Skip to main content
The Plant Cell logoLink to The Plant Cell
. 2026 Jun 22;38(7):koag192. doi: 10.1093/plcell/koag192

Plasmodesmata display dynamic local and systemic redox responses during plant stress

Niraj Kumar Vishwakarma 1,2, Md Abdur Razzak 3,4,2, Vishnu Mishra 5,6,2, Timothy Chaya 7,8, Jeffrey L Caplan 9,10,11,, Jung-Youn Lee 12,13,14,3,
PMCID: PMC13412043  PMID: 42325167

Abstract

Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) is a potent reactive oxygen species that plays a crucial role as a versatile signaling molecule for cellular function and vitality. Recent experimental evidence indicates that H2O2 affects cell-to-cell communication through plasmodesmata, tiny cytoplasmic nanopores connecting adjacent plant cells. H2O2-dependent systemic signaling has also been reported to involve plasmodesmal function in some contexts, although the dominant routes and messengers underlying rapid long-distance signaling remain under active debate. Nevertheless, direct monitoring of redox dynamics at plasmodesmata in live tissues has remained challenging. In this study, we developed a plasmodesmata-localized HyPer7 (Pd-HyPer7) reporter to investigate H2O2 dynamics at plasmodesmata in response to exogenous redox stressors and plant stresses, including cold and mechanical wounding. Pd-HyPer7 showed response characteristics that differed from the HyPer7 reporters localized to the cytosol, plasma membrane, and chloroplasts under the conditions tested, indicating that redox responses at plasmodesmata are distinguishable from these compartments. Notably, during mechanical wounding, both the cytosol and plasmodesmata showed transient redox responses with broadly similar temporal profiles in local tissues. In systemic tissues, however, the responses were temporally separated, with plasmodesmal oxidation peaking well after the cytosolic response. This timing relationship is consistent with plasmodesmata acting downstream of early systemic wound signaling, rather than simply mirroring cytosolic redox dynamics. Together, our results establish Pd-HyPer7 as a tool for monitoring plasmodesmal redox dynamics and support a model in which plasmodesmata participate in spatially and temporally regulated redox responses during plant stress.

Introduction

A well-orchestrated signal perception, processing, and relay across cellular boundaries is vital to multicellular organisms to grow, develop healthily, and ensure survival and reproduction. This aspect is especially critical for plants given their cellular immobility and sessile lifestyle. As an adaptation, plants have evolved a unique signal relay system through direct intercellular bridges called plasmodesmata. Plasmodesmata are tiny pores that are formed between adjacent cells to facilitate the transport of various types of small diffusible molecules, such as nutrients, ions, and hormones, as well as large mobile molecules including RNAs and proteins. It is now well established that plasmodesmata are highly dynamic channels undergoing rapid changes in their permeability in response to both internal signals and external challenges, as discussed in recent reviews (Sager and Lee 2014; Bayer and Benitez-Alfonso 2024; Tee and Faulkner 2024; Zanini and Burch-Smith 2024). Accumulating evidence also indicates that the dynamic responses at the plasmodesmata are enabled by regulatory mechanisms that integrate plasmodesmata with cellular signaling cascades to bring about coordinated responses across cellular boundaries, not only locally among adjacent cells, but also systemically throughout the whole plant body (Lee et al. 2011; Wang et al. 2011, 2023; Faulkner et al. 2013; Cui and Lee 2016; Lim et al. 2016; Sager et al. 2020; Tee et al. 2023; Li et al. 2024). Given their central role in plant-wide communication, it is not surprising that perturbation of plasmodesmal regulation results in loss of adaptive responses.

Among the various cellular signaling molecules, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) emerged as a key molecule crucial for establishing systemic acclimation to abiotic stress in plants (Petrov and Van Breusegem 2012; Mignolet-Spruyt et al. 2016; Sies 2017; Waszczak et al. 2018). H2O2, a potent reactive oxygen species (ROS), is required to regulate cellular processes that are essential for maintaining redox homeostasis and survival in both animals and plants. In animal cells, H2O2 accumulation is triggered during cell proliferation, differentiation, or programmed cell death in response to specific growth factors, cytokines, or oxidative stressors (Veal and Day 2011). Similarly, in plants, exposure to environmental stressors such as high light, extreme temperatures, mechanical wounding, or pathogen attack elicits an increase in H2O2 levels (Mittler et al. 2011; Smirnoff and Arnaud 2019). This then triggers a cascade of signaling events that facilitate plant adaptation to stress conditions and maintenance of redox homeostasis. In plants, the production of H2O2 can be induced rapidly in varying amounts and durations by an array of environmental stimuli and developmental cues (Waszczak et al. 2018). While the burst or increase in H2O2 levels occurs both extracellularly in the apoplast and intracellularly in various organelles, including chloroplasts, mitochondria, and peroxisomes, excessive H2O2 accumulation can be detrimental to cell vitality (Mignolet-Spruyt et al. 2016; Podgorska et al. 2017; Smirnoff and Arnaud 2019). Thus, cells maintain precise spatiotemporal redox homeostasis by tightly controlling H2O2 levels via a network of antioxidant enzymes localized not only within each compartment, but also in the cytosol (Foyer and Noctor 2011; Foyer and Kunert 2024).

As a signaling molecule, H2O2 also plays a crucial role in modulating cell-cell communication in both plant and animal cells (Fichman et al. 2023). In animal cells, H2O2 can affect neighboring cells through localized production and controlled diffusion, often facilitated by specific membrane channels (Miller et al. 2010; Ledo et al. 2022). Interestingly, in animal cells, H2O2 can stimulate the formation of membrane-lined, direct cell-cell communication channels analogous to plasmodesmata (Wang et al. 2011; Gousset et al. 2013; Rustom 2016; Liu et al. 2018). Whether H2O2 may have a parallel role as a signal to induce de novo biogenesis of plasmodesmata in plants remains an open question, and it is still unclear if H2O2 itself moves through plasmodesmata during its propagation. However, one notable observation is that, unlike in animals, H2O2 signals can rapidly propagate both locally and systemically in plants, and this process appears to require genes that regulate plasmodesmal permeability (Fichman et al. 2021). Indeed, RBOHD-generated ROS have been implicated in regulating callose deposition and immune signaling at plasmodesmata (Cheval et al. 2020; Vu et al. 2022; Tee et al. 2023). Notably, while H2O2 propagation appears to require functionally intact plasmodesmata, studies have also shown that H2O2 itself alters plasmodesmal permeability. For instance, using cytochemical staining, a study has shown that lateral meristematic cells accumulate H2O2 locally at the cell wall close to plasmodesmata (Ehlers and van Bel 2010), while another study demonstrated that chemically manipulating organellar redox states impacts cell-to-cell movement through plasmodesmata (Stonebloom et al. 2012). In a separate investigation, direct exogenous application of H2O2 has been shown to modulate plasmodesmal permeability between root meristematic cells in Arabidopsis seedlings (Rutschow et al. 2011). More recently, we have shown that exogenous H2O2, as well as endogenously produced H2O2 induced by mechanical wounding, results in a rapid plasmodesmal closure in leaf tissues of mature Arabidopsis plants (Cui and Lee 2016). In that study, we had speculated the possibility that H2O2 directly targets a specific plasmodesmal regulatory machinery given the rapidity of H2O2-induced plasmodesmal closure. Nevertheless, the precise molecular mechanism of this regulation remains obscure. In particular, it is unknown whether H2O2 accumulates directly at the plasmodesmata to alter plasmodesmal permeability or it acts indirectly through signal transduction.

In this study, to address whether H2O2 accumulates locally at plasmodesmata by monitoring real-time ROS dynamics at these intercellular bridges, we employed the genetically encoded ultrasensitive H2O2 redox sensor, HyPer7 (Pak et al. 2020) targeted to plasmodesmata. Using this approach, we performed a comparative study by targeting the same HyPer7 sensor to different subcellular compartments, including chloroplasts, cytosol, and plasma membrane. Through this investigation, we succeeded in visualizing how redox states change at plasmodesmata in real-time in response to defined oxidative, reductive, and stress treatments. Together, our findings reveal that plasmodesmata display sensitive and dynamic redox responses during stress and establish Pd-HyPer7 as a tool for investigating redox signaling across cellular interfaces.

Results

Generation of an ultrasensitive H2O2 sensor localized to plasmodesmata

To examine the redox status and dynamics at the plasmodesmata, we evaluated the suitability and efficacy of a recently developed H2O2 sensor named HyPer7 (Pak et al. 2020). HyPer7 has been shown to exhibit superb sensitivity and dynamic range along with pH insensitivity both in mammalian and plant cells (Pak et al. 2020; Ugalde et al. 2021b; Dopp et al. 2023). To localize and orient the sensor on the cytosolic face of plasmodesmata, we fused HyPer7 to the C-terminal end of a well-known plasmodesmal membrane protein, PDLP5 (Lee et al. 2011), with a flexible linker inserted between them (Fig. 1a). PDLP5 is a type-I transmembrane protein that specifically localizes to plasmodesmata and regulates plasmodesmal permeability by stimulating callose deposition, thereby restricting molecular movement between cells (Lee et al. 2011). It plays a critical role in salicylic acid (SA)-mediated innate immunity in the aerial tissues and auxin-dependent lateral root development (Wang et al. 2013; Lim et al. 2016; Sager et al. 2020). In the current study, PDLP5 was chosen to localize HyPer7 to plasmodesmata because of its highly specific plasmodesmal localization in various plants, including Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana, and more importantly, it is not involved in mediating H2O2-dependent regulation of plasmodesmal permeability (Cui and Lee 2016). Typically, plasmodesmata localization is validated with aniline blue staining of plasmodesmal callose, but HyPer7's fluorescence is nearly identical. Thus, we took a two-step approach. First, we fused PDLP5 to mKate2 (Pd-mKate2), a far-red fluorescent protein (Shcherbo et al. 2009) with no spectral overlap with HyPer7, and verified its plasmodesmal localization using aniline blue staining (Figure S1). Then, we separately colocalized the validated Pd-mKate2 with PDLP5-HyPer7 (herein, Pd-HyPer7) to characteristic punctate signals along the cell peripheries typical of plasmodesmata in epidermal cells (Fig. 1b).

Figure 1.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Pd-HyPer7 reports redox dynamics at plasmodesmata. (a) A cartoon illustrating the structure and orientation of the recombinant Pd-HyPer7. HyPer7 is fused to the C-terminus of PDLP5 to report redox dynamics at the cytosolic face of plasmodesmata. (b) A representative confocal image showing punctate fluorescent patterns of Pd-HyPer7 co-localizing with a far-red fluorescent Pd-marker, Pd-mKate2. (c). A schema illustrating the experimental workflow, which involves transient reporter expression in N. benthamiana, chemical treatment, ratiometric confocal imaging, and image data processing and quantitative analyses. Created in BioRender. (d) to (f) Time-lapse ratiometric imaging of Pd-HyPer7 under different redox conditions. (d) Representative fluorescence images of Pd-HyPer7. Top panel, 488 nm excitation; and bottom panel, ratio image (488 nm ex./405 nm ex.). Images show responses to mock treatment (water), 10 mM DTT, and 10 mM H2O2 selected at 3-mpt. Ratio values are represented by pseudocolor “Fire” LUT scaled from 0.5 to 3.0. Scale bar, 20 µm. Same LUT scale and scale bar apply to all ratio images. (e) Time-lapse of Pd-HyPer7 ratios over a 10-minute period following different treatments including varying concentrations of H2O2. The graph represents data from a total of n = 6 images from at least four plants per treatment, combined from two experiments, which were performed independently to ensure reproducibility. Shading represents SE. (f) Box plot showing fluorescence ratios (488 nm ex./405 nm ex.) of Pd-HyPer7 at 3- and 10-mpt selected from data in (e). (g) to (i) Comparative time-lapse ratiometric imaging of Pd-roGFP2. For roGFP2, the plotted ratio is 405ex/488ex. Experiments and data collection were performed as described for Pd-HyPer7. (g) Representative fluorescence images. (h) Time-lapse represents data from a total of n = 6 images from at least four plants per treatment, combined from two replicate experiments. Shading represents SE. (i) Box plot showing ratios at 3- and 10-mpt selected from data in (h), where indicated (N. Ratio) ratios were normalized to each sensor's mock at 3-mpt collected in the same experimental session. Each data point represents the mean ratio of plasmodesmata captured within each image, which were autodetected using custom ImageJ macro scripts, created to perform background subtraction, thresholding, and ratio calculation. Box plots (in all figures) show the interquartile range (25th to 75th percentile) with the median line, whiskers to the 5th and 95th percentiles, and individual data points. Statistical analyses were performed across all treatment × time point combinations in a single Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Conover's post-hoc test with Benjamini–Hochberg correction (α = 0.05). Letters are assigned with “A” corresponding to the highest group mean; groups sharing the same letter are not significantly different.

For the localization and ratio imaging experiments, the HyPer7 sensor was expressed using Agrobacterium-mediated transient expression in 3.5-week-old N. benthamiana plants and imaged 5 d later by spinning disk confocal microscopy. Figure 1c shows an overview of the workflow. Small pieces of treated leaves expressing the sensor were excised and immediately mounted on a chamber slide for imaging. HyPer7 has one emission peak at 516 nm, but two excitation peaks. When oxidized by H2O2, its 500 nm excitation peak increases and its 400 nm excitation peak decreases (Pak et al. 2020). For our experiments, we used fast, sequential imaging of HyPer7 fluorescence with 405 nm excitation (405ex) and 488 nm excitation (488ex) on a spinning disk confocal microscope. The collected raw image data were then batch processed to generate a ratiometric image (488ex/405ex) to find and measure the 488ex/405ex ratio at subcellular locations, and then displayed as ratiometric images using a Fire look-up table (LUT) (Figure S2 and Methods). For the time-lapse experiments, our ratio measurements began at 2 min post-treatment (mpt), reflecting the minimum time required for sample preparation, and continued until 12-mpt.

To evaluate the functionality of Pd-HyPer7 to detect changes in plasmodesmal H2O2, we infiltrated small regions of leaves with highly oxidative (10 mM H2O2), highly reductive (10 mM dithiothreitol [DTT]), or mock control (water) treatments. Tissue excisions were mounted in the treatments and imaged using spinning disk confocal microscopy. Compared to the mock control, the 488ex/405ex ratio of Pd-HyPer7 was higher with H2O2 and lower with DTT treatments (Fig. 1d). As an additional control, we targeted HyPer7 to plasmodesmata using a nonfunctional PDLP5 (mTM). mTM localizes to plasmodesmata, but unlike wild-type (WT) PDLP5, it is impaired in plasmodesmata-regulating function (Wang et al. 2020). The plasmodesmal localization of mTM-HyPer7 was confirmed by localization with Pd-mKate2 in N. benthamiana (Figure S3). Importantly, the quantitative analyses of the ratio images revealed that Pd-HyPer7 (WT PDLP5) and mTM-HyPer7 (mutant PDLP5) were both functional at plasmodesmata with no statistical difference in the ratio at 3-mpt under mock conditions (Figure S4). Moreover, upon the H2O2 treatment, both sensors similarly showed an over 2-fold increase relative to their 3-mpt mock ratio values. These results indicate that either the WT or the mutant form of PDLP5 can be used to target a functional H2O2 sensor to plasmodesmata. However, for some unknown reasons, we were unable to isolate Arabidopsis transgenic lines that express mTM-HyPer7 at sufficiently detectable levels. Therefore, WT Pd-HyPer7 was used in all our subsequent investigations to maintain consistency across N. benthamiana and Arabidopsis experiments. For Arabidopsis studies, we screened for transgenic Pd-HyPer7 lines that had a low expression level that was high enough for microscopic H2O2 measurements but did not cause an overexpression growth phenotype as discussed in a later Results section.

HyPer7 is suitable for measuring redox responses at plasmodesmata

Having confirmed the localization and functionality of Pd-HyPer7, we next investigated the redox dynamics of plasmodesmata in detail using the N. benthamiana transient expression system as described earlier. Specifically, to systematically characterize these dynamics under different redox conditions, we performed time-lapse ratio imaging using either DTT or varying concentrations of H2O2 (1 to 10 mM) (Fig. 1, d to f). Additionally, to capture the temporal nature of these redox responses and examine significant changes between the early and late responses within and between treatments, comparisons of the ratios at 3-mpt and 10-mpt were conducted (Fig. 1f). Because excised tissues remained submerged in treatment for the duration of imaging, these traces report dynamics under sustained exposure. In mock-treated plants using water, Pd-HyPer7 exhibited a relatively stable ratio with small increases over 10 min, consistent with the sensor's high sensitivity to small H2O2 fluctuations during imaging (Fig. 1, e and f). In contrast, ratio relative to mock, DTT treatment decreased the Pd-HyPer7 ratio by 40% and H2O2 increased it more than 2-fold. Interestingly, this response saturated at 1 mM H2O2, as higher concentrations produced no additional oxidation, suggesting this as a potential maximum oxidation level (Fig. 1e). Over the 10-minute time-lapse, this initial oxidation gradually decreased, possibly reflecting an activation of local antioxidant systems. Collectively, these results reveal that plasmodesmal redox state is highly dynamic and sensitive, capable of generating rapid responses to both oxidative and reductive stressors.

To further characterize the plasmodesmal redox environment, we examined a second sensor, roGFP2, which responds to changes in the glutathione redox state rather than directly to H2O2 levels (Morgan et al. 2011). To this end, we produced Pd-roGFP2 using PDLP5 for targeting and confirmed its plasmodesmal localization (Figure S5). The excitation response of roGFP2 is opposite to that of HyPer7, showing increased 405 nm excitation and decreased 488 nm excitation when oxidized (Fig. 1g). For comparison, we plotted the 405ex/488ex ratios. Interestingly, Pd-roGFP2 was insensitive to 1 or 2.5 mM H2O2 treatments (Fig. 1, h and i), which is markedly different from the saturated response of Pd-HyPer7. However, like Pd-HyPer7, Pd-roGFP2 was able to sense high levels of DTT and H2O2 (5 to 10 mM), albeit exhibiting only a maximum 0.3-fold change in ratio (Fig. 1, h and i), which corresponds to an 8-fold lower dynamic range revealed by Pd-HyPer7. Note that the full dynamic range of HyPer7 at plasmodesmata that we observed was from approximately 0.6 (in response to DTT) to 2.6 (in response to H2O2). Given the superior sensitivity and dynamic range of Pd-HyPer7, we selected it as an effective tool for subsequent studies.

Plasmodesmata are highly sensitive to sub-millimolar H2O2 levels

As described earlier, the HyPer7 sensor at plasmodesmata became immediately saturated when plants were treated with H2O2 at millimolar levels (1 to 10 mM). This rapid saturation response raised the question whether plasmodesmata might be tuned to detect sub-millimolar, more physiological changes in H2O2 levels. To answer this question, we examined Pd-HyPer7's response to exogenously applied sub-millimolar H2O2 concentration (0.1 mM) to compare with its response to 1 mM treatment. Representative ratio images at 3-mpt showed an increased ratio after 0.1 mM H2O2 treatment compared to the mock, but this increase was much less pronounced than the 1 mM H2O2 treatment (Fig. 2a). This result clearly indicated that Pd-HyPer7 was sensitive enough to rapidly respond to exogenously applied H2O2 concentrations as low as 0.1 mM.

Figure 2.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Pd-HyPer7 responses to sub-millimolar H2O2 levels. (a) Representative fluorescence images of Pd-HyPer7. Top panel, 405 nm excitation; middle panel, 488 nm excitation; and bottom panel, ratio image (488 nm ex./405 nm ex.). Images show responses to mock treatment (water), 0.1- and 1-mM H2O2 at 3-mpt. Scale bar, 20 µm. (b) Time-lapse ratio imaging over a 10-min period of Pd-HyPer7, following different treatments including varying concentrations of H2O2 at sub-millimolar levels. Shading represents SE. Data normalization and statistical analyses as in Fig. 1. (c) Box plot of Pd-HyPer7 ratios at 3-mpt across redox treatments. The graph represents data from a total of n = 6 images from at least four plants per treatment, combined from two replicate experiments.

Based on this result, we then performed time-lapse measurements of Pd-HyPer7 after treating plants with a series of H2O2 concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 1 mM. The ratio image analysis of the time-lapse experiment revealed a distinctive pattern of a steep initial increase in ratio upon H2O2 treatments (Fig. 2b). For each sub-millimolar H2O2 concentration (0.1, 0.5, 0.75, and 1 mM), Pd-HyPer7 exhibited distinct oxidation states in a clear dose-dependent manner. Even 0.1 mM H2O2 treatment could induce an immediate 1.4-fold higher ratio than the mock at 3-mpt, which persisted throughout the time course (Fig. 2, b and c). These results demonstrate that plasmodesmata undergo rapid and dynamic redox changes in response to oxidative and reductive treatments.

Subcellularly-targeted HyPer7 reporters show distinct responses to redox treatments

Plasmodesmata are continuous with both the cytosol and PM; however, it is unknown if they have similar or distinct redox characteristics. To compare redox dynamics of these compartments, we next generated two additional sensors, Cy (cytosol)- and PM-HyPer7. Cy-HyPer7 was similarly constructed to the original cytosolic HyPer7-NES (Pak et al. 2020; Ugalde et al. 2021b) by adding the same NES (nuclear-export sequence) to the C-terminal end of HyPer7, while PM-HyPer7 was produced by fusing HyPer7 to the C-terminal end of a PM-targeted PDLP5 mutant (Luna et al. 2023). Following confirmation of their correct localization (Figure S6a), we performed time-lapse experiments and quantitative analyses as described below.

Representative ratio images showed that DTT (10 mM) treatment induced only a minor reduction of Cy-HyPer7 while exogenously applied H2O2 (10 mM) rapidly and substantially oxidized the sensor (Fig. 3a). Time-lapse analysis revealed that Cy-HyPer7 maintained a stable mean ratio over 10 min both in mock and DTT treated leaves with the latter showing approximately 10% reduction in mean ratio relative to the mock (Fig. 3b). In contrast, H2O2 treatments induced rapid rises in mean ratios of Cy-HyPer7 in a dose-dependent manner, exhibiting approximately 30% (1 and 2.5 mM H2O2), 50% (5 mM), and 70% (10 mM) increases in initial mean ratios relative to mock, and 10% to 20% overall decline over time. Notably, high millimolar concentrations of H2O2 did not saturate Cy-HyPer7, consistent with strong cytosolic redox buffering capacity and/or limited accumulation of applied H2O2 in the cytosolic sensor environment. The PM-HyPer7 responses were overall comparable to those of the Cy-HyPer7 (Fig. 3, c and d), as expected given the close proximity of the PM reporter to the cytosol-facing cellular environment.

Figure 3.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Pd-HyPer7 displays distinct response behaviors to exogenous redox treatments. (a), (c), and (e) Representative intensity ratio images of Cy-, PM-, and Ch-HyPer7 sensors in response to mock (water), 10 mM DTT, and 10 mM H2O2 treatments. Scale bars, 20 µm. (b), (d), and (f) Time-lapse changes of fluorescence intensity ratios over a 10-min period of subcellularly-localized HyPer7 sensors, each corresponding to panels A, C, or E, following different redox treatments including varying concentrations of H2O2. Each data point represents the mean ratio per image. Shading represents SE. Each time-lapse graph represents the ratio image data (n = 6 images collected using at least four plants per treatment) from two sets of independent replicate experiments. N. Ratio as in Fig. 1. (g) Dose-response curves showing degree of oxidation (OxD) as (RRmin)/(Rmax−Rmin), where Rmin and Rmax are the ratios at 10 mM DTT and 10 mM H2O2, respectively. Data are mean ± SEM (n = 18 to 42 images per concentration). Curves were fitted with the Hill equation. (h) EC50 values derived from Hill equation fits in (g). Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals of the fit. Ratio data at 3-mpt are from Figs 1e and 2b (Pd-HyPer7), 3B (Cy-HyPer7), and 3D (PM-HyPer7). Ratio data for Ch-HyPer7 were recollected under the same laser setting used for Cy-, PM-, or Pd-HyPer7 images at 3-mpt.

To extend the comparison to another key redox-active compartment and a major cellular source of H2O2 (Asada 2006; Mignolet-Spruyt et al. 2016; Smirnoff and Arnaud 2019), we also investigated the chloroplast. To this end, we produced chloroplast-targeted HyPer7 (Ch-HyPer7) by fusing a transit peptide at the N-terminus of HyPer7 and confirmed its correct targeting (Figure S6a). To minimize chloroplasts’ high susceptibility to light-induced ROS production (Exposito-Rodriguez et al. 2017; Dopp et al. 2023) (Figure S7), we performed time-lapse experiments under a reduced laser power (Table S1) (Fig. 3, e and f). Ch-HyPer7 showed rapid, dose-dependent oxidation to H2O2 with subsequent partial recovery over time (Fig. 3f). H2O2 treatments (1 to 10 mM) rapidly produced a 1.4- to 2.6-fold increase in Ch-HyPer7 ratio compared to mock-treated samples, followed by partial recovery over time (Fig. 3f). DTT (10 mM) treatment, on the other hand, produced a slower but substantial reduction, reaching a 40% reduction by 6-mpt followed by a gradual recovery phase, eventually returning toward the initial 3-mpt value. These results highlight chloroplasts’ dynamic redox regulation, consistent with chloroplasts’ robust redox homeostasis (Exposito-Rodriguez et al. 2017; Dopp et al. 2023).

To compare the operational responsiveness of the four targeted HyPer7 reporters to exogenous H2O2 treatments, ratio values were then converted to degree of oxidation (OxD), adapted from the roGFP2 calibration framework (Schwarzlander et al. 2008), which was recently applied to HyPer and HyPer7 (Booth et al. 2021; Young et al. 2024; Huang et al. 2025). Accordingly, OxD values were calculated as (RRmin)/(RmaxRmin), where Rmin and Rmax are set to the ratios at 10 mM DTT and 10 mM H2O2, respectively, and the resulting OxD dose-response data were fitted with the Hill equation (Fig. 3g). These treatments are used here as operational calibration extremes for normalization. For Ch-HyPer7, we acquired its ratio images at 3-mpt in leaves treated with stepwise H2O2 (0.1 to 10 mM) and DTT (10 mM) under identical laser power settings used for other compartments (Table S1). We treat the OxD values and apparent half-maximal oxidation (EC50) as operational measures of sensor response under exogenous treatment conditions, not absolute intracellular H2O2 concentrations. These parameters are therefore used to compare relative reporter responsiveness rather than to infer absolute in vivo H2O2 concentrations among compartments. Before quantitative comparison across targeted reporters, we examined whether basal HyPer7 ratios were dependent on local reporter concentrations, given that in vitro assays have shown concentration-dependent HyPer7 behavior (Pak et al. 2020). We used total fluorescence intensity within each measured ROI as an approximation for the reporter concentration and plotted this value against the corresponding 488e/405e ratio collected under mock conditions (Figure S6b). Each data point represents an individual plasmodesmal spot or similarly sized ROI measured from chloroplast or cytosol reporter images. Linear regression analysis of the resulting plots did not reveal a systematic relationship between ROI fluorescence intensity and ratio across the measured intensity range. This result indicates that local HyPer7 intensity does not produce a simple directional bias in the mean ratio, consistent with previous reports (Dopp et al. 2023). However, we acknowledge that we cannot exclude concentration-dependent effects of HyPer7 and therefore interpret intercompartmental comparisons cautiously as operational comparisons of HyPer7 responses under defined experimental conditions.

The OxD analysis showed that Pd-HyPer7 under our experimental conditions had the lowest apparent EC50 of approximately 0.2 mM, followed by Ch- and PM-HyPer7 with 1.1 and 1.3 mM, respectively. In contrast, Cy-HyPer7 required a substantially higher concentration (∼2.7 mM) to achieve a comparable oxidation, corresponding to approximately 13-fold higher apparent EC50 than Pd-HyPer7 (Fig. 3h). Notably, while both Pd- and Ch-HyPer7 responded to sub-millimolar H2O2, Pd-HyPer7 exhibited a steep, switch-like response, reaching near-saturation by 1 mM, whereas Ch-HyPer7 showed a more gradual rise across a broader concentration range (Fig. 3g). Together these data show that Pd-HyPer7 has a high apparent responsiveness to exogenous H2O2 treatments and a response profile distinguishable from the other targeted HyPer7 reporters under the conditions tested.

Subcellularly-targeted APX effectively reduces plasmodesmata

Having found that plasmodesmata display distinct redox response characteristics, we next asked whether targeted H2O2 scavenging could modulate the Pd-HyPer7 readout. In order to achieve targeted redox modulation beyond relying on nonspecific chemical reductants like DTT, we expressed Arabidopsis ascorbate peroxidase (APX) 1, known to scavenge H2O2 in the cytosol (Nedo et al. 2024), in chloroplasts, cytosol, or plasmodesmata. (Constructs included mKate2 for visualization (Figure S8)). Because redox production/buffering and biosensor behavior differ by compartment, we interpret APX effects within each compartment rather than by direct cross-compartment comparison.

Representative ratio images showed that while expression of Ch-mKate2 control had no effect on chloroplast redox state, Ch-APX-mKate2 substantially reduced the ratio values as indicated by the clear shift from magenta to blue color (Fig. 4a). Quantitative analysis (Fig. 4b) revealed that Ch-APX achieved a markedly stronger reduction of chloroplasts than previously observed with DTT treatment (see Fig. 3f), demonstrating the high effectiveness of this compartment-specific approach. Similarly, the presence of APX in the cytosol could also reduce the cytosol more effectively (Fig. 4, c and d) than DTT. Consistent with these findings, Pd-targeted APX also reduced plasmodesmata relative to control treatments (Fig. 4, e and f). Note that untagged Pd-APX showed slightly higher efficacy than the mKate2-tagged version (Figure S9), likely due to its smaller size. Interestingly, the co-expression of cytosolic APX exhibited a slight reductive effect on Pd-HyPer7 while chloroplastic APX had no effect (Fig. 4f). Furthermore, Pd-APX proved highly effective at suppressing H2O2-dependent oxidation of plasmodesmata across the whole range of concentrations used in our experiments. For example, when challenged with exogenous H2O2, ranging from sub-millimolar to high millimolar concentrations, control plants showed pronounced oxidation with the sensor ratio reaching saturation around a 2.5 ratio at 3-mpt, while Pd-APX-expressing plants maintained significantly lower ratios, remaining below 1.5 even at the highest H2O2 concentration (Fig. 4g). These results demonstrate Pd-targeted APX as an effective tool for modulating plasmodesmal redox state.

Figure 4.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Plasmodesmata can be effectively reduced by pd-APX. (a), (c), and (e) Representative fluorescence ratio (488 nm ex./405 nm ex.) images of Ch-, Cy-, and Pd-HyPer7 sensors in the absence (−) or presence of mock (mKate2) or APX co-expression, each targeted to the same compartment as the sensor (for the cytosolic APX, APX-mKate2 localized primarily to the cytosol with weak nuclear signal). (b) and (d) Box plots of HyPer7 ratios corresponding to panels, A and C, respectively. (f) Box plot comparing Pd-HyPer7 ratios in the absence (−) of ectopically expressed APX or the presence of APX targeted to plasmodesmata, cytosol, or chloroplasts. (g) Line graph showing Pd-HyPer7 response to H2O2 attenuated by Pd-targeted APX. Each data set was collected from a total of n = 35 to 50 images using at least eight plants per treatment from two independent experiments. (h) Box plot comparing DTT effects on Pd-HyPer7 ratios with and without Pd-targeted APX. Data were collected for each treatment from a total of n > 20 images (at 3-mpt) using at least four plants from at least two independent experiments. Data are normalized to the mean ratio of mock-treated samples. Statistical analyses for panels B, D, and F were as in Fig. 1. Statistical analysis for panel H was performed using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post-hoc test (α = 0.05) with different letters indicating significant differences. The interaction between APX and DTT treatment was significant (P < 0.0001).

Notably, Pd-APX achieved reduction levels comparable to those induced by DTT treatment in mock-treated plants (Fig. 4h), prompting us to ask whether combining these two approaches might further reduce plasmodesmata. To better understand the limits of plasmodesmal reduction, we, therefore, examined how plants expressing Pd-APX would respond to additional reductive stress from DTT treatment. Intriguingly, while DTT reduced the Pd-HyPer7 ratio in control plants, this treatment significantly increased the ratio in plants expressing Pd-APX (Fig. 4h). This counterintuitive result suggests that Pd-APX achieves maximal physiological reduction of plasmodesmata, beyond which additional reductants paradoxically induce oxidative stress.

An SA-deficient state alters compartment-specific redox responses

To gain further insight into the compartment-specific redox dynamics, particularly at plasmodesmata, we employed our suite of subcellularly targeted HyPer7 sensors for comparative analyses between WT and NahG N. benthamiana plants. NahG is a bacterial enzyme that breaks down SA to catechol, and hence, transgenic plants expressing NahG are depleted in SA (Friedrich et al. 1995). Previously, we discovered that transgenic NahG Arabidopsis plants, as well as SA biosynthetic mutants, had enhanced plasmodesmal permeability and that SA and ROS independently modulate plasmodesmal permeability through distinct signaling pathways (Wang et al. 2013; Cui and Lee 2016). To use HyPer7 to further investigate redox dynamics at plasmodesmata in NahG plants, we first verified that NahG increases plasmodesmal permeability in N. benthamiana using GFP movement assays. Consistent with our previous finding in Arabidopsis NahG plants (Wang et al. 2013), the result showed that GFP movement in NahG was more extensive compared to WT plants (Statistical analysis showed that NahG plants exhibit 2.6-fold higher odds of GFP spreading to more cells compared to WT [ordinal logistic regression, P < 0.0001]) (Figure S10). Then, we expressed Pd-HyPer7 in NahG plants and examined its response to H2O2. When treated with increasing concentrations of H2O2 (0.1 to 1.0 mM), punctate structures in Pd-HyPer7 ratio images showed progressive increases, reflecting local oxidation states of plasmodesmata (Fig. 5a, ratiometric images in lower panels).

Figure 5.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Redox responses and dynamics are altered in NahG. (a) Representative ratio images of Pd-HyPer7 in NahG. Top panel, 488 nm excitation and bottom panel, ratio image (488 nm ex./405 nm ex.). Images show responses to H2O2 (0.1, 0.5, and 1-mM) at 3-mpt (mock is shown in the time-course in panel B). Ratio values are represented by pseudocolor Fire LUT scaled from 0.5 to 3.0. (b) Time-lapse of Pd-HyPer7 in NahG under different redox conditions. Shading represents SE. Data were collected for each treatment from a total of n = 6 images using at least four plants from two independent experiments and normalized to the mean value of mock-treated samples from the first 1-min imaging interval (corresponding to 3-mpt). (c) to (e) Line graphs comparing NahG to WT responses to H2O2, which show HyPer7 oxidation enhanced in the cytosol (c), dampened in chloroplasts (d), and normal at plasmodesmata (e). (f) to (h) Line graphs comparing temporal redox dynamics (measured as ratio changes between early [3 min] and late [10 min] time points) in NahG to WT across treatments (DTT, mock, and varying concentrations of H2O2). Negative Y-axis values indicate decreasing ratio (recovery from oxidation) and positive values an increasing ratio (progressive oxidation). For ease of visualizing recovery, the y-axis is plotted with negative values upward (faster recovery from oxidation) and positive values downward (progressive oxidation). (i) to (k) Box plots comparing HyPer7 ratios in NahG to WT with and without DTT treatment. The cytosol (i) and plasmodesmata (k) show unexpected oxidative response to DTT in NahG. Data extracted from a series of time-lapse images were normalized to the mean value of mock-treated NahG or WT samples at 3-mpt (the full time-lapse data for the cytosol and chloroplasts are shown in Figures S13 and S15). All data were collected from a total of n > 20 images at 3-mpt using at least six plants per treatment from two independent experiments. Error bars represent SE. Statistical analyses were performed using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post-hoc test (α = 0.05). The interaction between genotype and DTT treatment was significant (P < 0.0001). Different letters indicate significant differences between groups.

Time-course ratio analyses revealed H2O2 treatments induced sustained oxidation with gradual adaptation over time in NahG plasmodesmata (Fig. 5b and Figure S11), which was a similar response observed in WT plants (Fig. 2b). The apparently normal H2O2 response at NahG plasmodesmata, despite their enhanced plasmodesmal permeability, corroborates our previous finding that SA regulates plasmodesmal permeability independently of redox signaling (Cui and Lee 2016). Indeed, when we treated WT plants with SA or its analog benzothiadiazole for 30, 60, or 120 min, these treatments did not alter the redox state at plasmodesmata, demonstrating that SA does not alter plasmodesmal redox states under normal conditions (Figure S12).

Next, we investigated if the lack of SA in NahG impacts redox responses in other subcellular compartments, including the cytosol, PM, and chloroplasts, using HyPer7 targeted to these compartments and performed comparative H2O2 dose-response measurements in time-course ratio imaging. The HyPer7 responses to treatments in the cytosol (Figure S13) were indistinguishable from the PM (Figure S14), and thus, we chose to focus on the cytosolic data for further analyses. Compared to WT, the NahG H2O2 dose-response curves showed enhanced cytosolic response to higher concentrations of H2O2 (2.5 to 10 mM; Fig. 5c) and a greatly dampened chloroplastic response to all concentrations of H2O2 (Fig. 5d and Figure S15). In contrast, the plasmodesmal responses remained similar between WT and NahG at low concentrations of H2O2 (0.1 to 1 mM; Fig. 5e). Given that these data revealed distinct patterns across compartments, we decided to further investigate these differences by analyzing the rate of ratio change between the early (3-mpt) and late (10-mpt) time points using the data extracted from the time-course ratio imaging. In NahG plants, the cytosolic HyPer7 ratio decreased more rapidly (more negative rate values) in plants treated with higher H2O2 concentrations (5 to 10 mM; Fig. 5f), indicating faster recovery from initial oxidation. In contrast, NahG chloroplasts showed slower ratio decline (less negative rate values) across all H2O2 concentrations (Fig. 5g), suggesting dampened recovery dynamics. The response kinetics of plasmodesmata in NahG treated with sub-millimolar H2O2 were highly dynamic and almost identical to WT (Fig. 5h).

To further investigate compartment-specific redox responses, we analyzed the statistical differences in HyPer7 ratios between WT and NahG plants following mock or DTT treatment using two-way ANOVA with Tukey's post-hoc test (Fig. 5, i to k). Under mock conditions, the NahG cytosol showed a statistically significant but modest elevation (∼4%; Fig. 5i), whereas the NahG chloroplast ratio was substantially lower (Fig. 5j). In contrast, plasmodesmata did not differ from WT under mock conditions (Fig. 5k). However, the most striking finding was that WT and NahG responded to DTT in opposite directions. While all three WT compartments showed the expected reduction in response to DTT, both the NahG cytosol and plasmodesmata exhibited a rapid paradoxical oxidative response. Notably, plasmodesmata showed the most dramatic response reversal despite having no difference under mock conditions between genotypes. At plasmodesmata, this result recapitulated our earlier observation with Pd-targeted APX (Fig. 4h), and the oxidative spike was comparable in magnitude to the NahG plasmodesmal oxidation induced by 0.1 mM H2O2 (Fig. 5b). These findings indicate an enhanced sensitivity to reductive stress in a compartment-specific manner, suggesting that NahG plasmodesmata operate under altered redox regulatory mechanisms that render them particularly susceptible to reductive perturbation.

Both cold and mechanical wounding induce rapid oxidation at plasmodesmata

To enable monitoring ROS dynamics in intact seedlings, we generated stable transgenic Arabidopsis lines focusing on Ch-, Cy, and Pd-HyPer7 reporters. Treatments were performed using 7-day-old seedlings by gentle syringe infiltration of a whole seedling with water mock control or solutions containing H2O2 or DTT, immediately followed by ratio imaging of cotyledon epidermal cells. Correct localization, functionality, and responsiveness of the three HyPer7 reporters in Arabidopsis seedlings (Fig. 6 and Figures S16 to S18) were comparable to that of N. benthamiana leaves. In our previous study, we reported that expressing PDLP5 at high levels causes stunted growth (Lee et al. 2011). Considering that this might compromise the utility of the Pd-HyPer7 reporter lines, we isolated those lines that express the sensor just high enough for microscopic detection without causing visible growth phenotypes. Thus identified T2 or T3 seedlings of one of the lines, 35S:Pd-HyPer7 (line#27) (Fig. 6f and Figure S18), were used for further studies. Notably, this reporter line exhibited similar gradual responsiveness to sub-millimolar H2O2 treatments with slightly higher dynamic ranges, reaching over 3-fold increase in ratio upon 1 or 10 mM H2O2 treatment (Fig. 6g). We cannot fully exclude PDLP5-dependent effects on plasmodesmal physiology; however, the transient mTM control and lack of growth defects support that the observed HyPer7 dynamics primarily reflect compartmental redox responsiveness.

Figure 6.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

HyPer7 reporters show distinct sensitivities to redox treatments in intact Arabidopsis seedlings. (a) and (b) Representative ratio images and corresponding box plot of Cy-HyPer7 in cotyledon epidermal cells of 7-day-old seedlings treated with mock, 1, and 10 mM H2O2. Ratio values (488 nm ex./405 nm ex.) are represented by pseudocolor Fire LUT scaled from 0.5 to 3.0. (c) and (d) Representative ratio images and corresponding box plot of Ch-HyPer7. (e) Representative fluorescence ratio images of Pd-HyPer7 showing responses to mock, 10 mM DTT, 0.1, 1, and 10 mM H2O2 treatments. (f) Image of WT Col-0, 35S::PDLP5, and 35S::Pd-HyPer7 (homozygous line #T3 to 27) seedlings grown vertically on ½ MS agar plates. The picture was taken at 7 d post-imbibition. The 35S::PDLP5 line is originally reported by Lee et al. (2011). (g) Box plot of Pd-HyPer7 ratios across treatments. Scale bars—20 μm (a), (c), and (e) and 0.5 mm (f). Data were collected from n = 20 images using at least 10 seedlings per treatment from two independent experiments. Data are normalized to the mean ratio of mock-treated seedlings.

Next, we examined real-time redox dynamics in Arabidopsis seedlings using a flow chamber system (Fig. 7a and Figure S19). Intact seedlings were mounted in a chamber constructed from adhesive spacer sheets, allowing continuous flow of treatment solutions over the seedling while enabling real-time imaging of cotyledon cells. Solutions were delivered through tubing connected to a gravity flow syringe system (6.8 ml/min), providing consistent, reproducible flow between different treatments and replicates during time-course experiments. As expected from its high buffering capacity, the cytosol showed no detectable changes in Cy-HyPer7 ratio to 0.5 mM H2O2 treatment, with the ratio remaining stable throughout the time course (Fig. 7, b and c). In contrast, 10 mM H2O2 treatment triggered an immediate and dramatic increase in ratio, reaching a plateau of approximately 2.5-fold within 2 to 3 min and maintaining this elevated level throughout the treatment period (Fig. 7c and Video S1). Additionally, 10 mM DTT treatment produced a slight reduction. In contrast, both Ch- and Pd-HyPer7 showed rapid oxidation at 0.5 mM H2O2 (Fig. 7, d to g and Videos S2 and S3). Interestingly, while both Cy- and Ch-HyPer7 remained stable under mock (water) flow treatment for over 20 min, Pd-HyPer7 showed a slight but steady increase in ratio with mock treatment, indicating an oxidation response under our flow conditions. Also, these sensors responded to 10 mM DTT with Ch-HyPer7 showing a more pronounced response. These results confirmed that our flow system is functional and enables real-time monitoring of treatment responses in a continuous sequence.

Figure 7.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Real-time monitoring of redox dynamics using a flow chamber system. (a) Schematic diagram of the flow chamber setup showing 7-day-old seedlings mounted in an assembled flow chamber connected to a flow delivery system with waste collection. Created in BioRender. (b), (d), and (f) Representative ratio images of Cy-, Ch-, and Pd-HyPer7 during 0.5 mM H2O2 flow treatment at 0, 3, and 10 min. Insets are enlarged areas (panel f). Scale bars—20 μm. (c), (e), and (g) Time-lapse analysis of Cy-HyPer7 (c), Ch-HyPer7 (e), and Pd-HyPer7 (g) responses to mock, 0.5 mM H2O2 (and 10 mM H2O2 for Cy-HyPer7), and 10 mM DTT treatments. Shaded areas, baseline recording period; arrows, 3-mpt. Shading represents SE. Each time-course analysis represents data from n = 3 to 5 seedlings per treatment. Ratio values are normalized to each sensor's mock at the 0 time point collected in the same experimental session.

To further demonstrate real-time plasmodesmal redox responses under biological stress conditions, we treated Arabidopsis seedlings with cold stress. Cold stress is known to alter plasmodesmal permeability (Bilska and Sowinski 2010; Murata et al. 2025), but whether this response is rapid and involves changes in redox states remained unknown. We examined the cytosolic response to cold stress by switching from room temperature (RT, 23 °C) water to ice-cold water (2 °C) flow. Surprisingly, cold treatment induced a steady increase in Cy-HyPer7 ratio, reaching a maximum 0.5-fold increase within 10 to 12 min (Fig. 8, a and b and Video S4). This result indicates that H2O2 levels rise gradually in the cytosol under cold temperature stress. Pd-HyPer7 also exhibited a clear oxidation response over the 10 to 12 min cold exposure window (Fig. 8, a and c and Video S3). This cold-induced plasmodesmal response was intermediate between the RT water response and the 0.5 mM H2O2 treatment, demonstrating that cold stress generates a moderate, but physiologically relevant, level of oxidative stress at plasmodesmata.

Figure 8.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Cold stress and mechanical wounding induce rapid oxidation responses at plasmodesmata. (a) Representative fluorescence ratio images of Cy-HyPer7 (top panels) and Pd-HyPer7 (bottom panels) during 2 °C cold water flow treatment at 0, 3, and 10 min. Insets are enlarged areas. Scale bars—20 μm. (b) and (c) Time-course analyses of Cy-HyPer7 (b) and Pd-HyPer7 (c) responses to cold treatment. Shaded area indicates baseline recording period before treatment. Treatment starts at time 0. Mock and H2O2 response data from Fig. 7 are overlaid for comparison. Data were normalized to the mean value of 23 °C water-treated samples from the 1-minute baseline period preceding treatment (single z-stack images, captured at 6-second intervals). (d) Representative fluorescence ratio images of Cy- and Pd-HyPer7 following mechanical wounding at 3- and 10-mpw (minutes post-wounding). Unwounded mock sample imaged at 10-mpw is shown for comparison. Insets are enlarged areas. Scale bars—20 μm. (e) and (f) Time-lapse analyses of Cy-HyPer7 (e) and Pd-HyPer7 (f) responses to mechanical wounding. Images acquired as 10 z-stack images, using a 2 μm interval, captured at 6-second intervals under identical laser settings for the cytosol and plasmodesmata. Data are normalized to the mean value of mock-treated samples at 3-mpw. Data represent n = 6 independent seedlings per treatment. Shading represents SE.

Next, we examined the real-time responses to mechanical wounding in both the cytosol and plasmodesmata. We have previously shown that plasmodesmata close upon mechanical wounding and that this response is mediated by H2O2 (Cui and Lee 2016). However, the ROS states and dynamics at plasmodesmata during plant wounding responses remained unknown, since plasmodesmal-localized H2O2 measurements were not previously feasible even under normal conditions. To visualize changes in H2O2 levels upon wounding, one cotyledon of an intact, mounted 7-day-old transgenic seedling was mechanically wounded with a sharp scalpel and immediately imaged. Wounding rapidly increased HyPer7 ratios both in the cytosol (Fig. 8, d and e and Video S5) and plasmodesmata (Fig. 8, d and f and Video S6). The magnitude of the Pd-HyPer7 oxidation approaches the upper range of Pd-HyPer7 oxidation observed under high-dose exogenous H2O2 acquired using the same imaging settings (see Fig. 6, e and g). Importantly, this comparison is qualitative and does not imply an equivalent intracellular H2O2 concentration, because wounding involves multiple signals and the effective oxidant exposure at plasmodesmata is not directly measurable from exogenous dose alone.

Mechanical wounding reveals distinct redox dynamics between the cytosol and plasmodesmata

Previously, we have shown that wound-induced plasmodesmal restriction is transient (Cui and Lee 2016), but if wounding induces a systemic plasmodesmal response remains unknown. Having found a rapid H2O2 burst at plasmodesmata, we lastly examined the temporal aspects of wound-induced oxidative burst at plasmodesmata compared with that in the cytosol. Specifically, we asked how long the burst persists in local tissues and how this local event is signaled to systemic tissues. To address these questions, we wounded one cotyledon by making a small slit in half the cotyledon and measured Pd- and Cy-HyPer7 ratios in matched ROIs over a 2-hour time course in the wounded cotyledon (local) and for 30 min in the other cotyledon (systemic) (Fig. 9a). Upon wounding, both the cytosol and plasmodesmata exhibited rapid ROS bursts in wounded cotyledon, which was detected by the earliest time point (2 min post-wounding [mpw]) that reached maximal values within the early time window (2 to 15-mpw) (Fig. 9, b and d). Cy-HyPer7 subsequently declined toward mock level by 60-mpw and dropped below the mock level by 120-mpw (Fig. 9b). In systemic cotyledon, Cy-HyPer7 exhibited a modest transient increase at 5-mpw and returned toward its mock level by 10-mpw (Fig. 9c). In contrast, Pd-HyPer7 remained elevated at 60-mpw and decreased by 120-mpw, substantially above its mock level at this time point (Fig. 9d). Moreover, systemic Pd-HyPer7 responses were delayed, with a transient peak occurring at 20-mpw, which returned toward its mock level by 30-mpw (Fig. 9e). These data reveal distinct local versus systemic kinetics, and a temporal separation between early transient cytosolic oxidation and delayed plasmodesmal oxidation in systemic tissues, thereby defining the timing of systemic plasmodesmal oxidation relative to the systemic cytosolic oxidation burst.

Figure 9.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Systemic wound response reveals a distinct plasmodesmal redox behavior. (a) A scheme illustrating the experimental setup for recording wound-induced local and systemic H2O2 bursts. For local responses, one cotyledon per seedling was wounded by making a small incision, and the area adjacent to the wound site was imaged. For systemic responses, H2O2 dynamics were monitored in the opposite, unwounded cotyledon. (b) and (c) Box plots of Cy-HyPer7 ratios at the indicated times post-wounding in local (b) and systemic (c) cotyledons. n = 20 to 30 images from n > 12 to 15 seedlings per condition from two independent experiments. (d) and (e) Box plots of Pd-HyPer7 ratios at the indicated times post-wounding in local (d) and systemic (e) cotyledons. n = 40 to 50 images from n > 20 to 25 seedlings per condition from two independent experiments. Data are normalized to the mean ratio of mock-treated (unwounded) seedlings. Statistical analyses as in Fig. 1.

Discussion

Collectively, our results establish Pd-HyPer7 as a tool for monitoring redox dynamics at plasmodesmata in living plant tissues. Under defined exogenous H2O2 and DTT treatments, Pd-HyPer7 revealed redox response properties that differed from the same sensor targeted to other compartments. We note that these differences cannot represent differences in absolute H2O2 concentrations in each compartment. However, the rapid Pd-HyPer7 responses to exogenous treatments, the modulation of Pd-HyPer7 by targeted APX, and delayed systemic Pd-HyPer7 response compared to Cy-HyPer7 after wounding support the idea that despite lacking a complete membrane enclosure, plasmodesmata partake in spatially regulated redox signaling during stress responses.

In recent years, plasmodesmata have been increasingly recognized for their role in facilitating both local and/or systemic movement of various signaling molecules, including H2O2, calcium, and hormones (Lu et al. 2018; Toyota et al. 2018; Fichman et al. 2021, 2023; Peláez-Vico et al. 2022). These signaling molecules interestingly show a reciprocal relationship with plasmodesmata in that they regulate plasmodesmal permeability while their cell-to-cell movement depends on functional plasmodesmata (Sager et al. 2020; Wang et al. 2023). Among these signals, H2O2 has been directly linked to a rapid and transient plasmodesmal closure; and, intact plasmodesmal function has been shown to be required for a normal propagation of the H2O2 wave, which is crucial for plant acclimation to abiotic stresses (Rutschow et al. 2011; Cui and Lee 2016; Fichman et al. 2021). We have previously shown that the plasmodesmata-specific callose synthase, CalS8, is required for the H2O2-dependent plasmodesmal closure (Cui and Lee 2016). Based on the rapidness of this response, we reasoned that H2O2 likely acts locally to activate the enzymatic activity of CalS8, which points to the existence of localized H2O2 at plasmodesmata.

Our current study addressed this possibility by developing a HyPer7-based reporter that can monitor redox sensitivity and dynamics at plasmodesmata. Unlike the cytosol and PM, which show redox responses to exogenously applied H2O2 at the millimolar range, plasmodesmata become saturated at this range, exhibiting dose-dependent redox responses only at much lower, sub-millimolar concentrations. This unexpected, enhanced sensitivity to H2O2 and distinct response pattern suggests plasmodesmata may serve as early detection sites for oxidative signals at cell-cell boundaries. Moreover, the observed rapid and gradual redox responses at sub-millimolar H2O2 concentrations may define a regulatory or physiological range that is potentially crucial for signal processing at these junctions. These redox characteristics align with the established role of plasmodesmata in transmitting both local and systemic signals during stress responses and defense activation.

The sub-millimolar H2O2 measurements were made possible by the ultrasensitive, and ultrafast, HyPer7 sensor (Pak et al. 2020). HyPer7 was first adapted for plants to study H2O2 in the cytosol of root epidermal cells (Ugalde et al. 2021b), and similar to that study, we found that HyPer7 can detect lower, physiological levels of H2O2. In contrast, the overall redox state measured with Pd-roGFP2 was less sensitive to exogenous H2O2. Future studies could target roGFP2 fused to the oxidant receptor peroxidase-1 (Orp1) (Roma et al. 2018) or the faster TSA2ΔCR peroxiredoxin (Morgan et al. 2016) to enhance specificity to H2O2, but in the cytosol of plants, these had a relative insensitivity to exogenously applied H2O2, which was attributed to a high buffering capacity of the cytosol due to the glutathione-based antioxidant system (Schwarzlander et al. 2008; Niemeyer et al. 2021; Ugalde et al. 2021a). Thus, we chose HyPer7 for this study and did not pursue roGFP2 fusion variants. However, the sensitivity and speed of HyPer7 also bring challenges. Prior use of HyPer7 in roots used standard laser scanning confocal microscopy (LSCM) (Ugalde et al. 2021b), but we found that in leaf tissue, LSCM was too slow for the ultrafast HyPer7 variant, which is 60 times faster than the original (Pak et al. 2020). HyPer7 responds to changes in H2O2 on the time scale of milliseconds rather than seconds, and thus, changes in chloroplastic H2O2 caused by the scanning laser could be detected within a single image. Consequently, for our study, a spinning disk confocal microscope was required to match the speed and sensitivity of HyPer7.

Another point of caution is that any axial chromatic aberrations between 405 and 488 nm excitation can alter the HyPer7 ratio calculations of sub-resolution structures, like plasmodesmata. This can be avoided by using a highly corrected objective lens or by taking the ratio of maximum intensity projections. However, a strict requirement for the HyPer sensors is that the 405 and 488 nm channels must be acquired sequentially, and thus, any focal drift or sample movement can alter the ratio values. Therefore, it was difficult to determine if the fast flickering or heterogeneity of individual Pd-HyPer7 spots we observed (Videos S3 and S6) was a technical artifact or real rapid responses of individual plasmodesmata. Fast spinning disk confocal microscopy can minimize the effect of this limitation, and we are exploring approaches that enable us to characterize individual plasmodesmal spots in follow-up studies. Lastly, a caveat of using the HyPer7 sensor is that the sensitivity is concentration dependent in in vitro assays (Pak et al. 2020). We were unable to show similar concentration dependence in planta, but we cannot fully eliminate the possibility that the local HyPer7 concentration and local environment of the sensor are affecting the measurements. Therefore, the tool should not be used to calculate absolute concentrations of H2O2, and comparisons between compartments should be conducted with this caveat considered. Despite these challenges and limitations, the speed and sensitivity of HyPer7 made it possible to not only detect sub-millimolar H2O2, but also to examine the dynamics of H2O2 responses with time-lapse imaging.

Given that low amounts of exogenous H2O2 rapidly saturate plasmodesmata, we speculate that they likely function as redox sensors rather than primary sites for H2O2 detoxification. The precise, local H2O2 concentration at plasmodesmata from these treatments is unknown, primarily due to uncertainties in how much H2O2 reaches plasmodesmata and the potential for the interplay of other cellular responses in altering H2O2 levels at plasmodesmata. However, the observed low buffering capacity and responses at physiological, sub-millimolar concentrations are consistent with a sensory role that coordinates H2O2 responses across cellular boundaries. This saturation of redox responses at higher H2O2 concentrations may represent a protective mechanism, limiting the excessive spread of ROS or the passage of damaging molecules. Such a protective role would be crucial as the early ROS detection would enable cells to mount a timely and effective response to oxidative stress, thereby preventing damage and maintaining cellular homeostasis both locally and systemically.

The role of these rapid redox responses on plasmodesmal function remains to be determined experimentally. However, it is tantalizing to speculate that the distinct redox responses we observed below and above the saturation point might enable complex, differential regulation of plasmodesmal function. This possibility is supported by a previous study reporting an interesting biphasic plasmodesmal regulation, where a low concentration (0.6 mM) increased permeability while a high concentration (6 mM) decreased it (Rutschow et al. 2011). Although direct comparison is not possible due to different experimental conditions, we speculate that the stepwise increase in H2O2-induced oxidation could translate into differential regulation of plasmodesmal function, such as permeability, protein trafficking, or downstream signaling. Alternatively, the graded response to H2O2 levels could act as a distribution control system, facilitating H2O2 movement at low concentrations while restricting the spread of excessive oxidative stress at higher levels, ultimately enabling plants to fine-tune their responses to varying levels of oxidative signals.

SA and ROS are crucial signaling molecules in plant defense and abiotic stress signaling, contributing to local and systemic acquired immunity and stress tolerance (Mateo et al. 2006; Kachroo and Kachroo 2020; Devireddy et al. 2021; Spoel and Dong 2024). While some studies suggest they function in parallel (El-Shetehy et al. 2015), the precise functional relationship between SA and ROS remains complex. Our systematic analysis of NahG plants has revealed several key insights into plasmodesmal redox regulation and its relationship with SA signaling. Notably, the SA-deficient NahG line maintained normal H2O2 response patterns at plasmodesmata, despite altered redox responses in other compartments. However, the underlying redox capacity of these plants appears distinct. Previous studies indicate that depending on environmental conditions, SA-deficiency reconditions thiol buffering capacity and homeostasis rather than simply lowering basal H2O2 levels. For example, SA-deficient Arabidopsis NahG seedlings maintain a more reduced glutathione pool (higher GSH/GSSG ratio) compared to WT under salt and osmotic stress conditions (Borsani et al. 2001) and both NahG and sid2 mutant plants are predisposed to oxidative stress under high light stress (Mateo et al. 2006). Our data further provide evidence for a compartment-specific shift in redox status in mock-treated NahG plants.

While NahG chloroplasts were significantly more reduced than WT under mock treatment, NahG plasmodesmata maintained a redox state statistically indistinguishable from WT. This suggests that plasmodesmata possess local homeostatic mechanisms that actively maintain a specific redox setpoint even in an SA-deficient background. However, SA deficiency may push the buffering system at plasmodesmata toward its limit such that additional reductants paradoxically trigger oxidative responses. Importantly, exogenous SA did not alter redox states at plasmodesmata in WT plants, consistent with our conclusion that plasmodesmata have compartment-specific redox regulatory mechanisms that operate independently of SA signaling. Thus, while plasmodesmal redox regulation appears independent of acute SA signaling, persistent SA deficiency likely reshapes the cellular redox homeostasis, increasing the demand on local buffering at plasmodesmata to maintain its setpoint. We propose that maintaining this setpoint likely places NahG plasmodesmata under “reductive stress,” operating near their buffering limit to counteract the systemic reductive load.

Consequently, when challenged with additional reducing power (DTT), this fragile equilibrium collapses, leading NahG plants to exhibit a paradoxical oxidative response to DTT in both the cytosol and plasmodesmata. This parallels our result that DTT treatment increased oxidation in WT plants expressing Pd-APX. In both cases, the addition of a reductant triggered an oxidative burst, a hallmark of reductive stress described in human cells as an imbalance in redox couples [such as NAD(H) or GSH(GSSG)] that leads to paradoxical ROS generation (Xiao and Loscalzo 2020). Disruption of these shuttles can cause localized reductive stress in one compartment while triggering oxidative stress in another, making reductive stress equally detrimental to organismal function as oxidative stress. Reductive stress responses have also been reported in plants, where ER has been shown to be sensitive to reductive stress and mitochondrial oxidation safeguards ER via retrograde signaling (Fuchs et al. 2022; Ugalde et al. 2022). Our findings extend this framework to plasmodesmata, suggesting that they may represent another subcellular domain where reductive limits are tightly governed to prevent destabilization of the local signaling environment.

Our real-time monitoring revealed stress-dependent redox responses reported by Cy- and Pd-HyPer7. During cold treatment, both reporters showed broadly similar oxidation dynamics, which suggest plasmodesmata are not universally faster or stronger in responses than the cytosol. In contrast, mechanical wounding revealed distinct local and systemic response profiles. Notably, an early transient H2O2 burst was detected in the cytosol. A transient burst was also detected at plasmodesmata but with a delay. This temporal separation provides evidence that plasmodesmata function as a distinct redox compartment. In addition, the gradual oxidation observed at plasmodesmata even under gentle water flow suggests a mechanosensitive redox property that warrants further investigation. These findings are consistent with plasmodesmata acting not merely as passive targets but as sites where environmental perturbations are transduced into localized redox changes at intercellular junctions. Given that H2O2 can modulate plasmodesmal permeability, these data also support a model in which plasmodesmata participate in redox-based stress sensing at cell-cell interfaces.

Rapid systemic signaling in plants can involve propagating ROS and calcium signals, but the route of signal propagation and the role of plasmodesmata remain debated. In the context of systemic acclimation to high light, Fichman et al. (2021) showed that systemic ROS signaling requires RBOHD-generated ROS and involves plasmodesmal regulators for propagation of systemic ROS signals, which move at velocities of several centimeters per minute (Fichman et al. 2021). In the context of mechanical wounding, however, Bellandi et al. (2022) proposed an alternative framework in which wound-induced vascular calcium waves can be explained by apoplastic diffusion and bulk flow of amino acids acting as mobile chemical messengers moving at comparable speeds. They also reported that wound-induced calcium wave dynamics were not altered in rbohd/rbohf backgrounds nor impeded by inducing plasmodesmal closure through callose accumulation (Bellandi et al. 2022). Thus, both models predict a rapid arrival of the systemic signal within minutes, but differ in whether plasmodesmata actively propagate or passively receive the signal. Our cotyledon-to-cotyledon time-course experiments do not directly identify the primary long-distance messenger; however, they resolve the timing of oxidative dynamics within the cytosol and plasmodesmata and their relationship to plasmodesmal regulation.

Two observations (Fig. 9) support a model in which plasmodesmata function as sensors or integrators of wound signals rather than as conduits for ROS propagation: First, in local epidermal cells the cytosolic oxidation response resolves rapidly and falls below mock level by 120-mpw, whereas plasmodesmal H2O2 levels remain elevated longer, indicating distinct kinetics between the cytosol and plasmodesmata. Second, systemic responses are temporally separated, with the cytosolic transient burst peaking at 5-mpw and the plasmodesmal burst at ∼20-mpw. This lag or uncoupling implies that the plasmodesmal response is not a simple reflection of bulk cytosolic oxidation and likely involves additional regulatory steps and/or thresholding at plasmodesmata. Importantly, the delayed systemic plasmodesmal peak (∼20 mpw) provides a testable timing prediction that any systemic plasmodesmal permeability response (e.g. callose-dependent restriction) would be expected to occur after the early cytosolic burst, aligning with this later plasmodesmal oxidation window. Regardless, the temporal uncoupling is more consistent with plasmodesmata responding as downstream targets of earlier systemic signals (Bellandi et al. 2022). In this view, the distinct redox sensitivity of plasmodesmata positions them not as early warning relays, but as decision points that coordinate intercellular connectivity with the magnitude and duration of stress. This interpretation is also consistent with plasmodesmata being membrane-rich structures that are proposed to be enriched in receptor-like functions, signaling capacity, as well as redox-associated proteins (Fernandez-Calvino et al. 2011). Indeed, to enable a targeted ROS response apart from bulk cytosolic influence, it is reasonable to hypothesize a dedicated redox regulatory machinery associated with plasmodesmata. Candidate components include RBOHD-linked ROS production at plasmodesmata, plasmodesmata-associated peroxidases, and local thiol redox regulators that could set a threshold for plasmodesmal oxidation. The tools and timing framework established in our current study (including the delayed systemic plasmodesmal oxidation window) provide direct, testable predictions for dissecting these mechanisms genetically and pharmacologically. Future work will be required to define the upstream signals and molecular components that couple systemic wound perception to delayed plasmodesmal oxidation.

In summary, our findings using HyPer7 sensors offer new perspectives on redox responses at plasmodesmata. The dynamic responses reported by Pd-HyPer7 and the temporally uncoupled systemic response during wounding support a model in which plasmodesmata participate in spatially and temporally regulated redox signaling across cellular boundaries. Moving forward, defining the plasmodesmal redox regulators that set the redox sensitivity and dynamics will be essential to uncover the underlying molecular mechanisms.

Methods

Plant materials and growth conditions

N. benthamiana WT and NahG transgenic plants were grown in a controlled environment under diurnal conditions of 18 h light (120 to 180 μmol m−2 s−1) at 23 °C and 6 h dark at 21 °C with 60% relative humidity for 24 h.

Flowering Arabidopsis Col-0 plants were transformed with the same binary vector used for transient expression in N. benthamiana. Independent transgenic lines were screened using confocal microscopy to identify lines with suitable expression levels in target compartments and sensor functionality. A minimum of 10 to 20 lines were screened for each of Cy- and Ch-HyPer7, while over 50 lines were screened for Pd-HyPer7. Specific transgenic lines used for ratio imaging were: Cy-HyPer7 (T2-4), Ch-HyPer7 (T2-3), and Pd-HyPer7 (T2-27). Selected T2 or T3 Arabidopsis seedlings were grown vertically on ½ Murashige Skoog (MS) agar plates under ∼80 to 100 µmol m−2 s−1 light intensity with a 16 h/8 h light/dark cycle. For flow system experiments and wounding, seedlings were grown on MS agar under the growth chamber conditions of ∼50 µmol m−2 s−1 light intensity with a 10 h/14 h light/dark cycle and 65% humidity. Seven-day-old seedlings were used for all treatments and ratio imaging experiments.

Plasmid cloning

Recombinant DNA constructs were produced by overlapping PCR using high-fidelity Q5 Taq Polymerase (New England Biolabs [NEB]), followed by subcloning of gel-purified PCR fragments into SfiI-digested pMB binary vector (Sager et al. 2020) using T4 DNA ligase (NEB). All other enzymes, including restriction enzymes, were supplied by NEB. The HyPer7 sequence was amplified using an Addgene plasmid (pCS2 + HyPer7) as the template. The APX sequence (AtAPX1, At1g07890) was amplified from cDNA synthesized from total RNA isolated from Arabidopsis leaves. All plasmid clones expressing fusions of two proteins carry a glycine linker (RPGGGGGP) between them. The clone expressing a fusion of three proteins (PDL5-APX-mKate2) contains the glycine linker between PDL5-APX and an alanine linker (PAGAAAAAAGA) between APX and mKate2. The DNA sequence of each PCR-cloned plasmid construct was confirmed for its fidelity using Sanger or whole plasmid sequencing. All DNA primers used in this study are provided in Table S1.

To produce PDLP5 fusion to roGFP2, HyPer7, mKate2, or APX, the full-length ORF of each gene was PCR amplified with gene-specific primers containing AgeI and XbaI sites at the 5′- and 3′ ends, respectively, and subcloned into pMB35S:SfiI-PDLP5-EGFP (Wang et al. 2020) plasmid by replacing the EGFP fragment. The mTM-HyPer7 or -mKate2 was produced via subcloning SfiI-digested mTM sequence into pMB35S:SfiI-PDLP5-HyPer7/mKate2 by replacing PDLP5. The mTM DNA fragment was digested from the pMB35S-based vector containing a PM-localized PDLP5 variant (Luna et al. 2023). To produce chloroplast-localized constructs, the DNA region encoding the first 79-amino acid residues of the RbcS was PCR amplified from N. benthamiana leaf cDNA using 5′- and 3′-primers containing a unique SfiI site at each end. SfiI-digested PCR fragment was subsequently subcloned into pMB35S:SfiI-PDLP5-HyPer7, -mKate2, or APX-mKate2, replacing the PDLP5 sequence. To produce cytosol-localized constructs, HyPer7 or mKate2 was PCR amplified, using 5′-primer containing an SfiI site and 3′-primer containing another SfiI site followed by the DNA sequence encoding an NES (LPPLERLTL) (see Table S1 for primer sequence information) adopted from the original cytosolic HyPer7-NES (Pak et al. 2020). SfiI-digested PCR amplicon was subcloned into the vector pMB35S:SfiI, which contains two SfiI sites that allow for a directional cloning of the insert. APX-mKate2 was produced by overlapping PCR using 5′- and 3′-end primers that contain directional SfiI sites, followed by cloning into pMB35SSfiI. To produce PM-localized constructs, the EGFP in pMB35S:PM-GFP was replaced with HyPer7 or mKate2 using AgeI and XbaI. pMB35S:PM-GFP consists of a PM-localized PDLP5 variant resulting from a swapping mutation in its JMe and TMD domains with the corresponding segments derived from BAK1, a PM-localizing membrane protein (Luna et al. 2023).

Agrobacterium-mediated transient expression in N. benthamiana

Agrobacterium tumefaciens cells of strain GV3101 (+pSoup) were transformed with each pMB plasmid harboring a specific DNA construct by electroporation. Transformants were selected by culturing the electroporation competent cells overnight at 28 °C, on LB-agar medium supplemented with antibiotics (gentamicin 50 μg/ml, rifampicin 50 μg/ml, tetracycline 10 μg/ml, and spectinomycin 200 μg/ml). For a liquid culture, a single positive colony was picked and grown overnight at 28 °C by shaking at 225 rpm, in LB medium containing the same antibiotics. For agroinfiltration, cells were harvested and resuspended in an infiltration buffer (10 mM MES, pH 5.7, 10 mM MgSO4, and 100 µM acetosyringone [PhtoTech LABS, A104]) to an optical density of 0.1 to 0.3 at 600 nm. The resuspended Agrobacterium cells were syringe-infiltrated into mature leaves of 3- to 4-week-old N. benthamiana plants, which were kept in a growth chamber for an additional 4 to 5 d until they were imaged by confocal microscopy.

Chemical and mechanical wounding treatments

Chemicals (DTT [bioWORLD, #40400120 bioPLUS] and H2O2 [Fisher Scientific, # 7722-84-1]) used to treat plants were prepared in water freshly each time immediately before use to the desired concentrations. Water was used for mock treatment. Leaves of N. benthamiana were infiltrated with the prepared solutions using gentle syringe infiltration without a needle. Immediately following infiltration, small sections of treated leaves were excised and mounted in water or chemical treatments using single-well Lab-TekII Chambers with cover glass bottoms (Thermo Scientific, #155360) for imaging. Mechanical wounding treatment was performed using 7-day-old Arabidopsis seedlings by making a small incision on one cotyledon with a fine razor blade, extending less than halfway across its width to avoid severing the midvein, followed by confocal imaging of either the wounded (local) or unwounded (systemic) cotyledon. For local tissue, epidermal cells were imaged several cell layers away from the visible wound site to ensure recording of intact cells adjacent to the wound site.

Confocal microscopy for subcellular localization

Spinning disk confocal microscopy images were acquired on an Andor Dragonfly 600 (Oxford Instruments, Belfast, UK) with a Leica HC Plan Apochromat CS2 40 × water immersion objective lens [numerical aperture, 1.10] and a Zyla Plus 4.2 CMOS camera. The 405 and 488 nm laser lines were used to excite the 400 and 500 nm absorption peaks of HyPer7 or roGFP2 and fluorescence was collected with a 512/38 nm emission filter. The images acquired using the 405 nm excitation (405ex) and 488 nm excitation (488ex) were acquired sequentially and used for 488ex/405ex ratiometric calculations and image display. mKate2 and mCherry were excited with the 561 nm laser and chlorophyll autofluorescence with the 638 nm laser. The µW of laser power at the objective, percentage laser power, and exposure time can be found in Table S2.

Flow chamber system

An FCS2 flow chamber (Bioptechs Inc., Butler, PA) was modified for real-time monitoring of redox dynamics in intact Arabidopsis seedlings (Figure S19). The chamber was assembled using adhesive-backed Secure-Seal spacers (Thermofisher, #S24737), which remain adherent in water, to hold the seedling. Seven-day-old seedlings were carefully positioned in the chamber with roots oriented away from the curved edges to prevent damage, and the assembly was sealed to create a flow-through system. The flow chamber was connected to a 60 mL syringe equipped with a stopcock via 15 cm of tubing to control solution delivery. The mounted seedling was positioned on a microscope stage for continuous imaging of cotyledon epidermal cells while treatment solutions flowed through the chamber. For experimental treatments, baseline recordings were collected for 2 min before introducing test solutions (H2O2 at various concentrations, ice-cold water at 2 °C, or mock treatments with room temperature water). Flow rate was controlled by gravity (6.8 ml/min), with the syringe system allowing for rapid switching between different treatment solutions during time-course experiments. The system enabled continuous monitoring of cellular responses throughout the treatment period, typically over 20-minute time courses. A single focal plane was imaged to maximize the speed of the image acquisition.

Ratio image data processing

Ratio image processing was conducted using batch processing in ImageJ FIJI (Schindelin et al. 2012). In brief, raw spinning disk confocal microscopy z-stacks (2 µm thick) were first flattened using a maximum intensity z-projection. Noise was reduced with Gaussian Blur filtering, and the camera background level was adjusted. A 488ex/405ex or 405ex/488ex ratio image was created for HyPer7 and roGFP2, respectively. Analysis masks were created by thresholding and were used to measure the ratios at subcellular locations. The Analyze Particles function in ImageJ was used to calculate the maximum ratio value for each PD and the mean ratio value for chloroplasts, PM, or cytosolic regions. For each field of view, ratio values were averaged across all measurable structures for plasmodesmal puncta and chloroplasts, and cytosol or PM regions across multiple cells. This yielded a single average ratio value per image. For time-lapse datasets, an average of mock treatment values from 3- to 4-mpt was used to normalize ratios (N. ratio) to 1.0 to aid in the comparison of datasets. For single time point datasets, an average of all mock treatment replicates was used as the normalization value for the ratios. For flow chamber single focal plane datasets, an average of mock treatment values from −1 to 0 min (pretreatment) was first used to normalize the ratio, and then ratios were adjusted so that the ratio was exactly 1.0 at 0 min for all treatments. A complete workflow and more specifications can be found in Figure S2. Representative image time series were selected and drift-corrected in Huygens Professional Version 25.04. The stabilized data were then converted to an uncompressed AVI at 10 frames per second using Fiji. The resulting video files were arranged using KapWing software.

The OxD dose-response data were fitted with the Hill equation using the following formula: OxD = START + (END − START) × [H2O2]n/(EC50n + [H2O2]n), where START was fixed at the mock baseline OxD for each compartment, END was fixed at 1.0, EC50 represents the half-maximal effective concentration, and n is the Hill coefficient. Curve fitting was performed using Origin 2024 software with instrumental weighting (1/SEM2). R2 values are reported in Fig. 3g.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using R or Origin. Kruskal–Wallis tests were used to assess overall differences among treatment groups, followed by Conover's post-hoc tests with Benjamini–Hochberg correction for pairwise comparisons. Two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post-hoc test for pairwise comparisons was used to evaluate interaction effects between two different treatments or between treatment and genotype. Significance was set at α = 0.05. Ordinal logistic regression (proportional odds model) was used for categorized GFP movement outcomes (Figure S10).

Supplementary Material

koag192_Supplementary_Data

Acknowledgments

This research is dedicated to Late Dr. Michael Mishkind for his visionary support and guidance as the NSF program director who was passionate about funding this work.

Contributor Information

Niraj Kumar Vishwakarma, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19713, United States; Delaware Biotechnology Institute, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19713, United States.

Md Abdur Razzak, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19713, United States; Delaware Biotechnology Institute, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19713, United States.

Vishnu Mishra, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19713, United States; Delaware Biotechnology Institute, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19713, United States.

Timothy Chaya, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19713, United States; Delaware Biotechnology Institute, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19713, United States.

Jeffrey L Caplan, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19713, United States; Delaware Biotechnology Institute, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19713, United States; Department of Biological Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, United States.

Jung-Youn Lee, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19713, United States; Delaware Biotechnology Institute, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19713, United States; Department of Biological Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, United States.

Author contributions

N.V. produced major experimental data; Md.R. produced plasmid constructs and conducted initial experiments evaluating the reporters; V.M. conducted the GFP movement experiment; and J.C. wrote image processing scripts for automation of intensity ratio data extraction. J.L.C. and J.-Y.L. designed and directed the experiments; J.-Y.L. and J.L.C. drafted the figures and manuscript. N.V. processed image data and assembled quantitative data, T.C. processed flow system data and generated video files, and N.V., T.C., J.L.C. and J.-Y.L. analyzed the data and assembled the manuscript.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material is available at The Plant Cell online.

Funding

The research reported in this study was funded by the U.S. National Science Foundation (IOS-2054685 awarded to J.-Y.L. and J.L.C.). Microscopy equipment was acquired with an National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIH-NIGMS) grant (S10 OD030321), and access was supported by NIH-NIGMS (P20 GM103446; P20 GM139760) and the State of Delaware.

Data availability

Data supporting the findings of this study are available in the manuscript and its Supplementary files or are available from the corresponding authors upon request. The source data underlying Figs 1, f and i, 2c, 3, g and h, 4, b, d, and f to h, 5, c to k, 6, b, d, and g, and 9, b to e; and Figures S4, S7, and S9 to S15 are provided as the Source Data file.

References

  1. Asada  K. 2006. Production and scavenging of reactive oxygen species in chloroplasts and their functions. Plant Physiol. 141:391–396. 10.1104/pp.106.082040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bayer  EM, Benitez-Alfonso  Y. 2024. Plasmodesmata: channels under pressure. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 75:291–317. 10.1146/annurev-arplant-070623-093110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bellandi  A  et al.  2022. Diffusion and bulk flow of amino acids mediate calcium waves in plants. Sci Adv. 8:eabo6693. 10.1126/sciadv.abo6693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bilska  A, Sowinski  P. 2010. Closure of plasmodesmata in maize (Zea mays) at low temperature: a new mechanism for inhibition of photosynthesis. Ann Bot. 106:675–686. 10.1093/aob/mcq169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Booth  DM, Varnai  P, Joseph  SK, Hajnoczky  G. 2021. Oxidative bursts of single mitochondria mediate retrograde signaling toward the ER. Mol Cell. 81:3866–3876.e2. 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.07.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Borsani  O, Valpuesta  V, Botella  MA. 2001. Evidence for a role of salicylic acid in the oxidative damage generated by NaCl and osmotic stress in Arabidopsis seedlings. Plant Physiol. 126:1024–1030. 10.1104/pp.126.3.1024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cheval  C  et al.  2020. Chitin perception in plasmodesmata characterizes submembrane immune-signaling specificity in plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 117:9621–9629. 10.1073/pnas.1907799117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cui  W, Lee  J-Y. 2016. Arabidopsis callose synthases CalS1/8 regulate plasmodesmal permeability during stress. Nat Plants. 2:16034. 10.1038/nplants.2016.34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Devireddy  AR, Zandalinas  SI, Fichman  Y, Mittler  R. 2021. Integration of reactive oxygen species and hormone signaling during abiotic stress. Plant J. 105:459–476. 10.1111/tpj.15010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dopp  IJ, Kalac  K, Mackenzie  SA. 2023. Hydrogen peroxide sensor HyPer7 illuminates tissue-specific plastid redox dynamics. Plant Physiol. 193:217–228. 10.1093/plphys/kiad307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ehlers  K, van Bel  AJE. 2010. Dynamics of plasmodesmal connectivity in successive interfaces of the cambial zone. Planta. 231:371–385. 10.1007/s00425-009-1046-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. El-Shetehy  M  et al.  2015. Nitric oxide and reactive oxygen species are required for systemic acquired resistance in plants. Plant Signal Behav.  10:e998544. 10.1080/15592324.2014.998544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Exposito-Rodriguez  M, Laissue  PP, Yvon-Durocher  G, Smirnoff  N, Mullineaux  PM. 2017. Photosynthesis-dependent H2O2 transfer from chloroplasts to nuclei provides a high-light signalling mechanism. Nat Commun. 8:49. 10.1038/s41467-017-00074-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Faulkner  C  et al.  2013. LYM2-dependent chitin perception limits molecular flux via plasmodesmata. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 110:9166–9170. 10.1073/pnas.1203458110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fernandez-Calvino  L  et al.  2011. Arabidopsis plasmodesmal proteome. PLoS One. 6:e18880. 10.1371/journal.pone.0018880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fichman  Y, Myers  RJ  Jr, Grant  DG, Mittler  R. 2021. Plasmodesmata-localized proteins and ROS orchestrate light-induced rapid systemic signaling in Arabidopsis. Sci Signal. 14:eabf0322. 10.1126/scisignal.abf0322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Fichman  Y, Rowland  L, Oliver  MJ, Mittler  R. 2023. ROS are evolutionary conserved cell-to-cell stress signals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 120:e2305496120. 10.1073/pnas.2305496120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Foyer  CH, Kunert  K. 2024. The ascorbate-glutathione cycle coming of age. J Exp Bot. 75:2682–2699. 10.1093/jxb/erae023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Foyer  CH, Noctor  G. 2011. Ascorbate and glutathione: the heart of the redox hub. Plant Physiol. 155:2–18. 10.1104/pp.110.167569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Friedrich  L, Vernooij  B, Gaffney  T, Morse  A, Ryals  J. 1995. Characterization of tobacco plants expressing a bacterial salicylate hydroxylase gene. Plant Mol Biol. 29:959–968. 10.1007/BF00014969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Fuchs  P  et al.  2022. Reductive stress triggers ANAC017-mediated retrograde signaling to safeguard the endoplasmic reticulum by boosting mitochondrial respiratory capacity. Plant Cell. 34:1375–1395. 10.1093/plcell/koac017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Gousset  K, Marzo  L, Commere  P-H, Zurzolo  C. 2013. Myo10 is a key regulator of TNT formation in neuronal cells. J Cell Sci. 126:4424–4435. 10.1242/jcs.129239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Huang  H  et al.  2025. Activation of a FOXO3-induced cell cycle arrest regulates ferroptosis. Cell Death Discov. 11:465. 10.1038/s41420-025-02760-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kachroo  A, Kachroo  P. 2020. Mobile signals in systemic acquired resistance. Curr Opin Plant Biol.  58:41–47. 10.1016/j.pbi.2020.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Ledo  A, Fernandes  E, Salvador  A, Laranjinha  J, Barbosa  RM. 2022. In vivo hydrogen peroxide diffusivity in brain tissue supports volume signaling activity. Redox Biol. 50:102250. 10.1016/j.redox.2022.102250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lee  J-Y  et al.  2011. A plasmodesmata-localized protein mediates crosstalk between cell-to-cell communication and innate immunity in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 23:3353–3373. 10.1105/tpc.111.087742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Li  Z, Liu  S-L, Montes-Serey  C, Walley  JW, Aung  K. 2024. PLASMODESMATA-LOCATED PROTEIN 6 regulates plasmodesmal function in Arabidopsis vasculature. Plant Cell. 36:3543–3561. 10.1093/plcell/koae166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lim  G-H  et al.  2016. Plasmodesmata localizing proteins regulate transport and signaling during systemic acquired immunity in plants. Cell Host Microbe. 19:541–549. 10.1016/j.chom.2016.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Liu  T-L  et al.  2018. Observing the cell in its native state: imaging subcellular dynamics in multicellular organisms. Science. 360:eaaq1392. 10.1126/science.aaq1392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lu  K-J, Danila  FR, Cho  Y, Faulkner  C. 2018. Peeking at a plant through the holes in the wall—exploring the roles of plasmodesmata. New Phytol. 218:1310–1314. 10.1111/nph.15130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Luna  GR, Li  J, Wang  X, Liao  L, Lee  J-Y. 2023. Targeting of plasmodesmal proteins requires unconventional signals. Plant Cell. 35:3035–3052. 10.1093/plcell/koad152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Mateo  A  et al.  2006. Controlled levels of salicylic acid are required for optimal photosynthesis and redox homeostasis. J Exp Bot. 57:1795–1807. 10.1093/jxb/erj196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Mignolet-Spruyt  L  et al.  2016. Spreading the news: subcellular and organellar reactive oxygen species production and signalling. J Exp Bot. 67:3831–3844. 10.1093/jxb/erw080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Miller  EW, Dickinson  BC, Chang  CJ. 2010. Aquaporin-3 mediates hydrogen peroxide uptake to regulate downstream intracellular signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 107:15681–15686. 10.1073/pnas.1005776107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Mittler  R  et al.  2011. ROS signaling: the new wave?  Trends Plant Sci. 16:300–309. 10.1016/j.tplants.2011.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Morgan  B, Sobotta  MC, Dick  TP. 2011. Measuring E(GSH) and H2O2 with roGFP2-based redox probes. Free Radic Biol Med. 51:1943–1951. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2011.08.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Morgan  B  et al.  2016. Real-time monitoring of basal H2O2 levels with peroxiredoxin-based probes. Nat Chem Biol. 12:437–443. 10.1038/nchembio.2067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Murata  Y, Nagata  K, Abe  M. 2025. Cell-to-cell translocation of florigen is inhibited by low ambient temperature through abscisic acid signaling in Arabidopsis thaliana. P Natl Acad Sci U S A. 122:e2507987122. 10.1073/pnas.2507987122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Nedo  AO  et al.  2024. CHUP1 restricts chloroplast movement and effector-triggered immunity in epidermal cells. New Phytol. 244:1864–1881. 10.1111/nph.20147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Niemeyer  J, Scheuring  D, Oestreicher  J, Morgan  B, Schroda  M. 2021. Real-time monitoring of subcellular H2O2 distribution in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant Cell. 33:2935–2949. 10.1093/plcell/koab176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Pak  VV  et al.  2020. Ultrasensitive genetically encoded indicator for hydrogen peroxide identifies roles for the oxidant in cell migration and mitochondrial function. Cell Metab. 31:642–653.e6. 10.1016/j.cmet.2020.02.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Peláez-Vico  MA  et al.  2022. ROS and redox regulation of cell-to-cell and systemic signaling in plants during stress. Free Radic Biol Med. 193:354–362. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2022.10.305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Petrov  VD, Van Breusegem  F. 2012. Hydrogen peroxide-a central hub for information flow in plant cells. AoB Plants. 2012:pls014. 10.1093/aobpla/pls014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Podgorska  A, Burian  M, Szal  B. 2017. Extra-cellular but extra-ordinarily important for cells: apoplastic reactive oxygen Species metabolism. Front Plant Sci. 8:1353. 10.3389/fpls.2017.01353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Roma  LP, Deponte  M, Riemer  J, Morgan  B. 2018. Mechanisms and applications of redox-sensitive green fluorescent protein-based hydrogen peroxide probes. Antioxid Redox Signal. 29:552–568. 10.1089/ars.2017.7449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Rustom  A. 2016. The missing link: does tunnelling nanotube-based supercellularity provide a new understanding of chronic and lifestyle diseases?  Open Biol. 6:160057. 10.1098/rsob.160057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Rutschow  HL, Baskin  TI, Kramer  EM. 2011. Regulation of solute flux through plasmodesmata in the root meristem. Plant Physiol.  155:1817–1826. 10.1104/pp.110.168187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Sager  R, Lee  J-Y. 2014. Plasmodesmata in integrated cell signalling: insights from development and environmental signals and stresses. J Exp Bot. 65:6337–6358. 10.1093/jxb/eru365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Sager  R  et al.  2020. Auxin-dependent control of a plasmodesmal regulator creates a negative feedback loop modulating lateral root emergence. Nat Commun. 11:364. 10.1038/s41467-019-14226-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Schindelin  J  et al.  2012. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 9:676–682. 10.1038/nmeth.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Schwarzlander  M  et al.  2008. Confocal imaging of glutathione redox potential in living plant cells. J Microsc. 231:299–316. 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2008.02030.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Shcherbo  D  et al.  2009. Far-red fluorescent tags for protein imaging in living tissues. Biochem J. 418:567–574. 10.1042/BJ20081949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Sies  H. 2017. Hydrogen peroxide as a central redox signaling molecule in physiological oxidative stress: oxidative eustress. Redox Biol.  11:613–619. 10.1016/j.redox.2016.12.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Smirnoff  N, Arnaud  D. 2019. Hydrogen peroxide metabolism and functions in plants. New Phytol.  221:1197–1214. 10.1111/nph.15488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Spoel  SH, Dong  XN. 2024. Salicylic acid in plant immunity and beyond. Plant Cell. 36:1451–1464. 10.1093/plcell/koad329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Stonebloom  S  et al.  2012. Redox states of plastids and mitochondria differentially regulate intercellular transport via plasmodesmata. Plant Physiol. 158:190–199. 10.1104/pp.111.186130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Tee  EE, Faulkner  C. 2024. Plasmodesmata and intercellular molecular traffic control. New Phytol. 243:32–47. 10.1111/nph.19666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Tee  EE, Johnston  MG, Papp  D, Faulkner  C. 2023. A PDLP-NHL3 complex integrates plasmodesmal immune signaling cascades. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 120:e2216397120. 10.1073/pnas.2216397120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Toyota  M  et al.  2018. Glutamate triggers long-distance, calcium-based plant defense signaling. Science. 361:1112–1115. 10.1126/science.aat7744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Ugalde  JM  et al.  2021a. Chloroplast-derived photo-oxidative stress causes changes in H2O2 and EGSH in other subcellular compartments. Plant Physiol. 186:125–141. 10.1093/plphys/kiaa095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Ugalde  JM  et al.  2022. Endoplasmic reticulum oxidoreductin provides resilience against reductive stress and hypoxic conditions by mediating luminal redox dynamics. Plant Cell. 34:4007–4027. 10.1093/plcell/koac202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Ugalde  JM, Schlosser  M, Dongois  A, Martiniere  A, Meyer  AJ. 2021b. The latest HyPe(r) in plant H2O2 biosensing. Plant Physiol. 187:480–484. 10.1093/plphys/kiab306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Veal  E, Day  A. 2011. Hydrogen peroxide as a signaling molecule. Antioxid Redox Signal. 15:147–151. 10.1089/ars.2011.3968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Vu  MH  et al.  2022. ROS-mediated plasmodesmal regulation requires a network of an Arabidopsis receptor-like kinase, calmodulin-like proteins, and callose synthases. Front Plant Sci. 13:1107224. 10.3389/fpls.2022.1107224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Wang  X, Luna  GR, Arighi  CN, Lee  J-Y. 2020. An evolutionarily conserved motif is required for plasmodesmata-located protein 5 to regulate cell-to-cell movement. Commun Biol. 3:291. 10.1038/s42003-020-1007-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Wang  X  et al.  2013. Salicylic acid regulates plasmodesmata closure during innate immune responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 25:2315–2329. 10.1105/tpc.113.110676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Wang  Y, Cui  J, Sun  X, Zhang  Y. 2011. Tunneling-nanotube development in astrocytes depends on p53 activation. Cell Death Differ. 18:732–742. 10.1038/cdd.2010.147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Wang  Y  et al.  2023. Plasmodesmata mediate cell-to-cell transport of brassinosteroid hormones. Nat Chem Biol. 19:1331–1341. 10.1038/s41589-023-01346-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Waszczak  C, Carmody  M, Kangasjarvi  J. 2018. Reactive oxygen Species in plant signaling. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 69:209–236. 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042817-040322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Xiao  W, Loscalzo  J. 2020. Metabolic responses to reductive stress. Antioxid Redox Signal. 32:1330–1347. 10.1089/ars.2019.7803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Young  M  et al.  2024. Transcriptional regulation in the absence of inositol trisphosphate receptor calcium signaling. Front Cell Dev Biol. 12:1473210. 10.3389/fcell.2024.1473210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Zanini  AA, Burch-Smith  TM. 2024. New insights into plasmodesmata: complex ‘protoplasmic connecting threads’. J Exp Bot. 75:5557–5567. 10.1093/jxb/erae307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

koag192_Supplementary_Data

Data Availability Statement

Data supporting the findings of this study are available in the manuscript and its Supplementary files or are available from the corresponding authors upon request. The source data underlying Figs 1, f and i, 2c, 3, g and h, 4, b, d, and f to h, 5, c to k, 6, b, d, and g, and 9, b to e; and Figures S4, S7, and S9 to S15 are provided as the Source Data file.


Articles from The Plant Cell are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES