Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2026 May 22;16:23428. doi: 10.1038/s41598-026-50539-6

Performance evaluation of DF-based cooperative DCSK for next-generation wireless networks

Maiss M Al-Khasawneh 1, Mamoun F Al-Mistarihi 1, Moawiah Alhulayil 2,✉, Mohammed M Alammar 3
PMCID: PMC13408593  PMID: 42173933

Abstract

Differential chaos shift keying (DCSK) is a non-coherent modulation technique that has attracted attention for communication over fading channels. This paper investigates the performance of a cooperative DCSK system employing decode-and-forward (DF) relaying over Rayleigh and Nakagami-m fading environments. Analytical expressions are developed for outage probability and average-capacity evaluation, while the bit error performance is examined through an analytical treatment supported by Monte Carlo simulation. The analysis shows that the Nakagami-m fading parameter has a clear impact on system performance, where less severe fading leads to improved reliability. The results also indicate that the relay-destination link plays an important role in the cooperative gain achieved by the considered system. The contribution of the paper is presented within the scope of the adopted two-user DF cooperative DCSK model and the corresponding analytical assumptions. Therefore, the reported findings should be interpreted as an analytical and numerical characterization of the studied framework under the specified channel conditions.

Subject terms: Engineering, Mathematics and computing

Introduction

Wireless communication performance is heavily affected by signal distortions like multipath fading and intersymbol interference (ISI), which are common in real-world propagation scenarios1,2. Multipath fading arises when transmitted signals arrive at the receiver through multiple paths of varying delays, amplitudes, and phases, resulting in destructive or constructive interference that degrades signal quality3–7.

To mitigate these impairments, diversity techniques have become an essential design element in modern wireless systems. Among them, multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) systems offer improved link reliability and capacity by leveraging spatial diversity using multiple antennas at both ends of the communication link8–10. However, in scenarios constrained by hardware size, cost, and power, for applications involving wireless sensor networks (WSNs) and Internet of Things (IoT)-enabled systems, MIMO implementations may be infeasible.

To address these limitations, cooperative communication has emerged as a scalable alternative. In cooperative diversity, single-antenna nodes collaborate by relaying each other’s messages, effectively creating a virtual MIMO system11–13. This approach improves reliability and performance under fading conditions without requiring additional antenna hardware. Common cooperative strategies such as amplify-and-forward (AF) and decode-and-forward (DF) are widely adopted to support these operations14–18.

Recent research has explored the integration of chaos-based modulation techniques, especially differential chaos shift keying (DCSK), within cooperative systems. Chaotic signals exhibit broadband spectra, are non-periodic, and are highly sensitive to initial conditions, which has motivated their use in interference-resilient communication studies19–22. DCSK, in particular, is valued for its simplicity and robustness since it operates without the need for channel estimation or synchronization with the carrier signal23,24.

Although cooperative DCSK systems have been investigated to some extent, their behavior under practical multipath fading environments warrants further analysis. Fading, influenced by environmental scattering, shadowing, and mobility, introduces amplitude and phase fluctuations in the received signal. While coherent modulation schemes suffer from phase tracking errors, non-coherent schemes like DCSK primarily contend with envelope fading25–28. On the other hand, fading channels are further categorized based on time and frequency selectivity. Slow and fast fading are characterized by the channel’s coherence time and doppler spread. In contrast, the nature of the channel, flat or frequency-selective, is governed by its coherence bandwidth and delay spread characteristics29–33. Rayleigh fading is commonly used to model scenarios where the line-of-sight (LOS) signal is either weak or completely obstructed, while Nakagami-Inline graphic fading offers flexibility through a shape parameter Inline graphic and includes Rayleigh fading as a limiting scenario when the fading parameter is equal to one34–41.

The combination of cooperative communication and DCSK modulation has been examined in several prior studies under different channel assumptions and system configurations. The discussion below focuses on the studies most directly related to the considered cooperative DCSK framework, particularly under Rayleigh and Nakagami-m fading channels.

Cooperative DCSK systems have been examined under different channel settings and cooperation structures. Proposed42 a two-user DCSK cooperative communication system with decode-and-forward relaying and analyzed its bit error performance over multipath Rayleigh fading channels. Extended43 the cooperative DCSK framework to a multiple-access setting over Nakagami-m fading channels and provided BEP and throughput analysis. Investigated44 the bit error probability of a two-user DCSK cooperative communication system over Nakagami-m fading channels and examined the influence of fading severity on the resulting performance. In a broader extension,45 studied DCSK MIMO relay cooperative diversity under Nakagami-m fading and generalized Gaussian noise, with analytical error-rate results for multiple relaying protocols. Since these studies differ in system structure, channel assumptions, and analytical emphasis, a comparative summary is provided in Table 1.

Table 1.

Comparison of the present study with selected prior works on cooperative DCSK systems.

Refs. Primary focus System/scenario Fading model Analyzed
metrics
Main distinction relative to
this work
42

Two-user cooperative

DCSK performance

Two-user cooperative

DCSK with DF relaying

Multipath Rayleigh BEP

Focused on BEP analysis of a

two-user cooperative DCSK

architecture over multipath

Rayleigh fading, without

addressing outage probability

or average-capacity behavior

43

Multiple-access cooperative

DCSK analysis

Multiple-access

DCSK-CC system

Nakagami-m

BEP and

throughput

Considered a multiple-access

cooperative framework and

emphasized BEP and

throughput, rather than the

fixed two-user setting and

broader combined metric

evaluation considered here

44

BEP evaluation for

cooperative DCSK

Two-user cooperative

DCSK system

Nakagami-m BEP

Focused specifically on BEP

under Nakagami-m fading,

without including outage

probability or average-capacity

analysis

45

MIMO relay cooperative

diversity in DCSK

DCSK MIMO relay

cooperative diversity

Nakagami-m and

generalized Gaussian

noise

BEP

Examined a broader MIMO

relay diversity setting with

multiple relaying protocols,

which differs from the fixed

two-user DF cooperative

DCSK framework considered

in this paper

This

work

Two-user cooperative DCSK

performance study

Fixed two-user DF

cooperative DCSK

Rayleigh and

Nakagami-m

BEP, outage

probability,

and average-

capacity

behavior

Provides a consolidated

analytical and numerical study

of the considered fixed two-

user DF cooperative DCSK

model under the adopted

assumptions

To clarify the position of the present study relative to the most relevant prior contributions, Table 1 summarizes the main differences in terms of system setting, fading model, and analyzed performance metrics, with particular attention to works closely related in topic and analytical scope.

This study investigates the performance of a cooperative two-user DCSK system employing decode-and-forward (DF) relaying over Rayleigh and Nakagami-m fading channels. Rather than claiming a fundamentally new cooperative architecture, the contribution of this work is to provide a unified analytical and numerical treatment of three commonly used performance measures within the considered framework, namely BEP, outage probability, and average-capacity behavior, under the assumptions adopted in the manuscript. Therefore, the presented results should be interpreted as an analytical study of the considered DF-based cooperative DCSK model under the specified channel assumptions, rather than as a universal characterization of all cooperative DCSK systems. For completeness, the basic DCSK transceiver structure used as the basis for the subsequent cooperative system model is briefly recalled next.

The analysis presented in this paper is subject to the modeling assumptions adopted for analytical tractability. In particular, the results are derived for the considered two-user DF cooperative DCSK framework under Rayleigh and Nakagami-m fading conditions and based on the corresponding signal and SNR formulations used throughout the manuscript. Moreover, the present study does not address implementation complexity, protocol overhead, synchronization impairments, hardware constraints, secrecy aspects, or detailed energy-consumption analysis. Therefore, the conclusions of this work should be interpreted within the limits of the adopted analytical model and should not be generalized beyond the considered framework without further investigation.

Figure 1 illustrates a typical DCSK transceiver, which consists of a transmitter and receiver pair. DCSK is a non-coherent modulation scheme that transmits one chaotic reference and one data-modulated signal in each bit duration. The chaotic sequence serves both as a carrier and reference, eliminating the need for synchronization.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Block schematic of a DCSK-based transceiver.

The transmitted signal is represented using orthogonal basis functions Inline graphic and Inline graphic as follows

graphic file with name d33e540.gif 1

with

graphic file with name d33e545.gif 2
graphic file with name d33e549.gif 3

where Inline graphic is a chaotic sequence and Inline graphic is the bit period. At the receiver, a suboptimal decision variable is computed using an autocorrelation detector as follows

graphic file with name d33e563.gif 4

where Inline graphic is the received signal. A positive Inline graphic denotes bit 1, while a negative Inline graphic denotes bit 0.

The main contributions of this study are summarized as follows:

  • A performance study of a two-user cooperative DCSK system over Rayleigh and Nakagami-Inline graphic fading channels within a fixed decode-and-forward relaying framework.

  • Development of analytical results for outage probability and average-capacity evaluation, together with an analytical treatment of BEP under the adopted model assumptions.

  • Verification of the analytical results through Monte Carlo simulation and examination of the effect of fading severity on the considered system behavior.

The structure of the paper is as follows: Section “System model” introduces the system model. Section “Performance analysis” presents the analytical evaluation of performance metrics. Section “Results and discussion” discusses the simulation outcomes and comparative analysis. Lastly, Section “Conclusion and future work” summarizes the key findings and outlines future research directions.

System model

A two-user cooperative framework utilizing differential chaos shift keying (DCSK) is the focus of this investigation, where cooperation is achieved using a DF relay protocol. Each user not only transmits its own signal but also serves as a relay for the other, thus forming a virtual spatial diversity system without the need for multiple antennas. Cooperation occurs in two separate stages, namely the broadcast phase and the cooperation phase, both conducted over frequency-selective channels modeled using Rayleigh or Nakagami-m statistics. To maintain orthogonality between concurrent transmissions, Walsh codes are employed at the signaling level throughout the communication process.

In general, there are two cooperation schemes for communication. In the conventional cooperation protocol, the time is partitioned into odd and even periods. In the broadcast phase (odd time slots), each user transmits its own data, which is received by both the base station and the other user. During the cooperative phase (even time slots), each user forwards the decoded information received from the other to the base station. This configuration helps to improve the overall signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and achieve diversity gains. Alternatively, a space-time cooperation protocol may be used where both the user’s signal and the estimated signal from its partner are transmitted simultaneously using space-time block coding. We consider here a two-user cooperative DCSK system in which both users transmit their own signals and act as decode-and-forward (DF) relays for one another.

The communication process operates over two interleaved time intervals: the odd period (broadcast phase) and the even period (cooperation phase). The detailed transmission process is depicted in Fig.  2.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

System model of two-user cooperative DCSK communication.

The following assumptions are adopted throughout the analysis. The links Inline graphic, Inline graphic, and the inter-user link are assumed statistically independent. Within each link, the multipath components are taken to be independent, while the per-link fading severity is described by the link parameters Inline graphic, Inline graphic, and Inline graphic, respectively. Unless otherwise stated, equal transmit energy is assumed for the two users, and the fading coefficients are considered quasi-static over one DCSK symbol interval. Perfect timing alignment at the decision stage is also assumed so that the analysis can focus on fading-induced performance trends. In addition, the choice Inline graphic is adopted as a tractable representative multipath setting that is consistent with the three-ray DCSK modeling used in several earlier cooperative DCSK studies and allows a compact analytical treatment.

Let Inline graphic, for Inline graphic, denote the transmitted signal from user Inline graphic, and let Inline graphic represent additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) with zero mean and two-sided power spectral density Inline graphic. The base station is denoted by index 0.

The received signals at the base station, user 1, and user 2 during the odd period are represented by Inline graphic, Inline graphic, and Inline graphic, respectively, and are given by

graphic file with name d33e706.gif 5

Each user forwards the other’s decoded data to the base station during the even period. Let Inline graphic denote the signal relayed by user 1 on behalf of user 2, and Inline graphic the signal relayed by user 2 on behalf of user 1. In the cooperation phase, the received signal at the base station is given by

graphic file with name d33e720.gif 6

The wireless channels between nodes are modeled as linear time-invariant multipath channels with impulse responses Inline graphic, given by

graphic file with name d33e729.gif 7

where Inline graphic indicates the number of channel paths due to multipath propagation, and Inline graphic and Inline graphic represent the gain and delay of the Inline graphic-th path between transmitter Inline graphic and receiver Inline graphic, respectively.

During the even period, user 1 uses Inline graphic to decode and reconstruct user 2’s data and transmits it as Inline graphic to the base station. Similarly, user 2 reconstructs user 1’s data from Inline graphic and transmits Inline graphic.

This cooperative transmission strategy improves link reliability through spatial diversity. The present analysis assumes ideal timing alignment at the detector and does not explicitly model synchronization errors, implementation losses, or unequal power allocation. These practical aspects are therefore outside the scope of the current manuscript.

Performance analysis

Channel PDF derivation

To begin the performance analysis, we introduce the probability density function (PDF) used for the equivalent received SNR at the users and at the base station. For analytical tractability, the number of multipath components is fixed to Inline graphic. The channel gains are assumed independent, but not necessarily identically distributed across the three communication links. In the numerical study, Inline graphic, Inline graphic, and Inline graphic denote the per-link Nakagami-Inline graphic parameters of the source–destination, relay–destination, and inter-user links, respectively.

The PDF of each path-level fading coefficient Inline graphic is written as

graphic file with name d33e811.gif 8

where Inline graphic denotes the Gamma function,

graphic file with name d33e820.gif 9

The instantaneous SNR of each path is defined as Inline graphic, with average SNR Inline graphic. Accordingly, the path-level SNR PDF follows the Gamma form

graphic file with name d33e834.gif 10

For compactness, the adopted Nakagami-Inline graphic representation of the equivalent combined SNR is expressed in the generic form

graphic file with name d33e843.gif 11

where Inline graphic, Inline graphic, Inline graphic, and Inline graphic are effective parameters determined by the link fading severities and the corresponding average SNR values. The same functional form is used for the base-station equivalent SNR after combining the odd- and even-phase contributions, namely

graphic file with name d33e865.gif 12

This notation is adopted to keep the subsequent outage and average-capacity derivations compact and to avoid ambiguity between path-level parameters and link-level parameters. “Appendix A” summarizes the corresponding modeling steps.

Bit error probability (BEP)

This subsection derives an analytical lower-bound treatment for the bit error probability (BEP) of the considered DCSK cooperative system under a DF relay protocol and a two-phase cooperation scheme consisting of the broadcast phase and the cooperation phase.

During broadcasting, each user’s transmission is detected by the base station and the peer user. Specifically, the signal from User 1 is received at User 2 as

graphic file with name d33e885.gif 13

User 2 then makes a hard decision to estimate Inline graphic of User 1. The BEP is expressed as

graphic file with name d33e894.gif 14

where Inline graphic is the conditional BEP given instantaneous SNR Inline graphic and Inline graphic is the PDF from Eq. (11).

Given that User 1 transmits a bit ‘1’, the conditional BEP based on the generalized maximum likelihood criterion is expressed as

graphic file with name d33e917.gif 15

Here, Inline graphic and Inline graphic denote the decision metrics (or weighted energies) of User 1 corresponding to the transmission hypotheses of bit ‘0’ and bit ‘1’, respectively. When the chaotic sequence is produced via a logistic map, the conditional BEP becomes

graphic file with name d33e930.gif 16

At the base station, soft decision is applied to the received signals during both phases

graphic file with name d33e935.gif 17
graphic file with name d33e939.gif 18

To obtain a lower-bound characterization of the BEP at the base station, we assume that the even-period weighted energy equals the odd-period weighted energy and that the inter-user channel is perfect, i.e., Inline graphic. Under these idealized assumptions, the resulting expression represents a lower-bound approximation for the considered system rather than an exact BEP expression.

graphic file with name d33e949.gif 19

The lower-bound BEP at the base station is then obtained numerically by substituting Eqs. (12) and (16) into the integral form of Eq. (14). Please refer to “Appendix B” for more details.

Outage probability

Outage probability refers to the likelihood that the instantaneous equivalent SNR, Inline graphic, drops below a specified threshold Inline graphic. It is mathematically represented as

graphic file with name d33e978.gif 20

In the revised manuscript, the Rayleigh case is treated as the special case of the adopted framework obtained when the corresponding Nakagami-Inline graphic parameters are set to unity. Accordingly, the Rayleigh reference curves reported in the results section are obtained by numerical evaluation of Eq. (20) under Inline graphic, rather than by invoking an external closed-form expression.

For the general Nakagami-Inline graphic case, substituting Eqs. (12) into  (20) gives

graphic file with name d33e1007.gif 21

The corresponding numerical reference curves are obtained by evaluating the above integral directly. This presentation avoids unnecessary symbol proliferation and keeps the Rayleigh and Nakagami-Inline graphic cases within one consistent notation.

Average-capacity indicator

To complement the BEP and outage analyses, we consider an average-capacity indicator based on the equivalent received SNR of the studied fading model. This quantity is introduced to compare relative performance trends under different channel conditions. It should be interpreted as an SNR-based information-theoretic reference measure, rather than as the exact achievable spectral efficiency of the full DCSK-CC protocol, since the present analysis does not explicitly account for protocol overhead, reference-signal overhead, or half-duplex time normalization.

For an AWGN channel with bandwidth Inline graphic and received SNR Inline graphic, the instantaneous reference capacity is

graphic file with name d33e1030.gif 22

For a fading channel, the corresponding average-capacity indicator is obtained by averaging Eq. (22) over the SNR distribution,

graphic file with name d33e1038.gif 23

In this work, Eqs. (22) and (23) are used as reference expressions to quantify average-capacity trends associated with the equivalent received SNR. They are not intended to represent a fully normalized spectral-efficiency expression for the complete DCSK-CC transmission protocol. In particular, the present formulation does not explicitly include normalization factors associated with the DCSK reference segment or with the half-duplex broadcast/cooperation time split.

For the Rayleigh case, the numerical reference curves are obtained from Eq. (23) by setting Inline graphic in the adopted equivalent-SNR model. For the general Nakagami-Inline graphic case, substitution of Eq. (12) yields

graphic file with name d33e1066.gif 24

The resulting curves are obtained through direct numerical evaluation of Eq. (24). “Appendix D” summarizes the adopted evaluation steps.

Results and discussion

This section provides a performance assessment of the proposed DCSK-cooperative communication (DCSK-CC) system under different channel fading conditions using Monte Carlo simulations in MATLAB. The simulations assess bit error probability (BEP), outage probability, and the average-capacity indicator under Nakagami-m and Rayleigh fading scenarios. The key parameters adopted for simulation in this study are listed in Table 2. Each result is compared with the corresponding analytical or numerical reference curves to assess the consistency of the theoretical derivations.

Table 2.

Simulation parameters.

Parameter Value/description
Spreading factor (f) 32, 64
Number of Monte Carlo iterations Inline graphic
Modulation type DCSK
SNR range 0–20 dB
Nakagami-m parameters (Inline graphic)

Main discussion focused on 0.5 to 1.5; one legacy

stress-test case with a very small shaping parameter

is retained in the original BEP figures for completeness

Threshold SNR (Inline graphic) 10, 12.5, 15 dB (variable)
Channel types Rayleigh (Inline graphic), Nakagami-m

Figures 3 and 4 depict the lower-bound BEP at the base station over Nakagami-Inline graphic fading channels for spreading factors Inline graphic and Inline graphic, respectively. The close alignment between the numerically evaluated lower-bound curves and the simulation results supports the consistency of the adopted analytical treatment. In the revised discussion, the physically meaningful interpretation is restricted to the standard Nakagami-Inline graphic range, while the smallest shaping-parameter curve retained in the original figure is viewed only as a legacy stress-test case rather than as a standard propagation setting.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Impact of Nakagami-Inline graphic severity on the BEP performance of DCSK-CC with spreading factor Inline graphic.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Impact of Nakagami-Inline graphic severity on the BEP performance of DCSK-CC with spreading factor Inline graphic.

As shown in both figures, increasing the values of the fading parameter Inline graphic for the source-destination (Inline graphic), relay-destination (Inline graphic), and source-relay (Inline graphic) links significantly enhances performance. This improvement is due to the fact that higher Inline graphic values represent less severe fading and better channel conditions, reducing the likelihood of deep fades and enhancing the reliability of signal detection.

In Fig. 4, for instance, at an SNR of 18 dB, the BEP for the uniform case Inline graphic is approximately Inline graphic. When the fading on the source-relay link improves to Inline graphic, the BEP drops to nearly Inline graphic, demonstrating the crucial role of the relay link quality in cooperative systems. When the inter-user link becomes more severe, the cooperative gain decreases noticeably, highlighting the sensitivity of the considered scheme to relay-link reliability.

These results emphasize the importance of channel state variations in the three transmission links and validate that leveraging favorable fading conditions, especially at the relay, can significantly enhance the robustness of DCSK-based cooperative schemes.

For reference, the non-cooperative DCSK counterpart corresponds to retaining only the odd-phase direct contribution, whereas the cooperative model combines odd- and even-phase observations through the equivalent SNR used in the present framework. Under ideal DF relaying, this additional contribution improves the received decision statistic and therefore provides the qualitative benchmark against which the cooperative behavior in Figs. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 should be interpreted. A dedicated quantitative benchmark plot against a non-cooperative or AF-relay alternative is left for future work.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Outage performance of the DCSK-CC system over Rayleigh and Nakagami-Inline graphic fading channels for Inline graphic.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Outage performance of the DCSK-CC system under Rayleigh fading with threshold SNRs Inline graphic and Inline graphic dB.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Outage performance of the DCSK-CC system under Nakagami-Inline graphic fading with threshold SNR values Inline graphic and Inline graphic dB.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

DCSK-CC system outage probability under Nakagami-Inline graphic fading with varying Inline graphic, Inline graphic, and Inline graphic: Effect of link conditions at constant Inline graphic.

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9

Average-capacity indicator of the DCSK-CC framework under Nakagami-Inline graphic fading with Inline graphic and Inline graphic: effect of improved relay-link conditions.

Figure 5 illustrates the outage probability behavior of the proposed system model under Rayleigh fading and under Nakagami-Inline graphic fading with Inline graphic. The nearly identical curves confirm that the adopted Nakagami-Inline graphic model reproduces the Rayleigh reference case when Inline graphic, thereby supporting the internal consistency of the evaluation framework. From a practical perspective, this result highlights that the Nakagami-Inline graphic model can seamlessly adapt to model both severe and moderate fading conditions, making it a versatile tool in analyzing real-world wireless environments. Moreover, it establishes a baseline for comparing the system’s behavior under varying severity levels of channel fading in the subsequent results.

Figure 6 presents the DCSK-CC system’s outage probability performance in a Rayleigh fading scenario for threshold SNR levels of 10, 12.5, and 15 dB. As expected, increasing the threshold leads to a rightward shift of the outage curve, indicating that higher SNR levels are required to avoid outage as the system’s reliability requirement becomes more stringent. This trend reflects a fundamental trade-off in system design: while raising Inline graphic can support higher data rate or quality-of-service targets, it simultaneously increases the likelihood of outage in low-SNR environments. In addition, the close agreement between simulation and numerically evaluated reference results supports the consistency of the adopted outage evaluation.

Figure 7 shows the DCSK-CC outage probability over Nakagami-Inline graphic channels with varying threshold values Inline graphic dB. Similar to the Rayleigh case, increasing Inline graphic shifts the outage curves to the right, indicating stricter reliability requirements. The rapid transition in the outage probability curves highlights how system performance responds to variations in the operating SNR when Nakagami fading is present. This behavior reflects the model’s adaptability to diverse wireless environments, where Inline graphic may be tuned according to service-level agreements or energy constraints. In addition, the close alignment between the numerical reference curves and the simulations supports the robustness of the adopted evaluation framework under more general fading conditions.

Fig. 8 shows the outage probability of the DCSK-CC scheme over Nakagami- fading channels for various combinations of , , and , with a fixed threshold . The results clearly show that increasing the fading parameters leads to lower outage probabilities, as higher values correspond to less severe fading. Notably, the system is particularly sensitive to changes in , the parameter governing the source–relay link. When this link is heavily faded (e.g., ), system performance degrades substantially, underscoring the critical role of a reliable relay path. These findings suggest that enhancing the quality of the relay channel—through diversity schemes, positioning, or power allocation—can yield significant improvements in system reliability.        

Finally, Fig. 9 illustrates the channel capacity of the DCSK-CC scheme operating over Nakagami-Inline graphic fading channels with Inline graphic and Inline graphic, representing a scenario with improved fading conditions on the source–relay link. The numerical reference curve and the simulation results exhibit close agreement within the adopted equivalent-SNR model. As the SNR increases, the average-capacity indicator also increases, reflecting improved signal conditions at the destination. The result should therefore be interpreted as a comparative trend of the adopted indicator, rather than as a fully normalized spectral-efficiency claim for the complete protocol.

Conclusion and future work

This paper investigated a two-user differential chaos shift keying cooperative communication framework with decode-and-forward relaying over Rayleigh and Nakagami-m fading channels. Within the adopted model, outage probability and an average-capacity indicator were evaluated from the equivalent received-SNR formulation, while the bit error probability at the base station was treated through a lower-bound analytical characterization supported by Monte Carlo simulation. The results consistently showed that milder fading conditions improve reliability and that the inter-user link quality has a direct influence on the cooperative gain.

The revised manuscript intentionally limits its conclusions to the analytical setting studied here. In particular, the reported capacity quantity should be interpreted as a comparative indicator based on the equivalent SNR, not as a fully normalized spectral-efficiency expression for the full DCSK-CC protocol. Likewise, the BEP result at the base station is a lower-bound treatment obtained under idealized relay-decoding assumptions.

Overall, the analytical and simulation trends were found to be consistent within the adopted assumptions. Future work should extend the study by including explicit benchmark comparisons with non-cooperative DCSK and alternative relaying strategies, by incorporating synchronization and implementation losses, and by examining broader fading models and protocol-normalized throughput measures.

Acknowledgements

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Research and Graduate Studies at King Khalid University for funding this work through Large Research Project under grant number RGP2/388/46.

Appendix A: Adopted equivalent-SNR PDF representation

For the Nakagami-Inline graphic case, the path-level SNR is modeled by the Gamma distribution

graphic file with name d33e1537.gif 25

After combining the link contributions under the adopted equivalent-SNR model, the resulting base-station PDF is written compactly as

graphic file with name d33e1542.gif 26

This compact notation is used in the main text to keep the outage and average-capacity expressions concise and to avoid ambiguity between path-level and link-level parameters.

Appendix B: Lower-bound BEP evaluation

The conditional BEP adopted in the manuscript is

graphic file with name d33e1552.gif 27

At the base station, a lower-bound treatment is obtained by assuming ideal inter-user decoding and symmetric weighted-energy contributions from the odd and even phases. Under these assumptions, the average BEP is evaluated numerically as

graphic file with name d33e1557.gif 28

This is the quantity used to generate the lower-bound reference curves discussed in the results section.

Appendix C: Outage-probability evaluation

Using the adopted equivalent-SNR PDF in Eq. (26), the outage probability is evaluated from

graphic file with name d33e1570.gif 29

For the Rayleigh case, the same expression is evaluated after setting the corresponding Nakagami-Inline graphic parameters to unity. The numerical reference curves in the manuscript are obtained directly from this integral representation.

Appendix D: Average-capacity indicator evaluation

The average-capacity indicator used in the manuscript is computed as

graphic file with name d33e1584.gif 30

The Rayleigh reference case is again obtained by setting Inline graphic. The reported curves are based on direct numerical evaluation of the above integral and are interpreted comparatively within the equivalent-SNR framework adopted in the paper.

Author contributions

M.M.A.-K. designed the cooperative DCSK system model, carried out the analytical derivations, and performed the numerical evaluation and Monte Carlo simulations. M.F.A.-M. contributed to the technical validation of the mathematical analysis, interpretation of results, and manuscript review and editing, and provided overall supervision. M.A. also prepared the figures and tables and wrote the initial manuscript draft. M.M.A. contributed to interpretation of the results, improved the presentation of the simulation outcomes and discussion, and participated in manuscript revision. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Deanship of Research and Graduate Studies at King Khalid University through Large Research Project (Grant No. RGP2/388/46).

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Tusha, A. & Arslan, H. Interference burden in wireless communications: a comprehensive survey from PHY layer perspective. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor.10.1109/COMST.2024.3487068 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Panić, S. R., Stefanović, M., Anastasov, J. & Spalević, P. Fading and Interference Mitigation in Wireless Communications (CRC Press, 2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sultana, S. F., Sarala, M., Sree, L. S. N. N. & Mallika, S. Designing a multipath Rayleigh fading channel simulator utilizing filtered Gaussian noise method and sum of sinusoidal method. In Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Emerg. Technol. (INCET) 1–9. 10.1109/INCET61516.2024.10593290 (2024).
  • 4.Kalakoti, S., Vashapaka, U. K., Gujjula, M. R., Surasi, H. & Kusuma, S. Study and analysis of OFDM under Rayleigh fading channel using various modulation methods.. Mesop. J. Comput. Sci.10.58496/MJCSC/2023/017 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sudhakar, K., Tejnithish, S., Thirupukal, G. & Arsath Farves, T. S. Next-generation wireless networks: Advancements in hybrid beamforming for massive MIMO systems. In Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Adv. Comput. Technol. (ICoACT) 1–7. 10.1109/ICoACT63339.2025.11004811 (2025).
  • 6.Mohaisen, R., Al-Mistarihi, M. F. & Darabkh, K. A. Outage probability evaluation for relay-based DF cooperative diversity systems with multipath fading channels and non-identical interferers. In Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Recent Adv. Innov. Eng. (ICRAIE) 1–5. 10.1109/ICRAIE51050.2020.9358336 (2020).
  • 7.Mohaisen, R., Al-Mistarihi, M. F. & Darabkh, K. A. Bit-error rate analysis of relay-based DF cooperative diversity systems considering multipath fading channels along with non-identical interferers. In Proc. NAFOSTED Conf. Inf. Comput. Sci. (NICS) 393–398. 10.1109/NICS51282.2020.9335855 (2020).
  • 8.Krstić, D., Petrović, N. & Al-Azzoni, I. Model-driven approach to fading-aware wireless network planning leveraging multiobjective optimization and deep learning. Math. Probl. Eng.2022, 4140522. 10.1155/2022/4140522 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mapa, M. I., Ibarlin, D. K. M. & Arboleda, E. R. Optimizing antenna performance: a review of multiple-input multiple output (MIMO) antenna design techniques. Int. J. Sci. Res. Arch.12, 438–444. 10.30574/ijsra.2024.12.2.1252 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bakhsh, Z. M. et al. Multi-satellite MIMO systems for direct satellite-to-device communications: A survey. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 1–1. 10.1109/COMST.2024.3449430 (2024).
  • 11.Mukherjee, P., Psomas, C. & Krikidis, I. Differential chaos shift keying-based wireless power transfer with nonlinearities. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process.15, 1185–1197. 10.1109/JSTSP.2021.3086734 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mobini, M., Kaddoum, G. & Herceg, M. Design of a SIMO deep learning-based chaos shift keying (DLCSK) communication system. Sensors22, 333. 10.3390/s22010333 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mukherjee, P., Psomas, C. & Krikidis, I. Chaotic waveform-based signal design for noncoherent SWIPT receivers. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun.23, 11831–11846. 10.1109/TWC.2024.3385308 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ahmed, E. & Gharavi, H. Cooperative vehicular networking: a survey. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst.19, 996–1014. 10.1109/TITS.2018.2795381 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Alhulayil, M., Al-Mistarihi, M. F. & Shurman, M. M. Performance analysis of dual-hop AF cognitive relay networks with best selection and interference constraints. Electronics12, 124. 10.3390/electronics12010124 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Nomikos, N., Charalambous, T., Vouyioukas, D., Karagiannidis, G. K. & Wichman, R. Hybrid NOMA/OMA with buffer-aided relay selection in cooperative networks. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process.13, 524–537. 10.1109/JSTSP.2019.2894059 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ahmad, Q. S., Khan, I. U., Khan, M. J., Saeed, S. H. & Kidwai, M. S. A review on cooperative network using NOMA (non-orthogonal multiple access) technique. In Proc. Int. Conf. Comput. Charact. Tech. Eng. Sci. (IC3TES) 1–6. 10.1109/IC3TES62412.2024.10877530 (2024).
  • 18.Ibrahem, L. N., Al-Mistarihi, M. F., Khodeir, M. A., Alhulayil, M. & Darabkh, K. A. Best relay selection strategy in cooperative spectrum sharing framework with mobile-based end user. Appl. Sci.13, 8127. 10.3390/app13148127 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Parkouk, S., Torabi, M. & Shokrollahi, S. Secrecy performance analysis of amplify-and-forward relay cooperative networks with simultaneous wireless information and power transfer. Comput. Commun.193, 365–377. 10.1016/j.comcom.2022.07.020 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sahoo, S. & Kumar, N. Performance analysis of SWIPT-enabled two-way decode-and-forward relay network under - fading. Ann. Telecommun.10.1007/s12243-025-01079-z (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ghous, M. et al. Cooperative power-domain NOMA systems: an overview. Sensors22, 9652. 10.3390/s22249652 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Charitha, M. & Hosur, S. Enhanced BER optimization and jamming resilience in chaos communication systems using MIMO-OFDM and adaptive spreading factors. Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res.15, 23635–23641. 10.48084/etasr.10839 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pappu, C. S. et al. Interference resilient integrated sensing and communication using multiplexed chaos. IEEE Trans. Radar Syst.3, 26–43. 10.1109/TRS.2024.3513293 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Xiao, L. et al. Polarization fading suppression for optical fiber sensing: a review. IEEE Sens. J.22, 8295–8312. 10.1109/JSEN.2022.3161075 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hameed, S. M., Mohammed, J. K. & Abdulsatar, S. M. Performance of adaptive M-PAM modulation for FSO systems based on end-to-end learning. J. Opt.10.1007/s12596-024-01914-x (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hu, C., Lin, Y., Wu, Z., Yang, R. & Bu, X. A noise-tolerant carrier phase recovery method for inter-satellite coherent optical communications. Electronics14, 265. 10.3390/electronics14020265 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Neves, M. S. et al. Carrier-phase recovery for coherent optical systems: algorithms, challenges and solutions. J. Lightwave Technol.42, 1095–1108. 10.1109/JLT.2023.3340010 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zheng, T.-X. et al. Wireless covert communications aided by distributed cooperative jamming over slow fading channels. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun.20, 7026–7039. 10.1109/TWC.2021.3080382 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lavanya, V., Rao, G. S. & Bidikar, B. Fast fading mobile channel modeling for wireless communication. Procedia Comput. Sci.85, 777–781. 10.1016/j.procs.2016.05.265 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Quyen, N. X. & Barlet-Ros, P. Performance of direct-oversampling correlator-type receivers in chaos-based DS-CDMA systems over frequency non-selective fading channels. Wirel. Pers. Commun.95, 4357–4379. 10.1007/s11277-017-4084-8 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Yildiz, M. K., Uyar, F., Kartaloglu, T., Ozbay, E. & Ozdur, I. Distributed sensing using frequency-selective fading. Opt. Express33, 13829–13839. 10.1364/OE.557615 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.He, C. et al. Performance analysis and optimization of DCT-based multicarrier system on frequency-selective fading channels. IEEE Access6, 13075–13089. 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2806318 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Alhulayil, M. et al. Integrated THz/mmWave transmission method for enhanced URLLC communications. IEEE Access13, 62914–62929. 10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3558842 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Liu, R., Zhang, C. & Song, J. Line of sight component identification and positioning in single frequency networks under multipath propagation. IEEE Trans. Broadcast.65, 220–233. 10.1109/TBC.2018.2855662 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 35.López-Fernández, J., Espinosa, P. R., Romero-Jerez, J. M. & López-Martínez, F. J. A fluctuating line-of-sight fading model with double-Rayleigh diffuse scattering. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol.71, 1000–1003. 10.1109/TVT.2021.3131060 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Shankar, P. M. Modeling of fading and shadowing. In Fading and Shadowing in Wireless Systems 299–520. 10.1007/978-3-319-53198-4_4 (Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2017).
  • 37.Gómez-Déniz, E. & Gómez-Déniz, L. A new derivation of the Nakagami-m distribution as a composite of the Rayleigh distribution. Wirel. Netw.30, 3051–3060. 10.1007/s11276-024-03713-5 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Al-Mistarihi, M. F., Mohaisen, R. & Darabkh, K. A. Performance of relay-based decode-and-forward cooperative diversity systems over Rayleigh fading channels with non-identical interferers. IET Commun.13, 3135–3144. 10.1049/iet-com.2019.0129 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Magableh, A. M., Aldalgamouni, T., Badarneh, O., Mumtaz, S. & Muhaidat, S. Performance of non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) systems over -nakagami-m multipath fading channels for 5G and beyond. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol.71, 11615–11623. 10.1109/TVT.2022.3189589 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Shurman, M., Al-Mistarihi, M. F. & Alhulayil, M. Outage probability of dual-hop amplify-and-forward cognitive relay networks under interference power constraints over Nakagami-m fading channels. In 2015 38th Int. Conv. Inf. Commun. Technol., Electron. Microelectron. (MIPRO) 516–520. 10.1109/MIPRO.2015.7160326 (2015).
  • 41.Shurman, M. M., Al-Mistarihi, M. F. & Alhulayil, M. M. Performance analysis of amplify-and-forward cognitive relay networks with interference power constraints over Nakagami-m fading channels. IET Commun.10, 594–605. 10.1049/iet-com.2014.1182 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Xu, W., Wang, L. & Chen, G. Performance of DCSK cooperative communication systems over multipath fading channels. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I, Reg. Pap.58, 196–204. 10.1109/TCSI.2010.2071730 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Fang, Y., Wang, L. & Chen, G. Performance of a multiple-access DCSK-CC system over Nakagami- fading channels. In 2013 IEEE Int. Symp. Circuits Syst. (ISCAS) 277–280. 10.1109/ISCAS.2013.6571836 (2013).
  • 44.Magableh, A. M., Al-Mistarihi, M. F. & Al-Khasawneh, M. M. Performance evaluation of bit error probability in DCSK cooperative communication systems over Nakagami- fading channels. In 2014 IEEE 11th Int. Multi-Conf. Syst., Signals Devices (SSD14) 1–4. 10.1109/SSD.2014.6808776 (2014).
  • 45.Salahat, E. On the performance of DCSK MIMO relay cooperative diversity in Nakagami- and generalized gaussian noise scenarios. In IECON 2016 - 42nd Annu. Conf. IEEE Ind. Electron. Soc. 7203–7207. 10.1109/IECON.2016.7794109 (2016).

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

No datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES