Abstract
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder lacking effective disease-modifying therapies. A promising regenerative approach involves enhancing endogenous neurogenic capacity within the injured brain. Reactive astrocytes—stellate-like cells in the AD brain—may contribute to a pro-neurogenic environment through transcription factors (TFs) such as neurogenin 2 (NGN2) and SOX-11. This process is tightly regulated by epigenetic mechanisms, particularly SIRT-1, a neuroprotective histone deacetylase that modulates TF activity and neuronal fate. Vitamin A (VA), a key regulator of differentiation and epigenetic remodeling via its active metabolite retinoic acid, is stored in astrocytes and hepatic stellate cells (HSCs). We hypothesized that AD-related astrocyte activation depletes cerebral VA, mobilizes hepatic stores, contributes to liver fibrosis, and that VA supplementation may restore astrocytic function, activate endogenous TFs via SIRT-1, and drive cholinergic neuron regeneration. In a scopolamine (SCO)-induced AD rat model, VA biodistribution was traced using confocal microscopy. Brain and liver VA deficiency were confirmed via retinol-binding protein (RBP) and ALDH1A1 expressions. Rats received VA (1500, 3000, or 4500 IU/kg/day) or donepezil. Outcomes included neurogenesis (DCX), NGN2/SOX-11 expression, SIRT-1 activation, cholinergic regeneration, amyloid-β deposition, and serum tau. Liver fibrosis was assessed via TGF-β, hydroxyproline and histopathologically. AD induced systemic VA depletion and liver fibrosis. Medium-dose VA (VAMD) significantly enhanced neurogenesis, TF expression, SIRT-1 activation, cholinergic regeneration, and reversed liver fibrosis. VAMD demonstrated neuroregenerative and antifibrotic effects, indicating a possible therapeutic role in AD.
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease, Astrocytes, Neurogenesis, NGN2, SIRT-1, SOX-11, Vitamin A
Subject terms: Diseases, Drug discovery, Neurology, Neuroscience
Introduction
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common form of neurodegenerative dementia, characterized by progressive cognitive decline and neuronal loss. Despite advances in neuroimaging, biomarker development, and multi-omics technologies, the exact molecular mechanisms underlying AD pathogenesis remain elusive, and no single hypothesis can fully account for the complexity of the disease1. While the pathological hallmarks of AD, extracellular amyloid-β (Aβ) plaques and intracellular neurofibrillary tangles composed of hyperphosphorylated tau, have dominated research for decades2, these lesions alone do not fully explain the extent of clinical symptoms or disease heterogeneity. Recent perspectives have shifted toward a broader understanding of AD as a disorder of neural circuits, implicating mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, impaired proteostasis, neurovascular impairment, and neuroinflammation as significant contributors to its pathogenesis3. Within this complex network failure, multiple neuronal subtypes are affected, including glutamatergic, GABAergic, and monoaminergic systems. However, among these, cholinergic neurons are disproportionately vulnerable and are among the earliest to degenerate in AD3. Their loss correlates strongly with impairments in memory, attention, and executive function, and underlies the rationale for current symptomatic treatments targeting cholinergic transmission, either increasing synaptic acetylcholine (ACh), such as acetylcholine esterase inhibitors (AChEIs), as donepezil (DON), or acting as N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists (e.g., memantine)4. Given their early and central role in cognitive processing and disease progression, this study focuses specifically on targeting the cholinergic system.
A true disease-modifying therapy for AD would require the restoration of lost neuronal populations, particularly cholinergic neurons. While embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) have been investigated as sources for neuron replacement in both preclinical and early clinical settings5–8, their application remains limited by serious concerns, including ethical issues, risk of tumorigenesis, immune rejection, and genomic instability9. In contrast, direct reprogramming of somatic cells, such as fibroblasts or astrocytes, into functional neurons using defined transcription factors (TFs) offers a promising and innovative alternative. This approach bypasses the pluripotent state entirely, thereby minimizing associated risks while enabling in situ neuronal regeneration. By targeting endogenous cell populations and avoiding transplantation, direct reprogramming represents a novel and potentially safer strategy for neuronal restoration in neurodegenerative diseases. This study builds on this emerging paradigm, focusing specifically on the reprogramming of somatic cells into cholinergic neurons as a regenerative approach for AD.
Astrocytes constitute an ample abundance in the mammalian brain. Ascertaining the vital role of astrocytes in synapse formation, maturation, and efficacy, besides their interaction with and sculpturing developing neuronal circuits, puts these cells at a glance10. Growing substantiation in recent years indicated the potential of astrocytes to be starter cells for reprogramming into functional neurons, capable of replacing degenerated neurons in AD. In neurodegenerative conditions such as AD, astrocytes become reactive and exhibit enhanced plasticity, which may increase their responsiveness to pro-neurogenic signals9. This strategy bypasses many of the major limitations associated with pluripotency induction, including tumorigenic risk, ethical concerns, and immune incompatibility, offering a safer and more efficient route for in situ neuronal regeneration. Nonetheless, the government of exogenous TFs is poor and requires complex time-consuming manoeuvers with low induction efficiency11. Accordingly, modulation of endogenous TFs associated with neuronal differentiation may represent a promising alternative approach to support regenerative processes in AD.
Neurogenin 2 (NGN2) and SOX-11 are TFs that play pivotal roles in neuronal identity and fate determination. Notably, both have been shown to successfully reprogram fibroblasts into functional cholinergic neurons, bypassing the proliferative progenitor state and accelerating direct neuronal conversion12. However, the expression of these TFs is under tight epigenetic control. For instance, histone deacetylase (HDAC) activity suppresses NGN2 expression in late-stage neural precursor cells, and inhibition of this repression extends the neurogenic phase and delays astrocytic differentiation10. Similarly, the aberrant, de novo expression of SOX-11 has been associated with histone modifications, underscoring the role of epigenetic regulation in determining neural fate13. Sirtuin 1 (SIRT-1), a class III HDAC, has emerged as a key regulator in neurodegeneration. SIRT-1 exerts neuroprotective effects against Aβ toxicity, modulates multiple transcriptional pathways in the brain, and its deficiency in microglia has been implicated in cognitive decline in AD14. These findings suggest that modulating the epigenetic environment can influence TF expression patterns and neuronal outcomes, supporting the potential of targeting TF-associated pathways in regenerative strategies.
Vitamin A (VA) and its active metabolite retinoic acid (RA) have been shown to impact both epigenetic and transcriptional regulation in the nervous system. RA directly modulates neural-specific gene expression through nuclear retinoid receptors and promotes the expression of several TFs associated with neuronal differentiation pathways, including those implicated in dopaminergic neuron generation15,16. VA also facilitates the derivation of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs)17 and enhances neurogenesis through antioxidant, anti-apoptotic, and anti-inflammatory actions, involving pathways such as Nrf2 and glutathione regulation18. Despite its wide-ranging neuroprotective properties and reported effects in slowing dementia progression19, the potential of VA to modulate neurogenesis-related pathways and support cholinergic regenerative responses in AD remains insufficiently explored.
VA has a distinctive diffuse storage system known as the stellate cell system, present in the liver and extrahepatic organs, including the pancreas, lung, kidney, colon, and heart20. Under physiological conditions, hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) store nearly 80% of total body VA21. Upon tissue injury, HSCs lose their VA reserves and convert into matrix-producing myofibroblast-like cells22. This behavior is the foundation for HSC-targeted drug delivery, wherein VA-coupled liposomes selectively accumulate in VA-deficient activated HSCs to deliver antifibrotic agents23,24.
Emerging evidence suggests that astrocytes may share key structural and functional features with HSCs, supporting the idea that they belong to a broader stellate cell-like system. In AD and other neurodegenerative conditions, astrocytes become reactive and adopt a fibrotic, matrix-producing phenotype similar to that of activated HSCs25. Moreover, astrocytes are a known source of RA in the brain, regulating key aspects of adult neurogenesis26,27. Despite these findings, the co-occurrence of VA deficiency and AD-related astrocyte activation has not yet been explored, nor is it known whether VA can preferentially associate with reactive astrocytes in AD. Demonstrating such targeting could support the development of astrocyte-associated therapeutic strategies using VA-coupled approaches. Supporting this hypothesis, previous work showed that Parkinson’s disease (PD) is associated with VA depletion in both liver and brain tissues and that systemic VA administration selectively targeted brain astrocytes in PD models15.
This study aimed to evaluate the biodistribution, neurogenesis-associated and cholinergic regenerative effects of VA in a scopolamine (SCO)-induced rat model of AD. VA was administered orally and intraperitoneally, and its distribution was tracked by quantifying intrinsic fluorescence in various organs using confocal microscopy. Cellular uptake in α-SMA–positive reactive glial cells/astrocyte-like cells was assessed by fluorescent labeling. To assess VA’s role in neurogenesis-associated signaling, the expression of DCX, SIRT-1 localization, and the gene expression of SOX-11 and NGN2, two TFs associated with neuronal differentiation and cholinergic lineage-related pathways was examined. Functional and structural outcomes were evaluated using histopathological analysis, along with markers of cholinergic transmission and AD pathology. Additionally, we investigated the relationship between VA depletion, AD progression, and liver fibrosis by measuring hepatic and brain VA content, RBP and ALDH1A1 expression, liver histology, and TGF-β and hydroxyproline levels.
Materials and methods
Materials
VA (all-trans-retinol), choline/acetylcholine quantification kit and Ach activity assay kit were from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, United States); Donepezil hydrochloride was from Pfizer (New York, USA); Hyoscine (SCO hydrobromide) was obtained from Boehringer Ingelheim, Germany; Rat transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-ꞵ) and ALDH1A1 ELISA Kits from CUSABIO (Houston, United States); Rat choline acetyltransferase ELISA Kit was from Elabscience (Texas, United States); Hydroxyproline ELISA Kit from Mybiosource (California, United States); Tau ELISA kit from Novus Biologicals (Centennial, United States); DCX ELISA kit was from Assay Genie (Dublin, Ireland). Trizole plus RNA purification kit and alfa-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) antibody were from Invitrogen—ThermoFisher (Carlsbad, United States); Rotor-Gene SYBR® green PCR kit and miScript SYBR® green, miRNeasy Mini total and miRNA extraction kit, high capacity cDNA reverse transcription kit and RT-PCR reagents kits and universal primers were from Qiagen (Hilden, Germany); SIRT-1 antibody (Catalog # sc-74465) was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc (Texas, United States); Goat anti-mouse IgG H&L (Alexa Fluor® 555) secondary antibody was from Abcam (Cambridge, UK).
Animals
This study utilized 48 female Sprague–Dawley rats from a locally bred strain, each aged 10–12 weeks and weighing approximately 200 ± 10 g. The animals were obtained from the animal facility of the Faculty of Pharmacy, Pharos University in Alexandria (PUA), Egypt, where they were also maintained throughout the experimental period. All animal handling and experimental protocols were reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Pharos University in Alexandria, and the procedures were conducted in accordance with NIH guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals.
The experimental design
Assessment of VA bio-distribution in rats with induced AD following oral and intraperitoneal administration
Based on the intrinsic fluorescence of retinol, VA can be fluorescently detected and quantified in different tissues following either oral or systemic administration using confocal microscopy (Leica DMi8, Wetzlar, Germany) in rats with induced AD. This approach allows the assessment of VA distribution across tissues and its relative accumulation in the brain following AD induction, as well as comparison of its distribution patterns after oral versus systemic administration.
AD was induced in 12 rats by chronic daily administration of 1mg kg-1 SCO intraperitoneally (i.p) for four weeks4. These rats were compared to another 12 normal rats with no AD induction. Twelve rats (six normal and six with induced AD) received four successive oral doses of VA via oral gavage syringe, whereas the other 12 rats (six normal and six with induced AD) received four successive systemic doses of VA i.p. The dosing interval was two hours, and the VA dose was 1500 IU/Kg. Thirty minutes after the final treatment, rats were deeply anesthetized with desflurane inhalation anesthesia (8% in oxygen) delivered via a precision vaporizer in an induction chamber. Adequate depth of anesthesia was confirmed by the absence of the pedal withdrawal reflex. Animals were then euthanized by cervical dislocation under deep anesthesia, followed by rapid dissection and harvesting of the brain, lung, kidney, liver, spleen, and small intestine for subsequent analyses. Harvested organs were cryosectioned, mounted on slides, and fixed in acetone after air drying. Then, slides were examined under confocal microscopy. Nuclei were stained with the nuclear stain, Hoechst, for one minute. The fluorescent images of VA and the nuclei were acquired at emission wavelengths of 695 and 461, respectively. The intensity of VA fluorescence in different sections was semi-quantified using ImageJ software.
Assessment of VA uptake in reactive astrocytes
Reactive astrocytes in the cryosectioned brain samples, prepared in the previous section, were stained using a properly diluted α-SMA primary antibody, which was employed as a marker of fibrosis-associated reactive astrocytic activation. Briefly, tissue sections were blocked, incubated with the primary antibody, and then washed with PBS. For fluorescence imaging, sections were incubated with diluted goat anti-mouse IgG H&L (Alexa Fluor® 555) secondary antibody for 30 min at room temperature in the dark. Confocal microscopy examination was performed at emission wavelengths of 550 to detect α-SMA immunofluorescence and at 695 to detect VA fluorescence. Co-localization in merged images was used to evaluate the uptake of VA in α-SMA–positive reactive astrocytes. Images were obtained from comparable anatomical regions of the hippocampus under identical imaging conditions.
Experimental grouping
AD was induced using daily 1mg kg-1 SCO i.p injections for four weeks4 in thirty rats. These rats were divided into five equal groups,each six rats: The positive control group, where rats received 1 mL/day corn oil orally, the donepezil (DON)–treated group, rats received 2.5 mg kg-1 day-1 orally by gavage28, and three VA-treated groups receiving low, medium, and high doses of VA in corn oil (1500, 3000, and 4500 IU/Kg/day, equivalent to approximately 450, 900, and 1351 µg/Kg/day, respectively)15. VA and DON administration was initiated one week post-SCO initiation and was continued for three weeks. In addition, six normal healthy rats were included as a normal control group.
Blood and tissue sampling
At the end of the treatment period, rats were anesthetized using desflurane inhalation anesthesia (8% in oxygen) delivered via a precision vaporizer in an induction chamber until a deep level of anesthesia was achieved. Adequate depth of anesthesia was confirmed by the absence of the pedal withdrawal reflex. Blood samples were then collected retro-orbitally, after which animals were euthanized by cervical dislocation under deep anesthesia. Brains and livers were rapidly isolated, washed with ice-cold saline, and blotted dry for subsequent analyses. Appropriate parts of the isolated brains and livers were sectioned and kept in 10% neutral buffered formalin for H&E/Congo red staining and Masson’s trichrome staining, respectively, for histopathological examination. In addition, formalin-preserved brain tissues were used for immunohistochemical staining. The remaining parts of isolated brains and livers were stored at -80°C until performing ELISA, quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR), and biochemical testing.
Determination of VA content in liver and brain tissues
Assessing gene expression of RBP in both liver and brain tissues
Gene expression of RBP in brain and liver tissues was done by applying one step qRT-PCR technique. Briefly, RNA isolation was done using a Trizole plus RNA purification kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA concentration and purity were determined spectrophotometrically by measuring absorbances at 260 and 280 nm (A260/A280 ranging from 1.8 to 2.0 is equivalent to RNA purity of 90%-100%). Reverse transcription was done to generate cDNA using the high-capacity cDNA reverse transcription kit from Qiagen (Hilden, Germany) according to the provided instructions. Amplification of cDNA was done by thoroughly mixing the reaction mixture with a total volume of 25 μL. The reaction mixture consisted of Rotor-Gene RT mix (0.25 μL), Rotor-Gene SYBR Green RT-PCR master mix (12.5 μL), template RNA (1μL) and RNase-free water (6.5 μL). Primer sets are presented in Table 1. Acquisition of data was done using Rotor-Gene Q-Pure detection, software version 2.1.0 (build 9); Qiagen, Hilden, Germany. Relative target to reference genes expression in samples was quantified and expressed as a normalized ratio using the ΔΔCt method by calculating the threshold cycles (Ct) values of target genes relative to reference genes15.
Table 1.
Used Oligonucleotide primers for RT-PCR.
| Primer | Sequence | Accession number | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RBP1 | Forward | 5’- TTCAACGGGTACTGGAAGAT-3’ | NM_012733.5 |
| Reverse | 5’- TCCTGCACGATCTCTTTGTC-3’ | ||
| SOX-11 | Forward | 5’- TGTCTCAAGGTAGTTGCACA -3’ | NM_053349.2 |
| Reverse | 5’- CAGACTTCAAAGAGCCACGA -3’ | ||
| NGN2 | Forward | 5’- TGCTCTATTCCCATTGCTGT-3’ | NM_001398677 |
| Reverse | 5’- GCCCACGTAGAAAGAGATGA-3’ | ||
| β-actin | Forward | 5’- ATCATTGCTCCTCCTGAGCG-3’ | NM_031144.3 |
| Reverse | 5’- GGACAATAGGCATTGTGACG-3’ |
Determining ALDH1A1 level (responsible for VA activation) in brain tissue by ELISA
ALDH1A1 levels (ng/mg protein) were determined using specific rat ELISA kit in the supernatants obtained from centrifuging 20% hippocampal tissue homogenates in PBS (pH 7.4) using a cooling-centrifuge (Centurion-scientific-K3series, UK) at a speed of 15,000 rpm and temperature of 5°C for 5 min. ELISA technique procedure was done according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The protein content in brain tissue was determined by applying the Bradford method29.
Influence of VA on neurogenesis and AD pathology
Determining the level of the neurogenesis marker, DCX, in brain tissue by ELISA
Tissue preparation procedure for determining DCX levels (ng/mg protein) was similar to that mentioned in Sect. (2.3.5.2) and DCX levels were determined following the provided ELISA kit instructions.
Assessment of NGN2 and SOX-11 gene expression associated with neuronal differentiation by qRT-PCR
Gene expression analysis was performed following the same protocol described previously in Section "Assessing gene expression of RBP in both liver and brain tissues". The reaction employed Primer Assays containing the forward primers together with the miScript SYBR Green PCR Kit (Qiagen, Germany). This kit provides the miScript Universal Primer as the reverse primer along with the QuantiTect SYBR Green PCR Master Mix. Expression levels were normalized using RNU6-2 as the internal reference gene.
Assessment of the influence of VA on SIRT-1 by immunohistochemistry
Formalin-fixed brain tissue sections were mounted on coated slides and subjected to the avidin–biotin complex (ABC) immunohistochemical method using an anti- SIRT-1 antibody24. SIRT-1 immunostaining was assessed in selected brain regions relevant to AD pathology, including the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus, cerebral cortex, and cerebellar gray matter. Microscopic examination was performed using a light microscope (Inverted Microscope ECLIPSE Ti-S, Nikon, Japan), ), and positive immunoreactivity appeared as brown nuclear staining. Both qualitative histological evaluation and semi-quantitative analysis of staining intensity were performed using ImageJ software by an investigator blinded to the experimental groups.
Evaluation of VA efficacy on cholinergic neurotransmission
Choline, ACh concentrations (µmol mg-1 protein), choline acetyltransferase (U gm-1 tissue), and Ach esterase (U mg-1 protein) were assayed in the hippocampi colorimetrically using reagents provided by specific colorimetric assay kits following steps and instructions provided by the kits’ suppliers.
Determination of AD serum marker; tau protein level
Serum tau level was measured by a rat-specific ELISA kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Levels were assayed in the serum obtained following centrifugation of coagulated blood at 4,000 rpm for 15 min.
Histopathological examination of the hippocampal deposited Aβ and degenerated brain tissue
Ascending grades of alcohol (70–100%) were used to dehydrate formalin-fixed brain tissue samples. Samples were then paraffin-embedded and sectioned to prepare 3–4 μm-thick sections using a microtome. After that, sections were deparaffinized using two changes of xylene and rehydrated through descending grades of alcohol and brought into water. The prepared sections were stained using H&E or Congo red stain for detection of amyloid deposits30, then dried and mounted in Canada balsam for microscopic examination using a light microscope (Inverted Microscope ECLIPSE Ti-S, Nikon, Japan).
The mean amount of Aβ protein aggregates in the hippocampi was quantified by analyzing images captured using ImageJ software. In addition, neuronal degeneration was indicated by the quantitative morphometric analysis of the pathological changes in the frontal cortex using ImageJ software. These include calculating the percentage of damaged neurons (defined by intensely stained nuclei, cytoplasmic vacuolation, or cell shrinkage). Sections were scored for degeneration using a scale of 0–4 in which 0 = no damage, 1: ≤ 25% damage, 2: 25%–50% damage, 3: 50%–75% damage, and 4: > 75% damage15,31.
For both H&E and Congo red-stained sections, images were captured from eight different fields for each rat from each group under the same magnification by an investigator blinded to the examined groups. All images were captured from comparable anatomical regions under the same magnification to ensure consistency in quantification.
Association between AD and liver fibrosis
Histological evaluation of liver fibrosis, steatosis, and hepatocellular damage
Liver fibrosis grading and evaluation
For histopathological evaluation of liver fibrosis, formalin-fixed liver tissues were dehydrated, paraffin-embedded, and cut into 3–4 μm sections. These sections were deparaffinized and rehydrated using descending grades of alcohol. This was followed by Masson’s trichrome staining, microscopic examination using a light microscope (Inverted Microscope ECLIPSE Ti-S, Nikon, Japan) by an investigator blinded to the experimental group, and quantification of the blue-stained area, representing fibrous tissue content, in each section using ImageJ software. In addition, each section was scored according to the method of Ishak scoring system, which comprises 7 stages ranging from 0 to 624.
Liver steatosis and hepatocellular damage grading and evaluation
Liver steatosis was histologically graded and expressed as the percentage of hepatocytes containing macrovesicular or microvesicular fat. Steatosis was scored on a scale of 0–3 as follows: 0: no fat, 1: up to 33% fat, 2: 33%-66% fat, and 3: > 66% fat.
Ballooning degeneration of hepatocytes (indicative of hepatocellular injury) was characterized by the presence of swollen hepatocytes with rarefied cytoplasm. The mean percentage of ballooned hepatocytes was calculated for each group and given scores ranging from 0 to 5, where 0: no ballooning, 1: < 5%, 2: 5–10%, 3: 10–20%, 4: 20–50%, and 5: > 50%. Quantification was performed in eight different fields per rat under × 200 magnification. All images were captured from comparable anatomical regions under identical conditions.
Quantitative determination of hepatic levels of TGF-ꞵ and hydroxyproline by ELISA
TGF-ꞵ and hydroxyproline levels were measured in liver tissues using ELISA kits following the steps provided by their manufacturers’ instructions. Before assessments, liver samples were homogenized in PBS (pH 7.4) to prepare 20% homogenates using a cooling-centrifuge (Centurion-scientific-K3series, UK) adjusted at a speed of 15,000 rpm and temperature of 5°C for 5 min. Supernatants were collected and used to assay TGF-ꞵ and hydroxyproline levels15,32.
Statistical analysis of the data
Data were analyzed using the IBM SPSS software package version 20.0. (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp). The normality of distribution was verified using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Quantitative data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Comparisons among the different groups of normally distributed quantitative data were done using analysis of variance (ANOVA; F test) and were followed by a Post Hoc test (Tukey) for pairwise comparison. The significance of the results was judged at the 5% level33.
Results
VA biodistribution in rats with induced AD following oral and intraperitoneal administration
Tracing the biodistribution of VA was performed after repeated oral or i.p. administration in rats with induced AD. VA -associated fluorescence was semi-quantified in frozen sections from different organs using confocal microscopy. Regarding the distribution following multiple oral dosing, considerable fluorescence was observed in brain and small intestine tissue sections, with no statistically significant difference between their mean fluorescence intensities (p = 0.997), while both were significantly heigher than those detected in the other examined organs (p < 0.001). This pattern may reflect the role of the small intestine in VA absorption and early distribution following oral administration. Liver sections showed the next highest fluorescence intensity after brain and small intestine, significantly exceeding all remaining organs (p < 0.001, possibly related to its function as a primary VA storage organ.
On the other hand, a different VA biodistribution pattern was observed following multiple i.p. doses; the greatest fluorescence intensity was observed in sections obtained from brain tissue, which was significantly higher than any other organ (p < 0.001). This may suggest preferential distribution of systemically administered VA toward neural tissue. The other organ with significantly high fluorescent intensity was the liver, with a mean fluorescence intensity significantly higher than those obtained from other organs (p < 0.001).
Sections obtained from hearts, lungs, and kidneys of rats with induced AD receiving either oral or i.p. VA revealed comparable fluorescence intensities with no statistically significant difference between these organs (p > 0.05), Fig. 1. Collectively, these findings indicate route-dependent differences in VA biodistribution across organs.
Fig. 1.
Biodistribution of VA in rats with induced AD after oral or intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration, visualized by confocal laser microscopy. (A&B) Representative confocal micrographs of frozen sections from different organs of AD-induced rats before VA treatment and following repeated VA administration respectively. (C) Quantitative differences in the mean fluorescence intensity, expressed as (post-VA administration − pre-VA administration) for: (a) oral administration and (b) i.p. administration. Brain and small intestine showed the greatest fluorescence after oral dosing, whereas brain showed the highest fluorescence after i.p. administration. Tissue sections were analyzed using a confocal microscope (Leica DMi8, Wetzlar, Germany). Fluorescence images corresponding to VA were captured at an emission wavelength (λem) of 695 nm, and green fluorescence intensity was semi-quantitatively analyzed using ImageJ software. (AD: Alzheimer’s disease; VA: vitamin A).
Assessment of VA association with α-SMA-positive reactive astrocyte-like cells in AD
Figure 2 illustrates the spatial distribution of VA signals in relation to α-SMA–positive reactive cells within brain tissue sections using confocal microscopy. VA fluorescence (green) appeared predominantly localized within cellular nuclei, as indicated by overlap with Hoechst nuclear staining (blue). α-SMA–positive cells (red) were observed in proximity to these regions, and merged images demonstrated partial spatial overlap between VA signals and α-SMA immunoreactivity. These findings suggest a potential association between VA localization and cells exhibiting a reactive phenotype. However, α-SMA is not a lineage-specific astrocyte marker and may also label vascular smooth muscle cells, pericytes, or other mesenchymal-like reactive cell populations. Therefore, the observed co-localization should be interpreted as an association with α-SMA–positive reactive cells rather than definitive astrocyte-specific localization.
Fig. 2.
Confocal micrographs showing the spatial association of VA fluorescence with α-SMA–positive reactive astrocyte-like cells in brain tissue of AD-induced rats. VA signals are shown in green, α-SMA–positive cells in red, and nuclei stained with Hoechst in blue. Merged images demonstrate partial co-localization of VA fluorescence with cell nuclei and spatial proximity to α-SMA–positive cells, indicating an association with cells exhibiting a reactive phenotype. Scale bar = 50 µm. All images were obtained from comparable anatomical regions of the hippocampus across experimental groups.
Assessment of RBP in liver and brain tissues and ALDH1A1 in brain tissue
In normal rats, the gene expression of hepatic RBP was significantly higher than brain RBP (p ≤ 0.001). Both hepatic and brain RBP gene expression levels in normal rats were significantly higher than those with SCO-induced AD (p ≤ 0.001), with a greater percentage reduction in expression level observed with hepatic RBP. In liver tissue, all tested therapeutics significantly increased RBP expression (p ≤ 0.001). In contrast, only VAMD and VAHD significantly increased brain RBP expression in brain tissue compared to the untreated rats with AD (p ≤ 0.001). VAHD therapy resulted in the highest hepatic/brain RBP gene expressions, which were significantly higher than those obtained with the other treated groups (p ≤ 0.05), Fig. 3a. This may indicate increased VA availability at higher doses.
Fig. 3.
Effects of different treatments on (a) RBP expression (liver and brain) and (b) ALDH1A1 levels in brain tissue in AD-induced rats. (a) Both hepatic and brain RBP expression were reduced in untreated AD rats compared with normal controls, with a greater reduction observed in liver tissue. All treatments increased hepatic RBP expression, whereas only the VAMD and VAHD significantly increased brain RBP expression. The highest hepatic and brain RBP expression levels were observed in the VAHD group. (b) ALDH1A1 levels were reduced in untreated AD rats compared with normal controls and were not significantly altered by DON. VA treatment increased ALDH1A1 levels, with the VAMD showing the highest level, significantly exceeding all treatment groups and normal controls. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 6). *p ≤ 0.05; **p ≤ 0.001; N.S., not significant.
ALDH1A1 is responsible for VA conversion into the active form RA. Significantly higher levels were detected in the hippocampi of normal rats as compared to rats with SCO-induced AD (p ≤ 0.001). DON had no effect on ALDH1A1 levels with no statistically significant difference compared to the untreated rats with induced AD (p > 0.05). Among the tested VA doses, the medium dose produced the highest ALDH1A1 levels, which was significantly higher than all experimental groups even the normal group (p ≤ 0.001), Fig. 3b. This finding may suggest more efficient conversion of VA to its active form at the medium dose.
Influence of VA on the brain levels of the neurogenesis marker, DCX
SCO-induced AD significantly decreased the hippocampal levels of DCX compared with normal controls (p < 0.001). DON and VALD treatments showed no significant difference in DCX levels compared to the positive control group (p > 0.05), suggesting limited effect of these treatments on this marker. whereas VAMD treatment produced significantly higher DCX levels than all other experimental groups, including normal controls , Fig. 4A, which may indicate that the medium dose exerts a more pronounced effect on neurogenesis-associated activity compared to other doses.
Fig. 4.
Effects of experimental treatments on: (A) DCX, (B&C) NGN2, and SOX-11 in rats with SCO-induced AD. (A) DCX levels were reduced in untreated AD rats, with the greatest increase observed in the VAMD group. (B,C) NGN2 and SOX-11 expression were reduced by SCO-induced AD and improved by treatment, except in the VAHD and VALD groups, which did not show significant increases in NGN2 and SOX-11 expression, respectively with VAMD showing the highest expression. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 6). * p ≤ 0.05; ** p ≤ 0.001; N.S., not significant.
Assessment of NGN2 and SOX-11 gene expression associated with neuronal differentiation by qRT-PCR
SCO-induced AD significantly reduced SOX-11 and NGN2 expression in brain tissue compared with normal controls. All treatments significantly increased NGN2 and SOX-11 expressions compared to the positive control group (p ≤0.001), except the VAHD and VALD groups, which did not show significant increases in NGN2 and SOX-11 gene expression, respectively (p >0.05). Among treatment groups, the VAMD-treated group revealed the greatest expression of both transcription factors, which was significantly higher than other treatment groups (p ≤0.001), Fig. 4 B &C. This may reflect enhanced activation of transcription factors associated with neuronal differentiation.
Influence of VA on SIRT-1 immunostaining; a neuroprotective HDAC and a regulator of AD’s TFs
In the present study, in brain sections obtained from normal rats, intense SIRT-1 nuclear immunostaining was observed in different brain areas, including the hippocampal, cerebral cortex, and cerebellum gray matter (Fig. 5A, B &C). In the hippocampi, nuclei of dentate gyrus neurons showed prominent staining. Within the cerebral cortex, the central olfactory structures were the most stained structures, where the nuclei at the granular cell layer showed intense staining, followed by the glomerular layer, and scarce staining was observed at the external plexiform layer. Within cerebellum tissues, the neuronal nuclei in the gray matter showed significant SIRT-1 staining. The induction of AD with SCO resulted in a significant reduction in the intensity of SIRT-1 immunostaining in different brain areas compared to that of the normal, undiseased rats (p ≤ 0.001). VA and DON therapies significantly increased SIRT-1 expression compared to the positive control, untreated group (p ≤ 0.001). Notably, SIRT-1 expression in brain tissues derived from VAMD and VAHD-treated groups was comparable to normal, with no statistically significant difference observed between the two groups (p = 0.359), Fig. 5D, suggesting restoration of SIRT-1–associated signaling pathways.
Fig. 5.
Effects of experimental treatments on SIRT-1 immunostaining in different brain regions of rats with SCO-induced AD. (A) Representative immunohistochemical micrographs showing nuclear SIRT-1 staining in the dentate gyrus (DG). (B) SIRT-1 immunostaining in the cerebral cortex (CRTX), central olfactory structures. (C) SIRT-1 immunostaining in the cerebellum (CER). (D) Semi-quantitative analysis of SIRT-1 immunostaining intensity. SCO-induced AD reduced SIRT-1 immunostaining in all examined brain regions, whereas treatment restored staining intensity, with VAMD and VAHD showing levels comparable to normal controls. Brown nuclear staining indicates positive immunoreactivity. All images were obtained from comparable regions across experimental groups under identical magnification and acquisition conditions. Data in (D) are presented as mean ± SD (n = 6). *p ≤ 0.05; **p ≤ 0.001; N.S., not significant. A and B: Scale bar = 100 µm, with higher-magnification insets (50 µm). C: Scale bar = 200 µm, with higher-magnification insets (50 µm). GM: gray matter, WB: White matter, GL: glomerular layer; EPL: external plexiform layer, GCL: granular cell layer.
Influence of VA on gene expression of endogenous transcription factors capable of reprogramming brain fibroblasts; SOX-11 and NGN2
SCO-induced AD significantly reduced SOX-11 and NGN2 expression in brain tissue compared to normal brain tissue. All treatments significantly increased SOX-11 and NGN2 expressions compared to the positive control group (p≤0.001), except for VAHD and VALD-treated groups, which failed to significantly increase NGN2 and SOX-11 gene expression, respectively (p>0.05). Among treatment groups, the VAMD-treated group revealed the greatest expression, which was significantly higher than other treatment groups (p≤0.001), Fig. 4 B &C. These findings suggest that VA may enhance endogenous cholinergic neuroregenerative pathways, particularly at the medium dose.
Evaluation of VA influence on ACh synthesis and cholinergic neurotransmission
Induction of AD significantly decreased brain levels of ACh, choline, and choline acetyltransferase when compared to the normal rats (p ≤ 0.001). Percentage decrease of ACh, choline, and choline acetyltransferase levels in brain tissues after induction were 91.7, 94.1, and 51.1%, respectively. On the other hand, AD induction resulted in a significant rise in the brain levels of AchE (p ≤ 0.001). All treatments significantly increased the ACh, choline, and choline acetyltransferase levels and decreased AchE. Amongst all treatment groups, DON and VAMD showed the most prominent effects; the statistically significant greatest levels of Ach and choline acetyltransferase were observed in DON and VAMD-treated groups, respectively (p ≤ 0.001). This finding suggests improved cholinergic neurotransmission. There was no statistically significant difference between both groups in the brain levels of choline and AchE (p = 0.981 and 0.16, respectively), Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.
Effects of experimental treatments on cholinergic neurotransmission markers A: ACh, B: Choline, C: Choline acetyltransferase, D: Acetylcholinesterase. SCO-induced AD impaired cholinergic neurotransmission, evidenced by reduced ACh, choline, and choline acetyltransferase and increased acetylcholinesterase. Treatments attenuated these changes, with DON and VAMD showing the strongest restorative effects. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 6). * p ≤ 0.05; ** p ≤ 0.001; N.S., not significant.
Histopathological evaluation of cortical degenerated neurons
The cortical sections of normal rats showed minimal neuronal degeneration with intact cytoplasmic architecture.. The degeneration scores for these sections ranged from 0-1 (degeneration percentage = 5.2±4.8%. The cortex samples with SCO-induced AD showed numerous shrunken, darkly stained degenerating neurons with pyknotic nuclei. All sections of rats’ brains with SCO-induced AD demonstrated extensivecytoplasmic degenerative changes and perivascular edema. The percentage of degenerated neurons in these sections was 94±9.8% (degeneration score=4). Treatment of rats with SCO-induced AD with either DON, VALD, VAMD, or VAHD significantly reduced the percentages of degenerated neurons, with degeneration scores ranging from 1–3 across treated groups, with the lowest score observed in VAMD-treated rats, Fig. 7 and Table 2.
Fig. 7.
Representative H&E-stained cortical sections (× 200) from different experimental groups. Normal cortex (Nor) shows preserved neuronal morphology. SCO-induced AD sections (SCO + no treatment) display extensive neuronal degeneration (red arrows), shrunken dark neurons with pyknotic nuclei (white arrows), and cytoplasmic vacuolation (arrowheads). Treatment with DON, VALD, VAMD, and VAHD reduces neuronal damage to varying degrees, with the greatest improvement observed in the VAMD group. Scale bar = 100 µm.
Table 2.
Percentage of degenerating neurons and degeneration score in the cortical tissue stained with H&E and quantified using ImageJ software.
| Experimental group | Degenerating neurons% | Degeneration score |
|---|---|---|
| Nor | 3.2 ± 2.8% | 0–1 |
| SCO + no treatment | 94 ± 9.8%a | 4 |
| SCO + DON | 19.3 ± 9.7% a,b | 1–2 |
| SCO + VALD | 45.7 ± 8.2% a,b,c | 2–3 |
| SCO + VAMD | 11.1 ± 3.7% a,b,c,d | 1 |
| SCO + VAHD | 33.9 ± 11.6% a,b,c,e | 2 |
The degeneration scale ranges from 0 to 4; 0: no damage, 1: ≤ 25% damage, 2: 25%–50% damage, 3: 50%–75% damage, and 4: > 75% damage. ANOVA test was used to compare the different groups with the Post Hoc Test (Tukey). a: Statistically significant difference between this group and Nor group, b: Statistically significant difference between this group and SCO + no treatment group, c: Statistically significant difference between this group and SCO + DON group, d: Statistically significant difference between this group and SCO + VALD group, e: Statistically significant difference between this group and SCO + VAMD group. (Nor: normal control, SCO: scopolamine, DON: donepezil, VALD: vitamin A-low dose, VAMD: vitamin A-medium dose, VAHD: vitamin A-high dose). Quantification was done for images captured from eight different fields for each rat from each group and examined under the same magnification power.
Influence of treatments on hippocampal Aβ deposition and the AD serum marker tau
The amount of deposited Aβ in the Congo red-stained hippocampi was semi-quantified using ImageJ software. In addition, the AD marker, tau protein, was assessed in serum using the ELISA technique. The untreated rats with SCO-induced AD showed significantly more deposited Aβ and higher serum tau protein levels (pg/mL) compared to the normal group (p ≤ 0.001). All treatments significantly decreased Aβ deposition and serum tau protein levels compared to the untreated rats with induced AD (p ≤ 0.001). VAMD showing the strongest reduction in Aβ deposition, suggesting a more pronounced effect on AD-related pathological markers. VALD, did not significantly reduce serum tau levels (p = 0.443). There was no statistically significant difference between DON and VAMD-treated groups in reducing serum tau protein levels (p = 0.773), whereas the DON-treated group showed significantly more deposited Aβ in the hippocampi (p ≤ 0.001), Fig. 8.
Fig. 8.
Representative Congo red-stained hippocampal sections of different groups and quantified Aβ deposition and Tau protein level. (A) Representative micrographs showing hippocampal Aβ deposits across experimental groups. (B) Quantification of deposited hippocampal Aβ. (C) Quantification of serum tau protein levels. SCO-induced AD increased Aβ deposition and serum tau levels, whereas treatments attenuated these changes, with VAMD showing the strongest reduction in Aβ deposition. Thick black arrows indicate parenchymal Aβ deposits, and thin black arrows indicate vascular Congo red staining. Magnification × 100; inset in the SCO + no treatment group × 400. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 6). * p ≤ 0.05; ** p ≤ 0.001; N.S., not significant.
Evaluation of the association between AD and liver fibrosis
Histological evaluation of liver fibrosis, steatosis, and hepatocellular damage
Histological assessment of liver fibrosis was done by semi-quantitatively analyzing the amount of fibrous tissue (blue color) in Masson’s-trichrome-stained liver tissue sections using ImageJ software, grading the degree of fibrosis according to Ishac score, analyzing and scoring the percentages of steatosis and hepatocyte ballooning.
Sections obtained from the untreated group with SCO-induced AD revealed marked fibrotic alterations, including bridging fibrosis and increased fibrous deposition (Ishak scores 3–4). Quantitative analysis revealed significantly greater fibrotic tissue content than in normal rats (p < 0.001). These sections also exhibited prominent hepatocyte ballooning and predominantly zone 3 macrovesicular and microvesicular steatosis (score 2).Liver sections obtained from treatment groups showed significantly reduced fibrotic deposition, steatosis, and hepatocyte ballooning.. The greatest histological improvement was observed in the VAMD-treated group, indicating attenuation of fibrosis-associated changes showing fibrous expansion of only some portal areas with or without short fibrous septa (Ishak scores 1), steatosis < 33% (11.5 ± 4.3% ) (score 1), and hepatocyte ballooning < 5% (2.2 ± 0.8%) (score 1), Fig. 9A and Table 3.
Fig. 9.
Effect of experimental treatments on liver fibrosis histologically and biochemically on rats with SCO-induced AD. A: Representative Masson’s trichrome-stained liver sections (× 200) showing fibrotic deposition (blue colour), macrovesicular steatosis (black arrows) and microvesicular steatosis (black arrowheads), and hepatocyte ballooning (red arrows ) across experimental groups. . B: Hepatic TGF-ꞵ levels (pg/mg protein) C: Hepatic hydroxyproline levels (μg/mg tissue). Treatments attenuated histological and biochemical markers of liver fibrosis, with the greatest improvement observed in the VAMD group. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 6). * p ≤ 0.05; ** p ≤ 0.001; ns, not significant.
Table 3.
Quantitative and semiquantitative assessment of liver fibrosis, steatosis, and hepatocyte ballooning in Masson’s trichrome-stained liver sections.
| Experimental group | Fibrotic tissue intensity (gray value) (Ishak score) | Steatosis percentage (score) | Hepatocyte ballooning percentage (score) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nor | 113.1 ± 6.8 (0) | 1.4 ± 0.4% (0) | 0.2 ± 0.1 (0) |
| SCO + no treatment | 171 ± 9.8a (3–4) | 52.2 ± 10.4%a (2) | 7.2 ± 2.1%a (2) |
| SCO + DON | 132.4 ± 7.3a,b (1–2) | 21.4 ± 3.7%a,b (1) | 3.1 ± 1.9%a,b (1) |
| SCO + VALD | 143.7 ± 6.2a,b,c (2–3) | 24.2 ± 4.6%a,b (1) | 4.1 ± 1.3%a,b (1–2) |
| SCO + VAMD | 121.1 ± 4.4a,b,c,d (1) | 11.5 ± 4.3%a,b,c,d (1) | 2.2 ± 0.8%a,b,c,d (1) |
| SCO + VAHD | 155.3 ± 10.2a,b,c,d,e (2–3) | 31.9 ± 5.7%a,b,c,e (1–2) | 5.3 ± 1.4%a,b,c,e (1–2) |
Group comparisons were performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test
Superscripts indicate statistically significant differences:a: vs. Nor group, b: vs. SCO + no treatment group;, c: vs. SCO + DON group;, d: vs. SCO + VALD group; , e: vs. SCO + VAMD group. . Quantification was based on for images captured from eight different fields per rat at identical magnification from comparable anatomical regions.
Influence on liver fibrosis markers; TGF-ꞵ and hydroxyproline
The mean TGF-β and hydroxyproline levels were significantly higher in untreated rats with SCO-induced AD compared to normal rats (p ≤ 0.001). Treatment with VALD and DON did not significantly reduce hepatic hydroxyproline concentrations relative to the untreated group (p > 0.05). VALD did not significantly reduce TGF-β levels. Among treatment groups, VAMD produced the greatest reduction in both hepatic TGF-β and hydroxyproline levels compared to untreated AD rats (p ≤ 0.001). However, all treated groups remained significantly higher than normal controls (p ≤ 0.001), Fig. 9 B&C.
Discussion
AD is the most common type of neurodegenerative diseases with multiple etiopathological theories, including amyloid angiopathy, tauopathy, cholinergic neuron degeneration, and failure of the brain’s cholinergic system2. The failure of the FDA-approved AD therapeutics surged great enthusiasm to find a cure for AD. Intensive research came to the assumption that the actual AD disease-modifying agent is the one capable of replenishing the degenerated cholinergic neurons.
The present investigation revealed several key findings relevant to the understanding of AD pathophysiology and potential therapeutic modulation by VA. First, brain VA deficiency was observed in AD, and both orally and systemically administered VA showed preferential accumulation in brain tissue. Second: VA signals were spatially associated with cells exhibiting a reactive phenotype in AD brain tissue. Third: VA, at a medium dose, promoted neurogenesis as evident by increasing DCX levels (a neurogenesis marker) and enhanced the brain’s cholinergic system (increased ACh synthesis and decreased its degradation). These effects may be partially mediated by the VA-induced overexpression of SIRT-1, an HDAC that modifies several TFs. Accordingly, VA increased the expression of neurogenesis-associated transcription factors, including SOX-11 and NGN2. Fourth, VA significantly decreased AD markers, tau protein, and Aβ deposition in brain tissue. Lastly, SCO-induced AD was associated with hepatic VA deficiency and hepatic fibrosis that were reversed by VAMD administration.
The current AD model employed in this study was based on chronic SCO administration to induce sustained cholinergic blockade. This model reproduces several features relevant to AD pathology, including neuronal degeneration, Aβ and tau accumulation, oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, and impaired cholinergic signaling. Accordingly, it is widely used to investigate AD-related mechanisms and to evaluate potential therapeutic interventions at cellular and molecular levels34–36. However, it does not fully recapitulate the complexity of human AD.
In the present study, VA was administered at doses of 1500, 3000, and 4500 IU/kg/day to evaluate its dose-related effects. When translated to human equivalents, the low and medium doses fall within commonly used supplementation ranges, whereas the high dose approaches levels associated with potential toxicity. Although high-dose regimens may be used clinically for deficiency correction, prolonged exposure is linked to adverse effects, particularly hepatotoxicity37,38. In the current model, signs consistent with hepatotoxicity were observed at the highest VA dose, supporting a dose-dependent safety concern. These findings highlight the importance of dose optimization in potential translational applications.
Brain astrocytes are part of the diffuse stellate cells (VA-storing cells) system, mimicking the HSCs structurally and functionally. These astrocytes become activated, matrix-producing cells responding to brain injury under pathological conditions20,25. Generally, stellate cells lose their VA-storing capacity upon activation. However, it is not clear whether this could happen to activated brain astrocytes. A key consideration is that astrocytes are integral to neural homeostasis and Aβ plaque regulation,thus, their modulation may have dual effects, and excessive alteration could potentially result in functional imbalance.
Previous work from our group reported that astrocyte activation in a haloperidol-induced PD model is associated with reduced VA levels in brain tissue, and that VA supplementation selectively targets the VA-deficient brain astrocytes15. In the present study, we investigated whether a similar pattern occurs in AD. Accordingly, multiple VA doses were administered orally and intraperitoneally to rats with induced AD, and their biodistribution was assessed using confocal microscopy based on intrinsic VA fluorescence. Oral administration resulted in prominent fluorescence in the brain and small intestine, whereas intraperitoneal administration led to predominant accumulation in brain tissue. The liver also showed relatively high fluorescence following both routes of administration.
These findings are consistent with previous reports indicating reduced VA and β-carotene levels in AD patients, as well as impaired retinoid signaling, including reduced retinoic acid receptor expression and decreased activity of retinoid-synthesizing enzymes19,39,40.
More specifically, VA fluorescence was observed in close spatial association with α-SMA–positive reactive cells in brain tissue, as demonstrated by confocal microscopy. These findings suggest that VA accumulates in regions exhibiting a reactive cellular phenotype rather than confirming specific astrocytic localization.
As the activated brain astrocytes; is the main source of RA for the regulation of brain neurogenesis26,41, this findings suggests that these cells lose their VA storage capacity in active AD and externally administered VA can target activated astrocytes.
Notably, VA signals showed prominent nuclear localization, which may reflect engagement of retinoid-related signaling pathways, given that retinoic acid (RA) exerts its biological effects through nuclear receptors (RARs). Under oxidative stress conditions, retinaldehyde dehydrogenase translocates from the cytoplasm to the nucleus27. RAR activation by RA regulates neural progenitor and astrocytic differentiation into multiple neural cell types. Further, RA controls the action of TFs via epigenetic routes27.
The accumulation of VA in the intestinal tissue following oral administration has been previously reported and was interpreted as the probable uptake of orally administered VA by the intestinal stellate cells that act as a temporary VA storage site until directed toward VA-deficient sites (the brain in the AD case)15,24. The detectable VA accumulation in hepatic tissue, the main VA storage site, following either oral or i.p. administration indicates the probable existence of VA deficiency in liver tissue and more specifically within the HSCs that uptake some of the administered VA, but to a much lesser extent than did the brain astrocytes.
Comparison of hepatic and brain VA status was assessed by measuring RBP gene expression in liver and brain tissues. Due to the lipophilic nature of retinoids, they are carried by specific proteins in the blood and inside cells. The RBP can be detected within the liver and brain cellular components. The presence of RBP within cells was previously elucidated by the occurrence of receptor-mediated uptake of the RBP-retinol complex42–44. Consistent with its role as a primary VA storage site, hepatic RBP expression was higher than brain levels in normal rats. AD induction significantly reduced RBP expression in both tissues, , reflecting possible replenishment of the brain VA-deficient astrocytes by the stored VA in HCSs to achieve equilibrium between VA-storage pools24. Thus, nearly equal brain and hepatic RBP gene expressions were detected.
VA supplementation increased RBP expression in a dose-related manner, with the highest levels observed in the VAHD group. In contrast, ALDH1A1, which mediates conversion of VA to its biologically active form (retinoic acid), showed a different pattern, with the highest levels detected in the VAMD group, exceeding normal controls.
These findings suggest that while higher doses may enhance VA availability, the medium dose may more effectively promote its conversion to the active form, which may contribute to its more pronounced biological effects observed in this study.
The potential of activated astrocytes to contribute to neuroregenerative processes and support neuronal replacement strategies in AD remains an area of active investigation9. Exogenous TFs, NGN2 and SOX-11, previously managed to convert fibroblasts into efficient cholinergic neurons12. VA is known for its regenerative capabilities, especially in neurodegeneration16,17. Herein, VAMD significantly increased the hippocampal levels of the neurogenesis marker, DCX, compared to other groups and even more than the baseline observed in the normal rats, indicating active neurogenesis. DCX is a reliable and specific marker that reflects neurogenesis and its modulation and can be used to study neurogenesis under normal and pathological conditions45,46. Further, the potential influence of VA on endogenous TFs associated with neuronal differentiation, including NGN2 and SOX-11, was evaluated.
NGN2 is a key transcription factor widely used to induce neuronal differentiation from various cell types, including stem cells, glial cells, and fibroblasts47. Previous studies have demonstrated that members of the SoxC family, particularly SOX-11, play a critical role in enhancing NGN2-driven neuronal differentiation12,48–50.
The interaction between NGN2 and SOX-11 has been shown to promote neurogenic transcriptional programs and support neuronal lineage commitment. In particular, co-expression of these factors enhances neuronal differentiation efficiency compared to NGN2 alone. These findings highlight the importance of NGN2/SOX-11 interplay in regulating neurogenesis-related pathways51,52.
In the present study, normal brain tissue showed higher expression of TFs associated with neuronal differentiation, including NGN2 and SOX-11. SCO-induced AD significantly reduced the expression of these TFs, indicating impaired neurogenesis-associated processes.Treatment with DON increased NGN2 and SOX-11 expression; however, the effect was less pronounced compared to VAMD. The biological effects of DON have been reported beyond AD, including roles in cellular differentiation and tissue repair53,54. However, in AD, its clinical benefit is generally limited to symptomatic improvement in cognitive function, without clear evidence of disease modification, and may be associated with adverse effects55. This limited efficacy is consistent with its primary mechanism as AChEI, which enhances synaptic ACh levels rather than directly modulating neurogenesis-related pathways.
VA showed dose-selective rather than dose-dependent stimulation of TFs’ expression, with the greatest potential attained by the medium dose. VAMD therapy showed significantly higher gene expression levels of NGN2/SOX-11 compared to DON therapy. This dose selectivity of VA to induce neuronal regeneration is in line with Prof. Maden’s conclusions about the effect of retinoids on amphibian limb regeneration56. He stated that cells will differentiate into a particular tissue using a certain morphogen’s concentration, and at a different morphogen concentration, cells will differentiate into another tissue56. Results of the present study designated VAMD as dose-specific for regenerating brain neurons. Other VA doses may be more efficient for inducing regeneration in other organs. Similar results were obtained when testing the regenerative ability of VA in dopaminergic neurons in PD, and VAMD showed the greatest regenerative potential15.
Retinoids have many distinctive functions in the brain, including neuronal differentiation, axonal outgrowth, and regeneration. Retinoids can induce the regeneration of axons after damage and the generation of specific neuronal cell types. They also maintain adult neurons and neural stem cells in the differentiated state. RA signaling is crucial for synaptic plasticity, learning, and memory, and the loss of RA signaling is involved in the etiology of AD57,58. Retinoids’ roles in the CNS are carried out through their interaction with retinoid receptors,RA receptors (RARα, β, and γ) and retinoid X receptors (RXRα, β, and γ). These receptors are extensively expressed in brain areas involved in AD pathogenesis, including the prefrontal cortex, hippocampus, and amygdala. Retinoids and their receptors are transcriptional regulators that modulate the transcription of many genes coding for many functional proteins, including TFs57. Therefore, activated VA (RA) induced NGN2/SOX-11 gene expression after interaction with the retinoid receptors. In support of VA-induced NGN2/SOX-11 gene expression, the endogenous bioactive retinoids produced by the early embryonic neuroectodermal (NE-4C) stem cells induce more NGN2 expression to boost neuronal differentiation59. Further, in another study using Neuro2a neuroblastoma cells and cultured mouse dorsal root ganglia neurons, SOX-11 expression rose as these cells differentiated, and the addition of RA caused a further rise in SOX-11 level60. Moreover, in spinal motor neurons, a close connection was proved to exist between RA and NGN2,RAR binds to NGN2 to synergistically trigger transcriptionally active chromatin for cell fate specification61.
Data indicate that NGN2/SOX-11 expression is epigenetically regulated10,13. SIRT-1 is a highly conserved NAD + -dependent class III HDAC located inside the nucleus. SIRT-1 is one of the most studied HDACs in AD,those studies conclude that SIRT-1 overexpression exhibited protective effects on AD by mediating the survival of neurons and enhancing axonal growth, and synaptic plasticity through the deacetylation of target genes. On the other hand, SIRT-1 deficiency causes cognitive function impairment, neuronal degeneration, and excessive Aβ deposition62,63. HDACs/SIRT-1 tightly regulate the expression of NGN2 and SOX-11,For example, SIRT-1 activation by resveratrol promoted the neuronal differentiation and expression of the pro-neural TFs such as NGN263, and histone deacetylation induced SOX-11 expression during retinal development64. In the present investigation, SIRT-1 was immunostained in brain tissue and quantified in areas demonstrating extensive SIRT-1 positive staining. In brain tissues of normal rats, dentate gyrus neurons in the hippocampi, cerebral cortex (especially the central olfactory structures), and cerebellum gray matter showed prominent SIRT-1 immunostaining. As a neuroprotective protein, SIRT-1 is concentrated in the areas more susceptible to degenerative changes in the brain. Upon ageing, SIRT-1 was found to be located in cerebellar Purkinje cells, CA3 and CA4 regions of the hippocampus, neurons of the cerebral cortex, olfactory bulb, the dorsal root ganglion, midbrain, and striatum65. Induction of AD resulted in a significant loss of SIRT-1 neuroprotection, and poor staining was observed in different brain areas. DON and all VA doses significantly increased SIRT-1 immunostaining, and VAMD/VAHD nearly restored SIRT-1 expression with results comparable to normal. In accordance, DON demonstrated SIRT-1 activation in some studies,it ameliorates induced brain microvascular endothelial cell dysfunction via the SIRT-1/FOXO3a/NF-κB pathways66. In addition, DON repressed high glucose-accelerated senescence in human umbilical vein endothelial cells through SIRT-1 activation67. SIRT-1 activation by VA was also formerly verified in conditions other than AD68,69. VA regressed ethanol-induced neuroinflammation by regulating NFκB and SIRT-1 expression69. Additionally, RA protected against high-fat diet-induced steatosis in mice by improving the antioxidant capacity through SIRT-1 activation68.
While the current findings demonstrate transcriptional upregulation of NGN2 and SOX-11, further studies are required to clarify the underlying molecular mechanisms. In particular, approaches such as promoter activity assays and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) analyses may help elucidate transcription factor binding dynamics and epigenetic regulation of their expression in the context of VA -associated neurogenesis-related processes.
To further assess cholinergic neuron regeneration and restoration of cholinergic transmission, the effect on brain levels of ACh, choline, choline acetyltransferase, and AchE was investigated. Rats with SCO-induced AD showed a significant decrease in the brain levels of ACh, choline, and choline acetyltransferase and an increase in AchE, reflecting decreased ACh synthesis and increased degradation. The significant cholinergic pathways alteration, accompanying the chronic non-selective muscarinic receptors blockade using SCO, is in line with the cholinergic hypothesis of AD. All treatments significantly enhanced the altered cholinergic pathways. The ability of DON to increase levels of ACh, its precursor (choline), and decrease its degradation is mostly a result of its primary mechanism of action, being an AchEI, rather than an indication of cholinergic neuron regeneration. The influence of VA, especially the medium dose, on cholinergic transmission was widely discussed in the literature. RA, as a potent cell differentiator, has been reported to facilitate the maturation of the ACh phenotype and to have robust ACh transmission enhancement in brain cholinergic neurons70. The addition of RA to rat sympathetic neurons in a cell culture medium significantly increased the specific activity of choline acetyltransferase71. Knocking out retinoid receptors in mice altered the electrophysiological processes crucial for learning and memory. Moreover, animals with induced VA deficiency showed spatial memory task impairment and decreased hippocampal ACh release72. Further, retinoid receptors’ agonists enhanced cholinergic neurotransmission by increasing the expression of the vesicular ACh transporter gene and choline acetyltransferase gene57. Furthermore, VA and RA increased the survival of cholinergic but not GABAergic neurons and increased the level of choline acetyltransferase39. The increased ACh synthesis and decreased degradation may point to the efficient cholinergic neurons’ regeneration and an increased number of functional cholinergic receptors requiring activation by their ligands, ACh and choline.
Histopathological and morphometric analyses were performed to assess the percentage of cortical neuronal degeneration. Cortical tissue was selected as AD is primarily characterized by impairment of cortical cholinergic innervation73–75.
All treatments reduced neuronal degeneration, with the lowest degeneration percentage observed in the VAMD-treated group, consistent with the previously reported findings. In parallel, VAMD significantly decreased hippocampal Aβ deposition and serum tau levels. Previous studies have reported that retinoids may reduce Aβ accumulation, potentially through modulation of retinoid signaling pathways and cholinergic function39,76. In addition, SIRT-1, a key regulator of cellular ageing, has been shown to mitigate Aβ-induced cellular77. Previous studies suggest that VA may contribute to the clearance of tau aggregates, potentially through upregulation of heat shock protein 90, which is involved in facilitating tau degradation78. In addition, retinoids have been reported to modulate neuronal survival pathways, including regulation of steroidogenic acute regulatory protein expression, which may reduce amyloid precursor protein– and tau-related cytotoxicity79.Therefore, one possible mechanism underlying the observed reduction in Aβ deposition in the present study may involve SIRT-1–associated pathways. Similarly, the reduction in tau levels may be linked to retinoid-mediated regulation of protein homeostasis and SIRT-1 activity, both of which have been implicated in modulating tau expression and aggregation80,81. However, the precise molecular mechanisms require further investigation.
An additional aim of the present study was to explore the association between AD and liver fibrosis in the context of altered VA homeostasis, as reflected by hepatic RBP expression. Accordingly, liver fibrosis was assessed histopathologically and biochemically. AD was associated with marked fibrotic changes, including increased fibrous tissue deposition, steatosis, hepatocyte ballooning, and elevated levels of TGF-β and hydroxyproline. The link between liver dysfunction and AD has been increasingly recognized. Liver fibrosis has been proposed as a potential risk factor for AD, with evidence showing increased Aβ and tau deposition in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease82. Impaired hepatic clearance of Aβ and altered liver function may contribute to AD pathophysiology75. In addition, liver function parameters and fibrosis-related changes have been associated with circulating AD biomarkers83, Zhang84, supporting the concept of a liver–brain axis in AD85.
In the present study, the observed hepatic changes may be associated with disrupted VA homeostasis. Previous reports indicate that depletion of hepatic retinoid stores precedes HSC activation and fibrosis, while also impairing hepatocyte survival and regeneration86. Consistently, reduced hepatic retinoid signaling has been linked to steatosis and liver pathology, whereas retinoid supplementation may reverse these effects87,88.
Both DON and VA treatments improved liver fibrosis parameters. DON has been reported to exert variable hepatic effects, with hepatotoxicity mainly associated with long-term use89. Retinoids, on the other hand, have demonstrated hepatoprotective effects in multiple experimental models86–88. Although the highest hepatic RBP levels were observed in the VAHD group, the most pronounced improvement in fibrosis was achieved with VAMD. This finding may reflect a dose-dependent balance between therapeutic efficacy and potential toxicity. Previous studies support this observation, showing that lower VA doses can improve hepatic structure and function, whereas higher doses may induce HSC activation and fibrosis90,91. One potential mechanism underlying these effects may involve SIRT-1, which has been reported to regulate HSC activation and fibrosis progression92,93. However, the precise mechanisms linking VA signaling to hepatic outcomes in AD require further investigation.
In conclusion, SCO-induced AD was associated with reduced VA levels in brain and liver tissues, accompanied by hepatic fibrosis. Administration of VAMD was associated with SIRT-1 overexpression, enhanced cholinergic signaling, and increased neurogenesis-associated activity, potentially mediated through upregulation of TFs involved in neuronal differentiation, including SOX-11 and NGN2. Additionally, VAMD reduced hippocampal Aβ deposition and serum tau levels and attenuated AD-associated fibrosis. These findings support a potential role for VAMD in modulating AD-related pathological processes.
Despite the promising findings, several limitations should be acknowledged. First, the evidence for neurogenesis-associated effects is based on indirect molecular markers (e.g., DCX, NGN2, and SOX-11) rather than direct lineage-tracing approaches; therefore, the cellular origin of the observed effects cannot be definitively determined. Second, the use of α-SMA as a marker reflects reactive cells rather than specific astrocyte identification, which limits precise characterization of the involved cell populations. In addition, the SCO-induced model reproduces key cholinergic deficits but does not fully represent the complex pathology of human AD. The precise molecular mechanisms linking VA to SIRT-1 activation and TF upregulation were not fully elucidated and require further investigation. Moreover, long-term safety and functional behavioral outcomes were beyond the scope of this study. Future studies incorporating cell-type-specific co-localization, lineage-tracing techniques, and extended functional assessments are needed to validate and extend these findings.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge Dr. Ashraf K Awaad (Center of Excellence for Research in Regenerative Medicine Applications, CERRMA, Faculty of Medicine in Alexandria) for his help in confocal microscopy examination.
Abbreviations
- Aβ
Amyloid-β
- ACh
Acetylcholine
- AChEIs
Acetylcholine esterase inhibitors
- AD
Alzheimer’s disease
- ALDH1A1
Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 family member A1
- α-SMA
Alfa-smooth muscle actin
- DON
Donepezil
- iPSCs
Induced pluripotent stem cells
- DCX
Neurogenesis marker doublecortin
- HDACs
Histone deacetylases
- HSCs
Hepatic stellate cells
- NGN2
Neurogenin 2
- PD
Parkinson’s disease
- qRT-PCR
Quantitative real time-PCR
- RA
Retinoic acid
- RBP
Retinol-binding protein
- SCO
Scopolamine
- SIRT-1
Sirtuin 1
- TF
Transcription factors
- TGF-ꞵ
Transforming growth factor-beta
- VA
Vitamin A
- VALD
VA low dose
- VAMD
VA medium dose
- VAHD
VA high dose
Author contributions
All authors have contributed to performing the research experiments, interpreting results, writing and revising the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. The authors report no financial or personal conflict of interest.
Funding
Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files. RNA sequences analyzed during the current study are available in the GenBank repository, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/ , accession numbers are included in Table 1.
Declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Long, J. M. & Holtzman, D. M. Alzheimer disease: An update on pathobiology and treatment strategies. Cell179(2), 312–339 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Saez-Atienzar, S. & Masliah, E. Cellular senescence and Alzheimer disease: the egg and the chicken scenario. Nat. Rev. Neurosci.21(8), 433–444 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sharma, P. et al. Comprehensive review of mechanisms of pathogenesis involved in Alzheimer’s disease and potential therapeutic strategies. Prog. Neurobiol.174, 53–89 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.El-Mezayen, N. S., Abd El Moneim, R. A. & El-Rewini, S. H. Vitamin B12 as a cholinergic system modulator and blood brain barrier integrity restorer in Alzheimer’s disease. Eur J Pharm Sci174, 106201 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.De Gioia, R. et al. Neural stem cell transplantation for neurodegenerative diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci.21, 3103. 10.3390/ijms21093103 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gantner, C. W. et al. Viral delivery of GDNF promotes functional integration of human stem cell grafts in Parkinson’s disease. Cell Stem Cell26, 511-526.e5 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Schweitzer, J. S. et al. Personalized iPSC-derived dopamine progenitor cells for Parkinson’s disease. N. Engl. J. Med.382, 1926–1932 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Song, B. et al. Human autologous iPSC-derived dopaminergic progenitors restore motor function in Parkinson’s disease models. J. Clin. Invest130, 904–920. 10.1172/jci130767 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wang, Y., X. Zhang, F. Chen, N. Song and J. Xie. In vivo Direct Conversion of Astrocytes to Neurons Maybe a Potential Alternative Strategy for Neurodegenerative Diseases. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 13 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 10.Freeman, M. R. Specification and morphogenesis of astrocytes. Science330(6005), 774–778 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Xu, Z. et al. How to reprogram human fibroblasts to neurons. Cell Biosci10, 116 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Liu, M.-L. et al. Small molecules enable neurogenin 2 to efficiently convert human fibroblasts into cholinergic neurons. Nat. Commun.4(1), 2183 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Vegliante, M. C. et al. Epigenetic activation of SOX11 in lymphoid neoplasms by histone modifications. PLoS ONE6(6), e21382 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wu, L. H. et al. SIRT1 activation by minocycline on regulation of microglial polarization homeostasis. Aging (Albany NY)12(18), 17990–18007 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.El-Mezayen, N. S. et al. Reactive astrocytes targeting with oral vitamin A: Efficient neuronal regeneration for Parkinson’s disease treatment and reversal of associated liver fibrosis. CNS Neurosci. Ther.29(8), 2111–2128 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Shi, Z., Shen, T., Liu, Y., Huang, Y. & Jiao, J. Retinoic acid receptor γ (Rarg) and nuclear receptor subfamily 5, group A, member 2 (Nr5a2) promote conversion of fibroblasts to functional neurons. J. Biol. Chem.289(10), 6415–6428 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hore, T. A. et al. Retinol and ascorbate drive erasure of epigenetic memory and enhance reprogramming to naïve pluripotency by complementary mechanisms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.113(43), 12202–12207 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lee, K. H., Cha, M. & Lee, B. H. Neuroprotective effect of antioxidants in the brain. Int. J. Mol. Sci.21(19), 7152 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ono, K. & Yamada, M. Vitamin A and Alzheimer’s disease. Geriatr. Gerontol. Int.12(2), 180–188 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zhao, L. & Burt, A. D. The diffuse stellate cell system. J. Mol. Histol.38, 53–64 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Panebianco, C., Oben, J. A., Vinciguerra, M. & Pazienza, V. Senescence in hepatic stellate cells as a mechanism of liver fibrosis reversal: a putative synergy between retinoic acid and PPAR-gamma signalings. Clin Exp Med17(3), 269–280 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Cai, X. et al. Intercellular crosstalk of hepatic stellate cells in liver fibrosis: New insights into therapy. Pharmacol. Res.155, 104720 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.El-Mezayen, N. S. et al. Hepatic stellate cell-targeted imatinib nanomedicine versus conventional imatinib: A novel strategy with potent efficacy in experimental liver fibrosis. J. Control Release266, 226–237 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.El-Mezayen, N. S. et al. Oral vitamin-A-coupled valsartan nanomedicine: High hepatic stellate cell receptors accessibility and prolonged enterohepatic residence. J. Control. Release283, 32–44 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Schachtrup, C., Le Moan, N., Passino, M. A. & Akassoglou, K. Hepatic stellate cells and astrocytes: Stars of scar formation and tissue repair. Cell Cycle10(11), 1764–1771 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Környei, Z. et al. Astroglia-derived retinoic acid is a key factor in glia-induced neurogenesis. FASEB J.21(10), 2496–2509 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Shearer, K. D., Fragoso, Y. D., Clagett-Dame, M. & McCaffery, P. J. Astrocytes as a regulated source of retinoic acid for the brain. Glia60(12), 1964–1976 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kosasa, T., Kuriya, Y. & Yamanishi, Y. Effect of donepezil hydrochloride (E2020) on extracellular acetylcholine concentration in the cerebral cortex of rats. Jpn. J. Pharmacol.81(2), 216–222 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.He, F. Bradford protein assay. Bio-protocol. e45-e45 (2011).
- 30.Wilcock, D. M., Gordon, M. N. & Morgan, D. Quantification of cerebral amyloid angiopathy and parenchymal amyloid plaques with Congo red histochemical stain. Nat. Protoc.1(3), 1591–1595 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Me Abdel-Salam, O. Rotenone-induced nigrostriatal toxicity is reduced by methylene blue. J. Neurorestoratol.2, 65–80 (2014). [Google Scholar]
- 32.Noah, A. A., El-Mezayen, N. S., El-Ganainy, S. O., Darwish, I. E. & Afify, E. A. Reversal of fibrosis and portal hypertension by Empagliflozin treatment of CCl4-induced liver fibrosis: Emphasis on gal-1/NRP-1/TGF-β and gal-1/NRP-1/VEGFR2 pathways. Eur. J. Pharmacol.959, 176066 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kotz, S., Read, C. B., Balakrishnan, N. & Vidakovic, B. Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences, 16 Vol. Set (Wiley, 2005). [Google Scholar]
- 34.Benedikz, E., Kloskowska, E. & Winblad,. The rat as an animal model of Alzheimer’s disease. J. Cell. Mol. Med.13(6), 1034–1042 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Khan, K., Emad, N. A. & Sultana, Y. Inducing Agents for Alzheimer’s Disease in Animal Models. J. Explor. Res. Pharmacol.9(3), 169–179 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 36.San Tang, K. The cellular and molecular processes associated with scopolamine-induced memory deficit: A model of Alzheimer’s biomarkers. Life Sci.233, 116695 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Penniston, K. L. & Tanumihardjo, S. A. The acute and chronic toxic effects of vitamin A. Am. J. Clin. Nutr.83(2), 191–201 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Standing Committee on the Scientific Evaluation of Dietary Reference Intakes, Subcommittee on Interpretation, & Uses of Dietary Reference Intakes. Dietary reference intakes: applications in dietary assessment(2001).
- 39.Corcoran, J. P. T., So, P. L. & Maden, M. Disruption of the retinoid signalling pathway causes a deposition of amyloid β in the adult rat brain. Eur. J. Neurosci.20(4), 896–902 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Zeng, J. et al. Marginal vitamin A deficiency facilitates Alzheimer’s pathogenesis. Acta Neuropathol.133, 967–982 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Joe, E.-H. et al. Astrocytes, microglia, and Parkinson’s disease. Exp. Neurobiol.27(2), 77 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.MacDonald, P. N., Bok, D. & Ong,. Localization of cellular retinol-binding protein and retinol-binding protein in cells comprising the blood-brain barrier of rat and human. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.87(11), 4265–4269 (1990). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Poole, A. R., Dingle, J. T., Mallia, A. K. & Goodman, D. S. The localization of retinol-binding protein in rat liver by immunofluorescence microscopy. J. Cell Sci.19(2), 379–394 (1975). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Porter, S. B., Fraker, L. D., Chytil, F. & Ong, D. E. Localization of cellular retinol-binding protein in several rat tissues. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.80(21), 6586–6590 (1983). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Brown, J. P. et al. Transient expression of doublecortin during adult neurogenesis. J. Comp. Neurol.467(1), 1–10. 10.1002/cne.10874 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Nacher, J., Crespo, C. & McEwen, B. S. Doublecortin expression in the adult rat telencephalon. Eur. J. Neurosci.14(4), 629–644 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Hulme, A. J., Maksour, S., Glover, M.S.-C., Miellet, S. & Dottori, M. Making neurons, made easy: The use of Neurogenin-2 in neuronal differentiation. Stem Cell Rep.17(1), 14–34 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kavyanifar, A., Turan, S. & Lie, D. C. SoxC transcription factors: multifunctional regulators of neurodevelopment. Cell Tissue Res.371, 91–103 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Mu, L. et al. SoxC transcription factors are required for neuronal differentiation in adult hippocampal neurogenesis. J. Neurosci.32(9), 3067–3080 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Su, Z. et al. Reprogramming the fate of human glioma cells to impede brain tumor development. Cell Death Dis.5(10), e1463–e1463 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Singleton, K. S., P. Silva-Rodriguez and E. M. Silva. Pairing your Sox: Identification of Sox11 partner proteins and interaction domains in the developing neural plate. bioRxiv: 2020–2004 (2020).
- 52.Smith, D. K., Yang, J., Liu, M.-L. & Zhang, C.-L. Small molecules modulate chromatin accessibility to promote NEUROG2-mediated fibroblast-to-neuron reprogramming. Stem Cell Rep.7(5), 955–969 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Cui, X. et al. Donepezil, a drug for Alzheimer’s disease, promotes oligodendrocyte generation and remyelination. Acta Pharmacol. Sin.40(11), 1386–1393 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Todaka, H., Arikawa, M., Noguchi, T., Ichikawa, A. & Sato, T. Donepezil, an anti-Alzheimer’s disease drug, promotes differentiation and regeneration in injured skeletal muscle through the elevation of the expression of myogenic regulatory factors. Eur. J. Pharmacol.911, 174528 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Zhang, X., Lian, S., Zhang, Y. & Zhao, Q. Efficacy and safety of donepezil for mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg.213, 107134 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Maden, M. Retinoic acid in development and regeneration. J. Biosci.21(3), 299–312 (1996). [Google Scholar]
- 57.Das, B. C., Dasgupta, S. & Ray, S. K. Potential therapeutic roles of retinoids for prevention of neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease. Neural Regen. Res.14(11), 1880–1892 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Maden, M. Retinoic acid in the development, regeneration and maintenance of the nervous system. Nat. Rev. Neurosci.8(10), 755–765 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Orsolits, B. et al. Retinoid machinery in distinct neural stem cell populations with different retinoid responsiveness. Stem Cells Dev.22(20), 2777–2793 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Jankowski, M. P., Cornuet, P. K., McIlwrath, S., Koerber, H. R. & Albers, K. M. SRY-box containing gene 11 (Sox11) transcription factor is required for neuron survival and neurite growth. Neuroscience143(2), 501–514 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Lee, S., Lee, B., Lee, J. W. & Lee, S.-K. Retinoid signaling and neurogenin2 function are coupled for the specification of spinal motor neurons through a chromatin modifier CBP. Neuron62(5), 641–654 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Guo, P. et al. Effect and mechanism of fuzhisan and donepezil on the sirtuin 1 pathway and amyloid precursor protein metabolism in PC12 cells. Mol. Med. Rep.13(4), 3539–3546 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Wang, R. et al. Deciphering therapeutic options for neurodegenerative diseases: insights from SIRT1. J. Mol. Med.100(4), 537–553 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Usui, A. et al. Expression of Sox4 and Sox11 is regulated by multiple mechanisms during retinal development. FEBS Lett.587(4), 358–363 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Godoy, J. A., Zolezzi, J. M., Braidy, N. & Inestrosa, N. C. Role of Sirt1 during the ageing process: relevance to protection of synapses in the brain. Mol. Neurobiol.50, 744–756 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Sun, X. & Liu, B. Donepezil ameliorates oxygen-glucose deprivation/reoxygenation-induced brain microvascular endothelial cell dysfunction via the SIRT1/FOXO3a/NF-κB pathways. Bioengineered13(3), 7760–7770 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Zhang, T. et al. Donepezil attenuates high glucose-accelerated senescence in human umbilical vein endothelial cells through SIRT1 activation. Cell Stress Chaperones20(5), 787–792 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Geng, C. et al. Retinoic acid ameliorates high-fat diet-induced liver steatosis through sirt1. Sci. China Life Sci.60, 1234–1241 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Priyanka, S. H., Syam Das, S., Thushara, A. J., Rauf, A. A. & Indira, M. All trans retinoic acid attenuates markers of neuroinflammation in rat brain by modulation of SIRT1 and NFκB. Neurochem. Res.43, 1791–1801 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Szutowicz, A., Bielarczyk, H., Jankowska-Kulawy, A., Ronowska, A. & Pawełczyk, T. Retinoic acid as a therapeutic option in Alzheimer’s disease: a focus on cholinergic restoration. Expert Rev. Neurother.15(3), 239–249 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Berrard, S., Biguet, N. F., Houhou, L., Lamouroux, A. & Mallet,. Retinoic acid induces cholinergic differentiation of cultured newborn rat sympathetic neurons. J. Neurosci. Res.35(4), 382–389 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Carta, M. et al. Vitamin A deficiency induces motor impairments and striatal cholinergic dysfunction in rats. Neuroscience139(4), 1163–1172 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Chen, Z.-R., Huang, J.-B., Yang, S.-L. & Hong, F.-F. Role of cholinergic signaling in Alzheimer’s disease. Molecules27(6), 1816 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Coyle, J. T., Price, D. L. & DeLong, M. R. Alzheimer’s disease: a disorder of cortical cholinergic innervation. Science219(4589), 1184–1190 (1983). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Huang, Z., Lin, H. W., Zhang, Q. & Zong, X. Targeting Alzheimer’s disease: the critical crosstalk between the liver and brain. Nutrients14(20), 4298 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Colas, J. et al. Neuroprotection against Amyloid-β-Induced DNA Double-Strand Breaks Is Mediated by Multiple Retinoic Acid-Dependent Pathways. Neural Plast.2020(1), 9369815 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Li, Y., Lu, J., Hou, Y., Huang, S. & Pei, G. Alzheimer’s amyloid-β accelerates human neuronal cell senescence which could be rescued by Sirtuin-1 and aspirin. Front. Cell. Neurosci.16, 906270 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Nguyen, N. L., T. X. Hoang and J. Y. Kim. All-Trans Retinoic Acid-Induced Cell Surface Heat Shock Protein 90 Mediates Tau Protein Internalization and Degradation in Human Microglia. Mol. Neurobiol. 1–14 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 79.Manna, P. R., Reddy, A. P., Pradeepkiran, J. A., Kshirsagar, S. & Reddy, P. H. Regulation of retinoid mediated StAR transcription and steroidogenesis in hippocampal neuronal cells Implications for StAR in protecting Alzheimer’s disease. Biochimica et Biophys. Acta (BBA) Mol. Basis Dis.1869(2), 166596 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Yan, J. et al. Resveratrol mitigates hippocampal tau acetylation and cognitive deficit by activation SIRT1 in aged rats following anesthesia and surgery. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev.2020(1), 4635163 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Yin, X. et al. SIRT1 regulates tau expression and tau synaptic pathology. J. Alzheimers Dis.84(2), 895–904 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Weinstein, G. et al. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, liver fibrosis, and regional amyloid-β and tau pathology in middle-aged adults: the Framingham study. J. Alzheimers Dis.86(3), 1371–1383 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Han, S.-W., Park, Y. H., Jang, E. S., Nho, K. & Kim, S. Implications of liver enzymes in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. J. Alzheimers Dis.88(4), 1371–1376 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Zhang, B., C. Zhang, Y. Wang, L. Cheng, Y. Wang, Y. Qiao, D. Peng and I. Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging. Associations of liver function with plasma biomarkers for Alzheimer’s Disease." Neurol. Sci. 45(6) 2625–2631 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 85.Bassendine, M. F., Taylor-Robinson, S. D., Fertleman, M., Khan, M. & Neely,. Is Alzheimer’s disease a liver disease of the brain?. J. Alzheimers Dis.75(1), 1–14 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Melis, M., Tang, X.-H., Trasino, S. E. & Gudas, L. J. Retinoids in the pathogenesis and treatment of liver diseases. Nutrients14(7), 1456 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Friedman, S. L., Neuschwander-Tetri, B. A., Rinella, M. & Sanyal, A. J. Mechanisms of NAFLD development and therapeutic strategies. Nat. Med.24(7), 908–922 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Yanagitani, A. et al. Retinoic acid receptor α dominant negative form causes steatohepatitis and liver tumors in transgenic mice. Hepatology40(2), 366–375 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Erbayraktar, Z., Evlice, A., Yener, G. & Ulusu, N. N. Effects of donepezil on liver and kidney functions for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. J. Integr. Neurosci.16(3), 335–346 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Marsden, C. D. Problems with long-term levodopa therapy for Parkinson’s disease. Clin. Neuropharmacol.17, S32-44 (1994). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Pan, Z., Dan, Z., Fu, Y., Tang, W. & Lin, J. Low-dose ATRA supplementation abolishes PRM formation in rat liver and ameliorates ethanol-induced liver injury. J. Huazhong Univ. Sci. Technol. Med. Sci. Tech.26, 508–512 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Li, M. et al. SIRT1 antagonizes liver fibrosis by blocking hepatic stellate cell activation in mice. FASEB J.32(1), 500–511 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Li, M. et al. Hepatic stellate cell-specific deletion of SIRT1 exacerbates liver fibrosis in mice. Biochimica et Biophys. Acta (BBA) Mol. Basis Dis.1863(12), 3202–3211 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files. RNA sequences analyzed during the current study are available in the GenBank repository, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/ , accession numbers are included in Table 1.










