Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Jul 28.
Published in final edited form as: J Bras Doencas Sex Transm. 2026 Jan 19;38:e1480. doi: 10.5327/dst-2177-8264-1480

The Treponema pallidum outer membrane protein repertoire and the quest for a syphilis vaccine

O repertório de proteínas da membrana externa de Treponema pallidum e a busca por uma vacina contra a sífilis

Everton Burlamarque Bettin 1, Andre Alex Grassmann 1, Kelly Lynn Hawley 1,2, Melissa Jo Caimano 1, Justin David Radolf 1,2
PMCID: PMC13403249  NIHMSID: NIHMS2192720  PMID: 42516433

Abstract

Despite more than a century of investigation, syphilis vaccine development has long been hindered by the unusual outer membrane of Treponema pallidum subsp. pallidum (TPA) and the historical inability to propagate the spirochete in vitro. Early observations using the rabbit model established that protective, antibody-mediated immunity is achievable. The recent characterization of the repertoire of TPA outer membrane proteins (OMPs) defined the universe of potential targets for protective antibodies and provided a critical foundation for ongoing syphilis vaccine development. Built on a “learning from nature” approach, the mapping of antibody responses elicited during natural infection against OMPs allowed the identification and prioritization of extracellular loops as vaccine targets. Immunization of animals with protein scaffolds displaying these targets generates high titers of antibodies able to recognize surface-exposed regions of the spirochete. Recent advances in long-term in vitro cultivation and genetic manipulation of TPA have enabled the development of assays to directly evaluate the functional activity of extracellular loops — specific antibodies in promoting opsonophagocytosis, growth inhibition, impairment of motility, and outer membrane disruption. Next-generation platforms are being explored to enhance immunogenicity, simplify production, and facilitate scalable translation of these immunogens toward clinical evaluation. In parallel, researchers are uncovering the sequence variability in OMPs across circulating TPA strains to understand how mutations can affect antibody recognition and global vaccine efficacy. Collectively, these advances position the field to leverage structural, immunological, and microbiological insights to counter the stealth pathogen and, ultimately, achieve an effective syphilis vaccine.

Keywords: Treponema, Syphilis, OMPeome, Vaccine, Extracellular loops, Scaffolds

INTRODUCTION

Syphilis has been recognized as one of the most feared sexually transmitted diseases since the late 15th century, with devastating clinical manifestations and enduring social stigma(1). The modern era of investigation into this enigmatic disease began in 1906 with the identification of its causative agent, the spirochetal pathogen Treponema pallidum subsp. pallidum (TPA), by Schaudinn and Hoffmann(2). Despite more than a century of research, the development of a syphilis vaccine has lagged behind other bacterial pathogens, largely due to the unusual outer membrane biology of TPA(3) and the historical inability to propagate syphilis spirochetes in vitro. Nevertheless, early observations established that protective immunity against TPA is achievable(4,5). This concept was strengthened by a landmark 1948 study by Magnuson and Rosenau(6,7), which demonstrated that rabbits infected with TPA for increasing lengths of time prior to penicillin treatment required progressively higher challenge inocula to develop symptomatic reinfection.

Although these findings provided compelling evidence for acquired immunity, the immunological basis of protection remained unclear. Subsequent studies pointing to antibodies showed that pre-incubation of TPA with immune rabbit sera (IRS)(8) or human syphilitic sera (HSS)(9) reduced lesion formation in rabbits, providing the first direct evidence that protective factors resided in immune sera. Passive immunization experiments later confirmed antibodies as central mediators of host defense against TPA(10,11). The mechanism by which these functional antibodies conferred protection was ultimately clarified through studies using rabbit peritoneal macrophages, which identified opsonophagocytosis as a primary pathway for spirochete clearance(12). Together, these observations provided proof that protective antibodies must recognize antigens exposed on the spirochete surface — an insight that continues to guide contemporary syphilis vaccine development. The ability of antibodies to serve as mediators of protective immunity is in accord with evidence that the syphilis spirochete is an extracellular bacterium(13).

The Treponema pallidum outer membrane protein repertoire and the quest for syphilis vaccine candidates

With evidence in hand that functional antibodies can mediate protection, the syphilis vaccine field was confronted with a central question: which surface-exposed antigens of TPA serve as targets of protective immunity? Identifying such antigens proved unusually challenging due to the atypical ultrastructure of the TPA outer membrane (OM), a defining feature of the bacterium that led to its designation as a “stealth pathogen”(3,14). Unlike most diderm bacteria, TPA lacks the highly antigenic lipopolysaccharide and, instead, possesses an OM in which surface-exposed outer membrane proteins (OMPs) are present at exceptionally low density, resulting in poor immunogenicity(15). The intrinsic fragility of the TPA OM further complicated early efforts to identify surface-exposed targets. Routine sample preparation often leads to disruption of the spirochete’s OM, producing artifactual surface labeling and erroneous conclusions about surface exposure that have shaped decades of unsuccessful vaccine strategies(3,16). Subsequent microscopy and immunofluorescence analyses using antisera against a panel of recombinant, highly antigenic lipoproteins (e.g., Tpp15/TP0171, Tpp17/TP0435, TP0971/Tpp34, and Tpp47/TP0574) demonstrated that these immunogens are located beneath the OM (i.e., within the periplasm) rather than exposed on the spirochete surface(17,18). These observations reinforced the emerging view that only integral OMPs are antibody-accessible and, therefore, bona fide targets of functional antibodies.

The completion of the TPA genome in 1998(19,20) appeared to offer a straightforward path for the systematic identification of TPA OMPs. However, early genome-mining efforts failed to identify candidates with sequence homology to canonical Gram-negative OMPs(3). After years of largely unproductive searches for sequence-based orthologs, a conceptual shift in the field occurred when our group adopted a structure-based strategy focused instead on the identification of proteins predicted to form β-barrels(21), a defining feature of transmembrane OMPs(22). This approach enabled the identification of the spirochete’s OMP repertoire (OMPeome) and provided a critical foundation for the ongoing syphilis vaccine development. More recently, advances in protein structure prediction and machine-based learning approaches have further expanded the OMPeome(23), revealing that the TPA OM, while sparsely populated, is more complex and Gram-negative-like than originally appreciated. The currently known TPA OMPeome includes two stand-alone proteins, β-barrel assembly machinery A (BamA) and lipopolysaccharide transport protein D (LptD), both involved in OM biogenesis, and four paralogous families involved in nutrient uptake or extrusion of noxious substances across the OM: 8-stranded β-barrels (8SBB), OM factors for efflux pumps, TPA repeat proteins (Tpr), and orthologs for long-chain fatty acid transporters (FadL) (Figure 1)(23).

Figure 1. The Treponema pallidum outer membrane protein repertoire.

Figure 1.

Tpr: Treponema pallidum repeat proteins; 8SBB: 8-stranded β-barrels; BamA: β-barrel assembly machinery A; FadL: long-chain fatty acid transporters orthologs; OMF: outer membrane factor for efflux pumps; LptD: lipopolysaccharide transport protein D; OM: outer membrane; IM: inner membrane.

Learning from nature to prioritize vaccine targets

The definition of the TPA OMPeome established the potential targets for functional antibodies responsible for protection against reinfection. Mapping the natural antibody responses to OMPs elicited during infection, underpinning a “learning from nature” strategy, provided a rational framework for prioritizing vaccine candidates(24,25). To characterize this response, IRS and HSS were interrogated against identified TPA OMPs. However, full-length recombinant OMPs are notoriously difficult to express in heterologous systems (e.g., Escherichia coli) and often fail to adopt or maintain their native conformations outside the context of the OM(26). Because proper folding and preservation of conformational epitopes are essential for accurately assessing antibody recognition, this limitation required alternative experimental strategies. Although OMPs are the surface-exposed targets of TPA, the majority of each protein is embedded within the membrane, with only discrete extracellular loops (ECLs) accessible to antibody binding(27). Recent advances in protein structural prediction(28,29) have enabled precise mapping of these ECLs. Guided by these structural predictions, our group developed a structure-based approach in which individual TPA ECLs were displayed on a Pyrococcus furiosus thioredoxin (PfTrx) scaffold(30) to generate soluble, conformationally constrained ECL antigens. This approach circumvented the technical challenges associated with full-length OMPs and enabled systematic identification of accessible, immunologically relevant regions within TPA OMPs(24,25). Using this platform, we have identified multiple ECLs that are immunogenic during both rabbit and human infection, providing direct evidence that the host immune system can, and does, recognize these rare surface-exposed targets during natural infection(25,31–33). Together, these findings support the rational prioritization of surface-exposed targets for syphilis vaccine development.

Current strategies to develop a syphilis vaccine

Building on the “learning from nature” conceptual framework, another central question is whether immunogenic ECLs can elicit functional, protective antibody responses upon immunization. Along these lines, immunogenic ECLs from BamA and three FadL orthologs (TP0856, TP0858, and TP0865) served as our initial targets for immunization studies. As expected, immunization of rabbits and mice with individual PfTrx-ECL constructs elicited high titers of ECL-specific IgG, confirming that these regions retain immunogenicity upon artificial immunization when displayed on a scaffold(31,34). However, immunogenicity alone is insufficient; to qualify as effective vaccine antigens, the elicited antibodies must promote spirochete clearance. Recent advances in long-term in vitro cultivation(35) and genetic manipulation of TPA enabled our group to systematically evaluate sera obtained from immunized animals across multiple functional assays. These studies revealed that ECL-directed antibodies contribute to TPA clearance through complementary mechanisms. Sera from animals immunized with PfTrx-ECLs promoted opsonophagocytosis of TPA by both rabbit peritoneal macrophages and murine bone marrow–derived macrophages at levels comparable to those observed with immune serum generated during infection(34). In addition to enhancing phagocytic uptake, ECL-specific sera impaired multiple aspects of spirochete biology in vitro, including reductions in viability, motility, and host-cell attachment(13,33,34). Our findings further indicated that ECL-specific antibodies may interfere with OMP function, ultimately compromising the integrity of the fragile TPA OM. To directly assess this possibility, we engineered a TPA strain constitutively expressing green fluorescent protein(13). Using a flow cytometry-based assay, we observed that incubation of TPA with PfTrx-ECL antisera promoted OM disruption and dose-dependent growth inhibition in vitro, providing direct evidence that surface-directed antibodies can exert bactericidal effects against the spirochete(13,33). Importantly, these findings were not limited to in vitro assays; intradermal challenge of rabbits using treponemes pre-incubated with growth-inhibitory ECL-specific antibodies resulted in absent or transient lesions with substantially lower bacterial burdens(33). Although a formal correlate of protection for syphilis has yet to be established, the combined readouts of opsonophagocytosis, growth inhibition, impairment of motility, OM disruption, and neutralization of infectivity now provide quantitative functional surrogates previously lacking in the field, enabling a rational evaluation of vaccine candidates to be prioritized(25).

While recombinant PfTrx-ECL immunogens establish proof of concept, next-generation platforms are also being explored to enhance immunogenicity, simplify production, and facilitate scalability toward clinical evaluation. We recently developed messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA)-based immunogens encoding PfTrx-TPA ECLs previously shown to elicit functional antibodies as recombinant proteins (unpublished data). These constructs are efficiently translated in vivo and induce antibody responses upon immunization, representing a notable achievement in vaccine development for syphilis. In parallel, we generated virus-like particle (VLP)-based immunogens (unpublished data), which provide highly ordered, repetitive antigen display and are well known to elicit potent humoral and cellular immune responses(36,37). Both platforms can stimulate strong immunity even in the absence of external adjuvants, simplifying the formulation, storage, and manufacturing relative to recombinant protein–based approaches, while also supporting rapid and scalable production(37,38).

The low antigenic density of the TPA surface and interindividual variability in immune responses suggest that an effective syphilis vaccine will likely require a multivalent strategy. Scaffolds capable of simultaneously displaying multiple ECLs therefore represent a logical next step, enabling presentation of multiple protective epitopes by a single immunogen. To this end, our group has designed multivalent scaffolds accommodating up to four ECLs, including the C-lobe of Neisseria meningitidis transferrin-binding protein B (TbpB)(39,40) and a truncated form of Escherichia coli outer membrane protein A (OmpAtr)(41). These constructs elicit robust antibody responses against multiple ECLs without compromising reactivity to individual components, achieving titers comparable to those induced by single-ECL PfTrx constructs(42).

Insights from the global Treponema pallidum outer membrane protein repertoire

Collectively, these complementary strategies highlight promising paths toward a syphilis vaccine capable of achieving broad, global protection. Reaching this goal, however, requires explicit consideration of the sequence variability present in vaccine targets across circulating TPA strains worldwide, as even single amino acid substitutions can alter antibody recognition and compromise vaccine efficacy(43,44). Analysis of sequence variability is particularly critical for immunogenic, surface-exposed ECLs, where strong antibody binding is expected to impose immune pressure and promote the emergence of escape variants(45). Our group and others have sequenced clinical TPA strains from multiple geographic regions to define the global TPA OMPeome, the complete set of OMP variants across circulating strains(46–50). These analyses revealed sequence variability within OMPs in regions predicted to be extracellular and harboring B cell epitopes, suggesting that host immune pressure is a major driver of OMP diversity(46,47). Notably, and somewhat surprisingly, many vaccine-relevant ECLs that elicit functional antibodies upon immunization (e.g., BamA ECL4, TP0856 ECL2, and ECL4) remain highly conserved within clinical strains(46,47). The persistence of sequence invariance in these ECLs, despite their immunogenicity, raises intriguing questions regarding the nature and magnitude of immune pressure acting on them during natural infection. One possibility is that strong functional or structural constraints limit protein diversification without compromising essential OMP function(47). Alternatively, antibodies generated during natural infection may be quantitatively or qualitatively insufficient to exert meaningful selective pressure. These observations underscore an additional layer of complexity in vaccine design, highlighting potential differences between infection- and vaccine-induced antibody responses. For protein regions with more variability (e.g., TP0858 ECL4, TP0865 ECL3), our identification of alternative proteoforms circulating within distinct clinical lineages enables prediction of how naturally occurring mutations may influence antibody recognition of “wild-type” epitopes(47,51). Incorporating these insights refines antigen prioritization and supports rational vaccine design strategies that explicitly account for global sequence diversity within the TPA OMPeome. Ultimately, understanding how immune and evolutionary pressures shape OMP variation in TPA is essential for identifying vaccine targets that are both biologically indispensable and capable of eliciting durable, protective immunity.

CONCLUSION

The past decade has marked a turning point in syphilis vaccine research, shifting the field from questioning whether a vaccine is achievable to defining how one can be designed rationally. Rapid and coordinated advances in structural biology, immunology, and microbiology have reshaped our understanding of TPA. The growing evidence that immunization can elicit functional antibodies against surface-exposed targets has provided a mechanistic framework for comparing immunogens and prioritizing those with the greatest potential to elicit protective immunity (Figure 2). Although current functional readouts capture key mechanistic properties of antibody activity against TPA, they represent surrogate measures rather than definitive predictors of protection. Establishing true correlates of protection will require directly linking antibody functionality to protection outcomes in well-controlled challenge studies. In this regard, reductions in lesion development and treponemal dissemination following rabbit infection remain the gold-standard endpoints for evaluating protective immunity. Expanding these analyses through the development and refinement of additional animal models, including murine systems(52,53), will further facilitate systematic evaluation of immune responses and vaccine efficacy(34,54). Establishing robust correlates of protection will be critical for translating promising immunogens into clinical trials, as such benchmarks are required to predict protective immunity in humans(33). Recent progress indicates that the remaining barriers to syphilis vaccine development are no longer conceptual but technical. Over the coming years, the field is poised to integrate rationally designed antigens, quantitative immunological metrics, and scalable translational platforms to advance the most promising candidates from bench to clinic. With this foundation in place, syphilis vaccine research is now well-positioned to counter the stealth pathogen and, ultimately, achieve a safe and effective vaccine for a disease that has inflicted untold misery upon humankind for centuries(1).

Figure 2. Framework for development of a syphilis vaccine.

Figure 2.

ECLs: extracellular loops; PfTrx: Pyrococcus furiosus thioredoxin; ELISA: Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; Abs: antibodies; mRNA: messenger ribonucleic acid; VLP: virus-like particle; OmpA: outer membrane protein A; TbpB: transferrin-binding protein B.

Funding

The authors declare no financial support.

Footnotes

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Galli M, Fois L. The Centenary Series – STIs through the ages: the dawn of the syphilis pandemic in the old world: history and geography of syphilis in the early sixteenth century. Sex Transm Infect. 2025;101(6):355–60. 10.1136/sextrans-2024-056351 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Waugh M The centenary of Treponema pallidum: on the discovery of Spirochaeta pallida. Skinmed. 2005;4(5):313–5. 10.1111/j.1540-9740.2005.03988.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Radolf JD, Kumar S. The Treponema pallidum outer membrane. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2018;415:1–38. 10.1007/82_2017_44 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chesney AM. Immunity in syphilis. Medicine (Baltimore). 1926;5:463–47. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Radolf JD, Lukehart SA. Immunology of syphilis. In: Radolf JD, Lukehart SA, eds. pathogenic treponemes: cellular and molecular biology. Norfolk: Caister Academic Press; 2006. p. 285–322. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Magnuson HJ, Rosenau BJ, Clark JW Jr. The duration of acquired immunity in experimental syphilis. Am J Syph Gonorrhea Vener Dis. 1949;33(4):297–302. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Magnuson HJ. Current concepts of immunity in syphilis. Am J Med. 1948;5(5):641–54. 10.1016/0002-9343(48)90140-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Turner TB. Protective antibodies in the serum of syphilitic rabbits. J Exp Med. 1939;69(6):867–90. 10.1084/jem.69.6.867 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Turner TB, Kluth FC. Protective antibodies in the serum of syphilitic patients. Am J Hyg. 1948;48(2):173–81. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a119233 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Perine PL, Weiser RS, Klebanoff SJ. Immunity to syphilis. I. Passive transfer in rabbits with hyperimmune serum. Infect Immun. 1973;8(5):787–90. 10.1128/iai.8.5.787-790.1973 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bishop NH, Miller JN. Humoral immunity in experimental syphilis. I. The demonstration of resistance conferred by passive immunization. J Immunol. 1976;117(1):191–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lukehart SA, Miller JN. Demonstration of the in vitro phagocytosis of Treponema pallidum by rabbit peritoneal macrophages. J Immunol. 1978;121(5):2014–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Delgado KN, Vicente CF, Hennelly CM, Aghakhanian F, Parr JB, Claffey KP, et al. Development and utilization of Treponema pallidum expressing green fluorescent protein to study spirochete-host interactions and antibody-mediated clearance: expanding the toolbox for syphilis research. mBio. 2025;16:e0325324. 10.1128/mbio.03253-24 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Radolf JD, Deka RK, Anand A, Šmajs D, Norgard MV, Yang XF. Treponema pallidum, the syphilis spirochete: making a living as a stealth pathogen. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2016;14(12):744–56. 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.141 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Radolf JD, Norgard MV, Schulz WW. Outer membrane ultrastructure explains the limited antigenicity of virulent Treponema pallidum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989;86(6):2051–5. 10.1073/pnas.86.6.2051 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Cox DL, Chang P, McDowall AW, Radolf JD. The outer membrane, not a coat of host proteins, limits antigenicity of virulent Treponema pallidum. Infect Immun. 1992;60(3):1076–83. 10.1128/iai.60.3.1076-1083.1992 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cox DL, Akins DR, Porcella SF, Norgard MV, Radolf JD. Treponema pallidum in gel microdroplets: a novel strategy for investigation of treponemal molecular architecture. Mol Microbiol. 1995;15(6):1151–64. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1995.tb02288.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Deka RK, Brautigam CA, Tomson FL, Lumpkins SB, Tomchick DR, Machius M, et al. Crystal structure of the Tp34 (TP0971) lipoprotein of Treponema pallidum: implications of its metal-bound state and affinity for human lactoferrin. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(8):5944–58. 10.1074/jbc.M610215200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Weinstock GM, Hardham JM, McLeod MP, Sodergren EJ, Norris SJ. The genome of Treponema pallidum: new light on the agent of syphilis. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 1998;22(4):323–32. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.1998.tb00373.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Fraser CM, Norris SJ, Weinstock GM, White O, Sutton GG, Dodson R, et al. Complete genome sequence of Treponema pallidum, the syphilis spirochete. Science. 1998;281(5375):375–88. 10.1126/science.281.5375.375 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Cox DL, Luthra A, Dunham-Ems S, Desrosiers DC, Salazar JC, Caimano MJ, et al. Surface immunolabeling and consensus computational framework to identify candidate rare outer membrane proteins of Treponema pallidum. Infect Immun. 2010;78(12):5178–94. 10.1128/IAI.00834-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Koebnik R, Locher KP, Van Gelder P. Structure and function of bacterial outer membrane proteins: barrels in a nutshell. Mol Microbiol. 2000;37(2):239–53. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01983.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hawley KL, Montezuma-Rusca JM, Delgado KN, Singh N, Uversky VN, Caimano MJ, et al. Structural modeling of the Treponema pallidum Outer Membrane Protein Repertore: a road map for deconvolution of syphilis pathogenesis and development of a syphilis vaccine. J Bacteriol. 2021;203(15):e0008221. 10.1128/JB.00082-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Delgado KN, Caimano MJ, La Vake CJ, Jones L, LeDoyt M, Bettin E, et al. Pyrococcus furiosus thioredoxin (PfTrx) scaffolds displaying extracellular loops of Treponema pallidum outer membrane proteins: “learning from nature” in the search for syphilis vaccine candidates. In: 2023 STI & HIV World Congress. Chicago; 2023. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Liu A, Giacani L, Hawley KL, Cameron CE, Seña AC, Konda KA, et al. New pathways in syphilis vaccine development. Sex Transm Dis. 2024;51(11):e49–e53. 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000002050 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Carpenter EP, Beis K, Cameron AD, Iwata S. Overcoming the challenges of membrane protein crystallography. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2008;18(5):581–6. 10.1016/j.sbi.2008.07.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hayashi S, Buchanan SK, Botos I. The name is barrel, beta-barrel. Methods Mol Biol. 2024;2778:1–30. 10.1007/978-1-0716-3734-0_1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Abramson J, Adler J, Dunger J, Evans R, Green T, Pritzel A, et al. Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3. Nature. 2024;630(8016):493–500. 10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Cramer P AlphaFold2 and the future of structural biology. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2021;28(9):704–5. 10.1038/s41594-021-00650-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Canali E, Bolchi A, Spagnoli G, Seitz H, Rubio I, Pertinhez TA, et al. A high-performance thioredoxin-based scaffold for peptide immunogen construction: proof-of-concept testing with a human papillomavirus epitope. Sci Rep. 2014;4:4729. 10.1038/srep04729 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Delgado KN, Montezuma-Rusca JM, Orbe IC, Caimano MJ, La Vake CJ, Luthra A, et al. Extracellular loops of the Treponema pallidum FadL orthologs TP0856 and TP0858 elicit IgG antibodies and IgG(+)-specific B-cells in the rabbit model of experimental syphilis. mBio. 2022;13(4):e0163922. 10.1128/mbio.01639-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Moody MA. Persons with early syphilis make antibodies that differentially recognize extracellular loops of Treponema pallidum outer membrane proteins. In: STI & HIV 2023 World Congress. Chicago; 2023. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Delgado KN, Vicente CF, La Vake CJ, Bettin E, Caimano MJ, Radolf JD, et al. Antibodies directed against extracellular loops of FadL orthologs disrupt outer membrane integrity and neutralize infectivity of Treponema pallidum, the syphilis spirochete. Front Immunol. 2026;16:1724458. 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1724458 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Delgado KN, Caimano MJ, Orbe IC, Vicente CF, La Vake CJ, Grassmann AA, et al. Immunodominant extracellular loops of Treponema pallidum FadL outer membrane proteins elicit antibodies with opsonic and growth-inhibitory activities. PLoS Pathog. 2024;20(12):e1012443. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1012443 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Edmondson DG, Norris SJ. In vitro cultivation of the syphilis spirochete Treponema pallidum. Curr Protoc. 2021;1(2):e44. 10.1002/cpz1.44 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Gupta R, Arora K, Roy SS, Joseph A, Rastogi R, Arora NM, et al. Platforms, advances, and technical challenges in virus-like particles-based vaccines. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1123805. 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1123805 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mohsen MO, Bachmann MF. Virus-like particle vaccinology, from bench to bedside. Cell Mol Immunol. 2022;19:993–1011. 10.1038/s41423-022-00897-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Barbier AJ, Jiang AY, Zhang P, Wooster R, Anderson DG. The clinical progress of mRNA vaccines and immunotherapies. Nat Biotechnol. 40;840–54. 10.1038/s41587-022-01294-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Qamsari MM, Rasooli I, Chaudhuri S, Astaneh SDA, Schryvers AB. Hybrid antigens expressing surface loops of ZnuD from Acinetobacter baumannii is capable of inducing protection against infection. Front Immunol. 2020;11:158. 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00158 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Fegan JE, Calmettes C, Islam EA, Ahn SK, Chaudhuri S, Yu RH, et al. Utility of hybrid transferrin binding protein antigens for protection against pathogenic Neisseria species. Front Immunol. 2019;10:247. 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00247 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Verhoeven GS, Alexeeva S, Dogterom M, den Blaauwen T. Differential bacterial surface display of peptides by the transmembrane domain of OmpA. PLoS One. 2009;4(8):e6739. 10.1371/journal.pone.0006739 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Bettin EB. Comparison of single- and multi-valent scaffolds displaying treponema pallidum outer membrane protein ECL candidate syphilis vaccinogens. In: STI & HIV 2025 World Congress. Canada; 2025. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Luthra A, Anand A, Hawley KL, LeDoyt M, La Vake CJ, Caimano MJ, et al. A homology model reveals novel structural features and an immunodominant surface loop/opsonic target in the Treponema pallidum BamA ortholog TP_0326. J Bacteriol. 2015;197(11):1906–20. 10.1128/JB.00086-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kumar S, Caimano MJ, Anand A, Dey A, Hawley KL, LeDoyt ME, et al. Sequence variation of rare outer membrane protein β-barrel domains in clinical strains provides insights into the evolution of Treponema pallidum subsp. pallidum, the syphilis spirochete. mBio. 2018;9(3):e01006–18. 10.1128/mBio.01006-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Bliven KA, Maurelli AT. Evolution of bacterial pathogens within the human host. Microbiol Spectr. 2016;4(1). 10.1128/microbiolspec.VMBF-0017-2015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Sena AC, Matoga MM, Yang L, Lopez-Medina E, Aghakhanian F, Chen JS, et al. Clinical and genomic diversity of Treponema pallidum subspecies pallidum to inform vaccine research: an international, molecular epidemiology study. Lancet Microbe. 2024;5(9):100871. 10.1016/S2666-5247(24)00087-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Bettin EB, Aghakhanian F, Hennelly CM, Chen W, Davenport TC, Hackl ST, et al. Sequence variability of BamA and FadL candidate vaccinogens suggests divergent evolutionary paths of Treponema pallidum outer membrane proteins. bioRxiv. 2025. 10.1101/2025.04.21.649848 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Beale MA, Marks M, Cole MJ, Lee MK, Pitt R, Ruis C, et al. Global phylogeny of Treponema pallidum lineages reveals recent expansion and spread of contemporary syphilis. Nat Microbiol. 2021;6(12):1549–60. 10.1038/s41564-021-01000-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Lieberman NAP, Lin MJ, Xie H, Shrestha L, Nguyen T, Huang ML, et al. Treponema pallidum genome sequencing from six continents reveals variability in vaccine candidate genes and dominance of Nichols clade strains in Madagascar. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021. Dec 22;15(12):e0010063. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010063 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Pospíšilová P, Fedrová P, Vrbová E, Hennelly CM, Aghakhanian F, Hawley KL, et al. Analysis of Treponema pallidum subsp. pallidum predicted outer membrane proteins (OMPeomes) in 21 clinical samples: variant sequences are predominantly surface-exposed. mSphere. 2025;10(9):e0021325. 10.1128/msphere.00213-25 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Salazar JC, Vargas-Cely F, García-Luna JA, Ramirez LG, Bettin EB, Romero-Rosas N, et al. Treponema pallidum genetic diversity and its implications for targeted vaccine development: a cross-sectional study of early syphilis cases in Southwestern Colombia. PLoS One. 2024;19(7):e0307600. 10.1371/journal.pone.0307600 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Lu S, Zheng K, Wang J, Xu M, Xie Y, Yuan S, et al. Characterization of Treponema pallidum dissemination in C57BL/6 mice. Front Immunol. 2021;11:577129. 10.3389/fimmu.2020.577129 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Silver AC, Dunne DW, Zeiss CJ, Bockenstedt LK, Radolf JD, Salazar JC, et al. MyD88 deficiency markedly worsens tissue inflammation and bacterial clearance in mice infected with Treponema pallidum, the agent of syphilis. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e71388. 10.1371/journal.pone.0071388 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Ferguson MR, Delgado KN, McBride S, Orbe IC, La Vake CJ, Caimano MJ, et al. Use of Epivolve phage display to generate a monoclonal antibody with opsonic activity directed against a subdominant epitope on extracellular loop 4 of Treponema pallidum BamA (TP0326). Front Immunol. 2023;14:1222267. 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1222267 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES