Skip to main content

This is a preprint.

It has not yet been peer reviewed by a journal.

The National Library of Medicine is running a pilot to include preprints that result from research funded by NIH in PMC and PubMed.

Research Square logoLink to Research Square
[Preprint]. 2026 Jul 16:rs.3.rs-8554735. [Version 1] doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-8554735/v1

The initial melanoma T cell infiltrate is defined by tissue-resident programs restrained by regulatory T cells

Jason B Williams 1,*,, Shishir M Pant 2,3,*, Alexander L Kley 1, Bharat A Rajmalani 1, Clarence Yapp 2,3, Jiang Zhang 1, Kyle Deans 1, Elizabeth Rotrosen 1, Angelika Sales 4,5, Peter K Sorger 2,3, Thomas S Kupper 1,2,6,
PMCID: PMC13405490  PMID: 42523496

Abstract

How the immune system surveys nascent tumors and how this surveillance is subverted remain poorly understood. Using high-plex cyclic immunofluorescence and 3D imaging, we identified regulatory T (Treg) cells that co-localize with tissue-resident memory (TRM)-like T cells in early-stage human melanoma. In an autochthonous Braf/PTEN melanoma model expressing a defined tumor antigen, the initial CD8+ T cell infiltrate adopts a CD103+CD101+ TRM-like fate, establishing active immunosurveillance within nascent lesions. TRM-like cells dominate early tumors, occupy a stable epidermal niche, express effector molecules, and initiate T cell recruitment. However, Treg cells adopt a parallel tissue-resident phenotype, co-localizing with TRM-like cells and restraining both cytotoxic and sentinel functions. Tumor-site-specific Treg depletion reactivated TRM-like cells, drove robust T cell recruitment, expanded tumor-specific responses, and limited tumor growth. These findings reveal how early immunosurveillance is established through tissue-resident programs and identify Treg co-option of this response as a critical mechanism of tumor immune evasion.

One Sentence Summary:

Nascent melanoma imprints a tissue-resident program on the initial CD8+ T cell infiltrate, which is suppressed by regulatory T cells as a critical checkpoint in immune evasion.

Introduction

A major barrier to durable antitumor immunity, including responses to immune checkpoint blockade, is the emergence of resistance programs that enable tumors to escape immune pressure (1, 2). While much attention has focused on T cell exhaustion and dysfunction in established tumors, the initial interactions between transformed cells and the immune system may be equally consequential. This is the period when suppressive pathways are not yet established, antigen is available, and a small number of immune cells can determine whether a nascent lesion is eliminated or progresses (3, 4). Yet how nascent tumors evade elimination during this critical window remains poorly defined. Understanding how these early tumor-immune interactions unfold, and how they are subverted, is likely to reveal new therapeutic opportunities.

Tissue-resident memory T (TRM) cells are uniquely positioned to mediate early immunosurveillance. Unlike circulating memory T cells, TRM cells remain within epithelial and mucosal tissues, poised to mount rapid, localized immune responses upon antigen encounter (5, 6). They display a unique phenotype and transcriptome (710) reflecting adaptation for long-term survival and effector function in their tissue of residence. This physiology enables TRM cells to act as sentinels, responding swiftly to pathogenic insults and playing a critical role in protective immunity (11, 12). Mechanistically, TRM cells contribute to tumor immunity through direct cytotoxicity, secretion of inflammatory cytokines, and recruitment of additional immune effector cells (13, 14), functions that could be decisive during the earliest stages of tumor development.

Tissue retention by TRM cells is maintained by the expression of adhesion molecules and by reduced responsiveness to cytokines and chemokines that drive recirculation. In the skin, the αE integrin CD103 (Itgae), which pairs with β7 to bind E-cadherin, and CD69, which binds and internalizes the S1P receptor (15), are critical for tissue retention and TRM cell development (16). Most CD8+ TRM cells in the skin express CD69 and/or CD103, particularly in the epidermis, and T cells bearing these markers are transcriptionally distinct from other memory T cell subsets (7, 8, 16, 17). Cells expressing TRM-associated markers or a TRM-like transcriptional program have been identified in many cancer types (1822). However, the use of CD103 and CD69 to define TRM cells is imperfect: T cells upregulate CD69 following TCR stimulation and TGF-β can transiently induce CD103 expression (10). As a result, in chronic inflammation or progressing tumors, it can be challenging to determine whether T cells expressing TRM-associated markers are truly resident memory. For this reason, such cells within tumors are often referred to as “TRM-like” cells.

TRM-like cells have emerged as key players in cancer immunosurveillance and immunotherapy response. Their presence within tumors has been associated with improved prognosis and favorable responses to checkpoint blockade in multiple cancer types, including melanoma (18, 2327). Preclinical studies have demonstrated that prophylactic induction of TRM cells, either via vaccination or rejection of a primary tumor challenge, confers potent protection against subsequent tumor challenges (13, 28). In addition, TRM cells can control primary tumor growth in a state of cancer-immune equilibrium (29). However, these studies have focused either on TRM-like populations in established tumors, where exhaustion and chronic antigen exposure obscure early differentiation events, or on TRM cells seeded prophylactically before tumor challenge, which models pre-existing memory rather than natural tumor development. How TRM-like programs emerge and are regulated during ongoing, naturally arising tumor growth, and whether these early responses are suppressed before they can mediate rejection, remains largely unknown.

In this study, we combine spatial analysis of human melanoma with mechanistic interrogation in an autochthonous mouse model to define the fate and regulation of the earliest tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells. Using high-plex cyclic immunofluorescence and three-dimensional imaging of stage II human melanoma, we identify CD8+ T cells with TRM-like features in precursor and early invasive regions, where they localize near melanoma cells and are frequently juxtaposed with regulatory T (Treg) cells and dendritic cells. These observations suggest that tissue-adapted CD8+ T cells participate in tumor immunosurveillance from the earliest stages of melanoma development and may be subject to local immunoregulatory control.

To mechanistically dissect these early interactions, we employed an inducible Braf/PTEN melanoma model engineered to express ovalbumin (OVA) as a defined tumor antigen. In this autochthonous setting, the initial CD8+ T cell infiltrate rapidly acquires TRM-like characteristics, occupies a stable niche in the upper skin, and constitutes the majority of CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes during early tumor development. Despite their early dominance and effector potential, these cells are rapidly restrained by co-infiltrating Treg cells, which suppress both cytotoxic activity and immune-recruitment (“sentinel”) functions. Tumor-site-specific Treg depletion reactivates these early CD8+ T cells, drives robust secondary T cell recruitment, and limits tumor growth. Together, these findings identify Treg-mediated suppression of the earliest CD8+ T cell infiltrate as a critical early step in melanoma immune evasion.

Results

Stage II human melanoma contains TRM-like cells

Given their prognostic significance, we investigated the abundance and intra-tissue distribution of TRM cells in primary human melanomas. We used multiplex tissue-based imaging (cyclic immunofluorescence; t-CyCIF) and a hierarchical gating strategy (Figure S1AS1D) to distinguish immune cells with related lineages in 12 stage II primary human melanoma specimens (Figure 1A). CD8 and CD103 co-expression was used to identify TRM-like CD8+ TILs. However, CD103 was also expressed by Foxp3+ regulatory T (Treg) cells, Foxp3 conventional T (Tconv) cells, and dendritic cells (DCs) (Figure S1B). Analysis of immune cell composition revealed that most tumor samples contained TRM-like cells (Figure 1B and S1E), but their abundance varied substantially with the tumor, ranging from near absence (in MEL76 and MEL78) to the majority of the CD8+ TIL compartment (MEL71 and MEL72). In addition, CD4+ Foxp3+ T (Treg) regulatory cells were found in all tumors and composed a dominant fraction in some tumors (MEL81, MEL84, and MEL85) but not all (Figure 1B).

Fig. 1 |. Spatial organization of TRM-like CD8+ T cells and regulatory T cells in human stage II melanoma.

Fig. 1 |

A, Schematic of the study design. FFPE-embedded stage II melanoma samples (n=12) underwent tissue-based Cyclic Immunofluorescence to generate cell phenotype and spatial data. B, Immune cell composition across 12 stage II melanoma samples. C, CyCIF image of an example specimen (MEL71) annotated with clinical histological stages: Precursor (white dotted line) and vertical growth phase (VGP, orange dotted line) showing SOX10 staining (white). Two sites were selected for zoom in view are marked with red and yellow squares. Scale bars 2 mm. D, Higher magnification view of the boxed regions in C. Site 1 (insets i-iii) highlight CD8+ TRM-like cells in the red highlighted precursor region. Dotted line in iii highlights TRM-like cells in proximity to MART1+ SOX10+ melanoma cells. Site 2 highlights invading CD8+ TRM-like cells in proximity to Treg cells (white arrows). E, Dots plots with density contours showing Treg and CD8+ TRM-like cell distribution in MEL71. F, Distance from Tregs to the closest CD8+ CD103+ TRM-like or CD103 cells in VGP versus non-VGP areas across all tumor samples. G, 3D CyCIF image of melanoma tumor in vertical growth phase showing tumor cells (MART1: White), endothelial cells (CD31: Blue), and Immune cells (CD4: Cyan; FOXP3: Yellow; CD103: Magenta). Selected ROIs for higher magnification view are marked with white squares. Scale bars = 100 μm. Rendering of 3D CyCIF image (insets i-iv) from selected ROIs showing interaction between CD8+ TRM-like cells, Treg cells, and DCs. Scale bars = 5 μm. Significance was determined by Mann-Whitney U rank test in F.

Compared to their CD103 counterparts, a greater fraction of TRM-like CD8+ T cells expressed the co-inhibitory receptors PD-1, LAG-3, and Tim-3 (Figure S1B). TRM-like cells were distributed in a diffuse manner near fields of melanocytic atypia (precursor regions) or in the epidermis (Figure 1D, site 1) but were concentrated in invasive vertical growth phase (VGP) regions (Figure 1D, site 2, and Figure 1E). In precursor regions, TRM-like cells could be found in close proximity to MART1+ SOX10+ melanoma cells (Figure 1D, inset iii circled regions) and were found infiltrating the tumor bed in VGP areas (Figure 1D, insets iv-vi). Treg cells exhibited a similar distribution and could be found in proximity or interacting with TRM-like cells in VGP areas (Figure 1D, inset vi white arrows). Cell proximity measurements revealed that within VGP regions, TRM-like cells were in closer proximity to Treg cells compared to their CD103 counterparts (Figure 1F), suggesting potential crosstalk between these two populations. Three-dimensional tissue images (3D CyCIF) of thick sections provided a more detailed view of cell-cell interactions and, unlike imaging of standard 5 μm sections, includes many intact cells. A 35 μm thick 3D CyCIF reconstruction of invasive primary melanoma (30) revealed multiple instances of direct TRM-like:Treg cell interactions (Figure 1G). DCs were also frequently observed to form a triad with Treg and TRM-like cells (Figure 1G inset iv and Figure 1D inset vi, circled regions). Given these observations in human tumors, we sought to develop a preclinical model that could generate TRM-like CD8+ T cell populations in a melanoma TME and enable mechanistic analysis of their regulation and function including an exploration of Treg-mediated suppression of TRM-like cells.

The autochthonous Braf/PTEN tumor model contains TRM-like CD8+ TIL

We evaluated several mouse tumor models to determine their capacity to generate TRM-like CD8+ TILs. In the engraftable tumor models (B16.OVA, MC38.OVA, Yumm1.7), only a small percentage of CD8+ TILs expressed the TRM marker CD103 following subcutaneous or intradermal injection. Even when Yumm1.7 was implanted epicutaneously (29), the results were similar (Figure 2A). We then tested the genetically engineered BRafCA/+/PTENloxp/Tyr;;CreERT2 (BP) mouse model, which better replicates the microenvironmental cues due to its autochthonous origin. BP tumors harbored a distinct population of CD103+ CD8+ TILs 40–50 days post 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT) induction (Figure 2A). To facilitate tracking of antitumor immune responses, we introduced an EGFPOVA fusion protein into the BP model by crossing to Rosa26-Stop-flox-EGFPOVA (31) mice, generating BRafCA/+/PTENloxp/R26EGFPOVA/TyrCreERT2 (BPO) mice (Figure 2B). BPO tumors begin as hyperpigmented foci that gradually grow in size and ultimately merge into single larger tumor (Figure 2C). Flow cytometric analysis confirmed enrichment of CD103+ CD8+ TILs within BPO tumors (Figure 2D), with higher CD69 expression in CD103+ CD8+ TILs compared to their CD103 counterparts (Figure 2E). To assess whether these TRM-like cells arose as a function of the autochthonous environment, we established BPO-derived tumor cell lines and engrafted them into syngeneic mice. Engrafted tumors exhibited significantly lower frequencies of CD103+ CD8+ TILs compared to primary autochthonous tumors (Figure S2A and S2B), suggesting that factors intrinsic to the native skin microenvironment contribute to CD8+ TRM-like T cell development.

Fig. 2 |. TRM-like CD8+ TILs arise in the autochthonous BPO melanoma model.

Fig. 2 |

A, Frequency of CD103+ CD8+ TILs in engraftable (B16, MC38, Yumm1.7) versus autochthonous BP tumors. B, Schematic of BPO model generation (BP × Rosa26-EGFPOVA). C Images of BPO tumor progression. D representative flow cytometry plots for CD103 and CD69 on CD8+ TILs from BPO tumors and tumors from i.d. engrafted BPO-derived cell lines. E, comparison of CD69 expression on CD103+ versus CD103 CD8+ TILs. F, H2-Kb/SIINFEKL pentamer+ CD8+ T cell frequencies in TdLN, tumor-adjacent skin and tumor. G, OT-I transfer frequencies in TdLN, tumor adjacent skin, and tumor in BPO and BP mice. H, IFN-γ ELISPOT against SIINFEKL in the spleen, TdLN, and tumor cells from BPO mice. Data in panels A and D-I, display all mice from 2–5 independent experiments. Significance was determined by a Kruskal-Wallis test in A, D, F-H, and a Wilcoxon matched-pair signed rank test in E.

We next tested whether tumor-specific immune responses could be detected in the BPO model. Using H2-Kb/SIINFEKL-pentamer staining, we identified endogenous OVA-specific CD8+ T cells in the tumor, tumor-draining lymph node (TdLN), and adjacent skin 30–40 days after tumor induction – with highest frequencies in the tumor (Figure 2F). Adoptive transfer of OVA-specific, CD8+ T cells (OT-I T cells) also resulted in recruitment of OT-I T cells to the tumor, which was not observe in BP (EGFPOVA-negative) control tumors (Figure 2G). OT-I cells also proliferated robustly in TdLNs of tumor-bearing mice, but not in tumor-free Braf/PTEN/EGFPOVA mice, demonstrating tumor-specific priming (Figure S2C). Finally, IFN-γ ELISPOT assays confirmed systemic tumor-specific CD8+ T cell responses in the spleen, TdLN, and tumor (Figure 2I). Collectively, these findings establish the BPO model as a robust system to study tumor-specific TRM-like CD8+ T cell responses within an autochthonous melanoma setting.

TRM-like CD8+ TILs are phenotypically and transcriptionally distinct.

With the BPO model established, we next characterized the TRM-like CD8+ TIL by bulk RNASeq of CD103+ CD69+ CD8+ (DP: double positive) and CD103 CD69 CD8+ (DN: double negative) TILs. We compared DP and DN populations from the tumor to DP cells from tumor adjacent skin. As an additional TRM cell control, we isolated DP cells from the skin of mice that had rejected epicutaneous Yumm1.7OVA tumors (29). Differentially expressed genes were determined by normalizing to CD8 T cells from the spleen of naïve mice. We found 722 differentially expressed genes. A shared core of genes across all groups (gene set 1) included transcription factors (Bhlhe40, Irf5, Rora, Zeb2, and Ikzf2), cell surface receptors (Havcr2, Pdcd1, Cd244a, Klrk1, Fcer1g, Entpd1), chemokines (Ccl3 and Ccl4), and effector molecules (Ifng and Gzmb), all of which are consistent with activated T cell effector functions. Genes involved in lipid metabolism, including Fabp4, CD36, and Cav1, were selectively upregulated in skin-derived TRM cells (gene set 2), reflecting metabolic adaptations to epithelial niches, and transcriptional regulators (Zfp36, Crem, Runx2, Socs3, Dusp5, Klf6, and Fosl2) were upregulated solely in the tumor-rejected skin TRM group. In contrast, tumor-associated samples (gene sets 3 and 4) contained upregulated inflammation-related genes (Tnfrsf9, Fasl, Ccr5) and purinergic pathway genes (CD38, P2rx7).

Next, we searched for genes that distinguish TRM-like cells from other T cells by comparing the DP and DN populations (group 5). As expected, Itgae was upregulated in the DP groups, along with other TRM-associated genes (32) (Jun, Ccr10, Gzmc, Hspa1b, Hspa1a, Atf3) and the cell surface receptor Cd101. Genes upregulated in all groups except for DN cells in tumor adjacent skin (group6) included Cxcr6, Ccr8, Xcl1, Tnf, Nr4a2, and Tox2. Finally, downregulated genes in all groups included those involved in naïve and circulating memory T cell stemness and maintenance included Klf2, Ccr7, Sell, and S1pr1 (Figure 3A).

Fig. 3 |. Phenotypic and transcriptional distinction of TRM-like versus CD103 CD8+ TILs.

Fig. 3 |

A, Heatmap of differentially expressed genes (relative to splenic CD8+ T cells) from bulk RNA-Seq of DP (CD103+CD69+), DN (CD103CD69) CD8+ TILs and bona-fide skin TRM controls. B, Flow cytometry of ecto-enzymes and co-inhibitory receptor expression by CD103+ and CD103 CD8+ TILs. C, Comparison of PD-1 and Tim-3 median fluorescence intensity (MFI) in CD103+ versus CD103 CD8+ TILs. D, Co-expression of CD101 with CD103 on CD8+ T cells from the tumor, tumor adjacent skin, and TdLN compartments. B-D display all mice from 2–5 independent experiments. Significance was determined by a Wilcoxon matched-pair signed rank test in B and D.

We then confirmed the level of protein expression for several of the cell surface receptors by flow cytometry. The ectoenzymes CD39 and CD73 displayed reciprocal expression patterns: CD39 was enriched in CD103 cells, whereas CD73 was preferentially expressed in CD103+ TRM-like cells. Examination of coinhibitory receptors revealed that PD-1, Tim-3, and JAML were expressed at lower levels in TRM-like cells, while 2B4 was enriched in the CD103+ subset (Figure 3B), although the expression patterns of JAML and Tim-3 displayed variability across individual mice. Interestingly, PD-1 and Tim-3 on TRM-like TILs were expressed at intermediate levels, about 1.5-fold less based on median fluorescence intensity (MFI) compared to their CD103 counterparts (Figure 3C). Strikingly, CD101, a type I transmembrane glycoprotein, was highly co-expressed with CD103 in both the tumor and tumor adjacent skin but not in the TdLN, suggesting that CD101 as a potential marker to identify TRM-like cells (Figure 3D). Collectively, these findings define TRM-like CD8+ TILs as a phenotypically and transcriptionally distinct population within the tumor microenvironment.

TRM-like cells compose the majority of the CD8+ TIL compartment in early tumors

We next investigated how the abundance of TRM-like CD8+ TILs changed with tumor progression. BPO tumors originate as multiple hyperpigmented lesions that increase in size and eventually coalesce into a single larger tumor. Histologically, these early lesions are in the radial growth phase (Figure S3). In some mice, both hyperpigmented lesions and a coalesced tumor can be found simultaneously, allowing for the analysis of multiple tumor stages within the same animal. We leveraged this observation to examine whether the stage of tumor development correlates with the presence of TRM-like CD8+ TILs. We compared tumor-adjacent skin (non-pigmented), hyperpigmented lesions (early-stage), and coalesced tumors (late-stage) from the same mouse. TRM-like cells constituted the majority of CD8+ TILs in hyperpigmented lesions, with frequencies comparable to those in tumor-adjacent skin (Figure 4A). We confirmed that these lesions contained transformed melanocytes by detecting EGFPOVA expression in the CD45 fraction (Figure 4B). These findings suggest that CD8+ TILs are predominantly TRM-like during early tumor development.

Fig. 4 |. Dynamics of TRM-like CD8+ TILs during tumor progression.

Fig. 4 |

A, Frequencies of CD103+CD8+ TILs in tumor-adjacent skin, hyperpigmented lesions (early-stage) and coalesced (late-stage) tumors within the same mouse. B, EGFPOVA expression in CD45 cells from tumor adjacent skin, hyperpigmented lesions, and coalesced tumor within the same mouse. C, Time course of CD103+ CD8+ TIL frequencies binned by 10 day increments with representative flow cytometry plots. D, Expression of CD103 by OT-I and host CD8+ TILs over time. E and F, Representative flow plots showing the effect of FTY720 treatment on the relative frequency (E) and total number per gram of tumor of TRM-like CD8+ TILs (F) after 30 days. Graphs display all mice from 3 independent experiments. Significance was determined by a Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparison correction in A-D and F and a Mann-Whitney test in E.

To study this, we conducted a time-course analysis of TRM-like CD8+ TILs following tumor induction. In early-stage tumors (days 31–40 post-TAM), most CD8+ TILs expressed CD103 and CD101 (Figure 4C and Figure S4A). However, as tumors progressed, the frequency of TRM-like TILs steadily declined. By day 70, TRM-like TILs constituted only 20% of the CD8+ TIL compartment (Figure 4C). We extended this analysis to tumor-antigen-specific CD8+ TILs by adoptively transferring OT-I T cells at the onset of pigmentation. OT-I T cells upregulated CD103 after entering the tumor, peaking around day 30 post-transfer when approximately 30% expressed CD103. Similar to host (endogenous) polyclonal CD8+ TILs, OT-I cells expressing CD103 diminished in number over time, with only ~12% expressing this marker in late-stage tumors (Figure 4D).

These data suggest that initial CD8+ T cell infiltrates preferentially acquire a TRM-like phenotype during early tumor development, but this population contracts during progression, due either to dilution by newly recruited non-TRM cells or instability of the TRM-like state. To distinguish these possibilities, we sequestered T cells in tissues at the first signs of pigmentation by administering FTY720, a S1PR1 antagonist, in the drinking water; FTY720 prevents lymphocytes from trafficking out of lymphoid organs, preserving the tissue resident pool. We allowed the tumor to grow for 30 days and analyzed T cell frequences and phenotypes. As expected, FTY720 reduced circulating T cells (Figure S4B) and decreased total CD8+ TIL numbers approximately tenfold. Intriguingly, the majority of CD8+ TILs were TRM-like in FTY720 treated mice (Figure 4E) and the absolute number of TRM-like CD8+ TILs remained comparable to untreated age-matched tumors (Figures 4F). These data suggest that, once established, the TRM-like population can persist locally for at least 30 days in the absence of continuous renewal from the circulation.

Taken together, these results suggest that the initial CD8+ T cell infiltrate into the tumor and tumor-adjacent skin differentiates into TRM-like cells, establishing a local niche. However, the gradual decline in antigen-specific TRM-like OT-I cells over time indicates a role for antigen-driven attrition as an additional component in determining TRM abundance.

Spatial analysis reveals early TRM-like cell activity in the epidermis and hair follicles and is associated with Treg cell infiltration

Given that TRM-like cells constitute the majority of CD8+ TILs in early tumors and express low levels of coinhibitory receptors, we hypothesized that alternative inhibitory mechanisms might be involved in regulating initial antitumor immune responses. To investigate this, we used t-CyCIF using an immune-focused murine antibody panel to determine immune organization and cellular interactions during early tumor evolution (Figure S5A and S5B). Due to substantial heterogeneity from one BPO mouse to the next, we biopsied the individual mice at three distinct stages: before pigmentation, at the first signs of pigmentation, and after tumor formation. To make this possible, tamoxifen was applied at two separate sites on the backs of mice, which served as the first two biopsy time points, and both sites were re-biopsied once tumors had fully developed (Figure 5A).

Fig. 5 |. Spatial distribution and early activity of TRM-like cells and Treg infiltration by t-CyCIF.

Fig. 5 |

A, Experimental timeline and biopsy scheme (pre-pigmentation, pigmentation onset, and tumor formation). B, Representative scatter plot, multiplex immunofluorescence, and H&E image of a day 7 biopsy section. Insets highlight papillary dermal location of Sox10+ cells (white arrows), TRM-like and Treg cell localization, and GzmB expressed by TRM-like cells. C, Representative day 17 biopsy from the same mouse, with scatterplot, H&E stain, and multiplex imaging indicating hyperpigmented regions (sites 1–4). Insets show higher-magnification views of sites 1–4 highlighting epidermal location of CD8+ TRM-like cells and corresponding Gzmb expression. D, Scatterplot, H&E-stained sections, and multiplexed immunofluorescence of day 44 re-biopsy section from the same mouse. Insets (i-v) highlight Treg cell epidermal localization (green arrows) in proximity to CD8+ TRM-like cells. E and F, Absolute cell numbers (E) and relative proportions (F) of CD8+CD103, CD8+CD103+, CD4+Foxp3, and CD4+Foxp3+ T cells in the upper verses lower regions of the skin calculated among all time points and mice. G and H, Composition CD8+CD103, CD8+CD103+, CD4+Foxp3, and CD4+Foxp3+ T cells across time points t1, t2, and t3, represented as relative proportions (G) and absolute cell numbers (H). I, Proportion of GzmB-expressing cells within CD8+CD103+ and CD8+CD103 subsets across time points. J, Distribution of distances from Tregs cells to CD8+CD103+ and CD8+CD103 cells across time points, shown as violin plots with median and quartiles. Significance was determined by a Mann-Whitney U rank test in J.

At early time point (t1), Sox10+ cells were primarily localized within the lower hair follicle bulb, consistent with the presence of melanoblasts (Figure S6A), while scattered Sox10+ cells in the dermis and papillary dermis likely represented the earliest melanoma cells (Figure 5B, white arrows; Figure S6B). T cells and DCs were generally clustered around hair follicles and sparsely distributed in extra-follicular space (Figure 5B). The epidermis primarily contained TRM-like CD8+ T cells, which often expressed GzmB (Figure 5B and 5I).

At the second time point (t2), we observed a slight increase in the frequency of Sox10+ cells overall (Figure S5C and S5D), and the appearance of clusters of Sox10+ melanoma cells, which often colocalized with hyperpigmented regions (Figure 5C and Figure S7), but could also be amelanotic (Figure S7B, site iv). In general, these Sox10+ melanoma cell clusters were enriched for immune cells including GzmB+ TRM-like cells, Treg cells, and DCs (Figure 5C, sites 1–4, and S7; sites i-iii and v) but varied in the composition and spatial distribution of immune cells, even within the same mouse. For example, some clusters contained higher densities of CD4+Foxp3+ Treg cells compared to CD8+ TILs (Figure S7B, site iv and S7C, site vi) or were macrophage-dominant with few CD8+ T cells (Figure S9, site vii).

In late-stage tumors (t3), some regions remained pigmented, however, the bulk of the invading mass exhibited loss of pigmentation (Figure 5G). Sox10+ melanoma cells had invaded deep into the hypodermis, and nearly all mice contained LN metastases (data not shown). Interestingly, most T cells appeared to reside in the upper regions of the skin and were only sparsely distributed deeper in the tumor bed (Figure 5D): indeed, quantification of CD8+ (CD103+ and CD103) T cells across all time points revealed approximately 2-fold more T cells within ~400 μm of the epidermis, with TRM-like cells abundant in the upper regions (Figure 5DF). Consistent with our flow cytometry data, TRM-like CD8+ T cells were most abundant at early stages, but their frequency diminished as the tumor progressed (Figure 5G). Additionally, between the early (t1 and t2) and late (t3) time points, we observed an increase in the total number of CD8+ CD103, Tconv, and Treg cells, while TRM-like cells remained constant in number, which supports the notion that distinct TRM-niches exist within the TME and are filled early in immune cell recruitment (Figure 5H). Analysis of GzmB expression revealed that TRM-like cells comprised the majority of GzmB+ CD8+ T cells across all time points but their relative frequency diminished as the tumor progressed (Figure 5I). Finally, we found that at all time points, TRM-like CD8+ TILs were in closer proximity to Treg cells as compared to their CD103 counterparts (Figure 5J). Albeit, in late-stage tumors CD103 CD8+ TILs were closer to Treg cells compared to earlier time points, likely reflecting the overall increase in Treg cell numbers. Additionally, in late-stage tumors, Treg cells could be found within the epidermis, which was rare in earlier time points (Figure 5D, sites i-v, green arrows), indicating an activation of Treg cell migration, which can occur during inflammation.

Taken together, these data suggest that TRM-like CD8+ T cells are highly active in the epidermis and hair follicles during early melanoma development, where they are closely associated with infiltrating regulatory T cells, suggesting early immune crosstalk and niche formation within the tumor microenvironment.

TRM-like cells immunoedit tumors early in the antitumor immune response

Since Gzmb was upregulated in TRM-like cells within hyperpigmented lesions, we hypothesized that these cells might play a role in immunoediting during the earliest stages of tumor development. To investigate this, we first assessed whether TRM-like cells were tumor-specific using H2-Kb/SIIN-pentamer analysis at both early and late time points. Unexpectedly, while a subset of TRM-like cells were H2-Kb/SIIN-specific, the CD103 population contained a higher frequency of pentamer binding cells, which was further enriched in late tumors (Figure S8A). This pattern reflects the observed decrease in CD103 expression over time in the OT-I transfer study (Figure 3D) and suggests instability within the TRM-like population, possibly driven by antigen stimulation. To determine whether T cells present in the tumor during early development, which are predominantly TRM-like cells, contribute to immunoediting, we depleted CD8+ T cells using an anti-CD8α antibody beginning at the first signs of pigmentation and continuing every five days until the end of the experiment (Figure S8B). We confirmed a reduction in both the frequency and total number of CD8+ TILs at the endpoint (Figure S8C). Using EGFPOVA as a marker for non-immunoedited tumor cells, we found that tumors in CD8-depleted mice contained a higher frequency of EGFPOVA+ tumor cells (Figure S8D). This frequency was comparable to tumors from immunodeficient BPO/Rag1/ mice. Thus, by reducing the frequency of TRM-like cells early in the antitumor immune response we blunted CD8 T cell-mediated immunoediting, suggesting that TRM-like cells contribute to early tumor immunoediting.

Treg depletion enhances tumor control and expands tumor-specific CD8+ T Cells

Given the presence of Treg cells and their co-localization with TRM-like cells early in tumor development, we asked whether Treg depletion would enhance tumor control potentially be activating the TRM-like population. To do this, we crossed BPO mice with Foxp3DTR-EGFP mice; in these animals, which express human diphtheria toxin receptor, exposure to diphtheria toxin (DT) results in ablation of Foxp3+ Treg cells. We first assessed Treg cell expression of the activation markers PD-1, Tim-3, and CTLA-4 in the TdLN, tumor-adjacent skin, early tumors, and late tumors. While these markers were expressed at low levels in Tregs in the TdLN, their expression progressively increased from tumor-adjacent skin to early tumors and reached the highest levels in late tumors (Figure 6A). Most Treg cells expressed CD103 in the tumor-adjacent skin, early tumors, and late tumors, further supporting their ability to co-localize with TRM-like CD8+ TILs (Figure 6A). In parallel with increasing Treg expression of activation markers, we also observed a progressive increase in Treg cell abundance across these sites (Figure 6B). As a consequence, CD8+ T cells were more abundant in the tumor-adjacent skin but in early tumors Treg and CD8 T cells were found at similar frequencies and late-stage tumors contained more Treg cells than CD8 T cells (Figure 6C).

Fig. 6 |. Systemic Treg depletion enhances tumor control and expands tumor-specific CD8+ T cells.

Fig. 6 |

A PD-1, Tim-3, CTLA-4 and CD103 expression on Treg cells in TdLN, tumor adjacent skin, early and late tumors. B and C, Treg cell abundance (B) and Treg/CD8 ratio (C) in TdLN, tumor adjacent skin, early and late tumors. D, Tumor growth curves following two DT doses (i.p.) versus control. E, Treg cell kinetics in the tumor and mouse weight after DT treatment. F, IFN-γ ELISPOT of anti-SIINFEKL T cell response on day 11 post-DT administration. G Total number of CD8 TILs cells following Treg depletion. Graphs display all mice from 2–5 independent experiments. Significance was determined by a Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparison correction in B, C, F, and G. For tumor outgrowth (D) a Two-way ANOVA with Sidak multiple comparisons correction was used.

To determine whether transient Treg depletion would induce tumor control and enhance the antitumor immune response we administered two doses of DT i.p. into tumor bearing mice and monitored tumor growth. We observed that Tregs were nearly absent in the tumor by day 3 post-DT treatment and remained depleted for 14 days. In these animals, tumor growth was significantly reduced (Figure 6D) Treg numbers rebounded by day 39 but their frequency never returned to pre-depletion levels (Figure 6E). As expected, Treg cell-depleted mice experienced systemic autoimmunity highlighted by rapid weight loss (Figure 6F), but most mice eventually recovered. Strikingly, analysis of the antitumor immune response directed against the OVA epitope SIINFEKL 11 days post-depletion revealed a ~100-fold increase in the frequency of tumor-specific CD8+ T cells in both the spleen and TdLN (Figure 6F). Tracking the frequency of CD8+ T cells in the tumor following Treg depletion showed a ~10-fold increase in the total number of CD8+ TILs by day 5, and they remained elevated for at least 50 days (Figure 6G). We also probed for changes in other cellular compartments in the tumor including CD4 T cells, γδ T cells, DCs, macrophages, NK cells, and Neutrophils. Other than CD8 T cells, only CD4 T cells exhibited a significant increase in frequency (Figure S9A). These data show that depletion of Treg cells remodels the tumor microenvironment, slowing tumor growth while driving robust expansion of tumor-specific CD8+ T cells in the periphery and enhanced infiltration into the tumor.

Tumor site-specific depletion of Treg cells activates TRM-like cells

To determine whether the increase in CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) resulted from local proliferation or tumor infiltration, we depleted Tregs followed by daily FTY720 administration to block T cell trafficking, and quantified CD8+ TILs 5 days later. The increase in CD8+ TILs caused by Treg depletion was completely abrogated in FTY720-treated mice, showing that the increase in TILs was a result of CD8+ T cell recruitment (Figure 7A). A similar effect was observed for CD4+ Foxp3 T cells (Figure S9B). We also observed upregulation of PD-1 in both the CD8+ CD103 and CD103+ subpopulations (Figure 7B); a similar change was observed for Tim-3 expression (Figure S9C). Thus, when T cell infiltration was blocked with FTY720, tumor-residing CD8+ T cells still upregulated the PD-1 checkpoint protein upon Treg depletion.

Fig. 7 |. Local Treg depletion activates TRM-like cells and promotes T cell recruitment.

Fig. 7 |

A, Effect of FTY720 on CD8+ TIL recruitment post-systemic Treg depletion. B, PD-1 upregulation on CD103+ and CD103 CD8+ TILs ± FTY720. C, Mouse weights following DT administration given intratumoral versus i.p. D, Treg frequencies in the TdLN and tumor after intratumoral or i.p. DT administration. E, CD8+ TIL recruitment with intratumoral DT administration ± FTY720. F, PD-1 expression on CD8+ TIL subsets after intratumoral DT administration; G, CD4+ Foxp3 T cell recruitment after intratumoral DT administration ± prior CD8 T cell depletion. H, OT-I T cell recruitment with prior CD8 T cell depletion followed by local Treg depletion. Graphs display all mice from 2–5 independent experiments. Significance was determined by a Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparison correction in A, B, D-H.

A limitation of systemic Treg depletion is the potential for widespread autoimmunity, and the release of cytokines into the circulation which may non-specifically influence tumor-residing T cells (33, 34). To achieve local Treg depletion, while minimizing systemic autoimmunity, we administered a lower dose of DT (12.5 μg/kg), which did not cause weight loss (Figure 7C) or eliminate Treg cells in the TdLN (Figure 7D). However, we observed an approximately fivefold reduction in Treg cell frequency within the tumor, though depletion was less complete as compared to DT administered intraperitoneally (Figure 7D). This reduction in Treg cells led to significant CD8+ T cell recruitment, which was blocked by FTY720 administration; tissue resident CD8 T cells still exhibited upregulation of PD-1 (Figure 7F) and Tim-3 (Figure S9D), demonstrating that a change in CD8 T cell state was a direct effect of local Treg depletion rather than circulating cytokines.

The increase in PD-1 and Tim-3 expression after Treg depletion suggested that TRM-like CD8+ TILs had become activated. In infection models, a key sentinel function of TRM cells is the recruitment of other immune cells to inflamed tissues (12, 14), a process thought to be mediated by IFN-γ release. Additionally, conventional type 1 dendritic cells (cDC1s) have been shown to promote T cell recruitment to the tumor microenvironment (35). To investigate whether CD8+ T cells contribute to immune cell recruitment, we depleted CD8+ T cells systemic (i.p.) administration of an anti-CD8β antibody to avoid depleting cDC1s, which can express CD8α. 72 hours later, we depleted Treg cells with DT and used CD4+ Foxp3 Tconv cell infiltration as a measure of T cell recruitment. Surprisingly, CD8+ T cell depletion blunted the recruitment effect of Tconv cells following Treg depletion (Figure 7G). To test if tumor-residing CD8+ T cells were involved in peripheral CD8 T cell recruitment, we waited 10 days for free anti-CD8β antibody levels to diminish before transferring 1 × 106 OT-I T cells into tumor bearing BPO/Foxp3DTR mice; flow cytometry confirmed that Treg cells were depleted within 24 hours. We observed that OT-I CD8+ T cell recruitment into the tumor was diminished with prior CD8 T cell depletion. This was not due to lingering anti-CD8β antibody as the number of OT-I cells was not diminished in the TdLN (Figure S9E). Together, these findings suggest that intratumoral Treg cells suppress the antitumor immune responses, in part, by inhibiting CD8+ TRM-like cells from recruiting additional immune cells to the tumor microenvironment.

Discussion

TRM cells are a unique lineage of T cells with specialized functions that endow them with the capacity to adapt, survive, and exert potent effector functions in their tissue of residence. T cells expressing markers of tissue-residency or containing a TRM transcriptional profile are found across solid tumor types and their presence is associated with improved survival and response to immunotherapy (3638). TRM-like T cells in tumors can be either pre-existing, for example, those that populate tissue in response to infection, or tumor reactive, those that are primed in the TdLN, infiltrate into the tumor, and differentiate into TRM-like cells. A subset of pre-existing CD8+ TILs is pathogen-specific (3941), but whether the immune system generates TRM-cells in response to a progressing tumor is largely unknown. Preclinical studies of TRM cells in cancer have, for the most part, involved prophylactic TRM cell seeding before tumor challenge. While critical for uncovering the potent tumoricidal properties of TRM cells, it is unclear whether an infiltrating CD8+ T cell enters the TRM lineage. Here, we show that the earliest stages of tumor development involve TRM-like CD8+ T cells interacting with an initializing tumor microenvironment. We do not believe these TRM-like cells to be pre-existing as mice are kept in a pathogen-free environment, however, mouse skin is populated with a small number of TRM cells after birth (42). Therefore, further investigation is needed to definitively determine the origin of these cells.

The TRM-like population was identified by expression of CD103. This population was phenotypically distinct from the CD103 population and expressed lower levels of the coinhibitory receptors PD-1 and Tim-3, as well as differential expression of the ecto-nucleosides CD39 and CD73, and co-expression of CD101. A similar pattern of expression was recently reported in CD8+ TRM cells in human breast cancer (43). Intriguingly, CD101 has been found on TRM cells in multiple tissues (10, 44, 45) and recently reported to preferentially identify epidermal CD8+ TRM with IFN-γ production capacity in human skin (46). While the function of CD101 in vivo is unknown, it was shown to suppress T cell function in vitro (47) and was identified in terminally exhausted CD8 T cells in a model of chronical viral infection (48). Therefore, whether CD101 is a targetable receptor to activate TRM-like cells in tumors warrants further investigation.

In human tumors, TRM-like cells were found to express CD39 and PD-1(49). One explanation as to why TRM-like CD8+ TILs in the BPO model do not follow this pattern may be the relative activity of Treg cells, as PD-1 expression was upregulated in mice when Treg cells were depleted. Alternatively, while tumor-specific SIIN/H-2Kb+ CD8+ TILs were found in both CD103+ and CD103 populations at early time points, the majority of SIIN/H-2Kb+ CD8+ TILs were CD103 at later time points. This, coupled with our observation that EGFPOVA+ tumor cells are rapidly eliminated in most tumors, suggests either that antigen-availability promotes the TRM-like population or high-affinity TCR stimulation is unfavorable to generate TRM-like CD8+ TILs. Fully understanding the relationship between the CD103+ and CD103 population will require lineage tracing studies.

We found that most TRM-like CD8+ T cells remained in and near the epidermis throughout tumor progression, while a sporadic few were found deeper in the tumor bed. This suggests that signals driving this population, possibly TGFβ (17, 50), are expressed in the upper regions of the skin. It also suggests that a niche for TRM-like cells exists in tumors. In support of this idea, preventing new T cell recruitment with FTY720 starting when hyperpigmented lesions appear, showed that the TRM-like population can persist in a progressing tumor for at least 30 days. After 30 days, the total number of T cells is similar to the total number of TRM-like CD8+ TILs in untreated mice.

Depletion of CD8 T cells at the time of pigmentation increased the frequency of EGFPOVA+ tumor cells, suggesting tumoricidal activity in the TRM-like population. Furthermore, TRM-like CD8+ TILs upregulated Gzmb during the early stages of tumor development, suggesting cytolytic activity. However, the increase in EGFPOVA+ tumor cells was modest. Yet, it did match the frequency of EGFPOVA+ tumor cells from BPO/Rag1−/− mice. To explain the relatively low baseline EGFPOVA expression and the modest increase after CD8 T cell depletion, we propose several possibilities; first, it is possible that Cre activity after 4-OHT application does not lead to EGFPOVA expression in 100% of transformed cells, and thus only a fraction of tumor cells express EGFPOVA. Second, it’s known that bona-fide TRM cells in the skin at homeostasis are not effectively depleted with antibody. Therefore, it is possible that our depletion was incomplete, and the remaining TRM-like cells were able to eliminate tumor cells. In addition, non-TRM-like CD8+ TILs likely contribute to immunoediting and may be the dominant cytotoxic CD8 T cell population at later time points after the tumor escapes the initial TRM-mediated T cell insult.

It is known that tumors in the Braf/PTEN melanoma model contain a relatively low level of T cell infiltrate, and the T cell infiltrate is skewed towards CD4 and Treg cells. Interestingly, BPO-derived tumor cell lines engrafted subcutaneously develop tumors that generally contain a greater CD8/CD4 T cell ratio (data not shown), compared to autochthonous BPO tumors. Part of this is likely explained by an immunogenic start to subcutaneous engrafted tumors driven by large degree of tumor cell death after injection. Also, it suggests that the natural development of melanomas in the autochthonous setting influence the magnitude of the T cell infiltrate. In the absence of an immunogenic tumor initiation, our data suggests that Treg cells play a critical role in dampening early CD8+ T cell recruitment to the tumor. The source of Treg cells can also be either pre-existing or recruited. It is known that oncogenic Braf can drive CCR4-dependent recruitment of Treg cells to the tumor (51). In agreement, we observed a roughly 2-fold increase in Treg cell abundance between early and late tumors (Figure 6B). Additionally, after birth Treg cells localize to hair follicles and promote immune tolerance where hair follicle stem cells reside. Therefore, pre-existing Treg cells may also play a role in dampening the initial antitumor T cell response (5254).

Our data supports the notion that part of the Treg-mediated inhibition of the antitumor T cell response is through inhibiting the “tissue alarm” function of TRM-like cells. In infection models, the TRM alarm function is mediated through IFN-γ, which acts on nearby cells to secrete T cell recruiting chemokines. Future studies will determine whether TRM-secreted IFN-γ is suppressed by Treg cells and if activating TRM-like cells can induce T cell recruitment in the presence of Treg cells. We purpose that the initial T cell response to melanoma follows a tissue residency trajectory with CD8 T cells entering a TRM-like state, exhibiting cytotoxic and alarm functions. This TRM-response is rapidly suppressed by Treg cells but can resume when Treg cells are eliminated.

Method Details

Mice

B6.Cg-Tg(Tyr-cre/ERT2)13Bos Braftm1Mmcm Ptentm1Hwu/BosJ mice were purchased from Jackson and crossed to an inducible Rosa26-GFPOVA (31), a gift from Dr. Angelika Sales (formerly Stoecklinger) at the University of Salzburg, to generate BrafCA/WT/PTENloxp/R26-EGFPOVA+/+/TyrCreERT2 (abbreviated BPO) mice. BPO mice were crossed to Foxp3DTR mice (B6.129(Cg)-Foxp3tm3(Hbegf/GFP)Ayr/J) to generate BPO/Foxp3DTR mice. All BPO mice used were heterozygous for BrafV600E (BrafCA/WT). OTI/Rag1−/−/Thy1.1 mice were maintained in house. For subcutaneously engrafted tumor cell lines BPO TyrCre-negative mice were used. Both male and female mice were used All animal work and protocols in the current study were approved by the IACUC committee at the Center for Comparative Medicine at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, accredited by AAALAC.

Clinical samples

All CyCIF images with associated histopathological annotations for Stage II melanoma cohort were processed and imaged as described in Vallius et al. 2025 (doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.06.21.660851). Full-resolution CyCIF images, single cell segmentation masks, and cell count tables are available via the NCI Human Tumor Atlas Network data portal (https://data.humantumoratlas.org/). Code used for multimodal spatial analysis are available on GitHub (https://github.com/labsyspharm/2025_Williams_Pant_Melanoma-TRM). Based on the melanoma diagnostic criteria, the histopathologic annotations included normal skin (N), Precursor (P), and Vertical Growth Phase melanoma (VGP).

Cellular depletions, FTY720 treatment, adoptive cell transfers

CD8 T cells were depleted by administration of 200 ug/dose of anti-CD8α (clone 2.43, BioXCell) or anti-CD8β (53–5.8, BioXCell) antibody. For systemic Treg cell depletion, 50 μg/kg DT was administered i.p. For intratumoral Treg depletion, mice were anesthetized, and tumors were injected with 12.5 μg/kg DT intratumorally in a total volume of 50 ul. FTY720 was administered by either daily i.p. injection of 1.25 mg/kg or by addition to the drinking water to a final concentration of 3 ug/mL. OT-I T cells were adoptively transferred retro-orbitally. For proliferation OT-I cells were labeled with Cell Trace Violet according to manufacturer’s protocol.

Autochthonous tumor induction, tissue harvest, and cell line generation

To induce tumors, a 1 cm × 1 cm area on the backs of mice was shaved and depilated using Veet cream. The area was washed with ethanol and 1 ul of 4-hydroxytamoxifen (dissolved in DMSO to a concentration of 100 mg/mL). Tumors were induced at 6–9 weeks after birth. Mice were monitored weekly for tumor formation. If an off-site non-4-OHT-induced tumor was found at the start of the experiment the mouse was removed from the study. Tumor length (TL), width (TW), and height (TH) was measured with digital caliper and tumor volume was calculated (Tvol = TL × TW × TH). Tissue was harvested by depilating the hair on the backs of mice with Veet and washing the area with 70% ethanol. Tumor, tumor adjacent skin, and hyperpigmented lesions were excised with scissors and placed in a 70 mm tissue culture dish. Tumor adjacent skin and hyperpigmented lesions were minced with scissors and transferred to a 5 mL tube containing 1 mL digestion buffer (collagenase, type IV (10 mg/mL), hyaluronidase (1 mg/mL), and DNase (200 mg/mL) in HBSS). Tumors were injected with 1 mL digestion buffer, minced with scissors, and transferred to a 5 mL tube. Samples were incubated at 37°C with rotation for 30 min then transferred to a 100 um filter and systematically pushed through the filter using a syringe plunger with 4 filter washes using 5 mL of tumor wash buffer (PBS with 1% FBS, 1 mM EDTA, and 1X penicillin/streptomycin). Samples were spun and refiltered through a 100 um filter into a 15 mL conical tube. Live cells were purified by Ficoll and washed twice before antibody staining. To generate tumor cell lines, the pellet from the Ficoll step was filtered through a 100 um mesh filter and cultured in vitro. Approximately 16% of tumor samples generated a tumor cell line that grew progressively in vitro and in vivo.

BPO-derived tumor cell lines and engraftment

All cell lines were grown in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, MOPS (10 mM), and Penicillin/Streptomycin (100 U/mL) under 37°C / 5% CO2 conditions. BPO-derived tumor cell lines were generated in-house by extended in vitro cell culture without in vivo passaging in immune compromised mice. Cell lines were generated from male and female mice. B16.OVA and MC38.OVA cells were generated by lentiviral transduction of pLV-CMV>{OVA}:3xGGGGS:mCherry (Vector Builder) and sorted to 100% purity based on mCherry expression. Tumor cells were engrafted on the flanks of mice and tumor volume (TL × TW × TH) was measured with a digital caliper.

Bulk RNASeq

Library preparation and RNA sequencing was performed by the Dana-Farber Molecular Biology Core Facilities using Takara SmartSeq v4 reagents for low input mRNASeq. Samples with an RNA quality (RIN) score >7 were used for sequencing. Full-length cDNA was fragmented to an average size of 200 bp, and sequencing libraries were prepared from 2 ng of sheared cDNA. Double-stranded DNA libraries were quantified by Qubit fluorometer and Agilent TapeStation 2200. Uniquely dual-indexed libraries were pooled in equimolar amounts, assessed for cluster efficiency and pool balance with shallow sequencing on an Illumina MiSeq. Final sequencing was performed on an Illumina NovaSeq X Plus with paired-end 150bp reads. Sequencing data was processed and analyzed using Partek software. Alignment was performed by the STAR (version 2.7.8a) alignment method to mouse Genome assembly GRCm39. Raw read counts were processed by TMM normalization. Differentially expressed genes were determined by normalization to spleen CD8 samples with a cutoff fold-change > 2 and adjusted p-value <0.05.

Flow cytometry data acquisition and analysis

For bulk RNASeq, BPO tumors, tumor adjacent skin, and spleens from 3 BPO mice were pooled and sorted for CD8 T cells expressing CD103 and CD69. For the bona-fide TRM control, Yumm1.7.OVA cells were engrafted epicutaneously (29) on the backs of mice. Most mice reject epicutaneous tumors and the skin is populated with antitumor TRM cells. For flow cytometry single cell suspensions were reconstituted in PBS and stained with lived/dead discrimination dye (BioLegend) for 10 min at room temperature. Cell were washed with FACS buffer (PBS supplemented with 2% FBS, 2 mM EDTA, and 0.001% NaN3) and stained with H-2Kb/SIINFEKL-pentamer (ProImmune) in FACS buffer for 10 min at room temperature, followed by staining with the remaining antibody mix for 20 min on ice. Cell were washed with FACS buffer and fixed with 200 ul paraformaldehyde (BioLegend). All flow cytometric data acquisition was conducted a Cytek Aurora within 24 hours after fixation.

Imaging (H&E and tissue-based CyCIF)

H&E-stained FFPE sections were imaged using CyteFinder slide scanning fluorescence microscope (RareCyte Inc.) with a 20×/0.75 NA objective with no pixel binning. Serial FFPE sections (5 μm thick) were subjected to whole-slide CyCIF imaging with respective antibody panels for human and mouse tissue (Supplementary Table S1). CyCIF was performed as described in (PMID:29993362) and specifically as in protocols.io (dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.j8nlkoqbdv5r/v1). In brief, FFPE slides were baked using the BOND RX Automated IHC Stainer at 60°C for 30 minutes, dewax using Bond Dewax solution at 72°C, and antigen retrieval was performed using Epitope Retrieval 1 (Leica) solution at 100°C for 20 minutes. Multiple cycles of antibody incubation (overnight at 4°C in the dark), imaging, and fluorophore inactivation performed as cyclic imaging process. A 0.15mm single-sided self-adhesive spacer was applied to the slide followed by wet-mounting of a glass coverslip using 50% glycerol in 1× PBS for human tissue sections. Mouse tissue sections were imaged without spacers. Images were acquired using CyteFinder slide scanning fluorescence microscope (RareCyte Inc.) with a 20×/0.75 NA objective with no pixel binning. Coverslips were removed by soaking the slides in 42°C PBS and fluorophores were bleached by incubating slides in a solution of 4.5% H2O2 and 24 mmol/L NaOH in PBS and placing them under an LED light source for 1 hour. For mouse tissues were bleached twice for 45 mins in the same bleaching solution under LED light source. The list of all antibody panels used for both human and mouse tissue imaging are listed in Supplementary Table S1. Antibodies that passed a multi-step validation process and followed the expected staining pattern were included for downstream analysis.

CyCIF image pre-processing and quality control

MCMICRO pipeline (RRID:SCR_022832), an open-source multiple-choice microscopy pipeline (version:38182748aa0ec021f684ce47248c57340d2f4cc7; full codes available on at https://github.com/labsyspharm/mcmicro) was used to stitch individual CyCIF images together into a high-dimensional representation for further segmentation and analyses. Specific parameters used were optimized after iterative inspection of results, specifically focused on performance of the segmentation module to ensure accurate identification of single cells (params.yml files available at https://github.com/labsyspharm/2025-Vallius-Shi-Novikov-melanoma-PCAII). The mean fluorescence intensities of each marker for each cell were computed after generating the segmentation masks resulting in a single-cell data table for each acquired whole-slide CyCIF image. Several steps were also taken to ensure the quality of the single-cell data. At the image level, the cross-cycle image registration and tissue integrity were reviewed. Regions with poor registration, tissues deformity, or other artifacts were identified and excluded from downstream single cell analysis. Antibodies with low confidence staining patterns were also excluded from the analyses. Segmentation parameters were iteratively changed to improve the accuracy of the segmentation masks.

CyCIF single-cell phenotyping

As previously described (PMID:29993362), gating-based phenotyping approach was used to classify cells using an open-source visual gating tool (https://github.com/labsyspharm/gater) to determine gates for each marker. The identified gates for each marker were then used to rescale the single-cell data between 0 and 1, such that the values above 0.5 identify cells that express the marker. SCIMAP (PMID:38873023) python package (RRID:SCR_024751) were used to for cell-type calling based on a hierarchical classification. The assigned cell types were verified by overlaying the phenotypic labels onto the images.

Spatial Analysis

Distance analyses were performed using the functions spatial_count and spatial_distance within the SCIMAP(PMID:38873023) python package. To determine the spatial relationship within the CYCIF data, average shortest distances between selected cell types were compute from the cell centroid as measured by the Euclidean distance between X/Y coordinates. The spatial distances were computed for selected cell types using spatial_distance. Subregions with a thickness of subsequent 800-micron starting from epidermis were identified using an open-source software package SpatialsCells (PMID:38701421).

Statistical Tests

All statistical analysis was done in GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software Inc.). In all experiments, p<0.05 was considered significant. Statistical details for experiments are provided in the figure legends. Box plots show 25th to 75th percentiles, with the median as the center and the whiskers corresponding to the minimum and maximum values. For CyCIF, statistical tests to infer P value for significant differences in mean were performed using the Mann-Whitney U rank test with mann whitney function in the scipy Python package.

Supplementary Material

1

Key Resources Table

Reagent or Resource
Antibodies Clone Source Identifier
CD8a PerCP-eFluor 710 53–6.7 eBioscience 46-0081-82
CD103 (Itgae) BV711 2E7 BioLegend 121435
CD69 PE-Cy5 H1.2F3 BioLegend 104510
CD101 Alexa Fluor 647 Moushi101 BioLegend 564473
CD39 PE-Cy7 24DMS1 eBioscience 50–1128745
CD73 BV412 TY/11.8 BioLegend 127217
PD-1 BV605 29F.1A12 BioLegend 135219
Tim-3 BV421 B8.2C12 BioLegend 119723
2B4 APC m2B4 (BLY6) BioLegend 133517
JAML PE HL4E10 BioLegend 128503
CTLA-4 APC UC10–4B9 BioLegend 106309
Tcrb BV650 H57–597 BioLegend 109251
gdTCR BV480 GL3 BD Biosciences 746343
CD11b PE-Cy5 M1/70 BioLegend 101210
CD11c PE-Dazzle 594 N418 BioLegend 117357
NK1.1 Spark Red 718 PK136 BioLegend 156534
CD24 Alexa Fluor 532 M1/69 ebioscience 58-0242-82
CD45 APC-Fire 810 30-F11 BioLegend 103174
XCR1 BV785 ZET BioLegend 148225
CD4 BV570 RM4–5 BioLegend 100541
MHCII M5/114.15.2 eBiosciences 48-5321-82
Thy1.1 BV711 OX-7 BioLegend 202539
Thy1.1 PE-Cy7 OX-7 BioLegend 202518
Thy1.2 BV605 53–2.1 BioLegend 140317
Thy1.2 BV421 53–2.1 BioLegend 140327
CD8a depletion 53–6.7 BioLegend 100768
CD8b depletion 53–5.8 BioXCell BE0223
Chemicals, peptides, and recombinant proteins Source Identifier
Zombie Live/Dead Near Infrared BioLegend 423106
H-2Kb/SIINFEKL-pentamer ProImmune
Collagenase IV Sigma Aldrich C5138–1G
DNAse IV Sigma Aldrich D5025–150KU
Hyaluronidase V Sigma Aldrich H6254–500MG
4-hydroxytamoxifen Sigma Aldrich H7904–25mg
MOPS Sigma Aldrich M3183–500G
Penicillin Streptomycin Corning 30–002-Cl
FTY720 Sigma SML0700–25MG
Cell Trace Violet Invitrogen C34557
FluoroFix BioLegend 422101
Fetal Bovine Serum (Lot 22M275) Sigma Aldrich F0926
Ficoll Sigma Aldrich GE17-1440-03
Diptheria Toxin Sigma Aldrich D0564–1MG
Matrigel Membrane Matrix Corning CB-40234A
Veet Andwin Scientific NC0786304
Counting Beads BioLegend 424902
SIINFEKL Peptide GenScript RP10611
Critical Commercial Assays Source Identifier
RNeasy Plus Micro Kit QIAGEN 74034
Deposited Data Source
Bulk RNASeq of CD8 T cell populations This Paper NCBI GEO accession code: GSE305287
CyCIF of human tumors
CyCIF of mouse tumors
Experimental Models: Cell Lines Source Identifier
MC38.OVA
B16.OVA
Yumm1.7
Experimental models: Organisms/strains Source Identifier
Braf/PTEN Jackson Laboratory Strain 013590
Rosa26-EGFPOVA Dr. Angelika Stoecklinger Strandt, H. et al. Journal of immunology (2017).
Mouse strain: OT-I Jackson Laboratory Strain 003831
Thy1.1 Jackson Laboratory Strain 000406
Foxp3DTR Jackson Laboratory Strain 016958
Software and algorithms
FlowJo (version 10) TreeStar Inc.
Prism (version 10) Graphpad Inc
Python (v3.10)
SciMap

Acknowledgments

We want to thank the Center for Comparative Medicine at Massachusetts General Hospital for animal caretaking, the Flow Cytometry Core at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center for cell sorting assistance, and the Molecular Biology Core Facilities at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute for RNA sequencing. This work was made possible by the generous support from the American Cancer Society Postdoctoral Fellowship (T32AR007098 and PF-22-087-01-IBCD to J.B.W.), the National Institute of Health (R01AR065807, R01CA279457, R01AI175582, R01AI127654 to TSK). P.K.S. is a cofounder and member of the Board of Directors of Glencoe Software and a member of the Scientific Advisory Board for RareCyte and Montai Health; he holds equity in Glencoe and RareCyte and is also a consultant for Merck. This work was supported by the Harvard Ludwig Center, and an ASPIRE Award from The Mark Foundation for Cancer Research. SMP is supported by postdoctoral fellowship from Sigrid Juselius Foundation and Instrumentarium Foundation.

Footnotes

Declaration of Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Sharma P., Hu-Lieskovan S., Wargo J. A., Ribas A., Primary, Adaptive, and Acquired Resistance to Cancer Immunotherapy. Cell 168, 707–723 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ribas A., Wolchok J. D., Cancer immunotherapy using checkpoint blockade. Science 359, 1350–1355 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dunn G. P., Old L. J., Schreiber R. D., The Three Es of Cancer Immunoediting. Annual Review of Immunology 22, 329–360 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Koebel C. M., Vermi W., Swann J. B., Zerafa N., Rodig S. J., Old L. J., Smyth M. J., Schreiber R. D., Adaptive immunity maintains occult cancer in an equilibrium state. Nature 450, 903–907 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mueller S. N., Mackay L. K., Tissue-resident memory T cells: local specialists in immune defence. Nature Reviews Immunology 16, 79–89 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gavil N. V., Cheng K., Masopust D., Resident memory T cells and cancer. Immunity 57, 1734–1751 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pan Y., Tian T., Park C. O., Lofftus S. Y., Mei S., Liu X., Luo C., O’Malley J. T., Gehad A., Teague J. E., Divito S. J., Fuhlbrigge R., Puigserver P., Krueger J. G., Hotamisligil G. S., Clark R. A., Kupper T. S., Survival of tissue-resident memory T cells requires exogenous lipid uptake and metabolism. Nature 543, 252–256 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Smith N. P., Yan Y., Pan Y., Williams J. B., Manakongtreecheep K., Pant S. M., Zhao J., Tian T., Pan T., Stingley C., Wu K., Zhang J., Kley A. L., Sorger P. K., Villani A.-C., Kupper T. S., Resident memory T cell development is gradual and shows AP-1 gene expression in mature cells. JCI Insight 10, e187381 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Evrard M., Becht E., Fonseca R., Obers A., Park S. L., Ghabdan-Zanluqui N., Schroeder J., Christo S. N., Schienstock D., Lai J., Burn T. N., Clatch A., House I. G., Beavis P., Kallies A., Ginhoux F., Mueller S. N., Gottardo R., Newell E. W., Mackay L. K., Single-cell protein expression profiling resolves circulating and resident memory T cell diversity across tissues and infection contexts. Immunity, doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2023.06.005 (2023). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Scott M. C., Steier Z., Pierson M. J., Stolley J. M., O’Flanagan S. D., Soerens A. G., Wijeyesinghe S. P., Beura L. K., Dileepan G., Burbach B. J., Künzli M., Quarnstrom C. F., Smith O. C. G., Weyu E., Hamilton S. E., Vezys V., Shalek A. K., Masopust D., Deep profiling deconstructs features associated with memory CD8+ T cell tissue residence. Immunity 58, 162–181.e10 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ariotti S., Hogenbirk M. A., Dijkgraaf F. E., Visser L. L., Hoekstra M. E., Song J.-Y., Jacobs H., Haanen J. B., Schumacher T. N., Skin-resident memory CD8+ T cells trigger a state of tissue-wide pathogen alert. Science 346, 101–105 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Schenkel J. M., Fraser K. A., Vezys V., Masopust D., Sensing and alarm function of resident memory CD8+ T cells. Nature Immunology 14, 509–513 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Menares E., Gálvez-Cancino F., Cáceres-Morgado P., Ghorani E., López E., Díaz X., Saavedra-Almarza J., Figueroa D. A., Roa E., Quezada S. A., Lladser A., Tissue-resident memory CD8+ T cells amplify anti-tumor immunity by triggering antigen spreading through dendritic cells. Nature Communications 10, 4401 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Schenkel J. M., Fraser K. A., Beura L. K., Pauken K. E., Vezys V., Masopust D., Resident memory CD8 T cells trigger protective innate and adaptive immune responses. Science 346, 1254536–101 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Shiow L. R., Rosen D. B., Brdičková N., Xu Y., An J., Lanier L. L., Cyster J. G., Matloubian M., CD69 acts downstream of interferon-α/β to inhibit S1P1 and lymphocyte egress from lymphoid organs. Nature 440, 540–544 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mackay L. K., Rahimpour A., Ma J. Z., Collins N., Stock A. T., Hafon M.-L., Vega-Ramos J., Lauzurica P., Mueller S. N., Stefanovic T., Tscharke D. C., Heath W. R., Inouye M., Carbone F. R., Gebhardt T., The developmental pathway for CD103(+)CD8+ tissue-resident memory T cells of skin. Nature Immunology 14, 1294–1301 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Watanabe R., Gehad A., Yang C., Scott L. L., Teague J. E., Schlapbach C., Elco C. P., Huang V., Matos T. R., Kupper T. S., Clark R. A., Human skin is protected by four functionally and phenotypically discrete populations of resident and recirculating memory T cells. Science Translational Medicine 7, 279ra39–279ra39 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Edwards J., Wilmott J. S., Madore J., Gide T. N., Quek C., Tasker A., Ferguson A., Chen J., Hewavisenti R., Hersey P., Gebhardt T., Weninger W., Britton W. J., Saw R. P. M., Thompson J. F., Menzies A. M., Long G. V., Scolyer R. A., Palendira U., CD103+ Tumor-Resident CD8+ T Cells Are Associated with Improved Survival in Immunotherapy-Naïve Melanoma Patients and Expand Significantly During Anti–PD-1 Treatment. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 24, 3036–3045 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ganesan A.-P., Clarke J., Wood O., Garrido-Martin E. M., Chee S. J., Mellows T., Samaniego-Castruita D., Singh D., Seumois G., Alzetani A., Woo E., Friedmann P. S., King E. V., Thomas G. J., Sanchez-Elsner T., Vijayanand P., Ottensmeier C. H., Tissue-resident memory features are linked to the magnitude of cytotoxic T cell responses in human lung cancer. Nature Publishing Group 122, 3491 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Clarke J., Panwar B., Madrigal A., Singh D., Gujar R., Wood O., Chee S. J., Eschweiler S., King E. V., Awad A. S., Hanley C. J., McCann K. J., Bhattacharyya S., Woo E., Alzetani A., Seumois G., Thomas G. J., Ganesan A.-P., Friedmann P. S., Sanchez-Elsner T., Ay F., Ottensmeier C. H., Vijayanand P., Single-cell transcriptomic analysis of tissue-resident memory T cells in human lung cancer. The Journal of experimental medicine 216, 2128–2149 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Webb J. R., Milne K., Watson P., Deleeuw R. J., Nelson B. H., Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes expressing the tissue resident memory marker CD103 are associated with increased survival in high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 20, 434–444 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Komdeur F. L., Prins T. M., van de Wall S., Plat A., Wisman G. B. A., Hollema H., Daemen T., Church D. N., de Bruyn M., Nijman H. W., CD103+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes are tumor-reactive intraepithelial CD8+ T cells associated with prognostic benefit and therapy response in cervical cancer. Oncoimmunology 6, e1338230 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Djenidi F., Adam J., Goubar A., Durgeau A., Meurice G., de Montpreville V., Validire P., Besse B., Mami-Chouaib F., CD8+CD103+ Tumor–Infiltrating Lymphocytes Are Tumor-Specific Tissue-Resident Memory T Cells and a Prognostic Factor for Survival in Lung Cancer Patients. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) 194, 3475–3486 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Murray T., Marraco S. A. F., Baumgaertner P., Bordry N., Cagnon L., Donda A., Romero P., Verdeil G., Speiser D. E., Very Late Antigen-1 Marks Functional Tumor-Resident CD8 T Cells and Correlates with Survival of Melanoma Patients. Frontiers in immunology 7, 573 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Damei I., Trickovic T., Mami-Chouaib F., Corgnac S., Tumor-resident memory T cells as a biomarker of the response to cancer immunotherapy (2023). file:///Users/jbw38/Downloads/fimmu-14-1205984.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Han J., Zhao Y., Shirai K., Molodtsov A., Kolling F. W., Fisher J. L., Zhang P., Yan S., Searles T. G., Bader J. M., Gui J., Cheng C., Ernstoff M. S., Turk M. J., Angeles C. V., Resident and circulating memory T cells persist for years in melanoma patients with durable responses to immunotherapy. Nat Cancer 2, 300–311 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Jiang C., Chao C.-C., Li J., Ge X., Shen A., Jucaud V., Cheng C., Shen X., Tissue-resident memory T cell signatures from single-cell analysis associated with better melanoma prognosis. iScience 27, 109277 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Malik B. T., Byrne K. T., Vella J. L., Zhang P., Shabaneh T. B., Steinberg S. M., Molodtsov A. K., Bowers J. S., Angeles C. V., Paulos C. M., Huang Y. H., Turk M. J., Resident memory T cells in skin mediate durable immunity to melanoma. Science immunology 2, eaam6346 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Park S. L., Buzzai A., Rautela J., Hor J. L., Hochheiser K., Effern M., McBain N., Wagner T., Edwards J., McConville R., Wilmott J. S., Scolyer R. A., Tüting T., Palendira U., Gyorki D., Mueller S. N., Huntington N. D., Bedoui S., Hölzel M., Mackay L. K., Waithman J., Gebhardt T., Tissue-resident memory CD8+ T cells promote melanoma–immune equilibrium in skin. Nature 565, 1–23 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Yapp C., Nirmal A. J., Zhou F., Wong A. Y. H., Tefft J. B., Lu Y. D., Shang Z., Maliga Z., Llopis P. M., Murphy G. F., Lian C. G., Danuser G., Santagata S., Sorger P. K., Highly Multiplexed 3D Profiling of Cell States and Immune Niches in Human Tumours. bioRxiv, 2023.11.10.566670 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Strandt H., Pinheiro D. F., Kaplan D. H., Wirth D., Gratz I. K., Hammerl P., Thalhamer J., Stoecklinger A., Neoantigen Expression in Steady-State Langerhans Cells Induces CTL Tolerance. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) 199, 1626–1634 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Smith N. P., Yan Y., Pan Y., Williams J. B., Manakongtreecheep K., Pant S., Zhao J., Tian T., Pan T., Stingley C., Wu K., Zhang J., Kley A. L., Sorger P. K., Villani A.-C., Kupper T. S., Resident memory T cell development is associated with AP-1 transcription factor upregulation across anatomical niches. bioRxiv, 2023.09.29.560006 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Park B. V., Freeman Z. T., Ghasemzadeh A., Chattergoon M. A., Rutebemberwa A., Steigner J., Winter M. E., Huynh T. V., Sebald S. M., Lee S.-J., Pan F., Pardoll D. M., Cox A. L., TGFβ1-Mediated SMAD3 Enhances PD-1 Expression on Antigen-Specific T Cells in Cancer. Cancer Discov. 6, 1366–1381 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Terawaki S., Chikuma S., Shibayama S., Hayashi T., Yoshida T., Okazaki T., Honjo T., IFN-α Directly Promotes Programmed Cell Death-1 Transcription and Limits the Duration of T Cell-Mediated Immunity. J. Immunol. 186, 2772–2779 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Spranger S., Dai D., Horton B., Gajewski T. F., Tumor-Residing Batf3 Dendritic Cells Are Required for Effector T Cell Trafficking and Adoptive T Cell Therapy. Cancer cell 31, 711–723.e4 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Savas P., Virassamy B., Ye C., Salim A., Mintoff C. P., Caramia F., Salgado R., Byrne D. J., Teo Z. L., Dushyanthen S., Byrne A., Wein L., Luen S. J., Poliness C., Nightingale S. S., Skandarajah A. S., Gyorki D. E., Thornton C. M., Beavis P. A., Fox S. B., K. C. F. C. for R. into F. B. C. (kConFab), Darcy P. K., Speed T. P., Mackay L. K., Neeson P. J., Loi S., Single-cell profiling of breast cancer T cells reveals a tissue-resident memory subset associated with improved prognosis. Nature Medicine 24, 986–993 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 37.León-Rodríguez S. G. D., Aguilar-Flores C., Gajón J. A., Juárez-Flores Á., Mantilla A., Gerson-Cwilich R., Martínez-Herrera J. F., Villegas-Osorno D. A., Gutiérrez-Quiroz C. T., Buenaventura-Cisneros S., Sánchez-Prieto M. A., Castelán-Maldonado E., Rivera S. R., Fuentes-Pananá E. M., Bonifaz L. C., TCF1-positive and TCF1-negative TRM CD8 T cell subsets and cDC1s orchestrate melanoma protection and immunotherapy response. J. Immunother. Cancer 12, e008739 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Luoma A. M., Suo S., Wang Y., Gunasti L., Porter C. B. M., Nabilsi N., Tadros J., Ferretti A. P., Liao S., Gurer C., Chen Y.-H., Criscitiello S., Ricker C. A., Dionne D., Rozenblatt-Rosen O., Uppaluri R., Haddad R. I., Ashenberg O., Regev A., Allen E. M. V., MacBeath G., Schoenfeld J. D., Wucherpfennig K. W., Tissue-resident memory and circulating T cells are early responders to pre-surgical cancer immunotherapy. Cell 185, 2918–2935.e29 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Simoni Y., Becht E., Fehlings M., Loh C. Y., Koo S.-L., Teng K. W. W., Yeong J. P. S., Nahar R., Zhang T., Kared H., Duan K., Ang N., Poidinger M., Lee Y. Y., Larbi A., Khng A. J., Tan E., Fu C., Mathew R., Teo M., Lim W. T., Toh C. K., Ong B.-H., Koh T., Hillmer A. M., Takano A., Lim T. K. H., Tan E.-H., Zhai W., Tan D. S. W., Tan I. B., Newell E. W., Bystander CD8+ T cells are abundant and phenotypically distinct in human tumour infiltrates. Nature 557, 575–579 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Rosato P. C., Wijeyesinghe S., Stolley J. M., Nelson C. E., Davis R. L., Manlove L. S., Pennell C. A., Blazar B. R., Chen C. C., Geller M. A., Vezys V., Masopust D., Virus-specific memory T cells populate tumors and can be repurposed for tumor immunotherapy. Nature Communications 10, 567 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Scheper W., Kelderman S., Fanchi L. F., Linnemann C., Bendle G., de Rooij M. A. J., Hirt C., Mezzadra R., Slagter M., Dijkstra K., Kluin R. J. C., Snaebjornsson P., Milne K., Nelson B. H., Zijlmans H., Kenter G., Voest E. E., Haanen J. B. A. G., Schumacher T. N., Low and variable tumor reactivity of the intratumoral TCR repertoire in human cancers. Nature Medicine 25, 89–94 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Collins N., Jiang X., Zaid A., Macleod B. L., Li J., Park C. O., Haque A., Bedoui S., Heath W. R., Mueller S. N., Kupper T. S., Gebhardt T., Carbone F. R., Skin CD4+ memory T cells exhibit combined cluster-mediated retention and equilibration with the circulation. Nat. Commun. 7, 11514 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Burn T. N., Schröder J., Gandolfo L. C., Osman M., Wainwright E. N., Lam E. Y. N., McDonald K. M., Evans R. B., Li S., Rawlinson D., Dryburgh L., Zaid A., Maliga Z., Schienstock D., Meiser P., Lee H. J., Lai H., Moreira M. L., Zareie P., Lee L. H.-Y., Huq L., Christo S. N., Seow J. J. W., Ching K. A., Guillaume S. M., Knezevic K., Park S. L., Evrard M., Waithman J., Gebhardt T., Mueller S. N., Riddiough G. E., Perini M. V., Tsao S. C. H., Speed T. P., Sorger P. K., Loi S., Carbone F. R., Gras S., Fisher T. S., Baaten B. J., Dawson M. A., Mackay L. K., Antigen reactivity defines tissue-resident memory and exhausted T cells in tumours. bioRxiv, 2025.07.23.666465 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kumar B. V., Ma W., Miron M., Granot T., Guyer R. S., Carpenter D. J., Senda T., Sun X., Ho S.-H., Lerner H., Friedman A. L., Shen Y., Farber D. L., Human Tissue-Resident Memory T Cells Are Defined by Core Transcriptional and Functional Signatures in Lymphoid and Mucosal Sites. Cell reports 20, 2921–2934 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Leung E. L.-H., Li R.-Z., Fan X.-X., Wang L. Y., Wang Y., Jiang Z., Huang J., Pan H.-D., Fan Y., Xu H., Wang F., Rui H., Wong P., Sumatoh H., Fehlings M., Nardin A., Gavine P., Zhou L., Cao Y., Liu L., Longitudinal high-dimensional analysis identifies immune features associating with response to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. Nat. Commun. 14, 5115 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Sato T., Ogawa Y., Kinoshita M., Nagasaka Y., Shimada S., Momosawa A., Kawamura T., Preferential CD101 expression on resident memory regulatory T cells and IFN-γ-producing CD8+ resident memory T cells in human epidermis. J. Dermatol. Sci., doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2025.07.002 (2025). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Soares L. R., Tsavaler L., Rivas A., Engleman E. G., V7 (CD101) ligation inhibits TCR/CD3-induced IL-2 production by blocking Ca2+ flux and nuclear factor of activated T cell nuclear translocation. J Immunol Baltim Md 1950 161, 209–17 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Hudson W. H., Gensheimer J., Hashimoto M., Wieland A., Valanparambil R. M., Li P., Lin J.-X., Konieczny B. T., Im S. J., Freeman G. J., Leonard W. J., Kissick H. T., Ahmed R., Proliferating Transitory T Cells with an Effector-like Transcriptional Signature Emerge from PD-1+ Stem-like CD8+ T Cells during Chronic Infection. Immunity 51, 1043–1058.e4 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Duhen T., Duhen R., Montler R., Moses J., Moudgil T., de Miranda N. F., Goodall C. P., Blair T. C., Fox B. A., McDermott J. E., Chang S.-C., Grunkemeier G., Leidner R., Bell R. B., Weinberg A. D., Co-expression of CD39 and CD103 identifies tumor-reactive CD8 T cells in human solid tumors. Nature Communications 9, 2724 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Hirai T., Yang Y., Zenke Y., Li H., Chaudhri V. K., Diaz J. S. D. L. C., Zhou P. Y., Nguyen B. A.-T., Bartholin L., Workman C. J., Griggs D. W., Vignali D. A. A., Singh H., Masopust D., Kaplan D. H., Competition for Active TGFβ Cytokine Allows for Selective Retention of Antigen-Specific Tissue- Resident Memory T Cells in the Epidermal Niche. Immunity 54, 84–98.e5 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Shabaneh T. B., Molodtsov A., Steinberg S. M., Zhang P., Torres G. M., Mohamed G. A., Boni A., Curiel T. J., Angeles C. V., Turk M. J., Oncogenic BRAFV600E governs regulatory T cell recruitment during melanoma tumorigenesis. Cancer Res 78, canres.0365.2018 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Cohen J. N., Gouirand V., Macon C. E., Lowe M. M., Boothby I. C., Moreau J. M., Gratz I. K., Stoecklinger A., Weaver C. T., Sharpe A. H., Ricardo-Gonzalez R. R., Rosenblum M. D., Regulatory T cells in skin mediate immune privilege of the hair follicle stem cell niche. Sci. Immunol. 9, eadh0152 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Rodriguez R. S., Pauli M. L., Neuhaus I. M., Yu S. S., Arron S. T., Harris H. W., Yang S. H.-Y., Anthony B. A., Sverdrup F. M., Krow-Lucal E., MacKenzie T. C., Johnson D. S., Meyer E. H., Löhr A., Hsu A., Koo J., Liao W., Gupta R., Debbaneh M. G., Butler D., Huynh M., Levin E. C., Leon A., Hoffman W. Y., McGrath M. H., Alvarado M. D., Ludwig C. H., Truong H.-A., Maurano M. M., Gratz I. K., Abbas A. K., Rosenblum M. D., Memory regulatory T cells reside in human skin. J. Clin. Investig. 124, 1027–1036 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Ali N., Zirak B., Rodriguez R. S., Pauli M. L., Truong H.-A., Lai K., Ahn R., Corbin K., Lowe M. M., Scharschmidt T. C., Taravati K., Tan M. R., Ricardo-Gonzalez R. R., Nosbaum A., Bertolini M., Liao W., Nestle F. O., Paus R., Cotsarelis G., Abbas A. K., Rosenblum M. D., Regulatory T Cells in Skin Facilitate Epithelial Stem Cell Differentiation. Cell 169, 1119–1129.e11 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1

Articles from Research Square are provided here courtesy of American Journal Experts

RESOURCES