Abstract
The coupling between propagating surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs) in Au nanostructures and the exciton transitions of cyanine dye J-aggregates has been examined using leakage radiation microscopy. Real space images of the nanostructures give the propagation lengths of the leaky SPP modes, and Fourier space images yield their dispersion curves. The dispersion curves show an avoided crossing when the structures are coated with J-aggregates, with a Rabi splitting of approximately 30 meV. The lifetimes of the coupled states were calculated by combining the measured propagation lengths with the group velocities obtained from the dispersion curves. The SPP lifetimes decrease from ∼50 fs for the bare Au nanostructures, to ∼10 fs in the avoided crossing region for the coupled J-aggregate/Au nanostructure system. Analytical Holstein–Tavis–Cummings model calculations and finite element simulations of the coupled system show that the decrease in lifetime is primarily due to energy dissipation into dark states associated with the J-aggregates.
1. Introduction
The formation of hybrid light–matter states, known as polaritons, is of significant recent interest in the nanophotonics and quantum-materials communities. − Polaritons arise when the rate of energy exchange between a photonic mode and an optical transition of a semiconductor or molecular system exceeds their respective decay rates. , This creates hybrid states that share both photonic and material excitation properties. Polaritons are typically characterized by their Rabi splitting, which can be measured from dispersion curves for the coupled light–matter systems. ,− Polaritons enable long-range energy transfer and nonlinear optical responses within subwavelength volumes, and have been used to study phenomena such as Bose–Einstein condensation. ,
In the past decade polaritons formed through the coupling of surface plasmons with excitons have been extensively investigated. ,− An important attribute of surface plasmons is that they confine electromagnetic fields to dimensions far below the diffraction limit, enhancing the interaction with excitons and enabling strong coupling without the need for an external cavity. ,− Experiments have been performed on localized surface plasmon resonances, , surface lattice resonances, , and propagating surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs) − which are the focus of this work. Propagating SPPs are guided waves that move along the interface between an extended metal structure (such as a surface or nanowire) and a dielectric material. , Of the different excitonic systems that have been examined, J-aggregates of organic dyes are probably the most effective for forming polaritons, as they possess narrow absorption bands and large oscillator strengths. ,,− Rabi splittings of hundreds of meV have been observed for plasmons coupled to J-aggregates, ,,,− , placing these systems within the strong coupling regime. ,
There has been extensive research into the spectral and dispersion properties of plasmon-exciton polaritons; however, less information is available about their dynamics. , One reason for this is that plasmons have very short lifetimes, so direct time-resolved measurements are difficult. , Light scattering spectra from single plasmonic particles can yield lifetime information; , however, these spectra are challenging to interpret for coupled plasmon-exciton systems. , To the best of our knowledge there are only a few quantitative measurements of polariton lifetimes for plasmonic systems, all by two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy. − The polariton lifetime dictates how long the hybrid states preserve their coherence. Understanding how the coherence time varies with the identity of the excitonic species and coupling strength is important for designing polaritonic devices, where performance hinges on balancing field confinement and dissipation. ,
Here, we report leakage radiation microscopy experiments for J-aggregates coupled to SPPs of gold nanostructures. , Leakage radiation microscopy was used for these experiments because it can provide information about the dephasing time of the SPP states. The measured T 1 times for the coupled system are approximately 10 fs, much shorter than the lifetime of the SPPs in the bare Au nanostructures (ca. 50 fs). ,, This is somewhat counterintuitive. The simple coupled oscillator model for mixed states predicts that the dephasing should be an average of the damping rates of the two oscillators. , The width of the J-aggregate absorption band is on-the-order-of 30 meV. This line width has contributions from a variety of sources, including electron–phonon coupling, dephasing and inhomogeneous broadening, , which means that the T 1 lifetime of the J-aggregates must be longer than 25 fs. This implies that the coupled states should have lifetimes >33 fs, significantly longer than the measured lifetimes. An analytical model for the SPP-exciton system based on the Holstein-Tavis-Cummings Hamiltonian reveals that the decrease in lifetime arises from coupling between the SPP mode and dark states associated with the exciton. This is corroborated by finite element simulations, which show that the lifetimes of the polariton states created in this system suffer additional energy losses by resistive heating in the dye layer as well as radiation damping, ,,,, with resistive heating being the main effect in the avoided crossing region.
2. Methods
The gold nanostripes were fabricated on #1.5 borosilicate glass substrates using photolithography, followed by the physical vapor deposition and liftoff. The structures for the present study were 2.6 μm wide, 100 μm long, with a thickness of 50 nm. J-aggregates of the pentamethine cyanine dye, ZZ683, in a 5% poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) solution by weight were spin coated onto the substrate to create hybrid dye-Au nanostripe systems. The dye–polymer mixture was first drop-cast onto the substrate and then spin-coated at 1000 rpm for 30 s, resulting in a thin layer covering the nanostructures. The concentration of the dye was adjusted to be high enough to give an avoided crossing in the SPP dispersion curves, but not too high that the SPP propagation lengths are too short to be accurately measured. Identical deposition conditions were employed for all samples investigated in this study. J-aggregates were selected for this study due to their strong excitonic absorption and narrow line widths, ideal for achieving strong coupling with plasmonic modes. The specific cyanine dye for this study was chosen because it forms J-aggregates in the near-IR region, which is important for leakage radiation studies of the Au nanostripes. The thickness of the polymer/J-aggregate coating on the gold nanostripes was determined using a Gaertner L117 ellipsometer. Measurements were performed using a He–Ne laser (λ = 632.8 nm) at an angle of incidence of 70°. The polarization change of the reflected light was analyzed by the instrument software, which automatically fits the measured ellipsometric parameters to provide the film thickness. The polymer/J-aggregate layer was found to have an average thickness of approximately 20 nm.
A schematic of the experimental setup is presented in the Figure S1 of the Supporting Information. Briefly, the samples were placed on an inverted optical microscope (Olympus IX-71) and optically excited across a range of wavelengths from 730 to 820 nm with the output of a white light supercontinuum laser (NKT Photonics SuperK COMPACT). , Specific wavelengths were selected using a series of 10 nm bandpass interference filters (Thorlabs FBHXXX-10). The laser beam was tightly focused onto the end of the nanostripes using a high numerical aperture (NA) oil immersion objective lens (Olympus UPlanFL N, 100×, NA = 1.3) to launch the SPPs. The overlap between the laser focus and the nanostripes was achieved with a Mad City Laboratories MCL-uS motorized stage. The scattered light from the sample was collected using the same objective and was directed to a CMOS camera (Thorlabs, Kiralux CC895MU). Real space and Fourier space images of the nanostripe SPP modes were collected for all wavelengths. − The SPP propagation lengths L SPP were obtained from the real space images, and the SPP wavevectors k SPP were obtained from the Fourier space images. The absorption spectrum of the near-IR cyanine dye-PVA film was recorded with a Jasco UV-670 UV–vis spectrophotometer.
Finite element simulations of the nanostripes SPP modes were carried out in COMSOL Multphysics (ver 5.3a). A two-dimensional mode analysis calculation was performed in an “Electromagnetic Waves, Frequency Domain” simulation. , In our model a 3 nm Ti adhesion layer was included between the nanostripe and the glass substrate to match the experimental system. Values for the refractive index for Ti were taken from COMSOL’s library of materials, and the refractive index data for Au was taken from ref . The refractive index of glass was set to 1.45 (the value from COMSOL for silica glass). The mode analysis calculation yields the complex effective mode index for the system n eff – iα/k 0, where the real part gives the SPP wavevector k SPP = n eff k 0, and the imaginary part gives the attenuation constant α, which is related to the propagation length by L SPP = 1/2α. ,,, The values of α obtained from the simulations were separated into contributions from radiation damping, energy transfer to the dye layer, and resistive heating in the Au (Landau damping) by calculating the power losses for these different processes. ,,, Specifically, in our two-dimensional simulations the relative power dissipated by radiation was calculated from the line integral of the time-averaged Poynting vector ⟨S⃗⟩ over a circle that encloses the nanostripe: ∮n⃗.⟨S⃗⟩ dl where n⃗ is the outward normal unit vector. The powers dissipated by resistive heating in the metal or dye/polymer layer were calculated by ∬Q rh dA where Q rh is the resistive losses in the material and the integral is over the metal or dye/polymer domains. , The different contributions to the SPP attenuation were then calculated by α i = η i α tot where α tot is the total attenuation from the mode analysis calculation, and η i are the relative power losses for radiation damping (η rad ) and resistive heating (η Au and η dye ). ,,
3. Results and Discussion
Metal nanostripes on a glass surface have two SPP modes: a bound mode that propagates at the metal-glass interface, and a leaky mode at the metal-air interface. The wavevector of the bound mode is too large to couple to light, but the leaky mode can couple to photons in the glass. Figure (a) shows a momentum matching diagram for coupling between the leaky SPP mode and photons in the glass substrate. Momentum matching occurs when the SPP wavevector k SPP = nk 0 sin θ cos φ, where k 0 is the momentum of free space photons and n is the refractive index of the substrate. Using the coordinate system shown in Figure (a), this gives a line in the Fourier space image at (k x /k 0,k y /k 0) = (k SPP /k 0,k SPP tan φ/k 0). Note that the maximum wavevector that can be collected by the optical system is determined by the numerical aperture of the objective. Figure (b) shows an example Fourier space image from a bare Au nanostripe used in these experiments. The inner circle in the Fourier space image corresponds to the condition for total internal reflection k/k 0 = 1, and the outer circle is k/k 0 = NA. These two features calibrate the wavevector scale in the Fourier space images. A Fourier space image for a dye coated nanostripe is presented in Figure S1 of the Supporting Information. Figure (c) shows the real space image of the leaky SPP mode for the nanostripe in Figure (b). The SPP propagation lengths were measured by integrating the scattered light over the width of the nanostripe, and fitting the resulting intensity profile to an exponential decay I(x) = e–x/L SPP . Example intensity profiles for bare and dye-coated nanostripes are presented in Figure (d). SPP dephasing can be characterized by either attenuation constants/propagation lengths or lifetimes. The lifetime is more intuitive, and allows comparison to other systems. The SPP lifetimes are given by T 1 = L SPP /v g , ,,,, where v g is the group velocity. The group velocities were measured by recording Fourier space images over a range of frequencies to construct a frequency versus wavevector dispersion curve, and using v g = ∂ω/∂k.
1.
(a) Momentum matching diagram for the leaky SPP mode (wavevector k SPP ) coupling to photons in the glass substrate (wavevector nk 0 where n is the refractive index of the glass). (b) Example Fourier space image of the leaky SPP mode of a typical Au nanostripe used in our experiments. The inner circle corresponds to k/k 0 = 1, and the outer circle to k/k 0 = NA, where NA is the numerical aperture of the objective. (c) Real space image recorded for the Au nanostripe in panel (b). (d) Line profiles obtained by integrating the scattered light over the width of the nanostripe for the bare Au nanostripe (green), and a J-aggregate coated nanostripe (blue). The dashed lines show exponential fits to the data. The propagation lengths for the bare and coated nanostructure are 11.86 ± 0.07 and 3.94 ± 0.04 μm, respectively. The experimental data in panels (b)–(d) were collected at λ = 0.76 μm.
The excitonic system used for these experiments was a pentamethine cyanine dye, denoted as ZZ683, which can be induced to form J-aggregates by controlling solution conditions. − Figure (a) shows absorption spectra of the dye as monomer in methanol, J-aggregate form in phosphate buffered saline solution, and spin coated J-aggregate on a glass substrate. Spin coating broadens the J-aggregate band, indicating a reduction in the exciton delocalization length. Figure (b) shows the frequency versus wavevector dispersion curves for the leaky SPP modes of bare Au nanostripes (green symbols) and J-aggregate coated Au nanostripes (blue symbols and lines). The red line is the dispersion curve for free space photons (ω = c 0 k 0), and the dotted black line shows the absorption spectrum of the J-aggregates on glass. Six different nanostripes were examined for the coated system, and three different nanostripes for the bare system. The wavevectors and propagation lengths are typically very consistent for bare Au nanostripes, so a large number of measurements are not needed. ,, Note that only the first-order leaky modes were observed in these experimentswe do not see higher order modes for this system. This could be because the nanostripes interrogated here are thinner than in our previous studies, and the higher order modes suffer wavelength dependent cut-offs at small sizes. , It could also be a signal-to-noise issue: the back-focal plane images for the coated nanostripes are noisier than those for the uncoated stripes (see Figure S1).
2.
(a) Absorption spectra of the pentamethine cyanine dye, ZZ683, in monomer form in methanol solution (green line), and as J-aggregates in phosphate buffered saline solution (red line). The dashed black line corresponds to the J-aggregates spin coated onto a glass surface. (b) Dispersion curve for bare Au nanostripes (green markers) and J-aggregate coated nanostripes (blue markers and line). The dashed green line is the calculated dispersion curve for bare nanostripes. The red line is the light line (ω = c 0 k 0), and the dotted black line shows the absorption spectrum of the J-aggregates on glass. (c) Propagation lengths for bare and J-aggregate coated nanostripes, and the absorption spectrum of the J-aggregates on glass, same color scheme as panel (b). The dashed lines are the propagation lengths calculated from the finite element simulations. Note that the cyanine dye absorption spectra in panels (b) and (c) are simply scaled to fit the figure. (d) Experimental lifetime versus wavelength for bare nanostripes (green symbols) and J-aggregate coated Au nanostripes (blue symbols). Error bars in each panel are 95% confidence limits.
The dispersion curve for the dye coated nanostripes show a discontinuity at the maximum of the J-aggregate band. The Rabi splitting between the upper and the lower polariton branches was estimated to be approximately 30 meV (see Figure S7 in the Supporting Information). This is similar to the line width of the J-aggregates spectrum, placing the system in an intermediate coupling regime: strong enough to produce an avoided crossing in the dispersion curve, but not in the strong coupling limit where the Rabi frequency greatly exceeds the SPP and exciton dephasing rates. , The propagation lengths versus wavelength for bare and J-aggregate coated Au nanostripes are presented in Figure (c) (same color scheme as Figure (b)). It is important to note that the SPP propagation length decreases near the J-aggregate excitonic frequency in the coupled system, which implies that the interaction with the exciton transition causes increased SPP attenuation and, thus, decreased lifetimes.
Figure (d) shows the T 1 lifetimes of the bare and dye coated nanostripes obtained by dividing the propagation lengths (Figure (c)) by the group velocity (determined from Figure (b)). In this analysis the group velocities for the bare nanostripes were obtained by fitting the dispersion curve data to a line function and taking the derivative, allowing v g and thus T 1 to be calculated at each wavelength where L SPP was measured. For the coated nanostripes, the group velocity was determined point-by-point from the averaged wavevector data by v g = Δω/Δk. This yields v g values in between the experimental data points, which requires interpolated values of L SPP to be used for the T 1 = L SPP /v g calculations. The group velocities for the bare and dye-coated nanostripes are presented in Figure S8 of the Supporting Information. Errors for T 1 were calculated from the uncertainties in both L SPP and v g , but are dominated by the error in L SPP . The SPP lifetimes are significantly shorter for the J-aggregate coated nanostripes for all wavelengths, as expected from the propagation length data in Figure (c). Importantly, there is a significant decrease in the SPP lifetime near the J-aggregate exciton resonance. To understand the origins of these lifetime changes, analytic Holstein–Tavis–Cummings (HTC) model calculations were performed, as well as finite element simulations for the bare and J-aggregate coated gold nanostripes.
In the analytic calculations a minimal HTC model Hamiltonian was used composed of N molecular excitons coupled to their individual phonon baths, interacting with a single SPP mode. The SPP mode is modeled as a cavity photon of frequency ω c and loss rate Γ c , and we focus on the single photon excitation manifold (|0⟩ and |1⟩ as photon states). The electronic excitation of the dye molecule is modeled as an effective two-level system (|g n ⟩ and |x n ⟩ for the ground and excited states of molecule n) with the transition frequency ω0 and exciton relaxation rate Γ x . Each dye molecule in the J-aggregate is assumed to have an identical light-matter coupling strength g c , so that the effective coupling to the bright excitonic state (|B⟩ = ) is . The polaritonic states can be expressed as a linear superposition of the bright excitonic state and cavity photon excitation: |P +⟩ = cos Θ|B⟩|0⟩ + sin Θ|G⟩|1⟩ and |P –⟩ = −sin Θ|B⟩|0⟩ + cos Θ|G⟩|1⟩ for the upper/lower polaritons (UP/LP), respectively. Here |G⟩ is the ground state, and the mixing angle is given by Θ = .
The nuclear degrees of freedom of the dye molecules are modeled as an independent, noninteracting harmonic bath with a collinear coupling to the electronic exciton: V sb = ∑ n |x n ⟩⟨x n | × ∑α c α R nα , where R nα is the α-th bath mode coordinate of molecule n. , The system–bath coupling strength c α is characterized by the spectral density J(ω), taking the Drude–Lorentz form centered at ω0
| 1 |
where ω b is the characteristic bath frequency and λ is the reorganization energy, which represents the system-bath coupling strength. The system–bath coupling induces interbranch scattering to the dark states, which are purely excitonic states that do not involve the polaritonic states, leading to additional decay of the polaritonic states. , The total decay rate can be expressed as a weighted sum of three decay channels:
| 2 |
where the Hopfield coefficients are |C|2 = sin2 Θ and |X|2 = cos2 Θ for the UP branch, |C|2 = cos2 Θ and |X|2 = sin2 Θ for the LP branch, and Γ d is the decay to the dark states. In the presence of the electron–nuclear coupling, the scattering to the dark states can be estimated by Fermi’s golden rule: Γ d = |X|2 J(ω c ). , For the exciton decay, we estimate Γ x = 0.04 fs–1 from the absorption spectrum of the J-aggregates (Figure (a)). This value of Γ x is less than the experimental line width, with the additional broadening coming from vibrational relaxation. The reorganization energy and the bath characteristic frequency for the spectral density were chosen to be λ = 0.001 fs–1 and ω b = 0.026 μm–1 from fitting the upper/lower polariton lifetimes for ω c > ω0 and ω c < ω0, respectively (see the Supporting Information). Note that we do not fit the spectra for the uncoupled J-aggregates, as the presence of the metal surface could change the dye relaxation.
The dephasing rates from eq are compared to the experimental measurements in Figure (a). The analytic result qualitatively agrees with the experimental data. Note that without the dark-state decay, the polariton decay rate is a linear combination of Γ c and Γ x , and cannot capture the enhanced relaxation of the coupled system at the resonance ω c ≈ ω0. This implies that the dark-state decay channel dominates the overall relaxation of the coupled system. Also, using different values for the exciton decay Γ x does not change the form of the Γ tot versus wavelength curve; see the Supporting Information. Thus, the observation of increased relaxation due to dark-states is not sensitive to the exact values of Γ x , λ and ω b used in the calculations.
3.

(a) Dephasing rates Γ estimated by the analytical Holstein–Tavis–Cummings model for bare Au (green lines) and the coupled J-aggregate Au nanostripe system (blue lines). The symbols are the experimental data (error bars = 95% confidence limits). (b) Attenuation constant α versus wavelength for bare and J-aggregate coated Au nanostripes from the finite element simulations. Same color scheme as panel (a). The dashed and dashed-dotted lines are the calculated attenuation from resistive heating in the dye layer and the Au, respectively, and the dotted line shows the radiation damping contribution. For the bare Au only the total calculated attenuation is presented.
The effect of J-aggregates on plasmon dephasing was also analyzed by finite element simulations. The dye layer is modeled as a uniform 20 nm film that coats the nanostripes, with a complex dielectric constant of ϵ film (ω) = xϵ dye (ω) + (1 – x)ϵ m . The frequency and width of the Lorentz oscillator ϵ dye (ω) were adjusted to match the spectrum of the J-aggregate film, and the amplitude of ϵ dye (ω), mixing fraction x and dielectric constant of the medium ϵ m were adjusted to match the dispersion curve and the attenuation constant at a single wavelength (taken to be 0.78 μm) for the Au nanostripe/J-aggregate system. More details about the simulations and Lorentz oscillator model are given in the Supporting Information. The attenuation constants α determined from the simulations are compared to the experimental results in Figure (b). Note that we have chosen to present attenuation here, rather than propagation length or lifetime, as α can be directly compared to Γ in Figure (a), and can be also be separated into the different damping contributions (radiation damping, and resistive heating in the J-aggregate and gold domains) in the finite element simulations. , The solid line in Figure (b) shows the total calculated attenuation, which is in good agreement with the experimental data. The dashed line is the attenuation from resistive heating in the dye layer, the dotted line is the contribution from radiation damping, and the dashed-dotted line is resistive heating in Au nanostripe. ,,, These results show that the increased attenuation for the J-aggregate coated nanostripes at the exciton resonance primarily arises from energy dissipation in the dye. There is also a slight increase in radiation damping, that comes from the change in the refractive index of the dye film at the resonance. This is consistent with our previous studies of dye and semiconductor coated Au nanostripes. ,
Both the analytic model and the finite element simulations show that the polariton lifetimes are limited by energy dissipation into nonradiative states of the dye, and that the simple coupled oscillator model does not properly capture the behavior of this system. , This is a consequence of the strong optical absorption of the J-aggregates. It is important to note that the decrease in lifetime/increased attenuation observed in this work is likely to be a general feature of coupled plasmon-exciton states. Creating these states requires strong exciton transitions, and these transitions are always associated with strong absorption. − This effect is important for applications: decay into the dark states associated with the exciton limits the propagation lengths that can be achieved for the coupled SPP-exciton system.
4. Summary and Conclusions
Hybrid plasmon-exciton states have been created by coating Au nanostripes with J-aggregates of a pentamethine cyanine dye (ZZ683). ,− The states were interrogated by single nanostructure light scattering measurements, which probe the leaky SPP modes of the nanostripes. ,,,,, The dispersion curve for the coupled Au nanostripe/J-aggregate system shows an avoided crossing, with a corresponding Rabi frequency of approximately 30 meV. The lifetimes of the plasmon-exciton states were found to be on the order of 10 fs, significantly shorter than the lifetime of the leaky SPP mode of the bare nanostripes. Analytic HTC model calculations and finite element simulations show that the increased attenuation arises from energy dissipation in dark states of the J-aggregates. Similar effects have been observed for Au nanostripes coupled to non-J-aggregate forming dyes and semiconductor systems. ,
The coupled states in our experiments have propagation lengths of several microns. This is longer than the typical propagation lengths of excitons in room temperature J-aggregates, − but smaller than what has been observed for excitons of organic materials coupled to surface plasmons in nanoparticle arrays. ,,,, However, it is also important to note that the leakage radiation measurements used here are only sensitive to coherent energy transport (propagation before dephasing of the polariton states). Any subsequent diffusional motion of the excitons is not detected in our experiments. Finally, the Au nanostructure/J-aggregate system studied here has a relatively modest Rabi frequency. Work is currently underway to find strongly coupled plasmon-exciton systems by investigating different dyes and metals (i.e., Ag rather than Au).
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation (CHE-2304905), and the nanostructures used in the study were fabricated in the Notre Dame Nanofabrication Facility. Z.Z. and B.D.S. acknowledge support by NIH grant R35GM136212.
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6c02759.
Description of the optical system used for leakage radiation microscopy measurements; synthesis and characterization of the cyanine dye; details of the finite element simulations; determination of parameters for the analytic HTC model calculations; dispersion curves and group velocities for bare and J-aggregate coated nanostripes (PDF)
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Published as part of The Journal of Physical Chemistry C special issue “K. George Thomas Festschrift”.
References
- Bitton O., Haran G.. Plasmonic Cavities and Individual Quantum Emitters in the Strong Coupling Limit. Acc. Chem. Res. 2022;55:1659–1668. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.2c00028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bloch J., Carusotto J., Wouters M.. Non-equilibrium Bose–Einstein condensation in photonic systems. Nature Reviews Physics. 2022;4:470–488. doi: 10.1038/s42254-022-00464-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Dunkelberger A. D., Simpkins B. S., Vurgaftman I., Owrutsky J. C.. Vibration-Cavity Polariton Chemistry and Dynamics. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2022;73:429–451. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physchem-082620-014627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guan J., Park J.-E., Deng S., Tan M. J. H., Hu J., Odom T. W.. Light-Matter Interactions in Hybrid Material Metasurfaces. Chem. Rev. 2022;122:15177–15203. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bhuyan R., Mony J., Kotov O., Castellanos G. W., Rivas J. G., Shegai T. O., Börjesson K.. The Rise and Current Status of Polaritonic Photochemistry and Photophysics. Chem. Rev. 2023;123:10877–10919. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xiang B., Xiong W.. Molecular Polaritons for Chemistry, Photonics and Quantum Technologies. Chem. Rev. 2024;124:2512–2552. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Törmä P., Barnes W. L.. Strong coupling between surface plasmon polaritons and emitters: a review. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2015;78:013901. doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/78/1/013901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Toffoletti F., Collini E.. Coherent phenomena in exciton-polariton systems. Journal of Physics: Materials. 2025;8:022002. doi: 10.1088/2515-7639/adcbd6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Fofang N. T., Park T. H., Neumann O., Mirin N. A., Nordlander P., Halas N. J.. Plexcitonic Nanoparticles: Plasmon-Exciton Coupling in Nanoshell-J-Aggregate Complexes. Nano Lett. 2008;8:3481–3487. doi: 10.1021/nl8024278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baranov D. G., Wersäll M., Cuadra J., Antosiewicz T. J., Shegai T.. Novel Nanostructures and Materials for Strong Light-Matter Interactions. ACS Photonics. 2018;5:24–42. doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.7b00674. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sun J., Li Y., Hu H., Chen W., Zheng D., Zhang S., Xu H.. Strong plasmon-exciton coupling in transition metal dichalcogenides and plasmonic nanostructures. Nanoscale. 2021;13:4408–4419. doi: 10.1039/D0NR08592H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Son M., Armstrong Z. T., Allen R. T., Dhavamani A., Arnold M. S., Zanni M. T.. Energy cascades in donor-acceptor exciton-polaritons observed by ultrafast two-dimensional white-light spectroscopy. Nat. Commun. 2022;13:7305. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-35046-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tang Y., Zhang Y., Liu Q., Wei K., Cheng X. a., Shi L., Jiang T.. Interacting plexcitons for designed ultrafast optical nonlinearity in a monolayer semiconductor. Light: Science & Applications. 2022;11:94. doi: 10.1038/s41377-022-00754-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kasprzak J., Richard M., Kundermann S., Baas A., Jeambrun P., Keeling J. M. J., Marchetti F. M., Szymanska M. H., André R., Staehli J. L., Savona V., Littlewood P. B., Deveaud B., Dang L. S.. Bose–Einstein condensation of exciton polaritons. Nature. 2006;443:409–414. doi: 10.1038/nature05131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zengin G., Johansson G., Johansson P., Antosiewicz T. J., Käll M., Shegai T.. Approaching the strong coupling limit in single plasmonic nanorods interacting with J-aggregates. Sci. Rep. 2013;3:3074. doi: 10.1038/srep03074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jin L., Sample A. D., Sun D., Gao Y., Deng S., Li R., Dou L., Odom T. W., Huang L.. Enhanced Two-Dimensional Exciton Propagation via Strong Light-Matter Coupling with Surface Lattice Plasmons. ACS Photonics. 2023;10:1983–1991. doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.3c00466. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yadav R. K., Otten M., Wang W., Cortes C. L., Gosztola D. J., Wiederrecht G. P., Gray S. K., Odom T. W., Basu J. K.. Strongly Coupled Exciton-Surface Lattice Resonances Engineer Long-Range Energy Propagation. Nano Lett. 2020;20:5043–5049. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c01236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bellessa J., Bonnand C., Plenet J. C., Mugnier J.. Strong coupling between surface plasmons and excitons in an organic semiconductor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004;93:036404. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.036404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Symonds C., Bonnand C., Plenet J. C., Bréhier A., Parashkov R., Lauret J. S., Deleporte E., Bellessa J.. Particularities of surface plasmon-exciton strong coupling with large Rabi splitting. New J. Phys. 2008;10:065017. doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/10/6/065017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Bellessa J., Symonds C., Vynck K., Lemaitre A., Brioude A., Beaur L., Plenet J. C., Viste P., Felbacq D., Cambril E., Valvin P.. Giant Rabi splitting between localized mixed plasmon-exciton states in a two-dimensional array of nanosize metallic disks in an organic semiconductor. Phys. Rev. B. 2009;80:033303. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.033303. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Maier, S. A. Plasmonics: Fundamentals and Applications; Springer Science: New York, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Pelton, M. ; Bryant, G. . Introduction to Metal-Nanoparticle Plasmonics; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Canales A., Karmstrand T., Baranov D. G., Antosiewicz T. J., Shegai T. O.. Polaritonic linewidth asymmetry in the strong and ultrastrong coupling regime. Nanophotonics. 2023;12:4073–4086. doi: 10.1515/nanoph-2023-0492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fassioli F., Park K. H., Bard S. E., Scholes G. D.. Femtosecond Photophysics of Molecular Polaritons. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2021;12:11444–11459. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c03183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Devkota T., Brown B. S., Beane G., Yu K., Hartland G. V.. Making waves: Radiation damping in metallic nanostructures. J. Chem. Phys. 2019;151:080901. doi: 10.1063/1.5117230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dhamija S., Son M.. Mapping the dynamics of energy relaxation in exciton-polaritons using ultrafast two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy. Chemical Physics Reviews. 2024;5:41309. doi: 10.1063/5.0242352. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Al-Zubeidi A., McCarthy L. A., Rafiei-Miandashti A., Heiderscheit T. S., Link S.. Single-particle scattering spectroscopy: fundamentals and applications. Nanophotonics. 2021;10:1621–1655. doi: 10.1515/nanoph-2020-0639. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Vasa P., Wang W., Pomraenke R., Lammers M., Maiuri M., Manzoni C., Cerullo G., Lienau C.. Real-time observation of ultrafast Rabi oscillations between excitons and plasmons in metal nanostructures with J-aggregates. Nat. Photonics. 2013;7:128–132. doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2012.340. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Timmer D., Gittinger M., Quenzel T., Stephan S., Zhang Y., Schumacher M. F., Lützen A., Silies M., Tretiak S., Zhong J.-H., De Sio A., Lienau C.. Plasmon mediated coherent population oscillations in molecular aggregates. Nat. Commun. 2023;14:8035. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-43578-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peruffo N., Mancin F., Collini E.. Coherent Dynamics in Solutions of Colloidal Plexcitonic Nanohybrids at Room Temperature. Advanced Optical Materials. 2023;11:2203010. doi: 10.1002/adom.202203010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Beane G., Brown B. S., Devkota T., Hartland G. V.. Light-like group velocities and long lifetimes for leaky surface plasmon polaritons in noble metal nanostripes. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2019;123:15729–15737. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b03001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Brown B. S., Hartland G. V.. Chemical interface damping for propagating surface plasmon polaritons in gold nanostripes. J. Chem. Phys. 2020;152:024707. doi: 10.1063/1.5133958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sargent, M. ; Scully, M. O. ; Lamb, W. E. . Laser Physics, 4th ed.; Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA, 1982. [Google Scholar]
- Mukamel, S. Principles of Nonlinear Optical Spectroscopy; Oxford University Press: New York, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Ghosh B., Shingote A., Bhandari J., Hartland G. V.. Energy transfer and radiation damping in gold-MAPbI3 heterostructures. Chemical Science. 2025;16:23012–23018. doi: 10.1039/D5SC05386B. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bhandari J., Hartland G. V.. Energy Transfer for Leaky Surface Plasmon Polaritons in Gold Nanostripes. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2025;129:535–541. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c08238. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Z., Chasteen J. L., Smith B. D.. Cy5 Dye Cassettes Exhibit Through-Bond Energy Transfer and Enable Ratiometric Fluorescence Sensing. Journal of Organic Chemistry. 2024;89:3309–3318. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.3c02767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Song M., Bouhelier A., Bramant P., Sharma J., Dujardin E., Zhang D., Colas-des-Francs G.. Imaging symmetry-selected corner plasmon modes in penta-twinned crystalline Ag nanowires. ACS Nano. 2011;5:5874–5880. doi: 10.1021/nn201648d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang S. P., Xu H. X.. Optimizing substrate-mediated plasmon coupling toward high-performance plasmonic nanowire waveguides. ACS Nano. 2012;6:8128–8135. doi: 10.1021/nn302755a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang Z., Wei H., Pan D., Xu H.. Controlling the radiation direction of propagating surface plasmons on silver nanowires. Laser & Photonics Reviews. 2014;8:596–601. doi: 10.1002/lpor.201300215. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yang H., Qiu M., Li Q.. Identification and control of multiple leaky plasmon modes in silver nanowires. Laser & Photonics Reviews. 2016;10:278–286. doi: 10.1002/lpor.201500192. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang D., Xiang Y., Chen J., Cheng J., Zhu L., Wang R., Zou G., Wang P., Ming H., Rosenfeld M., Badugu R., Lakowicz J. R.. Extending the Propagation Distance of a Silver Nanowire Plasmonic Waveguide with a Dielectric Multilayer Substrate. Nano Lett. 2018;18:1152–1158. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b04693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johns P., Beane G., Yu K., Hartland G. V.. Dynamics of surface plasmon polaritons in metal nanowires. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2017;121:5445–5459. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b12748. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wei H., Pan D., Zhang S., Li Z., Li Q., Liu N., Wang W., Xu H.. Plasmon Waveguiding in Nanowires. Chem. Rev. 2018;118:2882–2926. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Olmon R. L., Slovick B., Johnson T. W., Shelton D., Oh S. H., Boreman G. D., Raschke M. B.. Optical dielectric function of gold. Phys. Rev. B. 2012;86:235147. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.235147. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ashcroft, N. W. ; Mermin, N. D. . Solid State Physics; Holt, Rinehart and Winston: New York, 1976. [Google Scholar]
- Bricks J. L., Slominskii Y. L., Panas I. D., Demchenko A. P.. Fluorescent J-aggregates of cyanine dyes: basic research and applications review. Methods and Applications in Fluorescence. 2018;6:012001. doi: 10.1088/2050-6120/aa8d0d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Anantharaman S. B., Messmer D., Sadeghpour A., Salentinig S., Nüesch F., Heier J.. Excitonic channels from bio-inspired templated supramolecular assembly of J-aggregate nanowires. Nanoscale. 2019;11:6929–6938. doi: 10.1039/C8NR10357G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Deshmukh A. P., Bailey A. D., Forte L. S., Shen X., Geue N., Sletten E. M., Caram J. R.. Thermodynamic Control over Molecular Aggregate Assembly Enables Tunable Excitonic Properties across the Visible and Near-Infrared. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2020;11:8026–8033. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c02204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barotov U., Thanippuli Arachchi D. H., Klein M. D., Zhang J., Šverko T., Bawendi M. G.. Near-Unity Superradiant Emission from Delocalized Frenkel Excitons in a Two-Dimensional Supramolecular Assembly. Advanced Optical Materials. 2023;11:2201471. doi: 10.1002/adom.202201471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bakalis L. D., Knoester J.. Linear absorption as a tool to measure the exciton delocalization length in molecular assemblies. J. Lumin. 2000;87–89:66–70. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2313(99)00231-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ying W., Mondal M. E., Huo P.. Theory and quantum dynamics simulations of exciton-polariton motional narrowing. J. Chem. Phys. 2024;161:064105. doi: 10.1063/5.0225387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sharma S. K., Chen H.-T.. Unraveling abnormal collective effects via the non-monotonic number dependence of electron transfer in confined electromagnetic fields. J. Chem. Phys. 2024;161:104102. doi: 10.1063/5.0225434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chng B. X. K., Ying W., Lai Y., Vamivakas A. N., Cundiff S. T., Krauss T. D., Huo P.. Mechanism of Molecular Polariton Decoherence in the Collective Light-Matter Couplings Regime. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2024;15:11773–11783. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.4c03049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gentile M. J., Núñez-Sánchez S., Barnes W. L.. Optical Field-Enhancement and Subwavelength Field-Confinement Using Excitonic Nanostructures. Nano Lett. 2014;14:2339–2344. doi: 10.1021/nl404712t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lin H., Camacho R., Tian Y., Kaiser T. E., Würthner F., Scheblykin I. G.. Collective Fluorescence Blinking in Linear J-Aggregates Assisted by Long-Distance Exciton Migration. Nano Lett. 2010;10:620–626. doi: 10.1021/nl9036559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marciniak H., Li X.-Q., Würthner F., Lochbrunner S.. One-Dimensional Exciton Diffusion in Perylene Bisimide Aggregates. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2011;115:648–654. doi: 10.1021/jp107407p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Caram J. R., Doria S., Eisele D. M., Freyria F. S., Sinclair T. S., Rebentrost P., Lloyd S., Bawendi M. G.. Room-Temperature Micron-Scale Exciton Migration in a Stabilized Emissive Molecular Aggregate. Nano Lett. 2016;16:6808–6815. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b02529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Berghuis A. M., Tichauer R. H., de Jong L. M. A., Sokolovskii I., Bai P., Ramezani M., Murai S., Groenhof G., Gómez Rivas J.. Controlling Exciton Propagation in Organic Crystals through Strong Coupling to Plasmonic Nanoparticle Arrays. ACS Photonics. 2022;9:2263–2272. doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.2c00007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hou S., Khatoniar M., Ding K., Qu Y., Napolov A., Menon V. M., Forrest S. R.. Ultralong-Range Energy Transport in a Disordered Organic Semiconductor at Room Temperature Via Coherent Exciton-Polariton Propagation. Adv. Mater. 2020;32:2002127. doi: 10.1002/adma.202002127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.




