Skip to main content
British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.) logoLink to British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.)
. 1986 Feb 22;292(6519):523–524. doi: 10.1136/bmj.292.6519.523

Discrepancy between standard and low range mini Wright peak flow meters.

T P Usherwood, J H Barber
PMCID: PMC1339507  PMID: 3081153

Full text

PDF
523

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Perks W. H., Tams I. P., Thompson D. A., Prowse K. An evaluation of the mini-Wright peak flow meter. Thorax. 1979 Feb;34(1):79–81. doi: 10.1136/thx.34.1.79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. WRIGHT B. M., McKERROW C. B. Maximum forced expiratory flow rate as a measure of ventilatory capacity: with a description of a new portable instrument for measuring it. Br Med J. 1959 Nov 21;2(5159):1041–1046. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5159.1041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Wright B. M. A miniature Wright peak-flow meter. Br Med J. 1978 Dec 9;2(6152):1627–1628. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6152.1627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Medical Journal (Clinical research ed.) are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES