus (YUOV) (440 bp). Red triangles indicate the newly isolated YUOV strains identified in this study, and red squares indicate the reference YUOV strains. The best-fit maximum-likelihood evolutionary model was the general time reversible model with gamma-distributed rate heterogeneity and a proportion of invariant sites (GTR + G + I). Bootstrap values were calculated from 1000 replicates

The best-fit DNA model was identified as the Kimura 2-parameter model with a proportion of invariant sites (K2 + I). Phylogenetic analysis revealed that the newly isolated strains from this study clustered within the same evolutionary branch as the known TIBOV strains, indicating that these isolates are indeed TIBOV. Further analysis showed that the TIBOV strains formed two major phylogenetic branches. The strains LS18C1-3, MS18C114-1, MS18C203-1, MS18C217-16, and MS18M129-1 clustered with the V290/YNSZ strain from Shizong County, Yunnan Province, suggesting a close evolutionary relationship. The remaining strains grouped into a separate evolutionary branch, indicating the potential presence of multiple genotypes or subtypes of TIBOV in the western border regions of Yunnan Province.

Identification of the Yunnan orbivirus (YUOV)

For YUOV identification, VP7-specific primers were used to amplify positive isolates from 33 strains of Cx. tritaeniorhynchus and C. tainanus collected in Mangshi. The sequences of the VP7 gene, consisting of 440 nucleotides, exhibited nucleotide homology ranging from 91.8% to 100%. Phylogenetic analysis showed that the representative strains isolated in this study clustered within the same evolutionary branch as five other YUOV strains from Yunnan, Japan, and Indonesia. The new strains were most closely related to the YOV-77–2 strain from Yunnan Province, with nucleotide homology ranging from 97.1% to 99.1% (Fig. 3B).

Identification of the Banna virus (BAV)

For BAV identification, VP12-specific primers were used to amplify and obtain the nucleotide sequences of the VP12 gene (820 nt in length) from six positive isolates. These isolates were derived from two pools of Cx. tritaeniorhynchus and four pools of C. arakawai collected in Lushui. The sequences exhibited nucleotide homology ranging from 91.9% to 100%. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that all newly isolated strains clustered within the previously defined A-type BAV group, sharing nucleotide identities greater than 91.4% with other A-type strains. Within this cluster, two distinct sublineages were observed: one (A1-type) included strains LS18M49-1 and LS18M49-2, and the other (A2-type) comprised strains LS18C2-2, LS18C2-10, LS18C2-16, and LS18C2-17 (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree based on nucleotide sequences of the VP12 gene of Banna virus (BAV). Red triangles indicate the newly isolated BAV strains identified in this study. The best-fit maximum-likelihood evolutionary model was the Tamura 3-parameter model with gamma-distributed rate heterogeneity and a proportion of invariant sites (T92 + G + I). Bootstrap values were calculated from 1000 replicates

Identification of the Akabane virus (AKAV)

For AKAV identification, S gene-specific primers were used to amplify a positive isolate from a pool of C. arakawai collected in Lushui. A 287-nucleotide sequence of the S gene was obtained and designated as strain LS18C2-3. The sequence showed 98.9% nucleotide homology to the AKAV-HN10174 strain previously isolated in Hunan Province. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that LS18C2-3 clustered within genotype Ia along with ten other AKAV strains, with nucleotide homology among them ranging from 92.7% to 97.9% (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree based on nucleotide sequences of the S gene of Akabane virus (AKAV). The red triangle indicates the newly isolated AKAV strain identified in this study. The best-fit maximum-likelihood evolutionary model was the Kimura 2-parameter model with a proportion of invariant sites (K2 + I). Bootstrap values were calculated from 1000 replicates

Identification of the insect-specific viruses (ISVs)

Identification of the Nam Dinh virus (NDiV)

For NDiV identification, five strains were isolated from three pools of C. oxystoma, one pool of Cx. pseudovishnui Colless, and one pool of C. arakawai collected in Lushui. These strains showed greater than 96.4% nucleotide homology to the reference strain NDiV-NJ8-09 (GenBank: KF771866) from Yunnan Province. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that the newly isolated strains were most closely related to three previously reported NDiV strains from Yunnan, with amino acid homology exceeding 95.8%, and clustered within the same evolutionary branch as NDiV, Houston virus (HOUV), and Dianke virus (DKV) (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree based on partial amino acid sequences of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) of Nam Dinh virus (NDiV) and related nidoviruses. Red triangles indicate the newly isolated NDiV strains identified in this study, and red squares indicate the reference NDiV strains. The best-fit maximum-likelihood evolutionary model was the Tamura 3-parameter model with gamma-distributed rate heterogeneity (T92 + G). Bootstrap values were calculated from 1000 replicates

Identification of the Manglie virus (MAV)

For MAV identification, 53 strains were isolated from 29 pools of Cx. tritaeniorhynchus and 24 pools of Culicoides collected in Mangshi and Lushui. The nucleotide homology among these strains ranged from 95.9% to 99.3%. Phylogenetic analysis showed that all newly isolated strains clustered within the Nelorpivirus branch and were most closely related to two previously reported MAV strains from Yunnan Province (Fig. 7).

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree based on partial amino acid sequences of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) of Manglie virus (MAV) and related negeviruses. Red triangles indicate the newly isolated MAV strains identified in this study, and red squares indicate the reference MAV strains. The best-fit maximum-likelihood evolutionary model was the Le and Gascuel model with gamma-distributed rate heterogeneity (LG + G). Bootstrap values were calculated from 1000 replicates

Identification of the Culex pipiens pallens densovirus (CppDNV)

For Densovirus identification, four strains were obtained from two pools of Cx. tritaeniorhynchus and two pools of C. tainanus collected in Mangshi. These strains shared nucleotide homology ranging from 99.5% to 100%, and showed the closest relationship to the reference strains CppDNV-YN05217, CppDNV-GZWN1, and CppDNV-XJ057, with amino acid homology exceeding 97.2% (Fig. 8).

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree based on partial amino acid sequences of the NS2 gene of Culex pipiens pallens densovirus (CppDNV). Red triangles indicate the newly isolated CppDNV strains identified in this study. The best-fit maximum-likelihood evolutionary model was the Le and Gascuel model (LG). Bootstrap values were calculated from 1000 replicates. PchDNV Penaeus chinensis hepandensovirus, PmoHDNV Penaeus monodon hepandensovirus, PmeHDNV Penaeus merguiensis hepandensovirus, DpDNV Dendrolimus punctatus densovirus, BmDNV Bombyx mori densovirus 5, CeDNV Casphalia extranea densovirus, PmoPDNV2 Penaeus monodon penstyldensovirus 2, PstDNV1 Penaeus stylirostris penstyldensovirus 1, PstDNV2 Penaeus stylirostris penstyldensovirus 2, GmDNV Galleria mellonella densovirus, DsDNV Diatraea saccharalis densovirus, JcDNV Junonia coenia densovirus, MIDNV Mythimna loreyi densovirus, AaeDNV, Aedes aegypti densovirus, AalDNV-1 Aedes albopictus densovirus 1, HeDNV Haemagogus equinus densovirus, CxDNV Culex pipiens densovirus, CppDNV Culex pipiens pallens densovirus

Identification of Yunnan Culex flavivirus (YCxFV)

For YCxFV identification, two strains were isolated from two pools of Cx. tritaeniorhynchus collected in Mangshi, sharing 98.3% nucleotide homology between them. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that the newly isolated strains MS18M129-14 and MS18M129-23 clustered within the evolutionary branch of unclassified flaviviruses. They were most closely related to the strain MT254443 Yunnan Culex flavivirus, which was isolated in Yunnan Province in 2018, with nucleotide homologies of 99.5% and 98.5%, respectively (Fig. 9).

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9

Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree based on partial nucleotide sequences of the NS5 gene of Yunnan Culex flavivirus (YCxFV) and related flaviviruses (272 bp). Red triangles indicate the newly isolated YCxFV strains identified in this study. The best-fit maximum-likelihood evolutionary model was the Kimura 2-parameter model with gamma-distributed rate heterogeneity (K2 + G). Bootstrap values were calculated from 1000 replicates

Identification of the Culex-originated Tymoviridae-like virus (CuTLV)

For CuTLV identification, strain MS18M129-29 was isolated from a pool of Cx. tritaeniorhynchus and amplified using KHV S10F/R primers. BLASTx analysis revealed that it shared 61.6% amino acid identity with Culex-originated Tymoviridae-like virus (CuTLV; GenBank: NC018703), which was isolated in Xinjiang in 2005. A phylogenetic tree was constructed using the partial amino acid sequences of the RdRp gene from the MS18M129-29 strain and 12 other reference strains of the family Tymoviridae. The results showed that all 13 viruses formed 3 distinct clusters, with the MS18M129-29 strain clustering within the Maculavirus group and showing the closest relationship to CuTLV (Fig. 10).

Fig. 10.

Fig. 10

Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree based on partial amino acid sequences of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) of Culex-originated Tymoviridae-like virus (CuTLV) and related viruses in the family Tymoviridae. The red triangle indicates the newly isolated CuTLV-related strain identified in this study. The best-fit maximum-likelihood evolutionary model was the Le and Gascuel model with gamma-distributed rate heterogeneity and a proportion of invariant sites (LG + G + I). Bootstrap values were calculated from 1000 replicates

Identification of the Armigeres iflavirus (ArIFV)

For ArIFV identification, strain LS18C5-4 was isolated from a pool of C. arakawai and amplified using primers targeting the Simbu group of bunyaviruses. BLASTx analysis revealed 76.0% amino acid identity with Armigeres iflavirus (ArIFV; GenBank: NC036585), which was isolated in the Philippines in 2010. A phylogenetic tree was constructed using partial amino acid sequences of the RdRp gene from strain LS18C5-4, 15 reference strains from the family Iflaviridae, and 1 strain from the family Dicistroviridae. Phylogenetic analysis showed that LS18C5-4 clustered within Iflaviridae, specifically in the same branch as ArIFV, indicating that it is a member of this family and is most closely related to ArIFV (Fig. 11).

Fig. 11.

Fig. 11

Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree based on partial amino acid sequences of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) of Armigeres iflavirus (ArIFV) and related viruses in the family Iflaviridae. The red triangle indicates the newly isolated ArIFV-related strain identified in this study. The best-fit maximum-likelihood evolutionary model was the Whelan and Goldman model with gamma-distributed rate heterogeneity (WAG + G). Bootstrap values were calculated from 1000 replicates

Discussion

The western border region of Yunnan Province, where many arboviruses reported in China have been detected, adjoins Myanmar, where multiple arboviruses are endemic. Characterized by a hot, humid climate with abundant rainfall throughout the year, the region has an average annual temperature ranging from 16 °C to 28 °C, providing favorable ecological conditions for the reproduction and transmission of arbovirus vectors. In this study, eight mosquito species belonging to four genera—Culex, Anopheles, Armigeres, and Aedes—were collected from Mangshi, Yingjiang, Lushui, and Tengchong. Cx. tritaeniorhynchus was identified as the dominant species in Mangshi and Yingjiang, whereas An. sinensis predominated in Lushui and Tengchong. Both species are major vectors of several important pathogens, including JEV [20], Getah virus (GETV) [21], and Plasmodium [22]. They exhibit nocturnal host-seeking behavior, frequently feed on humans and livestock, and are commonly found in peridomestic environments and human dwellings [23]. A total of 189 viral strains were isolated in this study, with the majority originating from Mangshi (163 strains), followed by Lushui (17 strains), Tengchong (6 strains), and Yingjiang (2 strains). These findings indicate that the border region harbors a diverse range of vector species and exhibits a high prevalence of arbovirus carriage.

Yunnan orbivirus (YUOV), Tibet orbivirus (TIBOV), and Banna virus (BAV) are members of the family Sedoreoviridae. Among them, YUOV and TIBOV belong to the genus Orbivirus and possess genomes composed of ten segments of double-stranded RNA. YUOV was first isolated from Cx. tritaeniorhynchus in Yunnan Province in 2005 and has been shown to induce neurological symptoms in animals [23]. The detection of immunoglobulin (Ig)G and IgM antibodies against YUOV in human serum samples collected from Xishuangbanna Prefecture, Yunnan, in 2011 suggests its potential for human infection [14]. In the present study, 33 strains of YUOV were isolated in Mangshi, with 20 originating from Cx. tritaeniorhynchus and 13 from C. tainanus. These findings suggest a potential role for Culicoides in the transmission of YUOV, while Cx. tritaeniorhynchus may also be involved in the transmission cycle of the virus in this region. Further experimental infection studies are needed to confirm vector competence.

TIBOV, recognized as an orbivirus, was first identified in Tibet, China, in 2009 [24]. Infection with TIBOV can cause fever and anorexia in domestic animals and can lead to death in suckling mice within 72 h [25]. A total of 83 TIBOV strains were isolated in this study, including 30 from Cx. tritaeniorhynchus, 2 from Cx. pseudovishnui, 1 from An. sinensis, and 50 from Culicoides spp. TIBOV not only represented the highest number of isolates in this survey, but was also detected in all four sampling regions, indicating its wide distribution across Yunnan Province and its ability to circulate among multiple host and vector species.

Banna virus (BAV) is a virus in the genus Seadornavirus and an important pathogen associated with viral encephalitis. It was first isolated in 1987 from the serum of patients with fever and the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with encephalitis in Xishuangbanna [17]. In this study, six BAV strains were obtained from Lushui, including two A1-type strains isolated from Cx. tritaeniorhynchus and four A2-type strains from C. arakawai. This suggests that different vector species within the same locality may carry distinct BAV genotypes. Given that Cx. tritaeniorhynchus is the dominant mosquito species in the study areas and was found to harbor BAV, it may play a role in the natural transmission cycle of the virus.

Akabane virus (AKAV) belongs to the Simbu serogroup within the genus Orthobunyavirus of the family Peribunyaviridae. It is a segmented, single-stranded, negative-sense RNA virus classified into four genotypes (I–IV), with genotype I further divided into subtypes Ia and Ib [26]. AKAV has been reported in Australia, Asia, and the Middle East [27]. Here, we identified one AKAV strain from C. arakawai in Lushui, which clustered within genotype Ia along with six other Chinese strains, suggesting that genotype Ia may be the predominant genotype circulating in China. AKAV is known to infect a variety of animals and can cause abortion and stillbirth in pregnant animals [28]. Although the virus has occasionally been isolated from mosquitoes, Culicoides are considered its primary vectors [29]. The widespread distribution of Culicoides in Lushui may facilitate the continued transmission of AKAV in the region.

A total of 64 insect-specific virus (ISV) strains were identified, representing 4 viral groups. NDiV, classified within the genus Alphamesonivirus, family Mesoniviridae, and order Nidovirales, is an unsegmented, single-stranded, positive-sense RNA virus and represents one of the largest groups of nonsegmented RNA viruses infecting insects [30]. In this study, four NDiV strains were isolated from Lushui, including one from An. sinensis and three from Culicoides spp., confirming that Culicoides may also serve as important vectors for NDiV. MAV, a single-stranded, positive-sense RNA virus, belongs to the negevirus group [31]. We isolated 53 MAV strains from mosquitoes and Culicoides in Mangshi and Lushui, representing the first detection of MAV in Culicoides and its first report in both Mangshi and Lushui. CppDNV is a small, non-enveloped, single-stranded DNA virus in the family Parvoviridae [32]. In this study, two CppDNV strains closely related to CxDNV—but more distantly related to HeDNV and AalDNV—were isolated from Cx. tritaeniorhynchus and C. tainanus in Mangshi. CxFV is a single-stranded, positive-sense RNA virus in the family Flaviviridae [33]. Two CxFV strains closely related to YCxFV previously identified in Yunnan were isolated from Cx. tritaeniorhynchus in Mangshi. Negeviruses have been demonstrated to suppress arbovirus replication in mosquitoes both in vivo and in vitro [34]. Consequently, coinfection of insect-specific viruses (ISVs) and arboviruses has emerged as a research hotspot, offering a novel strategy for arbovirus control. Furthermore, biological control approaches based on ISVs may eventually reduce reliance on chemical insecticides and contribute substantially to the prevention of arboviral diseases.

The family Tymoviridae comprises single-stranded, positive-sense RNA viruses transmitted by phytophagous insects during feeding. These viruses primarily infect dicotyledonous and graminaceous plants—such as turnip, cabbage, maize, and grape—and can cause considerable agricultural losses [35]. The MS18M129-29 strain identified in this study clustered within the genus Maculavirus and showed amino acid similarities of 61.64%, 49.32%, 52.86%, and 51.25% with CuTLV-J9, BtLV-UW1, EkBV-2007 (Mex), and MuTV-BeAr855909, respectively, suggesting that MS18M129-29 may represent a new member of the genus Maculavirus. The family Iflaviridae comprises small, non-enveloped, single-stranded, positive-sense RNA viruses [36]. The genus Iflavirus is the only taxon within this family; these viruses infect arthropods and can cause behavioral changes, developmental abnormalities, and premature death in economically important insects [37]. Here, the LS18C5-4 strain was isolated from C. arakawai in Lushui and clustered within Iflaviridae. It shared amino acid identities of 76.03%, 71.07%, and 73.55% with ArIFV-10P38-310, HaIFV1-FIN/L-2018/24, and PPKV-205642, respectively, suggesting that LS18C5-4 may be a novel member of Iflaviridae.

This study led to the isolation of multiple viruses from the western border region of Yunnan. These included human pathogens such as BAV, which is associated with febrile illness and encephalitis, as well as veterinary pathogens such as YUOV, TIBOV, and AKAV. Although YUOV-specific antibodies have been detected in humans, the potential health risks require further investigation. Additionally, two novel viruses belonging to the families Tymoviridae and Iflaviridae—which may negatively affect crops and beneficial insects—were identified. Four insect-specific viruses (ISVs), namely NDiV, MAV, CppDNV, and YCxFV, were also detected. In recent years, the influence of ISVs on pathogenic arboviruses in mosquitoes has attracted considerable scientific interest, providing a promising direction for the biological control of arboviral diseases.

This study has several limitations that should be considered when interpreting the findings. First, the sampling was conducted during a single 4-day period in July 2018, which may not capture the seasonal dynamics or full diversity of arboviruses circulating in the region. As such, the results represent a temporal snapshot rather than a comprehensive assessment of arbovirus prevalence, and broader conclusions regarding distribution, diversity, or vector importance require validation through longitudinal surveys spanning multiple seasons and years. Second, virus identification relied primarily on RT-PCR and sequencing, without additional purification or phenotypic characterization of the isolates. Consequently, confirmation of infectious virus particles necessitates further studies involving plaque purification and in vitro characterization. Moreover, the detection of viral RNA does not unequivocally indicate active replication within the vectors; experimental infection studies are needed to definitively establish vector competence.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that the western border region of Yunnan harbors a diverse and abundant population of mosquitoes and biting midges, and that these insects carry a wide spectrum of viruses during the sampling period. These include both previously recognized arboviruses and novel viral strains that warrant further characterization. Our investigation of midge-borne viruses in this area contributes to the understanding of local vector-borne infectious diseases. The findings provide valuable baseline information that can inform vector surveillance and control efforts against insect-borne infectious diseases in China. However, given the limited sampling duration, further longitudinal studies are needed to fully elucidate the seasonal dynamics and long-term patterns of arbovirus transmission in this region.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Material 1. (20.6KB, docx)

Acknowledgements

We thank all staff members who assisted with field sampling and laboratory work.

Author contributions

Jianzhong Yin and Jinglin Wang conceived and designed the study. Jinglin Wang, Jing Wu, Keping Zhao, and Zhao Li collected the mosquito and biting midge samples. Yiling Yang, Yuwen He, and Zhengxing Yang conducted the study. Yiling Yang, Jinglin Wang, and Yantao Zhu collected and analyzed the data. Yiling Yang, Yantao Zhu, and Jinglin Wang drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the Basic Research Projects of the Yunnan Chenggong Expert Workstation (202505AF350002), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32260896), and the Yunnan Provincial Major Science and Technology Project (202502AU100001, 202502AE090007). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, the decision to publish, or the preparation of the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

All the data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Authorization for the collection of mosquitoes and biting midges was obtained from the Yunnan Animal Science and Veterinary Institute and Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China (protocol approval numbers: 2019FA015, 202005AF150034, and KMMU2025MEC284).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Yiling Yang, Yuwen He and Yantao Zhu contributed equally to this work.

Contributor Information

Jianzhong Yin, Email: yinjianzhong2005@sina.com.

Jinglin Wang, Email: wangjl107@163.com.

References

  • 1.Tian F, He J, Shang S, Chen Z, Tang Y, Lu M, et al. Survey of mosquito species and mosquito-borne viruses in residential areas along the Sino-Vietnam border in Yunnan Province in China. Front Microbiol. 2023;14:110578610.3389/fmicb.2023.1105786 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 2.Barzon L, Gobbi F, Capelli G, Montarsi F, Martini S, Riccetti S, et al. Autochthonous dengue out break in Italy 2020: clinical, virological and entomological findings. J Travel Med. 2021;28 8:taab130. 10.1093/jtm/taab130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Weaver SC, Forrester NL, Liu J, Vasilakis N. Population bottlenecks and founder effects: implications for mosquito-borne arboviral emergence. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2021;19 3:184-95. 10.1038/s41579-020-00482-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Raulino R, Thaurignac G, Keita AK, Esteban A, Goumou S, Diallo R, et al. Seroprevalence of IgG antibodies against multiple arboviruses in bats from Cameroon, Guinea, and the Democratic Republic of Congo. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2022;22 4:252-62. 10.1089/vbz.2021.0076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Paz-Bailey G, Adams LE, Deen J, Anderson KB, Katzelnick LC. Dengue. Lancet. 2024;403 10427:667-82. 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02576-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zhang W, Yin Q, Wang H, Liang G. The reemerging and outbreak of genotypes 4 and 5 of Japanese encephalitis virus. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023;13:1292693. 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1292693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Turtle L, Solomon T. Japanese encephalitis - the prospects for new treatments. Nat Rev Neurol. 2018;14 5:298-313. 10.1038/nrneurol.2018.30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Guodong L. Arbovirus-the very important pathogen of neglected tropical infectious disease in the world. China Tropical Medicine. 2018;18 1:1-5. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Snyman J, Venter GJ, Venter M. An investigation of Culicoides (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) as potential vectors of medically and veterinary important arboviruses in South Africa. Viruses. 2021;13 10:1978. 10.3390/v13101978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Purse BV, Carpenter S, Venter GJ, Bellis G, Mullens BA. Bionomics of temperate and tropical Culicoides midges: knowledge gaps and consequences for transmission of Culicoides-borne viruses. Annu Rev Entomol. 2015;60:373-92. 10.1146/annurev-ento-010814-020614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Nouri S, Matsumura EE, Kuo YW, Falk BW. Insect-specific viruses: from discovery to potential translational applications. Curr Opin Virol. 2018;33:33-41. 10.1016/j.coviro.2018.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Elrefaey AM, Abdelnabi R, Rosales Rosas AL, Wang L, Basu S, Delang L. Understanding the mechanisms underlying host restriction of insect-specific viruses. Viruses. 2020;12 9:964. 10.3390/v12090964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yang L, Wu W, Cai S, Wang J, Kuang G, Yang W, et al. Transcriptomic investigation of the virus spectrum carried by midges in border areas of Yunnan Province. Viruses. 2024;16 5:674. 10.3390/v16050674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wang J, Zhang H, Sun X, Fu S, Wang H, Feng Y, et al. Distribution of mosquitoes and mosquito-borne arboviruses in Yunnan Province near the China-Myanmar-Laos border. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2011;84 5:738-46. 10.4269/ajtmh.2011.10-0294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 15.Li L, Guo X, Zhao Q, Tong Y, Fan H, Sun Q, et al. Investigation on mosquito-borne viruses at Lancang River and Nu River watersheds in southwestern China. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2017;17 12:804-12. 10.1089/vbz.2017.2164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yang Z, He Y, Li S, Meng J, Li N, Wang J. Isolation and genomic characterization of Kadipiro virus from mosquitoes in Yunnan, China. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2024;24 8:532-9. 10.1089/vbz.2023.0157. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 17.Yang Z, He Y, Chen Y, Meng J, Li N, Li S, et al. Full genome characterization and evolutionary analysis of Banna virus isolated from Culicoides, mosquitoes and ticks in Yunnan, China. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023;13:1283580. 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1283580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Liu L, Shen Q, Li N, He Y, Han N, Wang X, et al. Comparative viromes of Culicoides and mosquitoes reveal their consistency and diversity in viral profiles. Brief Bioinform. 2021;22 4:bbaa323. 310.1093/bib/bbaa32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ling J, Zhu Y, He Y, Li S, Xu C, Wang J. Isolation and identification of arboviruses from mosquitoes in Yuxi Region of Yunnan, China. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2025;25 11:651-62. 10.1177/15303667251372145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Huang YS, Hettenbach SM, Park SL, Higgs S, Barrett AD, Hsu WW, et al. Differential infectivities among different Japanese encephalitis virus genotypes in Culex quinquefasciatus mosquitoes. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10 10:e0005038. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Deng YL, Lin ZY, Lin R, Lu ZS, Yan XX, Li LX, et al. Isolation and characterization of Getah virus GD2202 from mosquitoes in Foshan, China. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2025;25 4:269-76. 10.1089/vbz.2024.0100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.He ZQ, Hu YB, Wang D, Liu YT, Yang CY, Qian D, et al. Insecticide resistance of Anopheles sinensis after elimination of malaria in Henan Province, China. Parasit Vectors. 2023;16 1:180. 10.1186/s13071-023-05796-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wang J, Xu H, Song S, Cheng R, Fan N, Fu S, et al. Emergence of Zika virus in Culex tritaeniorhynchus and Anopheles sinensis mosquitoes in China. Virol Sin. 2021;36 1:33-42. 10.1007/s12250-020-00239-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Duan YL, Yang ZX, Bellis G, Li L. Isolation of Tibet orbivirus from Culicoides jacobsoni (Diptera, Ceratopogonidae) in China. Parasit Vectors. 2021;14 1:432. 10.1186/s13071-021-04899-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wang J, Li H, He Y, Zhou Y, Xin A, Liao D, et al. Isolation of Tibet orbivirus from Culicoides and associated infections in livestock in Yunnan, China. Virol J. 2017;14 1:105. 10.1186/s12985-017-0774-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gao HF, Wang JP, Yang ZX, Xie JR, He YW, Hong QH, et al. Genetic and pathogenic characterisation of a virulent Akabane virus isolated from goats in Yunnan, China. J Vet Res. 2022;66 1:35-42. 10.2478/jvetres-2022-0007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Yanase T, Kato T, Hayama Y, Akiyama M, Itoh N, Horiuchi S, et al. Transition of Akabane virus genogroups and its association with changes in the nature of disease in Japan. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2018;65 2:e434-43. 10.1111/tbed.12778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kirkland PD. Akabane virus infection. Rev Sci Tech. 2015;34 2:403-10. 10.20506/rst.34.2.2366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Martínez-de la Puente J, Figuerola J, Soriguer R. Fur or feather? Feeding preferences of species of Culicoides biting midges in Europe. Trends Parasitol. 2015;31 1:16-22. 10.1016/j.pt.2014.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Thuy NT, Huy TQ, Nga PT, Morita K, Dunia I, Benedetti L. A new nidovirus (NamDinh virus NDiV): its ultrastructural characterization in the C6/36 mosquito cell line. Virology. 2013;444 1-2:337-42. 10.1016/j.virol.2013.06.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wang Y, Guo X, Peng H, Lu Y, Zeng X, Dai K, et al. Complete genome sequence of a novel negevirus isolated from Culex tritaeniorhynchus in China. Arch Virol. 2019;164 3:907-11. 10.1007/s00705-018-04133-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zhai YG, Lv XJ, Sun XH, Fu SH, Gong ZD, Fen Y, et al. Isolation and characterization of the full coding sequence of a novel densovirus from the mosquito Culex pipiens pallens. J Gen Virol. 2008;89 1:195-9. 10.1099/vir.0.83221-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Amaral C, Câmara D, Salles T, Meneses MD, Araújo-Silva C, Dias V, et al. Culex flavivirus isolation from naturally infected mosquitoes trapped at Rio de Janeiro City, Brazil. Insects. 2022;13 5:477. 10.3390/insects13050477 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Patterson EI, Kautz TF, Contreras-Gutierrez MA, Guzman H, Tesh RB, Hughes GL, et al. Negeviruses reduce replication of alphaviruses during coinfection. J Virol. 2021;95 14:e0043321. 10.1128/JVI.00433-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wang L, Lv X, Zhai Y, Fu S, Wang D, Rayner S, et al. Genomic characterization of a novel virus of the family Tymoviridae isolated from mosquitoes. PLoS One. 2012;7 7:e39845. 10.1371/journal.pone.0039845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Valles SM, Chen Y, Firth AE, Guérin DMA, Hashimoto Y, Herrero S, et al. ICTV virus taxonomy profile: Iflaviridae. J Gen Virol. 2017;98 4:527-8. 10.1099/jgv.0.000757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Shi SL, Xia RX. Codon usage in the Iflaviridae family is not diverse though the family members are isolated from diverse host taxa. Viruses. 2019;11 12:1087. 10.3390/v11121087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material 1. (20.6KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

All the data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.


Articles from Parasites & Vectors are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES