Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2026 Jul 3;18(28):39070–39082. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6c07765

Mimicking Pavlovian Conditioning with WSe2 Phototransistors

Andrea Sessa †, Adolfo Mazzotti †, Kimberly Intonti †, Aniello Pelella †, Loredana Viscardi †, Nadia Martucciello ‡, Stephen O’Sullivan §, Vilas Patil §, Paul K Hurley §,∥, Lida Ansari §, Farzan Gity §, Antonio Di Bartolomeo †,*
PMCID: PMC13397488  PMID: 42394627

Abstract

Neuromorphic engineering aims to bypass the energy and latency limitations of traditional Von Neumann architectures by emulating the biological efficiency of the mammalian brain. Two-dimensional materials, with their exceptional light-matter interaction, have emerged as prime candidates for next-generation optoelectronic artificial synapses. In this work, we demonstrate a robust optoelectronic synaptic device based on a mechanically exfoliated tungsten diselenide (WSe2) field-effect transistor. Unlike complex heterostructures, the proposed device exploits intrinsic defect-mediated charge trapping mechanisms to achieve neuromorphic functionalities. We report a reversible modulation of channel conductance, where optical stimuli induce potentiation via persistent photoconductivity and electrical gate pulses trigger depression. A key finding is the ability to selectively switch between Short-Term and Long-Term Plasticity simply by tuning the drain bias polarity, utilizing the asymmetry of Schottky contacts. To validate the device’s potential for bioinspired computing, we successfully emulate Pavlovian associative learning at the hardware level. These results establish exfoliated WSe2 as a simple yet versatile platform for light-stimulated neuromorphic computing.

Keywords: WSe2 , persistent photocurrent, neuromorphic, plasticity, associative learning, neural network


graphic file with name am6c07765_0010.jpg


graphic file with name am6c07765_0008.jpg

1. Introduction

The term neuromorphic was first introduced by Carver Mead in 1990. His core premise was simple: complex digital problems can be simplified by emulating the efficiency of the mammalian brain. Since then, research has advanced in two distinct directions: Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) and biologically inspired hardware (Natural Neural Networks, or NNNs). ANNs currently form the backbone of machine learning and big data classification. However, they require intensive digital calculations, typically handled by central or graphics processing units. Conversely, neuromorphic engineering aims to overcome the limitations of the conventional Von Neumann architecture by building analog circuits that mimic biological principles. To achieve this, it is fundamental to replicate the connection between neurons, known as synapses. While silicon circuits have been developed to imitate neuron spiking and synaptic connections, , achieving true brain-like intelligence on a standard chip remains a challenge. Consequently, research has shifted toward 2D materials. − Their unique properties, specifically their atomically thin, dangling-bond-free surfaces and strong light-matter interaction, make them ideal candidates for optoelectronic artificial synapses. Furthermore, the diverse bandgaps of 2D materials allow for broad light absorption (from UV to infrared). This enables multiwavelength modulation, paving the way for devices capable of performing both sensing and computation.

Among the investigated materials, tungsten diselenide (WSe2) emerges as an ideal candidate. WSe2 is a group-VI transition metal dichalcogenide exhibiting ambipolar charge transport, a layer-dependent electronic band structure, with a direct bandgap in the monolayer limit and an indirect bandgap in few-layer and bulk forms, strong spin–orbit coupling with a large valence-band splitting (∼460 meV), high carrier mobility, and pronounced light–matter interaction characterized by strong excitonic effects and high optical absorption. In addition, WSe2 presents mechanical flexibility, environmental stability, and compatibility with scalable device fabrication. WSe2 has been extensively investigated for a broad range of applications, including field-effect transistors, − field emission, photodetectors and optoelectronic devices, , valleytronic and spintronic systems, nonvolatile memories, , and neuromorphic devices. ,

Numerous studies have demonstrated that charge trapping and detrapping processes associated with intrinsic defect states constitute the dominant mechanism enabling neuromorphic functionalities in WSe2-based devices. Importantly, these trap states originate from native structural defects, such as selenium or tellurium vacancies and grain boundaries, and therefore do not require additional material engineering or postprocessing treatments.

Building on this understanding, recent progress in WSe2 optoelectronic neuromorphic devices has been driven by complex van der Waals heterostructures and floating gate architectures. Huang et al. demonstrated synaptic modulation in SnSe2/WSe2 heterojunctions from interfacial charge transfer. Similarly, Su et al. utilized floating-gate WSe2/MoS2 diodes for stable paired-pulse facilitation (PPF) and long retention. Zeng et al. employed a BP/PO x /WSe2 synaptic transistor for robust short- and long-term plasticity (STP and LTP) and neuromorphic visual processing. Graphene (Gr)-based heterostructures were reported by Kim et al. (WSe2/Gr) using asymmetric charge trapping for multilevel synaptic functions, while Tang et al. tuned potentiation and depression by light intensity for reconfigurable behavior.

Beyond floating gates, heterostructures also enable synaptic functions. Wang et al. realized MoS2/WSe2 memtransistors via carrier separation. Ma et al. achieved ultralow-power STP-to-LTP transitions in Lewis acid-doped WSe2 through defect-assisted photogating. Near-infrared operation was achieved by Lu et al. using WSe2 with lanthanide-doped nanoparticles through frequency conversion. Finally, Luo et al. demonstrated a synaptic memristor based on layered WSe2 nanosheets, exhibiting both STP and LTP through trap-controlled charge transport.

In this work, we present a systematic investigation of the photoresponse in FETs based on exfoliated WSe2 flakes. The device features asymmetric Schottky contacts characterized by significant disparities in their respective contact areas. Comprehensive electrical characterization under both dark and illuminated conditions reveals a controllable PPC. Specifically, the transistor exhibits a transition between STP and LTP that is selectively governed by the polarity of the applied drain bias.

This mechanism enables straightforward control over the synaptic response solely through engineered contact asymmetry, a configuration that is easily achievable via various fabrication strategies, such as top-and-bottom contact geometries, modulation of electrode or flake thickness, or by using different contact metals. The inherent simplicity of this architecture suggests high generalizability across other material systems. Furthermore, by exploiting the interplay between asymmetric Schottky barriers and trap-mediated photogating, we experimentally demonstrate associative learning at the device level, analogous to classical Pavlovian conditioning. Collectively, these results highlight the suitability of WSe2-based optoelectronic devices for next-generation neuromorphic computing and bioinspired learning architectures.

2. Materials and Methods

WSe2 flakes, characterized by the atomic structure shown in Figure a, were mechanically exfoliated and transferred onto an 85 nm SiO2/Si substrate. Ni/Au (20 nm/200 nm) contacts were fabricated via metal evaporation following standard photolithography and liftoff steps, resulting in the device displayed in Figure b. Specifically, the device features highly asymmetric Ni/Au electrodes with respect to their interfacial area with the WSe2 flake. Designating these terminals as Contact A and Contact B, their respective contact areas are approximately 138 μm2 and 5 μm2. Material quality was verified by Raman spectroscopy (Figure c), showing the spectrum of the multilayer WSe2 flake exhibits well-separated peaks corresponding to the E 1 2g/A 1g and 2LA­(M) modes. As previously noted, such multilayer flakes are selected to ensure higher carrier concentrations.

1.

1

Exfoliated WSe2-based field-effect transistor. a. Atomic structure of WSe2. b. Optical image of the flake with asymmetric Ni/Au contacts. c. Raman spectrum of the multilayer WSe2 flake. d. Schematic of the device with measurement setup and conditions.

The measurement setup and device schematic are illustrated in Figure d. Electrical characterization was performed in a two-probe configuration using nanoprobes, with the back-gate voltage applied directly through the sample holder. Data were acquired using a Keithley 4200 Semiconductor Characterization System at room temperature under vacuum (10–4 mbar). Measurements were conducted under high vacuum to isolate the intrinsic device physics from the influence of atmospheric adsorbates, which are known to modulate the transport and photoconductive properties of TMDs. Despite this choice, the device maintains robust electrical and synaptic functionality under ambient conditions, as demonstrated by the characterization provided in Figure S2 of the Supporting Information. All the measurements presented in this work were conducted on a single representative device, as shown in Figure a. Finally, the device photoresponse was analyzed using white light from a supercontinuum laser source, delivering white light in the spectral range from 420 to 2400 nm with a maximum optical power of 16.5 mW.

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Persistence of the Photocurrent

The electrical transport properties of the device were probed by measuring the drain-source current (I d) as a function of the drain-source voltage (V ds, output characteristics) and gate-source voltage (V gs, transfer characteristics). Figure a (black line) displays the current–voltage (IV) characteristics acquired in the dark with a grounded gate. The curve exhibits a pronounced difference between positive and negative drain bias polarities, characteristic of an asymmetric back-to-back Schottky barrier structure. The reverse leakage current in a Schottky diode is governed by thermionic emission and described by the following formula

I=SA*T2e−qϕBkT 1

where S represents the effective contact area, A* is the effective Richardson constant, and the exponential term relates to the Schottky barrier height qϕ B . The Schottky barrier heights at both contact interfaces were evaluated by performing temperature-dependent output characterization at a grounded gate from 300 to 380 K (see Figure S3a in the Supporting Information). By applying the standard Richardson plot analysis (Figure S3b), we extracted nearly identical barrier heights of 0.48 ± 0.02 eV for contact A (probed at positive V ds) and 0.53 ± 0.03 eV for contact B (probed at negative V ds). A comprehensive discussion of the Richardson analysis can be found in Section 3 of the Supporting Information.

2.

2

Optoelectronic characterization and persistent photoconductivity of the WSe2 FET. a. Output characteristics measured in the dark state, under illumination, and immediately after switching off the light. b. Effect of a gate pulse on the device recovery. Current–voltage curves show the persistent photocurrent and the restoration of the initial state after a positive gate pulse of 5 V for 20 s. c. Time-resolved photoresponse illustrating the persistence effect. The light is turned on for 160 s, followed by 6 h of data collection in the dark. The inset displays a statistical analysis of the current stability. d, e . Transfer characteristics comparing dark and illuminated states at a drain voltage of 1 V (d) and −1 V (e). The black arrows indicate the gate sweep direction. f. Evolution of the transfer curves at a drain voltage of 1 V acquired before, during, and after light exposure.

To ensure that the observed current asymmetry is not an artifact of potential barrier inhomogeneities, we further conducted a Werner-Güttler analysis (Figure S3c). This analysis revealed a standard deviation from the mean barrier height of approximately 10–2 eV for both interfaces. This negligible value falls within the experimental uncertainty associated with the Richardson method, confirming that the contact behavior is not significantly influenced by barrier fluctuations. Consequently, these findings provide strong evidence that the electrical asymmetry of the device is fundamentally rooted in the geometric disparity of the contact areas.

The device was stimulated by the light from a supercontinuum laser of nominal power P nom = 16.5 mW. The incident optical power density was calculated by normalizing the active channel area S active = 33.25 μm2 to the laser spot size S spot = 1 mm2 according to

Pinc=Pnom·SactiveSspot 2

Unless otherwise specified, measurements were conducted at 80% of the maximum laser power, corresponding to an incident power of P inc (80%) = 0.44 μW. Upon illumination, photoexcitation and photogeneration of electron–hole pairs increase the free carrier density, leading to the symmetrization of the IV curve observed in Figure a (red line). After switching off the light, the IV curve (Figure a, purple line) deviates from the initial dark state. Specifically, at positive V ds, the current fails to immediately relax to the preillumination level. This residual current, indicated by the green line in Figure a, is attributed to persistent photoconductivity. The absence of PPC at negative V ds underscores the critical role of contact asymmetry in this mechanism. Importantly, applying a positive gate pulse (V gs = 5 V) of 20 s suppresses the PPC, restoring the device to its pristine dark state (Figure b, blue line).

To elucidate the relaxation dynamics and the magnitude of the persistent current, time-dependent drain current measurements were performed at a grounded gate with a fixed drain bias of (V ds = 1 V). Following a 160 s optical pulse, the device does not relax immediately to the initial dark state but settles into a metastable, high-conductivity level. As shown in Figure c, the PPC, highlighted by the green arrow, remains stable for over 6 h. The stability of this excited state during the final 3 h of measurement is detailed in the inset of Figure c; the recorded current values exhibit a Gaussian distribution with a mean value of 45.53 nA and a standard deviation of 0.97 nA. This exceptional stability suggests a fundamental alteration in the conduction state, which can be reset via gate bias.

The transfer curve was investigated by sweeping V gs from 40 V to −40 V under both dark and illuminated conditions, at V ds = 1 V (Figure d) and V ds = −1 V (Figure e). As reported in Figure S1 of the Supporting Information, the gate leakage current was thoroughly monitored. The device displays ambipolar transport behavior, consistent with literature reports for similar WSe2 devices. , Notably, the charge neutrality point (Dirac point) is shifted toward positive V gs values, indicating p-type doping. In nickel-contacted WSe2, p-doping is typically attributed to tungsten vacancies, which represent the dominant defect in such material. Furthermore, a pronounced hysteresis is observed in the transfer characteristics under both positive and negative Vds biases, driven by the forward and reverse gate voltage sweeps. In TMD-based field-effect transistors, this hysteretic behavior is generally attributed to charge trapping and detrapping mechanisms occurring in intrinsic traps, at the oxide-semiconductor interface and within the dielectric layer, which collectively screen the applied gate field during the voltage sweeps. ,

The signature of persistent photoconductivity is also evident in the transfer characteristics displayed in Figure f. Immediately following illumination, the transfer curve retains a rigid shift toward negative gate voltages, pointing to positive charge storage. Even after the light source is extinguished, this shift persists; consequently, the current at zero gate bias remains elevated compared to the preillumination level, confirming the presence of the PPC effect (indicated by the green line).

To elucidate the photoconduction mechanisms governing the device operation, a power-dependent analysis was conducted. The temporal evolution of the drain current was recorded at a fixed drain bias and V gs = 0 V. Optical excitation started at t = 100 s, with the incident laser intensity varying from 10% to 80% of the maximum power. The photocurrent (I ph) was extracted as the differential current between the illuminated and the dark level

Iph=Ilight−Idark 3

I ph is plotted versus P inc in a log–log scale in the inset of Figure a. According to the standard power-law dependence,

Iph=APα 4

the exponent α provides insight into the generation/recombination kinetics and charge collection efficiency. A fit to the experimental data, reported in the inset of Figure a, yields α ≈ 0.6, indicating a sublinear photoresponse. Values of α in the range 0.5 < α < 1 are typically indicative of one specific trap-limited process, where the collection efficiency of photogenerated carriers is hindered by the presence of trapping intragap states.

3.

3

Power and gate modulation of the WSe2 optoelectronic synapse. a. Power-dependent photoconductivity. The inset shows the log–log plot of photocurrent versus optical power, revealing a sublinear behavior with a scaling exponent of 0.6. b. Time-resolved current response measured at a fixed drain bias while varying the gate voltage from −30 to 30 V in 10 V increments. c. Dependence of the photocurrent and persistent photocurrent on the applied gate voltage. d. Erasure of the persistent photoconductivity using positive gate voltage pulses of varying durations. e, f. Control measurements demonstrate that positive gate pulses effectively reset the persistent state (e) but induce no change when applied to the initial dark state (f). g. Schematic illustration of the costimulated synaptic device architecture based on a WSe2 transistor.

Furthermore, the dependence of the photoconductivity on the gate bias was investigated to study the interplay between electrostatic doping and carrier trapping. The time-resolved current response was measured while stepping V gs from −30 V to +30 V in 10 V increments, as displayed in Figure b. The data reveal different behavior between the negative and positive gate bias regimes. At Vgs = 0 V, the device exhibits a slow temporal rise upon illumination and a significant PPC following the extinction of the light source. This slow dynamic response is less pronounced at negative gate voltages. Conversely, at positive gate voltages, the photoresponse mechanism is fundamentally different: the device shows rapid switching dynamics with no observable persistence. This confirms the observations in Figure b, where a positive gate bias was shown to effectively quench the PPC. Figure c summarizes the gate dependence of the photocurrent magnitude (black squares) and the PPC ratio (red dots). The PPC ratio is defined as the residual current after light extinction relative to the photoinduced current, described by

PPC(%)=Idark,post−Idark,preIlight−Idark,pre 5

This metric quantifies the fraction of current that persists. The maximum photocurrent and PPC occur at V gs = 0 V. The PPC is effectively suppressed at positive gate biases and slightly reduced at negative biases. The correlation between the modulation of I ph and the PPC suggests that the same physical mechanism governs both the steady-state photoresponse and the persistent trapping effects.

The possibility of electrically erasing the persistent photocurrent was systematically investigated by applying positive gate voltage pulses of controlled duration. Figure d illustrates the device response to varying the pulse width of the reset signal. It is observed that a positive V gs pulse of at least 20 s is required to fully suppress persistence and restore the initial dark current level, attesting to the robustness and high stability of the photoexcited state. Furthermore, this dynamic response implies that the modulation signals need not be continuous; both the optical excitation (potentiation) and the electrical gate reset (depression) can be discretized into trains of shorter pulses. This capability allows for the fine-tuning of the device conductance state through the summation of discrete stimuli, a key feature for mimicking synaptic weight updates. A sequence of 5 optical pulses (period T = 2 s) was employed to progressively excite the current, establishing a distinct, elevated conductance state. This state can be subsequently erased by applying a corresponding train of 10 positive gate voltage pulses, effectively enabling a reversible write-erase protocol, as shown in Figure e. To verify that the posterasure baseline corresponds to the nonexcited dark level, the same positive gate sequence was applied to the device in the dark. The current exhibited only a minor transient decrease before fully relaxing to the initial starting level, confirming its stability (Figure f).

These transport characteristics establish a robust framework for implementing neuromorphic functionality, as conceptually illustrated in Figure g. The optical modulation of the drain current mimics the excitatory postsynaptic current (EPSC) observed in biological synapses. In our device, the photogeneration of electron–hole pairs enhances the channel conductivity, emulating this excitatory response. Crucially, efficient neural processing also requires a mechanism for depotentiation, i.e., the ability to forget obsolete information. The net synaptic weight is determined by the summation of these excitatory and inhibitory signals. We emulate this integration by utilizing light pulses for potentiation and positive gate voltage for depression. Consequently, the device operates as an elementary neural node with two distinct inputs (optical and electrical) and a single output (drain current).

While the gate-based control aligns with conventional three-terminal synaptic transistors, the optical input offers a distinct advantage: the highly stable and tunable PPC allows for the precise emulation of synaptic plasticity. Synaptic plasticity is widely recognized as the primary biological mechanism for information storage, serving as the bridge between transient sensory inputs and the formation of permanent memories. In our device, this phenomenon is emulated by encoding optical stimuli into a long-term potentiated state via PPC. Furthermore, the device provides the capability to inhibit or depress this state through the application of a gate voltage, thereby replicating the dynamic modulation of synaptic weights.

To elucidate the origin of the persistent photocurrent, we propose a band-structure model based on defect-mediated charge dynamics, as schematically illustrated in Figure . In the construction of the schematic band diagram, the work functions for both Ni and WSe2 were assumed to be approximately 4.5 eV. The bandgap and electron affinity utilized were 1.1 and 3.7 eV, respectively. , Intrinsic defects introduce acceptor-like states, deep within the bandgap, inducing WSe2 p-type doping. , These defects capture electrons, thereby generating free holes in the valence band. Consequently, the equilibrium band alignment (Figure a) exhibits a barrier profile that favors hole injections.

4.

4

Proposed band-structure model illustrating the defect-mediated persistent photocurrent. a. Equilibrium energy band diagram in the dark state. Acceptor-like trap states within the bandgap result in p-type doping and the barrier profile favors hole injection. b, c. Incident photons ionize the trap states, generating free electrons and leaving localized positive charges. This creates a virtual positive gate effect (b) that induces downward band bending, lowering the Schottky barrier for electron injection and switching the device to an n-type conduction regime (c). d. The model also accounts for the persistent state caused by hindered carrier recombination.

Upon illumination, the incident photon energy ionizes these occupied trap states. The electrons are excited into the conduction band, while the positively charged vacancies remain localized. These fixed positive charges act as a virtual positive gate. This photogating effect induces a downward band bending, effectively shifting the device from a p-type to an n-type conduction regime (Figure b-c). This transition lowers the effective Schottky barrier for electron injections, resulting in the observed dominance of electron transport under illumination and the corresponding negative shift (left shift) of the transfer curve (red line in Figure d). The slow temporal rise of the photocurrent (Figure a) and its sublinear power dependence further corroborate a transport mechanism governed by the kinetics of traps. Following the extinction of the light source, the system does not immediately relax to equilibrium. The restoration of the dark state requires the recapture of electrons by the ionized vacancies. However, this recombination process is suppressed because the electric field rapidly sweeps electrons toward the drain, reducing the time available for recombination. This difficulty in reoccupying the trap states maintains the “virtual gate” effect, leading to a metastable band configuration where the transfer curve remains shifted and the current at V gs = 0 V is higher, as confirmed by the postillumination transfer sweep in Figure f. This mechanism explains the remarkable long-term stability of the excited state reported in Figure c. This model also accounts for the gate-dependent photoresponse. When a large positive gate bias is applied, the channel is flooded with electrons (majority carriers). The high electron density significantly increases the capture probability, facilitating the rapid reoccupation of trap states upon light extinction and effectively suppressing the PPC. Conversely, at negative gate biases, the gate electrostatic field counteracts the local photogating, thereby reducing both the net photocurrent magnitude and the PPC, consistent with the data in Figure c.

3.2. Light-Stimulated Neuromorphic Behavior

To evaluate the device’s capability to emulate biological temporal processing, we characterized the drain current response under pulsed optical stimulation varying timing parameters. Figure a displays the time-resolved drain current at positive drain bias (V ds > 0) stimulated by a train of 10 short optical pulses with variable interspike intervals (t off), ranging from 50 to 800 ms. This measurement protocol permits the estimation of Paired-Pulse Facilitation (PPF), a fundamental form of synaptic plasticity observed in biological neural networks. In biological systems, PPF manifests as an enhancement of the excitatory postsynaptic current when a second spike closely follows a preceding one. To quantify this effect in our artificial synapse, the PPF index is defined as

PPF(%)=A2A1×100(%) 6

5.

5

Device response to optical pulse stimulation at different drain voltages. a. Dynamic response to 10 consecutive light pulses with a fixed on-time of 50 ms and varying off-times, measured at V ds = 1 V. b. PPF percentage plotted as a function of the time interval between pulses at a drain voltage of 1 V. The dashed blue line represents a double-exponential decay fit. c. Response to a train of 150 consecutive light pulses with varying off-times, recorded at a fixed drain voltage of 1 V. d. Current increment as a function of the number of pulses. The curve shows that saturation occurs after approximately 50 pulses. e. Dynamic response to 10 consecutive light pulses with a fixed on-time of 50 ms and varying off-times, measured at a negative drain voltage of −1 V. f. PPF percentage plotted as a function of the time interval between pulses at a drain voltage of −1 V, fitted with a double-exponential decay function.

where A 1 and A 2 represent the peak current amplitudes triggered by the first and second pulse, respectively (see the inset of Figure b). As shown in Figure b, the PPF index reaches its maximum of 167% at the shortest pulse intervals and decays asymptotically toward 100% (indicating no facilitation) as the interval increases. The temporal decay of the PPF is fitted using a double-exponential function, consistent with biological models:

PPF=C0+C1exp(−Δtτ1)+C2exp(−Δtτ2) 7

where C 0 represents the baseline (100%), while τ1 and τ2 denote the characteristic relaxation times for the rapid and slow phases, respectively. Notably, the extracted time constants are τ2 ≈ 1 ms and τ2 ≈ 100 ms. These values are significantly faster than those reported in many comparable 2D material-based devices and well align with the natural time scales of biological synapses (ms to s). ,

To further investigate the device stability and response to sustained stimulation, we exposed it to a train of 150 optical pulses (Figure c). Figure d illustrates the drain current evolution as a function of pulse number until saturation. Both the figures reveal Spike-Rate Dependent Plasticity (SRDP): the cumulative increase in conductance is dependent on the frequency of the stimulus. As the time interval between consecutive pulses increases, the cumulative effect diminishes.

A contrast in synaptic behavior is observed when the polarity is reversed to negative drain bias. Due to the suppression of the PPC at V ds = −1 V, the device exhibits negligible memory retention. Consequently, the current rapidly relaxes to the dark level upon light extinction, preventing the efficient summation of postsynaptic currents unless the pulse interval is extremely short. This results in a significantly reduced PPF index compared to the positive bias regime, e.g., 136% at minimal spacing, although the characteristic times remain comparable. This polarity-dependent behavior provides a versatile mechanism to switch the device functionality between Long-Term Potentiation (LTP) and Short-Term Potentiation (STP). From a neuromorphic engineering perspective, this duality is critical as it emulates the brain’s ability to optimize energy and processing resources by filtering irrelevant information (STP) while consolidating significant events into memory (LTP). In our architecture, this transition is controlled by switching from positive V ds (LTP mode) to negative V ds (STP mode). In particular, a double exponential fit of the photocurrent decay under both positive and negative V ds polarities are provided in Figure S4 of the Supporting Information. This analysis confirms the distinct short- and long-term retention characteristics of the photocurrent at the two drain voltages, consistent with the observed bias-dependent synaptic behavior.

The difference in persistence between positive and negative bias regimes is a direct consequence of the geometric asymmetry of the Schottky contacts. Under a positive bias applied to Contact A, electrons are injected from the grounded, smaller-area Contact B. The injection current is directly proportional to the effective contact area. Consequently, this smaller electrode acts as a transport bottleneck, injecting a significantly lower density of electrons into the channel. Because the recombination rate is strictly dependent on the free-carrier concentration, this restricted electron density severely reduces the probability of electrons being captured by ionized trap states. This hindered recombination sustains the photogenerated “virtual gate” effect, ultimately leading to the observed persistent photocurrent. Conversely, under a negative bias, electrons are injected from the larger-area Contact A. This extended geometric area facilitates a substantially higher injection of charge carriers into the channel. The resulting high density of free electrons drastically increases their capture probability by the localized positive traps. This promotes rapid and efficient charge recombination, which quickly quenches the photogating effect and results in a fast relaxation of the device current.

This result highlights the potential of utilizing asymmetric Schottky barrier field-effect transistors to engineer controllable and reconfigurable synaptic plasticity for neuromorphic computing. Overall, the demonstrated synaptic behavior indicates that the optically driven dynamics, retention characteristics, and bias-controlled plasticity of this device are fully consistent with the operational requirements of light-stimulated artificial synapses based on 2D semiconductors.

Compared to WSe2 neuromorphic devices reported in the literature, which often rely on heterojunctions, the device presented here employs a structurally simple exfoliated WSe2 channel, yet exhibits highly stable, long-lived photoinduced conductance states and optically driven plasticity, with paired-pulse facilitation metrics comparable to those of state-of-the-art WSe2 neuromorphic devices. Importantly, the plastic state can be efficiently and reversibly switched between long-term and short-term regimes and fully reset only through electrical biasing, enabling robust and reconfigurable long- and short-term synaptic functionality without the need for complex heterostructures or floating-gate integration.

3.3. Pavlovian Conditioning and Simulation of an Artificial Neural Network

To further extend the functionalities of the device under study, we performed an experiment based on Pavlovian conditioning. This simple yet fundamental concept is an example of associative learning. In the biological model, food acts as an unconditioned stimulus. When food is presented, it naturally triggers salivation, which is called the unconditioned response. In contrast, a bell is initially a neutral stimulus because it does not trigger any reaction on its own. However, if the bell is rung at the same time the food is presented, the subject learns to associate the two stimuli. After this learning process, the neutral stimulus (the bell) becomes linked to the unconditioned stimulus (the food). As a result, the bell alone is sufficient to trigger the salivation.

Experimentally, we mapped the biological inputs to the electrical signals of our device. The gate voltage acts as the food (unconditioned stimulus), while the light acts as the bell (neutral stimulus). We defined a current threshold of 150 nA; any value above this level corresponds to salivation. The food stimulus consists of ten gate spikes at −5 V, and the bell stimulus consists of ten light pulses at 80% power. Both signals have a period of 4 s and the measurement is conducted at a fixed drain bias of 1 V, while the gate voltage is initially grounded. The experimental setup is summarized in Figure a. Figure b shows the initial state: the neutral stimulus (light) alone generates a current below the 150 nA threshold, meaning no salivation occurs. In Figure c, we apply gate voltage pulses (food) alone. This causes the current to exceed 150 nA, triggering salivation. It is important to note that stimulating the device with the gate voltage alone does not enable the light to trigger a response later. This observation confirms that, in the absence of simultaneous pairing, no association is formed, as evidenced by the lack of response during the subsequent light stimulation shown in Figure c.

6.

6

Pavlovian classical conditioning experiment. a. Experimental configuration and bias conditions used to mimic the associative learning in Pavlov’s dog. b. Response to the neutral stimulus (bell) prior to conditioning. The stimulus alone is insufficient to trigger a significant output signal (salivation). c. Control test showing that the unconditioned stimulus (Food) triggers a response, whereas a subsequent isolated bell pulse fails to induce salivation d. The simultaneous application of bell and food stimuli (associative learning) strengthens the synaptic weight, allowing the bell alone to trigger the response (salivation). The plot monitors the subsequent decay of the association over time (forgetting) and the successful reestablishment of the connection through a second training.

The learning process is shown in Figure d. Here, we applied the light and gate signals simultaneously three times. After this training, the light pulses alone are sufficient to generate a current above 150 nA. This demonstrates that the device has successfully associated the bell with the food. Over time, the device shows a forgetting behavior, but the current remains higher than its initial state, indicating long-term plasticity. A single retraining step is then enough to restore the full response. This behavior is possible because the transfer curve under illumination is hysteretic, allowing repeated pulses to reach and maintain higher current levels.

Pavlovian conditioning is a classical experimental paradigm commonly used to demonstrate the emergence of associative behavior in biological systems. In contrast, current research in neuromorphic engineering primarily designs artificial networks inspired by neural processes. Artificial Neural Networks are computational models consisting of interconnected nodes organized in hierarchical layers. In these models, input data are processed through weighted connections and activation functions to generate an output, while training is achieved by iteratively adjusting weights via error minimization algorithms such as backpropagation. In this work, image recognition tasks were simulated using NeuroSim V3.0, an open-source framework designed for the implementation of synaptic devices in neuromorphic architectures. The network architecture was defined as a fully connected Multi-Layer Perceptron comprising three layers: an input layer of 400 neurons, a hidden layer of 100 neurons, and an output layer of 10 neurons, as illustrated in Figure a. From a hardware perspective, the physical realization of a large-scale ANN based entirely on 2D materials, such as WSe2, remains a formidable challenge at the current state of the art. This difficulty stems from intrinsic technological bottlenecks, including device-to-device variability, challenges in uniform wafer-scale synthesis, and the complex peripheral circuitry required for multiplexed multidevice stimulation and precise conductance control. Consequently, the ANN implemented in this study is entirely simulated in software. This approach serves as a system-level proof of concept, illustrating the potential neuromorphic capabilities of the device while acknowledging the current limits of 2D material integration. The MNIST handwritten digit database was utilized as the data set; specifically, the original images were flattened into 20 × 20 pixel input vectors to match the 400 input neurons. Training was executed using the Stochastic Gradient Descent algorithm over a total of 125 epochs. To optimize computational efficiency and mimic on chip learning constraints, each training epoch utilized a subset of 8000 images randomly selected from the 60000 available training samples, while inference accuracy was evaluated on the full set of 10000 test images. To ensure that the simulation incorporates realistic constraints, key synaptic parameters, specifically the maximum and minimum current (I high, I low), read voltage, and pulse duration, were extracted from potentiation characteristics consistent with those employed in the associative learning experiments. To implement the simulation, uniform device performance and linear, symmetric weight update characteristics were assumed across the network. Accordingly, the empirical parameters extracted from a single representative device were universally mapped onto all network nodes.

7.

7

Simulation of an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) for handwritten digit recognition. a. Schematic representation of the MNIST digit data set and the layer structure of the simulated ANN. b. Comparison of classification accuracy as a function of training epochs for ANNs based on an ideal device (black curve), light-stimulated (orange curve), and gate-stimulated (red curve) WSe2 devices. c-e. Image recognition simulations using experimental data from gate-stimulated artificial synapses: the device configuration is schematized in (c), while the corresponding confusion matrices show the increase in accuracy from Epoch 1 (d) to Epoch 125 (e). f-h. Detailed performance analysis for the light-modulated configuration.

Detailed information regarding the parameter extraction methodology is provided in Figure S5 of the Supporting Information. Specifically, the simulation incorporated physical models for both gate- and light-modulated devices, referred to as gate and optical stimulus configurations. Figure b reports the recognition accuracy as a function of training epochs. The performance of the realistic models, both gate-driven (Figure c) and light-driven (Figure f), is compared with an Ideal Device model, available in the open source of NeuroSim. In addition to classification accuracy, a neural network’s ability to predict all output classes with similar confidence is a very important performance parameter. Confusion matrix is a useful tool for understanding the effectiveness of the neural network model in differentiating the various output classes. Confusion matrices are arranged as square matrices to compare the predicted output with the ground truth values. The diagonal elements represent the normalized values of number of correct predictions and off-diagonal elements denote the corresponding wrong predictions. The confusion matrices for the gate configuration are reported in Figure d-e for Epoch 1 and 125, showing an increment in accuracy until about 72%. The accuracy acquired with the light configuration at epoch 125 is lower (≈60%) because of the lower ratio between the maximum and minimum conductance states, as is clearly visible in Figure S5a-b.

4. Conclusions

In this work, we have demonstrated that robust neuromorphic functionality does not necessarily require complex material engineering or multilayered heterostructures. By employing a structurally simple exfoliated WSe2 field-effect transistor, we achieved a versatile optoelectronic synapse capable of mimicking essential biological features such as Paired-Pulse Facilitation and associative learning. Our results suggest a different perspective compared to the standard requirement for defect-free devices; rather than eliminating intrinsic nonidealities, we leveraged them to enable synaptic functions. Intrinsic WSe2 defects and WSe2/oxide interface states are considered the primary trapping centers responsible for the observed persistent photoconductivity. Moreover, trap states at the WSe2/oxide interface drive hysteresis in the transfer characteristics, thereby enabling gate-voltage-driven write and erase operations. Crucially, we turned the geometric asymmetry of Schottky contacts, typically considered as a limitation for 2D device performance, into a functional control mechanism. This feature enables the selective switching between Short-Term and Long-Term Plasticity exclusively by tuning the drain bias polarity, allowing for the reconfiguration of synaptic weights without the need for additional floating gates or external memory elements. By validating the device through Pavlovian conditioning experiments and neural network simulations, our findings highlight the potential of WSe2 as a platform for energy-efficient and structurally simple brain-inspired systems.

5. Experimental Section

Thin WSe2 flakes are mechanically exfoliated onto a highly p-doped silicon substrate coated with 85 nm of thermally grown SiO2, which serves as the back-gate stack of the field-effect transistor. Metal contacts are then defined by photolithography, followed by electron-beam evaporation of Ni/Au (20 nm/200 nm) and a standard lift-off process.

Raman measurements are performed on the WSe2 flakes using a Horiba XploRA Plus Raman microscope equipped with an EMCCD detector and a 532 nm laser excitation.

Electrical characterization was performed in a Lake Shore probe station equipped with gold-coated tungsten tips with a radius of 25 μm. The system allowed measurements under variable temperatures in the range from 77 to 400 K and pressures between 10–4 and 103 mbar. Current–voltage characteristics were recorded using a Keithley 4200-SCS parameter analyzer. Optical response experiments were conducted with a SuperK COMPACT supercontinuum laser source (NKT Photonics), delivering white light in the spectral range from 420 to 2400 nm with an available optical power of up to 16.5 mW.

Supplementary Material

am6c07765_si_001.pdf (641.2KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Research Ireland (formerly Science Foundation Ireland) through the Frontiers for the Future PI Award (24/FFP-A/13329) and the AMBER Research Centre (SFI-12/RC/2278_P2). Support from the EU MSCA project 101153933 is also acknowledged.

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsami.6c07765.

  • Specific electrical characterizations, such as gate leakage current and ambient pressure measurements, an in-depth analysis of the Schottky barrier using the Richardson and Werner-Güttler models, and the estimation of additional parameters related to the neuromorphic behavior of the device. Furthermore, a comparison of the energy consumption per synaptic event with state-of-the-art literature is provided (PDF)

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Mead C.. Neuromorphic Electronic Systems. Proc. IEEE. 1990;78(10):1629–1636. doi: 10.1109/5.58356. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Indiveri G., Linares-Barranco B., Hamilton T. J., van Schaik A., Etienne-Cummings R., Delbruck T., Liu S.-C., Dudek P., Häfliger P., Renaud S.. et al. Neuromorphic Silicon Neuron Circuits. Front. Neurosci. 2011;5:73. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2011.00073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Mahowald M., Douglas R.. A Silicon Neuron. Nature. 1991;354(6354):515–518. doi: 10.1038/354515a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ham D., Park H., Hwang S., Kim K.. Neuromorphic Electronics Based on Copying and Pasting the Brain. Nat. Electron. 2021;4(9):635–644. doi: 10.1038/s41928-021-00646-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhang F., Li C., Li Z., Dong L., Zhao J.. Recent Progress in Three-Terminal Artificial Synapses Based on 2D Materials: From Mechanisms to Applications. Microsyst. Nanoeng. 2023;9(1):16. doi: 10.1038/s41378-023-00487-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Zhang G., Luo Q., Yao J., Zhong S., Wang H., Xue F., Yu B., Loh K. P., Zhang Y.. All-in-One Neuromorphic Hardware with 2D Material Technology: Current Status and Future Perspective. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2025;54(18):8196–8242. doi: 10.1039/D5CS00251F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hadke S., Kang M.-A., Sangwan V. K., Hersam M. C.. Two-Dimensional Materials for Brain-Inspired Computing Hardware. Chem. Rev. 2025;125(2):835–932. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kwak C., Park K., Song M.-K., Jang H. W., Suh J. M.. Van Der Waals Integration of 2D Materials for Advanced Intelligent Computing. Neuromorphic Comput. Eng. 2025;5(4):042002. doi: 10.1088/2634-4386/ae294e. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Wang Z., Li Q., Chen Y., Cui B., Li Y., Besenbacher F., Dong M.. The Ambipolar Transport Behavior of WSe2 Transistors and Its Analogue Circuits. NPG Asia Mater. 2018;10(8):703–712. doi: 10.1038/s41427-018-0062-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Yeh P.-C., Jin W., Zaki N., Zhang D., Liou J. T., Sadowski J. T., Al-Mahboob A., Dadap J. I., Herman I. P., Sutter P., Osgood R. M.. Layer-Dependent Electronic Structure of an Atomically Heavy Two-Dimensional Dichalcogenide. Phys. Rev. B. 2015;91(4):041407. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.041407. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jones A. M., Yu H., Ross J. S., Klement P., Ghimire N. J., Yan J., Mandrus D. G., Yao W., Xu X.. Spin–Layer Locking Effects in Optical Orientation of Exciton Spin in Bilayer WSe2. Nat. Phys. 2014;10(2):130–134. doi: 10.1038/nphys2848. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fang H., Chuang S., Chang T. C., Takei K., Takahashi T., Javey A.. High-Performance Single Layered WSe2 p-FETs with Chemically Doped Contacts. Nano Lett. 2012;12(7):3788–3792. doi: 10.1021/nl301702r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chernikov A., Berkelbach T. C., Hill H. M., Rigosi A., Li Y., Aslan B., Reichman D. R., Hybertsen M. S., Heinz T. F.. Exciton Binding Energy and Nonhydrogenic Rydberg Series in Monolayer ${\mathrm­{WS}}_{2}$ Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014;113(7):076802. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.076802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Akinwande D., Brennan C. J., Bunch J. S., Egberts P., Felts J. R., Gao H., Huang R., Kim J.-S., Li T., Li Y., Liechti K. M., Lu N., Park H. S., Reed E. J., Wang P., Yakobson B. I., Zhang T., Zhang Y.-W., Zhou Y., Zhu Y.. A Review on Mechanics and Mechanical Properties of 2D MaterialsGraphene and Beyond. Extreme Mech. Lett. 2017;13:42–77. doi: 10.1016/j.eml.2017.01.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ghosh S., Sadaf M. U. K., Graves A. R., Zheng Y., Pannone A., Ray S., Cheng C.-Y., Guevara J., Redwing J. M., Das S.. High-Performance p-Type Bilayer WSe2 Field Effect Transistors by Nitric Oxide Doping. Nat. Commun. 2025;16(1):5649. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-59684-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Tan Y., Yang S.-H., Lin C.-P., Vega F. J., Cai J., Lan H.-Y., Tripathi R., Sharma S., Shang Z., Hou T.-H., Beechem T. E., Appenzeller J., Chen Z.. Monolayer WSe2 Field-Effect Transistor Performance Enhancement by Atomic Defect Engineering and Passivation. ACS Nano. 2025;19(9):8916–8925. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.4c16831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Zhang H., Miao J., Zhang C., Zeng X., Zhang T., Chen T., Wu J., Gao K., Xu W., Zhang X., Zhao Y.. Improvement of P-Type Contact in WSe2 Field-Effect Transistors via Defect Engineering. Nano Lett. 2025;25(7):2803–2809. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c05970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Giubileo F., Faella E., De Stefano S., Viscardi L., Intonti K., Mazzotti A., Sessa A., Durante O., Pelella A., Cheng G., Mattevi C., Passacantando M., Bartolomeo A. D.. Hierarchical WSe2 Nanoflowers for Efficient Field Emission. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2025;11(19):e00490. doi: 10.1002/aelm.202500490. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Intonti K., Mazzotti A., Pelella A., Giubileo F., Martucciello N., O’Sullivan S., Patil V., Hurley P. K., Ansari L., Gity F.. et al. Ambipolar to Anti-Ambipolar Light-Induced Transition in WSe2-Based FETs. Mater. Horiz. 2025;13:2583–2594. doi: 10.1039/D5MH01871D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Zou Y., Zhang Z., Yan J., Lin L., Huang G., Tan Y., You Z., Li P.. High-Temperature Flexible WSe2 Photodetectors with Ultrahigh Photoresponsivity. Nat. Commun. 2022;13(1):4372. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32062-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Xiao D., Liu G.-B., Feng W., Xu X., Yao W.. Coupled Spin and Valley Physics in Monolayers of ${\mathrm­{MoS}}_{2}$ and Other Group-VI Dichalcogenides. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012;108(19):196802. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.196802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Siao M.-D., Gandhi A. C., Sahoo A. K., Wu Y.-C., Syu H.-K., Tsai M.-Y., Tsai T.-H., Yang Y.-C., Lin Y.-F., Liu R.-S., Chiu P.-W.. WSe2/WS2 Heterobilayer Nonvolatile Memory Device with Boosted Charge Retention. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2022;14(2):3467–3475. doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c20076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Chen M., Wang Y., Shepherd N., Huard C., Zhou J., Guo L. J., Lu W., Liang X.. Abnormal Multiple Charge Memory States in Exfoliated Few-Layer WSe2 Transistors. ACS Nano. 2017;11(1):1091–1102. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.6b08156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Huang Z., Wang L., Zhang Y., Cheng Z., Chen F.. Simulation of Optoelectronic Synaptic Behavior in SnSe2/WSe2 Heterojunction Transistors. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2025;7(5):1906–1913. doi: 10.1021/acsaelm.4c02195. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sung J., Kim S. W., Lee D., Moon S., Lee E., Kim H. H.. Co-Stimuli-Driven 2D WSe2 Optoelectronic Synapses for Neuromorphic Computing. Small. 2025;21(31):2504024. doi: 10.1002/smll.202504024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Tan T., Xu Q., Feng X.. The Rise of Two-Dimensional Materials Based Memtransistors for Neuromorphic Computing. Chip. 2026;5:100170. doi: 10.1016/j.chip.2025.100170. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Guo Z., Liu J., Han X., Ma F., Rong D., Du J., Yang Y., Wang T., Li G., Huang Y., Xing J.. High-Performance Artificial Synapse Based on CVD-Grown WSe2 Flakes with Intrinsic Defects. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2023;15(15):19152–19162. doi: 10.1021/acsami.3c00417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Su Z., Cheng H., Sun X., Sun H., Zuo C.. High-Performance Floating Gate Heterostructure With WSe2-MoS2 Diode Channel for Neural Synapse. IEEE Electron. Device Lett. 2023;44(7):1084–1087. doi: 10.1109/LED.2023.3278454. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Zeng Y., Lv W., Hou Z., Huang W., Yu Z., Han Z., Zhan R., Zeng T., Luo Y., Lin Y., Lv W., Fang B., Zeng Z., Guo L.. A Floating-Gate Photoelectric Synaptic Transistor Utilizing BP/POx/WSe2 Heterostructure for Neuromorphic Visual Processing. Adv. Sci. 2025;12(45):e10063. doi: 10.1002/advs.202510063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kim S. H., Park M. U., Lee C., Yi S.-G., Kim M., Choi Y., Cho J. H., Yoo K.-H.. Rectifying Optoelectronic Memory Based on WSe2/Graphene Heterostructures. Nanoscale Adv. 2021;3(17):4952–4960. doi: 10.1039/D1NA00504A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Tang H., Anwar T., Jang M. S., Tagliabue G.. Light-Intensity Switching of Graphene/WSe2 Synaptic Devices. Adv. Sci. 2024;11(24):2309876. doi: 10.1002/advs.202309876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Wang X., Chen F., Li X., Xiang T., Wang L.. Emulation of Optoelectronic Synaptic Behavior in a MoS2/WSe2-Based p–n van Der Waals Heterostructure Memtransistor. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2024;6(6):4311–4320. doi: 10.1021/acsaelm.4c00397. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Ma M., Huang C., Yang M., He D., Pei Y., Kang Y., Li W., Lei C., Xiao X.. Ultra-Low Power Consumption Artificial Photoelectric Synapses Based on Lewis Acid Doped WSe2 for Neuromorphic Computing. Small. 2024;20(51):2406402. doi: 10.1002/smll.202406402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Lu Y., Chen C., Sun Q., Zhang N., Lv K., Chen Z., He Y., Tang H., Chen P.. Near-Infrared Synaptic Responses of WSe2 Artificial Synapse Based on Upconversion Luminescence from Lanthanide Doped Nanoparticles. Inorganics. 2025;13(7):236. doi: 10.3390/inorganics13070236. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Luo S., Liao K., Lei P., Jiang T., Chen S., Xie Q., Luo W., Huang W., Yuan S., Jie W., Hao J.. A Synaptic Memristor Based on Two-Dimensional Layered WSe2 Nanosheets with Short- and Long-Term Plasticity. Nanoscale. 2021;13(13):6654–6660. doi: 10.1039/D0NR08725D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Zhang X., Qiu D., Hou P.. Enhanced Self-Powered Metal–Semiconductor–Metal WSe2 Photodetectors with Asymmetric Schottky Contacts through Tailored Electrode Thickness and Positioning. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2024;124(22):222105. doi: 10.1063/5.0212957. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Tong L., Su C., Li H., Wang X., Fan W., Wang Q., Kunsági-Máté S., Yan H., Yin S.. Self-Driven Gr/WSe2/Gr Photodetector with High Performance Based on Asymmetric Schottky van Der Waals Contacts. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2023;15(49):57868–57878. doi: 10.1021/acsami.3c14331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Kim J., Venkatesan A., Phan N. A. N., Kim Y., Kim H., Whang D., Kim G.-H.. Schottky Diode with Asymmetric Metal Contacts on WS2. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2022;8(3):2100941. doi: 10.1002/aelm.202100941. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Mathew S., Abraham A. R., Chintalapati S., Sarkar S., Joseph B., Venkatesan T.. Temperature Dependent Structural Evolution of WSe2: A Synchrotron X-Ray Diffraction Study. Condens. Matter. 2020;5(4):76. doi: 10.3390/condmat5040076. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Koleśnik-Gray M., Meingast L., Siebert M., Unbehaun T., Huf T., Ellrott G., Abellán G., Wild S., Lloret V., Mundloch U., Schwarz J., Niebauer M., Szabo M., Rommel M., Hutzler A., Hauke F., Hirsch A., Krstić V.. Unconventional Conductivity Increase in Multilayer Black Phosphorus. Npj 2D. Mater. Appl. 2023;7(1):21. doi: 10.1038/s41699-023-00384-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Mazzotti A., Intonti K., Sessa A., Viscardi L., Durante O., Pelella A., O’sullivan S., Patil V., Hurley P. K., Ansari L.. et al. Defect-Tuned Conduction in Ultrathin MoTe2 Field-Effect Transistors. J. Mater. Chem. C. 2026;14:9773–9787. doi: 10.1039/D6TC00385K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. De Stefano S., Spuri A., Barbella R., Durante O., Mazzotti A., Sessa A., Di Bernardo A.. Multilayer MoS2 Schottky Barrier Field Effect Transistor. IEEE Open J. Nanotechnol. 2025;6:51–57. doi: 10.1109/OJNANO.2025.3553692. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Di Bartolomeo A., Intonti K., Peluso L., Di Marco R., Vocca G., Romeo F., Giubileo F., Grillo A., Orhan E.. Metal-Semiconductor Schottky Diode with Landauer’s Formalism. Nano Express. 2025;6(2):022501. doi: 10.1088/2632-959X/ade460. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Werner J. H., Güttler H. H.. Barrier Inhomogeneities at Schottky Contacts. J. Appl. Phys. 1991;69(3):1522–1533. doi: 10.1063/1.347243. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. De Stefano S., Durante O., Sessa A., Politano A., D’Olimpio G., Dadiani T., Faella E., Dinescu A., Parvulescu C., Hetherington C., Kuo C.-N., Lue C. S., Aldrigo M., Passacantando M., Di Bartolomeo A.. Neuromorphic Photoresponse in Ultrathin SnS2-Based Field Effect Transistor. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2025;17(36):50901–50915. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5c11651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Di Bartolomeo A., Genovese L., Foller T., Giubileo F., Luongo G., Croin L., Liang S.-J., Ang L. K., Schleberger M.. Electrical Transport and Persistent Photoconductivity in Monolayer MoS 2 Phototransistors. Nanotechnology. 2017;28(21):214002. doi: 10.1088/1361-6528/aa6d98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Kim J., Cho K., Pak J., Lee W., Seo J., Kim J.-K., Shin J., Jang J., Baek K.-Y., Lee J., Chung S., Kang K., Lee T.. Channel-Length-Modulated Avalanche Multiplication in Ambipolar WSe2 Field-Effect Transistors. ACS Nano. 2022;16(4):5376–5383. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.1c08104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Pelella A., Camilli L., Giubileo F., Zak A., Passacantando M., Guo Y., Intonti K., Kumar A., Di Bartolomeo A.. Ambipolar Conduction in Gated Tungsten Disulphide Nanotube. Nanoscale. 2025;17(4):2052–2060. doi: 10.1039/D4NR04877F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Zheng Y. J., Chen Y., Huang Y. L., Gogoi P. K., Li M.-Y., Li L.-J., Trevisanutto P. E., Wang Q., Pennycook S. J., Wee A. T. S., Quek S. Y.. Point Defects and Localized Excitons in 2D WSe2. ACS Nano. 2019;13(5):6050–6059. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.9b02316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Di Bartolomeo A., Kumar A., Durante O., Sessa A., Faella E., Viscardi L., Intonti K., Giubileo F., Martucciello N., Romano P., Sleziona S., Schleberger M.. Temperature-Dependent Photoconductivity in Two-Dimensional MoS2 Transistors. Mater. Today Nano. 2023;24:100382. doi: 10.1016/j.mtnano.2023.100382. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  51. Meng X., Du Y., Wu W., Joseph N. B., Deng X., Wang J., Ma J., Shi Z., Liu B., Ma Y., Yue F., Zhong N., Xiang P.-H., Zhang C., Duan C.-G., Narayan A., Sun Z., Chu J., Yuan X.. Giant Superlinear Power Dependence of Photocurrent Based on Layered Ta2NiS5 Photodetector. Adv. Sci. 2023;10(20):2300413. doi: 10.1002/advs.202300413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Rose A.. Recombination Processes in Insulators and Semiconductors. Phys. Rev. 1955;97(2):322–333. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.97.322. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  53. Islam M. M., Dev D., Krishnaprasad A., Tetard L., Roy T.. Optoelectronic Synapse Using Monolayer MoS2 Field Effect Transistors. Sci. Rep. 2020;10(1):21870. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-78767-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Pelella A., Demontis V., Sessa A., Mazzotti A., Giubileo F., Zannier V., Sorba L., Rossella F., Di Bartolomeo A.. Photogating in Suspended InAs Nanowire Field Effect Transistors for Neuromorphic Applications. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2025;11(20):e00520. doi: 10.1002/aelm.202500520. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. Sessa A., De Stefano S., Durante O., Pelella A., Aldrigo M., Parvulescu C., Dinescu A., Kuo C.-N., Lue C. S., Dadiani T., D’Olimpio G., Faella E., Politano A., Passacantando M., Di Bartolomeo A.. Synaptic Behavior in SnSe2 Field-Effect Transistors Induced by Surface Oxide and Trap Dynamics. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2026;12(5):e00734. doi: 10.1002/aelm.202500734. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  56. Zhang N., Zhang Z., Feng R., Chen Y., Li Q., Yang Y., Jiang M., Zhao W., Zhu Z., Zhou X., Li Z.. Gate-Tunable Polarization Gradient in 2D Polar Semiconductor for Synaptic Transistor. ACS Nano. 2025;19(26):24109–24121. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5c07480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Li X., Chen J., Yu F., Chen X., Lu W., Li G.. Achieving a Noise Limit with a Few-Layer WSe2 Avalanche Photodetector at Room Temperature. Nano Lett. 2024;24(42):13255–13262. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c03450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Sun Y., Wang D., Shuai Z.. Indirect-to-Direct Band Gap Crossover in Few-Layer Transition Metal Dichalcogenides: A Theoretical Prediction. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2016;120(38):21866–21870. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b08748. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  59. Zhang Y., Xie X., Zong J., Chen W., Yu F., Tian Q., Meng Q., Wang C., Zhang Y.. Charge Transfer between the Epitaxial Monolayer WSe2 Films and Graphene Substrates. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2021;119(11):111602. doi: 10.1063/5.0058538. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  60. Zhang S., Wang C.-G., Li M.-Y., Huang D., Li L.-J., Ji W., Wu S.. Defect Structure of Localized Excitons in a ${\mathrm­{WSe}}_{2}$ Monolayer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017;119(4):046101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.046101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Shin D., Wang G., Han M., Lin Z., O’Hara A., Chen F., Lin J., Pantelides S. T.. Preferential Hole Defect Formation in Monolayer $\mathrm­{W}­{\mathrm­{Se}}_{2}$ by Electron-Beam Irradiation. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2021;5(4):044002. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.5.044002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  62. Buscema M., Island J. O., Groenendijk D. J., Blanter S. I., Steele G. A., van der Zant H. S. J., Castellanos-Gomez A.. Photocurrent Generation with Two-Dimensional van Der Waals Semiconductors. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015;44(11):3691–3718. doi: 10.1039/C5CS00106D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Sun, X. ; Hu, Y. ; Jiang, C. ; Yang, S. . Optoelectronic Synapses Based on Two-Dimensional Transition Metal Dichalcogenides for Neuromorphic Applications. InfoScience, n/a((n/a)), e70005. 10.1002/inc2.70005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  64. Wang S., Chen C., Yu Z., He Y., Chen X., Wan Q., Shi Y., Zhang D. W., Zhou H., Wang X., Zhou P.. A MoS2/PTCDA Hybrid Heterojunction Synapse with Efficient Photoelectric Dual Modulation and Versatility. Adv. Mater. 2019;31(3):1806227. doi: 10.1002/adma.201806227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Yang C. S., Shang D. S., Liu N., Shi G., Shen X., Yu R. C., Li Y. Q., Sun Y.. A Synaptic Transistor Based on Quasi-2D Molybdenum Oxide. Adv. Mater. 2017;29(27):1700906. doi: 10.1002/adma.201700906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Staddon J.. A Broken Thread: A Review of Pavlov’s Legacy: How and What Animals Learn By Robert A. Boakes. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 2024;122(2):240–244. doi: 10.1002/jeab.4203. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  67. Hao D., Yang Z., Huang J., Shan F.. Recent Developments of Optoelectronic Synaptic Devices Based on Metal Halide Perovskites. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023;33(8):2211467. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202211467. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  68. Jayasinghe S. C., Mahmoodian M., Alavi A., Sidiq A., Shahrivar F., Sun Z., Thangarajah J., Setunge S.. A Review on the Applications of Artificial Neural Network Techniques for Accelerating Finite Element Analysis in the Civil Engineering Domain. Comput. Struct. 2025;310:107698. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2025.107698. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  69. Luo, Y. ; Peng, X. ; Yu, S. . MLP+NeuroSimV3.0: Improving On-Chip Learning Performance with Device to Algorithm Optimizations. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Neuromorphic Systems; Association for Computing Machinery: New York, NY, USA, 2019; pp. 1–7. 10.1145/3354265.3354266. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  70. Jetty P., Kannan U. M., Narayana Jammalamadaka S.. Emulation of Pavlovian Conditioning and Pattern Recognition through Fully Connected Neural Networks Using Holmium Oxide (Ho2O3) Based Synaptic RRAM Device. Nanotechnology. 2024;35(7):075701. doi: 10.1088/1361-6528/ad0bd1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

am6c07765_si_001.pdf (641.2KB, pdf)

Articles from ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES