Skip to main content
Nucleic Acids Research logoLink to Nucleic Acids Research
. 2026 Jul 28;54(14):gkag738. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkag738

Metal-triggered topology switching in bipyridine-modified DNA G-quadruplexes

Armin Durmisevic 1, Joseph Openy 2, Aatikah Majid 3, Mrunal Nanda 4,5, Ramon Vilar 6, Guido H Clever 7,
PMCID: PMC13408043  PMID: 42516080

Abstract

Gaining control over DNA G-quadruplex topology bears potential to modulate and study their interaction with other biomacromolecules such as proteins. To achieve this, we introduced bipyridine ligands into short oligonucleotide strands derived from telomeric regions of humans and Tetrahymena as well as into an oncogenic promoter region capable of forming such G-quadruplexes. This modification makes it possible to dynamically access different G-quadruplex topologies through the formation of chelate complexes within the quadruplex loop regions using metals such as Cu2+, Ni2+, Zn2+, Co2+, and Cd2+. The metal-coordinated systems show enhanced stability towards thermal denaturation as well as a solvation-related response in the presence of molecular crowding reagents. Interestingly, these G-quadruplexes modified with bipyridine-metal complexes stay folded in cellulo and therefore show potential for creating new oligonucleotide-based diagnostic agents and therapeutics. Metal-stabilized G-quadruplexes could therefore be suitable as probes to explore protein-G4 interactions, as inducers for G4-dependent cellular processes, or decoys to sequester transcription factors.

Graphical Abstract

Graphical Abstract.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Introduction

Guanine-rich oligonucleotides can fold into tetra-stranded structures known as G-quadruplexes (often abbreviated as G4 or GQ). There is significant evidence showing that G-quadruplex DNA plays a crucial role in various cellular processes, including the regulation of gene expression and the maintenance of chromosomal integrity [1, 2]. Due to their regulatory function, G-quadruplexes have been identified as promising drug targets in various areas such as cancer and neurodegenerative diseases [37]. Various small molecules, usually characterized by flat, extended π-surfaces and positive charges, have been found to bind and stabilize G-quadruplexes, thus serving as potential drug candidates [811]. Structurally, G-quadruplexes are composed of π-stacked layers of Hoogsten-type hydrogen-bonded guanine quartets, folded from G-rich DNA sequences and stabilized by monovalent metal cations occupying a central channel between the nucleobases. Depending on the strand molecularity (uni-, bi-, tri-, or tetramolecular), G-count, glycosidic bond torsion angles, and interstitial nucleotides, they show a high topological variety [1215]. This extensive structural diversity is further influenced by the central metal cation (Li+, Na+, and K+), the solvation environment (including conditions of molecular crowding), and the presence of non-covalent binders, leading to different G-tetrad stacking patterns, strand polarities, and loop orientations [16, 17]. Common G-quadruplex topologies are divided into three categories, hybrid, parallel, or antiparallel, which can be easily differentiated through their distinct signatures in circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy [1820]. This polymorphism is crucial in defining the selective interaction of G-quadruplexes with regulatory proteins, and consequently, their cellular functions. Therefore, it offers a playground for the construction of new tailor-made G-quadruplexes with topologies and functions aimed at the targeted interaction with proteins of interest. Furthermore, chemical modification of such G-quadruplexes opens potential to control their structure and action by external stimuli [2126].

A promising approach to exert control over G-quadruplex folding and introduce triggerable functions is to combine their polymorphism with the concept of metal-base pairing, where artificial ligands, covalently inserted into the DNA strand, can coordinate transition metal cations with structure-stabilizing properties. While numerous reports describe this phenomenon in duplex DNA [27, 28], only a few examples exist for other DNA secondary structures such as triplexes [2931] and three-way junctions [3236]. For G-quadruplexes, the few known reports include Hg2+–thymine interactions within a loop [37, 38] and 2,2′-bipyridine-containing linkers in the loops of bimolecular G-quadruplexes that lead to metal-mediated G-wire formation [39].

Previously, we have introduced a series of transition metal-base tetrads incorporated into uni- and tetramolecular G-quadruplexes, based on the square-planar coordination of four monodentate pyridine or imidazole donors to divalent cations such as Cu2+, Ni2+, and Zn2+ [4044]. We applied these systems in the construction of rigid EPR spin labels (exploiting the unpaired electrons of coordinated Cu2+ cations), the enantioselective catalysis of a Michael addition, and the metal-dependent activity switching of a of G-quadruplex-hemin complex serving as peroxidase mimic [41, 4547]. While some of these systems already indicated the potential of increasing thermal stability through metal binding (and even a metal-triggered topological change could be observed [40]), the use of separate monodenate donors for the placement of tetra-coordinated metal complexes within the relatively short synthetic oligonucleotides (usually ≤25 bases) required chemical modification at four different sequence positions, thus risking significant structural disruption of the parental unmodified motif. We therefore now designed a 2,2′-bipyridine-based ligand-modified nucleoside (“ligandoside”) whose backbone architecture is similar to the glycol-based DNA surrogate introduced by Meggers (termed “GNA”) [48], thus allowing a facile synthesis of the respective phosphoramidite and enabling the incorporation of the ligand at any position during the DNA synthesis (5′, 3′, or internal). This new building block differs from previously reported, backbone-embedded chelate ligands, e.g. by Sugimoto [39], Sleiman [49], and us [50], as it is only connected to the strand via a one-point attachment. While it shares this feature with other previously introduced chelate ligands, e.g. a 2′-ribose-appended bipyridine by Shionoya [35], and some purine and pyrimidine deoxyribonucleotide-derived ligandosides by Switzer [32, 51], our herein introduced design benefits from a lean and easily accessible backbone that allows a flexible alignment of ligands in the G-quadruplex loop. Furthermore, bipyridines offer an enhanced complex stability as compared to monodentate pyridine ligands. They accept a broad spectrum of transition metal cations, as previously shown when incorporated into duplex DNA [32, 33, 52].

The work reported herein is aimed at exploring the impact of covalently incorporated bipyridine ligands on G-quadruplex topology and function. We describe the metal-binding capabilities of a series of modified G-quadruplexes and explored their effects on secondary structure stabilization and metal-responsive topology switching. We also report on their behaviour under varying solvation environments and within a cellular context.

Materials and methods

Chemistry

Chemicals and solvents were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich, Acros Organics, Carl Roth, TCI Europe, VWR, ABCR, or other suppliers and used as received without further purification. Ultrapure water (type I, 18.2 MΩ cm) was produced with a VWR Puranity TU 3 UV apparatus. Reactions involving substrates or reagents sensitive towards ambient air and/or hydrolysis were carried out using Schlenk techniques under argon. Purification was done by column chromatography with silica gel 60 from Macherey-Nagel (particle size: 40–63 μm). Additional purification was performed via gel permeation chromatography on Japan Analytical Industry LC-9210 II NEXT or Labo Ace LC-5610 systems with either HPLC-grade ethyl acetate or chloroform. NMR measurements were conducted at 298 K on Avance-500neo, 600, and 700 instruments from Bruker. Chemical shifts for 1H and 13C are reported in ppm with signals referenced to the residual solvent peak (signal multiplicity for 1H-NMR spectra: s: singlet, d: doublet, t: triplet, dd: doublet of doublets; dt: doublet of triplets; m: multiplet, and br: broad). High-resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI HRMS) was performed on a Bruker timsTOF ESI mass spectrometer.

UV-Vis analysis

For all UV-VIS-based thermal denaturation studies, G-quadruplex samples contained 4 μM single-stranded DNA (= 4 μM G-quadruplex), 100 mM KCl or NaCl, 10 mM HEPES buffer pH 7.2, and, if present, 4–8 μM M2+ (Cu, Ni, Zn, Co, and Cd). For all experiments, samples were prepared with ultrapure water, heated to 90°C for 10 min, slowly cooled to 4°C with a cooling rate of 0.5°C/min, and then left at this temperature for several hours (typically overnight). Further details can be found in the SI.

CD spectroscopy

For standard CD measurements, samples were prepared in the same way as for the UV-VIS-based thermal denaturation studies. CD spectra were measured on an Applied Photophysics Chirascan qCD spectropolarimeter (350–205 nm, 1.0 s time-per-point, step size 1 nm, bandwidth 0.5 nm, 3 repeats) at 25°C unless otherwise indicated. Temperature was controlled using a Quantum Northwest temperature control attached to a sample probe. The background was measured in the same cuvette as the sample. All spectra were averaged, background-corrected (cuvette, buffer, and electrolyte), smoothed (Savitzky–Golay, window size 5), and zeroed to the signal at 350 nm. Further details can be found in the SI.

Molecular dynamics simulations

MD simulations were carried out as previously described [40, 43] using the Gromacs 2019.2 program [5355] with the AMBER force field ff99bsc1 [56, 57] for the nucleic acid parts. A detailed explanation can be found in the SI.

Cell assays

U2OS and HeLa cells were plated (1 × 105 cells per well, 200 μl, 0.8 cm2) 24 h before each experiment and grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) media (Gibco) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). To measure cellular toxicity of the samples, methylthiazolysulfophenyl tetrazolium (MTS) assays were conducted using the Promega CellTiter 96 Aqueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay kit, following manufacturer’s instructions. Cells were incubated with DNA samples over 6 h at varying concentrations from 5 to 2000 nM. Absorbance of the MTS reagent was then measured at 490 nm. The experiment was conducted in triplicate.

Confocal images were acquired using a Leica SP5 II confocal microscope after incubation of U2OS/HeLa cells with the DNA samples for 16 h. Images were taken with a 100× oil-immersion objective (correction collar, NA = 1.2, Leica) after excitation using an internal Ar+ laser at 495 nm and detection at 500–700 nm.

DNA transfection was performed with Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer’s instructions: dye-labelled G4 DNA was incubated with Lipofectamine at a 3:1 ratio of Lipofectamine:DNA in Opti-MEM media (Gibco) for 15 min. The Lipofectamine/DNA mixture was then incubated with cells for up to 24 h and imaged every 4 h using a Sartorius Incucyte S3 Live-Cell Analysis System, from which the total green count of the selected cells was plotted over time to determine the optimal incubation time after which no more signal enhancement was present. All cell imaging experiments are an average of at least two independent biological repeats. Instances where images of three biological repeats were used are highlighted in relevant figure captions.

Statistical methods

Association constants (K) and their associated errors were obtained from the Benesi–Hildebrand method by least-squares linear regression of n = 22 data points per condition. K values are reported as value ± standard error (SE), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) calculated from the regression fit. Linear regressions were performed using OriginLab software. Observed rate constants (kobs) were determined by least-squares linear regression of the linear portion of the decay curve, assuming first-order kinetics. Each condition was measured in n = 3 independent replicates, and kobs values are reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD) across replicates. Activation parameters (ΔH‡ and ΔS‡) were determined from the Eyring–Polanyi equation by unweighted least-squares linear regression of ln(kobs/T) versus 1/T across n = 4 temperatures. Errors in ΔH‡ and ΔS‡ were derived from the SEs of the slope and intercept, respectively, and are reported as value ± SE with 95% CIs. Linear regressions were performed using OriginLab software. Cell viability was assessed in n = 3 independent biological replicates per condition. Absorbance values were normalized to negative (full dehydrogenase activity) and positive (DMSO, no dehydrogenase activity) controls and are reported as mean percentage viability ± SD. No formal statistical comparisons between conditions were performed. Fluorescence intensity (count) in Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based fluorescence microscopy experiments was calculated from n = 3 technical replicates and given as a mean value without error.

Results and discussion

G-quadruplex structure is modulated by transition metal binding

In order to incorporate the bipyridine ligandoside into an oligonucleotide strand, first a synthetic route had to be devised to obtain the necessary phosphoramidite building block (BiPy-L). As only few unsymmetrically substituted bipyridines are commercially available, the synthesis started with a Stille-cross coupling of 6-bromonicotinaldehyde and 2-(tributylstannyl)pyridine. The [2,2′-bipyridine]-5-carbaldehyde was then reduced to the alcohol, which was coupled to the glycidyl backbone via a nucleophilic substitution. After acid-promoted deprotection of the 1,3-dioxolane the necessary dimethoxytrityl (DMT) protecting group could be installed at the primary hydroxyl group. The phosphitylation followed reported procedures [40]. The glycol-based synthetic backbone was chosen as it was synthetically simple and offered a high degree of structural flexibility for the incorporated ligand. All synthetic steps were confirmed by NMR spectroscopy (SI, Supplementary Figs S1–S6). With the ligand at hand, solid-phase phosphoramidite synthesis (SPPS) was performed (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Panel A shows three reaction steps converting a pyridine aldehyde into a protected bipyridine-modified nucleoside. Panel B shows solid phase assembly of DNA strands that fold into G-quadruplex structures after annealing with sodium or potassium ions.

A) Synthesis of BiPy-L ligandoside starting from 6-bromonicotinaldehyde. (a) 2-(tributylstannyl)pyridine, Pd(PPh3)2Cl2, m-xylene, 110°C, 16 h; (b) NaBH4, THF, r.t., 24 h; (c) NaH, (R)-(2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl)methyl 4-methylbenzenesulfonate, DMF, r.t., 24 h; (d) TFA, THF/water (1:1), 70°C, 3 h; (e) DMT-Cl, DIPEA, DMAP, THF, r.t., 24 h; and (f) CEP-Cl, DIPEA, THF, r.t., 3 h. (B) SPPS of various G-quadruplex-forming oligonucleotides, followed by annealing in buffer solutions containing either Na+ or K+ ions.

In a first design, several sequences known to fold into unimolecular DNA G-quadruplexes, derived from the human telomeric region (htel), the promoter region of the Myc oncogene (pu22), and from the Tetrahymena telomeric region (ttel), were site-specifically modified with two bipyridine ligandosides each. Positions within the strands were decided based on the analysis of known structures of the parental sequences, together with experience from our previous studies on the incorporation of monodentate ligands [40, 41, 4447, 58]. Therefore, selected nucleotides either within loop regions of the G-quadruplexes or guanines within a terminal tetrad were exchanged for BiPy-L. As pu22-derived parallel quadruplex topologies do not offer any closely neighbouring loops, we placed BiPy-L before and after the first and last run of guanines, respectively, and in addition elongated the first loop by up to two bases to increase structural flexibility. Eventually, the overall goal is to combine minimal disturbances with respect to the initial structure with optimal ligand positioning for the successful formation of metal complexes, not only to achieve a metal-mediated increase of thermal stability but also to exert stimuli-responsive control over G-quadruplex topology. It is important to note that the three parental sequences studied herein differ not only in their G-quadruplex topology but also in loop composition and length, and that the modification strategy is not identical across all constructs. Consequently, certain observations—in particular the quantification of thermal stability and the sensitivity to metal coordination—are expected to be scaffold-dependent and should not be uncritically transferred between systems. In contrast, the fundamental principles underlying the metal–BiPy complex formation, including coordination geometry and the spin-state-dependent fluorescence behaviour, are intrinsic to the bipyridine ligand and the respective metal ions and are therefore expected to be generally applicable regardless of the specific scaffold.

Successful synthesis and purity of modified G-quadruplex sequences were confirmed by analytical HPLC (SI, Supplementary Figs S7–S18) and LC-ESI-MS (SI, Supplementary Figs S19–S41). Modified sequences were investigated by thermal differential spectra (TDS), UV-Vis melting analysis, and CD spectroscopy after annealing in absence or presence of divalent metal cations and different buffers containing either K+ or Na+. All six synthesized sequences (Table 1) showed a characteristic minimum at 295 nm and maxima at approx. 243 and 273 nm in their respective TDS spectra, indicative of successful G-quadruplex formation (SI, Supplementary Figs S52–S61) [59].

Table 1.

Bipyridine-modified DNA sequences

Name Sequence (5′–3′)
htel22(a) A GGG TTA GGG TTA GGG TTA GGG
htel22-L2a A GGG L(b)TA GGG TTA GGG TTL GGG
FAM-htel22-L2a FAM(c)-A GGG LTA GGG TTA GGG TTL GGG
FAM-htel22-L2a-Cy3 FAM-A GGG LTA GGG TTA GGG TTL GGG-Cy3(c)
htel22-L2b A GGL TTA GGG TTA GGL TTA GGG
FAM-htel22-L2b FAM-A GGL TTA GGG TTA GGL TTA GGG
FAM-htel22-L2a-Cy3 FAM-A GGL TTA GGG TTA GGL TTA GGG-Cy3
ttel24(a) TTG GGG TTG GGG TTG GGG TTG GGG
ttel24-L2a TTG GGL TTG GGG TTG GGL TTG GGG
ttel24-L2b TTG GGG TTL GGG TTG GGG TTL GGG
pu22(a) TGA GGG TGG GTA GGG TGG GTA A
pu22-L2a TGL GGG TT(d)GG GTA GGG TGG GLA A
pu22-L2b TGL GGG TTAGG GTA GGG TGG GLA A

(a) DNA sequences of parental G-quadruplexes for the modified systems; (b) incorporated BiPy-L ligandosides indicated by L; (c) FAM = carboxyfluorescein, Cy3 = cyanine3; (d) nucleotides added in addition to the parental sequence are underscored.

This also held true when annealed in the presence of a divalent metal source, where only minor changes between G-quadruplexes with and without M2+ could be identified, such as an additional band at 315 nm in the TDS spectra. This additional band stems from the redshift of the incorporated bipyridine ligands when forming a corresponding metal chelate complex (SI, Supplementary Figs S52–S61) [52]. This marked a first indication for the successful formation of a transition metal complex within the G-quadruplex. The region between 265 and 220 nm in the TDS spectra showed some differences between the individual sequences, originating from their different loop compositions and adopted topologies. With first spectroscopic evidence for the complexation of Cu2+, Ni2+, Zn2+, Co2+, and Cd2+, we next investigated the potential thermal stabilization by the respective metals. UV-Vis melting curve analysis revealed that even in the absence of transition metal cations, the bipyridine modifications have an overall positive impact on the stability of the respective quadruplexes, as the Tm values were found to be similar or above those of the parental sequences (Table 2). Furthermore, a large thermal stabilization could be observed for many of the modified sequences when a divalent metal ion was added. Ni2+ and Zn2+ exerted the strongest effects, with an increase of up to ΔTm = +31 K in the case of htel22-L2b. The lowest stabilization was achieved for the Myc-derived sequences pu22-L2a and -L2b where Tm values were already above 80°C without the formation of a metal complex (SI, Supplementary Figs S62S71). Overall, a strong influence of the formation of bipyridine metal complexes on the G-quadruplex stability could be observed, rendering these artificial DNA constructs largely resistant to thermal denaturation.

Table 2.

Melting temperatures of bipyridine-modified DNA sequences in presence and absence of various transition metal cations, measured by UV-Vis spectroscopy

Name T m [°C] T mTm) (+Cu2+) T mTm) (+Ni2+) T mTm) (+Zn2+) T mTm) (+Co2+) T mTm) (+Cd2+)
htel22 64 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d.
htel22-L2a 68 79 (+11) 84 (+16) 83 (+15) 81 (+13) 83 (+15)
htel22-L2b 44 72 (+28) 75 (+31) 74 (+30) 74 (+30) 71 (+27)
ttel-24* n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d.
ttel24-L2a 65 75 (+10) 77 (+12) 77 (+12) 73 (+8) 76 (+11)
ttel24-L2b 65 76 (+11) 79 (+14) 77 (+12) 71 (+6) 74 (+9)
pu22 85 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d.
pu22-L2a 37 + >85** >85 >85 >85 n.d. n.d.
pu22-L2b >85 >85 36 + >85** 37 + >85** n.d. n.d.

* Poorly defined melting transition. ** Two melting points identified [67].

Binding constants for the chelate metal complexes were determined via UV-Vis titration experiments by stepwise (0.1 eq) addition of a solution of metal source, incubation for 10 min, and subsequently following the increase of the 315 nm band. All sequences showed very high binding constants in the range of 1010‒1011 M−1. For the calculations, we treated the two incorporated bipyridines as a single tetradentate ligand as they are covalently attached to each other through the DNA strand. This characteristic will serve as an important factor for creating functional systems resistant to harsher conditions within a cellular environment (SI, Supplementary Fig. S72, Supplementary Table S2).

As we chose parental sequences known to adopt a variety of possible quadruplex topologies, and even show polymorphic behaviour, we then probed how the artificial ligandosides and their coordination with divalent metal cations affect the quadruplex topology. Out of the six synthesized sequences, the most notable behaviour could be observed for htel22-derived sequences, found in the human telomeric region. Two design approaches were followed here. (i) Replacement of loop nucleotides with the BiPy-L ligandosides aimed towards minimal disturbance of the initial structure, followed by formation of the metal complex within the quadruplex loop region. (ii) Replacement of guanines aimed towards the formation of a tetrad mimic whereby two bipyridines (chelating a metal cation) take the stabilizing and structural role of a natural G-tetrad. In the case of htel22-L2a, where two bipyridine ligandosides are incorporated into the loops at positions #5 and #19 (in 100 mM KCl-containing buffer), the formation of a hybrid topology—similar to the parental sequence—was observed, indicating no large structural impact of the modifications. In contrast, for htel22-L2b, where two guanines at positions #4 and #16 were replaces, a fully antiparallel topology was obtained (Fig. 2A and B).

Figure 2.

Three-panel figure. Panels A and B show schematic structures of two bipyridine-modified DNA sequences alongside circular dichroism spectra recorded before and after addition of divalent metal cations, shown as dotted and coloured lines respectively. Panel C shows a native mass spectrometry spectrum with a labelled peak matching a metal-bound complex.

CD spectra of bipyridine modified sequences (A) htel22-L2a and (B) htel22-L2b in absence (dotted line) and presence (coloured lines) of divalent metal cations. While htel22-L2a changes from a hybrid-2 to an antiparallel topology upon metal addition, htel22-L2b is already prefolded into an antiparallel topology and shows no refolding upon metal complexation. (C) Native mass spectrometry measurements further confirm selective binding of one transition metal cation by the modified G-quadruplexes (expected mass for htel22-L2a + 2K++Cu2+-4H: 1772.2583, measured mass: 1772.2592).

As htel22 is known for its polymorphic behaviour [61, 62], the possibility of tuning its topology through metal coordination seemed intriguing. After annealing sequence htel22-L2a in the presence of a divalent metal cation (Cu2+, Ni2+,or Zn2+), CD analysis revealed the adoption of a new antiparallel topology with characteristic maxima at 290 and 240 nm and a minimum at 260 nm. Similar to the TDS spectra, an additional band at 315 nm could be identified, confirming the formation of the metal complex within a chiral environment. We therefore assume that the two spatially separated bipyridines form a stable metal complex during the annealing process and consequently force the DNA to adopt a folded topology that can accommodate this complex on one side of the G-stack. Compared to our previous results [42], based on monodenate ligands, this complexation-induced refolding was here not only achieved with Cu2+ but also a variety of other transition metal cations such as Ni2+, Zn2+, Co2+, and Cd2+, owing to the coordination versatility of the bipyridine ligand. On the other hand, heavier metal cations (with slower ligand exchange kinetics, e.g. Pd2+, Pt2+, Ag+, and Au3+) or those strictly requiring an octahedral coordination geometry (such as Fe2+/3+, Ru2+/3+, and Rh3+) could not be employed for the topological control of htel22-L2a, comprising two bidentate ligands. In NaCl-containing buffer, the topology of htel22-L2a is not clearly identifiable, as the initial structure has characteristics of an antiparallel topology with slight shifts in the minimum from 260 to 280 nm (whether the strand in the presence of sodium forms a mixture of different topologies or an unexpected folding pattern could not be unambiguously characterized). Here, addition of M2+ did not lead to any refolding, as indicated by only minor changes in the CD spectra upon metal addition (SI, Supplementary Fig. S42).

When the bipyridines were not placed within the loops of the sequence but replaced two guanines at positions #4 and #16, a replacement for a natural G-tetrad could be formed as seen for modified sequence htel22-L2b. We therefore left the two guanines of the parental tetrad in positions #8 and #20 unchanged. Due to then only two full G-tetrads being present, this quadruplex always adopts an antiparallel topology, indifferent to either KCl or NaCl in the buffer or the addition of M2+. Here, the two bipyridines already sit in close proximity to each other and are therefore not able to induce any refolding of the structure when coordinating the transition metal cation (Fig. 2B and Supplementary Fig. S43).

The sequences derived from Tetrahymena or the Myc oncogene promoter formed G-quadruplexes of different topologies as shown by their respective CD signatures (SI, Supplementary Figs S44–S47). In the case of ttel24-L2a and ttel24-L2b in potassium-containing buffer, the initially folded structures were more complex as they consist of a mixture of different topologies, not clearly distinguishable. Although these structures did show a partial refolding in presence of M2+ ions, they most likely remained mixtures of topologies. This indicated that metal complexation in this case only slightly affects the equilibria between almost equally populated structures. While in Na+ containing buffer, both ttel24-L2a and -L2b showed no distinct G-quadruplex signature, addition of M2+ cations triggered formation of an antiparallel topology (SI, Supplementary Figs S44 and S45).

The Myc-derived sequences pu22-L2a and -L2b adopt fully parallel topologies with a maximum at 260 nm and a minimum at 240 nm, identical to their parental sequence. Here, neither the addition of M2+ nor the change from K+ to Na+-containing buffer affected the observed structure. This behaviour is in line with their extremely high thermal stabilities (Table 2) as well as the general consideration that—wherever their formation is feasible—parallel G-quadruplexes represent the thermodynamically most favourable topology. Still, the presence of minor bands at ~315 nm in the CD spectra as well as the TDS spectra, together with native mass spectrometry measurements, allowed us also for these constructs to confirm the formation of the bipyridine metal complexes (with Cu2+, Ni2+, and Zn2+) (SI, Supplementary Fig. S46 and S47). Overall, all six sequences tolerated the BiPy-L modification well, successfully folding into G-quadruplex topologies of all three major structural types (or mixtures thereof). Although all six sequences showed successful metal complexation with varying degrees of stabilization, only htel22-L2a showed a metal dependent switching where both accessible states had clearly identifiable topologies, making it the most interesting system for further investigations.

MD simulations

In order to better understand these new bipyridine-modified G-quadruplexes and their assumed topologies, we performed a series of molecular dynamics (MD) simulations for each system. Our goal was to compare the positioning of the BiPy-ligandosides and the corresponding metal complexes and identify potential interactions with other nucleotides (Fig. 3). All systems were run in the Gromacs program with the AMBER force field over 100 ns at 298 K, with 100 mM KCl in a periodic rhombic dodecahedron box with a cutoff at 1.5 nm. All systems reached a stable state within the 100-ns simulation runs, at which root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) values remained consistent. Looking more specifically into the refolding of htel22-L2a, we first compared two starting structures for a hybrid-2 (“3 + 1”) and a hybrid-1 (“1 + 3”) topology in absence of any transition metal cations, modelled on the basis of the experimentally observed CD results (Fig. 3A). For the hybrid-2 structure, the bipyridine located in the first loop was found to stack in between the upper G-tetrad, hovering above G22 and G3 mainly, and the loop thymine T5. The RMSD of this bipyridine ligandoside was ~1.8 Å without strong deviations over 100 ns, indicating low structural flexibility. The distances between the aromatic rings of the ligandoside and the G22, G3, and T5 nucleotides ranged from 3.7 to 4.2 nm, which is well within the region for potential π–π interactions and would explain the slight increase in thermal stability of htel22-L2a over the wild-type sequence (delta Tm = +4°C) (Fig. 3D). The constant RMSD values of the guanines and the backbone, as well as the whole artificial construct, further emphasize the stability of the htel22-L2a system. Interestingly, the bipyridine in the third loop shows an expected flexibility over the first 50 ns, but stabilizes afterwards, seemingly interacting with the neighbouring thymine of T18. We then compared second rounds of MD runs, initiated from various starting structures that were generated through manual alteration of the bipyridine ligand orientations, to check if the obtained structures can be taken as viable representations of the thermodynamic minima. Indeed, the newly obtained structures were found to be very similar to the initially observed ones in that the ligand towards the 5′ end tends to “swing back” and engage in π–π interactions with the G-tetrad and the thymine T5, while the bipyridine ligand towards the 3′ end rotates outwards and does not remain stacked underneath the lower G-tetrad. While the resulting conformations obtained from the starting structure variations are not perfectly superimposable, they are structurally very similar, and it can be assumed that the found arrangement indeed comes close to a reasonable minimum (SI, Supplementary Fig. S75).

Figure 3.

Five panel figure. All panels show G-quadruplex structures obtained from molecular dynamics simulations. Panel A and B show comparison of energies between two topologiesand relative positioning of modifications. Panel C and D show comparison to metal-complexed G-quadruplex. Panel E shows residual mean square deviation of selected G-quadruplex parts during simulation run time.

(A) Comparison of potential energies for the modelled structures for htel22-L2a in either a hybrid-2 (parental starting structure adopted from PDB: 2JPZ) [63] or hybrid-1 (PDB: 2HY9) [64] topology. (B) Closer examination of BiPy-L, positioned in the two different hybrid topologies, reveals π-stacking of the bipyridine unit in the hybrid-2 (3 + 1) structure, absent in hybrid-1 (1 + 3). (C) Models of htel22-L2a in hybrid-2 topology (left) and after refolding into the observed metal-induced antiparallel topology (right). (D) Closer examination of the interactions of BiPy #1 with the G-tetrad and the thymine T6, leading to additional stabiliszation of the metal-free structure (left). In contrast, the bipyridine metal complex does not lie flush with the G-tetrad underneath and shows no additional π-stacking or CH–π interactions with surrounding nucleobases (right). (E) Comparison of RMSD values of individual components of the models for htel22-L2a in the presence and absence of Cu2+ stabilization.

For the alternative hybrid-1 starting structure of htel22-L2a, a more complex situation was encountered. The obtained RMSD values showed an overall stable structure over 100 ns, yet the orientation of the free bipyridine ligands was found to be very different. The first ligandoside is wedged between the G-tetrad and the phosphate backbone in a perpendicular fashion, creating a rather bulged propeller-type loop towards the 5′ end. The bipyridine ligand in the lateral loop towards the 3′ end is oriented away from the G-core and does not stack on top of the upper G-tetrad. Again, altered starting structures were created from the first MD run, able to show that the initially obtained structure was already very close to a robust minimum structure (for details see SI). Comparing the potential energies of the two systems, we obtained a significantly lower value for the 3 + 1 starting topology with Epot = ‒339 091 ± 156 kJ/mol compared to that of the 1 + 3 starting structure at Epot = ‒236 395 ± 82 kJ/mol. While these values can only be taken with caution as a rough basis for an energetic comparison, the number, type, and covalent connectivity of all atoms (including the DNA, electrolytes, and solvents) are identical for both modelled systems. We therefore conclude that htel22-L2a in absence of any metal adopts predominantly a hybrid-2 topology in accordance with CD spectroscopic results.

Next, we modelled the antiparallel topology ofhtel22-L2a—as inferred from the experimental results in the presence of a single M2+ cation, chelated by both bipyridine ligands on one side of the G-quadruplex stem. Positions of the individual bipyridine nitrogens coordinating to the metal center where not fixed in space as to allow free flipping of the two bipyridine ligands around the metal center during the simulation run. Restraints where only put on the relative orientation of the nitrogens with respect to the Cu(II) cations to make them obey a square-planar coordination geometry (that would otherwise not be properly kept by the force field approach). The system showed an overall remarkable stability with low RMSD values and only minor changes throughout the 100-ns simulation time. As expected, the ligandosides demonstrated an overall increase in structural stability in the newly formed metal complex, with very low RMSD values. When comparing the backbone flexibility in absence and presence of the metal complex, also an overall RMSD value decrease could be observed, nicely showing the metal-stabilizing effect on the entire G-quadruplex structural dynamics. Overall, the obtained calculation results are thus in accordance with the spectroscopic observations and thermal stability studies.

The modelled structures of the smaller htel22-L2b sequence, adopting an antiparallel basket-type topology, showed a distinct strain within the G-tetrads as the individual guanines are slightly off-plane twisted in a propeller-type arrangement around the central potassium cation. This is potentially caused by additional π–π interactions between the bipyridine ligandosides and the neighbouring nucleobases. The overall antiparallel topology is, however, maintained. In presence of the formed metal complex, the guanines adopt a flatter arrangement towards each other, representing a slightly less distorted G-quadruplex. Interestingly, during the simulation run, the orientation of the biypyridines towards each other changed from an initially expected (and manually modelled) cis orientation to a trans arrangement around the square-planar metal center (SI, Supplementary Figs S73 and S74).

Refolding kinetics

With the possibility of accessing multiple topologies through the formation of the bipyridine metal complexes in hand, we next wanted to investigate if this process could be induced after a DNA G-quadruplex had already been formed (by thermal annealing) and if the topological switch could be reversed. When 1 eq. of MSO4 (M = Cu, Ni, or Zn) was added to the pre-folded htel22-L2a quadruplex (4 µM DNA concentration, 100 mM KCl-containing HEPES buffer, 25°C), a slow but strong change in the CD signature could indeed be observed, showing the transition into an antiparallel topology after 1.5 h at 25°C (Fig. 4C). We note that this slow process, concomitant with significant changes in the CD spectra, strongly indicates a major refolding of the G-quadruplex (as in alternative cases, where metals bind into an already preorganized ligand environment, CD spectral changes are usually rapid and only of minor extent) [40]. Following this process by decay of the CD band at 260 nm over time and at various temperatures allowed us to identify a first-order reaction as well as determine its kinetic rate constants in the range of 10−3 to 10−4 s−1 (Fig. 4). Through Eyring–Polanyi plot analysis, the activation enthalpy (ΔH), entropy (ΔS), and the Gibbs energy of activation (ΔG) could be determined. A large positive enthalpic contribution of +37.9 kJ∙mol−1 was calculated, likely originating from the loss of stabilizing interactions (H-bonds) during the refolding process. The negative activation entropy of −80.2 J∙K−1∙mol−1 indicates that the system seems to retain a rather organized and folded state throughout the process, which aligns with similarly flexible systems which were described to refold via transitory ensembles without fully unfolding [65].

Figure 4.

Four panel figure. Panel A shows circular dichroism signal decay. Panel B shows Polanyi-Eyring plot. Panel C shows change of circular dicroism spectrum indicating topological change of G-quadruplex. Panel D shows schematic representation of G-quadruplex refolding.

A) Decay of the CD signal of htel22-L2a at 260 nm over 7200 s at 306 K, measured in intervals of 10 s. (B) Eyring–Polanyi plot for the determination of enthalpy and entropy of activation and Gibbs activation energy. (C) CD spectrum of htel22-L2a showcasing the slow refolding from hybrid-2 (red line) to antiparallel topology (green line) upon addition of CuSO4 (grey lines). This process is reversible by ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) addition. For comparison, htel22-L2a annealed directly in presence of Cu2+ (dashed line). (D) Schematic representation of the suggested refolding mechanism, comprising the thermally induced (but low-probability) melting of the hybrid-2 form under slight steady-state population of a partially unfolded state that is then strongly driven to refold into the metal-stabilized, antiparallel product by formation of the chelate complex.

The resulting Gibbs activation energy of 61.8 kJ∙mol−1 at 298.15 K is in good accordance with reported values for other refolding processes of G-quadruplexes [65]. Apparently, refolding of htel22-L2a is eventually driven by the formation of the metal complex, and we suggest a mechanism going through a lowly populated, partially unfolded intermediate as depicted in Fig. 4D. The formation of the metal complexes (with Cu2+, Ni2+, and Zn2+) should—according to the typical coordination kinetics of these metals—be fast (103–106 s−1) [66], leaving the actual refolding of the quadruplex as rate-determining step, which is also demonstrated by the DNA concentration-dependent first-order kinetics observed for the process. Furthermore, when comparing the impact of the different metals, no large differences could be observed (SI, Supplementary Figs S76 and S77; Supplementary Tables S3 and S4). In order to revert the now antiparallel htel22-L2a quadruplex into its starting hybrid structure, metal decomplexation was tested. Although EDTA shows exceptionally large binding affinities for many transition metals [67, 68], the DNA-confined bipyridine complex showed to be stable to metal de-coordination after addition of up to 2 eq. of EDTA for 12 h. Only after 4 eq. of EDTA was added, a slow change of the CD signature was observed, leading to the reconstitution of the hybrid topology of htel22-L2a after 24 h (SI, Supplementary Figs S78 and S79). We additionally showed that refolding can occur undisturbed in presence of other chelating reagents such as spermin (SI, Supplementary Fig. S81).

Refolding under molecular crowding conditions

With these modified systems in hand, both capable of switching topologies as well as being stabilized by the formation of the bipyridine metal complexes, we then set out to explore them in a more biological context and solvation environment. The cellular environment is much more densely packed, with other bio- and small molecules exerting a crowding effect on the DNA, when compared to isolated in vitro conditions containing only water, buffer, and metal ions. For this reason, we first studied the system under molecular crowding conditions using PEG200, a common reagent capable of mimicking a cellular environment and known to have an impact on G-quadruplex topologies [17, 69]. When annealed in increasing concentrations of PEG200 (0%–40% w/t), the sequenceshtel22-L2a and htel22-L2b showed different behaviours (Fig. 5).

Figure 5.

Panel A shows circular dichroism spectra of G-quadruplex and change thereof through addition of polyethylene glycol 200. Panel B shows change of three selected wavelengths of circular dichroism spectra.

(A) CD spectra of htel22-L2a in increasing concentration of molecular crowding reagent PEG200 (10%–40%). PEG200 induces an earlier and stronger refolding of htel22-L2a into a parallel topology when not stabilized by the metal complex, as indicated most prominently by the CD signal at 290 nm. (B) Change of CD signal intensities of htel22-L2a in the absence and presence of Ni2+ at various wavelengths with increasing PEG200 concentration.

While htel22-L2a in the absence of stabilizing M2+ ions quickly refolds into a fully parallel G-quadruplex upon PEG addition, the samples in the presence of M2+ ions did not refold from antiparallel to parallel before the addition of up to 20% PEG200. Only after further increasing the PEG200 content did a change became noticeable. In the optical spectra, a large shoulder at 290 nm is still observable even at 40% PEG200, indicating an incomplete topological switch of the M2+-stabilized htel22-L2a quadruplex by the molecular crowding reagent (Fig. 5A and B).

PEG200 had an overall destabilizing impact on htel22-L2a without divalent cations, lowering its melting temperature by ΔTm = –13 K with 20% PEG200 and by ΔTm = –16 K at 30% PEG200, where a second higher melting point at Tm = 82°C could be observed, likely representative of the now parallel G-quadruplex. PEG200 had no large effect on the M2+-stabilized structures, independent of the concentration, lowering their melting temperatures by just ΔTm = 1–2 K. No melting profile could be obtained for samples containing 40% PEG200. In contrast to this, htel22-L2b, incapable of adopting another topology, remains fully antiparallel even up to 40% PEG200 in the solution, either in presence or absence of stabilizing M2+ ions (Supplementary Fig. S80). This is comparable to similar G-quadruplexes, like those derived from TBA, where no refolding was observed [40]. Only small changes can be observed in the corresponding CD signatures, yet these do not indicate any major structural refolding.

Transfection of G4s into living cells

Our long-term goal is to develop highly stabilized G-quadruplexes that can serve as potential ‘decoys’ for the cellular sensing and modulating of protein-quadruplex interactions. Towards this aim, and considering the high stability of the metal-stabilized G-quadruplexes herein reported, we sought to investigate their behaviour within a cellular environment, i.e. by establishing their cellular uptake, stability, potential toxicity, and localization within living cells by fluorescence microscopy. For this purpose, DNA oligonucleotides htel22-L2a and -L2b (carrying additional modifications as outlined below, Supplementary Figs S48–S51) were transfected into two human cancer cells lines, HeLa and U2OS. The modifications included either a single fluorescein (FAM) fluorescent label on the 5′-end of the oligonucleotide strand or a double fluorescent labelling with FAM and a cyanine-3 (Cy3) on the 5′- and 3′-ends, respectively, to perform FRET experiments to reveal the folding state.

Before conducting any imaging studies, it was first necessary to establish the viability of the cells in the presence of the modified G-quadruplexes (as indicated earlier, htel22-L2a and htel22-L2b were selected) under different conditions (i.e. with/without coordinated Ni2+ or Zn2+, and lipofectamine). To this aim, MTS assays were performed with U2OS and HeLa cells incubated with different concentrations of the oligonucleotides (with/without Cu2+, Ni2+, or Zn2+, and lipofectamine). As can be seen in Supplementary Figs S82 and S83, viability was >80% for both cell lines when incubated with 1 μM oligonucleotides (10 μl of a 10 µM oligonucleotide solution added to 100 μl of cells in DMEM media; final oligonucleotide concentration 1.0 μM) with/without Cu2+, Ni2+, or Zn2+, and lipofectamine. Increasing the concentration to 2 μM led to cell viabilities <80% (in some cases as low as 50%), and therefore it was decided to use 1 μM for subsequent studies since this provided high enough fluorescence signal to be easily detected by microscopy and good cell viability. The observed toxicity is well within the realm of oligonucleotide systems of similar molecular weight or nucleotide length reported for human cancer cell lines (SI, Supplementary Figs S82 and S83) [70].

Next, we transfected FAM-labelled oligonucleotides htel22-L2a and -L2b into HeLa and U2OS and followed the process in 96-well plates using an Incucyte® S3 Live Cell imaging system by Sartorius via fluorescence microscopy. Qualitatively, all G-quadruplexes transfected with lipofectamine showed a successful penetration into the cytoplasm, where punctuate formations could be observed in many of the tested conditions, indicating a high local concentration of transfected DNA (SI, Supplementary Figs S84 and S85). The observed fluorescing aggregates could have various origins, ranging from intracellular agglomeration of the polyanionic oligonucleotides together with the polycationic transfecting reagent, endosomal compartmentalization or cytoplasmic aggregation with proteins [7173]. Interestingly, when the modified G-quadruplexes were stabilized by coordination to Ni2+ prior to transfection, a strong nuclear staining could be observed, with only a minor formation of cytoplasmic punctuate objects with high fluorescence intensity (Fig. 6B). In contrast, no comparable nuclear enrichment was observed for the Cu2+ or Zn2+ complexes. In the case of Cu2+, this is likely attributable to quenching of the fluorescent signal, precluding reliable localization. For Zn2+, impaired nuclear uptake of the metalated construct may be responsible, though the underlying mechanism remains to be established. The question may arise whether one exclude partial unfolding under intracellular conditions and that aggregation could then result from DNA crosslinking via inter-strand metal-bipyridine complex formation. To this end, inspection of the MD structures indicates that the intact G-quadruplex assemblies rather sequester the bipyridine complexes within a pocket created by the loop region, rendering the invasion of a bipyridine from a neighbouring strand unlikely. Furthermore, in vitro CD spectroscopic data provided no evidence for unfolding/crosslinking upon metal complexation, and native ESI-MS experiments show that the metalated constructs exist as discrete monomeric species in solution without evidence of higher-order intermolecular assemblies (SI, Supplementary Figs S29–S41). Also, native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis experiments at high concentration showed no evidence of high-order species forming (SI, Supplementary Fig. S89).

Figure 6.

Panel A shows green fluorescence count under varying conditions. Panel B shows fluorescence microscopy images of transfected G-quadruplexes.

(A) Plot of recorded fluorescence of FAM-labelled, ligand-modified G-quadruplexes (in absence or presence of divalent metal cations) over time after transfection into U2OS cells, indicating a maximum yield of transfection after 16–24 h. (B) Confocal fluorescence microscopy images of transfected htel22-L2a in presence or absence of Ni2+. Localization of the Ni2+-stabilized G-quadruplex to the nucleus was found to be enhanced. No entering of the nucleoli could be observed.

As shown in in previous sections, the Ni2+-bound quadruplexes show high stability under in vitro conditions. To investigate if this also holds true under cellular conditions, we transfected the double fluorescently labelled oligonucleotide strands of htel22-L2a and -L2b, bearing a FAM donor and a Cy3 acceptor, thus creating a FRET pair (Fig. 7A). When these modified oligonucleotides fold into a G-quadruplex, donor and acceptor fluorophores are in close proximity and hence show a high FRET efficiency (SI, Supplementary Fig. S87). We then transfected the modified htel22-L2a and -L2b sequences, pre-annealed in absence or presence of Ni2+, into U2OS cells (Fig. 7B). By plotting the counts of individual intensities (max intensity value: 255) from the nucleus, we created a histogram of the two emission wavelengths for the donor FAM and the acceptor Cy3 (see Fig. 7C). Overall htel22-L2a shows FAM donor emission with extremely low intensity (<5) both in presence and absence of Ni2+. The Cy3 acceptor emission intensity increased from a mean value of 20–44 when the G-quadruplex was stabilized with Ni2+, yet a lower maximum count was concomitant, which can be due to the quenching by the transition metal (see SI, Supplementary Fig. S86–S88). We conclude, however, that htel22-L2a remains partially folded even in the absence of Ni2+ and is further stabilized, as shown in vitro, by the metal, leading to a substantial FRET effect. The case is similar for htel22-L2b, where FAM donor fluorescence does not decrease in presence of Ni2+ but shows higher intensities (<10) than inhtel22-L2a. A slight increase in FAM donor emission can originate from the increased stabilization and better cellular transfection of the metal-complexed structures, as has been shown for the singly fluorescently labelled G-quadruplexes (see Fig. 6). Contrary to the previous strand, Cy3 acceptor fluorescence shows very low intensities in absence of Ni2+ (<5) for htel22-L2b, indicating that the G-quadruplex was either transfected improperly due to the lacking stabilization of Ni2+ or is unfolded in its absence. Similarly, we see that the metal-stabilized G-quadruplex shows an increased Cy3 donor fluorescence (with a mean value of 20). Again, partial quenching due to the involvement of the Ni2+ cations in the FRET process may explain a lower count.

Figure 7.

Three panel figure. Panel A shows schematic representation of Förster resonance energy transfer effect in G-quadruplexes. Panel B shows fluorescence microscopy images. Panel C shows quantified fluorescence intensity of microscopy images.

(A) Schematic representation of the FRET experiments. Low FRET efficiency is observed when the G-quadruplex is unfolded as donor and acceptor are further away. High FRET efficiency is observed when the G-quadruplex is folded as donor and acceptor are in close proximity. (B) Fluorescence microscopy of U2OS cells transfected with either htel22-L2a or htel22-L2b (without and with Ni2+). Images show filters applied for the individual fluorophores (FAM 520 nm, Cy3 595 nm) as well as overlay with the brightfield image (excitation wavelength corresponding to the excitation maximum of FAM donor, 495 nm). (C) Counts of fluorescence intensities of FAM and Cy3 fluorophores of htel22-L2a and -L2b (without and with Ni2+).

Conclusions

Taken together, we were successful in the implementation of a novel artificial ligandoside capable of forming transition metal complexes in DNA that not only affect the thermal stability of the resulting G-quadruplexes but can alter their respective topologies dynamically. We demonstrate the structural dependence of ligandoside placement and how positioning them within loops versus the G-core affects folding and stability. A clear metal-dependant topology switching from a hybrid to an antiparallel form was established. MD simulations support the experimental observation made for the different G-quadruplex topologies and give helpful structural insights. We further show that metal-triggered refolding of these structures withstands adverse molecular crowding conditions. Initial studies demonstrate that these functionalized G-quadruplexes can be transfected into live cells and that they most likely remain folded. Interestingly, coordination to Ni2+ improves transfection and nuclear localization of the modified G-quadruplexes. This paves the way for further applications of these biohybrid G-quadruplex constructs as potential interaction partners for proteins, acting as robust molecular decoys capable of binding to targets involved in certain diseases and serving as diagnostic probes. Our upcoming studies will focus on (i) the further development of minimal size/structure-impacting modifications to stick as close to wild-type loop and G-stack structures as possible, (ii) the screening for protein binding by libraries of such modified G4s, and (iii) the triggering biological responses by robust, metal-stabilized G-quadruplex constructs.

Supplementary Material

gkag738_Supplemental_File

Acknowledgements

Dedicated to Prof. Dr Bernhard Lippert on the occasion of his 80th birthday.

Author contributions: Armin Durmisevic: conceptualization, compound synthesis, DNA experiments, cell and microscopy studies, data analysis, and manuscript preparation. Joseph Openy: MD simulations and data analysis. Aatikah Majid: cell and microscopy studies and data analysis. Mrunal Nanda: compound synthesis, DNA experiments, and data analysis. Ramon Vilar: conceptualization, data analysis, and manuscript preparation. Guido Clever: project lead, conceptualization, data analysis, and manuscript preparation.

Contributor Information

Armin Durmisevic, Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, TU Dortmund University, Otto-Hahn Str. 6, 44227 Dortmund, Germany.

Joseph Openy, Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, TU Dortmund University, Otto-Hahn Str. 6, 44227 Dortmund, Germany.

Aatikah Majid, Molecular Sciences Research Hub, Department of Chemistry, Imperial College London, 82 Wood Lane, London W12 0BZ, United Kingdom.

Mrunal Nanda, Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, TU Dortmund University, Otto-Hahn Str. 6, 44227 Dortmund, Germany; Department of Biochemistry, University of Winsconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, United States.

Ramon Vilar, Molecular Sciences Research Hub, Department of Chemistry, Imperial College London, 82 Wood Lane, London W12 0BZ, United Kingdom.

Guido H Clever, Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, TU Dortmund University, Otto-Hahn Str. 6, 44227 Dortmund, Germany.

Supplementary data

Supplementary data is available at NAR online.

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Funding

This work was financed by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany’s Excellence Strategy EXC2033, project number 390677874 (“RESOLV”), by the MERCUR project “Synthetic Nucleic Acid Systems” of the Mercator Research Center Ruhr, and was supported by the “Netzwerke 2021” program, an initiative of the Ministry of Culture and Science of the State of North Rhine-Westphalia (CANcer TARgeting, CANTAR, NW21-062C). Funding to pay the Open Access publication charges for this article was provided by TU Dortmund University library OA funds.

Data availability

Data for this article, including NMR and mass spectra, UV-Vis and CD results, and molecular dynamics simulation files, are available at the RESOLVdata repository (https://data.tu-dortmund.de/dataverse/resolv) at https://doi.org/10.17877/RESOLV-2025-MHT5G3K3.

References

  • 1. Choi  J, Majima  T. Conformational changes of non-B DNA. Chem Soc Rev. 2011;40:5893–909. 10.1039/c1cs15153c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Phan  AT. Human telomeric G-quadruplex: structures of DNA and RNA sequences. FEBS J. 2009;277:1107–17. 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07464.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Marchetti  C, Zyner  KG, Ohnmacht  SA  et al.  Targeting multiple effector pathways in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with a G-quadruplex-binding small molecule. J Med Chem. 2018;61:2500–17. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b01781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Burge  S, Parkinson  GN, Hazel  P  et al.  Quadruplex DNA: sequence, topology and structure. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:5402–15. 10.1093/nar/gkl655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Neidle  S. Quadruplex nucleic acids as targets for anticancer therapeutics. Nat Rev Chem. 2017;1:s41570–017-0041. 10.1038/s41570-017-0041. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Zamiri  B, Reddy  K, Macgregor  RB  et al.  TMPyP4 porphyrin distorts RNA G-quadruplex structures of the disease-associated r(GGGGCC)n repeat of the C9orf72 gene and blocks interaction of RNA-binding proteins. J Biol Chem. 2014;289:4653–9. 10.1074/jbc.C113.502336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Su  Z, Zhang  Y, Gendron  TF  et al.  Discovery of a biomarker and lead small molecules to target r(GGGGCC)-associated defects in c9FTD/ALS. Neuron. 2014;83:1043–50. 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.07.041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Fracchioni  G, Vailati  S, Grazioli  M  et al.  Structural unfolding of G-quadruplexes: from small molecules to antisense strategies. Molecules. 2024;29:3488. 10.3390/molecules29153488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Sun  Z-Y, Wang  X-N, Cheng  S-Q  et al.  Developing novel G-quadruplex ligands: from interaction with nucleic acids to interfering with nucleic acid–protein interaction. Molecules. 2019;24:396. 10.3390/molecules24030396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Ghosh  A, Trajkovski  M, Teulade-Fichou  M-P  et al.  Phen-DC3 induces refolding of human telomeric DNA into a chair-type antiparallel G-quadruplex through ligand intercalation. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2022;61:e202207384. 10.1002/anie.202207384. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Yan  MP, Wee  CE, Yen  KP  et al.  G-quadruplex ligands as therapeutic agents against cancer, neurological disorders and viral infections. Future Med Chem. 2023;15:1987–2009. 10.4155/fmc-2023-0202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Karsisiotis  AI, O’Kane  C, da Silva  MW. DNA quadruplex folding formalism—a tutorial on quadruplex topologies. Methods. 2013;64:28–35. 10.1016/j.ymeth.2013.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Webba da Silva  M. Geometric formalism for DNA quadruplex folding. Chem Eur J. 2007;13:9738–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Luo  Y, Živković  ML, Wang  J  et al.  A sodium/potassium switch for G4-prone G/C-rich sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;52:448–61. 10.1093/nar/gkad1073. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Weisz  K. A world beyond double-helical nucleic acids: the structural diversity of tetra-stranded G-quadruplexes. ChemTexts. 2021;7:25. 10.1007/s40828-021-00150-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Zheng  K, Chen  Z, Hao  Y  et al.  Molecular crowding creates an essential environment for the formation of stable G-quadruplexes in long double-stranded DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:327–38. 10.1093/nar/gkp898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Miyoshi  D, Nakao  A, Sugimoto  N. Molecular crowding regulates the structural switch of the DNA G-quadruplex. Biochemistry. 2002;41:15017–24. 10.1021/bi020412f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Vorlíčková  M, Kejnovská  I, Bednářová  K  et al.  Circular dichroism spectroscopy of DNA: from duplexes to quadruplexes: CD spectroscopy of DNA. Chirality. 2012;24:691–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Randazzo  A, Spada  GP, da Silva  MW. Quadruplex nucleic acids—circular dichrosim of quadruplex structures. Top Curr Chem. 2012;330:67–86. [Google Scholar]
  • 20. del Villar-Guerra  R, Gray  RD, Chaires  JB. Characterization of quadruplex DNA structure by circular dichroism. Curr Protoc Nucleic Acid Chem. 2017;68:17.8.1–17.8.16. [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Brázda  V, Hároníková  L, Liao  J  et al.  DNA and RNA quadruplex-binding proteins. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;15:17493–517. 10.3390/ijms151017493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Zhang  X, Spiegel  J, Cuesta  SM  et al.  Chemical profiling of DNA G-quadruplex-interacting proteins in live cells. Nat Chem. 2021;13:626–33. 10.1038/s41557-021-00736-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Spiegel  J, Cuesta  SM, Adhikari  S  et al.  G-quadruplexes are transcription factor binding hubs in human chromatin. Genome Biol. 2021;22:117. 10.1186/s13059-021-02324-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Bryan  TM, Jarstfer  MB. Interrogation of G-quadruplex–protein interactions. Methods. 2007;43:332–9. 10.1016/j.ymeth.2007.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Fry  M. Tetraplex DNA and its interacting proteins. Front Biosci. 2007;12:4336. 10.2741/2391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Meier-Stephenson  V. G4-quadruplex-binding proteins: review and insights into selectivity. Biophysical Rev. 2022;14:635–54. [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Müller  J. Nucleic acid duplexes with metal-mediated base pairs and their structures. Coord Chem Rev. 2019;393:37–47. [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Naskar  S, Guha  R, Müller  J. Metal-modified nucleic acids: metal-mediated base pairs, triples and tetrads. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2019;59:1397–406. 10.1002/anie.201905913. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Tanaka  K, Yamada  Y, Shionoya  M. Formation of silver(I)-mediated DNA duplex and triplex through an alternative base pair of pyridine nucleobases. J Am Chem Soc. 2002;124:8802–3. 10.1021/ja020510o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Ihara  T, Ishii  T, Araki  N  et al.  Silver ion unusually stabilizes the structure of a parallel-motif DNA triplex. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:3826–7. 10.1021/ja809702n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Takezawa  Y, Maeda  W, Tanaka  K  et al.  Discrete self-assembly of iron(III) ions inside triple-stranded artificial DNA. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2009;48:1081–4. 10.1002/anie.200804654. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Megger  N, Welte  L, Zamora  F  et al.  Metal-mediated aggregation of DNA comprising 2,2′-bipyridine nucleoside, an asymmetrically substituted chiral bidentate ligand. Dalton Trans. 2011;40:1802–7. 10.1039/c0dt01569e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Düpre  N, Welte  L, Gómez-Herrero  J  et al.  Bipyridine-modified oligonucleotides: aggregation in the presence of metal ions. Inorg Chim Acta. 2009;362:985–92. [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Duprey  JHA, Takezawa  Y, Shionoya  M. Metal-locked DNA three-way junction. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2013;52:1212–6. 10.1002/anie.201207338. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Takezawa  Y, Yoneda  S, Duprey  J-LHA  et al.  Metal-responsive structural transformation between artificial DNA duplexes and three-way junctions. Chem Sci. 2016;7:3006–10. 10.1039/C6SC00383D. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Stubinitzky  C, Bijeljanin  A, Antusch  L  et al.  Bifunctional DNA architectonics: three-way junctions with sticky perylene bisimide caps and a central metal lock. Chemistry A European J. 2014;20:12009–14. 10.1002/chem.201402956. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Smith  NM, Amrane  S, Rosu  F  et al.  Mercury–thymine interaction with a chair type G-quadruplex architecture Chem. Commun. 2012;48:11464–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Withers  JM, Telfer  SG, Filichev  VV. Towards metal-mediated G-quartet analogues: 1,2,4-triazole nucleotides. Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids. 2015;34:277–88. 10.1080/15257770.2014.990156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Miyoshi  D, Karimata  H, Wang  Z-M  et al.  Artificial G-wire switch with 2,2′-bipyridine units responsive to divalent metal ions. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:5919–25. 10.1021/ja068707u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Engelhard  DM, Nowack  J, Clever  GH. Copper-induced topology switching and thrombin inhibition with telomeric DNA G-quadruplexes. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2017;56:11640–4. 10.1002/anie.201705724. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Punt  PM, Clever  GH. Imidazole-modified G-quadruplex DNA as metal-triggered peroxidase. Chem Sci. 2019;10:2513–8. 10.1039/C8SC05020A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Engelhard  DM, Pievo  R, Clever  GH. Reversible stabilization of transition-metal-binding DNA G-quadruplexes. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2013;52:12843–7. 10.1002/anie.201307594. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Engelhard  DM, Stratmann  LM, Clever  GH. Structure–property relationships in CuII-binding tetramolecular G-quadruplex DNA. Chemistry A European J. 2018;24:2117–25. 10.1002/chem.201703409. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Punt  PM, Clever  GH. Tailored transition-metal coordination environments in imidazole-modified DNA G-quadruplexes. Chemistry A European J. 2019;25:13987–93. 10.1002/chem.201903445. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Stratmann  LM, Kutin  Y, Kasanmascheff  M  et al.  Precise distance measurements in DNA G-quadruplex dimers and sandwich complexes by pulsed dipolar EPR spectroscopy. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2021;60:4939–47. 10.1002/anie.202008618. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Punt  PM, Langenberg  MD, Altan  O  et al.  Modular design of G-quadruplex metalloDNAzymes for catalytic C–C bond formations with switchable enantioselectivity. J Am Chem Soc. 2021;143:3555–61. 10.1021/jacs.0c13251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Engelhard  DM, Meyer  A, Berndhäuser  A  et al.  Di-copper(II) DNA G-quadruplexes as EPR distance rulers. Chem Commun. 2018;54:7455–8. 10.1039/C8CC04053B. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Zhang  L, Peritz  A, Meggers  E. A simple glycol nucleic acid. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:4174–5. 10.1021/ja042564z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Yang  H, Rys  AZ, McLaughlin  CK  et al.  Templated ligand environments for the selective incorporation of different metals into DNA. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2009;48:9919–23. 10.1002/anie.200904186. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Pereira  FA, Clever  GH. DNA incorporation of a trans-chelating bis-pyridyl ligand for square-planar coordinated metal cations. Inorg Chim Acta. 2016;452:188–93. 10.1016/j.ica.2016.04.024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Switzer  C, Sinha  S, Kim  PH  et al.  A purine-like nickel(II) base pair for DNA. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2005;44:1529–32. 10.1002/anie.200462047. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Weizman  H, Tor  Y. 2,2′-Bipyridine ligandoside: a novel building block for modifying DNA with intra-duplex metal complexes. J Am Chem Soc. 2001;123:3375–6. 10.1021/ja005785n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Pronk  S, Páll  S, Schulz  R  et al.  GROMACS 4.5: a high-throughput and highly parallel open source molecular simulation toolkit. Bioinformatics. 2013;29,845–54. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Hess  B, Bekker  H, Berendsen  HJC  et al.  LINCS: a linear constraint solver for molecular simulations. J Comput Chem. 1997;18:1463–72. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(199709)18:12<1463::AID-JCC4>3.0.CO;2-H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Spoel  DVD, Lindahl  E, Hess  B  et al.  GROMACS: fast, flexible, and free. J Comput Chem. 2005;26:1701–18. 10.1002/jcc.20291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Ivani  I, Dans  PD, Noy  A  et al.  Parmbsc1: a refined force field for DNA simulations. Nat Methods. 2016;13:55–8. 10.1038/nmeth.3658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Wang  J, Wolf  RM, Caldwell  JW  et al.  Development and testing of a general amber force field. J Comput Chem. 2004;25:1157–74. 10.1002/jcc.20035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Schumann  SL, Kotnig  S, Kutin  Y  et al.  Structure and flexibility of copper-modified DNA G-quadruplexes investigated by 19F ENDOR experiments at 34 GHz. Chemistry A European J. 2023;29:e202302527. 10.1002/chem.202302527. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Mergny  J-L, Cian  AD, Ghelab  A  et al.  Kinetics of tetramolecular quadruplexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:81–94. 10.1093/nar/gki148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Beseiso  D, Chen  EV, McCarthy  SE  et al.  The first crystal structures of hybrid and parallel four-tetrad intramolecular G-quadruplexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50:2959–72. 10.1093/nar/gkac091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Prislan  I, Lah  J, Vesnaver  G. Diverse polymorphism of G-quadruplexes as a kinetic phenomenon. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:14161–9. 10.1021/ja8026604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Sproviero  M, Fadock  KL, Witham  AA  et al.  Positional impact of fluorescently modified G-tetrads within polymorphic human telomeric G-quadruplex structures. ACS Chem Biol. 2015;10:1311–8. 10.1021/cb5009926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Dai  J, Carver  M, Punchihewa  C  et al.  Structure of the hybrid-2 type intramolecular human telomeric G-quadruplex in K+ solution: insights into structure polymorphism of the human telomeric sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:4927–40. 10.1093/nar/gkm522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Dai  J, Punchihewa  C, Ambrus  A  et al.  Structure of the intramolecular human telomeric G-quadruplex in potassium solution: a novel adenine triple formation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:2440–50. 10.1093/nar/gkm009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Grün  JT, Blümler  A, Burkhart  I  et al.  Unraveling the kinetics of spare-tire DNA G-quadruplex folding. J Am Chem Soc. 2021;143:6185–93. 10.1021/jacs.1c01089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Pearson  RG, Ellgen  P. Rates and mechanism of formation of some nickel(II) complexes in methanol. Inorg Chem. 1967;6:1379–85. 10.1021/ic50053a021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Schilling  K, Ujueta  F, Gao  S  et al.  Pharmacokinetics of metal excretion following different doses of sodium EDTA infusion. Metallomics. 2025;17:mfaf010. 10.1093/mtomcs/mfaf010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Waters  RS, Bryden  NA, Patterson  KY  et al.  EDTA chelation effects on urinary losses of cadmium, calcium, chromium, cobalt, copper, lead, magnesium, and zinc. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2001;83:207–21. 10.1385/BTER:83:3:207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Nishio  M, Tsukakoshi  K, Ikebukuro  K  et al.  Flexible conformational changes by cations, pH, crowding and its applications to biosensing. Biosens Bioelectron. 2021;178:113030. 10.1016/j.bios.2021.113030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Yin  DL, Pu  L, Pei  G. Antisense oligonucleotide to insulin-like growth factor II induces apoptosis in human ovarian cancer AO cell line. Cell Res. 1998;8:159–65. 10.1038/cr.1998.16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Greitens  C, Leroux  J-C, Burger  M. The intracellular visualization of exogenous DNA in fluorescence microscopy. Drug Deliv and Transl Res. 2024;14:2242–61. 10.1007/s13346-024-01563-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Flynn  LL, Li  R, Aung-Htut  MT  et al.  Interaction of modified oligonucleotides with nuclear proteins, formation of novel nuclear structures and sequence-independent effects on RNA processing. bioRxiv, 10.1101/446773, 04 march 2019, preprint; not peer reviewed.. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Flynn  LL, Li  R, Pitout  IL  et al.  Single-stranded fully modified-phosphorothioate oligonucleotides can induce structured nuclear inclusions, alter nuclear protein localization and disturb the transcriptome in vitro. Front Genet. 2022;13:791416. 10.3389/fgene.2022.791416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

gkag738_Supplemental_File

Data Availability Statement

Data for this article, including NMR and mass spectra, UV-Vis and CD results, and molecular dynamics simulation files, are available at the RESOLVdata repository (https://data.tu-dortmund.de/dataverse/resolv) at https://doi.org/10.17877/RESOLV-2025-MHT5G3K3.


Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES